HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING C ANGE REQUEST
Approximately 10, 20, 30-32, 34 and 58 NE 5 r`' Street & 11, 17, 25, 35, 43, and
57 NE 52" Terrace
File ID 0-00216me
REQUEST
The proposal is for a change of the Zoning designation from R--2 "Two Family Residential" to
G/i, "Government and institutional", (A complete legal description is on fie at the Hearing
Boards Office),
The subject property consists of eleven parcels comprising approximately 1,41 acres (64,443 sq,
f.) It faces NW 53rd Street and NW 52'd Terrace between N Miami Avenue and NE Miami Place,
The property comprises the entire block with the exception of one parcel located in the
northwestern corner of the block, The site is currently designated R-2. Surrounding the subject
site is G/l. designation to the east and south, To the north is R-2 with SD-12 and to the west is an
R-2 zoning. The subject site is in the Little Haiti NET area,
ANALYSIS
The Planning Department is recommending APPROVAL of the application as presented
based on the following findings:
It is found that the G/I is a logical extension of that category since this designation is already
within the subject block and will unity the designation with the properties to the West,
It is found that the proposed change will unify the whole property with the same zoning
designation and under the same ownership,
it is found that the proposal is not in compliance with the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan and a companion application requesting a land use change was presented
to PAB and was recommended for approval.
1
Yes No NIA.
O Z fi
Z 0 0
0
N 0 0
0
E 01 01
lS 01 0
E 0
01 Li-
°01
Z 01
01
Z 01 01
• Q 01
0
Z 0 01
• 0
na ysisf r
File lD: 07-OO2I6ZC
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment,
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood
or the city,
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density
pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities
such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change
necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the
neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not
affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the
existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to
adjacent areas as the existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the
adjacent area as the existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as
to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the
protection of the public welfare,
of There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited
under existing zoning,
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the
proposed use in districts already perrnitting such use.