Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal CD 2Southeast overtown•/Park West DRI 14ocOriest A4'0 Stseet City of Miami October 1991 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Increment II SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City of Miami Department of Development and Housing Conservation October, 1991 Table of Contents Page PART I. Applicant Information 1. Applicant/Project Identification 1 2. Applicant 1 3. Authorized Agents 1 5. Legal Description 2 7. Government of Jurisdiction 2 8. Permitting Agencies and Permit Applications 3 PART II. General Section 9. Maps C. Topography & Hurricane Flood Zones 5 10. General Project Description Part I - Specific Project Description A. Summary and Phasing 7 B. Existing and Proposed Land Uses 10 C. Previous and Existing Activities 10 D. Primary and Secondary Market Area 12 E. Description of Project Demand 12 Part II - Consistency with Comprehensive Plans A. Local Plan 12 B. Regional Plan 16 C. State Plan 17 Part III - Demographic and Employment Information A. Demographic and Employment Tables 18 Part IV - Impact Summary A. Impact on Natural Resources 20 B. Public Facility Costs 22 11. Revenue Generation 23 PART III. Environmental Resources Impact 17. Water Supply A. Potable/Non-potable Water Demand 29 B. Potable/Non-potable Water Supply 31 C. On -site Wells 31 D. Impact to Existing Wells and Aquifer 31 E. Operation/Maintenance of Internal Water Supply 31 F. Letter from Off -site Supplier 31 G. Conservation Measures 33 H. Service Area Boundary 38 18. Wastewater Management A. Projected Generation and Proposed Treatment 39 B. Description of Pre-treatment Techniques 39 C. Letter from Off -site Treatment Authority 41 D. Septic Tank Identification 41 E. Service Area Boundary 41 Table of Contents (cont.) 20. Solid/Hazardous/Medical Waste A. Solid Waste Generation B. Waste Management 1. Specification of Waste Generated 2. Separation Measures 3. Identification of Off -site Disposal 4. Applicable Regulations, Permits and Plans C. Documentation 1. Letter from Developer 2. Letter from Service Provider PART IV. Transportation Resources Impacts 46 46 48 48 21. Transportation (see Question after Appendices) 22. Air Impacts (see Question after Appendices) 23. Hurricane Preparedness A. Identification of Designated Areas 54 1. Vulnerability Zone B. Identification of Evacuation Requirements 54 1. Shelter Space Need and Availability 2. Evacuation Route Capacity C. Identification of Mitigation 57 PART V. Human Resources Impacts 24. Housing A. Residential Development Characteristics B. Housing Availability/Employment Opportunities C. Provision for Displacement/Relocation 25. Police and Fire Protection A. Dedication of Facility or Site B. Letter from Service Provider 28. Health Care A. Description of Facilities and Services B. Letter from Service Provider Appendices: 60 62 63 64 64 69 69 Appendix I - Ordinance No. 10543 73 Appendix II - Report on Employment and Wages 92 li STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING 2740 Centerview Drive - Rhyne Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES RPM-BSP-ADA-1 PART I. Application Information 1. I, Cesar H. Odio, the undersigned owner/authorized agent of the City of Miami, hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional Impact as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statues (F.S.), and Chapter 28-24. , Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). In support thereof I submit the following information concerning the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project Development of Regional Impact, which information is true any correct to the best of my knowledge. 10-10-91 (date) Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent 2. Owner/Developer (name, address, phone). State whether or not the owner or developer is authorized to do business in the State of Florida pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 607, F.S. City of Miami, Florida (a municipal corporation) P. 0. Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 (305) 250-5400 3. Authorized Agent and Consultants (name, address, phone). Herbert J. Bailey Assistant City Manager City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 250-5331 Reginald Barker DRI Project Manager City of Miami 300 Biscayne Blvd. Way, Suite 400 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 579-3366 Linda Kearson Assistant City Attorney City of Miami 1 S.E. Third Ave., Suite 1100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 579-6700 Basil S. Williams Project Manager Keith and Schnars, P.A. 8880 N.W. 20th St., Suite A Miami, Florida 33172 (305) 477-8855 5. Attach a legal description of the development site. Include section, township and range. Beginning at a point at the intersection of the center line of N.E. 5th Street and the center line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence west on the center line of N.E. 5th Street (and N.W. 5th Street) to the east ROW line of 1-95; thence northwesterly on the east ROW line of 1-95 to the south ROW line of 1-395; thence easterly on the south ROW line of 1-395 to the center line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence southerly on the center line of Biscayne Boulevard to the point of beginning, comprising 209.38 acres more or less; or Blocks 2N, 3N, 4N, 5N, 6N, 7N, 14N, 15N, 17N, 18N, 19N, 20N, 21N, 22N, 23N, 24N, 25N, 34N, 35N, 36N, 37N, 38N, 39N, 40N, 41N, 42N, 43N, 44N, 45N, 55N, 56N, 57N, 58N, 59N, 60N, 61N, 62N, 65N, 65E, 66N, a portion of 27N, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami (B-41); and Blocks 7, 8, 9, 10, 19, 20, 21, portions of blocks 6, 11, 16, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Alice Baldwin, Jenny M., and Charles E. Oxar Subdivision A-57 Amended (B- 87); and Blocks 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, a portion of block 3, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 36, Township 53, Range 41 East, Sosts Subdivision (B- 27); and Blocks 1, 8, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 36, Township 53, Range 41 East, Perry Division (B-163); and Greyhound Center (77-98); Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami (B-41); and Block 46N, Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, G. G. Bolles (1-16); and Blocks 16N, 26N, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; S37, Township 53, Range 41 East, P. W. White Re -Subdivision (B- 34); and Blocks 59N, 60N, and all existing street rights -of - way between said blocks, Section 37, Township 53, Range 41 East, Miami South Half -Blocks (1-185); and RTY SEC CORPS 3- 172, J.A. Danns Sub 7-36 Blocks C and D, Howard Johnson Sub 79-87, Jones Resub 3-176, Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A. L. Knowlton Map of Miami (B-41). 7. List all local governments with jurisdiction over the proposed development. City of Miami, Florida 2 8 List all agencies (local, state and federal) from which approval and/or a permit must be obtained prior to initiation of development. Indicate the permit or approval for each agency and its status. Indicate whether the development is registered or whether registration will be required with the Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes under Chapter 478, Florida Statues. Indicate whether the development will be registered with H.U.D., Division of Interstate Land Sales Registration or other states. Agency City of Miami City of Miami City of Miami Dade County Dade County State of Florida State of Florida Approval and/or Permit Zoning review/permit Building permits Certificates of Occupancy Storm water disposal/drainage Sanitary sewer and water line connections Storm water disposal wells Complex source permits Where applicable, the aforementioned approvals and/or permits will be obtained as specific development programs (projects) are proposed to the City of Miami. Registration will be required with the Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes under Chapter 478, F.S., for specific condominium developments (projects) as they are proposed to the City of Miami. 3 PART II. General Section OUESTION 9 - MAPS The following maps must be provided as a appropriate scale for each map should be determined at the preapplication conference. part of the ADA. The Map C. A topographic map with project boundaries identified (contour intervals from one to five feet should be determined in consultation with the appropriate regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at the preapplication conference). Delineate 100-year flood prone areas (including hurricane flood zones) and indicate major land surface features, If applicable, delineate the coastal construction control line. Please see Map C-1 (Topography) and Map C-2 (Hurricane Flood Zones). 4 EIZA ‘ ANA II Illlb , �,�,.�. t ���, II 1I1IIII`*\‘,,,,k,W�` ��i �-, III , ,I q"���`, `'� `���e�� a�'' ae►4:.ire,, .„; `!e'',,,,v��''�A``,. s, ,i•I w, ,. �.`V'�,Q 1.�a' 0'�.`E'h.@"+'4'''e'+.`�+' ' at �''w`ti'w`4::r'�..3.0 ti »� apia, r,., `L���,1'y Q \O ate • ` : 1� t k• N4`.V.:eINN4 ykkvii.4 �� yNkk flI �'�- r,�'e+�•,�'j,�i.'_�i.W.�w+n�'rAZI,?��� AY�`i'''�'�f��'4�+. ��,�.,�k.�bM N\Yk"N.N��� iNk' kt, NW;:W, a.& 1 NWN, IVESISMININOCAll SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST TOPOGRAPHIC MAP mn�eeee .mn.a �e aeee flippI 1 IIIIIII MENUMEE 111111 IIIII rn HURRICANE FLOOD ZONE category 4 or 5 Hurricane 3 1111111111 5E( NAVA "NW. WYNN • 1111111111 1 MOW MOM ME MOB.. MM gEMN2: MOMS MMMM MMON WMUM SW IIIIII Barnum :af IIIIII01 1111111111 II SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST HURRICANE FLOOD ZONES HURRICANE FLOOD ZONE fit . MINIM $$11N\ tossi 111111111 IMMO 1111111111 1111111111 .ORS DO EVARO IIIII i _ IMAP .. OTESTION 10 - GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Part 1 Specific Project Description A. Describe and discuss in general terms all major elements of the proposed development in its completed form. Include in this discussion the proposed phases (or stages) of development (not to exceed five years), magnitude in the appropriate units from Chapter 28-24, F.A.C., where applicable, and expected beginning and completion dates for construction. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project (DRI) entails the redevelopment of 200 acres of prime real estate adjacent to the Miami central business district for new residential, office, commercial, hotel and attractions activity. Representing the culmination of a ten- year planning process by both the City of Miami and Metropolitan Dade County, the general redevelopment concept for the project is directed toward the provision of a wide range of housing opportunities for moderate income families (e.g., families with incomes ranging from $15,000 to $50,000) within a downtown setting. Also incorporated in the development plan is the provision of support services necessary to serve the area's future population. In conformance with the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan (adopted by both the Miami City Commission Resolution No. 82-755, and the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 1677-82), the role of the public sector will not be to undertake specific building programs but rather to facilitate overall development using a variety of positive investment incentives including special zoning designations, public land acquisition, financial subsidies and the provision of new public facilities and amenities. The City of Miami has initiated the redevelopment effort with a Phase 1 development action surrounding the Overtown Metrorail Transit Station. Nine (9) development parcels (or city blocks) have been acquired and developers have been selected. To date, *Stage 1 of the Phase 1 redevelopment program has included the construction of 857 residential .dwelling units, 18,000 square feet of commercial space, a 16,500 seat sports arena, a pedestrian mall and the acquisition of properties for the Historic Overtown Folklife Village. 7 Existing Acreage Proposed Acreage EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES (Acreage) Commercial Residential Parks/Open Space* Institutional Trans, Comm., Util. 52.30 52.28 44.21 9.14 51.45 44.50 96.19 12.06 9.14 47.49 *Includes vacant land slated for future development. co Phase PROPOSED LAND USES (Units) Office Commercial Hotel Residential Attractions (gsf) (gsf) (rooms) (units) (seats) Phase 1 (1988-1997) Phase 2 (1992-1999) Phase 3 (1999-2007) Totals 166,000 337,000 500,500 1,003,500 95,400 0 2,000 8,000 71,700 - 500 2,000 8,000 90,600 600 5,000 0 257,700 1,100 9,000 16,000 In its entirety, the Phase 1 ,redevelopment program will include the construction of 2,000 residential dwelling units, 166,000 square feet of office space, 95,400 square feet of commercial space, 8,000 attractions seats, and a sports arena (a roved and R . The Phase 1 development program is anticipated to occur between 1988 and 1997. The Phase 2 (1992-1999) development program includes the provision of 2,000 additional residential dwelling 'units, 337,000 square feet of office space, 71,700 square feet of commercial space, 500 hotel rooms and 8,000 attractions seats. The attractions land use (in Phases 1 and 2) may include a museum, theater, cruise port -related activities, specialty exhibits, performing arts center, theme entertainment, and institutional/educational uses. Phase 3 (1999-2007) is proposed to include 5,000 residential dwelling units, 500,500 square feet of office space, 90,600 square feet of commercial space and 600 hotel rooms. In total the three phases of development (1988-2007) include the construction of 9,000 residential dwelling units; 1,003,500 square feet of office space, 257,700 square feet of commercial space; 1,100 hotel rooms; and 16,000 attractions seats. When all phases have been completed the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project (DRI) is intended to transform a presently blighted, under-utilized land area into a socially and economically integrated community providing unique living and working opportunities in downtown Miami. B. Provide a breakdown of the existing and proposed land uses on the site for each phase of development through completion of the project. The developed land uses should be those identified in Section 380.0651, F.S., and Chapter 28-24, F.A.C. Use Level III of The Florida Land Use and Covej ClassificaSlon System; A Technical Report (September 1985), available from each regional planning council. Refer to Maps D (Existing Land Use) and H (Master Plan). Use the format below and treat each land use category as mutually exclusive unless agreed to at the preapplication conference. A breakdown of existing and proposed land uses by acreage, and a breakdown of proposed development by unit (square feet, rooms, units and seats) is provided on the following tables. Pursuant to the preapplication conference Maps D and H are not included. C. Briefly describe previous and existing activities on site. Identify any constraints or special planning considerations that these previous activities have with respect to the proposed development. 10 Excluding the Phase 1 redevelopment effort, Southeast Overtown/Park West is a blighted under-utilized area of approximately 200 acres bounded by Biscayne Boulevard, North 5th Street, 1-95 and I-395. The "Overtown" portion of the project area is one of the oldest neighborhoods in Miami. Overtown was born in the 1890's when Henry Flagler and his railroad company required a place for its black workers to live. A tract of land west of the railroad tracks, "Overtown," was designated for black railroad employees. Overtown grew and developed into a vibrant community. Blacks eventually became owners of .businesses and thereby helped establish a viable economic community. Schools, homes, churches and commercial uses were developed. Blacks developed large economic ventures such as hotels, apartments, theaters, night clubs and small neighborhood markets. This created a very strong and pulsating community. In the 1920's and 1930's, Northwest 2nd Avenue was called Avenue G. It was a center for entertainment, retail stores and hotels. The population continued to expand until the early 1960's. Desegregation, urban renewal, the Neighborhood Development Program and construction of the State Road 836 and 1-95 expressways significantly changed the character of the neighborhood. Residents were scattered and relocated and economic, physical and social decay became more pronounced. Today few structures of historical significance can be found in Overtown (see Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA), Question 9 - Historical and Archeological Sites). Most of the area currently referred to as Park West was a part of the original plat for the City of Miami. Called the "Miami" Subdivision, this area was platted in 1896 by Mary and William Brickell, Julia Tuttle, Henry Flagler and the Fort Dallas Land Company, the principal developers of'the early City of Miami. While the initial development of Park West was for residential development, it soon established a commercial character, housing general commercial activities associated with its downtown location and proximity to the Old Port of Miami (site of Bicentennial Park). Before 1964, the -area directly west of Bicentennial Park was basically a warehouse and wholesale district related to the old port. When the port moved,.the linkage was broken and today the few remaining businesses have no functional relation to the new port. New warehouses and containerized storage areas are provided on Dodge Island and areas west of Miami International Airport. Overtown and Park West offer no constraints and warrant no special planning considerations, beyond those of the Redevelopment Plan, with respect to previous and existing activities at the proposed development site. 11 D. If the development is proposed to contain a shopping center, describe the primary and secondary trade areas which the proposed shopping center will serve. The development does not propose a shopping center. E. Describe, in general terms, how the demand for this project was determined. Several reports document the demand for this project. They include Market Potential & Development _Strategies for the Southeast Overtown/Park West-Communit Redevelo ment Area, Hammer, Siler, George Associates (1985), Demographic and Demand Factors Affecting the Appeal of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Among Persons Employed in Downtown Miami, Behavioral Science Research Corporation (1985), Downtown Development Plan: Economic Analysis and Growth Projections, Hammer, Siler, George Associates (1986), and Market Analysis Update of the Historic Overtown Folklife Village, Laventhol & Horwath (1987). Each of these reports support the proposed development program Part 2 Consistency with Comprehensive Plans A. Demonstrate how the proposed project is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Indicate whether the proposed project will require an amendment to the adopted local comprehensive plan, including the capital improvements element. If so, please describe the necessary changes. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 (MCNP) was adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989. The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI is consistent with the MCNP. Specifically, the future land use element from the MCNP states as a goal the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted or declining areas in the City. The objective is to promote the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted, declining or threatened residential, commercial and industrial areas. This is to be achieved through an adopted policy which states that the City will continue to implement plans for Southeast Overtown/Park West as a Community Redevelopment Distr-ictaiu-4_,LcaLL,/,5 /63.,336 Another objective from the MCNP is to encourage commercial, office and industrial development within existing commercial, office and industrial areas, and to concentrate new commercial activity in areas where the capacity of existing public facilities can meet or exceed the minimum standards for Levels of Service adopted in the Capital Improvement Element. Accordingly, the City's policy is to continue to provide incentives for commercial redevelopment and new construction in Southeast Overtown/Park West through such programs as the Community Development Block Grant Program. 12 A land use objective from the MCNP is to continue the growth of Downtown Miami, expand its role as a center of domestic and international commerce, further its development as a regional center for the performing arts and other cultural entertainment activities and develop a urban residential base. This objective is to be accomplished, in part, by a policy which states "implement the Downtown DRI development orders for downtown [Miami] and Southeast Overtown/Pare West, and seek approval for future increments of development in a timely manner." Southeast Overtown/Park West is proposed to include land uses (activities) which would meet this objective namely office, commercial, hotel, residential and attractions land use categories. The following land use designations (from the MCNP, Future Land Use Plan Map) are located in Southeast Overtown/Park West and they are consistent spatially and substantively with the proposed development program: Recreation: This land use designation only allows public parks and recreation uses. Within parks, such recreation uses permit educational and cultural facilities such as museums, art galleries and exhibition space, and marine facilities. Supporting social and entertainment services, public health and safety and entertainment facilities may also be permissible provided that such activities and facilities are an integral part of the park's design or of the recreation function. Medium Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum of 65 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in -the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Permissible uses within medium density multifamily areas also include commercial activities that are intended to serve the retailing and personal service needs of the building or building complex, places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and accessory post -secondary educational facilities. High Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "High Density Multifamily Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 150 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Higher densities may be allowed as shown for these specially - designated areas: Southeast Overtown/Park West 300 units per acre 13 Supporting services such as offices and commercial services and other accessory activities that are clearly incidental to principal uses are permitted; community -based residential facilities will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law; places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and day care centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable locations. Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities: Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" allow facilities for federal, state and local government activities, major public or private health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational activities, and major transportation facilities and public utilities. Residential facilities ancillary to these uses are allowed to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions. Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; any activity included in the "Office" designation as well as commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those described above, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. Central Business District (CBD): The area designated as "Central Business District" (CBD) is intended to apply to the central commercial, financial and office core of the metropolitan region, and allows all activities included in the- "Office", "Restricted Commercial", and "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" designations. Residential facilities (except for rescue missions) alone or in combination with other uses are allowable to a maximum density of 1,000 dwelling units per &acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. 14 General Commercial: Areas designated as "General Commercial" allow activities included in the "Office" and the "Restricted Commercial" designations (with the exception of permanent living facilities but including rescue missions), as well as wholesaling and distribution activities that generally serve the needs of other businesses; generally require on and off loading facilities; and benefit from close proximity to industrial areas. These commercial activities include retailing of second hand items, automotive repair services, new and used vehicle sales, pares lots and garages, heavy equipment sales and service, build g material sales and storage, wholesaling, warehousing, distribution and transportation related services, light manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses describe above. Again, the land uses proposed for Southeast Overtown/Park West are consistent with the above land use designations and their permitted uses as prescribed by the MCNP Land Use Element and Future Land Use Plan Map. One Housing Element goal from the MCNP is "increase the supply of safe, affordable and sanitary housing for low and moderate income households ... by alleviating shortages of low and moderate income housing, rehabilitating older homes, maintaining, and revitalizing residential neighborhoods." The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI proposes to revitalize a blighted neighborhood, in part, through the development of 9,000 affordable housing units between 1988 and 2007. Another housing goal from the MCNP is "achieve a livable city center with a variety of urban housing types for all persons of all income levels." This is to be accomplished through adopted City policies such as "promote development of new, high quality, dense urban neighborhoods in Southeast Overtown/Park West through special district zoning" and "working together with private developers, the City will continue to apply for Urban Development Action Grants, and Housing Development Action Grants in .. Southeast Overtown/Park West ..., where housing can be developed as a part -of mixed -use projects." Finally, the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI is consistent with policies from the Transportation Element of the MCNP. For example, one policy states that the City's land 'development regulations will direct high density commercial and residential development in close proximity to Metrorail and Metromover Stations. Southeast Overtown/Park West is served by one Metrorail Station (Overtown Station) and two Metromover Stations (State Plaza and College). Another policy states that the City shall encourage development of housing near large employment centers in order to reduce the need for commuting. The DRI is adjacent to the Miami central business district, a large employment center. 15 The City of Miami's zoning ordinance is in conformance with the adopted land use plan and the proposed development program is in conformance with the zoning ordinance. The zoning districts within Southeast Overtown/Park West and their corresponding land use plan designations are as follows: PR Recreation R-3 Medium Density Multifamily Residential R-4 High Density Multifamily Residential G/I Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transporta- tion and Utilities C-1 Restricted Commercial CBD Central Business District C-2 General Commercial SD (Special District) 16, 16.1 and 16.2 are commercial - residential districts intended to guide redevelopment in accordance with -the adopted Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan by regulations encouraging a quality residential living environment with direct access to shopping, recreation, transportation and employment. It is intended that development at appropriate high intensity will provide a variety of housing opportunities, open character, attractive and secure open space, appropriately located residential recreation space serving residential uses, adequate retail and service support facilities, and a safe pedestrian movement system. The SDs are in conformance with the MCNP Future Land Use Plan Map and the proposed development program is consistent with the SD designations. B. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in the appropriate Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. Southeast Overtown/Park West meets several goals and policies contained in the Regional Plan for ,Sovthi_ Tloridq. The housing goal from the Plan states that "by 1995, meet 15 percent of the 1987 need in the Region for affordable and adequate housing for low and moderate income homeowners...' The DRI proposes the construction of 9,000 affordable housing units, sixty percent. (60%) of which will be owner -occupied. One regional policy is "residential development should provide adequate amounts of low and moderate income housing a units that are readily accessible to employment centers, with priority for development accessible by public transportation facilities. As previously mentioned, Southeast Overtown/Park West is adjacent to the Miami central business district and served by Metrorail and Metromover. 16 The Regional Plan indicates that new development will not be permitted in areas where public facilities do not already exist, are not programmed, or can not economically be provided, and the existing infrastructure capacity of regional facilities will be utilized to the maximum extent feasible before the provision of new capacity is required. The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI is located in an area with an existing infrastructure network, with capacity, including transportation and other public facilities. C. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.), including, but not limited to, the goals addressing the following issues: housing, water resources, natural systems and recreational lands, land use, public facilities, transportation, and agriculture. The DRI meets housing, water resources, air quality, waste, land use, downtown revitalization, public facilities, transportation and employment goals and polices contained in the State Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is intended to increase the supply of affordable housing; development will not be approved unless an adequate supply of potable water is available (see Development Orders in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval); air quality monitoring has been conducted in the project area and preliminary findings suggest that air quality standards are not being exceeded; hazardous and non -hazardous materials and waste are properly collected and disposed of by the City and County pursuant to adopted ordinances and codes; development is directed to an area with an existing infrastructure and public facilities network; the development encourages the centralization of commercial, residential and cultural activities within a downtown area thereby facilitating downtown revitalization; the development is to utilize existing public facilities; the development is proposed in an area with an integrated transportation system including highways and mass transit; and, the development encourages economic development in an economically distressed area. Part 3 Demographic and Employment Information A. Complete the following Demographic and Employment Information tables. See the following Demographic and Employment Information tables for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI. 17 PHASE Demographic Information Related to the Project's Population Total Persons Total Children Total Elderly Total Dwelling Per Population Per School Age Per Elderly Units Household Household Children Household Existing 857 1.8 1,534 Phase 1 1,143 1.8 2,058 Phase 2 2,000 1.8 3,600 Phase 3 5,000 1.8 9,000 Totals 9,000 16,201 Notes: . 25 . 25 .25 . 25 126 168 292 730 1,316 . 15 . 15 . 15 . 15 129 172 300 750 1,351 1. Existing units are defined as those Phase 1 units with certificates of occupancy. 2. All dwelling units are multifamily units. 3. The "children per household" factor was applied to the total number of units with two or more bedrooms. Estimated Employment Generated by Project by Income Range(1) PHASE Under $10K $10K-$14,999 $15K-$19,999 $20K-$24,999 $25K-$29,999 $30K-$34,999 $35K-$39,999 Over 40K C NC C NC C NC C NC C NC C NC C NC C NC Phase 1 47 76 120 92 1530 158 1535 163 470 61 470 61 470 61 932 189 Phase 2 34 80 90 75 1142 178 1145 180 350 75 347 75 345 74 690 231 Phase 3 24 235 65 239 815 560 619 563 250 225 250 226 248 225 490 730 Totals 105 391 275 406 3487 896 3499 906 1070 361 1067 362 1063 360 2112 1150 (1) Construction (C) employment in terms of full-time equivalents (FTE); Non -construction (NC) employment in terms of permanent employees. Source: Consolidated Application for Development Approval, (Hammer, Siler, George Associates). Part 4 Impact Summary A. Summarize the impacts this project will have on natural resources. Air Ouality With the possibility of air quality violations associated with areawide development, the City is implementing an air quality monitoring and abatement program pursuant to the Increment I development order. Preliminary results from air quality monitoring suggest that no standards are being exceeded and an ordinance (Ordinance No. 10543, see Appendix I) outlining transportation control measures has been adopted. Additionally, Ordinance 10543 addresses the control of airborne dust during construction. Water Quality The project site overlies a portion of the Biscayne Aquifer considered to be a zone of saltwater intrusion. Ground water tests done by USGS and DERM show that the area is east of the salt barrier, rendering the Aquifer and unsuitable source of potable water. The water table in this area lies, on the average, 5 to 7 feet below the surface. The water drawn from this well was tested for 12 constituents. The results were typical for groundwaters in coastal urban areas. There are no surface waters on the site itself, or adjacent to the site. However, much of the stormwater runoff from the site is discharged off -site into Biscayne Bay. In the past, this form of stormwater disposal has caused local degradation of surface water quality in the Bay. As stormwater management systems in the area are retrofitted, this problem should improve. Pursuant to the Master development order, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 10543 (see Appendix I) which will help mitigate impacts on both ground and surface waters in this area. Drainage A source of groundwater and surface water pollution is stormwater runoff. Southeast Overtown/park West has a significant amount of impervious surface due to previous development. Currently, the predominant mode of stormwater runoff disposal is through positive outfall to Biscayne Bay, However, new development in this area is required to have on - site disposal systems consisting of drainage wells, exfiltration trenches or other subsurface exfiltration systems to retain the first inch of runoff. The improvements to the drainage systems in the area will help decrease pollutant loading in the Bay due to stormwater runoff. (Also, see Ordinance No. 10543.) 20 Hazardous Materials Another source of water pollution, if disposed of or treated improperly, is hazardous materials. By adopting Ordinance No. 10543 (see specifically Sec. 14-70(7)), the City has reduced the possibility of adverse impact on regional water quality from hazardous material (waste) generated in Southeast Overtown/Park West. t3and and Soils The soils currently on the project site are of the Rockdale fine sand associations. All areas are covered by a one to five feet deep layer of sand fill. Any limitations to development will be overcome by the use of standard engineering techniques. Flood Prone Areas The majority of Southeast Overtown/Park West is categorized as an area of minimal flooding. The lowest floor elevations proposed for the site are 11 to 12 feet in accordance with FEMA requirements. The roadways and parking lots will be at 5 feet NGVD, in keeping with the requirements of Metro Dade County. Vegetation and Wildlife Due to the highly urbanized nature of the project site, there is little or no natural vegetation present. There are no rare or endangered plant species known to exist on the project site. Ordinance No. 10543 requires the removal of invasive exotic plants prior to new construction. Most of the wildlife within the project site are those species adapted to urban areas. There are no rare, endangered'or threatened animal specials known to occur on the site. Wetlands There are no wetlands on -site. Because of the location and nature of development, the creation of wetlands as a part of this project is inappropriate. B. Summarize public facility capital costs associated with project impacts using the following table: See the following table for a summary of public facility capital costs associated with Southeast Overtown/Park West project impacts. 21 Phase/Facility PUBLIC FACILITY IMPACTS(1) Total Capital Cost Responsible Entity Phase 1 Central Wastewater Treatment Plant -- 12 MGD Expansion North/Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Interconnection North Wastewater Treatment Plant - 20 MGD Expansion Alexander Orr, Jr., Water Treatment Plant - 52 MGD Expansion Transportation (see Transportation Question) Phase 2 South Wastewater Treatment Plant 37.5 MGD Expansion North Wastewater Treatment Plant 20 MGD Expansion Alexander Orr, Jr., Water Treatment Plant - 36 MGD Expansion Transportation (see Transportation Question) Phase 3 South Wastewater Treatment Plant - 18.75 MGD Expansion Transportation (see Transportation Question) TOTAL $6,224,000 7,686,000 26,296,000 11,155,000 92,778,000 15,960,000 10,400,000 36,500,000 $206,999,000 Metro -Dade WASAD Metro -Dade WASAD Metro -Dade WASAD Metro -Dade WASAD Metro -Dade WASAD Metro -Dade WASAD Metro -Dade WASAD Metro -Dade WASAD (1) At a minimum, this table should include transportation, wastewater, potable water, recreation and open space, and education. OUESTION 11 - REVENUE GENERATION A. Project the funds anticipated to be generated by the project. This projection should include any sources or use of funds which could have any reasonable connection to the proposed development. 1. Make the following projections by year, including the first and last year in which any construction and/or development takes place: (a) Yearly ad valorem tax receipts (b) Yearly impact fees collected (c) Yearly sales tax received by local government (d) Yearly gasoline tax received by local government (e) Yearly projections of any other funds by any other sources generated as a result of development of the proposed project within the region Please see the tables on the following pages for the above projections. 2. List all assumptions used to derive the above projections and estimates, show the methodologies used and describe generally accepted accounting principles used in all assumptions, estimates and projections. Assumptions used to derive projections and estimates are included with the appropriate tables. 23 Phase Local Ad Valorem Revenues Market Assessment Assessed Value Ratio Value Millage Rate Total Ad Valorem Tax Yeild Existing: Total Value $144,643,083 0.75 $102,482,312 30.9186 $3,168,610 Land 57,857,233 0.75 40,992,925 30.9186 1,267,444 Buildings 86,785,850 0.75 61,489,387 30.9186 1,901,166 Phase 1 Total Value 174,838,491 0.75 80,903,094 30.9186 2,501,410 Land* 0 0.75 0 30.9186 0 Buildings 174,838,491 0.75 80,903,094 30.9186 2,501,410 N Phase 2 Total Value 329,517,977 0.75 217,138,483 30.9186 6,713,618 Land 65,903,595 0.75 43,427,697 30.9186 1,342,724 Buildings 263,614,382 0.75 173,710,786 30.9186 5,370,894 Phase 3 Total Value 579,277,175 0.75 434,457,881 30.9186 13,432,829 Land 115,855,435 0.75 86,891,576 30.9186 2,686,566 Buildings 463,421,740 0.75 347,566,305 30.9186 10,746,263 *Land is being leased by the City of Miami. Notes: 1. A Homestead Exemption has been deducted from assessed value assuming that 60% of the Phase 1, 2 and 3 residential units will be owner occupied at $25,000 per unit. 2. Millage rates are as follows: School Operating 8.6660 School Debt 0.3350 FIND 0.0550 SFWMD 0.5470 Countywide 7.3680 Debt Service 1.2100 Library 0.3510 EEL 0.7500 City Operating 9.5995 Debt Service 2.3381 DDA 0.5000 3. It should also be noted that the Southeast Overtown/Park West area has been established as a Tax Increment District. The tax base is now therefor frozen with respect to City and County Operational Revenues. Taxes on increment go into the Trust Fund. 4. All estimates and projections have been made in 1987 dollars. Fees Non -Ad Valorem Revenues Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Building Permits 1/ Energy 2/ Water and Sewer 3/ Fire Flow 4/ Plumbing 5/ Air Conditioning 6/ Electrical 7/ Zoning Variance 8/ Major Use 9/ People Mover 10/ Totals City of Miami 2/ City of Miami Dade County 6/ 1/ 8/ // City City City City City City 10/ Dade of Miami of Miami of Miami of Miami of Miami of Miami County $173,776 73,055 34,200 1,140 10,880 65,750 52,600 87,666 29,222 199,878 $728,167 8.00/100 s.f. (commercial) 5.50/100 s.f. (residential) .025/s.f. 900.00/hookup (commercial) 500.00/hookup (residential) 30.00 flat fee 4.50/outlet 4.50/horsepower .90/outlet .03/s.f. .01/s.f. .18/s.f. $163,384 69,808 25,200 840 20,762 62,827 50,261 83,769 27,923 190,993 $695,767 $402,248 172,578 59,400 1,980 25,751 155,320 124,256 207,093 69,031 472,172 $1,689,828 IMPACT FEES Phase/Land Use Fee Phase 1 Office $232,068 Commercial 133,369 Hotel 0 Residential 0 Attractions 223,680 Phase 2 Office 471,126 Commercial 100,237 Hotel 489,300 Residential 0 Attractions 223,680 Phase 3 Office 699,699 Commercial 126,659 Hotel 587,160 Residential 0 Attractions 0 Total $3,286,978 Notes: 1. Residential development in Southeast Overtown/Park West is exempt from the Impact Fee Ordinance. 2. The Impact Fee coefficient is $1.398 per gross square foot. 27 Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI Supplemental Fees Phase/Fee Amount Phase 1 Transportation Mitigation Air Quality DRI/Master Plan Recovery DRI Administration Phase 2 Transportation Mitigation Air Quality DRI/Master Plan Recovery DRI Administration Phase 3 Transportation Mitigation Air Quality DRI/Master Plan Recovery DRI Administration Total. Notes: 1. All Phase 1 development is Mitigation fees. 2. Phase 1 affordable housing 3. All Phase 1 development is Recovery fees. 4. Phase 1 affordable housing fees. 5. Fee coefficients are identified in the City of Miami Code, Section 13-67; coefficients for the hotel and attractions land uses (for transportation mitigation and air quality) are from Sec. 13-46. 6. Fee coefficients are subject to change pending the approval of the ADA for Increment II of the DRI. 0 43,567 0 21,070 385,452 144,697 149,565 145,935 626,966 280,885 395,937 300,555 $2,494,629 exempt from Transportation is exempt from Air Quality fees. exempt from DRI/Master Plan is exempt from DRI Administration 28 OUESTION 17 - WATER SUPPLY ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: Transmission Capacity (City): 200 gallons/resident/day Treatment Capacity (County): 200 gallons/resident/day Pressure (County): No less than 20 psi, no greater than 100 psi EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE: Transmission Capacity (City): 200 gallons/resident/day Treatment Capacity (County): 200 gallons/resident/day Pressure (County): No less than 20 psi, no greater than 100 psi LEVEL OF SERVICE AFTER PROJECT BUILDOUT: Transmission Capacity (City): 200 gallons/resident/day Treatment Capacity (County): 200 gallons/resident/day Pressure (County): No less than 20 psi, no greater than 100 psi A. 1. Provide a projection of the average daily potable and non -potable water demands at the end of each phase of development. If significant seasonal demand variations will occur, discuss anticipated peaks and duration. Use the format below: A projection of the average daily potable water demand is included in the following table. Significant seasonal demand variations are not projected to occur. All demand is for potable water. A. 2. Describe how this demand information was generated, including the identification of the consumption rates assumed in the analysis. The demand table was generated using consumption rates provided by the Metro Dade County Department of Environ- mental Resources Management and approved in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval for Southeast Overtown/Park West. The consumption rates are as follows: Office 10 gallons/day/100 square feet Commercial 10 gallons/day/100 square feet Hotel 200 gallons/day/room Residential 200 gallons/day/unit Attractions 3 gallons/day/seat 29 POTABLE/NON-POTABLE WATER DEMAND Phase/Land Use Potable Water Demand (MGD) Existing .5475 Phase 1 Office .0166 Commercial .0095 Hotel .0000 Residential .4000 Attractions .0240 Phase 2 Office .0337 Commercial .0072 Hotel .1000 Residential .4000 Attractions .0240 Phase 3 Office .0501 Commercial .0091 Hotel .1200 Residential 1.0000 Attractions .0000 Note(s): 1. All demand is for potable water. 30 B. Provide a breakdown of sources of water supply, both potable and non -potable, by development phase through project completion. Use the format below. A breakdown of sources of water supply is included in the following table. All potable water is to be supplied by the Metro Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department. C. If water wells exist on -site, locate them on Map H and specify those that will continue to be used. Also locate on Map H all proposed on -site wells. (For residential developments, if individual wells for each lot are proposed, simply indicate the number of units to be served, general locations, and any plans for eventual phase -out.) Indicate the diameter, depth, and pumping rates (average and maximum) for each of the existing wells and project this information for the proposed wells (for lots served by individual wells, this information may be grouped for projection purposes). Also provide a breakdown of the wells with regard to potable and non -potable sources. Water wells do not exist and are not proposed for the development site. D. If on -site water wells are used, will this result in interference with other wells or result in adverse impacts to underlying or overlying aquifers? Document the assumptions underlying this response. On -site water wells are not proposed to be used. E. Who will operate and maintain the internal system after completion of the development. The internal water supply system will be maintained by the City of Miami. water supply operated and F. 1. If an off -site water supply is planned, attach a letter from the agency or firm providing service outlining: (a) the projected excess capacities of the water supply facilities to which connection will be made at present and for each phase through completion of the project, (b) any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity, (c) a statement of the agency or firms ability to provide services at all times during and after development. (This agency must be supplied with the water demand and supply tables in paragraphs A and B above). 31 POTABLE/NON-POTABLE WATER SUPPLY(MGD) Phase Off -site Supply Existing Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Note(s): .5475 .4501 .5649 1.1792 1. All potable water is to be supplied by Metro -Dade WASAD. 32 Please see the following letter from the off -site supplier of potable water, the Metro Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department. 2. If service cannot be provided at all times during and after development, identify the required capital improvements, timing, cost, and proposed responsible entity for each phase in which service is unavailable. Service can be provided at all times during and after development. G. Please describe any water conservation methods or devices incorporated into the plan of development. What percentage of reduction is anticipated over conventional plans? The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 includes the following policies that relate to the conservation of potable water in Southeast Overtown/Park West: 1. The City will cooperate and participate to the fullest extent possible with Dade County and other county municipalities receiving potable water from WASAD in developing an acceptable countywide water conservation plan. 2. The City will adopt an emergency water conservation ordinance that is consistent with the existing Dade County emergency water conservation ordinance as well as the emergency water conservation policies of the South Florida Water Management District. 3. By 1995, the City will develop and adopt an acceptable city -level water conservation plan which lists specific measures to be taken on a regular basis as well as 'in emergency drought conditions; such measures will include but not be limited to: 1. Requiring plumbing fixtures which use low volumes of water in new developments and renovations. 2. Where appropriate, require xeriscape landscaping which is the use of plants in landscaping which require little or no irrigation. This is in accordance with South Florida Water Management District policies. 