HomeMy WebLinkAboutMaster Report (2)City of Miami
Master Report
Resolution R-06.0050
City Hall
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, FL 33133
www.miamigov.cam.
File ID #: 06-00047
Version: 1
Enactment Date: 1/26106 '
Controlling Office of the City Status: Passed
Body: Clerk
Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF
THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE
PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 04-05-109, THAT THE FIRMS MOST QUALIFIED
TO PROVIDE SERVICES FOR THE VIRGINIA KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
REMEDIATION, IN RANK ORDER ARE: (I)1NTERCOUNTY US LABS, (2) CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE,
AND (3) WRS INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONMENT, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH INTERCOUNTY US LABS, THE TOP -RANKED FIRM;
FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
SECOND -RANKED IN THE EVENT NEGOTIATIONS FAIL WITH THE TOP -RANKED FIRM, OR
UNTIL A CONTRACT HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATED; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER
TO PRESENT THE NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION
AND APPROVAL.
Reference: Introduced: 114106
Name: RFP 04-05-t09 - Virginia Key Environmental Assessment of the Virginia Key Landfill
Requester: Department of Capital Cost: Final Action: 1/26/06
Improvement
Programs/Transportati
on
Notes:
Sections:
Indexes:
Attachments: 06-00047 Legislation.pdf, 06-00047 Summary Form.pdf, 06-00047 Memo.pdf, 06-00047 Memo 2.pdf,
06-00047 Synopsis.pdf, 06-00047 Parking Forms.pdf, 06-00047 RFP Cover Page.pdf, 06-00047 Pre Public
Notice.pdf, 06-00047 Scope of Work.pdf
Action History
Ver. Acting Body
Date Action
Sent To
Due Date Returned Result
1 Office of the City 1/17/06 Reviewed and
Attorney Approved
City of Miami Page I Printed on 10/31/2006
1 City Commission 1/26/06 ADOPTED
1A,
t
1
City of Miami
Page 2
Printed on 10131/2006
A motion was made by Joe Sanchez, seconded by Tomas Regalado, that this matter be ADOPTED. Chairman
Gonzalez: Commissioner Sanchez,
Commissioner Sanchez: CA.2 is a resolution. I respectfully request that it be pulled for discussion; just have some
questions pertaining to this item. It is an item pertaining to the Department of Capital lmprovetnents, and if we could
have the executive director step up to the mike. This contract, my understanding, covers everything from the
assessment to the enure clean-up, but it's my understanding that the funding -- there's only funding for assessment
now. I want to know what's going to be the steps. How is this going to be done? This is -- it's my understanding,
it's a total of $45 million for the clean-up, correct?
Mary Conway: Mary Conway, CIP (Capital Improvements Program). The total of 45 million is the worse case estimate
that DERM (Department of Environmental Resources Management), in conjunction with the City, have determined
may be the cost for the total clean-up al the Virginia Key site. The item that's before you today is simply approving
the rank order of the firms that went through a competitive selections process, and then what will be brought back
before you is only phase I, which is estimated to cost no more than a million dollars, which is the assessment -- all of
the environmental testing and the assessment -- to determine the extent so that we'll know exactly how much the
cleanup will cost. There is an option in the contract to actually have the selected firm, once the assessment is
completed, also do the cleanup on site. Funds will have to be identified, and we'll work in partnership with DERM.
Alicia Cuervo Schreiber (Chief of Operations): Commissioners, Alicia Cuervo Schrieber. The County is paying the
$650,000 for the assessment and has passed a resolution identifying up to $45 million for the clean-up, They broke
that down earlier last year. The details of that have not been ironed out, but that is a funding source that we would be
seeking.
Commissioner Sanchez: Hut different phases are going to have an estimated cost, so in other words, what I'm
requesting from This resolution, being that worst case scenario, you're talking about $45 million, I want to see more
transparency as to the amounts as we go along the process, especially when it comes in front of us on a consent
agenda item, so that's all that I'm asking for. We want to be more informed as to the numbers pertaining to the entire
process -- ��' -
Ms. Cuervo Schreiber: Commissioner --
Commissioner Sanchez: -- because you have a resolution right here, and basically, you know, thanks through
gathering information, meetings through you, we estimate that possibly the costs for the assessment will possibly be
around the ballpark figure, about $750,000; yet, it's not stated in this resolution.
Ms. Cuervo Schreiber: And Commissioner, I apologize. I will clarify it. This resolution is only to select the firm.
However, the dollar amounts will come in a subsequent Commission meeting, where we will outline the costs, the
negotiated amount, and the entire cost of the project. This is just for the selection of the firm.
Commissioner Sanchez: All right, Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman Gonzalez: All right. Need a motion to approve.
Commissioner Sanchez: Yes, so move.
Commissioner Spence -Jones: Second.
Commissioner Regalado: Second.
Chairman Gonzalez: We have a motion to approve CA.2 and we have a second. All in favor, say "aye."
The Commission (Collectively): Aye. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Angel Gonzalez, Johnny L. Winton, Joe Sanchez, Tomas Regalado and Michelle Spence -Jones
City ofMiemi Page 3 Printed on 1013I/2006
1 Office of the Mayor 1/31/06 Signed by the Mayor
1 Office of the City Clerk 2/1/06 Signed and Attested by
City Clerk
Office of the City
Clerk
fA,
t
City of Miami Page 4 Primed on 10/31/2006