Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal FLUM AmendmentSUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR 1TEMJ2 ON//-,-e4,_ HERALD SQUARE ("PARCEL 3) 1. FLUM arnendment 2. Zoning Change 3. MLISP Andrew W.J. Dickman Attorney at Law 4!cF Naples, FL T: (239) 597-701 7 F: (239) 597-2899 Miami, FL T: (305) 758-362I F: (305) 758-0508 ( Law Offices of ANDREW DICKMAN, P.A. P. O. Box 771390 Naples, FL 34 107 andrewdickman®bellsouth. net ,www.andrewdickman.us 2 LFLUM Amendment (parcel 3) Zoning Change (parcel 3) T MUSP Approval (parcel 3) 1 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM", ONu.eyod Requires Replat of Tract A (Parcel 1 & 3) Parcel 1 Needs Variances to complete Replat Illegal1 Miami Herald nonconformities become enlarged Illegal 7,7 47-1 PR [Bad I tint... HAI PR 47,7 SD-6 . , -, SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM I(Ti1-1 ON "Herald Park" Tract A ; '1,1 run- 1 1 .11. r 3 SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR C-2 Liberal Commercial. 2 ! Intent cvidScow: ITEM_!ctil ON Ily -c"i-o(. The liberal coinniercial category allows coinniercial activities which serve the needs of o er businesses, require extensive li,nding facilities, and often benefit from proximity to industrial areas. The district is also intended to allow a mix of office tvith retail uses. Hotels. motels, rescue missions and residential facilities of a density equal to R-3 or higher are the only residential uses allowed'Al this district. The district permits four (4) types of uses which distinguish C-1 from C- 2_ including wholes sling, light assemblage, secondhand merchandise sales and other outdoor sales_ t ci;s i.'t'• Miniillunl lot size: Ten thousand (10.000) square feet. Setbacks: Front - no setback required_ side - no setback required, or the same as the abutting district, whichever is greater; rear - ten (10) feet, or the salve as the abutting district, whichever is greater_ Minimum lot width: One hundred (100) feet. Height: One hundred twenty (120) feet or ten (10) stories. whichever is less. except for broadcasting_tov.er _whi.c _may.be-one lrnadked fifty]," W) f e't height_csee section 91 S :;_)— Floor area ratio: Maximum of one and seventy -two -hundredths (1.72) times the gross lot area. Building footprint: Maximum of six -tenths (0.60) tunes the gross lot area. Green space: Minimum of one -tenth (0.10) times the gross lot area_ O sr Lei ParlcingRequirements: UeireT•nr?4 , As for C-1 uses. Other uses not included in C ar• svecifically listed below,. Minimum of one (1) space per one thousand (1.000) square feet of gross floor area. Miniwarehouses: Minimum of one (1) space per one hundred (100) storage units and one (1) space for the facility manager. Garages, paint and body shops: Three (3) spaces for each service bay or stall. Flea markets: Minimum of one (1) parking space per stall and one (1) parking space for each five hundred fifty (550) square feet of gross sales area. Property Information Map �iilrtal Orthophotography - 2006 0 183 ft ,. crested ✓I• 12.2512005 9 39 ?3 . .i fn. , ror. nceurpailci:,, only. Veb Site r 2002 Miami -Dade County Ail rights reserved. Summary Details: Folio No . 01,-3231-P _:10 vProperty I HERALD PLAZA I dailijsg Address. KNIGHT -RIDER NEWSPAPERS INC KNIGHT ROGER PROPFRTY TAX 1 HERALD PLAZA 6TH FLR MAIAMI FL 33132-1609 iiroperty Information: iPmnary Zone; 6600 LIBERFI COMMERCIAL CLUC it1013 OFFICE BUILDING i3eds!6aths: 0/0 Roars: 7 Living Units: 0 Adi Sq fo;,;a te: 604,146 Lot Size- 247,421 SQ FT Year Built.1963 Legal Description: HERALD PARK PB 12//7/ A LOT SIZE 5.680 AC MIL Sale Amount: 50 Assessment Information: Year: 2006 2005 Land Value: ‘S51,958.41 i 534,638.94G Building Value: S100,000 $100.00 Market Value: Z52,058,410 S34,738 de Assessed Value: $52.058.41 G634,7 ,940 vial xrtunlions 50 i s 1 Taxable Value: i552,058,41 34,738,9401 FAR (1.72 x 406,396 = 699,001) Currently 604,146 Footprint (nearly the entire property) Greenspace (minimal pervious areas, i.e. grass) Parking (1:1000 sq.ft.) Parcel 3 used entirely for parking SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM ralici ON 1\-05 00, One Property Lot siize 5.68 ac • f,i r �` ". Omni CRP, Redevelopment Plan FINAL DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW 4 Historical Context: The birth of "Mega" structures Existing Streets Streets 'lost" due to Development SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR 1TEML ON I)--o&. The second component was the effort to create Miami's first "suburban" commercial destination, which began with the development of Sears at 13th Street and Biscayne Boulevard in 1929. Later developments would include the Jordan -Marsh department store in 1953, complete with its entrance oriented toward a rear parking lot with 3,000 spaces. The Jordan Marsh building would eventually evolve into the Omni Mall in the late 1970's. The Omni Mall, the Miami Herald Building (completed in 1960 )and the area hotel development on the waterfront all play a role in segregating the remainder of the area from Biscayne Bay through the overall scale of the buildings and their physical and visual obstruction to Biscayne Bay. Omni area historical street grid Sears (1929) Omni Mall and area hotels Ifl lYY11M1Y1F11A 1 Y i1Y 11N Y�i11taliii ill ll111ii111 i111111 . -r iuiiliil Miami Herald Building "..lJ��t .i�1:'ii l•2Lh .II .all.''.:.• 36 06-00383mu - Projects in the Vicinity (Parcel 3) it -Indicates Mixed -Use Project with Retail and/or Office uses 01NW 0)-.1U10)(J10) 0) 0)ACA0NN01N i W 0) NO )(00110))C▪ O)100D A U* 0 0* N 01 O O 01 01 O '0 CD "0 '0 CD "0 73 73 CD 0 C 0_ '0 0) '0 '0 Co '0 '0 '0 fn 0. 0 c0 cn cn < 0 < < 0 < < < 0 n o o.X ao.XQQo.X o ca • if) CD— — CD5. 