3. Distribute water conservation information to the public which details voluntary water conservation practices from those that are mandatory during drought conditions. 33 MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT P. O. BOX 330310 MIAM€. rLOrUDA 332,33.0310 July 2, 1991 City of Miami Department of Development and Housing Conservation Attention: Mr. Herbert J. Bailey, Assistant City Manager 300 Biscayne (Boulevard Way, Suite 400-401 Miami, Florida 33131 Mash 0Mae; 357!' LeJeur1(.y Road 7oI , oc�cIrei:,17 9747% r- :,ca ^Cr7s. _ n • Fr) .; y 4 1 cn to [,] f•W Re: Water and Sewer Service for Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (1)11). Dear Mr. Bailey: This is in response to your letter regarding water and sewer service to the referenced project for Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department currently has water and sewer capacity in the plants and transmission system serving the areas in question at the present time. However, water distribution and sanitary sewers in the area are old and may be undersized, thus not capable of providing proper domestic service and fire flow for the proposed development. The Department will study individual projects as they are presented for review and make recommendations as to how to improve the system for proper service. These improvements should be at the Developer's expense. Information concerning the estimated cost of facilities must be obtained from a consulting engineer. All costs of engineering and construction will be the responsibility of the property owner. In addition, the Department's standard water and sewer connection charges will be required. Easements must be provided covering any on -site facilities which will be owned and operated by the Department. At the present time, we have available water and sewer system capacity for the referenced project. However, the availability 34 City of Miami Department of Development and Housing Conservation "Water and Sewer Service for Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DR)" Page 2 of water and sewer service for subject project is conditioned upon the approval of various regulatory agencies and no continuing unconditional commitment can be made at this time. Consequently, this letter is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a commitment for service. When development plans for subject property are finalized, and upon the owner's request, we will he pleased to prepare an agreement for water and sewer services, provided the Department is able to offer those services at the time of the owner's request. The agreement will detail requirements for off --site and on —site facilities, points of connection, connection charges, capacity reservation and all other terms and conditions necessary for service in accordance with the Department's Rules and Regulations. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact us. Very) truly yours, 7 Grrett S1an Director TRG/ch cc: bulce M. Rodriguez Rick tterrera 35 (City of tanuu F-iERBERT j. BAILEY Assistant City Manager May 30, 1991 Mr. Tomas Goicouria New Business Manager Metro -Dade WASAD P. 0. Box 316 Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Mr. Goicouria: CESAR 11. ODIO City Manager The City of Miami, through its Department of Development and Housing Conservation, is preparing an Application for Development Approval (ADA) for Phase II of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The ADA is a questionnaire designed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council to measure a proposed development's impact on the environment and public infrastructure network and services. Question 17 (Water Supply) and Question 18 (Wastewater Management) from the ADA require us to provide a letter from WASAD outlining: (a) the projected excess capacities of the water supply and wastewater treatment facilities to which connection will be made at present and at the end of each phase of the project, (b) any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity, and (c) a statement of WASAD's ability to provide services at all tunes during and after development. To assist you in responding to this request we are enclosing our Proposed Development Program/Project Description (Attachment I), tables identifying potable water demand by project phase (Attachments II and III), and tables identifying the amount of wastewater generated by the project (Attachments IV and V). Consumption and generation rates have been taken from the Consolidated Applications for Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/Park West and the Downtown Miami DRIs. 36 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING CONSERVATION/DUPONT PLAZA CENTER 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Suite 400-401/Miami, FL 33131 DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (305) 579-3366 / HOUSING DIVISION (305) 579-3336 PROPERTY AND LEASE MANAGEn1ENT DIVISION (305) 372-46,10 / Tclocnpier: (305) 371-9710 Mr. Tomas Goicouria Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information to respond to our request, please contact Reggie Barker, of my staff, at 579-3366. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, erbert J. 3a y Assistant City Manager /rb Attachments 37 H. Indicate whether proposed water service will be provided within an established service area boundary. The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI is within an established potable water service area boundary. 38 QUESTION 18 - WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE: Transmission Capacity (City): 100 gallons/resident/day Disposal Capacity (County): 100 gallons/resident/day ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: Transmission Capacity (City): 100 gallons/resident/day Disposal Capacity (County): 100 gallons/resident/day LEVEL OF SERVICE AFTER PROJECT BUILDOUT: Transmission Capacity (City): 100 gallons/resident/day Disposal Capacity (County): 100 gallons/resident/day A. Provide, in the table given below, the projected wastewater generation at the end of each phase of development and proposed wastewater treatment. Identify the assumptions used to project this demand. A projection of average daily wastewater generation at the end of each phase of development and proposed wastewater treatment is included in the following table. All wastewater is to be treated by the Metro Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department. The generation table was developed using rates from the Metro Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management and approved in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI. The generation rates are as follows: Office 8 gallons/day/100 square feet Commercial 8 gallons/day/100 square feet Hotel 160 gallons/day/room Residential 160 gallons/day/unit Attractions 2.4 gallons/day/seat B. If applicable, generally describe the volumes, characteristics and pre-treatment techniques of any industrial or other effluents prior to discharge from proposed industrial -related use(s). Industrial uses are not proposed for Southeast Overtown/Park West. 39 On -site Off -site Wastewater Wastewater Wastewater Phase Generation (MGD) Treatment (MGD) Treatment (MGD) Existing .4380 .0000 .4380 Phase 1 .3601 .0000 .3601 Phase 2 .4519 .0000 .4519 Phase 3 .9433 .0000 .9433 Total 2.1933 .0000 2.1933 Note(s): 1. All wastewater is to be treated by Metro -Dade WASAD. C. 1. If off -site treatment is planned, identify the treatment facility and attach a letter from the agency or film providing the treatment outlining present and projected excess capacity of the treatment and transmission facilities through buildout, any commitments that have been made for this excess and a statement of ability to provide service at all times during or after development. Please see the following letter from the Metro Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department. 2. If service cannot be provided, identify the required capital improvements, costs, timing, and proposed responsible entity necessary to provide service at all times during and after development. Service can be provided at all times during and after development. D. If septic tanks will be used on site, indicate the number of units to be served, general locations and any plans for eventual phase -out. Septic tanks will not be used on site. E. Indicate whether proposed wastewater service will be provided within an established service area boundary. The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI is within an established wastewater service area boundary. 41 MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT P. O. 00X 330316 rLO111L]A 33233.0316 July 2, 1991 City of Miami Department of Development and Housing Conservation Attention: Mr. Herbert J. Bailey, Assistant City Manager 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Suite 400-401 Miami, Florida 33131 Main Ofliae) 357 La,letrnm Fload Tvl Janetrijg),17.47I c r7 -r! r- rIn7 C )• CL] [)3 Re: Water and Sewer Service for Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (till.) . Dear Mr. Bailey: This is in response to your letter regarding water and sewer service to the referenced project for Southeast 0vertown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (ART.). The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department currently has water and sewer capacity in the plants and transmission system serving the areas in question at the present time. However, water distribution and sanitary sewers in the area are old and may be undersized, thus not capable of providing proper domestic service and fire flow for the proposed development. The Department will study individual projects as they are presented for review and make recommendations as to how to improve the system for proper service. These improvements should be at the Developer's expense. Information concerning the estimated cost of facilities must be obtained from a consulting engineer. All costs of engineering and construction will be the responsibility of the property owner. In addition, the Department's standard water and sewer connection charges will be required. Easements must be provided covering any on --site facilities which will be owned and operated by the Department. At the present time, we have available water and sewer system capacity for the referenced project. However, the availability 42 City of Miami Department of Development and Housing Conservation "Water and Sewer Service for Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DR)" Page 2 of water and sewer service for subject project is conditioned upon the approval of various regulatory agencies and no continuing unconditional commitment can be :Wade at this time. Consequently, this letter is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a commitment for service. When development plans for subject property are finalized, and upon the owner's request, we will be pleased to prepare an agreement for water and sewer services, provided the Department is able to offer those services at the time of the owner's request. The agreement will detail requirements for off -site and on -site facilities, points of connection, connection charges, capacity reservation and all other terms and conditions necessary for service in accordance with the Department's Rules and Regulations. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact us. C) Very) truly yours, GZG G trett 51 an Director TRG/ch cc: Dulce M. Rodriguez Rick Herrera 43 Efg of trznxi HERBERT I. BAILEY Assistant City Manager May 30, 1991 Mr. Tomas Goicouria New Business Manager Metro -Dade WASAD P. O. Box 316 Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Mr. Goicouria: CESAR 11. 0010 City Manager The City of Miami, through its Department of Development and Housing Conservation, is preparing an Application for Development Approval (ADA) for Phase II of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The ADA is a questionnaire designed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council to measure a proposed development's impact on the environment and public infrastructure network and services. Question 17 (Water Supply) and Question 18 (Wastewater Management) from the ADA require us to provide a letter from WASAD outlining: (a) the projected excess capacities of the water supply and wastewater treatment facilities to which connection will be made at present and at the end of each phase of the project, (b) any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity, and (c) a statement of WASAD's ability to provide services at all times during and after development. To assist you in responding to this request we are enclosing our Proposed Development Program/Project Description (Attachment I), tables identifying potable water demand by project phase (Attachments II and III), and tables identifying the amount of wastewater generated by the project (Attachments IV and V). Consumption and generation rates have been taken from the Consolidated Applications for Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/Park West and the Downtown Miami DRIs. 44 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND MOUSING CONSERVATION/DUPONT PLAZA CENTER 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Suite 400-401/Miami, FL 33131 DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (305) 579-3366 / HOUSING DIVISION (305) 579-3336 PROPERTY AND LEASE MANAGEMENT DIVISION (305) 372-4640 / Telrropier: (305) 371-9710 Mr. Tomas Goicouria Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information to respond to our request, please contact Reggie Barker, of my staff, at 579-3366. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, erbert J. :ai -y Assistant City Manager /rb Attachments 45 QUESTION 20 - SOLID WASTE/HAZARDOUS WASTE/MEDICAL WASTE EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE: Collection (City): Disposal (County): 1.28 tons/resident/year 1.28 tons/resident/year ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: Collection (City): Disposal (County): 1.28 tons/resident/year 1.28 tons/resident/year LEVEL OF SERVICE AFTER PROJECT BUILDOUT: Collection (City): 1.28 tons/resident/year Disposal (County): 1.28 tons/resident/year A. Provide a projection of the average daily volumes of solid waste generated at the completion of each phase of development. Use the format below and identify the assumptions used in the projection. A projection of the average daily volumes of solid waste generated at the completion of each phase of development is included in the following table. The generation table was developed using rates from the Metro Dade County Department of Solid Waste Management and approved in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI. The generation rates are as follows: Office Commercial Hotel Residential Attractions 1 lb/day/100 square feet 4 lbs/day/100 square feet 5 lbs/day/room 16.7 lbs/day/unit .88 lbs/day/seat B. 1. Please specify the extent to which this project will contain laboratories, storage facilities, and warehouse space where hazardous materials may be generated or utilized. What types of hazardous waste or toxic materials are likely to be generated? Will a hazardous materials management plan be prepared covering all uses of hazardous materials on -site? If so, please discuss contents and enforcement provisions. 46 SOLID WASTE GENERATION Domestic Solid Waste Phase Tons/Day Existing Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Note(s): 3.2600 22.9580 24.5890 47.5645 1. Cubic yards per day not available. 2. Industrial, hazardous, medical and other special wastes will not be generated by the proposed development. 3. All waste will be disposed of by Metro -Dade Department of Solid Waste Management. 47 Southeast Overtown/Park West is not proposed to include laboratories, storage facilities or warehouse space where hazardous materials may be generated or utilized. However, pursuant to the Master development order the City has adopted Ordinance No. 10543 (see Appendix I) which addresses hazardous materials by stipulating that all development within the project area is subject to Section 24-35.1 of the Dade County Code. This section of the Code states that operating permits must be issued by the Metro Dade Department of Environmental Resources Management for listed SIC activities which may produce hazardous waste. The criterion for the issuance of permits is adherence to the provisions of Section 24 (Environmental Protection) of the Code. 2. Please discuss what measures will be taken to separate hazardous waste from the solid waste stream. What plans and facilities will be developed for hazardous or toxic waste handling, generation, and emergencies? Please see the response to Question B.1. 3. Please identify off -site disposal plans for hazardous waste generated by this development and provide assurance of proper disposal by a qualified contractor. Please see the response to Question B.1. 4. What local and state regulations, permits and plans will regulate the generation and handling of hazardous waste at this development? City of Miami, Ordinance No. 10543 Dade County Code, Chapter 24 Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 17-16, and 17-22 Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 10D-4 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 40 C.F.R. 403 C. For all waste disposal planned (on or off site), attach a copy of the letter from the developer describing the types and volumes of waste and waste disposal areas requested, and attach a letter from the agencies or firms providing services outlining: 1. the projected excess capacity of the facilities serving the development at present and for each phase through completion of the project, 2. any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity, 48 3. a statement of the agency's or firm's ability to provide service at all times during and after development (the agency or firm must be supplied with the solid waste generation table in (A) above). Please see the following letter from the Metro Dade Department of Solid Waste Management. 49 (IUUg of $ttamt HERBERT J. BAILEY Assistant City Manager May 30, 1991 Ms. Diane Ragbeer Solid Waste Management Planner Metro -Dade Dept. of Solid Waste Mgmt. 8675 N.W. 53rd Street, Suite 201 Miami, Florida 33166 Dear Ms. Ragbeer: CESAR H. ODIO City Manager The City of Miami, through its Department of Development and Housing Conservation, is preparing an Application for Development Approval (ADA) for Phase II of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The ADA is a questionnaire designed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council to measure a proposed development's impact on the environment and public infrastructure network and services. Question 20 (Solid Waste/Hazardous Waste/Medical Waste) from the ADA requires us to provide a letter from the Metro -Dade Depart- ment of Solid Waste Management outlining: (a) the projected excess capacity of the solid waste disposal facilities serving the project (DRI) at present and at the end of each phase of development, (b) any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity, and (c) a statement of the Department of Solid Waste Management's ability to provide services at all times during and after development. To assist you in responding to this request we are enclosing our Proposed Development Program/Project Description (Attachment I) and tables identifying solid waste generation by project phase (Attachments II and III). Generation rates have been taken from the Consolidated Applications for Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/Park West and the Downtown Miami DRIB. 50 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING CONSERVATION/DUPONT PLAZA CENTER 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Suite 400-401/Miami, FL 33131 DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (305) 579-3366 / HOUSING DIVISION (305) 579-3336 PROPERTY AND LEASE MANAGEMENT DIVISION (305) 372-4t40 / Telecopier: (305) 371-9710 Ms. Diane Raybeer Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information to respond to our request, please contact Reggie Barker, of my staff, at 579-3366. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Herbert J. p 4„.1-y Assistant CI -Cy Manager /rb Attachments METRO SOLID WASTE M A N A Q E M E N i Mr. Herbert J. Bailey City of Miami Dept. of Development and Housing Dupont Plaza Center 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Suite 400 Miami, Florida 33131 Re: Proposed Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI Dear Mr. Bailey: July 8, ~ti Please excuse the slow response to your information request. Each year the Department of Solid Waste Management issues a solid waste disposal level -of -service (LOS) concurrency finding. A copy of the finding last issued October 5, 1990 is attached for your use. The finding states that the current LOS for solid waste disposal is adequate to permit development orders to be issued. I hope this information is adequate to fulfill your needs. If you have questions concerning this letter or the concurrency finding please contact Paul Mauriello of my staff at (305) 594-1621. Sincerely, Ben J. Guilford II Director Department of Solid Waste Management BJG/pjm enclosure cc: Kathie Brooks, Chief of Management and Budget Diana Ragbeer, SWM Planner Paul Mauriello, SWM Planner 52 8675 Northwest 53rd Street, Suite 201, Miami, Florida 33166 • 305-592-1776 r M E M 0 R A N 0 M 107.0/-17A.u41ro4.nt.s...•t .1ct See Distribution List* DATE: October 5, 1990 SUBJECT: solid Waste Disposal FROM Guilford II Level of Service/ Concurrency Finding lid Waste Management In accordance with Metro --Dade Ordinance No. 89-66 and Resolution No. R-761-89, the Department of Solid Waste Management is providing you with this finding regarding the current status of the existing level of service for solid waste. In accordance with the County's adopted Comprehensive Master Development Plan, the County shall maintain solid waste disposal faciliti.es:in an amount sufficient to provide a minimum of five (5) years of disposal capacity at the generation rate of seven (7) pounds per capita per day. A recent analysis of the capacity of the solid waste system has resulted in the determination that existing facilities have sufficient capacity to provide service through the end of year 1995. This determination is contingent upon the the continued ability of the County to obtain construction permits for the preparation of new landfill cells on existing sites and renew current operating permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation as needed. Therefore, please be advised that the current level of service is adequate to permit development orders to be issued. This finding shall remain in effect for a period of one (1) year, at which time you will be advised of any revisions to this concurrency status. BJG:dlr * Distribution List Jorge Rodriguez, Building & Zoning Reynaldo Villar, Building & Zoning Terry Lunn, Building & Zoning Walter Herndon, Public Works Russell Kelly, Public Works Tony Toledo, Public Works John Renfrow, DERM Lee Rawlinson, DIC Rebecca Osterman, DIC Craig Coller, County Attorney Eric Gressman, County Attorney Patrick Casey, County Attorney Jeffrey D. Kaplan, Solid Waste Management Andrew Wi'fork, Solid Waste Management Tanhum Goldshmid, Solid Waste Management Bobby Tomlin, Solid Waste Management Kathie G. Brooks, Solid Waste Management 53 QUESTION 23 - HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS A. 1. Identify any residential development proposed within the hurricane vulnerability zone delineated in the applicable regional hurricane evacuation study, regional public hurricane shelter study or adopted county peacetime emergency plan. If so, delineate the proposed development's location on the appropriate county and/or regional hurricane evacuation map and respond to questions B.(1) and B.(2) below. Proposed mobile home and park trailer developments should answer question B.(1), regardless of location, or answer question B.(1) and B.(2) below, if proposed within the hurricane vulnerability zone or high hazard hurricane evacuation area. Please see the map which follows, Hurricane Preparedness - Dade County Evacuation Zones. B. 1. For each phase of the development, determine the development's public hurricane shelter space requirements based on the behavioral assumptions identified in the applicable regional study or county plan. Identify the existing public hurricane shelter space capacity during the one hundred year or category three hurricane event within the county where the development is being proposed and indicate whether the county has a deficit or surplus of public hurricane shelter space during the one hundred year or category three hurricane event. Southeast Overtown/Park West is located in Evacuation Zone 12. An order to evacuate will be issued for Category 2 or stronger hurricanes (Evacuation Level D). Based on assumptions identified in the appropriate plan, 15-20% of the residents of the proposed development will evacuate the area and require shelter space. (See the following table for shelter space requirements.) According to the Metro Dade County Office of Emergency Management, there is currently a deficit of public hurricane shelter space. 2. For each phase of the development, determine the number of evacuating vehicles the development would generate during a hurricane evacuation event based on the transportation and behavioral assumptions identified in the applicable regional study or county plan. Identify the nearest designated hurricane evacuation route and determine what percentage of level of service E hourly directional and maximum service volume the project will utilize. 54 PHASE HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS Shelter Space Requirements Total Persons Dwelling Per Units Household Total Population Persons Requiring Shelter Space Phase 1 2,000 1.8 3,600 720 Phase 2 2,000 1.8 3,600 720 Phase 3 5,000 1.8 9,000 1,800 Totals 9,000 - 16,200 3,240 Lri Evacuate for category 4 or Hurricane 111111 MINI WW1 MISS gientag OSSIOSSIO MOWN 1610113NF =DE NAM MOSS MEM ISIXINfo Oral MOM 11111 with" iful MISIO ttal animal 1111111111 t III IRS Woo SU= SaAll MOM 111 MUM MO11111 111111111 EMU 11 -- rid, a inn llM111Hm 0-1CtMT1ar&y PARE f:�Y:ifitSss Evacuate for category 2 or Greater Hurricane Y 11111111 0§"Rk `� _.1\51 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS-DADE COUNTY EVACUATION ZONES w z U FORT ROULtVS D The number of evacuating vehicles is identified in the following table, Hurricane Preparedness - Evacuating Vehicles. According to the Metro Dade Office of Emergency Management, the evacuation routes for Southeast Overtown/Park West are the "normal routes" persons would travel to exit the area. C. Identify and describe any action(s) or provisions that will be undertaken to mitigate impacts on hurricane preparedness. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 identi- fies several policies to minimize the potential for loss of human life and the destruction of property from hurricanes. The policies are as follows: 1. Enforce building code standards that protect against the destruction of structures by hurricane winds and tidal swells. 2. Continue to insure that all development and redevelopment conforms to proper elevation requirements in the Coastal High Hazard Area. 3 Immediately subsequent to the event of a major storm, the adequacy of existing building standards and the appropriateness of land uses and development regulations in the Coastal High Hazard Area will be reviewed, and all modifications to standards, zoning or land use policies required to reduce future risk of loss of life and property damage will be adopted prior to the approval of long term, post disaster redevelopment plans. 4. Each proposed land use and land development regulation within the Coastal High hazard area of the city will require an analysis of its potential impact on evacuation times and shelter needs in the event of a hurricane. 5. The City will work with the South Florida Regional Planning Council to develop a model post -disaster redevelopment plan. The City will prepare its own redevelopment plan by 1992 which will provide guidance for long term repair and redevelopment activities; the removal, relocation or structural modification of damaged infrastructure and unsafe structures. 6. The City will work in cooperation with regional and state agencies in the preparation of advance plans for safe evacuation of coastal residents. 57 PHASE HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS Evacuating Vehicles Total Vehicles Total Evacuating Dwelling Per Vehicles Vehicles Units Household Phase 1 2,000 .465 930 186 Phase 2 2,000 .465 930 186 Phase 3 5,000 .465 2,325 465 Totals 9,000 - 4,185 837 HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS Evacuating Vehicles: Level of Service "E" Roadways Phase/Roadway Percentage of LOS "E" Traffic Volume Phase 1 1-95 Northbound b/t S.R. 836 and S.R. 112 1-95 Northbound b/t S.R. 112 and Golden Glades S.R. 836 Westbound b/t 1-95 and Florida T'pike Phase 2 1-95 Northbound b/t S.R. 836 and S.R. 112 1-95 Northbound b/t S.R. 112 and Golden Glades S.R. 836 Westbound b/t 1-95 and Florida T'pike Phase 3 1-95 Northbound b/t S.R. 836 and S.R. 112 1-95 Northbound b/t S.R. 112 and Golden Glades S.R. 836 Westbound b/t I--95 and Florida T'pike Notes: .83 1.00 1.67 1.66 2.00 2.00 3.75 4.50 4.50 1. Normal DRI exit routes are 1-95 and S.R. 836. 2. Evacuating vehicles will be travelling northbound and westbound. 3. Fifty percent (50%) of the evacuating vehicles will use 1-95 Northbound and 50% will use S.R. 836 Westbound. 59 PART V. Human Resource Impacts QUESTION 24 - HOUSINQ A. 1. If the proposed development contains residential development, provide the following information on Table 1 for each phase of the development. Please see Table 1 on the following page. 2. What number and percent of lots will be sold without constructed dwelling units? What is the extent of improvements to be made on these lots prior to sale? No individual lots will be sold. 3. What will be the target market for the residential development (breakdown by number, percent and type the number of dwelling units to be marketed for retirees, families, etc.) What portion will be marketed as second or vacation homes? In 1985, the City of Miami commissioned a study intended to provide essential data on the characteristics of the population of persons employed in the downtown Miami area and their reactions toward and interest in housing in the Southeast Overtown/Park West project area. Through a survey it was determined that approximately one-third of the downtown workforce would consider relocating downtown to a residential community. The survey revealed that: -The likely relocators include a larger number of blacks and Hispanics than the unlikely relocators. -The likely relocators tend to be younger, more likely to be single, and are substantially less affluent than the unlikely relocators. -Likely relocators tend to occupy smaller housing units, and are more often renting and more likely to already be living in central Miami than the unlikely relocators. -Despite concerns about crime, likely relocators consider downtown Miami an advantageous place to live, principally because of convenience to shopping and work. 60 Housing Costs(1) Table 1 Dwelling Units within Development Number of Dwelling Units Apartment Condominium Total Rental -Occupied D.U.s $495-$900 3,600 N.A. 3,600 Owner -Occupied D.U.s $66,000-$85,000 N.A. 5,400 5,400 Totals 3,600 5,400 9,000 (1) Rental and cost ranges to be determined at the preapplication conference. 61 The survey revealed that the ideal residence contains two or three bedrooms: preference and demand for one bedroom units is soft, and a very small demand is exhibited for efficiencies or studio apartments. The amenity requirements are extremely conventional, and are typical of condominium apartment projects throughout Dade County: building security, personal washing machines, covered parking, balconies, a swimming pool. Residential dwelling units are not proposed to be marketed as second or vacation homes. B. Indicate and discuss the availability or projected availability of adequate housing and employment opportunities reasonably accessible to the development site. Housing opportunities should be described in terms of type, tenure, and cost range and location within the following circumscribed area: adjacent, two miles, five miles, ten miles, and within the local jurisdiction or county. Employment opportunities should be described in terms of two digit SIC code numbers located within the local jurisdiction with estimated distances or transit times to the development site. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project proposes the construction of 9,000 affordable housing units between 1988 and 2007. The City defines affordable (moderate income) housing as residential units whose associated housing costs (mortgage principal repayment, interest and real property taxes for owner occupied housing, and gross rent for renter occupied housing) are equal to or less than 30 percent of the median household income in Dade County. Multifamily housing is proposed for the development site. Approximately sixty percent of the units will be owner - occupied. Rent and sales prices at the recently constructed Phase 1 apartments and condominiums are as follows: Biscayne View Apartments One Bedroom Two Bedroom Three Bedroom Arena Towers (Apartments) One Bedroom Two Bedroom $569-$759 $600-$849 $900 $495-$700 $605-$1000 Poinciana Village (Condominiums) Two Bedroom $66,000-$75,000 Three Bedroom $76,000-$85,000 62 During the course of development (1988-2007), approximately 4,800 permanent jobs will be created in Southeast Overtown/- Park West. The majority of the jobs created will be in the office and retail sectors. These employment opportunities will be within walking distance of the proposed residential development. Additionally, Metrorail and Metromover are available to provide residents with easy and quick (10 minutes or less) access to the Miami central business district (adjacent to the project area), Omni and Brickell. In total, these subareas of downtown contain more than 100,000 jobs. Finance, insurance, real estate, and professional and related services comprise most employment opportunities in downtown Miami. According to the Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security, employment data by two digit SIC code is not available for the City of Miami. However, data by two digit SIC code is available for Dade County. This data is included as Appendix II. Most countywide employment opportunities are within a thirty minute commute of the project area. C. If displacement or relocation of existing residents will occur due to the proposed development, identify the number of people that will be affected, any special needs of these people, and any provisions for addressing the effects of the relocation or displacement of these people, particularly in regards to their ability to find suitable replacement housing. Displacement or relocation of existing residents will not occur due to the proposed development. 63 QUESTION 25 - POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION A. If police/fire services, facilities or sites will be dedicated or otherwise provided on -site, describe them, specify any conditions of dedication and locate on Map H. Police and fire services will be provided in Southeast Overtown/Park West by the City of Miami Police Department and the City of Miami Fire Department. The police facilities proposed to serve the project are located at 400 N.W. 2nd Avenue (one block south of the project area) and 1600 N.W. 3rd Avenue (approximately one block north of the project area). Two fire stations are proposed to serve the project. They are located at 144 N.E. 5th Street (adjacent to the project area) and 1901 N. Miami Avenue (approximately eight blocks north of the project area). Pursuant to the preapplication conference, Map H is not required. B. Provide correspondence from the appropriate providers acknowledging notice of the proposed development and phasing, and indicating whether present facilities and manpower are capable of serving the project or specifying the additional manpower/equipment necessary to serve the development. If the provider is from another jurisdiction, the letter should also identify any non -facility -related problems in providing said service. See correspondence from the City of Miami Police Department and the City of Miami Fire Department on the following pages. 64 CITY cW MIAtv1I, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Iierb~Bailey -`Asq-i.sta FROM': �rt alvih' Ross Chief of Police ty Manager Development Conservation un3E SUBJEC 1 . FIEFEIlENCFS : t NCLOSURES -In 2 { 1911 Overtown Park West DRI Police Services ADM 8-1 The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Phase II will have an impact on the delivery of police services. At the current time resources have been stretched to the limit and the delivery of services is diminishing from its present levels, Additional development or redevelopment will place greater demands on current service levels resulting in the need for additional personnel to be added to the Miami Police Department. Based on the projected development supplied by your staff, we have prepared the attached table that projects estimated service population for each phase of development. We then applied our established factor of 1.4 police officers per thousand service population and one civilian per three police officers to determine personnel needs as detailed below. The following additional personnel will be required to provide police services to the Overtown/Park. West Project (excluding attraction events): SERVICE POLICE CIVILIAN YEAR PRASE POPULATION OFFICERS PERSONNEL 1988-1997 I 6,435 9 3 1992-1999 II 8,744 12 4 1999-2007 III 16,387 23 7 Total 31,566 44 14 With regard to staffing of officers for attraction events, the promoters of the event or the host facility must arrange for additional off -duty police personnel to provide security and traffic control both inside the facility and in the impacted area on the outside of the facility, thereby, relieving -:the burden from normal police resources that provide routine services to the surrounding community. This also includes specializedstyles of patrol such as Mounted Patrol and K-9 Units. Routine police services will be provided to the facility during normal non-event hours. 65 Mr. Herb Bailey Assistant City Manager Overtown Park West Page 2 Expenses for capital expenditures needed for the increased personnel should come from Impact Fees. If projects do not fall under the City of Miami Impact Fee Ordinance, then capital costs should be provided for in the DRI application. If further information is needed, please contact me or Lt. Joseph T. Longueira in the Planning and Research Unit, telephone extension 6524. CR:mn 66 HIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT OVERTOWN/PARK WEST PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT/SERVICE POPULATION OFFICE SPACE COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS RESIDENTIAL ATTRACTIONS SQ.FT. EMPLOYEES 4.44 PER 1K SQ.FT. CLIENTS 1 PER 200 SQ.FT. SQ.FT. EMPLOYEES 2.75 PER 1K SQ.FT. CUSTOMERS 1 PER 193 SQ.FT. ROOM EMPLOYEES 1 PER ROOM CUSTOMERS 1.5 PER ROOM @ 76.5% OCCUP. OMITS LABOR .651 PER UNIT RESIDENTS 1.327 PER UNIT SEATS EMPLOYEES .02 PER SEAT PHASE I 166,000 737 830 95,400 258 494 0 0 0 2,000 1,302 2,654 8,000 160 PHASE II 337,000 1,496 1,685 71,700 194 371 500 500 382 2,000 1,302 2,654 8,000 160 PHASE 111 500,500 2,222 2,505 90,600 245 469 600 600 459 5,000 3,255 6,635 0 TOTAL 1,003,500 4,455 5,020 257,700 697 1,334 1,100 1,100 841 9,000 5,859 11,943 €6,000 320 P&R/6/21/91 TO : FROM : CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA GI y 11 1N,M5fitirc/!_ fl I(EMEMORANDUM Herbert J. Bailey 1 MAY 30 At�11Q 38 Assistant City Manager Department of Development and Housing Conservation O.R.I. E. J. Lutes, Fire Marshal Chief, Fire Prevention Bureau DATE : SUBJECT : REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: May 29, 1991 Phase II Overtown FILE : Southeast Parkwest In response to your letter of May 13, 1991, whether or not the fire department is capable of providing the required services for Phase II of the above proposed development. From the viewpoint of providing the necessary fire fighting services for this development, my response would be affirmative. This response is based upon the requirements for the type of construction that will be required and fire sprinklering of the buildings which will significantly reduce the potential of any major fire problems from developing. Presently, we have two fire stations providing all emergency medical service in this area. 'We are presently capable of handling these cal i s. We must though keep in mind that E.M.S. calls are increasing each year. Phase II will be a number of years before most of these units come into being. At that time or before we may be forced into providing additional rescue service to handle the E.M.S. calls in a timely manner. EJL:bfh cc: C. H. Duke, Director F. Jordan, Deputy Chief 68 QUESTION 28 - HEALTH CARE A. Describe the health care services and facilities that will be required to meet health needs generated by this project. Please provide a letter from the various providers acknowledging notice of the proposed development and ability to serve the project. The residents of Southeast Overtown/Park West will require both hospital and primary health care services. The hospitals in close proximity to the area are Jackson Memorial Hospital located at 1611 N.W. 12th Avenue and Cedars Medical Center located a 1400 N.W. 12th Avenue. Both hospitals are less than a ten minute drive from the project area. According to the 1990-1992 District XI Health Plan, Jackson is operating at 87.4% of licensed capacity and Cedars is operating at 45.1% of licensed capacity. A new primary care center is being planned to be housed at the Overtown Shopping Center located at 1600 N.W. 3rd Avenue. Additionally, numerous physicians maintain practices in the Miami central business district which is adjacent to the project area. Also, Civic Center, located approximately ten minutes from the project area is the site of the metropolitan region's medical complex. The medical complex houses numerous practicing physicians. A letter from the Health Council of South Florida acknowledging notice of Southeast Overtown/Park West and stating that health care providers are capable of meeting the health -related demand of the DRI is provided on the following page. 69 OFFICERS EVELYN BAf4RITT, RO3ERT WALKEP Lei I'31(ntcr.tlt J01114 SFORZA MA[liO JARDOII HEALTH COUNCIL OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. N., PILO, BOARD MEMBERS HERBERT A. AMMONS, SR. VERY REV ROBERT A. GENDREAU, M.Div., M,A. ELAINE GOWAN IfVIt4G GFIEENBLATT EMILIO LOPEZ WILLIAMIr MALJK, 41OIJ. MIKE PWO JOAN G. RODBINS EXECUTIVE DIIIECTORI LIUDA S. OUIGI( June 5, 1991 Herbert J. Bailey Assistant City Manager City of Miami Department of Development/Dupont Plaza Center 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Suite 400 Miami, FL 33131 Dear Mr. Bailey: The Health council of South Florida, Inc. has received the notice of the proposed Southeast Overtown/Park review of these documents, the Health Council has made the following determinations: w Hospital services are available within 30 minutes travel distance from the proposed development site. Jackson Memorial Hospital and Cedars Medical Center are both located in close proximity (See attached hospital addresses). e. A new primary care center is being planned for the proposed geographic area to meet the needs of Overtown residents. In addition, it is recommended that physicians be encouraged to rent space in the proposed office building to help attract private practitioners to the area. Based on the above, the Health Council finds that health care providers would be capable of meeting the health --related demand of the DRI, especially if private physicians were encouraged to establish practices in the area. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 46t_ Linda S. Quick Executive Director LSQ:or 70 5757 BLUE LAGOON DRIVE • SUITE 170 • MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 • (305) 263-9020 "AN EOUA1 OPPORTUNITY EMPLOWEfl" Hospitals located in closed proximity to proposed Development Site: Jackson Memorial Hospital 1611 NW 12th Avenue Miami, FL 33136 Cedars Medical Center 1400 NW 12th Avenue Miami, FL 33125 APPENDICES 72 Appendix I 73 3-88-1156 12/5/88 ORDINANCE NO. 10543 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14, ENTITLED "DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT," OF THE, CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE IV, ENTITLED "REGULATIONS AFFECTING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AND SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT"; PROVIDING FOR: GENERAL INTENT; DEFINITIONS; PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS FOR RESERVATION OF DEVELOPMENT CREDITS; REALLOCATION OF EXPIRED OR RESCINDED CREDITS/ EFFECT OF PLAN CHANGES; AND APPEAL PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND TRAFFIC RELATED REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT. WHEREAS, the City Commission has adopted Resolution No. 87-1148 and Resolution No. 87-1149 rendering a Master Development Order and Increment I Development Order, respectively, pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes (1987), on the Application for Development Approval filed by the Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami, Florida for development of Downtown Miami (less the Southeast Overtown/Park West area), a Development of Regional Impact (DRI); and WHEREAS, the City Commission has adopted Resolution No. 88-110 and Resolution No. 88-111 rendering a Master Development Order and Increment I Development Order, respectively, pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes (1987), on the Application for Development Approval filed by the City of Miami, Florida for development of Southeast Overtown/Park West, a Development of Regional Impact (DRI); and WHEREAS, the Downtown Development Authority and the City sought development approval for a Downtown Development of Regional Impact to enable effective planning and monitoring of the growth and development of Downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West in conjunction with the availability of needed infrastructure and environmental safeguards to support such growth: and 74 i0543 WHEREAS, the development orders for both Downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West provide in part that: "The City shall monitor the capacity of Total Allowable Development by reserving the amount of Development Credits necessary for Net New Development at a time, to be determined by the City, prior to or coincident with approval of a building permit or Major Use Special Permit", and further say in part that: "The City shall place reasonable time limits on all building permits to assure that construction progresses within a reasonable period of time after approval to prevent stockpiling of Reservations for Development Credits"; and WHEREAS, the City finds it necessary to establish reasonable time limits on the Reservation of Development Credits pursuant.to said Resolutions 87-1148, 87-1149, 88-110 and 88-111 to protect the integrity of those resolutions and the integrity of planned, orderly development within the Downtown DRI area and the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI area; and WHEREAS, the City finds that the establishment of reasonable time limits on the Reservation of Development Credits pursuant to said Resolutions 87-1148, 87-1149, 88-110 and 88-111, to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Miami. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION Of THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Chapter 14, entitled "Downtown Development", of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, is hereby amended by adding a new Article TV, entitled "Regulations affecting Development within the Downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West Developments of Regional Impact", to read as follows: "CHAPTER 14 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE III. Gusman Hall Sec. 14-52. Advisory Committee. - 2 - 75 105.43 Sec. 14-53 - 14-59. Reserved ARTICLE IV - REGULATIONS AFFECTING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AND SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/FARK WEST DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT DIVISION 1. GENERAL INTENT This Article is intended to assist in the implementation of the Downtown Development of Regional Impact (Resolutions 87-1148 and 87-1149) and the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (Resolutions 88-110 and 88-111) Development Orders. Its purpose is to assure the orderly use and flow of development credits by preventin q the retention of such credits by developments unable to complete construction within a reasonable eriod of time and to initiate implementation of traffic control and environmental protection Measures of said resolutions. DIVISION 2. DEFINITIONS For the pur}sose of this Ordinance, the following terms shall be defined as presented below: (41 Building Permit: A permit issued bzr the City of Miami Building and Zoning Department, pursuant to the South Florida Building Code, for the construction or alteration of a structure which encloses space defined herein as "Net New Development". As used herein. this term shall be construed to mean all building_permits needed to construct or alter the full amount of Net New Development for which a Reservation of Development Credits has been issued on any given Parcel of Land. (b) Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent or temporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued., pursuant to Section 307 of the South Florida Building Code. for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. 