The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutIII.Tab 2 Sufficiency Letter and Traffic Impact Analysis11/10/iUU6 1Z=us rAA uxs • • Neverriber f8, 2006 Via Fax. and AL M:aij Ms: Ulla. Med nay AicP Assistant Transportation Coordinator City of Miami; OM* of the City Mana erlt ranst of l t on 444 SW 2 Avenue (10Ih Floor) Miami, Florida130 Re: Edgewater (tea # 170 Sufficiency Letter Dear Ms, Medina: Subsequent to ourOctober 13, 2006 review comments for the subject Project we have received a formai response. from Kira y.-Horn end Associate.* inc. (HA) on November 14, 2006. We have also received a revised site plan showing the turning radius of the delivery truck from (HA. Photocopy of the response letter arlti revi ed site plan from MIA ere attached herewith_ At thia time, we conclude that the revised traffic report along with the subsequentsubmittal meets all the traffic requirements and the report is found to be sufficient Should you have any questions, ,please call Quazi mac! or me at 954,739_ 1881. $1604, UR Raj anrri Sen > Trafficngineer =Ahem Attachment Cc: Mr 4nknict P Pefnnsrlt, •C jr e fMiami Mending (Fax - 305 418 "lit Mr. Aikony A. vet" Engieeer4 City of Miami Zoning (PPr - 305.416 M7 ) Mr. John McWilliams, PE (KNA) ( x 954 '39.2247) uRtt Cmicuir'tion taua litram Campi= as ejv flW 33rd. AVOrital, la ISO TO: #;? :], 81 F.ti 9.73a2T09 11/16/06 T`RU 10 57 IT'%/RX NO 0759) 11r16/2008 i. GO VAX lit G03/009 • • Krriley41601 id- ` ,€ . No Mr: Rai Shancoupro, P. E URS Southern 5100 14.1W 3341As ; She 150 Fort Leuderdele, F1,31309 Re: Edgewater URS Woi*order #170 P rtidlic Impart;A Response c to Comments Derr Mr. Sharrrtuga : We received your emoments dared October r 13, 2006, rem, the 'tt c study submitted/ for the above referenced 'project_ We offer the following responses: 1, The attached .pin: site does- t include the mezeuvering. (turning path) of the dethery trades within the project boundary, The report most include i>t a torsokag psrlit of a d 3d, , tag "AutoT " or any other -approved A t . n'eraMUity analysis is attetchedfor your rs}ar ►rice (Attachment A), 2. The soutithoural approach lane conilguratien at: NE 4t Avenue/NE 3i Stand intersection (Brur 2i' s ins with the information providedprovidad ia the Tref& Count Data (Appendix B), whtrb mot t be revised; The YW C cnwiz data provided .b The original reportindicated single law approaches at the irIersfctian (also referred to as 4 in:Recovery Woy cznd Wi4gr n',rt Village Way). It showkl be noted that no intersection control is pii,wided Gt this location. As a result, the original analysis oSsumed that the north -south street operates ci 'defame' stop controlled minor stria Figure 2 and rrciffiC cotettt dma are now conSisteir. Sae revised w: nt (Attachment 13)_ 3. The raw taming inovetnent cant at NE 411' Ave 31" Street, e Avenue/NE 31 Street,and.NE 7 Avenue/NE 3 " Street. ici ¢ 9h0wnfn Appendix S ishiconsiShutt with the 'mimes shown in the "Volume Development 1 orkshnet" (Appendix C), which ifiliiNt he revue. Additionally the volume development wuriesheet rows 8iguificant Ott of "t .`urn'"' et st;� aud eastbound approachesat NE, . Ares 3,10 Street intersection. which must be expleiniod or revised. T. FAX 3 4:.7 H FOR 11 t'i6E00. 10:57 Sai iae tizat kW, WA Amu 130 91 11/10/2000 2; Z004/ • priarnimi kmopHotrt L..3 and Anzetaies, Mupmtz„, No 4, 2006, Pg.2 The peak hour tree:a used in the analysis Wm calculated based on the •total volumes .4'4 tntersemions. Therefore network peak hour traffic was •taed. The peak hour factor calculated was from 445 to 545. As a remit the voltam* used in the 'Volume Dovelopnent Worksheet' contain the traffic correspondent to that period of time. The ibtlims Yea:led in the traffic data were miscaded. 7lut U-turn voitono shown were determined to be pedestrian ammo the intersection& Rindstents to the effected analyses are attached (Attachment C). rd 4. The westbound and northbound volumes' at NE 33 Street/Biscayne Boulevard and westbound volunerOnt Ng 31st Street/NB 41b Avenue interseotten Isshown incorrectly in the futury year graphics (rigure *Ada .now be revised: Figure. 6 is now consistent and a revised Figure ir attached (Arrodutteru Dj S =The wed input volumes in the Synchre Sabre= Woriedialst at "NE 3d Street/NE 4 Avenueinterseetion ni inrensistent with the volumes shown In existing end moire condition greptits (Figure 3, 4 and 6), which must be Wised; Rpm 3, Figure 4, Fig 6. and Synchro outpas are now consistent (Attachment E). We trust these responses should address .your corn ts. Should EYula have any questions, please feel free to contact une. Very truly yours, RY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC J. McWillierns.-Pa CiA040(01 . .L. .n 06 ugs itr4c 11/10/00 TRU 1.O.57 rrx/Rx SO 0759] • Attach •t; 11 ent 11/10/00 Tflt 1057 NO OM) 5;5 L 11/18 2 : 1 p PAX 11/18/08 Ti 10:57 [TX/RX N(i 75:9) �dtaa or* • IJ.- 16/08 Tatf 10-c 87 tT9 /RINO 975D] 41/1 VAS • • • 11/16/00 THU 10 t 5.7 [ TX/RX NO 915 g I i.9/1no6 14 MT i ' OQ /c O9 11 /16/08 mi 10:57 [TX/RX NO 975.9 ) Traffic Impact Analysis for Submittal to the City of Miami Edgewater Miami, Florida Prepared for: City Center Development, LLC Miami, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. For t Lauderdale, Florida Kirriley-Hoin and Associates. nc. ©2006 Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. May 2006 044391002 • • KInley-Haan and Associates, Inc, Traffic Impact t Iysf, TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................... ................ a...,................ ,......................... ........... 1 DATA COLLECTION 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 7 Level of Service Standard 7 Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology 7 Intersection Level of Service Methodology 8 EXISTING CONDITIONS (2006) CAPACITY ANALYSIS 9 Transportation Corridors 9 Intersections 13 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 14 Background Area Growth 14 Committed Developments 14 PROJECT TRAFFIC 17 Existing and Proposed Land Uses 17 Project Access 17 Trip Generation 17 Trip Distribution and Assignment 19 TOTAL (2009 WITH PROJECT) TRAFFIC 21 FUTURE CONDITIONS (2009) CAPACITY ANALYSIS 23 Future (2009) Background Traffic Conditions 23 Future (2020) Total Traffic Conditions 26 PROJECT DRIVEWAY ANALYSIS 29 TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PLAN 30 FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 31 CONCLUSIONS 32 G:1044391002 CCE Phase 1\Report\TIA.doc Page - a May 2006 • • fril Kimley-Hom Associates, Inc, ari LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Methodology Correspondence Appendix B: Traffic Count Data Appendix C: Miami -Dade Transit Data Appendix D: Existing Conditions (2006) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Appendix E: Growth Trend Analyses Appendix F: Cardinal Trip Distribution Appendix G: Volume Development Worksheets Appendix H: Future Conditions (2009 Without Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Appendix 1: Future Conditions (2009 With Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Appendix J: Driveway Queuing Analysis Appendix K: Future Project Infoiuiation LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location Map 2 Figure 2: Intersection Lane Configurations 4 Figure 3: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4: 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic 16 Figure 5: Project Trip Distribution & Assignment 20 Figure 6: 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Traffic 22 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds 8 Table 2: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes 9 Table 3: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions — Biscayne Boulevard 11 Table 4: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 12 Table 5: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 13 Table 6: Proposed Trip Generation 18 Table 7: Cardinal Trip Distribution 19 Table 8: Future (2009) Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 24 Table 9: Future (2009) Background P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 25 Table 10: Future (2009) P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 27 Table 11: Future (2009) P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 28 G:\044341002 ICE Phase PReport!TIA,doe Page - ri May 2005 • • PCrniey-Horn 1 and Associates, ire INTRODUCTION Traffic impact Analysis City Center Development, LLC is proposing to construct a residential development located at NE 32nd Street and NE 7th Avenue in Miami, Florida. Figure 1 depicts the location of the project. The project proposes to constnict 206 residential condominium units. This analysis conservatively assumed 210 condominium units. Construction is expected to be completed by the year 2009. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has completed this traffic impact analysis for submittal to the City of Miami as part of the Major Use Special Permit (MUST') application. The purpose of the study is to assess the project's impact on the surrounding roadway network and determine if adequate capacity is available to support future demand. The study's methodology is consistent with the requirements outlined by the City of Miami for traffic studies. This report summarizes the data collection, project trip generation and distribution, and capacity analyses. A methodology meeting was conducted with the City of Miami's Traffic Consultant on April 27th, 2006. Methodology correspondence is included in Appendix A. It should be noted that this project was previously referred as ICE Phase 1. G:y044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\TIA.doc Page -- t May 2006 • • K mley-Horn and Associates, IN, Traffic Impnd Ana _ DATA COLLECTION A study area was examined for this traffic impact analysis commensurate with the anticipated increase in traffic associated with the project. The study area for this project is defined as: • I-195 (north) • NE 20th Street (south) • North Miami Avenue (west) • Biscayne Bay (east) Additionally, several intersections were examined within the study area including the following: • NE 33rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard • NE 29th Street and Biscayne Boulevard • NE 32nd Street and NE 4th Avenue • NE 3151 Street and NE 4th Avenue • NE 31 Si Street and NE 7th Avenue The following corridors were identified for analysis: • Biscayne Boulevard • NE 29`I' Street Lane configurations for each of the examined intersections within the study area are provided in Figure 2. G:0044391002 ICE Phase 11Report1TIA.doc Page - 3 May 2006 W CO 0 m0 tom O am dl*;i i4)iN NE 32nd Street E 33rd Stree NE 3ist Street NE 30th Street 41L_84- --*°4)11'* LEGEND _4. LANE CONF1GURA71ON c NE 29th Street FIGURE 2 INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS ©1 IGmley-Hom#} Ny1 anti ASSOd :;4 ®t o. • • ' lmiey-liam a M Associates Inc. Traffic Impaet A,:rs/v is P.M. peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 P.M.) turning movement counts were collected in the study area on April 25, 2006 (Tuesday). The study area peak hour was determined to be from 4:45 P.M to 5:45 P.M. The traffic count data is included in Appendix B. The FDOT peak season conversion factor was applied to the traffic counts to adjust the traffic to peak season volumes. The appropriate peak season conversion factor for when the traffic counts were collected is 1.0.1. The peak season conversion factor table is also provided in Appendix B. Figure 3 presents the 2006 peak season transportation corridor volumes (person -trips including transit riders) and peak season turning movement volumes at the study intersections. G:\044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\flA.doc Page - 5 May 2006 xx co t, 2 0 [1" 41-1328 NE 33rd Street 39 —146 42 —10 48 --sir NE 32nd Street co 0 3 4-- 10 r 2 NE 31st Street z - 4 NE 30 h Street 19 cp 4-- 28 59 z rn a - NE 29th Street 78 ---16 43 —Ito 207 —111 44 41— 206 LEGEND P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (VEHICLES) P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (PERSON —TRIPS) FIGURE 3 2006 PM PEAK HOUR —PEAK SEASON TRAFFIC EMI Nmley-Hom and Associates, Inc. rig Kimley-Harr NM Li and Associates, Inc. Traffic fic Impact Analysis naly°sis • • CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Level of Service Standard Level of service (LOS) is the traffic performance measure generally used in traffic impact analysis. Levels of service range from LOS A (free flow with negligible delays) to LOS F (heavily congested with long delays). The City of Miami has adopted LOS E as its .minimum level of service standard. Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology Transportation corridor traffic conditions were examined applying the methodology outlined in the Miami Comprehensive .Neighborhood Plan. This methodology considers the person - trip capacity (including transit) for transportation corridors rather than evaluating only the vehicular roadway capacity. Level of service analyses were performed to assess the capacity of the transportation corridors evaluated in this study based on a comparison between person - trip volume and person -trip capacity within the corridors. The analyses of person -trip volumes and person -trip capacities account for both passenger vehicle and transit service within the corridors. Table 1 illustrates the level of service thresholds for each study corridor. The corridor level of service thresholds, measured in volume (v) to capacity (c) ratios, were developed from the 2002 version of FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook. G:\044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\TIA.doc Page - 7 May 2006 ©K�snley-Hom and Associates, inc. Traffic Impact Ana1y:si.s • • Table 1: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds LDS A B C D E F Biscayne Boulevard Peak Hour Directional Volume Thresholds V/C Ratio NE 29"' Street Peak Hour Directional Volume Thresholds V/C Ratio (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) 650 0.38 480 0.59 1,510 0.88 760 0.94 1,720 1.00 810 1.00 >1.00 >1.00 (1) Cannot be achieved per "Table 4-7" from FDOT's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Intersection Level of Service Methodology Level of service analyses were performed for study intersections using Trafficware's SYNCHRO 6.0 Software, which applies methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual. 2000 Edition. G:1044391002 ICE Phase i\Report\TIA.doe Page - 8 May 2006 ECrnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis EXISTING CONDITION Transportation Corridors S (2006) CAPACITY ANALYSIS Vehicular roadway conditions and transit ridership were examined to determine the current level of service for the transportation corridors examined in this study. Table 2 presents the unadjusted 2006 P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes, peak season conversion factors, and the 2006 peak season P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes for the study corridors. Table 2: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes Roadway Segments Direction 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes FOOT Peak Season Adjustment Factor 2006Peak Season P.M. Peak Hour Volume Biscayne Boulevard NB 974 1.01 984 SB 763 1.01 771 NE 29r" Street EB 147 1.01 148 WB 146 1.01 147 Existing transit conditions were examined considering the ridership on and capacity of the Miami -Dade Transit (MDT) bus service operating in the corridors. MDT staff was contacted to obtain the P.M. peak hour ridership and capacities for the bus routes. The only information readily available was the ridership by route on a typical weekday. Therefore, additional research was conducted to determine the transit ridership and capacities in the study corridors. Six (6) Miami -Dade Metrobus routes presently serve the Biscayne Boulevard corridor during the P.M. peak hour. • Route 3 operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. • Route 16 operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. • Route Biscayne Max operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. • Route 95 operates with variable headways in the northbound direction. - • Route T operates with 20 minute headways in the northbound direction. • Route 62 operates with 20 minute headways in both directions. GA044391002 ICE Phase I1Report\TIA.doc Page - 9 May 2006 Kmiey-Haar let and Associates, Inc. .hraf�ic impac. Ar,ulysis • it should be noted that Biscayne Boulevard is also currently served by Metrobus Route 36. However, ridership data was not available for this route. Therefore, Route 36 was not included in the transportation corridor analysis, It should be noted that NE 29t6 Street is not served by any transit routes in the study area. MDT staff indicated that the Metrobus routes on the study corridors utilize different bus types on the same route with variable capacities. For purposes of this analysis, an average capacity for each route was determined using data obtained from Miami -Dade Transit. The ridership capacities for the bus routes were calculated for the P.M. peak hour using the appropriate headways and capacities. Metrobus route maps are included in Appendix C. Table 3 summarizes the transit capacity provided. Data were obtained to determine the existing P.M. peak hour ridership for the identified Metrobus routes. The data reflect typical ridership on the routes using the most recent ridership data available. Table 3 present the existing P.M. peak hour ridership on the routes and the ridership data is also included in Appendix C. In order to determine person -trip level of service for the study area's transportation corridors, total person -trip volumes (vehicular and transit) were compared to the total person -trip capacities. The person -trip volume to capacity (v/c) ratios were compared to the person -trip v/c level of service designations outlined in Table 1. Table 4 presents the existing transportation corridor level of service. As indicated in Table 4, the transportation corridors have excess person -trip capacity during the P.M. peak hour and operate at acceptable levels of service. G:1044391002 10E Phase l\Report\TI.A.doc Page - 10 May 2006 rig ECtmley-Horn Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis Table 3: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions — Biscayne Boulevard Transit Route Information Route 3 Route 16 Route 95 Route Biscayne Max Route T Route 62 Total Direction of Travel Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Buses per Hour Average Bus Capacity (riders) P.M. Peak Hour. Directional Person -Trip Capacity No P.M. operation within the study area P.M. Peak Hour Headways 15 minutes 15 minutes 15 minutes 15 minutes Variable 15 minutes 15 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes P.M. Peak Hour Average Directional Route Ridershi 140 (35 riders per bus) 104 (26 riders per bus) 60 (15 riders per bus) 56 (14 riders .er bus) 0 (0 riders per bus) 40 (10 riders •er bus) 52 (13 riders per bus) 45 (15 riders per bus) 27 (9 riders .er bus 12 (4 riders .er bus) 312 (12 riders E er bus 224 (10 riders er bus G:104439 i 002 ICE Phase [\Report\T!A.doc Page - 11 May 2006 • • IGmtey-Hom I and Associates, inc. Tragic Impact Analysis Table 4: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadways Peak Season P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes P.M. Peak Hour Transit Ridership P.