Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Submittal Site Assessment Report
SUBMITT INTO THE- PUBLICECORD FOLHSA ERS AND SCIENTISTS A Member of the CRA Family of Companies ITEM,ON H-9- e_ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Company: Address: Ms. Lisa Smith January 11, 2006 JOB I 8015-4385-01 Dade County Environmental Resources Management Pollution Control Division 33 SW 2nd Avenue, 8th Floor Miami, FL 33130 Mr. Terry Horan Knight Ridder-Miami Herald Property (HWR-620/File-22234) located at, near, or in the vicinity of 1431-1451 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida We are sending you the following items: ® Attached ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Specifications • 0 Under Separate Cover ❑ Prints ❑ ❑. Change Order 0 ❑ via: Reports 0 Samples Other: Copies' Patd: Na•'. _.._ 3e c iRtio _. _. 2 January 2006 801438501 Site Assessment Report 1 Jan. 5, 2006 51629 Check— Review Fee of S 925.00 These are transmitted as checked below: ❑ For Approval ❑ For Your Use ❑ As Requested ❑ For Bids Due: 0 Other: ❑ Approved as Submitted ❑ Approved as Noted ❑ Returned for Correction Resubmit: Submit: Return: copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints O Prints returned after loan to us Remarks' Dear Ms. Smith: Please find attached two (2) original Site Assessment Reports for the Knight Ridder Miami Herald Property, plus one (1) check for $925.00 towards the review fee. Please contact us at (561) 688-9008 with any questions or comments. Thank You Signed: www.hsa-env.com Environmental & Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Materials Testing I486-A Skees Road / West Palm Beach, FL 33411 Tel: (56l) 688-9008 / Fax: (561) 688-9005 Offices in: Tampa / Orlando / Cape Canaveral / West Palm Beach / Hilton Head 11!�1I11 ,;400pm6N°°i iy 1VI�1@III I i mi^in1 ;a1 �VII ��apN �N.NMl mloiooumm��Ilidli,�Nl�i�NpiplNhuWdNINPNINV11I� mN109tP9W�NIVI 412/ ill ffil1111 11111'1 111111111111111 ;1( I'IIIIII 1�111111.1i11111IIMMopl,�' HSA ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS A member of the CRA family of companies Site Assessment Report Knight Ridder-Miami Herald Property HSA Project No. 8015.4385.01 January 10, 2006 0 E Full Service Engineering & Construction / Environmental & Water Resources / Testing & Inspection / Drilling / Geological & Geophysical Services / Industrial Hygiene & Building Science Tampa • Ft. Lauderdale • Ft. Myers • Cape Canaveral • Pensacola • West Palm Beach • Hilton Head • Savannah www.hsa-env.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION Site Assessment Report for: Miami Herald One Herald Plaza Miami, FL 33132 In accordance with Chapter 471, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 62-780 Florida Administrative Code, I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all engineering plans, specifications, and calculations included herein are in accordance with standard and appropriate engineering practices. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM;:A ON u.».„,.. P. , ", ►li,/ob Terrence R. Horan, P.E. Project Manager Florida Registration #54815 SAR Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property samegimpuenas r r r r r r -616P-m SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Miami Herald One Herald Plaza Miami, FL 33132 Prepared for: Knight Ridder One Herald Plaza Miami, FL 33132 Prepared by: SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM;;; ON . HSA Engineers & Scientists 1486-A Skees Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33411 HSA Project No. 8015.4385-01 January 11, 2006 r � SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR TABLE OF CONTENTS IIFM7,1!x ON'P..e. 1 INTRODUCTION 1 rw 2 BACKGROUND 1 3 ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES 2 3.1 DETERMINATION OF WATER TABLE DEPTH 2 3.2 FORMER FACILITIES INSPECTION 3 3.2.1 SOIL SAMPLING 3 3.2.2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES 3 3.2.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 4 3.2.4 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLES 4 3.3 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT 4 3.3.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 4 3.3.2 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS 5 3.4 SOIL ASSESSMENT 5 3.4.1 ARSENIC 6 3.4.2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF ARSENIC EXCAVATIONS 7 3.4.3 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) 7 3.4.4 LABORATORY RESULTS OF PAH EXCAVATIONS 8 3.4.4.1 EX-C1 9 3.4.4.2 EX-A5 9 3.4.4.3 EX -Al, EX-A2, EX-A3, AND PARKING GARAGE VICINITY 9 3.4.5 SOIL SAMPLING FOR TRPH 10 3.4.6 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLING FOR TRPH 10 3.5 UNDERGROUND DEBRIS 10 3.6 WASTE DISPOSAL 11 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 4.1 DETERMINATION OF WATER TABLE DEPTH 11 4.2 FORMER FACILITIES INSPECTION 11 4.3 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT 12 4.4 SOIL ASSESSMENT 13 4.4.1 ARSENIC 13 4.4.2 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) 13 4.4.3 TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TRPH)13 4.5 UNDERGROUND DEBRIS 13 r SAR Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Mm8m SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR LIST OF FIGURES ITEM T:,'; ON ii•av«.. Site Plan Location of Underground Utilities Location of Monitoring Wells Tidal Survey on MW-A1 at the Miami Herald Sampling Locations for Former Facilities Groundwater Analytical Results Excavation and Sampling Results for Arsenic Excavation and Sampling Results for PAH Near the Parking Garage Excavation and Sampling Results for PAH North of the Parking Garage Locations of Proposed Excavations LIST OF TABLES Laboratory Results of Soil Samples for Historical RECs (Former Facilities) Laboratory Results for Groundwater Samples Laboratory Results of Soil Samples for Arsenic Source Removal Laboratory Results of Soil Samples for PAH Assessment and Source Removal Laboratory Results of Soil Samples for Carcinogenic PAH Assessment and Source Removal Laboratory Results of TRPH Speciation LIST OF APPENDICES DERM Letter from September 13, 2005 Well Completion Reports Historical Documents Laboratory Analytical Reports Groundwater Sampling Logs Picture of Underground Concrete Slab SAR Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property r JBMITTED INTO Th 5LIC RECORD FOF 1 INTRODUCTION MGZ 1; ON E���� �� 9 . This Site Assessment Report (SAR) presents the results of assessment and remediaduu aclivitk.a completed at the Knight Ridder — Miami Herald Property (Site) located between Biscayne Boulevard and Biscayne Bay, and Northeast 13th Street and Northeast 15th Street in Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida as shown on Figure 1. A Work Plan (HSA, July 13, 2005) for the assessment and remedial activities was prepared with the goal of a "no further action" determination for residential use for the Site. This work was performed to confirm and delineate the extent of soil and groundwater impact reported in the Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), (EE&G April 2005), which was a precursor of a proposed property transaction. Assessment and/or remedial activities were not completed for the Miami Herald Building (see Figure 1) because it is not included in the transaction. The Boulevard Shops (see Figure 1) is a historically designated building and included in the sale, but will not be demolished during site development; assessment and/or remedial activities were not completed for this area of the Site. The proposed development of the Site, as contemplated by the Buyer, includes constructing residential and retail units on the out parcels at the Site. All sampling methods used by HSA Engineers & Scientists (HSA) on this project were in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures established by the • Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Both laboratories used, Jupiter Environmental Laboratory, Inc. and US Biosystems, Inc. are certified by NELAC. 2 BACKGROUND Knight Ridder, Inc. and a potential property purchaser agreed in a contract to the scope of work for investigating the soil and groundwater at the Site. On behalf of the potential purchaser, Greenberg Traurig, P.A. retained EE&G Environmental Services, LLC (EE&G) to perform an ESA of the Site. In January 2005, EE&G conducted a Phase I ESA and identified alleged Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with historical Site operations. In March through April 2005, EE&G completed a Phase II ESA to assess the soil and groundwater quality for contaminants of concern (COCs) typically associated with the RECs identified during the Phase I ESA. During this time, EE&G also conducted a limited -scope geophysical survey to determine the presence of subsurface anomalies, e.g. underground storage tanks (USTs). HSA observed the field operations and split samples of soil and groundwater for laboratory analysis. The Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment (EE&G, April 2005) included the following recommendations: 1. Based on the presence of elevated concentrations of arsenic, lead, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and ammonia in groundwater samples collected across the Site, EE&G recommended additional assessment to further characterize these impacts; 2. Due to the presence of arsenic, total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbon (TRPH), and PAH constituents in soil samples above the soil cleanup target levels (SCTL) given in Chapter Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 1 62-777, Florida Administrative Code (FAC) and Chapter 24 of the Code of Miami -Dade County (Chapter 24), EE&G recommended a contingency be established to characterize, handle, and dispose of all soils excavated or removed from the Site; and, 3. Due to the presence of scattered buried debris in limited areas on the southern edge of the Site, EE&G recommended that a geotechnical engineer evaluate the need to excavate these areas to minimize the potential for future settling. HSA submitted a Work Plan to the Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) for the assessment and remediation of the Site. DERM offered comments on the proposed sampling plan included in the Work Plan in a letter dated Se tember 13, 2005. A copy of the DERM letter is included in AppendixSUBMITTED ITO �TH E 3 ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES PUBLIC RECORD FO R 3.1 DETERMINATION OF WATER TABLE DEPTH ITEM-? ON U U - o 1- o. . The Work Plan included researching the depth -to -groundwater (DTW) at the -Site to determine the extent of the unsaturated zone. The Phase II ESA reported soil contaminant concentrations exceeding the respective SCTLs in soil samples collected from 0 to 2 feet, 2 to 4 feet, and 4 to 6 feet below land surface (bls). This task was completed by measuring the DTW in permanent monitor wells constructed at the Site and completing a tidal -survey of the water table elevation in one of the wells. Prior to beginning the underground investigation, ground -penetrating radar and .electromagnetic induction were performed and Sunshine State One Call of Florida was notified to locate underground utilities. The locations of the underground utilities are depicted in Figure 2. From November 7 through November 11, 2005, 12 monitor wells (MW-AI, A2, A3, A4, BI, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, DI, and D2) were constructed at the locations shown on Figure 3. These permanent monitor wells were installed to confirm the potential impacts documented by the direct push sample results (EE&G April 2005). The wells were constructed of two-inch diameter, schedule 40 PVC with screen (0.010-inch slot size) from two to twelve feet bls. The wells were installed using a truck -mounted drill rig with 8.5-inch diameter hollow -stem augers. The wells were completed by pouring sand (20/30) in the annulus beside the screen and a fine sand seal was poured in the annulus above the screen to one foot above the screen. Grout was poured from one foot above the screen to the surface. Each well was finished with a concrete pad flush with grade, locking well cap, and steel manhole. The wells were developed by pumping approximately 100 gallons of groundwater from each well. The development water was containerized in 55-gallon drums, pending characterization and off -Site disposal. Copies of the Well Completion Reports are included in Appendix B. From November 22 through November 25, 2005, HSA used a pressure transducer and datalogger installed in monitor well MW-AI (see Figure 3), which is located approximately 475 feet west of Biscayne Bay, and the DTW was recorded at twenty minute intervals. As shown on Figure 4, the DTW ranged from 3.47 to 3.72 feet below the top -of -casing. Therefore, an unsaturated zone Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 2 thickness of approximately four feet (0 — 4 foot interval) was, IljDe INtQTH E assessment and remediation activities. j J' L f C RECO RD FO R TEM pz 1s DERM requested a scaled site diagram depicting the locations of the fjrx.e. face ities (Me.gan 3.2 FORMER FACILITIES INSPECTION Chemical, Nash Body Shop, Rubin's Auto Body Shop, Fincher Motors, and a boat repair facility) described in the Phase II ESA (see Appendix A). HSA reviewed available historical documents (aerial photographs, Sanborn fire insurance maps, etc.) to determine the approximate location of the former facilities. City Directories, Sanborn Fire Insurance maps from 1918, 1921, 1939, 1950, and 1987, and aerial photographs from 1945, 1963, and 2003 were used to conclude that the former facilities listed in the DERM letter were located in the areas depicted in Figure 5. Figure 5 shows the locations of the samples collected during the Phase II to assess potential impact to the Site soil and groundwater from the former facilities. Based upon this information, additional sampling was required to assess the soil and groundwater quality in the vicinity of the former facilities. The locations of potential source areas (i.e. USTs, pipelines, soakage pits, etc.) were not evident from review of the historical documents. Therefore, three soil samples and one groundwater sample were collected in the approximate footprint of the former facilities. Copies of the historical documents are included in Appendix C. 3.2.1 SOIL SAMPLING On November 1 and 2, 2005 soil samples were collected in the vicinity of the former facilities using a direct push drill rig (see Figure 5). • Morgan Chemical Facility — Three soil samples (SBREC-10, SBREC-11, and SBREC- 17) were collected from the 0 — 2 foot and 2 — 4 foot intervals and analyzed for chlorinated pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and the 8-RCRA Metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver); • Nash Body Shop - Three soil samples (SBREC-1, SBREC-2, and SBREC-18) were collected from the 2 - 4 foot interval and analyzed for 8-RCRA Metals; • Rubin's Auto Body Shop - Three soil samples (SBREC-7, SBREC-8, and SBREC-19) were collected from the 0 — 2 foot interval and analyzed for 8-RCRA Metals; • Fincher Motor facilities - Three soil samples (SBREC-4, SBREC-5, and SBREC-16) were collected from the 2 — 4 foot interval and analyzed for 8-RCRA Metals; and, • Boat Repair facility - Three soil samples (SBREC-13, EXA1-N1, and SBREC-15) were collected from the 0 — 2 foot interval and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 8-RCRA Metals. 3.2.2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES The laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 1. • Morgan Chemical Facility — Dieldrin was reported in sample SBREC-17 (2 — 4 foot interval) at a concentration of 2.6 µg/kg, exceeding the DERM Chapter 24 Leachability Based on Groundwater SCTL of 2 µg/kg. r- Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property r 3 • Nash Body Shop - Barium was reported in sample SBREC-2 at a concentration of 180 mg/kg, exceeding the DERM Chapter 24 residential SCTL for direct exposure (120 mg/kg). • Boat Repair facility - Barium was reported in sample SBREC-13 at a concentration of 160 mg/kg, exceeding the DERM Chapter 24 residential SCTL for direct exposure (120 mg/kg). The remaining analytes were reported at concentrations below the method detection limit or below the SCTLs. Copies of the sample chain of custody and laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix D. 3.2.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING On November 1 and 2, 2005 groundwater samples were collected from 4 — 8 feet bls in the vicinity of the former facilities using a direct push drill rig (see Figure 5). • Morgan Chemical Facility — Groundwater sample SBREC-17 was collected and analyzed for 8-RCRA Metals, Pesticides, and PCBs; • Rubin's Auto Body Shop — Groundwater sample SBREC-19 was collected and analyzed for 8-RCRA Metals; • Fincher Motor facilities - Groundwater sample SBREC-16 was collected and analyzed for 8-RCRA Metals; • Nash Body Shop — Groundwater sample SBREC-18 was collected and analyzed for 8- RCRA Metals; and, • Boat Repair facility — Groundwater sample SBREC-15 was collected and analyzed for VOCs and 8-RCRA Metals. Copies of the Groundwater Sampling Logs are provided in Appendix E. 3.2.4 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLES The laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 2. All analytes were reported at concentrations below the method detection limit or below the oundwater cleanu tar et levels in Appendix Copies of the sample chain of custody and lat9 t� mil-rfEer �luTeHE in Appendix D.v vv yy 3.3 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT 3.3.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM IM ON 11-01.01.. During the Phase II ESA, EE&G collected and analyzed groundwater samples from 41 direct - push locations. The groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs, semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOC), 8-RCRA metals, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH), total arsenic, lead, mineral spirits, and ammonia. As mentioned above (Section 3.1), from November 7 through November 11, 2005, 12 monitoring wells (MW-A 1, A2, A3, A4, B 1, B2, B3, B4, C 1, C2, D 1, and D2) were constructed at the locations depicted in Figure 3. From November 8 through November 12, 2005, Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property groundwater samples were collected from the newly installed monitoring wells and analyzed for the parameters previously reported above the respective GCTLs to confirm the direct -push sampling results. Groundwater samples were collected from the monitor wells and analyzed for the parameters listed below: • Ammonia — monitor well MW-B4; SUBMITTED INTO THE • Arsenic —monitor wells MW-Al, A3, B1, B3, Dl, and BLIC RECORD FOR • Lead — monitor wells MW-A3, A4, B2, B4, and CI; an , • PAHs — monitor wells MW-A2, B1, B4, Cl, and C2. ITEM ON 01.0t . The laboratory analytical results for soil samples collected from EX-Al,X-A2, and EX-A3 (see Section 3.4.4) reported concentrations of PAHs in the samples collected from the base of the excavation that exceeded the SCTLs. Therefore, on December 7, 2005, groundwater samples were collected from the center of these excavation areas using a direct push drill rig (4 — 8 foot interval) and analyzed for PAHs to assess the groundwater quality in these areas. Copies of the Groundwater Sampling Logs are provided in Appendix E. 3.3.2 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS The laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 2. The groundwater monitor wells and analytical results are shown on Figure 6. • Arsenic — Arsenic was reported at a concentration of 0.011 mg/L in the sample collected from MW-B 1 and at a concentration of 0.017 mg/L in the sample collected from MW- D2, exceeding the GCTL of 0.01 mg/L. • PAHs — Benzo(k)fluoranthene (0.054 µg/L) was reported in a sample collected from MW-C 1 at a concentration exceeding the DERM Chapter 24 GCTL of 0.05 µg/L. The remaining analytes were reported at concentrations below the method detection limit or below the GCTLs. Because the concentrations listed above were reported at concentrations that marginally exceeded the respective GCTL, on December 8, 2005, groundwater samples were collected from MW-B1, MW-D2, and MW-C1 and analyzed for arsenic (MW-B1 and MW-D2) and PAHs (MW-C1). Arsenic and benzo(k)fluoranthene in samples collected on December 8, 2005 were reported at concentrations less than the respective GCTL. Laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from excavations EX -Al, EX-A2, and EX-A3 were reported at a concentrations for PAH constituents below the GCTLs. Copies of the sample chain of custody and laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix D. 3.4 . SOIL ASSESSMENT During the Phase II ESA (EE&G, April 2005), 44 soil borings were advanced across the Site using direct -push drilling technology. The soil samples were collected from surface grade to approximately eight feet bls, using a Macro Core sampler. The samples were collected in four - Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property foot acetate liners and segregated into two -foot intervals for field analysis. The samples were visually inspected and screened using an organic vapor analyzer, equipped with a flame ionization detector (OVA/FID). Laboratory analytical results were reported at concentrations exceeding the applicable SCTLs for the following parameters: • Arsenic - 26 soil samples were reported with arsenic concentrations exceeding the direct exposure residential SCTL of 2.1 mg/kg; • PAHs - five soil samples were reported with benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the direct exposure residential SCTL of 0.1 mg/kg, including one sample that contained a "heavy petroleum -like interference, which resulted in a dilution that increased the detection limits to above the SCTLs"; and, • TRPH - one soil sample, SB-42 collected from 4 to 6 feet bls, was reported at a concentration of 2,100 mg/kg, exceeding the groundwater based on leachability SCTL of 340 mg/kg. Concentrations of the 8-RCRA Metals, VOCs, organochlorine pesticides, and PCBs were reported at concentrations either below the laboratory detection limit or reported below the applicable SCTL. The Work Plan (HSA, July 13, 2005) proposed collecting additional soil samples to assess the extent of the arsenic, equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentration, and TRPH impact in the areas where concentrations were reported above the applicable SCTL. There was no additional sampling proposed to assess for 8-RCRA Metals, VOCs, organochlorine pesticides, and PCBs. The proposed approach in the Work Plan was to divide the areas of the Site with reported soil concentrations exceeding the SCTLs into 1/4 acre parcels and then collect additional soil samples from these areas. The Site was to be divided into (15) one -quarter acre exposure units, with boundaries extending around the potentially impacted areas identified during the Phase II ESA, and additional samples were proposed to be collected from each Unit until a total of 10 samples were collected, from both the 0-2 and 2-4 foot zone for each quarter acre parcel. The FLUCL calculator was proposed to be used, with a 95% upper confidence limit (UCL), to calculate the average soil arsenic concentration. Interim Source Removal activities were proposed for the soils which exceeded three times the applicable direct exposure SCTL, including excavation and off -site disposal. However, as discussed below, the Work Plan was revised after HSA received the DERM response letter. 