3 76 10543 (c) City: The City of Miami, Florida. (d) Credit Holder: Entity to which a Reservation of Development Credits has been issued in conjunction with receipt of a Building Permit or Major Use Special Permit. (e) DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami. Florida. (f) DERM: Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. (g) AR1: Developmenr, of Regional imp ct. (h) Development: As defined in Section 380.04 Florida Statutes (1987), and any amendments thereto. (i) Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats. (Z) Development Orders: City of Miami Resolutions 87-1148 and 87-1149, as amended (Downtown Development of Regional Impact) and Resolutions 88-110 and 88-111 (Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional pact) as amended, as applicable. (k) Major Use Special Permit or MUSP: A special permit issued by the City Commission pursuant to Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended. (1) Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will result in a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling units. hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for office, government - 4 - 77 10543 office, • retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be removed by demolition of a building or structure may be credited against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of the Master and Increment I Development Orders rendered for the Downtown DRI for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. (m) Parcel of Land: Any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. (n) Reservation of Development Credits: ,q written certificate, signed by the Planning Director, allocating an amount of Development Credits equal to the amount of Net New Development approved by a MUSP or Building Permit to a specified Parcel of Land, subject to the terms and conditions of this ordinance. Reservations of Development Credits shall run with the land and shall not be transferable to any other Parcel of Land, Building Permit, or MDSP. - 5 - 78 10543' Co) Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of the Increment I Development Order, together with the applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1987), and which shall be measured by the following land uses: \ Office Southeast Overtown/ Downtown: Park west: 1,100,000 grass sq. ft. 166.000 gross sq. ft. Government Office 100,000 gross so. ft. 0 66,200 gross sq. ft. 0 2,000 dwelling units Retail/Service Hotel Residential Conventions Wholesale/ Industrial 1f 050,000 gross SI. ft. 0 Institutional 300,000 gross sa. ft. 0 11050,000 gross sg. ft. 1,000 rooms 3.550 dwelling units 500,000 gross sq. ft. 290,000 gross sa. ft. Attractions/ Recreation 3,400 seats 0 (p) Work: work shall be considered to have commenced and be in active progress when the Planning Director determines, after consultation with the City's Building Official, that a full complement of workmen and equipment is present at the site to diligently, customary incorporate in accordance construction with normal and scheduling, materials and equipment into the structure throughout the day on each full working day, weather permitting. DIVISION 3. PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS FOR RESERVATION OF DEVELOPMENT CREDITS Sec. 14-60. Reservation of Development Credits with Building Permit. - 6 - 7 9 1054Y Application tor Reservation of Development Credits for Net New Development within the Downtown DRI Area that is not required to undergo Major Use special Permit (MUSP) review pursuant to Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended, shall be made concurrent with applications for a Building Permit. Reservations tor Development Credits will be issued simultaneously with an approved Building Permit subject to the payment of all applicable fees at the time when due pursuant to ordinance. Sec. 14-61. Reservation of Development Credits with Major Use Special Permit. Application for Reservation of Development Credits for Net New Development within the Downtown DRI area that because of its size and nature must undergo Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) review pursuant to Ordinance 9500_4 the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended, shall be made concurrent with the application for a MUSP. pplicants shall only apply for Reservation of Development Credits for those portions or phases of their Net New Development anticipated to be Under Construction within twenty-four (24) months from the date of the issuance of the MUSP. Subsequent phases may receive a„ Building Permit has been Reservation only after the issued for the prior phase. Reservation of Development Credits shall be issued simultaneous with the MUSP, subject to the payment of all applicable fees at the time when due jursuant to ordinance, and further subject to adherence to the following time limitations: 11) Within six (6) months from the effective date of the MUSP. the applicant must demonstrate to the Planning Director that design development plans and drawings for those portions of Net New Development for which a - 7 - 80 10543' Reservation of Development Credits has been issued are in progress and are likely to be completed within the succeeding six (6) months. (2) Within twelve (12) months from the effective date of the MUSP, the applicant must submit a letter of intent to provide construction financing from a lending institution or other qualified source and demonstrate to the Planning Director that working drawingj'construction documents for those portions of Net New Development for which a Reservation of Development Credits has been issued are in progress and likely to be completed within the succeeding six (6) months. (3) Within eighteen (18) months from the effective date of the MUSP, the applicant must submit a binding. letter of commitment for construction financing from a lending institution or other qualified source and demonstrate to the Planning Director that a complete application for a Building Permit has been submitted to the Building and Zoning Department for those portions of Net New Development for which a Reservation of Development Credits has been issued. 14) Within twenty-four (24) months from the effective date of the MUSP, the applicant must demonstrate to the Planning Director that the Building Permit has been obtained and that Work has commenced on the Net New Development for which a Reservation of Development Credits has been issued. - 8 _ 81 10543 It shall• be the responsibility of the holder of the MDSP to submit the required information, in writing. to the Planning Director on or before the expiration date of each of the above described six month intervals. At any of the above described intervals the Planning Director may rescind the Reservation of Development Credits for failure to comply with the time limitations. Notice of intent to rescind a Reservation for Development Credits shall be made. in writing, by the Planning Director, stating reasons therefore, within fifteen (15) days from the 'expiration date of the current six month interval of the time limitations. The Credit Holder may present additional facts, information or data in support of his position prior to the rendering of a final decision by the Planning Director which shall be made in writing within thirty (30) days from the expiration date of the current six (6) month interval of the time limitations. Development Credits rescinded pursuant to this paragraph shall be held in reserve by the Planning Department pending the outcome of an appeal pursuant to Section 14-65. Sec. 14-62. Time Limits on Development Credit Reservation After Building Permit(S) Issued. Reservations of Development Credits will remain in effect for so long as the Building Permit remains in effect in accord with the South Florida Building Code; except as provided herein. (1) After twenty percent (20%) or more of the construction is complete, as measured by construction loan disbursements, on the full amount of Net New Development for which. a Reservation of Development Credits is applicable, the Reservation shall not expire or be rescinded except by termination of the 9 82 14543 Building' Permit. It shall be the responsibility of the Credit Molder to submit bank drafts or other relevant documentation to the Planning Director to verify required pro rata completion of said construction. (2) Prior to completion of twenty percent (20%) of construction, as provided above, if "Mork" appears not to be actively underway for at least fifty (508_)__percent of the working days [Monday - Friday, national holidays excluded) within any given six (6) month period, the Plannin_9 Director may, by certified mail, request a review of the reasons for the work stoppage. If the Credit Holder fails to respond in writing with supporting documentation, within fifteen (15) days, or if the Planning Director finds that Work has been abandoned or is likely to be stopped for longer than a six (6) month period of time due to financial. failure, legal action, or any other reason, he/she may rescind the Reservation of Development Credits. Notice of intent to rescind a Reservation for Development Credits shall be made in writing by the Planning Director, stating reasons therefore, within thirty (30) days from the date that. the Planning Director transmits, by certified mail, the written request for review of the work stoppage. The Credit Holder may present additional facts, information, or data in support of his position prior to the rendering of a final decision by the Planning Director which shall be made in writing within forty-five (45) days from the date that the Credit Holder - 10 - 83 10543 received- the written request for review of the work stoppage. If the Planning Director, after consulting with the City's Building official, finds sufficient evidence that Work will be resumed within the succeeding six month period and will continue on a reasonable time table for the size and nature of the construction project, according to local construction industry standards, he shall not rescind the Reservation of Development Credits; but he/she may establish a reasonable time table for completion of at least twenty (20%) percent of the Net New Development, and conditions upon which the Reservation of Development Credits may be rescinded upon failure to meet the time table. work stoppages caused by, civil unrest, labor disbutes on the site, or fire, shall be counted as "nonworking" days. Development Credits rescinded pursuant to this paragraph shall be held in reserve by the Planning Department pending the outcome of an aeaeal_pursuant to Section 14-65. Sec. 14-63. Reallocation of Development Credits Subsequent to Expiration or Rescission of a Reservation. If a Reservation for Development Credits expires or is rescinded by the Planning Director, Pursuant to this Ordinance, those Development Credits shall be reserved on a first -come -first -served basis for other Net New Development, subject to the following order of priority: (1) Net New Development with Building Permits approved subject to availability of Development credits. 84 10543 (2) Net' New Development with pending Building Permit applications, based upon the date of acceptance by the Building and Zoning: Department of the complete Building Permit applications. (3) Net New Development with a Letter of Commitment for construction financino and, if applicable, an approved MUSP. (4) Net New Development with approved MUSP's, based upon the approval date of the MUSP. If more than one MUSP was approved on the same datef priority will based upon the date of acceptance by the Planning Director of a complete MUSP application. No sooner than six (6) months after a Reservation for Development Credits has expired or been rescinded pursuant to this ordinance, a new Reservation for Development Credits may be given to the same Parcel of Land, following submission of a new application and payment of all applicable fees by the owner, subject to availability of Development Credits based upon the order of priority listed above. Sec. 14-64. Changes in Pi"ans SubsOuent to Reservation of Development Credits Any proposed change in plans affecting the use or gross square footage of any Net New Development shall be approved by the Planning Director, The Reservation of Development Credits and applicable fees shall be adjusted accordingly, provided however that additional Development Credits shall be reserved only when available according to the order of priority listed in Section 14-63 above. Sec. 14-65. Appeals If a Reservation of Development Credits is rescinded by the Planning Director, pursuant to this Ordinance, the Credit Holder may appeal said action to - 12- 10. 85 the City Commission by filing a notice of appeal with the City Clerk, within fifteen (15) days from the date of transmission to the Planning Director's written notification of Reservation of Development Credit rescission, and paying a filing fee of five hundred dollars ($500.00). The Notice of Appeal shall contain sufficient documentation for the City Commission to make a determination as to whether the Credit Holder has complied with the relevant portion of the time limitations set forth in Sections 14-61 and 14-62 herein. A public hearing shall be scheduled for the next available City Commission meeting, not to exceed forty-five (45) days from the date of appeal, whereupon, the City Commission shall, by Resolution, ratify the action of the Planning Director or shall reinstate all or -part of the Reservation of Development Credits for a time certain not to exceed six months, except as provided below, subject to appropriate terms and conditions, and subject to compliance with subsequent intervals of the in Sections 14-61 and 14-62. If work has been halted time limitations set forth by court injunction or governmental action. the City Commission may reinstate all or part of the credits for a time certain not to exceed one year upon a strong evidentiary showing by the appellant that matters giving_ rise to the injunction or governmental action have a very high probability of being resolved within six (6) months of the date of the ppellant's City Commission public hearing. Review of actions of the City Commission in reinstating a Reservation of Development Credits, reinstating a Reservation of Development Credits subject to terms and conditions. reinstating a portion of a Reservation of Development Credits whether or not subject to terms and conditions, or denying - 13 -- B6 1054a reinstatement of a Reservation of Development Credits shall be by filing a Notice of Appeal with the Circuit Court in accordance with the procedure and within the time provided by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure for the review of rulings of any commission or board. Secs. 14-66 - 14-69. Reserved DIVISION 4. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Sec. 14-70. Environmental Regulations All Development shall adhere to all terms and conditions in the Development Orders and in addition: (1) ❑uring construction, all Development with areas of exposed soil over five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. shall spray said exposed areas with water as Frequently as necessary to prevent airborne dust. Other methods of controlling airborne dust may be substituted if approved by DERM. If any area of e posed soil over five thousand (5.000) sq. ft. is intended to be undisturbed by construction for more than ninety (90) days. such area shall be sodded or seeded and mulched to provide grass cover. (2) During construction, Section 4611.1 of the South Florida Building Code shall be enforced by requiring all stormwater runoff to be retained on -site. or by placing temporary screens, berms, and(or rip --rap around the perimeter of the construction site to filter all stormwater runoff until the permanent stormwater retention system is operative. Such retention or filtration systems shall be approved by DERB and the City of Miami Department of Public Works. - 14 - 87 1d_ (3) All stormwater drainage systems shall be approved by DERM pursuant to the South Florida Water Management District rules; and shall be designed to retain on -site at least the first one inch of runoff from a 5-year storm event. (4) All drainage structures, including wellsL shall include pollutant retardant devices approved by DERM pursuant to the South Florida Water Management District rules. Such pollutant retardant devices shall be maintained in efficient operating condition, including periodic removal of accumulated contents. (5) Net New Development shall reduce pollutants entering ground water and/or surface waters by limiting application of pesticides and fertilizers in vegetated stormwater retention areas to once per year for preventive maintenance and to emergencies. such as uncontrolled insect infestation. (6) Net New Development shall reduce pollutants entering groundwater and/or surface waters by vacuum sweeping all parking lots of eleven or more vehicle spaces and private roadways serving the parking lots at least once per week. (7) All Development is subject to Section 24-35.1 of the Dade County Code. (8) Prior to construction on any site, all invasive exotic plants shall be removed, specifically Melaleuca, Casuarina, and Brazilian Pepper. Net New Development shall use only those species included in the official list of recommended plant species 15 - 88 1.0344 pr pared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as may be amended from time to time: provided, however, that additional species may be used if written approval is supplied by the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Said official list is on file with the Planning Department. Sec. 14-71. Traffic Control Measures The following requirements shall apply to all Development except: renovation of existing structures or land improvements; change of use or intensity of use of an existing structure or land improvement; new structures or additions to existing structures of less than 10,000 ssuare feet; excavation; demolition; or deposit of fill. All Development not excluded above shall: (1) Actively_ encourage all employees within the development to participate in carpools or vanpools by establishing or participating in an information and referral program, and shall maintain a current list (updated annually) of all employees interested in participating in a carpool or vanpool. (2) Establish and maintain a permanent distribution system for current Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Authority mass transit route and schedule information in locations throughout the development that are visible and accessible to existing and potential transit users, (3) Encourage mass transit use by the provision of bus shelters, bus turnout lanes, or other physical improvements intended to improve the safety, comfort or convenience of transit - 16 - 89 ridership, where such transit amenities are needed as determined by the Planning Director. Additional transportation control measures regulating traffic generated by and related to Net New Development shall be promulgated an/ adopted within six (6) months of adoption of this ordinance. Sec. 14-72. Enforcement A violation of this Article shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors are prosecuted and upon conviction the violator shall be punishable according to law; however, in addition to, or in lieu of any criminal prosecution, the City of Miami, Florida shall have the power to sue in civil court and to enforce the provisions of this Article before its Code Enforcement Hoard. Further. the Planning Director, Zoning Administrator or Building Official are hereby empowered to temporarily revoke any Building Permit for development evidencing violation of this Article pending a recission determination by the Planning Director. Secs. 14-73 - 14-79. Reserved" Section 2. The recitals and' findings contained in the Preamble to this Ordinance are hereby approved, confirmed and adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as it fully set forth in this Section. Section 3. All Ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 4. If any section, part of a section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this ordinance shall not be affected. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after final reading and adoption hereof, pursuant to law. - 17 - 10543 90 PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 15th day of December 1488. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING SY TITLE ONLY 26th day of January ATTE MATT HIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: • JOEL4 E . MAXWELL ASS STANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORREyTNESS: JD GR EIL. +'ERNI�.VDE2 CITY ATTORNF..Y/ JEM/db/M427 r - 18 - 91 89. XAVIER L. SU:R:2, MAYOR 10543 Appendix II 92 DADE COUNTY STATE OF FLC;::' - EDITED ES-202 'THIRD.. RTER. 1990 - QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON EM IMENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES INDUSTRY TOTAL ALL INDUSTRIES PArc 92 ;460 0..r 22/91 NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 58,222 852.476 853,481 869.010 858.222 4.865.691,008 PRIVATE 58,011 740,341 743.059 745,823 743,074 4,071,301,110 01-09 AGRIC.. FORESTRY,& FISHING 1.046 9.915 10,284 10.530 10.243 34,576,390 01 AGRICULTURE - CROPS 293 4.447 4,526 4,782 4,585 15,892.479 013 10 119 118 113 117 432,674 016 74 524 548 760 611 2,044,687 017 27 286 290 297 291 923,317 018 178 3,485 3.530 3,565 3,527 12.321,519 02 AGRICULTURE LIVESTOCK 16 79 79 79 79 308,576 021 3 16 16 17 16 50.808 027 13 47 47 47 47 218.209 07 AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 730 5,380 5,670 5,660 5,570 18,330,110 072 24 968 1,012 1.027 1,002 3,843,522 074 135 943 893 923 910 3,631,007 075 85 249 250 249 249 824,854 076 BO 885 1,102 1,098 1.028 1,806,299 078 405 2,349 2,398 2,347 2.365 8,145,184 08 FORESTRY 3 7 7 7 7 35.953 10-14 MINING 17 873 837 827 846 6.602,082 13 OIL AND GAS EXTRACTIONS 5 24 24 24 24 242,987 138 3 17 17 17 17 155.550 kip w 14 NONMETAL. MINERALS EXC FUEL 12 849 813 803 822 6,359,095 142 10 830 795 784 803 6,269.093 15-17 CONSTRUCTION 4,110 36.662 37,005 36,814 36,827 213,632.437 15 BLDG CONSTR - GENL & OPERAT 1.258 10.439 10,436 10,204 10.360 64,714,259 152 932 6,135 6,146 6,083 6,121 33,106,472 153 44 469 464 439 457 3,902,557 154 282 3.835 3.826 3.682 3,781 27,705.230 16 HEAVY CONSTR. CONTRACTOR.; 144 4.105 4.084 4.180 4,123 29,424,356 161 33 1,330 1.289 1,310 1,310 8,465,473 162 111 2.775 2.795 2,870 2.813 20,958,883 17 SPECIAL TRADE CONSTRUCTION 2,708 22.118 22.485 22,430 22,344 119.493,822 171 578 4,972 4,965 4,910 4.949 27,808,367 172 219 1,176 1,206 1,124 1,169 4,832,619 173 554 5,135 5.169 5.238 5.181 29,665,858 174 380 3,040 3,098 3.140 3.093 14,635,140 175 239 1,204 1,269 1.274 1,249 5,926,412 176 213 1.655 1,692 1,682 1.676 7.776.311 177 128 1,377 1,491 1,409 1,426 6,898.690 178 11 56 53 52 54 308,520 1.79 386 3,503 3.542 3,601 3,549 21.641,904 20-39 MANUFACTURING 3,281 86.770 86,610 86,752 86,711 444,140,406 20 FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS 154 6.010 6,083 6.121 6,071 37,024,615 201 21 702 711 702 705 2,923,344 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPL0YMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048, IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE C= FLG= - EDITED ES-202 PAGE 93 THIRD t :TER. 1990 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON EM 'MENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA 160 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEr.,r'LOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 0...2/91 INDUSTR Y NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 202 11 997 1,001 1,013 1,004 7,210.150 203 22 386 403 387 392 1,741,225 205 32 L..8.23.-. 1,845 1,857_ 1,842 11,513.427 206 - 7 •-- - - 25 24 31 27 73,237 207 6 65 65 62 64 483,702 208 17 1,248 1,249 1,262 1,253 8,303,624 209 37 763 784 806 784 4,772,839 21 TOBACCO PRODUCTS 20 105 99 101 102 276,789 212 18 95 89 90 91 210,114 22 TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS 87 2,865 2.913 2,764 2,847 11,062,528 221 5 60 58 57 58 228,781 222 5 108 120 114 114 492,869 224 10 148 227 224 200 654,532 225 20 1,509 1,483 1,361 1,451 5,397,514 226 29 863 846 830 846 3.372.970 228 3 36 36 35 36 182,121 229 13 137 139 139 138 712,987 23 APPAREL & FINISHED PRODUCTS 682 17,947 18,142 17,980 18,023 57,165,754 231 4 557 564 580 567 1,450,149 232 58 1,810 1,899 1,861 1,857 5,923,371 233 425 9,408 9,624 .9,470 9,501 29,134,397 234 6 505 518 577 533 1,599,072 W 235 8 267 257 263 262 958,457 4' 236 42 1,533 1,504 1,415 1,484 4,652,379 238 17 527 539 537 534 1,646,126 239 122 3,340 3,237 3,277 3.285 11,801,803 24 LUMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS 115 2.376 2.364 2,338 2,359 10,545,752 242 4 146 153 153 151 791,505 243 72 1,885 1,688 1,861 1,878 8,396.345 244 7 27 26 27 27 77,891 249 32 318 297 297 304 1,280,011 25 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES 194 4,353 4,341 4,432 4,375 17,846,865 251 109 2,611 2,548 2.587 2,582 8,962,496 252 17 294 309 309 304 1,311,011 253 8 135 136 134 135 947.748 254 25 816 851 914 660 4,453,333 259 35 497 497 488 494 2,172,277 26 PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS 44 1,834 1,861 1,877 1,857 10.346,217 265 14 728 741 759 743 4,280,689 267 28 1.079 1,093 1,090 1.087 5,799.717 27 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 678 12,212 12,206 12,275 12,231 84,449,420 272 66 1,374 1,346 1,356 1,359 8,969.914 273 20 252 254 254 253 1.850.142 274 45 1.384 1,393 1,397 1,391 9,319,177 275 439 4,637 4,669 4,690 4,665 29,598.448 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048. IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY .THIRD APTER, 1990 STATE OF : LOR3 A - EDITED ES-202 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON i OYMENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND U,.4PLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES PAGE 94 SB460 /22/91 INDUSTRY NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 276 9 228 230 232 230 1,444,324 278 16 421 424 423 423 2,200,315 279 49 459 461 490 470 3,654.740 28 CHEMICAL & ALLIED PRODUCTS 94 3,247 3.238 3.252 3.246 22.921,976 281 5 210 208 203 207 1,739,205 282 3 8 9 15 11 62,177 284 35 333 335 333 334 1,807,192 285 13 191 181 188 187 1,092.253 286 4 395 394 395 395 2,998,981 287 6 77 76 78 77 382.508 289 11 117 117 118 117 913,764 29 PETROLEUM & RELATED INDUS. 5 245 243 243 244 2.053,384 295 4 232 231 229 231 1,936.324 30 RUBBER & PLASTICS PRODUCTS 129 5,748 5,659 5,660 5,689 24.080,725' 302 4 2,420 2.302 2,319 2.347 7,531,874 306 7 250 262 266 259 1.065.274 308 114 2,986 2,999 2,975 2,987 14.973,646 31 LEATHER & LEATHER PRODUCTS 35 1.558 1,441 1,492 1,497 5.558,539 314 9 409 361 360 377 1,261,120 316 6 177 171 161 170 558,531 317 16 679 606 655 647 2,760.696 32 STONE,CLAY,GLASS,& CONCRETE 88 3,163 3.077 3,025 3,088 18,426,237 Lo 323 15 378 393 385 385 2.149,300 cn 324 4 298 292 294 295 2.565,175 326 5 21 21 18 20 51.377 327 48 2,333 2.238 2,197 2,256 12.993,846 328 7 77 76 75 76 393,164 329 7 47 47 44 46 237,572 33 PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES 38 941 955 940 945 5,640.618 331 5' 27 24 29 27 75,542 334 10 46 48 49 48 353.780 335 10 256 260 255 257 940,493 336 8 157 154 152 154 770,492 34 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS 225 5,881 5.827 5,848 5,852 28.069,863 342 12 608 600 603 604 2,710,583 344 136 4,001 3,934 3,948 3,961 18.347,143 345 7 221 217 215 218 1,276,572 346 17 201 206 204 204 1,203.304 347 26 318 319 312 316 1,566,287 348 4 88 87 88 88 648,824 349 21 409 430 444 428 2.188,720 35 MACHINERY & COMPUTER EQUIP. 203 3,334 3.259 -- -. 3,318 3,304 18,985,769 351 -- 3 81 BD - 80 80 466.613 353 17 844 739 771 785 5,045.244 354 46 489 501 510 500 2,546,134 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048. IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE .:F FLD{I' • EDITED ES-202 PAr 95 THIRD 0,..-t2TER, 1990 . QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON EMI-. _1MENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA 460 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 02/22/91 INDUSTRY NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 355 11 67 66 67 67 625,792 356 22 239 239 237 238 1.460,332 357 7 152 146 -t46 148 1.072,807 358 28 929 961" ----972 954 4,950,771 359 67 366 357 363 362 1,788,262 36 ELECTRONIC & ELECTRIC EQUIP 102 2,531 2,558 2,600 2,563 11,734,461 361 • 3 50 49 30 43 205,094 362 6 234 232 246 237 1.387.399 364 27 748 787 805 780 3.292,594 365 15 74 81 81 79 224,790 366 8 79 79 77 78 520,497 367 19 790 754 751 765 3.855.521 369 15 401 415 442 419 1,571,560 37 TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT 154 4,449 4,269 4,362 4.360 27,021,649 371 16 312 305 283 300 1,641,024 372 26 1,876 1,829 1,871 1,859 13,095,080 373 103 2,100 1,985 2,067 2,051 11,4E9,054 379 8 121 110 100 110 404,994 38 INSTRUMENTS & RELATED PROD. 79 6,179 6,224 6,238 6.214 42.837.063 382 20 693 712 688 698 2.815,506 384 30 4,297 4,332 4,357 4.329 32.959,609 385 19 812 799 813 808 4,090,035 W 386 3 7 7 7 7 77,974 39 MISC. MANUF. INDUSTRIES 155 1.792 1,851 1,886 1.843 8.082,182 391 61 829 861 874 855 3,821,079 394 19 208 222 223 218 1.014,163 395 5 59 57 56 57 186,558 396 13 97 101 96 98 372,706 399 57 599 610 637 615 2,687.656 40-49 TRANS.,COMM.. & PUB. UTILS. 2,592 71,963 71,725 71,951 71,880 516.704,122 41 LOCAL & INTERURBAN TRANSP 104 1,466 1,380 1.413 1,420 6.564,681 411 42 838 786 823 816 3.378,511 412 25 186 177 189 184 783,882 414 15 212 198 201 204 998,613 415 16 59 53 52 55 140.950 417 3 21 24 25 23 94.205 42 MOTOR FREIGHT TRANSP & WHSE 672 9.126 9,159 9,094 9,i26 53,722.141 421 555 8,182 8,231 8,176 8.196 49,710.967 422 115 943 927 916 929 4,000,924 44 WATER TRANSPORTATION 142 7.090 7,169 7,253 7,171 41,822,917 441 13 519 537 544 533 3,939,716 442 6 238 225 232 232 1.979,747 448 18 3,900 4.009 4,068 3,992 22.941,232 449 103 2.302 2.261 2.261 2,275 11,704,351 45 TRANSPORTATION BY AIR 26€ 27,610 27,536 27,626 27,591 200,100,321 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/486-1048, IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE OF FLOR' - EDITED ES-202 PC''F 96 THIRD „._a-RTER. 1990 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON Et. JYMENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA 3460 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES V./22/91 INDUS T R Y t4Q. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 451 119 22,269 22,157 22.227 22,218 173,509,772 452 38 1,100 1.149 1,337 1,195 7,685,656 458 104 4,241 4,230 4,062 4.178 18,904,893 47 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1,259 8,113 8,185 8,176 8,158 45,181,396 472 665 3,480 3,492 3,432 3.468 17,129,481 473 568 4,559 4,619 4,665 4,614 27,761,135 478 25 74 74 79 76 290.780 48 COMMUNICATIONS 119 11.266 i1,218 11,318 11.267 97,297,121 481 40 7,674 7,646 7,692 7,671 66.699.430 482 11 125 129 125 126 861.206 483 40 2.297 2.289 2.306 2,297 21,992,530 484 24 i,120 1,104 1,146 1,123 7,567,358 489 4 50 50 49 50 176,597 49 ELECTRIC, GAS, & SAN. SERV. 35 7,292 7,078 7,071 7,147 72,015.545 492 5 270 271 264 268 1,615,636 493 .3 63 63 63 63 476,447 494 3 18 16 16 17 88,225 495 21 1,123 1,133 1,100 1.119 7,926,045 50-51 WHOLESALE TRADE 7 738 69.208 69.637 69,823 69.556 464.416.486 50 WHOLESALE TRADE-DUR, GOODS 4 683 39.273 39,385 39.407 39.355 269,853,482 501 491 4,143 4,188 4,184 4.172 23.391,831 502 300 2,047 2,066 2,055 2.056 13.155,542 kip v 503 261 2,481 2.499 2.502 2,494 15.470,728 504 765 7,175 7,120 7,165 7,153 57.594.068 505 94 658 660 654 657 5.237.769 506 679 6.414 6,397 6,448 6.420 44.951,814 507 294 2.773 2.814 2,831 2.806 20,453,566 508 1 077 9,226 9.222 9,160 9,203 65.468,602 509 722 4,356 4,419 .4,408 4.394 24,129,764 51 WHOLESALE TRADE -NONDURABLE 3 055 29.935 30,252 30,416 30.201 194.563.004 511 249 3,139 3,173 3,185 3.166 20.133,252 512 263 2.652 2.739 2,794 2.728 18,560,111 513 568 3,861 3,903 3,881 3,882 22.253,729 514 792 9,917 10,046 10,060 10,008 82,876,219 515 17 86 87 87 87 556,811 516 151 1,223 1,222 1.244 1,230 9.087.131 517 54 970 964 980 971 9,126,956 518 60 2,292 2,285 2,293 2,290 19,253,808 519 901 5,795 5,833 5,892 5.840 32.714,987 52-59 RETAIL TRADE 11.101 161,006 162,200 162,616 181,941 581,937,341 52 BLDG,HDWE,GARDEN,& MOB.HOME 413--_.-., . -4,987 4,980 5,041 5,003 22.146,523 521 - 125 3,143 3,200 3,217 3,187 14,172,371 523 83 586 553 568 569 2.587,444 525 123 864 866 844 858 3,347,953 526 71 363 331 380 358 1,903,719 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY. BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, E5-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048, IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE OF FLOR:1,' EDITED ES-202 THIRD 0U. ,EP, 1990 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON EMPL ':4ENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES INDUSTRY PAGF 97 L. S0 02/22/91 NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 527 11 31 30 32 31 135,036 53 GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORES 112 20,321 20,015 19,314 19,883 82,542,181 21- 17,810 17,505 16,851 17,389 74.346,074 533 33 499 548 505 517 1,862.038 539 58 2.012 1,962 1,958 1,977 6,334,069 54 F000 STORES 1,129 26,582 26,545 27,246 26,791 88,066.312 541 648 23.257 23,194 23,862 23,438 77,555,383 542 115 485 491 513 496 1,781,126 543 42 .260 277 274 270 880,249 544 26 185 181 179 182 460,995 546 241 1,556 1,556 1,578 1,563 4,454,227 549 50 349 350 343 347 1,529,720 55 AUTO. DEALERS & SERV.STAT. 1,402 16,650 16,611 16,605 16,622 90,474,471 551 128 7.842 7,834 7,876 7,851 53,813,271 552 214 722 739 708 723 3.058.415 553 342 3.250 3.451 3,219 3,207 14,025,948 554 601 3.736 3,748 3,690 3,725 12,976,109 555 80 584 597 578 586 3,302.123 556 6 187 189 182 186 924,410 557 19 181 204 202 196 1,201,659 559 12 148 149 150 149 1,172,536 56 APPAREL & ACCESSORY STORES 1,438 14.434 14,673 14,465 14,524 44,977,894 Lo 561 162 1,138 1,132 1,119 1.130 4.919,852 m 562 495 5.478 5,565 5,471 5.505 15,374,860 563 85 1,072 1,109 1,063 1,081 3.070,667 564 69 554 568 566 563 1,421,791 565 €31 2.532 2,526 2,472 2.510 8,002,465 566 284 2.672 2.719 2,721 2,704 8,961,205 569 €92 988 1.054 1,053 1,032 3,227,054 57 HOME FURN. & FURNISHINGS 1,076 8,251 8.388 8,325 8.321 38,771,350 571 709 4,914 5.005 4.930 4,2550 20.541,222 572 82 802 824 808 811 4,564.026 573 285 2,535 2.559 2,587 2,560 13,666.102 58 EATING AND DRINKING PLACES 2,601 47,219 48,291 48,790 48,100 128,407,057 581 2,601 47,219 48.291 48,790 48,100 128.407,057 59 MISC. RETAIL STORES 2,930 22,562 22,697. 22,830 22.696 86.551.553 59i 391 6,562 6,689 6,754 6,668 23,950.063 592 158 606 601 588 598 2,324.097 593 149 619 631 640 630 1,995,925 594 1,151 7.869 7,843 7,864 7,859 28.507,862 596 107 1.109 1,118 1,183 1,137 5,784,284 598 23 360 364 354 359 2,140.681 599 951 5.437 5,451 5,447 5.445 21,848,641 60-67 FINANCE, INS.,& REAL EST. 5,394 69.158 69,093 69,197 69,149 459,298.046 60 DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS 285 24,395 24,479 24,291 24,388 156.035,314 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION. ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048, IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY THIRD ARTER. 1990 STATE OF FLGP'-. - EDITED ES-202 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON ( DYMENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNcMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES PAGE 98 SB460 ./22/9 i INDUSTR Y NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 602 78 12.911 13.053 13.054 13,006 79.756,726 603 36 7,237 7,178 6,957 7,124 44,424,767 606 48 989 991 1,000 993 5.210,868 608 63 2,179 2,173 2.187 2.180 19,176.409 609 59 730 735 745 737 5,436.249 61 NONDEPOSITORY CREDIT INST. 389 4.831 4,739 4,821 4.797 34,015,717 611 3 12 12 12 12 120,056 614 80 687 677 674 679 6,196,836 615 28 868 868 859 865 5,255.223 616 278 3,264 3.182 3.276 3,241 22.443.602 62 SEC.& COMM. BROKERS,& SERV. 278 2,417 2,396 2.425 2,413 38,230.350 621 131 1,908 1,899 1.914 1,907 31.610,626 622 13 132 120 118 123 1.659,173 628 132 366 365 379 370 4.873.087' 63 INSURANCE CARRIERS 220 8,285 8.286 8,314 8,295 62,100.755 631 56 3,104 3.125 3,142 3.124 23,274.049 632 23 1,922 1.895 1,906 1,908 13,591,393 633 54 2,020 2.019 2,047 2,029 17,601,871 635 14 169 174 170 171 1.163.736 636 59 843 835 821 833 5,000.257 637 14 227 238 228 231 1.469,449 64 INS, AGENTS,BRDKERS.& SERV. 1.119 7,395 7,399 7,431 7,408 50,866,208 '0 641 1,119 7,395 7.399 7,431 7.408 50,866,208 'A 65 REAL ESTATE 2,877 18,816 18.846 18,921 18,861 96.063.406 651 1.390 8,154 8.149 8,263 8,189 34,089,798 653 1,209 6,556 6,569 6,531 6,552 36.332,501 654 32 208 206 201 205 887,925 655 246 3.898 3.922 3,926 3,915 24,753,182 67 HOLDING & OTHER INVEST. OFC 226 3,019 2.948 2,994 2,987 21.985,696 671 90 2,482 2.409 2,449 2,447 17,258,28G 672 11 13 13 13 13 103.814 673 21 160 159 168 162 1.442,496 679 104 364 367 364 365 3,181,100 70-89 SERVICES 22,583 234,529 235,361 236,325 235,605 1,348,859,706 70 HOTELS & OTHER LODG. PLACES 456 20.179 19,805 19,577 19,854 65,672,697 701 426 19.904 19,572 19.367 19.614 64,971,473 702 19 109 107 112 109 278.932 703 10 159 119 91 123 393,572 72 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,796 10,530 10,597 '10,729 10,619 31,978,143 721 550 4,370 4,383 4,386 4.380 14,170,186 722 99 333 362 373 356 1,390,111 723 -870 3,938 3.964 4.031 3,978 10,074,659 724 45 114 115 --114 114 ..264 C62-8 725 45 84 89 90 88 254,163 726 38 478 467 455 467 2,377,316 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION. ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488.1048, IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE C FLO;: - EDITED ES-202 PA'" 99 THIRD .RTER. 1990 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON EM' YMENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA 460 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 02/22/91 INDUSTRY NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 729 149 1,213 1,217 1,280 1.237 3,447,680 73 BUSINESS SERVICES 3.598 49,947 50.550 50,451 50.316 214.081,253 731 -323 2.115 2.262 2,169 2.182 15.502,159 732 62 940 974 969 961 4,764.090 733 316 2.209 2,222 2,229 2,220 11,266.242 734 498 7,000 7,030 6,968 6,999 17,531,357 735 273 1,917 1,986 1,921 1,941 10,317.344 736 228 14.630 14,580 14,833 14,581 47,381.765 737 377 5,069 5,017 5.026 5,037 41,803.002 738 1,521 15,067 16,479 16,336 16,294 65.515,294 75 AUTO REPAIR,SERV.,& PARKING 1,381 9,842 9,952 10.091 9,962 48,066,208 751 82 4,185 4.263 4,440 4,296 26,253,358 752 24 908 924 909 914 2.269,031 753 1,123 3,896 3.914 3,896 3,902 16,311,314 754 152 853 85€ 846 850 3,232.505 76 MISC REPAIR SERVICES 746 4,039 4.057 4,092 4.063 22.020,330 762 245 1.281 1,285 1,287 1,284 6,849,656 763 41 107 105 101 104 315,774 764 90 294 307 312 304 984,886 769 369 2,357 2.360 2,392 2,370 13.870,014 78 MOTION PICTURES 304 2,143 2,077 1,983 2,068 7,631,747 781 117 572 553 585 570 3.671,787 €"` 782 19 91 85 83 86 651,593 O 783 20 950 910 791 884 1,937,445 784 148 530 529 524 528 1,370.922 79 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERV 526 10,332 10,206 10.689 10,409 44,232.424 791 43 111 99 150 120 295.532 792 98 1,547 1,572 1,646 1.588 5,990.538 793 5 238 232 212 227 553.305 794 104 2.324 2,289 2,784 2,466 17,307,995 799 276 6,112 6,0€4 5.897 6,008 20,085,054 80 HEALTH SERVICES 4,789 63,711 64,305 64,643 64,220 473.971.021 801 2,792 13,621 13,67€ 13,771 13,688 181,458,450 802 799 3,691 3,726 3,733 3,7€7 22.002,899 803 77 404 389 399 397 3.783,931 804 607 2.251 2,278 2,293 2,274. 14,338,767 805 65 6,870 6,888 6,935 6.898 29.192,838 B06 41 28,636 28,882 29.069 28.852 179,079,997 807 223 1,694 1.732 1,741 1,722 11,763,299 808 87 3,003 3.222 3,136 3.120 13,460.549 809 98 3,541 3,517 3,556 3,541 18,890.291 81 LEGAL SERVICES 2,572 13,727 13,708 13,575 13,670 156,813.551 811 2,572 13,727 13,708 13,575 13.670 156,813.551 82 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 290 14,143 14,458 15,507 14,706 89.197,289 821 104 2,469 2,718 3.565 2,951 12,383.390 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION. ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048. IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE OF FLOR:,A - EDITED ES-202 -THIRD RTER. 1990 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON E1 YMENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UN,.,JLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES PAGE 100 8460 22/91 INDUSTRY NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 824 57 1,257 1,292 1,324 1,291 4.322,150 829 113 1,162 1.204 1,170 €,179 3,691,518 83 SOCIAL SERVICES 606 10.314 10,261 10,222 10,266 35.090.242 832 110 2,537 2,571 2.441 2,516 9,260,680 833 25 1,201 1.230 1.233 1,221 3.146,663 835 263 2.311 2.263 2.325 2,300 5,204,828 836 130 3,062 3,074 3,073 3,070 12.175,047 839 78 1,203 1,123 1.150 1.159 5,303.024 84 MUS.,ART,&BOT.&ZOO.GARD. 8 140 127 116 128 488.725 86 MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATIONS 876 7.125 6.863 6,873 6,954 27,753,714 861 81 577 570 579 575 3,793,761 862 23 152 €54 152 153 1,023,565 863 80 529 526 546 534 2.958,651 864 586 4,830 4,559 4,508 4,632 15.705,650 865 3 3 3 2 3 4.821 866 82 744 763 801 769 2.655.661 869 21 .290 288 285 288 1,611,605 87 ENGR.ACCT,RESEARCH.MGT,ETC. 2,555 15,775 15.800 15,818 15,798 123.412,005 871 625 5,105 5.093 5,040 5.079 38,858,543 872 1.034 5,647 5,607 5,686 5,647 43,454,779 873 107 1.150 1,138 1.134 1,141 7,646,250 874 789 3,873 3,962 3,958 3,931 33.452.433 F-+ 88 PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS 2.003 2.424 2,423 2,401 2,416 7,123.495 0 1✓ 881 2,003 2.424 2.423 2,401 2,416 7,123,495 89 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 77 158 162 158 159 1,326,862 899 77 158 162 158 159 1,326,862 9999 NONCLASS. ESTABLISHMENTS 149 257 307 388 317 1,134,094 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 67 19,190 19,128 18,876 19,065 166,103.316 40-49 TRANS.,COMM., & PUB. UTILS. 1 6,976 6.986 6.941 6.968 62,011.782 43 U. 5. POSTAL SERVICE 1 6.976 6,986 6,941 6,968 62,011,782 431 1 6,976 6,986 6,941 6,968 62,011,782 52-59 RETAIL TRADE 2 643 655 658 652 1,359,149 53 GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORES 1 311 327 326 321 667,389 531 1 311 327 326 321 667,389 58 EATING AND DRINKING PLACES 1 332 328 332 331 691.760 581 1 332 328 332 331 691,760 60-67 FINANCE, INS.,& REAL EST. 1 5 5 5 5 12.760 61 NONDEPOSITORY CREDIT INST. 1 5 5 5 5 12,760 611 1 5 5 5 5 12,760 70-89 SERVICES 8 3,249 3.268 3.272 3,263 29.864,811 70 HOTELS & OTHER LODG. PLACES 1 51 51 53--- 52 . 95,031 702 1 . - 51 51 . _ .. __ - . 53 52 95.031 79 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERV 1 196 198 198 197 1,161,953 799 1 196 198 198 197 1,161,953 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION. ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048. IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE OF fLC^ - EDITED ES-202 THIRD ,.,.tRTER, 1990 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON Ei,,..,c]YMENT AND WAGES COVERED 8Y THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES INDUSTRY P . 101 .d460 02/22/91 NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 80 HEALTH SERVICES 2 2.568 2.606 2,601 2,592 24,921.33€ 806 2 2.568 2.606 2,601 2.592 24.921.331 83 SOCIAL SERVICES 1 23 20 21 21 106.182 839 1 23 20 21 21 106,182 87 ENGR,ACCT,RESEARCH,MGT,ETC. 2 10 10 10 10 66,300 871 2 10 10 10 10 66,300 89 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 1 401 383 389 391 3,514,014 899 1 401 383 389 391 3,514,014 91-97 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 55 8,317 8,214 8,000 8,177 72,854,814 91 EXEC,LEGIS,GEN GOVT EXC FIN 2 50 48 49 49 330.837 919 2 50 48 49 49 330,837 92 JUSTICE,PUB. ❑ROER.& SAFETY 5 2,650 2,681 2.708 2.680 26,018,172 921 1 437 438 446 440 3,829,760 922 4 2.213 2,243 2.262 2,239 22,188,412 93 PUB. FIN,TAX,& MONETARY POL 6 1,88€ 1,846 1,854 1.860 16,518,739 931 6 1,881 1,846 1,854 1,860 16,518,739 94 HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAMS 7 432 442 442 439 3.182,686 943 2 52 59 57 56 388.482 944 4 373 376 378 376 2,743,232 945 1 7 7 7 7 50,972 95 ENV, QUAL. & HOUSING PROGS. 5 123 120 118 120 782,267 951 4 59 59 56 58 374,542 t.-+ 953 1 64 61 62 62 408,725 O 96 ECONOMIC PROGRAMS 22 1,934 1.855 1,633 1,807 17,307,137 961 9 456 373 163 331 2,281,638 962 1 1,142 1,151 1,145 1,146 12,440,093 963 1 7 7 7 7 54,389 964 8 270 267 262 266 2,034,940 965 3 59 57 56 57 496.077 97 NATL SECURITY & INTL AFFS. 8 1.247 1,222 1.196 1,222 8,713.976 971 5 1,112 1,108 1,082 1,101 7.740.1E13 972 3 135 114 114 121 973.793 STATE GOVERNMENT 85 13,971 14,181 14,606 14,253 75.575,962 01-09 AGRIC., FORESTRY.& FISHING 1 16 14 14 15 65,284 08 FORESTRY 1 16 14 It 15 65,284 085 1 16 t4 14 15 65,284 15-17 CONSTRUCTION 1 732 716 745 731 4,455,380 16 HEAVY CONSTR. CONTRACTORS 1 732 716 745 731 4,455,380 161 1 732 716 745 731 4,455,380 70-89 SERVICES 8 4,156 4,385 4,606 4,382 21,306,718 73 BUSINESS SERVICES 1 12 13 13 13 43,899 738 1 12 13 i3 13 43,899 79 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERV 1 69 68 68 68 225.983 799 1 69 68 68 68 225,983 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY. BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048, IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE . COUNTY THIRD ,ARTER. 1990 STATE OF :w t - EDITED ES-202 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON i .OYMENT AND WAGES COVERED BY THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES INDUSTRY P"iE 102 513460 ...2/22/91 NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING DULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 82 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 4 3.088 3.308 3,528 3,308 17.544,649 822 4 3,088 3.308 3,528 3,308 17,544,649 83 SOCIAL SERVICES 2 987 996 997 993 3,492,187 832 1 5 14 i5 11 61,176 836 1 982 982 982 982 3,431,011 91-97 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 75 9,067 9,066 9,241 9.125 49,748,580 91 EXEC,LEGIS,GEN GOVT EXC FIN 6 197 194 194 195 1,156,983 911 1 19 19 19 19 175.669 912 2 89 87 86 87 498.122 919 3 89 88 89 89 483,192 92 JUSTICE,PUB. ORDER,& SAFETY 13 2.961 3,009 3,011 2,994 20,292.954 921 2 80 81 83 81 411,074 922 11 2,881 2,928 2.928 2,912 19,881,880' 93 PUB. FIN,TAX,& MONETARY POL 10 279 284 290 284 1,662,563 931 10 279 284 290 284 1,662,563 94 HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAMS 1.1 4,647 4,607 4,766 4,673 22.536,516 941 1 30 30 30 30 146,614 943 5 4,123 4,079 4.239 4,147 19,884,888 944 4 487 491 490 489 2,474.953 945 1 7 7 7 7 30,061 95 ENV. QUAL. & HOUSING PROGS. 5 49 49 51 50 365,629 951 5 49 49 51 50 365,629 p 96 ECONOMIC PROGRAMS 28 928 918 924 923 3.727,728 (."' 961 2 11 11 11 11 78,127 962 5 563 553 553 556 1,883,681 963 1 12 13 12 12 89,609 964 8 146 136 131 138 594,546 965 12 196 205 217 206 1,081,765 97 NATL SECURITY & INTL AFFS. 2 6 5 5 5 6,207 971 2 6 5 5 5 6,207 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 45 78,228 76.076 88,970 81,091. 547,125,923 40-49 TRANS.,COMM., & PUB. UTILS. 3 177 178 178 178 1,202,193 49 ELECTRIC, GAS. & SAN. SERV. 3 177 178 178 178 1.202.193 493 1 140 141 142 141 939,650 494 2 37 37 36 37 262,543 52-59 RETAIL TRADE 1 57 56 56 56 135,130 58 EATING AND DRINKING PLACES 1 57 56 56 56 135.130 581 1 57 56 56 56 135,130 60-67 FINANCE, INS.,& REAL EST. 4 126 129 131 129 693.954 - 65- REAL ESTATE 4 126 129 131 129 693.954 651 1 70 69 70 70 259.091_ 653 3 56 60 61 59 434,873 70-89 SERVICES 7 42,372 40.110 50,154 44,212 279,208,385 75 AUTO REPAIR,SERV.,& PARKING 1 164 164 175 168 811,352 SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, ES-202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048. IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. DADE COUNTY STATE OF FLORIO). EDITED ES-202 PAGE 103 THIRD Q rER, 1990 QUARTERLY COUNTY REPORT ON EMP. JIENT AND WAGES COVERED 8Y THE FLORIDA 1. 60 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 02,_4/91 INDUSTRY NO. OF EMPLOYMENT AVERAGE TOTAL REPORTING JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER MONTHLY QUARTERLY UNITS EMPLOYMENT WAGES 752 1 164 164 175 168 811,352 79 AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERV 2 6 6 6 6 48,903 794 - -- 1 6 6 6 6 48.903 799 1 0 0 b 0 0 80 HEALTH SERVICES 2 7,785 7,720 7,729 7,745 57.269.408 806 2 7.785 7,720 7,729 7,745 57,269,408 82 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES .2 34,417 32,220 42,244 36.294 221,078.722 821 1 29.559 29,630 36,876 32.022 197,585.728 822 1 4,858 2,590 5,368 4,272 23.492,994 91-97 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 30 35.496 35,603 38,451 36,517 265,886,261 91 EXEC,LEGIS,GEN GOVT EXC FIN 25 35.454 35,559 38,412 36,475 265,611,199 913 26 35.454 35,559 38,412 36,475 265,611,199 95 ENV. QUAL, & HOUSING PROGS. 