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V)Capacity Directional Peak Hour Vehicular {2) p y Y.M. Peak Hour Transit Capacity p Y P.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C)Excess p yCapacity P.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Vehicles Person- Trips �� Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicles Person- Trips ti> Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS Biscayne Boulevard N13 984 1,378 312 1,690 1,720 2,408 1,474 3,882 2,192 0.44 D SB 771 1,079 224 1,303 1,720 2,408 854 3,262 1,959 0.40 D NE 29 Street EB , 148 207 207 810 1,134 - 927 0,18 C WB 147 206 - 206 810 1,134 - 1,134 928 0.18 C (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2002 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook and the Miami -Downtown DRI. G:1044391002 ICE Phase 11Report\TIA.doc Page - 12 May 2006 E] � K mle l i and AssocIates4 inc. Trafrfic Impact Analysis Intersections P.M. peak hour capacity analyses were also performed for the study intersections. Table 6 presents the results of the analyses. The signalized intersections are currently operating at LOS B or better and the stop -controlled approaches at the remaining unsignalized intersections operate at LOS A. Detailed SYNCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix D, along with existing intersection traffic signal timing plans. Table 5: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Overall Level of Service (Existing Timings) LOS Delay (s) Biscayne Boulevard and NE 33td Street A 8.2 Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29th Street B 12.4 NE 32°d Street and NE 4th Avenue A(1) 9.0 (1) NE 315t Street and NE 4th Avenue A(1) 9.5 (1) NE 31s' Street and NE 7t Avenue A(1) 8.4 (1) (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. T`lte worst minor street movement is indicated. C :1044391002 10E Phase 0Report\TIA.doc Page - 13 May 2006 K miey-tiom and Associates, Inc, 'Traffic invoct .4nelysrs BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Background traffic conditions are defined as the expected traffic conditions on the study roadway network in the Year 2009 (corresponding to total buildout) without the development of the proposed project. The background traffic volumes are the sum of the existing traffic and additional "background" traffic to account for expected traffic growth in the study area. Background Area Growth Future traffic growth on the transportation network was determined based upon historic growth trends at nearby FDOT traffic count stations. The following FDOT count stations were referenced for this analysis: • Count station 0143 is located on SR 5/US 1 south of NE 36{h Street • Count station 5058 is located on SR 5/US 1 north of NE 29th Street The growth rate analysis calculated a growth rate of -3.06 percent (-3.06%) for count station 0143 and a growth rate of -0.12 percent (-0.12%) for count station 5058. However, a growth rate of 0.5 percent (0.5%) was applied annually to the traffic counts to attain future (2009) background conditions. Historical traffic count data and growth trend calculations are included in Appendix E. Committed Developments City of Miami staff was contacted to determine if any projects that have been approved but not yet completed in the vicinity of the project site should be accounted for in this analysis. . The April 2006 Large Scale Development Report was reviewed and twenty six (26) major use special permits (MUSP) projects were identified: • Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) • Onyx on the Bay (Biscayne Bay Lofts) • Rosabella Lofts (Edgewater Tower) • Star Lofts (Bay 25) G:1044391002 ICE Phase i`.Report\TIA.doc Page - 14 May 2006 • r_Kimiey-Hom ..1 and Associates, Inc, • Biscayne Park • The Boulevard (Avant Towers) • District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) • Lima • Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condominium) • Onyx 2 • Paramount Bay (Paramount at Edgewater Square) • Park Lane Tower • The Platinum Condominium • Platinum on the Bay • Soho • Soleil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) • Vista Biscayne • Midtown Miami: (Tract A) The Shops -North Block • Midtown Miami: (Tract C) The Shops — Mid Block West • Midtown Miami: (Tract D) Mid -Block East • Midtown Miami: Four Midtown Miami (Tract F) • Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miami (Tract G) • Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miami (Tract H) • Buena Vista East Track D (Parcel 6) • Buena Vista East Track E (Parcel 5) • Buena Vista West Track G (South Block North) The projected traffic from the above projects was added to background traffic. Tatjic Impact Analyis G:\044391002 ICE Phase raeport\TIA doe Page 15 May 2006 xx co � 50 �� `► �58 NE 33rd Street l w 40 54 —4. 49� w 0 0 �0[ B NE 32nd Street ri 5 4—* 17� 0 Z �3 4— co.— 23 NE 31st Street a m JL NE 3Oth Street 335 --► ----- 318 P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (VEHICLES) P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (PERSON -TRIPS) 26 53 4- --- �° 71 NE 29th Street FIGURE 4 FUTURE (2009) NON -PROJECT P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC IGmIey�Hcrn - and Astes, Inc. • • Onley-Horn and Associates, Inc. mjkCiAnaly =s PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic is defined as the vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project, and the distribution and assignment of this traffic over the roadway network. Existing and Proposed Land Uses As previously indicated, the project proposes to construct 206 residential condominium units. This analysis conservatively assumed 210 condominium units. The buildout and occupancy of the project is expected to occur by 2009. Project Access Two driveways will connect to NE 32nd Street. One (1) driveway will be used to enter to the site (the easternmost driveway) and one (1) driveway will be used to exit the site (the westernmost driveway). Additionally, one driveway will connect to NE 7th Avenue that will provide ingress to the valet parking drop-off. Trip Generation Proposed vehicular trip generation for the project was calculated using rates and equations contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. The trip generation for the proposed land uses was determined using ITE Land Use 232 (High - Rise Condominium/Townhouse). Project trips were estimated for the P.M. peak hour. ITE trip generation assumes a vehicle occupancy rate of 1.2 persons per vehicle; however, the City of Miami has determined that 1.4 persons per vehicle are more appropriate for the local area. Therefore, vehicular trips were reduced by 16 percent to adjust for these vehicle occupancy assumptions. The vehicular trip generation calculations for the project are presented in Table b. G:1044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\TIA.doc Page - 17 May 2006 • nniey+lorn and Associates, Inc Traffic Impact Anolysii.; Table 6: Proposed Trip Generation Future Land Use (ITE Code) Scale P.M. Peak Hour Driveway Volumes Gross Total Trips Internal Capture Reduction Net External Trips Pass -By Capture Reduction Net New External Trips Entering Exiting % Trips % Trips High -Rise Condominiums (232) 210 d.u. 87 N/A 87 - 87 62% 54 38% 33 Total 87 87 87 54 vph 33 vph 1TE/Miami vehicular occupancy adjustment (16% reduction) 73 vph 45 vph 28 vph Person -Trip Conversion (1.4 persons per vehicle) 102 p.t. (1) 63 p.t. (1) 39 p.t. 0) i) p.t. = person -trips G-A044391002 .ICE Phase faeport\TIA.cloc Page - 18 May 2006 • • r1m1ey-Horn IGand Associates, Inc, Traffic Irrnpanal3s1s Trip Distribution and Assignment The likely distribution of project traffic was forecast for the trips expected to be generated by the project. The trip distribution was based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2005 Cost Afjbrdable Plan for the project site's traffic analysis zone (TAZ 504). The cardinal trip distribution for TAZ 504 is provided in Table 7. The detailed cardinal distribution is included in Appendix F. Table 7: Cardinal Trip Distribution Cardinal Direction Percentage of Trips North -Northeast 11.43% East -Northeast 4.11% East -Southeast 5.08% South -Southeast 4.25% South -Southwest 21.36% West -Southwest 23.94% West -Northwest 13.27% North -Northwest i 6.56% Total 100.00% Figure 5 shows the project trip distribution and assignment at the project driveways and adjacent intersections. The project trips (vehicular and person -trips) were then distributed and assigned to the roadway network. As part of the directional person -trip distribution, the maximum possible directional project traffic assignment was determined for the entire transportation corridor segment. G_1044391002 ICE Phase IsReport\TfA.doc Page - 19 May 2006 35% IN/22 / 35% OUT/14 25%/B 30%/10 NE 33rd Street 0 10%/3 5%/2 15X/B NE 32nd Street z m cn > < co D 03 55X/1 8 41 —15%/5 C 0 0 0 X x w 0 5X/3 W 70%/38 —► B5%/46 5%/2 —► /— 20%/7 10%/3 75%/41- 1D%/5-- NE31stS 0 ait NE 30th Street 30X/16 5X/3 ---� 4---- 5%/1 5%/2 W 4) 10%/6-f LEGEND XXX/XX XX> NEW DISTRIBUTION/NEW ASSIGNMENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT (MAXIMUM) XX% IN/XX PERSON NE 23th Street FIGURE 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Kimley-Hom and Assoaat: Ire. • • Kmiey-Ho n __.. and Associates, Inc, Traffic impact Analysis TOTAL (2009 WITH PROJECT) TRAFFIC Total traffic volumes (vehicular and person -trips) considered in the future year (2009) analysis for this project are the sum of 2009 background traffic volumes and the expected project traffic volumes. Figure 6 presents the 2009 total traffic for the study area. Total turning movement volume development worksheets for the study intersections are included in Appendix G. G:1044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\TIA,doc Page-21 May2006 xx 358 —4 --- 332 NE 33rd Street 40 -J 54 —I. 49� co 411 NE 32nd Street J1 TE 66 ---. NE 31st Street 15 41 25 —. NE 30th Street 4-- 15 1111) 3 11 1 26 f --- 54 � 73 41 TT' .,g LEGEND P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (VEHICLES) KXXXI P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (PERSON -TRIPS) NE 29th Street FIGURE 6 2009 P.M PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC Igrnik,Ays-sHo: • • C�� Kimiey-Ham 111111an(I Associates, Inc. Iriffc impact Ana?ys; FUTURE CONDITIONS (2009) CAPACITY ANALYSIS Two separate future conditions peak hour capacity analyses were performed. A transportation corridor (person - trip) capacity analysis. Intersection capacity analysis was performed at the study intersections. The future conditions analysis were performed for (I) the 2009 background traffic conditions and (2) the 2009 total traffic conditions, which included the 2009 background traffic and the new trips expected to be generated by the project. Future (2009) Background Traffic Conditions Table 8 presents the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2009 P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. As indicated in Table 8 the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). Table 9 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2009 P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. The intersection timings were optimized to reflect the change in traffic patterns in the year 2009. All the intersections operate at LOS B or better. Detailed SYNCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix H. G:1044391002 ICE Phase I\Repoit\TIA.doc Page - 23 May 2006 • • ®—® Klmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Inpacl.ilna/l'sis Table 8: Future (2009) Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadway 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Background Volume Committed Peak Hour Volume (z) 2009 P..M. Peak Hour Total f3J Volume 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) t't 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Excess Capacity 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Level of Service Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS Biscayne Boulevard. NB 1,715 238 UM 3,882 1,929 0.50 Il SB 1,323 225 1,548 3,262 1,714 0.47 D NE 29t°' Street EB 210 126 336 1,134 798 0.30 C` WB 209 109 318 1,134 816 0.28 C (1) An annual growth rate (0.5 percent) was applied to the 2006 P.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2009 background volume. (2) Total traffic generated along the corridors by committed developments (3) The summation of 2009 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. (4) Total capacity determined in Table 4. G:1044391002 tC E Phase 11Rcport\TIA.doc Page - 24 May 20Ob • mieyHorn and Associates, Inc. 'Traffic Impact Analysis Table 9: Future (2009) Background P I® Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection 2009 PM. Peak Hour Overall Level of Service LOS Belay (s) Biscayne Boulevard and NE 33`d Street B 14.4 Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29th Street B(2) 15.0 (2) NE 32°d Street and NE 4d' Avenue A(1) 8.9 (1) NE 315` Street and NE 4`t' Avenue A(1) 9.5 (1) NE 31s` Street and NE 7th Avenue A(1) 8.4 (1) (I) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. The worst minor street movement is indicated. (2) Phasing splits were optimized. G:1044391002 ICE Phase 1\Report TIA.doc Page - 25 May 20°6 • • and Associates, Inc. Tragic Impact Anal;>sr,<, Future (2009) Total Traffic Conditions Table 10 presents the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2009 P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. As indicated in Table 10, the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). Table 11 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2009 P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. The intersection timings were optimized to reflect the change in traffic patterns in the year 2009. All the intersections operate at LOS B or better. Detailed SYNCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix I. G:v044391002 ICE Phase T1Aeport\TIA.doc Page - 26 May 2006 • �Kimley-Hom and Associates. Inc. Traffic .f npact 4nalysis Table 10: Future (2009) P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadway 2005 P.M. Peak Hour Background Volume Committed Peak Hour Volume (2) 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total is) Volume Project P.M. peak Hour Distribution (Maximum) Project P.M. Peak Hour Assignment 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) {4) 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) rst 2009 P.M.2009 Peal. Hour Excess Capacity P.M. , leak Hour Total Level of Service Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio l Oi Biscayne Boulevard NB 1,715 238 1,953 55% IN 35 1,988 3,882 1,894 0.51 1) SB 1,323 225 1,548 20% IN { 30% OUT 24 1,572 3,262 1,690 0.48 D -5 w, EB 210 126 336 35% IN 22 358 1,134 776 0.32 WB 209 109 318 35% OUT 14 332MI 802 0.29; (1) An annual growth rate (0.5 percent) was applied to the 2005 P.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2009 background volume. (2) Total traffic generated along the corridors by committed developments (3) The summation of 2009 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. (4) 2009 P.M. peak hour total volume (V) is defined as the sum of the project P.M. peak hour assignment and the background volume. (5) Total capacity determined in Table 4. G:1044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\TIA.doc Page - 27 ?Flay 2006 • • Table 11: Future (2009) PaM.. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Overall Level of Service LOS Delay (s) Biscayne Boulevard and NE 33`d Street B 18.5 Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29th Street B(2) 15.7 (2) NE 32'Aa Street and NE 4a Avenue A(1) 9.4 (1) NE 31 s` Street and NE 4th Avenue A(1) 9.7 (1) NE 3151 Street and NE 7t Avenue A(1) 8.5 (1 ) NE 32"d Street and Entry Driveway A(1) 4.7 (1) NE 32"d Street and Exit Driveway A(1) 8.7 (1) NE 7th Avenue and Driveway A(1) 1.7 (1) (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. The worst minor street movement is indicated. (2) Phasing splits were optimized. G:\044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\TIA.doc Page - 28 ?vIay 2006 • • nnley-tom and Associates, Inca Traffic Impact .4naiy is PROJECT DRIVEWAY ANALYSIS As previously indicated, two driveways will connect to NE 32nd Street. One (1) driveway will be used to enter to the site (the easternmost driveway) and one (1) driveway will be used to exit the site (the westernmost driveway). Additionally, one driveway will connect to NE 7th Avenue that will provide ingress to the valet parking drop-off. The proposed entry driveway connection along NE 32nd Street will provide access to residents and guests (valet only) and will be gated. As a result, a queuing assessment was performed for this driveway. The driveway analysis is included in Appendix J. Figure 6 indicates that approximately 44 vehicles are expected to enter through the resident lane and 10 vehicles through the guest lane during the P.M. peak hour. All vehicles will enter the residential garage via a proximity card reader. Assuming a gate service rate of 300 vehicles per hour, the expected 90 percentile queue length is less than one (1) vehicle for each lane. G:1044391002 ICE Phase I\Report\TIA.doc Page - 29 May 200E • • VKi ey Horn and Associates, Inc. 