3.4.1 ARSENIC In the Work Plan response letter (see Appendix A), DERM indicated that, with the exception of the results from soil borings SB-1 (arsenic concentration of 13.5 mg/kg) and SB-19 (arsenic concentration of 11.0 mg/kg) from two to four bls, the arsenic concentrations in on -Site soil appears to indicate sub -regional background influences. The arsenic concentrations from soil borings SB-1 and SB-19 (2 — 4 foot intervals) represent population outliers and, therefore, must be removed. The maximum arsenic concentrations considered as sub -regional background was 7.6 mg/kg. On November 2, 2005, soil in the vicinity of SB-1 (excavation area "EXA-4") and SB-19 (excavation area "EXB-1") was excavated and stockpiled on Site pending off -Site disposal. The excavations had final dimensions of approximately five feet 8, f 8 Nif nie r 1r Combined Report PUBLIC RECORD FOR Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 6 ITEMT., ONU-o'tbo(,. water table at approximately four feet bls. Confirmatory soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls (0 - 2 foot and 2 - 4 foot intervals) of each excavation. The excavation areas were backfilled with imported fill material. The approximate extent of the excavation areas and the locations of the confirmatory samples are shown on Figure 7. 3.4.2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF ARSENIC EXCAVATIONS The laboratory analytical results for the arsenic confirmatory samples are summarized in Table 3. The arsenic concentration reported from the confirmatory soil samples ranged from 0.90 — 4.2 mg/kg; consistent with the site -wide arsenic distribution. Copies of the sample chain of custody and laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix D. 3.4.3 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PARS) In the Work Plan response letter (see Appendix A), DERM did not object to the source removal of PAH impacted soils in the vicinity of soil borings: • SB-2 (benzo(a)pyrene concentration of 0.39 mg/kg, 0 — 2 foot interval); SB-3 (benzo(a)pyrene concentration of 0.37 mg/kg, 0 — 2 foot interval); • SB-6 (benzo(a)pyrene concentration of 0.52 mg/kg, 0 — 2 foot interval); • SB-14 (benzo(a)pyrene concentration "interference", 2 — 4 foot interval mg/kg); and, • SB-26 (benzo(a)pyrene concentration of 0.53 mg/kg, 0 — 2 foot interval). On November 2, 2005, soil in the vicinity of SB-2 (excavation area "EX-A3"), SB-3 (excavation area "EX-A2"), SB-6 (excavation area "EX -Al"), SB-14 (excavation area "EX-A5"), and SB-26 (excavation area ` EX-C 1 ") was excavated and stockpiled on Site pending off -Site disposal (see Figure 8 and Figure 9). All excavations had dimensions of five feet by five feet and were two feet deep. Excavation EX- A5 was completed to a depth of approximately four feet bls. Confirmatory soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of each excavation for analysis of PAH parameters. Laboratory analytical results indicated that additional excavation was necessary due to the equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations reported above the residential direct exposure SCTL. • Excavation EX -Al (see Figure 8) was expanded further east, south, west, and to the water table (four feet bls); • Excavations EX-A2 (see Figure 8) and EX-A5 (see Figure 9) were expanded further north, east, south, west, and to the water table (four feet bls); and, • Excavation EX-C 1 (see Figure 9) was expanded further north, south, and west. Additional confirmatory samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavations. Laboratory analytical results reported equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations above the residential direct exposure SCTL in most of the samples. Since the majority of the samples collected south of the parking garage were reported with equivalent benzo[a]pyrene concentrations above the residential direct exposure SCTL, further excavation was discontinued and additional assessment was completed to delineate the extent of soil impact. Soil samples were collected from the 0 — 2 foot interval and 2 — 4 foot interval in a 20-feet (east/west) by 10- Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 7 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMI,+I,ONH. eq.oc r feet (north/south) grid, starting from the southwest comer of the parking garage. The first sample was collected approximately five feet south and twenty feet east of the southwest comer of the parking garage, and was labeled "PG-5-20"; the second sample was fifteen feet south and twenty east of the southwest corner of the parking garage and labeled "PG-15-20", etc. The sampling was continued eastward to the vicinity of the high -voltage transformer immediately east of EX -Al (see Figure 8). Additionally, four soil samples were collected in a grid west of the southwest corner of the parking garage. To delineate the extent of the PAH impact near the parking garage, soil samples were collected in a grid from beneath the parking garage. Soil samples were collected from two rows of fourteen with approximately twenty feet between each sample from east to west, as shown in Figure 8. The samples were labeled by column first (A through N) and then by row (1 and 2), e.g. IPG-N2 (inside parking garage, column N, row 2). Samples do not exist for IPG-H2 through IPG-L2 due to the ramp to the parking garage's second level. On December 1, 2005, a direct push drill rig was used to collect soil samples to the north and west of EX-A5 and to the north of EX-C 1, to delineate the PAH impact in the vicinity of these excavation areas (see Figure 9). 3.4.4 LABORATORY RESULTS OF PAH EXCAVATIONS The laboratory analytical results for the PAH confirmatory and assessment soil samples are summarized in Table 4 and Table 5, and are shown on Figure 8 and Figure 9. Table 5 summarizes the analytical data from the carcinogenic PAHs. As in the case of dioxins and furans, carcinogenic PAHs are found as mixtures in contaminated media. Given that carcinogenic PAHs have a common toxicity mechanism, but display difference toxic potencies, the TEF approach can be used to convert individual PAH site concentrations into a single concentration of the index chemical, benzo(a)pyrene. This approach should be followed to evaluate risks from direct exposure. Consequently, direct exposure SCTLs were derived only for benzo(a)pyrene. The table below presents the TEFs used to calculate site concentrations before comparison with the direct toxicity SCTLs for benzo(a)pyrene. Toxic Equivalency Factors for Carcinogenic PAHs Contaminant TEF SUD benzo(a)pyrene 1.0 0.1 PUB L benzo(a)anthracene benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.1 ITEM 0.01 benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene 0.001 dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1.0 indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.1 IITTEDINTOTHE IC RECORD FOR e«n ONII-oq-oc. Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 8 Table 5 presents the reported PAH concentrations, the TEFs, and the equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations. Copies of the sample chain of custody and laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix D. 3.4.4.1 EX-C1 Excavation EX-C1 was initiated in the location of SB-26 from the Phase II ESA. Laboratory analytical results indicate that soil samples for which the equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations were reported less than the residential direct -exposure SCTL ("clean" confirmatory samples), were collected approximately 2.5 feet east, 7.5 feet south, 7.5 feet west, and 2 feet deep from SB-26. Although the soil sample collected 12.5 feet north of SB-26 (0 - 2 interval) was reported with equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations less than the residential direct -exposure SCTL, the soil sample collected 17.5 feet north of SB-26 (at the Site perimeter, 0 — 2 foot interval) was reported at an equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentration (0.68 mg/kg) greater than the residential direct -exposure SCTL. 3.4.4.2 EX-A5 Excavation EX-A5 was initiated in the location of SB-14 from the Phase II ESA. Laboratory analytical results indicate that soil samples with equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations reported less than the residential direct -exposure SCTL were collected approximately 7.5 feet east of SB-14 (0 — 2 foot and 2 — 4 foot interval), 7.5 feet south of SB-14 (0 — 2 foot and 2 — 4 foot interval), 7.5 north of SB-14 (0 — 2 foot and 2 — 4 foot interval), and 17 feet west of SB-14 (0 — 2 foot and 2 — 4 foot interval). As shown on Figure 9, the soil samples collected from 7.5 feet north to 27.5 feet north of SB-14, which is covered by asphalt, did not have any equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the SCTL; the soil sample collected approximately 35 feet north of SB-14, which is covered by grass, was reported at an equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentration that exceeded the SCTL (0.74 mg/kg). The soil between 7.5 and 17.5 feet west of SB-14 could not be sampled due to underground utilities (storm drain). The soil from 17.5 feet west to 42.5 feet west of SB-14, which is covered by asphalt, did not have any equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the SCTL; the soil sample collected approximately 60 feet west of SB-14, which is covered by grass, was reported at an equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentration (0.61 mg/kg, 0 — 2 foot interval) exceeding the SCTL. 3.4.4.3 EX -Al, EX-A2, EX-A3, AND PARKING GARAGE VICINITY Excavation EX -Al was initiated in the location of SB-6 from the Phase II ESA. In the 0 — 2 foot interval, soil samples collected 7.5 feet east of SB-6, 7.5 feet south of SB 6, 7.5 feet north of SB- 6, and 7.5 feet west of SB-6 were reported at equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the residential direct -exposure SCTL. Additionally, the soil sample collected from the 2 — 4 foot interval at SB-6 was reported at an equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentration exceeding the residential direct -exposure SCTL. In the 2 - 4 foot interval samples could not be collected 7.5 east, south, or west due to underground obstructions. The underground obstructions are discussed further in Section 3.6. Excavation EX-A2 was initiated in the location of SB-3 from the Phase II ESA. Laboratory analytical results of sidewall samples reported equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations in the Combined Report Knight Ridder Miami Herald Property 9 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR n-oy-oa soil samples collected 7.5 feet south of SB-3 (2 — 4 foot interval), 2.5 feet east of SB-3, 2.5 feet west of SB-3, and 7.5 feet west of SB-3 exceeding the residential direct -exposure SCTL. Excavation EX-A3 was initiated in the location of SB-2 from the Phase II ESA. Laboratory analytical results of all four sidewall samples collected from the 0 — 2 foot interval were reported at equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the residential direct -exposure SCTL. Laboratory analytical results indicate that all samples immediately south of the garage (which are covered by grass), except for the soil samples collected 25 feet south and 240 feet east of the southwest corner of the parking garage (2 — 4 foot interval), were reported at equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the residential direct -exposure SCTL. Laboratory analytical results also indicate one of the seven soil samples collected southwest of the parking garage (which are covered by asphalt), was reported at an equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentration exceeding the residential direct -exposure SCTL. Equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations were reported in soil samples IPG-E1 (0 — 2 foot interval), IPG-MI (2 — 4 foot interval), IPG-C2 (2 — 4 foot interval), IPG-D2 (0 - 2 foot interval), and IPG-E2 (0 — 2 foot interval) exceeding the residential direct -exposure SCTL. The other 39 soil samples collected from beneath the parking garage were reported at equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations less than the residential direct -exposure SCTL. 3.4.5 SOIL SAMPLING FOR TRPH During the Phase II ESA, 26 soil samples were analyzed for TRPH using the FL PRO Method. TRPH in one soil sample (sample collected from soil boring SB-42) was reported at a concentration of 2,100 mg/kg, exceeding the groundwater based on leachability SCTL of 340 mg/kg. Soil sample SBREC-13, which was used during the former facilities investigation, was collected using the direct push method in the same location as SB-42 from the Phase II ESA (see Figure 5). This soil sample was submitted for lab analysis using the TRPH Working Group Method (WGM). 3.4.6 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLING FOR TRPH The soil sample collected from SBREC-13 was analyzed in a laboratory for TRPH speciation using the Working Group Method. As shown in Table 6, concentrations of each of the TRPH speciation parameters were reported less than the laboratory reporting limit of 55 mg/kg, which is less that than the SCTL for each aliphatic and aromatic species. 3.5 UNDERGROUND DEBRIS The DERM response letter (see Appendix A) required further investigation of the potential for buried solid waste debris along the southern boundary of the Site, as referenced in the Phase II ESA. This investigation was completed, including observations made during the installation of monitor wells and soil borings and during source removal activities. The only underground objects encountered, which are not active utilities, include: • An unused concrete conduit which was placed by Florida Power & Light and is oriented SUBMITTEDnorth -south approximately 50 feet east ofEX-A2; and, INTO THE Combined Report PUBLIC RECORD F Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 10 ITEMzi, ONii.0it . o -* ` . • A horizontal concrete slab located approximately two feet bls near EX -A 1. The concrete slab may be the foundation of a former building. A picture of the concrete slab is included in Appendix F. 3.6 WASTE DISPOSAL Soil excavated during the source removal was stockpiled at the site pending off -Site disposal. Except for the drill cuttings from MW-C2, all drill cuttings from the monitoring well installation were spread on site. The drill cuttings from MW-C2 exhibited a petroleum odor and were placed with the stockpiled soil from the excavations. The groundwater purged during the monitor wells during development was containerized in drums pending laboratory analysis. The drums will be emptied and the groundwater poured onto the Site, since the laboratory analysis reported concentrations of parameters below the GCTLs for all monitor wells samples. 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This Site Assessment Report (SAR) presented the results of assessment and remediation activities completed at the Knight Ridder — Miami Herald Property (Site) located between Biscayne Boulevard and Biscayne Bay, and Northeast 13t Street and Northeast 15t Street in Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida as shown on Figure 1. The Work Plan for the assessment and remedial activities was prepared with the goal of a "no further action" determination for residential use for the Site. The scope of work was performed to confirm and delineate the extent of soil and groundwater impact reported in the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), (EE&G April 2005), which was a precursor of a proposed property transaction. 4.1 DETERMINATION OF WATER TABLE DEPTH A pressure transducer and datalogger were installed in monitoring well MW-A1 (see Figure 3), which is located approximately 475 feet west of Biscayne Bay, and the depth to groundwater (DTW) was recorded at twenty -minute intervals. As shown on Figure 4, the DTW ranged from 3.47 to 3.72 feet below the top -of -casing. We recommend using an unsaturated zone thickness of approximately four feet when reviewing the results from the assessment and remediation activities. 4.2 FORMER FACILITIES INSPECTION HSA reviewed available historical documents (aerial photographs, Sanborn fire insurance maps, etc.) to determine the approximate location of the former facilities (Morgan Chemical, Nash Body Shop, Rubin's Auto Body Shop, Fincher Motors, and a boat repair facility) described in the Phase II ESA. Figure 5 provides a scaled site diagram showing the locations of the samples collected during the Phase II to assess potential impact to the Site soil and groundwater from the former facilities. Additional sampling was completed to assess the soil and groundwater quality Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 11 :iUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM It/ri ON ltoq.o,• in the vicinity of the former facilities. Three soil samples and one groundwater sample were collected in the approximate footprint of the former facilities and these samples were analyzed for contaminants of concern associated with the former facilities. Soil samples were reported with concentrations of dieldrin (Morgan Chemical Facility, SBREC- 17, 2.6 µg/kg) slightly exceeding the DERM Chapter 24 Leachability Based on Groundwater SCTL (2 µg/kg), and barium (Nash Body Shop, SBREC-2, 180 mg/kg; and, the Boat Repair facility, SBREC-13, 160 mg/kg) and the DERM Chapter 24 residential SCTL for direct exposure (120 mg/kg). The laboratory analytical results of groundwater samples were reported at concentrations below the method detection limit or below the groundwater cleanup target levels (GCTLs). Based on the concentrations of select soil samples being reported only slightly above the SCTL; the concentration reported for dieldrin in SBREC-17 is less then the FDEP SCTL for residential direct exposure (0.06 mg/kg); and, all groundwater samples being reported below the GCTLs, we propose no further action for the assessment and remediation related to the former facilities at the Site. 4.3 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT Twelve monitoring wells (MW-AI, A2, A3, A4, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, D1, and D2) were constructed at the locations depicted in Figure 3. Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells and analyzed for the parameters previously reported above the respective GCTLs to confirm the direct -push sampling results (ammonia, arsenic, lead, and PAHs). The lab reported concentrations of arsenic (MW-B 1 and MW-D2) and benzo(k)fluoranthene (MW-C1) that marginally exceeded the respective GCTLs. The remaining analytes were reported at concentrations below the method detection limit or below the GCTLs. Monitoring wells MW-B 1, MW-D2, and MW-C 1, were subsequently resampled and analyzed for arsenic (MW-B1 and MW-D2) and PAHs (MW-C1). Arsenic and benzo(k)fluoranthene in samples collected during the second sampling event were reported at concentrations less than the respective GCTL. Due to equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations reported for soil samples collected from the base of excavation areas EX -A 1, EX-A2, and EX-A3 (2 — 4 foot interval, immediately above the water table interface) exceeding the SCTL, groundwater samples were collected using a direct push drill rig (4 — 8 foot interval) and analyzed for PAHs to assess the groundwater quality in these areas. Laboratory analytical results reported groundwater concentrations below the GCTLs. Due to the analysis of 9 of the 12 samples being reported at concentrations below the GCTLs from the first sampling event; the results from the second sampling event reported at concentrations below the GCTLs; and, that the additional groundwater investigation in the vicinity of impacted soil showed no impact to groundwater, no further action is proposed for the assessment and remediation of groundwater at the Site, and the permanent monitoring wells located at the Site should be abandoned by filling with grout. Combined Report Knight Ridder - Miami Herald Property 12 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM IM ON II-et.so . 4.4 SOIL ASSESSMENT 4.4.1 ARSENIC Source removal was completed in the vicinity of the Phase II ESA soil borings SB-1 and SB-19 (2 — 4 foot interval). Because the confirmation samples collected from the excavation sidewalls were reported at concentrations consistent with the site -wide arsenic distribution, no further action is proposed for the assessment and remediation of arsenic impacted soil at the Site. 4.4.2 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) There are approximately 2,500 cubic yards of soil in -place at the Site that laboratory analysis has reported equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the SCTLs. These soils are primarily located in the unpaved area (0 — 4 foot interval) located adjacent to the south side of the parking garage. We propose removing the impacted soil located immediately south of the south side of the parking garage to a distance approximately 10-feet north of the FPL underground conduit (FPL mandated a minimum 10-foot setback from the utility line), running east -west on the north side of Interstate I-395, and using the results from analysis of samples collected beneath the parking garage as confirmatory data points. We also propose expanding the excavations EX-A5 and EX -CI further north and west, to the location of soil samples collected with equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations reported below the SCTLs. This source removal plan does not included removing soil beneath the parking garage, since only five of the 46 samples collected were reported at equivalent benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceeding the SCTLs. Additionally, any impacted soil in the right-of-ways and FPL utility setback area will be left in place. After the additional soil is excavated, we will propose no further action for the assessment and remediation of PAH impacted soil at the Site. Figure 10 shows the extent of the proposed excavation areas. 