The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutIII. Tab 2. Traffic Impact Analysisou a n laza Major Use Special Ferrnit Prepared by: ALEMAN & Associates, Inc. CCNS*1.1ING EN6€VEERS & SURVEYORS June 4, 2007 • • COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) F. R. Aleman & Associates, Inc Arthur R. Cushnie, P.E, PTOE June 4, 2007 Project Engineer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the findings of a traffic impact study for the proposed project, known as the Courthouse Parking Plaza building, located in the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County Florida. The study, in particular, focused on evaluating existing and future traffic operating conditions along the roadway network and project area corridors in the immediate vicinity of the building site location_ The following findings resulted from the traffic impact study: 1. The proposed office building consists of 33,000 Square Feet (SF) of office space, 5,000 SF or retail, and 700 parking spaces. This project is funded by the Miami Parking Authority and is scheduled for completion in year 2009. 2. During a typical weekday PM peak hour, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 18 net inbound vehicular trips and 68 net outbound trips. The project's traffic impact on the roadway network is insignificant and adequate capacity is available for the build out year, 2009. The capacity analysis conducted for this project indicates a LOS "C" for the two corridors assigned for this study — North Miami Avenue and NE/NW lst Street. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Introduction...._.„_..,.....„ ....... ...... ........ ..... „_....„, I 1.1 Study Purpose ................... 1.2 Project Description 1 1.3 Study Area .1 2. Study Methodology 1 3. Existing Traffic Conditions 3 3.1 Roadway Network Characteristics 3 3.2 Intersection Inventories 3 3.3 Existing Traffic Control 5 3.4 Existing Traffic Volumes 5 4. Future Traffic Conditions 5 4.1 Committed Developments Future Traffic 5 4.2 Future Background Traffic 5 4.3 Planned Roadway Improvements 9 4.4 Project Traffic 9 4.4.1 Project Generated Trips 9 4.4.2 Person -Trip Capacity 9 4.4.3 Trips Distribution and Assignment 10 5 Capacity Analysis and Level of Service 15 5, I Existing Conditions 15 5.1.1 Intersections Level of Service 15 5.1.2 Corridors Level of Service 15 5.2 Future Conditions 15 5.2.1 Intersections Level of Service 15 5.2.2 Corridors Level of Service i5 6 Conclusions and Recommendations 21 APPENDIX A APPENDIX I3: APPENDIX C: APPENDIX D: APPENDIX E: APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX I Approved Methodology Building Layout. Intersections Condition Diagrams Existing Signal Timings and Capacity Analysis worksheets Mechanical and Turning Movement Counts Project Trip Generation and Committed Developments Traffic Volumes Related Calculations Service Capacity and Generalized Tables Downtown Miami DRI Increment It Project Related Correspondence flt LIST OF FIGURES AND EXHIBITS TITLE PAGE Figure 1 Site Location Map 2 Figure 2 Existing Lane Configuration 4 Figure 3 Roadway Network Traffic Volumes (2006) 6 Figure 4 Committed Developments Location 7 Figure 5 Network Traffic Volumes (without project) for 2009 8 Figure 6 Project Generated Trips 11 Figure 7 Cardinal Trip Distribution for TAZ 533 12 Figure 8 Project Trips Assignment (percentage) 13 Figure 9 Project Trips Assignment 14 Figure 10 Existing (2006) Corridor Capacity Conditions 17 Figure 11 Existing Corridor Level of Service (LOS) 18 Figure 12 Future Traffic Volumes 19 Figure 13 Future (2009) Corridor Capacity Conditions and LOS 20 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Project Generated Trips 9 2. Level of Service 2006 16 3. Level of Service 2009 16 iv y i 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 INTRODUCTION FRA has been retained by the Miami Parking Authority to conduct a traffic impact study for the new Courthouse Parking Plaza Project. The project is located within the limits of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI and consists of a mixed land use development. The site is presently occupied by a City of Miami Parking Garage with approximately 540 parking spaces. 1.1. Study Purpose The purpose of this traffic study is to evaluate the impacts (PM peak hour) the proposed development is expected to have on the neighboring roadway network using the person -trip capacity method, as outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) document. The study, in particular, focuses on evaluating potential impacts along North Miami Avenue and E/W North 1st Street in the immediate vicinity of the project site. A capacity analysis will be performed for the selected four intersections and two main corridors within the immediate vicinity of the project's site as described in the study methodology memorandum provided in Appendix A. 1.2. Project Description The Courthouse Parking Plaza building is proposed to be located on North Miami Avenue between NW 2nd Street and NW 3rd Street, in the City of Miami, Florida. Figure 1 shows a site location map for the proposed development. A layout of the building and parking area is provided in Appendix B. The planned development consists of33,000 square feet of office space, 5,000 square feet of retail, and a parking structure housing approximately 700 parking spaces. The project is scheduled for completion in year 2009. Two access points are planned for the development via two two-way driveways on NW 2nd and NW 3`d Street. 1.3 Study area The limits of the study area have been defined as follows: NE/NW St Street to the north, Biscayne Boulevard to the east, SE/SW 4th Street to the south, and 1-95 to the west. 2. STUDY METHODOLOGY The study was conducted in accordance with general guidelines provided in the MCNP and summarized in the methodology memorandum. The study involved inventory of roadway and intersection conditions, collecting traffic volume data, estimating project generated trips, distribution and assignment of project generated trips, level of service analysis and recommendations. Project trips were estimated from data provided in the Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip distribution and assignments were computed in accordance with Miami -Dade County cardinal trip distribution procedures. Intersections Level of Service (LOS) computations conformed to the Highway Capacity .Manual, 2000 Edition. The 1 FR. ALEMAN & Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SITE LOCATION MAP COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 1 person -trip method outlined in the MCNP was used to determine existing and future LOS conditions for the project corridors. 3, EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.1 Roadway Network Characteristics North Miami Avenue This urban roadway is one of the principal arterials in the Miami Downtown Central Business District. The typical section consists of three -lane undivided roadway (although the left lane is marked for parking just south of NW 3rd Street), with curb and gutter and sidewalk on both sides. It is a one-way southbound street within the limits of the study area. There are two lanes available for traffic along the studied segment due to (1) the on -street parking on the west side from NW 3'd Street to the south, and (2) a concrete barrier on the east side from NW 4`1' Street to NW 3rd Street (Federal Courthouse building security feature). NW 1st Avenue This roadway is a two-way undivided local street, with curb and gutter and sidewalk on both sides. It has one lane of traffic in each direction from NW 3'd Street to the south (on -street parking on both sides between NW 3rd and NW 2"d Street, and only on the west side south of NW 2nd Street). It is a two-way, two lanes roadway north of NW 3"d Street NE/NW 2"d Street Local city street that consists of two lanes, one-way eastbound, east of North Miami Avenue. It becomes a two lanes, one-way eastbound for the east half of the street between NW l' Avenue and North Miami Avenue. The west half of the street operates as a two-way, one lane on each direction. On -street parking is allowed on the south side. NE/NW 3`d Street This street operates as a two lanes, one-way westbound. Parking is allowed on the north side, however, a concrete barrier is located on the north side of the street between NE 15` Avenue and North Miami Avenue (Federal Courthouse security feature).. 3.2 Intersection Inventories An inventory was conducted for the four intersections already identified in the study area. The inventory provided existing lane configurations, channelization, and intersection traffic controls. A condition diagram for each intersection is provided in Appendix C. Figure 2 shows the existing lane configuration. 3 E� w T� w a —‹ NE NE 4 ST N„T,S J �� NE 3sr L____ lk ....... NE 2 ST NE 1 ST FLAGLER ST LEGEND SE 1 ST IN - XX OW (XX) -4.-- ONE WAY $A1MAN litFIGURE r' JSfl@ IX15nrE55 KJ. 4654 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC IMPACT Srucr 2 pjp5 N .V. !1 STREET Yrl6ll r I-P./JT ENGOIEERNG P 3.3 Existing Traffic Control The intersections at N Miami Avenue with NW 2"d and 3"1 Street, and NW 15` Avenue at NW 3rd Street currently operate under signal control. The intersection at NW 1 s` Avenue and NW rd Street operates under stop sign control. Signal timing data was obtained from Miami -Dade County Traffic Signal Division and are included in Appendix D. 3.4 Existing Traffic Volumes Turning movement counts and 24-hour mechanical traffic counts were collected on June 2005 for the former City View project at the intersections and segments assigned. The use of these counts has been approved by the City since local traffic conditions in the area have not changed. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) seasonal factors were used to adjust the raw counts to annual peak season conditions. Detailed results from the mechanical counts are given in Appendix E. Manual turning movement counts (TMCs) were conducted at the four intersections above described. The turning movement counts were conducted on Wednesday, June 22, 2005_ Detailed results from the turning movement counts are shown in Appendix E. Figure 3 shows the roadway network traffic volumes adjusted for year 2006 peak season conditions. 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Committed Developments Future Traffic A detailed review of the "City of Miami Planning Department Large Scale Development Report: 1995-Present (March 31, 2006 update) was conducted to determine the committed development projects in the defined study area. Figure 4 shows the location of the projects impacting the roadway network in the area under study, as approved by the City. Appendix F provides the committed developments projected traffic volumes for the year 2009. The above data was obtained using the same methodology described for the deteitnination of the site's traffic projections. 4.2 Future Background Traffic Background traffic is a measure of the expected traffic flow volumes on the study network area should the proposed project not be implemented_ Traffic flow rates along North Miami Avenue and roadways adjoining the project were adjusted using a one percent traffic growth factor, consistent with other studies conducted for the downtown area. The estimated background traffic for year 2009 is shown in Figure 5. 5 r t w i — NE 5 ST w a 11.1 › Q ' Li! NE 4 ST N. i,5 68 41 /86 275 20 0 265 38 _ �1 Ij 38 �5 NE3ST 63 DI/4, A 163 177 P02L 83 A 211V 60 76 NE2ST --_ 112 210 a 82 109 f NE1ST FLAGLER ST LEGEND !N - XX OUi (XX) -).- - ONE WA r SE1ST RALEM +sr a,.- . COMEULTICEN 3r a3JOS .N.w •f sucEr Yu lrl FL 37B !S051 5V-8,7 ERGIHEE...0 Pu&wESS .0. 4658 2006 PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA — TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ? FIGURE 3 Fe ALEMAN d Assoti»tes, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • COMMITED DEVELOPMENTS LOCATION COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 4 184 132 274� L w 180 32 0 75 119 1220 52 LEGEND IN- XX OUT (XXI - ONE WAY 280 42i G 3Qi L.79, 243 N.T,S NE5ST NE 4 ST NE 3 ST NE ST -4- NE 1 ST FLAGLER ST SE 1 ST �A .EMAN qI?$ -g 41 SIR£ Nita,FL wO rSD5i 53/-81Y% Em`.+kEE1�� AU5/NE5S rv0. 465d FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT (2009) PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 5 • 1e) 4.3 Planned Roadway Improvements A review of the latest Miami -Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) did not identify any projects providing capacity improvements within our downtown study area before the project's completion date, scheduled for year 2009. 4.4 Project Traffic 4.4.1 Project Generated Trips Trip generation for the project was estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. The Trip Generation Manual provides trip generation rates and/or equations for various land use types. Table 1 shows the estimated trip generation rates for the proposed project based on information provided in the ITE Manual. Since there already exists a parking structure at the proposed site — operated by the Miami Parking Authority - with approximately 540 parking spaces, only 160 parking spaces of the proposed new project were considered for trip generation purposes because the other 540 stalls are already serving existing trips in the roadway network area. TABLE 1 PROJECT GENERATED TRIPS (FOR TYPICAL WEEKDAY) Courthouse Parking Plaza Miami, Florida PM Peak Hour Trips (Gross Vehicle Tr ps) Land Use (ITE Code) Indep. Variable IN OUT TOTAL General Office (710) 33,000 Sq. 20 96 116 Specialty Retail (814) 5,000 SF 15 18 33 4.4.2 Person -Trip Capacity Person -trip calculations are consistent with the approved methodology and the guidelines provided in the Increment II of the Downtown DRI. The main steps in the procedure are as follows: 1) Convert the gross ITE generated trips to net external vehicle trips by reducing them for a 48.6% (16% due to the trip rates difference between the City of Miami's 1.4 versus ITE's 1.2 pers/veh, 10% reduction to account for pedestrian/bicycle, and 22.6% due to transit usage; 2) Convert the net external vehicle trips to person -trips in accordance with City' standards; 3) Convert the transit trips to person -trips; and 4) Obtain the total net external project person -Trips. Figure 6 provides a detailed step by step summary sheet of the above calculations procedure. 9 4.4.3 Trips Distribution and Assignment The County's Cardinal Trip Distribution methodology was used to determine the directional distribution pattern for trips generated by the proposed project. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) to other areas of Miami -Dade County. The trip distribution pattern for TAZ 533 was used for the distribution and assignment of trips for the proposed project. The distribution of trips for TAZ 533 is shown in Figure 7. The resulting assignment of project trips to the roadway network is shown in Figure 8. In assigning trips to the road network, consideration was given to the roadways available for travel in a desired direction and the attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. It was assumed that the current traffic circulation patterns in the studied downtown area will remain unchanged. I0 M N r I M - III - - - l - III M el PM Peak Hour Project Trip Generation Analysis (2009) USES UNITS ITE Land Use Codes IN PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS Trips OUT TOTAL Trips Trips General Office 33,000 S.F. 710 17% 20 83% 96 116 Specialty Retail 5,000 S.F. 814 44% 15 56% 18 33 Parking Structure Adjusted Trips (1) Stalls N/A NIA 0 NIA 19 19 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 21% 35 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment C 16% of Gross External Trips (2) 21% 6 79% 133 168 ° 79% 21 27 Transit Trip Reduction © 22.6% of Gross External Trips (3) 21% 8 79% 30 38 Pedestrian 1 Bicycle Trip Reduction 10°/0 of Gross External Trips (3) 21% 4 79% 13 17 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 21% 18 79% 68 86 Net External Person Trips using Vehicles @ 1.4 PersonsNehicle 21% 25 79% 95 120 Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1,4 Persons / Vehicle 21% 11 79% 42 53 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS (VEHICLES AND TRANSIT MODES) 21% 36 79% 137 173 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.4 Persons / Vehicle 21 % 79% 19 24 4 Notes: (1) See Appendix F for related calculations, (2) A 16% reduction to account for differences between City of Miami (1.4) and ITE (1.2) auto occupancy rates. (3) Reductions according to the Downtown Miami DR! Increment II, TP F2. ALEMAN . Assod.tu, Int. CONSULTING ENGINEERS COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 6 CA.RDINA TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR TAZ 533 ORIGIN e_ _m --_ CARD[NFALD1RECT[ONS TOTAL ZONE NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW % 11.94 6.68 3.85 7.09 9.31 23.28 19.43 18.42 NNW NNE SSW 9 7 SSE Figure 7 ENE ESE 100 12 NE5ST NAVE ..�., ---- w 4 NE 4 ST > -‹ l e i G E 2197E 15%1 d 0 Z 10% i0% NE 3 ST 5% 25Z) r5%) -- © 20t (70"/,1 i (J19%I fi19/.1� 25% NE 2 ST fl G%1 F NE 1 ST 5% 6D% 41% (60Z) d0/. FLAGLER ST ................. 400% 20% LEGEND SE 1ST A 50% IN- %X' our. (xx%) (60%1 -.► - ONE WAY PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT (PERCENTAGE) COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 8 • Ll @ v--- NE 5 ST 63� LLI N,Ta5 ui > Q NE 4 ST l31 4 II7J _ __—_ 0- —01 2 5 NE 3 ST 1 -- 4 k (98I Imp 1(20) NE2ST II ]. f NE1ST (71 L NI FLAGLER ST LEGEND SE 1 ST 1N - xx our- (X,YI - ON[PMY FzaLe aN aso5 Y Y. 31 51R_Er WAY' FL 351rs 1-5051 59+-877I EK,N'E£%be.G d15lrsE5S AV, +556 PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 9 5. CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) 5.1 Existing Conditions 5.1e1 Intersection Capacity Analysis Signalized intersections have a direct impact on the capacity of an arterial, Three signalized intersections and one unsignalized were analyzed for the purpose of determining the project traffic impacts on the existing network. The Level of Service (LOS) was selected as the performance measurement for roadway congestion. Table 2 provides a summary of the results of the intersection capacity analyses utilizing the SYNCHRO model which implements the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 16. 