3 36 39 33 36 256,329 951 1 7 7 5 6 27,271 953 2 29 32 28 30 229.058 96 ECONOMIC PROGRAMS 1 6 5 6 6 18,733 962 i 6 5 6 6 18,733 INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT 14 746 737 735 739 5,584,697_ 40-49 TRANS..COMM., & PUB. UTILS. 12 723 714 711 716 5.306,673 45 TRANSPORTATION BY ATR 11 632 623 620 625 4.523.497 451 11 632 623 620 625 4,523.497 0 a' SUBTOTALS MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO DISCLOSURE EDITING AND/OR ROUNDING. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY. BUREAU OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION, ES--202 PROGRAM - TELEPHONE 904/488-1048. IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. OUESTION 21 - TRANSPORTATION SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI ADA INCREMENT II QUESTION 21 - TRANSPORTATION The transportation analysis for the ADA for Increment II of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact is being structured to conform to the new DRI questionnaire approved by the Department of Community Affairs in November 1990. The details of the traffic analysis have been established and modified according to input received from reviewing agencies during the February 13, 1991, traffic methodology meeting. The traffic impact study area is located within Dade County and is bounded by North 79th Street on the north, Biscayne Bay on the south, Alton Road on the east, and West 42nd Avenue on the west. In general, the roads analyzed include expressways and major arterials leading into the project area within a five (5) mile radius, minor arterials leading into the project area within a three (3) mile radius, and important collectors within the project area. The roads have been analyzed under existing (1991) average season PM peak hour conditions. Planned improvements for the roadways have been identified. Previously approved committed developments within the traffic impact study area have also been identified, and are incorporated into the future background traffic analysis. Traffic conditions at Increment II buildout (1999) has been estimated using the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) software. The input data used in this model consists of the Dade County Year 2000 roadway network and the socio-economic data provided by the Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization. All work was conducted using the highway portion of the FSUTMS model, and transit modal split was estimated using historical data and FSUTMS output for model years 1986 and 2010. Using the highway -only FSUTMS output and estimated transit capture, the year 1999 traffic has been projected and analyzed on the roadway network. This analysis includes the effects of background growth, other large scale committed development projects, roadway improvements, and transit availability. Based upon the results of this analysis, roadway and signalized intersection deficiencies have been identified. The proportional share cost for improving the failing roadway links has been estimated as $497,292.00. TABLE OF CONTENTS 21. Transportation Introduction 21-1 A. Existing Traffic Conditions 21-3 B. Project Trip Generation 21-19 C. Internal and External Project Trips 21-26 D. Future Projections 21-28 E. Future Projections and Peak Hour Directional Project Distribution 21-40 F. Modifications to the Roadway Network 21-61 G. Project Access Locations 21-66 H. Transportation Corridors 21-67 I. Movement of People 21-68 Appendices I. Transportation - Methodology and Agency Correspondence H. Transportation - Intersection Analyses i Map Map J-IA Map J-1B Map J-IC Map J-1D Map J-IE Map J-2A Map J-2B Map J-3 Map J-4 Map J-5A Map J-5B Map J-5C Map J-5D Map J-6A Map J-6B Map J-6C Map J-6D LIST OF MAPS Existing PM Peak Hour Level of Service (Inset) Existing PM Peak flour Level of Service Transit Routes (Inset) Transit Routes Transit Routes (Bus Routes) Signalized Intersections (Inset) Signalized Intersections and Interchanges Programmed Roadway Improvements Committed Developments Future Background Traffic Level of Service Future Background Traffic Level of Service (Inset) Future Total Traffic Level of Service Future Total Traffic Level of Service (Inset) Increment II Trip Distribution Percentages Increment 11 Trip Distribution Percentages (Inset) Increment II Trips Increment 11 Trips (Inset) LIST OF TABLES Table Page 21.A-1 Existing (1991) Traffic Condition 21-7 21.A-2 Growth Rate Calculations 21-11 21.A-3 Roadway Functional Classifications 21-15 21.A-4 Programmed Roadway Improvements 21-18 21.B-1 Increment to Socio-economic Data 21-21 21.B-2 ITE Land Use Codes and Average Daily and PM Peak Hour Trip Rates 21-22 21.B-3.A Daily Trip Generation 21-23 21.B-3.B PM Peak Hour Trip Generation 21-24 21.B-4 Trip Generation Comparisons (HI, versus FSUTMS) 21-25 21.C-1 • Internal and External Project Trips as Generated by FSUTMS 21-27 21.D-1.A Committed Developments (PM Peak Hour/ITE Rates) 21-32 21.D-1.B Committed Developments (PM Peak Hour/DRI Rates) 21-33 21.D-2 Committed Development Socio-economic Data 21-34 21.D-3 Committed Development FSUTMS Zones 21-35 21.D-4A ZDatal Comparison (Productions) 21-36 21.D-4B ZData2 Comparison (Attractions) 21-37 21.D-5A ZDatal Update (Productions) 21-38 2I.D-5B ZDatal Update (Attractions) 21-39 21.E-1 Future Background Traffic Conditions (1999) 21-43 21.E-2 Future Total Traffic Conditions (1999) 21-47 21.E-3 Project Trip Distribution and Significant Roadway Links Year 1999 Total Traffic 21-51 21.E-4.A PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic 21-55 21.E-4.B AM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic 21-58 21.E-5 Signalized Intersection Level of Service 21-60 21.F-1 Proportional Share Percentage (Roadway Links) 21-62 21.F-2 Proportional Share Cost (Roadway Links) 21-63 21.F-3 Proportional Share Percentage (intersection) 21-64 21,F-4 Proportional Share Cost (Intersection) 21-65 PART IV. Transportation Resource Impacts QUESTION 21 - TRANSPORTATION This transportation analysis provided in Question 21 for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI has been structured to adapt to the new ADA for DRI questionnaire as approved by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in November of 1990. Responses to the new questionnaire have been expanded to include elements from the original transportation questionnaire as requested by the South Florida Regional Planning Council during the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI Pre -Application Conference and the Traffic Methodology Meeting. This transportation section has been prepared based upon detailed traffic assumptions which have been established and modified according to agency and staff input from the February 13, 1991, traffic methodology meeting. Incorporated into the transportation methodology are analytical procedures from the SFRPC General Guidelines for the DRI Transportation Section dated November 6, 1990. Pertinent items addressed in this study (structured according to the new ADA questionnaire format) are listed below: A. Traffic Impact Study Area Existing Traffic Conditions Planned and Programmed Improvements B. Project Trip Generation C. Internal/External Project Trips 21-1 D. Traffic Projections Background Traffic Growth Committed Development Traffic FSUTMS Model and TAZ Projections DRI Zonal Modifications Total Traffic at Buildout E. Project Traffic Assignment Project Distribution Percentage Regionally Significant Roadways Intersection Analyses F. Recommended Roadway Improvements Recommended Intersection Improvements G. Project Access Locations H. Transportation Corridors I. Alternative Means of Moving People 21-2 A. Using Map J or a table as a base, indicate existing conditions on the highway network within the study area (as previously defined on Map J), including AADT, peak -hour trips, directional traffic split, levels of service and maximum service volumes for the adopted level of service (LOS). Identify the assumptions used in this analysis, inducting "K" factor, directional "D" factor, facility type, number of lanes and existing signal locations. (If levels of service are based on some methodology other than the most recent procedures of the Transportation Research Board and FDOT, this should be agreed upon at the preapplication conference stage.) Identify the adopted LOS standards of the FDOT, appropriate regional planning council, and local governor nt for roadways within the identified study area. Identify what improvements or new facilities within this study area are planned, programmed, or committed for improvement. Attach appropriate excerpts from published capital improvements plans, budgets and programs showing schedules and types of work and letters from the appropriate agencies stating the current status of the planned, programmed and committed improvements. Traffic Impact Study Area A traffic impact study area has been defined for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI as being located within Dade County, bounded by North 79th Street on the north, Biscayne Bay on the south, Alton Road on the east, and West 42nd Avenue on the west. This traffic impact study area has been adjusted as needed to include non -expressway roadway links which carry three percent (3%) or more of the total project trips, and expressway and non -expressway roadway links on which the directional project trips are equal to or exceed ten percent (10%) of the level of service (LOS) D maximum service volume for each particular roadway link. Roadway segments which meet the above referenced criteria have been designated as "significant" roadway links, and are identified in Table 21.E3 as part of the response for item E below. Map J-1 (found in the map series at the end of Section 21) identifies the traffic impact study area for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI. 21-3 Based upon Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) guidelines, the traffic impact study area also includes roadway links where project trips contribute over seventy- five (75) vehicles per hour per through lane in the peak direction at the approach of an arterial intersection. This criteria has been utilized to assist in defining significant roadway links. According to the FDOT guidelines, where the project contributes over 200 vehicles per hour per through lane in the peak direction of an expressway, that portion of the expressway has also been included as part of the study area, and has been designated as a significant roadway link. Existing Traffic Conditions Existing traffic conditions have been identified in Table 21.A1 for each roadway link within the traffic impact study area. Average daily traffic (ADT) link volumes have been obtained -through use of local governmental data bases, primarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6, the planning offices of Dade County, and subconsultant services. Where PM peak hour link counts were not available, daily link volumes have been converted to PM peak hour link volumes through use of the daily to peak hour conversion factors identified by the SFRPC General Guidelines for the DRI Transportation Section, dated November 6, 1990. These conversion factors are different based upon a two-lane road (9.0%), a four -lane road (8.4%) and a six -lane road (8.0%). Where actual directional factors were not available, the default directional factor "D" of 56.5% (as set forth by the FDOT) has been utilized in this analysis. For roadways that are one-way and inbound to the project site, AM peak hour link volumes have also been provided. 21-4 Roadway link capacity and roadway levels of service have been evaluated through the use of the FDOT capacity thresholds established and contained within the FDOT Florida Highway System Plan - Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual. The evaluation of existing traffic conditions on the roadway links within the traffic impact study area are shown on the attached Table 21.A1, and include both "significant" as well as "non -significant" roadway links. The existing traffic conditions evaluated in Table 21.A1 consist of the following: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a directional traffic analysis for each roadway segment; the number of lanes for each roadway link as of 1990; the 1991 average daily count based upon 1989 and 1990 counts and historical growth rates as outlined in Table 21.A2; the daily to peak conversion factor utilized for each roadway link based upon the SFRPC guidelines; the actual or default "D" factor from the FDOT guideline; as available; the 1991 PM peak hour volume; the 1991 AM peak hour volumes for "inbound" and one-way links; the 1991 LOS "D" capacity; and the 1991 LOS for each roadway link. Table 21.A2 has been provided to document the factors used on each link to project 1991 average daily traffic from 1988, 1989 and 1990 counts. 21-5 Map J-1A and Map 7-1B (found in the map series at the end of Section 21), are graphical presentations of the existing PM peak hour levels of service shown in Table 21.A1. Map J-2A and Map J-2B (also found in the map series at the end of Section 21), identifies the locations of all signalized intersections and expressway interchanges within the project's traffic impact study area. Planned and Programmed Improvements State, County and local authorities in Dade County have been contacted regarding planned and programmed improvements to the roadway network within the traffic impact study area. Correspondence has been sent to Dade County authorities indicating a preliminary review of road improvement projects from the Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 1991-1996 and the tentative Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) five year work program. The attached Table 21.A4 indicates those roadway improvements located within Dade County as identified by Dade County Planning and the FDOT. Map J-3 (found in the map series at the end of Section 21) illustrates the findings represented in Table 21.A4. The letters that were sent by Keith and Schnars, P.A. requesting the status of the programmed roadway improvements as identified in Table 21.A4 and the agency responses which correspond to those letters, are included in Appendix I at the end of Question 21. 21-6 TABLE 21.A1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOVN/PARE WEST DRI EXISTING (1991) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Peak PN AN Pk Nr to PN Peak Peak Pk Dir Peak 1990 Count 1991 Daily "D° Hour Hour LOS D Hour Roadway From To Dir Lanes Source AADT Ratio Factor Volume Volume Capacity LOS NV 5 STREET BRIDGE NW 8 AVENUE I-95 NV 7 AVENUE NB 5L 0,565 - 1,430 5B 0.435 1,430 US 1 SW 8 STREET NB 4L TAP 72,133 0.066 0.411 1,959 3,710 B SB 0,589 2,811 3,710 C SW 8 STREET SR 836/1-395 NB 6L TAP 122,594 0.072 0.484 4,270 5,570 C 58 0.516 4,545 5,570 C SR 83611-395 SR 112 NB lOL FDOT 153,645 0.080 0.565 6,945 9,280 C SB 0.435 5,347 9,280 B SR 112 NV 79 STREET NB lOL ?DOT 210,316 0.080 0.565 9,506 9,280 E SB 0.435 7,319 9,280 C NV 3 AVENUE NW 2 STREET 1-95 ON RAMP NB 2LOY TAP 1.000 974 1,860 C W 2 AVENUE SW 7 STREET FLAGLER STREET NB 21,11 - 0.565 710 SB 0.435 710 - FLAGLER STREET NW 2D STREET NB 2LU TAP 6,082 0,074 0.668 303 746 D tt 5B 0.332 150 710 D iI 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NW I0 STREET NB 41,11 TAP 4,087 0,070 0.616 176 1,320 C SB 0.384 109 1,320 C HIAMI AVENUE RIC8ENBACEER CSWY S 15 ROAD NB 41.0 DADE 6,963 0.084 0.435 255 1,590 0 SB 0.565 331 1,590 D S 15 ROAD N AGLER STREET NB 41,U TAP 11,211 0,100 0.463 521 1,590 0 58 0.537 604 1,590 0 FLAGLER STREET N 17 STREET SB 3LOV TAP 5,055 0.060 1.000 305 440 2,830 C N 17 STREET N 36 STREET NB 4LU TAP 10,784 0.072 0.581 453 1,590 0 SB 0.419 326 1,590 8 E 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NE 17 STREET NB 3LOV TAP 10,339 0.097 1.000 998 2,830 C E 2 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET 1-395 5B 3LOV TAP 11,765 0.062 1.000 735 1,448 2,830 C 21-7 TABLE 21.AI SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARE BEST DRI EXISTING (1991) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Peak PH AN Pk Hr to PE Peak Peak Pk Dir Peak 1990 Count 1991 Daily "D` Hour Hour LOS D Hour Roadway From To Dir Lanes Source AADT Ratio Factor Volume Volume Capacity LOS US 1 DOUGLAS ROAD SW 17 AVENUE NB 6LD FDOT 74,337 0.080 0.435 2,587 2,510 E 58 0.565 3,360 2,510 F SW 17 AVENUE 1-95 NB 6LD FOOT 97,345 0,080 0,435 3,388 2,510 F SB 0.565 4,400 2,510 F I-95 SE 7 STREET NB 4LD FOOT 26,775 0,084 0.435 978 1,430 D SB 0.565 1,271 1,430 D SE 7 STREET SE 2 STREET NB 4L➢ FDOT 29,705 0,084 0.435 1,085 1,590 D SB 0.565 1,410 1,59D D SE 2 STREET PORT BOULEVARD NB 7LD FOOT 31,711 0,080 0.565 1,433 2,450 0 ;44 58 0,435 1,104 2,450 D PORT BOULEVARD 1-395 NB ILD FDOT 40,740 0.080 0.565 1,841 2,450 ➢ *## SB 0.435 1,418 2,450 D 1-395 NE 36 STREET NB 4LD FDOT 31,877 D.084 0,565 1,513 1,590 D SB 0.435 1,165 1,590 D NE 36 STREET NE 62 STREET NB 4LD FDOT 35,090 0.084 0,565 1,665 1,430 E SB 0.435 1,282 1,430 D BAYSHORE DRIVE SW 27 AVENUE RICBENBAC8ER CSWY NB 4LD DADE 28,301 0.084 0.435 1,034 1,430 0 58 0.565 1,343 1,430 D CORAL WAY SW 27 AVENUE SW 12 AVENUE EB 4LD TAP 30,478 0,089 0.368 995 1,430 D WB 0.632 1,706 1,430 E SW 12 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD EB 4LD FDOT 17,488 0.084 0.435 639 1,430 D WB 0.565 830 1,430 D SW 15 ROAD US 1 EB 4LU F➢0T 10,695 0.084 0.435 391 1,590 D WB 0.565 508 1,590 D S 8 STREET SW 2? AVENUE I-95 EB 3L0W FDOT 26,459 0.080 1.000 2,117 2,117 2,670 C I-95 US 1 EB 3L0W FDOT 21,352 0.080 1.000 1,708 1,708 2,670 C S 7 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 WB 3L0W F➢OT 16,831 0,080 1,000 1,346 2,670 C I-95 US 1 WB 3LOW FDOT 22,981 0.080 1,000 1,839 2,670 C 21-8 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21.A1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARB WEST DRI EXISTING (1991) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Roadway From 1990 Count 1991 To Dir Lanes Source AADT Peak PK AN Pk Rr to PR Peak Peak Pk Dir Peak Daily "D" Hour Hour LOS D Hour Ratio Factor Volume Volume Capacity LOS S 1 STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE E8 !LOW FOOT 13,944 0.080 1.000 1,116 1,116 3,600 C SW 2 AVENUE US 1 EB 3LOW TAP 11,574 0.099 1.000 1,146 387 2,830 C ttts FLAGLER STREET Sit 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE WB 3LOW FOOT 21,868 0.080 1.000 1,749 2,670 C SW 2 AVENUE US 1 WB 2L0W TAP 7,366 0.071 1,000 522 1,860 G tttt N 1 STREET I-95 US 1 ED 2L0W TAP 4,967 0.097 1.000 482 259 1,860 C ttts N 5 STREET 1-95 US 1 EB 3LOW TAP 6,816 0.085 1,000 583 720 2,830 C ttt* N 6 STREET 1-95 US 1 WB 3LOW TAP 3,909 0,084 1.000 329 2,830 C rttt PORT BOULEVARD US 1 PORT OF MIAMI EB 4LD DADE 16,235 0,080 0.435 665 1,890 A WB 0.56E 734 1,890 A N 10 STREET 8 STREET ROAD US 1 88 2LOW DADE 9,056 0.080 1.000 724 761 1,860 C N RIVER DRIVE/11 11 STREET NW 17 AVENUE 8 STREET ROAD EB 4LD 0,435 1,430 - t WB 0.565 1,430 8 STREET ROAD US 1 WB 2L0W DADE 571 0.080 1.000 46 1,860 C 21-9 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21,A1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI EXISTING (199U TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Peak PM AN Pk Hr to PH Peak Peak Pk Dir Peak 1990 Count 1991 Daily "0" Hour Hour LOS D Hour Roadway From To Dir Lanes Source AADT Ratio Factor Volume Volume Capacity LOS SR 836/1-395 LEJEUNE ROAD NW 27 AVENUE EB 61,0 FOOT 139,811 0,080 0.435 4,865 5,570 D WB 0,565 6,319 5,570 F NW 27 AVENUE 1-95 EB 6LD FOOT 134,631 0.080 0.435 4,685 5,570 0 WB 0.565 6,085 5,570 F 1-95 95 1 EB 6LD TAP 92,948 0.065 0.458 2,775 5,510 8 NB 0.542 3,288 5,570 C US 1 ALTON ROAD BB 61,0 FDOT 72,932 0.080 0.565 3,297 5,570 C WB 0.435 2,538 5,570 B NW 20 STREET NW 7 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE EB 4LD DADE 15,669 0.08 0.435 545 1430 0 WB 0.565 708 1430 * Existing count data not currently available. ** 2 LU with center left turning lane. Capacity is adjusted with 5% increase. #*# 3 SB lanes, 4 NB lanes, analyzed as 6LD. $$$* One-way collectors analysed as one-way arterials. COUNT SOURCES: TAP = Transport Analysis Professionals FDOT = Florida Department of Transportation, District 6 DADE = Retro-Dade County Department of Public Works TABLE 21.A2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARR WEST DRI EXISTING 11991) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS ROADWAY FROM ADJ'D ADJ'D FACTORED 1990 COUNT 1988 AXLE 1988 1990 GROWTH GROWTH SEASON 1991 1991 TO DIRLANES SOURCE STA.f COUNT FACT COUNT COUNT FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR COUNTS AADT NW 5 STREET BRIDGE NW 8 AVENUE NW 7 AVENUE * 5L I-95 0.986 - - 1,073 - US 1 SW 8 STREET tt NB 4L TAP 0.986 - 1.073 0.96 72,133 SB SW 8 STREET SR 836/I-395 NB 6L TAP - 0.986 - 111,241 1.073 0,96 - 122,594 SB SR 83611-395 SR 112 NB 101 FOOT 2096 183,711 0.986 181,139 153,645 0.921 1.000 1.00 - 153,645 SB SR 112 NW 79 STREET NB 101 FDOT 2036 218,164 0.986 215,110 210,316 0.989 1,000 1.00 210,316 S8 NW 3 AVENUE NW 2 STREET 1-95 ON RAMP 20W - 0.986 - - 1.073 - W "VENUE SW 7 STREET FLAGLER STREET $ NB 2LU SB FLAGLER STREET NW 20 STREET NB 2LU TAP SB W 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NW 10 STREET NB 41,11 TAP SB 0,986 - - - 1.073 - 0.986 - 1,073 1.01 6,230 6,082 0.986 - - 1,073 1.01 4,186 4,087 MIAMI AVENUE RICXENBACRER CSWY S 15 ROAD NB 4LD DADE 654 0.986 - 8,600 1.073 1,00 - 6,983 SB S 16 ROAD FLAGLER STREET NB 4LU TAP - 0.986 - 1.073 1.01 11,484 11,211 SB FLAGLER STREET N 17 STREET S8 3LOW TAP - 0.986 1,073 1.01 5,178 5,055 N 17 STREET N 36 STREET NB 41,U TAP - 0.986 - 1.073 1,01 11,047 10,784 SB E 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET N8 17 STREET NB 3LOW TAP 0.986 - - 1.073 1.01 10,591 10,339 E 2 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET 1-395 SB 3LOW TAP 0.986 - 1.073 1.01 12,051 11,765 21-11 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21.A2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOYNIPARB WEST DRI EXISTING (1991) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS ROADWAY FROG ADJ'D ADJ'D FACTORED 1990 COUNT 1988 AXLE 1988 1990 GROWTH GROWTH SEASON 1991 1991 TO DIRLANES SOURCE STA.i COUNT FACT COUNT COUNT FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR COUNTS AADT US 1 DOUGLAS ROAD SW 1? AVENUE NB 6LD FOOT 5200 82,04? 0.986 80,898 74,337 0.959 1.000 1.00 SB SW 1? AVENUE 1-95 NB OLD FOOT 5036 81,450 0.986 80,310 91,299 1.066 1.066 1.00 SB 1-95 SE 7 STREET NB 4LD FOOT 5039 27,341 0.966 26,956 26,775 0.997 1.600 1.00 SB SE 7 STREET SE 2 STREET NB 4LD FOOT 550 31,172 0.986 30,736 29,705 0,983 1.000 1,00 SB SE 2 STREET PORT BOULEVARD N8 ILO FOOT 504? 30,862 0.986 30,430 31,278 1.014 1.014 1,00 SB PORT BOULEVARD 1-395 NB ILD FDOT 5049 37,451 0,986 36,927 39,42? 1.033 1.033 1.00 SB I-395 NE 36 STREET NB 4LD FDOT 5056 34,807 0.986 34,320 31,87? 0.964 1,000 1,00 SB NE 36 STREET NE 62 STREET NB 4LD FDOT 5060 32,900 0.986 32,439 34,183 1.027 1.027 1,00 SB 8A7gUORE DRIVE SW 27 AVENUE RICSENBACXER CSWY NB 4L0 DADE 650 SB CORAL WAY 0.986 26,750 - 1.073 1.00 74,337 97,345 26,175 29,705 31,711 40,740 31,877 35,090 28,301 SW 27 AVENUE SW 12 AVENUE EB 4LD TAP 0.986 - 1.073 1.01 31,220 30,478 WO SW 12 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD EB 4LD FOOT 1035 12,898 0.986 12,717 15,726 1.112 1.112 1.00 17,488 YB SW 15 ROAD US 1 89 4LU FDOT 86 10,205 0.986 10,062 10,480 1.021 1.021 1.00 - 10,695 KB S 8 STREET SW 27 AVENUE [-95 I-95 US 1 S 7 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 1-95 US 1 88 3LOW FDOT 5090 10,527 0.986 10,380 19,369 1.366 1.366 1.00 EB 3LOW FOOT 5098 17,754 0.986 17,505 19,984 1,068 1,068 1,00 k8 3L0if FDOT 5091 7,172 0,986 7,072 12,606 1.335 1.335 1.00 1tB 360ii FOOT 5097 11,550 0.986 11,388 18,186 1.264 1.264 1.00 21-12 26,459 21,352 16,831 22,981 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21.A2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI EXISTING (19911 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS ROADWAY FROM ADJ'D ADJ'D FACTORED 1990 COUNT 1988 AXLE 1988 1990 GROWTH GROWTH SEASON 1991 1991 TO DIRLANES SOURCE STA,8 COUNT FACT COUNT COUNT FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR COUNTS AADT S I STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE EB 4L00 FDOT 98 11,563 0,986 11,401 13,039 1.089 1.069 1.00 13,944 SW 2 AVENUE US 1 3B 3LOW TAP 0.986 1.073 1,01 11,856 11,574 FLAGLER STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE WB 3LOW FDOT 99 13,588 0.986 13,398 18,573 1.177 1,177 1,00 21,868 SW 2 AVENUE US 1 WB 2LOW TAP 0.986 - 1.073 1.01 7,545 7,366 11 1 STREET 1-95 US 1 ED 2LOW TAP - 0.986 - 1.073 1.01 5,088 4,967 N 6 STREET 1-95 US 1 EB 3LOW TAP 0.986 - 1.073 1.01 6,982 6,816 N 5 STREET I-95 US 1 WB 3LOW TAP 0.986 - 1.073 1,01 4,004 3,909 PORT BOULEVARD US 1 PORT OF HIAMI E8 4LD DADE 626 - 0.986 - - 1.013 1.01 16,630 16,235 WB N 10 STREET 8 STREET ROAD US 1 2LOW DADE 350 0.986 - 8,560 - 1.073 1.00 9,056 N R[VER DRIVE/N 11 STREET NW 17 AVENUE 8 STREET ROAD # 4LD 8 STREET ROAD US 1 2LOW DADE 352 21-13 0.986 - 1.073 - 0.986 540 - 1.073 1.00 571 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21.A2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARE WEST DRI EXISTING (1991) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS ROADWAY FROM ADJ'D ADJ'D FACTORED 1990 COUNT 1988 AXLE 1988 1990 GROWTH GROWTH SEASON 1991 1991 TO DIRLANES SOURCE STA.I COUNT. FACT COUNT COUNT FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR COUNTS AADT SR 836/1-395 LEJEUNE ROAD NW 27 AVENUE EB 6LD FOOT 2207 121,294 0.986 119,596 132,719 1.053 1.053 1.00 W8 NW 27 AVENUE I-95 EH 6LD FDOT 2232 125,355 0.986 123,600 130,849 1.029 1.029 1.00 WH 1-95 US 1 ED 6LD TAP 0.986 84,340 1.073 D.96 WD US 1 ALTON ROAD EB 61,0 FOOT R-31 56,848 0.986 56,052 66,805 1.092 1.092 1.00 WE NW 2D STREET NW 7 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE 4LD DADE 382 0.986 139,811 134,631 92,948 72,932 14,810 - 1.073 1.00 15,669 AVG: 1,073 Existing data not currently available. ** 1991 AADT is derived froa July 29 thru 31, 1989 data, AADT = (1989 count( $ (FDOT Average Growth)'2 ; (0.986 Axle Factor) ; 1/1.00 Seasonal Factor). NOTES: -FOR THE FDOT COUNTS, IF A POSITIVE GROWTH WAS IDENTIFIED BETWEEN 1988 AND 1990, THIS GROWTH WAS UTILIZED TO ESTIMATE 1991 COUNTS, -FOR THE FOOT COUNTS, IF A NEGATIVE GROWTH WAS IDENTIFIED BETWEEN 1988 AND 1990, A GROWTH RATE OF 1.00 WAS UTILIZED TO ESTIMATE 1991 COUNTS. -FOR THE TAP AND DADE COUNTS, THE AVERAGE OF ALL ACTUAL GROWTH FACTORS CALCULATED FROM THE FOOT COUNTS, WAS UTILIZED TO ESTIMATE 1991 COUNTS, COUNT SOURCE YEAR FACTORING METHOD FDOT 90 (ADJUSTED 1988 TO 1990 GROWTH) * (1990 COUNT) DADE 90 (AVERAGE UNADJUSTED FOOT 1988 TO 1990 GROWTH) * (AXLE FACTOR) ; (1990 COUNT) DADE TAP TAP 91 (AXLE FACTOR) ; (1991 COUNT) 90 (AVERAGE UNADJUSTED FDOT 1988 TO 1990 GROWTH) * (AXLE FACTOR) * (1/SEASON FACTOR) # (1990 COUNT) 91 (AXLE FACTOR) ; 1/SEASON FACTOR) ; (1991 COUNT) 21-14 TABLE 21.A3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS EXISTING YEAR 1999 EXISTING 1990 FUNCTIONAL FUNCTIONAL ROW ROADWAY FROM TO LANES CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION WIDTH NW 5 STREET BRIDGE NW 8 AVENUE NW 7 AVENUE 51, PA PA 70' I-95 US 1 SW 8 STREET 4b FRWY FRWY SW 8 STREET SR 836/1-395 6L FRWY FRWY SR 836/1-395 SR 112 IOL FRWY FRWY SR 112 NW 79 STREET 1OL FRWY FRWY NW 3 AVENUE NW 2 STREET I-95 ON RAMP 2L0W COLL COLL 50' W 2 AVENUE SW 7 STREET FLAGLER STREET 2LU NA HA 65' FLAGLER STREET NW 20 STREET 2LU MA HA 50' W 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NW 10 STREET 4LU COLL COLL 50' HIAMI AVENUE RICKENBACXER CSWY S 15 ROAD 4L1) NA MA 120' S 15 ROAD FLAGLER STREET 4LU NA HA 60'-70' FLAGLER STREET N 17 STREET 3LOW NA HA 60' N 1? STREET N 36 STREET 4LU HA HA 70' E 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NE 17 STREET 3LOW MA NA 70'-75' E 2 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET 1-395 3LOW HA HA 70' TABLE 21.A3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS EXISTING YEAR 1999 EXISTING 1990 FUNCTIONAL FUNCTIONAL ROW ROADWAY FRON TO LANES CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION WIDTH US 1 DOUGLAS ROAD Sit 17 AVENUE 6LD PA PA 60'-85' SW 17 AVENUE 1-95 6LD PA PA 85' 1-95 SE 7 STREET 4LD PA PA 100' SE 7 STREET SE 2 STREET 4LD PA PA 70' 5E 2 STREET PORT BOULEVARD 7LD PA PA 100'-200' PORT BOULEVARD 1-395 7L0 PA PA 100' 1-395 NE 36 STREET 4L➢ PA PA 100' NE 36 STREET NE 62 STREET 4LD PA PA 90'-180' BAYSHORE DRIVE SW 27 AVENUE RICRENBACXER CSWY 4LD NA NA 70' CORAL WAY SW 27 AVENUE SW 12 AVENUE 4LD PA PA 100' SW 12 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD 4LD PA PA 120' SW 15 ROAD US 1 4LU PA PA 70' 5 8 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 3LOW PA PA 65'-75' I-95 US 1 3LOW PA PA 70' S 7 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 3LOW PA PA 40'-50' 1-95 US 1 3LOW PA PA 50' 5 1 STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE 4L0W PA PA 70'-85' SW 2 AVENUE US 1 3LOW COLL COLL 70' FLAGLER STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE 3LOW PA PA 70'-100' SW 2 AVENUE U5 1 2L0W COLL COLL 70' 21-16 TABLE 21,A3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARR WEST DRI ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS EXISTING YEAR 1999 EXISTING 1990 FUNCTIONAL FUNCTIONAL ROW ROADWAY FROM TO LANES CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION WIDTH N 1 STREET 1-95 US 1 2LOW COLL COLL 70' N 5 STREET I-95 U5 1 3LOW COLL COLL 70' N 6 STREET 1-95 US 1 3LOW COLL COLL 50' PORT BRIDGE US 1 PORT OF NIANI 4LD NA NA - N 10 STREET 8 STREET ROAD US 1 2L0W COLL COLL 5D'-?0' N RIVER DRIVEIN 11 STREET NW 17 AVENUE 8 STREET ROAD 4LD COLL COLL 60'-70' 8 STREET ROAD US 1 2LOW COLL COLL 50' SR 836/1-395 LEJEUNE ROAD NW 27 AVENUE 6LD FRWY FRWY NW 27 AVENUE 1-95 6LD FRWY FRWY - 1-95 US 1 6LD FRWY FRWY US 1 ALTON ROAD 6LD FRWY FRWY NW 20 STREET NW 7 AVENUE NW a AVENUE 4LD NA NA 70' LEGEND: PA : Principal Arterial NA = Ninor Arterial FRWY = Liaited Access Freeway COLL = CollectarJLocal Street TABLE 21.A4 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARE WEST ➢RI PROGRAMMED ROA➢WAY IHPROVEHENTS FOOT NUMBER ROADWAY COST TYPE IKPROVEHENT 1S1,000's) YEAR RESPONSIBILITY 6113230 SR 9/NW 27 Avenue Add 2 Lanes 2,812 ROW 1991 FDOT NW 11 Street to to 4 Lanes 5,384 CST NW 42 Street 539 CEI 6113601 SR 836 Add Lanes 6,204 PE 1991-93 FDOT SR 82.1/R.E.F.T. to and SR 9AII-95 Resurface 6113705 SR 25INW 36 Street Add Through 2 PE 1991-92 FDOT NW 17 Avenue to Lanes 2,405 ROW 1992 SR 112 off ramp 6113769 Leleune Road Reconstruct 1O0 PE 1990-91 FDOT Okeechobee Road to 4 Lanes and 3200 CST NW 103rd Street Add Center 320 CEI Left Turn Lane 6123165 Port Tunnel New 4 Lane 9,222 PE 1991-94 FOOT Port of Miami to Tunnel SR 836/1-395 6141774 SR 9A/I-95 Add 2 Lanes 9,369 CST 1991 FDOT SR 836 to to 10 Lanes 937 CEI SR 112 6141775 SR 9AII-95 Add 2 Lanes 8,798 ROW 1991 FDOT NW 58 Street to to 8 Lanes 16,430 CST NW 95 Street 1,643 CBI 6141777 SR 9A/I-95 Add Through 313 PE 1991-92 FDOT NW 129 Street to Lanes 119 ROW NW 151 Street 13,86? CST 1,387 CEI 6141892 SR 9AII-95 Construct 196 PE 1991-92 FDOT NW 151 Street to HOV flyover 950 ROW South of SR 860 and Add 2 42,010 CST Lanes to 4,858 CEI 8 Lanes NW 14 Street Add 2 Lanes 30 PE 1990-91 DADE COUNTY NW 10 Avenue to to 2 Lanes 70 CET 1-95 730 CST NW 14 Street Convert One 10 PE 1990-91 DADE COUNTY Miami Avenue to Way Street 10 CEI Biscayne Boulevard to Two Way 100 CST 21-18 B. Provide a projection of vehicle trips expected to be generated by this development. State all standards and assumptions used, including trip end generation rates by land use types, sources of data, modal split, persons per vehicle, etc., as appropriate. The acceptable methodology to be used for projecting trip generation (including the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure or the Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates) shall be determined at the preapplication conference stage. Proiect Trip Generation The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI is currently in the first increment of a master/incremental DR1 consisting of three increments. The second increment is envisioned as a single phase project with proposed land uses consisting of 2,000 residential dwelling units, 71,700 square feet of commercial space, 500 hotel rooms, 337,000 square feet of office space, and an attraction/recreational land use equivalent to an 8,000 seat theatre. For comparative purposes, trip generation for the proposed DRI has been calculated using two methods: 1) FSUTMS generated trips based upon the number of dwelling units, number of hotel rooms, the number of employees in the commercial and office land uses, and the number of seats at an attraction, and 2) 1TE, formulas according to the number of dwelling units, number of hotel rooms, the number of thousands of square feet of commercial and office land use development, and the number of seats at an attraction. The number of employees is calculated using employment rates from the Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI (July 1988). 21-19 As indicated earlier, rates from the CADA for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI have been utilized to convert the project land uses into the employee and population data contained within the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS). FSUTMS determines the number of project trips for the proposed commercial and office land uses according to the number of employees anticipated for the project site. FSUTMS recognizes a residential dwelling unit based upon population data reflecting the inhabits of the proposed dwelling units. Table 21.B1 has been prepared to present the zonal data information for the second increment of the proposed development. Table 21.B1 also includes the rates utilized to determine the number of employees and the population for each proposed land use. An attached Table 21.B2 has been prepared to identify the 1'1'E average daily, PM and AM peak hour trip generation formulas that have been used to project the number of trips for the proposed land uses. Trip generation for the attraction land use has been based upon the ITE land use code 441 (designated for Live Theatre). The attached Tables 21.B3A and 21.B3B have been prepared to identify the average daily PM and AM peak hour vehicle trips generated by the Southeast OvertownfPark West DRI, as determined by direct application of 1TE rates. Neither internal capture transit modal split has been incorporated into Tables 21.B3A or 21.B3B. Table 21.B4 has been prepared to compare the ll ,t, generated trips to the FSUTMS generated trips. As further elaborated in the response to item C below, an estimated internal capture and transit modal split has been applied in Table 21.B4 but only to the 11E generated trips. The FSUTMS generated vehicle trips incorporate the model's internal capture, and transit modal split was estimated as 6.8%. 21-20 TABLE 21.B1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARE WEST DRI INCREHENT I1 SOC[O-ECONOMIC DATA ATTRACTION VARIABLES PRODUCTION VARIABLES COHNERCIAL SERVICE EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT TOTAL HULTI-FAHILY D.U. HOTEL/MOTEL UNITS LAND USE INTER UNIT FACTOR EHPL FACTOR EHPL EHPL FACTOR POP, %OCC RHS OCGIRH OCC OFFICE 337.0 1SF 4,44 1,496 1,496 RETAIL 71,7 KSF 2.71 194 194 RESIDENTIAL 2000.0 DU 1.327 2,654 HOTEL 500.0 RHS 1.00 500 500 67% 335 1.60 536 ATTRACTION B000.0 SEAT 0,02 160 160 194 2,156 2,351 2,654 335 536 NOTES: it ALL FACTORS WERE EXTRACTED FROM THE SEO/PW CADA 2) HOTEL AND HOTEL OCCUPANCY WERE DERIVED FROM YEAR 2000 ZONAL DATA TABLE 21-B2 SOUTHEAST OVERTONNIPARK VEST DRI ITE LAND USE CODES AND DAILY, PR PEAK HOUR AND AV PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES ITE AVERAGE DAILY PR PEAK HOUR AN PEAK HOUR LAND USE CODE TRIP RATE TRIP RATE TRIP RATE Genii Office 710 Ln(T) = 0.75Ln(A) + 3.77 Ln(T) = 0.83Ln(A) + 1.46 Ln(T) = 0.861,0) + 1.34 Commercial 820 Ln(T) = 0.65Ln(A) + 5.92 WTI : 0.52Ln(A) + 4.04 Ln(T) = 0.60Ln(A) + 2,40 Hotel 310 T = 8.80(X) - 59.0 Ln(T) = 1.301n(X) - 2.15 Ln(T) = 1.61Ln(X) - 3,90 Residential 220 T = 5.92(DU) + 51,0 T : 0.39(DU) + 59.0 T = 0.50(X) + 4.0 Attraction/Rec $ 441 T = 2(S) T = O.02(S) T : 0.02(S) T = Two-way volume of traffic A = Area in 1,000 gross square feet X = Rooms DU = Dwelling units 5 = Seats t Daily rate = 10 * PH rate AK rate = PH rate TABLE 21-B3A SOUTHEAST OVERTONN/PARii WEST DRI DAILY TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY LAND USE INTENSITY CODE TRIPS General Office 337,000 S.P. 710 3,412 Commercial 71,700 S.F. 820 5,986 Hotel 500 RNS 310 4,341 Residential 2,000 D.U. 220 €1,891 Attraction/Rec 8,000 SEATS 441 1600 Total Daily Trips: 27,230 a O.U. = dwelling units RNS = rooas S.F. = square feet * Internal capture and transit modal split have aot been incorporated. TABLE 21-838 SOUTHEAST OVERTONNIPARE NEST DRI PE PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION PH PEAR ITE HOUR LAND USE INTENSITY CODE TRIPS General Office 337,000 S.P. 710 540 Commercial 71,700 S.F. 820 524 Hotel 500 RNS 310 376 Residential 2,000 D.O. 220 839 Attraction/Rec 8,000 SEATS 441 160 Total PK Trips: 2,438 * AK PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION AN PEAK ITE HOUR LAND USE INTENSITY CODE TRIPS General Office 337,000 S.F. 710 570 Commercial 71,700 S,F, 820 143 Hotel 500 RES 310 448 Residential 2,000 D.U. 220 1,004 Attraction/Rec 8,000 SEATS 441 160 Total AN Trips; 2,325 * D.O. : dwelling units RES : rooms S.F. : square feet * Internal capture and transit modal split have not been incorporated. TABLE 21-84 SOUTHEAST OVERTONN/PARK NEST DRI TRIP GENERATION COMPARISONS DAILY TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY DAILY DAILY NET LAND USE INTENSITY CODE TRIPS INTERNAL TRIPS General Office 337,000 S.F. 710 3,412 863 2,559 Commercial 71,700 S.F. 820 5,986 1,496 4,489 Hotel 500 RNS 310 4,341 1,085 3,256 Residential 2,000 D,U. 220 11,891 2,973 8,918 AttractinnlRec 8,000 SEATS 441 1,600 400 €,200 TOTAL ITE: TOTAL FSUTMS; 27,230 17,658 PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION 6,807 20,422 606 17,052 PK PEAK ITE HOUR PM PM NET LAND USE INTENSITY CODE TRIPS INTERNAL TRIPS General Office 337,000 S.F. 710 540 135 405 'Commie! 71,700 S.F. 820 524 131 393 Hotel 500 RMS 310 376 94 282 Residential 2,000 D.U. 220 839 210 629 AttractinnlRec 8,000 SEATS 441 160 40 120 TOTAL ITE: 2,438 610 1,829 TOTAL FSUTMS: 1,580 54 1,526 C. Estimate the internallexternal split for the generated trips at the end of each phase of development as identified in (B) above. Use the format below and include a discussion of what aspects of the development (i.e., provision of on -site shopping and recreation facilities, on -site employment opportunities, etc.) will account for this internal/external split. Provide supporting documentation showing how splits were estimated, such as the results of the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) model application. Describe the extent to which the proposed design and land use mix will foster a more cohesive, internally supported project. Internal Trip Reduction and Transit Modal Split The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI is proposed as a mixed use development. Table 21.C1 has been prepared to summarize the daily and PM peak hour internal and external project traffic split, based upon the results from the FSUTMS model runs. For the daily and PM peak hour at the Increment II buildout Year 1999 of the project, the FSUTMS generated internal capture equates to 606 daily trips and 54 PM peak hour trips. At Increment II buildout, the net external daily trips (according to the FSUTMS model run) equates to 17,052 daily trips. The net external trips at buildout for the PM peak hour equates to 1,526. Due to the inter -relationships among existing and proposed land uses contained within the development site, the direct application of ITE rates to calculate trips will overestimate the number of external project trips generated. As indicated in Table 21.B4, the ITE trip rate analysis was prepared using an estimated internal trip reduction and transit modal split applied to the calculation of ITE generated project trips for the proposed land uses. The internal capture rate was based upon the Fourth Edition ITE Trip Generation Manual. The transit modal split was extracted from the CADA. 21-26 TABLE 21,C1 SOUTHEAST OYERTOWNIPARA WEST DE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS AS GENERATED BY FSUTHS FSUTHS NET TOTAL GENERATED EXTERNAL DAILY INTERNAL DAILY TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS YEAR 1999 17,658 606 17,052 FSUTHS NET TOTAL GENERATED EXTERNAL PH PEAK INTERNAL PH PEAK HOUR TRIPS TRIPS HOUR TRIPS YEAR 1999 1,580 54 1,526 Note: The PH peak hour FSUTHS trip generation is based upon 8,95% of the daily FSUTHS output. D. Provide a projection of total peak hour directional traffic, with the DRI, on the highway network within the study area at the end of each phase of development. If these projections are based on a validated FSUTMS, state the source, date and network of the model and of the TAZ projections. If no standard model is available and some other model or procedure is used, describe it in detail and include documentation showing its validity. Describe the procedure used to estimate and distribute traffic with full DRI development in subzones at buildout and at interim phase -end years. These assignments may reflect the effects of any new road or improvements which are programmed in adopted capital improvements programs and/or comprehensive plans to be constructed during DRI construction; however, the inclusion of such roads should be clearly identified. Show these link projections on maps or tables of the study area network, one map or table for each phase -end year. Describe how these conclusions were reached. Background Growth The Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) has been utilized to project a background growth in traffic volumes for the development buildout year for Increment II. The socio-economic and roadway network data for Year 2000 were used in this anolysis. The data was provided by the Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization. As further discussed below, the zonal data set was modified to incorporate the committed developments within the study area. Committed Developments To assess the impact associated with committed projects within the traffic impact study area, various County and local government agencies were contacted in writing to gather information regarding developments which have received preliminary development approval. Projects generating in excess of four hundred (400) PM peak hour trips were considered significant, and their impacts were included as updated committed development data contained within the transportation analysis zones (TAZ) within the project area of influence. 21-28 In order to establish a fixed number of committed development projects to include in the transportation analysis, only those projects within the traffic impact study area which have received preliminary development approval by the date of the pre -application conference, and which have been identified in writing by the City of Miami have been included in the transportation analysis. Appendix 1 includes the letters sent to and received from the City regarding committed developments within the traffic impact study area. Trip generation for these committed developments has been calculated using the fourth edition of the Trip Generation manual and rates identified in their respective ADA's. Tables 21.D1A and 21.D1B outline trip generation data for each committed development project within the traffic impact study area. This table includes the following: • the development (or plat) name; • the development (or plat) location; • the land uses proposed; • the scale at project buildout (Le. square footages, dwelling units, rooms); • the PM peak hour inbound and outbound trip generation rates; • the PM peak hour inbound and outbound vehicle trips; and • the total PM peak hour vehicle volumes. The committed developments identified in Tables 21.D1A and 21.D1B have been assigned to the corresponding traffic analysis zones as outlined in Table 21.D2. The information presented in Tables 21.D1A and 21.D1B is provided for comparative purposes with FSUTMS model output and as an estimate of committed development impact. Table 21.D2 has provided the basis to update the Year 2000 socio-economic data. Traffic analysis zones are presented in Tables 21.D3 through 21.D5. The Year 2000 data was 21-29 updated to include ail development that is anticipated to be built by the Increment II buildout in 1999. The incorporation of the committed developments into the zonal data sets is explained in detail in the subsection titled "Socio-Economic Data Update Process". Map J-4 (located in the map series at the end of Section 21) has been prepared to show the locations of all committed developments included in Tables 21.D1A and 21.D1B, Socio-Economic Data Update Process The actual existing development plus committed development data from Tables 21.D1A and 21.D1B has been organized by traffic analysis zone, and has been translated into the peninent socio-economic data. This data has been added to the ZDATAI.00F and 7DATA2.00F and the results are presented in Tables 21.D2 through 21.D5. Table 21.D2 lists the attraction and production variables for each of the committed developments, and Table 21.D3 lists, by committed development, the candidate zones for updates. The production and attraction variables for the 49 zones identified in Table 21.D3 were compared for the FSUTMS model years 1986 and 2000 (ZDATAx.86C and ZDATAx.00F). This comparison is shown in Table 21.D4A for production variables and Table 21.D4B for attraction variables. The difference between the 1986 and 2000 data sets was then compared to the values calculated for Table 21.D2, and the differences were used as the basis for updating the zonal data in the Year 2000 data sets. The changes made to each zone are shown in Tables 21.D5A and 21.D5B. The following assumptions were made during the update process: o No committed development growth occurs in the 1986 to 2000 period other than that identified in Table 21.D2. That is, the difference between 1986 and 2000 is completely accounted for by Increment II and the committed developments of Table 21.D2. 21-30 o No development is removed other than that already accounted for in the data sets. Therefore, Increment II and the committed developments do not replace existing development. These assumptions have offsetting effects in that the first tends to underestimate future values for production and attraction variables and the second tends to overestimate them. Roadway Network Update Process The Year 2000 network was checked against the existing network and programmed improvements (TIP and FDOT Five Year Plan) for accuracy. No modifications were made to the network. 21-31 TABLE 21.D1A SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT PH PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION [TB TRIP GENERATION RATES PROJ. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 City of Miami Downtown DR€ Increment [ 2 City of Miami SE 0vertown/ Park West DRI Increment I 3 Brickell Square DRI Phases II and III 'aughton Island DRI LOCATION LAND USE GENERATION RATES VEHICLE TRIPS PH SCALE 8 TOTAL YEAR 1999 PH(IN) PH(OUT) PM(IN) PH(OUT) VOLUMES 851 Brickell Avenue Brickell Key Office (710) 6906,50 KSF Retail (820) 1044.00 KSF Convention 500.00 KSF Institutional (540( 300.00 KSF Wholesale (860) 1050.00 KSF Hotel (310) 1000,00 R1(5 Residential (220) 3550.00 DU Attraction (441) 3400.00 SEATS Office (710) Retail (8201 Residential (220) Attraction (441) Office (710) Retail (8201 166,00 ISF 95,40 KSF 2000.00 DU 8000.00 SEATS 0.15 0.80 1,059 5,558 4,493 1.38 1.56 1,445 1,629 2,088 0.03 0.08 17 40 57 # 0.80 0.27 239 80 216 #t 0.00 0.00 NIA N/A 152 0.50 0.43 500 426 628 0.28 0.13 982 462 980 0.01 0.01 34 34 46 0.29 1,52 48 252 280 4.48 4.67 428 445 814 0.29 0.13 571 268 783 0.01 0.01 80 80 149 937,80 85F 0.22 1.13 202 1,060 1,023 43.00 KSF 5.13 5,33 220 229 365 Office (710) 900.00 KSF Retail (820) 143.00 K5F Hotel (310) 800.00 RHS Residential (2321 1600.00 DU 0.22 1.14 195 1,024 989 2.69 2.80 385 400 637 0.47 0.40 374 318 561 0.22 0.13 350 214 457 :# ITE Rates were unavailable for this land use. Rates from the Downtown DRI were used. Actual Land Use unknown, ITE Land Use Junior/Community College (540) was assumed. Notes: Where R"2 is greater than or equals 0,75, [TE fitted curve equations were used. Where R"2 is less than 0.75, [TE average trip rates were used. Volumes include modal split based on Downtown DRI and SEOIPW Increment I. Source: ITE Trip Generation, Fourth Edition 21-32 TABLE 21.01E SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI CONNITTRD DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION PN PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION DRI TRIP GENERATION RATES GENERATION RATES VEHICLE TRIPS PH PROJ, SCALE N TOTAL 8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION LAND USE YEAR 1999 PM(IN) PN(0UT( PH(INi PN(OUT( VOLUMES 1 City of Miami Downtown DRI Increment I 2 City of Rini SE Overtownl Park West DRI Increment I Office 6906.50 KSF 0,17 0.39 1,151 2,687 3,838 Retail 1044,00 &SF 0.15 0.34 153 358 511 Convention 500.00 KSF 0.03 0.08 17 40 57 Institutional 300.00 KSF 0.01 0.03 3 8 11 Wholesale 1050.00 KSF 0.04 0.09 39 91 130 Hotel 1000.00 RNS 0.05 0.13 55 128 182 Residential 3550.00 DU 0.04 0.10 147 342 489 Attraction 3400.00 SEATS 0.00 0.00 2 6 8 Office 166.00 KSF 0.26 0.61 43 101 144 Retail 95.40 KSF 0.23 0.54 22 51 73 Residential 2000.00 DU 0,05 0.12 107 249 356 Attraction 8000.00 SEATS 0.00 0.00 6 13 19 3 Brickell Square DRI 851 Brickell Avenue Office 937.80 KSF 0.12 0.47 110 440 550 Phases II and III Retail 43.00 KSF 0.00 0,00 0 0 4 aughton Island DRI Brickell Key 0f€ice 900.00 KSF 0.12 0.62 107 562 670 Retail 143.00 KSF 0.32 0.34 46 48 94 Rotel 800.00 RNS 0.15 0.12 117 100 217 Residential 1600.00 DU 0.09 0.06 152 93 244 Notes: Trip rates are from original DRI's except Claughton Island for which 11DRI rates were used. Volumes are adjusted for nodal split. TABLE 21.02 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI CURETTED DEVELOPMENT SOCIO-ECONOM1C DATA ATTRACTION VARIABLES PRODUCTION VARIABLES COMRERCIAL SERVICE EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT TOTAL MULTI -FAMILY D.U. BOTEL/ROTEL UNITS PROJECT LAND USE INTER UNIT FACTOR EEL FACTOR EMPL ERPL FACTOR POP. %OCC MS OCC/RM OCC CITY OF EAR' OFFICE 6906.5 KSF DDR1 RETAIL 1044.0 6SF 2.71 2,829 CONVENTION 500.0 KSF INSTITUTIONAL 300.0 KSF WHOLESALE 1050.0 KSF 1.42 1,491 HOTEL 1000.0 RNS RESIDENTIAL 3550.0 DU ATTRACTION 3400.0 SEAT 4.44 30,665 30,665 2,829 1.00 500 500 1.53 459 459 1,491 1.00 1,000 1,000 0.02 68 68 1.327 4,711 SE OVERTOWN/PARK OFFICE 166.0 &SF 4.44 737 737 WEST [NCR [ DRI RETAIL 95.4 KSF 2.71 259 259 RESIDENTIAL 2000.0 DU 0 1.327 2,654 ATTRACTION 8000.0 SEAT 0.02 160 160 BRICEELL SQUARE OFFICE 937.8 KSF 4.44 4,164 4,164 RETAIL 43.0 KSF 2.71 117 117 49% 490 1.60 784 CLAUGHTOH ISLAND OFFICE 900.0 KSF 4.44 3,996 3,996 RETAIL 143.0 KSF 2.71 388 388 RESIDENTIAL 1600.0 DU 1.32? 