4.4.3 TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TRPH) One of the 26 soil samples collected during the Phase II ESA, and analyzed for TRPH using the FL PRO Method, was reported at a concentration exceeding the SCTL. A soil sample (SBREC- 13) was analyzed using the TRPH-WGM to confirm the results presented in the Phase II ESA. Concentrations of each of the TRPH speciation parameters were reported less than the laboratory detection limit of 55 mg/kg, which is less that than the SCTL for each aliphatic and aromatic species. Due to all samples being reported at concentrations below the TRPH fraction -specific SCTLs, no further action is proposed for the assessment and remediation of TRPH impacted soil at the Site. 4.5 UNDERGROUND DEBRIS Due to the extensive underground investigation completed during the assessment and remediation activities, including observations made during the installation of monitor wells and soil borings and during source removal activities, it is believed that other underground objects, except utilities, are not present. Since no evidence of buried solid waste debris was revealed during the assessment and remediation activities, no further action is proposed to investigate the potential for buried solid waste debris at the Site. S UBMIrrED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR Combined Report ITEMZsLONKnight Ridden -Miami Herald Property 13Nii - bdf. 0`. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM ON HDio. TABLES r �.F � -� �-� 1 1 1 .] -1 `T 7 ®` -*A a m 0) TABLE 1 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR HISTORICAL RECs (FORMER FACILITIES) KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY SBREC10-0-2 i SBREC10-2-4 Moran Chemical Facility SBREC14-0-2 SBREC11-2-4 SBREC17-0-2 SBREC17-2-4 Nash Body»Shop„ w CO 0 Resid, FDEP Resid. Indus. DERM CTL Indus. CTL leach. (DERM) (DERM) leach. Arsenic Barium mg/kg, mill% 1.5 6 0.75 -- 1.1 2.2 5.2 2.6 2,8 0.49 5.1 1.4 5.8 2.8 19 1.7 180 0.79 5.1 2.1 120 12 130 000 SPLP 1800 0.7 120 4.1 110 000 5.8 1600 Cadmium mg/kg < 1.1 <1.1 < 1.2 < 1.2 <1.1 <1.4 <1.3 < 1.1...._< 1,2 82 12.00...... 7.5 82 1,700 8 Chromium mgncg 5.1 1.1 4 2.4 2.5 , -6.5 6 3.8 5.3 210 470 38 200 460 38 Lead m9/k9 3.8 1.4 .... 19 10 3.2 17 62 44 4.8 400 1400„» _ SPLP , 400 920 SPLP Selenium mg/kg < 1.1 < 1.1 < 1: 2 < 1.2 < 1,1 < 1.4 < 1.3 < 1.1 < 1,2 440 11,600 ,,.... 5.2 440._ 11J000 _ 5 Silver meg < < 1.1 �._. < 1.1 0.57 µ <1.2 < 1.1 < 1.4 < 1.3 < 1.1 < 1.2 ` 410 8 200 ,_,,,»17 ,,,, 410 »,,, 8,200 17 Mercury mg/kg 0.0088 0.0027 0.011 0.0015 0.0041 0.017 0,021 0.023 0.01 3 17 2.1 4.6 28 2.1 PCB 1016 PCB 1221 upncg,_,,, ueg < 18 < 18 < 19 < 19 < 21 < 21 < 2T < 18 < 18 < < 24 24 500 500», 2 600 2 600 f7 000 17 000 500 500 2 000 2 000 17 000 17 000 < 21 • PCB 1232 u ....».fig < < 18 < 19 < 21 < 21 .....»_._._.._....._ < ................< ........_.». 24 ._.._»__.»»..»..».__._. » 500 2,600 17,000 500 2,000 17,000 ......�»......».... < 21 500 2,800 17 000_ 500 2000, PCB 1242 ueg < < 18 <19 21 < 16 < 24 17,,000 PCB 1248 ueg < < 18 < 19 < 21 < 21 < 18 < 24 „ 500 » 2600 17 000 500 ,- 2000 17 600_„ PCB 1254 ugikg,,,,,, < 18 < 19 17 < 21 < 18 < 24» µ »� 500 » 2 600 » 17 000 ».. 500 .. 2 000 17 000 ".. ...17 PCB 1260 ugikg 9.2 < 19....».... <21 _.... _. » <221 » < 18 < 24 500.... 2,800 17,000 500 2 000...M 060 alpha-BHC gamma-BHC beta-BHC Heptachlor delta-BHC Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide gamma -Chlordane ueg...... ueg ueg ueg ugncg ... ueg ueg ueg < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 1.4 2 < 1.9 < 1.9 < 1,9 < 1.9 < 1.9 < 1.9 < t .9 < 1.9 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 2.1 < 2.1 2.2 <2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 ......<..2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.8 2 < 2.4 < 2.4 < 2.4 < 2.4 < 2.4 < 2.4 < 2.4 3.9 n n n 200 n 60 100 n n n n .1,000 n 300 500 n n n n 23 000 n 200 600 n n n n 200 n 60 100 n n n n 1,000 n 300 500 n n n ri alpha -Chlordane upnig„.... 1.7 1.7 2.2 <2.1 1.7 3.1 n n n n n n _ Endosulfan I ueg 2.1 < 1.9 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 1.8 < 2.4 4 450,000 7,800,006 „., 3,800 » 480,000 7,800,000 3,800 4,4'-DDE ueg 0 0.85 < 3.8 2.6 ,_......1.8»„», <3.8 <4.8 2,900 15000 , 18,000 2,900 15,000 18,000T Dieldrin ueg < < 1.8 < 1.9 2 2 < 1.8 2.6 60 300 2 m , 60 300 2 r Endrin ueg < 3.6 < 3.8 < 4.1 < 4.0 < 3.6 < 4.6 2 25,000 510,000 1,,000 ., 25.000.,,, 510 000„� 1,000 „: 4,4'-ODD ug/kg < 3,6 < 3.8 < 4.1 < 4.0 < 3.6 < 4.6 4,200 22,000 5,800 . 4,200 22,000 4,000ti .. Endosulfan II ueg < < 3.6 < 3.8 < 4,1 < 4.0 < 3,6 < 4.6 4 450,000 7,600 000 3,80 460,000 , 7,800,000 3,80y1 4 4'-DDT up/kg 2.9 < 3.8 < 4.1 < 4.0 < 3.6 < 4.6 2 2,900 15,000 11 00.0 , 2,900 15,000 11,9, Endrin Aldehyde ueg < < 3.6 < 3.8 < 4.1 < 4.0 < 3.6 < 4.6 n n n n n n Endosulfan Sulfate ueg 2.7 :ail < 4.1 < 4.0 < 3.6 < 4.6 4 450 000 7 600 000 3 800 n n n Methoxychlor ueg 3.4 < 19.0 < 21.0 < 21.0 <18 _ »420000 8,800,000 160,600 420,000 8,900,000, 160,01 0 ■ Endrin Ketone uQ/k < 3.6 < 3.8 < 4.1 _» < 4.0 < 3.6 .................. < 4.6 n n n n n n Toxaphene ug/kg < 110 < 110 < 120w» < 120 < 110 < 140 900 4,500 31,000 900 4,500 31,000_ Notes: Concentrations greate than, or equal to, the lesser Residential CTL are bolded. n: A cleanup target level (CTL) has not been established Blank cell: analyses was not required. Page 1 016 VOLATILE SCREEN TABLE 1 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR HISTORICAL RECs (FORMER FACILITIES) KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY i ISBREC10-2-4 Morgan Chemical Facility SBREC11-0-2 SBREC11-2-4 SBREC17-0-2 'SBRECI7-2-4 Nash Body Shop U w m N w CL co C) co CO Resid. FDEP Resid. Indus. DERM CTL Indus. CTL leach. (DERM) (DERM) leach. Acetone ai aeE (74 c'i Q a[ aR ai mat q aj mat a sae E ai of woe f moo-€ ai �aeF �o 'ag a€ of aE a3 Q Q ai of ok a aR v ae Q a€ ae cr', o EEEE EE E E EEE EE E E E E E EiE EE,E Eil �" °" E E E E g 11,000 66 000 25 n n n Acrolein 0.05 0 ....»»»0...- .. 0.01 »........»0.3 0.05 .».....»».. 0.3 0.06 Acrylonitrile »»...»...» »........»».»»» ».»...»..» ..»..... _ _ 0.3 ..» 6 0.0003 0.3.»..». 0.0003 Benzene 1.2 1.7 0.007 1.2 1.7 0.007 Bromobenzene »....»»..»»...» »... »....»n» .»»µ»»»n »»» . n ..... n ».....»^..»..- n Bromochloromethane 95 530 0.8 95 530 0.6 Bromodichloromethane 1.5 2.2 » 0.004 1.5 2.2 0.004 Bromoforrn 48 93 0.03 48 93 0.03 Bromomethane 3.1 16 _ 0.05 3.1 16 0.05 n-Butylbenzene »...»_ . ^»»..». ... " _ n n ^»»». ^.......... sec-Butylbenzene n n n n n n tert-Butylbenzene n n n n n n Carbon Disulfide 270 1500 5.8 270 1500 PT Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 0.7 0.04 0.5 0.7 0.04 Ch orobenzene Chloroethane » » »..............»» 120 n ...»...»».. 650 n 1.3 n 120 3.9 ......».»5.4'»»....»...0.06 650 1.3 ..., 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether n n n n n n.» Chloroform 0.4» 0.6 » ......». 0.4 »0.01...» 0.3 0.6 »4.8 » 0.03 µ Chloromethane » .» ..» _ »....» _.......... » µ 4 ...» .» ».. 5.7 . .....» 3.2 ,.»». »» »..».... 0.01 2-Chlorotoluene » »..»».» » . » »» ._ n ........» ^..»........».... n„..»... �»»».... n n 4-Chlorotoluene »»» ^ _......».»� Dibromochloromethane 1.5 2.3 0.003 1.5 2.3 0.003 1,2-Dibromo 3-Chloropropane. 3.8 0.001 0.7 3.8 0.001 1,2-Dibromoethane .»0.7 0.1 0.2 0.001 0.01 0.05 0.0001 Dibromomethane ^ n n..».»... n »........ "»..»........... n 1,2-Dichlorobenzene »..._»» 880 5,200 17 880 5 000 17 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 380 2200 7 14 85 0.3 2.2 ■ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.4 9.9 2.2 6.4 9.9 Dichlorodifluoromethane 77 410 44 77 410 44 1,1-Dichloroethane _ 390 .,..2,100 » 0.4 390 2,100 0.4 : 1,2-Dlchloroethane 0.5 0.7 0.01 0.5 0.7 0.01 1,1-Dichloroethene 95 510 0.06 0.1 0.1 0. cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 33 180 0.4 33 180 0.4 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene _ _ 53 290 0.7 53 290 0.7 1,2-Dichloropropane m. 0.6 0.9 0.03 0.6 0.9 0.0 •.• 1,3-Dichloropropane 1.4 2.2 0.002 1.4 2.2...... 0.0 ». 2,2-Dichloropropane n n n n n 1,1-Dichloropropene n .. n» _» ^»»» » n n n cis-1,3-Dichloropropene n n n n n n Notes: Concentrations greater than, or equal to, the lesser Residential CTL are bolded. n: A cleanup target level (CTL) has not been established Blank cell: analyses was not required. Page 2 of 6 a co VOLATILE SCREEN TABLE 1 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR HISTORICAL RECs (FORMER FACILITIES) KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY SBREC10-0-2 SBREC10-2-4 Morgan Chemical Facility 'Y U ce m y SBREC11-2-4 SBREC17-0-2 SBREC17-2-4 Nash Body Shop U ce m y N w w Resld. FDEP Resid. Indus. DERM CTL Indus. CTL leach. (DERM) (DERM) leach. trans-1,3•Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene 2-Hexanone isopropyl Benzene m9/k mgfkk mq%hp milli24 ,., -_ »».. , ...._ »..» n 1,500 n ........._....n.. n .9,200 n 130 » ........._.n n 0.6 n» 1.4 n 1,500 n 24 n n 94100 n 130 .............. n 0.6 • n 1.4 n 4•1sopr9Pyl Toluene TOIL._ n n n n n n .......................ik9 1 18 000 110,000 17 2.4,200 .21000 17 Methylene Chloride _..mpi . map_ _ n n n 17 26 0.02 MIBK(4•Methy1-2•Pentanone1 mg/kg_ __ _ 4300 44,000 2.6 300 1,600 »». 2.6 MTBE mQ/k»p _ 24000 0.09 4 400 24 000 0.2 Naphthalene » »_4400» 55 » 300 1.2 55 300 1.7 n-Propylbenzene »5lkp n n n n _ n n Styrene mpiic - -"Tear- .... 23 000» 3.6 3,800» ........ ... 23 000 .» 3.6 1,1,1,2•Tetrachloroethane rn Ikp 2.9 4.3 0.01 ...2 6.3 0.01 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mgAcp _». 0.7 1.2 0.2 0.7 1.2 0.002 Tetrachloroethene mgnk.g. 8.8 16 0.03 8.8 18 0.03 Toluene mlfkp 7 7,500 80 000 0.5 520 2 800 0.5 Total Xylenea 130 700 0.2 8,000 44 000 0.2 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ms1k»p » 650 8,200 4.6 660 8 800 4.6 124-Trichlorobenzene n I 660 8,500 5.3 660 8500 5.3 1,1,1-Trichloroethane m9lkp 3,900 1.9 730 3900 1.9 1,1,2-Trichloroethane mplkp ...m730 1.4 2 0.03 1.4 _ 2 0M03 Trichloroethene mgfcp 6.4 9.3 0.03 6.4 9.3 0.03 M.., Trichlorofluoromethane mg/kp 270 1,50....,. 270 1500 33 1,2,3-Trichlorop%,pane mQIkk9 .._ _ 0.06 0.1M» ».33 .».. 0,0001 0.02 0.03 0 0.00003 ».. 1,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene »...» 18 95 0.3 18 95 0.3 », 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ,mQncp.» m9I 15 80 0.3 15 80 ................ 0:3 . Vinyl Acetate m1kp 320 1,700 0.4 320 1 700 0.4 Vinyl Chloride mg/kg 0.2 0.8 0.007 J 7 Notes: Concentrations greate than, or equal to, the lesser Residential CTL are bolded. n: A cleanup target level (CTL) has not been established Blank cell: analyses was not required. Page 3 of 6 92 CO { C7 ED Z � z cf o O E TABLE 1 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR HISTORICAL RECs (FORMER FACILITIES) KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY Rubin's Auto Bod Shop Of Fincher Motor Facilities CO Boat 4 Repair Facility a zW in mce co co co co co co y 8y y Resid. FDEP Resld. Indus. DERM CTL Indus. CTL leach. (DERM) (DERM) leach. Arsenic Barium Cadmium rnla9 mglkQ mpncQ 2.8 12 < 1.3 1.9 7.2 < 1.2 1.1 63 0.42 .,,..» 2.4 17 < 1.2 1.9 7.9 < 1.2 1,4 -..._...'8.67. < 1.1 2.9 160 < 1.7 1 9.4 0.2 1.7 4.5 < 1.1 2.1 120 82 12 130,000 1,709 SPLP 1600 7,5 0.7 120 82 4.1 11.9,000 1200 5.8 1600 8 Chromium mp/kp 2.8 8.4 7.1 2.9 2.9 » 1.5 7.8 5.5 4.8 210 470 38 200 460 38 Lead Selenium mpM rum 3 35 < 1,3 43 < 1.2 220 0.45 25 »,»»»,•»- < 1,2 14 < 1.2 10 < 1.1 22 < 1.7 30 <0.08 2.3 ....»....»»„»...... < 1.1 400 440 1400 ,s»»»...„..»...„...........»...........00 11 000 SPLP 5.2 400 ......»»».,,,, 440 920 11,000 SPLP 5 Silver » me.9.••»_ <1.3 <1.2 <1.2 <1,2 <1.2 <1,1 <1.7 <0.05 <1.1 410 8200 17 410 8200 17 Mercury mg/kg 0.038 0.016 0.28 0.019 0.018 0.024 0.0078 <0.05. 0.019 3 17 2.1 4.6 28 2.1 PCBs PCB 1016 PCB 1221 4150 um _ _ - - 5 500 500 2,600 2,600 17,000 „ 17 000 500 506 2 2,900 21000 17,000 17,000» PCB 1232 uQik 500 2,600 17,000 500 2,000 , 17,000» PCB 1242 ue.g 5 500 2t600 17,000 500 „ 2,000 17,000 PCB 1248 u.0.9 500 2 600 » _ 17,000_ -» 500 - 2,000 1 17,000 PCB 1260 ug/kg »».....»..»..»»»»..._...» '....»...........».» ».»...»».......»...500...»......»2,600 600 17,000 500 2,000 2,000 17,000 PESTICIDES alpha-BHC gamma-BHC beta-BHC ,,,,_uQ/k9 ug/kg um _ »... n n n n ,,.»» n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Heptachlor ug/kg 200 1,000 13,000 200 „»»1,000 23,000 delta-BHC Aldrin ugnkg ` um60 n n n ,» 300 n 200 n 60 n 300 n 200 Heptachlor Epoxide u9!19 100 500 800 100 500 600 gamma -Chlordane ,,,, _ u n n s n n n n alpha -Chlordane u9lkg n n n n n n Endosulfan 1 4/4 4 450,000 7,800,000 3,800 460,000 7,800,000 3,800 4,4'-DDE u9/k9 2 2,900 15,,000 1 18,000 2,900 15 000,,,, 18,000 Dieldrin ug/k9 60 300 2 60 300 2 Endrin uQlk9 2 25,000 510,000 1,_000 25,000 510,000 1,000 4,4'-DDD u9/k9 4 4,200 22,000 5,800 4,200 22,000 4,000 Endosulfan II u91k9 _ 4 450,000 7,600,000 3,800 460,000 7,800,000 3,800 4,4'-DDT ug/k9 2 2,900 15,000 11,000 2,900 15,000 11,000 Endrin Aldehyde ug/kg....._ n n n ».,,....»!!.».»..... n n Endosulfan Sulfate ug/k9 ...................... 4 450,000 7,600,000 3,800 n n n Methoxychlor ug/k9 4 420,000 8,800r000, 160,000 420,000 8,900,000 160,00 Endrin Ketone ug/kg n n ...,,,, »». n n n n Toxaphene ug/kg 900 4,500 31,000 900 4,500 31,000 Notes: Concentrations greater than, or equal to, the lesser Residential CTL are bolded. n: A cleanup target level (CTL) has not been established Blank cell: analyses was not required. Page 4 of 8 0 a) o. to LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPL SF OR HISTORICAL RECs (FORMER FAC MMITTED INTO TH E KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY Rubin's Auto Body Shop Fincher Motor Facilities Boat Repair Facility N Oi t0 M 1. ' N ? W re co re co re co ce co re co re Do wmcc co co PUBLIC RECORD FOR iTEMUA ON n.w.a.. Resid. FDEP Resid. Indus. DERM CTL Indus. CTL leach. (DERM) (DERM) leach. Acetone mptkp 0 0.0081 0.0067_ 11,000 _ 68,000 - 25 n n n Acrolein - mpncp < < 0.042 ..«<, 0,,.030 0.05 0 0,01 0.05 0.3 0.06 Acrylonitrile mpncp.,_ „, < < 0.042 < 0.030 0.3 0.6 0.0003 0.3 0.3 0.0003 Benzene mptkp „«« « 0.003 0.00082 1.2 1.7 0.007 1.2 1.7 0.007 eromot�enzene Bromochloromethane - mplkp "lea � p - < <0.009 < 0.009 <0.006 < 0.006 n 95 n «. »» « 530 n 0,6 n 85 » ». n 530 n 0.6 Bromodichloromethane mg/kg < < 0 003 < 0.002 1.5 2.2 0.004 1.5 2.2 0.004 Bromoform mpAcp < 0.009 < 0.006 48 93 0.03 48 93 0.03 Bromomethane _ mpAcp < < 0.009 < 0.006 3.1 16 _ 0.05 3.1 16 0.05 n-Buty'benzene melt 0 0.0025 0.001 n n n _ n n n sec-Butylbenzene m0j _ _,,,_ 0 0.0014 < 0.006 n n n n n n tert•Butylbenzene mgikQ < < 0.009 < 0.006 n n n n n n Carbon Disulfide met.- 0 0.0017 0.0024 270 1500 5.6 270 1500 5.6 Carbon Tetrachloride _ "109 < 0.009 < 0.006 0.5 0.7 0.04 0.5 0.7 0.04 Chlorobenzene Chloroethane mee g m p�,p < < 0.009 < 0.009 < 0.006 .,, < p.0pg .� 120 n 650 � n 1.3 n 120 3.9 650 « » 5.4 1.3 0.06 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether meg � < 0.085 < 0.059 n n n IT n n Chloroform 'leg< 0.009 < 0.006 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.03 Chloromethane mpAcp < 0.009 0.006 4 5.7 0.01 3.2 4.6 0.01 2-Chlorotoluene mgrkg _ < < 0.009 . <0.006 n n n n n n 4•Chlorotoluene mpncp < < 0.009 < 0.006 n n n n n n Dibromochloromethane mpikp_ < < 0.003 < 0.002 1.5 2.3 0.003 1.5 2.3 0.003 1,2-oibromo-3-Chlwopropane mplkp r < < 0.009 < 0.006 0.7 3.8 -'�«' 0.001 r 0.7 3.8 ' «-0.05 0.001 1,2-Dibromoethane m9I < < 0.003 . <«0.002_ 0.1 0.2 0.001 0,01 0.0001 Dibromomethane mQlkp _ < < 0.009 < 0.006 n n n n ...« n n 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mpAcp _ < < 0.009 < 0.006 880 5,000 », »„ 17 880 880 5,000 17 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Mmpikp "'SAW ..,� _ < < 0.009 < 0.009 • < 0.006 "- «.. „«<.0.008 380 6.4 2,,,200 9.9 7 2.2 14 8.4 85 9.9 0.3 2.2 Dichlorodifiuoromethane < < < 0.006 77 410 44 77 410 44 11-Dichloroethane meg < <0.009 < 0.006 390 2100 0.4 390 2100 0.4 1,2-Dichloroethane 1 1•Dichloroethene mpAcp .....1 p _ .- « » ..- ,«< 0.009,. < 0.009 < 0.008 .«....«..»..»»..._«...«..�...«....„...«...«.«««... < 0.006_ 0.5 95 0.7 510 0.01 0.06 0.5 ,.««»..»»»..«...._ 0.1 0.7 ..., 0.1 » 0.01 0.06 cis•1,2-Dichloroethene mg/39 < 0.009 ,.«< 0.008 33 .,_ 180 0.4 33 180 0.4 trans-1,2•Dichloroethene ._ mpihp « < < 0.00e < 0.006 53 290 0.7 53 « 299 «' 0.7 1,2•Dichloropropane mpAcp < < 0.003 0.002 0.6 0.9 0.03 0.6 0.9 0.03 1,3-Dichloropropane mpncp < < 0.009 0.006 1.4 2.2 0.002 1.4 2.2 0.001 22-Dichloropropane mpncp„ < 0.009 < 0.006 n n n n n n 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.009 <0.006 n n n n n n cis-1,3-Dichloropropene _.mpikp._ « mgikg _ < 0.003 < 67002 n n n n n n Notes: Concentrations greater than. or equal to, the lesser Residential CTL are bolded. n: A cleanup target level (CTL) has not been established Blank cell: analyses was not required. Page 5 of 6 3 `-....-,p -1 • *I 1 1 TABLE 1 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR HISTORICAL RECs (FORMER FACILITIES) KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY Rubin's rs. w Auto Bogy co? w Shop a, w Fincher W Motor Facilities LO W (0 W Boat N M W Repair Facility.... V " W CZ m Uf W Resid. FDEP Resid. Indus. DERM CTL Indus. CTL leach, (DERM) (DERM) leach. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene mpncp mpncp < < 0.003 0.0012 < 0,002 0.0045 n __JAM.... n 9200 n 0.6 n 1,500 n 9,100 n 0.6 Hexachiorobutadiene mpIk9 < < 0.009 < 0.006 n n n _ n n n 2-Hexanone _ mpncp < < 0.085 < 0.059 24 130 1.4 24 130 1.4 Isopropyl Benzene - mg/kg 0 010076 0 00048 n n n n n n 4-Isopropyl Toluene m949 0 0.0011 < 0.008 n n n n n n MEK(2-Bufanone) „ mpAcp ,,,,_ < < 0.085 „ <»0,.059 16,000 110 000 17 4 200 23 000 17 Methylene Chloride mplkp - -,«0.0049 0.011 n n n 17 26 0.02 MIBK(4-Methy1-2-Pentanone) mpikp < 0.085 < 0.059 4 300 44 000 2.6 300 1 600_ „ 2.6 MTBE _ _ mfe. 0 0.009 0.0012 4,400 241000 009 4,400 24,000 0.2 Naphthalene mpncp 0 0,0044 ,,,«0,0019 55 300 1.2 55 300 1.7 n-Propylbenzene m91k9 0 0.0017 0.0017 n n n n n n Styrene mpAc < 0.009 <0.006 3,600 23,000 3.8 3 600 23 000 3.6 1,11,2-Tetrachloroethane m9/k < <0.009 <0.006. 2.9 4,3 0.01 4.2 6.3 0.01 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene mQikp _ < <0.002 <0.009 <0.001 < 0.006. 0,7 8.8 1.2 18 0.2 0.03 0.7 8.8 „...«._.... 1.2 18 0.002 0.03 Toluene ,,,_Meg mpikp«„_ 0.0017 0A11 ., _0,0 7,500 60,000 0.5 520 _ 2.,800 0.5 Total Xylenes 0 0.0054 , 22 130 700 ,» 01 8,001 4.4,000 02« 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene , mmpAcp _ „«,, _ 0.009 «» « < 0,006 650 8.290 _„ „_„ 4.6 660 6 600 4.6 1,24-Trichiorobenzene mg./.1.9....._ _« «< < 0.006 660 8 500 5.3 880 «. 8.500 5.3 1,1,1-Trichloroethane mpp „ „« _ < 0,009 < 0.006 730 3,900 1,9 730 3 900 1.9 1,1,2 ,Trichloroethane mpAcp« < 0.009 . < 0.006 , 1.4 2 0.03 1.4 2 0.03 Trichlorcethene mpncp _ w w0.009 < 0.006 6.4 9.3 0.03 6.4 9.3 0.03 Trichlorofluoromethane „««mpncp _ _ „»<0:009 <0.006 270 1,500 33 270 1,500 33 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ,,,_mgncp _ < <0.003 <,0.002 0.06 0.1 0.0001 0.02 0.03 0.00003 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mp,/kg,«_._ 0.0085 .,« 0.0086 18 95 0.3 18 95 0.3 1,3,5•Trimethylbenzene r Ik 0 0,0025 „ 0.0026 15 80 0.3 15 80 0.3 Vinyl Acetate mpncp _< 0.017 < 0.012 320 1 ,_ 1 700 9.4 Vinyl Chloride mg/kg < 0.007 < 0.0047 0.2 0,_4 0. 0.05 0.007 Notes: Concentra ions greater than, or equal to, the lesser Residential CTL are bolded. n: A cleanup target level (CTL) has not been established Blank cell: analyses was not required. Page 8 of 6 TABLE 2 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY FDEP DERM reg. limit reg. limit 8 RCRA METALS Sample ID a, w m m w co SBRECI7 v) w co ro w a3 0 • 0 Q a 0 Arsenic Barium mgil 0.01 2 0.01 2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.036 < 0.01 0.067 < 0.01 0.023 < 0.01 0.15 0.017 <0.0028 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 mgf Cadmium m�/l 0.005 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Chromium 0.1- 0.1 <0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Lead _TO mgll _ 0.015 __<0.005 0.015 <0.005 <0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.012 Selenium mgll 0.05 0.05 <0.01 <0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 Silver mg/1 0.1 0.1 <0.01 <0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 Mercury mgA 0.002 0.002 <0.0002 <0.0002 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 PESTICIDES alpha-BHC gamma-BHC Heptachlor _VI ugA N N N N < 0.006 < 0.05 0.4 0.4 < 0.05 Aldrin ugA 0.005 0.002 < 0.005 beta-BHC ugA N N < 0.02 delta.BHC 41 N N <0.05 Heptachlor Epoxide ugA 0.2 0.2 < 0.05 Endosulfan I ugll 42 42 < 0.05 4,4'-DDE ugA N N <0.12 alpha -Chlordane gamma -Chlordane ugll 2 2 < 0.05 ugll 2 2 < 0.05 Dieldrin , ugf 0.005 0.002 < 0.005 Endrin ugA 2 2 < 0.1 4,4'-DDD ugll N N < 0.1 Endosulfan II ugf 42 42 < 0.1 4,4-DDT ugll N N <0.1 Endrin AJdeh� ugll N N < 0.1 Endrin Ketone ugA N N < 0.1 Methoxychior ugfl 40 40 < 0.5 Endosulfan Sulfate ugll N N < 0.1 Toxaphene ugll 3 3 < 3 PCBs PCB 1016 ugll r 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 PCB 1221 ugA 0.5 0.5 • < 0.5 PCB 1232 ugA 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 PCB 1242 ugh 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 PCB 1248 ugil 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 PCB 1254 ugA 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 PCB 1260 ugfl 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 PAHs Naphthalene ugA 20 20 2-Metlrylnaphthalene 40 20 20 1-Methylnaphthalene use 20 20 Acenaphthylene ugfl 210 210 Acenaphthene ugfl 20 20 Fluorene ugfl 280 280 Phenanthrene ugll 210 210 Anthracene ugfl 2100 2100 Fluoranthene ugfl 280 280 Pyrene ugA 210 210 Benzo(a)anthracene ugA 0.2 0.05 Chrysene ugll 4.8 4.8 Benzo(b)Iluorantherte call 0.2 0.05 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ugll 0.5 0.05 Benzo(a)py►ene ugll 2 0.2 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene ugll 0.2 0.05 Dibenzo(e,h)Anthracene ugll 0.2 0.005 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ugA 210 210 _ VOLATILE SCREEN 1,1,1,2 TetracNoroethane ugll 1.3 1.3 < 1 1,1,1-Trichloroefhane ugfl 200 200 < 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug. 0.2 0.2 < 0.2 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ugll 5 5 < 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ugA 70 70 < 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ugll 7 7 < 1 • Data from resampfrp: MW-02, MW-C1, Page 1 of 4 -° SFfBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR TABLE 2 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY FDEP DERM reg. knit reg. tin if 8 RCRA METALS Sample ID 9 v 0 2 2 m m m a < 0 m 3 § 3 3 3 3 3 3 § § 3 Arsenic Barium _.