'Traffic Impact Anal};sis_ TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PLAN A Transportation Control Measures Plan is required for this site to demonstrate how the developer plans to alleviate traffic from the proposed site on the surrounding roadway network. Miami -Dade County provides public transit in close proximity to the project site. in addition, other measures of transportation control can be used by the developer to encourage people to use public transportation, promote bicycling and walking, encourage car/vanpooling and offer alternatives to the typical workday hours. Examples of these incentives include, but are not limited to: Provide transit subsidies for residents of the site Provide transit information within the site including route schedules and maps Provide convenient and secure areas for bicycles Provide other transit -oriented amenities The applicant intends to make the site pedestrian- and transit -friendly and will consider these features for incorporation into the site. GA044391002 ICE Phase 11Report\TLA.doc Page - 30 May 2006 • • Kmiey-liorn and Associates, Inc. FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Trrrnpac; 4na! sfS As part of this traffic impact analysis, future transportation improvements (programmed and planned) were identified within the corridors adjacent to the project site. Project documentation is included in Appendix K. The following projects were identified: Premium Transit — According to Miami -Dade County Long Range Transportation Plan (2030 LRTP), there is a project that will provide premium transit service between Downtown Miami and the Broward County line along the U.S.1/ FEC Rail corridor. This project is a Priority N project scheduled for implementation between 2021-2030. G:\044391002 ICE Phase 0Reporr1 1A.doc Page - 31 May 2006 • Kimsey -Horn and Associates, Inc, Tratjic Impact A naWsis CONCLUSIONS This traffic impact study assessed the impacts of the Edgewater project on the surrounding transportation network. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the City of Miami requirements and included data collection; project trip generation, distribution, and assignment; transportation corridor segment capacity analysis and intersection capacity analysis. This report is being submitted as part of a MUSP application. Transportation corridor capacity analyses and intersection capacity analyses were performed for the existing 2006 peak season conditions. Results of the analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and intersections in the vicinity of the project site operate at acceptable levels of service. Trip generation calculations indicate that the project is expected to generate 73 new vehicular trips and 102 person -trips during the P.M. peak hour. These trips were assigned to the roadway network based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2005 Cost Feasible Plan. Capacity analyses were also perfoiiiied for the future (year 2009) with project conditions. Results of these analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and major intersections will continue to have sufficient capacity and operate at acceptable levels of service. G:1044391002 ICE Phase ilReport1 T IA.doc Page - 32 May 2006 APPENDIX A: • Methodology Correspondence • • Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Memorandum To: Mr. Rajendran Shantnugam, P.E. Mr. Quazi Masood, E.I. URS Southern Corpora From: John McWilliams, P.E. Date: April 27, 2006 Subject: ICE Phase II --- Residential Development MUSP Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the MUSP traffic impact analysis methodology as agreed to during the April 12ti meeting. The following items were discussed: Trip Generation Trip generation calculations will be performed using I l'h Trip Generation, 7th Edition and the ITE Trip Generation Handbook Trip Distribution Trip distribution will be determined using the cardinal distribution from the appropriate Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). According to Miami -Dade County's TAZ Map, the project is located in TAZ 504. Committed Development The City of Miami will be contacted to obtain the April 2006 Edition of the Large Scale Development Report. Projects currently under construction or approved will be included. Projects in the application stage who have submitted a traffic study will also be included. TEL 954 739 2233 FAX 954 729 2247 3uila 157 5100 N.W. 33rti Awerve Ft. Loodetdafe, Florida 33399 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Rajet.drab Shanningarri, PE, Apra 27, 2006, Pg. 2 Study Area The study area for this project is boarded by 1-195 on the notth, NE 20th Street on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east, and North Miami Avenue on the west. Within this study area, five (5) intersections were identified for analysis: • NE 33mStreet at Biscayne Boulevard (signalized) (Z5ckb) • NE 32nd Street at NE\Sth Avenue (unsignalized) ' • NE 31Street at NE 4th Avenue (unsignalized) • NE 31' Street at NE 7th Avenue (unsignalized) • NE 29th Street at Biscayne Boulevard (signalized) The following corridors were identified for analysis: • Biscayne Boulevard • NE 29th Street Data Collection PM peak hour turning movement counts will be conducted at all identified study intersections. 24-hour machine counts will be conducted on Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29th Street. All traffic counts will be adjusted to reflect peak season conditions using the appropriate FDOT adjustment factors. Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses will be conducted for the PM peak hour at all identified intersections and corridors. Intersection analyses will be performed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology.. Corridor analyses will be conducted using information from the Miami DR1-11 (Le. person -trig capacity) and the FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook. In addition, all project driveways will be addressed in this analysis with respect to access (controlled/uncontrolled) and queuing. Site parking information will also be provided in the report. Documentation The results of the analysis will be summarized in a report. The report shall include all necessary supporting documents including signal timings, lane geometry, and software output sheets. 0:N044391002 ICE Phase 1.1\CcuespondenceNemo '042706 URS Merno.doc • • p w al <wl 27 Miami, Florida, United States itiVittkII.601Aisrri 0 yds 200 400 Copyright CI 18e82004 Microsoft Corp. andior Its: suppliers. NI rights reserved. hitp:Ilwww,mtcrosoft.cotristreet I Copyright 2003 by Geographic Data Techrolopy, Inc. Ail rights reserved. 02004 NAVTEQ. Ali rights reserved. This date Includes Information taken with permission from Canadian auttwritl€a a Her MaJesty the fain Ire Right of Canada. 800 • • • APPENDIX B: Traffic Count Data • Intersection Turning Movement Counts • Print Date: May/02/2006 Florida Department of Transportation. Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Peak Season Factor Category Report MIAMI-DADS NORTII O = 0.97 Category 8700 • • Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2004 - 01/03/2004 1.00 2 01/04/2004 - 01/ 10/2004 1.00 3 01/11/2004 - 0 //7/2004 0.99 4 01/18/2004 - 01/24/2004 0.99 5 01/25/2004 - 01/31/2004 0.99 * 6 02/01/2004 - 02/07/2004 0.98 * 7 02/08/2004 - 02/14/2004 0.98 * 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21/2004 0.97 * 9 02/22/2004 - 02/28/2004 0.97 * 10 02/29/2004 - 03/06/2004 0.97 * 11 03/07/2004 - 03/13/2004 0.97 * 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.96 * 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.97 * 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.97 * 15 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 0.98 * 16 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.98 * 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 0.98 * 18 04/25/2004 - 05/01/2004 0.98 19 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 0.99 20 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 0.99 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004 0.99 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004 0.99 23 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 0.99 24 06/06/2004 - 06/12/2004 1.00 25 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 1.00 26 06/20/2004 - 06/26/2004 1.01 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 1.02 28 07/04/2004 - 07/10/2004 1.03 29 07/ 11 /2004 - 07/17/2004 1.04 30 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 1.04 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 1,03 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 1.03 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 1.02 34 08/15/2004 - 08/21/2004 1.02 35 08/22/2004 - 08/28/2004 1.03 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 1.04 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 1.05 38 09/12/2004 - 09/I8/2004 1.06 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 1.05 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 1.03 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 1.01 42 10/10/2004 - 10/16/2004 1.00 43 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 1.00 44 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 1.00 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 1.01 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 1.01 47 11/14/2004 - 11/20/2004 1.01 48 11/21/2004 - 11/27/2004 1.01 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 1.01 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 1.00 51 12/12/2004 - 12/18/2004 1.00 52 12/19/2004 - 12/25/2004 1.00 53 12/26/2004 - 12/31/2004 0.99 1.03 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.02 1,01 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.07 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.02 Note: °'*" indicates p season week Page 1 0 FDOT Peak Season Conversion Factor Report • Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace 0 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ****************************************************************************** Data File : D0425005.PRN Station : 000000041709 Identification : 000058410067 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : NE 29 Street West of NE 2 Court ******************************************************************************* Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 11 7 1 1 4 8 13 42 79 30 7 2 6 5 9 3 28 57 70 45 13 4 4 2 4 13 39 65 63 00 5 8 4 4 4 10 38 63 68 ____ ____ ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 36 21 15 12 21 34 118 227 280 71 69 63 60 263 59 75 59 55 59 57 75 66 248 257 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 82 84 81 61 75 79 96 46 37 37 23 16 30 75 66 54 62 76 66 61 42 51 29 24 13 45 103 86 62 62 69 66 62 41 30 30 30 14 00 106 73 79 67 82 72 72 39 24 16 17 11 ---- ---- ---- ---- ____ -_-- ---- ---- ---- --__ Total 366 309 276 252 302 283 291 168 142 112 94 54 Hour Total : 4181 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 298 Peak hour factor : 0.72 PM peak hour begins : 12:15 PM peak volume : 368 Peak hour factor : 0.87 ******************************************************************************* 410 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ******************************************************************************* Data File : D0425005.PRN Station : 000000041709 Identification : 000058410067 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : NE 29 Street West of NE 2 Court ******************************************************************************* Apr 25 Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 -------- ____ -- 15 3 5 1 30 3 0 5 45 6 0 3 00 3 4 0 Hr Total 03 04 05 1 3 2 3 2 1 1 4 9 3 2 5 15 9 9 8 11 06 07 08 09 10 6 25 44 39 28 13 40 39 33 43 22 40 38 33 31 22 37 35 30 34 11 31 31 37 36 17 63 142 156 135 136 135 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 15 52 53 42 27 41 30 43 35 34 33 32 45 58 48 33 36 31 00 51 29 33 37 45 Ilk- Total 204 165 142 133 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 37 35 33 40 48 29 24 20 13 10 29 20 23 20 14 7 33 24 16 16 13 5 37 20 17 10 12 8 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 147 93 80 66 52 30 Hour Total : 2242 AM peak hour begins : 1130 AM peak volume : 168 Peak hour factor : 0.72 PM peak hour begins : 12:15 PM peak volume : 205 Peak hour factor : 0.88 ******************************************************************************* Apr 25 Westbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 8 2 0 0 1 6 7 17 35 32 31 28 30 4 2 1 2 7 2 15 17 31 36 32 26 45 7 4 1 1 0 4 17 25 25 30 28 38 00 2 4 4 1 2 5 16 26 33 30 21 30 Hr Total 21 12 6 4 10 17 55 85 124 128 112 122 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 30 31 39 34 34 42 48 17 13 17 10 6 30 32 31 20 29 44 31 32 22 28 9 10 6 45 45 38 29 26 38 33 29 17 14 14 17 9 00 55 44 46 30 37 32 35 19 7 6 5 3 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 162 144 134 119 H.5 Ta 144 75 62 46 42 24 24 Hour Total : 1939 AM peak hour begins : 08:45 AM peak volume : 131 Peak hour factor : 0.91 PM peak hour begins : 12:15 PM peak volume : 163 Peak hour factor : 0.74 ******************************************************************************* - 2_ - Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace 0 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ****************************************************************************** Data File : D0425004.PRN Station : 000000041708 Identification : 000110252092 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 0000 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 2400 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : Biscayne Boulevard South of NE 32 Street ******************************************************************************* Apr 25 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 149 74 47 39 39 60 171 296 427 411 410 399 30 119 61 57 51 38 56 192 339 421 439 431 460 45 118 66 55 32 34 93 275 373 365 393 409 444 00 95 51 49 43 31 127 302 387 395 487 358 415 Hr Total 481 252 208 165 142 336 940 1395 1608 1730 1608 1718 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 420 479 397 424 431 456 429 337 306 249 224 220 30 430 441 400 393 401 438 410 342 282 263 227 201 45 497 440 394 420 423 454 369 333 259 291 227 164 00 436 427 381 392 459 412 372 298 270 216 188 140 ---- ---- Total 1783 1787 1572 1629 1714 1760 1580 1310 1117 1019 866 725 44 Hour Total : 27445 AM peak hour begins : 11:15 AM peak volume : 1739 Peak hour factor : 0.95 PM peak hour begins : 12:30 PM peak volume : 1853 Peak hour factor : 0.93 ******************************************************************************* • Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ***************************************************************************** ata File D0425004.PRN Station : 000000041708 Identification : 000110252092 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Apr 25, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Apr 25, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : Biscayne Boulevard South of NE 32 Street ******************************************************************************* Apr 25 Southbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 44 33 21 21 21 39 102 178 249 236 189 204 30 45 24 28 20 14 30 124 212 249 256 195 211 45 53 30 26 9 15 47 172 220 224 213 209 213 08 41 23 21 25 20 88 188 245 240 225 174 198 Hr Total 183 110 96 75 70 204 586 855 962 930 767 826 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 208 237 183 177 202 181 185 132 115 117 98 30 194 213 185 157 177 199 181 143 125 118 98 45 251 198 191 160 183 194 147 147 119 131 106 00 202 205 184 146 206 184 150 129 118 102 90 Hr Total 855 853 743 640 768 758 663 551 477 468 392 318 1pHour Total : 13150 peak hour begins 07:45 AM peak volume : 967 Peak hour factor : 0.97 PM peak hour begins : 12:30 PM peak volume : 903 Peak hour factor : 0.90 ******************************************************************************* 97 96 69 56 Apr 25 Northbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 105 41 26 18 18 21 69 118 178 175 221 195 30 74 37 29 31 24 26 68 127 172 183 236 249 45 65 36 29 23 19 46 103 153 141 180 200 231 00 54 28 28 18 11 39 114 142 155 262 184 217 Hr Total 298 142 112 90 72 132 354 540 646 800 841 892 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 212 242 214 247 229 275 30 236 228 215 236 224 239 45 246 242 203 260 240 260 00 234 222 197 246 253 228 Hr Total 928 934 829 989 (940 5.002 18 19 244 205 229 199 222 186 222 169 20 191 157 140 152 21 22 23 132 145 160 114 126 123 129 105 121 95 98 84 917 759 640 551 474 407 24 Hour Total : 14295 AM peak hour begins : 09:45 AM peak volume : 919 Peak hour factor : 0.88 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 1027 Peak hour factor : 0.93 ******************************************************************************* • st 24-Hour Machine Counts • • \.ort F-07.spa c'SIGI`t ST f 'DEAD END IAM1 , F'WRI t7,A, Apr•,1 zy , WOb blz-M.4N 11.4 ,_MtCIA AEtm. KALE 6 \t5T 'StCt44 1Z&t> NE 31ST STREET 5 NE VTR AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: SUSAN MALONE SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 524 GARDENIA TERRACE DELEAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 ;561) 272-3255 FAX 5611 272--43E1 ALL VEHICLES 51te Code : 00060120 Start Date: 04/75/06 File i,1a. 31S _7AV Page 2 NE 7TR AVENUE INE 31ST S REET INE 31ST STREET From North 'From East IFrom West Right DTur Left j Right Thru ! Thru UTurn Left Total Date 04/25/06 Peak Hour Analysis Ry Entire Peak stars 16:39 Volume 6 0 1 Percent 861t 0t 14% Pk total 7 Highest. 