2,123 HOTEL 800.0 RMS 1.00 800 800 49% 392 1.60 627 5,083 42,549 47,632 9,488 882 1,411 NOTES: 1 ALL ATTRACTION VARIABLES ARE CALCULATED USING FACTORS FROM THE CITY OF EARL DDRI AND SEO/PW CADA 2) HOTEL AND MOTEL OCCUPANCY WERE DERIVED FROM YEAR 2000 ZONAL DATA TABLE 21.D3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT FSUTMS ZONES PROJECT AREA ZONES CITY OF MIAMI OKNI 482, 483, 492, 493 DOWNTOWN DRI CBD 488, 489, 490, 491 497, 498, 503, 504 505, 506, 511, 512 513, 514, 515, 516 517, 518, 519, 520 521, 525, 528, 529 530, 531 BRICKELL 523, 524, 709, 710 713, 714, 715, 716 717, 718, 719, 72D SE OVERTOWNIPARK SE OVERTOWN 534, 535 WEST INCR I DRI PARK WEST 494, 495, 496 BRICKELL SQUARE BRICKELL 712 CLAUGBTON 9RICKELL 711 ISLAND DRI KEY TABLE 21.044 SOUTHEAST OVERTOYN!PARK NEST BRI • TONAL PRODUCTION VARIABLE COMPARISON MULTI FAMILY DELUXE UNITS HOTEL AND MOTEL UNITS MF DU PERM POP TOTAL UNITS % OCCUPIED TOTAL OCCUPANTS TONE 26C OOF CHNO 86C OOF CHNE 86C OOF CHUG 86C 44F CHHE 86C OOF EHNE 422 281 281 607 607 25 -25 48 -48 19 -19 483 282 282 222 114 -162 600 600 49 49 469 469 428 644 644 49 49 644 504 -140 489 490 491 492 493 818 818 951 951 412 387 -25 49 49 412 302 -110 494 368 959 591 426 1136 710 303 285 -18 49 49 303 222 -81 495 464 440 -24 470 446 -24 153 153 49 49 120 120 496 35 35 48 48 21 21 48 48 16 16 497 498 154 154 106 106 144 149 49 49 149 117 -32 503 69 69 69 20 -49 90 90 49 49 90 70 -20 504 505 506 511 512 513 514 65 65 65 65 515 516 95 95 95 88 -7 230 230 49 49 179 179 517 52 52 52 25 -27 518 519 520 521 202 202 202 55 -147 301 301 49 49 235 235 523 524 10 10 20 20 525 528 529 530 531 534 1474 1584 110 1982 2130 148 130 122 -8 62 67 5 130 131 1 535 736 783 47 1397 1486 89 40 40 63 68 5 40 43 3 709 156 169 13 331 350 1? 69 166 97 49 49 54 130 76 710 110 110 162 155 -7 600 600 49 49 169 469 711 312 642 330 302 582 280 250 250 49 49 195 175 712 840 840 1204 1154 -50 12 65 53 50 49 -1 10 51 41 713 394 358 -36 629 552 -�7 38 145 107 50 49 -1 30 114 84 714 64 64 88 84 -4 715 725 725 781 732 -43 716 3821 4250 429 3410 3540 130 717 391 414 23 725 750 25 50 141 91 48 49 1 38 110 72 718 587 582 1072 1040 -32 319 976 936 -40 1795 1666 -129 35 35 49 49 27 27 720 205 203 -2 387 373 -14 51 -51 48 -48 24 -24 1451 643 471 46 TABLE 21.048 SOUTHEAST OVERTOHNIPARR HEST ORI ZONAL ATTRACTION VARIABLES COMPARISON COMMERCIAL SERVICE TOTAL SCHOOL EHPLOYHBNT EMPLOYMENT BHPLOYHENT ENROLLNENT ZONE 86C OOF CHNG 86C OOF CHNG 86C 00F CHNG 86C OOF CHNG 482 1900 1925 25 2530 2640 110 4970 5105 135 414 500 86 483 2150 2150 0 2066 2089 33 4646 4679 33 488 25 49 24 2433 2433 0 2458 2482 24 489 0 0 0 69 83 14 70 84 14 490 15 679 664 124 220 96 148 908 760 491 8 8 0 44 44 0 79 79 0 492 440 700 260 855 1594 739 2701 3774 1073 493 895 1200 305 2100 3233 1133 3684 5174 1490 494 833 1200 367 1600 2227 627 3806 4875 1069 495 4? 100 53 354 780 426 521 1000 479 496 282 360 78 375 614 239 837 1154 317 497 213 223 10 177 520 343 417 770 353 498 93 102 9 526 684 158 619 786 167 503 91 170 79 115 228 113 308 500 192 504 41 50 9 89 223 134 164 307 143 505 107 107 0 101 1080 979 260 1239 979 506 205 206 1 707 726 19 1080 1100 20 511 990 990 0 1000 1000 0 2366 2366 0 512 1056 1056 0 3100 3100 0 4405 4405 0 513 560 560 0 3670 3670 0 4356 4356 0 514 123 22? 104 449 1059 610 762 1476 714 515 1101 1101 0 700 700 0 1889 1889 0 516 435 435 0 800 800 0 1501 1507 0 517 500 550 50 840 880 40 1503 1593 90 518 840 840 0 2444 2444 0 3726 3726 0 519 980 980 0 4500 4500 0 5667 5667 0 520 13 35 22 3230 7955 4735 3234 8000 4766 521 254 254 0 640 640 0 905 905 0 523 0 180 180 101 2261 2I60 160 2500 2340 524 16 180 164 236 2286 2050 286 2500 2214 525 310 310 0 1530 2620 1090 1945 3035 1090 528 0 0 0 1230 1440 210 1230 1440 210 529 31 31 0 72 113 41 123 164 41 530 266 266 0 960 1660 700 1319 2019 700 0 870 870 531 410 410 0 1740 2930 1190 2216 3406 1190 534 490 490 0 471 471 0 1051 1051 0 535 37 38 1 133 138 5 190 196 6 701 790 89 709 700 702 2 3050 2565 -485 4133 4650 517 710 41 250 209 1815 4611 2796 2417 5000 2583 711 0 0 0 0 2340 2340 161 2500 2339 712 1220 2500 1280 6305 10882 4577 8173 14200 6027 713 730 841 111 4720 7515 2795 5931 8881 2950 481 814 333 714 310 310 0 1530 1532 2 2009 2011 2 115 210 210 0 1853 1853 0 2231 2167 -64 716 120 120 0 88 88 0 1295 295 -1000 717 19 20 1 186 186 0 246 248 2 718 375 424 49 1006 1121 115 1455 1628 173 158 1028 870 719 240 240 0 613 613 0 985 985 0 720 200 200 0 448 420 -28 968 940 -28 19922 23979 4057 63715 93821 30106 95612 129722 34110 1754 4002 2248 21-37 TABLE 21.054 SOUTHEAST BVERTOWNIPARI WEST DRT ZONAL. PRODUCTION VARIABLE UPDATE MULTI FAMILY DWELLING UNITS HOTEL AND MOTEL UNITS MF DU PERM POP TOTA1. UNITS TOTAL OCCUPANTS ZONE OLD CHN= 168 OLD CHNS NEW OLD CHNS NEW OLD CHNS NEW 402 281 90 371 607 135 742 483 282 282 114 114 600 600 469 469 488 644 644 504 504 489 490 491 492 493 818 360 1178 951 538 1489 387 387 302 302 994 459 319 1278 1136 433 1569 285 285 222 222 495 440 440 446 446 153 153 120 120 996 35 35 48 48 21 21 16 16 497 498 154 180 334 106 269 375 149 91 240 117 91 200 503 69 180 244 20 269 289 40 91 181 70 91 161 504 505 506 511 512 513 514 65 180 245 65 269 334 515 516 95 180 275 88 269 357 230 91 321 179 91 270 517 52 180 232 25 269 244 518 519 520 i 521 202 202 55 55 301 301 235 235 523 524 10 10 20 20 525 528 529 530 531 534 1584 319 1903 2130 433 2563 122 122 131 131 535 783 763 1486 1486 40 40 43 43 709 169 169 350 35D 166 166 130 130 710 110 110 155 155 600 600 464 469 711 642 1270 1912 582 1843 2425 250 550 800 195 432 627 712 840 840 1154 1154 65 65 51 51 713 358 225 583 552 337 889 145 63 208 114 64 178 714 64 225 289 84 337 421 63 63 64 64 715 725 225 950 738 337 1075 63 63 64 64 716 4250 225 4475 3540 337 3877 63 63 64 64 717 414 225 634 750 337 1087 141 63 204 110 64 174 718 582 225 807 1040 337 1377 63 63 64 64 719 936 225 1161 1666 337 2003 35 63 98 27 64 91 720 203 225 428 373 337 710 63 63 64 64 15122 5058 20180 18281 7423 25704 4424 1327 5751 3504 1217 4721 21- 3 8 TABLE 21.D58 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DkI ZONAL ATTRACTION VARIABLE UPDATE COMMERCIAL SERVICE TOTAL SCHOOL EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT ENROLLMENT ZONE OLD CHN8 NEW OLD CHNO NEY OLD C66 NEW OLD CHN6 NEI 482 1925 31.6 2241 2640 2832 5472 5105 3148 8253 500 270 770 483 2150 2150 2409 2089 4679 4679 488 49 49 2433 2433 2482 2482 489 83 83 84 84 490 679 679 220 22D 900 900 491 8 8 44 44 79 79 492 700 700 1594 1594 3774 3774 473 1200 270 1470 3233 1736 4969 5174 2006 7180 494 1200 -194 1006 2227 38 2265 4875 -156 4719 495 100 100 780 780 1000 1000 496 364 360 614 614 1154 1154 497 223 26 249 520 114 634 770 140 910 498 102 26 128 684 114 79B 786 140 926 503 170 26 196 228 114 342 500 140 640 504 50 26 76 223 114 337 307 140 447 505 107 26 133 1080 114 1194 1239 140 1379 506 206 26 232 726 114 840 1100 140 1240 511 990 990 1000 1000 2366 2366 512 1056 98 1144 3100 311 3481 4405 469 4874 513 560 88 648 3670 381 4051 4356 469 4825 514 227 88 315 1059 381 1440 1476 469 1945 515 1101 88 1189 700 381 1081 1889 469 2358 516 435 88 523 805 381 1181 1507 469 1976 517 550 88 631 880 381 1261 1593 469 2062 518 840 86 928 2444 381 2825 3726 469 4195 519 980 88 1068 4500 381 4881 5667 469 6136 520 35 88 123 7965 381 8346 8000 469 8469 521 254 254 640 640 905 905 523 180 180 2261 2261 2500 2510 524 180 180 2286 2286 2500 2500 525 310 310 2620 2620 3035 3035 528 1440 1440 1440 1440 529 31 31 113 113 164 164 530 266 266 1660 1660 2019 2019 870 470 1340 531 410 410 2930 2930 3406 3406 534 490 490 471 471 1051 1051 535 38 38 138 138 196 196 790 427 1217 709 702 702 2565 2565 4650 4650 710 250 250 4611 4611 5000 5000 711 388 388 2340 2456 4796 2500 2844 5344 712 2500 2500 10882 10882 14200 14200 713 841 841 7515 7515 8981 8881 814 440 1254 714 310 310 1532 1532 2011 2011 715 210 210 1853 1853 2167 2167 716 120 120 88 88 295 295 717 20 20 186 186 248 248 718 424 424 1121 1121 1628 1628 1028 554 1582 719 240 240 613 613 985 985 720 200 200 420 420 940 940 23979 1728 25707 93821 11175 104996 129722 12903 142625 4002 2161 6163 E. Assign the trips generated by this development as shown in (B) above and show, on separate maps or tables for each phase -end year, the DRI traffic on each link of the then -existing network within the study area. Include peak -hour directional trips. If local data is available, compare average trip lengths by purpose for the project and local jurisdiction. For the year of buildout and at the end of each phase estimate the percent impact, in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips/ total peak hour directional trips and in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips/existing peak hour service volume for desired LOS, on each regionally significant roadway in the study area. Identify facility type, number of lanes and projected signal locations for the regionally significant roads. Total Traffic at Increment II Buildout The level of service operation was measured for each designated significant roadway link within the traffic impact study area based upon average weekday peak hour directional volumes and the corresponding maximum service volume as designated by the approved FDOT generalized capacity tables for the minimum acceptable level of service standard. Total traffic at Increment II buildout was established through the use of FSUTMS with the updated year 2000 data, both with and without the proposed Increment II project (hereafter referred to as "the project"). The FSUTMS runs were for the highway network only; a transit factor was included in the analysis to allow for the effects of an estimated transit modal split. These factors were derived using an unweighted average of production and attraction modal splits from the output of the year 2010 existing plus committed traffic network. When the transit portion of the 2000 data set is available, FSUTMS will be rerun to redistribute the traffic applying the FSUTMS calculated modal split directly. Table 21.E1 (future without project) and Table 21.E2 (future with project) identify the Year 2000 traffic volumes, the roadway capacity and the roadway levels of service. Table 21.E3 (future with project) identifies the project distribution percentage, the project trips and delineate whether or not a roadway has been found significant according to SFRPC guidelines. Table 21.E3 also indicate (1) the percent impact of PM peak hour 21-40 directional project trips, divided by the total PM peak hour directional trips, and (2) the percent impact of PM peak hour directional project trips, divided by the PM peak hour level of service „D„ roadway capacity. Roadway deficiencies as a result of the proposed project have been identified on Table 21.F1 within item F of this transportation. section. The project's proportional share percentage, and estimated costs to eliminate roadway deficiencies, have been provided where applicable. Map 7-5A, 7-5B, J-5C and J-5D (found at the end of Question 21) have been prepared to illustrate the roadway levels of service outlined in Tables 21.E1 and 21.E2. Map 7-6A, 7-6B, 7-6C and J-6D have been prepared to specifically illustrate the link by link project distribution percentage and link by link number of project trips. Intersection Analysis Intersection capacity and levels of service have been determined through the use of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and the related Highway Capacity Software (HCS). Intersections critical to the traffic study impact area have been identified as the major intersections within the project area. When the FSUTMS model is run with transit network, the traffic will be redistributed. At that time the list of intersections will be expanded to include those on both ends of significant roadway links operating below LOS D. The following is a list of those intersections which were studied through the DRI process: NE lst Avenue/1-395 west bound on ramp NE 2nd Avenue/I-395 east bound off ramp US 1/NE 11 Terrace NE 1st Avenue/NE 6th Street 21-41 NW 3rd Avenue/NW 6th Street US 1/NE 5th Street NE 2nd Avenue/NE 5th Street NE 1st Avenue/NE 5th Street N Miami Avenue/N 5th Street NW 2nd Avenue/NW 3rd Street US 1/NE lst Street N Miami Avenue/N lst Street NW 2nd Avenue/NW 1st Street PM peak hour turning movement counts were performed at each intersection listed above. For intersections on one-way links into the project area, AM peak hour counts were also performed. Tables 21.E4A and 21.E4B have been prepared to identify the intersection turning movement counts and the projected Year 1999 turning movement volumes. Each intersection has been analyzed to address the existing operating conditions. The analysis of future intersection operations has been performed for the future background traffic without the project, and to incorporate the impact of the proposed project at buildout (Year 1999). A summary of the intersection levels of service are included as Table 21.E5. The analysis summary sheets are included in Appendix li at the end of Question 21. 21-42 TABLE 21,E1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARE NEST DRI FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (1999) PEAK PEAK AD1'D TO PEAK HOUR PEAK 1999 1999 TRANSIT 1999 DAILY "D" HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway Fro To DIR LANES BCKGND FACTOR BCKGND RATIO FACTOR VOLUME CAPACITY LOS NW 5 STREET BRIDGES NW 8 AVENUE ow 7 AVENUE NB 5L 48,449 0.977 47,334 0.084 0.565 2,246 2,140 8 58 0.435 1,730 1,430 E 1-95 US 1 5148 STREET NB 41 106,758 0.977 104,303 0.084 0.435 3,811 3,710 E SB D.565 4,950 3,710 F 8148 STREET SR 836/I-395 NB 6L 219,927 0.977 214,868 0.080 0.435 7,477 5,570 F SB 0.565 9,712 5,570 F SR 836(1-395 58.112 NB 12L 260,823 0.977 254,824 0.080 0,565 11,518 11,140 8 SB 0.435 8,868 11,140 C SR 112 NW 79 STREET NB 10L 269,823 0.977 263,617 0.080 0.565 11,915 9,280 F SD 0.435 9,174 9,280 D NW 3 AVENUE NW 2 STREET 1-95 ON RAMP NB 2L04 26,713 0.921 24,603 0,084 1.000 2,067 1,860 F 1 2 AVENUE SW 7 STREET FLAGLER STREET NB 2LU 25,062 0.947 23,734 0.090 0.565 1,207 710 F SB 0.435 929 710 F FLAGLER STREET NW 20 STREET NB 2L11 19,757 0.921 18,196 0.090 0.565 925 746 F SD 0,435 712 746 E ii 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NW 10 STREET NB 4LU 30,360 0.921 27,961 0.084 0.565 1,32? 1,320 E SB 0.435 1,022 1,320 D MIAMI AVENUE RICKENBACKER CSWY S 15 ROAD NB 4L0 20,727 0.947 19,628 0.084 0.43E 717 1,590 ➢ SB 0.565 932 1,590 D 5 15 ROAD FLAGLER STREET NB 41,11 35,352 0.947 33,479 0.084 0,435 I,223 .1,590 ➢ 56 0.565 1,589 1,590 D FLAGLER STREET N 17 STREET 50 31,01f 14,953 0.921 13,772 0.080 1.000 1,102 2,830 C N I7 STREET N 36 STREET NB 4LU 24,660 0.938 23,131 0.084 0,555 1,09E 1,590 0 SB 0.435 845 1,590 0 E 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET HE 17 STREET NB 3L014 26,453 0,921 24,363 0.080 1,000 1,949 2,830 C E 2 AVENUE FLAGLER STRERT I-395 SB 3L01i 29,342 0.921 27,024 0.080 1.000 2,162 2,830 C 21-43 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21.E1 SOUTHEAST OVSRTOWNIPARK WEST DRI FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (1999) PEAK PEAK ADJ'D TO PEAK HOUR PEAK 1999 1999 TRANSIT 1999 DAILY "D° HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway From To DIR LANES BCKGND FACTOR BCKGND RATIO FACTOR VOLUME CAPACITY LOS US I DOUGLAS ROAD SW 17 AVENUE NB 6LD 72,353 0,977 70,689 0,080 0,435 2,460 2,510 D SB 0,565 3,195 2,510 F SW 1? AVENUE 1-95 NB 610 66,352 0,977 64,826 0.080 0,435 2,256 2,510 D 58 0,565 2,930 2,510 F 1-95 SE 7 STREET MB 4L0 55,279 0,947 52,349 0,084 0.435 1,913 1,430 F 58 0.565 2,485 1,430 F SE 7 STREET SE 2 STREET NB 4L0 47,669 0,947 45,143 0,084 0.435 1,650 1,590 E SB 0.565 2,142 1,590 F SE 2 STREET PORT BOULEVARD NB 7LD 65,668 0,921 60,480 0,080 0.565 2,734 3,270 D SB 0.435 2,105 2,450 0 PORT BOULEVARD I-395 NB 7LD 76,269 0.932 71,083 D,080 0.565 3,213 3,270 D 58 0.435 2,474 2,450 E 1-395 NE 36 STREET NB 4LD 44,€13 0,938 41,378 0,084 0,565 1,964 1,590 F SB 0.435 1,512 1,590 0 NE 36 STREET NE 62 STREET NB 4LD 45,994 0,977 44,936 0,084 0,565 2,133 1,430 F SB 0.435 1,642 1,43D E °AYSHORE DRIVE SW 27 AVENUE RICKENBACKER CSWY NB 4LD 31,672 0.977 30,943 0,084 0,435 1,131 1,430 D SB 0,565 1,469 1,430 E CORAL WAY SW 27 AVENUE SW 12 AVENUE EB 4LD 44,990 0.977 43,955 0.084 D.435 1,606 1,430 E WB 0.565 2,086 1,430 F SW 12 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD EB 4LD 38,290 0,977 37,410 0,084 0.435 1,367 1,430 D WB 0.565 1,775 1,430 'F SW 15 ROAD US l EB 4LU 39,717 0.947 37,612 0.084 0.435 1,374 I,590 D WB 0,565 1,785 1,590 E S 8 STREET SW 27 AVENUE I-95 EB SLOW 30,145 0,977 29,452 0.080 1.000 2,356 2,670 ➢ 1-95 US 1 EB 3LOW 34,380 0,947 32,558 0,080 1,000 2,605 2,670 0 S 7 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 WB 3LOW 32,754 0.977 32,000 0.080 1.000 2,560 2,670 D 1-95 US 1 WB 310W 29,872 0,947 28,289 0.080 1.000 2,263 2,670 D 21-44 Diaaca roFar to tha nntac aF and of tRbla, TABLE 21.81 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (1999) PEAK PEAR ADJ'D TO PEAK HOUR PEAK 1999 1999 TRANSIT 1999 DAILY "D" HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway Frog To DER LANES DCEGND FACTOR BC8GN0 RATIO FACTOR VOLUME CAPACITY LOS S 1 STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE EB 4LOW 26,635 0.977 26,023 0.080 1.000 2,082 3,600 C SW 2 AVENUE US 1 EB 3LOW 27,479 0.921 25,308 0.080 1.000 2,025 2,830 C # FLAGLER STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE N 1 STREET I-95 SW 2 AVENUE WB 3L0W 30,952 0.977 30,240 0.080 1.000 2,419 2,670 D US 1 WB 2LOW 21,426 0,921 19,733 0.084 1.000 1,658 1,860 D $ US 1 EB 2LOW 13,272 0,921 12,223 0.084 1.000 1,027 1,860 C $ 0 5 STREET I-95 US 1 88 SLOW 22,068 0.931 20,545 0.080 1.000 1,644 2,830 C * N 6 STREET I-95 US 1 WB SLOW 14,375 0.931 13,384 0,080 1.000 1,071 2,830 C 1 PORT BOULEVARD US-1 PORT OF MIAMI E8 41,1) 34,979 0.931 32,566 0.084 0.435 1,190 1,890 A WB 0.565 1,546 1,890 A N 10 STREET 8 STREET ROAD US 1 BB 2LOW 17,550 0.931 16,339 0.084 1.000 1,372 1,750 C N RIVER DRIVE/N 11 STREET NW 17 AVENUE 8 STREET ROAD BB 4LD 26,412 0.977 25,805 0.084 0.435 943 1,430 0 WB 0.565 1,225 1,430 D 8 STREET ROAD US 1 WB 2LOW 17,550 0.931 16,339 0,084 1.000 1,372 1,750 C 21-45 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21.E1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOHN/PARK HEST DRI FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (1999) PEAK PEAK ADJ'D TO PEAK HOUR PEAK 1999 1999 TRANSIT 1999 DAILY °D° HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway Fran To DIR LANES BCKGND FACTOR BCKGND RATIO FACTOR VOLUME CAPACITY LOS SR 836/1-395 LEJRUNE ROAD HH 27 AVENUE EB 1OLD 172,573 0,977 168,604 0.080 0,435 5,867 9,280 C HB 0.565 7,621 9,280 C NH 2? AVENUE 1-95 EB 10LD 180,607 0,977 176,453 0.080 0.435 6,141 9,280 C HB 0,565 7,976 9,280 D I-95 US 1 EB 6LD 126,262 0,977 123,358 0.080 0.435 4,293 5,570 C NB 0.565 5,576 5,570 E US 1 ALTON ROAD EB 6LD 63,824 0.977 62,356 0.080 0.565 2,819 5,570 B WB 0.435 2,170 5,570 B NW 20 STREET NH 7 AVENUE NH 2 AVENUE EB 4LD 51,403 0,938 48,216 0.084 0.435 1,762 1,430 F HB 0.565 2,288 1,430 F * One-way collectors analyred as one-way arterials, 21-46 TABLE 21.E2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (1999) PEAK PEAK TOTAL PEAK PM PEAK PROJ % HOUR TO PEAR HOUR PEAK 1999 HOUR TRIPS PROJ PROJ DAILY '0' HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway Froa To DIR LANES VOLUME DAILY TRIPS TRIPS RATIO FACTOR VOLUME CAPACITY LOS NV 5 STREET BRIDGE NW 8 AVENUE RN 7 AVENUE NB 5L 2,246 887 5.2% 37 0.084 0.565 2,284 2,140 8 SB 1,730 42 0.435 1,772 1,430 F 1-95 US 1 SW 8 STREET NB 4L 3,811 784 4,6% 33 0.084 0.435 3,844 3,710 E SB 4,950 37 0.565 4,987 3,710 F SW 8 STREET SR 836/1-395 NB 6L 7,477 1,466 8.6% 62 0,080 0.435 7,539 5,570 F SB 9,712 70 0.565 9,782 5,570 F SR 8361I-395 SR 112 NB 12L 11,518 2,029 11.9% 96 0.080 0.565 11,614 11,140 E SB 8,868 85 0.435 8,953 11,140 C SR 112 NW 79 STREET NB IOL 11,915 2,029 11.9% 96 0.080 0.565 12,012 9,280 F SB 9,174 85 0.435 9,259 9,280 1) NW 3 AVENUE Nit 2 STREET I-95 OM RAMP N8 2LOW 2,067 733 4.3% 66 0.084 1.000 2,132 1,860 F fi 2 AVENUE SW 7 STREET FLAGLER STREET NB 2LU 1,207 222 1.3% 9 0,090 0,565 1,216 710 F SD 929 11 0.435 940 710 F FLAGLER STREET NW 20 STREET NB 2L11 925 972 5.7% 41 0,090 0,565 966 746 F SB 712 46 0.435 758 746 E W 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NW 10 STREET NB 4LU 1,327 597 3.5% 25 0.084 0.565 1,352 I,320 E SB 1,022 28 0.435 1,050 1,320 D MIAMI AVENUE RICKENBACKER CSWY S 15 ROAD NB 4L0 717 68 0.4% 3 0.084 0,435 720 1,590 D SB 932 3 0,565 935 1,590 D S 15 ROAD FLAGLER STREET ND 4LU 1,223 324 1.9% 14 0.084 0.435 1,237 1,590 D SB 1,589 15 0.565 1,604 1,590 E FLAGLER STREET N 17 STREET SB 3LON 1,102 4,331 25.4% 388 0.080 1.000 1,489 2,830 C N 17 STREET N 36 STREET NB 4LU 1,098 597 3.5% 28 0.084 0.565 1,126 1,590 0 88 845 25 0.435 870 1,590 D E 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NE 17 STREET NB 3LOY 1,949 4,331 25.4% 388 0.080 1.000 2,337 2,830 D E 2 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET 1-395 S8 3LOi4 2,162 4,621 27.1% 414 0.080 1.000 2,575 2,830 D 21-47 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21.E2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (1999) PEAK PEAK TOTAL PEAK PH PEAK PROD % HOUR TO PEAK HOUR PEAK 1999 HOUR TRIPS PROJ PROJ DAILY '0" HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway From To 0IR LANES VOLUME DAILY TRIPS TRIPS RATIO FACTOR VOLUME CAPACITY LOS US 1 DOUGLAS ROAD S14 17 AVENUE NB 6L0 2,460 324 1.9% 14 0.080 0,435 2,474 2,510 0 SB 3,195 15 0.565 3,211 2,510 F SW 17 AVENUE 1-95 NB 610 2,256 324 1.9% 14 0.080 0.435 2,270 2,510 D SB 2,930 15 0.565 2,946 2,510 F 1-95 SE ? STREET NB 4L0 1,913 392 2.3% 16 0.084 0.435 1,929 1,430 F SO 2,485 19 0.565 2,503 1,430 F SE 7 STREET SE 2 STREET NB 4L0 1,650 495 2.9% 21 0.084 0.435 1,670 1,590 E SB 2,142 23 0,565 2,166 1,590 F SE 2 STREET PORT BOULEVARD NB 71,0 2,734 682 4.0% 29 0,080 0.565 2,762 3,270 D SB 2,105 32 0.435 2,137 2,450 D PORT BOULEVARD I-395 NB 71,0 3,213 1,893 11.1% 90 0.080 0.565 3,303 3,270 1 SB 2,474 80 0.435 2,553 2,450 E 1-395 NE 36 STREET NB 4LD 1,964 733 4.3% 35 0.084 0.565 1,999 1,590 F SB 1,512 31 0.435 1,543 1,590 0 NE 36 STREET NE 62 STREET NB 4L0 2,133 460 2.7% 22 0,084 0.565 2,155 1,430 F SB 1,642 19 0,435 1,661 1,430 E lAYSHORE DRIVE SW 27 AVENUE RICKENBACKER CSWY NB 4L0 1,131 119 0.7% 5 0.084 0.435 1,136 1,430 D SB 1,469 6 0,565 1,474 1,430 E CORAL WAY SW 27 AVENUE SW 12 AVENUE EB 4LD 1,606 102 0.6% 4 0.084 0.435 1,610 1,430 E WB 2,086 5 0,565 2,091 1,430 F SW 12 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD EB 4LD 1,367 102 0.6% 4 0.084 0.435 1,371 1,430 D WB 1,775 5 0.565 1,780 1,430 F SW 15 ROAD US 1 EB 4LU 1,374 171 1.0% 7 0.084 0.435 1,382 1,590 0 WB 1,785 8 0.565 1,793 1,590 E S 8 STREET SA 27 AVENUE I-95 EB 3LO0 2,356 51 0.3% 5 0.080 1.000 2,361 1,670 D I-95 US 1 EB 3L0N 2,605 205 1.2% I8 0.080 1.000 2,623 2,670 S 7 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 08 3100 2,560 136 0.8% 12 0.080 1.000 2,572 2,670 0 [-95 US 1 NB 3100 2,263 119 0.7% 11 0.080 1.000 2,274 2,670 D 21-48 Please refer to the notes at Pnd of table. TABLE 21.E2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (19991 PEAK PEAK TOTAL PEAK PH PEAK PROJ % HOUR TO PEAK HOUR PEAK 1999 HOUR TRIPS PROJ PROJ DAILY 'D" HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway Fro' To DIR LANES VOLUKE DAILY TRIPS TRIPS RATIO FACTOR VOLUHE CAPACITY LOS S 1 STREET SW 2? AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE E8 4LOW 2,082 I53 0.9% 14 0.080 1.000 2,096 3,600 C SW 2 AVENUE US 1 ER 3LOW 2,025 392 2.3% 35 0,080 1.000 2,060 2,830 C # FLAGLER STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE WB 3LOW 2,419 324 1,9% 29 0.080 1,000 2,448 2,670 D SW 2 AVENUE US 1 WO 2LOW 1,658 256 1.5% 23 0.084 1.000 1,680 1,860 D # N 1 STREET 1-96 US 1 ER 2LOW 1,027 I19 0.7% 11 0.084 1.000 1,037 1,860 C N 6 STREET I-95 US 1 EB 3LOW 1,644 682 4.0% 61 0,080 1,000 1,706 2,830 C 6 STREET 1-95 US 1 WB SLOW 1,071 955 5.6% 85 0.080 1.000 1,156 2,830 C # PORT BOULEVARD US 1 PORT OF HIAHI EB 4LD 1,190 392 2,3% 20 0,084 0.435 1,210 1,890 A WB 1,546 15 0.565 1,561 1,890 A N 10 STREET 8 STREET ROAD US 1 ED 2LOW 1,372 2,097 12.3% 188 0,084 1.000 1,560 1,750 0 N RIVER DRIVE/N 11 STREET NW 17 AVENUE 8 STREET ROAD EB 4LD 943 921 5.4% 39 0,084 0.435 982 1,430 0 WB 1,225 44 0.565 1,268 1,430 0 8 STREET ROAD US 1 WB 2LOW 1,372 2,097 12.3% 188 0,084 1,000 1,560 1,750 D 21-49 Dl adca rofor Fn Fho nnEac di anri of F"{la TABLE 21.E2 SOUTHEAST OVERTONN/PARK NEST DRI FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (1999) PEAK PEAK TOTAL PEAK PN PEAK PR03 % HOUR TO PEAK HOUR PEAK 1999 HOUR TRIPS PROD PR03 DAILY "0" HOUR LOS D HOUR Roadway From To D1R LANES VOLUME DAILY TRIPS TRIPS RATIO FACTOR VOLUNE CAPACITY LDS SR 836/1-395 LEJEUNE ROAD NW 27 AVENUE E8 10LD 5,867 1,330 7.8% 56 0.080 0.43E 5,923 9,280 C NB 7,621 63 0,565 7,684 9,280 D NW 27 AVENUE 1-95 EB IOLD 6,141 1,671 9.8% 70 0.080 0.435 6,211 9,280 C NB 7,976 79 0.565 8,055 9,280 0 1-95 US 1 EB 6LD 4,293 3,018 17.7% 127 0.080 0.435 4,420 5,570 C NB 5,576 143 0.565 5,719 5,570 E US 1 ALTON ROAD EB 6LD 2,819 443 2.6% 21 0.080 0.565 2,840 5,570 B NB 2,170 19 0.435 2,189 5,570 B NW 20 STREET NW 7 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE E8 4LD 1,762 836 4.9% 35 0.084 0.435 1,797 1,430 F NB 2,288 40 0.565 2,328 1,430 F * One-way collectors analyzed as one-way arterials. 21-50 TABLE 21_E3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DR[ PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY LINKS YEAR 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC Roadway From To PROD TOTAL TRIPS PEAK PROD PK HR HOUR DIP. %AGE DIR VOLUME NW 5 STREET BRIDGE Nat 8 AVENUE NW 7 AVENUE 1-95 US 1 SW 8 STREET SW 8 STREET SR 836/I-395 SR 836/1-395 SR 112 SR 112 NW 79 STREET NW 3 AVENUE NW 2 STREET 1-95 OH RAMP 2 AVENUE SW 7 STREET FLAGLER STREET FLAGLER STREET NW 20 STREET W 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET NW 1D STREET % [PACT OF % IHPACT OF PK RR PH PK HR DER PH PK HR DIR PK DIR PEAK PROJ.TRIPS/ PROJ.TRIPS/ LOS D HOUR SIGNIFICANT TOTAL PH PK PH PK HR CAPACITY LOS ROADWAY HR DIR TRIPS LOS "D" CAP. NB 5.20% 3? SB 42 NB 4,60% 33 SB 37 NB 8,60% 62 SB 70 NB 11,30% 96 SB 85 NB 11.90% 96 SB 85 NB 4.30% 66 NB 1.30% 9 SB 11 NB 5.70% 41 SB 46 NB 3.50% 25 SB 28 NIAHI AVENUE RICKBNBACKER CSWY S 15 ROAD NB SB S 15 ROAD FLAGLER STREET NB SB FLAGLER STREET N 17 STREET SB N 17 STREET N 36 STREET NB SB E 1 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET HE 17 STREET 2 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET 0.40% 1.90% 25.40% 3.50% 2,284 2,140 E YES 1,63% 1.74% 1,772 1,430 F YES 2.37% 2,94% 3,844 3,710 E NO 0,86% 0.891 4,987 3,710 F N0 0.75% 1.001 7,539 5,570 F NO 0.82% 1.11% 9,782 5,570 F N0 0.71% 1.25% 11,614 11,140 E NO 0.83% 0.86% 8,953 11,140 C N0 0,95% 0.77% 12,012 9,280 F NO 0.80% 1.04% 9,259 9,280 D NO 0.92% 0.92% 2,132 1,860 F YES 3.08% 3.53% 1,216 710 F NO 0.77% 1.21% 940 710 F NO 1.12% 1.48% 966 746 F YES 4.23% 5,48% 758 746 B YES 6.08% 5.18% 1,352 1,320 E YES 1.86% 1.90% 1,050 1,320 D YES 2.70% 2,14% 3 720 1,590 D NO 0.40% 0.18% 3 935 1,590 0 N0 0.35% 0.20% 14 1,237 1,590 0 HO 1.101 0.86% 15 1,604 1,590 E NO 0.96% 0.97% 388 1,489 2,830 C YES 26.03% 13.70% 28 1,126 1,590 D YES 2.51% 1,78% 25 870 1,590 D YES 2.88% 1,58% NB 25.40% 388 2,337 2,830 D YES 16.59% 13.701 I-395 SB 27.101 414 2,575 2,830 0 21-51 YES 16,06% 14.61% Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21_E3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY LINKS YEAR 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC Roadway From To PROJ TOTAL TRIPS PEAK PROJ PK RR HOUR DIR RAGE DIR VOLUME US 1 DOUGLAS ROAD S1d 17 AVENUE NB SB SW 17 AVENUE 1-95 NB SB 1-95 SE 7 STREET NB SB SE 7 STREET SE 2 STREET NB SB SE 2 STREET PORT BOULEVARD NB SB PORT BOULEVARD 1-395 NB SB I-395 NE 36 STREET NB SO NE 36 STREET NE 62 STREET NB SB % [PACT OF % IKPACT OF PK HR PH PK HR DIR PH PK HR DIR PK DER PEAK PROJ.TRIPSI PROJ.TRIPSI LOS D HOUR SIGNIFICANT TOTAL PH PK PH PK HR CAPACITY LOS ROADWAY RR DIR TRIPS LOS "D" CAP. 1,90% 14 2,474 2,510 D NO 0.55% 0.54% 15 3,211 2,510 F NO 0.48% 0,61% 1,90% 14 2,270 2,510 D 80 0.60% 0.541 15 2,946 2,510 F NO 0.52% 0,61% 2.30% 16 1,929 1,430 F 80 0,861 1.15% 19 2,503 1,430 F NO 0.741 1.30% 2.90% 21 1,670 1,590 E NO 1.25% 1.311 23 2,166 1,590 F NO 1.08% 1.481 4.001 29 2,762 3,270 D YES 1.04% 0.881 32 2,137 2,450 0 YES 1.51% 1.32% 11.10% 90 3,303 3,270 E YES 2.72% 2.75% 80 2,553 2,450 E YES 3.12% 3.25% 4,30% 35 1,999 1,590 F YES 1.74% 2.19% 31 1,543 1,590 D YES 2.00% 1.941 2.70% 22 2,155 1,430 F 80 1.01% 1.53% 19 1,661 1,430 E NO 1,171 1.35% .,YSHORE DRIVE SW 27 AVENUE RICKENBACEER CSWY NB 0.70% 5 S8 6 CORAL WAY SW 27 AVENUE SW 12 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD S 8 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 S 7 STREET SW 27 AVENUE 1-95 SW 12 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD US 1 1-95 US 1 1-95 US 1 EB 0.60% 4 WB 5 EB 0.60% 4 WB 5 E8 1,00% 7 WB 8 EB 0.30% 5 EB 1.20% 18 WB 0.80% 12 WB 0.70% 11 1,136 1,430 D 80 0.44% 0.35% 1,474 1,430 E NO 0,38% 0.40% 1,610 1,430 E NO 0.27% 0.30% 2,091 1,430 F NO 0,23% 0.34% 1,371 1,430 D NO 0.311 0.301 1,780 1,430 F NO 0.27% 0.34% 1,382 1,590 D NO 0.52% 0.45% 1,793 1,590 E 60 0.45% 0.51% 2,361 2,670 0 NO 0.191 0.171 2,623 2,670 D NO 0.701 0.69% 2,572 2,670 D HO 0.471 0.46% 2,274 2,670 D NO 0.47% 0.40X 21-52 Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21_83 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AN➢ SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY LINES YEAR 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC Roadway Fro To PROJ TOTAL TRIPS PEAK PROJ PK HR HOUR DIR %AGE DIR VOLUME S 1 STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE FLAGLER STREET SW 27 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE N 1 STREET 1-95 N 5 STREET 1-95 SW 2 AVENUE US 1 SW 2 AVENUE US 1 US] US 1 N 6 STREET I-95 US 1 PORT OF HIM 11 10 STREET 8 STREET ROAD US 1 PORT BOULEVARD US 1 N RIVER DRIVEIN 11 STREET NW 17 AVENUE 8 STREET ROAD 8 STREET ROAD US 1 % 'PACT OF % (PACT OF PK HR PH PK HR DIR PH PE HR DIR PE DIR PEAK PROJ.TRIPSI PROJ,TRIPSI LOS 0 HOUR SIGNIFICANT TOTAL PR PK PH PK HR CAPACITY LOS ROADWAY HR DIR TRIPS LOS "0" CAP, EB 0,90% 14 EB 2.30% 35 WB 1.90% 29 WB 1,50% 23 EB 0,70% 11 EB 4.00% 61 WB 5.60% 85 2,096 3,600 C NO 0.66% D.33% 2,060 2,830 C # HO. 1,?0% 1.24% 2,148 2,670 D NO 1,18% 1.09% 1,680 1,860 D * 110 1,36% 1.23% 1,837 1,860 C $ N0 1.03% 0.57% 1,705 2,830 C * YES 3,58% 2,16% 1,156 2,830 C $ YES 7.39% 3.02% EB 2.30% 20 1,210 1,890 A W8 15 1,561 1,890 A EB 12.30% 188 1,560 1,750 D 8B 5,40% 39 WB 44 WB 12.30% 188 982 1,430 ➢ 1,268 1,430 0 1,560 1,750 D 21-53 N0 1,65% 1.06% N0 0.97% 0,80% YES 12.03% 10.73% YES YES YES 3.95% 3,44% 12,03% 2.71% 3.05% 10.73% Please refer to the notes at end of table. TABLE 21 E3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY LINKS YEAR 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC Roadway From To PROJ TOTAL TRIPS PEAK PROJ PK HR HOUR DIR %AGE DIR VOLUME % IMPACT OF % IMPACT OF PK HR PM PK HR DIR PM PK HR DIR PK OIR PEAK PROJ.TRIPSI PROJ,TRIPSI LOS D HOUR SIGNIFICANT TOTAL PH PK PH PR HR CAPACITY LOS ROADWAY HR DIR TRIPS LOS "D" CAP. SR 836/1-395 LEJEUNE ROAD Nil 27 AVENUE EB 7.80% 56 5,923 9,280 C NO WB 63 7,684 9,280 D NO NW 27 AVENUE 1-95 EB 9.80% 70 6,211 9,280 C N0 WB 79 8,055 9,280 ➢ N0 I-95 US 1 EB l?,70% 127 4,420 5,510 C N0 6R 143 5,719 5,570 E NO US 1 ALTON ROAD EB 2.60% 21 2,840 5,570 B N0 WB 19 2,189 5,570 B NO NW 20 STREET NW 7 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE EB 4.90% 35 1,797 1,430 F YES WB 40 2,328 1,430 F YES 0.94% 0,82% 1.13% 0.98% 2,87% 2.50% 0,74% 0.85% 0,60% 0.68% 0.76% 0,85% 2,28% 2.57% 0.38% 0.33% 1,96% 2,46% 1.70% 2,77% One-way collectors analyzed as one-way arterials, JTES: SIGNIFICANT ROADWAYS ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: Non -Expressway links carrying 3% or more of the project traffic. , Expressway links carrying project traffic equal to 10% or more of directional maximum LOS "D" volume, 21-54 TABLE 21.E44 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI PH PEAR HOUR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC INTERSECTION JUNE FACTORED 1991 DATA 1999 BCRGND DATA 1999 TOTAL DATA 1991 HOV'T RAW INC APPR. VOL INC VOL APPR. VOL INC VOL APPR. VOL THC VOL NE 1 AVE 8 1-395 RAMP NE 2 AVE 8 1-395 RAMP U5 1 8 NE 11 TERRACE HE 1 AVE 8 NE 6 ST 118L 0 0 0 NBT 57D 599 576 745 716 794 753 WBR 23 23 29 31 HBL 331 334 692 830 NBT 601 941 607 1949 1257 2337 1507 NBR 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 EBT 385 812 389 1727 827 1821 872 EBR 4I9 423 900 949 SBL 46 46 223 288 SBT 399 449 403 2162 1939 2575 2309 SBR 0 0 0 EBL 518 523 737 977 EBT 577 0 812 0 1077 0 EBR 53 64 75 100 BBL 0 0 0 NBT 1348 2064 1362 2734 1604 3303 2179 NBR 695 702 930 1124 SBL 4 4 8 10 597 1015 1029 1025 2105 2097 2553 2543 5BR 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 14BT 276 679 279 1071 440 1156 475 WBR 396 400 631 681 NBL 68 69 163 196 NBT 743 819 751 1949 1786 2337 2141 NBR 0 0 0 0 TAKE 21,84A SOUTHRAST OVERTOWNIPAR8 WRST BRE PH PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC INTERSECTION DUNE FACTORED 1991 DATA 1999 BCHGND DATA 1999 TOTAL DATA 1991 HOV'T RAW TNC APPR, VOL TEC VOL APR. VOL TNC VOL APPR, VOL TNC VOL NW 3 AVE 4 4 NW 6 ST US 1 N NE 5 ST NE 2 AV8 a NB 5 ST NE 1 AVO N 11E 5 ST N MIAHI AVE N N 5 ST WBL 0 0 0 0 WBT 397 618 401 1071 695 1156 750 WBR 215 217 375 405 NBL 37 37 86 89 NBT 848 894 857 2067 1981 2132 2043 NBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 325 328 820 851 EBT 70 522 71 1305 I77 1363 183 EBR 122 123 308 319 NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT 1817 1915 1835 2734 2620 3303 3165 NBR 79 80 114 138 SBL 106 107 149 181 50T 1088 1206 1099 1680 1531 2037 1856 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT 334 534 337 1644 1038 1705 1077 EBR 195 197 506 628 SBL 75 76 267 318 SBT 532 613 537 2162 1895 2575 2257 SBR 0 0 0 0 BBL 268 271 702 728 187 360 634 364 1644 942 1706 977 EBB 0 0 0 0 RBI, 0 0 0 0 NBT 567 757 573 1949 1475 2337 1769 NBR 182 184 474 568 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT 552 624 558 1644 1468 1705 1523 1BR 66 67 176 182 SBL 65 66 268 610 SBT 184 252 186 1102 814 2337 1727 5BR 0 0 0 0 21-56 TABLE 21,E4A SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST ART PH PEAR HOUR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC INTERSECTION JUNK FACTORED 1991 DATA 1999 BCKGND DATA 1999 TOTAL DATA 1991 KOV'T RAW TKC APPR, VOL TKO VOL APPR, VOL THC VOL APPR, VOL THC VOL NW 2 AVE W NW 3 S T US1PNR1ST R HIAMI AVE K H 1 ST N112AVEHHIST BBL 11 11 63 65 EBT 71 99 72 564 409 581 421 B8R 16 16 92 95 VBL 77 78 101 104 WBT 565 715 571 926 739 954 761 WBR 66 67 86 89 BBL 148 149 249 260 NBT 290 556 293 925 488 966 509 NBR 112 113 188 197 BBL 51 52 154 164 68T 86 238 87 712 259 758 276 SBR 99 100 299 318 WBL 15 15 186 187 WBT 68 84 69 1027 841 1037 850 WBR 0 0 0 0 NBL 72 73 99 100 NBT 1918 2010 1937 2734 2635 2762 2662 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT 973 1101 983 2105 1879 2137 1908 SBR 117 118 226 229 WBL 125 126 311 314 WBT 288 417 291 1027 716 1037 723 WBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT 416 547 420 1102 846 1489 1143 SBR 126 127 256 346 't'BL 22 22 54 54 WBT 311 424 314 1027 760 1037 768 WBR 87 88 213 215 NBL 73 74 128 134 NBT 455 533 460 925 797 966 832 NBR 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 SBT 178 307 180 712 417 758 444 SBR 126 127 295 314 21-57 TABLE 21,E4B SOUTHEAST OVERT044NIPARE WEST DRI AH PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC JUNE FACTORED 1991 DATA 1999 BCECND DATA 1999 TOTAL DATA 1991 INTERSECTION • HOV'T RAW THC APPR, VOL TIC VOL APPR• VOL THC VOL APPR, VOL THC VOL NE 2 AVE 8 I-395 RAID US 1 4! NE 5 ST NE 2 AVE @ NE 5 ST NE 1 AVE H NE 5 ST EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT 686 1486 693 1727 805 1821 849 EBR 785 793 922 972 SBL 80 81 266 316 SBT 571 658 577 2162 1896 2575 2259 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 114 115 294 305 EBT 451 643 456 1644 1164 1705 1207 EBR 72 13 186 193 NBL 0 0 0 0 HBT 634 809 640 2734 2164 3303 2614 NBR 167 169 570 689 SBL 652 659 637 712 587 1504 2178 1519 2105 1468 2553 1781 58R 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 E87 436 648 440 1644 1116 1705 1158 EBR 206 208 528 547 SBL 263 266 556 663 SBT 759 1032 767 2162 1606 2575 1912 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 117 118 267 277 EBT 603 727 609 1644 1377 1705 1428 EBR 0 0 0 0 NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT 220 299 222 1949 1449 2337 1737 N8R 76 77 500 600 TABLE 21.84E SOUTHEAST OVERTONNIPARK NEST DRI AN PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC JUNE FACTORED 1991 DBTA 1999 BCKOND DATA 1999 TOTAL DATA 1991 INTERSECTION NOVT RAN TNC APPR. VOL INC VOL APPR. VOL INC VOL APPR. VOL THC VOL NE 2 AVE @ I-395 RAMP US 1@ NE 6 ST NE2AVE NNE5ST NE 1 AVE @ NE 5 ST EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT 686 1486 693 2227 1039 2321 1082 EBR 785 793 1188 1239 SBL 80 81 266 316 SBT 571 658 5?? 2162 1896 2575 2259 SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 114 115 294 305 EBT 451 643 456 I644 1164 1705 1207 EBR 72 73 186 193 NBL 0 0 0 0 NBT 634 809 640 2734 2164 3303 2614 NBR 167 169 570 689 SBL 652 659 637 772 SBT 1504 2178 1519 2105 1468 2553 178I SBR 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 EBT 436 648 440 1644 1116 1705 1158 EBR 206 208 528 54? SEL 263 266 556 663 SBT 759 1032 767 2162 1606 2575 1912 SBR 0 0 0 0 E8L 117 118 267 277 EBT 603 727 609 1644 1377 1705 1428 EBR 0 0 0 0 RR 0 0 0 0 NBT 220 299 222 1949 1449 2337 1737 NBR 76 77 500 600 21-59 TABLE 21-E5 SOUTHEAST OVERTONN!PARK WEST DRI SISNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1991 1999 BACXRROUND 1999 TOTAL 4i! IMPROV. INTERSECTION AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NE 1 AVE @ 1-395 RAMP NiA NIA D NIA F NIA D NE 2 AVE @ 1-395 RAMP D C E F F F C C JS I @ NE 11 TERRACE NIA C NIA E NIA F NIA D NE I AVE @ NE 6 ST N/A B NIA D NIA E N/A N/A NW 3 AVE @ NW 6 ST N!A B N!A C N!A C N/A N/A US 1@ NE 5 ST C B F F F F E E NE 2 AVE @ NE 5 ST B B D D E E NIA NJA NE I AVE @ NE 5 ST B B C D F F E D N MIAMI AVE @ N 5 ST B C C C C D NIA N/A NW 2 AVE @ NW 3 ST NIA i, NIA C NIA C N/A N!A US 1 @ NE 1 ST N/A A N/A D N/A D N!A N/A N MIAMI AVE @ N 1 ST B B C C C C NIA NIA NW 2 AVE a NW I ST NJA B N/A C N/A D NJA N!A N!A = Not Applicable 21-60 F. Based on the assignment of trips as shown in (E) above, what modifications in the highway network (including intersections) will be necessary at the end of each phase of development, to attain and maintain local and regional level of service standards? Identify which of the above improvements are required by traffic not associated with the DRI at the end of each phase. For those improvements which will be needed earlier as a result of the DRI, indicate how much earlier. Where applicable, identify Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives (e.g., signalization, one-way pairs, ridesharing, etc.) that will be used and any other measures necessary to mitigate other impacts such as increased maintenance due to a large number of truck movements. Based upon the project distribution as generated by FSUTMS, the roadway segments and intersections which are anticipated to operate below the adopted level of service standard have been identified for further analysis. Table 21.F1 has been prepared to specifically identify roadway deficiencies as a result of the proposed project. The project's proportional share percentage has also been provided. Table 21.F2 lists the improvements necessary, an estimate of the cost for each roadway improvement, and the Increment 11 proportional share cost. Tables 21.F3 and 21.F4 are the corresponding tables for signalized intersections. Table 21.F4 will be updated with complete cost information during sufficiency. 21-61 TABLE 21-F1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARE NEST DR' PROPORTIONAL SHARE PERCENTAGE LINE 1999 1991 TO 1999 1991 TOTAL 1999 PROJECT PROJECT TRAFFIC TRAFFIC GROWTH TRAFFIC PERCENTAGE NW 5th Street Bridge 1,204 4,056 2,852 79 2.77% NW 8th Avenue to NW 7th Avenue NW 3rd Avenue Flagier Street to 1-95 On -Ramp NW 2nd Avenue Flagler Street to Ni 20 Street 1,121 2,132 1,011 66 6.53% 453 1,724 1,271 87 6.95% US 1 2,678 3,542 864 76 8.80% NE 14 Street to NE 36 Street NW 20 Street NW 2 Avenue to NW 7 Avenue 1,253 4,125 2,872 76 2.61% TABLE 21-F2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARH WEST DRI PROPORTIONAL SHARE COST CEI COST ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ? 7% OF PROPOR- CONSTRUC- CONSTRUC- CONSTRUC- TICNAL TION TION TION TOTAL PROJECT SHARE LINK LENGTH• IKpROVESENT COST/MILE COST COST COST % COST NW 5th Street Bridge 26,000 S.F. 6L novable NW 8th Avenue to span bridge Not 7th Avenue N1t 3rd Avenue Flagler Street to 1-95 0n-Rapp NV 2nd Avenue Flagler Street to NW 20 Street OS 1 NE 14 Street to NE 36 Street NW 20 Street NW 2 Avenue to NW 7 Avenue $112.5 /S.F. $2,925,000 $204,750 $3,129,750 2,77% 386,694 0.5 NI Add 1L to $742,800 $371,400 $25,998 3397,396 6.53% 125,943 existing 2L 1.3 NI 1,4 KI Add 2L to existing 2L Add ZL to existing 4L $1,485,700 $1,931,410 $135,199 12,066,609 11,668,700 6.85% $141,459 32,336,180 1163,533 12,499,713 1.80% $219,882 0.5 HI Add 2L to $1,668,700 $834,350 $58,405 $892,755 2.61% $23,314 existing 4L S,F. = Square Feet HI = Miles TOTAL PROPORTIONAL SHARE COST: NOTES: Construction costs are based on "1990 Transportation Costs" published by FDOT August 21, [990. Bridge, Arterial and Collector roadway improvements are based on cost per centerline mile on urban state arterial roads. Interstate and Expressway improvements are based on national average cost per centerline mile of urban freeways. 1497,292 TABLE 21-F3 SOUTHEAST OVERTONN/PARY, NEST IR1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PROPORTIONAL SHARE PERCENTAGE 1.999 1991 TO 1999 1991 TOTAL 1999 PROJECT PROJECT INTERSECTION TRAFFIC TRAFFIC BROTH TRAFFIC PERCENTAGE NE 1ST AVEN1EE @ 1,540 3,131 1,591 437 27.47X 1-395 RAMP CIE 2ND AVENUE 1,261 4,396 3,135 507 16,17x 1-395 RAMP U5 1 @ NE 11 TERRACE 3,870 6,933 3,263 1,2E2 39.29% US 1 @ NE 5TH STREET 3,643 6,693 3,050 974 31,93X NE 1ST AVENUE @ 1,2t91 4,042 2,651 449 16.94X NE 5TH STREET TABLE 21-F4 SOUTHEAST OVERTONNIPARK WEST DRI SIaNALIUED INTERSECTION PROPORTIONAL SHARE COST CEI COST ESTIMATED ESTIMATED D 72 OF PRDPOR- CONSTRUC- CONSTRUC- TIONAL CONST, TION TION TOTAL PROJECT SHARE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT COST DST COST COST Z COST NE 1ST AVENUE g i-395 RAMP NE 2ND AVENUE P. 1-395 RAMP CHANGE NB T + R TO T + TR 27.472 ADD ES T LANE -- -- 16.17% US 1 P. NE 5TH STREET ADD NB T LANE 51.93% NE 1ST AVENUE O NE STH STREET CHANGE EB LT + T TOL+LT+T 16.94Z TOTAL PROPORTIONAL SHARE COST: `COTES; Allsignalized intersection ihprovenent casts to he provided during sufficiency SO G. Identify the anticipated number and general location of access points for driveways, median openings and roadways necessary to accommodate the proposed development. Describe how the applicant's access plan will minimize the impacts of the proposed development and preserve or enhance traffic flow on the existing and proposed transportation system. This information will assist the applicant and governmental agencies in reaching conceptual agreement regarding the anticipated access points. While the ADA may constitute a conceptual review for access points, it is not a permit application and, therefore, the applicant is not required to include specific design requirements (geometry) until the time of permit application. The Increment II development will occur within the Southeast Overtown/Park West area. The exact locations of developments will be determined as the City seeks to develop the area. At that time, the City's permitting process ensures that the access points for individual developments will be examined. The existing roadway network should require no changes other than those identified in Section F of this Question 21. However, if roadway modifications are found to be necessary, they will be reviewed during the permitting process. 21-66 H. If applicable, describe how the project will complement the protection of existing, or development of proposed, transportation corridors designated by local governments in their comprehensive plans. In addition, identify what commitments will be made to protect the designated corridors such as interlocal agreements, right-of-way dedication, building set -backs, etc. The significant roadways for the Increment II DRI lie entirely within the City of Miami. The City has no existing or proposed transportation corridors identified in its comprehensive plan. 21-67 What provisions, including but not limited to sidewalks, bicycle paths, internal shuttles, ridesharing and public transit, will be made for the movement of people by means other than private automobile? Refer to internal design, site planning, parking provisions, location, etc. The provision of alternative means of transportation is encouraged by Section 14- 71 of City of Miami Code, "Transportation Control Measures". The existing transit system includes extensive bus route coverage, heavy rail transit in the western project area including the Overtown station, and people mover access along the southern edge of the project area (State Plaza and College). Future transit expansion includes the extension of the people mover through the project area into the Omni area. The extension is currently under construction and is anticipated to be online before Increment II buildout. The transit routes are shown in Maps J-1C through 7-1E at the end of Question 21. The City encourages the use of the transit system through parking and development requirements. Large scale developments, such as those envisioned for Increment II, are required to submit Transportation Control Measures (TCM) plans as a part of the permitting process. Components of the TCM plan are to provide a methodology for reducing PM peak hour vehicle trip ends and to institute a program whereby the vehicle trip end reduction may be monitored on annual basis. 21-68 le> Not to Scale Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI: EXISTING (1991) PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE LEGEND A f LEVEL OF SERVICE A THE OF MIAMI CITY ilICSi KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEEI?S . P&ANNERS . SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J-A ....................... FISE MV 02ASE. II> Not to Sedo Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI EXISTING (1991). PM PEAK HOUR . LEVEL OF SERVICE .^"7. F Mv27.F. LEGEND A 1 ;' pp f/ffp1 MV 17ALf. b d t My r2As LEVEL OF SERVICE A �� n� I I� a Fk.-cayne a t Tray ►,— ' •..r INiEA57AM 95 .� J J THE. OF MIAMI CITY to 0 .w h6U0A5F. d`A`E r- _ w �- . . .(t. Iriracaa:C.f wefa,Yay rr ` KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS r► REVISIONS MAP J-1B awwa��}�' anaol !Coy a. r rfir, 001315041E 05 W 2 Alf �wwLSf�wwwww��. rrrirf eirr��''ririrurrrrr irr:.� 'I. rea Introconsmt W f ASE E 1 ME E 2 AVE ra 1 • •11111.■MMMI4APR4.