___._........_.__....._.. . Cadmium mgA !".11" _ mQA �... mrel m l�l m I 0.01 .__..2 _. 0.005 _....__._ 0.1 0.015 0.05 0.01 __? 0.005 0.1 0.015 0.05 < 0.005 0.00042 .005- < 0.005-------- 0.011 -- <0.0028 0.0059 < 0.005 ___.__._..__.._...._..�__...._. Chromium Lead _ _ _ < OA05 Selenium ----- Silver mill 0.1 0.1 ...._ Mercury mgA 0.002 0.002 PESTICIDES alpha-BHC !h9A N N _._N _. N ._.__ �_----+-� T__-- - - _ gamma-BHC He hp cNor ugA ugA 0.4 0.4 Aldrin ugf 0.005 0.002 beta-BHC ugf N N delta-BHC ugll N N Heptachlor Epoxide ugA 0.2 0.2 Endosulfan I ugA 42 42 4,4'-DDE use N N alpha -Chlordane ugll 2 2 lane tire_ 2 2 ,gamma-CNo Dieldrin ugll 0.005 0.002 Endrin ugf 2 2 4,4'-DDD ugA N N Endosulfan 11 ugf 42 42 4,4'-DDT uglI N N Endrin Aldehyde N N Endrin Ketone ..mill ugA N N Methoxyc hior ugA 40 40 Endosulfan Sulfate ugA N N Toxaphene ugA 3 3 PCBs PCB 1018 ugf 0.5 0.5 PCB 1221 ugf 0.5 0.5 PCB 1232 ugll 0.5 0.5 PCB 1242 ugf 0.5 0.5 PCB 1248 ug/ 0.5_-, 0.5 PCB 1254 ugll 0.5 0.5 PCB 1260 ugf 0.5 0.5 PAHs Naphthalene ugll 20 20 < 1 <10 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 2-Methylnapht alene ugA 20 20 < 1 <10 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 1-Methylnaphthalene ugll 20 20 < 1 <10 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Acenaphtylene ugf 1 210 210 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Acenaphthene Fluorene ugA 20 20 0.029 <10 0.32 0.32 < 1 < 1 < 1 0.32 ugA 280 280 0.037 <10 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Phenanthrene ugl 210 210 <1 <10 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 <1 < 1 Anthracene ugf 2100 2100 < 1 <10 < 1 < 1 < 1 <1 <1 <1 Fluoranthene ugA 280 280 0.170 <10 0.19 0.19 <1 < 1 < 1 0.20 yrene ugA 210 210 0.190 <10 0.17 0.17 < 0.1 0.063 < 0.1 0.23 Benzota)antfracene ugll 0.2 0.05 0.046 <0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Chrysene uo_A 4.8 4.8 0.052 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ugA 0.2 0.05 0.064 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Benzogc)fluoranthene ugf 0.5 0.05 < 0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Benzo{�pyrene ugll 2 0.2 < 0.1 <0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Indeno(1,22c,d)pyrene ugf 0.2 0.05 < 0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 < 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 DBhenzo(a,h)Mthracene ugA 0.2 0.005 < 0.2 <0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ugA 210 210 < 1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 < 1 <1 VOLATILE SCREEN 1 1,1,2-Tet achloroefhane ugA 1.3 1.3 1,1,1-Triddoroethane ug4 200 200 1,1,22-Tetrachloroethane ugA 0.2 0.2 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Nil ugA 5 5 1,1-Dichloroetlhane 70 70 ,,,_Dichioroethene WA 7 7 'i • Data from resamotina: MW-D2. MW-C1. & M1TD INTO Page 2of4 HE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMT1 ON n•09 w. TABLE 2 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY FDEP DERM rep. limit reg. limit VOLATILE SCREEN 1 Sample ID SBREC19 CO U W m SBREC17 SBREC15 SBREC16 N CI m MW--D2' p v m m 0 m 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/I 0.2 N/A <1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene u9/1 70 70 <1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ugA 0.2 0.005 < 0.2 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene ugll t%/1 70 10 70 10 _..--_-4 <1- < 1 _.__._.._. 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2-Dbromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 41 0.2 0.2 < 1 t _ ue.. u9n 0.02 600 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 -_0.02 600 3 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ! ug/1 ugll _.5 ...._. 10 ..... 10 5.__. 10 10 __._._. _._ ..._....._....... __.< 1__.._._..-- < 1 < 1 ..._. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Didlbropropane ugA N N/A < 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/ 75 75 < 1 2,2-Didlloropropane ug/1 N N/A < 1 2-Chloroetbylvinyl Ether ug/1 175 N/A < 10 '2-Chlorotoluene ug/1 140 N/A < 1 2-Hexanone ugA 280 280 < 10 4-Chlorotoluene ugll 140 N/A < 1 4-Isopropyl Toluene ug/1 N N/A < 1 Acetone ug/1 700 700 4.1 Acrolein ugf 14 14 < 10 Acrylonitrile ugA 1 0.06 < 1 .- Benzene u9A 1 1 < 1 Bromobenzene ug/1 N N/A < 1 Bronroddoromethane u9A 91 91 < 1 Bromodichloromethane ugn 0.6 0.6 <1 Bromoform ug/1 4.4 4.4 < 0.6 Bromomethane ugn 9.8 9.8 < 1 Carbon Disulfide ugf 700 700 < 2 Carbon Tetrachloride ug/1 3 3 < 10 Chlorobenzene up l 0.1 100 < 1 Chloroethane ugA N 12 < 1 Chloroform ugA 5.7 5.7 < 1 Chioromethane ugll 2.7 2.7 < 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ugA 70 70 <1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/1 0.2 N/A < 1 Dbromochloromethane ugA 0.4 0.4 r < 0.2 Dibromomethane ugf N N/A < 0.4 Didilorod8luoromethane ugn 1400 1400 < 1 Ethylbenzene ugA 700 30 < 1 Hoxac hlorobutadiene ugA N N/A <1 Isopropyl Benzene u&l N N/A < 1 MEK(2-Butancne) ugA 4200 4200 < 0.5 Methylene Chloride ugA 5 5 < 0.8 MIBK(4-Methy1-2-Pentanone) ugA 560 560 < 10 MTBE(Methyi *a -butyl ether) ugll 50 50 <5.0 Naphthalene ugA 20 20 < 10 n-Butylbenzene ugA N WA < 5 gene ugl N WA < 5 sec-Butylbenzene ugll N N/A < 1 § yrene ugA 100 100 < 1 tert-Butylbenzene ugA N WA < 1 Tetrachloroethene ugA 3 3 < 1 Toluene ugf 1000 40 1.2 Total Xylenes ugn 10000 20 1.2 trans-1 2-Dic loraethene ugo1 100 100 < 1 trans-1,3-Dictloropropene ugA 0.2 N/A < 1 Trio loroetlrone u0 • 3 3 1.2 Trichloro8uoromethane ugA 2100 2100 1.2 Vmyt Acetate ugn 88 88 1.2 Vinyl Chloride ugll 1 1 <1 'Ammonia General Chemistry rnglL I 2.8 2.8 I I J I "`-"A""`"msf1B161fTTED INTO THE Page ,., PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM ON n-a-u.. TABLE 2 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY VOLATILE SCREEN FDEP DERM reg. limit reg. limit Sample ID U 2 U 3 2 m 2 m 3 2 m 2 m 2 m Q 2 n a 3 U 3 2 9 m 2 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/I 0.2 N/A 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ugA 70 70 1,2,3-T ' ne 1,2_4_Trichforobenzene 1,2,4-Trimeth I�benzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-ChloroQro _._._ 1,2-Dibromoethane --, 1,2-Dichlorobenzene .._ ..- ue u9/1_ t A ugll ... ugl 0.2 .__ 70 . 10_._ 0.2 0.02 3 0.005 _ 7D 10._. 0-Z_. 0.02 600._.1,2-Dichloroethane 3 1.2-Dtchloropropane 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1,3-DicNorobenzene 1 _ ugf _5._-_.. 10 5 10 uglt 10 10 1,3-D3chloropropane 1,4-Diddorobenzene ugll N N/A ` uy/I 75 75 2,2-Dichloropropane ugf N N/A 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 2-Chlorotoluene ug/I 175 N/A ug4 140 N/A _ 2-Hexanone 280 280 4-Chlorotoluene ug4 140 N/A _ 4-Isopropyl Toluene ugll N N/A Acetone ugA 700 700 &olein ugn 14 14 Acrylonitrde .,..__VI Benzene ugA 1 0.06 1 1 Bromobenzene ugll N N/A one ugA 91 91 Bromodichloromethane u nL 0.6 0.6 Bromoform ugn 4.4 4.4 Bromomethane ugA 9.8 9.8 Carbon Disulfide ug/I 700 700 Carbon Tetrachloride ug4 3 3 y Chlorobenzene ugn 0.1 100 Chloroethane ug/I N 12 Chloroform ugf 5.7 5.7 Chloromethane ug/I 2.7 2.7 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/I 70 70 cis-1,3-DicNoropropene Dibromochloromethane ugll 0.2 N/A ugll 0.4 0.4 Dibromomethane ugll N N/A Dichloroddluoromethane ug/I 1400 1400 Ethylbenzene ugA 700 30 Here ug/I N N/A Isopropyl Benzene ug/I N N/A MEK(2-Butanone) ug/I 4200 4200 Methylene Chloride ugn 5 5 MIBK(4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) MTBE(Mettyl tett-butyl ethe ug/I 560— 560 ugA 50 50 Naphthalene ug/I 20 20 n-Butylbenzene n benzene ugll N N/A ugll N • N/A seo-Butylbenzene ugn N N/A Syron* ugA � 100 100 tert-Butylbenzene • ug/I N N/A Tetras loroethene ugA 3 3 Toluene ugll 1000 40 Total Xylenes ugn 10000 20 trans-1,2-Dictloroethene , ugA 100 100 _ _. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/I 0.2 Nth TricMaoethene ugn 3 3 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/I 2100 2100 Vinyl Acetate ugll 88 88 Vinyl Chloride ugf 1 1 jArn nonia General Chemistry 2.8 2.8 1 1.3 Data `�"���"'MW'ITTED INTO THE Page ... PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMtI ONfl.o9.o. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR ARSENIC SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY Sample ID: Concentration EXA4-B1 1.1 EXA4-E1 0-2 1.8 EXA4-E1 2-4 4.2 EXA4-N 1 0-2 1.5 EXA4-N 1 2-4 1.9 EXA4-S1 0-2 1.3 EXA4-S1 2-4 1.8 EXA4-W1 0-2 2.5 EXA4-W 1 2-4 2.1 EXB1-B1 1.6 EXB1-E1-0-2 0.90 EXB1-E1-2-4 3.4 EXB1-N1-0-2 2.1 EXB1-N1-2-4 1.5 EXB1-S1-0-2 2.6 EXB1-S1-2-4 2.2 EXB1-W1-0-2 1.7 EXB1-W1-2-4 2.8 Resid. CTL: 2.1 Indus. CTL: 12 FDEP leach.: SPLP Resid. (DERM): 0.7 Indus. (DERM): 4.1 DERM leach. 5.8 Notes: All concentrations expressed in mg/kg. SPLP: Synthetic Precipitate Leachate Procedure SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM,_ONu. o'.oc,. . �. d - . �.,� -I I ---1 4t . TABLE 4 UBM I TTE D INTO DORY RESULTS OF SOIL KNIGHT R DDERLES FOR PAH ASSESSMENT MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY AND SOURCE REMOVAL PU ITE BLIC RE Mn�z Litt Sample ID: EXA1-B1 EXA1-B2 CORD F9R Pi;o4. Acenaphthylene Benzo1g,h,i)perylene c 2 Ta LT z Phenanthrene c EXA1-E1 EXA1-E2 EXA1-N 1 EXA1-S1 EXA1-S2 EXA1-W1 EXA1-W2 EXA2-B1 EXA2-B2 EXA2-E1 EXA2-E2 EXA2-N1 EXA2-N2 EXA2-S1 EXA2-S2 EXA2-W1 EXA2-W2 ............_.... EXA3-B1 EXA3-E1 EXA3-N1 EXA3-S1 EXA3-W1 EXA5-B1 EXAS-E1-0-2» EXA5-E1-2-4 EXA5-E2-0-2 EXA5-E2-2-4 EXA5-N1-0-2 EXA5-N1-2-4 EXA5-N2-0-2 EXA5-N2-2-4 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 0.336 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 0.346 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6,00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 0.850 2.400 < 6.00 < 6.00 0.950 2.050 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 0.500 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 0.600 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 0.360 1.050 < 6.00 < 6.00 0.400 1.050 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <8.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 '<6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 Page 1 of 6 enmmera SUBM IT 1ED INB�Y RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES OR PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY PUBLIC. RECORD FOR 2 ITEMv Sample ID: EXA5-N3 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 EXA5-N4 0-2' < 0.30 EXAS-N5 0-2' EXA5-N6 0-2' Benzo[g,h,ijperylene 2 2 c L g d L 0 0 o. ea T. U. z < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 Phenanthrene < 0.30 cu a < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 EXA5-NROAD-0-2 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.58 0.54 1.60 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.87 1.20 EXA5-S1-0-2 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 EXA5-S1-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 EXA5-S2-0-2 < 6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 _- < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 EXA5-S2-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 EXA5-W1-0-2 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 EXA5-W1-2-4 EXA5-W2-0-2 EXAS-W2-2-4 -W4 0-2' EXAS-W4 2-4' EXA5-W5 0-2' EXA5-W5 2-4' EXAS-W6 0-2' EXA5-W6 2-4' EXA5-W7 0-2' EXA5-W7 2-4' EXA5-W8 0-2' < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 ---- - - <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0,30 <0.30 <0.30 EXAS-W8 2-4' EXA5-W9 0-2' EXAS-W9 2-4' EXAS-WROAD-0-2 EMS-INROAD-2-4 EXC1-B1 <0.30 <0,30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0,30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.38 0.71 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.51 0.34 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 EXC1-E1 EXC1-N1 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 ._ < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 EXC1-N2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 EXC1-N3 < 0.10 < 0.10 <0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.36 0.61 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.25 EXC1-N4 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.43 0.90 <0.10 <0.10 0.59 0.56 Page 2 of 6 TABLE 4 S U BM ITTED INTOTE RESULTS KN GHTI RIDDER MIAMIRHEAH RALDPROPERNT TY AND SOURCE REMOVAL PUBLIC RCORU FOR lTEMTPNlt*.oi. .1 Sample ID: a dr c 2 occu To a Phenanthrene EXC1-S1 EXC1-S2 EXC1-W1 EXC1-W2 IPG-A1 0-2' < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00. <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-Al2-4' <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 IPG-A2-0-2 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-A2-2-4 < 0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30<0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-B1 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-B12-4' <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 IPG-B2 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-B2 2-4' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30<0.30_......._-_-.._....._<0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-C1 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-C1 2-4' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-C2 0-2' <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 IPG-C2 2-4' <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 6.70 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 7.40 IPG-D1 0-2' IPG-D1 2-4' IPG-D2 0-2' IPG-D2 2-4' IPG-E1 0-2' IPG-E1 2-4' IPG-E2 0-2' IPG-E2 2-4' IPG-F1 0-2' IPG-F1 2-4' IPG-F2 0-2' <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.50 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.32 0.50 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 1.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.65 1.35 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 IPG-F2 2r1' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-G1 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-G1 2-4' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0,30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-G2-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 IPG-G2-2-4 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-H1 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 Page 3 of 6 TABLE 4 SUBMITTEDINTORTTeESULTSKONFIGSHOTILRISDADMEPRL.EmSIAF0mRi HPEAH ALSD PROPERNT TY AND SOURCE REMOVAL PUBLIC RCOR FOR lTEM,1 ION Ii i.ol, • c Sample ID: I c i 4. 4. i c f Se y 7 W w ET. L 0. ea Z Phenanthrene C d a IPG-H1 2-4' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-I1 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 '< 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-I1 2-4' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-J1 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-J1 2-4' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-K1 0-2' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0..30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-K1 2-4' < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-L1-0-2 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.47 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.40 IPG-L1-2-4 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-M1-0-2 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.37 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0,30 < 0.30 IPG-M1-2 4 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-M2-0-2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 IPG-M2-2-4 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-N1-0-2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 IPG-N1-2-4 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 IPG-N2-0-2 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 IPG-N2-2-4 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 PG15-100-0-2 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 PG15-100-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-120-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-120-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-140-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 11.400 < 6.00 < 6.00 9.320 9.960 PG15-140-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 6.230 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-160-0-2 < 6,00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-160-2-4 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 , <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 PG15-180-0-2 ' < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-180-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-200-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-20-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-200-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-20-2-4 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 PG15-220-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 8.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 Page 4 of 6 SUBMITTED INTOZINETABLE4 RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM',iI al 11- o404 IN £ Sample ID: Benzo[g,h,ijperylene O u. C L 0. co z Phenanthrene C N a PG15-220-2-4 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 PG15-240-0-2 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 PG15-240-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-40-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-40-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-60-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG15-60-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG25-240-0-2 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 1.45 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.50 1.25 PG25-240-2-4 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0,30 PG5-100-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-100-2-4 < 6,00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-120-0-2 PG5-120-2-4 PG5-140-0-2 PG5-140-2-4 PG5-160-0-2 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 PG5-160-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-180-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-180-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-200-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-20-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-200-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-20-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-220-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-220-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-240-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-240-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-40-0-2 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-40-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 PG5-60-0-2 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6,00 Page 5 of 6 -1 '.�. ,� _...1 . _e 1 TABLE 4 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY 8 2 g. Sample ID: 2 1 c c 0 u. c ifs as z Phenanthrene c a. PG5-60-2-4 PG5-80-0-2 PG5-80-2-4 PGW-25-40-0-2 PGW-25-60-0-2 PGW-25-60-2-4 PGW-5-40-0-2 PGW-5-40-2-4 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 <6.00 < 0.30 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.33 < 0.30 0.60 < 0.30 0.80 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.35 0.75 2.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 2.15 1.90 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 PGW-5-60-0-2 PGW-5-60-2-4 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 <6.00 < 0.30 < 6.00 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 < 6.00 Resid. CTL: Indus. CTL: FDEP leach.: Resid. (DERMA;,, Indus.It)ERM, :. DERM leach. 200 210 2,400 1,800 21,000 2,500 1,800 2,100 3,200 2,600 55 20,000 20,000 300,000 52,000 59,000 33,000 300 2,200 36,000 2,400 45,000 3.1 8.5 2.1 27 2,500 32,000 1,200 160 1.2 250 880 93 110 2,400 -„� 1,800 21,000 2„500 3,200 2,600 55 2,200 2,400 510 610 20,000 -_ µ20,000 300,000 52,000 59,000 33,000 300 36,000 45,000 2.2 6.1 2.1 27 2,500 32,000 1,200 160 1.7 250 880 CTL: Cleanup Target Level All concentrations expressed in mg/kg Bolded values have concentrations greater than the lesser Residential CTL Bolded and Italicized values have concentrations greater than the Industrial CTL Page 6 of 6 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEIVIT:g/i ON iGs,.ocep. OUDIVII LABVRATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR CARCINOGENIC PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL PUBLIC RECORD FOR KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY ITEMS*;, qN �r col-ott. TEF 0.1 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 Sum of Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration. Concentration Equiv. 8(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration ! Equiv. B(a)P : Concentration Carcinogenic PAHs Sample ID: EXA1-81 0130 I 0.013 0.145 0.145 0_165 0.0165 <0.10 0.001 0.150 0.00015 <0.10 1 0.1 0.165 0.0165 0.19 EXA1-82 0.460 1, 0.046 ,,„� 0.470 „_ 0.47 0.400 0.04 0.160 0.0016 0.250 00.00025 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 ? 0.01 0.56 EXA1-E1 0.470 „ „ 0.047 0.470 0.47 _ 0.410 0.041 0.180 0.0016 0.250 0.00025 _, <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.56 EXA1-E2 0.570 0.067 0. 0.590 0.059 0.230 0.0023 0.490 0.00049 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 ' 0.01 0.71 EXA1-N1 <0.10 M,,,_„. 0.010 ._». 0.10 ....__0.58 0.1 _ 0.11 0.011 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 i 0.01 0.11 EXA1-$1 0.560 0.056 0.520 0.52 0.460 0.046 0.210 0.0021 » 0.370 0.00037 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 I 0.01 0.62 EXA142 0.730 0.073 0.610 0,61 0.680 0.066 0.250 0.0025 0.550 0.00055 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 i 0.01 0.75 EXA1-W1 0.241 0.024 0.209 0.209 0.268 0.0266 0.149 0.00149 0.273 0.000273 <0.10 0.1 0.190 1 0.019 0.28 EXA1-W2 0.470 0.047 0.460 0.46 0.400 0.04 0.180 0.0016 0.250 0.00025 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 I 0.01 0.55 EXA281 0.760 0.076 0.710 0.71 0.790 0.079 0.340 0.0034 0.740 0.00074 <0.10 0.1 0.650 1 0.065 0.93 EXA2.82 0.480 0.048 0.460 0.46 0.400 0.04 0.150 0.0015 0.240 0.00024 < 0.10 0.1 < 0,10 0.01 0.55 EXA2 Et 1.15 0.115 1.10 1.1 1.25 0.125 0.95 0.0095 1.50 0.0015 0.14 € 0.135 1.05 1 0.105 1.59 EXA2 E2 0.560 0.056 0.550 0.55 0.500 0.05 0.270 0.0027 0.420 0.00042 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 1, 0.01 0.66 EXA2-NI 0.270 0.027 j 0.300 ! 