17:15 Volume 3 0 1 Hi total 4 PHF .44 ntersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 04/25/06 0 0 16.30 16:30 0 4 2 4 8 6% 1001 9 14% 29% 57% 4 i 14 17:15 16:30 0 2 1 1 5 2 j 7 .50 i .50 6 410 31ST STREET 0 4 6 10 12 12 2 2 14 0 6 NE 7TH AVENt7E 0 7 24 19 12 0 0 12 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 25 7 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 1 3 2 0 NE 31ST STREET 0 • 0 NE 3IST a', EFT s NE 7TH AVENUE MIAI4I, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: SUSAN MALONE SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561i 272-4361 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00060120 Start Date: 04/25/06 File I.D. 31ST 7AV Page : 1 NE 7TH AVENUE INE 31ST STREET`NS 31ST STREET From North 'From Eaet iFram West Right 'Mum Left i Right Thru i Thru UTurn Left [ Total Date 04/2S/06 16:00 3 16:15 1 1630 1 16:45 1 Hr Total 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 5 1 10 6 3 4 20 17:00 i O 0 0 0 3 2 8 17:15 } 3 0 1 1 1 22 I1 0 0 0 1 6 17:30 } 0 0- 17:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 Sr Total 5 0 1 1 0 3 "TOTAL" • 10 0 1 0 0 0 3 2 4 LI 0 s I 2 4 14 1 36 LkA 2 16 • 104/14.LGiteerv5 WAN A 1.4 2 J 3 ? a i N w A.y WNW April V k , Z oe DR.A 414 'may , M 1 C A.E. L. MALO t4 E- tV� a '5Top 31 N 5 / SI G NI A L L I G H-T 5 • 11E 31ST STREET S N° 4213 2VENUR MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED 8Y: SHARZE GONZALEZ SIGNALIZED, NO STOP SIGNS WALGREE14'S DRIVEWFkY From North Right Thru UTurn Date 04/25/06 - Peak Hour Analysis By Peak start 16:00 Volume 2 23 Percent 95 895 Pk total 26 Highest 16:15 Volume 2 ,3 Hi total 15 914F 43 TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX 3551) 272-4361 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00060120 Start Date: 04/26/05 File I.D. 31ST 4AV Page 2 j DIE 31ST STREET From East Left f Right ;NE 4TH AVENUE 1NH 31ST STREET [From South !From blest f I Thru UTurn Left f Right Thru tYPurn Left f Right Thru UTurn Left # Total Entire Intersection for 16:40 0 1 2 05 4% 13% 15 16,00 0 0 1 7 .54 0 0 the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 04/25/06 16:00 7 0 6 7 23 47% 04 40% 17% 05% 42 16:00 4 0 2 2 7 15 .70 j WALGREEN'S DRIVEWAY 411 31ST STREET 12 7 2 21 23 23 26 54 68 16:00 4 12 f 11 O5 29% 33% 33 16:15 6 6 j 3 12 .69 17 23 2 42 ALL VEHICLES 5 33 Intersection Total 116 11 11 0 • 0 82 611 12 23 11 4011 12 NE 4TH AVENUE 28 42 • 23 23 15 5 0 15V 0% 17 f 52% 1 } 0 0 9 0 0 2 2 7 7 6 6 13 NE 31ST STREET 1 5 7 7 7 0 0 NE 313T STREET S 601 411T AVEN1TE MIA MI, FLORIDA COUNTED EY: SHARIE GONZALEZ •SIGIAL3ZED . NO STOP SIGNS TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4301 ALL VEH0CI„S Site Code : 00060120 Start Date: 04/24/06 File I.D. 31S? 4AV Page : 1 NALGRESN'S DRIVEWAY INR 31ST STREET 1NE 4TH AVENUE 1NE 315T STREET From North IFrom East (From South jFrom West I 9 1 Right Thru UTurn Left ! Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left I Total Date 04/25/06 16.00 0 3 0 0 16.15 2 13 0 0 16:30 0 7 0 16:45 10 0 0 0 Hr Total 2 23 0 1 4 1 1 0 0 2 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 6 2 1 2 7 7 7 5 23 17:00 1 1 6 0 0 j 1 1 0 3 j_ 3 4 17 : 15 11i 0 4 0 0 j 1 0 0 1 1 1 5 17:30 L1_"_ 5.___ _____o.__..__.1L_1_. 2_. ._ _� 3 I _j-___,_9-_._.-._..2 17:45 1 5 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 j 3 Hr Total 3 24 0 0 I 4 3 0 5 j 7 'TOTAL* 5 47 0 4111 6 10 4 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 3 1 0 5 1 34 4 j 3 0 0 9 1 41 2 1 2 3 0 2 1 25 0 I 3 1 0 1 1 16 12 I 11 5 0 17 1 116 1 1 5 1 0 1 1 27 3 I 5 0 0 2 1 22 $ I 4 2 0 1 1 37 a 1 2 2 0 2 1 27 20 I 16 5 0 6 1 113 c= 11 1 14 43 0 32 1 27 10 0 23 j 229 • 2 N� 3Z 5T• M1AAA , Ft..017_1DP Apr 1 7.4 I zoo& D1ttmm 8y , Mtc-I-kkEt_ MI _ome %617 11:2l41l�L.tZ • NE 32N3 STREET 6, NE 4TH AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: OSCAR ALVAREZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 272-3255 FAX i561) 272-4361 ALL VE.EICLES Site Code 00060120 Start Date: 04/25/06 File 1,13, 7 32ST_4AV Page 2 NT 4TE AVENUE INE 32ND STREET / 1NE 32N0) STREET I From North !From East 'From South IFrom West I I I I I Right Thru UTurn Left i sight Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left I Total Date 04/25/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire In:taro-action for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 04/25/06 Peak start 16:00 1 16:00 16:00 I 16:00 Volume 21 0 4 5 I 10 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 I , 0 7 11 67 Percent 701 0% 13% 171" i 531 371 Itt 0% 0% 01 0% 0% I , 0% 81 131 79t Pk total 30 I 19 0 1 85 Highest 16:15 I 16:45 16:00 1 16:15 Volume 9 0 1 1 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 29 Hi total 11 i 6 0 I 31 PHF .68 I ,79 .0 1 .69 0 0 432ND STREET 0 7 21 28 78 78 7 NE 4TH AVENUE 21 21 113 30 118 78 0 10 88 - ALL VEHICLES 7 85 Intersection Total 134 0 0 0 • 0 2 0 0 2 35 0 0 0 10 10 19 7 0 0 7 2 2 16 NE 32ND STREET 0 0 9 7 0 NE 32ND STREET & NE 4TR AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: OSCAR ALVAREZ SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS: INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELR Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33414 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 600b0129 Start Date: 04/25/06 File I.D. : 323T 4AV Page : 1 NE 4TH AVENUE 1NE 32ND STREET { INE 32101 STREET From North 1From East !From South (From West. Right Thru .Tlurn Left Right Thru tlrurn Left i Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Total Date 04I25/06 15:00 6 0 3 2 16:15 9 0 _ 1 16:30 5 0 1 0 16 45.. Hr Total 21 0 4 5 17:00 5 0 6 3 `17,15 5 0 5 2 17: 5 .0......... 4 __..__..2 17:45 6 0 5 0 Hrry, Total 22 0 20 7 'TOTAL* 42 • 0 24 10 0 0 .. 1 2 1 3 2 2 3 1 7 1 2 1 11 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 2 0 0 0._ 0 0 Z 12 1 61 18 2 0 01 0 x L\ u o o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 3 3 17 35 0 0 0 2 29 47 0 0 2 2 14 ( 29 ...0............ 0_... ........._.2.... 4 __.....7.... 23 O f 0 7 11. 67 [ 134 O d 0 0 0 O l 0 0 t 0 2 5 12 # 32 .�..,_,_14 39 2 1 10 i 27 11 9 46 126 1(K t-\'5 O ( 0 18 20 113 $ 260 • • • vUt4BE L.T 1 1 or't 1 N E Zq ST, kyr-IL 2.4 , Zoo& J \AJt s9 1-&tcvkAk e,L MA•iximE Si Gt\tp L12.er, NE 29I74 STREET & 5/SCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 M/AMI, FLORIDA COUNTED SY! NICBObE BOWEN 1ALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33144. {561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 60060110 Start Date: 04/25/05 Pile 1.0. 29ST_0S1 Page : 2 BISCAYNE BOBLEVARD/US 1 1NE 29TH STREET 191SCAYNE BOULEVARD/US a INE 29TH STREET Prom North From East ;From South From West 1 Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left i Total Date 04/25/06 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 04/25/06 Peak start 16:45 16:45 1545 Volume 73 707 1 27 19 29 0 58 34 979 Percent 9% 88% Ot 3% 18% 27% Olc 55% 3t 93% Pk total 808 105 1053 Highest 1545 17:30 17:00 Volume 23 197 1 4 1 7 4 0 18 11 260 Ri total 225 1 25 282 PHF .90 1 .91 .93 0 BISCA 73 0 73 41129TH STREET 40 28 141 73 77 77 43 BOUL 707 305 VARD/US 1 28 0 46 0% 4% 77 979 19 707 28 1,075 808 1,883 0 11 • ALL VEHICLES 43 164 Intersection Total 2,130 44 44 58 707 44 809 1,862 40 40 210 1,053 979 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 979 16:45 44 43 0 77 27% 26% 0% 47% 164 16:45 11 16 0 21 48 .85 0 0 19 19 28 105 28 58 58 105 NE 29TH STREET 28 43 34 34 34 0 0 NE 79TR STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 MIAMI, FLORIOA COUNTED BY: NICBOLE BOWEN IIIIIALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC 624 GARDRNIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 561) 2/2-1255 FAX {561) 272-4181 ALL VEHICLES Site Code , 00060120 Start nate: 04/25/06 File I.J. 29ST_LS/ Page 1 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 INE 29TH STREET 1BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 1NE 29T11 STREET i From North 'From East IFro m South 'Prom West 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTurn Left J Right Thru UTUrn Left Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Total nate 04/25/06 16100 21 165 0 6 9 8 0 5 5 265 0 13 7 6 0 23 533 16:/5 13 157 0 5 4 11 0 11 4 230 0 15 11 10 1 21 € 443 16:30 19 155 I 5 4 7 0 9 9 244 0 9 6 9 0 /4 I 491 16:45 23 197 1 4 j 2 7 0 15 4 229 0 11 1 11 16 0 21 1 5417_1' Hr Total 76 674 2 20 19 33 0 40 1 22 968 0 48 1 35 41 1 79 I 2058 17:00 21 160 0 7 7 6 D 11 1 11 260 0 11 15 9 0 19 I 537 17:15 15 176 0 9 j 3 11 0 14 1 5 233 0 8 9 12 0 16 I 511 17:30 14 174 0 7 7 4 0 18 14 257 0 10 9 6 0 21 I 541 17:45 16 165 0 5 6 5 1 17 5 232 0 2 5 18 0 20 I 497 iir Total 66 675 0 28 1 23 26 1 60 1 35 982 0 31 1 38 45 0 76 1 2086 .T0TAL. 142 1349 2 48 1 42 59 1 100 1 57 1950 01 73 86 1 155 I 4144 j!) • t�l 3345T • • WANNI kw-- i z.Lt , -ZOO b "31 O1.1At_1Z.eD me 3 3 ST. NE 33R0 STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: KENN3 MARTINEZ '3ALI ZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE 2S RFY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 361j 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00068120 Start Date: Q4/25/06 File I.E. : 33ST 051 Page : 2 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 !NE 33RD STREET !BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 {NE 33RD STREET From North !From East !From South !From West !tight Thru UTurn Left ! Right Thru )Y1'urn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left j Right Thru UTurn Left ; Total Date 04/25/0E Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 an 04/25/05 Peak start 16:45 { 16:45 16:45 16:45 1 Volume 8 702 0 23 20 12 0 38 34 1021 0 65 48 42 0 39 1 Percent It 961 04 3t { 291 171 0t 541 31 911 0t 6% 37t 33% 01 301 i Pk totaa. 733 j 70 1120 129 i Highest 16:45 17:00 17:00 17:00 j Volume 5 188 0 4 6 3 0 12 5 261 0 21 13 10 0 11 J Hi total 197 j 21 287 34 1 PI -IF .93 .83 .98 .95 I BISCAYNE BO 0 0 Oil 33RD STREET 65 12 8 85 39 39 42 42 129 48 48 0 • 0 EVARD/US 1 702 23 39 1,021 20 702 23 1,080 733 214 1,813 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 2,052 38 702 48 788 1,908 { 0 0 20 20 12 70 12 169 38 1,120 :65° 1,021 651 1,021 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 1 34 34 38 99 NE 33RD STREET 23 42 34 0 0 NE 33RD STREET & BISCANE BOULEVARD/US 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: KENNY MARTINEEZ dAT IZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC_ 624 GARIDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, 5LORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX t561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00066129 Start Date: 04/25/06 File I.D. : 33S7_U51 Page 1 HXSCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 !NE 33RD STREET !BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 !NE 33RD STREET From north fFrom East !From South 'From blest Right Thru UTurr Left ( Right Thru UTurn Left ( Right Thru UTurn Left j Right Thru UTu_ra Left 1 Total Date 04/25/06 16:00 2 164 0 7 5 6 2 6 14 216 0 15 f 11 16 0 4 f 468 16:15 2 153 0 S 10 9 0 6 6 199 0 32 f 6 11 2 8 f 449 16:30 0 160 0 5 1 10 0 14 8 226 1 16 I 3 8 0 8 f 460 16:45 5 188 0 4 6 3 G 8 f 9 259 0 14 1 11 12 0 8 527) As Total 9 665 0 21 22 28 2 34 37 900 1 77 f 31 47 2 28 f 1904 17:00 2 164 0 5 f 6 3 0 22 f 5 261 0 21 ( 13 10 0 11 j 513 17:15 1 178 0 6 f 5 4 0 10 ; 11 242 0 16 j 11 11 0 9 504 17:30 0 172 0 8 3 2 0 8 f 9 259 0 14 1 13 9 0 11 1 508 17;45 3 155 0 14 f 3 6 0 13 j 9 236 0 11 1 7 11 0 10 1 478 Nr Total 6 669 0 33 1 17 15 0 43 34 998 0 62 f 44 41 0 41 2003 "T0TAL* 15 1334 0 54 1 39 43 2 77 f 71 1898 1 139 f 75 88 2 69 1 3907 • • • APPENDIX C: Miami -Dade Transit Data • • • Route Maps • • Route WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE CV I 2 163 St Mall Government. Center Metrorail Station Flaer S SW/SE 1 St DOWNTOWN BUS — TERMINAL L�) NE 199 St NE 172 St 4 NE 171 St NE 167 St Mil a L-► NE 163 St OMNI BUS TERMINAL DIPLOMAT MALL • Cll Hallandale Beach Blvd 192 St Cswy MMMMM L.1.- Aventura Blvd .Mncy'5 AVENTURA MALL NE 17 Terr OMNI NE 14 St al I 111— Wal-Mart N Country Club TURNBERRY ISLE COUNTRY CLUB O tc� a 192 St at IN Is to MI El North Map not to scale 9/0Z • Route 1 WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE Government Center Metrorail Station Downtown Bus Terminal North Miami w z NE 163 S NE 125 St Biscayne cn Park z Miami Shores '� `.46 e El Portal NE17Ter 15St. OMNI Bus Terminal SW/SE 0 c NE14St v St N Bayshore Dr 163 Street Mali NE 159 St North Miami Beach NE123St North Map not to scale • • Biscayne A METRO AREA EXPRESS MAKES ALL LOCAL STOPS NORTH OF 163 ST 91 St 0 Limited Stop MAKES ALL LOCAL STOPS SOUTH OF 19 ST Government Center Metrorail Station Downtown Bus r Terminal Flagler St a) SW/SE 1 St cn 199 st IND -13 Aventura Mall 163 St 151 St 146 St 35 St 123 St Sans Souci Blvd 07 St 96 St 79 St 62 St 54 St 36 St 29 St 19 St 15 St OMNI BUS TERMINAL N 0 m E 17 Terr OMNI m Z NE 14 St North Map not to scale North Map noia/os t to scale AM VIA SR 836 NW 199 St a Golden Glades Park & Ride Civic Center ) le 95 CIVIC CENTER/ NORWOOD NE 183 St 11 ALL BUSES ARE WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE PM VIA SR 112 NW 39 St VA Hosp 17 St 1 SR 112 ■ a a • 1 Jackson Memorial Hospital sn a . + • Route • Legend Weekend Only Q - Limited Stop NE 38 St NE 36 S NE 29 St NE 19 St • Julia Tuttle Cswy Government Center Metrorail Station Downtown Bus Terminal NE 17 Terr NE14Str! w z Toll Booth -I HAULOVER L,_ PARK MARINA Omni Bus Terminal 0 NE4St ¢' MDCC Downtown Campus SW/SE 1 St Flagler St MIAMI BEACH BAL HARBOUR •c 72 St U St SURFS(DE C 0 0 North Map not to scale • HIALEAH E 9 St a3 E NW 62 St NW 64 St Martin L. King Jr. IMetrorail Station Liberty City 0 OA WIE 3 St North Map not to scale • Route 6 NE 62 St NW 62 St NE 61 St NE 38 St NE 36 St a CO a0 sr 0 0 NE 17 Tarr Omni Bus Terminal WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE MIAMI BEACH Rush Hour Only Omni .41 NE 14 St N Bayshore Dr Julia Tuttle Causeway a 41St SC 0 j[ s� 39 St U as 0 • Ridership Data • Route 3 Day Date Time Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Monday 11/22/2004 1704 24 NB 38 15 53 Friday 8/27/2004 1626 21 SB 38 15 53 Monday 3/10/2003 1747 31 SB 43 1 20 63 Monday 11/8/2004 1540 45 NB 43 1 20 63 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 35 58 S13 26 58 • • • Route 16 Day Date Time Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity - Tuesday 5/31/2005 1624 12 SB 38 15 53 Tuesday 5/31/2005 1653 19 NB 38 15 53 Thursday 4/15/2004 1603 4 NB 38 15 53 Wednesday 6/4/2003 1559 21 NB 43 20 63 Friday 1 /3 /2003 1640 7 SB 38 15 53 Friday 2/7/2003 1536 28 SB 38 15 53 Wednesday 12/10/2003 1524 9 SB 38 15 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 15 56 SB 14 53 • • Biscayne Max 93 Day Number of Date Time Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Monday 7/11/2005 1554 15 SB 38 15 53 Monday 7/11/2005 1617 9 NB 38 15 53 Friday 12/27/2002 1554 4 NB 42 20 62 Friday 12/27/2002 1755 14 SB 42 20 62 Monday 6/7/2004 1607 20 SB 38 15 53 Wednesday 9/17/2003 1605 7 SB 42 20 62 Wednesday 9/17/2003 1625 19 NB 42 20 62 Wednesday 6/11/2003 1737 9 SB 43 20 63 Wednesday 6/11/2003 1755 7 NB 43 20 ] 63 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 10 60 SB 13 59 • • Route 95 Civic Center Day Date Time Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity- Tuesday 3/18/2003 1651 0 NB 38 15 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 0 53 SB /D1V/0! #DIV/0! • • Day Date Time Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Wednesday 4/9/2003 1710 19 NB 38 15 53 Thursday 4/10/2003 1624 17 SB 43 20 63 Thursday 4/10/2003 1651 10 NB 38 15 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 15 53 SB 17 63 Route 62 Day Date Time Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Tuesday 3/8/2005 1605 6 WB 38 15 53 Tuesday 3/8/2005 1802 0 EB 38 15 53 Tuesday 3/8/2005 1805 8 WB 38 15 53 Tuesday 2/17/2004 1631 4 EB 42 20 62 Tuesday 9/23/2003 1619 12 WB 38 15 53 Tuesday 9/23/2003 1757 6 EB 38 15 53 Wednesday 8/6/2003 1559 1 EB 38 15 53 Thursday 6/19/2003 1723 5 EB 43 20 63 Wednesday 6/18/2003 1713 5 WB 43 20 63 Tuesday 6/17/2003 1605 4 WB 43 20 63 Tuesday 6/17/2003 1758 0 EB 43 20 63 Thursday 5/1/2003 1726 13 EB 43 20 63 Monday 4/21/2003 1658 0 EB 38 15 53 Monday 4/21/2003 1705 17 WB 38 15 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity EB 4 58 WB 9 56 • Summary Route NB/EB ° SB/WB Average Ridership Average Capacity Average Ridership Average Capacity Route 3 35 58 26 t 58 Route 16 15 56 14 53 Biscayne MAX 93 10 60 13 59 Route 95 0 53 0 Route T 15 53 17 63 Route 62 4 58 9 56 Total Ridership 79 79 ,..:: • • • APPENDIX D: Existing Conditions (2006) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Miami -Dade County Public Works Department Existing Timing Plans • 0 0 0 3598N2417.txt 3598 US I & ME 53 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3} PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF MSG G Y EWP Y S Y Im [Y[ MIN: 20 12 0 II ]O 67 1 4 14 4 90EAKLY NI 15 21 O 30 l 4 12 4 D 5INIYE m2 1I5 23 0 30 1 4 22 4 6 51LATE NIG 500 19 O 30 I 4 lZ 4 6 51DAWN M2 545 l 30 07 l 4 14 4 90AVG M2 O 615 2 40 66 I 4 15 4 90PRE AM M 745 lZ 59 81 1 4 20 4 90AM PEAK 845 16 46 88 I 4 13 4 110MID MORN 1200 17 49 88 I 4 13 4 110N0OM M2 1345 10 49 88 l 4 l] 4 1I0AFT Ml 0 1545 9 45 93 l 4 13 4 115PKE PM P _-4---- -_-_-_ I15PM PEAK I800 ] JZ 52 5 4 25 4 - -��---- --------9UP0ST-Pw 1900 l 30 67 I 4 14 4 90AVG M2 0 2130 ll 30 67 l 4 14 4 90EARLY NI ENTER NEXT PAGE # (I DIGIT), DAY # (2 DIGIT,99=HELP) OR ASSET # (4 DIGIT) Z4I7u5I& TIME PT OFF MIN: O 11 75 15 21 O 115 2] O 500 19 0 545 I 75 615 2 70 745 12 86 84S 16 98 NE 29 ST NS6 G Y 20 61 ]O 30 30 61 63 59 84 1200 17 103 82 1345 10 103 82 1545 9 10I 90 1630 1900 I 75 51 2I30 II 75 OI ENTER NEXT PAGE 1 I 1 1 l l 1 1 l � 1 l l l # 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (I TIMING FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION J) R EWP Y R 5 Y M [YC 14 l 18 4 I I 14 4 I 1 14 4 l l 14 4 l l 18 4 I l 16 4 I l 20 4 l 1 15 4 I l 17 4 I l 17 4 I l 14 4 I l 18 4 l l IO 4 I I 18 4 I 98EARLY NZ 6 55mITE m2 O 55L4TE NZG O 55DAWN M2 90AVG MZ O 9OPRE AM M 9OAM PEAK IIOMID MORN 1IONO0N MZ llOAFT MI 0 I15PRE PM P -' '- 115PM PEAK______ 9OAVG mJ 0 90EAALY NI DI6IT,99=HELP) OR ASSET # (4 DIGIT) L� 4- • • • • 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Existing Timings HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard k. 4\ ,7177, Lane Configurations 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions /4. dealffO*0.0h41).:Z.,...,R.,::1900 1900 ...,....:„,....„ 19061900 ...:....:,.......:..: .....,,,...-.,, "'-'':"::: ,...,-,,,-...,.„ Total Lost time (s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane:::.Utk•060tOrl::'n. l',!':,j,:--;:ignti,.1.',..66.4;-:M:.,,,,;Mtt.., '1:41100.P.:,,:qii:,igV.N,1 000.95 1.00 Frt 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .>„..::' .4.0teOted:'::,:ig.g;?:'. -.:':''.:::,::',,I.,,,9Q3.9.. -;:g,,E...4:•:i.:::.A.i.,'i&'''':::c.1.-;19741',.E..:.,..:',::::::...::014!,,.::,:a6w,:,:',AF,;,;;;A;004.,.:Igsn',:g0000'4,0:,:,:pc):4::;::ip:.01 Said. Flow (prot) 1743 1742 1770 3522 1770 3533 Fit 0f:Ott04;:,,,,,::;.:,.„,!,..,,:,,,.... '.....:,.,3,;,!'„,::.::,.....:!:.,.,....,..':,......,„..,,,.. ''''':Q.:50..Z:p.,;!::.3,.:',.irG..37.:5-..1490:5n:a:',4:40::?:0015gtioa:„::,..!:,,,,:.A:,:::,, .... , -......_,... .,..,„,.::::„.,„„...,...: ,,:„.:,..„.,.,.., Said. Flow (perm) 1550 1056 681 3522 457 3533 1::.:11'....0•:'; 'Y"'::'::',:::tr:r,.•:!E.-!;M:'3.,..:106,tf_.T.I.ati.48:038„,..'0,::-.::::12 - •20.-ez,i..,:g60ii:5,',1.631ota::34,iivip2:4-41.::,„...„:.„.„4400 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 : '1:F4110_*00§Y10;,:::iiafM404:Nt''':::,:!:;:::?4910fil::;i:::.';'Ai?'tigiON: -:" 7.g,:::Moomoz4eig:: RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 0 :*rf.;.egrOAPFtO*(9;ph),:iA:4!:.0;P,IF2:113::f,:::::T:g:',:0i,:i.R.,,.A.;.i:.,.. 