The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board Resolution No,: 06-1248 Monday, October 30, 2006 Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE. CITY COMMISSION OF CHANGE OF ZONING AMENDING PAGE NO. 40, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R- 2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1000 SOUTHWEST 30TH AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. Upon being seconded by Ms. Chloe Keidaish, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. Ron Cordon Yes Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Away Ms. Deana Hernandez -Acosta Yes Ms. Chloe Keidaish Yes Mr. Juvenal A. Pine Away Mr. Angel Urquiola Away AYE: 5 NAY: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 NO VOTES: 0 ABSENT: 3 Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 5-0 Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary Hearing Boards File ID#: 06-00830zc Z.4 LEG rill, DES Rtl'"1 R)N: Hie North 1 OX.75 f ct orSontli 386�5 fei~t of'tl;s V: of 1.0t 7, o!'HICKSO b SUBD1V15ION, as record) .d in floe Book 13, t 1'nge 130 of the Public Rccorc?s of Dade County, 4 lorida, RISC) known as 9)40 S.W. 30th Avcnuc, Miami, Florida, AN1) The South V2 of the North 108.75 feet of the South 386.75 feet of tiac East ''A of Lot 7, of HICKSON SI;BDIV`ISItJN, as recorded in Plat Book 13, at Page IN of the Public Records -of Dade County, Florida, S.W. 30°'•Avenue, Miami, Florida, AND The North 125 feet of the South 27R feet of the East Y2 of Tract 7, of HICHSON'S SUBDIVISION, According to the Pat thereof recorded in P ;t Book B_ Poe l30 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: Elevations are referred to NGV Datum, based upon a City of Miauni Ben .h Mark, the same being a PK nail & brass washer, ).geared at S.W. 1 l`'' Street and S.\V. ,t)th Avenue. Elevation 11.48 City of MiatNW/ DATUM. Bearings are based on an assumed system where the Centerline of S.W. 30th AVENUE hears 36" 1 . The National Flood %nsurance Rate Map for Florida, Catutnunity No. 1206.50, Pastel No.01.87, Suffix J, FIRM Date 09/30/72 and Revised with an effective date of 03/02/94. published by the United. States Department of Housing and Urban 'Development, delineates the herein described land to be situated within Zone X. Only the surface indications of the underground utilities have been located in the field. The location of utilities on or adjacent to the property was not sewed, The Surveyor has preformed no subsurface investigation or determined the Iotation-af underground footers. It should be noted that there might be other underground utilities in addition to those evidenced by the visible appurtenances shown on this sketch. The owner or his agent should verify all utility locations with the appropriate utility provider before using. Circle zppropria CO r When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered, where applicable, whether or not: a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district. d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc. f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact_ on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Motion: Aft r cpnsidering tt a factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinan requeai •. F:ge k : item # obe recommended to the City Commis sio Print Nam natQ I move that the nial).