0.3 0.375 0.0375 0.290 0.0029 0.390 0.00039 <0.10 0.1 0.285 ? 0.0285 0.40 EXA2-N2 0.560 0.058 0.530 0.53 0.490 0.049 0.230 0.0023 ..... 0.380 0.00038 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 [ 0.01 0.64 EXA2S1 0.500 0.050 0.500 0.5 0.600 OM0.480 0.0048 0.700 0.0007 <0.10 0.1 0.500 0.05 0.67 EXA2S2 ,_,, 0.970 0.097 0.850 0.85 0.850 0.085 0.570 0.0057 0.990 0.00099 <0.10 0.1 ii <0.10 t 0.01 1.04 EXA2-W1 1.24 0.124 0.98 0.98 1.09 0.109 0.52 0.0052 1.32 0.00132 w <0.10 0.1 0.79 i, 0.079 1.30 EXA2-W2 2.32 _ 1.63,_„_, 1.63 1.60 0.16 0.98 0.0096 2.35 0.00235 0.62 0.62 1.33 0.133 2.79 EXA3.81 1.09 _0.232_,_, 0.109 0.79 0.79 0.84 0.084 0.42 0.0042 1.00 0.001 0.55 0.55 0.66 `: 0.066 1.60 EX4k3-E1 0.550 0.058 0.580 0.55 0.510 0.051 0.230 0.0023 0.420 0.00042 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 r 0.01 0.66 EXA3-NI __ 0.890 ...... 0.069 0.600 0.6 0.640 0.064 0.270 0.0027 0.580 0.00058 0.550 1 0.55 0.520 0.052 1.34 EXA3-S1 0.550 0.055 0.530 0.53 0.510 0.051 0.220 0.0022 0.370 0.00037 0.520 0.52 0.450 0.045 1.20 , EXA3 W1 0.630 0.083 _._.._ 0.580 0.58 0.580 0.058 0.260 0.0026 , 0.510 0.00051 0.540 + 1 0.54 0.490 1 0.049 1.29............... EXAS-81 0.470 0.047 0.480 0.46 0.410 0.041 0.160 0.0018 0.260 0.00028 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.55 EXAS EIS 2 0.440 0.044 0.450 0.45 0.380 0.038 0.140 0.0014 0.210 0.00021 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.53 EXA5-E1.2.4 0.460 0.048 0.480 0.48 0.390 0.039 0.150 0.0015 '0.230 0.00023 < 0.10 0,1 < 0.10 i 0.01 0.55 EXA5-E2-0.2 < 0.10 0,010 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 <'0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0,01 0.00 EXA5-E2-2-4 0.45 0.045 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 0.23 0.00023 <0.10 0.1 t <0.10 I 0.01 0.05 EXA5-N1-0.2 0.45 0.045 0.45 0.45 0.38 0.038 0.14 0.0014 0.22 0.00022 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.63 EXA5-N1-2r1 0.45 0.045 0.45 0.45 0.38 0.038 0.14 0.0014 0.22 0.00022 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.53 EXA5-N2 0-2 0.44 0.044 0.45 0.45 0,38 0.038 < 0.10 0.001 0.21 0.00021 < 0.10 0.1 . <0.10 1 0.01 0.53 Page 1 de 4.0w.Rnal.T.G...41. M lT c rut hat.:" LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR CARCINOGENIC PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMLOJP1'0'r 1 1 -1 1 TEF 0.1 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 Sum of Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Cor>centre0on Concentration B(a)P Concentration ConcentrationEquiv. Concentration B(a)P Concentration ConcentrationEquiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentrs ion Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration I Equiv. B(a)P i Concentration Carcinogenic PAHs Sample ID: EXA5-N2-24 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 ! 0.01 0.00 EXAS-N3 0-2< 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 4 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 i 0.1 < 0.10 y 0.01 0.00 EXA5-N4 0-2 < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 . < 0.10 I 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 EXASN502 ,, <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <o.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <a10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.00 EXA5-N80-2' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 . <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 ( 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.00 EXAS-NROAD-0-2 0.84 , 0.084 0.74 0.74 0.78 0.078 , 0.40 0.004 0.80 0.0008 0.57 I 0.57 0.64 I 0.064 1.64 EXA5S1-0-2 0.530 0.053 0.490 0.49 0.430 0.043 0.170 0.001.7 0.300 0.0003 <0.10 ( 0.1 <0.10 ) 0.01 0.59 EXA5S1-2-4 0470 0.047 0.480 0.48 0.400 0.04 0.150,, 0.0015 0240 0.00024 <010_r, 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.55 EXA5S2-0-2 0.450 0.045 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 «..,_ 0.220 0.00022 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 • 0.01 0.05 EXA5S2-24 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 } 0.01 0.00 EXAS W1-02 0.450 0.045 0.450 0.45 0.380 0.038 0.140 0.0014 0.210 0.00021 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 + 0.01 0.63 EXA5-W1-2.4 0.470 0.047 0.470_.„ 0.47 0.400 0.04 0.150 0.0015 0.250 0.00025 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.66 EXA5-W2-0-2 0.480 0.048 0.480 0.46 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 0.240 0.00024 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.62 EXAS-W2.2-4 0.480 0.048 0.480 0.48 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10_ 0.001 0.2240 0.00024 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 1 0.01 0.51 EXA5-W4 0-2 c0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 _ m 0.01 _ »» <0.10 0.001 mm� <0.10 0.0001 c0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.00 EXAS-W4 24' < 0.10 0.010 < 0,10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.00 EXAS-WS O-T < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 EXA5-1M24' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 EXA5-0.6 0-2' < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.10 t 1 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 EXAS-W8 24' < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 .,,0.10 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 , , <0.10 1 0.01 , 0.00 EXA5-W7 0-2< 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 �0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 1. 0.1 < 0.10 T 0.01 0.00 EXA5-W7 24' < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 .».« 0.1 «_.. < 0.10 ».«. 0.01 .. _»» < 0.10 i 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 ! 0.01 0.00 EXA5-1A9 0-2' < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0,10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 i 0.01 0.00 EXA5-W824' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 f 0.01 0.00 EXA5-W90- « <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 EXAS W➢24' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0,10 0.0001 <0.10 OJ <0.10 11- 0.01 0.00 EXAS-WROAD-0-2 0.54 0.054 0.51 0.51 0.48 0.048 0.21 0.0021 0.35 000035 < 0.08 0.08 < 0.07 1 0.007 0.61 EXA5-WROA0-24 < 0.07 0.007 < 0.07 0.07 < 0.08 0.006 < 0.07 0.0007 < 0.04 0.00004 < 0.08 0.08 < 0.07 I 0.007 0.00 EXC1.81 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 i 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 EXC1-E1 0.470 0.047 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 0.250 0.00025 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.05 EXC1-N1 „� 0.880 0.068 0.630 0.83 0.860 0.088 0.270 0.0027 0.590 0.00059 0.540 0.54 0,530 a 0.053 1.36 EXC1-N2 0.480 1 0.048 0.470 0.47 0.420 0.042 0.150 0.0015 0.260 0.00028 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.66 Page 2 of 8 SUBMITTED INTO TAilelE TABLE 5 ORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR CARCINOGENIC PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY PUBLK REORJ FOR ITEM , n Nii°toil . 8 1 1 TEF 0.1 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 Sum of Caxentraton Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Cornevrtu0on Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentrreton j Equiv. B(a)P i Concentration Carcinogenic PAHs Sample I0: EXC1-N3 0.49 0.049 < 0.07 0.07 <0.06 0.006 < 0.07 0.0007 0.28 0.00028 < 0.08 0.08 < 0.07 I 0.007 0.05 EXC1-N4 0.80 0.080 0.56 0.56 0.53 0.053 0.24 0.0024 0.45 0.00045 <0.08 0.08 <0.07 1 0.007 0.68 EXC1-zS1 0.490 0.049 0.490 0.49 0.430 0.043 0.180 0.0018 0.290 0.00029 0.520 0.52 0.380 0.038 1.14 EXC152 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 S 0.01 0.00 EXC1-W1 0.480 0.048 0.470 0.47 0.420 0.042 0.180 1 0.0016 0.270 0.00027 <0.10 1 0.1 0.360 I 0.036 0.60 EXC1-W2 <0.10 t 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0,10 0.1 <0.10 i 0.01 0.00 IPG-A10-7 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 4 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.00 IPG-Al2-4' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 1 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0,10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPG-A2-0-2 < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 I 0.01 < 0.10 1 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 i 0.01 0.00 IP0-42-2.4 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 ..,,_ 0.01 _ <0.10 1 0.001 <0.10 1-0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPO-B10-7 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <o.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPG-812.4' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001_ <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPG-82 0.7 0.18 0.018 < 0.10 t._ 0.1 <0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 0.18 0.00018 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.02 IPG-82 2-4' < 0.10 _ 0.010 _ _ < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0,10 0.1 <0.10 i 0.01 0.00 IPG•C1 0-2' < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 .< 0.10 0.0001 _ < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.00 IPG-C1 2.4' ..._.»..._ ` 0.10 ....... 0.010 < 0.10 0.1. < 0.10 ... .» 0.01._.»». < 0.10 .........0.001 _.. .. _...» <T0.10._..... 0.0001..........__...<0.10 0.1 ... < 0.10 1........... 0.01 0.00 IPG-C2 0-T < 0.10.,,.,. 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0,01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPG-C2 2-4' 3.1 0.310 2.8 2.8 <2.00 0.2 < 2.00 0.02 3.9 0.0039 < 2.00 2 < 2.00 F 0.2 3.11 IPG-010-T 0.010 <0.10 0,1 001 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 { 0.01 0.00 IPG-D12-4' ..__<0.10 <0.10 0.010 __...._ <0.10 0.1 _......<0.10 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 iPG-02 0-2' 0.175 0.018 0.145 0.145 <0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 0.170 0.00017 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 1 0.01 0.18 IPG-D2 2-4' < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0,001 < 0.10 0.0001 -. < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 f 0.01 0.00 IPG-E1 0-T 0.2 0.020 0.2 0.215 0.3 0.025 0.1 0.00135 0.3 0.000285 < 0.10 i 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.26 IPG E12-4' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 "f <0.10 } 0.01 0.00 IP0-E2 0-7 0.600 0.060 0.500 0.5 0.550 0.055 0.460 0.0046 0.750 0.00075 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 i 0.01 0.62 IPG-E2 2-4' < 2.00 0.200 < 2.00 2 <2.00 0.2 < 2.00 0.02 < 2.00 0.002 < 2.00 2 < 2.00 1 0.2 0.00 IPG-F10-2' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0,00 IPG-F12-4' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 t 0.01 0.00 IPG-F2 0-7 < 2.00 0.200 < 2.00 2 <2.00 0.2 < 200 0.02 < 2.00 0.002 < 2.00 2 < 2.00 I 0.2 0.00 IPG-F22-4' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 i. <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 IPG-GI0-T • <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0,10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 i 0.01 0.00 IPG-012.4' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 I 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 Page 3 of 6 SUBMITTEDINTO TLI4EI.ORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR CARCINOGENIC PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER • MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY PUBLI RECORD fOR ITEMh N�i.o,.a�. E A csi TEF 0.1 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 Sum of Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration . Equiv. Bp)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration CorlaentraGon Equiv. B(a)P Concentration( Concentration i Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Carcinogenic PAHs Sample ID: 1 C IPG.G2-0-2 < 2.00 0.200 <2.00 2 < 2.00 0.2 < 2.00 0.02 <2.00 0.002 < 2.00 2 < 2.00 I 0.2 0.00 IPG-02-24 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 1 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 IPG•H10.2' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 1.. 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPG-H1 2-4' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 { 0.01 0.00 IPG I1 0 7 < 0.10_ 0.010, <w0•10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 ! 0.01 0.00 IPG-11 2.4' , < 0.10 0.010 ,_�,,,__ <0.10 0.1 < 0,10 0.01 < 0.10 _, 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10..._......_.........0........._.._........-<0.10..........1 0.01 0.00 1PGJ10-T <0.10 ...._. 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 ....» <0.10 0.1 <0.10 ............................................ IPGJ124' <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 .<0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 i 0.01 0.00 IPG-K1 0-T < 0.10 1 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 <1.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 1 0.01 0.00 IPG-K1 24' < 0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 1PG-L1-0.2 <0.10 , ,., 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 0.37 0.037 0.13 0.0013 0.24 0.00024 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 F 0.01 0.04 IP04.1-2-4 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 I 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 IPG-M1-0.2 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 IPG-M1-2-4 1.6 0.160 0.495 0.495 1.15 0.115 1.25 0.0125 2.4 0.0024 0.8 0.8 2.3 , 0.23 1.81 IPG-M2-0-2 <0.10 I 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 1 0.01 0.00 IPG-M2-2r4 < 0.10 0.010 <0.10 ,,_,,, 0,1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.00 1PG-N1-0.2 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 t 0.01 0.00 IPG-N1.2.4 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPG-N2-0-2 < 0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 . < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 I 0.01 0.00 IPG-N2-2-4 <0.10 0.010 t„ <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 <0.10 0.001 <0.10� 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 1. 0.01 0.00 PG15-100-0-2 0.530 0.053 0.520 0.52 0.510 �__ 0.051 0.190 0.0019 _ 0.350 0.00035 < 0.10 0.1 ,._._.__<.-0.10..........I < 0.10 I 0.01 0.63 PG15-100-2-4 0.990 0.099 0.720 0.72 0.770 0.077 0.290 0.0029 0.840 0.00084 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.90 PG15-120-0-2 0.780 0.078 0.870 0.67 0.660 0.066 0.330 0.0033 0.850 0.00065 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.92 PG15-120-2.4 '0.870 0.087 0.820 0.82 0.840 0.084 0.2600.0026 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0,75 PG15-140-0-2 3.71 0.371 2.41 2.41 2.92 0.292 1.76 0.0176 _0.670 4.78 ,0.00057., _ 0.00476 0.79 , 0.79 1.84 i 0.184 4.07 PG15-140-24 2.17 0.217 1.77 1.77 2.10 0.21 1.27 0.0127 3.04 0.00304 0.67 ..... 0.67 ._ 1.57 1 0.157 3.04 0.0018 0.270 P015-180-0-2 0.480 0.048 0.480 0.48 0.420 0.042 0.160 0.00027 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 1 0.01 0.57 PG15-160-24 0.490 0_ 049 0.490 0.449 0.440 0.044 0.170 0.0017 0.300 0.0003 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 i 0.01 0.59 PG15-180-0-2 0.470 0.047 0.480 0.48 0.430 0.043 0.160 , 0.00018 0.260 0.00026 < 0.10 I 0.1 ...,, < 0.10 1 0.01 0.57 PG15-180-2-4 0.460 0.046 0.470 0.47 0.410 0.041 0.150 0.0015 0.240 0.00024 < 0.10 E 0.1 < 0.10 I 0.01 0.56 PG15-200-0-2 0.490 0.049 0.480 0.48 0.420 0.042 0.170 0.0017 0.300 I 0.0003 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 r 0.01 0.57 PG15-20-0.2 1.000 0.100 0.790 0.79 0.830 0.083 0.450 0.0045 0.930 I 0.00093 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 I 0.01 0.98 Page 4 of 6 SUBMITTED INTO PUBLIQ R CORD FOR ITEMi bN no'.o4 . TABLE S LL RY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR CARCINOGENIC PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY 1 1 n 1 2 TEF 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 Sum of ConcentrationEq ' B(a)P Concentration Corwntretlon Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration concentration B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Conantretion Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Carcinogenic PAHs Sample ID: PG 15-200.2.4 0.600 0.060 0.560 0.58 0.590 0.059 0.210 0.0021 0.450 0.00045 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.68 PG15-20-2r4 0.940 0.094 0.800 0.8 0.840 0.084 0.480 0.0048 '0.920 0.00092 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 } I 0.01 0.98 P015-220-0-2 0.490 0.049 0.490 0.49 0.450 M1 0.045 0.160 0.0018 0.290 0.00029 * < 0.10 i 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.59 PG15-220-2-4 0.510 0.051 0.490 0.49 0.450 0.046 0.180 0.0018 0.300 0.0003 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.69 PG15-240-0-2 0.590 0.059 0.560 0.56 0.550 0.055 0.250 0.0025 0.440 0.00044 <0,10 0.1 <0.10 t 0.01 0.68 PG15-240-2-4 0.760 0.078 0.670 0.67 0.870 0.087 0.360 0.0036 0.860 0.00066 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.82 P915-40-0.2 0.480 0.048 0.480 0.48 0.440 0.044 0.160 0.0016 0.260 0.00028 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.67 PG15-40.2.4 0.680 0.066 0.610 0.61 0.660 0.066 0.270 0.0027 0.550 0.00055 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.76 PG15-60-0-2 0.630 0.063 0.580 0.58 0.610 0.061 0.210 0.0021 0.490 0.00049 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.71 PG15-80-2-4 0.740 0.074 0,690 0.69 0.690 0.069 0.330 0.0033 0.680 0.00068 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.84 P025-240-0-2 2.15 0.215 0.65 0.65 1.10 0.11 0.41 0.00406 0.80 0.0008 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 i 0.01 0.98 PG25-240-2-4 < 0.10 + 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0,1 < 0.10 0.01 0.00 P95-100-0.2 0.570 , 0.057 0,540 0.54 0.530 0.053 0.200 0.002 0.400 0.0004 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.66 PG6-100-2-4 0.700 0.070 0.830 0.83 0.620 0.062 0.320 0.0032 0.610 0.00061 <0.10 0.1 . < 0.10 0.01 0.77 PG5-120-0.2 0.540 i 0.054 0.510 0.51 0.460 0.046 0.190 0.0019 0.330 0.00033 < 0.10 1 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.81 PG5-120-2-4 0.750 0.075 0.880 0.68 0.670 0.067 0.340 0.0034 0.620 0.00062 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.83 PG5-140-0.2 0.940 0.094 0.780 0.78 0.760 0.076 r----0.450 0.0045 0.800 0.0008 1 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 ... 0.01 _ 0.96 PG5-140-2-4 ' 0.780 0.078 0.690 0.89 0.740 0.074 0.350_ 0.0035 0.750 , 0.00075 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.85 PG5-160-0-2 0.570 1 ... 0.057 ».»«. 0.540 0.54 0.510 _ » 0.051 , 0.210 0.0021 0.390 0.00039 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 ,.. 0.66 PG5-160.2.4 0.5550 10.055 0;530 0.53 0.500 0.05 0.200 0.002 0.380 0.00038 < 0.10 I.. 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.64 P05-160.0.2 1,39 0.139 1.09 1.09 1.41 0.141 0.49 0.0049 1.45 0.00145 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 1.38 PG5-180-2-4 0.670 0.057 0.630 ,»»_» 1 0.83 0.620 0.082 0.320 0.0032 0.580 ! 0.00058 < 0.10 0.1 _ < 0.10 0.01 0.76 P65-200-0-2 0.480 0.048 0.470 0.47 0.430 0.043 0.150 i 0.0015 0.260 0.00028 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.56 PG5-20-0-2 0.770 0.077 0.890 0.69 0.700 0.07 0.320 0.0032 0.680 0.00068 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.84 PG5 200 2 4 0.480 0.048 0.480 0.48 0.430 0.043 0.160 0.0016 0.270 0.00027 < 0.10 ! 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.57 PG5-20-2-4 T�»m' 0.950 0,095 0.830 0.83 0.880 0.086 0.510 0.0051 Y 0.950 0.00095 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 1.02 PG5-220-0.2 0.570 0.057 0.550 0.55 0.530 0.053 0.210 0.0021 0.410 0.00041 < 0.10 i 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.66 PG5-220-2-4 0.540 0.054 0.520 0.52 0.500 0.05 0.190 0.0019 0.350 0.00035 < 0.10 I 0.1 < 0.10 I 0.01 0.63 PG5-240-0-2 0.480 0.048 0.480 0.48 0.410 0.041 0.160 0.0016 0.270 0.00027 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.87 PG5-240-2-4 0.480 0.048 0.460 0.48 r 0 400 0.04 0.150 0.0015 0.240 0.00024 < 0.10 I 0.1 < 0.10 . 0.01 0.65 PG5r40-0.2 0.710 0.071 0.630 0.63 0.830 0.063 0.320 _ 0.0032 0.610 0.00061 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.77 PG5.40-2.4 # 0.610 j 0.051 0.500 0.6 _ 0.450 0.045 0.190 0.0019 0.310 0.00031 ».. < 0.10 0.1 t < 0.10 0.01 0.60 Page 5of6 P'. TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR CARCINOGENIC PAH ASSESSMENT AND SOURCE REMOVAL KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY 1 m c vsk TEF 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 Sum of Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentratlwr Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration Equiv. B(a)P Concentration Concentration':Equiv. B(a)P , Concentration 1 Carcinogenic PAHs Sample ID: PG5.60-0-2 0.560 0.056 0.540 0.54 0.490 1 0049 0,230 0.0023 0.380 0.00038 y �`0.10m + 0,1 <0.10 0.01 t 0.66 P95-60-2r4 0.9 0.090 0.8 0.79 0.7 0.073 0.4 0.004 0.8 0.00081 <0.10 I 0.1 <0.10 i 0.01 0,96 PG5-80-0-2 0.760 0.076 0.680 0.68 0.670 T00.087 r„0.350 0.0035 0.870 0.00067 < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 i ,,,,, 0.01 0.83 PG5-80-2.4 0.570 0.057 0.550 0.55 0.530 0.053 0.230 0.0023 0.420 0.00042 < 0.10 ,, 0.1 < 0.10 I. 0.01 0,66 PGW-25-40-0.2 t <0.10 0.10 ! 0.010 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 < 0.10 i 0.001 < 0.10 0.00 1 _ _ < 0.10 0.1 < 0.10 0.01 0.00 PGW 25-00-0-2 < 0.10 0.010 0.33 0.33 0.80 0.08 0.24 0.00235 0.47 0.000465 <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 i 0.01 0.39 PGW-25-60-2-4 1.60 0.160 0.50 0.495 1.15 0.115 1.25 0.0125 2.40 0.0024 0.80 0.8 < 0.10 I_ 0.01 1.68 mm Pcws-tao-z_.._._.�,.._._...._.._._..,._..».......»_... <0,10 0.010 <0.10 ...._.._»..._..._...._,.._....._....._.._..»..,_. 0.1 <0.10 »....._...»..»_____......._______._.._ 0.01 <0.10 .___.._...».»..__ 0.001 <0.10 1 0.0001 _..._._.._»_._.._.._..»._»».»._.__. <0.10 0.1 < 0.10 t 0.01 0.00 0.001 PGVy.5.40-2-4 <0.10 0.010 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 <o.t0 0.0001 <0.10 0.1 <0.10 0.01 0.00 PGW-5-60.0-2 < 0.10 0.010 < 0.10 o. t < 0.10 0.001 < 0.10 0.0001 < 0.10 0.1 <0.10 ' 0.01 0.00 PGW-5-80-2.4 < 2.00 _ 0.200 < 2.00 2 _ < 2.00 0.2 _ < 2.00 0.02 < 2.00 I 0.002 < 2.00 2 < 2.00 ! 0.2 0.00 • Resid. CTL: 0,1 __.._. 0.1 0.1 0.01 » _ 0.001 1 0.1 _ 0.001 Indus. CTL: .......0.1 _.__._...»..._. 0.7 ».».__.. 01 ..