• WsCowcy •NPI' Not Pr - to Scots Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI TRANSIT ROUTES LEGEND - -0 - EXISTING METRORAIL STATION —1111-- EXISTING METRO MOVER STATION —0— PROPOSED METRO MOVER STATION THE OF MIAMI CITY Y KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J-c III> Not to Scale i Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI TRANSIT ROUTES LEGEND ---- METRO RAtL METRO MOVER METRO MOVER EXTENSION (Under Construction) THE OF MIAMI CITY SI KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J 1 D J-1 E hxrxna,ral )1N r$4,,417'9S .CAM Ali .:4i.... ............... ti LS'a[c*wJy ii Not N10- to SCQ!G Southeast Overtown / Park West DRI • TRANSIT ROUTES LEGEND — BUS ROUTE THE OF CITY MIAMI :IC KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS * PLANNERS . SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J-1E • ♦ • • • • • • • Key get 41, MI STA 7E 95 W J ALE ♦ W 2ALE • •- a • • • • • • r ALE • s z z • •. E 2 ALE lammrstat • • Z. Z. • • • a• • • • Wetets y J-2A N. 111> Not to Scale Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI SIGNALIZE] INTERSECTIONS LEGEND • SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION THE OF MIAMI CITY UM KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J ® 2 NPlb. r Not to Scale Southeast Overtown / Park West DRI SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS AND . INTERCHANGES . LEGEND • SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS O INTERCHANGE THE OF MIAMI CITY KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS J-2B MAP SW ]7 AVE. ©ay J-3 MY42 Alf. rvw27AfE UHRIIsslRII MV 17 ACE. MY f2A1.E. a ARIVAIRW. intracoosiat Wazamoy Not to Scale Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND ".////////i/i/ 4 LANES ssssssssssa 6LANES ;,,r,.:.r.,W.,,...._...:w7.::,: 8 LANES iz 10 LANES "//////////zz 12LANES THE OF MIAMI CITY 1 tea KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS N. PEVISFONS J-3 MAP N. Not to Scale Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI COMMITTED . DEVELOPMENTS LEGEND BRICKELL S9UARE CLAUGHTON ISLAND DRI \\`\\`` NI REEMENVi'ADRIOWNTbWN :•""Oii: SE OVEPTOWN/AAPK WEST '` INCREMENT I DPI THE OF MIAMI CITY PIM KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J-4 LE.11 .11E Ril MY42 ALE. SW 37 AVE Ds moo nn Bay m v J`aA MYr7A few Al. 7E AVE.2 W r D D WoMwily D D F ;1 Not to Scale Southeast Overtown / Park West DRI FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC LEVELS OF SERVICE (YEAR 1999) LEGEND A LEVEL OF SERVICE A THE OF MIAMI CITY KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS J-5A MAP Not to Scale Southeast Overtown / Park West DRI FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC LEVELS OF SERVICE .. (YEAR 1999) LEGEND A LEVEL OF SERVICE A THE OF MIAMI CITY KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J-5B LE XLEEm NW 42 AVE SW 77 A MY 27 AVE. rEACinne nay MY I7 ALE J-5C 0 PAY At. 1 c D M6STATE2 MAARAVE. D F Wata.wy MI No110 II' Scoia Southeast Overtown / Park West DRI • FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC LEVELS OF SERVICE (YEAR 1999) LEGEND A LEVEL OF SERVICE A THE OF MIAMI CITY le KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A... ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS / MAP J-5C Eh> Not to Scale Southeast Overtown / Park West DRI • FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC. LEVELS OF SERVICE (YEAR 1999) N LEGEND • LEVEL OF SERVICE A THE OF MIAIVII CITY OW KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS . PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J-5D MN I7ALE. PAN 12 AVE 7W 7ASE. 11.9% tiicwi4rES 119% 2.7% WUIn'Iwy 1 c Southeast Ovcrtown Park West DRI INCREMENT II TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENRAGES LEGEND X.X°/a TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES THE CITY OF MIAMI aNG�� KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS , PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVESIONS MAP J-6A s Not to Scala Southeast Overtown/ ` Park West DRI INCREMENT II TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES LEGEND 0% TRIP DiSTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES THE OF MIAMI CITY -19. KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS J-6B MAP 2114E fl 1 MV 42Ast. 5111 77 Ale Biscara CT NW 27A1E. goy iJ MV 77ASE N A N� M q4 r � 111 S c � Jrev J-6C 15 4t J «A NW 12A NW 7 AVE as as I 73 4E • 24IE. 3 1 0 VYfE4WTAiE 95 96 milli AVE. t 22 I 111 11>N1 Not to Scala Southeast Overtown / M Park West DRI INCREMENT II TRIPS LEGEND XX INCREMENT it TRIPS THE OF MIAMI CITY I KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS . SURVEYORS REVtSSONS MAP J-6c 111> No to coS Southeast Overtown / Park West DRI . INCREMENT II TRIPS LEGEND XX INCREMENT II TRIPS THE OF MIAMI CITY eil KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS REVISIONS MAP J-6D APPENDIX I TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY AND AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY MARCH 1991 _r"s- KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. E N G I N E 5 n S - P L A N N E R S - S U n V E v O n S March 4, 1991 Mr. Ping Chang Senior Planner South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 Re: Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Traffic Study Assumptions Keith & Schnars Project Number 13654 Dear Mr. Chang: This letter will serve to address detailed traffic assumptions for incorporation into the Southeast Overtown/Bark West Increment 2 DRI-ADA, located in the City of Miami. These assumptions are based upon the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) General Guidelines for the DRI Transportation Section dated November 6, 1990. Pertinent items addressed in this methodology are listed below: o Traffic Impact Area o Existing Traffic Conditions o Planned and Programmed Improvements o Background Growth and Committed Development o Project Trip Generation o Project Distribution and the Traffic Modelling Approach o Link Maximum Service Volume Analysis o Intersection Analysis o Concurrency Requirements TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA A preliminary traffic impact study area has been defined as being located within Dade County, bounded by North 79th Street to the north, Biscayne Hay on -the south, LeJeune Road to the west ap0 Alton Road to the east. This preliminary traffic impact study area will be adjusted as necessary to include non -expressway roadway links which carry three percent or more of the total project trips or non -expressway roadway links on which the directional project trips are equal to or exceed ten percent of the level of servig' "D" maximum service volume for each particular roadway link. ,:' 8880 Northwest ?OM Sir -eel, Sufle "A" • M1 -,-I rt "'HT." . ctinr., .-- Page 2 - March 4, 1991 Mr. Ping Chang Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA All expressway links in the above defined traffic impact area will be analyzed. Additionally, the expressway links outside the impact area carrying project traffic greater than ten percent of LOS D volumes will be analyzed. Roadway segments which meet the above referenced criteria will be designated as "significant" roadway links. A preliminary list of links is included in the attachments. The analysis of the traffic volumes and the available roadway capacity on significant roadway links within the traffic impact study area will be performed in three major phases as listed below: 1) Existing Traffic Conditions 2) Background Growth and Committed Developments 3 Total Traffic EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1990 Traffic Volumes - 1990 Traffic Volumes plus Background Growth plus Committed Devel- opment Traffic. - 1990 Traffic Volumes plus Background Growth plus Committed Devel- opment Traffic plus project Traffic. Existing traffic conditions will be identified for each significant roadway link within the traffic impact study area. Average weekday traffic link volumes will be obtained through use of local governmental data bases, primarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6, the planning and engineering offices of Dade County, and the planning and engineering offices of the City of Miami. Twenty-four hour traffic counts will be performed at specific locations where local government link volumes are unavailable. Link data sources and average weekday conversion factors will be provided. Additional link volume counts will be performed on as needed basis. Daily link volumes will be converted to PM peak hour link volumes through use of the peak hour to daily volume ratios identified in 111[r Si KEITH slid SCXUNARS, P.A. r n n r ri r r n u- n i n r+ea r n n_ ¢,r„v r v n n C Page 3 - March 4, 1991 Mr. Ping Chang Southeast 0vertown/Park West DR1-ADA the Genera _ggide1ines. Also applied in this analysis will be the default directional factor ("D" factor) set forth by the FDOT. These factors will be utilized except where data is collected to allow for the calculation of actual peak hour to daily volume ratios and "D" factors. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS State, county and local authorities in Dade County will be contacted regarding planned and programmed improvements to the roadway network within the preliminary traffic impact study area. Correspondence will be sent to Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization authorities indicating a preliminary review of road improvement projects from the 1991 Dade County Transportation Improvement Program and the Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. BA J GROWW GROWTH AND CQ2 MITIED DEVELOPMENT In order to extend existing traffic volume into the proposed buildout year, the year 2000 Dade County FSUTMS model will be used. Theoretically, the model will account for all background growth and committed development traffic. However, through correspondence with public agencies and examination of the model's socio-economic data, an assessment of the representation of committed development will be made. If any significant developments are determined to be inadequately represented, the socio-economic data will be adjusted accordingly. Projects generating more than 400 PM peak hour trips ends will be considered significant. Once the model is adjusted to reflect the committed developments permitted for the buildout year, the model will be run with the project data also included. After using TRANPLAN to isolate project traffic on the network, the project traffic will be subtracted from the total traffic. The "total traffic minus project traffic" scenario will be taken as equal to "existing plus background growth plus committed" scenario. Comparing this scenario with the existing traffic data, the amount of background 1St KEITH alai SC1INARS, P.A. Page 4 -- March 4, 1991 Mr. Ping Chang Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA growth and committed traffic can be determined. As a check on selected links and for links that are not represented in the model, traditional methods using historical growth rates and committed development trip generation will be used. PROJECT TRIP GENERATIOni The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI- -ADA is a master/increment DRI currently in its first phase. The second phase will begin in 1992 with buildout in 1999. It will include 837,500 square feet of office space, 127,900 square feet of commercial space, 1,100 hotel rooms, 3,500 residential units and an attraction/recreational facility with 8,000 seats. The year 2000 Dade County FSUTMS model is available and will be used in determining project trip generation characteristics. However, to approximate the project trip generation, Table 1 in the attachment lists the daily and PM peak hour trip ends calculated using ITE's Trip Generation, 4th Edition. PROJECT DISTRIBUTION AND THE TRAFFIC MODELLING APPROACH Project trip distribution and assignment will be performed utilizing the FSUTMS computer model for Dade County. Base year and year 2000 data will be obtained from the Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization in order to incorporate the current socio-economic information. The model will be run for the base year to check existing data collection efforts and assumptions. The model will then be run for the year 2000 with the project. The appropriate TPAIPLAN functions will be executed to isolate the project traffic on the significant links. LINK MAXIMUM SERVICE VOLUME ANALYSIS The level of service operation for each designated significant roadway link within the traffic impact study area will be evaluated based on average weekday peak hour directional volumes and the 1[1-0 KEITH anti SCt I NARS,1'.A. vrrninF - r r nl+.4r.n1 - 5u+rvr-.••+n q Page5 - March 4, 1991 Mr. Ping Chang Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA correspondin maximum service volume as designated by the approved FOOT generalized capacity tables. Any other capacity studies will be performed on an as needed basis, consistent with the FOOT Florida Highway System Plan - Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual. Roadway improvements needed as a result•of the proposed project will be identified within the transportation section of the DRI- ADA. Estimated costs for each roadway improvement will be provided where applicable. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Intersection capacity and levels of service will be determined through the use of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manua. techniques. Intersections critical to the traffic study impact area will be identified as the major intersections within the project area and those located on both ends of significant roadway links which operate below the acceptable level of service "D". Any assumptions made for purposes of capacity analysis will be provided. Attached to this letter is a preliminary list of intersections which may require analysis. PM peak hour turning movement counts will be performed at each designated intersection requiring further study. Additional intersections will be studied on an as needed basis. Intersection improvements needed as a result of the proposed project will be identified within the transportation section of the DRI-ADA. Estimated costs for each improvement will be provided where applicable. CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS Since DRI projects are required to meet the concurrency requirements of the appropriate local government comprehensive plans, and since this project falls within the incorporated area of the City of Miami, the City's concurrency requirements and regulations will apply to this development site. A formal ilrolia KKEITI-I Heal SCIINARS, P.A. Page 6 - March 4, 1991 Mr. Ping Chang Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA concurrency analysis will be performed for the project site once the DRI--ADA transportation section reaches preliminary sufficiency. At your earliest convenience, please indicate to us any concerns that you may have with the above referenced approaches and methodologies to the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA. Sincerely, KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers-P1ann-Surveyors Clarke Davis Project Engineer CD/bmv cc: Reginald Barker, City of Miami Sabrina Bouie, City of Miami ,David Korros, Florida Department of Transportation Richard Lee, Dade County Public Works Dean Mims, Dade County Development Impact Committee Michael Moore, Dade County MPD Phil Steinmii.ler, Florida Department of Transportation Clark Turner, City of Miami Diana Wheeler, City of Coral Gables F xl C. [ xl $ [t R r t n 11 N r [t R . ['. u r, •! r v rS �[ !', (Methodology letter, cont'd) ATTACHMENT Land Ilse TABLE 1 PRELIMINARY TRIP GENERATION for SE GVERT814N/FART: il£ST Fhas_e 11 1TE LU Intensity Code Trip Fates Adjusted Trip Ends Trios 111 6en'1 Office 837.5 ksf 710 Gaily: Ln(TI-0.75LniA)+3.77 6753 54103 PH: LniTl=0.133Ln1A1+1,46 1149 919 Commercial 127.9 ksf B20 Gaily: LnUT1=0.65LntA1+5.92 0719 5929 PM: Ln(TI=0.52LntA1+4.04 7013 482 Hotel 1100 ra's 310 Daily: 1 = 8.80(51 - 59 9621 7697 R€{: Ln(T1=1.10Ln(UI-2.15 1047 838 Residential 3500 du's 220 Daily: T = 5.92(5) + 51.0 20771 16617 PH: T = 0.37(5) + 59.0 1424 1139 Attraction/Rec 8000 seats 4{:1{21 Daily: 13) 1600 1280 P's1: 0.02(441 average 160 128 Total Daily: 47465 36926 PH: 44B8 350 111 Adjusted Trigs represents a reduction of 201 for internal capture for all LU's and 154 fur passerby capture {ar commercial. {Nu nodal split adjustments) 121 For purposes of this preliminary data, Live Theatre (L{l 4411 is assumed. Of •It is assumed that the daily rate will be 10 times the peal: hour rate DOWNTOWN DRI ROADWAY LINKS Roadway From To SR 836/1-395 Biscayne Boulevard 1-95 N.W. 27th Avenue 1-95 • N.W. 27th Avenue `LeJeune Road MacArthur Cswy. Alton Road Biscayne Boulevard Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Boulevard N. 6th Street Biscayne Boulevard I-95 N. 5th Street Biscayne Boulevard 1-95 N. 1st Street Biscayne Boulevard I-95 Elagler Street Biscayne Boulevard W. 2nd Avenue W. 2nd Avenue W. 27th Avenue S. 1st Street Biscayne Boulevard S.W. 2nd Avenue S.W. 2nd Avenue S.W. 27th Avenue S. 7th Street Brickell Avenue I-95 1-95 S.W. 27th Avenue S.W. 8th Street Brickell Avenue 1-95 1-95 S.W. 27th Avenue Coral Way Brickell Avenue S.W. 15th road S.W. 15t- Road S.W. 12t1. Avenue S.W. 12th Avenue S.W. 27th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard N.E. 62nd Street N.E. 36th Street 1-395 Port Boulevard N.E. 36th Street I-395 Port Boulevard S.E. 2nd Street DOWNTOWN Dill ROADWAY LINKS (CONTINUED) N.E. 2nd Avenue I--395 Flagler Street Brickell Avenue S.E. 2nd Street S.E. 7th Street S.B. 7th Street Rickenbacker Cswy. I.E. 1st Avenue E. 17th Street Flagler Street f-iiemi Avenue N.W. 1st Avenue W. 2nd Avenue 1-95 U.S.1 Bayshore Drive N. 36th Street S. 17th Street Flagler Street S. 15th Road N. 17th Street Flagler Street S . 15th Road Rickenbacker Cswy. N.E. 20th Street Flagler Street N.W. 20th Street Flagler Street Flagler Street S.W. 7/8th Streets N.W. 79th Street SR 112 SR 836/1-395 S.W. 8th Street SR 112 SR 836/1-395 S.W. 8th Street U.S.1 1-95 S.W. 17th Avenue S,W. 17th Avenue Douglas Road Rickenbacker Cswy. S.W. 27th Avenue . S.E. OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT AREA RRI INTERSECTIONS TO BE ANALYZED Intersections N. Miami Avenue/N. l5th Street• N.W. 1st Avenue/N.W. 14th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/N.W. l4th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/I.395 (Borth Ramp) N.E. 1st Avenue/I-395 (South Rainp) N.E. 2nd Avenue/I--395 (North Ramp) N.E..2nd Avenue/I-395 (South Ramp) Biscayne Boulevard/I-395 Biscayne Boulevard/N.E 12th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/N. W. 8th Street N.W. 3rd Court/N.W. 8th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/M.E. 6th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/N.W. 6th Street N.W. 3rd Court/N.W. 6th Street Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 5th Street N.E. 2nd Avenue/N,E. 5th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/N.E. 5th Street N. Miami Avenue/N. 5th Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/N.W. 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 1st Street N. Miami Avenue/N. 1st Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/N.W. 1st Street SOUTHEAST OVRRTOXHIPARE WEST 0RI PROPOSED DEVELOPRENT PR0GRAM/PR0JECT DESCRIPTION (5/17/91) [NCRENENT I ENCRRHENT II INCREHENT III LAND USES 098B-1997) (1992-1999) (1999-2007) TOTALS Office 166,000 s.f. 337,000 s.f, 500,500 s.f. 1,003,500 s.f. Coatereial 95,400 s.f, 71,700 s.f. 00,600 s.f. 257,700 s.f, Hotel 0 roots 500 roots 600 roots 1,100 roots Residential 2,000 d.u. 2,000 d.u, 5,000 d.u. 9,000 d.u, Attractions 8,000 seats 8,000 seats 0 seats 16,000 seats s.f. = square feet d.u, = dwelling units PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGENCY LETTERS SENT �'�• E. KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS P L A N N E R S^ SURVEYOR S vmoommommw April 29, 1991 Mr. David Korros Assistant Planning Manager Florida Department of Transportation 602 South Miami Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 RE: Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Programmed Roadway Improvements Keith & Schnars Project No. 13654.1J Dear Mr. Korros: Keith & Schnars, P.A., has been retained by the City of Miami to prepare the transportation portion of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval (DRI-ADA). Our preliminary study area in Dade County is defined by the following boundaries: o North 79th Street to the north o Biscayne Bay to the south o LeJeune Road (West 42nd Avenue) to the west o Alton Road to the east After reviewing the adopted 1991 Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Improvement Plan and the tentative Florida Department of Transportation Five Year Work Program (April 1991) we have identified the projects listed in the attached Table 1 as being located within or adjacent to our preliminary study area. If you concur with our findings, please sign in the space provided below and return this letter at your earliest convenience. 8880 Northvvest 20th Street, Suite "A" • Miami, FL 33172 • [305) 477 -8855 Mr. David Korros Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Programmed Roadway Improvements April 29, 1991 Page 2 If there are changes or additions to this table, please note the changes and return a signed copy of the letter with the changes to our office. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, KEITH AND SCHNARS , P.A. Engineers -Planners -Surveyors Clarke Davis Project Engineer CD/btv Please check one of the following Concur Changes required cc: Reginald Barker, City of Miami Sabrina Bouie, City of Miami Signature Date k.' = KEITH SCIINARS, P.A. r r� r. a rat F' n �; • n a n N y i �� : - c �i n v r v ri i� c WPI No. TABLE 1 Programmed Roadway Improvements for the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Roadway Improvement Description 6113601 SR 836 SR 821/H.E.F.T. to SR 9A/I-95 Add lanes and resurface Preliminary engineering: FY 91-93 6113705 SR 25 / NW 36 St. NW 17 Avenue to SR 112 off ramp Add through lanes Preliminary engineering: FY 91-92 Right of way acquisition: FY 92 6123165 Port Tunnel Port of Miami to SR 836/1-395 New 4 lane tunnel Preliminary engineering: FY 91-94 6113230 SR 9 / NW 27 Avenue NW 11 Street to NW 42 Street Add 2 lanes to existing 4 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141774 SR 9A / 1-95 SR 836 to SR 112 Add 2 lanes to existing 10 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141775 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 58 Street to NW 95 Street Add 2 lanes to existing 8 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141777 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 129 Street to NW 151 Street Add through lanes Construction: FY 92 6141892 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 151 Street to south of SR 860 Construct HOV flyover and Add 2 lanes to existing 8 lanes Construction: FY 92 _ ;•;� KEI'rn l and SCI i NARS, P.A. r rr .: 1 N F F ,t 9- n t A N N r +1 ,. _ B t, FI V£ V /1 11 G S � KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS -PLANNERS •• SURVEYORS April 29, 1991 Mr. Pedro Hernandez Chief, Highway Division Metro Dade County Public Works 111 Northwest 1st Street Miami, Florida 33128-1970 RE: Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Programmed Roadway Improvements Keith & Schnars Project No. 13654.1J Dear Mr. Hernandez: Keith & Schnars, P.A., has been retained by the City of Miami to prepare the transportation portion of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval (DRI-ADA). Our preliminary study area Dade County is defined by the following boundaries: o North 79th street to the north o Biscayne Bay to the south o LeJeune Road (West 42nd Avenue) to the west o Alton Road to the east After reviewing the adopted 1991 Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Improvement Plan we have identified the projects listed in the attached Table 1 as .being located within or adjacent to our preliminary study area. If you concur with our findings, please sign in the space provided below and return this letter at your earliest convenience. 8880 Northwest 201h Street. Suite 'A' • MIarnl, FL 33172 • (3057 477 • 8E355 Mr. Pedro Hernandez Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Programmed Roadway Improvements April 29, 1991 Page 2 If there are changes or additions to this table, please note the changes and return a signed copy of the letter with changes to our office. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers -Planners -Surveyors Clarke Davis Project Engineer CD/bmv Please check one of the following: Concur Changes required cc: Reginald Barker, City of Miami Sabrina Bouie, City of Miami Signature Date .i[• - KEI I I I and SC.I I NA RS, RA. r rs n r re r r n n -. r i new .4 r n 1- S i i re v r v n n S TABLE 1 Programmed Roadway Improvements for the Southeast overtown/Park West DRI-ADA PRIMARY, INTERSTATE, AND TURNPIKE IMPROVEMENTS: Project Number Roadway Project Description 6113601 SR 836 SR 821/H.E.F.T. to SR 9A/1-95 Add lanes and resurface Preliminary engineering: FY 91-93 6113705 SR 25 / NW 36 St. NW 17 Avenue to SR 112 off ramp Add through lanes Preliminary engineering: FY 91-92 Right of way acquisition: FY 92 6123165 Port Tunnel Port of Miami to SR 836/1-395 New 4 lane tunnel Preliminary engineering: FY 91-94 6113230 SR 9 / NW 27 Avenue NW 11 Street to NW 42 Street Add 2 lanes to existing 4 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141774 SR 9A / 1-95 SR 836 to SR 112 Add 2 lanes to existing 10 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141775 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 58 Street to NW 95 Street Add 2 lanes to existing 8 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141777 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 129 Street to NW 151 Street Add through lanes Construction: FY 92 6141892 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 151 Street to south of SR 860 Construct HOV flyover and Add 2 lanes to existing 8 lanes Construction: FY 92 ROAD IMPACT FEE PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS: Roadway Project Decription NW 14 Street NW 14 Street NW 10 Avenue to 1-95 Add 2 lanes to existing 2 lanes Construction: 1990 - 1991 Miami Avenue to Biscayne Blvd. Convert one, way street to two way Construction: 1990 - 1991 _l►• = KEITII and SC 11NARS, P.A. f 1l ,1 1 N 1` r n r . hi n ��• KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS ^PLANNERS ^ SURVEYORS April 29, 1991 Mr. Sergio Rodriguez, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department 275 N.W. 2nd Street, Room 300 Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Southeast overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Committed Developments Keith & Schnars, Project No. 13654.1J Dear Mr. Rodriguez: Keith and Schnars, P.A., has been retained by the City of Miami to prepare the transportation question of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact - Application for Development Approval. In compliance with the requirements of Chapter 380, F.S., and the policies of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, we are required to include a list of committed development projects which lie within the traffic impact area for this project. Our preliminary traffic impact area is defined by the following boundaries: o North 79th Street to the North o Biscayne Bay to the south o LeJeune Road to the west o Alton Road to the east Committed development projects are those which have received preliminary or final approval but are not yet built and will generate 400 or more peak hour trip ends. After meeting with Clark Turner and Roberto Lavernia, we have identified the developments listed in Table 1 as those that meet the criteria for committed developments. 8080 Northwe.t 20tth Street. Suite "A' - FL 33t72 • (305) 477 • 8855 Mr, Sergio Rodriguez Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA April 29, 1991 Page Two Please review the list and if you concur withourfindings, sign in the space provided below and return this letter at your earliest convenience. If there are changes or additions to this table, please note the changes and return a signed copy of the letter with the changes to our office. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers -Planners -surveyors Clarke Davis Project Engineer CD/bmv Please check one of the following: Concur Changes required cc: Reginald Barker, City of Miami Sabrina Houle, City of Miami Signature Date 1(ElTI t atnl SCI-I NA RS, P.A. r ti r. t a F c ry . n I A N N r n,- a n r1V r Y 011 q Development TABLE 1 Committed Development for Southeast overtovn/Park West DRI-ADk Increment II Development Activity (as of 2/91) Buildout Total Constructed Date Land Use Allowable to date Remaining City of Miami Downtown 1997 Office (gsf) 7,100,000 193,500 6,906,500 DRI Increment I Retail 3gsf) 1,050,000 6,000 1,044,000 Convention (gsf) 500,000 0 500,000 Institutional (gsf) 300,000 0 300,000 Wholesale (gsf) 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 Hotel (rms) 1,000 0 1,000 Residential (du) 3,550 0 3,550 Recreational (seats) 3,400 0 3,400 City of Miami S2 overtown( . }9Y Office (gsf) 166,000 0 166,000 Park West DRI Increment I till Retail (gsf) 66,200 18,000 48,200 Convention (gsf) 290,000 0 290,000 Residential (du) 2,000 971 1,029 Brickell Square DRI 1992 Office (gsf) 937,800 0 937,800 Phases II and III Retail (gsf) 43,000 0 43,000 Claughton Island DRI 1995 Office (gsf) 1,200,000 300,000 900,000 (Brickell Key) Retail (gsf) 150,000 7,000 143,000 Hotel (rms) 800 0 800 Residential (du) 2,300 700 1,600 _ 1•S_ KEIT! I <<<,dd SC'I I NARS, 1'.A. F rr F: r N r F !I !: e• I c sr n v r v sl Is c PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGENCY LETTERS RECEIVED FLORIDA "` . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LAWTOR COILES GOVERNOR 11.111111111111 MAY j Office of Planning and Programs 602 South Miami Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 377-5910 May 8, 1991 Mr. Clarke Davis Keith and Schnars, P,A. 8880 NW 20th Street Suite A Miami, Florida 33172 RE: Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI Dear Mr. Davis: Den G. WATTS SECRETARY This letter is sent in response to your April 29th letter regarding committed projects in the Department's Five Year Work Program. Your letter is attached, and I have indicated our concurrence with the projects identified in Table 1. Please note that you have correctly identified these projects as being included in the Department's tentative work program for fiscal years 1992 through 1996. As you are aware, the Department's adopted work program may contain some adjustments to these projects. The adopted five year work program should be available in July. T trust this information will be helpful. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Phil Steinmiller Transportation Planning Administrator �• KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. .______ ENGINEERS -PLANNERS-SURVEYORS April 29, 1991 Mr. David Korros Assistant Planning Manager Florida Department of Transportation 602 South Miami Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 RE: Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Programmed Roadway Improvements Keith & Schnars Project No. 13654.1J Dear Mr. Korros: LEgirl VIP, 2, 1g91 6th DISTRICT PLANNING AND PROGRAMS OFFIOIt Keith & Schnars, P.A., has been retained by the City of Miami to prepare the transportation portion of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval (DRI-ADA). Our preliminary study area in Dade County is defined by the following boundaries: a North 79th Street to the north a Biscayne Bay to the south a LeJeune Road (West 42nd Avenue) to the west a Alton Road to the east After reviewing the adopted 1991 Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Improvement Plan and the tentative Florida Department of Transportation Five Year Work Program (April 1991) we have identified the projects listed in the attached Table 1 as being located within or adjacent to our preliminary study area. If you concur with our findings, please sign in the space provided below and return this letter at your earliest convenience. 8680 Northwest 20th Street, Suite "A" • Mtami. FL 33172 + (305) 477 -8B55 Mr. David Korros Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Programmed Roadway Improvements April 29, 1991 Page 2 If there are changes or additions to this table, please note the changes and return a signed copy of the letter with the changes to our office. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers -Planners -Surveyors Clarke Davis Project Engineer CD/bmv Please check one of the following: Concur Changes required cc: Reginald Barker, City of Miami Sabrina Bouie, City of Miami. Date SC'I-INALRS, P.A. <. 3 N F F V r f 4 ne n •; s U n v P v (S N s. WPI No. TABLE 1 Programmed Roadway Improvements for the Southeast overtown/Park West DRI-ADA Roadway Improvement Description 6113601 SR 836 SR 821/H.E.F.T. to SR 9A/I-95 Add lanes and resurface Preliminary engineering: FY 91-93 6113705 SR 25 / NW 36 St. NW 17 Avenue to SR 112 off ramp Add through lanes Preliminary engineering: FY 91-92 Right of way acquisition: FY 92 6123165 Port Tunnel Port of Miami to SR 836/1-395 New 4 lane tunnel Preliminary engineering: FY 91-94 6113230 SR 9 / NW 27 Avenue NW 11 Street to NW 42 Street Add 2 lanes to existing 4 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141774 SR 9A / 1-95 SR 836 to SR 112 Add 2 lanes to existing 10 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141775 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 58 Street to NW 95 Street Add 2 lanes to existing 8 lanes Construction: FY 91 6141777, SR 9A / 1-95 NW 129 Street to NW 151 Street Add through lanes Construction: FY 92 6141892 SR 9A / 1-95 NW 151 Street to south of SR 860 Construct HOV flyover and -:.. Add 2 lanes to existing 8 lanes Construction: FY 92 _pr i- KEI H aTid SCI l NARS, P.A. 4..c,sivEv0n, METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA METRO DADS METRO-DADE CENTER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUITE 1610 111 N.W, 1st STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128-1970 (305) 375-2092 May 6, 1991 Mr. Clarke Davis Project Engineer Keith and Schnars, P.A. 8880 N.W. 20 Street Suite A Miami, Florida 33172 Re: Southeast 0vertown/Paris West DRI-ADA Dear Mr. Davis: Reference is made to your letter of April 29, 1991, requesting a review of the proposed projects listed in the study area. The list as presented is correct except for the following addition. Project No. 6113769 Location & Limits Le Juene Road from Okeechobee Rd. to N.W. 103 St. Remarks Reconstruct 4 existing lanes, curb & gutters and add 5th lane. We trust the above data will serve your immediate needs. PGH/BC/em Very Ped Ch ef, Hig my yours, dez, P.E. .vision Equal Opportunity/Handlcap Employer/Services APPENDIX II INTERSECTION ANALYSES 1985 HC:M: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTIONI-799 ON RAMP/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE OTHER ANAL `ST k_&S D€yTE 07-07-1991 TIME.:F'M PEAK Gi lMMENT ..... _ :EXISTING TRAFFIC -VOLUMES , GEOMETRY E1=, WR . NR SR . EF. 1.4B N P, LT i_) 0 c_# . _ - . 0 T i2.0 LT _ a - 12,0 TH 0 57i, r,07 0,1 12.0 R 17.0 T 17.0 __ ») RT t 2 0 0 . 1__0 1'7,0 T 12,0 '# RR 0 0 0 0_ 1:7:0 1O.0 1}.0 12_0 12.0 1 ? . 0 1 _-t=) 1.2,c) ADJLSTMENT EACT0RS GLADE HV ADJ F'k:r RUBEB F'HF• F'EDS PEP. RIFT. 'ARR . TYPE r °: i ! i Y.`N Nm Nb Y/N min T RP 0.00 2.00 N 0 t_) 0.70 F._? N i4.7 _ WR 0.00 '700 N i:# i i 0.90 50 N 14.7. NR 0.00 _,tii N 0 c_? 0,90 50 N 1 i . _ SR 0.00 '.. 00 N t # i 1 0.90 50 )N 1 1 :.. SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 F'H-- 1 PH-2 F'H-7 PH--4 E L LT NF+ LT X TH TH X RT RT n P€) En NB LT SB LT TH .. TH RT PT Pn PD GREEN 7,9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BREEN 50.0 0.0 0») 0.0 {E1 i DW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; ELLOW 7.0 0.0 0 ., c_) LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRF`. V/C G!C DEL AY LOS APP. DELAY AFF'. LOt-: WP T 0.876 0.410 E'S.? r) TS. R 0.041 0.410 1 ..5 N �-t L 0.458 0.50 10.6,, 8 10.0 _' T 0.7A1 0,550 9,7 TNTER'SEC.T T )5N a I-! Delay - 17.0 (_mc/veh) Vf'- = 0_677 LOP = 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ##*###*##*****************#######*######*****############*###*####******** INTER;SECTIONI-795 OFF RAMP/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE OTHER At.IALYST . , K&S is 1 T E , : , 07-07-1991 TMEr 31 PEAK TRAFF I r VOLUMES GEOMETRY EP wR NB SR EB ND ND 5D LT (! fS ii Al , T 12,E1 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT _2,0 TH 693 0 0 577 , 17 t 7 9 17.0 T 1 C. i_f T 12.0 RT 0 0 0 (_ 1y, t 1 1 2, t 1 T• 1 2= t i T 12.0 RR i_) (_I i t i ) 1 : 1 , f_! 12 , 0 1 2 . < ) 17.0 12.() 17.0 2,0 AD3! STMENT F(C: T E'RS GRADE HV Aml 9p::0 I3 ISE`S F'HE REDS PFn . BUT. ARR . TYPE l' j r Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T ER c_!,(i_i 2.00 N €_; 0 0,90 50 N 115 _ !a!E 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11,5 ND 0..00 :, 0 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5,5 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB IT X NB LT TH h TH RT X RT P8 PD WB i T EP I T k T!-; TH ." RT RT X 9 } F' n '3FEEN 77.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BREEN 47.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `r,'EE LOW 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 YELLnW A.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 LEVEL OF FR:V I CE LANE 6RP. V!C 6!C DELAY !FIR APP. DELAY 3_8 T 0.997 0.477 43.6 E 47.6 88 i T 0.294 0 . 5_7' 9.7' Pi 9.7, NTE9SE:CTIDN: Delav = 26=0 ( ec/v h) Yin = 0,61. APP , L117: L O S - 5 1985 HrM : SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION.. I- T95 OFF RAMP/NE 2 AVENUE ARE:' T`,'F'E.....t THER T I NIE . . . . . . . _ .. F'M PE(1I. C OMh1Et1T „ . _ ..: `X I'ST I NE_ TRAFFIC LT TH RT Ew Wn N 8 88 Vril I LINES GEOMETRY Ep WE h' R 88 . PR 1i1E NB SB 0 0 46. 117.0 T 17.0 LT 12.0 LT iT.° .:9 _i 0 407. . 12.0 F: 12.0 T 17.0 T 17.0 423 0 0 0 . I-,i} 1_.0 T 12..0 T 12.0 j 0 0 0 . 17.0 17.0 12.0 2. 0 17. i 17.0 17.0 12.0 --- ADJUSTMENT FArToRE GRADE HV A8.1 F' KB BUSES• FIHF PEDS FED. RUT. 'ARR. TYPE (%) a) `,` / N Nm Nb Y ! NI min T .00 2.00 N £., 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 0.00 7.00 r.l 0 0 0.90 50 N 1 1 . 5 0.00 2.00 N iy 0 0.90 cal_) N 5. 0.00 0 7.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N c . c, _ CR IT TH RT Fn R LT TH F°T P8 r3R:EE N YELLOW I BNAL SETTINGS FWD L E LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 P'H-3 PH-4 :x NB LT TH RT F' 8 BB LT TH .. RT x P8 3u . 0 ).0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4. u 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW A.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE ERF'. V/r S/r DELAY LrJS AF'F'. DELAY APP. ill ER T 0.79 0. _70 27.2 8 27.2 D pi 8 IT 0.163 0.A40 5.5 8 c 5 _ INTERSECTION; Delay = 1.1 (=er / ; f :) / i_ _ 0.7A2LOS = 1 9R5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *******************************;************************************K**** INTERSECTICN..NE 11 TERRACE/US 1 AREA TYRE ..... !OTHER i'YBT. . . . . . . I�.&S. %:A '!» . u , . . ; 07-07-1991 TIME....., ..... PM F'EAh.: CnM`€FNT,_.,,__EXISTING TRAFFIC 'JOLT [ME=: _ GEOMETRY EB LLJB • NB RR _ EB WB NB SS LT --- 0 0 4 2 1 12.0 17.0 T 12.0 I_' 17.0 TH 0 0 1: _, 107,5 . LT 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 54 0 0 0 t F 12.0 R 17.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R c:) =i 0_ 12.0 17.0 17'. o 1 �_ 4D LISTMFNT F4CT(_RR GR4DF HY 4nJ F•,;:,G S IsEri PHF pFnP, PFD , BLIIT . 'ARR. . TYPE (A) (.,) 'Y/N N7= Nh •, iN min T FR 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 0 . 5 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 so N ' a, NR 0.00 7.is0 i'.4 i) 0 0,90 50 N 11,5 9R 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 s: N 1 1. 5 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 1.15.0 PH-1 PH-2 EH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH- PH.-7. PH-4 FR LT X NB LT .. TH X TH v RT .. RT X Pn Pn W B LT F; LT X TH TH T F:T X PO F•n E;F:E'EN 51 . 0 0.0 0.0 u.0 r. RFEN 54.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 U. J 0.0 LEVEL OP SERVICE LANE GBRP . V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY AF'F' . LOE: ECG L 0.748 0.470 2C .1 IC ?0 . i_ LT 0.092 0.470 12.9 B R 0.084 0.470 12.8 B NB T 0.62R 0. 4 9 /, 1A,5 r 16.5 C: CFI L 0.071 0.49x, 1 1. 5 8 17.4 i_: T 0.77 0.494 17.5 I_ TNTER'S:EI_TT0N: DGI_,;; = 17.5 (se /voh) 4`1[: = i).717' 1 OS = I_ 198.5 HOM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS �;i MMARY REPORT ********************************************************************** ** INTERSECTInN..NE Fa STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA T Y'F'E ..... DTHEF ANAL` :ST . . . . . . . K&S DATE. . . . . . : . .. ()7-07--1991 TIME , ......... F' M PEAK GC'MMENT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY FP a1F: - NP 5,N , 5Z WF: NB _c LT 0 0 69 0 . L 12,0 T 17_0 LT 12.0 LT 12_ TH )j 779 751 0 _ LT i7,0 TR 17,() T 17 .} T `—.- F, T 0 400 0 0 ) , R ._ _ , u F: 1 "C = () T 12.0 T 12,0 RR 0 0 0 0E _ . 017 . 0 1 . 0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 ADJUSTMENT F ArTOF:S GRADE HY A.DJ F'I..B BUSES F'HF EEDS PE), RUT. 'ARR. TYPE r i r Y/N Nm Nb min T EB 0.00 7.00 r1 0 0 0.90 50 N 70,9 W 0.00 2.00 N (j () 0.90 50 N _() , r1 F.B 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 () , 9() 50 N 11 , 5 :E 1. r6N1 .L SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 EH-7 PH-1 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 FH-1 PH-4 cB i T NB LT X TH TH I FAT RT En Pi ) WFes, LT GF1 11- TH TH RT RT F°D F'D GREEN 5r.. () 0.0 0.0 0.0 GF:EEN 4,=..0 YI_i_I OW 4.0 {;),(„) ().0 ().€j YE LOW 4.() 0.0 0.0 0,0 N 8 LEVEL OF SERV I s E LANE GRF'. V/C ram'jC: F.)EI AY LOC APP. DELAY APP. Lfl9 TR (),2()5 0.5^7 10, = A 11C 0 R 0.499 0.577 1 .w . 1 R LT 0. 4 6 0. 4T,t, 1A.5 C 1,, 51 ,I,. N EF;€ECT 110N: Delay = 14.4 V/r = 0.4AP LDS may./ 1985 HCM: S SUMMARY REP *********** INTERSECTIO AREA TYPE ANALYST.... COMMENT..., LT TH RT RR ER WE NP EE sT TH RT F' 4 i WE LT TH RT Pr) GREEN YELLOW IGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS OFT *************************************************************** N.. NW Q STREET/NW 7 AVENUE OTHER .. i z7-07-1991 ...PM PEAK ...EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES _ F E LJ F: • NIP. y 8 0 401 857 0 , 0 217 ) t_ t RAnE HY AD3 PKG _) ( ) Y/N Nm 0,00 ,00 N i_) 0,00 7.00 N 0 L LT F N, 12.0 17.0 12.0 1'7, 0 REFINFTRY VTR 12.0 LT TR 12.0 T ti 12.0 r 1.2_f_i 1.7.0 12.0 D_i i ESTMENT FAL :TfFS Bi USES PHF PEDS N Li E_) 0.90 50 0.90 50 0.90 50 0 .90 5) SIGNAL SSETTING4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-7 PH-4 35.0 4.0 LANE GRP . WE: TF' F.' EFL LT tl , ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 NB LT TH RT F'D 68 LT TH RT R D GREEN YELLOW V/8 (1.7R() 0.392 0.749 NB S.L 12.0 T 12.0 17.0 PED. Y /N N h N N BHT. ARR . TYPE min T 20.5 70,5 1.5 11..5 _ CYCLE LENGTH = 100,0 PH-1 PH-2 r'H--7 PH-4 X X k 57.0 0.0 i) ,t) 4.0 0.0 (0 _ 'J LEVEL OF SERVICE G/C DELAY L)]S APE . DELAY APP . 0E. 0.770 0.770 0.590 INTERSE)_TI0N: Delay = D fwr/Vh) 17,7 V/C = 0.3 2 LO= = 1905 HL:M : SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY LMMaRYREPORT T****y******** y"yy * y*y* * * * * yy T * * T T * * T * * y* * * * * T S T * * * * * y * T * * * * y* * * * * * * * * * T y* * h INTERSECTIiJNNE 5 STREET/US 1 AREA TYF'F OTHER ANALYST.. K&S D TE._..,07-07-1991 AM PEAK C'0MN!ENTEX I ST I NG TRAFFIC : '..'fLH HME'-5 GEOMETRY E4 Ea R NB =R , EB WR N =:S IT 1 1 5 0 0 r_.59 _ 1 1'7_if T l'ID:0 i 12,0 L 12.0 TH 456 0 F,'!.ti 1519 L 1.. ,i) TR 12,0 T 1......0 L 12„0 RT -_ 0 1,=' 0 2 T 12 ) R 17.) TR 12-0 T AEI.ii RR ,_i 0 0 0 = TR 12.0 12,0 12.) T 12.0 1 . [ s17.0 1., i_s T 12.0 12.0 1'..... 1 12.0 -1 2 .., ADJ UFTMENT FACTORS OF 3 .E E HV ADO F'KG: BL ISEE F'HE F'EDS FED. Ei iT . ARR . TY1 (X) E. ": i Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T 1EE: i-i . c o 7.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 'i-i , 5 'OR i_) , i i 0 2 , 00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 7'0 , 5 _ 0.90 50 5 BE: C)_00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11,5 _ SIEiNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH - 90,0 PH-1 PH-2 PH--3 PH-4 FH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ER LT X NR LT X TH .. TH .. R_!.. RT X PD F'D M B LT SD IT X X; TH TH X X Pr) F'Ti i= RFF N 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN C .. a 0 21.0 0.0 0.0 YELL +=ill 4.4: riii C),is 0.0 YELL DW 4.0 4.0 0.0 _x.i. LEVEL OF SERVICE L_ANF FiR _ V/C:: iE,/C DiELAY LC+S APP. DELAY APP. L OB F_ L 0.1'7.) 0.411 1'7.5 8 14.2 5 TR 0.470 0.411 14.5 NR TR 0.747 0,?5r, 75,1 SI i5.1 it _;.R 0.748 0.544 14.3 D 1 . 1 - T 0.638 0.544 11.2 NTER Ei_ TTON, DIay _. 15.4 -:/= h,i V/17 _ 0.611 LO'E = 19R5 HCM; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY UMMARYREPORT ************** * * y W * y * y * * * * y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * y * * y * y * y * * * * * * * * * * y * * * * * * * * * * * INTERSECTIOILPEE 5 STREET/LDS 1 AREA TYPEOTHER ANAL`!'ST . ... , KR,S DA i .. _ , :i ►7-{)7--1'991 TIME. PM PEAK lC Or 1MENT .... _ _ E I ST I NG TRAFFIC VOLUMES _ GE'JMETRY EB W 1 ' NR S ; E _: WR NR Rn L T _,_'s 0 0 107 . L 12: T 12.0 T 17.0 L 1. 0 TH 71 c.) i f c.:5 1 099 L 12.0 TR 17.0 T 1_.0 L 12.0 RAT 1'77. 0 0 0 _ .,_ 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 'F 0 0 0 i] T,, 12_0 12..C1 17.0 T .2.0 „':n,7 9 T MEN i FACTORS GRADE H`,' An3 P <.G Bi BE`-= PH1= PEDS FED. BHT. 'ARR. TYPE ("A) (.) Y/N Nm Nh Y/N min T FR 0,00 7.00 N is 0 0.90 nO N 70.5 _ W.B i_!.i €-€ 7,00 p,1 0 0 0.90 50 ,1 20,9 _ NR 0.00 . 0i } N 0 0 0.90 i no N 11 , 5 _ i 0.00 2,00 N i) 0 0.90 no N 1i ,5 SIGNAL SETT T NOS lµ YCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 NCH-3 1; H- 4 PH-1 PH PH-._ RH-4 ER LT .. NR IT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PLC Pn LJ13 IT RFC LT X TR TH X RT RT FT) pn BP_EEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 €€.0 GREEN 1A.O 42.0 0,0 :jU '(EI_LUW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELL[IJ 4.0 4.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERY T ICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LlS APP. DELAY APP. LOS 513: L 0.447 0.770 20.P C 7.0. 1 TR 0.719 0.770 1R,9 i= NR TR 0 ..,GS 0. A4G 9.2 3 9.2 "j:1 L 0.873 0.440 47.0 E' 1R.8 T 0.571 0.440 1-,, . 7 C r NTERECT I ON r 1.rt, - 17.9 (=_/yeh) V!E: = 0,._7.3 LOS = Imo: 1925 HEM. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTICINS. SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.. ... OTHER ANALY��.......K&B �ATE' . 07-07-199� TIME..........AM PEAK COMMENTI-TING TRAFFIC LT TH RT RR EB wB N8 SB E� � �40 20� 0 EB LT T� RT W� LT TH; RT PD 8REEN YELLJW o 0 T T TR GRADE HV ADJ �KG Y/N Nm 0.00 2.00 N 0 0.00 2.00 N 0 0.00 2.00 N 0 0.00 2.00 N 0 SI8NAL SETTINGS PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 T TR R GEOME7-RY WB L2.0 12.Q 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTNENT =ACTORS BUSE� PHF PEDS Nb 0 0.90 O 0.90 0 0.90 X X � 47.(-) �.� LANE GRP. TR LT 0.0 0.0 V/C 0.2B6 O.601 0.0 0.0 NB LT TH RT PD �B SB T 12,0 LT 12.� T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T l�.0 12.0 1�.0 12.O 12.0 PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N min T 5� N 20.5 3 50 N 20.5 3 50 N 11.5 3 50 N 11.5 3 CYCLE LENGTH = 9O.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH--4 �;B LT X TH X RT � PD 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE G/c. DELAY LOS 0.544 0.4 B 0.411 16.1 C INTERSECTION: APP. DELAY 8.4 Delay = 13.1 (sec/veh) WC = 0.422 tFP. LOS B C LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NE 5 STREET/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE'- '.OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK. [GMMENT ' .EXI5TImS TRAFFI[ VOLUMES GE�METRY EB 6B' NB SB : EB w� .-T 0 0 12.0 12.0 T 12,3 __ i2,� T1--� 337 O 0 12.0 T� 7 12.0 � R� 197 0 c : TR 1210 R 12.0 TR 12.? T ±2AC RR 0 0 : 12.� 0 12.6 12.a � 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12' _________________________________________________________________________ WDJJSTMENT P4CTORS G�ADE (%) EB 0.00 WB 0,00 N� SE 3.00 H� <%> 2.00 2.00 N N 0 ./ BUSES Nb 0 0 PHF PEDS RED. BUT. '/N min T 0.10 50 N 29.5 0.90 50 N 20.5 0.90 50 N 11.5 0 50 � 11.5 ARR. TYPE 3 3 3 __________________________________________________________________________ EIBNAL SETTINSS CYCLE LENGTH PS-1 PH-2 Pp-T PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-7 pH-H. EB LT X W] LT TH X TH RT % RT P� PD WE LT 5B LT X TH TH RT RT � P-;,; PD. GREEN 53.0 0.0 GREEN 39.0 o.0 0.0 ,ELLDW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0. YELLOW 4.0 .0 0.1 C.0 LEYEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY App. EB TR 0.235 0.550 8.3 B B.8 � SB LT 0.34q 0.410 15.5 15.5 C 1ATERSECTIDN: '---------- Delay = 12.4 (sec//eK; V/C = 0.284 19B5 HCM: 5IBNALIZED INTERSECTIONS `SUMMARY REPORT *t**Ilk ***�*********�*�**�****�************�*******************���*t INTERSECTION..NE 5 GTREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER TIME.. .......AM PE;:�K C�M�NT..,...,E�IETI�G �RAF�I� G ��L��ES : GEOMETRY TH RT �R m� � 0 0 0 LT 12.� 222 0 : T 12,� TR 12.0 T 12.0 L TR 12.O T : 12.0 12.0 12.0 A�JUSTMENT FACTORE GRA�E HV A�J PK� B�SE� PHF PE�S PE�. BUT. ARR. TYPE �m N� Y/N min T E� 0.0C 2.0� N 0 0 0.90 50 M 2.00 N 0 0 0.�0 50 N 11.5 3 �lGNAL SETTIMGS ZY�LE LEN�TH P�-1 FH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 p�-4 �B LT X NB LT K TH � Tp X �T X �T P� PD SB LT T-H TH RT PT PD PT G�EEN �0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 42.0 O.O 0.0 0.3 �ELL�W 4,� 0.0 0.0 O.0 YELL�W 4.O _ LEVEL CfF SERVI�E LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY ��P. L�S EB LT 0.