5.1.2 Corridor Capacity Analysis The LOS for the corridors within the study area was determined by using the FDOT Generalized Level of Service tables. The City of Miami has adopted a minimum LOS "E" for the two corridors under consideration. The peak -hour service capacity of the roadway segments under study for a LOS `E" is determined from the 2002 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes Table 4-7, Urbanized Areas, of the FDOT Level of Service Handbook shown, in Appendix G. The generalized tables of the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 Transit Ridership are also provided in this Appendix. The person -trip methodology, as outlined in the MCND document, has been used to deter urine the existing traffic conditions on the two selected corridors. In accordance with City of Miami's guidelines, a vehicle occupancy factor of 1.6 persons/vehicle was used to deter urine the person -trip capacity of the corridors. Transit (bus and fixed rail) ridership and capacity data for each corridor was obtained from the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. Figures 10 and 1 I show the existing corridors' conditions and LOS, respectively. Appendix H provides all the necessary supporting data. 5.2 Future Conditions 5.1.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis Figure 12 shows the future traffic including the project generated vehicular traffic (a growth factor of I% per year has been used in accordance with approved methodology). Table 3 shows the results of the capacity analysis, which indicates that all intersections will operate with an acceptable LOS. Appendix D contains the SYNCHRO worksheets for the capacity analysis for both existing and future conditions. 5.1.3 Corridor Capacity Analysis Figure 13 shows the future corridors' capacity conditions and LOS. All calculations has been based on procedures consistent with Increment II of the Downtown DRI and the approved methodology. 15 11116 MIN MO MI N M IIII M WIN M NM MI M - W TABLE # 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS P.M, Intersection NB SO Eft WB Delay LOS Delay LDS palsy LOS Delay .11111111.. 19'7 ©® 8 - LOS Intersection Belay - 13.8 LOS 1111.11111111 2"©1111111101 15.0 18.0 ©IIIIIIIIIIMIMMIMM 9'5 A Intersestien BB nein - TABLE # 3 FUTURE CONDITIONS P.M. S8 EB WB Intersection LBS Belay LOS Delay LOS Qeley LOS Belay 7.4 A ®llallill LOS a NW 3 St & N Miami Ave - - 23.3 C - - 19-7 ZEE 0 39.0 =EOM 0 33.0 © 9.3 1111111® 22.9 C - 12.0 MIIIIIIIIMI 12.0. 11.8 A 4FZ.ALEMAtd SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS e EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS MN — MIN M MIMI N MIN elk— Illy — III. III ilr . 1111 Existing Corridor Conditions Corridor From To Roadway Conditions and Service Volumes Transit Conditions and Ridership Capacity Dir Existing Lante 9 2005 Raw PM Peak Hour Volume Peak Season Factor Annual Growth Rate 2006 PMf Hour Volume Dir Max Service Vo ume Volume (1) Total Bus Ridership p (2) Bus Capacity (2) Total Ridershifl p (3) Metrorail Capacnsit ity (3) Total Transit Ridership Capacity Miami Avenue NE 14 Street NE 6 Street SB 3L 250 1.07 1% 271 2988 4 156 692 1463 696 1619 NE 6 Street NE 4 Street SB 3L 250 1.07 1% 271 2988 154 534 691 1463 845 1997 NE 4 Street Hagler Street SB 2L 265 1.07 1% 287 1992 154 534 691 1463 845 1997 Flagler Street SE 6 Street SB 3L 417 1.07 1% 450 2988 251 534 0 0 251 534 NW/NE 1 Street Biscayne Blvd NE 2 Avenue WB 2L 582 1.07 1% 629 1992 204 948 204 948 NE 2 Avenue NW 2 Avenue WB 2L 582 1,07 1% 629 1992 352 1726 352 176 NW 2 Avenue I-95 WB A 2L 582 1.07 1% 629 1992 540 1208 540 1208 Notes: (1) Service Volumes obtained from FDOT's Quality Level of Service Handbook. (2), (3) information obtained from the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II. Imo ALEMAN 1 V / AParvcata�, Inc. cO NsuLFING ENGINEERS COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 10 SIMI" MINI M r M r MI — II N M H MN N MI M41. . Existing Corridor LOS (Person -Trip Volume and Capacity) Corridor From To Roadway Mode Transit Mode Segment Total Dir (a) Roadway Vehicular Capacity (b) Pers -Trip Capacity @PPV-1.6 (c) Roadway Vehicular Volume (d) Pers -Trip Volume n,PPV-1.4 (e) Available Pers-Trip Capacity (b) - (d) (f) Total Pers- Trip Capacity (g) Total Pers Trip (h) Pers-Trip Available Capacity (f) -(g) (i) Segment Pers-Trip Capacity (b) + (f) (j) Segment Pers-Trip Volume (d) + (g) (k) Available Pers-Trip Capacity (i) - (j) (I) Segment Trip Person _ vie (j) i (i) LOS Miami Avenue (1) (2) (3) (4) _ (5) _Volume (6) (7) NE 14 Street NE 6 Street SB : 2988 4781 271 379 4402 1619 696 923 6400 1075 5325 0,17 C NE 6 Street NE 4 Street SB 2986 4781 271 379 4402 1997 845 1152 6778 1224 5554 0.18 C NE 4 Street Flagler Street SB 1992 3187 287 402 2785 1997 845 1162 5184 1247 3937 0,24 0 Flagler Street SE 6 Street SB 2988 4781 450 630 4151 534 251 283 5315 881 4434 0,17 C NWINE 1 Street Biscayne Blvd NE 2 Avenue WB 1992 3187 629 881 2306 948 204 744 4135 1085 3050 0.26 C NE 2 Avenue NW 2 Avenue WB 1992 3187 629 881 2306 1726 352 1374 4913 1233 3680 0.25 C C NW 2 Avenue 1.95 WE 1992 3187 629 881 2306 1208 540 668 4395 1421 2974 0.32 Notes; (1) The Roadway Vehicular Capacity is obtained from Figure 10. (2) Person - Trip capacity is derived by applying a 1.6 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. (3) The Roadway Vehicular Volume is obtained from Figure 10. (4) Person - Trip Volume is derived by applying a 1.4 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. (5) The Total Transit Person -Trip Capacity is obtained by adding bus, metrorait and metromover capacities (see Figure 10). (6) The Total Transit Person -Trip Volume is obtained by obtained by adding bus and metromover volumes (see Figure 10). (7) The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix G). Fe. ALEMAN 6M2 .t1 Inc.[' ,tKi r.16,1,EEN5 COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 11 NW 1 AVE --4.- NE 5 ST N.T.S w 4 4 a LU fat NE 4 ST 32 184 67 280 2A8 ©._._.____ 285 7 44 F 4-0a �`r 99 NE3ST 75� 119 1220 4-8211L� 62 L0 _).... NE2ST 184 274 1 136 L I 4 2 - 11 i NE 1 ST 270 92 182.._` FLAGLER ST LEGEND SE 1 ST —4-- ONE WAY ALE MAN CONSIXITICHIGNEENS 44-41adea.k R305 N.W. 91 STAEET NL41N FL 3l118 (305, 591'4777 Ek3fNEEPoNG 10.1SrkE55 NO. 4658 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 12009) PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 12 NI) it M N r Mill IIIIIII ICI II M r M N IIr -411 - FUTURE (2009) CORRIDORS CAPACITY CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Corridor From To Without Project With Project Dir (a) Existing Pers-Trip Volumes (b) Yr2009 Pers-Trip 1% (c) Committed Development Pers-Trip (d) 2009 Pers T°ripl Volumes (b) + (°) (e) Protected Transit Capacity (f) Future Pers-Trip Capacity (9) FutuPreeCSl��,pProt (b) Project Pers-Trip Volume (i) PerstTrip Volumes (d) (b) (I) Futureal v�it�rPpoject vie ((WO) LOS vic 0)/(0 LOS Miami Avenue (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (5) NE 14 Street NE 6 Street, SB 1075 1107 164 1271 -24 6376 0.2 C 4 1275 0,2 C NE 6 Street NE 4 Street SB 1224 1261 164 1425 -30 6748 0.21 C 4 1429 0.21 C NE 4 Street Flagler Streets SB 1247 1284 299 1583 -30 5154 0.31 C 4 1587 0.31 C Flagler Street SE 6 Street SB 881 907 697 1604 -30 5285 0.3 C 83 1687 0.32 C NW/NE 1 Street Biscayne Blvd NE 2 Avenue WB 1085 1118 431 1549 -110 4025 0.38 C 0 1549 0.38 C NE 2 Avenue NW 2 Avenue WB 1233 1270 294 1564 -297 4616 0.34 C 14 1578 0.34 C NW 2 Avenue 1-95 WB 1421 1464 60 1524 -120 4275 • 0.36 C 0 1524 0,36 C Notes: (1) The Existing Person Trip Volume is obtained from Figure 11, column (j). (2) Year 2009 Background Person Trip Volume is derived by applying a 1% growth factor to the existing person -trip volume. (3) Projected Transit Capacity was obtained from the Downtown Miami DR! Increment II. (4) The Total Future Peak Hour Trip Capacity is obtained by adding all modes of transportation (Figure 11, column (i)) and the projected transit capacity (column e). (5) The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the PDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix G). (6) Project Person Trip Volumes are derived from Trip Generation Analysis. .,LCOURTHOUSE �� FZ, ALEMAfV PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 13 CONSULTING ENGINEERS The calculated LOS for the two corridors is "C", which indicates that the traffic impact project on the roadway network is insignificant since it did not affect the existing LOS, 6. CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions can be drawn from the results of the traffic impact study: 0 the i. The proposed office building consists of 33,000 Square Feet (SF) of office space, 5,000 SF or retail, and 700 parking spaces. This project is funded by the Miami Parking Authority and is scheduled for completion in year 2009. 2. During a typical weekday PM peak hour, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 18 net inbound vehicular trips and 68 net outbound trips. The traffic impact of the project on the roadway network is insignificant. Existing LOS are retained for the future year of analysis, 2009. The calculated LOS "C" for the two corridors analyzed as well as the capacity analysis conducted for the four intersections surrounding the project site show that adequate capacity will be available for the year 2009 during the PM peak hours, the busiest traffic period of the day. 21 APPENDIX A Approved Methodology ALE & Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS www°_ FR- A leman. cs�rra 10305 NW 41 Street, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33178 TEL: (305) 591-8777 FAX: (305) 599-8749 May 30, 2006 URS Corporation Attn: Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P,E. 5100 NW 33rd Avenue Suite 150 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 RE: Courthouse Parking Plaza - #06154 Courthouse Parking Plaza Traffic Impact Methodology Dear Mr. Shanmugam: FRA has been retained by the Miami Parking Authority to develop a traffic impact study for the Courthouse Parking Plaza project. Please note that this project is listed under the "Exempt" type of permit category. The project is located within the limits of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI, on North Miami Avenue between NW 2°d and 3id Streets in Miami, Florida. The project consists of approximately 700 parking spaces, 33,000 SF of office space, and 5,000 SF of retail. The site is presently occupied by a City of Miami parking garage with approximately 545 parking spaces. The study area to be used for the purpose of this traffic impact study will be the same previously approved for the City View project on June 2005 since the location is the same: N E/NW 81h Street to the North, SE/SW 4th Street to the south, 1-95 to the west, and Biscayne Bay to the east. The methodology proposed for the subject traffic impact study is as follows: 1. The turning movement traffic Counts to be used will be the same as the traffic counts collected for the City View project on June, 2005. These counts were collected for the following four major intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project: • North Miami Avenue @ NW 2n6 Street • North Miami Avenue @ NW 3rd Street • NW 15L Avenue @ NW 2nd Street • NW 1" Avenue @ NW 3=d Street 2. The segment traffic volumes will be the same as collected for the City View project, that is: * Miami Avenue between N 8"' Street and N 4th Street * Miami Avenue between N 4"' Street and Flagler Street • Miami Avenue between Flagler Street and S 4'h Street * 1S° Street between Biscayne Boulevard and 1-95 Miami - Orlando - Tampa - Jacksonville - Tallahassee All traffic counts used in the study will be adjusted to peak season, Signal timing and phasing will be updated, as necessary (Miami -Dade County Traffi Division). Biscayne Boulevard will be assumed to be a 6-lane, median divided principal arterial, with a median Opening at NE 9' Street. 6. The person -trip method will be used to determine existing and future condition for the project corridors, as outlined in the "Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan". The "Increment II of the Downtown DRI (I2DDRI)" will be used to establish corridors' capacity values. FDOT LOS Manual will be used to determine vehicular capacities. 7, The ITE Trip Generation Rates will be used to determine the project's vehicular trip generation. Project's person -trips will be determined using procedures consistent with the I2DDRI, 8. A 1% growth factor is proposed to be used to determine the background traffic. 9. Committed Developments will include only those relevant projects that are either under construction or to begin construction this year. The list of projects to be included in the analysis is as follows: Everglades on the Bay, The Loft 2, Met Miami Parcels B, C, and D, Dupont Towers, One Miami, Columbus Office tower, River Front (west), River Front (east), Sawyer's Walk (Crosswinds), Overtown Transit Developments, and the US Federal Courthouse. 10. Intersection capacity analysis for the four intersection listed under item (1) will be performed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). 11. The County's Cardinal Trip Distribution methodology (Traffic Analysis Zone procedure) will be used to determine the directional distribution pattern for trips generated by the proposed project. If you have any questions please call me at 305-591-8777. Sincerely, Leo.: do E. Gimenez, P.E. cc: Lilia Medina, AICP / City of Miami Miami - Orlando - Tampa - Jacksonville - Tallahassee 1 APPENDIX B Building Layout 00,, MN RE TAR SPACE (2.500 AO PARKINS ii!OiRTS 01 f,SCA (845 50 • .1,- Ell NORTH 9,112. COURTHOUSE GARAGE Conceptual Plans 41` D ISOMETRIC @, DN Acss&E TOT • tr-o- X I0-0" STANDARD STALLS • ST. ONE—WAT TRAM. Ground Tier Plan Timl aahs ENCINELMS.AR(NITECTS Parking Planning and Design '0,0,...,0 Line Road Suite 100 Blue Bell, PA IN. .484..2.02-00 2ND TIER ) TIER COURT Miami, FL SE GARAGE EN s. A pc t;irccrs Parking Planning and Design 550 icv.ip Line Rt. a too Siue ee�L Pa 19422 DN \\M\ UP 9� ON UP _ T h 4TH, 61H, STH TIERS 5TH & 7TH TIERS NORTH COURTHOUSE GARAGE Miami, FL Conccplual Plans Typical Tier Plans SCAT Ti A aahs Pavking Panning and Design 550 Township tine Road ue Oaf. PA 19022 OFOCE SPACE (20.300 s') COURTYARD FUTURE EtE ATOR STOP PARTIAL TOP TIER OFFICE TIER f N NORTH COURTHOUSE GARAGE Miami, Ft, Conceptual Plans Parking Planning mid I)es .0 To Mp Line Road Blue Hell PA 19422 Arf ALEMAN d A,axk,N In. CONSULTINGENtAllEERS 110: Shopping Centers, Commercial, Stadiums, Tracks 113: Office 320: Industrial 414/450/460: Institutional 510: Parks (Including Preserves & Conservations) 6201633/650: Communications, Utilities, Terminals, Plants LAND USE DISTRIBUTION COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA DOWNTOWN MIAMI APPENDIX B M i i i i APPENDIX C Intersections Condition Diagrams GOVERNMENT CENTER (METRORAIL) N.W. 1ST AVENUE S TOP SIGN CONTROLLED RESTAURANTS N.W. 2ND STREET COURT HOUSE CENTER N,T.S ffLAL.E.M1114 4965 #.w, e1 Snwer maw Ft 3S17S £365, 59!-8777 ENGINEER -NC H+SNESS G. 4658 N.W. 1ST AVENUE & N•W. 2ND STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS PARKING LOT N.W. 3RD STREET PARKING LOT N.W. 1ST AVENUE SIGNAL CONTROL (PEDESTRIAN FEATURES) N.T.S NEW FEDERAL COURT HOUSE N.W. 3RD STREET EMPTY LOT F2ALEMAN watt raga ENGINEERS SOS N.M.ZST2FEJ M!Alf1 FL 3i(!® rJO51 53f-8T� 8,430tEfRwc /3119n�55 A+3. 404 N. 1ST AVENUE & N.W. 3RD STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS LOCAL SHOPPES .S U.F. NEW WORLD SCHOOL OF THE ARTS N.W. 2ND STREET N.E. 2ND STREET PARKING LOT SIGNAL CONTROL (PEDESTRIAN FEATURES) LOCAL SHOPPES .A.WAAN corawspiat 03C5 N.W. T! GW E R d'f40 E S ,76 AP lSgS1 53r_®RT £PrGlNE£R'A'6 �1$lN..S$ %^�. t556 NORTH MIAMI AVENUE & NoW. 2ND STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA — TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS NEW U.S. COURTHOUSE N.W. 3RD STREET PARKING LOT N, T.S OLD U.S. COURTHOUSE N.E. 3RD STREET CONCR E <r r SIGNAL CONTROL (PEDESTRIAN FEATURES) LOCAL SHOPPES NOTE: THE EXISTING CURBED LANE ON THE NORTH LEG OF THE INTERSECTION SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS A RIGHT -TURN ONLY LANE. a, m 4305 MM. kf SMEET MOW: FL SSP.5 ex.5J 59f-5777 EHGINfEmv &lSePESS HO. 9E52? NORTH MIAMI AVENUE Sr N. W N.W. 3RD STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS i i i i i N i i i i i APPENDIX C Intersections Condition Diagrams RESTAURANTS GOVERNMEN T CEN TER (METRORAIL) N.W. 2ND STREET COURT HOUSE CENTER 5TOP SIGN CONTROLLED N.T.S A CM 4N EtAMR tc. , 5 - ?7 E S1,11ze y��l FL S3f78 r}p5i 5g1-azl7 �"NGiNEER'AG AlStRESS rr3, *6.6 N.W. 1ST AVENUE & N.W. 2ND STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA — TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS r• PARKING LOT N.W. 3RD STREET PARKING LOT 1ST AVENUE N.T.S NEW FEDERAL COURT HOUSE zz / N.W. 3RD STREET 14.1 EMPTY LOT I� L SIGNAL CONTROL (PEDESTRIAN FEATURES) 41FRALMAN 6. poxstalideCONEERS CMS N.K. or STRFEr Yrafn FL 33176 CC62 59f-8777 E..G.E.M,. 4,05.Es5 .v2. 4658 IST AVENUE & N.W. 3RD STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS LOCAL SHOPPES 11+ N.W. 2ND STREET % N.E. 2ND STREET N.T.S PARKING LOT U.F. NEW WORLD SCHOOL OF THE ARTS o� r SIGNAL CONTROL (PEDESTRIAN FEATURES) LOCAL SHOPPES ALEMAN *80,eve....� +1365 N.%'. i! StREE7 urAvr F'l TO.5 551,4777 EAVNEEfi9.< HUSPVESS //OAU.. 4658 NORTH MIAMI AVENUE & N.W. 2ND STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS I to NEW U.S. COURTHOUSE N.T.S OLD U.S. COURTHOUSE N.W. 3RD STREET \ \ N.E. 3RD STREET PARKING LO T r SIGA'AL CONTROL (PEDESTRIAN FEATURES) CONCRETE BARRICADE LOCAL SHOPPES NOTE: THE EXISTING CURBED LANE ON THE NORTH LEG OF THE INTERSECTION SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS A RIGHT —TURN ONLY LANE. 41RALEMAN 1,,c. TM tetONEEFS U' x,is. 41 srREEr to,uer Ft SS+>E l3O5r 59!"BTTT E461NEE/41*40 BV5rxEss 1A9. 