__. _.._ 0.01 1 0.1 FDEP leach.: 0.8 8 2.4 24 77 0.7 6.6 ReaiQ. jDERM%;»..._.._.._...__... ,_„_, ._......1:3 »,, 0.1 1.3.._. 13 130 0.1 1.3 Indus,;.iDERW ..._ _..._.. _.......8,6 0.7 _.»8.5.»_.». 66 640 0.7...._ 6.6 77 DERM leach. 0.8 _ 8 2.4 25 0.7 _ 6.6 ': Determined by multiplying the PAH concentration by the appropriate Toxicity Equivalency Factor (TEF) CTL: Cleanup Target Level All concentrations expressed in mgAg Bolded values have concentrations greater than the leaser Residential CTL Bolded and Italicized values have concentrations greater than the Industrial CTL SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM T'P ON_II'OO&, Page 6 of 8 TABLE 6 LABORATORY RESULTS OF TRPH SPECIATION KNIGHT RIDDER - MIAMI HERALD PROPERTY Sample ID: Soil Cleanup Target Levels SBREC13-4-6 Direct Direct Leachability 340 Aliphatics C5-C6 <55 340 2500 Aliphatics C6-C8 <55 340 1800 34 Aliphatics C8-C10 <55 490 3700 59 Aliphatics C10-C12 <55 460 2700 340 Aliphatics C12-C16 <55 900 5900 520 Aliphatics C16-C35 <55 1500 12000 1000 Aromatics C5-C7 <55 1300 11000 3200 Aromatics C7-C8 <55 2300 40000 25000 Aromatics C8-C10 <55 6200 33000 470 Aromatics C10-C12 <55 8700 46000 1300 Aromatics C12-C16 <55 850 4800 7000 Aromatics C16-C21 <55 2900 21000 * Aromatics C21-C35 <55 42000 280000 * Notes: All concentrations expressed in mg/kg * Not a health concern for this exposure scenario. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMZ:n ON 11-w-o‘. 011011MAID. HISTORICAL DESIGNATION 11�vAH CHAPAMAN BL ILL NOT BE DEMOLISHED) (N.E. 15TH SI01tt1 1-395 OFF -RAMP VAH CHAPMAJ BLVD. u(N.E. 15TH SIREE1 fee 120 LEGEND MONITORING WELL 121 I a O o UEMITTED INTO THEQF UBLIC RECORD FOR - EM(t , ON It -ov.o. III_ MIAMI HERALD BUILDING (NOT FOR SALE SOURCE EEAG ENVRMON11ENTAL SERVICES, LAC PROPOSED DRUIDIC =CATIONS YAP. DATED MARCH 9. 2006. k Q4 V S MEET IRE SITZ ruff rIGURE 1 1 7 i 1 3 0 f..t 120 LEGEND WATER ELECTRIC GAS SEWER AND DRAINS COMMUNICATIONS UNDERGROUND UTILITY TYPE IS INFERRED BASED ON ABOVEGROUND FEATURES. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM r j. i ON i 5 Zmp� 2 1 1 SAKI ME LOCATION IONIONOMM OMNI 7 UNI 2 Arsenic Installed: 11-7-05 MW—D1 MW-D2 Arsenic Installed: 11-7-05 Lead Arsenic Installed: 11-11-05 Installed: 11-11-05 MW—B2 MW-B3 MW- B1 Arsenic, PAH, PAH (DUP) Installed: 11-11-05 MW-A2 PAH Installed: 11-8-05 1,leBd Installed 11-8-05 MW- Al Arsenic (with DUP) Installed: 11-8-05 f MW— C1 PAH, lead Installed: 11-11-05 MW- A3 Arsenic, lead Installed: 11-8-05 W— A4 Lead Installed: 11-8-05 MW-C2 PAH Installed: 11-11-05 0 fee 120 SCALE LEGEND MONITORING WELL ® MONITORING WELL SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM t ON n 1 i 1 1 i R. i$ 8 W uw nu 111CA7fON 0P IOUS FIGURE 3 3.75 3.7 3.65 3.55 3.5 3.45 _re FIGURE 4: Tidal Survey on MW-A1 at the Miami Herald APZ NOv Nev „AP .4943 Date, Time MW-A1 is a flush -mounted, 2" diameter monitoring well, approximately 475 feet west of Biscayne Bay. pz, LEGEND SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION * FOR FORMER FACILITY INVESTIGATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 0 LOCATION FOR FORMER FACILITY INVESTIGATION APPROX. BOUNDARY OF FORMER FACILITY EE&G SAMPLING LOCATION 411 RELEVANT TO FORMER FACILITY INVESTIGATION ONLY CONCENTRATIONS FROM HSA SAMPLES WHICH EXCEEDED REGULATORY LIMITS ARE SHOWN. 0 f..t 120 SCALE EE&G SAMPLED FOR RCRA METALS, PCBs, P TI D AN I V MORGAN CHEMICAL (Pesticides, PCBs, RCRA metals) Dieldrin: 2.6 _./k EE&G SAMPLED FnR vnrs EE&G SAMPLED FnR vnrs EE&G SAMPLED FOR RCRA METALS AND CBRFr-7 CRRFr-t NASH BODY SHOP (RCRA metals) RUBIN'S AUTO BODY SHOP C R RF r-R (RCRA metals) CRRF .-1R SBREC-2 Barium: 180 mg/kg fL' EE&G SAMPLED FOR PCBs AND RrRA MFTAI CRRFr-4 CRRFr-1A SUBMITTED INTO THE SRRFr-5 PUBLIC RECORD FOR FIf�CI R' n' ORSON (RCRA metals) EE&G SAMPLED nR vnrs SBREC-13 Barium: 160 mq/kq EE&G SAMPLED FOR PFSTTC:TT]FC BOAT REPAIR FACILITY (Solvents, RCRA metals) EE&G SAMPLED nR vnrs ri ig ly a Q 5 91EEi EEE WIMP I '% FIGURR 5 0 filet 120 SCALE LEGEND ® MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 7 AND NOVEMBER 11, 2005 CONTANIMANT OF CONCERN GCTL ABBREVATION 8ENZ0(b)FUJORAN1HENE 0.05 88F BENZO(u)PYRENE 0.2 8AP BENZ00)ANTHRACENE 0.05 BAA BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE 0.5 BRF INOENO(1.R3— 0)PYRENE 0.05 IP ARSENIC 10 As LEAD 15 Pb AMMONIA 2.800 NH3 GCTL — GROUNDWATER CLEANUP TARGET LEVEL NOTES: 1.) ONLY GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN THE GCTL ARE SHOWN. 2.) GROUNDWATER CONCENTRAT1ONS ARE GIVEN IN ug/L 3.) RESULTS FROM THE PHASE II ESA ARE IN BLUE. UBMITTED INTO THE UBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM y+ ON 11-01-A. SOURCE RUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC PROPOSED DRILLING LOCATIONS MAP, DATED MARCH 9, 2005. 1 1 i1 1 0 I0 R. n r ci 0 8 a 01 a Y0 5 9Q1 SAE GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RDULTS FIGURE 0 EXCAVATION EX-A3 0 fs.t 1S 2' BLS: (0-2): 1.60 - 1.34 (0-2): 1.20 0-2: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 2 0-2: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 0-2: <0.1 II 2-4: <01 0-2: <0.1 2-4: <0. (0-2): 0.66 EXCAVATION EX-A2 (0-2): 2.79 (0-2): 1.3 (0-2): 0.64 (0-2): 0.4 <0-2): 1.59, (0-2): 0.66 (0-2): 0.67 2' BLS: 0.93 0 feet 20 4' BLS: 0.55 0-2: <0,1 0-2: <0,1 2-4: <012-4: <01 feet S0 SCALE C{'2f 0.26 0-2: <0.1 0-2: <0.1 0-2' <0.1 0-2' <0.1 <0,1 4: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 2-4: 1.81 0-2: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 j 0-2: <0.1 0-2: <0.1 0-2: <0.1 0-2: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 0-2: <0.1 1 0-2: 0.16 0-2: <0.1 2-4: 3.11 2-4: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 (0-2): 0.77 (0-2): 0.84(2-4): 0.60 (2-4): 1.02 0-2: <0.1 2-4: 1.58 2-4: <0.1 (0-2): 0.65 (2-4): 0.96 1 0.-rf--20�-#-I (0-2): 0.57 (2-4): 0.75 0-2: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 .Iik '1!lI111 (0-2): 0.83 (2-4): 0.66 (0-2): 0.61 (2-4): 0.83 (0-2): 0.65 (2-4): 0.77 (0-2): 0.63 (2-4): 0.90 (0-2): 0.57 (2-4): 0.59 RAMP TO /SECOND FLOOR (0-2) 0.65 (2-4) 0.64 (0-2): 0.96 (2-4): 0.85 0-2: <0.1 2-4: <0.1 <0-2): 0.11 (0-2): 0.55 (2-4): OBS. feet 1So (0-2): 0.28 ® <2-4): on. SCALE (0-2): 0.56 (2-4): 0.57 LEGEND EXCAVATION LIMITS RESULTS ARE EQUIVALENT BENZO[A]PYRENE CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN mG/kG.°� LIMITS 1 SUBMITTED INTO TI� E PUBLIC RECORD FOI ITEM rt,' ON 11-41.o1, (0-2): 0.19 (2-4): 0.56 (0-2): 0.75 (2-4): OBS. (0-2): 1.38 (0-2): 0.66 (0-2): 0.57 (2-4): 0.76 (2-4): 0.63 (2-4): 0.55 (0-2): 0.57 (0-2): 0.57 (2-4): 0.68 (0-2): 0.59 (2-4): 0.59 0-2: 0.98 2-4: <0.1 (0-2): 0.68 (2-4): 0.82 (0-2): 0.56 7 1\ (0-2): 0.62 0 (0-2): 0.71 (2-4): OBS, fief SCALE L L 10 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER CHAIN -LINK FENCE UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTIONS PREVENTED SAMPLING UNDERGROUND HIGH -VOLTAGE LINES CA ivnne III NEAR RTM fc1ff1®16 cj�An�a c 1 FIGURE 8 EXCAVATION EX-B1 LEGEND E1cigATION (0-2), 0.9 SUBMITTED INTO TEiEnkspEAFR 1 (2-4)I 3.4 1.5 PUBLIC RECORD FORLTS RAm /kIgSATIN BLUE(0-2), 2.1 ITEf 191 ON 1I.61-or.. ii; (2-4), 2.8 C a SB-19 (2-4), 11.0 4' BLS: 1.6 (0-2), 2.6 (2-4)1 2.2 0 i..$ 10 SB-1 (2-4), 13.0 EXCAVATION EX—A4 (0-2), 2.5 (2-4), 2.1 (0-2): 1.5 (2-4), 1.9 4' BLS: 1.1 (0-2), 1.3 (2-4), 1.8 i itirTrilfr LOT O KCT RI STREET LEGEND EXCAVATION LIMITS RESULTS ARE EQUIVALENT BENZO[A]PYRENE CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN mG/kG. LIMITS SOIL BORING EXCAVATION EX—A5 0 furl SCALE (0-2)' 1.54 (0-2): <0.1 (0-2): <0.1 (2-4): <0.1 (0-2): 0.52 (2-4): 0.51 (0-2), 0.61 (2-4), <01 0 foe 20 SUBMITTED INTO THEEXCAVATIO�NA�EX—C1. PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMS i; ON 11=o1-ok 12 (0-2): 0.53 (2-4): 0.56 0.55 II IIIIIIIIUHillllllll T IIM (0-2): 0.53 (2-4): <0,1 (0-2). 0.53 (2-4): 0.53 (0-2): <0.1 y (2-4) 0.05 (2-4) 0.53 (0-2)1 0,59 (2-4): 0.55 (0-2). 0.05 (2-4): <0.1 (0-2)' 056 11 iliilitlii1 E ICU MR l0i A �LLt€,iil1 11I11 `ililllU['illfl:lk; 111111tJ (2-4 ): 0.68 <0-2)1 0.05 <0-2): 1.36 (0-2), <01 (0-2): <0.1 tlrTTrrrT! rrr T(1 ntRtl; SCALE 1{ 1 t W unE ce 01 9311 mere OP PIRIDKG G1WG= FIGURE 9 V/1 LEGEND PROPOSED EXCAVATION 7PREVIOUS EXCAVATION FP&L CONDUIT --10—FEET SETBACK —R/W—RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT OF WAY DETERAIINED ARM BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHO SURVEY, MAX BY NYMPL LEAVY, —R rw—ROW —RN 0 lost 120 SCALE r 111 Lc! A , . MI LOT D • 1.11111 • 11111.1.5y f •): EXCAVATION EX—A5 4.TriTF„{: EXCAVATION EX—C1 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM 7s2Oris1-01-01.. U E tTiNDi_.!7 1 1 1 1 SKr Ill LOCATIONS OP 11010010 11T41100011 FIGURE 10 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMQN.oi. APPENDIX A DERM LETTER FROM SEPTEMBER 13, 2005 r 1 r MIAMI-DADE11 COUNTY ADA Cooean.don '�6arda CooedY.uon 'M in ►uhk Places Audit Mid wnapnn•a fen4cee . Men e Weueng Code Cne npFnnce IWdrn$ ee.ina. oe•ekrien, °Fend M ChiM..4 rdepe deMTnngn4dm Tenn Coweenientimr Community Community Jr Eceinaiiiii ue,:e opn+^e Cana.. Swabs Corrections a Rehabitedon Cena";;d• erNeaa1: rddgnt. 94end'M4in rraeare. rwpope eeteur. Iireeeprieeketn.olalySenikee lair &O ned! PM OM rreReeoee Centel Services AdinYrneillebn neonate rmw +eo044P4Y IndepmAre hewn laid ameema.lirade:Cancea.n Iu sea. Meemr :aretCem. Heirs lbasirdr. MetroPeilitnnilannins .ANY rd ieoseebe Mast eW:cane Police !rticzneittniiitanisenneni Ikerei 'WOW SYN.!. r* Neillibertiodd►ad. • Mazy Jean. Connors Knight-Ridder, lnc./Richwood, Inc. 50 W San Fernando Street, Suite 1500 San Jose, California 95113 .. _ . P. A. Ridder Miami -Herald Publishing Company 50 W San Femando Street San Jose, California 95113 Departmentof Environmental Resources Management Pollution Control Division 33 SW 2nd Avenue • 8th Floor Miami, Florida 33130-1540 7 305-372-6817 F 305-372-6982 miamidade.gov September 13, 2005 • CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 70010320000380961730 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED • CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 70010320000380961723 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Draft Work Plan, dated July 13; 2005 and prepared by HSA Engineers & - Scientists, :and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, dated April 2005 and prepared by .EE&G Environmental Services; LLC, for the Knight Ridder-Miami Herald Property (HWR-602/File-27734) located at, near, or in the vicinity of 1431-1451 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida. Dear Ms.. ConniNs and Mr. Ridder: The Pollution Remediation Section (PRS) of the Dt,.y a,nt of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) has reviewed the above -referenced documents received July 14 and. August 29, 2005, -respectively, and offers. the following comments with regards to the - Proposed •sampling plan: Based upon the population distribution of the .data presented in the Phase 11, • • .. with the exception of the results from. soil borings- SB-1 and SB-19 (2-4' intervals), the arsenic concentrations in on-site=soil appears to .indicate. sub- . regional background influences: The arsenic concentrations from soil borings : . SB- 1 and SB-19 (2..-4' intervals) represent .population outliers and, therefore, must be ' removed. • Following source -removal, a sufficient -number of confirmation samples, consisting of wall samples from both the 0 —'2 foot and the 2 = 4 foot intervals and bottom sample(s) (unless. the excavation extends • into the water table), :shall be collected and analyzed for arsenic. Source removal shall be deer lid complete upon 'demonstrating that the conformation sample results . are consistent with the- "site -wide arsenic distribution.— • . Notwithstanding, DERM has no objection to source removal in any "other areas . . tt»pacted by :arsenic (e:g.,. removal of soils exceeding" date -times the. applicable direct exposure soil CTLs). Solid Wade idar egernirei : ' . Srae.�le w:e.e wreep.mrm . -Team wen . Twmah UeDa. 4wbeaab. Tide rose' .Mauve ne.eee. erred Carden. Wier and fence SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM,.ON,1_ojot,, Ms. Connors and Mr. Ridder Knight-Ridder-Miami Herald Property HWR-602JFile22234 September 13, 2005 Page 2 of 4 2. DERM does not object to the proposed • source removal of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon • (PAH)-impacted . soils in the vicinityof soil borings SB-2, SB-3, .SB-6, SB-14, and Sa-26. • • Following source removal, a sufficient number of confirmation samples shall be collected and • analyZed. for PAI-Is. .Confirmation samples shall consist of wall samples from the 0 — 2 foot interval *. • for all area, wall samples from the 2 — 4 foot interval for the area represented by .SB-14 only, and bottom.sample(s) for all areas (unless the excavation -extends into the water table). Source removal shall be deemed complete . upon . demonstrating. that the confirmation • sample results meet the • applicable soil 'CTLs. Be advised that if source removal beyond- the proposed depth is required, additional Confirmation wall samples from the appropriate intervals and bottom sampleswill be required. In addition, soil removed from the:0 — 2 foot interval in the vicinity of SB-!4 shall be , . properly diaposed,:. unless analytical results from a sufficient number of samples demonstrate that . -soil meets.the applicable CTLs for. PAHs (see Supporting Information for the hnplementation. of RBCA, Soil Reuse Guidance, at wivw.miarnidade.aoviderroLlandittvids risk based.asp): • • . . • • • • • • . . • 3. The concentration of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (1111'%) in die. soil sainple collected . from SB-42 (4-6 ft interval) exceeded theapplicable soil CTLs.••• Since the water:table-was estimated to be 6 feet -BLS, the.sample niay not be representative of conditions in the unsaturated zone soil. . If • •• • • • . - this is the case (based Upon depth -to -water Measurements during the assessment), a verification- sample front the interval one foot above the water table shall.be .collected andanalyzed for TRPH.- If the resuh fromthe verification sample exceeds the applicable soil CTL,- or the sample:result • docuthented.in the Phase 11 is determined to be representative of unsaturated soil, then thesoil.shall beapproptiately addressed (e.g., TRPII specration, delineation, source removal; etc.). .• l• - • * • • • . • • • . - • •• . •• : • . • . . • .. .. • . . . 4. • -A sufficient number of soil: samples froni the 0 — 2 foot interval shall be collected inthe vicinity the former Morgan Cheriricid facility and analyzed for chlorinated pesticides, - polychlorinated • • • .biphenyls, • and • RCRA metals, *unless technical justification for not sampling • this inter -Val: is • . • 5. . • Dahl concurs with the proposed groundwater sampling to confirm the potential impacts documented by the direct push sample results (Note: a shigle well may be Sufficient to represent two areas thatare within approximately 15 fcet of each other, such as, potentially, sampling locations 5 • • • and 43). Be advised, if groundwater contamination is confirmed, additional assessment. (groundwater and, as necessaiy, soil mumiling •for all contaminants of potential concern) will be • . „ A scaled site diagram depicting the locations of the former facilities provided by the Phase II and, to the -extent feasible baied upon available information, the lorAtionir of any potential source .areas (e.g., USTs, pipelines; soakage pits, etc) in reference to the -soil and groundwater .sampling locations '• shall be provided in "the site assessment report (SAR). Based upon this information- the following additional sampling may be required • . • • •• • . • • ••••. ... • • • a. Soil (from the appropriate intervals) and groundwater sampling for the RCRA -metals in the. vicinity of the former Nash Body Shop Rubus s Auto Body Shop and Pincher Motors facilities. • • • •.• • : * 13: Soil (from the appropriate intervals) and groundwater sampling for appropriate chemicals of potential concern (e.g., solients,:metals, etc.) in the vicinity of the former Boat Repair facility, . .• • SUBMITTED INTO THE • PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMZIONAAIL. Ms. Connors and Mr. Ridder Knight-Ridder-Miami Herald Property HWR-602/File22234 September 13, 2005 Page 3 of 4 The depth to groundwater and a 24-hour tidal cycle shall be provided in the site assessment report. Be advised that soil delineation shall include the entire thickness of the unsaturated zone (e.g., ground surface to approximately one -foot .above the high groundwater table). hi addition, in .Order • to qualify for a no further action (NFA) without conditions, the entire unsaturated zone mustcomply with the residential soil cleanup target levels (CTLs) and the applicable leachability soil Ms. The potentiai for buried solid waste debris along the southern boundary of the site, as referenced in the Phase II, requires • further investigation using invasive .techniques (e.g., test pits, .trenches,. borings, etc.): Observations made during the installation of monitoring wells/soil borings and during source removal activities may be utilized for this investigation.. Be advised that based upon the.results of this investigation; additional action.. may be. required (e.g.; delineation of the buried debris, methane assessment; etc.). 9 All the information (e.g., monitoring well construction logs, lithology logs, laboratory reports, etc.) • referred • to in . the- SAR guidance shall be . provided (see_. Supporting .Information- for the Implementation of RBCA,, at www.iniamidade.aov/derrdland/trends risk baseit.asp): 10. Soilexcavated- during source 'removal activities.. -shall be disposed it a Class I landfill. : For • information additional guidance or requirements regarding disposal at South Dade landfill, contact Lee Casey, Miami-Dade.County Department of Solid Waste Management, at.(305) 514-6672.. • Be. advised that .the timeframes and requirements set forth in the August 4, 2005 retrain in effect In addition, a • •:fee of.$650 is due for review of the above -referenced documents and, at the time of submittal of the SAR, a - review fee of3925_wi11 be due. .Failure to comply with these:tuneftames may result in this case being prepared for further enforcement action up.to and including being referred to the Office of the County Attorney for faunal • enforcement action in a court of competent jurisdiction. • The vertical and horizontal extent of the contaminant plumes) must be fully delineated. The3efore; additional • site* rehabilitation actions may be recjuired based upon the results of the. activities proposed in the above - referenced work plan and.modified herein: DERM has the option to split any samples deemed necessary with the consultant or laboratory at the subject site: • The consultant collecting the samples grist perform field sampling work in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures provided in Chapter 62-160, Florida Administrative Code. (PAC), as amended. The • laboratory analyzing the samples must perform laboratory. analyses pursuant to: the National Environmental .. 'Laboratory. Accreditation :Program (NELAP) certification .regiii ements: - 1f the data submitted exhibits a Substantial. variance from the' DERM • split sainple analysis,. a . complete resampling using two independent • certified laboratories will -be required. Lorna Bucknor of DERM must be notified inwriting a minimum. of three . • (3) worl®g days prior to the implementation of the referenced plan.. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEntION i :e .d, , 5EP.14.2t65 12:55PM DERTI STORAGE TANKS NO.426 P.4 Ms. Connors and Mr. Ridder Knight-Ridder-Miami Herald Property H'WR-602/Fi1e22234 September 13, 2005 Page 4 of 4 if you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Lisa Smith of the Pollution Control Division at (305) 372-6700_ pc: Larry Marbert, Knight Ridder Alicia Beaena, The Miami Herald Terry Horan, HAS Engineers and Scientists Sincerely, Wilbur Mayorga, P.B., Chief Pollution Control Division SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMZ,2A ON��-o�.o�. APPENDIX B WELL COMPLETION REPORT r r E r r r r r r r r r r WELL COMPLETION REPORT WELL PERMIT NO FORM 0124 SFWMD WATER USE PERMIT NO. R.v.11/90 AA, Rem Lo (3:5,19.k- 4- i? Ms Ar+, Address C1ty Sat. Tip <. ' I►t �Z. 11- 1%-o•L-ts Contractor's Signature license No. Compistlon Date Casing Depth Tole Depth Wee e TYPE OF WORK: Construct OK) Repair ( ) Abandon ( ) WELL USE: Domestic Well ( ) Public ( ) Monitor (i) Test ( ) Irrigation ( ) FireWell ( ) Other METHOD: Rotary with MUD ( ) or Air ( ), Cable Tool ), Jet ( ) Casing Driven ( Other I-1 .5 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL } Ft. below top of casing PUMPING WATER LEVEL_S_Ft. after__Hrs at GPM PUMP SIZE 7 " H P CAPACITY tc GPM PUMP TYPES i; FIzirciITAKE DEPTH ( Z From top of ground LOCATION Located Near y s '" i` r� County Z i/}....- _ b vet 1) g' su Of' 31 S3 5, `1 l k. ,/4 1/4 Section TownaNp Range lanbW.d orglude Cuttings sent to District? ( ) Yes ( ) No LOCATE IN SECTION Note: PWS Welts attach a site map if well Location Is different from site location on permit application. X Grout Calingsomina �m (R) DRILL Eximin II'ut ng.S LOG every 20 R. or at brrrtagon cMng.a Give color, grain size. and Not* caviller. � a produckig woes. Tterial � Diameter From To apt t _,__ kfv ftcr+ s;L4 a.' � r--ice- s a,,4 . Casing Black Steel ( ) Galv. ( ) PVC ( A Fiberglass ( ) Screen* Type Q rs ` Slot size Screened from 7 (ft.) to Type of grout with % additives — Water: Clear ( ) Colored fC) Sulphur ( ) Salty ( ) Iron ( ) Conductivity Chlorides mg/I • r^tr� 'Z (n ) SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM v,i.n ON flo1oc'. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM_,, ON n-oq-oo . APPENDIX C HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS • wi..:i::44.64iciali1011111111111111e • e 211 26 ad..1 LSD. EA a 7.3 El a El ICI ED ca frfait_ e211 121 k k PR a A MOROC 1115-4 131 81 611 L22 FLASIJER k 1 22 0 ErA Al at Walla ENI k .18 0 AV MI rJ SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR st-oiu ILsawizammesf 32e 29 RCM BLVD 1 1-4 r.Karc. A As2 F IN, a gi [IA 71 fa' a a Gh GO - PAL Ft - An••••••••• The Sanborn Library, LLC Copp14.10 19¢1 Th. 9rb..1 u.lrt,. LLC r 1�1a EMI xa.mra. ST. (Rica 62 ST. (RICE a R/ a c E r B 4 J S J aB U L Li v . —10 ISM .1 Om . At :x r . Oa 0 p ^N.R.t6t$ "' T. ,wrion as Jr, N.E. 1471. TERRACCMouwNvl" " crag �N. WADOELLJ• N u ITEMT\ONoi'oCt6 ‘'4 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUILI'C1{EcURD FUR A A V S. 0 / (TATUM AV.) 519 e. 