�67 0.467 1�.8 B 11.8 B �B �R 0.145 0.489 9.6 p" 9.� � IXTE�SE�TI0N: 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST' ..K&B DATE- ........ 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK EGMMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC --------------------------- ;OLUMES : OEOMETRY EB WB ' NB SB : ED, 4 8 NB S� LT 271 0 0 O : LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.� TH 364 0 573 8 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.� 184 0 : T 12.0 R i2.0 TR 12.0 T 12.� _2.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.S : 12.0 12.0 12.0 7 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS SRADE Hy ADJ PK2 BUSES PHF FEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 wB 0.00 2.00 to 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SET7INGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110,0 PH-! PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PA-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X R- X RT x PD P-D, WB LT SB LT TH TH RT RT �D PD GREEN 42.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 NB LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C B/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY L 0.511 0.400 19.6 T 0.298 0.400 17.1 C TR 0.319 0.564 9.7 B 9.7 ENTER5ECTION: ' APP. L�� Delay = 13.4 vsec/veh) V/c = 0.399 �05 = E, - � '_711 1?.85 HCF1. 8I8Nai I'ED IrlTEE:Er.TIEir SUMMARY F:EF'0RT L TNTERS,EC T IDN, .NE 5 STREET/N MIH3"1I ;-;VENUE AREA TYPE _ _ . _ . OTHER ANAI I A E . . _ _ _ . . _ . _ '•_} / — 0 / —1 99 '1 TINE.______ . ..AM PEAK 'T F'pF 7 'r „4 ;O UM. ;EON( —TRY LT 12.0 TR 12.0 0 0- 12.0 12.0 12.0 AD3 UFiTMENT FACTORS _Gti ,iiE HV -»E l F-•j;'E _w „:(='v: i=`1-iC= ;-'EDS F'En, F;iLT.. 'ARR. TYPE i i i , ;1 `? .' N ,j � i 1 N F_, 'Y N m 1 r- T u;i R 0,00 , i_ o ; ,f t i 09.0 ti 7 N 20.5 0'00 200 N 0 i} 0e90 50 N 11,9 12-0 S I NA! ET a. •' 1 CYCLE i_ _NIEi T H — 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-_ , PH-4 PH-1 PH-7 F''H --''•;.:._ C 0.0 0,0 NB LT TH T pi 1 TH I ) 6RFFN 44.0 r, 0.0 ; E1 LOW 4 a 0 LEVEL OF EF;V T 1 LANE GFF'. V/f E C 1_iP! Ay __s-E APP. nEI A'`{ 1 =`.LDS r 1=. 0. 4 -r 0.444 1= 1 8 1. = .1. - SR, I T 0.$20 0,c11 C',- `.r 9.2 9 '_...EF. [8fION. 1e. a;% = 1.1 _6 i :: s»../vr fi.1 ViC = 0__15 t (].= — i-. 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NE 5 STREET/N MIAMI AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE.....' 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT .... -EXISTING TRAFFIC __________________________________________________________________________ GEOMETRY EB WB' NB So : EB WB N� LT 0 0 0 T 12.0 T 12.6 l2.0 LT L2-� TH 559 0 0 186 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 67 0 0 0 ; TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T L2.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 : : 12.-' 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.J _____________________________________________________________________ ADjUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE Hv ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED, BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.06 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB C.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 W 0 Q 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 5B 0.00 2.00 N 0 8 0.10 50 N 11.5 3 _ SIONAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.3 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 pH-2 PH-3 PH-'' EB LT NB LT T9 TH RT X RT PD p--l" WB LT SB LT X Tj-� TH X RT R'T X P PD GREEN 42.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0& 0.0 0.0 =ELLOW 4.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 3.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB TR 0.363 0.400 17.7 C 17.7 C SB LT 0.107 0.564 8.5 B. 8.5 .5 _ INTERSECTION: Delay = 15.0 {sec/veh) u/C = 0.213 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NW 3 STREET/NW 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... FM PEAK COMMENT ....... EXISTING TRAFFIC -____________________________________________________-__________________-_ ��LUMEGECMETRY EB WB TD, « 048 NB LT 11 78 143 52 : 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L Ll.q. T>� 72 571 293 87 TO 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.3 RT 16 s7 117 100 : 12.0 TR 12.3 i2.0 p T�� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT PACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE W (%) TIN Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 O 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 C ;X0 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 W 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 _____________ ________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100,� PH-1 P1 --2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 F'H--- 2 FH-7 �7�-� EB L_ X ND LT X TH X TH � RT X RT X PD PD WB LT 5B LT X T� TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 36.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 56.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 00 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 o.� EB WB sB LEVEL OF TERVICE LANE GRF. V/C B/C BELAY LOS L 0.054 0.380 14.9 D TR 0.148 0.330 15.5 � L 0.168 0.380 15.6 C TR 0.558 0.380 18.9 C L 0.240 0.580 7.8 B TR 0.455 0.580 9.4 G L 0.119 0.5% 7.2 B T 0.054 0.5% 7.1 B R 0.126 0.520 7.2 D. APP. DELAY 15.4 12^� s.9 7.2 !71 ________________--________________-__________________________________- INTER5ECTIOW: Delav = 13.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.496 L]S = E 1965 HCM; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS _SUMMARY REPORT **************************************************** :M*:#:*: ::* :m* :: '****. ,+. FNTERSECTICN..NE 1 STREET/US AREA YPE . . V i HER. __'t.:EiF_ e . _ _ . _ ... 07-07-j991 iIME.,...,.....F'M F'EAF-. r:r€•'i `•Y NiT...... -EX:IE T INB TRAFFIC: LT TH RT SR ED aip ND VOi LIME!----; GE0METR:,: rEI i.i_ ' NR f,L1P ;, FP a Jr; NB r 0 0 :.1L T 17.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 0 A9 7'01 1_i ,% W . T 1.y . lam) T 12,0 T 12.0 12.0 12..0 1.2.. 12.0 1-.i) 1-° - TR 12.0 1:, ZDJ i;_•.TMF_NT FACTORS GRADE HV An3 F'K3 DUSE F'Hr= F'EDE RFD. RHT , f-?RR , TYPE . ( °`) 4 /N Nm Nb Y!N min T 0.00 2.00 I 0 0 0.90 50 :.i 20,5 0.00 2.00 ;_} '_) 0.90 _ N 20.5 0.00 2.00 N 0 ) (_) #) , 7/ } _il_) N 1 ') , «5 SIGNAL SETTINRF; CYCLE L. NijjH = 100,0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-7 PH-4 PH---:; PH-2 PH-7 PH ER LT NB LT TH TH .. RT RT X FE Pn WB LT .. 9B LT X TH TH .. RT .. RT X Pn Pn GREEN 15.0 0, 0 0.0 o o GREEN 77.0 0.0 _ . t) _ „ 1.7 YELLOW O 4.0 0.0 s) . C 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GR F' . V / C / ' DELAY LOOS APP. DELAY AF F . _ c. !:LS LT 0.167 0.170 77.0 _) 27.0 D NB IT 0.476 0.790 2.6 A 2.6 SD TR 0.243 0.790 7.1 A 2,1 .1 MTEF;.:SECT I ON a Dp .A.y - 7.0 V/L _„, 0. 3R9 LE'`- = . . 1925 RCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSE+TICN..N 1 STREET/N MIAMI AVENUE AREA T , F'E _ ....OTHER -_-IME.. ..... _ ...AM PEAt.. 1_. MMFNT, . : _ . . _X1_:T INE TRPFF72. YrILUMP-s _ GEOMETRY Mr WG • NP =_ - `_.8 W`_' NB; -A i T .i Y '.) IT 12.0 Il — 12.0 —_0 € T 12.0 1-_- ? 12.0 .-.I 0 _ : , l 225 - T 12.0 T 1'7 . €:: T 12.0 r F 12 = - FCF r_, EL- - 12,0 12.0 T 12.0 12, 12,0 12,0 12.0 —_t_ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS E[RADE L.IV A )J PF. G 1_{U ;E _, PHF F' DS RED, PUT. ARIA:. TYPE (.,) } `{/N N,;. Nb, `s. N min T ' _D - - 2.00 r r-, •-_r (] b(:`.; 20.5 N T: .._ ,-3 -) .-- _ _ i'S € ) € ) 0.90 c €_ N 11.5 _ r=:D, 0.00 2.00 I'-d 0 0 0.90 50 p,j 1 1 = `-' E 19NAL SETT T NEiS CYCLE L ENE'TH = 90,0 PH-1 PH-7 PH-7 PH-4 PH-1 PH--2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH R.T RT W5 LT :x =8 LT X T.- TH .. P D F' ' 5:F..EN E .0 ;_),€:) ;_)„0 *_)0 I-iREEN 44z0 €) cr C, €=) _ , _ '---�._ �i �;:i . i_3 0.0 0.0 `) _ (,1 YELLOW '^. F €_r t_r '_3 0 „ 0 L E"=-.'EL OF SERVICE LANE 1_GRF' . V/C 9/0: DELAY LOB APP . DELAY Ww, LT c s . 1 26 0.444 11.5 E: t 1 , 5 _ t7: TR 0.202 0.511 ..2 7,,, F,=2 INTERSECTION! na1 a.:i = 10.2 (F.7. vh) V / C = o.198 PPP. —OS LU ; = Y; 19E5 HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION._ SUMMARY REPORT K******************************* **=***** *********************** :*$**:z*±; INTERSECTION.. N 1 STREET/N M I r M I AVENUE AREA TYPE . _ ... OTHER ;T1 07- 0 7 -199 1 TINE .. - ...FM PEAK COMMENT .. _ 5 _ X. I :E:T I NG T RAFF 1 {_ LT TH :'I ti ir1E'' _ GEOMETRY RY FP 1, • r..I ; _: R- FP L B NB SE,. E7- 0 0 LT _ ._I LT r-,t_ L. 12.0 ---- 0 7,9 1 0 420 . T 12.0 T 1.».0 T 17.0 F 12 _;_' 3 0 127 _ .1.-.. _ . C. T 17.. _ i o 0 o _ 1 7..0 15._0 T 12.0 1: a i„1 x 12.0 1 0 12.0 12.0 "D 3UTMF.NT PArTOR57i i.:r, B i P. - ' �� T'• _�r=�r-��"�E__ HV �I,i �-'1t-:1_� _��_�:_�E`_' F'i-IF 1='1=_)w Fir'[, _ �;i_ tT } rr�( � F'F (_) I .? 'Y N Nrn •J_, '(/NI min T 1=is 0.00 2.00 r r, „ 0,90 {_, I'.I 0,5 _ 111_' f i , 0 0 __. _ 00 N i_t ( } 0 . 90 50 N 20.5 - r_; ("} , ; t::i 2 = i i t.% I>I (_) i:l 0.90 Gl 0 N 1 1 _ 5 SIGNAL _ETT I Nr, PH-1 PH- ' PH-3 PH-4 R IT TH T pn R ` x. ED YELLnw .t _S j , 0 0.0 Q.0 C 'T'CLF LENT TH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB IT TH RT Pn 8, LT TH 'X RT F' n 0.0 GREEN 47.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 iELI OW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVELOF SERVICE LANE B;RF'. V/C S/C DELAY LOS APP. nELAY A.F'F • L'-= e LT 0.307 0.470 1 . 5 i;' 12.5 i SD TRH 0.779 0.490 i 2 . B 12.2 _ =NTF RSECTInN; Delay 12.3 (sec/,;eh) v/1= = 0.343 LOS = 8 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NW 1 STREET/NW 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.. ... OTHER, ANALYST. ...... K&S DATE....... '«7-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT ..EXISTING TRAFFIC _________________________________________________________________________ LT TH RT RR 0 0 0 0 �OLUilES, GEOMETRY OB ' 18 E_7' WB NB SB 22 74 0 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.3 TR L2.3 314 460 180 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 BB 0 127 ; TR 12.0 TR 12.6 12.0 12.3 � 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.J� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PED5 PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE {%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 6.60 2.00 N; 0 O 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 5B 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH TH X R7 RT X FD PD WB LT X. SB LT X TH � TH X �T �T X PD PD GREEN 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 65.0 0.0 0 0 3.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0 0 0 LEVEL QF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB LTR 0.34B 0.290 21.4 C 21.4 [ ND LT 0.291 0.670 5.2 B 5.2 � GB TR 0.342 0.670 5.5 B 5.5 � INTERSECTION: Delev = 10.9 (sec/vehi V/C = 0.344 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..I-395 ON RAMP/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE. OTHER ANALYST.......K&8 TIME ........... PM F,EAK C0MMENT...,...BACKGROUND 7"RAFf1C VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WBSB : EB WB NB SE- L- T 0 0 692 0 , 12.0 T 12.0 LT l2.0 12.� TH 0 716 l257 0 � 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.� 12.� 12.0 T RR12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.(0 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.3 3 NB 0.B0 Z.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.3 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH TH X RT RT X Pr- PD WB LT X SB LT TH % TH RT X RT PD PD GREEN 39,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 50.0 YELLLW 4,0 YELLOW 7.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C GC DELAY LOS APP. DELAALO PP. /Y S WB T 1.089 0.410 66.9 F 64.7 F R 0.052 0.410 11.5 B NB L 0.950 0.550 31.0 D 18.� C T 0.746 0.550 12.1 B TNTERSECTION: De1av = 31.1 (sec/veh> V/C = 1.009 LOS = D 1905 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTER8ECTION..I-395 OFF RAMP/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .....07-07-1991 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB sB LT 0 0 0 266 : T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12^9 TH 806 0 0 1896 : 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 921 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 � 12.8 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HY ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11,5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5,5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.� PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-7 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT X ^FH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOB APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 1.160 0.433 111.0 F 111,0 F SB LT 0.967 0.522 23.8 C 23.8 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 45.B (sec/veh) V/C = 1.055 LOS = E 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..I-395 OFF RAMP/HE 2 ()VENUE AREA TYPE. ....OTHER DATE,.... »7-07-1991 TJME..,.......PM PEAK COMMENT -.....,BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUNES GEOMETRY BEOMETRY EB WB NB BB : EB WB B 5B LT 0 0 0 223 T 12.0 T 12,� LT 12.0 LT |�.0 TH 1066) 0 0 193c? R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12'0 RT 1161 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 U 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nrri Nb Y/N min T E8 0.00 2.00 M 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 WB 0.0O 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 NB V.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 EB LT X TH X R� X PD WB LT TH RT PD GREEN �0.0 YELLOW 4.0 V.0 O.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 0.0 0.0 PH-1 PH-12 PH-3 PH-� NB LT TH RT PD SB LT x TH X RT X PD 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C B/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 2.077 0.320 * * * * SB LT 0.786 0,640 10.8 B 10.8 B INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.217 LOS = e 1985 HCM- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 8UMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .NE 11 TERRACE/US 1 AREA TYPE ... ..OTHER ANALYST..,....K&S DATE..........07-O7-1991 TIME...,......PM PEAK �OMMENT.....,.BACK�ROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY Er-! WB NB zE B EB WB NB S� LT 737 0 0 B : L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 LT i�.� TH 0 0 1B04 2097 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12'1- RT R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12,0 T i2 S RR : 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEI). BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.9O 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.80 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 Z.00 W 0 0 0.9D 50 N 11.5 3 6116NAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 F'Fi-2 I H-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 EB LT X HB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X F'D PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH x RT RT X PD PD GREEN 39.0 GREEN 66.V YELLOW 5.0 �'0 �.0 0.0 YELLOW LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE 5RP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. L�S ED L 0.761 0.365 �B.8 D 27.B D LT O.761 D.365 2B.8 D R 0.151 0.365 18.6 C Ns, T 0.687 0.600 12.3 B 12.3 3 SB L 0.142 0.7.7 T 1.144 0.�00 93.7 F INTER8ECTION; Delav -- 5O.6 (sec/veh} V/C 0.999 LOS = E 105 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 6 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TyPE..,.,OTHER ANALYST K&5 DATE 07-07-1991 TIME. PM PEAK COMMENT -.-BACKGROUND TRAFFIC __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 0 163 0 L 12.0 T 12,0 LT 12.0 LT L2.0 TH 0 448 1786 0 : LT 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 631 0 0 : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 x 12.0 12.0 12.O 12.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.; 12.0 12.0 12-0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDB FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%> (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NO 0,00 2.00 N 0 O 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT TH x TH RT X RT PD PD GREEN 52.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 50.0 0,0 0.0 0.,- YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS NB TR 0.293 0.491 12.7 B 25.6 D R 0.943 0.491 35.0 D NB LT 0.956 0.473 28.5 D 22.5 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 27.5 (secyveh) V/C = 0.950 LOS = D 1985 HCN: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT -k l*•it:*•3 **UHF** ai 4) 5F*3( :*** •'F.•3F**i'*** r** *-34 *****t+.=*'.Yc•t 1F•?ta.-i4.-s-*** -*+- ;i:K_.s- +:1-:• * *4, --;: INTERSECTION. AREA TYPE.... ANALYST. - DATE......... COMMENT.. . . .NW 6 STREET/NW -? AVENUE . OTHER . 07-07- 1 99 1 .PM PEAK . BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES . GEOMETRY EE+ ND ND SP. . EEs WE, NB FD LI 0 0 E6 0 . L. 12.0 T 1.2.0 LT 12.0 Lr 4.2.t" TH 0 695 1 981 0 . L. t 12.0 TR J2.0 T 12.0 T 1 u PT i ? 0 1 F: 12.0 R :12.0T 12.0 1 .12.0 RR i 0 0 0. 12. 0 J.2. 0 12,0 1-'. .1.2,0 12.0 12.0 I.2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1-2.. 0 EB N 8 ND .SE: EE, LT TH RT F'D L1E: LT RT F'D 0F;F•>DE H`% " DJ f-•F;'! r;,., (7.) Y/N N-n 0.00 7.00 N ?_i 0.00 2.00 3<r ICI ; 0.00 2.00 N f_ o. 00 2.00 N 0 PH-1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS BUSES PHF PEDS Nb 0.90 50 7 0 0.90 50 (? 0.90 r(_) SIGNAL SETTINGS PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 GREEN 75.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 LANE GRF' . dal F; TR R NB{ LT INTER 'EETION ,Y ; C 0.615 0.745 0.807 0.0 0.0 0.0 NB LT TH RT F' D SD LT TH RT F' D GREEN YELL -OW LEVEL OF SERVICE GIG DELAY LEIS 0.370 0.770 0.590 20.1 24.6 13.4 L: S E FED. `Y'/N N N BUT. ARR. T`/PE m i n T 20.5 _ 70. 11.5 1 11.5 CYCLE LENGTH == 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X Y X 57.0 4.0 0, ti 0, 1) , APE. DELAY AF'F'. LOS, 21.6 13.4 D>1 -ty --• 16.1 (s c/veh) 0.783 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/US 1 AREA TYPE OTHER ANALYST K&S DATE 07-07-1991 TIME . . . . . . . . . AM PEAK COMMENT. . . . - . RACKGROUMD TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB 5B LT 294 0 0 637 : L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1164 0 2164 1468 : L 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 186 0 570 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T !2.0 RR 0 0 O 0 ; TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 2 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.6 ; 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDG PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T E8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 P1+-7 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SD LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 22.0 21.0 0.0 0.3 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 O.C.- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE 8RP' V/C G/C DELAY LOB APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.312 0.411 13.7 B 62.2 F TR 1.098 0.411 72.7 F NB TR 1.185 0.544 114.2 F 114.2 F SB L 4.692 0.256 * * + * T 1.313 0.256 * * INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.370 LOS = * 19B5 HCMt SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/US 1 AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&B DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8EOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NEI SS LT 1033 0 0 187 ; L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 1�.6 TH 222 D 2620 1918 : L 22.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 PT 388 0 114 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.a RR 0 0 : TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12'0 : 22.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.O 12.0 12.0 12'0 12.� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADO PKG BUSES PHF PEDB PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 pH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PE. WB LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT Y, PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 16.0 42.0 0.0 0.C_- YELL8W 4.0 0.0 0,0 0~0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 1.409 0.320 * * * * TR 0.690 0.320 23.9 C NB TR 0.983 0.640 22.1 C 22.1 c SB L 1,525 0.440 * * * * T 0.997 O.440 34.8 D TNTERSECTION: Delav = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1,470 LOS = � 1985 HCMt SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMAqY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... BACKGROUND TRAFFIC EB LT O TH 1116 RT 528 RR 0 VOLUMES : GEOMETRy WB NB SB EB WB NB Q; � V 556 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT iZ.�' 0 0 1606 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.8 T 12.0 0 0 0 : TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.� 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.8 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.6 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Q) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 M 20.5 3 WE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 pH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X |H RT X RT P1:1 PD WE LT 3D LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 YELLOW 00 0.0 0,0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP, LGS EB TR 0.911 0.433 22.7 C 22.7 C SB LT 0.991 0.522 27.8 D 27.8 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 25.6 (sec/veh> V/C = 0.955 LOS = D 1985 HCM; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/NE 2 AVENUE q?EA TYPEOTHER ANALYSTK&S DATE..... 07-07-1991 TIME PM PEAK COMMENT BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB NB NB SB EB WB LT 0 O 0 367 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12". TH 1038 O 0 1895 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12,0 T 12.0 RT 606 0 0 0 : TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 7 12.0 RR 0 0 0 2.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AD3 PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) Q) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-1 EB LT X NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PE) PD WB LT BB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD pD GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 47.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EB SD LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LO� TR 0.847 0.470 11.9 C 19.9 C LT 1.031 0.490 41.4 E 41.4 E INTERSECTION: Delay = 32.1 (sec/veh> V/C = 0.941 LOS = D 1995 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST. ...... K&S DATE .... ...... 07-07-1991 TINE .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... BACKGROUND TRAFFIC __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB S� LT 267 0 0 0 : LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1377 0 1449 0 ; T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.3 RT 0 0 500 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK8 BUSES PHF PEDB PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YyN Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT BB LT TH TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 40,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 42.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C 8/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS ES LT 0.829 0.467 17.7 C 17.7 C N8 TR 0.948 0.489 23.1 C 23.1 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.990 LOS = � 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PM PEAK COMMENT ...... .BACKGROUND TRAFFIC _________________ - VOLUMES � GEOMETRY EB WB' NB EB : EB WB WB BB LT 702 0 0 0 : LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12,0 L 12.� TH 942 0 1475 0 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 0 0 474 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.; T 12.0 : 12,0 12.0 12.0 T 12.� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG 8USE3 PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 5B 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD ;E LT SB LT To! TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 54.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C B/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY OPP. LoS EB L 1.041 0.509 58.0 E 32.8 El T 0.606 0.509 15.0 B NB TR 1.017 0.455 41.5 E 41.5 E INTERSECTION: Delay = 37.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.030 LOS = D A65 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 BTREET/N MIAMI AVENUE AREA TYPE OTHER ANALYST K&S DATE 07-07-1991 TIME.. AM PEAK COMMENT'.. ....BACKGROUND VOLUMES EB WB' NB LT 0 0 0 TH 1360 0 0 RT 284 0 0 RR 0 0 0 TRAFFIC : GEOMETRY SB � EE, wB NB EB 226 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12'0 876 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 0 : TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.� 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.D 12.::,� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.3 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUBTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%> Y/N Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WE 0.90 2.00 N 6 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11'5 3 GB 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 P1-1-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X TH RT X RT pD PD WE LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PE) Pr) GREEN 3B.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C B/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB TR 0.868 0,444 19.9 C 19.9 C. SE LT 0.511 0.511 11,2 B 11.2 F. INTERSECTION: Delay = 16.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.677 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/N MIAMI AVENUE AREA TYPE...,.OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT...'.. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB BB : EB WB HB s T-1 LT 0 0 0 288 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.� TH 146B 0 0 814 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.� RT 176 8 0 0 : TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12 (:t RR �:,i 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.9 12.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 12A, : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� ------------------------------------------ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED, BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 11,5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 W 11.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB LT � TH X RT X PD WB LT TH RT PD GREEN 66.8 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 1i?-� PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 P�-i-1 PH-2 PH-3 P!-�-� NB LT TH RT PD EB LT X TH X RT X PD 0.0 0.0 GREEN 36.0 0.0 0'0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.(� LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY OPP. LOS EB TR 0.618 0.61G 10.1 0 10.1 S BB LT 0.764 0.345 25.B D 25.8 D TNTERSECTION: Delay = 16.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.670 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT IWTBRSECTION..NW 3 STREET/NW 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST .K&S DATE..........07-07-1991 TIME.. .PM PEAK COMMENT ....... BACKGROUND TRAFFIC __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB N8 SB ; EB WB LT 63 101 249 154 : L 12.0 L 12.8 L 12.0 L 12XI TH 409 739 488 259 ; TR 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T i2.0 RT 92 86 1B8 299 : 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 R 12,0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20,5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0,00 2.00 N O O 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 _______________________________ ____________ --------------------- PH- I EB LT X TH X RT X pi-? WE LT X TH X RT X PD GREEN 36.0 YELLOW 4.0 PH-2 0.0 0.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT X TH X RT X PD SB LT X TH X RT X PD 0.0 0.0 GREEN 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.i) 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _________________ ___________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS E8 L 0.461 0.380 19.3 C 27.4 D TR 0.845 0.380 28.5 D WB L 0.716 0.390 29.6 D 22.3 C. TR 0.722 0.380 21.5 C. MD L 0.793 0.580 20.5 C 16.0 C TR 0.758 0.580 14.4 F. SB L 0.683 0.580 16.1 C 10.1 � T 0.278 0.5B0 8.0 B R 0.378 0.580 8.7 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 18,7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.814 LOB = C 205 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE l STREET/US 1 AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST .K&S DATE...-.. .... 07-07-1991 TIME...,......PM PEAK COMMENT TACKORDUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB BB : EB NB NB SE' LT 0 186 99 C : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.(-' TH D 941 2635 1879 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.;:) RT 0 0 0 226 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 17'0 RR 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.S ; 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _________________________ _____________ ---------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 96.C� PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X X TH TH x X RT RT X X PD PD WE LT X SB LT % TH X TH X RT y RT X PD PD GREEN 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10,0 41.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APp. LOS WB LT 0.952 0.365 33.9 D 33.9 D NB L 0.342 0.594 7.9 B 30.0 D T 1.015 0.594 30.7 D SB TR 0.819 0.448 18.9 C 18.9 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 26.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.991 LDS = �D 1905 HCM� SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION,.N 1 STREET/N MIAMI AVE�QE AREA TYPE OTHER UATE...' 07-07-1991 Tl�,`!EAM PEAK CFIMMENT. CKGROUND TR�7'jF,FI7. VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB WB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 195 0 0 : LT 12.0 LT 12,0 LT 12.0 � 12.0 TH 0 832 0 799 : T 12.0 T 12,0 T 12.0 TR 12.� RT 0 O 0 3C)4 \2.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 Q 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 T l2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.3 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 W� O.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINBG CYCLE LENGTH = �0.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-!� EB LT NB LT TH TH RT RT PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT � PD FD GREEN 3B.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 44.0 0.0 YELLOW 4,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 �.O 0.O LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C G/c DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WLT 0.782 0.444 18.1 C 16.1 C SB TR. 0.736 0.511 14.3 B 14.� B INTERSECTION: Delay = 16.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.758 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT IWTERSECTION..N 1 BTREET/N MZAMI AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST.......K&S DATE,....^.,..O7-07-1991 TIME ......... ..PM PEAK COMMENT.......BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 311 0 0 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12'0 TH 0 716 0 846 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.O RT ; 0 0 256 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.(--, : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0,90 50 N 20,5 3 NB 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH -I PH-2 PH-4 PH PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH RT RT PD PD WE LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 47.0 0.; 0.0 0.9 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 8.O LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE 8RP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB LT 0.755 0.470 18.0 C 1B.0 C SB TR 0.763 0.490 17.3 C 17.3 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.6 (sec/veh) V/C = ().759 LOS = C 1995 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION.NW 1 STREET/NW 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE OTHER ANALYST......,K&S DATE ........ 07-07-17�91 TI ME. .PM PEAK C'OMMENTBACK GROUND TRAFFIC '------------------------- VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB' NB SB : EB WB LT 0 54 128 0 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT TH O 760 797 417 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T RT 0 213 0 295 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR12.0 12.0 12.0 12.3 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1�.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKB BUBES PHF PBDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB O.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 �.O0 � 0 0 0.90 5V N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LEINGTH PH-2 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 pH-2 P!-i-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X "T X RT X PD PD GREEN 27.D GREEN 65.0 YELLOW 4.0 YELLOW 4.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY AFP. LJS WB LTR 0.843 0.290 2B.6 D 2B.6 � NB LT 0.669 0.L-70 8.3 SB TR 0.7970 12.0 B 12.8 B INTERSECTION: �elay = 17.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.809 1OS = C. 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION.'I-395 ON RAMP/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST- ..... KiS DATE . 07-07-1991 TIME... ..PM PEAK COMMENT, TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SS LT 0 0 B30 0 : 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 12.0 TH 0 763 1507 0 : 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RT 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.O RR 0 ; 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.8 12.0 12.0 12.1-,", 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.3 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 W 11.3 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIBNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 FH-3 FH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WE LT X SD LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PD GREEN 39.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 7.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOB APP. DELAY APP. LDS WB T 1.160 0.410 115.3 F 111.3 F R 0.055 0.410 13.5 B NB L 1.139 0.550 97.6 F 46.4 E T 0.897 0.550 19.5 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 62.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.14B LOS = F 19B5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ****************************************************************+*******++ INTERSECTION.~I-395 OFF RAMP/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST .K&S DATE 07-07-1991 TIME AM PEAK COMMENT TOTAL TRAFFIC __________________________ _ ________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB N9 SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 O 0 316 ; T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 TH 849 0 0 2259 : 12^0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 972 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.� RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 P4 EB LT y NB LT TH Y TH RT X. RT PD PD WB LT Sri LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.(:, LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APp. L03 EB T 1.222 0.433 * * * * SE. LT 1.152 0.522 94.1 F 94.1 F INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.184 LOS = * 1905 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..I-395 OFF RAMP/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....CBD ANALYST- ... .K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1?91 TTME. .........PM PEAR COMMENT ...... .7'OTAL TRAFFIC VOQUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SF : EB WB N8 SB LT 0 S 0 266 , T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.O TH 872 0 0 2309 : 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 631 0 0 0 : 12,0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 : 12.0 lZ.O 12.0 12.(:, 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.6 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ______________________ ___________ ________ __ -------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES FHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%> YIN Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 6 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 Ws 0.00 2.00 N 0 D 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 BE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 5.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X TM RT X RT PD PD WE LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BREEN 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 YELLOW .4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 e.0 ____________ _____________ --------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP, V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY AFP. LDS EB T 1.949 0.310 * * * * SD LT 1.057 0.630 45.0 E 45.0 E INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C - 1.351 LOB = * 105 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTIONI-395 OFF RAMP/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE OTHER ANALYST K&S DATE 07-O7-1992 TIME PM PEAK COMMENT TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB NB NB SB : EB WB NB 05 LT 0 O 0 266 : T 12.0 T 12,0 LT 12.1) LT 12,0 TH 872 0 0 2309 : 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 631 O 0 0 1 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.� RR 0 3 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.3 12.� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKB BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%> Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11,5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT � PD PD DREEN 30,O 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 60.6 0.0 0.0 0.;:1 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.!:,. LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 1.699 0.320 * * * * sB LT 0.937 0.640 16.7 C 16.7 C INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.191 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ***************************************************e********************** INTERSECTION -NE 6 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE OTHER ANALYST K&S DATE 07-07-1991 TIME PM PEAK COMMENT TOTAL TRAFFIC _______________________________ ____________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB Sp, : EB WE? SED LT 0 0 196 0 : L 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.'} TH 0 475 2141 0 : LT 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.� RT 0 681 0 0 : R 12.0 R 12,0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.} : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12../ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT, ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Wb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N ; 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.� PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SE LT TH Y TH RT X RT PD PT) GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 54.0 0.0 0 0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 �.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LDS WR TR 0.342 0.455 14.8 B 55'2 2 R 1.099 0.455 84.8 F NB LT 1.065 0.509 55.0 E 55,0 E INTERSECTION: Delay = 55.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.081 LOS = E 19B5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NW 6 STREET/NW 3 AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST.......KIS DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME.. ...^PM PEAK COMMENT ....... TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB. WB NB E F. LT 0 0 89 0 : L 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12^0 LT 12.{ T'H 0 750 2043 0 : LT 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12,0 T 12.0 RT 0 406 O V : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 () 0 0 12.0 12.0 12'8 12.':, 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.1) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKB BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE K> (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0-90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 7 ________________________________________ _______ ----------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SD LT TH, ""K TH RT X RT PD PD GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 57.0 0.0 0.0 0.� YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4,0 0.0 0.0 0.(:� _ ---------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOB APP. DELAY APF, L&S WB TR 0.664 0.370 20.9 C 23.1 C R 0.805 0.370 27.3 D NB LT 0.832 0.590 14.0 B 14.0 � ------------ _---------- __________________________ -_-___________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.1 (sec/veh) VyC = 0.222 LOC = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/US 1 AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... TOTAL TRAFFIC _____________________________________________ ___ _______________ VOL0MES GEOMETRY EB WE NB SB : EB WE NB 2B LT 305 O 0 772 ; L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.� TH 1207 D 2614 1781 ; L 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.{/ RT 1Q3 0 689 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12'� RR 0 i:-� 0 0 : TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 : 12.0 12,0 12.0 T 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.C! __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKB BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N NM Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20^5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11-5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.� PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 P1+-4 PH-1 PH-2 F'H-3 FH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PE. WB LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT ] PD PD BREEN 35.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 GREEN 22.0 21.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.{) 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 -------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP, DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.324 0.411 13.7 B 79.Q F TR 1.138 0.411 93.3 F NB TR 1.432 0.544 * * * * SE L 5.686 0.256 * * * * T 1.593 0.256 * * INTERSECTION: Delay = * <sec/veh) V/C = 1.571 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION' SUMMARY REPORT INTERBECTION. .NE 5 STREET/US 1 AREA TYPE .... OTHER ��TE 07-07-1991 TINE. .....,PM PEAI:�- COMMENT..,..'T�T0L TRAFFIC �OLWME� : GEOMETRY P.R. WB NB SB EB WB MB S� LT 851 0 0 181 : L l2.0 T 12.0 T 12'0 L 12.0 TH �B3 g 3165 185� : L 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.� RT 319 0 138 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T RR TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 � 12.0 12.0 12.0 � 12.0 12.O ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) <%) Y/N Nm ill] b Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB D.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.O0 Z.00 N 0 (% S.90 �O N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.O0 N 0 O 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIONAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH �H-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 �H-2 PH-3 PH-� EB LT X. NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SB LT % �H TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN SREEN 16.0 42.0 YELLOW 4.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOB APP. DELAY APP. LOS EID L 1.161 0.32O 116.2 F 81.3 F TR 0.568 0.320 22.0 C MB TR 1.1B7 0.640 115.4 F 115.4 F SB L 1.476 O.440 * * * * T ().964 0.440 29.2 D INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.481 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NU 5 STREET/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE . 07-07-1991 TIME ........ -AM PEAK COMMENT ....... TOTAL TRAFFIC ____-_-__-_____-_______-______-__________________________-_-___________ VOLUMES : 3E01ETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WE NB 5B LT 0 O 0 663 : T 22.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 1Z.� TH 1158 0 0 1912 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.3 PT 547 O 0 0 1 TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.X� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12'S : 12.0 12.0 12.0 �2.0 � 12.t:? 12.0 12.0 12.� ________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMEN7 FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%> Y/N Wm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 ND 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB u.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X HP LT TH X TH RT X HT PD pD WE LT BB LT X. TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 50.0 010 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 _____________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRF. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB TR 1.084 0.37B 65.3 F 65.3 F EB LT 1.067 0,578 48.9 E 48,9 E, --------------------------------------------- I NTERSECTION: Delay = 55.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.074 LOS = E 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NE 5 STREET/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ... ....K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... TOTAL TRAFFIC __________________________________________-______-_-_______________' VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 0 O 318 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.� TH 1077 0 0 2257 : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.� RT 628 0 0 0 : TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.S F'R 12.0 12.0 12.0 1�.�' : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.} ---------------- I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE Hy ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/W Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,70 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.3 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PD PD WE LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 3B4O 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 54.0 0.0 0 0 0,� YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 o'S __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LDB APP. DELAY APP. LOE EB TR 1.031 0.400 46.7 E 46.7 E SB LT 1.074 0.560 54.6 E 54.6 E _______________________________________ ---------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 51.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.056 LOS = E 105 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION AREA TYPE ANALYST DATE. TIME.......^. COMMENT...... ED LT 277 TH 1428 RT 0 EB WB ND SB EB LT TH RT PD WB LT TH pi- p D .NE 5 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE OTHER .K&S 07-07-1991 .AM PEAK .TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES W2' NB 0 0 0 0 O 1737 600 0 GRADE HV (%) (%> 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 : SB : EB 0 : LT 12.0 0 : T 12.0 0 : T 12.0 0 : 12.0 : 12.0 � 12.0 T TR R WE., 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _ GEOMETRY NB T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 L S� 12.9 12.0 T 12.6 T 12.� T i2,0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb YIN min T N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PR-4 GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------- EB NE LANE GRP. LT TR V/C 0.903 1.087 0.0 0.0 NB LT TH RT PD LT TH RT PD GREEN YELLOW SB X X X 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0'0 LEVEL OF SERVICE G/C DELAY LOS 0.444 21.6 C 0.511 60.6 F APP. DELAY 21.6 60.6 INTERSECTION: Delay = 44.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.001 APP. LOS C F LOS=E 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NE 5 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST. ...... K&S DATE 07-07-1991 TIME.,... . PM PEAK COMMENT ....... TOTAL TRAFFIC ___________________________________ ____________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB !{B sB LT 728 0 0 0 : LT 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12'G TH 977 0 1769 O : T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 0 0 568 0 T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PB}S PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%> <%> Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 N8 0.00 2.00 N 0 Cl 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 _________________________ _ _ _ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-11 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X P12 PD WR LT BB LT TH TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 42.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 010 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.S LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS ED L 1.374 0.400 * * * * T 0.80O 0.400 24.5 C NB TR 0.984 0.564 27.8 D 27.8 D INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.146 LBS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/N MIAMI AVENUE AREA TYPE... -OTHER ANALYST ....... k&G DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME, ..... .....AN. PEAK COMMENT,.. ...TOTAL TRAFFIC Y3LUMES � GEOMETRY EB Wp' NB Sp ; EB wB NB ED LT 0 0 0 305 / T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12&; TH 1411 0 0 1184 ' T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12'� RT 294 0 0 0 : TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.