0 N . v OD o — o O .- 0 z 3 -n D 0 5 N sv C xPi 03 OD a m Parcel Net Lot Gross Lot Gross Lot Area SU 1 4.58 acres 7.27 acres 316,681 sq.ft. PU 3 1.1 acres 2.6 acres 89,715 sq.ft. Tract A 5.68 9.33 acres 406,396 sq.ft. MITTED INTO THE LIC RECORD FOR 1� n ON 11-09-oc. C-2 Liberal Commercial Zoning Regulations Required Before Replotting Required After Replotting RESULT OF HERALD SELLING PARCEL 3 Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) = 1.72 times the gross lot area 699,001 544,691 The square footage of the Herald/printing press building is 604,146. Removing "parcel 3" would cause the structure/lot to be nonconforming to the C-2 requirements. Maximum Building footprint = 0.60 times the gross lot area 243,838 The footprint of the Herald/printing press building may a!;eady be nonconforming. The removal of parcel 3 enlarges this nonconformity. ,— 190,009 - Minimum Greenspace = 0.10 times the gross lot area 40,640'° 668 ' `' The parking lot (parcel 3) is not greenspace because it is an impervious surface. Therefore .93 acres of greens'ace does not exist now. Removing parcel 3 enlarges this nonconformity. Offstreet Parking requirements for uses not included in C-1 or specifically listed below: Minimum of 1 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. 604 604 The Herald/printing press needs and uses Parcel 3 for parking. It is unlikely the minimum parking requirement is being met now, a nonconformity which would certainly be enlarged'! the removal of its parking on parcel 3. Incorporate parcel 1 MUSP into the record ARTICLE 2.5. DEF]INITIONS SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM WI ON 11-o9-ob, Lot area,, gross. The net area of the lot, as defined herein, plus half of adjoining street rights -of -way and severity (70) feet of any other public open space such as parks, lakes, rivers, bays, public transit right-of-way and the like_ For areas included in applicable Special Districts (SD-5, 6, 7, 10, 11, -14, 16), the gross lot area shall include net area of the lot plus half of adjoining street rights -of -way and ninety (90) feet of any other public open space such as parks, lakes, rivers, bays, public transit right-of-way and the like_ In both cases, where such space adjoins lots on two (2) adjacent sides, the area thus adder: shall include the area required to corn fete the gap otherwise left at the intersection. Nonconforming structure. Any building or st. Jcture where the nonconformity was created Lby ordinance adoption or amendment, as provided at section 'I101.2 of this ordinance. The !ement of use not a factor in determining structural nonconformity. Thus a structure —in nonconforming use is not to be construed as a nonconforming structure if otherwise lawful under district regulations concerning lot dimensions, lot coverage, height, yards, location on the lot. floor area ratio, or requirements other than those applying to use. Green space_ An open space area rrf_:` occupied by impervious surfaces and local?ct at ground level. Parcel 3 is a parking lot! 9 ARTICLE 11, NONCONFORM1TIES SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMi,.i'ri ` ON II-o9-o4, Sec. 1101. Intent; general definition. !. Nonconformities created by ordinance adoption or amendment_ The following shall be defined as nonconforming for the purpose of this ordinance: (a) Lots; ( Uses of lands, water or structures, or lands or waters in combination with structures; (c) Structures; and `I (d) Characteristics of use; 1990 which exist within districts established by this ordinance or later amendments and which were lawful before passage or arnenc rnent of this ordinance, but which would be prohibited, regulated, or restricted under the terms of this ordinance or its future amendment_ •1101_3 intent concerning nonconformities generally_ It is th intent of this zoning ordinance to require removal or cessation ztf ce,-tain of these nonconformities, and to permit others to continue subject to the terms or this zoning ordinance until they are otherwise removed, or cease, rbut not to encourage their survival] it is further the intent of this zoning ordinance that nonconformities shall not be used as grounds for adding other structures or uses prohibited elsewhere in the same district, nor shall nonconformities be enlarged upon, extended, of. expanded_ Nothing herein contained shall be construed as prohibiting change in tenancy, ownership; or management of a nonconforming lot, use or structure, provided such change is otherwise lawful_ 10 1 1 04. i . Subdivision or structural additions_ bUtiMl I I tU IN I U I 11t PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM1.,1 ON II-pi-ay. .. Structure used foLnonconfosminsg pucores as of t e effectiv_e date or ar end nt of this zoning ordinance shall not be subdivided, nor shall any structures be added on the premises, lexcept for purposes and in'rrfarrner conforming to —the regulations for the dfstri-ct-in ritch such premises are located. 1104.8. Destruction of structure or structures_ Where nonconforming use status a .:.Mies to a structure or structures, or to a structure or structures in combination, removal or destruction of the structure or structures shall eliminate the nonconforming status of the land except as set out in section 1 1±14.g, and any new structure she!i comply with all conditions of the district. "Destruction" of the structure for purposes of this subsection is defined as damage to an extent of fifty (50) percent or morelof the gross square footage of the building at the time of destruction except in HP districts where the HC board may allow reconstruction of historically designates buildings. Where damage is less than fifty (50) percent of the gross square footage of the building, such structures rvpay be restored to the same or lesser size and in the same location, provided, however; that restoration shall begin within six (6) months of damage and be diligently carried to completion_ and noncon,-wming use may be resumed and continued as before, or on a lesser scale, through Class II Special Permit subject to the applicable criteria listed in Section '1305, but in any case shall not be enlarged orintensified. Unless restoration is so initiated and completed, the use shall terminate and not be resumed. Sec. 1106. Nonconforming structures. 