4659 NORTH MIAMI AVENUE & NM. 3RD STREET EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA — TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT INTERSECTIONS APPENDIX D Existing Signal Timings and Capacity Analysis Worksheets 2307 Miami TIMING DATA FOR 2307 N MIAMI AVE & 2 ST PAT OF SW F Y EW F Y 2 M 61 35 6 4 35 6 4 3 M 66 37 6 4 33 6 4 5 M 62 31 6 4 39 6 4 6M8045 6 4 35 6 4 7 T 48 30 6 4 10 6 4 8 T 58 50 6 4 20 6 4 9 T 62 31 6 439 6 4 10 T 62 31 6 4 39 6 4 11 T 65 38 6 4 42 6 4 12 T 66 37 6 4 33 6 4 13 T 3 25 6 4 15 6 4 14 T 62 30 6 4 40 6 4 15 M 44 55 6 425 6 4 16M6841 6 449 6 4 17 M 6 19 6 4 21 6 4 23 T 6 19 6 4 21 6 4 24 T O 19 6 4 21 6 4 MIN: 7 6 7 6 Ave & 2 Stmtxt (SEC: 25 TYPE: NA) S Y M CYC 900 S PARADE I 90GRAND PRIX M 90MID-DAY M1 0 1000 B PARADE 0 60PRE AM M2 0/ 90AM PEAK M1 1 90MI0--DAY M1 0 90MID-DAY M1 0 100PM PEAK M1 0 90POST PM M2 0 60NITE 0/1 90SATURDAY MID 100MIAMI ARENA 110PM PEAK M1 0 60NE 2 AVE HIG 6 60LATE NIGHT 3 6 60RECALL TEST TIMING PATTERNS FOR SECTION # TYP CYC DESCRIPTION # TYP 1 NOT USED 2 M 90 0 8 PARADE IN M1 0/1 3 M 90 GRAND PRIX M2 0/2 4 NOT USED 5 M 90 MID --DAY M1 0/1 6 M 100 0 8 PARADE OUT MI 0/.1 7 T 60 PRE AM M2 0/1 8 T 90 AM PEAK M1 1/1 9 T 90 MID -DAY M1 0/1 10 T 90 MID -DAY M1 0/1 11 T 100 PM PEAK M1 0/1 12 T 90 POST PM M2 0/1 TIME PATTERN 0 23 600 13 630 7 720 8 930 9 1130 10 1345 9 1545 11 1800 12 1900 13 2300 23 CYCLE 60 60 60 90 90 90 90 100 90 60 60 25 CYC DESCRIPTION 13 T 60 NITE 0/1 14 T 90 SATURDAY MID -DAY M1 0/1 15 M 100 MIAMI ARENA OUT -NIGHT 16 M 110 PM PEAK M1 0/1 17 M 60 NE 2 AVE HIGH SPEED M2 0 18 NOT USED 19 NOT USED 2.0 NOT USED 21 NOT USED 22 NOT USED 23 T 60 LATE NIGHT 37/1 24 T 60 RECALL TEST DESCRIPTION - SECTION LATE NIGHT 37/1 NITE 0/1 PRE AM M2 0/1 AM PEAK M1 1/1 MID -DAY M1 0/1 MID -DAY M1 0/1 MID -DAY M1 0/1 PM PEAK M1 0/1 POST PM M2 0/1 NITE 0/1 LATE NIGHT 37/1 25 PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR DAY # Page 1 4 TIMING DATA PAT OF SW 2 M 58 42 3 M 58 32 5 M 56 42 6 M 10 30 7 T 8 T 9 T 10 T 11 T 12 T 13 T 14 T 15 M 16 M 17 M 23 T 24 T 56 26 O 42 56 42 O 42 64 34 58 32 56 27 56 42 10 60 62 38 56 24 56 24 O 24 2311 Miami FOR 2311 N MIAMI AVE & 3 ST F Y WW F Y 6 4 28 6 4 6 4 38 6 4 6 4 28 6 4 6 4 50 6 4 6 4 14 6 4 6 4 28 6 4 6 4 28 6 4 6 4 28 6 4 6 4 46 6 4 6 4 38 6 4 6 4 13 6 4 6 428 6 4 6 4 20 6 4 6 4 52 6 4 6 4 16 6 4 6 4 16 6 4 6 4 16 6 4 MIN: 7 6 7 6 # TYP CYC TIMING PAHHERNS DESCRIPTION 1 NOT USED 2 M 90 0 8 PARADE IN M1 0/1 3 M 90 GRAND PRIX M2 0/2 4 NOT USED 5 M 90 MID -DAY M1 0/1 6 M 100 0 B PARADE OUT M1 0/1 7 T 60 PRE AM M2 0/1 8 T 90 AM PEAK M1 1/1 9 T 90 MID -DAY M1 0/1 10 T 90 MID -DAY Mi 0/1 11 T 100 PM PEAK M1 0/1 12 T 90 POST PM M2 0/1 TIME 0 600 630 720 930 1130 1345 1545 1800 1900 2300 PATTERN 23 13 7 8 9 10 9 11 12 13 23 CYCLE 60 60 60 90 90 90 90 100 90 60 60 Ave & 3 Sttxt (SEC 25 TYPE: NA) 5 YMCYC 900 B PARADE I 90GRAND PRIX M 90MID--DAY Ml 0 1000 B PARADE 0 60PRE AM M2 0/ 90AM PEAK M1 1 9OMID-DAY Mi 0 90MID-DRY Ml 0 100PM PEAK M1 0 90P05T PM M2 0 60NITE 0/1 905ATURDAY MID 100MIAMI ARENA 110PM PEAK M1 0 60NE 2 AVE HIG 6 60LATE NIGHT 3 6 60RECALL TEST FOR SECTION 25 # TYP CYC DESCRIPTION 13 T 60 NITE 0/1 14 T 90 SATURDAY MID -DAY M1 0/1 15 M 100 MIAMI ARENA OUT -NIGHT 16 M 110 PM PEAK M1 0/1 17 M 60 NE 2 AVE HIGH SPEED M2 0 18 NOT USED 19 NOT USED 20 NOT USED 21 NOT USED 22 NOT USED 23 T 60 LATE NIGHT 37/1 24 T 60 RECALL TEST DESCRIPTION - SECTION LATE NIGHT 37/1 NITE 0/1 PRE AM M2 0/1 AM PEAK M1 1/1 MID -DAY MI 0/1 MID --DAY M1 0/1 MID -DAY M1 0/1 PM PEAK M1 0/1 POST PM M2 0/1 NITE 0/1 LATE NIGHT 37/1 25 PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR DAY # 4 Page 1 i it 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TIMING DATA PAT OF NSG 2 M 88 28 4 M 12 28 5 M 12 28 6 M 27 24 7 M 14 8 T 49 9 T 86 10 T 4 11 T 8 12 T 66 13 T 58 14 M 88 15 M 88 16 M 88 17 T 52 23 T 52 24 T 52 34 16 33 33 26 22 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 MIN: 7 # TYP CYC 1 2 M 90 3 4 M 90 5 M 90 6 M 100 7 M 60 8 T 90 9 T 90 10 T 90 11 T 100 12 T 90 TIME 0 600 730 900 1145 1315 1545 1800 1900 2100 2300 3584 NW FOR 3584 NW 1 AVE & 3 ST G Y EWG Y 1 4 53 4 1 4 53 4 1 4 53 4 1 4 67 4 1 4 17 4 1 4 65 4 1 4 48 4 1 4 48 4 1 4 65 4 1 4 59 4 1 4 35 4 1 4 65 4 1 4 65 4 1 4 65 4 1 4 35 4 1 4 35 4 1 4 35 4 7 TIMING PATTERNS DESCRIPTION NOT USED O B PARADE IN 2/0 NOT USED O 8 IN 2/0 O B OUT 4/0 O 8 PARADE OUT 2/0 PRE AM 1/0 AM PEAK MID --DAY 1/0 NOON 1/0 PM PEAK POST PM 1/0 PATTERN 23 13 8 9 10 9 11 12 13 17 23 CYCLE DESCRIPTION - 70 NIGHT 20/0 70 NIGHT 1/0 90 AM PEAK 90 MID -DAY 1/0 90 NOON 1/0 90 MID -DAY 1/0 100 PM PEAK 90 POST PM 1/0 70 NIGHT 1/0 70 NIGHT 5/0 70 NIGHT 20/0 1 Ave & 3 St,txt (SEC: 27 TYPE: NA) S Y M CYC 900 8 PARADE I 900 B IN 2/0 900 B OUT 4/0 1000 8 PARADE 0 60PRE AM 1/0 90AM PEAK 90MID-DAY 1/0 90NOON 1/0 100PM PEAK 90POST PM 1/0 70NIGHT 1/0 100MIAMI ARENA 100MIAMI ARENA 100MIAMI ARENA 70NIGHT 5/0 6 70NIGHT 20/0 6 70RECALL TEST FOR SECTION 27 # TYP CYC DESCRIPTION 13 T 70 NIGHT 1/0 14 M 100 MIAMI ARENA 15 M 100 MIAMI ARENA 16 M 100 MIAMI ARENA 17 T 70 NIGHT 5/0 18 NOT USED 19 NOT USED 20 NOT USED 21 NOT USED 22 NOT USED 23 T 70 NIGHT 20/0 24 T 70 RECALL TEST SECTION 27 PATTERN SCHEDULE Page 1 IN OUT IN (PM--PK) FOR DAY # 4 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 2307: NE 2 St & Miami Au N 6/4/2007 { k- 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WEIL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tto 4t Ideal Flow (vphpf) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.93 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow (pmt) 3277 3493 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3277 3493 Volume (vph) 0 112 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 211 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 138 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 234 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 273 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 44.0 48.0 Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 48.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.48 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1442 1677 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.19 Uniform Delay, dl 17.1 14.9 Progression Factor 1.00 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.2 Delay (s) 17.4 10.7 Level of Service B B Approach Delay (s) 17.4 0.0 0.0 10.7 Approach LOS B A A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 13.8 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.19 Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.3% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Existing Conditions (2006) ARC MIAMIDADL7-AA51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Thn|nB Report, Sorted By Phase 2307, NE 2 Bt& Miarni/\v N � � 644/2V07 Phase Number 4 0 Movement EBT SBTL Lead/Lag Leed'LagOptimize Recall Mode Max Max Maximum Split (s) 48 52 Maximum Split (%) 48% 5296 Minimum Sp|it(u) 48 52 Yellow Time (n) 4 4 All -Red Time (o) 0 0 Minimum Initial (n) 13 13 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 Minimum Gop(a) 3 3 Time Before Reduce (o) 0 O Time TnReduce (s) O O Walk Time (s) S 5 Flash DontWalk (y) 11 11 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 100 Control Type Pmdmod Natural Cycle 100 Offset: 8O(6594), Referenced tophase 2:and 8:S8TL.Start ofGreen 4 Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/212O06Existing Conditions (2006) Synchro 5 Report ARC Page M|AM|DADL7-AA51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2311:NW 3St&Miami AvN 614/2007 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + ri Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4,0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.99 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1836 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.99 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1836 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 95 225 0 0 0 0 0 186 38 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 117 278 0 0 0 0 0 224 46 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 395 0 0 0 0 0 224 46 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 52.0 40.0 40.0 Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 40.0 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 955 745 633 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.30 0.07 Uniform Delay, di 14.7 20.5 18.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.0 0.2 Delay (s) 16.0 21.5 18.8 Level of Service B C B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 16.0 0.0 21.0 Approach LOS A B A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 18.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36 Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.6% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Existing Conditions (2006) Synchro 5 Report ARC Page 1 MIAMIDADL7-AA51 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 2311:NVV 3St&Miami AvN Phase Number Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize 6 8 SBT WBTL Recall Mode Max Max Maximum Split (s) 44 56 Maximum Split (%) 44% 56% Minimum Spilt (s) 44 56 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 0 0 Minimum Initial (s) 13 13 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 100 Offset: 64 (64%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 2311: NW 100 Pretimed 3 St & Miami Av N 4- 06 08 6/4/2007 Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Existing Conditions (2006) Synchro 5 Report ARC Page 2 MIAMIDADL7-AA51 F1CMSignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis * _� °- j" ~6 Movement E8L EBT E8R VVBL \N8T VVBR N8L NBT N8R S8L SBT S8R Lane Configurations + 1 ?� � t + if ideal Flow (vphp0 1800 1000 1900 1900 1000 1900 1000 1000 1000 1908 1900 igO0 Total Lost time (n) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.8 4.O 4.0 LanoU0, Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.90 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 8.99 0.05 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 -Said.Flow (prut) 1658 1770 1825 1770 1803 1803 1583 Fit Permitted 0.83 0.50 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.O0 1.00 Said. Flow (penn) 1385 1076 1825 1303 1863 1883 1583 Vo|ume(vph) 63 O 177 38 285 41 114 183 0 0 08 20 peak'hourhuctor. PHF 8.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0,81 0.82 0.82 8.82 0.76 0.76 O.78 Adj. Flow (vph) 78 O 210 47 327 51 130 188 O 0 89 20 Lane Group Flow (vph) O 207 0 47 378 0 13* 199 8 O 89 26 Turn Type Perm Penn Perm Penn Protected Phases 4 8 2 0 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 8 Actuated Green, G(s) 85.0 65.0 66.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27D Effective Green, g(u) 65.0 65.0 65.0 27.0 2TU 27.0 27.0 Antuotodg/C Ratio 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.27 0.27 027 O.27 Clearance Time (n) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) OUU 689 1186 352 503 503 427 Wo Ratio Prot 0.21 o0.11 O�OS wsRatio Perm o021 0.04 0.11 0.02 v/oRabn 0.38 O.07 0.32 0.39 0.40 0.18 0.06 Uniform De/ay' d1 7.8 0.4 7.7 28.8 29.8 28.0 27.1 Progression Factor 1.00 124 1.48 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 incremental Da|ny. d2 1.0 0.2 0.7 3.3 2.8 0.8 8.3 Dn|ay(o) 8.8 8.1 12.1 33.1 32.2 28.7 27.4 Level ofService A A 0 C C C C Approach Delay (o) 8.8 11.7 32,6 28.4 AppmwohL(]8 A 8 C C Intersection Summary HCK4Average Control Delay 18.0 HCM Level ufService B HON1 Volume toCapacity ratio 0.35 Cycle Length(o) 100.0 Sum oflost time (o) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.4% ICU Level of Service B o Critical Lane Group Courthouse Parking Plaza 0/2/2008Existing Conditions (20O8) ARC M|AM|DADL7-AA51 SynohnoSReport Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 3584: NW 3 St & NW 1 Av t —0- Phase Number 2 4 6 8 Movement NBTL EBTL SBT WBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Maximum Split (s) 31 69 31 69 Maximum Split (%) 31% 69% 31% 69% Minimum Split (s) 31 69 31 69 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 0 0 0 0 Minimum Initial (s) 7 7 7 7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle Offset: 8 (8%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 3584: NW 100 Pretimed 100 3 St & NW 1 Av Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Existing Conditions (2006) ARC MIAMIDADL7-AA51 3/22/2007 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCM UnzignaUzmd Intersection Capacity Analysis 8387: NE 2St &NVV 1 Au � - �� 4 = | $8mmmen1 VV8L VVBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r t r I t Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Volume(vah/h) 8 60 210 82 83 282 Peak Hour Factor 0.59 0.59 0.73 0.73 0J3 033 Hourly flow rate (voh/h) 0 182 288 112 114 277 Direcbom, Lano# VVB 1 N8 i N82 SB I S82 Volume Total (vph) 102 288 112 114 277 Volume Left (vph) 0 O 8 114 0 Volume Right (vph) 102 0 112 0 O HacU(s) '0�6 0,0 -8�6 0.2 0.0 Departure Hmudway(o) 5.0 5.1 4.5 5.3 5.1 Degree Utilization, x 0.14 0.41 0.14 0.17 0.39 Cnpeci\y(voh/h) 660 685 768 853 886 Control De|uy(o) &8 10�5 71 &2 18.2 Approach Om|ay(o) 8.8 0.5 9.8 ApprnaohLOS A A A Intersection Summary Delay 9�5 HCK4Level ofService A Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.1% ICU Level of Service A 3/22/2007 Courthouse Parking Plaza 61212006Existing Conditions (2006) SynchroSReport ARC Page My\M!DADL7-AA51 HCW1Signalized intereectionCapn:ih//\nG|ys\S 2307.NE 2S{&Miami AvN 61412007 A _I, -.1t � �- 4 4 J Movement E8L E8T EBR VVBL VVBT VV8R NEL NBT NBR SBL S8T S8R Lane Configurations ti, 0 Ideal Flow (vphp/) 1300 1900 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (n) 4.0 4.0 Lane U0.Factor O.95 0.95 Frt 0.82 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 0.80 Satd.Flow (proU 3241 3403 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.99 8o1d.How (penn) 3241 3483 Vo|ume(vph) O 142 182 O O 0 D 0 O 78 211 U Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.92 O.02 0.92 0.02 0.02 0.92 0.90 0.80 0,90 Adj. Flow (vph) O 175 225 0 0 O O U 0 84 234 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) U 400 0 O D O 0 U O O 318 0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 G Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, B(o) 44.0 48.0 Effective Green, g(u) 44.0 4&0 Actuated Q/CRatio 0.44 0.48 Clearance Time (n) 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1426 1677 v/o Ratio Prot u012 v/sRatio Perm o0.09 v1cBatk, 0.28 0.19 Uniform Delay, d1 17.9 14.9 Progression Factor 1D0 0.48 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.2 Oe|ay(o) 18.4 7.4 Level ofService B A Approach Delay (o) 18.4 0,0 0.0 7.4 AppnoeohL[]S 8 A A A Intersection Summary HCkAAverage Control Delay 13.5 HCyNLevel ofService 8 HCK4 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.23 Cycle Length (a) 100.0 Sum oflost time (o) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.6% ICU Level ofService A o Critical Lane Group Courthouse Parking Plaza 8/2/2OGFuture Conditions (2000 ARC MA\MIQ4DL7-AA51 Synchro 5Report 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 2307 NE 2 St & Miami Av N Phase Number 4 6 Movement EBT SBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Max Max Maximum Split (s) 48 52 Maximum Split (%) 48% 52% Minimum Split (s) 48 52 Yellow Tirne (s) 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 0 0 Minimum Initial (s) 13 13 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 100 Control Type Pretimed Natural Cycle Offset: 65 (65%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 100 2307: NE 2 St & Miami Av N 6/4/2007 Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Future Conditions (2009) Synchro 5 Report ARC Page 2 MIAMIDADL7-AA51 HCKASignalized intersection 'C',apacjtv Analysis 2311:NVY J8t{lMiami AvN O/4/2OV7 * _W __V 1#r 4-- * °* Movement E5L EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S8L SBT 3BR Lane Configurations "T + if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1800 1800 1000 Total Los1time (o) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lune UhiFactnr 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.86 FIt Protected 0.90 1.08 1.00 8atd.Flow (pro1) 1837 1863 1583 FhPennittwd 0.89 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow (penn) 1837 1883 1588 Vu|umo(vph) 0 O 0 98 248 O 0 O O U 280 44 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0,92 0.02 0.81 0.81 0�81 0.92 0.92 0,92 0-83 0.83 U.88 Adj. Flow (vph) U 0 0 122 306 O 0 O O U 337 58 Lane Group Flow (vph) U U 0 8 428 O U O 0 0 337 53 Turn Type Perm Penn Protected Phases 8 0 Permitted Phases 0 6 Actuated Green, G(o) 52.0 40.0 40.0 Effective Gneen, Q(o) 52.0 40.0 40.0 Actuated g/CRatio 0.52 0.40 0.40 Clearance T|mo(u) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 955 745 833 v/sRatio Prot o0.18 v/sRatio Perm oO.23 0.82 v/oRmUn 0.45 0.45 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 15.0 22.0 18.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Dm{ny. d2 1.5 2.8 0.3 Doloy(s) 10.5 24.0 18.9 Level ofService B C 8 Approach De|oy(o) 0.0 16.5 0,0 233 AppmauhLOS A B A O Intersection Summary HCKdAverage Control Delay 19.7 HCK4Volume 0oCapacity ratio 0.45 Cycle Length (o) 100.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.3% o Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service B Sum of lost time 8.0 ICU Level of Service A Courthouse Parking Plaza 602006 Future Conditions (2009) ARC MIAM|DADL7-AA51 Synchm5Report A 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tinning Report, Sorted By Phase 2311: NW 3 St & Miami Av N Phase Number Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Max Max Maximum Split (s) 44 56 Maximum Split (%) 44% 56% Minimum Split (s) 44 56 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 0 0 Minimum Initial (s) 13 13 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 6 8 SBT WBTL 100 Pretimed 100 Offset: 64 (64%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 2311: NW 3 St & Miami Av N +t— Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Future Conditions (2009) ARC M1AMIDADL7-AA51 6/4/2007 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HGM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 3584: NW 3 St & NW 1 Av t r 3/22/2007 Movement EEL EBT EBR WEL WET WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SET SBR Lane Configurations 4 11 I ) + + rt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 Lane Utii. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.90 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1660 1770 1809 1770 1863 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.79 0.56 1.00 0.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1324 1051 1809 825 1863 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 75 0 184 40 285 67 119 220 0 0 184 32 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.76 0.76 0.76 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 0 227 49 352 83 145 268 0 0 242 42 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 320 0 49 435 0 145 268 0 0 242 42 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 861 683 1176 223 503 503 427 v/s Ratio Prot 0.24 0.14 0.13 vls Ratio Perm c0.24 0.05 c0.18 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.07 0.37 0.65 0.53 0.48 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 8.1 6.4 8.1 32.3 31.1 30.6 27.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.20 1.