0:1g,:igaii:Onig:;.:',00:',.,„....,_., :Ainit561NE24ti07._ Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ',R000.to:0;Pfl0.00..*.:.:;:,:..?!.A...T;grii*,.,.N44,.'0.h:.;NiA,R0,:::00,N.::g:-,,01-A:tow.wR;$,;',:14:43:::V,:4MATZKOMINiiii,04:0ftqaglirn:!::p Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated*400.0.!!().ER:g.i5:4:;,agv4::::',51,4,m4:,.31zEizE:;1511,,'''::::;.:i,.:::N:',95.4:?3ii,,!.,,:„.95.4AptigggeR,,,.„,,,, 4.3„..„.,.,,;:.,,,,„,,:,,::,, Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 11.6 95.4 95.4 9514 95.4 .,:0001*(*CiR014:$';:qtAPANK:Pg14-0-21;:li:',51:-T.:4-',',1'''',:4.':::';'4,1q1941":ti3OF:i'4 ...,. '..,...,, ....A.::1.:Vitatl'.943N:iscIMEMOt Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .jv:,00totktxto:q.#joolxoy;;;:.g.:og,.m:::,,,Fo4.,mmtggg;,:,'..::FFesg-i'..gia.A;V5:'g:.1.:RVZCq'g-R5FZAP:ZISREfoglxtgn'4.:;6Zt:E:41,R Lane Grp Cap (vph) 156 107 565 2922 379 2931 di ..it.*":,:noto,,,oifov,-,i,,,,',g,,,:::gr.,„,..:::..,.:,,.,:ia,i;,:aitay.i;:floga:i:::,!mvp:4A-q,;,;:65:401-64.:::::,..0000:01:t04::,:60412:F.;;;;:00-4.gliowila-,',#...gloggig mor %/is Ratio Perm c0.07 0.06 0.10 0.05 Vit R:-70tVP:t':'1:t'',a,-,:A'Pg::d;Wgiitg:V::ifttigl.,VgalfgRETttnfdpgoz55x5to-tompAggfggortoaoiegolooiygAAoiqot,A Uniform Delay, d1 50.2 49.2 1.9 2.4 1.8 2.1 „---.'14#4104IE0a0fQ4iititiatigi:TiOataniatiit0514!,.1,41:0a:46,4,Nlqat 1.00P1 0s0gilltZg4O10f00::giggg. Incremental Delay, d2 15.4 5.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 :;:::::iifgiliiazos:;ogg,;tfiditsAVARiSitilitKewvgilo:MZVI'SZ:aSOEI-NltAUMMg. :Mg Level of Service E D A A A A r':0010*401#3:i ,,. ''''"KtIINE250102ntaiigNittAi.,, ., 8lignilinilMetI2AII-021".113.fitlia2.0..:Naigg Approach LOS E D A A T-) 1900 4.0 0 i,g52.14,F,'KiAr._ gyti vkqz- '"!z;,1•;1,1,4.1„. _ - . -„L - _ „ HCM Average Control Delay 8.2 HCM Level of Service A HM ::0k4:47040600.tioniffiltrforf*,::::::EmotoometattimidgvemiorgtmwatementrA Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115,0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 - .R16ts:!:0It4:00t4giOtj*:tt*ta.EO§61.VgiaitifWl*.0:.O$6:Kit: '-g08140.41.*Intsimposmo:;i: Analysis Period (min) 15 c CriticaL Lane Group G:1044391002 ICE Phase il\Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 5/4/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. Timings 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard t \*. 040 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations 000:0:014.0.y.,:::m'INkti:;!E:,,r,,:.:,,:1-:;::aq;;:f:!,T',i;w., .",$!.R.18 :,:,:;:!.,,,I,...,,,,N.g1:66i,04,031,,.sigg.„., 709:1,:,':::-.),::::.ii,:$0,,!:-,:!.:,,,:',!,:',.,i::g.!-,,:,,:..,:::::.,.,i.; Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ::*§otoOp000..00ho:gn'oOoF;:,:eo:,Y;:,.N:;,;4011:--tgi,:::::x,..ti§::;,:v:!t9',:',::;',,,:ig:::o,:xa,zs.,N'gj-so'tti,.;.,:.:::::,:vgi,:',3:,,.::!:it':::.1,ik.:'!,,:g:'.:';':'px.,mit.,;;:!::gli,*.,;,:'if,.li::.i., Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 q0,.OdtOt;Ptia$:-ge;!!i'$:sf::::'i.El:.I',.-*ai;:',RAIEA'g68:;':',::..:!:Mi'i!fQ:g:::'A::,.,:"1::i:::g:c;:,;4!:.V.2.RRA:4'g;gil!';.,:P:'j;;0.„.,::,;',::;A:,;;V'.;:'','it;!-'.::..g::':;fiigg:M.,g,P.:',:,':":'-A:.;:'::j,::;',; Minirnum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ..''' joireotpotit(*yig:::,int:.:,:174:.5.5.17.,tpin.:47:p,'E,E.::::iiiiz4',,,,.;:,',.,:pAi,:;;.:::20.:::,:-0,-as2:.q;B:T3:?p....,,..:':',:,::::::,:: Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 ' :,,::.0::lif:,,T41;3!:ii:,-4';:::4.,.,,f,;:::0;!,,1,4;010244..14*gil.14,1:0%-,A1:144%.:zf,-0-$4%.,§0;2%,:§i§A .g204,703gindigotagnisiltOr! Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 AU-Red,,..,"....,.JftoIqoe:;a:;,'.i:;:i;::::,i'oo:,:RN.0Vllt:Bf.:0o:E:q::!ttpKsiE:;,zp,;.:i,geoktittqA::'ix!Vg;:;„ Lead/Lag '"Ill.;..,„ 'cIPIi(94-011:-::',',',',(i.:;i:1:':!,.,:::.2.,;::,,,::::5-....:6,‘,.;,::::,.-::..,#,A,i,.:5ii:;a3;Wsil'::Za,.„.:,..,..;,,,:3,:.,:.,::.,,, Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act JP..001410Realgaill;Ogigetwatlif.Aim.,:igpAR:igkAISP§.?:44a,,,.95. ..„„ Actuated giC Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 it.tP''.0ti;..051:4'Ziti:`;':::!2'1,)%aii:'::;5N5g:410q§rilna:igg04§01Q;ipAgigg.fgogigq,:..,, ,.... Control Delay 59.2 51.6 2.6 2.9 2.4 2.4 :..t::,i.:40*iPOTOVOgggglgtiflgfifMf OOA'illigilgM*Gigff:ZtVfEiit,lagqtsgfrjip:Avfpvt:tia.mtoigknoizia-wst Total Delay 59.2 51.6 2.6 5.6 2.4 2.4 ..,..LOS ';eid?:•':';'a.';tgk'.N':,'KZ'''''I"Pir:,',:-g:':''. ,. sfalfit'AttOZIAN:43::.W`!i:,,,43:5:;:F;:;:::!fggi,':::::i:iRtgaiggg:Rs,'T,Nigt:4; Approach Delay 59.3 51.6 5.4 2.4 :::(000'LOS,::EaRi:15::.!::-=:',fraiSig.42fig4135ig2i';::'::;':a41:17,R;,',#',1 .,'A,,AilfiNifAtiSititii:Egii*Anlilk:"‘ 7:0108MOWEAINORWUSMAIMMeenSiMenatatimaMegVIS, Actuated Cycle Length: 115 4(319)ii4001;0004f7:2 and Stari of Green Natural Cycle: 40 7§00tn**10106a404604144 -0#11000MinvoWaftigeNeff*AERANORktiMaittsa4A0 Maximum vie Ratio: 0.75 :1076#0013$4001iV"IffigilitiOntateraffiteffi&ITM .,,2:7NEWASSAIPPRIP:4IPIJAPINNO: Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service A -Analysis Ntjo: 5goste"Votamtzaaftanmt,.;-iqgvoaeettbmtgt%4:;,gtzn,,y"?g.,:r Splits and Phases: 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard G:1044391002 ICE Phasell\Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 5/4/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard 4- 45A-4 140 Lane Configurations 1::::1: Flow-.. -'11.. 7:4596:91giaitg.„, 1900..,..:,,...,:„ ..„„:,111::::.....,...,,,1 I,.:. Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 p:**1440footorM060AINOCAPROtio:5,,WK'ImetPOVIntal,...,00 0.95.,,,,,:-7,--NitT0,00,141Y1,.' :,P Frt 0.96 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 :;::,;::,,-764.01'd:'0.50:RMS044-goolO,SgiltiNiegiiii.COVEWSREVS P1.00MMOIROSIM0M001:1* Satd. Flow(pro) 1754 1769 1770 3521 1770 3489 Fit OtrittediE:Alki4:::::1-:;!ingi116M;44:,.:41':15:M§RititaPiQP30K1340EgAlt,v..,.:..14,1iPPA;;Riiazing101046MV00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1393 i 189 626 3521 478 3489 ;::.4t0W11,,aifiy.:::*it::l:RgtgN,,jgt0.SSP*CN:ogMg?g:SYINPMZEiOSIVS:PPCMWSPIVNNvatr4 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 ::17frovOljrog:o:!e,::::*Agen.440*-1,40ii.,-;go;4401-29:4,Mit044:04-tgl:INICRAI00180tCLI.... '"' R-TOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 0 trtd000atif.,fo.wooiywosoa,iwam,p:vmomlov:*RRqoo*Vgfgoi,Swiooggs*.x4w,., Turn Type Perrn Perm Perm Perm... Per POteCteitikh'a'SegU:s.MfAeiggan.MRRMeadtr-gffRfq0RtrgrAM'VP::V3gMRMNFVft4 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 -01UaidttiGe0-46.,•G,:ti.)%6Rj'aiWag4.4104:0:,,,:;444.Ag6:0w400ii:Wiii4-011ziA.O.tz,::.%::ii,ARENAMBOMP;: Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 14.8 92.2 92.2 92.2 92.2 :We*0!btO:010PAEI:iE:':;tNoNftfgif4:tifffiEEY:ViAtPM:VVNMPP'iM0184P'taVttNrNaa;,:oz ,..,,. Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 r4fitrk0tOni16:6(0:gi:'IRMEREAECRE%:::WkiFER:MVMSIRMiS3Z.':tetoo:ln:t5,EFV:,:'::Er2::,3;ctntEf!$1P Lane Grp Cap (vph) 179 153 502 2823 383 2797 ':;.'±j!P'".FTOCna:Fagik;'algaitt:et-PMSat45kattfittatiiii.tiiilitOMOPMIINE:MIEZIBIIZ4 vfs Ratio Perm c0.11 0.08 0.07 0.0i ..,„-AtiatiNiii0ROSAMINISPIOPRINESISMNPOINfattlit4409:1700MIVIStit,,..,,,0.29 ,,,,„.., Uniform Delay, di 49.2 47.7 2.4 3.2 '.'ii 2.9 7t:*10-00fk!Maitftj,ta.j10:CEINFINIEIAPP:klaanNVPnttg .ttitaittnitirligOill4L Incremental Delay, d2 36.0 10.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 ::::10figiteRNMENIERIOISEMIIIIMOIIMEROSONVOIMISORMON114,144 Level of Service F E A A A A '140,3,0:00'IaliffigS114413111•2111t grAgtildlIMINIP 3.2 Approach LOS F E A A 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions P Siferdc icrf ezzi.-1:31 HCM Average Control Delay 12.4 HCM Level of Service HCMz000apoo0000g521Nto:MostimitimmemoolimiuttatErganedwitt Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 01040.0.6:j000006/0.00000042000"nriel fr+ Analysis Period (min) 15 c CrthcaT Lane Group GA044391002 ICE Phase II\CalcsISynchro\Existing.sy7 5/3/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard 4, 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions LatO.Configurations Ideal j:*000tititavil mmxtg,notvevzconoeg-vztrtmmmoom*momgomAktaoozoEvvpoo*exr Total Lost time (s) Lane Util FactoretkgM221tAWMgPWaWv.xtftweOfWM*IWggitgmAtwvpynmpwwovwlmcnwsvx Frt Fit =1:?000#1010i1101•011111.11itillesefoomoneattormientmg, Satd. Flow ()rat) Fit -..,...,z:00110061100g:::::PCMORPIRASNERNERIMINERiENENtig.tmgatonomican,N2 Satd. Flow (perm) Nti33:400'41001110114614Peak-hour [actor. PHF 0.98 0111MAINESSZMOSEISMIREINTOMMIINMSOINIO 49:*AYPtCSANizitgtt§attivgitaatigimitdggsfaoaimgptNaimotommmaasaow RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 MOOCClogrosouttailitiMatializiattaSSMIASENnaniaailteltdas Turn Type Protected Phases ''''L-3-WqPtNfg'P4P2R8:14aVRIP-'4*40*'v"''?'''' Permitted Phases 011.0#0.4P.*1101: KittliggiSNBititbNENNSISRtNINESAINVIkniMfMISOSRB%:?, Effective Green, g (s) Actuated;-matiopttf000woxomxaeglR„naaftVMVRgaf--A.figfiVi,,tdggi!,-MVbttV't,tn$ Clearance Time (s) Vehicle *SrMtgggiatSnaVMBIMFSTVEICIFOEMN*NEKABMNsmnpmggmg Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm #VAffetr'gkr,f,kftfegt*.-IM•RV,WffffltfggiTtataftCMgtttWNNC.Atit',afgng,,n5:k,ttgfiiTMA!V Uniform Delay, di ProgressonFactoritammavatamateRntieRattMaTe.:2*Niatetligatiantaittingladintie Incremental Delay, d2 Delay(s)voama00000rtmtfsmsatA9a*..:.-„,„„ Level of Service Approach LOS GA044391002 ICE Phase 111Calcs\SynchrolExisting.sy7 5/3/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Timings 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard -Di- lc 4- t 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions Jr _,SM-M.1.2"-LNIe161, Lane Configurations t"r# Y.04004000tREgnimmiTSVP04P§Abg-AW'A;--gil#PAOVANtsagnefltungialsollin Turn Type Perrn Perm Perm Perm Perm Jdt:e.4ted:iPb44t,Mint'REINSERg4ittNNRNWgetttngr:V-Mtnrt4.ggn:'fs'6Fg.geftMMEagk'M Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 ',.:11t4a5t(PhiOWREe,te14St.te+:tatg§Vftitn::WgINRga't:Mq:dMOAWtANVtfgtkeakibtt Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Z117I:-kW01:;:'':itMii:44'.INIPAMtorgnipx:.g.,zifg?,;:vgt0;,,IZZ,tcKV:-ZSAMttAggiginingamt:: Total Split (s) 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 Vtoiz§otwo:gnotg5gAtWg*0*k.ttO:Mfoz5r%g:govP;oWfA:4:woi§*tqi$:VEIFlaostneg Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 -,....,,,....„....... -01*FA-1.41-M-?,:'i14fAMtqi,t'gi:..F1P!ZtR;TiQidigt;:PMtgdtak,:oostgtim,it:toitogfstw4gA,gp,oy,i Lead/Lag -...#.„,.„,, 7:;001,Mitage444$4a4gaitkiatafilfe.SMODZONSIVER41,1K-VMEta Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max 1::;ItiPffOtAt*:h3:(#Y:NEikikiagtgit:ofi*w,t4mm;ogosgtozcgNgfetig,..922 92.2 Actuated g!C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 I, Z*:CiVtNfgfngiglani9Aq;4:ANgi:t .0:1$0114010No0.37iaggai08l0.29idatalinaMilatio Control Delay 85.1 64.9 2.9 3.6 3.0 3.1 - .-----:**POOYM:0:01MNAWN4044tagain040.410,AMOVanowinti t;o ltamoomoinge Total Delay 85.1 64.9 2.9 3.6 3.0 3.7 LOS:„.,.aikggggintlnjltNNgRVEVNtdgtftgllit•EgVWSBMtVgARMEAKONOSilttEg Approach Delay 85.1 64.9 3.6 3.7 :;."0000k.L.,,„„„ 2e,--4t,., :6?"-7,-.,,iligRANgainPiggiL :z.,-,.',Io:,4:FlgttSliAa:ifilit4taigaiaatgi; i'ailtYPAlifit:6411P5t7t. Actuated Cycle Length: 115 ' ' ffeidfor Natural Cycle: 40 ase, ,,,FIVFNIIMEPPR -rtoof Green --08NON 0.44PROPMPWa --:2sazoopataeweavgwQ:'aw..gpww,4Rwm,.-LtfasA.--41,-:aatwAtm:tF-ArAt--e4z-zvagwt "kr- ;','gAgfiritg*,`"14V-On Maximum vie Ratio: 0.88 tOteretbn Sgal Jnt&ectibr L Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service A alysfS:Perto fotny Splits and Phases: 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard *4t 02 .6 04 4117J- -V 08 GA044391002 ICE Phase IIICalcs\Synchro‘Existing.sy7 5/3/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 32nd Street & NE 4th Avenue 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions • 4-- Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1:1:04001,64;rate (vph) Pedestrians Walking Speed (Ws) 1,:iCent Biockage Right turn flare (veh) Mantpe Median storage veh) 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 None -- pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 171:VP40:fifjt*f§:**keititCO9AVPS''-'j45:VA'-f,-44PWIVAIB vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vot 19 0 17'116 — tu, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 96 0 99 98 Volume Left 71 0 12 QthcsH 1597 1700 942 — - Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 Bfitrdrbetak(4)%:eaVS-4.10i-tn,OifrtiV- ,:gty44-',..,,IMN-R4g*kt-2-Rgttl-tliagkelafiaaaEgtfA--tit,gfS*MK5 Lane LOS A A a Jffg%„Ntfiifgigniit:W'---jffi4NNNRAIVEAEMNkrifiegi:SIRCK Approach LOS A Average Delay ntrsebon Capacity Analysis Period (min) 15 6.0 G:\044391002 ICE Phase II\Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/3/2006 Synchro 6 Report • • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 17: NE 31st Street & NE 4th Avenue 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions 4\ t tfr Ng- Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade VOlt.iffik'0011170A-A:::, Peak Hour Factor Hourfy flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Biockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 1:!:,...::04Y0100sTsI46.0,PORSMA;'e.g vC1, stage 1 conf vol .1:::;AOgf#0001,4,4251aalgit-Ni5gakii,w4rgifg.,„:4g, vCu, unblocked vol 13 30 gittal7A535'; OIZST'131$2,'V4402;51013 100 99 98 96 99 100 97 100 1605 1582QilPiag.tki2:871:ii.i4612k10601tt857 802g'19,74 ;,.10191:4:0-EN'AO: tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 04:-000-104.1* „ Volume Left 0% 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0,69 0.69 0.69 0.69 12 17 441-305ild-43-fatiggatANEStRANargeMilan 0.69 None Noneitatfi,!4. .1a0,024AW:7-VAMO,310,k. Vit.RVIalt491.04-00,4140 Nit.-Z1g-R,,V$404411:1•Piaglittga 83 69 18 89 78 10 cSH 1605 1582 862 822 L014f#6,1004000WWigtt tE0.01A-0A:M0.04YEtfittAtEoiMMWMSWISSMietfet• Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 5 3 9OPIMPOPY4sYr*V.'7411.4-2,i3i5W4-w,??_*q=Nowi-!,!*-,g4-Awt.F**14-arovv-t,gitt-ptw*-mi Lane LOS A A A A '"-J4*POOYZWAEM4VN9.5eiggAtaitatattatilagtanitertanntaMP Approach LOS A A -11(;.:1 41. 4MItA attaremw ska&sa Average Delay 1titosi:00004!,p4frad: toit;',4a;:;:a Analysis Period (min) .4 VO:Oof*NreCae.w,i,:telitek„-VInittialegaigh 15 G:1044391002 ICE Phase 111Calcs\SynchrolExisting.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 5/3/2006 Synchro 6 Report • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 23: NE 31st Street & NE 7th Avenue Lane Configurations Grade Free Free Stop 0% 0% 0% 2006 PM Peak Hour Present Traffic Conditions V0406*AY00)' Peak Hour Factor 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 M14-410*s'rafO(vtih)':X=6:1-'::::':':'eIf::'gfigfZgtfgrnfgckgZfiVgitffMgtgfltM;'A-Yr.4f:N'tigWOY'AbiiAfgtV Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) *04VPf00-kag6::Hs' Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veil) Upstream460001), 1154 pX, platoon unblocked vC,"mettet 7iiitaMite***Tat.-14400MI7OINatMagliatigaltAMAI# vc , stage 1 cont vol vCu, unblocked vol tGsing1 (s) tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 7 30 7 4.1 6.44t16.2 Volume Left 11 ,:,::VV'tgl*S-taft4eltniai-MV'ttVeihlf-rVWattifitifMtAWtaiMVPNZNM-Zq, cSH Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 01!*10014(s)'53iO44gigAtif0.',,,IditafteinlattWWIAMMINEKIVEMin Lane LOS A A ''IFFM4Oi$1AMMSNMEMVtMifgiNZR*RKWN,AfORMM Approach LOS A 1613 1700 1060 Average Delay 5.7 10fetSeCtiOtip; padlty utir .1-04%-f.%11;1., ICUtev Analysis Period (min) 15 :1 of::00) eiiagaietiig.NegRift::!j, GA044391002 ICE Phase II\Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/3/2006 Synchro 6 Report • * APPENDIX E: Growth Trend Analyses 0 • • FOOT Historical Count Information • Print Date: May 02, 2006 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Historical AADT Report County: 87 - DADE 0143 Description: SR 5/US-1, 200` S NE 36 ST AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor 2004 C 38,000 N 21,500 S 16,500 0.09 0.53 4.40 2003 C 43,500 N 21,500 S 22,000 0.09 0.58 4.00 2002 C 46,500 N 22,500 S 24,000 0.10 0.52 4.00 2001 C 39,500 N 19,500 S 20,000 0.08 0.54 5.50 2000 _.._......_.. C 47 000 N 24,000 S 23,000 0.08 0.53 3.20 1999 C 40,000 N 22,500 S 17,500 0.09 0.53 4.90 1998 C 47,000 N 24,000 S 23,000 0.09 0.53 2.50 1997 C 38,500 N 19,000 S 19,500 0.09 0.65 2.30 1996 C 35,000 N 16,000 S 19,000 0.09 0.53 2.90 1995 C 34,500 N 16,500 S 18,000 0.08 0.63 6.70 1994 C 40,500 N 20,000 S 20,500 0.09 0.60 5.50 1993 C 41,000 N 21,500 S 19,500 0.00 0.00 0.00 1992 C 38,000 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 36,330 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 34,615 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 39,580 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 35,420 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 36,371 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 36,604 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 34,067 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1984 30,047 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1983 31,810 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1982 35,630 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1981 37,135 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35,927 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,203 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1978 35,121 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1977 27,090 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 28,598 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1974 27,190 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1973 29,291 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 27,691 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 30,967 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1970 24,942 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F T First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T =Third Year Est; X = Unlmown Page 1 Print Date: May 02, 2006 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Historical AADT Report County: 87 - DApE 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1976 5058 Description; Auk. DT C 43,000 37,500 38,500 39,000 42.500 38,000 41.000 35,000 39,500 30,500 35,500 39,000 35,500 33,470 31,754 32,594 31,272 32,181 36,425 36,854 29,670 Ij SR 5/US-1, 200' N NE 29 ST Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor D Factor T Factor N 21,500 N 18,000 N 19,000 N 19,000 N 23,000 N 18,500 N 21,500 N N N N NT N N N N N N N N 17,500 23,500 14,500 17,000 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S s S S s S S S S s s s S S S 8 s s S S S 21,500 19,500 19.500 20,000 19,500 19,500 19,500 17,500 16,000 16,000 18,500 19,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 6.20 0.58 6.60 0.52 3.40 0.54 5.30 0.53 3.10 0.53 3.10 0.53 2.50 0.65 2.30 0.53 2.90 0.63 6.70 0.60 5.