1106_ 1. Structural change, extension, or expansion; criteria. No portion of a building or structure, which is nonconforming shall be enlarged, extended, or altered ir any way which increases its nonconformity. No variances from the provisions of section 1106 shall be permitted. Sec. 1113. Variances prohibited. No variances from the provisions of tris article are permitted, except as provided in article 7 and article 19. (Ord_ No. 10771, § '1, 7-26-90; Ord_ No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) Variance. The relaxation of the terms of the ordinance by approval of the zoning board where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where, owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the applicant. a literal enforcement of this ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the property. As used in this ordinance, a variance is authorized only for height, lot coverage, dimensions of yards, parking, other open spaces and/or loading requirements. ;:ERBAC=, Petit° ne-, .3. --- ,•F Milli•]:, FLORIDA, 1_o__tic.a= s.ab iv_s_da of the State of Flcr_da, and 02, LLC, a LOWER --_rida Li:r.-te.i L=abi__t'y IRI3::NrL NC. C4-5e7AP - T'ti prat__ a, CASE _du. '_L:OS--S";, 1 1, espc^de t3. Cps=..iu._ files Y.a 29, i]fi. SUB ITTED INTO THE PUBLRECORD FOR ITEMie ±w_ON11�9 a. IZ As in Hemisphere Ega\sy Real=\ C SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM1r;ON lI- t 9-ot. Rey 3' scavne ?r3'erty Taxpayers Ass`£, 3@2 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 3d DCk ±27))we find 20 basis to 2£terfere with the major use special /arm\t granted by the cmmisicn and approved by the ciroul_ court, but conclude otherwise as to the variance. The .atter holding. is oase& &mcn the undisputed showing that the vaefance, which resulted in -permission for the developer to build to the Cat Sine contrary s: :,2@r;±, a222fcah1e setback: £egs/£e.ents! iz =2=a2±y unspported 2/ the legal bar re: Lred by the governing City of M ari ordinance to /ass/£y that =::£e£. See Herrera v. (Fla. 2d _.CA 207.)5). the ether han_if by invalidating the variance, we reaffirm this Court's solemn promise, whi:=-_ it has steadfastly honored, that 7.r=1_ not and cannot aripro e zonina regulation or any aovernmenta= action adverselv affecting the rights of i otherswhich 1s based on nomore than the : that _a_ v Iva those who support ithave the -Dower to wc: r k their will. Ai_apattah Cmty. Ass'rf =r':. _.f Fla. -r. City of Miami, i, 379 S_. 2d 327, 394 (Fla. . _._. _aa L98)), _.e_ . , denied, 386 So. _.d 633 (Fla. 1 =' I:,,__1f•r_zri granted in pares., :_ie-nleci in part. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM-,1 ON 1607-0b. What happens if parcel 3 is approved:: SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR � ITEM 'nsON it-o9-or.. 1. The Existing nonconformities are enlarged, violating Article 11 "Noricon'ormities" of the City's code of ordinances. 2. Knight -Rider would become more at risk due to the strict policy in Article 11 regarding cessation of nonconformities and their ability to rebuild in the event of 50% destruction of the building. 3. To sell and develop parcel 3, the city requires Tract A to be "replatted". 4. In order to replat Tract A, the Herald building including the printing press must meet the minimum requirements of C-2 zoning. 5. Article 11 precludes the Herald from altering the nonconforming building, therefore the only option is to seek variances. 6. Article 11 strictly forbids variances (see section 1113 "Variances Prohibited) 7. The need for variances is a result of actions by the property owner, not hardship. The District Court of Appeals will void the variances in keeping with Auerbach v. Onyx 11. 8. Depending on the terms of the contract between the developer and Knight - Rider, the sale will not be completed or perhaps litigation will ensue. IS Objective PW--1,2: Ensure adequate levels of sift of e „• lter are available to meet the needs of the city. (See. Resource Conservation Objective YR-2.1.) SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR r;ii ON 11-�1•7. Policy LL--1.1.1: Development order. ant: a:izing nelv development o::edere1opment that resul-s in an increase in the r eusity or tntensiv: of 12. _td tizse shall be contingent upon the availabili-tr of public racil::ies 2nd'ser.zces that meet or exceed tie miainnw: LOS .Tandards adopted in the CIE. Policy CI-1.2.3: Accep:able Level of Sep :ce Standard3 fo: public facilities ID Jie C:i:v of Miami are: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 'QodioVed to melting Florida a barter plo o la calf home' • 1eiruerr 1 he FLa,"xxbk C9rlos Ali apex Mayer, Munn -Dade Couny t" $frtcr atla-m, Florid. 33128 tier Mny, Tar rRjyrt„anE la. mr- -w eal' Owr+an>lyd r yrrrsei l.u,c rt.nmrnamem for 'le rtl e..aose co,laer itie f..,.,,:, „a,� t+ oral rttcivedm neee'd,n 21. 2085. Copse, ofIhe pi -oinked 11.e ,..:,.