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.2 0.9 13.8 4.0 3.3 0.5 Delay (s) 9.3 7.9 12.8 46.1 35.1 33.9 27.8 Level of Service A A B D D C C Approach Delay (s) 9.3 12.3 39.0 33.0 Approach LOS A B D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45 Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.8% ICU Level of Service C c Critical Lane Group Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Future Conditions (2009) ARC MIAM1DADL7 -AA51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 3584: NW 3 St & NW 1 Av 3/22/2007 Phase Number Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize 2 4 6 8 NBTL EBTL SBT WBTL Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Maximum Split (s) 31 69 31 69 Maximum Split (%) 31% 69% 31% 69% Minimum Split (s) 31 69 31 69 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 0 0 0 0 Minimum Initial (s) 7 7 7 7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle Offset: 8 (8%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 100 Pretimed 100 3584: NW 3 St & NW 1 Av 2 4 08 Courthouse Parking Plaza 6/2/2006 Future Conditions (2009) ARC MIAMDADL7-AA51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCMUnaign@UzBdIntersection Capacity Analysis 6367:NE 2 St &NyV 1Ax 4, & � ^ Movement WBL W8R NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r + r I 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Vo|umo(voh@) O 82 270 02 138 274 Peak Hour Factor 0.50 O59 0.73 0,73 0.73 0,73 Hourly flow rate (veh1h) 0 105 370 126 186 375 Direction, Lane # VV81 NB N82 S81 S82 Volume Total (vph) 105 370 120 186 375 Volume Left (vph) 0 0 O 186 0 Volume Right (vph) 105 0 128 0 U Hadj(n) -0.6 0,0 '00 O�2 0.0 Departure Headvvay(o) 5.4 5.4 4.8 5.5 5.3 Degree Utilization, x 0,18 0.55 8.17 8.28 0.55 Capadty(voh/h) 607 667 720 036 660 Control Do|my(o) 9.4 13.6 7.5 9.4 13.3 Approach Do|ay(x) 84 12.0 12.0 ApproachLO8 A B 8 Intersection Summary Delay 11.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.5% ICU Level of Service A Courthouse Parking Piaza 612/2006Future Conditions (2009) ARC MIAM}UADL7-AA51 3/22/2007 Syoohru5Report 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX E Mechanical and Turning Movement Counts Raw Traffic Counts A i i i i i 16 HEINS 3RD STREET & NORTE MIAMI AYEAGE AIAX1, FLORIDA MATEO BY1 191DRO UNZALRL SIGNALIZED NORTH HIM' AVENUE ?mai Forth 2ed$ Date 06/22/15 Right 'bz Le NE 3RD STREU 'Froa East TRAFFIC SUM SPICULTSIS, INC. 624 GARDIFIA TERRACE DELRAY BEAU, FLORIDA 33444 0111 272-3255 FAX {561) 271-4381 ALL aRICLES 4 REDS Reds Rig?it Ihry Left NORTE KIAEI AVENUE INF 3RD STRUT Fro Sotth 1Fropi Eest Pegs Figlat Thru Le t Site Code ; 90159176 Start Date-, 06(22/05 File 1.D. FEMIAA Page ; 1 Peds Right VIrki Lett Toai 16:08 9 11 St 16:15 4 13 43 1613C 13 8 49 16;45 19 Er Total 40 39 180 11:0C 17:15 17:30 17-4c Er Total 22 12 10 4 48 8 11 6 7 12 44 15 44 4a 16] 2i 9 49 0 0 0 9 9 0 51 36 SO i9 186 Al 67 49 231 25 25 la a 88 4 2 1 0 7 a 9 0 0 9 0 0 12 9 21 1 0 0 0 24 4 0 0 1 23 2 0 0 0 0 81 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 10 1.3 31 16 12 9 1 118 0 117 12 125 7)3 493 120 137 13B 20 513 'TOTALt 88 71 343 0 1 77 0 111 175 24 0 1 I 72 0 0 1906 1;; NO8 3E0 STREET & KOZT0 KARI AVENUE MAXI, nORIDA COUNTED EY: 1DI3RO OKALEZ SIGNALIZED ------- ----- -------------------------------- TRAFFIC EORVET SPECIALISTS, INC, 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY B6ACE, PUMA 33144 (561) 272-3255 FAX (5611 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES & HOS .-efm ------ NORTH NIAX1 PPM 1IN 3RD STREET 'NORTH CAE AVENUE Frog South Pram North PCOT East Peds Right Thrli Left Date C6/22/05 Peds Right I'm Le t Peds Right 13rt2 Site Cade : 0005017 Start Date: “/22/CS File L. MSHIAM Page : 2 114 3RD STREET Frolt W2St. Left I Peds Right Thu Lefi: Desk Neer Analysis By ntilIntersection far Peak start 16:45 16:45 Vole 12 lit) 0 Parcent 171 P11 0 Pk total 192 Highest 1700 Volue 8 total 52 91 PH7 .92 =.86 NW 3RD STREET 0 222 32 0 0 the Period: 16:0 0 222 01 711 2 31A 17;15 1 0:00 on 06/21/05 1S:4$ 16;00 0 0 0 01 CI DI 0 241 0 0 .12 NORTH MIAMI AVENUE 32 160 0 32 160 254 0 0 0 192 254 192 0 0 0 0 ALL, VEHICLES & PEDS Intersection Total 506 1 92 160 0 252 252 0 314 NpRTH NIAMX AVENUE 0 314 16:45 0 0. 0 01 0 01 16:00 0 0 46 46 N.70.4•WM•AJTV 0 0 222 222 92 92 0 NE 3RD STREET 0 0 0 ri 3 r K-irt w Q L O Q S_ Co cig t 4Ou S E TuLy � zQ T 4 MY/NR 2MO SUM & HO9Th MIMI AV.71111 MIAMI., FLORIDA COUNTH 67: RAMROD E019AN93Z 5IGMAMED TUFFIC SUM SPIRCIALITS, INC, E24 GARDENIA TiRRACS DELRAY BRAM FLORIDA 33444 (560 272-3255 ?AI 1561) 272-4382 ALL VSHICLU 4 HOS Site Code : 0045017i Start Date: 46122;05 File 1.0. P12SNIAX Page : 1 NORTH M1ANI AMUR froa North Fed 5 Right Thru Le Date O6/22/03 16:44 16:1S 16:30 17:00 1715 17.30 itt PAS Total 6 0 SE S 4 51 7 0 43 22 13 7 44 0 0 0 9 0 53 40 52 47 192 N 2N0 ST7.8R1 F om 0aSt Pads Right T.71.rii Le INORT5 MIAMI PUN Tr on South ?eds Right Thra IHM 2N0 STREET ?con Ne$t Left Pe -cis Right Thru Left ehicle Total 18 18 21 17 24 22 9 72 23 0 14 0 2 32 2 29 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 /9 2S 23 11 148 11 0 0 0 1 7 26 28 0 6 9 0 0 1 6 23 28 0 26 0 0 0 . 19 25 13 9 1_14_11 „ 0 ! 45 91 I20 0 St 129 114 114 464 124 115 137 478 iTOTAIO 1111111 70 0 391 141 87 0 0 I 107 0 0 85 202 2GS 0 I 942 2ND STEM i NORTH CAM! AVENGE II2l1A111, FLORIDA COUNTED ET; RAINDNDO HERNANDEZ SIGNALIZED ...... NORTH MINI AMUR Fri North Peds Rieht Dat. 0E/22/05 TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC, 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY ESKA, FLORIDA 33440 r5611 272-1255 FAX 561) 272-41E1 ALL VEHICLES t PERS E 2110 STREET !NORTH MAXI AVENUE Froo:: East Froa South 41r0 Left 1 Peds Riyht Tbru Let: 1 Peds Ri91 ?tau 1,eit Site Code G0050175 Start Date: 06122/05 File I.S. NE2SHIAK ?age 2 !0' 2880 8TMT LProa We5t Vebi1e PEds RighZ ThN Ltft Total Peak or Analysis Peak start 16:45 Vo1uGe Percent Pk total 264 Righest 17:30 'John Ri total 74 POP .89 Ey Entire Intersection for the Period: 16;00 to 18:00 on 06/22105 16:05 16:45 0 18 75 0 0 0 0 0 01 721 281 DI 01 41 01 01 0 16:00 0 52 22 D 0 KW 2ND STREET 0 0 0 112 0 112 217 105 105 0 16:00 0 0 13 .0 NORTH MIAMI AVENUE 189 189 264 217 7 75 264 0 0 0 [---- - ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Intersection Total 481 0 189 105 294 294 — NORTE MIAMI iVE0flJF 187 0 16:45 217 17:30 63 .86 3) 105 112 13 481 521 01 25 38 0 0 0 0 187 NE 2N0 STREET 75 112 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 le U L ,-/ L1(Tf, Zoos" s" ("ti'p Mt , = .ot2taA DKAt.t,,-} ey : 1<E v r/ t7 r “ALLy NW 3RD 5TR01. 6 Ng 1ST OWE MUNI, FLORIDA CO0NTE0 BI: JORNATHAS 50N2ALE2 SIONALINO TRAFFIC SURYN,Y SPNCIALWIS, INC. 824 DAROENI4 TRUCE tRLRAY BRACE, FLORIDA 3340 1561) 232-3255 FAX 061) 272-4381 ALL MICLRS & PROS Site Code 05159176 Start Datet 0122/46 Fide LO.t N4151AVE Page : 1 00 1ST AVENUE NW 3R0 STREET INN 1ST AVENUE Pro North Fro z East FroSoth Feu Right Thru Left Peds Right Thti Left j Peds Right Date 06/22105 7777 IRO STRUT rott Nest Vehicle T'nli Left Peas Right Thrti Left Total 16:09 1 5 16:15 1 1 16:33 3 1 ;5:15 Er Total 7 12 11:40 2 6 11:15 0 1 17:30 3 9 Er Total 6 26 13 0 3 3 57 14 3 0 30 23 1 15 44 9 1/ 201 11 0 2 6 47 5 4 0 25 321 15 32 0 10 169 23 2 5 56 10 , 12 0 37 16 25 41 G 13 202 31),___A2—.--li L 13 2 61 0 15 2/ 226 40 22 0 334 17711 77 177 0 4335 15 19 0 13 0 113 0 57 9 9 10 59 6 0 15 11 12 1 31 11 6 2 13 1 3 50 264 31 10 0 36 36 3 15 55 9 11 235 4 0 41 21 4 42 0 24 252 5 0 41 22 19 30 4 20 229 6 0 i2 15 i 77 12 205 21 0 166 104 33 150 0 1.11 921 TOTAL° 13 39 126 0 • 13 71 454 711 43 0 390 2111 110 327 77 116 1156 bb A NW 3RD STREET k FR IS? AVENUE MIAHI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: JOHHAT81i GGNZALBZ SIGNALIZED) NK 1ST AVENUE ?ran North Peds Right Taro Le Date 06/22/05 iRWIC SURVE3 SPECi4id3TS, INC. S24 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEAC8, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272.3255 FM (561) 271.4381 ALL 488ICLB5 a PEDS H# 3RD SSR38T HR 18T AVENUE N8 380 STREET From East )Fro} South Rom Nest Peds Right MI La Peds Rlght, Taru Left Site Code : 0605017G Start Date; 06/22(45 ?Ile I.D. = N'i3S1143 Page : 2 Pets Right Thru Veit chicle Total Peak Hut Analysis Ey 16°10 13 141 Peak start 7alu�e Percept Pk total 42 Bighest 16:45 volute - 5 22 Si total 27 .35 NW 3R7 STREET 115 252 380 13 62 62 0 0 255 193 193 xwz+s ass a imv as 66 66 Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:08 on 06/22(05 16:10 16:33 19 3 - 43 252 39 0 1.56 861 0. 131 253 121 0% 581 334 11:15 98 .85 271 16:45 l5 11 12 76 .87 NW 1ST AVENUE 13 79 13 79 92 635 0 0 353 M 0 4l 52 156 43 261 • ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Intersection Total 952 582 — 334 271 390E - 115 ) 156 79 193 31?. 115 156 NW 1ST AVENUE' 16:30 115 - 133 0 62 421 • 764 01 24I 255 16:15 33 63 .34 60 0 43 43 252 252 39 39 0 NW 3RD STREET 0 0 0 1 1 r AU6�lu6" 1� I d: Lo ,4,t gcCT f-IIkt_t CO Co ,» i7 a uJ S 6 (\tcE-'. 3R0 ST1.c:i 11 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 HN 2140 TREET E. NV 1ST AVEN33 MANI, FLORIDA COUNTED SY: OSVALDO 'JR' GONZALEZ NOT SIGNALIZED, NB STOP TRAFFIC SURVET SPECIALISTS, INC: 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 13444 )551) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4361 ALL VEHICLES k PBS Site Code : 0005017E Start Eate: 01/22/05 file I.V. : F712SIAVE Page : 1 NH 1ST ANEEUR Froz North Peds 7?iti) Left Date 06i22/05 INN 2N0 STREET Fro a East Peds Right NX 1ST AVENUE a South Lett Ferls Right T6ru Vehicle Other Toni Total 16:00 2 44 26 15 11 0 16:15 3 36 15 1 14 14 0 1E:30 9 54 16 4 13 1S:4,5 6 61 227 Er Total 20 196 65 1 ao 57 7 11:00 17;15 17:30 Br Total 12 6 32 57 55 30 34 177 1TOTALt 15 19 19 15 E8 13 22 9 16 5 3 11 28 54 3 1 1 5 1 23 22 17 17 20 15 55 10 45 " 136 65 174 51 22 16 15 104 25 la 23 20 86 la 54 69 13 214 140 40 120 34 136 88 10411 584 236 161 166 151 120 604 /6 39 28 71 1E1 52 373 151 108 111 .12 240 151 3a8 1 ma co 1. • RFD STREET EW 1ST MIME PIM, FLORIDA COUNTED SY: OSVALDO 'JR' coNiALaz VDT SIGNALIZED, 60 STOP TRAFFIC SDPVST SRSCIALISTS, IEC, 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACHLORIDA 33114 (5611 272-3255 FAX (5611 271,4381 Abl, VEHICLES 6. PBS gita Code : 08050176 Stact Date: 06/22/05 Filo I,C. NW2S1AVE Page i 2 NH 1ST MENUS Froa North Pads Thru it Date 06/22/0S NA 2NO 5TR31T Froa East Pas Rig4 Lnft 14 IST MENU iFroaSout Peds Right Thru ehicie Dther Total Total Peak Xour Analysis By Peak start 16:10 Voluqe 229 78 1 Percent • 751 251 Pk total 301 Highest 16:45 VOME • 62 28 116 tolal 90 Pof .as 8fItit Intersection for 36:10 35 35 the Petiod: 16:00 to 11:88 16:30 70 1 66 204 881 121 241 761 80 210 16:45 17:00 26 73 .77 .42 19 25 43 NW 1ST AVENUE 229 229 307 L 78 78 J 581 06122/85 0 204 70 274 ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Intersection Total 657 /0 229 0 239 509 NW 1ST AVENUE 70 70 0 10 10 144 NM 21'JD STREET 78 0 66 22 270 2041- 66 8 73 73 204 66 169 169 T TU UN-( 4nf, Zco.S- MIAMLoa IVA £3fiA,JQy: aU( /fAccLy Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Shone (561) 272-3255 ) Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 *,**********A*A******************A**************** Data File : D0623016.SRN Station 000000+062201 Identification : 000411692013 Interval : 15 minutes : Start date : Jun 23, 05 Start time 00:00 Stop date ; Jun 23, 05 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : Miami Avenue North of North 5 Street Jun 23 Southbound Volume End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- k 1 4 2 11 58 113 122 86 56 30 7 7 3 2 1 6 25 72 127 105 65 63 15 9 6 3 45 5 3 5 4 2 9 34 84 114 84 57 60 If 006 9 2 0 2 24 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 33 122 0 89 57 56 VEr Total 27 25 13 7 9 41 103 336 354 400 265 235 11 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 - ---- ---- 18 19 20 -- ---- ---- 21 22 23 15 54 64 54 61 46 61 46 36 20 15 15 11 30 60 72 62 60 59 73 32 38 10 9 10 7 IP 45 68 55 58 63 49 78 37 13 13 16 9 8 ,,,00___ 51 65 51 79 72 61 31 13 16 10 7 13 '11r Total 233 256 225 263 226 273 146 105 59 50 41 39 --------- ----- IF 24 Hour Total : 3731 AM peak hour begins : 07:45 AM peak volume 476 Peak hour factor : 0.94 wPM peak hour begins : 16:15 Pm peak volume 284 Peak hour factor I 0.91 9-1•******,****.********A****A****A**************4,A*****A***N**********A********** !-q I Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc, 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour. Totals Page 1 *******1**/,**,,,-*************-****A*******k****-A**************,,.*****4,.********** I Data File : D0623017.PRN . Station : 000000062202 I I Identification : 000110252092 Start date Stop date : Jun 23, 05 Start time 0000 ; Jun 23, 05 Interval : 15 minutes 1 ; Stop time : 2400 City/Town Miami, Florida County : Dade "%Location : Miami Avenue North of North 2 Street ***A******A****A,t**************-****/t****************************************-A** Jun 23 Southbound Volume --- 11 ti End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 8 5 0 1 4 2 6 48 85 109 86 62 3) 30 8 6 2 2 1 4 16 41 101 83 79 68 45 4 2 5 4 2 6 28 56 106 71 80 71 II00 5 10 1 0 1 15 36 73 88 90 00 74 Hr Total 25 23 8 7 8 27 86 220 380 353 325 275 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 61 77 75 74 59 75 58 43 23 25 112 12 10111 30 75 86 45 00 69 79 71 72 75 83 82 60 46 47 16 20 12 13 91 62 98 95 58 66 66 64 32 34 21 16 19 30 13 7 8 9 8 10 Hr Total 284 306 303 350 265 265 170 127 88 65 40 44 24 Hour Total : 4044 l'AM peak hour begins 08:15 AM peak volume : 404 Peak hour factor : 0.93 PM peak hour begins 15:00 PM peak volume 350 Peak hour factor : 089 Ilb Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc 024 Gardenia Terrace Ir Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 HOUr Totals Page 1 ********-k******1,***t************************+****h*W********4-***************** Data File : D0623014.PRN I! Station z 000000062203 Identification : 000411638008 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Jun 23, 05 St.art time : 00:00 Stop date • Jun 23, 05 Stop time ! 2400 : Dade City/Town : Miami, Florida County IrLocation : Miami Avenue North of South 3 Street ****A***-*****************************************It**A**A**A***************** Jun 23 Southbound Volume II' End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 10 2 0 1 1 3 23 52 76 91 72 78 30 6 6 1 2 2 11 46 34 95 98 73 64 I 45 00 7 6 2 5 5 3 2 6 6 17 18 56 70 60 29 85 80 76 69 72 72 71 99 -Ir Total 29 15 11 8 15 49 195 225 336 334 289 332 II End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 82 93 77 84 72 144 90 64 31 40 30 29 1111111 30 65 45 00 104 89 86 74 91 66 66,81 87 77 50 12 29 22 21 80 71 79 7? 107 128 74 140 96 52 42 37 21 31 32 40 25 13 22 12 • ---- Hr Total 340 344 294 306 334 499 315 193 95 141 99 75 k 24 Hour Total : 4873 AM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak volume : 354 Peak hour factor : 0.90 PM peak hour begins : 17:00 PM peak volume : 499 Peak hour factor : 0.87 ****-R**********A*******************A***************************RAlt*****.******** Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Page 1 t Volume Report with 24 Four Totals ******,A********A*********************************frk**k******-**********„***t, Data File : D0630003,PRIN ) Station : 000000062901 I Identification : 009601150099 Start date : Jun 30, 05 Interval : 15 minutes Start time ; 0000 Stop date ; Jun 30, 05 Stop time : 24:00 C City/Town : Miami, FL County : Dade Location NE 1 Street West of NE 2 Avenue *************-w****A*********************,1*4,*****i***************t********** Jun 30 Westbound Volume ----- End Time 00 15 18 01 02 6 03 04 ---- ---- 5 2 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 r 7 3 11 34 58 56 82 76 30 13 6 4 3 5 11 18 29 43 69 85 09 II 12 45 3 4 3 0 7 25 35 66 71 66 66 00 15 4 2 5 3 -------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 13 28 58 63 64 78 ea - - - - - - - - - --- -- -- -- -- -- - - 1 Hr Total 58 20 16 16 10 34 82 156 230 260 311 339 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 106 94 93 104 128 162 100 59 29 31 21 16 011 30 90 83 101 110 1 45 00 111 108 102 135 139 158 9618 171 94 55 30 29 18 11 73 94 146 157 131 68 62 53 31 22 30 17 le 17 9 16 30 Hr Total 403 358 390 495 542 622 324 198 111 95 72 46 11 24 Hour Total : 5188 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 111 **Jciik**kkks4k*A1,**FA AM peak volume : 370 Peak hour factor 083 PM peak volume 648 Peak hour factor : 0.95 *A******AAkA.****************-A***************************t** 1' Adjusted Traffic Counts I3 • 'IiY J� 110 ® M Project Name: Location: Observer: TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS CityView MUSP North Miami Avenue and NE 3 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: 05164 Count Hate: 6/2212005 Day of Week: Wednesday North Miami Avenue L .7. `it ..1�" 1 INTE { u;eo .'P.,' 04: t. PM RVAL G :�S �a l 04:30 Pra i NO T UN 0 0 0 0 C j3 43 i [��Q j� 'T cA 78�i3 + AA CC�TAL ....—,.. 0 0 £5 �. 1O TA 0 0 Y_._. ' 26 _._ 51 35 __ � 0 w ... 76 61 _..... t3 0 0 0 0 0 1 ; 11 � i3 6 62 58 0 0 0 $ 0::30 P..4 04:45 PM 0 0 0 49 1 8 } 37 0 0 0 0 18 50 0 68 125 0 n1.1 "_....,�..:s 03:00 PM us: 15 PM1 0 0 0 0 ..,.. 0 -- -- 0 i l D ) 0 0 37 44 i 7 9' 44 .... 52 1 0 b 0 _ „_ . 0 0 -..._... 0 0 0i 20 _49 - 0 0 59 fib 113 t20 0::.:5 Ir S:OO P,f ! (3515 P.m 05•-20 PM 0 0 0 i 0 0 35 11 ! 46 0 0 0 0 67 0 i 91 137 05'30 PM `)5"15 PN'1 05. 5. PM 06:00 PI.1 0 i 0 0 u 0 1 0 0 44 6 r 9 50 '1 a 0 0 � a 0 o 0 n 1115111 15 59 �s 0 � 85 7� ... 3 ,36 1�e 47 TOE hh INTERVAL foi:c.oP L0i.00PM{�,0 0 PLAK rs0) I FACTO AVEE.AGE PM PEAK PERIOD HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE OAtLY TRAFFIC. CONDITIONS North Miami Avenue NORTHBOUND 7 R TOTAL 0 50UTY1BOUN1) IR TOTAL 221 N!A 0.63 'pole: 2002 FOOT Seasonal Weakly Volume Factor 1 07 .r EASTHOUNO L T R E 3 Street WESTBOUND TOTAL L �I 94 223 0 317 538 0.81 0.94 n rr emi eve_ne 3 si.xls mob - -EMI 111111 EOM IIIIII M - INN - 1111.11- 0,r.). l 5 r,SLC.CMTz S. 1nC- Project Name: Location: Observer: CityView MUSP TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS North Miami Avenue and NE 2 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, - No Miami Avenu 0 Project Number: 05154 Count Date: 6/2212005 Day of Week: Wednesday NE 2 Street GAaf51 - • AL _ _ _ _. T}_ y29... INTERt1At _ 20 29 55 o:aaPna D. 17w: E 5 PMOa:30 ce:30 P1 10 0";5 V. Pt.". � :a5 P gSoa Pan M 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 1 -2 0 0 (1 0 0 1 � 0„� 16 12 5b � 48 44 0 0 0 0 � 74 92 0 0 0 0 _ .._. . _ . .._ ... 47 43 49 ...., �, 0 0 . `... .... � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 IIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIII 0 116 . .. r 1 14 it 69 1� 55,_.. oN U6a0 ... _... 174 70 i 0 25 ' 26 54 i 102.. z, _ ... nSC5 Pt� o- a s 5 t I n 45 PA la3,nai'A PA'! 0a'30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 2115 22 40 aa2 64 ! _ 74 0 ___ 0 28 z 8, 3$ 1 23 25 51 0 0 © 0 p 0 63 0 46 0 0 0 t U ...._P 06 i fkC4Ph%j'r 6 0 0 ' i D 9 47 Q ! 