HomeMy WebLinkAboutSummary FormAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY FORM
FILE ID:
Date: 7/27/2007
Requesting Department: Dept of Capital Imp Programs
Commission Meeting Date: 9/11/2007 District Impacted: 3
Type: ® Resolution n Ordinance n Emergency Ordinance n Discussion Item Other
Subject: Resolution to approve the award of an Agreement for Dredging Services for Seybold Canal
and Wagner Creek to CHM2Hi11, Inc.
Purpose of Item:
To request approval of the attached resolution, by a four -fifths affirmative vote adopting the City Manager's
recommendation to award the agreement to the most qualified firm utilizing the competitive negotiations
method stipulated in Section 18-86 of the City of Miami Code and to authorize the City Manager to execute a
contract with CH2M Hill, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000, consisting of $917,381 for the scope of
work and $82,619 as an owner's contingency.
Background Information:
The Department of Capital Improvements Program (CIP) issued a Request for Letters of Interest (RFLI) No.
05-06-090 for the purpose of soliciting firms to competitively negotiate an agreememt for hazardous materials
dredging services for Seybold Canal and Wagner Creek. Fifty seven (57) firms were contacted and three (3)
submittals were received in response to the RFLI. The 3 firms were CH2M Hill, Inc; Subaqueous Services,
Inc.; and Mario J, Faz, P.G. CIP issued a Request For Information (RFI) No. 05-06-090 requiring the firms to
submit project plans to be used as the basis for competitive negotiations. All three firms submitted responses
and all three proposers were asked to clarify their RFI submittals and to submit a fee proposal. CIP
subsequently conducted negotiations with all three firms and determined CHM2 Hill, Inc. to be the most
responsive and responsible. Based on the results of the competeive negotiation process, CIP recommended to
the City Manager that CHM2Hill, Inc. offers the City the most advantageous contract based on a combination
of experience, program plan, quality, and price. The Manager approved this recommendation and method of
procurement and has made a written finding justifying this action. In the existing procurement code this
procurement method is limited to procurement under $50,000 and therefore it is necessary to determine an
emergency and waive the competitive proposal process as permitted by City Code Section 18-89.
Budget Impact Analysis
NO Is this item related to revenue?
YES Is this item an expenditure? If so, please identify funding source below.
General Account No:
Special Revenue Account No:
CIP Project No: B-50643
YES Is this item funded by Homeland Defense/Neighborhood Improvement Bonds?
Start Up Capital Cost:
Maintenance Cosa: --
Total Fiscal Ir pacRAPPROVAI-,0p0,000
Final Annrovals (SIGN A
CIPe:ac. '� 0
If using or receiving ". tHof funk
Grants N/A
Purchasing
to
Budget
Ri k Management
pt. Director
��3�.►1" --�- ei(.t01
N/A
Chief � /f =E� 'v('3 et 7City Manager .
ect Manager: Bill Embree/ Fred Reynolds
Page 1 of 1