• ra,pile Vole. rein o,o I. MA Jae -mien rot Nen and rbeir ernlsr..n: - . Jr : The r3 rrA.,. I . tr- r:„ n:r niengrenninaor y1 rr srar,d,ne,f fn <wainency arpr4 RNIr 97- ' Flondn Admin•.en,la•n .:1 A C I aria Cheolor 163,Fan II. FIN -iris Salul.r lF%7arA hla pc arrd ihcatlaehcd r»j<rnnm, ::c.. •.:renrloY Ca and Corwroo LORE', Nurse which outlines era Tina conremma;he corm-in-hr..: �e yian .nresdr tl The- i> 0000 idnrnf d in the Tenor u.rran Caor11Ika lrulyail. asR>s aarcria�n'_rl Iranxperwaan m1 idormL 5m.onarICnay 01 drrn e earning ep<b,ntiPlan •e petiole rc�ardng nro.3ng rrre Urban tk.eleiornanei ko..1.ry. Ada}ima Ily. 9nan1. or 11'<amen'drncnr0 am Pxonnarrai a.4111 Ooop al, P1 id. %lean.. 6i po r 187, f Lcndo Sunnca, Aide 91-S. I.9rnda ndnnlri orao.ae Corr•ard+1e Sonar Floesda Strelr-gja R relsxxi Pal,c. Pl oo If }n0 Ieve,0. v110.00:13 91.. Ihi, 04lC rapcv: or art Cefnrtmans'a vmnwn.. ptaror weed Pate Darr., Senior at 195u) 922-1744 Suaerely, Roger Wlhun Retina.] Kooning A dmrneseux 201111de Eiylmaer pbinrirw,s, koeurnnmala ion. Sod Comments Repoli tericer Agency Coavacrb Ma giant 0.1..: inn R'riliw+. nnras.l 3aprno r.PPlannins and 'lrnlnt M.- rynlyr .A Dekle- Exs<.rn IT t31r6•nr. Sau!1 needy xetrn,rw Pier:rim, Conrail 71..ARrI OAM aO4rl.VAnTALL...IRE, • TAll.. IRE, r l ltll9.Jr9 Pl..nn. eeo.am .aol,e9ncom l e a,xn i nreitap:p-•om 1,+ MAP, CONCLIRRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF W)AMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT IMPACT OF PROFOSED AMENDMENT TO LAND USE MAP WITHIN A TRANSPO R1 ATION CDR RIL OR --i CONC U13RENCV ANALYSIS AMENDMENT INFORMATION A2pflcant Javier F. Avino on behalf of Ciusqu are Group LLC as contract purchaser and Knight Redder Newspapers Inc. owner A701 ass: One Herald Squa-r Boundary Sheets; North. 11:. 151h Street Past' pin Soulh:n!a West-. Ourstd Square P'cposed Change: Fran: Gene. -at Corrmercla• to: Re511lcted Cdrilmercral Esisgng Designation, Maximum LOEO Use Inc•. -'+sky ?esldeniLsf 1.1 acres i C-,ac•e Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Rosid� -, fll Other se-h. ,t) F:,fi Peak Hour i erson-Trp Genaraccn. Other Proposed Designation. Maxim:en Lead Use Intensity ResAamial 11 acres 0 `' it GUrac•e roe1k Hour Person -Trip Generation, Res:dentral Other sq.it. 4I' FAR Peak HOW' Person -Trip G eneralldn. 0 tiler Net Increment With Proposed C'1ange. ' Population Dwelling Units Peak Hour Person -Trips Planning District Co,Jnty W s,:ew•ater Collection Zcne Drainage Suhcalhment Basin Solid Waste Ccllecuon Route Transportation Corridor Nar-c RELEVANT MCNP COALS, OBJECTIVES, AND Land Use Policy 1.1.1 CIE Policy 12,3 550 Mrs 276 0 sq.B_ D J's 276 0 sq.fl. 0 RECREATION At4D OPEN SPACE Population tnc-ement, Residents Spica Recpirernear. A7e3 Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Ca, a0.y After Change Cancunwu}• Chscscli 0 0.0_0 182.80 '62.80 OK POTABLE WATER TR,f•`I$k55SfQN Pcpulal00p :r1,;re:mapl, Resl2enl5 Transmission Requirement, Ord Enccss Casac 1; 6efoe Change Ercess Cards+:, k8er C5ooi, e Concurrency Chucsoff 0 0 >2'.- above demand 2.20 o5:2ro demand OK Downtown 308 K1 16 Drocayne SANITrAY SEINER TR FISMISSIQN Poputalkan Increment Reskionls Transmic,nn Repai-poem, gpd Excess Capacity 3e'nre Change ,xcess Capacity Aver Change G.ancurrensy Cts,so8 O See Nolo 1. I See Nola 1. I . :.ABA Perme Requettl STLOR!.1 SEWER CAPACITY Et • •-et 5C Systelr•, 5efe-r, Change x1111ration System Ater Change Concurrency Checkoff Cn-site On -site OK SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Propulaton Increment. Residents Solid 'Weald Ger•e,alion, tnnsiyear Excose Caoacey Softie Change POLICIES Excess C4 ..Idar Ater Change Concurroncy Crieeko6 0 0 afro TRAFFEC CICCUTAFPOH PopulaLlo,l fnaemenl. R•eshiani8 Peak -Fleur I'orucn-Trip Generation LOS Before Cha-.io LOS ANT Cnan' 3 Cunarrrency Cltc0Jraff OK 0 0 5 B OK :.o-TES 1. Permitfor sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Metro -Dade Water and Sews,' Aluolrity Department (WASAI. Excess capacity, if any, is currenby, not known C',! 1 IN 03, 00090+- ASSL56if.Ti0.45 mop CC0rlfNTa ti Fr]nla.rl10n In-JRTlnl +5 o=.,)mpf le be ,al gates reai3Onta Pc a\-pefod vi0 I IHaeratu9 la b�P4 en :'r: T. C Gereroi1On. E• -- t r.,r 3.maga GC......1; .1.17y far pnvrrlc pee -' velv:lea. Tran,Paurbn Baer.r, -<•x:: :u and LOS ore Blom 7 600 PT.21111 TronopOl!alian CO,Po,0. rasa Pal tdy warn. Jn l is :4 r.1s18-Dore Cow 1r3 a �µ ro yen -.co ce0Te; ,ub,rdklaM .• :1 yllrp:Ile,oC, n04 COfv,efl:CRn .Ye 1O b.o -d a' ,Mfer., e,pelgr Re, .:rnr a:,e+. S:z:.- --'23ye +e4u,rer5Jrs 58e «0•:uo M: ,.2n prepox -2 16 Objections, F.ecorarnendations, an Comments Report for Miami -Dada County Amendment 06-1 February 20, 2006 I. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 163, F.t.., AND RULES 9J-5 8s 9J-11, F.A.C. The Dep;:;rtment has c:ompieted its review of the proposed `.liami-Dade County Amendment 06-1 and has the following objections and comments. OBJECTIONS NON-AVAILArit%ITY OF POTABLE WATER SUPPLY The Depcartnr.nt objects to all seventeen of the proposed Miami -Dade County land use amendments (Applications Nos.:., 2, 3, 4, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, .Lod 24) because they are not supported by an ,adequate potable water supply analysis. The total increased potable demand from the applications in Amendment 06-1 is estimated at approximately 3.1 million gallons a day. The County roust demonstrate that it has available potable water supply to serve this increased demand. Until this is ihiie it would be inappropriate to approve land use changes to the comprehensive plan which would entail in eased water consumption. The :Irnendment also does not address any changes in the Capital Improvements Element that may he needed to provide for the facility enhancements to serve the proposed land use changes. The Department has received