56 0 26 I 20 AVERAGE PM PEAK PEiLOD FLOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUA. AVEflAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONOITIONS North Miami Avenue �_... TIME {{ INTERVAL 04.00 PM' 06:00 P?A NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 0 75 209 Note: 2902 FOOT Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor 1.07 TOTAL 285 0.90 EASTBOUND 111 108 NE 2 Street WESTBOUND GRANO TOTAL t. T R TOTAL TOTAL 219 a 0 0 0 504 0.81 N/A n rniami ave_ne 2 sx.xls ® EN ® r„NaSAC`Al ii. �n Project Name: Location: Observer; TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS CityView MUSP NW 1 Avenue and NW 3 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: 115154 Count Date: 6/22/2005 Day of Week; Wednesdayom� et Nvv 1 Avenue ' +rTTNt __.. Eat INTERVAL N1RT 1B0 N• ' aUT t3•u iD SEA -4 i-OUN0 wn 1.. RA.0 TOTAL t j R s A � ....; � L " 23 30 0 i " 53 0 -�', I 18 12 1 0 a , MEM6 ! E 201 169 202 c4:oo PM 04:1S DM ,A•15 PM 04'20 Pia O4:,30 Pm L445 PM 32 25 0 0 57 53 `J 11 23 1 1 12 24 10 13 16 37 1 as a5 PM os:co PM ; 33 42 0 • 78 0 22 5 27 3 ' G0 68 ---- 1 t GG IMO ' 90 263 ..�„UPh 3:1a .1 3& 38 0 1 72 0 15 & 21 17 0 6 59 75 235 75 �35 PM i 05:15 Pm 05;30 p,�4 27 41 0 1 68 :•� 10 20 24 0 42 98 252 05.3PM 1 22 47 I 0 1 69 0 13 22 20 Q 30 50 6 70 12 88 229 U5:•75 PM 5C:€10 PM 19 42 ! 0 61 0 10 10 20 aga 0 40 7 6: 13 = 84 20a 0.1.1161.IME NO INTERVAL, L D•1:C0 PM Ot4.0O PM PEAK €DOUR fAcrnr1 AVERAGE PM PEAK PERIOD HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NW 1 Avenue GOtINO SOUTHBOUN0 t ~ TOTAL L T RTc3TAL. 0 273 0.82 Note: 2002 FDOT Seasonal Weekty Volume Factor = 1.07 NW 3 Street EAST13 LIN WESTBOIJNL3 GRAND TOTAL 939 .81 0.9: nw 1 avC,-r1w 3 st.xis MIN 11•140 R INN M M IIIIIIII NMI M M Project Name: Location: Observer: CityView MUSP TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS NW 1 Avenue and NW 2 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. I Lr fitci " NURTtie- U ii INTERVAL i T i f1" . 4,.CQPM C4:15PM 0 ..... 37 22 jo:1:15PMt04:70PhAL 0 35 »•.;O PM. 0.17n5 PM 1 0 45 II04 45 PC:5:00 P!,ai 0 I 57 13 i05:OOP11 05' 48 25 Ca',!5P1' OS'4 18 C5 0 PM i} 05:1 '. ] 69 23 L98a5PMIu3:'u4P My:; 0 i 43 20 5 PI,.t 0 30 ?Ni?t1 0 5 P71^'. 0 NW 1 Avenue H€3iJUND tR L 59 25 44 0 t 70 0 0 55 15 35 0 51' 0 0 55 1C 54 0 70 0 0 70 i 28 62 0 90 0 0 72 0 _ . 0 72 19 56 0 75 1 0 0 92 1 19 34 0 53 I' 0 0 Project Number; 05154 Count Date: 6/22l2005 Day of Week: Wednesday NW 2 Street AVERAGE PM PEAK PERIOD HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ,_.ram_ -_ r4W 1 Avenue ~ TIME „ INTERVAL L T L A TOTAL 04 12 "' ca:o0 P�'. Dry-1 208 i 81 288 82 200 r _ 0 1 0.73 _,�.a— .. __...... ....NW 2 Street , SOUTHSOUND EASTEOU,NO PEAK HOW.1 f AC T CNIi,! NORTHBOUND Ni:oe2002 FOOT Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 1.07 R TOTAL L 281 0.73 T R 0 TOTAL It L NfA WESTBOUND 1,.0 wa 120 138 i86 ' 167 156 51 GRAND TOTAL, 636...... 0.90 rtw 1 ave_n.YJ 2 tit.xL0 r i z;.au47?i0. )fa0.¢A-1.9 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name; 1 ityView MUSP Lacotian: Miami Avenua North 01 Narih 5 Street Observer: Tra1lic Survey Specialists, Inc. i1EGIN '1ME CRY 2nst 174 1J SOU 3rd 174 , 4It1 1/4TO'fRt.; 17.:a004 0 0 0 0 0 01:00Am 0 0 0 0 0 250 AM 0 0 0 0 0 03:0? AM ' 0 0 0 0 0 04:C0 Am 0 0 0 0 0 os:co AM 0 0 0 0 0 04.00 AM 0 0 0 0 o7:c0A:4 0 0 0 0 I0 Q13:G0 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 09.00 Aal 0 0 0 0 0 10.00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 11.07 A51 0 0 0 0 0 12.04 PM 0 0 0 0 0 01:00PM 0 0 n 0 0 'zco PM 0 0 0 0 0 rao.ec Pk 0 0 0 0 0 QRO:4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gr,0I't1 0 0 0 0 t 0 I 0,,OO KA 0 0 0 0 09::.CPti1 a 0 0 0 I coin PM 0 0 0 0 0 10;t~0l3.1 0 0 0 0 0 € e0 PM Project No.: _05154 Count Ossto: 6/30l2005 6F:G1N TIME. IIt6TiiGpllNiY 181 174 2r1G` 1/4 31d 1/.1 Oil i!•t"TOTAL 7 5 6 27 ,1 Q1 7 3 2S 02:CO A. 3 3 5 2 13 30onv. i 2 2 VIM ai;O€>O AM 4 1 2 r;5.rn ._ 2 6 9 • ah03 A.Y. 07a� nit 11 25 3-1 _ NEN 58 7Z 8i' 04 GO AM 113 127 114 0 aj m AM 122 105 ® 89 400_ .0.00 AM39 65 57 265 1 co AM 63 60 56 235 12:00 Phi CO GO 51 233 01€.A rat , 64 72 55 _4 65 256 e2.19051 5-1 62 58 51 225 03-JJr5'. € G1 60 03 73 26:i 4 00 P7.1 .1/3 50 -19 226 CS ..0 PH 61 73 78 s1 2i3 e4Cr.P.' 45 32 37 91 r.16 07_caP'.. 36 34 Ili 13 ie3.5 •:a:ea 1':. 20 10 13 16 5 ee to r*s1 le ea pm 15 9 16 10 50 15 10 3 7 41 11.03 P :M 11 7 El 13 39 - _L 24•HOlfi.tpi.11.i 3.131 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY TWU-WAYiry TOTAL. 27 25 13 7 9 103 336 35.1 400 265 235 233 ?,5€i 225 253 226 273 Ati Peak N_ur T:m.•: t2 CO M4 Voovmu: 0 q%i Pe ei Ii@e,r, Tir-.e- 07.45 A4,1 Vdv44:0 -475 P?.`1'eaa Naar: 7r.: •f773rK O i'V Pe a<ti7r Tine. 04:,5 P:; Ah1 How.: Ph1 €'Pak NOW: NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHF3OUNO Tune: 07-:45 737 VvMr 11:: 475 i5-!a(7 1: 1211'. Pt(r: 0. -t J,laclar: _100.0'.% 571 __ Time.: c.:.$PM��.. =1Vo`oac: 2P.4 K-ra4Tcr.- 7.417 Pt1P: 9,r1 a.1aclo1: 309.0!7 $03 J4•r:n rl.U°.^/F�f� a,asstac;irr ;, :v:: 24-HOUR COUNTS Praject Narnc: CityView WISP 1oeatiOn: Miami Avenue North of North 2 Strect 065ervcr: _Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. EGI TIME 1st 1(9 2nd 12:r4xr1 0 0 9t :✓JA!n 0 0 4T..I_ Mtn A 0 13:00Ama 0 3S. 11} 4M U6:t�) AAA 0Y_G0 (151 N.1 1H.00 A1A 10.63 AM 0 a AM 0 1}.c01'M 0 t-01:Q0 PM0 Q2::0 PM fl 0363 PAS i 0 4:0..0 651 <p P. CG C0 PM 5 0 o7:ca r— _ v r o 1 •'00} P?.. 0 I j;1.t111'Ai 0 l o.cc 0 ! 10fii FitSO 0 11n 3rd 1(4 4th 1(4 T(YIAL 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O _. 0 O 9 —4.14000 T TN_ 0 Project No,: 05154 Count EWE; 6/30/2005 SL)L17'HHOUN iW4•Wi 2nd 1/4 3rd 1I4 41h 1(4 TO At. TOTAL 5 25 25 10 23 l 23 8 0 9 01 U3 (117 + 3 1 2 1 0 a5w 4r ' 2 1 a 15 sa ra n>n 6 18 28 33 73 811 0 0 0 0 101 105 a9 t13 7 16 70 8 •12 tin 7 0 i 0 0330r1.1 74 i 0 1) i c, oP PM 59 0 fl_ 05:CO PM 75 O 0 ' 06.0GPm 58 46 32 G7.00 Pm 43 47 ... - 2 1 0 0 � 38636M 23 16 11.3 fl 0 j 03:30Pm 25 20 13 0 ' 0 10:09 Pm 12 12 8 0 0 1 1:31 PM ... 12 .,..... _15 _...� `9 r4. NORI I{BOUND 13 27 E6 220 380 61 75 611 79 2$•1 28.1 77 35 72 71 305 306 75 91 02 303 303_ F43 98 95 350 350 i 02 38 56 255 265 60 66 6.4 , 265 265 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY nlh Pea"., 1F0ur. Tonic- :z:03 AM VolLonc: 0 Ak11'.s7 PM Peak }64 4. -r-.nc: 'Z:C.0 PM Vil:s:r.C. 0 f".S Po.ot6 1?3, Pecex PM Po351171:r. NOST1-R3OUND AND SOUfloe iiND 3.i 170 16 127 30 _ 10 -1U9Fl TOTAL. 170 127 orti} 65 65 40 .04S ?one^ 08.:5 AM V*1,14: 404 7 =:�•.v: 03 00 0:,1 350 T4010: 07:15431 VVL!'1C: .13)4 1Cd,1o141: 10.0:: PNP: 0.33 0-lar.tcr•- 100.0% Sit Tirir•; ~.- e:1:^F3 91-.1 Vo:I:me: 350 is-€, c:or: $T.: P1af: 0.99 0-1ac:er: �100.09: SO r i 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Natnc: CityVier MUSP Project No.: 05154 Location: Miami Avenue North of South 3 Strcel Count Date: 6/30/2005 Observer Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 8E003 4 TIME 7:00 ,47.t r, 11THt15U1u Ci Cirf TIME 12:63 A sQu7til30t]rtr — - —1 17t ➢Id 0 _ 211d 1!-1 0 _- 3r(1 1/4 ._.0- _ 4131 1/4 r'1OTRL ...0. 4 - 0 171 1/4 2nd 1/4 I h *I.4{ "rpfAL 10 6 7 5 29 0➢;00 Na 0 0 0 0 0 01:oo Am 2 5 2 5 15 02.:era AM 0 0 0 0 0 02:0^ AS.1 0 0 5 5 2 It-7 11 03 011 AM 0 0 0 0 0 03.03 333* ( 1 2 3 ^c,oa ,utl 0 0 0 0 0 n:_ea AM t 2 6 5- 0 06 h41 0 0 0 0 05:00 AV 3 1 1 18 -.-__.- 9 j 00:043 Alf 0 0 0 0 0 , ggg C6:C0 A31 € 23 46 70 195 07:00Ak. 0 fl 0 0 0 07:CCA: 52 3.1 00 79 225 49OG 1.41 0 0 0 0 0 Oil 00AV. . 76 130 336 0300aM ( 0 0 0 0 0 00CA337 ! 91 99 76 69 334 taco. '1v ' 0 0 0 0 0 �0 00 AM 72 73 72 72 269 0 0 0 .,. 0 0 L100, 3, 70 134 71 99 332 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12.80 PO 02 65 139 105 340 01:C0 1'M 0 0 0 0 0 0! 00 4't'• 93 91 86 74 02.0010,1 0 0 0 0 0 02.00P31 77 66 80 71 - 29.1 a3:co to 0 0 0 0 0 03 00 4° .1 01.CO PP 64 t 72 65 #I 1 77 107 306 • 334 0n 001'M 0 0 0 0 0 71ii 05-^0 T,-h 0 0 0 0 0�� 03 03 P7/ t44 57 110 121E 459 o6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 i 11 o0 ry l 90 77 96 52 } 315 07;0 P!.4 0 0 0 0 fl 07-u1 PM 64 50 42. 37 193 c0 c0 n34 ,I 0 0 0 0 fl 0 08:no Pm 31 12 31 21 9S 11 P14 k 0 0 0 0 C0.00II'M 40 29 32 40 10 1 13C0PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.00PM 1 ;:C7 "' 30 22 25 22 99 r 75 1 € cO P.�1 3,,.. 0 0 0 0 124-HC3UF170TA1. L.4 29 21 13 12 _ .. �_._— . 02nt40V�i _. __--- 7QTAL ,.,67;1 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY NORTHBOUND `r WO. WA1 TOTAL_ 15 11 9 15 49 334 499 315 193 95 I.11 90 — 75 .. 4.2373 A.1 Poo3 f 301,r_ Tf , 0, 12.00 Am voScMe- © 14}- Po.i* 11ou,- 1',mn C3r:10 Al? PM Po:I, H ( Tir.,p_ 17:C0 I'M 'i73Fire: C' PM P•+, 3 1-tour: 1 'o, 05:050.0 'Io:ixre e: .:09 /,9.1 Peak £[301: Yid Peak liavr; NORFH#3OUNO AND SOUTHEIOUNO rl, 1,1: MI ^7 1M Vo0,RIC: -154 K-I.C10r: 7.30, P110. 0110 0-0,C 0r: £00.0 a 59 TIr7C: eri:79 PM V79rn4C: 49D K-factor: 19-25', P£WW: �,;.117 0413=Ar: 100.0:41I3 _._. 24-HOUR COUNTS Proieci Name: CityView MUSP Location: NE 1 Street West 0( NE 2 Avenue Observer: Traffic Serve Specialists, inc. Project Copt Date; 05154 6/3072005 BIN f EASTBOUND f3EGEN weSitiOUNii— 1si 771k,' 20d 1/4[3M 1/1 41h 114 10 AL TOTAL TIi1EIs! 1/4 2nd 1/4 afd 1/4 lh I/4 loTm _ _ . ....,.. ...:...._ I2,C AM 0 0 0 0 12:90A. II 13 i'2IS jI3'-tr---1 0 0 0 0 0 ci:04 A....1 5 3 4 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 OTC° Am 6 4 1 4 2 16 16 11 0 0 13 0 0 .l3:90A4l 3 5 1 1. ecee Ai,4 0 0 0 0 0 0,1:C0(1 3 0 3 190 01,00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 3 3, O4 34 O li :CM0 0 0 05:CO AM 62 a ___ s'...,.a.cra .!..! 11 25 28 0/1.:0 A.Na 0 0 0 0 1 ':, a.v:oo AM- 34 29 36 58 155 155 CELCO NM 0 0 0 0 0 01117.0 AM 58 .13 66 63 230 230 00:e0 rim 0 56 69 71 64 260 2E0 0 82 OS 66 NEM" 311 1 311. 110,)A. 0 0 0 76 89 86 95 339 330 1200 PM 9 0 0 0 0 90Pm 105 90 111 ss ,ma rfoa 111:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0;69P51 9,1 83 108 73 .358 358 02:en 2i.10 0 0 0 0 oi.o.Rs..1 93 101 102 94 390 390 03..eo Pm 10 0 .. 0 03:9* Pm 104 10 14G 405 94 :V7 Pm0 0 13 I. 0 C.‘“), PM 126 118 139 1137 542 1 622 • 542 051C-J PM , 0 0 0 0 0$P . 9 M 1132 I ..' I 58 13 522 05:110 PM 0 0 0 0 0 I :_ CG?e* 1 100 94 66 62 324 324 07:0 P10 0 0.1D FM 555 53 31 196 9 11 030PMo n ul.00 P:o. 29 39 22 30 111 0400 Pm 0 0 0 0 0 eg c., iw I: 29 I7 le 95 95 10-90 PM 0 0 0 0 0 tinC f....1 21 18 i? 1 72 72 i i Asu PM .o o 0 if cso psi 16 11 9 10 46 46 .,,,_,-..----........_...............___ — 11t13 fet AI. ---"i'f"— 44-libti-11Vat ---.711-1-1 —S,1118 -1 9053(151 6100 nx. AM 70Hwo: PM 11oak11coT: EASTBOUND PM Peak How': DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY 1 !:41: .3M .193 EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND MAU-. I:45 A0 vo-:vin,., 393 K4acto% 75123 PI4': 0.8F7 0r0ciae 1,30n1, 570 iiiTIO; 0.1,13 PM 1/07rne: 5•19 K-Inczol. 12.97. PHP: 9- 95 0-tas0r: 1.90.07. 7/E3 APPENDIX F Project Trip Generation and Committed Developments Traffic Volumes Related Calculations Courthouse Parking Plaza Trip Generation Supporting Calculations for Figure 6 (Parking Spaces) The following steps have been conducted to determine the gross vehicle trips generated during the PM peak hours: 1- There already exists a parking structure with 543 stalls at the proposed site. Therefore, only the difference in parking spaces between the proposed and the existing parking structures will be considered for the purpose of trip generation since the existing 543 stalls are already serving vehicular trips in the roadway network area. That is, only 157 parking spaces will be further considered in the trip generation process. 2- The latest edition of the 1TE Trip Generation Manual does not provide rates for parking structures land use. Since the new parking structure will mainly be serving governmental and general offices (including the US Federal Courthouse), a directional distribution of 85% for exiting and 15% for entering traffic has been used (after a detailed review of the related land use splits provided in the ITE Manual). As a result, 133 outbound trips (85% of 157) and 24 inbound trips will be used in the next step of the calculations procedure. 3 The project also includes land uses for General Office and Specialty Retail. Therefore, the trips generated by these land uses need to be subtracted from the trips derived on step 2 since these trips will be having their origin/destination in the project building. From Figure 6, these land uses produce a combined number of 35 inbound and 114 outbound trips. Therefore, the final number of trips allocated to the project's parking structure portion is as follows: Inbound (24-35) = 0 Outbound (133-114) = 19 M COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA VOLUME CALCULATIONS Turning Movement Counts (June 22, 2005) APPENDIX E Adjust to year 2006 (10/0 per year) FIGURE 3 y Adjust to year 2008 (1% per year) Add year 2008 Committed Development (Sawyer's Walk & Overtown Project Trips) APPPENDIX F Adjust to year 2009 (1% per year) FIGURE 5 Add Project Generated Trips (Project Trip Assignment) FIGURE 9 y 2009 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 12 Fe ALE MANI & Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS op- wive NV911-1STm NE ....ryE Yt1ST r. 5 fist,'; s [Central Business Distric it --ter �r sF�T<=sr S=S s1 s�fl15 M lgricketI `� TST THsTT - Scin 5:J.. Par: 1,4741 y:: Ilt^J. Z y k 7 T . .._.,. n...._.,S i 31 Sr 1-1h‘' iF SW i.1TH `"- 1 ti��•r- . �, fffltt © 2003 Det.orrne. Street Atlas USA® 2004, Mrvsnr.d�3a<:rie ronr Street Atlas €3SA® 2004 State 1 : 17 600 1' = 1-466.7 it Data .?mot 13-5 mon — M MN OM M — — N — MN N r • Committed Development Trip Assignment in Personship (Roadway+Transit) Corridor From To Person -trips Dir Everglades on the Bay The Loft 2 Met Miami Parcel B,C,D DuPont Towers One Miami Columbus Office Tower River Front (West) River Front (East) Sawyer's Walk Overtown Transit Development Total Miami Avenue NE 14 Street NE 6 Street NE 6 Street NE 4 Street NE 4 Street Flagler Street Flagler Street SE 6 Street NWINE 1 Street Biscayne Blvd NE 2 Avenue NE 2 Avenue NW 2 Avenue NW 2 Avenue 1-95 SB SB SB SB 0 0 23 0 0 0 11 29 29 29 53 17 24 17 24 17 24 17 24 WB 137 101 0 12 58 2 2 0 0 42 42 126 357 42 45 45 91 204 45 WB 57 39 24 0 58 15 42 45 WB 23 0 24 0 12 1 Fe. ALEMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 0 0 8 8 0 164 164 299 697 431 4 294 60 11111110Ilia NM I — NM N M 11 NM NM MU an PM — — PM Peak Hour Sawyer's Project Trip Generation Analysis (2009) IN �f0 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS Trips 01. OUT Trips TOTAL Trips GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 49% 2,335 51% 2,435 4,770 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment (© 16% of Gross External Trips (2) 49% 374 51% 389 763 Transit Trip Reduction © 22.6% of Gross External Trips (3) 49% 528 51% 550 1,078 Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10% of Gross External Trips {3) NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 49% 234 49% 1,199 51% 51% 243 1,253 477 2,452 Net External Person Trips using Vehicles Q 1.4 PersonsNehicle 49% 1,679 51% 1,754 3,433 Net External Person Trips using Transit (g 1.4 Persons / Vehicle 49% 739 51% 770 1,509 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS (VEHICLES AND TRANSIT MODES) 49% 2,418 51% 2,524 4,942 Notes: (1) From Sawyer's walk MUSP, Table 6 (2) A 16% reduction to account for differences between City of Miami (1.4) and ITE (1.2) auto occupancy rates. (3) Reductions according to the Downtown Miami DR1 increment II. FR, ALEMAN AMwcl.fe., 12 , CONSVLT]I ENL3fuE,.S COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SAWYERS WALK TRIP GENERATION 31 w ¢ NE5ST NE 4 ST N.T.S 7 i �' NE3ST 2 5 L lL 19 -..._ NE2ST 19 .<.- -4-- NE ST 5 I 1 I2 FLAGLER ST LEGEND SE ST 1 N - XX OUT- (XXI —0-- ONCMY R ALEMAN ir. =MUM VR n305 #_p. sr StHEET mlkel VE 3317$ 133t1 59t-N77 E#GKcERIG arSmESS ill, <553 SAWYERS WALK - PROJECT TRIPS 2008 PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRIPS ASSIGNMENT 111111 111111110 MIN W I I MI MN M is MI — N N. PM Peak Hour Overtown Transit Village Project Trip Generation Analysis (2009) USES UNITS ITE Land Use Codes PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN Trips OUT Trips TOTAL Trips General Office I340,722 S.F. Office 17% 78 83% 382 460 Specialty Retail 4,006 S.F. Retail 44% 14 56% 17 31 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 19% 92 81% 399 491 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16% of Gross External Trips (2) 19% 15 81 % 64 79 Transit Trip Reduction 22.6% of Gross External Trips (3) 19% 21 81% 90 111 Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction 10% of Gross External Trips (3) 19% 9 81% 40 49 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 19% 47 81% 205 252 Net External Person Trips using Vehicles 1.4 PersonsNehicle 19% 66 81% 287 353 Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.4 Persons / Vehicle 19% 29 81% 126 55 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS (VEHICLES AND TRANSIT MODES) 19% 95 81% 413 508 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1,4 Persons / Vehicle 19% 13 81% 56 69 Notes: (1) See Appendix X for related calculations. (2) A 16% reduction to account for differences between City of Miami (1.4) and ITE (1.2) auto occupancy rates. (3) Reductions according to the Downtown Miami DRI increment II. FZ, ALEMAN OOt lJLTINO f.NO1NEE3i5 COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY OVERTOWN TRANSIT VILLAGE TRIP GENERATION NW 1 AVE NE 5 ST N.TSS 9 3 €a NE 4 ST NE3ST 6. n t______ 6 ,____, _,.... NE 2 ST 23 9 L 5 _..,(- NE 1 ST .r'>- 6 FLAGLER ST 2 4 LEGEND SE 1ST 11Y- XX GUT- (XX) ONE WAY F.B. ALEMAN A. a,et1.505 Mil. fK 1ST r�7g; 59,--6777 T:M`,INfLIIL'NG B!rSWE55 xo, n55& OVER TOWN - PROJECT TRIPS 2008 PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES COURTHOUSE PARKING PLAZA - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRIPS ASSIGNMENT biusp roffr-21' bhp.lc? Sir.P.r Exhibit 10 Cardinal Distribution of Trip TAZ 533 Cardinal Direction Distribution TAZ 533 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW Total % 6.68% 3.8Jrk 7.09% 23.2 8% I 9.4i 3% 3 SA 2% 100 1111111 MIN — N r Olio IMO NM — S N — USES High -Rise Residential Condominium Retail m�. —less Everglades TAZ 538 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis UNITS 866 DU 65,549 SE cGROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 'Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ ransit Trip Reduction @ {Pedestrian !Bic cle Trip Reduction @ I��pe ',NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 13 ITE Land Use Code Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net External Person Trips using Transit @ External Person Taps (vehicles and transit modes) {lydet 16.00% 22.00% 10.00% 1.40 1.40 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle Notes (1 } A 15% reduction to adjust icy" the roiEluseriun the Downtown Uiami DRI Incrernentlil4 vs. 1TE's 1.2 pars/Yen ) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal plits (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DR1 Increment I 232 814 Of Gross Extern& Trips (1) of Gross External Trips (2) et Gross External Trips (3) Persons/ Vehicle ersons/ Vehicle PM PEAK t OUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL ip s Trips ® p Trips Trips ri 62°io 208 38% 121 44% 78 56% 100 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 149 329 178 288 221 507 .................. 