'j(COLLINs Emu:ma RO) Cow . same (a.Mn Lamy 9sli d P..1. m • . The Sanborn Library, LLC Capp100 NU TN Sorban Libtery, LLC CHP 6111111•••=11.044 uv 72:1- N.E. (.17,701,11.81/00111.61•1y.1.1.01,4P01111.110.2.1•WW • ":17.. • 0 .0 0 518 t ,ice urt.ve) 131 CID AV.) SIJRMITTFD INTO TH A a U g. 0 / V (TATUM AV.) (COLLINS ORID GIC WO) PLC 147 SS The Sanborn Library, LLC CAPI'001050 TIC Swim, Limn. LLC GNP .rr Eeonnrr m** (TATUM AM) w N.E. 104 TERRACE i810D AV.) 6J o grammesAsa C The Sanborn Library, LLC C 0/4101Yl7 Ti. 9nba81A114. LLC C11P •lr Fg RMerMAM.lr 1sWeft o.pa11r1tiesaLYu,.LLCuwe.P+llrrarloAPtrwm 55 { 1:' Dfwvi /Aa8Y RA.wlf 1 J171011iOK�t WPM C p� •• Jel ru®a 1.01 OWN lE ows-wmapormma spasm peromasimps 1 p A s A 517 t sweats-r.imam an .AfN' AN /WM Aver. SIoet • 11 N. E. ISTH sr - f f ip ,iz Ak41' TtRRA0[ 1. Sls 1' 62 e • 01043 Dwal DECK /MAKI" ARt•1e r...I LSI V e_0 is C o ° R� t ytPLE 1411 •SLR Ral 1101^006 -- t 52 SUBMIIUh'i.s roc PUBLIC RECORD FOR J SI1t, 4 :15% ANAII.{ItAIOLI 1 Ca eworg.- x«+lti . -I•Q in-f,A8V. re :: e.) it • 7. 1"'"' k r.el• rr•••Al•• 56 /ARMY f M I /AR,11 fee• 30 t 000ivuTTED u 1 HE PUBLIC RECORD FOR In is r Aerial Photo -1963 Location: Knight Ridder Property Rubin's Auto Body (1958) Identified Facilities: Nash Body Shop (1958) r- Fincher Motors (1953) Boat Repair/Service Station (1921 1'39) 1. Nash Body Shop —1435 NE Bayshore Place, 1958 2. Morgan Chemical Company —1337 N Bayshore Drive, 1944 3. Fincher Motors —1325 NE Bayshore Place, 1953 4. Rubin's Auto Body —1308 NE Bayshore Court 5. Boat Repair/Service Station — 511 NE 13th Street, 1921/1939 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR I TEM rj+74 ON ti-o 1.0‘. t Aerial Photo - 2003 Location: Knight Ridder Property Identified Facilities: SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR 11151 11-o9:ov 1. Nash Body Shop -1435 NE Bayshore Place, 1958 2. Morgan Chemical Company -1337 N Bayshore Drive, 1944 3. Fincher Motors -1325 NE Bayshore Place,1953 4. Rubin's Auto Body -1306 NE Bayshore Court 5. Boat Repalr/Service Station - 511 NE 13th Street, 1921/1939 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM1�Ztn ON II-oq.os. APPENDIX D LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS (CD Attached) SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM' ON11•o1-01.. APPENDIX E GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOGS Dec 19 05 01:24p 305-944-8058 p.2 svrE NAME: 4(NA� WELL NO: W\ r DEP-SOP-001/01 SUBMITTED INTO THE Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LC i iRi I(' RECORD FOF 1-1;41, SAMPLE ID: SITE LOCATION. vary, i PURGING DATA r2 WELL DIAMETER (Itches): r2 TUBING L , DIAMETER (inches):1f-I WELL SCREEN INTERVAL DEPTH:' feet to I. L feet STATIC DEPTH r TO WATER (feet):J4 )7 PURGE PUMP TYPE OR BAILER: WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME _ (TOTAL WELL DE - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only fill out I app bk) _ ( I ) fee!- -> i 0 feet) X ( (( galena/foot = L 08 Batb"s EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only MI out if applicable) __K• = + ( gallons/foot slfKX feet) + tarns = galions INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): FINAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (tea): PURGING INfT1ATED A PURGING Q`i�a/ _ ENDED AT. ( LACPURGED TOTAL VOLUME • (gallons): TIME VOLUME (9 1PURGED CUMUL VOLUME PU(g llonsRGED PURGE RATE (�hhh) DEPTH TO WATER (leaf) PH ( � xj 2 f COND. (pnthos/c trmt0 DISSOLVED OXY %a c r TURBIDITY (NTUs) COLOR (describe) ODOR (describe) 6: A o, t s,20 -Ity�tSi-l3i1-3c3 c�ca59,11 `'. L�%l:e2- 9.do O 1 t, l 0,I -7�,.s7 O7(, ca.00 _ c.�.r.�.r- "c -- • WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Pet Foot): US* = 0.02; 1" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16: 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.02; 6" = 1.47; 12" = 5.ti6 TUBING INSIDE D1A. CAPACITY (GaLIFt): 1/s" = 0.0006; VW = 0.0014; fit." = 0.0026; 5H6" = 0.004; 316" = 0.006; V2" = 0.010; 518" = 0.016 SAMPLING DATA LED 8 (PRINT) / AFFILIATION: �jj (•�- �4e�r!?"t+1r1 ■ f LEI( SIGNATURES: � '� SAMPLING t 1NIiIATED AT: j .,1 SAMPLING EKED AT: Cl . �( "' PU OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feed ((.. _ SAMPLE P FLOW RATE (taper min41 :0 A i TUBING MATERIAL CODE: FIELD DECONTAMINATION: © N tFILTEREM Y[, j FILTER SIZE Filtration ype: ym DUPLICATE: O N _ SAMPLE SPECIFICATION R SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE ID CODE I RS MATERI AL CODE VOLUMEUSED PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN Fir n (mL) FINAL pH •NMv3.141 r2 Pti sacVhi 3 61"i L As APP REMARKS: MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glass; PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene: $ = Silicone: T = Tenon; 0 = Other (Speet<y) SAMPUNG1PURGING PPP = After Peristaltic Pump: B = Baler, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; SR = Strew Method (Tubing Gravity Dram); VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Spey) NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the Information regudred by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C. 2. STABn.RATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION of LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE nEA4e4Otf$Ex FS 2212. SECTION V pH: ± 02 units Temperature: ± 02 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); optionally, ± 02 mgll or + 10% (whichever is greater) Turbldtty: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater) Dec 19 05 01:24p 305-944-6058 p.3 r r r r r r r DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE i NAME: }( -f t?-ItIGi r (��l t IKgal LOCrrEATION: :�) ,L ` F WELL NO: �' `j O ( �_(.C.' SAMPLE ID: Yh�2 t DATE: / l _-f S.^0 PURGING DA WELL DIAMETER (etches): TUBING L�/ DIAMETER (inches): 1�T WELL SCREEN WESCREEN INTERVAL feet ? feet to -2_J STATIC DEPTH ^� TO WATER (feet): �� 3 PURGE PUMP TYPE I� OR BAILER 9 WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only frg out lt applicable) - . [ 1 = ( (Z feet- J reel) X C Ho gallons/foot = l —1 gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (ony fit out B applicable) = gallons + ( gallons/foot X feet) + gallons = gallons INrUAL PUMP OR TUBING C t; DEPTH IN WELL (feet): 1 FINAL PUMP OR TUBING �y^C- DEPTH IN WELL (feet): L PURGING WRIATED AT: be PURGING ENDED AT- / :C7, TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons): O ter TIME VOLUME PURGED (paHorts) CUMUL. VOLUME PURGED (gallons) PURGE RATE (gpm) DEPTH TO WATER (feet' PH (standardY units)uSfcm) COND. (*mho& c m or DISSOLVED OXY (nr~ or % saturation) TURBIDITY (N7Us) COLOR (describe) ' ODOR (describe) , /() 03 03 ell l3 (`t Ef63-1c7 cLS i L/ tru-- n4-©3 Q.C2 c ( 't3 `710 -71 1 ©t?P 1IAcure,. II:o e).3 0 �9 � 3 t3 -7.07- 2. 2 d L Z$ i car _• ate. WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75' = 0.02; 1" = 0.04; 125" = 0.06; 2' = 0.1 B; 3' = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 6" =1.02; 6' = 1.47; 12" = 5.88 TUBING INSIDE DNA. CAPACITY (Gal/FL): 1/r = 0.0006; 3/16" = 0.0014; 114 = 0.0026; 5/16' = 0.004; sir = 0.006; VP = 0.0t0; 5/6" = 0.018 SAMPUNG DATA LED B (PRINT) I AFFILIATION: PkrC411 R(S) IGNA1URES: GJpATEDAT: 'IC+rs � � �! yPLE SAA�L tjr tC :03 W(TIj, SAMPLING ENDED AT: PUMP OR TUBING �• DEPTH IN YVELL_(feet): �'j SAMPLE- PUMP FLOW RATE (mL per minute ©A TUBING MATERIAL CODE: FIELD DECONTAMINATION:0 NFIE. FILTER SIZE: _tun ILatian DUPLICATE: Y 15 Fjlo EttuipnentType ` SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAMPLNG EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE ID CODE X CONTAINS RS MATERI AL CODE' VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIELD (mL) FINAL pH AND a L iczo4 -•j c2-C?T -7. o2 p14.4 ltT PP '1 ;'1TED1NTOTHE p ; rcRECORDFoR P2 I N REMARKS: ITE .SON 0- ..0` MATERIAL CODES: AG - Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glass; PE = Pcyethylene: PP = Polypropylene; S = Silicone; T = Teflon; 0 = Other (Spedfy) SAMPLJNGIPURGNG APP = Auer Peristaltic Pump; " B = Bader, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump: PP = Peistaltc Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump: SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap: 0 = Other (Specify) NOTES:1. The above do not corn Lute all of the information requfnd by Chapter 62-160, F.A. 2. STABILIZATION CnrreR$A FOR RANGEOF vAR1AT10N OF LAST THREE OWNECUTIYE READINGS (sit FS 2212. SECTION 9) pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 0.2 °C Speclic Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: al readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); - optionaly, ± 0.2 mg/L or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: al readings .120 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 10% (whidtever le greater) r Dec 19 05 01:25p 305-944-G058 p.4 r r r a r r r r r r r r r r r DEP-SOP-001 /01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE NAME: WELL NO: SITE l4 LOCATION: ! `' 4'^u SAMPLE ID: i) :n,. ,4- y DATE: it WELL /�''�1 DIAMETER (inches): TUBING �% DIAMETER ): r .j — WELL SCREEN INTERVAL fir:,- feet b I feet STATIC DEPTHPM) TO WATER (Peat): ► . $A PURGE PTYPE OR BAILER: v1 - WELL VOLUME PURGE: only NI out if applicable) 1 WELL VOLUME _ (TOTAL WELL DEPTH — STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY p _ ( I;)- feet — S - 2ga feet) X ®- 1(0 gallons/foot = Q •. to gallons " EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fin out If applicable) = gallons + ( gallons/foot X feet) + gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): FINAL PUMP OR TUBING b DEPTH IN WELL (feet): Ii PURGING INITIATED AT: ft ' ? 7 PURGING ENDED AT (` - TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons): C.43 ODOR (describe) TIME VOLUME PURGED Mallon) CUMUL. VOLUME PURGED (gallons) PURGE RATE (YPm) DEPTH TO VrATFR (feet) PH (standard ) TENS. (o� COND. (pmhos►c mot ItShm) DISSOLVED OXYGEN (' % ) TURBIDITY (NTUs) COLOR (describe) 11:1- Cis' ®•S O. 9 d.Sti s`1-z7 0 sG o-3 3 ck..'r i1=3'-1 ©•D 0.7 t9•53- sv-i-aL elSet°"�'Sr -. 3 li =b a i 6.S 1 ;o--s'�. %`i. 1st 0.1.4 it • WELL CAPACITY (Gallons --Per Foot): 0.75 = 0.0Z 1" = 0.04; 1.25' = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.oz 6" =1.47; 12" = 5.60 ( TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (Gs./Ft) 118' = 0.0006; 3MC = 0.0014: 114" = 0.0026; sf16' = 0.004; 3/8" = 0.008; 1l2" = 0.I110; 518" = 0.016 A SAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFFILIATION: �)."?ti 5• L'c../ N &A SAMPLER(S) SIGNATURES: l__..1,-; SAMPLING ' . ' 37 SAMPLING ENDED AT: t 1 = PUMP OR TUBING Q DEPTH 1N WELL (feet): p SAMPLE PUMP •1 FLOW RATE (p.Cper minute: ItD - 1 TUBING MATERIAL CODE: ` FIELD DECONTAMINATION: 0 N FIELD -FILTERED: Y FILTER SIZE: pm DUPLICATE: Y _ Mallon Equipment Type: SAWLE SPECIFICAT10N CONTAINER INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAMPLING EQU�MENT CODE SAMPLE PRESERVATION SAMPLED CODE T t ABIE RSCAE MATERI VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIEU) (mL FINK. pH • r4.24c3 1 Qr Las.' 1414e3. las. 40.4.---`s'1► Ate, Pig MP INTO THE S ITTED PUB1JC RECORD. FOR t REMARKS: IT tv+t; oN I% =t.o• . MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = CIS Gtasati PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; Si* Stioone; T = Tebn 0 = Other (Specify) SAMPUNQJPURGING APP = Alper Pedststc Pump; B = Baler, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = decide Submersible Pump; PP • Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Per lk Pump SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain) VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Specify) NOTES: 1. 'ihe above do not constbute all of the Information required by Chapter 112-160. F.A.C. 2. STABILICATKJN CRnERIA FOR RANGE or VARIATION OF LAST 1NREf;..CONSIMUTWE REAOI OS (sEE FS2212,11ECT1oN S) pH: ± 02 tatifs Temperature: ± 02'C Spectflc Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturalon (see Table FS 2200-2); optionally, ± 02 mgll or ± 1096 (whichever is greater) Turbidity: al readings < 20 NTU ; optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 10% (whichever is greater) r t Dec 19 05 01:25p 305-944-6058 p.5 DEP-SOP-001101 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE NAME: WELL NO: SITE �e7a, LOCATION: �i1'�• SAMPLE ID: 1 1-fit PURGING DATA DATE WELL ^ DIAMETER (Inches):.maIA TUBING • DIAMETER (inches) y WELL SCREEN INTERVAL DEPTH: a. feet to Q feet STATIC DEPTH TO WATER (feet):4-67 PURGE PUMP TYPE OR BAILER: 14' WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL. VOLUME _ (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTHETO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only MI out I applicable) _ ( ) feet- ` 1. ( f feet) X ©. 1,6 gallons/foot = i.17 gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME * (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only IN out I applicable) = g + ( gabonsaroot X feet) * gallons = gallons INmAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): FINAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): 5 PURGING INTUITED AT: 1" 3y PURGING ENDED AT 13 _ 1 TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons): 16.7 THE VOLUME PURGED WW1) CUMUL VOLUME PURGED WO* PURGE RATE Wpm) DEPTH TO WATER (Met) PH (standard TEMP. (°C) r COND. (lunhoslc m m MS/ari) DISSOLVED OXYGEN (circle moll or % salutation) TURBIDITY (NTUs) COLOR (describe) ODOR (describe) ll=y6 1•0� (•a ©.i '44.7 3•.is al-cf.., .*13 0- lei Eris' _4.6.4, .v-,.,� it. o , 1 -0 a -P. z l it, a-• 3.4 i.s a (5- l - • .:)..1 crV.)."dy _ f. M-t7 2..1 10•X 9-c$_csa-1? Q -°t L?-la los" ' it- iti 0• 10.5- -I0 Zr3,a, vas O -I 107 1 tS-a-1 ©i 1&•7 J :, 01 . -z=, aa-7 o -3.0 ) 03 .\, WELL CAPACITY 1 TUBING INSIDE (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.0Z 1" = 0.04; 125' - 0.06: 2' = 0.18: 3" = 0.37; 4' =0.65; 5" =1.0Z 6"=1.47; 12" = 5.88 DNA. CAPACITY (GaI.IFL) U8" = 0.0006: 3Pt6' = 0 0014; U4' = 0.0026; stir = 0.004; 3I8" = 0.006; 1/2" = 0.010 Sid" = 0.016 SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFFILIATION: /► Cam: i5. i1Sf i S) TURES: INrnATEDAT: SAMPLING - 13 �) SAMPLING ENDED 1L ` a PUMP OR TUBING b DEPTH IN WELL (Met): SAMPLE PUMP '1 FLOW RATE fCp (per 0 . t TUBING MATERIAL CODE:- +�+�- t D_ ) FIELD OECONTAta/tfIATI0N N FIELD-FI TERED: Y O FILTER SIZE Filtration Type:DUPLICATE: _ fun Y { N�1 ` SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODE INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD METHODADDED SAMPLE ID CODE 0 CONTAWE RS MWTERI � VOLUME PRESERVATIVE TOTAL VOL t4 FIELD (mL) FINAL pH iHisa' 444 1 ?if- lase, IA /WI I as- P At.t. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMi ON. o`• o REMARKS: Uar, &b.., -.,.r-.\_nrd:c,,,_‘.o T `` . ,..,y,� cot... . MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glass; PE = Palyet►ylane; PP = Pdypropylene; S = Sftoare: T = TeOon: 0 = Otter (Specify) gAgipuggjpugggig APP = Mer Peristaltic Pump: B = Baba: BP = Bladder Pump: ESP = Electric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Revers, Flaw ParistalUc Pump: SM = SCaw Me l iod (T ei* Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Spedy) NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute M Of the !rdomotion required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C. 2 STABU.IZA'TnOrt CRR RIA FOR RAW -OF VARIATION CF LAST THREE cotisgarrivE REAB1NGS IEEE F52212. swum 3� pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 0.2 °C Sp.CNIc Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: MI readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2): OptbnaBy. ± 0.2 mgll. or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: a4 readings 120 NTU: optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 10% (whichever is greater) t. fi -19 E - Dec 19 05 01:26p 305-944-6058 p.6 r r r r DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SFTE SITE FL NAME: rN; P: - i�C�v►. ►l�')'ci A , LOCATION: "4 ^^ WELL NO: M6.)-�, SAMPLE ID: r w - �1 PURGING DATA DATE: 11_��-oS WELL DIAMETER (Itches):,. TUBING , i . DIAMETER (inches):Ill WELL SCREEN INTERVAL DEPTH: feet to feet STATIC DEPTH TO WATER (feet):3..5 PURGE PUMP TYPE n OR BAILER: ' r� WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME _ (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only nu out K applicable) = ( / a feet - .S 4 feet) X 4.1[o geuonslfoot = t • gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only tin out if applicable) = gallons + ( gallons/foot X feet) + gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH 61 WELL (feet): �, FINAL PUMP OR TUBING ,., DEPTH IN WELL (feet): 2> PURGING t INITIATED AT: ; 4. 10 PURGING ENDED AT: IV! TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons): TIME VOLUME PURGED (gallons) CUMUL VOLUME PURGED (gallons) PURGE RATE (gPm) DEPTH TO WATER (feet) PH (standard units) TEMP. (°r COND. (Iunhoslc m or pSlcm) DISSOLVED O (dni or 1L saturation) TURBIDITY (NTUN) COLOR (describe) ODOR (describe) lilt -IS O. O.S 0 1 t..54 7.a& Vint 11.0 0•iq 1 c.leAc +row. 11=17 0 •.D Q .7 1 7. a3 i�y.-7y 41' 0.07 ly`(c, C'7 JD_ ®.`i i ,?- a3 $`I.T� 1y4 0 .OP 6 ..,t 4 WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foal): 0.75" = 0.OZ 1" = 0.04: 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.02 6" =1.47; 12" = 5.e8 TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaIJFL): 118" = 0.0006; 3H6" = 0.0014; 1/4" = 0.0026; 6116" = 0.004; 316" = 0.006; ill" = 0.010; WS" = 0.016 SAMPLING DATA SSAImoIED BY (PRINT)/ AFFILIATION: �t V_' s L4-ted N SAMPLERS) SIGNATURE&r�, ( �2�<r / r SAMPLING WRIATEDAT: PI SAMPLING ; t'} � p ENDED AT: PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): SAMPLE PUMP FLOW RATE� rninute� (D. ( TUBING MATERIAL CODE: I FIELD DECONTAMINATION: N FEW F0.7ERED Y FILTER SIZE: pinDUPLICATE: © N Filtration Equipment Type. SAMPLE SPECIFICATION CONTAINER SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR SAMPt.ING EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE ID COOS S CONTAINS MATERI AI CODE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FELD (ml FINALMETHOD PH tiLs)-t.1 1 Pe Ias.a. y less LD As ASP , 4 A o 1 L �°a' 51- .... °Y-4-23.• 7a3 ?MX C- , ) ITTEDI-NTOTHE : FOR , : IC RECORD REMARKS: wTt 11"aMATERIAL LTE1'Sa'2QT4 CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glss; PE = Polyetlrylene: it = nom" rveaily) ^SAMPUNGIP(RtGOIG APP = After Peristaltic Pump; 8 = Beatly, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; Sat = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain) VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Specify) NOTES:1. The above do not constitute all of the it on regalired by Ctlaptier 62160. 2. STA*IUZATION CRRERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST TIC 410I1(ITNE READ6GS (U FS2212. SECTION S) pH: ± 0.2 trails Temperature: ± 02 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: al readings < 20% saturation (free Table FS 2200-2): optionalyy. ± 0.2 mglL or ± 10%(whichever is greater) Turbidity: ail readings _< 20 NTLI: optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 10% (whichever is greater) r Dec 19 05 01:26p 305-944-6058 p.7 r r r r r DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE K ^ • 1n� NAME , • �1 WELL NO: ; 1 — /1;c 1.4c►c), SITE LOCATION: SAMPLE ID: tip' PURGING DATA P1 DATE: i t_)�-Q� WELL DIAMETER (niches): TUBING ` DIAMETER (inches): _ WELL SC INTERN DEPTH: feet to Met STATICDEPTH TO WATER (feet):j .0E1 PURGE PUMP TYPE OR BAILER Q � ` WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME _ (TOTE WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only fill out if applicable) = ( l 5.crnb = 1. lei gallons feet - feet) X 0 - ( gallons/foot EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)+ FLOW CELL VOLUME (only all out if applicable) = gallons 4 ( gallons/foot X feet) + gallons = gallons INMNG DEPTHL PIN E el DEPTH IN WELL (feel):II DEPTH IN WELL (feetFO4AL PUMP OR ): 2s, PURGING INITIATED AT: PURGING ENDED AT: Ll f 014 TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (ganonsY©8 ODOR (describe) T VOLUME PURGED (gallons) CUMUL. VOLUME PURGED (gallons) PURGE RATE (gPm) DEPTH TO WATER (feet pH (a TEMP. (°p COND. (pmhosto mar pS1cm) DISSOLVED OXY (c d r % ) TURBIDITY (NTUs) COLOR (describe) i9 c ®'I 0 .`f o i 3 7--43 11...55 aS157 0.06 nc. e. ,A:o.2 e9,a o.6 I 7`i( ca-� �.�18 o .c i'Vcrt 0) .� o 4 -7- -t I '�-_->1 al s) s, o oc 3 v WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04; 1.2S" = 0.08; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" = 1.02; 6" =1.4T; 1 r = 5.88 TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaliFt): 118" = 0.0006; 3M8" = 0.0014; 114" = 0.0028; 5H8" = 0.004, 3/8" = 0.008; 1m" = 0.010; 518" = 0.016 SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED//''�iiBY (PRINT)``l�AyF,F, AFFILIATION: A CJv t S Lr 1 i / r,3*+ SAMPLER(S) SAMPLING INITIATED AT: It'{°OJ SAMPLING ,h�y.��.7 ENDEDAT. T 1 ll PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet) SAMPLE i FLOW RATEDer r/ TUBING " MATERIAL CODE t FIELD DECONTAMINATION N FIELD-F1L Y FILTER SIZE FAtration EquipmentType: WTI DUPLICATE: _ SAF1'LE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE ID CODE 8 CONTAINS RS MATERI AL CODE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIELD (mL) FINAL pp tiw-t. 1 P� tas,$. N�o Ins �a t.1(N h�P SU:iiTTED it INTO THE PUBLIC- RECORD FOR ITEM fi$, ON II -od•oe REMARK MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass: CG = Clear Glass; PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Skate; T = Teflon; 0 = Other (Spedy) SAMPUNGIPURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Baler, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; SPA = Sean Meted (tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Specify) NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute aU of the Inlornlation reptdrod by Chapter 62-160. 2. O'(ABI marow CFI_ PQR TAN OFF VARIATION OF LAST T REE_COM UTIVE READINGS ($EE FS 2212 CnoN 3 pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 0? °C Spedflc Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 209E saturation (see Table FS 2200-2): optionally, ± 0.2 mgft. or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: alt reaadings < 20 NTU: optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Dec 19 05 01:26p 305-944-6058 p.8 r r r r r r r r DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE AME: [-R. h•T F^g01CY M:an-. 'd SITLOCATION: J-i'ta�.• . tL WELL NO: 1./1 SAMPLE ID: }J{ I,,j- Q.'/ DATE: 10 4-Q PURGING DATA WELL DIAMETER (inches): �, TUBING I DIAMETER (inches): L( WELL SC EN INTERVAL DEPTH: feet Io a feet STATIC DEPTH .