reports on Amendment 06-1 from the Florida Department of Environmental Fr.otection (DEY) and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD or District) concerning water availability in lliatrti- Dade County. According to the District's report, the County has applied for a consolidated 20-year consumptive use permit for all of its wellfields, which is currently being processed by the Die,irict; however_, data available to the District indicate that tradition: t titer -'tpply sources will not adequate to meet the County' future - . ater supply nee is. In order for the County to get a permit to meet increased clkm::nds, it will be necessary for the County to meet the criteria for issuance, including identifying and implementing effective alternative water supplies. The District's report states that at this point in time the County cannot demonstrate that there are adequate water supplies to serve the cumulative development proposed in the 06-1 .Amendment_ Adoption of the land use amendments in the absence of an assured water supply and necessary facilities would also be internally inconsistent with existing Miarni- Dade County policy requiring coordination between future land uses, the availability of water, and necessary capital improvements, as expressed in CDMP SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM,iON ) i -09 ob "...however, data available to the [water management] District indicate that traditional water supply sources will not [be] adequate to meet the County's future water supply needs." Posted on Wed, Oct. 25, 2006 email this print this SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM �+ n ON ti -oq-o6 S. Florida condo, home sales fall in Sept.; prices hold steady BY MATTHEW HAGGMAN mhaggrnansa MiamiHerald.cam PLANNING DEPARTMENT http:/f'.rcud.miarni rev.corn/Planningg/pages/lanrd deg±Flog,mentrLargeiSc_aleDe•i.asp Cityr de Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) and applicable Class II,.Special Exception & Exempt Projects Summation by Project Status As of September 30, 2006 No. Units Square Footage Parking Spaces Construction Cost (est.) Res I Condo Hotel j l Office Retail EXISTING & UNDER CONSTRUCTION 41°Jo of Projects A B COMPLETED PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 100 99 15,525 22,254 1,526 407 1,609,744 1,864,233 285,846 1,350,469 2 24,279 36,011 $ 4,135,875,238 $ 9,150,716,074 1199 _ 37,779 1,933 3,473,977 1,636,316 60,290 $ 13,286,591,312 PROPOSED & FUTURE 59°/0 of Projects C APPROVED PROJECTS 123 29,558 2,907 3,919,930 3,770,710 65,280 $ 13,687,706,238 D APPLICATION FILED PHASE 44 13,720 430 1,449,347 768,547 24,801 $ 5,509,647,231 E PRELIMINARY REVIEW PHASE 117 16,954 72 1,020,385 1,078,488 33,204 $ 709,004,700 2841 60,232 3,409 6,3 89,662 5,617,745 123,285 $ 19,906,358,169 F WITHDRAWN PROJECTS 191_ 3,246._ 5431_ 134,772 114,122 5,681 $ 412,171,048 Note: Cost data totals varies as "gimes are not provided for all projects by developers b)" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m i9. + m 300 m dolm 0. 30 3 zv 2 : 0 3 w �W e 00 a3C *° cnw wQm N 0 0 0 ip sas fa °'or or 0 :As palredeJd )d 0 0 NOS w m— 3o,m mm rr00 wr-im _.m'�� i®zon� C• OP =m°mvn rac*xi D Ocnr �r,, "4Zm-0 .1 3) N 0 e3 -, 0, z v ow 3yi E�z g 542:1> Z vyoo ©DA z oZ O 2 mm n v O• m OrE 3 -1_ m N LIZoi 0 c 70 TI a CD 0 z m Z -�� a= m r O mom m qm m= co 0, m co m z A14THENE 0.18 ug/L 0.37 ug/1. ) PiRENE 0 5? ug./L r---- 4 1:77 Ai_VAI-1 CHAPMAN F.. 'D. • I il BENLO(h) ELJORT‘TrIF'4E 0.17 ug,k.. (15TSTR1 C1:1)44;;1::"..fli // 1 •••,/ ,•• ? ///// ,C.='• • / • "r-'T Li -- ; 1) QM< STAGNC 44(4 -33 < 44,22 17 • 5,Z>. _Thi.:11:114C7TITITIFT11 11 I I I I u L. 1..n4 s•,-.1-ET (20.'706 X". Ft) ',/$:„.,A11 11 - 4 7 ,ick-wkr,ith:v”» (1171-7-11-71111f1Ifl LOP A (160.314 SQ.FT.) (1.11.1_11._LI_IiLLII 111111P111,1 -11 11 L Tot, Ev7i.CivEt: PARKE`!C LCT IZ52 ;41 -. lIrriTITMTIIr11771—"c- ,— Oil ill 'PH 11111+H_I BENF.0(h) ELLIORANTHENE 0.66 ug/L BE!20(o) P1RENE • 0.50 uq/L BENZO(o) ANTHRACENE 0.33 ug/L (3FN2r3!:) FL1.102,ANTI•irl,IL 0.72 ug/t. 1:,10EN0(1,2,3—cd) P.T1-Er.!E 0.64 Jg/1 BD:Z000) C. 22. ug/L F 1 1 1-1 177) 1-1-Trnifi 25 ; -2T U..tA :•.J.,ini,i_Ltn • ___111N-A, NI) 1Z75-1717 I 7171-1'- EMTTI ``, -27 , riTd . J OAR P,00..} %.IIijlL rill•kRIC.,4. 1"; • • EE6G ,MailYirrecil 1,1 SUBMITTED NTO THE PUBLIC RE RD FOR ITEC4)16-i N 11-01-047, 0 3J 60 90 12D i to( i . _ I f ik r, ' t? •.i..... ___„ f i i tl 1 -' LVAH CHAPMAN BLVD. (N.E. ' 5TY STREET) • , <7 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 64' r 20t 117-7 )111_1111 1 1111111J LOT rr 156 ,111111 S109,18.3 SO.FT.) , • • , 417/./ Ili TRUCK STACAC, 4zo 23 PV.E, 1,1 rf STREET C2.0,1 Of, so. FT : . ! (I , :1' I' .11 • • , \`•`-:„18(1 L iiiL i .L : ' 1...._____. J) _111-11H1-711111WIT117177 -11 13 LOT A (160.314 SOFT) — • il fl Lli ji 11111 1 LEI!! I I 1 tii111.1111_11 14,8 i. `.1.1111FIIJN11111.1711,i1TITTIIIIiL.i 7 li D.otOrti P.'..1,1r1C., LCT -0,- 10c, 41 '3.- 77717717 TIT i n-lil Ti Cf-Prt--i ri— . ..4 ., ‘4'ElLilliji[illilli ) NH 11 x i :- -, , F 1., Pt. (11)-1-1,.,”:.."..k tr,F11 ail 1111 In _15 ..._„. i _ 1 ‘,11 SUBMITTED INTO T_HE EEG PUBLIC RECORD F ITEM 17,(1-11 ON _ 11 25 - Rai -Ma LL.In ••=-' NitiV-A mW-K -61117,1111-T-77TirriiT 28 iiViTn r 1.rul, Jr 11 • z 0 30 60 90 120 /4, ,/ ' \ s ••••- " -:- ,/;:2.1 TRUCK STAGING. 440 23 ....i _ =• - - E _ L ....„ - i 7 I .. 18 — _ LOT B - 156 (105,183 SO,FT.) 1 ▪ 1 I I LLE 1 11 I Li_ ILILLILLRE . ....,„„ NC 1.1r1-1 STREET (20006 SO. FT) 6 k. b •. - • xric 1D7 4p 1J, ; • 1, L, LC: A (:60,.51,/ SQ.FT.1 !ILE 1 LLL1 I 11.111LIILLILLI !J._ ' 1-171fi :01 .717771717711 1 7717 ' kt In! lh 111111() .72 ET ..111_111j11H14 = 4 EMPLOYEE.22.1.a ALvAld CHAPMAN BIND. (N.E. 15TH SIKEET) F SUBMITTED INTO PUBLIC RECORD R EEG ITEM Z7i-i ON 1)--041-o& 1.1 T1 02'111-11111-11 11117111-1 MW-ft M1.1W-11 I) 1 -TUFT] A28 ILflJJJJ U 1.11 ' • it VAR:kJ:L.1- . . . . BISCAYNE BAY 0 30 80 90 120 ENE •0 099 mg/kg iff •4:7 •TRucx STAGING. 