46 44% 35 81 63 44% 49 112 29 44% 22 °5. 1. 44%115 264 44% 56% 208 44% 161 369 56% 88 44% 68 156 56% 296 44% 229 525 56% 40 44% tO515--T-gen_ccmritled devel.xls 1,40 Persons/ Vehicle Everglades r ea :'05154 - TAZ 538 CityVEew MMUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 538 NNE 11.25% ENE 4.62% ESE 2.78% SSE 6.18% SSW 14.70% WSW 24.78% WNW 19.21% NNW 16.48% TOTAL 100.00% TAZ-xis IIIIII IIIIIII MINI MINI M N - M M MINN MIMI M • The Lofts 2 TAZ 539 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis I USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL Trips % Trips Trips High Rise Residential Condo 496 DU 232 62% 119 38% 69 188 GROSS VEHrCI.E TRIPS (1) &3a/o 119 37% 69 188 rrehicie Occupancy Adjustment @ 16,00% of Gross External Trips (2) Transit Trip Reduction @ 22.60% of Gross External Trips (3) Pedestrian 1 Bicycle 'Trip Reduction © 10.0091,, of Gross External Trips (4) 63°/% 63% S3% 19 27 12 37% 374/0 37% 11 16 7 30 42 19 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 53% 61 37% 35 . 97 r Nel External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle het External Person Trios using Transit @ 1. 40 Persons/ Vehicle 63% 63% 86 38 37% 37% 50 22 135 59 INet External Person Trips (vein clas and transit modes) 63% 123 37% 71 195 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 17 Notes (1) Based on Traffic Impact Study provided by City of tviiami (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. LTE's 1,2 pers/vsh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment iI :405154 - T-gen_committed dove{.xis 26 i The Lof;s 2 CityView MUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAsZ 539 NNE 11.28% ENE 4.43% ESE 2.[3% SSE 8.25% SSW 10.59% WSW 2.5.04% WNW 20_03% NNW 1.7.26% TOTAL PO.S1 Sa: - To-Z 539 100.01% TAZ.x[s 11•10 Mill NEI MI NMI IIIIII lin MIS III EN MN NM Ilia NM 11011 Metropolitan Miami: Parcels B, C, and 0 TAZ 555 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL cii Trips no Trips Trips High Rise Residential Condo Office Specialty Retail 1,500 DU 9,000 SF 159,061 SF 232 710 814 62% 17% 44% 360 2 189 38% 83% 561% 210 • 11 242 570 13 431 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS f 54% 551 46% 463 1014 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16.00% of Gross External Trips (1) Transit Trip Reduttien @ 22.60% of Gross External Trips (2) Pedestrian ? 8icy-cle Trip Reduction 0 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 54% 54% 54% 88 125 a5 46% 46% 46% 74 106 46 162 229 101 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 283 238 521 1t Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit Q 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 54% 54% 396 174 46% 46% 333 146 730 321 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 54% 571 46% 480 1051 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 54% 77 46% ®65 142 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vo, ITEs 1.2 perslveh) (2! Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DPI Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based en D0wntown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DPI increment it 151a*) e T-gcn_cammitied dcvel.xls Met tvliami 110 i 005154--+AZ555 CityView MUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 555 NNE 11,29% ENE 4.61% ESE 2.08% SSE 1.24% SSW 11.33% WSW 24,87°! WNW 23.42°% NNW 21."17% TOTAL 100.01 %) TAL.xls M Mill R IIIIIII MIN 111111 INN 1111 M M MI I r l M USES Nigh Rise Residential Condo Itotet Specialty Retail DuPont Towers (DuPont Plaza) TAZ 557 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis UNITS 1,228 DU 62 Rooms 38,000 SF rGRCSS VEHICLE T R1PS \Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian / Bic de Trip i"teduciion @ NET EXTERNAL VEHECLE TRIPS 16.00% 22.60% 10.00% ITE Land Use Code 232 310 814 e1 Gress Externaf Trips (1) cf Gross External Trips (2) of Gress Pxterral Trips (3) 268 19 45 OUR TRIPS TOTAL Trigs 433 36 103 58°%0 332 42% 58% 58% 58% 53 75 3 8% 171 42% 42% 42% 42% 240 572 38 54 24 123 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 'Net Extetnai Person Trips using Transit 0 Net Exterhet Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 1.40 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Persons? Vehicle Net External Person trios walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 239 42% 105 42% 344 58% 58% Nrates , TE's f ,2 perslveh} (i) A,t 6°4 reduction to adjust icr the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ; (2) Transit trip reduction based on proiected modal splits used in me Downtown Miami DRI increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downlown Miami DRI increment 11 005154 - T-gen_commilied devel.ris 42% 173 76 249 34 92 129 57 294 412 181 593 OuPcn CityView MUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 557 12.32% 5.59% 1.25% 0.71 % 9.68% 24.85% 22.50% 23.05% TOTAL 1105t5,1 • lAZ 557 100.01 % TA Z.xis mis 1.11111 JINN all ;PO MIN MIMI One Miami TAZ 556 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS iTE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips pia Trips Trips - ..High -Rise Condominuim Office Speciality Retail 896 DU 24.000 SF 17,000 SF 232 710 814 62% 17% 44% 215 18 20 38% 83% 56% 125 83 26 340 1066 46 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 166% 253 Li57% 239 152 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16,00% of Gross External Trips Transil Trip Reduction G 22,60°"a of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips {1) (2) (3) 166% 166% 166% 40 57 25 157% 157'2/4 157% 38 54 24 ' 24 34 23 INET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS t66% 130 157% 122 71 i Net External Person Trips in Vehicles 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 166% 166% 164 80 157% 157% T 155 76 99 48 er Nei Ext nat Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 165% 244 157% 231 147 r Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 166% 53 157% . 50 32 -Notes (1) A 16% reduction to ad)ust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and loca# data (Miami's 1.4 vs. !TE's 1.2 pets/vet-I) (2) Transit trip reduction based an projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI lncremeni It (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI increment e05S54 T_gen_committed devel.xls One Miami l 'e CityVfew MUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution ENE 4.61% ESE 1.39% SSE 1.47% SSW 8.25% 5g WSW 26.41% WNW 29_i2% NNW 21.68% TOTAL 100.00% TAZ. (LS U05154 - TAL alb — M INN M 11111. MI M is MI OM I I M M — Oolumous Office Tower TAZ 543 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Anatysis PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code IN OUT TOTAL °fa Trips % Trips Trips Nigh -Rise Residential Condon'€urn Retail 523 DU 15,727 SF 232 814 62% 44% 126 19 38% 56% 73 24 199 43 ^ GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 1 44% 13 56°/0 24 43 44% 44% 44% 3 4 2 56% 56% 56% 4 5 2 7 9 4 d Vehicle Occupancy Ajustment @ 16,00% of Gross External Trips (1) Transit Trip Reduction © 22.00% of Gross External Trips (2) Pedestrian 1 Bicycle Trip Reduction © 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 1NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 44% 16 56% 12 22 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles Q 1.40 Persons) Vehicle Net External Person Trios using Transit © 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 44% 44% 14 6 56% 56% 17 7 31 13 Net External Person Trps (vehicles and transit modes) 44% 20 56% 25 45 I w FNIet Exlernat Person trips waikinc / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 44% 3 56% 3 3 Notes -(1) A 16% reduction to adiusl for the dlf(erance betwaan ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miarrii's 1,4 vs. I T E's 1.2 perslveh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on protected modal spills used in. the Downtown tviiami 0RI Increment II (3) Pedesirian and bicycle trip reduciians based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI increment 11 t 251 4 7.gen,_committed devel.xts Colum bus CityView MUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution NNE 10 85% ENE 5.47% ESE 2.82% SSE 6.70%� SSW 9.79% W S W 25. 49% WNW 19.84% NNW 19.05% TOTA I! 111 100.O 1 % 9.52% 111111 111111 IIIIIII NM Mil IOW IIIIIII 111111111 NMI NMI NM INN W River Front (West Parcel) TAZ 558 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR 1 RSPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips/n Trips Trips Residential (High•Rise Condominuim) 1,424 DU 232 62% 342 38% 199 541 Office 52.800 SF 710 17% 13 63% 55 78 Specialty Retail 41,994 SF 814 44% 50 56% 64 114 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 55% 405 45% 328 733 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment C, 16% of Gross External Trips (1) 55% 65 45% 52. 117 Transit Trip Reduction 0 22.60% of Gross External Trips (2) 55% 92 45% 74 166 Pedeszriian / eicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 55% 9 45% 33 73 NET EX T 5RNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 55% 240 45% 1009 377 Net External Person Tdps in Vehicles © 1,40 Persons! Vehicle 55% 291 45% 236 527 Net External Person, Trips using Transit © 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 55% 128 45% 104 232 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes} 55% 420 45% 340 759 1 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 55% 57 45% 45 103 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and ocat data (Miami's 1.4 vs, ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Tiansil trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRi Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DAt Increment II 1 a4 7•gei;_comrnit°ted devel.xls River Front (west) CityView MUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 558 NNE 14,68% ENE 8.83% ESE 5.34% SSE 7.52% SSW 7.14% W S W 17.00% WNW 18.47% NNW 21.04% TOTAL 405154 • TAZ ssc3 100.00% TAZ.xis aIllo I .. ", MN NM MN IOW MINI River Front (East Parcel) TAZ 662 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UMTS ITS Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR Ti IPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips . % Trips Trips Residential (High -Rise Cortdorniniim) 1,433 DU 232 62% 345 38% 201 5416 Office 203,000 SF 710 17% 52 836/. 254 306 Specialty Retail 38.728 SF 814 44% 41 56% 53 94 CROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 46°l0 438 54% 508 _ 946 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment 1 5% of Gress External Trips (1) 46% 70 54% 81 151 Transit Trip Reduction C 22.60'%0 of Gross External Trips (2) 46% 99 54% 115 214 Fecestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduciion C 10.00% of Gross External Trips (0) 46% 10 54% 51 95 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 46% 259 54% 261 486 681 Net External Person Trips in Vehic+es g 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 46°!a 315 54% 366 Nat External Person Trips'using Transit C 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 46% 139 54% 161 299 Net External Person Trips (vehiCreS and transit modes) 46% 454 544/., 526 980 71 132 t et External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 46% 61 ' 54% Notes -(1) A 16% redaction to adjust for the difference between 1TE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI tncrement II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment I1 )05154 - T-genecommitled devel.xls River Front (eaSt) ; o575,f - TAZ 6t32 CityView MUSP 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 662 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 22.09% 34.05% 18.94% 14,03% 6.52% 0.46% 0.00% 3.91 % TOTAL 100,00% 3.91% 22.09% 4.05% 0.<46% 94% 6,52% 14.03% TAZ.xls APPENDIX G Service Capacity and Generalized Tables Downtown Miami DRI Increment II i r r 1 Uudividcd 2 Divided 3 Divided 4 Divi4ic4 TABLE 4 - 7 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL,. VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED ARC' IRVI N Lance Divided I Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided UPTEO FLOW HIGUWAYS A 100 1,0fA t 600 l.tac] of Service B C 0 E 340 670 950 1,100 1,720 2,500 3230 3,670 2 590 3 740 4,840 5.300 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS Class ((>0,00 to 1.99 dig -mile ed ia1erseetitsnapermile) Level of Service C,.ancs Divided A 13 C 0 1 Undivided ®• 220 720 860 2 Divided 250 1,530 1,310 1,860 3 Divided 380 2,330 2,770 2,790 4 Divided 490 3,030 3,460 3,340 C1aes 11(2.00 to 4.50 s iga.Iited interactions per mile) Level of Service 19 C 13 Lanes Divided A .0 • O. l50 210 340 440 590 1,360 2,110 2,790 810 1,710 2.570 3,330 E 890 144 aria ®.* AS0 1,800 2,710 3,500 Class 111 (more than 4.5 signalized interscctinns per rtsi(e note not within primary city central lsusirtesa district ofats urbanized area over 750,000) Lutes Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided 4 Divided Level of Service A 8 C [S .. a4 04 AO 99 04 44 280 630 1,020 1,350 650 1,510 2,310 3,070 810 1,710 2,580 3,330 Class IN (tonne than 4.5 4ignsliacd intcracctiona pee mile and within primary city central busiacss distciet of an tsstraniz d area over 750,000) Lance Divided Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided 4 Divided Lever of Service A 13 C 004 E .. .a 276 550 1,000 1,350 720 1,530 2,390 3,130 730 1,660 2490 3,250 Lanes Divided 1 Uodividu( 2 Divided 3 Divided NON -STATE ROADWAYS MajorCityICaunty Roadways Level of Service A 13 a. sa as A• *a C 0 4E0 7147 1,120 1,620 1,740 2,450 810 1,720 2,580 lnteresaange speckle > 2 ms. spsrt Lanes 2 3 4 5 a FH1 SWAYS Level of Service A 8 C 1] 1,270 1,930 7,660 3,360 4,050 2,110 3,160 4,410 5,560 6,710 2,940 4,550 6,150 7,760 9,360 3,580 5,510 7,484 9,440 11,390 dtste ehaege epaciug < 2 mi. apart Level of Sc;vicc Lents A 31 C 0 2 1,130 3 1,780 4 2,340 5 3,080 6 3 730 1,840 2,390 3,940 4,990 6 040 2,660 4,180 5,700 7,220 8 744 3,440 5,410 7,380 9,340 11 10 BICYCLE MODE € 3,980 5,150 3,326 10,436 12,630 E 3,910 6.150 3,.300 10,620 12,150 (Note: Level offaervice for the bicycle made In this table is based on roadway gaarnettica at 40 mph pesetc 3 epee# end traffic cacdi0iotu, riot number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle vs:decri s shwa below byasumbez of directional roadway lanes so dctermiac tnaAinntm service Yalutrtcs.) Paved Shoulder/ 13icycic Lint Coverage 0-49`/. 50-84 85-100% Level afScrvicc A B C: 0 •• 170 720 >720 130 21.0 "210 163 380 >380 'a' PEDESTRIAN Mon); (Nate: Level of sen-ice for the pedestrian mode in this table is basal on ro>sdwsy geotnetrics et 40 mph posted speed and traffic coriditions, not the number of p'dcatrians trains the facility.) (Me triply motorized vehicle vo1umc3 shown below by number of directional roadway (ants to dete t-eisle maximum service seturrtca,) Sidewalk Coverage 0-4950 50-94 85-14€ta% Sidewalk Coverage 0.84% 05.100% A 40 Level of Strvie< 13 C 0 € 120 04 390 330 810 520 990 >590 BUS hMOOE (Sebcduled Fitted Rause) (Metes per bole) Level of Service A 8 a. >5 >6 r4 C >3 0 >5 >2 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) Level of Service I secs Divided A 11 C: D 1 Uadividcti *' •* 250 530 2 Divided 410 •* 580 1,141 Sunecc: Find& Dei artmes t o(Traceportstivn Syaternt Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399,-0450 $tnpSievwvr 11 ally#lurid*.ccfrnlp(arrniugisystcret_dsnifklieefaWr.ht;n E 640 1.320 02/22 432 ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADWUSTh1 ENTS 131V1DE13/`JHDt VEOEwD (alter corresponding volatiles by the indicated percent) Lanes Median 1...c11 Turns Lance 1 Divided Yea 1 Undivided Afo Multi Undivided Ycs Multi Ucdividcd No Adjt,stracstt Factors +3% -2054 •5%. -25! ONE WAY FAC1L1TihS i,rerea$C corm „actin • volume 20 '1]a pia boss ooveae.ta a w..rS+cd „od rYa.dd b+ send oar ks 4vanp,47 :rnae& 6.un, .iva dJ. 4hSa €s h 'v¢d .no.e 66 S. mad fat roan g4.win4 .in'xexicu Teo east m-0 dai.''vaa TAR '.'...4.3, #+e=td na Le we Poe mn a .e int.atrtien [o:ms. .4.crc a,a,, .,1 +,,4' ' ',,,, <si.c v.1.,,. ahc- c are +vms-sg £,. ,,aai =e9,.s.+a 6aa 3s.s6 ar at+ee. sea arc k,r 4a •+.twc, b0*'k vek pea'k 07 as nmi €nod ar,scrite tna 11 4e 4er4. en g.,bmiy 54c m,npe.nilL e,=oe. +'.4' , J, ,L.rcrar , r�.va ,acdsl aw,-�.,;,e.a mhee94 roc ,oi, of .crvto. of d: Ffvuq .sme, Lana aria owalt n,.a�.my sr,t{ a<ac:race u mac *te�wn,-,.k t Tv ern rrs ,o u..m.+1 s.rrc , daiep eaFft se:wr,�a. m�e wbora mew tx 41.;,3.,a 6/ .yr cvy�ie y O andkK r.cmra r ,, aSk'a i, +s rorne & r,,,t,e .e4 ac �¢ ar ur+6cc aide •a9'm°' w afie h.t:ay.,a dent, Csk.l.,rn sc 6,,e d me riw..eia g er: t'vissiav adrLa §tip!enaq t.p,a;rp Ftw,..eC Block r.OS rtr,HL, t,&',msa tans stand .M Lass, r'.p.eitg ua,d CN gice ar5-mk. lk,," i. 6".x saes,. ••C'�+ n $e`rsd wise able Wp..e am-km.44,44, • ".4 ,ftelk.iric kr 51,4 kve9 orsamba i+saer g.*.dz. fan ®.,cro ,Lirsh+.at eno.icswi.mes :FURY 4',,, ° a4 err ee,.,;t. ® ":new++- F s<ee se ia+nus veo �y,..sdia. save *4ra srssba. iu< aryrts cr.4 psd".e;m men&,. Ar 3.-r a ©ttec4Me setter ,.e.s tIecedn g `-3+a oe¢.ckia..a�, a.c.,,..c Owe no ma..m,..a-ac,x9e r.€,.e.s Lket46ai,4+ing c.54 iny,.r soda: 9 111111, M INN ® M -Mil OM LEVEL OF SERV3CE TABLE 1 CLASSIFICATION I TYPE FOOTS 2002 QUALITY / LEVEL OF SERVICE ill PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE A 8 C D E A 8 C1 1 CLASS 4 ARTERIAL 1 LJ 0 0 270 720 760 • 0 0 0.35 0.92 1.00 0 0 650 1580 1560 , 0 0 0.39 0.95 1.00 3LD 0 0 1000 2390 243E 0 0 0,40 0.96 1.00 4LD 0 0 1350 3130 3250 0 0 0.42 0.96 1.00 d CLASS 4 ARTERIAL [21 it_ 0 0 324 864 936 0 0 0.35 0.92 1.00 2L 0 0 780 1896 1992 0 0 0.39 0.95 1.00 3L 0 0 1200 2868 298S 0 0 0.40 0.96 1.00 4L 0 0 1620 3756 3900 ' 1 0 0 0.42 0.96 1.00 Scarce: FOOT's 2002 OualilyJ;.ere€ of ServiCB Handbook NOTES: It; THE PERSON TRIP LEVEL OP SERVICE IS DERNED BY D[ViDiNG THE %DOT'S 2002 LEVEL OF SERVICE BY THE LOS c. FOR EACH TYPE OF ROADWAY, 9i FOR ONE-WAY FACiLTIE5. THE CORRESPONDING VOLUME HAS BEEN INCREASED OY 20%. Ito TABLE 21.C1 DOWNTOWN MIAMI DR I UPDATE - INCREMENT II TRANSIT AND PEDESTRIAN MODE SPLITS AREA 17-Se -20 1 TRANSIT MODAL SPLIT [1] INCREMENT OMNI 11.7% CBD 23.3% BRICKELL 14.3% SE OVERTOWN 8.3% INCREMENT II 14.9% 22.6% 14.1% 8.2% PEDESTRiAN REDUCTION [2 10.0% 10.0% 15.0% NIA NOTES: [11 TRANSIT MODAL SPLITS BASED ON APPROVED RATES USED IN THE ORIGINAL DOWNTOWN MIAMI DR1. [2] PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRIP REDUCTION BASED ON AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY OFFICIALS. 