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C= Computed; E =Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T =Third Year Est; X = Unknown Page • • • Growth Trend Analyses • • TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5/US-1 -- 200' S of NE 36 ST Cou nty: Station #: Highway: 50000 45000 m 40000 - Q d 35000 > 30000 17'2 20000 c% 15000 Q 10000 25000 5000 0 2000 Observed Count Fitted Curve 2005 2010 Year 2015 2020 ** Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2004 to Design Year): Printed: -1,400 29.8% -3.06% -3.49% 2-May-06 Straight Line Growth Option 2025 Miami -Dade 87-0143 SR 5/US-1 Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 47000 39500 46500 43500 38000 45700 44300 42900 41500 40100 2006 Opening Year Trend 2006 2007 N/A 37300 2007 Mid -Year Trend N/A 35900 20 8 Design Year Trend 2008 N/A 34500 TRANPLAN Forecasts rends *Axle -Adjusted • • • 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 2000 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5!US-1 -- 200' N of NE 29 ST Observed Count Fitted Curve I 1 1 1 1 1 1 + 2005 2010 2015 Year 2020 2025 **Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2004 to Design Year): Printed: 50W 0.1% -0.12% -0.13% 2-May-06 Straight Line Growth Option Traffic (ADT/AADT) Year Count* Trend** 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 42500 39000 38500 37500 43000 40200 40200 40100 40100 40000 2006 Opening Year Trend 2006 N/A 39900 2007 Mid -Year Trend 2007 N/A 39900 2008 Design Year Trend 2008 N/A 39800 TRANI LAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted • 0 APPENDIX F: Cardinal Trip Distribution • • • • t i imi-Dade Interim 2005 Cost .Feasible Plan ORIGIN ZONE DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY CARDINAL DIRECTIONS ; TOTAL 1 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 496 TRIPS 129 41 46 111 149 155 117 89 832 PERCENT 15.50 4.93 5.53 13.34 17.31 18.63 14.06 10.70 497 TRIPS 161 64 55 123 193 198 146 136 1076 PERCENT 14.96 5.95 5.11 11.43 17.94 18.40 13.57 12.64 498 TRIPS 638 658 345 853 1426 924 576 607 6027 PERCENT 10.59 10.92 5.72 14.15 23.66 15.33 9.56 10.07 499 TRIPS 225 93 79 191 331 303 202 247 1671 PERCENT 13.46 5.57 4,73 11.43 19.81 18.13 12.09 14.78 500 TRIPS 678 183 300 780 850 1284 624 649 5348 PERCENT 12.68 3.42 5.61 14.58 15.89 24.01 11.67 12.14 501 TRIPS 389 164 142 317 355 633 386 402 2788 PERCENT 13.95 5.88 5.09 11.37 12.73 22.70 13.85 14.42 502 TRIPS 344 150 116 244 291 613 325 386 2469 PERCENT 13.93 6.08 4.70 9.88 11.79 24.83 13.16 15.63 503 TRIPS 1343 521 570 957 1490 2194 1403 1706 10184 PERCENT 13.19 5.12 5.60 9.40 14.63 21.54 13.78 16.75 " 504 TRIPS 617 222 274 229 1153 1292 716 894 5397 PERCENT 11.43 4.11 5.08 4.24 21.36 23.94 13.27 16.56 505 TRIPS 934 380 570 400 2148 2499 1567 1502 10000 PERCENT 9.34 3.80 5.70 4.00 21.48 24.99 15.67 15.02 506 TRIPS 732 277 254 434 719 1304 893 909 5522 PERCENT 13.26 5.02 4.60 7.86 13.02 23.61 16.17 16.46 507 TRIPS 593 309 290 197 1085 1232 1107 927 5740 PERCENT 10.33 5.38 5.05 3.43 18.90 21.46 19.29 16.15 508 TRIPS 45 101 79 10 53 238 146 74 746 PERCENT 6.03 13.54 10.59 1.34 7.10 31.90 19.57 9.92 509 TRIPS 339 134 88 47 589 847 705 631 3380 PERCENT 10.03 3.96 2.60 1.39 17.43 25.06 20.86 18.67 510 TRIPS 18 23 10 3 17 73 54 44 242 PERCENT 7.44 9.50 4.13 1.24 7.02 30.17 22.31 18.18 - 34 - 1/18/05 0 • 0 APPENDIX G: Volume Development Worksheets VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Biscayne Boulevard & NE 33rd Street PM PEAK HOUR Description Biscayne Leff Boulevard Southbouutl Right Left NE 33rd Street Westbound Right Biscayne Left Boulevard Northbound Right Left NE 33rd Street Eastbound Rl ht Throu t Through Through Throu ,h 2006 Existing Traffic 23 702 8 38 12 20 65 1021 34 39 42 48 Peak Season Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0i 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 21306 Volume Conversion 23 709 8 38 12 20 66 1031 34 39 42 48 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0,5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 11 0 1 0 0 1 I6 1 1 1 I Committed Projects Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx on the Bay (Bisacayne Bay Lofts) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosabella Lofts (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Star Lofts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 8 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 Disixict Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Arf Condotniaiutn) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park lane Tower 35 0 0 19 9 30 0 0 19 0 11 0 The Platinum Condominium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soleil (3160 Biscayne Boulevard) 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami; (Parcel C+E) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Four Midtown Miatui(Parce€ 4, Tract F) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miami(Parcel 3, Tract G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miatni(Parcel 2, Tract N) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract D (Parcel 6} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract E. (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista West Tract G (South Block North) 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Background Traffic 58 748 8 58 21 50 73 1063 54 40 54 49 Project Traffic 8 11 0 10 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 Pass-55 y Tsaz7lr; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Total Traffic 66 759 8 68 21 58 73 1046 54 40 54 49 40 • VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Biscayne Boulevard & NE 29th Street PM PEAK HOUR TDescr1 Win 11-Turn Biscayne Left Boulevard Southbound Right Left NE 29th Street We$fbpund Right Biscayne Left Boulevard Northbound Right Left NE 29th Street Eastbound Right Through Through Through Through 2006 Existing Traffic 1 27 707 73 58 28 19 40 979 34 77 43 44 Peak Season Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 2006 Vo1u€ne Conversion 1 27 714 74 59 28 19 40 989 34 78 43 44 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 11 1 1 0 0 1 1.5 1 1 1 I Committed Projects Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx an the Bay (i3isacayne Clay Lofts) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosabella Lois (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Star Lofts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 4 Lima 0 2 0 0 5 10 0 0 2 5 2 13 0 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condominium) 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 Onyx 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 6 Paramount Day (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 19 26 0 0 0 17 ParkLaneTower 0 0 34 6 0 0 0 0 35 0 11 0 0 The Platinum Condominium. 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 5 0 6 0 Platinum on the Bay 0 4 0 0 2 10 3 0 0 3 0 I 1 0 Sebe 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Soleil (310013iscayne Boulevard) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 11 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 7 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 7 0 2 0 Midtown Miarni: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miarni: (Parcel C+E) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami, Four Midtown Miami(Parcel 4, Tract F) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Mia€ni(Parcel 3, Tract G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miarni(Parcel 2, Tract 1I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract 13 (Parcel 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 Buena Vista West Tract G (South Block Nortii) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 2009 Background Traffic 1 40 830 81 71 53 26 88 1107 55 92 76 90 Project Traffic 0 0 9 10 2 1 0 0 13 3 16 3 0 Pass. -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009Total Traffic 1 40 839 91 73 54 26 88 1120 58 108 79 90 • VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 4th Avenue & NE 32nd Street PM PEAK HOUR Description 11-Tom Left NE 4th Avenue Snufhbqund Right 11-Tum Left NE 32nd Street Westbound Right Left NE 4th Avenue Northbound Right LJ-Turn Left NE 32trd Street Eastbound Right Thronlit Through Through Through 2006 Existing Traffic Peak Season factor 2006 Volume Conversion Annuai Growth Rate 16 1.01 9 1.01 0 1.01 16 1.01 2 1.01 0 1.01 10 1.01 3 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 12 1.01 43 1.01 1 L 1.01 0 1.01 16 9 0 16 2 0 10 3 0 0 0 12 43 11 0 0.5% 0,5% 0.5% 0.5% 0,5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0,5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%n 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Contntitted projects Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx on the Say (Bisacayne Bay Lofts) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosabelia Lolls (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Star Lofts (Ray 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condanunium) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Lane "Cower 0 0 0 21 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Platinum Candominfum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soleil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miarni: (Parcel C+E) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: pour Midtown Miami(Parcel 4, Tract 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miami(Parcel 3, Tract Gj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miami( Parcel 2, "tract H) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract D(Parcel 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bueuu Vista West Tract G (South Block North) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Background Traffic 16 9 0 37 29 0 10 3 0 a 0 12 44 11 0 Project Traffic 0 a 0 0 0 0 S 18 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 Pass -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Total Traffic 16 17 0 37 29 0 15 21 0 0 0 12 44 49 0 ro all VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 4th Avenue & NE 31st Street PM PEAK HOUR Descri thin Walgreen's Left Driveway Soufhhpurjg, Ri t Left NE 31st Street Westbound Rt ht Left NE 4th Avenue Northbound Right Left NE 31st Street Eastbound Ri ht Tbrou r Than€ 1 Throu 1 Thrortg) 2006 Existing Traffic Peak Season Factor 2006 Volume Conversion Annual Growth Rate 0 1.01 19 1.01 2 1.01 8 1.01 5 141 4 1.01 12 1.01 20 1.01 6 1.01 5 1.01 4 I.01 17 1.01 0 19 2 8 5 4 12 20 6 5 4 17 05'y 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5E Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed Projects Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx an the Clay (Bisacayne 13ay Lofts) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rasabel1a Lofts (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Star Lofts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condominium) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Lane Tower 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Platinum Condominium 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soleil {3100 Biscayne Boulevard) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel C-€-E) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Four Midtown Nliami(Parcel 4, Tract F) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Mianti(Parcel 3, Tract G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Mianu: Two Midtown Miami(Parcel2, Tract 11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract 1? (Parcel 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista West Tract G (South Block North) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Background Traffic 0 19 2 8 5 4 12 20 6 5 4 17 Project Traffic 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 Pass -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 2009 Total Traffic 0 19 2 11 12 4 12 20 12 5 6 17 • • VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 7th Avenue & NE 31st Street PM PEAK HOUR De scri lion Left NE 7th Avenue Smithbound Right Left NE 31st Street Westbound Right Left NE 7th Avenue Northbound Right U-Tom Left NE 31st Street Eastbound Right Through Through Through Through 2006 Existing Traffic Peak Season Factor 2006 Volume Conversion Annual Growth Rate 1 1.01 0 i.01 6 1.01 0 1.01 4 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 3 1.01 3 1.01 1 1.01 0 1.01 1 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed Projects BIue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx on the Bay (Bisacayne Bay Lofts) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roaabella Lofts (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Star Lofts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Lolls (Biscayne Condos) Cr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mondrian Miarni (Gallery Art Condominium) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Lane Tower 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Platinum Condominium 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soleil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel C+E) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: FOnr Midtown Miami(Parcel 4, Tract F) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miami(Parcel 3, Tract (i) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miami(Parcel 2, Tract 11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract 1') (Parcel 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista West Tract G (South Block North) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2009 Background Traffic 1 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 Project Traffic 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 as -lay° Ttaff"tc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 "Total Traffic 1 0 16 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 11 1 0 • VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Entry Driveway & NE 32nd Street PM PEAK HOUR Deseri YSon Left Entry Driveway Southbottnd Right Left NE 32nd Street Westbound Right Let Entry Driveway Northbound Right Loll NE 32nd Street Eastbound Rigllu Through Through Through Through 20116 Existing Traffic Peak Season Factor 2006 Volume Conversion Annual Growth Rate 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 15 1,01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 I.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 20 1.01 0 1.01 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 20 11 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed Projects Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay' Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 Onyx on the Bay (Bisacayne Bay Lofts) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 Roaabella Lofts (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 Star Lofts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i'he Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condominium) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ,Onyx 2 'l'aaamount 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Lane Tower 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Platinum Condominium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum en the Bay 0 0 0 t) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soleii (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel C±E) The Shops 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) M.id-Block East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: POUT Midtow El Miami(Parcel 4, Tract F) a o 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miansi(Parcei 3, Tract G) 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miaou(Parcel 2, Tract 1-1) 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract 0 (Parcel 6) 9) 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 9 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista West Tract Cr (South Block North) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 2009 Background Trallic 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 211 0 Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 41 5 0 Pass -By Traffic 'natal 0 0 lk 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Traffic 0 0 0 0 15 3 0 0 0 41 25 9 110 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Exit Driveway & NE 32nd Street PM PEAK HOUR i)escr rtian Left Exit Driveway Southbonnd Right 1„eft NE 32nd Street Westbound Right Left Exit Driveway Northbound Right Left NE 32nd Street Eastbound Right Thrau�h Through Through Through 2006 Existing Traffic Peak Saasou Factor 2006 Volume Conversion Annual Growth Rate 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 15 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 TO 0 1.01 0 1.01 20 1.01 0 1.01 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cantntitted Projects Blue Condominium (Biscayne Flay Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx on the Bay (13isacayne Bay Lofts) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosabella Lofts (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Star Lofts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mondrian Miami (Gallery An Condominium) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx 2 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Lane Tower 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Platinum Condominium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soleil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel C+E) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) Mid -Stock East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami; Four Midtown Miami(Parcel 4, Tract F) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miansi(Parcel 3, Tract G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i1 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midt©)vn Miami(Parcel 2, Tract H) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract D (Parcel6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista West Tract G (South Block North) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Background Traffic 0 