440 2 4,- ":" / ..K's • \•-• • \ 1-1 =17 ••••, 18 r— I L,- 113171T1 5 91.171s11111 1 11 22 -1m-wawa., U.E. 1481 SWEET t20.106 SV. Fr. frIT-11 1.1 „LI11111 U9: -L_1 LJL. rL .11 i3 LOT A 060.314 SO Fl I 11 10:1111U1H111111[119111 a Lsr, rTnr-T-1-1711Til 1 ri ITU T1711.1 Toy, DIPLC PORI :NG LOT "10=-139 41 4. -i'"T--1-1-1'1 11 11111'17i H. I L 11 I lirR 3.1 EMPLOYEE- 72'.c 42 - • k swaimmilmer PUBLIC RECORD F ITEM (4,4,11 ON kl-oi ALVAH CHAPMAN BLVD. (N.E. 15TH STREET) 11 iTilTiTt 25 NIW-A .E.1LNZO(o) PYRDL,E: 0.53 rogfkg tjaaidimit..0 TI-.11 i 1.1 1.11 un 111 • 00 : HEAV? PETROLEUM TER'EPENCE SIGNATURE. 0 33 60 90 12.0 R EEG L dN3 0,:VAI-1 CHAPMAN LVD. (!,(E. 15TH STRFTT) SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORDFp ITEM t:1--:-51 ON ii-0 ‘; v 1 41,1 17-1.1 L! '1 I 1 1.-11 1-0 ITT'F`Tti u'•\: 29 1 in I Ln 1 ill) —11 - N 1,UOIL 1 ,;, L-1 ////// „ 1 T1111111 Oil LMTI-r-rIT) TRUCK SI AGINr,- '14 4.? 17-iTru. I u rt9_81- t\ ' - F ;IP LOT 8156 (109,183 50.FT[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 IL1J1 1 111 412 '7= 1.f E. 11TI (73.105 011. Fr. A) 3 LOT A (160,314 S0.FT.) (1j-H1 )11[1 11..1 1 I I it 1 I 1 1 141 n [111krf•TfT,TirTT.T1111-11_1-17TT71_.) 717T71711n f-- Lt H HiLLH 1J\ r- „LtH r1.1[1.1 1 0 30 60 90 120 EEG 1 2-A SUBMITTED INTO THE ITEM 1 f'i1 ON f _a -010. _. . nth I . l 2 TRUCK STAG r.= ♦-:`? Z.+ LOT B 155 (109.183 SO,FTL 11111 ILi'�1111111.11(' LI I J11 1110.11 r7,E. ,»TH STREET so. rrj } }. TOTOTALt4'.'LN 1'f?' nd.,.r:WC LC- "A", -WC ^} _ " —. r1i1mlTi'T II'iiII i1 jH __ . .=:- _Ll!t will yriJ) - ylilfl111 ALVAH CHAPMAN BLVD. (N.E. 15TH STREET) i I W L 1 ITTI 1iTT ii r— ITFT6 l I LUUJ J.1 t rj `1f = TrWrirrrrrEl 0 30 60 90 120 w =-7 • \ 1 / ;;(///c •-• 4..1"-A,21 — TR UCK S 44.C. LJ 1 1 i 1 20 • 19 -T:17-1--- ..7` 1 LOT 6' 156 clog, 83 .TT.) 1111_1.111111 1 HPLILILLi N E, I lTM 5rIZEZT (2chle.5 s O. 27 =-• .17'.17711P t• I Liffn • i\ TrrijiTin I .1 •13 LOT A 060.31 SOF.) 11 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 Iiiiii-L1111 JI V0.711 FIT! fiTTITililifl71.1 • • elFAL.OvrE P ARK 1.77 19 41 WnTmTrmI i'T- 4if 11111 ••-,EwpLoyEt=223o .17 SUBMITTED INTO THE PU&CRECORO FOR ITEM rc,41-7 ON ALVAH CHAPMAN BLVD. (N.E. 15TH STREET) 1n-1TM-9-11TM 1 25 LIFILLun N1W-A M NV -I; 1111-17-15ftErrnTrrnli—TrT - L.PU1 • U r • ttAltIttItt‘f • El • 0 0 BISCAYNE BAY 0 30 60 90 120 EEG J • m la a ITTED INTO T PUBLIC RECORD FQ `liEMTt; ON it *el m fok Ci 23- COASTAL HIGH HAZARD STUDY COMM ITTEE Goal CM-4: Errsrrrepsiblic safety and the protection ofproperty within the coastal :,one from; the threat of iiwric nes. Areas, Subject to Coastal Flooding and High Hazard Flood Areas ( it.. tf,}t1riffti Air1, tilH9r..I ?u 4:04: E,rr 1'£I:101lr: ldHi_6&ia: id �.7 it:i:c.ls ions; Da .u.4 _ i•III+ll. '_tr,J:::Lfl ra.. }',tt..l.n fan•}+r..+r+. Objective C:M41: Minimize the potential for lass of huanan life and the destruction of property from hurricanes. SLBM1TIED-NTOIHE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM �°v`ii, ON II-09a. Policy- CM-4.I S: Each proposed. land use and land development regulation change within the C'oas`al High Hazard area of the city- will require an analysis of its potential impact on. evacuation time 'and shaker needs in the event of a hurricane. ARTICLE III. SI-IORELINE DEVELOL• rftENT REVIEW" Sec. 33D-31. Legis:_:�i'at: intent (a) The Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County, Florida, hereby declares that it is in the public interest to provide a unifier.) management system for the Biscayne Bay Shoreline Area that will preserve the basic qualities, characteristics, and the natural, recreational and aesthetic values of the Biscayne Bay area,lincluding the northern embayments of Dumfoundling Bay, Maule Lake and Little Maule Lake. In m ing this declaration the Board is mindful of its authority under its Home Rule Charter to prepare and enforce comprehensive plans for the development of Miami -Dade County; to establish coordinate and enforce zoning as is necessary for the protection of the public; and to exercise all powers and privileges granted to municipalities, counties and county offices by the Constitution and law of the State, and all powers not prohibited by the Constitution or by the Charter, and to perform any other acts consistent with laws which are required by the Charter or which are in the common interest of the people of the County Greenberg Traurig 3IA I-t,AND DF.I 11'1•:RT .Sir Jeses 1)nril:a Shoreline 1)erelopmenl Review L'oordin;dor De, Anpinenihil ]na3aacl Committee I I 1 N.W. First Street, i I"' F'iaor ran&8IDn,rnern ( December 3?. 21,14 . . ]. 'bf-5� eC Stnni.11orida lISI2t-I9'c Rc; 1Ldghi•Ridiis Parcel 11jApplicotion for Biscayne Bay Shoreline Development exicn• / Len of Intent Dear 34r Davila: flus n0nst11Liee the letter o1 tarsi accnmprurymy tire application by I erre tiroup Stile '.l.ppli.anl"l for 13 iscrytae lie' Shoreline u ulopnieni Res ice. of its prutx,sal for a single residential tower tr'101 it toad of 6 O units ulihiii the el'rper.,Ie limns of dtc fir_. of Miami. Florida the preporty is located at xpprexin-alely I 1-Iorold I'I \'i.oni. Reside ;the 'Prolxny"). '1111 Pn?prrt•: is. aurran 111. coned C-3 (Liberal C'ommrreiali in the Official atlas ilup of the City of Miami and the .Applicata is seeking a running of the properly to SD 5 I rCenirai Commercial - Residential District'. As sea ed, Ihr Applicant is proposing a single residential moms with a total of 65(1 units. The proJna all+ imiades a fully screened 12 story parking garage which wilt house a total •,f I!03B parking spaces. 