HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppeal Letter from Mr. Colemam15970 W STATE RD #219
SUNRISE; FLORIDA 33326
(561) 306-7224
November 6, 2006
CITY COUNCIL OF tvlIAMI
444 SW 2NDAV
MIAMlg FL 33130
ATT: VANESA OAST€LLO
RE: APPEAL LETTER
FOR : 760 NW 4TH STREET
MIAMI FL 33128
HEARING 13 06-01035V
Sincerely,
ROBERT GOLEMAM
MANAGING DIRECTOR
R-CONSULTANTS,LLC
APPLICANTS: ANAND PARASRAM & MERCEDES ARRIOLA
LL-C.
Helping to build betterointnw
5970 [ . State .Rd 3 9
F oric10 33326
954) 347_77d0
,5
-9492
-- r60
November 6, 2006
City Council of Miami
444 SW 2'd Avenue
Miami, .Fl 33130
Arland Parasrarn & Mercedes Arriola
And Luis UVA, DP. Realty Corporation
760 NW 4h Street, Units # 101,102 and 103
Miami, fi 33128
Re: Hearing Z3 06-01035 v Variance from ordinance do hereby request an
appeal of zoning board decision to deny a permitted use with a variance
request for a cross parking agreement.
Dear: Vanessa Castillo
The undersign is appealing the decision of zoning board agenda, Monday
October 30, 2006 item Z 3 06-01035-v requesting a variance from the City
of Miami Article 9, Section 19 and Article 401, of street parking
requirements The property is located at 760 NW 4th Street, Units 101,102
and 103 Miami, Fl 33128
The current zoning on the subject property is C®1 and allows for a night
club use if the applicant can show that the facility use will be in compliance
With all ordinance.
The applicant is and has provided a cross parking agreement (see attached cross
parking agreement), with another business property across the street from this
location witch viil provide even more the use the applicant required for the use.
The applicant has met with the neighbors and surrounding business that support
his efforts to have a place of business where people can go to have an enjoyable
evening and feel safe doing so. 'see attached neighborhood survey)
The subject property use and the appecai is in accordance with all applicable
ordinance/ regulations of the City of Miami_ Based on the following facts that
occurred at the hearing on October 30,.E 006 the applicant feel that prejudice from
zoning board member and comments frorn the witness were placed on record of
the hearing was based cm being discriminatory toward the applicant race and
country was reason enough to deny the applieation o please see the enclosed of the
hearing.
This type of governmental abase on people es not permitted in our countty non will
the applicant allow this type of abuse to be allowed in our city. This WaS a zoning
matter not a racial matter until now.
Ifyou need any further assistance regarding this aitea° . please feel free to
contact my office at (561) 306-7224
Sincerely
Robert Colernart
Managing director
R-Coleman consultants, LLC