21-77 SOURCE: KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. nAtranpan\projects12001\16716\tableskcbd2prn,wk4 IIIIIII MIMI MIMI JINN 11101 NI! TAELE 21.A2 Dow?./TowmiAmi 010 UPDATE ex3STTho V8/410L8 ROADWAY 0014:3rTf0Ns 02].. . , i.' FAreCipt...EITY i COUNT pEAK '' . .---, PEAK (3H1 oPLJEAKR ': ktrAlkil PEAK F, ELDADw.Ay ; PuNcrioNAL ;rosTINO; COUNT [7] SOURCE pReDaLiv:70 PEAK AN0 SEASON AXLE COUNT PERiOD seRVICE i TEO ' OIR HOUR CtRy:LAX A11:73- HOUR Trr.T:g::rl-"CP'IF'rP''Tj.9't:L''. LA'N" STATI°1.4 EAcToR FACTOR DATE ; V4ILIJME N6 20 STREET NE 17 STREET .; SS -:. . .....,....-,..,..,, too 04/25/01 392 3,070 E-7w NE 17 SIRE.E...',.' NE 14 STREET miNoR ARTER.AL 1.00 1.00 NE 14 STREET NE 5 STREET MINOR ARTERIAL 21 ; N(A 1.00 1.00 04/2.5131 3.070 E-7w NE., 6 5TREE7. NE STREET ELAGLER STREET SE 6 STREET SE a STREET SW 12 STREET SW 13 STREET NW 1 AVENUE NEE STREET • Sw 1 Av.6Nue 14. M14A11 AvENLLE sw 7 STREET SIN 3 570009 143 NE 7 STREET NE 1 STREET' STRE6 RCE/4E1THA'3 S..1,'H.NARS. RA. ELAnLER STREET SE STREET SE 8 STREET Sw 12 STREET SW 13 STREET SE 18 ROA c NE 7 STREET NE STREET fLAGLER STREET Se a STREET SW 7 STREET SIN 8 sTRE:ET SW 13 STREET 4 STREET MINOR ARTERIAL 3L 3L se ss ;00 SE se N8 N8 /10 148 SS NS SS 146 SE ; SB ; NE 803 S5 SE PEND° VQ1_15ME MINOR ARTERIAL St, NJA KE.S-A7,1 392 1.00 3: 14AS-AM 392 N&S-AM 392 hiiNOR ARTERAL NIA XE,S.A.).4 400 9.011 1,4NOR ARTERIAL NA K&S-Rm 1.047 1.03 MINOR ARTERIAL 21. N/A KS.S.PM 1,041 ; 1.00 hc;NOR ARTERIAL 2L. N/A KaS..Pm 1,093 1 1.o0 rAINOR ARTERIAL 2L. N/A KSS-PNI 1,000 Loa MINOR ARTERIAL 2Lu /4.,A OTM?•Am 3003 7.00 EC 7.00 K&S-Ah.! 4.ca LOCAL ROAO CoLLEcTOR COLLECTOR LOCAL, RGAD LOCAL ROAD LOCAL ROAO LOcAl, ROAO 41.1) 2L 4LLI 2L 21. A N/A xas•Am Ks,s.Am 4.03 S,AM K&S-AM 141.6 KF-S-pm NiA KE.s.py 14/.6A K&S.PM 175 1.00 449 : 1.00 176 ; 1.00 449 1.00 176 ; 1.00 449 1 00 776 ; 11.00449; 100 1,003 772 7=3 1.00 7,03 1,30 1444 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.30 1.00 1.00 1 DO 1.00 1,33 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 04725/01 04/25/01 04/25/01 04/25/01 04725701 04/25/01 aans.toi 04/17/01 04/25101 34725/01 04/25/01 04/25/01 1.00 04/25/01 1.00 04/2S/07 1.00 I 04/2510i 392 302 400 433 1,041 1.041 1,003 1,003 308 'EC 176 449 176 4,19 776 449 176 449 1,0.03 Lcc3 r.79 3,070 3,070 2,040 3.070 2,040 2,040 2,040 800 800 7,700 1,700 1,733 1,700 800 1,703 1.615 1.615 3,070 2,040 2.340 8 E-1W 0 W 9 01 ;• 4 E E-7w E.1W 0 .... 'EA w E.TW E. w./ E. tw E-lw c, NATRANREANWROJECTS\2007m716\TABLES1 INITI)1111111N NM INN MINI MIMI MIK III MINI MN MIN 11111111, Pt 7 mg, TABLE 21..A2 DOWNTOWN 9R1 UPDATE EXIST tNO vEN:cLE ROADWAY CCINomoNs 20-N,..,2001 . : -" -RoATMAYCONorrit) L f 1 PAC1LITY i 12i COUNT P2,AK , pEAK j (-141 OPUEARK77-YI MIAPEAK '-'•:. • V] TYPE SOUSES POUR PEAK : . HouR DM mAX AOOP- ;.•tOUR '..] p.OA0wAy i : FUNCEXISIING COUNT ANO PERIOD SEASON AXLE TIONAi. ' ,, f COUNT PE5130 SERVICE TED DIR LANES STATION PER1OO :,- vOLumE ! FACTOR FACTORSTATE VOLUME VOL LOS Los 326 e4/25/01 325 2.0.* E-lw 322. 04125701 328 2,040 E-17/ S7S 2,040 E-1W 04126/01 875 :., 13JSCAYNE aLvo NE 2 AVENUE We mINcR ARTERIAL a NE 2 AVENUE ww 2 AVENUE WS MINOR I.RTERIAL NW 2 .AVENUE. 1.95 WO MINOR AR T'ERIAL FLAGLER STRe."-,T•• 13SCAYNE BLVD NE 2 AVENUE WB M!NOR ARTERiAl. .• NE 2 AVENUE NE 1 AVENUE WE MINOR ARTERIAL .• • NE i Av5.NUE N,,..9 I. AVENuE ,..kre M.N0R ARTERIAL N'A.; i AVENUE NW 2 AvENuE ,..v5 MiNOR ARTEMAL NV., 2 AVENUE 1-95 98 MINOR ARTR[AL •, •, 551 SIPMET BISCAY14O 0L70 SE.: ¶ AVF.NUE EB MINOR ARTER!AL SW 1 A7ENL.12 EB MINOR ARTERIAL ..• • • 57.: 1 AVENUE Sw 2 AVENUE ES KNOR ARTERIAL ..•. SW 2 AVENUE i•95 En MINOR ARTERLAL 15 2 STREET/SAS/US-1 BISCAYNE aLyo. SE 3 AVENUE WS PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL wa PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL SZ 2 AVENUE se 4 STREnSRS/US-1 atscArNE ELvO. SE., 2 AVENUE 99 PRINCIPAL ARTEPJAL !ACE: ANC SCHNAAS, P 2L 20 2L 2L 20. 20. 3L 3L 30. 4L SL 4L 3L N/A Ka.S,-AM tvA K&S-AM N/A -:•DTroP.Pm 101 T.Pm let FOOT -PM 131 FrIOT.PM 1034 NIA •DThiP•PM • 100 F007.At4 100 FEOT-AM 1033 FO07-Am 504E 5048 50.45 FOOT.PM 7,00 ?,pm FOOT,AM 422 428 4 1,29? 259 1,046 1,041 985 912 2,379 2.379 1,2.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.09 1.00 1.01 0.98 1.01 10.05 1.01 0.96 1.01 0.9.5 1,01 0192 1.01 0.98 1.01 0.98 1.01 0.98 1,00 0.95 1.02 0,80 1.02 1.02 0.98 05/18/99 05/18.'99 05/12/49 05./18129 35/02/01 05/12:99 05/18/39 05/18/99 04;19/99 424 2,040 E-1Vv 424 2,040 E-.1W 424 2,040 E-1W 1,254 2,040 9.19/ 256 2.C40 lw 1.(137 1,037 975 ,594 06/29/99 2,402 0.'29 0E/29/99 3,070 3,070 3.070 3,770 3.770 2,402 3,770 05/29/99 1,825 3,070 E.1W E.1W E-1W E-nry E-1W E O 5 51. O O 0 E E r!! E 1\1:1TRANpLANI.PR0JECTSi2001%.16716\7A8LS\11MATRIX.M4 MI6 NMI MIMI NM IIIMI INN MN MN II MN MIN fAtILI 10E6 11 A46965'6,0! I C..,316,5. ROH TO . f mu ta SMSLI K2 17 S1'344SiT 211 &MI AVIA:a 246. 2 61 nEtt 64 2 6!LEE.1 .:4•S 19461. 0224SL24L2T & s94 5 AVE. Hot 1,5 &A....4 AvE9vE 1 1,99A.40,1,1 ,i•ORCA1- $^2.4 2 sTnroT 094491199.242 3,1NA 51f1S36 NW 4.2204.41. MN 5 dit 5 .21 9,51 61416E1 1.49 1 .1112,6 099 0921.1.45 5.92 ST14211: SW 7 StrIELF 155311.36E7 139 t 1°4E02 592 t 3-InCEP 04 s26:26! NI& a 7312 92 4 5194541 6114149 5111412 SE 1 31.9557 1554022431. :26/ f2 StriEL7 2.9210 stnLif IS ,3:913430 24 SS 21.4 so 01.5 449 .229 so so SO 3:- 36 91 21 2L 2L 449 NEET. S ;REST 1.31 6L45 99 1132.47 KE1 41.4 SS i F1.4CL69INC 55 22. 2 VALE": ;NS ALL.. 224'2 619666 Est 35, 455,111112.12 ; SS :h. gr";A', 563 3. HA' 5-7,1,W6 ; so &_d..s VAIL/ 1152 ro... ; so STR51.3. 2.9 2121: .242 3 12P2S1 ;1.3 t.i) ;$.$ ; 1R662 Mb 2L SS 11 5441 6226,3 5:.:•2 2 S7.4FIE7 90 SW 3162 322:66,2 24 22.1. 6.4.1 Sera STREC7 1.66 4224 Sn Se, 6 "REV 04 Ado 241 559 ttS31/VE 441 7.12 SO ger i R2,2230 11.1.1 4 ; Ot 91 11, 11 2 21 Z; 2, 92445 191 :"55 55 Its 36 33 / :2i i 1221 994111 3:66114 492 1.1.94; EPS 24,4. L- 02 96 93 55 155 51 1. 1 55 ;91 166 (3 iS) !SS 93 93 16 • 1.2.612 19 Al 0.27644fT OWN 111021611 UPS., r1 EA:Sr:KG Po 9:32641.32.9.14111,0 4.44E3 6611O46.1941. 6.1.14AC&TET A 931G Ma 5,611 boa 40141511d I...6G 4 4 155 E:54 5 1,6 2' 45 1d 7 152 r$2 LS $1 61 7.1 22 24 21-9 9.3 s 6 54 41 05 40 24 54 57 '2 1.5 11E 120 734 1.54 241 otx, Actv'rErs.:691) 3.35.14411121 PER Si1.114Z411' 'wry. 89, 41.14541.9141441 208 156 254 69 435 osof 2.46 pot ; r-24423e6rY sck: 01 166 6 6:232 55: ,4224 '54:4: 511, 2; " Y76nfa.2744 551 46, 14C,4]. 47,, 752; 741; 94; AfT, 91'4 921; 44 0. 02 085i SSA 54441.. 1.59, 1412 t 219.2 o tf6 1_9161 1..263 3 5t6; 0267 I 1.2.741 3451 J. 5,115 1 51167 674; 3,519 1,124; 0253 1. 621' 0.11.9 111 14121 $2, 1.4045 Is* gzsa 1.55 OSS3 4.6211.1421.2,-9.319.6602213.2745:362:65T911,E4312452.74111.66214 II% AVM MN MN WM MI OM OM NM MI MN MS NIIMI • T StAIET 1,SCA7NL /.4.491J/ AVEtt.E. SNA15 AVEN4....1 .I.AS N NS .7.111.1774 541)7*434,34 11.Et7 0,541.114E514S NIL. 7.14 NE .4E545 54443*4*338 ro Z :TR E :7mA MAO 5r5^.LAVSLIS.,C; 52 7 492.67762 i. . .;- SC43444, f!-i'....-er-------....----'.-9-----......------'°" ,..,....,....,;,41 L1....C. .188 L X....L.,.4: .. EC r38! AVE!!.....111. ; are ::. NE: i ..wl.lawl. .1754S AVE771..1 ; FS I;- s N., s'ef.1.1..1 SNI 2 AVE7E,,-;7: L a NW 1 NN 1"1/...4 :.11 EL • 6.50915 ; A3 CC.:86.100.3.61.4941.091 11788832 'oust...cc SILL-RS.1P ANQ S1144018 9-590 4945 26av 45.310514114r1 ; 70663. TYPC 84:511988!Wt. /1171,/7E51.6k.l.N.0 077C.L'''s.'111711 C,Ac!,,,Crn aux,2, 14 r C 266 26; AD !f ! AC 953 2 .NVE.7545 1.84 ,V9'!! SE 1 N v a 141:2 330 :43.60,97.9 Va 7 410967:2 513 SI: 1 AN NE 2 CN-,a; IX a 24.1k54r9.98,;:1;!! AvESLIL 9:9 666 30 20 EH 26 z!a 9359 25 711 21 .511 5. 35 2,. 21 47. 2E7 sTR4E1 5, ONE 5"..q: 0548 31. 59, AVENUE 6.93 !;1.6661 ..„ allC11.14s1A45 55sma.f1S.3, ..a 3 HF, 97 TS 5) 2 116 33 21 ;33 h5 • 0 7 2 7 1 .1 i 16 at 4/ a 41 S 57 1)1 1 55 5 3 55 91 93 !Si -93 139 95 ;.£5. 15 195 71 115 el IS SI Y7 • .• .• 5 9.1 95 15 .91 94 !SS Si C S 34 .; .1 73 5! 48 I+ 51 52 41 58 .5 41 ;2 12 16 .7 11 ;Et I67 21 5/. 24 7 LI / :3 32 .52 45 17 aLr a sz 36 44 : 6 I a 710 89 57 77 161 23 76 i 60 gat 1165 .ttlM 95 ; si 50 1 Aarj 0 5 50 .2A16 1 73 15 655 ! 93 52 :471 l; 34 69 i84 gig') 71;71 !!! 7815 8629 665615.5 4066 62,E6dix616 0E6 5E6561E61 77,9 5.5 % 118 44 ; 1'2 16 1 59 ta 62 lr las 76 79. 24 11 15 1 31.9 a 91 1 58 .56 11 72 48 .34 03 65 .94 69 60 53 73 76 59 52 75484 9.49 2119 9112 8114 858* *24 26 290 1129 885,4 LT% 422, 5.978 1528 5)11 AM, 2.745 9025 11184 C !4.c 0 2a.4 15 20: GA us C.2 0155 23 /0/ f.7 15) / 1./4 4283 1457 c!cr Atl 0.1$; NITPX,PILM.cIcClaCCTSNAMIcICPIIrer,..ELCA,t rw.r.c!x.,,ccA. 1111111111 Nall WIN Mil MINI Mill MN ims, MIN MIN 11, ip NW; !al 21A6 8OWNTOMN 1.7AM1 ORt UPDATE STING Am AND PM METROR.A.,..... AN1 .meTleamOvee R.178ERSI+P AND PE RS0;4411118 cApAcrry A SSJCNio.tur - • • • '' ''' ''''''" PEAX '.. ROAnyay ! ; MSTIRC ! METRO,. ; Ili ! CAPACITY -7.,,,,,,;...........-YR,.,........„,.....„.;!?2!;,..EL,.....;P;;7...,:,.......h ..7,;....9.!).! NS :1 S Y REF! NE 14 Si'PE E'r A8 .; 2,..L1 • •!. NE :4 si:ss Er :.ns 1 se ! i ra sL .. i :-.V75 7:8 i STn.SE7 j :•.; 8 : 'IL •J ; • NE. 6 STREET PIAGLER $TRStr Pt.49,LSF: SIRES': SS I SteES9 :7.19 .: sc. : STREFY 26,2 Sifter H mil. AVENLAIS. AIMM1 AVENUE NE 28 57REE N.E 17 STREET 22 7.5TREET NE 44 SIRES'S NE 14 SPREE': NE. 6 STRSEI f3 SMUT NE STREET NE 4 STREET ElAGLSA &MEV:" SE 6 STREET Se, e STREE-1 ss SirceST SE 8 VREET SW1.1 ST REST 5.•,:v :2 SMES' SW 13 STASS2 SW I .37RSEI SE 15 SOAD AYENUE 't 5.1*Ree9 NE : sleSET STES1' sw AYE.NVE 71, AAA!' Ave,..,US Sw S78E5-7 S'N ST e:•:ET SCHPAAS, 71. NP. 7 STREET !92717157 RZET SE 2 STReer Sy/ 7 2771522 5,2.; 8 STPECT S7151 13 STAEET SS se 7171 56 Se 25 718 t•::3 58 NS se 77 27 27. 27. 72. 72. 2L 2LU Nei 7772 Se pia ..' 7171 Ne 77. 55 3.. 59 58 SS SS 27. Aht PEAK .......................... -F07AL-7-; etE38I92179 1 Pm 12.1DERSHIP i Am . • . , . , . . MRI 25% ‘. 4 63 672 0.1.71 2.59 9.175 ...Al,* 257. .,..63 [Si C.,: 72 248i 0.764 1.82 252. 1.463 eS 1 S 477 140 O. 8••5 :MRS1 71717 5845 7.825 881 8.1.92 7.5.1.1 8.531 St % 2.825 555 0.:2.8 1,825i 0.582 50% 2,725 72723 2.7779 I .826 0,558 1.,4717 802. 2.725 584 4 734 1,286 4.481 77. 2,925 1.1.8s *An sls 0.1rs mu str, ! 2.225 57271 2.2.1.5 1,25e 5.t24 6.377; 2.825 1.8.8.4 2.03 ..,..11 0.775 PR2 50%. E 2.875 7177 0.275 5872 ; 2.e25 7.3712 6.473 1.288 4 410 575 8.0'5 • 583; 0 Is: M ..,..R.s 58 !., .7... ! 7.655 5.846 R!!1 % 25 ; 2 5 1..71773 3.628 9431 CASS 121 AM PE;AX .; Pm PE!,,,y( PEAK --PdfiC ' •------- -•••••*-,6-0d,...---,,-------- s+- Ergo- 13j , CAPriCITY R1OEP.SWP ! elrf RS3ERS141P 1 A,1.4 ; ,-,”9.%•,..--!6,.,1e,T....s,R.7.1.1.,T,9,4„..5_1,4,.....y!9,,1., M.1...,2 S!14%. 45.0 0 0 !) NO 22! 0.946 2 26; 6,1 2.5i ai 871 57.6:2 /535 -I 5 W.K12 WY. $63 :711 :.C.1;489 8 t ; i . 4.4711 5071 1.4.0 7.IE 6.041 SA ARM4 Cl.V. 41,44e.I M! 2.7227 *..' PAM I 5:37.. 1,140 106! 5.524 12.7 719.1 Ser', ,.:44 1 $.1 $.371 Altel 50% 222 IPA 11.757 1581 51742 592. 588 1671 0.01 1.83 L11.2 , 5871. i 984 85 8.4.68 V ! 9072 .1 964 Pt 4.01 93 8.088;; 0.5522 4.889i 0.72077. a osP 223? 22 ssi; 0,1651 0,969; ;;. ••c• 14.17.P.A.NPLAP,A9ACCTSVIVtlIES795-i7Ael,ESAI IMA?KtiX 7,214 7AP,1,.4 140YnOCANIN nitAkl r.,jp0ATE F...X3STING AM ANC) M1.iETRORA/k.AWDAgE71101.1CNEst R1g:3E314RP Atil:g REASON-1RIP CAPACtYY ,,I -ANT • • .• • .t• as-t• FAC4,!TY TYPE• 9Tr t°4.1$43./481 scr4zR SHiP RC/AV/AY t1E-'1 sTA "rtr-- " eiEcArNE St,V0 NE, 2 AVEN,JE I, N5 2 AVENT,,T, N, •VoIsid4 AVENUE x. AVE,NuE NW 3 AVENUE STREET F iSSCAYS,c. &NO ?Jr 2 AVENu5 Avezu NE NE rAL Noo AVEg.o.44 NW 2 AVENUE S'n 1 AV:NuF, NW 2 AV,j,i SE 1 V61E57 ISCAYINEI Z.„VO S: 1 MgCNLJE SY.: 1 AVOI.JE SW S."2 STREEVSli5.11S•1 b:SCAYNE eLVO. dE 1 AvErnoi- • SE •ra S VUS, I AYNE S'e SrkZE7 ...1PCXELL AVENL•Lq. AVENUE Ki;rri A.440 SCN.N.«.dgS, fixr5T/NQ 7,14."rR(). g 1.1 CAPACITY E21 P14 P-E.A5S ! MAX Yeffi:i. ME-,11N)-• 1 cAPAerry RIDERt5,41p I PM 140,01A % .tPERSC)ij [PER.,94N.S1 I 1/..C, E5 2L0 AS ' EEi 2l.0 , . 5B 7.1.3 I . WS E:scAyme Eiyo s,:E 2 AVENUE W.:. AvENUE NW 2 Avf..M.IE A,43 21, .nrw 2 AVA)U j.$WSI• zt. I,111 V41 E3 2r, 41, S5 AVENI4E S. SW I AVENUE SW 2 AW...NUF. 3« JOE ,AVENL'E 2ANL2 S5 2 AvEw....'z AVENUE ES 4. Vd9 5L dL MMI NAP. N4'.11 1.1Pdt c4% 1M% 1001: MMI 50% • 2c4-, c Wm; 106 0.04d 325 e. 148 0.E1Sf 1,C 105 D...7d PEX1C -1t-ITAL - AM A 21-gt 151 151 ¶CQ N.1TRANPLANIPROAVI'51.%0 tt I 6.7 1617A,91,£51/1worAPOW.1 111111110 1111111 Sill INN MN MIN 11111 MI MO MIN OM Ma NM IMO APAGNYs.,.. at..e.A 5521 .1.VEkft- 7.7 VSEA OlkEEt 10 47547 5557 5777 NE A SMS,C.1 07405tE01 S7 ilEE7 5857451471 5.1.4E07 52477.5510051 Kum, Nvt 0,6 N751470747475574. 17 11rgEE7 :Lit iiPEEt NE ...1S1.11k.1:7 1457407047 ksrsukt 52 iratEl n:0 1444757555 74.k.477411 S111E0 t ie. 4 534KF,T 5.:4 :,oFo.o SE 9 S1A.E£:k 107745,7 iNs' J2 ii.A6Er 7755724757 57,151(15ST 452474757 s 1 S IkkOst N5457574747 144751 O AVLIea 0,4744740-5 4772570) ^ 3. AS.V.'.:6. ms• ST0Et P.31 AY. / 5 INAS! 5-1 NE 010.:.451 !7)44 ; fidoiLE-11 3711S.E`1 : 10.5 0,1 6E2 SIafAr ma if I 77re 74-7 s Afii7 x77352.r05C; N.A. soak:: f ! 2 S'.•rttstl 2,5-57.4471 ▪ 7764857 51477155477 S W %I STPCA SW 1 AC5.0 45 52 NS SS SO 53 sa N{!. 5,4 e ; 7,52 !.59° !AO' 41.70.911.7 41177 57.150:71.A7 1.04.141 OR, ..11:A.1.1"11. 75lt7 074.7/7:P 701.14110^AO caPatly CO08n1*4.1 StAIRIX 'Ow '407 440'. '40841 qlg -4.444. 4534r 444`' 091.7.2..V 4.,.t.,,........,..,....,•,.....• •,,,r,....!.,...-.....!..,......,.,,,...,..,,,k-d.i.:6",uc.,k-,,....... ................,,,,...,,,,,...„.•.,,,..........,,,,,,,,,...3!!"..,,,,,•.64,Fiaptii47t-,:f.............--...-.....,•,...-,..,..,..,,,,,,,,,......,,,,k-a.4.6..,„..6..eir...........--,..,2....1 ,,,..:1..,a.....,...1'"1:. .,.r,,tE..et.W..•.*•1.,•.o„.tnt. .u. YL.,i. ,7icc..s.o,k: to ..,. 5 oi,re:r. g Ii: CiAPiiAii.r., 7,,:,!. '..". ' '] 1'....10461.1 - ...-i4 -e41.12 410..e.u..%r/i..t52 v11.W-7 c6I.,:N-'-toCk•wi.4 c-o--,tner.,.er'1f.r'V.EkCil'k.Il ..;P4.45.i47171 01510i 105S3 4322047 *Ai fLVEA UltTOTA"""10TAL ..45r itt rrAcAT 180 •0lr5r 7.5194E ntux atax PTpm !.l-raiPa1RP TP101 15R0?YtitAVT1544171iP470541 7447414 Pikl-rkPPfl" kap i40t00541.AWM..1tv_S70707geP 10 4i.41rdCAC074 106:11EAigalVEiltZP PIA: itCE3TAW 'MS eC41 13P :?:l,z-tr.,tt.7tvz2;;5.vc)7163l5.0000. 7.3450.CisCM opt SortIt vo.kfucrasIry etatry c45112647 aZ1Ott A 48CO Eai0 „1100 12620= A 5 sec5200 C 3;s.73!000 . 44i4, ,A0:'9t61460a :v , s5 Et SC,S S11 OA] 5C4 7.112e3n zC958PASS eaiat S51 104 7474152 2102 ,6066 0 1,1 w Hs ,74 7 O 0747 1.47* e 11" rSO 2kOE 41CAT 9: 705 7,00 1.37C1.774i1' ' 0.1 it C. i tit E.1,1 i ,ei 1 073 s.112 til $34 4.03 0 .:1' -',-; 1.113 ..,64Q 1 ir 754 , !7a. 81 ; 6.69. 2086 1,4.64 ‘.f...SS S.iiii 611a C :1•. '.5 52.1Y..1 5.1 3.0;0 4912 kin 959! 4,011. a o 7 5' 7 1 4,:: 1, .. „...,= : O I !N, .1711; 74 47,5 ,075 i..444 k.,11.11 7,:.ks e!.o5.1 C i Ng A..!, o1 5.0kt +.312 oqo SY; 4,C,,i C.A.? C . : sy,..tsi so 1 0:5 175 1.6.3 SALit. 1,0 ti. 7,0"t3 3.551 C 1 S;1 52 114 LS .t/C .,1t2.'92 1'.0 k,5551 a .c ss _1S5 1i1 .152 3..48 5531.i ...5,5 .A01 Si L5 LON 93SS31i V, 4il1049 iI 0I7* OA 5N00 *742 .,X1 1 it ii Isi ?a556 MA!! 7i7:01: C ,t, 4,i ki 912 ii $tir 9 I c 931 %497 atei 32,.471 &VI:7. 01.1 : 13 SS Ewk sS 2010 32434 AOCi477 2.794 o r? c SI, 1,461. s.7914473 2+0'121 1,67k S2r1 4121 A.190okg SS E-, WI+.912 5..07 1.45010 0 51913. 257) 051 791 5.2 de 1./9T 05141 ife0 ! ! ! ! sos 2...11 .44 orkokto 124. !.251 .,455- 1.60 3 43 C S.1.-0sae 47S23i 4.4,9 ,,,. ,f, 5431 ,56 ,..,, . m( 0; 2,252 4.74,1 4079 ii I NO 7..7'5"5.3 ii} h0,-, 5.165 7.10,1'4 2.43A L',...01' 3-112i 4 '4. 7,7247'i.k.6. 1,?!...1 1.47ii ,...734 t. ,i 0 180 iii- 2.925MSS 50' IL, s1..l.1 CW 5 2.5047 oti1 1.5210 7..k17 0 1 0 tc i 2,9ASA 101 li4 iSii 904 S7a1 7Ssi. 2.o54 .5-'. 19111 . 3 SW 1,61 al al1 61S 31; 0 ii 36 TSt er27;01 Al 7132 59 E OLS 5.2647 09' 44 1.171 eV ! C. OiS 90 s AV 2.7t01 7) 177 .0:043i a.01.1 C i ! A ..5. 1 2,710 lts 246 2,04 0.0 ; :2.935 7.7517 ..256 5,974 eii 14,4164r50 4.5311 02se! C =I. S. 1 ,107: 2.736 srti 625 0-51t. : 7111 t'. 2.5977 043 5:3 2.47 0i6i ..E.. 1,112 ::r197 E i:S ,1.01 7111 in ?..4 1,02.5.05 I C. 2.955 1.421. 1,5110 1.5514 1E4. 5.5407 1,50.4 A 51 .74701,,/It Vi GOO 2,:J1 i 21. 42.921 2..921 13 913 2..7' .&S....6; l:aAiat 0 ?Ili f A s 827 4.1” :i vs 0.17 C 7.itS2.jA2S4 ',tit 7,64 4:21i1tStA7./01 0C 1708 2./73 4i 413 201:211 C 2525 47317,ilD tll 2.41 0V; 1.10 4,921 02472 : 1 E akk 566,, 2k52118 0.0 - ,: i . 7,5441 Zda 2.119 0095 C ; !.lo1,118 I17.1- e .::, ...,,, 1.0,5 o .5 os : C 5,59411 ar). 1.4,.$ t.OSA. 513 1_070 AS12 1 t.r..‘ :A.Z.'s 1 Sie 0 25 C ilk 13,.. 7.4-3 ZAS ita S.Aas et ..!..k, n.3., : ..olo ..oio! I.111-1 S.-ko C o5.‘ 2,21 1,,Ii2 1,i %Sib 5.727 .t..0.-3i 3,..1`1A, 0.49:!.,! 0 ,...,,, ,,,..), ,,,,,,. !...6os %St! ' ..1-',1gi , "7'7 : (7 E.ow i ...0 ,0,i 2,2134 1.A.S1 t.tr) i9-1. 5 2.474 2_9751 1611 0 t.Aii 41.i07 2.,-tli . , . . . . . . , .. 11C,E ' ' S 5a.N..A ........271: 42 .4:.'. I'l. ''' . 2 ':. - :!;',.'1'' 1)4 tit , ili t,Xi)... 3.1:. 'a.:Z ..,1370 217 1-51sio; 551'1:.rt” kko/00 -01A IA,!IA5. 7:1 e...7r1,i. : ; ikit :40 .1EE ?c 9s11 acS] 077 n ::72i4,601784 64 MAE 3.252 SAW ISko 1s., ..',; 0 5170 OM2!S 241] 1/5 ; C CC! ,.01 li Si 635SOU 32it 1.11ii 0015 0140 47 i - "S 647 33A4703 5553316.01ac ,329 4I97 le: iLi tAsi9.1521 5549; 2,52k9 7.198 32; 0.; 51 ,, ,!.„ ?Si ata;U 5.et9 62 01 2.4! 1645 7't: ▪ oi i. NA isc1 1,5 Lt,G14 .4,309 72. b775 144ktr?SAY7445 3 E 513":74 15' ;:.117 51 024 1.405 2013 Si 052 77 1,5?) 7.577I 1,isa 2.255 215si D 4 LS 1 1564nt55 t: 1.A33! c,1614 ,it 49 4147 ,215 4.T10. 1,23 2,5171 eN1 0 I i *017s0 794 33 ..44 i” 0 A., O. st 05,Ait.,SS ,.i.-,i ,1154700 ISO :.e047,21 0 :,, , .5 Sii 2%sk.02c ,.vru,, 7M 2473 311 1170250 EO52, 7151 93 311 ,;,,i ASS 1J4595214107 , 53 : 7SV7, .,...6 4: ?.,.,...,s. : st • tcr :.t.r tf.tr .,s A ,7,964L.94) i f40,7 0 0i U114S;i; .°) E 7.1 25ik' CS 1,5 Arat 4530.! 0 , 25101 Ii ,s7.iiii} a i63 7.72 Ili 0.160 4453 IASI 701 117 1.stA 2•4.2.1 1.450! S cso,6 MS 1269! SS ili 370n•0 1,465 1.43 692 ES2n, 2.7.3.001 47 . I.15 1140'51 il.til 1e47 07 , 0 " '701 €,,, 404/1 1211 Z411 71440 71 •5Esi.ci^ 0., 1.41a>1 ! .0 1:4i1ssi ,.4.44! 4:921 1„k63J ),GIr, ,..,, FS 4511: 12to 69' 957 111 076 D .a,03.51 !t Vs, 'ow 2.7:21 $.2071:6C::.5:01 tVi! E5 5111 iir i?, ; 0 :3 15541 I,Sli ASc6I3 t:i 0.994,6,1i;.i1') 141 803! ,tiO, fn. 47 313 510 0 1.:4''1: 311 in 51d, t,,,t T.t11,..1 i, 7, 240!! SS 10' !. ,;) 1.4O. vk ti2,q LAM; .0S] 0551 47 : '65; 11.5A! 215 VI: 2..tili 0.tt. 47 62 M 2,22? 