'rhe developer hus proposed a public walkway in addition to a unique aura that will pn,1ide access directly to the uatcr The Plaza Ixts been treated with lush iropiesi landscaping ;Iloog with vutdrair sealing and other wetter features to e11JU1 Iltr niow:y or the )day. In addition retail ,paces poll be fully accessible to and from the plaza. The entire 1oo fronting Biscayne- Bic, cons6 is ,+f residential unill unh the parking garage cumpietely Iocazrd behind the knlilJmg so Iltat. it is masked item public slew 'The prcrx ad project i5 ainsislrnl wish the Ohjoatises of the Coaxial Management I lenient of the Dade C:nunn Comprehensive Development blaster Pier {'C1)1,11'"i. Objective 311 state, that'. I njcw dri•eiepmcnsx, larger dtan single family or duplex residences within the C•atutty'y Shoreline Dece]epnt and Revic Bounder/ shall to waiter dependent. :water Mated. ter at a mmimuln s3tou d iucJede cnlviromncnulk compatible oiinteinc access facilities such as walkways. piers. and s iawin1 grata, as presided {he in Chapter 3 3p of the Cade ar Metrnyso ! t n Dade C'au illy .es roar he amended from lime in limo. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMi ON -09-60 Greenberg Traurig t3nir. a9 cv 1. •.vfrl h.cin.rUZel, rem December2_5.1'005 VIA L,NDDL•LIVECRY Mr. taros Davila Shoreline Development Resins Coordinator Developmental Fume[ Committer Ill N 8L'. First Street, 11'^ Floor Miami, Merida 351=8-IU73 F- •_ Re: [(night-Ridde Parcel 3 I'&ppGeatlon Development eview / Lnire of Intent Dear F:1r. Davila. for Hiscny ne Bay Shoreline This causally/es the lender of intent accompanying the application by Terra Group (lire "Applicant") for B:looync Bay Shoreline Development Review oC its proposal fen a singe residentiul tear, with a (vizl of 554 emirs withinthe corporate limits or the City of Rutter, Florida TIIC property is boated at approximately 1 Ileri1d Plata, 1Viarni, Florida ithe "Property"). "nit Property is currently ',enact C-2. ILiheral C'emincrciedl In the Official Atlas ,ilap or Mc City or Miami and the e\pplicant i.. seeking s rezoning of the prnperty to SI) 6.1 Openlral Commercial - Residential District). As stated, the Applicant is proposing a single Te ldcntinl tower with a total of 454 units. 'The project also Includes a full` ;ureened story panting garage which will house a total of 714 parking spaces. More importantly, the project has beat des.gnul will particular attention to its location 0t3 }3iscasne Hay. The entire fafade ftrntirg Hiscnync Say has been irealtxl with lush Ialtdsuping„ public bavwalk and water failures. "Sire proposed project is consistent with tJo Objectives of the Cuastrd Management Elmmern of the Dade County Comprehensive Dean urnncnt Islasicr Plea ("COMP"). Objective 4D 91.11es shut. to Jcw do-elopmenu. iargcr )fur•, single fnmify x dap li t-t residences within the Con oily"s Shoreline Devclepment Review Boundary swill be water dependent, water related, or at a minimum should iise1ude envimnrrt<•ntolly compatible shoteliire access facilities such as walkways. piers. and viewing areas, as provided for in Chapter 31D of the Code o1'M.-irnpolittai Dade County as may be amended from time to time. Stnulariy, Objective 9G 510145 than- 1 nu tkr•'L'bx-,i 4--1r,.,rr.,,r133r5- 1819:s S"DV ulrq• :;'.r%n,r I, ra••<.•,., SUBMITTED INTO TH[ PUBLIC RECORD FOF. ITEj r ON 1) -9-o, Ovsrali Vision Diagram f) Improved ConnectivHy 2) Omni Mall Redevelopment 3) Miami Heraki and Sutmonding Pr ,rife3 Redevetaprnenf ,1) Performing Fats Center 5J Area Capfsire Parking 57 F.fedei/Erinrtnininent DrVerel /1 49.41w0i5 E) SlreerscOpes 5J kLavnc Pres_rvar,on 1b) Naghboncced Greenspoce r t) tionety of Housing Ili Neighborhood School Omni CRA Redevelopment Plan FINAL DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ID Tract A: one parcel - set back from the shoreline and 15th Street r; It! Urban Barrier: Biscayne Corridor SUPPORTING PROJECTS Public/Private Strategies Omni Mall Miami Herald City of Miami Properties School Board Properties PAC Parking Convention Facilities Regulatory Strategies Entertainment District Expansion Zoning Strategies Design Guidelines Improving the Public Realm Baywalk Streetscapes Historic Preservation Neighborhood Greenspace Transportation/Infrastructure Miami Streetcar 17th Street/FEC Crossing Street Reconstruction 2-way Streets Water and Sewer Upgrades Infrastructure Omni CRA Redevelopment Plan FINAL DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW The Plan Update proposes that the redevelopment of the Omni and Herald properties be supported by the CRA and the City of Miami, provided that the development solutions contribute to improved access and connectivity by establishing corridors through the sites and providing street level pedestrian oriented uses and architecture. CRA financial support may include aide for elements which contribute to the public good, including the development of new streets, infrastructure, public parking, public greenspaces/plazas, an improved Baywalk and streetscape improvements to Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Corridor Urban Barrier SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM11_ON 1-w-a 111.• 44 Dm 1N1H1.6.111.•Nu• 'i ¢ N• •••••••.• LW ,•i;1w - u I,e UMrp 01••1041( 11 i1•iaa• gi dn.•;y.►drP: t I.. +tti•i.