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 Project 'Traffic 10 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 Pass-1.3y Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Total Traffic f0 0 23 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 40 1110 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 7th Avenue & Driveway PM PEAK HOUR Description Left NE 7th Avenue Southbound Right Left Driveway Westbound Right Left NE 7th Avenue Northbound Rit Left Driveway Eastbound Right Through Through Through Through 2906 Existing Traffic Peak Season factor 2006 Volume Conversion Annual firowth Rate 0 1.0) 7 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 3 1.01 0 1.0I 0 i.01 0 1.01 0 1.01 0 7 0 If 0 1) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.5"/0 11.5% 0.5% 0,5% 0.5% 0.5`Y 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commit -fed Projects Blue Condominium (Biscayne )3ay Tourer) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx on the Bay (Bisacayne Ray Lofts) 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosabelia Lolls (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stat Lofts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condominium) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Lane Tower 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Platinum Condominium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum on the Day 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sokil {3100 Biscayne Boulevard) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A)'Fhe Shops 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0lidtown Miami: (Parcel CFL) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami. (Parcel D) MIS -Block fast 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 Midtown Miami: Four Midtown Mianti(Pareel 4, Tract F) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nlidlown Miami: Three Midtown Miarni(Parcci 3, Tract G) 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miartti(Parcel 2, Tract LI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract D (Parcel 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 Buena Vista Iast Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10uena Vista Nest Tract G (South Block North) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Background Traffic 0 7 0 0 0 11 (I 3 0 0 0 0 P0olecr Traffic 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 .3 5 0 0 0 t'ass-Hy Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 11 0 0 0 0 2009 Total Traffic 5 77 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 • PEAK HOUR DETEIRMI.NA T.ION STLJDX AREA.INTERSECTI.ON TOTALS Description PM Peak !hour 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 13sscayrre Boulevard & NE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard 44x. NE 29th Street NE 4th Avenue & N11 32nd Street NE 4th Avenue & NE 31st Street NE 7th Avenue & NE 31st Street Totals 468 533 35 34 6 449 493 47 4'1 3 460 491 29 25 7 527 541 23 16 4 513 537 28 27 8 504 511 32 22 6 508 541 39 3'7 O 478 497 27 27 2 1076 1033 1012 1111 1I13 1075 1125 103 4232 4269 4311 4424 4344 k: 10443A1002 ice phase r 0Vcalcsl(:e:c, x'IsJpenic bore 5,2/2006 7/; 07 1.1111.11 Kimley-Horn OEM and Associates, inc. C,PYrig “ ,0 2004, .Kirnf y-Flom and 4_crocfates, Me. Peak Hour 4:45 P1V1-5:45 PM 40 • APPENDIX H: 0 Future Conditions (2009 Without Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs III HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard Lane Configurations Idea Pow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane litil Factor { 4\ t 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions 4, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 010.0:53:161.EAfiN:;:46.1"-. ',,,-';;2,P1:100:::.,.1: 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.99 .,_ 1.00 1.00 FIt ..itite6fdet.;::::...:.:::::::::;',Ei':;',51i1gRiV50744:0:i.t,A.kg.g,,',1.:',":;:,A.,3.i:.:§6:pi ;:ii'.t:o.A.:.0.A5:,,,,y1499::poNi::!,::;',44:0,i94#:!.g1p90.1:g;r1;E'','ii:i Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1727 1770 3513 1770 3534 .„,-1000,404NW,::::6:';',.i.P0:,:::gitagoget:N:tp..ii:::.:::;':.;:zi3:id:P.,-.::',.:i:ok,-,::,9.,..: ,-,,,,,,,,,,,:5,,,,,,,,0.35-1.00,,,,.,,::,::,1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1441 1043 649 3513 426 3534 V jO4:*WTK;:i'ittngifitit4(*fkitOil8R4qOXAa'nliLZVPM:'.%11SRZ4NWg:M!0tMP:ggK:flg*11RL, Peak -hour factor;PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0,97 0.97. 0.97. 0.97 0.97 _0797,. 9.97 9.97 0.97 .,.....1, ,AOPVi5PEt:RENP.E41NSP:1*Wa:*tNRR'Pg4at Ogighgj,e'Nfr--. . 1096„.:.:4!,t'',.77.,4!.:,-,-V:ePY4::-A771%11tr.. RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 20 0 0 0 ,, 0 1 0 ::,., ---....:0:t9W0Phlitif DA*141;;;b',20gQ4104:PM-, .11,.;:i!:4WE:',::q::'siazZogg,l ogigm60 778,ippg.:ggo Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm :7t#t§*4Rjj000ti.:'neetegNtn74'tt'gM:rPfgt!.'t:V'4i!'''!;E'ttt'2:";!::::::'gl':ltgl:Ytt5F.: '''''j'111!'"kT7,?!.:'.t.i::-fgS7 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 ;0__14000(00:6P:t4'ii:NPVitigliaAllkilieVimigs-0,5,-i4„0,,,„,..,„.,,,„,,,,,„, ,:,,.„..,„,... ..„, . 2,-.1mg Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 13.0 940 .. 94.0_ _ _ , 94.0 94.0 ,,,---40thi-: -Jititi:t;:::::%mottett .005t200:?:SilitalsgMR-97Sittitatitgli-0!2::!IP.:013I1#00-01.V3WIP!gfiiiP: Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 , 4.0 , 4.0 4.0., 4.0 :04:010,000*i0MOYAWaidtegitaggnolevag,',,Psi4AgigiiR*rnt3.0 -:$50.M:Piika5a4.'i0topl:Aarie Lane Grp Cap (vph) 163 118 530 2871 348 2889 ----Ratia'Prot,'S;tia',i'2','ktaa:'Vaad,0J8:*BSNMiBVgigt,gigg vis Ratio Perm 0,09 c0.11 0.12 0.14 71R400;:PME!'it"..54;g0110351118:AMPIARKEISE30010MAWftCit.i-COVOINUAtriffintwizilso Uniform Delay, di 49.8 50.8 2.2 2.8 2.2 2.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t00 . 1.00. Incremental Delay, d2 24.2 73.2 0.6 0.4 1.1 0.2 _...41:40IIIIiiiNtAtie114171400MIORIMIlg4PRIMPAgIef 34•14tV;A,3;- NMI Level of Service E F A A A ,,-':,AiW;4::01,,r-,,:''N-,,,,,,-,.,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,r:,.,:--,-Ff.5,5f.,--,....,...-.,;...?.._.. :t•ii....,G i...,78, ,_:-..5,;,r;;;,:,..,,,,f,,vg*---,.k,,..,,,-,-,,,:.÷':y.*v:.----',6.:sfz-aaie:igia.:ti,,,v.o:::: guivizt*---WREA.4 -.020a _„„„„............. Approach LOS E F A X'''' RCM Average Control Delay 14.4 HCM Level of Service HCM . ii.001:01.0400104(101ktig0,41047iiibiggifiggallattgigAigiERRINKINI-Atigiligilitif Actuated Cycle Length (s‘) 115.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 114(040:00;;POO.O.V0010#0300650:0*Mti.,.,..1:::00tOtAIONfOONERIMR:I' Analysis Period (min) 15 GA044391002 ICE Phase 111Calcs\SynchrolBackground.sy7 5/4/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kim ley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Perm Perm Pe 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Timings 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard Lane Configurations l rne(p )' Turn Type ct d P.has.>r Permitted Phases .............:. inimum Initial (s trit Total Split (s) LQ Yellow Time (s) Lead/Lag Recall Mode ::..:.........:.............. Actuated g/C Ratio Control Delay Total Delay Approach Delay Actuated Cycle Length: 115 Natural Cycle: 45 Maxum vlc Ratio: 0.97 0.11 0.11 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 77.2 112.9 2.8 3.3 3.5 2.7 77.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.6% itaTy 112.9 2.8 7.4 3.5 ICU Level of Service B Splits and Phases: 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard 2.7 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions 08 G:1044391002 ICE Phase II\Calcs\Synchro\Background.sy7 5/4/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard WtarINFItM Lane Configurations geatflOWAVO4011::1::::!;.,. :.:.,..,,.. .,,...,:.,,.„...,..,...., . - 1900 1900 1900:'.'i'.!•:::19000::,i:.1. ..,....,,,,... Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 gook:.pot:4Footor...:s.u.:.:::.::: ..:s.!!i:'!:,..;.-.,.:',z..',=.A.:,',::119:q:,E'.::.::,FIs]::-.ii.',.,'.;:;::::!'.::.,,,'.1:tt:itspP-;:'..,',,.'' '''.':;,,..:::','''':::,i,,:.., Fr t 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.99 Fit,.,,. .,..:OteOteCi'ji::.':E,..!:i::::.,,::::::!:::::;.:::2',::!•:•:14i9:t.F0;(94,:::::V.,,..,4pi :.0:"..gii..e's..::.t;:.%6("::::,',,..,.,::.i.:',,::::;•-.?:;1::',%95:;::.-, .':::',$0;t:,'!':;tVA,:g:inef",..., .:‘:',g410„.:p Said. Flow (prot) 1744 1777 1770 3514 1770 3492 Etti'..,P000:400:.i::zi,t':.:;.:,:...":'.::'.:......::::;,..,..:E,5,..,:.:::!:nk0:...79.g.:::;,i;i4,;.q:.;:ti„:,k3::::'4,.:.'::..:;.:.::::pi...3.::::::';*:::;::;,.',,;2,:;,:;:;940...,:pi,:i1;40::i,:!:::::,-4,:;:.:0;zi':::;gi:.,,:;,',;..:;::0,1::::::.;10i-29::.;;dis!fig: ' Satd. Flow (perrn) 1397 1146 521 .36 14 378 3492 VOtg:..0dt(00:)n::::k:)!:';';''ir'iF'J::;;.;:10glnt-PZ:0:S:g::0',04;R:Et'XtfEA.TO;$1;lkg::Ag0j''.RAio$:z:001::MF,"$::RIA,ipfffgir4A2at,':::„...... Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 F.1:0*jlotaggi,',4::!;gq,':::',::',:',::-:ig:94t'.;,A*7;.$1ivggio24:itl.,1SC., 2 54 27 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 Lane Group •*:(:V-011),M,:t;!:92 242••.-g,.R:;0''E;1;i'aiIi0iti.:1 '144;''::V:':.9,,, , , 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions - Splits Optimized ''`If ak- 4\ 114 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.99 0 0 4 Perm Perm Turn Type P(0404' ''Phases:::::;:: .,,-,!,;:!..,;;;;i:::,,,,,,,,F.::,,.;,..-,,,,,,.,!j..,.:,.,!..:,;.., 8,.:;.,:::„:,.,.::.::::.2g,.:,:,:-..e.,g,:p:.i.:E...,,:,:..w;,:::,:,,,,,,,.:12,.,,p:,,,.,,,,..:,:i..?:m..,..,Tt:,..-.4,5;.:-.g.t:.7517..gsgir-:3.,,:;.:,r,-:!*:,?:::6 Permitted Phases !:;f010004..0(0::..... ' Y' Effective Green, g (s) ;::001404.0p,IFOilk4E::;:''iX:43,E3',.:,',;;Ai:„.: Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle EX.tetl0;i.Or);3(S)::A;]!:'Og!i,:':j',';:::;,e:,3;Q,;..im,'z,QaF,Ifit',.*.gtkai,:.:ig- .:',q;::.N,!:'::„x,,iii;;fag:14-*Egi44.,.... 4N:q0483‘,--,t,f00-101§3PE,,igiii4i9 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 279 229 381 2567 276 2551 ....,f atiWProt,i':::'„,•4;,..:.:::,..:;.3A;',/-0.,,,4t.?Agi;;Aki:g0:Ttt,.,,..'5;;Zti,;::.,;:girdita,'-:gK...'i.A:::..-.,-,:ti!.:;g:::.1-i,::X'.:..,:ii::::,:,iE.': ,.,,,,:i4-,,r,,teitg-.7j*,:if4i,10:.k.-ionegi.',. - , v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.13 0.17 6.11 ,..,,:,gyoK:;z.,:..:,:n:::::,:p:.:!,:::3,,,:imigagt.iA.: Tg-trant-Mrigt::'e.,,,0.63.. 4,70,:%,,,..,.10:902, .;.:.,:g41:),, ':.-..4.,,,....;;;,:00,--,:m7.- .',.:' .... - Uniform Delay, dl 44.5 42.1 „ 5.0 623 '„ '„ 4.7 ' '6:-i. :itgsiiti6cadtbrv'='3',''''',"z:'''g"',3144'g':'v",•'-'241'.00':'"'f"':6'"'-'''''''"''''"'"'A''''''''''''iQO''''''''''''""''''''':':''''"t'OO"''-tO :"---- ''' '' - - Incremental Delay, d2 23.3 5.3 1.5 0.6 1.2 0.4 '...A14.t(44,M1r.::it.:::-t•Vitgit4t;r:A:03`,'4',:6718::s:,,,:',4',9,-,',-,,,--,,,,,,,,----''----'i:---i474*-t''''-' ---',--.:65'-',4,...we9;:ftlA"--;;;Pgdr,D3rg"'"'..e3I=4646*4i44 Level of Service E D A A A A Approach,POY].1 .:,4::2:,-:,4-'jikiwZst::',67iaiki;i-ih:ili4::iMtgio,Jgig47.,-4::::::o:ggoa-:Aga.,q:,-mqo,t.tg.:tii,-;,:m:,migg,:ws:Am.;:m.o51..vR.,-6.1 " Approach LOS E D A A Perm Perm Perm 4 8 2 6 6 23.0 23.0 020 5.0 84.0 84.0 073 5.0 5. • 84.0 84.0 5.0 5.0 riDt•'',44.-tfitfi' " HCM Average Control Delay 15.0 HCM Level of Service B '.: :,T40.40;g000tcociniat;; ,,a2"MgtngEff.--r;'PSSzfea'or:ggANIWiz,:tkR;;a:ziqS; Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 toopopoikgoopity:P:#00:00.:§:aN;;;§?i0tantmoik*Olpfkie" - -10:::::3-origgrant p.;'MatintERVIRM: Analysis Period (min) 15 c CntLca1 Lane Group GA044391002 ICE PhasellICalcs\SynchrolBackground_Optimized.sy7 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 14. NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard 4/ mrtaa-.-T 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions - Splits Optimized -A,..-r'--.---ivz-mt.'tvfll...r....5.>.,•••'V,-*Mat',W,v.1,":t4or-,S Latt*Configurations Total Lost ti-ne (s) Lane Uth. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd.Flow (pro) Fit Perrnitted Satd. Flow (perm Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 GroupLane Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated Clearance Time (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) ::11!-POOtProt.„... v/s Ratio Perrn v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di ...otoiogo;qioioaaaa.gmggs8:-ainvtmvo.wagammissxogoitiitkoak.-oili;i'.;......, Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach Delay Approach LOS tiVg",e94111-'10:131151-ilaL..a___ G:1044391002 ICE Phase IIICalcs\SynchrolBackground_Optimized.sy7 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Timings 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard f Lane Configurations Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases DetectorPhases Minimum initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Total Split (s) 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 66.0 TOt4fgfitr,(4)'RV4Ygi.A.Z;P%14gie!Yll',„ Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Agir440.70-0:4AfisithVganligeK:;:iW:,*,1.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None 4ceve000.6tfoy Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.53 Control Delay 40.5 38.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 40.5 38.1 8 2 ApProach Delay 40.5 Approach LOS,E:*A6aigRingieRNIVAMA0.4.0 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions - Splits Optimized t L4 let+ 6 6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0, 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . . C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 9.8 7.8 10.0 6.8 9.8 7.8 10.0 7.6 38.1 7.9 7.7 4490,13.TAiLtiati3,S1,:allt?-4;Xik*-01:606:«i2C-:-:..KW44.kt**-;?_,--1Z.,4.--.: • a.isa Cycle4-C10:1SActuated Cycle Length: 115 :31tOcrAligg4040V7:7-' Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Ua Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 te#0:00000A6*04110MNSEPOMMINA00000*. AgilfRammolgeng*MMI Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B J00*.#*000Y WANDEONEMENOWAMMOMANONEWMNINOIRMIONSI Splits and Phases: 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard reen 02 06 Ll 08 GA044391002 ICE Phase IRCalcs\Synchro1Background_Optimized.sy7 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 32nd Street & NE 4th Avenue Lane Configurations Sbn Philtre! Grade 0% Vetttnie (vellh): Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 flouryfieW" rate (vph) 12 14 Pedestrians 440:Width (ft) • Walking Speed (Ws) 0% 0(Y0 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked Inflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 54 0 191 33 tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 95 . „1552 5 Volume Left 72 0 12 0.00 'E*Off**4:00',N104'-"'"33 0 98 95 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions ,IAV47V:Stif,fitiftfg4ffitSlkt,+VNVt.attreggtiagitVittdFR cSH 1552 1700 970 k:Inflto ped! Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 rAti#06.14Y-,( Lane LOS A Approach LOS 1004.:91?.NSTIMitiZ,WWW*1404-WattagilMMIAMSIO A ',,Sit,89 ,,,,„:-fif-MPEP-MOSTRIETIOSiMateVamMizimiatatv A anit-4,-iref"trft- Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utthzation Analysis Period (min) 5.4 15 alrotSaM- G:1044391002 ICE Phase II\Calcs\SynchrolBackground.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/4/2006 Synchro 6 Report • • HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 17: NE 31st Street & NE 4th Avenue -SSZ Fiwx 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions , Lane Configurations Sign::.qdrittol Grade v,stilcoo(vem-i) Peak Hour Factor H.OttrlyflOkfateVph Pedestrians Lane Wrdth (fr) Walking Speed (Ws) Percent Biockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type 'Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 con f vol veu, unblocked vol 13 30 83 69 18 89 78 10 sfp.,,fl14.„1:10-.6!lio.,6.2 • 2 stage (s) :i.R.14415,mci-4,4w3.3 p0 queue free % 100 99 98 96 99 100 97 100 : . 'ooty.(vetiih) 1605 1582 871 812 1060 857,f4FA802Alitritc 0% 0.69 0.69 roe 7:fgfiky,'40433::,:,og§tpoR, o% o % o% 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 " Volume Leff 7 12 17 6,lt:APO--Rj,9tlVigAggera„„,:ee.NOLSSVRNtekiMniSafa,'MaiiaMfttaNkfW,MPV, cSH 1605 1582 862 822 17.01filr*Aqpi*NOMOMI4100.1141APAMAIWENSCalegitaageft:MtanAPVI Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 5 3 ;16fit*P0149:, *--A'K':31-04RI4ITAi8AMI5WNIAWASMOMMINUISIMWONAMORWeit Lane LOS A A A A 7464 „ 144 'Y:aal-4RPONg9T.5kiMOttatti*4%****20.:WR*TavAN§WPIforeffitWY, Approach LOS A A Average Delay „ Analysis Period (min) 15 6.4 GA044391002 ICE Phase II\Calcs\Synchro\Background.sy7 Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/4/2006 Synchro 6 Report HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 23: NE 31 st Street & NE 7th Avenue 2009 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations Sign Gantreil ; :_ Grade alurne (v h/ ). Peak Hour Factor Hourlyfiow:rate :(vph). Pedestrians Lane ;Width; (ft) :. Walking Speed (ftls) Pei c r%t Blockage, Right turn flare (veh M ion: Median storage veh t pstreap);;signal (f pX, platoon unblocked flidting>vdlur> e` vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol igle.:(s- tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % aacity:;(veI Queue Length 95th Lane LOS E t as l3e1a4;. Approach LOS 4- 0% 0% 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 1613 1700 1060 Average Delay sec#irl.a Analysis Period 5.7 G:1044391002 ICE Phase Il\Calcs\Synchro\Background.sy7 Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/4/2006 Synchro 6 Report • • APPENDIX I: Future Conditions (2009 With Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs • 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,,:',,,::.:,!;•:.::z:.i.,.':'',',..!',.1:::,,......'1.00':-...:.."';F,::;•!:,,:lpA;ikili'xioi,:i::';',tt) .,. ‘.:,:::::.::::1 1!1:511.:;:g: 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 .6±66-ted.:,..':':..:'''',..:::'''''''".'''el.'.'':1..,0i'''',:':','''';':'1±',::Fir''.: 0::98!::‘:-..?..-'1'.1g,':-'::,"N".bi954:0:'ta(Ye"."'''25-'''''::';'''''2'.70.:19$n"..5::4 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1 724 1770 3513 1770 3534 ...jr0Oft:00:...:::::!:...•:.::;:':1:::•:'i]li.::...'.:::::',:.§::;,,:%,',64$6:0,te,:::!,:::::!:::,,I':::];;,,4i;]p.'sg,:'16.:58:;:.t.:'::i:li.:;::.1,Rit::46i.;1;44010:!4'.,..R'::::'.,:',i:':::.E.:6::c4:.-ataitiCI,,..j.,. Said. Flow (perm) 1421 1030 641 3513 425 3534 vor000.tirii,::::-.::;;,;iw:!,.i'j.gi-ssw::.,-ooga-omitgLo,ip"!:giA--,.mokg:Ntg;tg:atttoWigt xo6g"l::ogoioigl:w,;:::i,,.::::F'}-ioo'E:o:yiI.i.