0,2 c. . -. . 22:ST.,i S9S t.t9.i 3,1 ! l'. ilil "10-1 0 ,,it e - 1,..11., t L.,: 2 I µ koa.skyka,ss5P-a&IS.CoVM!....:t r!mtkakasol P../.1 a!1o,w! amio me an NM NM RIM NMI WIN 11 NMI MN MINI MINI - 11111 0.155.45.Tentm 0.11.0.n PLAtA54,4:41P ..,,e)GaPACAY EX734.548 N574.02, *247581 '.t..F.F.R5-TAIP,5XCE51 . t AC,C1P. i IROACt,VA.t?!C*PACtr.Y!AC....00,AY: 9955.2413 ,. IF.itte)% . . ROA.,.. t 140 :.ESEENEEN2Eieee,cLELELEE. €$.95,, VE)0CUS...0i telAV. i 1 ruPt g g':, 4 ..„, ... ..,.,':9...„_......_.., ..,„..........i...!,;ALITr ,,.V...........,c1,1r., , 1.!, .... '''4.C.. „ i. , . !,;%.,., .:. -7: .5.:SCAtPtlf !TM; M.: 2 At ,-...; .21 E "4.vir 1, 5.1151 6.457 , 15.1 `,11! 4,64.1. 1,an95.; s,315 J.1U, en .,,S.. 2 .,,,,E,,,,c .,..: 1 Kv6:,; i Es .S. pi) MS i e.9:2 '.: 51 !P??5,,,4 I; OW, ANE /...,,,:f, : Ea ! E•EvEE 1-E12 1.13.70t .,91.1, 15•Lt .ti 9. ...At?..7..tE5.1..17: NW It.,4`,..d 7: Ee 5:: t'i? 5.-1170. 112127 1.5,: 1,15 ),I.3H 0 ZS t..,.,/ 2 31/E.5..:1. .55 .0 1 2.1'.".. LS Ica...)! ,,.5., 2'1 -1,t,16 .411? . . , . t . ,..S OAS ,,I,... 513, 1:4 68' It/ ,5.Z.ne.,, 1,:14.4 1 90 ,te, [...kg 734. 444 527 1214 ..).k. 55 ,38 ..,,,h 1144 01; 9? 2 ,. ta ) ,F.,..,..4. n NE 2 A.,f.t....,,E t..1 ,..•A.m.tAt?,,,,,£. : ,, 74,3131 ..,...4.,4 r,,,•: I 2. i...I.,.:,,,,,E Es ' t,...x, 31.,,5 7 1.3R547 ; at5X,A.,,,le itt.-e5 .t...f e.,,,...,....E. ,...1:. ?, xi B s5lit: s, .1 At4.,:ig- ~~~~~~ E.E.Es E EEE,E•E Ls • =tea SEE E2E LS • '743 EE274 : Ls L i•EJ,a; Es state! , '‘, I:., A, Si ...,,-D ,..E. 2. nu.r.S.,,..1',7272 5.125 '.. ,t‘t,, 2 AN f.-Nt.: F.. ....??, 1 At.S??,:f, 1.....a F.s1, .::: ,..,,4 . AE.E.ErEELE. NEN t ELEEN,EE i ',,,,.) 5.14.1 ,....• : .4'14...Z I,•,y ,.?. A v E e..P.,..F. Wt.. ..,,,57?.94 :-42 ; PF E 72P? e! .4.,5.:?..74,71 tr,.‘,.) ZE t. At:El...Lt.:A :. Et, 1728 .. ES OW 5, 1 Avg:K..1. E `,. 6.?...?845.74A .55 ' 't, ES E 4. EEE. E. E ! ! :a[ 2 1!AEE-782,5.71-V, -..>, GAY NI: i.t..,:g f,c 5 a.-E,...1 i "41. :, E•Ikv SF, 5 1.4.,!.t...:E. -N-E / A,..c.P.:,:t AC srEitETESIEELVS4 ':.64...trAlt. ELEA,. SE 2 A./EN...ES Efs ,..',...Y :. str snIxtT 5.5.44,7513757475. 27574135 72arEEEES •,•}ZE.I.EELLALEE2,LEE -ES ssE.E.s.E.E.EAsE2E sELEE AvENLES. 9.7 2712 9.13 Ls • Its EES E.Es ste, s re0. : 75 ‘•15 813EEra • LS 13441.2,21322915 sa E-EEEEE 'E LS , ! E.Ss ES EEEW ILE as.,LE 2.441 S.e2o 3.2C. 5,26. 7281 2,0.9 3,3152 2.264 ?..SES 3,375. 1..;•75 1.0,3:5714- 7.115; 5.7'70 1.5 Ea 1 SEC, 5,05 7125 21751 4113 376 114 EA 424 1,2s4 .2 56 4.713 :55 t el -5? 17 C.1`:2 5.21343 611321. 41.4; g,0,2 9,421 6.022 Ss, 4.241 625 .5271 ,.47131 1.01 2 ns 002048481 PERI di 2702 Vie 055 0.71 C 1,211EE4134 3171 277 21e.E aSS 2272022 1,2',1 2713; 5.17 2 Elsa EE•E 414 / cm: 271130 54 2472i 0 15 5. SSE, 2,7213 S Ea 1.256! 1,SsErE...aSE E5. 3-5.5 • . 02: 5.46.5 a 35 , It, °". 74.3109.127 CPIXA1A-Tentn'F rC.LAAP304.."r'rlire-1E0."1..'.e"frU?' ,' 123 LESEES ?ML 784.27. 10!A. TRANwl 5CMF7 a0E075EZsiV,rr 4.,.4,Ehl1 ;"::"11' j':1v1E.i---.:ti%'-7--::7.-''r°' :,,,„4 -,1.,7,t .7,E,;71..73::,;i ,,, E.6.41 7550 tsE E. ISJ 2.2E56 SL„s 47.::: IEE:527ES ::::: ::::: : 2.8st! 1.VA s',.1 1St 7.2771, SE,SEEES ISIE LSE 2,22E5 rya? 2.124 5,701 .1 55E i C , 1 41322 1.174 1,1241 7.2.221 a E,.. . . L SOIE ssEE ss 77I.7:2i 9..6,5 2.4E11 SaS, a E" +AL:, SASS] 5133:5. E.,:sssE 2; S C 1,25.:: .157; 0 51 1.541', 71132.1324 3,74 : D S.St E 726£ SI ,12 E -ESS, .3.07 3242.5423 C 2054 3167 L5. 213353 '1.9?1 3.510. 1.541 541 5 3,125‘ es2 50'E E .13 71244 S.S.TEE 2.005 EtEssE • 1227:: -2.E; 7.4543 SOS (1343 27e12132 410 51E! 1 91.4 Lin 1721 2,325 1.78 6.1.0 as; EEO 672 150 3.271 ‘21. TaEs 2.75.03 422 4383 2.22)1 3,245 Lass ;IL 174 7114 61 2171 12.2 550 252 1132 3:5 11323 51 `,3•1 4,50 524 505 211 210 ESC 387 SOS .2.9t 1,178 S4S I At., :Se :,,,12.5 I.,....c 911 372 1,2.+1 174 Es, 7,1.4.72 VI 372 t.S.,..; In 1224 5,14.13 97-2 2.22 .!.tkr; 7213 7,34 .E.E2E2 2,440 4.772 71342 2.1:041. 47414 SAM a55 0.2145 2,1321 4383 2.°E-02 71334 312 .1,?45 5.,{4 'LEOS 2112 970 5117 102 %The 1:1 0S6 5.7247 G <5424.3427 1 gni 6,018 214 1..87 5,4197 2,101 3,874 3E. 3,1'2 A. SZE,: 1.7E5 3.0%2 SAV 5,2013 .7,061 1.07 2,452 37273 2,7)2 45133, 0.5627 1.0747,EE82, 0.021 E.,E 1, t C n a i E• C 97 t`tgt.''t SE:222.2.4-sE,ssspaa.&CISZEO-122E21EVEEE.s.,SIELIEWEE,•$2EM'EEE's, MIN 1111/10 MIN MINI INN NMI NMI MIN MN lit 1111111 IIIII MI NM NW 911111 V 'sr r ••31 49," 20.Na....2111 . • • ' ,141)),01.1.1AY ti) .!.11E 1 A:11.11.1E tt244 701446? NE 14 STREET NE 702144i 1315 1.3133 NE, s /RE el 246 6 STREET rk.Aci. S711EET Na. FLAC....EliVREET SE 1339467 243 SE sTAr41 SE t sel AYENuas. *tz.014.t AYENut N.E. StRECT . Ng 1) STRE0? SB NE 17 S?ftEET 11 NE 1. STMEET 6 S7AE6I' NC 6 STRUT 38 st S 7 REC.": NE. STA.EET Se NE 4 EIREET FLAGLER 5-MEET SE PLACLER S70497 Si 1 ST PEET Sa SE S STREET 6418962 6 ST0C ET , S1112 sT REV 7 Sw 13 SYslEC lAVOlui. NE 8 STREE7 440777392 ntE 9291.7 Ft.ASt.ERSYREET svy 4181408 44. )41M11 AVENFA S01/ .11 STREET Sw 8 STREET 43 URC„, 2451224ANC SCPINA(2.. Se; 12 STREET 748 Svo 15 STREET 185 SE 15 RC31.0 • 48 58 fRiCY NS t STSCC 7 LAGLEP STRECT SE 2 STREET ). STREET S'l STREET 11 STREET N5 59 2411 07 448 07 tve 08 2;6 sa 98 .1,1110.11 AeOP. TEO 00.1 LOS NE ;a F. N0 C-70 447 E•20 8.20 C.70. E, E•20 E E. 28 E•70 E 20 E..2t 6.24 E•271 E-21) C, 4424 8.25 E.20 fACtLiTy:: YYPC 1.ANES Pis N/A 7.9 23. 3. 30 34. 31. 0. 34. 51. 7.„ 23. 20 0.12 6'74 0.94 844) F71 0f.70 i PM i 0510001 04'2931 A he (14)2!4111 8.24 0.24) 114,1 FM 4424 A1.1 .54/2•310t 6,7675701 CA22-7:0 0025,01 64123401 12437901 13.1121101 04.17031 43.0 484127431 41.0 11. 0. 4t..1 31. 2L 0. •Att 6.18 PM 4424 0.44 .2 .atT ':air '4F 0, "cao. ,ao, AP tV AV 'ar TASLE 21.016 00w).17/3.tm04 2444444081580407 TEAR 2W% PERSON 170.011 CONerlieuS 712 CY1STING PERSON COkINT DRIp DATE 80(4,1144 Pi/A 14/A WA 04/25101 2.19.2 0.5.91101 3,339 as24)3.01 1,5124 4.249 11115 553 2.01 305 052 e..13 1.20,s 2252 2.434 2.14 511 117 1.241 %la? 0-112001 1.634 1. t..2 0,2510 4,442 44123101 246 8,20 0.025243: 1.520 64415+0+ 2.305 04127004 2,711 YR 7009 YR 2024 Fuli.IPLE 951 06TOTAL PERSON 81413 PER50/0 12024141. t axe TRtP. PV2.7024 TRip TTre 7974.50.+4 eA0Aerry2 1134. 4730.0.1S cCv. TRIP TOTAL 1 NIA 4444 2.212 1.383 .1,070 1,061 579 578 11.47 024 772 75.8 874 1527 07.5 415 1,006 t 151 332 4,, 925 A21 1.780 2.159 2 54S 2,5-17 517 las .584 1,196 1.575 i,196 1,575 258 056 1;726 3.4E2 2.913 450 440 3443 25.5 256 134 CO 66 70 +32 )9 19 94 142 104 1714 955 772 4.760 1i 0.434 758 1..7413 ! 6:01 3.7366 8.8.41 3..L51 2.440 411.01 2,504 00144 10,265 1 2,115 3.665 ; .267 2.747 7,336 ; 0.222 840 013 1.1.79 1.337 1,146 2:01 7,808 2,604 2,864 751 312 1,6* 1.282 1,643 1,?93 E.5.4 1.318 3.52 1474 4,892 3,e4.9 3.218 5.344 3,044 6.007 6875 5,211 0748 7453 9.581 9,181 2,240 2140 71.,177.0 71. ta2 0 181 0.194 0757 2,499 0367 0 310 0.3519 5338 9.242 5,6..5 0.112 5,645 0 7.27 5.645 1 0.2.5t 6.6.45 0730 4,205 I 0.331 5.643 0.233 2.5$4 0,136 2,564 5.310 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 42 42 12 12 12 12 12 c 0 12 12 12 12 12 5,418 0.349 0 8.993 3.544 0 71.+99 1 5.526 i0 937. 24142 ;el YR 2,50.3 FUTURE 721 PRO.t. AS 'i 1193.9 t: 1.14C4t TOTAL i 86811 i 70Y.A4„. A % Of 1 TRIPS 2 PRO.% 95R9018 ; TRW t 799R0,4 tkix 224E.397907..1 9;EPS.054 79144 iCA2AC1TY 1, TRIP 554.11C E. 1 11-17+N 0'4'1; TRIP VOLUME' t! TOTAL :r: 177t ; 1.0S y95,:i1.4,918934 342 1 050 10.037 0 6.e.27. YES 126 t0.1 88.2 't 2,750 .`. 8.490 I) 3.9114. YE l'.. 247 3,331 s, 6.34 g ; 0.4er a 1 5.01, ND 420 2.090 'i 8,1444 1 0.4111 4) 357 i /3'0% y E s ! 2,841 3,649 , 03.23 0 3.82% NO 225 2.$40 . 3.649 i 0.2443 D 2.56% 2:10 ' 275 2.537 I 7.110 3,3+0 0 3. 8M 1,191 [. it 1 i * I 168 1.115 i 5.044 10.221 C 333% No 4 1 1 ...1 157 4,020 3 4..04.4 i 0.213 C C. $ rn NC) 1 109 1,370 o. 14.307 lrtt 22.444, NO 2+5 1,522 't 6.875 ii 0221 C 3.134. 7+0 .,;. 24.4 1.512 i 5.7.37 0.345 0 4.761. NO 7... 5.4 555 2,900.154 0 10.30% •-t .3 t '16 YES 3+3 3.173 : 7,E43 0.412 0 4.51% NO At 3, €71S 5.291 0.139 0 2.355. 1.70 41', 6 143 2.462 1 4.151 3.316 0 1. 74% 240 1 92 352 6.3156 124.4244 0:0 s' .,. f..S. 376 1 /...;44°11 0.1.69 C ma% 140 1 • 21 1,872 0645 0.217 0 1 305% 1 740 ;1 52 1.114 1 3.6,4 3 6.238 e , 6.92•6+ 740 45 4.890 I 7.323 3,645 5.211 D i 11.213%. NO :.. 75 5.6.1 1 C 1.33% .20 35 y.6.54 :1 4,263 1 0C'',42012a ; 0.8351. MO R Sa 1,372 ', 5.6.8 i 0.245 c 1 1.03% NO .. 38 .190 1 2.5,54 10.151 C I +.478. NO t..: 8.4 592 ' 2,884 i 0.2.35 a 1 2.4415. NO f ; f 145 2,335 1 .456 +:70 5,41-6 171376 D 2.6 175 3.312 j 6,653 i 0,070 0 2.63% ND s, 't E .1543,472 8.10 're 381 311 ,K f t ) t _....„. -j... N.1710A7...00,3001,00.,CC70.,2-00strot7181,rA0t.8.8110mVitat.v..00., - 1111111114m, MI Mil MIN IIIIIII IIIIIII INN - -111 All NIX NMI PIM Mil• 11/ 254 77.94.9 00 I 1.49,4191 •' ,2 • 4434444• I; ROA6WAY F ; TED :L.. FAOht TO 5:00A5N4 SLVO Ne 2 AvEryo5,. Eil 1 6 E wE a„. ; fi. NI 4.4,47.41AVEN5IE NE 2 ...I.,t4d44 E. 4. 7,C.,,k7h: AVENUE NW 3 AVV941.F. ET?, t E Yee. • E tiL I 'MEET efscArKE; Step 4)2' A50 Nw .44£1,42E FLAGLER 571087 zAVENuE ...a.V114r.Th I'M 7 ,Y,AN 5.: I 57714.57 5I$CAyNE 00..50 aVi:P4uE SV 1 AVS.5,,.,IE Sw AvENIJS 355 €429 2AVENUF NW 2 AVE-51i.g. Yr5 E.4 20 !..gS WE. E. • •3r0 VA) 42-a >45 2 .455•ENA...0 RE 1 AvENUE iW E.,20 14991 14V8.-44M 499 E -24 NW 2 AVENUE 515E.,20 !-45 561 E sF. AvENu E 89 AV9441le kD. SW 2AVENUE ES 9.44 SE 2 MEE Tt'SRS/L/9.9 stSt..ATNE •SE 3 7745UE SE 49/E141.4 NE 259/EMU8 SF; 4 SIRE EffS 414.75-1 SE 2 A4E61,55 1591STREET SAJCAEtt. Av5,NUE Sw 1 AvF.N1,JS sw 1 AvSNLIE 7-95 .47MS: 41.7737'rt ANO 301A14ARS, 1111. 545 998 E9 3.75 E •20 E-7-3 E• 20 E420 E*26 • ACkirr, rypc 5aoarm13.:.4.544 009947 LANES W• DATE 11L0 ; 0025-01 7.13 21.0 31. 21- 34 23 21. 71. 25. 9.. -It E. 24 5. ,70 WS S • 20 31. 31. P9 61/25/0 4 C,4125t1 2, .5 /0 0034547055441.04k9410147 1.7R6441-4 YEAR 2409 PERSON NIP SON011.1121.4S rti E.YJSnErs MR SON TRIP YOLUVE 1714 277 :7fi 5-45:4 12-8 012 AJp.a4/2901 516 ; 704 04,76•0! 1,7E8 05,-6 9.3.541 05.-994-55.1 1.6.14 P1.41.13•91S751.3 2,111 r-9.4 0s/Gr2/0 9 Ise Aki 0 5/1 5.9g AN. .34 RNI Psi 01.4 P9.4 09ierri 04.144:43 C8725.5.42 41.842470 0991,29,74 0179E44 4411 7441 YR 2429 31813 81.1.51.991. TRIP YOLOWE • .. • • 584 1.313 S1,7 1,051 132 1.451 540 ra? 1.118 9.004. 2,449 575 7.377 2,045 2..4547 1.64 2,387 2.377 1,104 4.642 3.5;0 2714 3.641 2.6E0 2,7927 1 YR 24209 FU TIME C61 131 Tat'AL 1 PER-S4144 eXC 4.49.9.44.49. L45.03 1.141 P ,44E5S4,44 ?TEO kRSON CAPACITY MP ON. IRS TOTAL 'TC; 808 157 52 57 92 89 132 :24 4 2 192 17 345 245 951 118 253 1,190 994 %ISO 22, s,144, 578 //5 1,9.2 5.4772 1.E24 4,4.111 2.E.02 1,392 1,344 1.74.4 i.,14441 1,3.44 3,344 4,1934 4,64}3 .11.2 (7.457, 9,65s 4).-44.$ 4,104 531 3.2914 4Z5 2,520 734 2411I 1E1 2,474 145 1,707 245 141 7457 1 4,55 1.456 1.,545 403 2.2441 [ 2.171 4071 3.994 4.451 33.1 1.5419 2,974 I 9,552 11.951 1,33.2 5.740 4.9391 10,424 7,344 5.960 4.2e44 1971. 0,819 0 0 444 C (501. .5 0.164. C 0 8-441 rlsoi C C 0.104 , • 0 434 0 07011 C, 0.1E8 C 0,537 1 C 0.12! 3.105 0,716 b;tD5 0.219 24.5 0.01 0.4.27 0,4.49 3 378 1543 9 13 01 13 13 13 72 0 71.1 13 to 1 2001 1fUTLIRE [1.) 1 Enos. kst4140.11 , MrAi P8R5014 1.37AL 1 99411-g TruPE ps404. 4. CP t*,0041 MIS, 1.099•044 j sws:4:11,4LA144, P7.5-500 ; 'TRIP ICA0-AC0T(7 TRIP SEJNICE 39144t TRIP VOLtita TOrk. vt -US VOLLNE ; ‘cSiAig). 112 39 3.0 111 127 1 5 1011 17 133 97 112 52 56 24-4 133 I !O 1414 725 301 1 492 1,179 1,144 2111 7,177 1,341 332 1,144 06, 7,1914 3,571 3,103 g 404 0.247 0.443 213 3-101 10.174 597 4.693 2,004 2.192 1,721 5.401 7,617 434 2,834 3.094 7.589 1,044 4.164 247 4.508 7.8011 9,65,5 8,100 3.26,7 9.035 10.634 255 1,570 17,554 3,3 2,24S 3. ry 1,160 5.24.4 0.199 0:441 4'4 G. lie 514 Ida 0.332 01.193 C 11.27% 0 0 i; E 1 9.4511. 01 01 13 0.115% 2.X17. 3237. 0241 1 13 12,54% 11103 13 0.885. 0,215 C 9.077. 6774 C 9.47% 2 4 IS 13 450 1 e 13 13 72 NO ND 7611 IF. S 7e5 NO 1110 5,45 NO NO 140 1812 NO ^' 40 1`• 711 laT% NO 1,4S% 110 5.01% YES I, A", NO 545 NtnRANPLAkr..PnaEcrsmoikl.5716,..TAR.k.s;t:wATIV-X.W/L4 APPENDIX H Project Related Correspondence From: Medina, Lilia [limedina@ci,rniarni.fl.us] Sent; Friday, May 05, 2006 5:02 PM To: Leo Gimenez Cc: Mark Trowbridge; Raj_Shanmugam@URSCorp,corn; Quazi_Masaod@URSCorp.corn; Watford, Kevin C Subject: RE: MUSP Traffic Study for the Courthouse Parking Plaza Leo, we just discussed that e new traffic count will not be necessary and you can use the City View traffic counts provided in the Plummer traffic study since out of the committed developments listed below, only One Miami is open for occupancy. However, we need to discuss how the methodology for the new traffic study will address the traffic from the new Federal Courthouse, Miami -Dade Overtown Transit Village, and Sawyers Walk (Crosswinds)_ Leo, please call Raj so that we can discuss further. Thank you all. Lillla 1. Medina, AJCP Assistant Transportation Coordinator City of Miami, Office of the City Manager/Transportation 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 10th Floor, Miami, FL. 33130 Tel.: 305.416.1080 Fax: 305.416.1019 limedina@ci.miarni fl.us V111akohos Leonardo [Leonardn]N con] Tuesday May 16,2006 9:53AM Lea Gimenez mtmmbhdge@miamiperNng.com; Medina,UUa RE: MU5PTnaffic Study for the Courthouse Parking Plaza M5CPM_May171lna|'|oops.ppt Attached isacopy ofthe conceptual alignment for the streetcar project. The dots reflect the preliminary locations of the station stops. At this time, there are two stops in the vicinity of your project: 1� NMiami Ave, South buund@NVV4~St/Fedaoa|Courthouse 2. NVV1 ' AveSouthbound@NVV3 m St/GovtCtr Please let nn*know ifyou any other questions. Leo Frmmm:Vi|lalobos Leonardo Sent: Friday, May 12,20069:48AM To- 'Medina, LUia'; LnoGimennz Cc, aNboko@5rn�eman.com;Rai_Shanmugam@UAS[orp.com; Qunzi_Masood@URSCorp.uom; mtrowhddge@miamipaddng.mm Subject: RE: MUSP Traffic Study for the Courthouse Parking Plaza Enclosed ksacopy ofthe Design Guide|ineofnrthe Streetcar Station Stops. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (786)298-0218. LeuVlUe|obou Project Manager City ofMiami Streetcar 1 1 1 1 1 i. 1 From; Leo Girnenez [lgimenez@fr-alernan.comj Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:48 AM To: Quazi_Masood@URSCorp.com Cc: Raj Shanmugarn@URSCorp.com, Medina, Lilia; 'akiboko@fr-alemarl.CQm° Subject: Courthouse Parking Plaza and new Federal Courthouse traffic impact related issues Hi Quazi, i would like to have your opinion/advice concerning the following issues (which seem to be unique and very relevant to the traffic impact study we are developing for the Miami Parking Authority project). They are as follows: 1 a- The 1TE Trip Generation Manual does not have rates available for Courthouse buildings. contacted them for additional input but they have no more information. A research of the available rates provided in the lTE Manual for related land uses such as a Government Office building (a factor of 1.21 per 1,000 SF) and a State Motor Vehicle Department (17.09 per 1,000 SF) reveals too much discrepancy. Please note that the new Federal Courthouse has been designed for 385,173 SF of office space and a total area of 577,784 SF. Also note that the Federal Courthouse has been designed with only 100 parking spaces. Using an average rate between 1.21 and 17.09 will still generate a huge number of trips (about 3,600 trips during the PM peak hour) which most likely will exceed the capacity of the existing roadway. 1 b- We have not been able to find any traffic impact/analysis study prepared for the Federal Courthouse (it may not be existing or available due to the secrecy surrounding this kind of governmental/judicial buildings after 9/11)_ In addition, note that the old Federal Courthouse has a concrete barrier around the building perimeter as a securit' measure (but reducing the existing roadway capacity from three to almost one lane along NE r Street and N Miami Avenue in the immediate vicinity). Is the new Courthouse going to have a similar protection device? lc- The new Federal Courthouse building has only 100 stalls. Where are most of the vehicular trips going to end? My guess is that it would most likely be in the surrounding parking lots already at capacity, and most likely in our project, the Courthouse Parking Plaza, since it is so conveniently located. We have investigated that the Miami Parking Authority has not reserved any floors in our project for exclusive use of the Federal Courthouse building's users, so far. However, thinking of the existing arrangement for the two Courthouses in Fort Lauderdale where there is a parking garage structure next to each of them (with official stalls reserved for Courthouse users), l would not be surprised if a similar arrangement will be workout for the City of Miami due to the importance of the case. In fight of the above reasons, t do not think there is a realistic and simple approach to account for the New Federal Courthouse traffic impacts and trip distribution. The assumption that the new Federal Courthouse traffic impact is already accounted for as part of the existing traffic since the old Courthouse is located just one block west from the new Courthouse seems as valid as any other one for the purposes of our project traffic impacts. We think that both our project location midway between the two Courthouses and our project land -use as a MPA parking garage structure (700 stalls) replacing an existing MPA parking structure (550 stalls) justify the simple approach of assuming the new Federal Courthouse traffic impacts already accounted for. Please advise so we can proceed with this matter of mutual interest. Thanks, Leo From; Leo Gimenez [lgimenez@fr-aleman,corn] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:20 PM To: Medina, Lilia Cc: Raj_Shanmugam@URSCorp.com; Quazi_Masood@URSCorp.com; 'akiboko@fr-aleman.com`; 'Roamy Valera" Subject: Courthouse Parking. Plaza Traffic Impact Study and New Federal Courthouse Traffic Impact We have not been able to find information concerning the new Federal Courthouse traffic impacts in the Miami Downtown area despite our best efforts. The consideration of this information was one out of the ten Committed Developments' traffic impacts required to be included in our study. As you know, we need to proceed and complete our traffic impact study for the Courthouse Parking Plaza in accordance with approved methodology. To this effect, we would like to notify your office that if we are not able to obtain the above information within the next seven calendar days, we will proceed and complete our traffic impact study for our project, the Courthouse Parking Plaza development, without consideration of the potential traffic impacts of the new Federal Courthouse. As always, we appreciate your participation in this matter of mutual concern. Leo