HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: O6 1227
Monday, September 11, 2006
Mr. Miguel Gabela offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING AMENDING PAGE NO. 23, OF THE
ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO, 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401,
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO SD-6
CENTRAL COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTIES
LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1770 & 1778 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, 1799
NORTHEAST 4TH AVENUE AND 430 NORTHEAST 18TH STREET, LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-
DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Angel Urquiola,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Ron Cordon Away
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Ms. Chloe Keidaish Away
Mr. Juvenal A. Pine Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 6
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 2
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 6-0
Teresita L. Fernah°dez, executive Secreta
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-01055zc
Z.7
•
•
EXHIBIT 'RA"
COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
COMBINING ALL LOTS, ALL OWNERS
Lot 1, Block 8, MIRAMAR, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5,
Page 4, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida,
AND
Lots 2 and 3, Block 8, MIRAMAR, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat
Book 5, Page 4, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida.
AND
Lot 4, Block 8, MIRAMAR, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5,
Page 4, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida.
Lot 1 - 1778 N. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33130, Folio No.: 01-3231-003-0580
Lot 2 - 430 N.E. 18 Street, Miami, Florida 33131, Folio No.: 01-3231-003-0620
Lot 3 - 1799 N.E. 4t Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131, Folio No.: 01-3231-003-0630
Lot 4 - 1770 N. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33130, Folio No.: 01-3231-003-0640
Circie appropriate conditio
tsi
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on Tight and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance N 11000, I move that the
request on agenda item # be recommended to the City Commission f approval (denial).
Signatur Print Name
Agenda Item
Date