► i Existing Miami Herald Building Potential Redevelopment 3� 48 Omni CRA Redevelopment Plan FINAL DRAFT PROJECTS AND STRATEGIES 5 The Plan Update supports a redevelopment proposal that includes the reintroduction of streets through the site, thus reconnecting the site within the urban fabric and providing dramatically greater overall development opportunities. Compared to the existing one million square foot facility, the current zoning of the property (SD-6) would allow for up to five million square feet of mixed -use development including almost 5,600 residential units. SUBMITTED INTO THE Omni Mali Conceptual Aerial View (looking northeast) 1) New High Density Mixed -Use Development 2) New Streets 3) Biscayne Boulevard 4) People Mover 5) 18th Street .-OT TIAL DEVELOPMENT 200,000+ SF Commercial/Retail 200,000+ SF Office 5600 Residential Units Hotel/Convention Facilities New Streets/Parking 56 ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE 1 Herald Plaza FILE NO: 06-00383ze Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 and Article 22 or Ordinance 11000. as amended. the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reliewed for an amendmen': to the Zoning Atlas as follows: The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows: The subject property consist of the north portion of parcel which comprise the block bounded to the north by NE 15i6 Street and NE Bayshore Place aka "Herald Plaza" (Complete legal description on tile at the Hearhtg Boards Office), from C-2 "Liberal Commercial" to SD-6 "Central Commercial -Residential District". The following findings have been made: • It is found that the subject property is currently under the same ownership of the parcel immediately to the south, which `fronts NE Bayshore Drive (Herald Plaza), tt is also found than the proposed "PARCEL 3" ,currently houses the printing_prrss building for the Miami herald and by virtue of this requesl-the applicant will be creatirs a non-confitl ing use within the requested SD-6 "Central Commercial - Residential District". SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMiON n-oq.ob City of Miami Legislation Ordinance , Et- .:— r+ rj.5.w.., .0+4.1apn. rwrnrlw wet AN OE'JNNAFICE z THE AVA1k VT" 2CLII.S9ON 'M5 l ATTACH/FEN-FIE] 41.1EN0i1aa PAGE 14. al. OF THE 21:41NNG ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO 11 h9 a1.IfNCE0. THE 20511NG 001aNAHCE OF THE CITYOF AV,V,u. F'LpR107. ARTICLESECTION 401. SC -FEMALE OF 1715TR1M' REC2N.4.1-10410. EN C ANG11513341E 25441140 CLA6ii0091 pd FHOM`C-2- LIOFISAL CGN.AERCUL. ro "szs CENTRAL OOMLIEEVFC- tE91[ENTNL 01STRICT. FOR rIo PFtoPEATT' LOC\TEO Al APPROriNAIFLY ONE HERAI. PL470100510E11!. A11g41. EL0460A, WIRE EFATICIILNFLY 009001ED 0 40H11 IT.' COS- MMN.SA REPEALER PRp4I$r_M5ANISA SFVE0A0XLITY CLAUSE are PRON1NG FOS AN E'FECT0E 007E WHEREAS. the FSwoe 2en05 6®d. y.61Md. a an Wary a. 2003 pyn No 22 S>rrf,Wy m a9.4461441•4.44a ad[/SW ReapulbaNo. 26%1110. 01'rtNao11011. I/m.14-21. CENTING pal Wiln.l ror ..0+•11a cr Erne, cla1e.0ten, open a maim to dory by a +vm d bu a.w,1a1.1M w.w ar ha 41.1441 sao-pn 42-9) a' die CAy Cone l.v.an rye i51 serwx+, .ar a a. rti epla,,A1 57?*0+N sw1retom,c 00.1404Iw 51-1RE.5S• TF1 CAT Orr4411Non. alp, aupl:, c>,lainnaaan d u.a mono, .11d,cf.dnama1Tarne. <er-nma.altBa1 of am 2 .p Sw1Q. /Oka l fdrsabie 4144 n 11m uf1 memo U yr gams*, w,5OAre 0150 Dry W Ysrl era e..tMosno to Fan1:hA camp/ of gamy c mokiorapn aF halos aAy .ae br1 HG1Y• THEREFORE 6E 5000AINE0 SY THE C0aIMIJ 155N OF "HE CITY OF0AU121, F0OR1DA SaC11d11 0R. i. t de .0Id Ip 0Ir . curv>npd m Ne1 01..ot0 01 vk IT]murvm an ty Vd.F0 ! ar11.r Y1ad ea 4' 1W.Y'YI WW1 sl Hin SE• 1m 6.my02 T11. 2y41y y AlAtlm aa ni Oremna510 I10[d, µp.nr0. wlie ROM 2adrw1r of Ills ur of Marc Flnad• a,s«amn 401.scl,adw o'Mu-NIaey1„I.Imw. I: u,l.0*.•yd ITr alarp.,4 te.:day areu.55Al rMn c•r uuerx camar.d el a '1,13.0 Cerual 0m404414-R441J441110 Deli 9, Oro rise Prupxry kwgkd ti pruNrt 415 On ieva RUE 1Psc.d 1} !AImma. Rm.. nva p• rrr dimmedIM1Yipt✓'1A' 541119a 3. 5 01ueltl tlm (m1 I. 44 ardor*, nqh In 11.VE d 5a•NNl Con, .1., FE..a N..y*05-11ond Ron FEE . not Eft.* +a.c1raw Imo 04 ono.. (e)aIrag oiRa an aa1111101/111/o1>ndn010 a/a/PI ann nasr➢y Rik. 1611,0pwaawl. rpn.no**a•Urn na. yrpoda.,.err: t..1raisrlaRyen 01251 WAwau.p clins4 p.Hgre o< ece.aa. m p,..r4 rromaa. parcraallowens. lzheac.FWw. sepal .in • 111 dIwaaaryd1.F somn,p.d FICI FFEN4 unn•or.c• (01 ,as RN .H.1+.7 .robar.celporq Cv1111pae H vac nayle0+ex r4..2w..4..7N FIDE (slumber 06-00383zr (h) will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety; (i) will not create a drainage problem; (j) will not seriously reduce tight and air to adjacent area; (k) will act adversely affect property value in the adjacent area: (I) will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations; (m)will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner so as to compromise the protection of the public welfare; (n) The subject property is currently under the same ownership cf the parcel immediately to the south, which fronts NE Bayshore Drive (Herald Plaza); It isalso found that the nroposed'PARCEL 3" currently houses the printing press building for the Miami Hera4d and by virtue of this request.the applicant will be creating a non -conforming use within the requested SD-5' Central Corntiercial-Residential District; (o) This petition is part of a Major Use blsecial Permit (MUSP) for a mix -use project named "Herald Square Parcel 3;" (p) The theoretical potential residential use created by this amendment will not be an intrusion into the existing Liberal Commercial use due to the fact that the project is located in downtown area, where this type of mixed -use project already exists; and (q) The requested change to'•SD-6" Central Commercial -Residential District will allow for greater Flexibility in developing the proposed mixed use. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM ON 3