HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Resois i Zonin oaru
Resolution No.: 07-0004
Monday, January 08, 2007
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION TO AMEND PAGE NO. 36, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 216-20 AND 250 NORTHWEST
SOUTH RIVER DRIVE & 601, 609, 615 AND 619 NORTHWEST 2ND STREET,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS
OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Ron Cordon Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Ms. Chloe Keidaish Away
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 7
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-0
f
�.. _Vt4
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-02234zc1
Z.6
•
•
EXHIBIT 'A'
LEGAL 1ESCRIPil0N: REZONING R--4 to C-?
Lots 1, 2 and 17, In Block 4 South, of CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plot thereof, as recorded in Plot Book B, of Pope 41, of the Public
Records of Miami--00de County, Florida.
Together With:
Parcel B:
East 60° of West 110' of Lots 18 and 19, in Block 4 SOUTH, of CITY OF MAW, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plot Book B ,
Page 41 of the Public Records of Miarni—Bode County; Florida.
Parcel C.
Lots 18 and 19 less the West 110' thereof, in Stock 4, of SOUTH CITY OF MIA LI, according to the Plot €hereof, os recorded in Plat Book B ,
Page 41 of the Public Records of Miorni—Dude County, Florida.
Parcel D:
Lot 20 less the West 50; ire Block 4, of SOUTH CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book '°U ; al Page 41, of
the Public Records of Wan -if —Dade County, Florida.
Parcel F'
The West 50' of lots 18, 19 and 20, in Block 4 South, of CITY OF M/.4M1, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book '8" at Page
41, of the Public Records of Miami —Dade County, Florida.
L @e isu /41
NW 3rd. Street
N90' 00mE 1001?i d.
Qi
oN
fete+ if1 Pie
lkJ4 Gq
76
1pd.d 7/7' pert
oa
2 Star C&S
11.46,4
Arplmt
6'fimDd rm=
S-Sa2 C83
HRAon%U '
I Roy Gfl5 _
Ms 178..,222 4
(naMad FMT
LOCATION SKETCH
5a r5
Ywf lief'tl. Ave €i
Std., ! Irm>,tq 4 S'ta!fi Abrgd 4,1.1
afqra RAaFr b•xq 4.0•wx•ma+:m mnx, .Ewa: nrxoatntw mn vnx
xmn qus.iexcaw Ar
n Fla i.ffart b.
�mry
Mpx/wM1re nsn�rlraTe B+x �rS�iandanomn sw» nh•iww, mar..e .. ro�vM a.
in X0.4,0 nxa ummin as Ps mr um
mmrorX Jx e,dNRQ »t.awitbwramKK mmvmf:tm+m T;dtigYq
.r rM• le d�Yw a•rxyew Mma{nmew �,w ae. i;n lq.
P roadr etx fmx esat rx
� 3 as 1(5` C.terie Sra. /
se 2
7Cut. d GtiFel
. nd gtreet
16,10 fwttm
Miowle b'
MaXPo w x•mnTx.m+f� rXVx.'YWY4m uv
t >n n w m.m mx•memw ha mr mu [Wx�
xx Aek[ Stm'aNme yµ
aorpcsose Yee
r..r.sd`W dw�r MW„Mernnmr t3'M
ryga.lg ^
NWY a'+w�m�m arvrva4 dS Lwr
6rtwi nrs N.nxnsxmnevmr 1 0
m....ai v. e.q.p ae ..w er n'm+nr+326. w
n 8uaw
iwwi-ww � ��1 w-"IVA ux w�.mw�ap
•• erwrxxnmrnmawr�+ #• Pagq.s.$).s.
Olv4 nely!N qm�x ROO...wayw va•gm
96 „r x kraalsr..40,. hxr n¢dxnrw a.»
a dr, wrsm.b1 mxax.wrroa mean
o�rmp M ii
rryr b xmimu.tw
47.
p,a x�.nw'dbw.a
�pn �a�awm�s
sA-Jae
Circle appropriate conditio
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
•d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets,.etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Mo o : enideririg the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, 1 move that the
reqUe 1 *a item # L be recommended to thecity Commission for (approval) (denial).
JO n r print
arse
Agenda Item
Date 1