HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 07-0041
Monday, May 14, 2007
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION TO AMEND PAGE NO. 21, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE
NO, 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM "R-4'° MULTIFAMILY HIGH -
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN "SD-20" EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT TO
"R-4" MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN "SD-19" DESIGNATED
F.A.R. OVERLAY DISTRICT, F.A.R. OF 2.3, AND "SD-20" EDGEWATER OVERLAY
DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 601, 611, 613
AND 615 NORTHEAST 23RD STREET AND A PORTION OF A PARCEL EAST OF
615, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC
RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Angel Urquiola,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin No
Mr. Ron Cordon Yes
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela (alternate) N/A
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta No
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina No
Mr. Cornelius Shiver Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 6
NAY: 3
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 1
ABSENT: 0
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 6-3
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 04-01269zc
Z.1
EXIT 'T
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The East 45 feet of Lot 4 and the West 5-feet of Lot 5 of SHORELAWN according to
the Plat thereof as recorded in Piet Book 9, at page 23 of the Pub'; Records of
Miami -Dade C,ounty, Florida,
AND;
The Eas1. 15 feet of Lot 5 and all of Lot 6 and the West 35 feet of Lot 7 of
SHORELAWN according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 9, at page 23
of the Public Records of Miarhi-Dade County, Florida;
AND:
The West 30 feet of the East 45 feet of Lot 5 of SHORELAWN according to the Plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 23 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade
County, Florida;
AND:
Lot 2, less the West 5 feet Thereof, all of Lot 3, and the West 5 feet of Lot 4 of
SHORELAWN according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 9, at page 23
of the Public Records of MiamkDade County, Florida,
.I35SO5VM22`, 4 6B581 4 3
812304 12:19 PM
12
Circle appropriate conditionts):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in ditricts
already p Ong such use.
Mc t fter considering the factors sett orth in Section 2210 of Ordinance 1000, 1 m• t #fie
regr r "n nda item # I be recommended to the City Commis ion
egnaure
Aaend gem
Date