� TO WATER (feet)4 • PURGE PUMP TYPE OR BAILER: rp WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME _ (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only fill out if applicable) _ ( 1 a feet - - feet) X O. t 6 gafonsHoot = t .3,1 gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fill out if applicable) = galorhs + ( gallonslroot X )+ gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING ('� DEPTH IN WELL (feet) ., FINAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): g, PURGING INITIATED AT: 13: 2> PURGING ENDED AT I3' TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons): © on TIME VOLUM PURGED (gam) CUMUL VO VOLUME PURGED (gallons) PURGE RATE ( ) DEPTH DETO PTH WATER (feet)units) pH (standaN T COND. m or µS/cm) DISSOLVED OXY ( % ) TURBIDITY (NT'UA) COLOR (describe) ODOR (describe) I.)- 3S b..5 ©.S a I r3.aa _ ..% a)_.-N 6-co. g fir :�e . t''�c� d.at p.`7 11 G)1K i.e. 3.7 ate; o-C 'hi i 11„ • WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 6.75` = 0.02; 1" = 0.04; 1.2S" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; r = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" = 1.02; 6" = 1.47; 12" = 5.88 TUBNG INSIDE DIAL CAPACITY (GaLIFL): 1/8" = 0.0006; 3116" = 0.0014; 114" = 0.0026; 5116" = 0.004; 3N6" = 0.006; 1/2" = 0.010; 516" = 0.016 SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFFILIATION: C -iS L,. e/ SAMPL l S) TU SAMPLING vlm*TED AT l L, Lt . SAMPLING r ENDED AT: t 3' L[ J PUMP OR TUBING (y DEPTH IN WELL (feetk 2S PUMP FLOW RATE per minute : C_-1 _ TUBING ..........— MATERIAL CODE: FIELD DECONTAMINATION: © N FIELD -FL : Y N FILTER SIZE Matron Equipment Type. pal DUPLICATE: Y 490. ---� SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE ID CODE S CONTAWE MATERI AL CODE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIELD (mL) FINAL pH yy�� l ri J IRS I Pe- em..►L k&x tor,4..a pp As. A r SUBM-ITTEDINTOTHE PUBLIC RECORD FOR i;s, REMARKS ITEM ON 0- o 9- o & . MATERIAL CODES: AG = Niter Glass; CG = Clear Glass; PE = PcIyethlens; PP = Polypropylene SO Mow T = Teflon; 0 = Other (Specify) SAMPUNGsIPURGING APP a After Peristaltic Pump; B = Baler. BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Beattie Submersible Pump; PP - Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow PelW3ltic Pump; SM = Shaw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Specify) NOTES: 1. TM above do not constitute all of the irdonnation required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C. 2 STAMLILITION CRITERIA FOR RANGEOF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECIITNE READMCSISEE FS 2212. SECTION 3) pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 02 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: al readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); optlonaly, ± 0.2 mgli. or± 1096 (whichever is greater) Turbidity: a1 readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 10% (whichever Is greater) Dec 19 05 01:27p 305-944-6058 p.9 r r r r r 1 r r r DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG STTE NAME: ( 2 -. ii:=1 /vi He -At WELL NO: E R� - D"T SITE LOCATION: yv1 Q SAMPLE ID: DATE: i PURGING DATA WELL DIAMETER (inches): t� TUBING A DIAMETER (Inches): V1-� WELL SCRFIEN INTERV L DEPTH: a feet to /� feet STATIC DEPTH TO WATER (feet):3.bq PURGE PUMP TYPE Qa OR BAILER: r l WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY T Only fit out If applicable) _ ( % . feet - .. feet) X 0.14 gattonsiloot = 1 . }S gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fiN out if applicable) = gallons + ( gallons/Toot X feet) + gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): �j ANAL PUMP OR TUBING p DEPTH IN WELL (feet): O PURGING INITIATED AT: h( - PURGING ELIDED AT. I L' �7 TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons)0.7 TIME VOLUME PURGED (gallons) CUMUL VOLUME PURGED (Qaflone) PURGE RATE Wm) DEPTH TO WATER (et) PH TEMP. (°). COND. (µmhosle m or KSlcm) DISSOLVED • =. (circle L. • % TURBIDITY (NTUs) COLOR (describe) ODOR (describe) 19:3-7 m.3. ©- 3. ©.1 1.1A ? a7 V-• is 7 o-• )4 .:.or �� �y- a•a ©.s 7,aS a �;77g e-� 3 lg-l"kI a -a i.7 i 1 -7- t,• '77 o -•lc/ `•1 4 • • WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02: 1" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; TUBING WIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaUFL : tl: = 0.0008; 3t16" = 0.0014; 1t4" = 0.00266 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.OZ 6" = 1.47; 1T = 5.88 Sir = 0.004- 3A" = 0.008; 1R" = 0.010; 518" = 0.018 LING DATA SAMPLED BY (PRINT) t AFFILIATION:SAlAP1�R{S '��y 1~• � / �� SIGNA�CPUNGSAM ` , I INmATEDAT: Lj: a SAMpLMIG ENDED AT: I"1 it PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): SAMPLE PUMP FLOW RATE - TUBING MATERIAL CO'� S FELD DECONTAdINATI0It N FILTER size pmMadan DUPLICATE Y EquipmentFIELD-FILTERED:_ Tr� SAMPLE CON SPECIFICATION AINER SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE ID CODE S CONTAINE RS MATERI AL CODE VOLUME . PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIELD (ml) FINAL pHMETHOD M `� 1 Ps l2S 3 Las �� �'� DPP J� i g.k,0...,4 �t �cx�o S�,I.�- 7,ae PA yr . PP SUBMITTED INTO TFI PUBLIC RECORD FO REMARKS: = ITEMZI:n 011iirol-Dt MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG - Czar Ghat; PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; 3 = 0 is umer (ype y) SAMPLRIGIPURGR8IG APP = After Pedsta8ic Purnp; B = Baler. BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Ebatrlc Submersible Pump; PP = Pedetaplc Pump - murmur CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flown PerbWOc Pump; 3M = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT =Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Specify) NOTES: 1. above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C. 2. STABS -CATION CRITERIA Pot RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE REAOI IT (sEE FS 2212. SEC1i0N 31 pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 02'C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen al readings s 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); optionally. ± 0.2 mgll. or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: ail readings < 20 NTU: optionally ± 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater) r r r r r r r r DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE SITE V NAME: [+."' 4- p. '/:AM. r141thikt&LOCATION: l^M• SAMPLE ID: '- W —,1j 111 PURGING DATA WELL NO: MW=gH 1 FL DATE: ^1 1 47_4:DJ WELL ^^ (inches): pl TUBING y DIAMETER (inches)gi WELL SCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH DEPTH: feet to feet TO WATER (feet):, PURGE PUMP TYPE ^DIAMETER OR BAILER: r1 WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only NI out if applicable) = ( feet - feet) X galonsifoot = gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only RN out If applicable) = gallons + ( gatons/foot X feet) + gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): �MUL. FINAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): PURGING ^ INITIATED AT: �� Ia PURGING ENDED AT: g •� TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons): ,. 14 TAME VOLUME PURGED (gallons) VOLUME PURGED PURGE RATE (gpm) DEPTH TO WATER (reef) PH (standard ) TEMP. (°C) COND. (lunhos/c m or Won) DISSOLVED OXYGEN (aide mglt. or % saturation) TURBIDITY (NTUs) COLOR (describe) ODOR (describe) 48r= toet ©.1 .sa 7 ZI.1t arse► C. a.t3 ��. gta4 6.2 i•� {{ MS' �l.i7 a-t bl co .at 3. •� $1• �7 .a� i 1 Atab ©•• 1.14 d� • WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4"= 0:65; 5" =1.02; 6" =1.47; 1Y = 5.88 TUBING INSIDE DNA. CAPACITY (Gal./Ft): iir = 0.0006; 3116" = 0.0014; 1l4" = 0.0026; 5H6" = 0.004; . 30I" = 0.006; 1/2" = 0.010; 5/6" = 0.016 SAMPUNG DATA SAMPLED BY (PRINT)/AFFILIATIO[N: G��'1S• LAVE-7 rl SAMP R(S) SIGNATURES: INrrlATTED AT: O =.7 b ENDED ASAMPLST: IS'�-1 PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH WELL (Feet): SAMPLE PUMP FLOW RATE r 0.1 TUBINGIN MATERIAL CODE: 1 FIELD DECONTAMINATION: Q N FIELD-FILTEY FILTER SIZE T� Farallon Equipment Type: DUPLICATE: Y 0 SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION TRENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAWING EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE IN CODE CONAINE T MATERI CODE ' VOLUMEVPRESERVATIVEUSED PRESERVATIVE TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIELD (mL) FINAL pH 1114i0 t PE , fa ''4t as* 4 10H) NTO AR THE SUBMITTED PUBLICREGO-RDFOR ITEMiu . Is ON I' -tot-or REMARKS: T , • • MATERW. CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CO = Clear Glass; PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Silicone; T = Teflon; 0 = Other (Specify) SAMPLING/PURGING APP = Alter Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pulp EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; MA = Straw Method (Tubing Gravlty Dram); VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Specify) 2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST T1*EE consomme me READINGS l6EE FS =IL 6EGTION 3) pH: ± 0.2 units T ratu s: ± 0.2 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: aN readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); optionally, ± 0.2 mglL or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: ail readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 10% (whichever is greater) r Dec 19 05 01:28p 305-944-6058 p.10 SITE NAME: WELL NO: DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SAMPLE ID: SITE LOCATION: •er r Ic i PURGING DATA DATE: i /1QQr. WELL DIAMETER (inches):0L TUBING i DIAMETER lunches): WELL SC N INTE DEPTIt t feet to feet STATIC DEPTHelie4 TO WATER (fee(): PURGE PUMP TYPE Q OR BAKER: WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC r PTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only fiM out I appYcabie, _ ( d a feet- .3: 8 8 feet) X CD r I) gallornaffoot = l . 30 gallons EQLNPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME * (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) • FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fill out if applicable) = gallons * ( gallons/foot X feet) * gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): FINAL PUMP OR TUBING Q DEPTH IN WELL (feet): t.% PURGING ` INITIATED AT: kD'Q) PURGING ENDED Allid. f t TOTAL VOLUME ` PURGED (gallons): LA3 TIME VOLUME PURGED (gins) VOLu PURGED (galons) PURGE RATE (ITPm) DEPTH O WATER (feeKZ PH (s � COND. (wrrtnoe/c m or can) DISSOLVED oxr S saturation) TURBIDITY (Kilts) COLOR (describe) ODOR (destsiec) y "3 _ -- 0. 4 O. 3` `14W—rite . 2 r o i 1 Clear newt, tptc2 oi3 01 rat 1 3 7 LIV-1 6,2 . 3Q (act, i dear �o,..,�,, t�:�� 0.3 1-O c i 1 - SS S^C a07 rim- n 'w -1 WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02 1" = 0.04; 1.26" = 0.06; 2" = 0.18; 3'. 0.37; 4" = 0.86; 5" = 1.02; s" = 1.47; 12" = 5.88 TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaL1FtX 1JE" = 0.0006; stir = 0.0014; 114 = 0.0028; 611s" = 0.004; 318" = 0.008; 112" = 0.010; 618" = 0.018 SAMPLING DATA 7.sici„. BY (PR t� AFF1UAT7OPt L1 SAM ) ES: Q t t LE rMATEDAr. fa l2 ENDEDSAWING PUMP OR DEPTH IN WELL (feet): PUMP /�• FLOW RATE (mi. per rrdnuteI. Q, i TUBING MATERIAL CODE: FIELD DECONTAMINATION: N FIELD -FILTERED: Y �l FILTEII SIZE: pm _ Filtration Equipment Type: DUPLICATE: Y �N 1 �J SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED SAMPLING SAMPLE ID CODE a CONTAINS ITS MATERI AL CODE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDF.O IN FIELD (• ) NAL PH ANALYSIS ANWOR METHOD EQUIPMENT CODE v` )r. �?i�_ '� (f /� t W7 T[ LOCH i Pa jQ ,t � o3 f c.7. �Vi'fl SUBMITTED INTO TN PUB14CREC0RDF01 REMARKS 1T`G M j!t. A ON1lo1.ob MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glass; PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene = T= Teflon; u = win. tr) SAMPLINGIPURGWG APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Baler, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Fletitc Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; Sit = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Spe fy) NOTES:1. The above do not constitute ail of the information ngtlred by Chapter 62-160, RA. 2. DTArruz TiON Car lima FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE COIMIECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. 8EC710N 3) pH: ; 0.2 units Temperature: ± 02 6C SpecirD Conductance: nce: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); optionally. • 02 mg& or a 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionaly ± 5 NTU or a 10% (whichever is greater) Dec 19 05 01:28p 305-944-6058 p. 11 r r e r r DEP-SOP-001/01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG NAMEE: ......4. 4ci � SITE LOCATION: i `' L + �-. WELL NO: Th tit) L 2 SAMPLE ID: coLJ c 2 \ DATE: I d isLo WELL DIAMETER (inches` TUBING DIAMETER (inches): WELL SCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH . DEPTH. feet to , feet TO WATER (feet): PURGE PUAAP TYPE OR BAILER: WELL VOLUME P 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only M out If applicable) .^� _-7 _ ( ` 2._ f - `C / ) X C/c! gall = t ?S.- gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT V L = PUMP VOLUME + (TU ZrAPACT(Y X TUBIN LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fib out if applicable) = gallons * ( gallons/foot X feet)* gallons = gallons INrTIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN 1NELL (feet): FINAL PUMP OR TUBING C� DEPTH IN WELL (feet): () PURGING t ITI INATEDA : o PURGING % ENDED AT: • TOTAL VOLUME 7 t� PURGED (gallons): 1` TNME VOLUME PURGF-D (gallons) VOL PURGED PURGE RATE(gam) DEPTHCUMUL TO WATER() PH (standard �F ( tzSm Or lcm) VED GIN ci ) TURBID Y (NTUs) COLOR (describe) ODOR (describe) Cap©.�0CS oa 34�i ., Si -I a g O 0,1 1 1.4 ` : ? 3 /? •E :...:. m ` oZ t r n tY�._ %1 0.4 1.3 , -11 _, -1.(41 .: • tt Ate.oc .2 c-tir...- , r s. • WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.0Z . 1" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06; r = 0.18; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5 =1.02; 6" =1.47; 12" = 5.88 TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (Gal/Ft): 1/8" = 0.0006: 3/16" = 0.0014; 1M = 0.0026;_ 5n6- = 0.004; sir = 0.006; 112 = 0.010; 6i8" = 0.018 LED Y / AFFILIATION: SAMPLER(S) S TU � � ES: INMAUTED ATFt. 31 SAMPU ENDED AT: ,1 l' P OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): SAMPL PUMP FLOW RATE (mt. ninu• TUBING MATERIAL CODE: FIELD DECONTAMNAiTON: Y� N FIELD -FILTERED: Y N FILTER, prn �� Filtration EquipmentT DUPLICATE: Y (N ) �� SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED SAMPLING EQUPMENT CODE tf l SAMPLE ID CODE * CONTAINS RS MATERt AL VOLUMEPRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOLFINAL ADDED IN FIELD pH ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD rnt.c_iC z ` • �}C�O��DE X'G P151 cXX a Ae_ 'fib 41 P''1\-IFIP. : i I� 1 1 EC INTO THE ' FOR IC RECORD �3 REMARKS: IT 'ri4� 1��• ON ii -lei- O4 ■ MATERIAL CODES: AG = miter Glass; CG = Clear Glass: PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Silicone: T = Tef$on 0 = Other (Specify) SAMPLMIGIPURGMIG APP =After PerismIlc Pump; B = Bailor; BP = Madder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow PetdetaPoic Pump; SM = Straw Msend (Tsbing Gravity Drab): VT = Vacuum Trap; 0 = Other (Specify) :1. TAe above do not eonsfitruta as 01 the h orrnatlort required bl► Chapter 32-160. FJIC. 2. STNlla(g/ATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF Vela/MON OF LAST THREE COARRECLMVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. BECTKIN 31 • pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 02 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200.2): optionally. ± 0.2 mg/L or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater) r Dec 19 05 01:29p 305-944-6058 p.12 r r r r r r r r DEP-SOP-001 /01 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE - NAME K"S 2 e - I't:a rv.. mil. SAMPLE ID: M :) I, WELL NO: SITE - LOCATION: DATE: PURGING DATA WELL IA DMETER (inches): . TUBING J DIPMETER (inches): !�{ WELL SCREEN INTERVAL DEPTH: �.4 feet to ( ) feet STATIC DEPTH ' TO WATER (feet):1. ( PURGE PUMP TYPE OR BALER: WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL IACrTY only fiti out If applicable) ( is feet - a - v 1 feet) X 0 - 1 Zr, gallons/foot = gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)* FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fit out I applicable) = gallons + ( gallonsffoot X feet) + gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING 8 DEPTH IN WELL (feet): CJ FINAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH WI WELL (feet): 8 PURGING INITIATED AT: i 0 •O; PURGING ENDED AT 10 ts I TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gabon*S' CI T VOLUME PURGED Oplions) CUMUL. VOLUME PURGED (gam) PURGE RATE (9P m) DEPTH TO WATER(stinciard PH TEMP. ep. COND. (iudros/c m or aSn DISSOLVED OXY,c � (ondNN4bgl' `A) ) TURBIDITY (NTUs) COLOR (describe) ODOR (desabe) 10'47 ( 1•Jj p L(•b 0- i1 3..et. l -7- Ea %2.-?,.i Ltlf'j 0.-"a7 Jc de.r (o.e. y i -7-1X 5C74 i-I. 18 a .,„cy 'a) i )0 'St o-�: ,o i '7- i s S-7 7a 14 C, 0 . cl 7 v . WELL CAPACITY (GaDohs Per Foot): 0.rs" = 0.0Z 1" = 0.04; 1.25' = 0.08; 2= 0.16; 3" = 0_37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.0Z 6" =1.47; 12" = 5.118 I TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACf1Y (GM.IFL): 1/6" = 0.0006. 3H6" = 0.0014; 1/4" = 0.0026; 6M6" = 0.004; 318" = 0.006: 112" = 0.010; 515" = 0.016 SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY (PRINT)/AFFLIATION: ��r L.4 c -v' SAMPLER(S)SIGNATURES (-7_.".....„INITIATED J SAI�LIN(a AT: 10 -a a SAAPLING ENDED AT: (0: j +i PM' OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): ei SAMPLE PUMP FLOW RATE (ptCper minute 0 - ( TUBING MATERIAL CODE: I Of N FIELD -FILTERED: Y FILTER SIZE Filiation Equipment Type pre ,--� DUPLICATE: Y N FIELD DECONTAMINATION: SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAMPLING SAMPLE ID CODE • COHTAINE RS MATBiI AL CODE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIELD (nd.)k FINAL pH EQUIPMENT CODE h") - 64 1 P E. (e13.=/- 14 MO (.D.s A A P+ SUBMITTEDINTOTHE P1JBLFC RECORD FOR REMARKS: TEMTh ON it- oq.e`a MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass: CG = Clear Glaser PE = Polyetlrylene; PP = Polypiopylene; S = T= Tellog 0 = Other (Specify) $AYPU}lGIPURGlNG APP = Alter Peristaltic Pump; B = Baler. BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Perlslallic Pomp; SM = Straw. Mdnod (Tubing Gravity Drain): VT Ptmip; = Vacuum Trap; PP = Peristaltic. Pump 0 = Otter (Specify) NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the Information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C. 2 DTAat tZATwN CRITERIA FOR MANGE OF wunkvion OF LASTZI+AEIE CONSECUTIVE mammas ONE FS 2212. section 31 pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 0.2 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: al readings ± 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); optionally. ± 0.2 mg/t or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings c 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or ± 1096 (whichever is greater) Dec 19 05 01:29p 305-944-6058 p.13 r r t r r r r r r DEP-SOP-001101 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE ( NAME: WELL NO: SITE LOCATION: M`'i.M: rL SAMPLE ID: lbw _� DATE: yti-8-Os- PURGING DATA WELL ^ DIAMETER (inches): QL TUBING , DIAMETER comes): l� WELL SCREEN INTERVAL DEPTH: a feet to i . feet STATIC DEPTH TO WATER (feet):3. 19 PURGE PUMP TYPE OR BAILER: Q WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only fill out H applicable) _ ( 1 a feet - Z • 14 feet) X 0. 110 peons/foot = gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)* FLOW CELL VOLUME (only NMI out if applicable) = gallons + ( gallons foot X feet)' gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH IN WELL (feet): FINAL PUMP OR TUBING DEPTH el WELL fleet): PURGING INITIATED AT: tt' = •S 1 PURGING II 1 ENDED AT ' TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (gallons): I • I :) ( TIMEPURGED VOLUME (gallons) CUMUL. VOLUME PURGED (gallons) PURGE RATE Op* DEPTH TO WATER (Teat) PH ( standa)� units 7. COND. (Nrrltroa/c Tr! or pS/an) DISSOLVED OXY (:, .: W 1 . 11 . . ) TURBIDITYCOLOR (NTUs) (describe) ODOR (desadle) I ): o-o 0. •7 b. l 3- I N L- 4,3 .6Z 3811 -'C43.16.43 7 ete-or. eto-Ae. ,►=oS `� a— a �.� 6.� %s .67 t- H o-i1 1 I) ' )8 6t 0 - 3 1. I J jo-61 31s.'? 1 i tag f> - �3 4 • WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.T5" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06: 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.02, 6" =1.4T; 12" = 5.88 i TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GeIJFt): 1/8" = 0.0006-, 3116 = 0.0014; 1/4" = 0.0020; 5M6" = 0.004; 3/8" = 0.006; 112" = 0.010; 618" = 0.018 SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFFILIATION: ` t'IS L": *le / 1 SAMPL6jt(S) SIGNATURES& �/ �� / I ��j SAMPLING AAT: I) I y SAMPLING ENDED AT: j } t 3 PUMP OR TUBING [[``'� DEPTH IN WELL Veet): 8 SAMPLE PUMP FLOW RATE (pIC per minute ): 0 ' I TUBING MATERIAL CODE ) FIELD DECONTAMINATION: CP N FIELD -FILTERED Y /.AJ�+ FILTER SIZE Fdtmtlon Equipment Type DUPLICATE: Y _yin SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SIMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND/OR METHOD SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODE SAMPLE ID CODE s CONTAINE RS MATERI AL CODE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOL ADDED IN FIELD (mL) FINAL pH ria.Na 1 PiG lasi.t. { a 13s %-s APA SIJBMITTED THE INTO PUBUCRECORDFOR ITEMNP�1 ON 'Y#01•4 . REMARKS: MATERIAL. CODES: AG :Now Grass; CG = CIS Ggss; PE = Pofye8tylsne PP = Polypropylene; S = Silicone; T = Tel 0 = Other (Specify) SAMPUMB1PURGING APP = Alter Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer; BP = Bladder Pump: ESP = Elecbic Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic Pump EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Pedstaltic Punpc SM = Straw Medics! (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Rag 0 = Otter (Spey) NOTES: 1. The above do not consb'hfte all of the required byr Chapter 62-160, F.A.C. 2. $TAaa.IZA110W CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THII151.03NIECUTWE READINGS Mae FS 2212. SECTION 31 pit ± 0.2 units Temperature: ± 02 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2); optionally. ± 0.2 mg/L or± 10% (wttichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU: optionally± 5 NTU or± 10% (whichever is greater) Rz r s LJLh,11 APPENDIX F PICTURE OF CONCRETE SLAB