-$:.,,F":',:ER,P Peak -hour factor, F-IF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 .IZ:,..,„ ',:kVtitgda;';;,.!::',::,Ec::';',:k.iN=::!4.'tal:W,:-,SP,O1:E:::.::.::s:,N;.r0;:i::'ga,t42-Za,Ztl.:ii:-:00;:f!,::',fAigf?:0.iii-:U:110.0PIR:6Sgr.$6::PZPO:A:it'.g., 4.4140'0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 20 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 440k40400,ROW:001Y'.V0.0:;00:141:41P:ME:994RAMBIAZ:::::',AENA.Oggit I.5:'It 1152 .1.1sa:Tooggitmo. Turn Type Perrn Perm Perm P•0410-00:4;.,...Rh:00*:;'.::E''':',•,.',:::;';.;'.cm::',',,;:,!.:.r.-''t!!4.5:!'..r.:::::V':1::?,-•:'::ti,',':!-.n,..'!..iIty'F'I::T.'•!.-.,2;‘,7::,"!-',"*0.n',2-71;IN!!:... Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, 0 (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated gfC;:iRatio Clearance Time (s) - <0;i:P4,000fkilkS1:4: Lane Grp Cap (vph) Perm 6 43.*:,:,:::jVianggent:!,M1,..3PARI4'4:14:gif-, ....„.„.,.V006CE:94„,.,....;1--Z9„ItgaN::','::' 13.0 13.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94714.4t$10',005-':'IRM::'..3:ict;:11:::.:itlEgit...914gkl'i,g,p,-:?!:',4:,,,M:,,::15:':)::::„......,,..:„...,,,,,0.82 ,,,,,ialitgg, 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3gl::''4:eE'M:g5:M;tfAfip39'iRgqiM:kR§i3i0;;S3*FSEYZ':E:r5!:ti;-::IMt:Ng3i0-,',,e4tRg:' ... . . . . .. . .. .. „...:...-.. 524 2871 ...Mig, 161 116 347 2889. ' Ratio Prot ,,„,,,..,..„,,... ,.. ... 6i 0.16 vts Ratio F'errfl .., 0.09 ,,,„:„_,..,,,,,,„„,,,,,l,„ma,„w,c,-/°i41)-33',,Fw$R,NaCiitilitt,,, :,.t.t44.42:0,9;,4, 0.27.:AT:-,,.,,::'::,.'''S.--Ai.7„--4.;:, ,,t,g,O14.i:''..:,..'N:ggi''',':':Z:.':''''''''':''.if"Kll'''''''''-'''':t3:1):ia'l'''''*''''''''''''"'"''"'"."'''''''f''':''''"'''i 2-- 2 .9 2.3 2.5 Progression _4,::,a'.':;•:•24r''i:'''-4•;-'-ttk.--•'-'''-'' 6nird" DetaY' di ..' -'''o4504;00'84aatt';W:*MN:35i'o-g°g;otaawtiP'PNPtiAtitgglgttcP;-ti-itfP,..,,oiag:Ctfai'. Incremental Delay, d2 ,.,_ 26.1 ,, , ,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.„„„4;;'3.3.„„,.;,:„2,,,,,,.„.,,,„:am:;4u;,ww.89i4s.56mstip,0411.3mog°ixzetit: 4--tayityg:i.gwmg::;::aw,ty-gri!AlitI§,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-:,„,-.------ - ","•---•••••- ' • - • A A Level of Service E F .,,,,..„..,,„,,,,-. A,,W,;,:-.,.,,,Y,,.taq.WqRRSytt:Rgt:Nin --7ft5410;toixinimigoi, litatipOREO,0:475:0-101$3,,Sig01:. at.ofaf.,f7,:,-....,,,,,o,,,,,,,,,m,,,,, ,,A,,,,,,,,,,,,„„ Approach--.:..-... F Approach LOS HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4.0 - ane Ut Factor 100 0.95 Frt 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions 4.0 HCM Average Control Delay 18.5 HCM Level of Service :::;;::::Ot***NpaOiVtatlO3ENae.sMO;.:ngfagirP:E'.;','5i.f,'ItMNIRINXStiff:gaAk4:RM52:gM:Mngtg Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Analysis Period (min) 15 CritaI Lane Group G:1044391002 ICE Phasell\Calcs\Synchro\Future.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report Timings 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard c 4-- t . . . • . ".• • .F ge • • Lane Configurations Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minwnurn SpIit(s 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 20.5 .„ Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.82 0,82 0.82 0.82 Control Delay 79.6 149.8 2.8 3.3 3.7 2.7 Total Delay 79.6 149.8 2.8 7.5 3.7 2.7 ti* ttis Perm Approach Delay 79.6 149.8 7.2 2.8 pproachL, 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions 4SHININIZERNI., Actuated Cycle Length: 115 mita-MeRre""'' engniMattantENNVIONIN Natural Cycle: 45 0h*V*fpIt*fpWjjj!0;AgVRNeNtEASSMZVAWMIVEaeRA.'OPMMAA1MEMMSRsoatfem6 Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.11 yot0000zvo:*gofwttgagmmftosv.ogewoo:og:t,p,ip;:mgolgrgRonmmoswitu,,Aon: Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) .1.:-5atabilagetatetiii*P50114081***.MMONIONNAMMINISOMEW Splits and Phases: 6: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard 4 08 GA044391002 ICE Phase li\Calcs\Synchro\Future.sy7 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. • HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard Lane Configurations Ideal Flow ( Total Lost time Frt tt::l';l~fcie€ Satd. Flow (prot tt Satd. Flow It Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions - Splits Optimized __ ' '! k- t 4.0 0.96 4.0 0.9 Turn Type 'r h to 'Phases Permitted Phases Effective Green, g Clearance Time (s) Perm 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.99 770 3513 502 3513 E:0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.99 1770 3487 362 3487 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Perm 5.0 5.0 81.9 81.9 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 c Incremental Delay, d2 Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) rtl ectioi" Analysis Period (min) ° i t caL Lane G oup: 301 c0.19 43.4 259 0.12 40. 358 2502 0.18 5.8 5.7 HCM Level of Service 115.0 15 Sum of lost time (s) 7.2 8.0 258 2483 0.12 5.4 6.5 G:1044391002 ICE Phase lllCalcs\SynchrotFuture_Optimized.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard Configurations lia!"F Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow Satd. Flow 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions - Splits Optimized Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 RTOR Reduction (vph) rc ;Flo' ib> Turn Type Pro�eter a °=< i Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Clearance Time Lane Grp Cap (vph v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d Proi ressie...:,.....:_. Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service ►ra<eJ. Approach LOS G:1044391002 ICE Phase 111Calcs\SynchrolFuture_Optimized.sy7 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Timings 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard Lane Configurations Turn Type Permitted Phases ''3efeci Minimum Initial (s) Total Split (s) Yellow Time (s lR : t Lead/Lag n s: Actuated g/C Ratio Control Delay eue Delay Total Delay proach Delay t Perm Perm 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 50.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions - Splits Optimized L4, Per Perm 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max 0.22 0.22 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 40.7 36.4 11.4 8.8 11.7 7.7 40.7 36.6 11.4 8.8 11.7 8.6 40.7 36.6 9.0 8.7 Actuated Cycle Length: 115 Natural Cycle: 45 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 asp, Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.6% eoc ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 14: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard "lb' 04 m8 G:1044391002 ICE Phase lilCalcs\SynchroiFuture_Optimized.sy7 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. • 9: NE 32nd Street & NE 4th Avenue HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions 14,2-17 .7 „„. Lane Configurations 41' ii, 11 Sign . ,0.-itr9t -,,%.; : i=i:.2;..iii.:;,,,1,.iy,-N,:-J;.:, Free Free ,.:". ,: ,''',,,!:::-, .Vi'i-:::::,;:,'!':':*::::: o % (Ty. o % ,.... , , Grade VOIUMelOttftt) Peak Hour Factor 14:64f)*OfOlV. Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Biockage Right turn flare (veh) Medan type None Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 6.0 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 83 0 258 51 tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 95 0 97 95 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 EIMPIRMINEM-P Volume '.,...,Total,"';:::-;;',::'ARAII837,:;,7,7,'69 Volume Left 72 0 22 :fitrt`e-; Right :,,'-6=.:;,:-,,,:-,/:;--f,xtttva.qom„,:;az,to,,,„,,,,,,,„-_v,,i„o„-o,t,va,,,,,„,-,,,,:4„:,,,,,,,t,;„,,:,:„,v,:,,,,go:gt*,,,,m,,,ov.ttrz8-merv.:n, cSH 1514 1700 888 ,019::Avp:00040001-442100wit,p Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 6 0600rtet4V1'(0)eiNeiltli-4123;00;olge0.4 Lane LOS A ZotOokpoloy3,-om.kiit 421114,00M9... :',:'-:.,..-;:gmg.;',:„:Tia,f,AStg,0-1,itzigi.nto.Nr.:110<liffeRitalgatiONTSt.94=. Approach LOS A ' SA Average Delay irft0t*Otitikt009.,i„ Analysis Period (min) 4.2 GA044391002 ICE Phase II\Calcs\Synchro\Future.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 17: NE 31 st Street & NE 4th Avenue 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations Sigr%"Corrtrot - : Grade Vale "(vetith) Peak Hour Factor .rate (vph)" Pedestrians t o idth (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent=Bioct ag Right turn flare (veh edtai `-1 Median storage veh) Upstrearn:'aigi at::(ft} pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf voi vC2 stage 4rnf-v vCu, unblocked vol ,'sirgle;() tC, 2 stage (s) t. s p0 queue free % tl capaety(vthih) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 100 99 104 91 21 120 100 20 98 96 98 100 96 100 cSH Volume to Queue Length 95th ontro Lane LOS .elay Approach LOS 592 1578 862 799 Average Delay Intersection .Capacity Utitizatlah Analysis Period (min) 6.2 15 G:1044391002 ICE Phase 11\Calcs\Synchro\Future.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report • • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 23: NE 31st Street & NE 7th Avenue 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations $ign Control Grade Vdjurn,& (vehih),.: Peak Hour Factor 0.56 0.56 0.5 090.0Y:flOW,tate'(Vph).:2; Pedestrians .Lang:.VVidths,00 Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent B[Ockage Right turn flare (veh) 0.0:n.:typP Median storage veh) Upstream pX, platoon unblocked "" vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 98 100 97 ,',0000.04(vohltlY • -2. , 0% 0% 0% 6 0.56 0.56 0.56 None 59 • • • Volume Left 25 o cSH 1613 1700 1066 Yet411)10i*:Cap. Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS A Approach LOS 1 0 - Average Delay 6.8 Wit0:SeCtt'On'CaPecity.:0111#42.0r111004 Analysis Period (min) 15 G:\044391002 ICE Phase II\CalcsiSynchro\Future.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. "dVer,bf 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 27. NE 32nd Street & Entry D ive a 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions • Lane Configurations 4 . . ....... . . Sgri Coritrol Free Free Stop Grade O% o% o% Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Pedestrians Lane Wdth (ft) Walking Speed {ft/s) 17§(000tBiockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vci , stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 27 tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 96 184 25 100 100 Volume Left 61 cSH 1587 1700 yoKop Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 Lane LOS preach Delay‘(s) Approach LOS 00 Average Delay Delay Interteetion:' Capacity. Utilization 13 Analysis Period (min) 3.7 15 alt:eVe0ic GA044391002 ICE Phase i\Calcs\SynchrolFuture.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 5/12/2006 Synchro 6 Report • • HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 29: NE 32nd Street & Exit Driveway •41,• Lane Configurations Sign Contro Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0°/0 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0„67 Pedestrians Lane Wdth (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Biockage Right turn flare (veh) Medien type Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 22 tQ single (s) 4 tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 100 &Lime Volume Le cS H n'ter9PI:„ 0 0 15 0 1700 1700 875 1055 VOlt-.0,0,0VP.00:00tN/3.4i0.002:00:ift. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 cintrOVDelay,„(sr,,H.x,,k'N%q0g-ta',0.0 Lane LOS OprOaeh::DOtOY:MiaAll?9:;,,: Approach LOS trIr- A • 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions 121 22 62 98 97 10 f-ZSkNgaagiVfNf'A4:';:;4.:.ia:;5'A;',::'4ggiitNkitia,gER'gAgt Average Delay 2.5 fi-itOSeCtiOrtiCaPaOfqlt$tjlr*jOkg'f,VWI: O-017 Analysis Period (min) 15 GA044391002 ICE Phase II\Calcs\Synchro\Future.sy7 Kimiey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/5/2006 Synchro 6 Report • HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 31: Driveway & NE 7th Avenue Lane Configurations ign Oontr 1, Grade .o ikil :'.(vehth' Peak Hour Factor Hrl e y:flow ,rate= 'vg1 Pedestrians .......... ...... Lane tdth (ft} .;; Walking Speed (ft/s Right turn flare Media : typ Median storage veh t p.stre m s gnat< pX, platoon unblocked VC, con .ictingvattCrstia,: vC1, stage 1 conf vol u ' tage2'confv0[.: vCu, unblocked voi tC, 2 stage (s) t p0 queue free % capacity(vehi/h} Volume Left cSH Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS roc(' Delay:, Approach LOS 0°!° 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 39 100 100 1700 607 12 100 2009 PM Peak Hour Future Traffic Conditions Average Delay trterseetiin -Capacity .Util`[zation Analysis Period (min) 1.1 15 ervie G:1044391002 ICE Phase I\Calcs\Synchro\Future.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5/12/2006 Synchro 6 Report • 0 • APPENDIX J: Driveway Queuing Analysis • • Reference: Parking Structures: Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Repair (Anthony Christ, Mary S. Smith, and Sam Bhuyan, 1989, Van Nostrand Reinhold) Analysis: Residents Entry off NE 32 d Street Arrival Rate: 44 v h Service Rate: 300 vph Traffic Intensity: 0.15 Queue <1 vehicle z 0 4 u� Cr 1.! a CC' z aw cC La LU 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 70 8 4 2 9 PROB BILL Y win 90% "ROB Es1 Y 1111111,11111411 MI I .C} 13 B I L I Y 1.111111W jlN =1•11111111III 80% PROB. BILI Y ' • f • UEU i. r...-, Ad 1 re•r"-- 0.2 04 06 0.8 TRAFFIC INTENSITY (ARRIVAL RATE DIVIDED BY SERVICE RATE) Figure 3-9 Single -channel queue curves. Intensity = 0.15 Queue <1 vehicle • • • Reference: Parking .Structures: Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Repair (Anthony Christ, Mary S. Smith, and Sam Bhuyan, 1989, Van Nostrand Reinhold) Analysis: Guests Entry off NE 32nd Street Arrival Rate: 10 vph Service Rate: 300 vph Traffic Intensity: 0.03 - Queue <1 vehicle 30 C� 25 26 0 24 22 Lil V 20 tL..r 18 W u]k" 18 2> 14 12 w 0 10 Cr z 7 Cr 4 w rn 2 W cr 0 8 99% PROBABiLI 0% PROB�4BILi 85% PRO A 80% PR©BABtLI" 0.2 Y 'Y 0 4 0.8 0 8 TRAFFIC INTENSITY (ARRIVAL RATE DIVIDED BY SERVICE RATE) Figure 3-9 Single-channe& queue curves. Intensity = 0.03 Queue <1 vehicle 9 • 0 • APPENDIX K: Future Project Information • • YEAR 2030 TRANSPORTATION PLAN COST FEASIBLE PLAN - HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT PROJECTS PRIORITY IV PROJECTS In 2025 Limits i RTP Planning Area Project or Facility Project Description From To COUNTYWIDE GREENWAYSITRAILS COUNTYWIDE EXISTING PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES O&M COUNTYWIDE EXISTING TRANSIT SYSTEM O&M COUNTYWIDE MIC LOAN REPAYMENT MIC COUNTYWIDE PUBLIC WORKS PTP PROJECTS O&M COUNTYWIDE SR 1121-195 1-95 (NW 10 AVE) BISCAYNE INTERCHANGFJRAMPS IMPROVEMENTS AND AUXILIARY LANES COUNTYWIDE BUS PURCHASES AND NEW BUS SERVICE REPLACEMENT BUSES AND NEW SERVICE BEACHICBD SE 1 AVE SE 8 ST SE 5 ST EXTEND SE 1 AVE BEACHICBD W 1 AVE MIAMI ARENA NW 20 AVE EXTEND W 1 AVE CORRIDOR EXTENSION BEACH /CBD, NORTH NORTHEAST CORRIDOR DOWNTOWN MIAMI BROWARD COUNTY LINE PREMIUM TRANSIT ° CENTRAL NW 21 ST 1 NW 32 AVE BRIDGE NW 37 AVE NW 28 STREET CONSTRUCT HIGH LEVEL BRIDGE CENTRAL PERIMETER RD NW 20 ST NW 72 AVE 2 TO 4 LANES NORTH DOUGLAS ROAD CORRIDOR DOUGLAS ROAD METROSTATION MIC PREMIUM TRANSIT NORTH, BEACHICBD NORTHEAST CORRIDOR DOWNTOWN MIAMI BROWARD COUNTY LINE PREMIUM TRANSIT NORTH, NORTHWEST SR 826 - HOV 1-75 GOLDEN GLADES INTERCHANGE ONE HOV LANE EACH DIRECTION NORTHWEST HEFT US-27 1-75 WIDEN TQ 8 LANES NORTHWEST HEFT SR 836 US-27 6 TO 8 LANES + 2 AUX LANES NORTHWEST HEFT 1-75 FL TURNPIKE 4 TO 6 LANES (SHOWN AS FUNDED IN BROWARD LRTP) NORTHWEST 1-75 SR 826 NW 138 ST IMPLEMENT MASTER PLAN * NORTHWEST MIAMI GARDENS DRIVE 1-75 NW 57 AVE 4 TO 6 LANES NORTHWEST NW 36141 ST NW 42 AVE HEFT EXPRESS STREET (ITS, GRADE SEPARATIONS. ETC.) NORTHWEST NW 72 AVE NW 122 ST NW 138 ST. WIDEN 2 TO 3 LANES NORTHWEST OKEECHOBEE RD CONSTRUCT GRADE SEPARATED INTERSECTIONS AND ADD TURN LANES AT KROME AVE, HIALEAH GARDENS BLVD / NW 116 WAY, NW 105 WAY. NW 87 AVE, AND NW 79 AVE NORTHWEST SR 924 EASTERN TERMINUS OF SR 924 OKEECHOBEE RD EXPRESSWAY EXTENSION FROM SR 924 TO OKEECHOBEE * PROJECT INCLUDED IN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 2025 LRTP 34 FedEx ! Sh na+Ler ; Label 7922 4426 7980 Page 1. of 1 Frei;,_ Oft, in i9. [9 4)535.510C Margaret tcDermoll KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 520C NW 33rd Ave Suite 109 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33349 Express CL5 N163136:19:2: Ship Date: 21N0000 AckWg1: 1 LB Syslern#: 3449617 IN ET2500 Account#i S ""t**** SHIP TO: (GDC1000 0000 BILL THIRD PARTY Vicky Garcia Toledo, Esq. Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price&Axelrod 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 REF: 044391002 N uia i its Delivery Add ess Bar Code n ID PRIORITY OVERNIGHT WED Deliver By: TRK# 7922 4426 2980 PCRM1 22Nov06 MIA A2 33131 -FL-US 3C MPBA _abet- Your `_hhement I complete 1. Use the 'Print' feature from your browser to send this page to your laser or inkjet printer. 2. Fold the printed page along the horizontal line. 3. Place label in shipping pouch and affix it to your shipment so that the barcode portion of the label can be read and scanned. Warning: Use only the printed original label for shipping„ Using a photocopy of this label for shipping purposes is fraudulent and could result in additional billing charges, along with the cancellation of your FedEx account number. Use of this system constitutes your agreement to the service conditions in the current FedEx Service Guide, available on fedex.com. FedEx will not be responsible for any claim in excess of $100 per package, whether the result of loss, damage, delay, non -delivery, misdelivery, or misinformation, unless you declare a higher value, pay an additional charge, document your actual foss and file a timely claim. Limitations found in the current FedEx Service Guide apply, Your right to recover from FedEx for any loss, including intrinsic value of the package, loss of sales. income interest, profit, attorney's fees, costs, and other forms of damage whether direct, incidental, consequential, or special is limited to the greater of $100 or the authorized declared value. Recovery cannot exceed actual documented loss. Maximum for items of extraordinary value is $500. e.g. jewelry. precious metals, negotiable instruments and other items listed in our Service Guide. Written claims must be filed within strict time limits, see current FedEx Service Guide. hutps://www.fedex.co /cgi-bin/ship_it/unity/8JeVw9HfTu6AjRs7GjZz4HeQt9HeRg6Ec... 11/21/2006