� R. FR 0 0 0 0 : 12.(:., 12.0 12.0 ;.2.0 1Z.0 12.0 12.0 12.S : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADO PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/W min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 O 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.O0 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.8O N 0 0 0,90 50 N 11.5 3 ______________________________________________________ -------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 F�-1 PH-2 PH-3 FI-1-4 PH-1 F1f-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT % NB LT TH J TH RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT X 'TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.� YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0,0 0.0 0.S _ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C B/C DELAY LOS APP. D E L A Y APP. LO"-: EB TR 0.900 0.444 21.4 C 21.4 c SB LT 0.691 0.511 13.2 B 13.2 � INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.788 LOS = C 19G5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/N MIAMI AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE'..,.'. 07-07-1991 TIME...... .... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB N B LT 0 O 0 610 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT l2.� 7H 1523 0 0 1727 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T RT 182 0 0 0 : 7R 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR D 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12 0 � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.1-, ________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PBDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 8 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 PH-2 P1+-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PB-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 42.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS E1? TR 0.990 0.400 39.1 D 38,1 D SB LT 0.993 0.564 29.6 D 29.6 D ------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 33.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.992 LOS = Z� 1985 HCM: SI6NALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTIONNW 3 STREET/NW 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE3THER ANALYST,,K&S DATE 07-07-1991 TIME PM PEA]--:! COMMENT TOTAL TRAFFIC _______-________________ _ YOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB t EB HB NB S� LT 65 104 260 164 a L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.� TH 421 761 509 276 : TR 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.� RT 95 B9 197 318 : 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 R RR O 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 i2 � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12'� __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PE}. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm mb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 20^5 3 NB 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 11.5 3 BB 0.00 2.00 N 0 D 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 ______________________________ _ _______________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-! Pw-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X T8 X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X BB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT x PD PD GREEN 36.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 56.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 Q.S LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY App. wS EB L 0,504 0.380 20.4 C 29.3 -D TR 0.871 0.380 30.4 D WB L 0.796 0.380 39.0 D 23.7 [ TR 0.744 0.390 22.0 C MD L 0.908 0.580 34.3 D 20.6 � TR 0.792 0.580 15.5 C Sp L 0.803 0.580 25.0 C 12.1 � T 3.297 0,580 B.i B. R 0.402 0.580 B.9 B ___________________ INTERSECTION: Delav = -------------------------- 21.1 Hec/veh> V/C = 0.893 LOS = � 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NE 1 STREET/US l AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST- .... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PH PEAK COMMENT ....... TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 187 100 0 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT I2'0 T 12.0 TH 0 850 2662 1908 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12'0 RT O 0 0 229 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.O RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12'O : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� _____________-__-________________________-___-_____________-__--__________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) K) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11,5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.� PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 1-1,-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X x TH TH x X RT RT X X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH y TH x RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 4.0 48.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.3 0.S LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR, LOS NB LT 0,922 0,380 30.4 D 30.4 D NB L 0.536 0.580 12.9 B 42.4 E T 1.049 0.580 43.4 E SB TR 0.745 0.500 15.8 C 15.8 � _________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: DeIay = 30.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.999 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZE] INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPDRT INTERSECTION. .N 1 STREET/N MJA1I AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER TIM2.,....,...AM PEAK CDMMENT.......TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES : GEO��TRY ED WB NB SB : EB WB NB �B LT 0 197 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT �2.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 0 07B : .0 T 12.0 � 84lT 1217, TR 12'0 �T 0 0 0 411 12.0 T RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.D T 12.0 12.3 12.0 12.0 1Z.0 12.; 12.0 12.0 12.0 l2.� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE H� ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. 8UT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.� 3 WB Q.00 2.O0 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 BB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1, PH-2 P11-7 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH RT RT PD PD NB LT LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 49.0 YELLDW 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. IV, /C 8/C DELAY LCiS APP. DELAY APP. LDS WB LT 0.903 0.389 26.0 D 26.O D 8B TR 0.897 O.567 17.4 C 17.4 C IHTERSECTION: Delay = 21.0 (sec/veh> V/C = 0.9OO LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************++ INTERSECTION..N 1 STREET/N MIAMI AVENUE AREA TYPE- ... OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK TRAFFIC _________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY 2B WB NB SE EB WE: NB Sb LT 0 314 0 0 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.� TH 0 723 0 1143 T 12.5 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 0 0 0 346 : 12.(:1 12.0 T 12.0 i2.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 1�.D 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12'0 12.0 12.0 12^� ----------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Wb Y/N min T EB 0.80 2.0 6 M 0 O 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 ____________________________-______ EP LT TH RT pD WB `LT TH RT IT [I GREEN 37'0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT Thi RT PD � BB LT X % TH X X RT % PD 0.0 0.0 GREEN 55.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP, LW''. WB LT 0.919 0.390 29.6 D 29.6 D 5B TR 0.886 0.570 18.0 C 18.0 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 22.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.899 LOS = C 198� HQM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..NW 1 STREET7NW AVENUE AREA TYPE.....O7HER DATE.. »7-07-1991 .7O7AL IC _ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY �B WB NB SB LT 0 �4 134 0 : LT 12.0 LT l2.0 LT ��,� TH 0 7�8 832 444 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.� 12.9 RT 0 215 0 314 : TR 12.3 TR 12.0 12.0 RR 12.� : 12.� �2.0 12.O 12.0 12.0 12.� EB WB �B �DJUSTMENT FACTOR'-D GRADE H: �DJ PKG BUSES PHF Pr--DS F,Et), BUT. ARR. PE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 7 0.00 �.�0 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 1.1.5 3 0.90 5O N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINSS SETTINBS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 P�-3 E B LT WB LT X TH TH X RT RT X Pi�- PD WB LT y SB LT X TH H X RT X RT X PD PD BREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 55.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 YELLOW 4.0 �.0 0.� 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APF,. �OS NB LTR 0.633 A.39-0 19.3 C 19.3 C .4B LT 0.934 0.570 24.6 C 24.6 � SB T� 0.�94 0.570 3B.6 D 3B.6 D INTER5EC7I8N: Delay = 2! S..1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.847 1905 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..I-395 ON RAMP/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TvPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... O7-07-1991 TIME .......... PM PEAK E3MMENT....... WITH IMPROVEMENTS VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB LT 0 B 830 0 : 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 TH 0 763 1507 0 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 31 0 0 � 12.0 12.0 T 12.8 �2.0 12.3 12.6 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE BV ADJ PKG BUSES FHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYRE Y/N 111m Nb Y/W min T EB 0.00 2-00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 14.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 M 14,3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 11.3 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 o 0.90 50 N 11,3 3 ___-________________________-_______________-__________________-____-_____ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 17.-1+-1 PH-2 PH-3 PI-1-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 EB LT NB LT X TH 01 X RT RT X p E, PD WB LT SB LT TH TH RT X RT PD PD GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BREEN 54.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVB- OF SERVICE LANE BRP, V/C S/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY WE TR 0.707 0.370 21.7 C 21.7 NB L. 1.062 0.590 5B.9 E 30.0 T 0.836 0.590 14.8 B --------------------------------------- ---------- APP. L02 C � INTERSECTION: Delay = 27.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.925 LOS = D 1985 HCN: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..I-395 OFF RAMP/NE 2 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&S DATE .......... 07-07-1991 TIME.'........AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WITH !MFROVEMENTS ________________________________________________ V0LUMES : GEDMETRY EB WB Np SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 0 0 316 : T 12.0 T 12,0 LT 12.0 LT 12 � TH 849 0 0 2259 : T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 972 0 0 0 , 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T lZ`� RR 0 0 O 0 ^ 12.0 12,0 12.0 1Z_� � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12'0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUBTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 5.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.� PH-1 1"'H-2 PH-3 FH-4 PH PH-2 PH-3 PH-� EB LT NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT � VW TH X RT RT X PE! PC, GREEN 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 53.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 ________________ __________ ______________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRF. V/C G/c DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APF. LDS EB T O.B63 0,Z22 26.7 D 26.7 E SB LT 0.950 0.633 16.9 C 16.9 C __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 19.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.920 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTIONI-395 OFF RAMP/NE Z AVENUE AREA TYPE OTHER ANALYST K&5 DATE,' 07-07-1991 TIME PM PEAK COMMENT.' WITH IMPROVEMENTS ____________________________________________________________________ YOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB NB N2 SB : EB wB HB EB LT 0 0 0 266 : T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT I2.� TH 272 0 0 2309 : T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12'(.'! RT 631 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T RR S 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.�:? 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE H: ADJ PKB BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T ES 8.00 2.00 M 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 � WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5o N 5.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N O 0 0.90 50 N 5.5 3 SIBNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH P1.1-1 PH-2 PH-3 OH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH X TH RT X RT Fri PD WE LT SB LT X TH TH X RT RT X PD PD SREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0.0 0.0 0./) YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOB APP. DELAY APR. LOE EB T 0.892 0.320 31.1 D 31.1 D SB LT (D.937 0.640 16.7 C 16.7 - -___________-__________________________-__-___-_________-_________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.2 <sec/veh) V/C - 0.922 LOB = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED 'INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 11 TERRACE/US 1 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST.,.....K&G DATF. ...07-07-1991 TIME.... ...... PM PEAK CDMMENT...'...WITH IMPROVEMENTS VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB B, LT 7 0 0 10 : L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 TH 0 O 2179 2543 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 T RT 1O0 () 1124 0 : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.C, RR 12.0 12.0 T 1�.� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12 0 - ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE Hy ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 W 0 0 0.9O 50 N 20.5 3 NB A. 2.00 N 0 O 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 BB 0.0D 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SIDNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 P1+-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD IN F' LT SB LT X. �H TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 69.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LANE BRP. V/C G/c DELAY LOB APP. DELAY APP, LOS EB L 1.01B 0.362 63.2 F 59.1 E LT 1.01B 0.362 63.2 F R 0.203 0.362 19.4 C NB T 0.826 0.603 15.2 c 15.2 C GD L 0.179 0,603 7.9 B 23.2 C T 0.963 0.603 23.2 c" INTERSECTION: Delay = 26.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.�64 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTIUN..NE 5 STREET/U'm-, 1 AREA TYPE.....OTHE� DAT�.......... 07-07-1991 TlHE..........PM PEAK WITH IMP ROYEME 1, F� ------------------- -------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES � GELI METH� E� W� NB SB B WB �12- �B LT 851 81 L 1�.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 1�.� TH 183 0 3165 1B56 : L 12.0 TR 12-0 T i2.0 RT 3l9 0 13B 0 : T 12.0 � 12.0 �R 0 0 0 0 TR 12,0 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE /)DJ PKG B1. ES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. "'YF'E Y/N Nn' Nb Y/N min T �D 0.00 2.00 N 0 � O.90 50 N 20.5 3 NE? N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB �.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 50 N 11.5 3 �B 0.D0 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE i�;.� PH-1 PH-2 F� H-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 EB LT X NB LT X T� X TH X RT RT X PD BJ �� LT S8 LT l X TH TH Y. X RT P. X � PD PjD GREEI'l 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 4.0 51.0 YELLON 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.O YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/c G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. !.-CS EE L 1.061 0.3�-0 66.3 F E TR 0.519 0.350 20.0 c hB TR 1.1075 54.9 E 54.9 E S� L 0.632 0.610 12,8 � 10.7 B T 0.696 0.61O 10.5 B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -NE 5 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE .... .OTHER ANALYST ....... K&B DATE .......... O7-07-1991 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WITH lMPROYEMEHTS ------------------------------------ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB N F, NE, S' LT 277 0 0 0 : L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.� TH 1428 0 1737 0 ; LT 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L RT 0 (:,� 600 0 : T 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.3 T 12.3 : 12.0 12,0 12.0 T 12.� 12.0 12.0 12.0 ________________________-______________________-_____-________-__-__ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (Z> YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WG 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 O 0.90 50 M 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SlGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-Z PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT � pD PD WE LT SB LT TH TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 1B.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 44.0 0.0 YELLOW 4,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 ____________________ --------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. y/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LD2 EB L 0.470 0.44& 13.8 B 45.9 E LT 1.052 0.444 51.8 E NB TR 1.087 0.311 60,6 F 60.6 F INTERSECTION: Delay = 54.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.071 LOS = E 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERGECTION..NE 5 STREET/NE 1 AVENUE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... K&9 DATE 07-07-1991 TIENE.....'...,PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WITH IMPROVEMENTS __________________________________________________________________________ �)OLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB s ZZ: LT 728 0 0 0 : L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 977 0 1769 0 : LT 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 L i2.0 RIT 0 O 56B 0 : T 12,0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 ? 12.�' �R, 8 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T i�.� 1Z.0 12.0 12.0 T l�.0 1Z.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 N P 0.08 2.0("1 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.5 3 _ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH1-3 PH-4 PA-1 PH-2 Er. LT X MB LT X TH � TH X RT % RT X Pic. PD WB LT SB LT T� TH RT RT p'-1) pD GREEN 42.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 60.0 0'0 Y�LL3W 3 0.0 0.0 0.8 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _______________________________________________ ----------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE BRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LO� E P L 1.042 0.400 66.1 F 46.4 E �T 0.969 0.400 37,5 D NB TR 0.984 0.364 27.8 D 27.E, D __________________ ______________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 35.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.008 LOS = D QUESTION 22 - AIR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AIR QUALITY STUDY: SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST RE -DEVELOPMENT KEITH AND SCHNARS PROJECT NO. 13654 The air quality study for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Re - Development Project requires both the monitoring of Carbon Monoxide (CO) levels at a severe intersection in the project area, and the macroscale modeling of the entire project area to predict the worst case impact the project will have on the ambient CO levels. The intersection to be monitored was selected by representatives of the Florida Department of Environmental Resources (FDER), the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC), the Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM) with representatives of the City of Miami and Keith and Schnars, P.A. present. The intersection (NE 1st Ave./NE 6th Street) was monitored for a continuous four week period, and a report based on the results of that monitoring event was submitted_to the SFRPC with copies sent to FDER, DERM, and the City of Miami. This document is currently under review. Concurrently with the monitoring action, an Air Quality Study Design was developed, formalized and submitted to the SFRPC, FDER, and DERM. Verbal communications with the agencies have promulgated adherence to this design. Air Quality Modeling is to commence on the completion and acceptance of the finalized traffic questions for the Developmental Regional Impact. L; KEl T H ELn SCHNARS,, P.A. r Pl C. N 5..E h S - P t A N n a n F” S '.' R v r v O n QUESTION 22 - AIR A. Document the steps which will be taken to contain fugitive dust during site preparation and construction of the project. If site preparation includes demolition activities, provide a copy of any notice of demolition sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) as required by the National Emission Standards for Asbestos, 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. B. Specify structural or operational measures that will be implemented by the development to minimize air quality impacts (e.g., road widening and other traffic flow improvements on existing roadways, etc.). Any roadway improvements identified here should be consistent with those utilized in Question 21, Transportation. C. Complete Table 22-1 for all substantially impacted intersections within the study area, as defined in Map J, and all parking facilities associated with the project. Using the guidance supplied or approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, determine if detailed air quality modeling for carbon monoxide (CO) is to be completed for any of the facilities listed in the table. D. If detailed modeling is required, estimate the worst case one -hour and eight -hour CO concentrations expected for each phase through buildout for comparison with state and federal ambient air quality standards. Utilize methodology supplied or approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation for making such estimates. Submit all air quality modeling input and output data along with associated calculations to support the modeling and explain any deviations from guidance. Provide drawings of site geometry and coordinate information for each area modeled. Show the location of the sources and receptor sites. Modeling assumptions should consider federal, state, and local government programmed link and intersection improvements with respect to project phasing. Any roadway improvements utilized in the model should be consistent with those used in Question 21, Transportation. Provide verification of any assumptions in the modeling which consider such programmed improvements. It is recommended that air quality analyses be completed concurrently and in conjunction with the traffic analyses for the project. E. If initial detailed modeling shows projected exceedance(s) of ambient air quality standards, identify appropriate mitigation measures and provide assurances that appropriate mitigation measures will be employed so as to maintain compliance with air quality standards. Submit further modeling demonstrating the adequacy of such measures. TABLE 22-1 PHASE: (One table for each phase) YEAR OF PHASE COMPLETION: PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC MAXIMUM HOURLY SERVICE VOL.(2) Source Type(1) Projected Existing Projected Existing (1) Specify source type as either intersection, surface parking area, or parking deck. For each intersection provide an approach volume for each link. For each parking facility provide the total (incoming and outgoing) volume. (2) These should be compatible with maximum service volumes utilized in Question 21, Transportation KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS -PLANNERS -SURVEYORS April 29, 1991 Ms. Leila Lukes-McQuade Environmental Planner South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 RE: Condition 2 from The Increment 1 Development Order Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project DRI Keith and Schnars Project No. 13654.1E Dear Ms. McQuade: Condition 2 from the Increment I Development Order (DO) for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project of Regional Impact requires the collection of carbon monoxide concentration data for the project. The collection of air quality monitored data is based on the following requirements: a. CO monitoring data shall be provided for the project area at one location. b. The monitoring shall consist of four (4) weeks of data collection during the winter months, November 15 through March 15. c. The monitoring shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy within that location for the first development under the presumptive threshold for Developments of Regional Impact pursuant to Rule 27F, F.A.C., within that sub -area; or prior to March 15, 1991, whichever comes first. d. The monitor will be located at the presumed worst case intersection for the development area. The location will be selected jointly by the City, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), Dade County Resource Management (DERM), and Council staff. Perform the monitoring required by (a.) and (b.) above as prescribed by the policies and regulations governing DERM and submit final air quality monitor- ing reports to FDER, DERM, and the Council staff within 60 days of the completion of the monitoring. 1115 Northeast 4th Avenue • Fort Lauderdale. FL 33304 • (305) 763-3843 • Fax (305) 760-7121 Ms. Leisa Lukes-McQuade AIR QUALITY MONITORING STUDY/P13654.1B April 29, 1991 - Page 2 Air Quality Monitor Station On December 4, 1990, representatives of Keith and Schnars, P.A. met with representatives of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC), the FDER, DERM, and the City of Miami. The purpose of the meeting was to tour the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project area to select the most appropriate worst case intersection for the air quality monitoring. The selection of the intersection to be monitored was based on traffic counts at the intersections, predominant wind direction historically throughout the winter months, and accessibility for optimum monitor placement. The intersection selected was Northeast 1st Avenue and Northeast 6th Street (see Figure 1). The monitor station was situated in a second floor apartment on the southeast corner of the intersection. The CO sampling tube was strategically placed outside a westward window at approximately three (3) meters above the eastern NE 1st Avenue sidewalk. Teflon tubing [outer diameter (OD) one -quarter inch (1/4")] was used for sampling with an aluminum funnel attached to the end to protect the monitor equipment from possible intake of rainfall. The monitoring began January 24, 1991 and was completed March 13, 1991. CO concentrations were continuously monitored for a period of four (4) weeks. From the data, the worst case one -hour and eight -hour concentrations were identified (see Attachment 1). The equipment and methodology used by Keith and Schnars to conduct air quality (CO) monitoring are as follows: a. A Thermo Electron (TECO) Model 48 Carbon Monoxide Analyzer was used to measure the CO at the selected monitoring station. The TECO measured hourly, daily and weekly CO concentrations. The TECO-48 is a •multi -range analyzer with an overall range of (0) to one thousand (1,000) parts per million (ppm). The principle of measurement is based on the EPA Federal Reference Method for CO (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix C) and has been certified on an equivalent method (RFCA-0981-054) within a 0-50 ppm range. b. The TECO was initially calibrated (multipoint) using three (3) EPA Protocol gases. A daily equipment inspection and weekly calibration verification was Et a• KEITH ra:l SCHNARS N.W. 12 ST. BIBBEISOMBRI M.M.2ST. a t•OINCIANA VILLAO i112 .TOWN NOM N.W.19 IT. I oNDOII) s MIAMI ARENA V NTOW N ST STTIO POLICE NO. OpVERNMMEM CENTER STATION AIR QUALITY MONITOR LAB LOCATION ATE PLAZA STATI O a ; N.E. 7 ST. M.L. 2 ST. L EDCOY STATION M.E. 4 SS. IMST STREET STATION E. PLAGLER S k.l. 1i STt BICENTENNIAL PARK 1 4 4 i4 IIAYSIOE 4 4 COLLIDE $ 4ATION 1i niI BAYFRONT PARK SOUTHWEST OVERTO N/ PARK WEST D. R. I. A.Q. LAB LOCATION - - FIGURE Keith and Schnars,P.A. :inn 1 INVIROMMENTAL DEPARTMENT Ms. Leisa Lukes-McQuade AIR QUALITY MONITORING STUDY/P13654.1B April 29, 1991 - Page 3 conducted (see Attachment 2). The close out of the monitoring also included a multipoint calibration. c. A Soltec Model 1241 Pen Strip Chart Recorder was used to collect a continuous monitoring record for the study. The strip chart recordings were reduced by hand for purposes of data referencing and valid- ation. d. In support to the Soltec Strip Chart Recorder, CO Concentrations, and interior(equipment)temperature (on an hourly basis) was recorded by a Rustrak Ranger Data Logging System connected to the TECO. e. Electronically collected data was reduced by utiliz- ing the Rustrak Ranger Database software package (Pronto). Monitoring/Results Monitoring was conducted as planned with the weekly multipoint calibration exhibiting little deviation (see Attachment 2) at- tributing to the accuracy of the analytical equipment (TECO). As demonstrated by the monitored CO concentrations (Attachment 1), the general trend is for an increase in CO during the afternoon. This was the expected result as the intersection traffic increases weekday afternoons. The monitored data exhibits the impact from the afternoon traffic increase, but the levels of CO concentrations clearly do not approach the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Although there were CO peak concentrations of 50 ppm (recorded Day 3), the highest one hour concentration was 6.7 ppm (recorded Day 6 between 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.). The instantaneous peak readings can be attributed to the proximity of one specific vehicle's exhaust to the sample hose; and as it is a spot con- centration and is quickly dispersed, it is not considered harmful. The peak one -hour concentration of 6.7 ppm is 19 percent of the NAAQS of 35 ppm and therefore has little detrimental impact to the public health. The NAAQS defines the eight -hour concentration as values that are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The NAAQS for an eight -hour period is 9 ppm.The worst eight -hour average concentration measured was 3.9 ppm (recorded Day 24) equating to 43 percent of the State and Federally accepted (permit- ted) concentration. KE)TH ,,n6 SCHNARS Ms. Leisa Lukes-McQuade AIR QUALITY MONITORING STUDY/P13654.1B April 29, 1991 - Page 4 Conclusion The air quality CO concentration monitoring was conducted at one of the highest congested intersection in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area at the busiest time of year. The monitoring was conducted yielding accurate results representa- tive of that which was expected. The highest concentrations recorded under these conditions suggest that the CO levels at the intersection of NE 1st Avenue and NE 6th Street will not approach any NAAQS for any period of exposure. As this intersection is representative of the worst case intersection in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Area, the monitored data suggests there are no levels of CO concentration great enough to cause concern anywhere in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project area. Sincerely, KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers -Planners -Surveyors Robert C. Summers, Environmental Geologist RCS/MMJ:skd Enclosures fi.EITH nn.I SCHNARS KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers--Planners-Surveyors PI"( Mary M� Johns, P.G. Direct• af( Environmental Scienc-s Depa'rtment ATTACHMENT 1 r• "4 KEITH and SCHNARS., P.A. : ORE DAY 1 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG TIME iN1 FlECPJ I --0UP HnLIRq : c:0 r_ppri) z.pprn) ' TEMP 1, 2 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 714 23 24 29 7 _2 1 9 1.1 1 .1 1 .9 .6 15 1.1 1.0 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.4 0 4 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.1 13.4 24 0 17.7 94.3 17; 8.0 8.0 25.3 9.0 25_7 12.7 95.7 18.9 25.2 20.8 25.0 16.1 24 9 3.7 24.9 6.9 24 9 18.9 24.7 5.1 24.7 1.5 24.6 11.2 24.6 1.1 ;24.5 1 8 -94 4 0.9 24.4 94.4 6.5 94.5 6.2 24.6 6_9 i 94_9 16.8 16.8 25.8 8-HOUR AVG co tr.iprn 1.9 1.7 1 15 1.5 1.4 1.2 1 .0 0 9 0.7 0.6 05 c)..5 0.8 1.0 11 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 2 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR TIME IN ; 1-HOUR GO EQUIP AVG Hz URS GO ;ppm; Prtm) . TEMP GO (ppm) 1t 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 46 4.0 1.7 1.6 2.0 1 7 3.5 y7 F8 1.6 1 24 4 23.1 10.5 1?_5 1: 12.6 12.6 4.7 6.0 7.6 .2.8 2.9 3.4 4.6 •? 4 1 .6 7 9 4.4 4.9 9.6 32.1 22 3 19.1 17.9 20.1 20.2 .20.2 20_0 198 19,9 19.9 13.8 19.9 19.7 19.8 19.7 196 19,6 19.5 19.5 19.4 195 19.5 19.6 6 '7 3 ?.0 1.7 y t.4 1.2 1 0 0 '? 0 9 0.9 09 na v.9 1.1 11 1 .5 1 C 1.7 1 .8 2.1 2.4 2.3 * 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 3 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 6- HOUR TIME IN 1-HOUR CO EQUIP AVG ' HOURS C:0 :, p!n° ':'=pm) TEMP CO (riper) 1* 39 205 19.9 2 5.3 32.3 19.E 3 4.6 40.6 19.5 4 4.0 . 40.6 19.6 5 3.1 21.6 19.5 6 1.0 : 21 ,6 19.4 = 1_0 5.9 19.4 5 2.5 ' 17.1 . 19.4 : 9 1 3: 16.6 1 7 10 1.1 ;04 19.4 11 1 ? 7.7 194 1.? 0.9 9.9 19 4 13 0.5 1.4 19.3 14 o.7 1 5.5 19.1 15 1.7 : 5 5 19.4 16 1.3 `. 5.7 19.4 17 : 13: 76 19'2 18 0.4 : 15. 19.? 19 2.0 ` 50.2 19.4 20 3.0 15.8 19.4 '1 2.7 41.9 : 19.0 22 1.0 19.5 18.2 03 2.7 19.5 18.3 ?4 3.2 15.4 18.2 28 3.1 2.E 2.3 1 .9 1 .5 1.2 11 ?.6 29 3.0 3.1 3.0 "' 3:00 - 4:00 PM Ind 0 0:t7 - o0:c 91 6'L ,L( ,9- @'L G [ z 1 « I- C: i- EL 0 [ ([ . g'( Z( 90 90 9 0 6-0 60 0L L �G[ 8� z Z. Ga 4'0 ( aE E z 1 LE 6.0 { 6 t 8.0 ' GI 80 Z! 90 9L Q0 §! »0 �( e9 , 3� 8.0 aE 8.0 0L t ; 6 z0- • e e0 . 9 6'[ $3 0E *L gd:taYi g»Y ; dines BnOH-8 9At( (®dCr: (ad$) co } BAEH-I. 1Y3d gA« SdACD NI3 G: 03SdY.12 b AVG DAY 5 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG TIME !N 1-F401.UR GO EQUtP HOURS R 0.0 i n p rr3 i (m) TEMP 4 5 [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1a 15 17 18 19 90 21 J3 ? 4 7 1 .0 07< 1 .8 0.5 0.6 0 7 0.5 0> 0.5 0.5 0.5 . 4 n_ry 0.7 u.5 1 4 1.4 94.3 24.3 9_0 9.0 41 4.1 1.7 1 .7 1 .4 1.9 4.1 4.1 3.5 531 .4 13.1 94.1 23.8 '33 v .J. 28.0 27.6 97.6 18 18.4 19,4 13.4 18.5 1 8.6 ,3.6 18.5 18 4 18 5 18 18.5 1R.5 18.5 19.6 185 18.5 18.6 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.3 18.4 8-HOUR AVG' 00 ;p, m 08 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 111 1) .5 0 5 l: 6 rrJ 9 3 1.7 .1 1 2.1 2 6 .9 4 2.4 7 � 2.0 1.6 1.9 1.9 0.7 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 6 ELAPSED AVG TINIE IN 1-HOUR HoHpq00,:pr_tr, • PEAKAVE 8-HOUR Go EQUIP AVG TEMP GOpm) 1 4 ,I ,... t ,., 19 8 2 2.7 ! 19.9 2 6.7 43.1 4 0.9 43 1 5 3.9 ; 4:2; 1 6 2.9 24.6 7 0.5 24.6 9 02 7.7 9 1 1 7 7 1 0 0 .7 4 .7 1 1 0 3 2.0 12 0.4 2.0 13 0.6 3.7 14 0.5 1.'2 15 1.7 14.9 15 -0.2 14.9 17 --).-, 14 9 18 1.6 19 1.4 . 42.8 20 5.6 ; 48.0 CAr., 22 1.4 ! 16.3 ......., 4.0 24 4.5 T 26.5 184 18.5 18.5 18.3 12.3 1. 18.3 18.3 184 12.4 12.4 19.4 12.4 iq 16,5 19.2 184 18.3 16 4 18.4 13.1 18.3 16.4 19.3 24 2 1 1 3 1 2 O S O 7 0.6 3 7 0.9 O 9 1 6 1.9 7 1 2 4 '7: 0 2 9 3 0 3.0 3.00 - 4:00 PM DAY 7 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR 11.. y -HOUR EQUP TIME 1N 3 -1 :OUR i.'O EQU P AVG ?`-}OUR_ Go ,:pp3T) :`i rn) TEMP G( f I'ppm 1 2.1 4 3.5 6 i 9 7 4.J D "f 9 7 0 10 2_0 1 1 •7 12 1 .1 1 3 1.4 1? 0.6 1 3 0.5 16 0.4 17 0 4 18 0.5 19 20 3.0 21 4.4 77 ! 4 8 �3 24 2.1 . 19 8 20.5 31.1 2✓.4 29.1 205 99.1 20.5 15.0 70.5 17 6 20,7 3 2 20.6 4q.9 20.4 186 203 33.5 20.2 48? 90.1 13.3 20.2 160 20.0 2.1 20.1 1 -0 90.0 4.2 20 1 3.8 20.0 5.6 2c,2. 7.0 20.3 10.'3 20.4 10.3 20.4 9.7 20.2 12.6 20.1 0 2.7 1.8 1 .4 1.9 1 .0 09 1 .1 1 .5 2.0 2.4 2.6 '2.6 7 0 1 .8 1 .3 2.1 2.J 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 8 ELAPSED AVG PEAK TIME N 1-HOUR CC) HouRS CO (ppm) r,ppm) 14 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 19 1.3 14 15' -iC I 17 19 20 19 23 24 1.4 7.9 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.5 1 .9 ! 1.9 1 3 1.4 1 1 0.8 0 I3 0.5 0 3 : 0.6 : 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.0 5.3 215 22 8 •?9_8 .7.1 91 1 8.4 11.5 6 1 7.2 5 5 7 5 7.5 4.9 3 8 7 6 11 5 7.9 2.7 7 is 9.4 7.0 AVG 8-HOUR EQUIP AVG TEMP CO ,:opm', • 20.2 20.2 • 20.1 20.2 20 3 20.2 90.3 20 20.3 20 2 ?os 20 3 20 3 :111 V 20.3 20.3 20.3 20.6 90.7 20_4 20.2 1 6 1.5 1 .4 1 3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0 8 0 B 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 A 7 . 0 6 0 1.0 1 .1 1 .9 1 1.5 77`,-00 - 4:00 PM DAY 9 ELAPSED AVG TIME 1N 1-HOUR Hilt IRS i_:%1 rn) PEAK AV;..1 8-HOUR GO EQUIP AVG 1nnm1 'EMP GO nnm) 4 J 6 9 10 11 1� 13 14 15 16 17 2 0 J.J .?4 1 .8 1 .7 19 a0 ..J 1.8 2 0 1 .8 1 8 1.7 1 7 1.6 1.5 1 1 11 1 5 2.31 1.0 9.8 5.6 6.3 7.6 5.7 3.7 3.R 3.8 W .5 7 5 .74 �9 2.1 ? .0 r▪ j 4 3 6.9 4.5 50.5 r_ Q !k 5.3 4.7 '29.1 22.8 21.3 •70 4 ,U.1 19.9 19.7 13.. 19.6 19.6 19.6 19P 0.0 19 9 1S.4 .9 19.6 196 19.6 1 9.5 1 9.5 19.6 1 9 7 1 .9 1 .9 1.8 17 1.7 1 1 .4 1 1 .4 i 6 1.5 1 .7 1 1 .9 i 7 1 4 I.5 1 .5 1 7 1 .5 15 1 _5 1 7 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 10 ELAPSED AVG TMEiN 1-HOUR PEAK AVG CO EQUIP - TEMP 1". 9 8 7 9 _::,:, 5.5 .." ..., 2.0 13.9 4• .-) 7 13.9 5 3.6 132 . 6 1 .9 9.1 7 1.8 "3.0 8 1.9 2.0 9 1 3 2 6 10 1.8 : ,? o 11 1 a -, 0 19 1 .6 1 .9 13 0.9 1 ,3 1 4 0 . 7.,' 1 .7 15 0_6 9 5., 16 0.5 : 2.2 17 ," 0 5 6 15 ,:;,-..) 5.6 19 90 1.5 i 6.0 22.5 : .f..". i ..r . X. 9? 0.8 ! 19.8 3 9.6 14.3 T, 90 1 20 0 19 19.6 19.6 19 6 19. 19.6 19 6 19 6 19 5 19.7 1g 3 19.8 19.7 5 1 9 5 15.8 19 P, 19 3 19.4 19 4 19.5 23 9.1 '? 0 1 7 1 5 1 3 1 .2 I .0 1 .3 1 3 1 .6 1 6 19 1 2 1 5 7 3 1 .4 15 1 6 1.7 1 .6 1 .9 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 11 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 3-HOUR TIME IN i 1-HOUR Co EQUIP AVG HOURS } GO ƒPm! JP®% ' TEMP co (pPm) 1 2.921.5 2 } 3.3 322 2 21 12.1 4 1.9 : 1 5_9 5 26 15.7. 2.5 6.0 7 1.6 6.0 9 2.2 ' 6.5 9 11: 11 10 is ; 2.0 11 0 e 1.9 19 1.0 5.5 13 1.6. 7.4 14 25' Ea 15 2.5 4.6 16 ' 1.9 : 4.1 17 18, 211' 19 2.0 16.9 19 5} E,. 20 2.2; 22.9 21 1.615.1' 22 1.3 ; 99.6 23 . 3.21 45.41 24 1.7I 8 5' 20 3 2e5 205 1 9.9 19.5 1 9.4 19.5 19.6 199 19.9 20 2 20.3 2 0.2 2«5 20.3. 19.8 19 5 19.4 195� 19.4 19.5 . 19.4 19.6} 19.5 22 1.9 1 .7 1.6 1 .5 �.5 1 ,6 1,5 16 1.3 22 2.1 2.; 2.0 2.0 l8 2a� l9 1 .9 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 -3a0-4:00PM DAY 12 ELAPSED AVG T;ME :N 1-HOUR Hi:1u R S (r r ri) 1 5 7 2.8 3 1.4 4 1.5 1.4 6 0.9 7 0.8 8 .0 i 9 0 3 10 0 4 11 0 3 1 7 0.3 1 3 0.4 1 (1.4 15 0.3 16 0. 1 7 1 •� 18 9.0 19 1.4 70 1. 21 1.1 0.9 �w 1.0 24 0.9 PEAK AVG 8-HOU=R C:O EC., UiP AVG Ipprn} TEMP GO ;,-prn) 11 9 25.2 15.9 15.9 9 5.6 11.7 4 2 1 -I M 1 1.9 40 6.4 4.9 4.5 4.4 9.6 2.8 .-, 195 19.7 19.9 1919 6 19.7 19.6 19.6 196 19 6 1 9 6 1 9.6 1 9 7 19.7 19 198 19.8 198 19.8 19.3 19.9 19.9 1 0 v.8 0 7 0.6 0.5 r)4 ,.4 0.5 0 7 0.8 0 9 t.'J 1 1 1 2 7 1 .1 8 0.8 .3 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 R3:00-400PM DAY 13 ELAPSED AVG TIME IN 1-HOUR ; Hou R GO :spp rn 2 4 5 6 3 9 10 11 1.2 13 14 15' 16 17 1.3 19 :›0 21 9* 23 24 1 0 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.3 0 7 0 5 0 6 0.3 f,.% 4 0.6 Q 0.5 0 9 1 .7 ( 1 .1 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.5 PEAK AVG ; EQUIP (ppm) • TEMP 3 4 3.7 7.7 7.7 5.2 4 1 2.9 3.0 0 1.5 4.3 6 1 2. r-‘ R 1 6 4 4.2 8.1 6.1 6.1 9,9 ! 2.4 2.8 i 20.0 20.0 7D1 20.0 -?0,0 0 20 0 : 20 2 20.2 20 0 20.3 20 2 .?.0 3 20.2 20 2 20.0 19.8 19.7 19.6 19.5 8-HOUR AVG GO (ppm) O 9 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 O 5 0.5 O 6 0.8 9 1.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 9 O 7 0 6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 -; 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 14 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR TIME IN 1-HOUR ; GO EQUIP AVG HOt iRq ,111pry-1) innr1-0 TEMP ! CO .pprYi) 0.7 ; 2 0.6 0.9 4 0.8 5 0.6 6 OE 0.4 0.4 9 04 10 0.4 11 0,"3 12 04 12 0.4 14 0.4 15 0.4 16 04 17 0 8 18 .0.7 19 ,0.9 20 0.8 '71 0.9 9 9 0.9 0.8 ; 9 4 1.1 9 3 2.3 1.6 2.1 1.2 1.5 11 1.3 0.9 23 1.4 0 7 1.6 1.1 8 7 2.3 2.5 3.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 6.6 20 8 :20.7 21.1 21 5 21.6 71 20 21.5 20 '3 19 7 19.1 12.6 18 2 17.7 172 17 0 16.9 16,6 16.7 16.9 17.0 17.2 17.6 O 6 0.6 0.4 0.4 O 4 0.4 0.4 0 4 O 5 O 5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0 8 -0.9 0 2 0.8 • 0.8 0.7 0.7 : 0.6 0.6 * 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 15 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR T1MEN 1 -HOUR GO EQUIP F AVG i-40u FR s ;c.o (ppm) TEMP GO cpprn) • 8 4 2 9.3 23.0 4 17.6 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 99 •?-,3 24 1_3 2.1 2.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.1 0 0.7 0.6 0.6 06 0.6 0.6 0.8 1 2 1.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 1:2 0.6 1.4 .7)4 4.4 4.4 1 9 3.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 10 1.3 1.9 •-) 2.9 5.7 13.5 9.6 12.8 7.9 30.2 19 1 1 2 18.9 1.0 19.1 0.9 19.4 0.8 19.0 0.8 17.6 0.7 17.3 . U.7 17.0 '7 168 16.6 0.9 15.4 0.9 15.2 1.0 16.0 1.1 15.9 1.1 15.9 1.1 1.0 15 8 0 8 16_2 ! 1.0 16.9 10 17.6 1.1 113.2 : 1.0 18.5 !1.1 19.1 1.1 19.7 1.2 * 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 16 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR TIME IN 1 ...HC UR i GO EQUIP AVG Hot )RS ; f:s=) tppm; g t rtFit TEMP Cc) t„ _nt 1' 4 6 7 9 9 10 11 1=2 13 14 it) 16 17 18 19 90 GI 24 09- 1.3 1.1 0.6 1.5 0.6 0.7 0.5 05' 0.6 0 0.4 3.4 0.4 0 ..J 0.8 09. 0.7 1 .1 20 1.8 1.1 1.81 13.9 15.2 2 5.1 21.6 46 _.5 1.4 1 4 1.4 ' 7 0.9 2.0 2.0 �.0 8 7 33.9 16. 8.6 17.1 15.7 15.7 14.5 20 21.3 9 20.6 2C.4 20.5 20_5 20.6 '?0 7 20.8 7f 9 21.0 21.1 0.9 20.B rt 20.8 20.7 20.7 08 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0 7 0.8 0 9 1 .1 1.2 1 1.4 ti 3 1 0 I 1 .0 1 .0 0.8 0.6 0.7 * 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 17 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR MElN 1-HOUR : co EQUIP AVG HOURS no(pp®) 1 $Pm) ; TEMP ' COƒ(m): f ]- 4.4407� 2 : 0.9 19.6 S lei 15.0. 4 2.6! 26.3 5 ; 1.4 : 19,4 ' 6 1.2 9.5 7 0.7 11.1 9 V. 9.0 9 . 05 36 10 0.7 3,3 11 . 0.5 2 8 !2 0.40.8 la : '5 3.0 14 O.S1.5 15 0.5 2.2 16 0.7 7.6 17 10' 45 15 1.0 4.5 10 !a 56 20 1.8 472 2 ; 1.5 S.9 22 ' 1.7 10.3 23 ; 4.3 ; 2 8.4 20.9 20.9 gs9} 20.7 Z«7 2 0.7 20.7 20.7 20 7 20.7 20 7 '20.7 20.8 208 20.8 20.9 20 . 2G§ a Q '0.9 70,9 21.0 21.1 l .] 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 o$ 07 0.9 1 0 1.2 1 .6 1 1.4 1.3 l2 l.s 12 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.9 -2:00-4:00PM DAY 18 ELAPSED AVG 2MEIN 1-HOUR 1-4DURq ,ƒpm) 4� 22 J - 4.1 4 2.1 1.1 6 l.9 7 0.8 S %Z 9 04 10 . 0.4 11 0.4 1 2 0.4 13 . 0.4 14 as 15 0.5 16 0.5 17 16 13 1.7 19 2.a 2 0 1.5 21 1.4 22 1.8 2 S , 3.6 24 ' 1.7 PEAK AVG 8-HOUR GO ' EQU!P ; AVG ,pm) ' TEMP . GO ;rpm. 7.7 17.3 442, 10.1 9.9 9.9: 6.1, a.! ; 202.6 e 1.2 1.9 4.9 4.4 R0 156� 15.6 151 9.4 11.6 1 2.5 50.0 28.5. 215 21 .6 71.5 21.5 21.7 21 .2 21 .2 21..7 2 21.2 2, 2 a1 2 21.1 . a 21.2 2l.1 . .1 21.2 21 .1 21.3 21 .4 71.4 21.4 21.5 14. 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6. 08 ,.0 1 1 1.2 1.4 1 l.9 1 .7 15. 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 1 .4 1.« 1.3 -200-¢00PM DAY 19 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR TPA E 11'4 ; 1-HOUR CO EQU P : AVG HOURS co (pp) ƒPr} / TEMP Qo (ppm)� 1* 2 ; 1.6 .1 7 4 ' 3.5 5 6 1.4 7 1.9 8 1.0 9 12 10 0.7 11 04 le 0.4 13 3.3 14 0.4 10 0.6 ] s 1.2 17 2 .3 18 : 1.5 19 20 20 21 2.3 22 2.5 23 ' 4 24 3.5 9.7 14.4 199 350' 15.3 10.4 26.6 5.4 29 3.3 , 2.0 05 09 4.4 9.9 13 8 10.7 13.1 91.9� 21.2 13.7 18.5 30.2 21.6 91.7 21.7 21.5 71.4 91.4 21.4 21 3 21 4 21.3 2-.3 21.3 21 3 21 2 91.3 21.3 21 2 21 .4 91.5 91.5 91.5 91.6 91 .6 91.6 1.9 1.5 , 1.1 ' 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 09 1 .1 14 1 .7 1 .9 s2 24 2.2 20 77.,7 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.8 * 3700 - 4:00 PM DAY 20 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR TIME !N ` 1-HOUR ; GO EQUIP AVG' HOURS , CO iE?pn7.9 - ft:, rn) TEMP C., t -. !?'i; 1' 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 11 19 13 14 1E5 16 17 18 iG 30 21 2.4 12 1.1 11 1.1 0.9 1 .1 1.3 1 3 1 0B 0.7 0.9 0,7 0.7 1 .0 10 1 .2 1 5 2.4 0.6 1.5 1 .1 3.0 8.0 3.9 5.6 4.3 4 0 55 4.5 4 . 6 7. 0 1r ... 10.0 6.0 6._ 114 37.7 30.2 39.0 91 .5 21.6 21.5 21.6 31 5 )1 7 21 6 71 .7 ?1 7 21.7 21.5 )1 7 21 .. ?1 .7 21 . 21 6 21 6 21 6 7i r 91,5 21 .5 91.4 21 5 91.4 1. 1,1 1.1 1 .1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0 9 ..0 1 1 .1 3.? 1 1 .5 1 4 1 3 1.9 11 1 .1 1.1 1 .1 0.9 1 .0 3:00 - 4-00 PM DAY 21 ELAPSED AVG PEAK .AVG TIME IN 1-HOUR G EQUIP i-OU tR 1 { 1 nPt (ppm) TEMP 1 ` 0.3 2 1.8 1.0 4 1.7 5 0.7 A 0.9 7 0.8 3 1.4 9 14 10 1.3 11 1 0 1 2 1.0 13 1.1 14 09 15 0.Es 15 1.5 17 18 5.9 19 8 20 1 3 21 1.4 99 24 2. C1 3.9 ' ?_4 ' 16.5 13.5 111 18.9 42 4.2 4 0 3.`i i5 1 .5 1.4 1 .9 9.4 18.9 16.0 16.0 '.+ 11.4 21.0 15.9 21.5 21.5 21.4 21.5 )1.4 21.5 21.5 1 5 _21 31 5 21 .6 21 .6 i 11 J7.5 21.5 21 4 21 .5 _^.' 1 4 :21 .4 21 .5 21 4 21.4 21.4 8-HOUR AVG CO ; 1listr1 * 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 22 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-HOUR THVIE IN 1-HOUR GO EQUIP . AVG : HOURS ; r'w.rr TEMP ) 9 2 ,.9 ,.) 4 1.5 5 1.4 6 1.2 7 1.5 2 1.7 9 1 3 10 1.3 11 1.2 12 1.0 '13 cLa 14 0.7 15 0.6 16 0.5 17 0 5 13 0.5 19 0.4 20 0.4 21 0.6 22 23 1.1 24 1.3 14 6 14.6 7.9 10.2 4 .7 11 8 9.5 5 8 4.0 3.5 2; .6 1.8 1.6 17 4.5 1 .0 A A . 1.4 2.7 7 21 5 21 6 21 5 21.5 21 5 21 6 21.7 21 5 21.4 •-)1 21.4 21.5 21 .6 21.9 22 22.5 22,5 22.0 22.1 22.0 22.1 16 1.4 1 .4 1 3 1.3 1.2 0.91.1 0.9 0 7 E 0.6 5 0 5 0.6 0.7 0 6 0.9 1 C. 12 • 12 1 1.4 1.4 2:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 23 ; ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG TIME IN ! 1-HOUR ; CO EQUIP HOJRS r:0 (ppm) ppm) TEMP 14 1 6 2 2.7 3 2.6 4 3.1 5 28 6 1,9 7 3.0 9 10 11 19 1 3 14 16 17 18 20 19 21 24 4.7 3.9 1.4 1.4 0.7 0.9 10 0.7 0 5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 1,3 2.5 3 5 1 GB 19.2 25.6 12.3 20.8 30 4 23.9 22.0 9.1 0 111 2.5 2.4 11 1.5 1 5 1.8 1.8 3.4 5.3 6.3 21.9 21.3 21.0 203 91 0 21 .1 20.9 20 9 20 ;'3 2.7. 9 20.8 ')0.8 20.8 20 9 29 8 20 .3 90.9 20.8 20.7 21.0 21.0 21.0 8 - HOUR AVG CO 3.1 ;3..0 25 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.3 0 9 1,-; 7 0.6 0.7 O.R 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.6 * 3:00 - 4:00 PM DAY 24 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 8-i-#OUR ! !ME 11J 1 -HOUR Go EijiUIP AV( HOURS C:0 ,ipprri) • irprmm) TEMP _0 1pnm1 2.0 .9 1.9 3 2.9 4 2.2 5 .1 4 07 3.2 9 51 10 3.5 11 1.6 12 0.5 1 7 14 1.0 15 1.0 16 0.8 17 0.5 18 0.5 19 05 20 0.6 21 0.8 72 2.2 '23 1.2 24 1.5 18 9 18.9 7 i 19.0 44.E 50.0 50 0 19.4 15 1 3 5.2 4n 12.3 10.7 21 0 20.9 -''!1 21 .1 21 .1 21.0 21.0 21 .0 210 21.0 9 2G.9 21.0 1( 21 0 220.9 2Q 9 21 .0 :10' 21.0 21.0 21 1 '21 .1 21.2 2.9 2.9 2 6 1 .8 1 a 0.8 0 . 0.7 J.. ...8 Q 9 10 r. a O a 1.1 1 .3 1 .6 1.9 2 -2.8 3.4 3700 - 4:00 PM DAY 25 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG TitM1E IN , 1-HOUR CC) EQUIP Ftt;.'IUPE . CO (n im) :ppm; TEMP 1* 3.4 4.7 4 3.4 1 ... 6 2.0 7 0.6 8 1.2 9 07 10 0.5 11 1.3 122.0 13 . .9 14 18 15 1.7 16 1.7 17 1 6 18 1.6 19 1.5 20 1.4 21 1.4 .79 1.2 ?3 1.3 24 1 .2 173 50.2 2a 6 28.6 16.2 6,1 28 3.8 8 8 3.8 3.8 2_8 3.B 3.8 3.8 3.8 8-HOUR AVG CO ±:7prn) 1 20.4 . 20.9 20.9 1.9 0 1.3 20-M, 1 .3 70.8 1.4 20.7 1.5 '2 7 1 6 20.7 1 .. 17 2?0.6 1 .7 20,6 16 20I.5 1 .5 20.5 1 5 20.5 1 .4 05 1_. 20.4 1.6 704 1.6 20.4 2.0 20.3 20.3 i '2.1 20.3 '2.0 20.3 : ?.0 *3:00-4:00PM DAY '26 : ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 9--HsOUR- TME ; 1-F-tOUR co : EQ:QUiP AVG . RO€USS I,a o) ! p n) ;nr}€i�1 TEi. r1P O:pprrti i I' .- i i' I' 1.2 2 1.1 1.1 4 1.0 5 1.0 6 0.9 7 0.9 8 0.9 9 03 10 0.8 11 0. E 0.! 12 0,7 14 0.7 15 0 6 16 0.6 17 06 18 0.6 19 0.6 ?0 0.5 21 0.5 0.5 ? 0.5 24 0.5 8 3.8 3.9 •.1.8 3.8 [] .J . 8 3 E1 2.R 3 3 3.8 1 3 W 3 3 3 2 R 3.6 3 8 3.8 2.9 3.8 3.8 3 .8 3.8 3.8 -2 0 .� 20.2 sn.2 20 1 20.1 20.1 20.1 0 1 70.0 20.0 20.0 20,0 19.9 19.9 19 9 19.9 1 9 9 1 9.9 19.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 0 9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.3 0., 0.7 07 0) 0.6 6 0.6 w 5 0 6 0.5 0 4 3.5 0.5 0.6 . 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 3:00 - 4.00 PM DAY 27 ELAPSED AVG PEAK 1 TIME IN 1-HOUR : Go ,UPS Q9T ) ƒp®) AVG 8-HOUR EQUIP AVG TEMP CO ƒƒm)� l- 0.5 38 198 2 0.528 19.8 2 C5' se 198 4 0.5 : '3.8 19 8 5 Q.5 3.a 19.7 6 0.5 DB1s7 Z Cs 3e19.7 5 03 »S :9,7 9 05 38 197 10 0.5 26 157 11 0 5 S.a 19,7 12 0.5 DB 13.7 12 0.5 3.8 19.7 14 ' 06 2.8 19.7 15 0.6 3.8 19.7 15 06 3s 1.9.7 17 06 38 136 18 0.6 3.8 19.6 19 e.2 39 19.6 20 : CZ 3.8. 19.6 21 ) 0.7 y6j 19.6 9 0.7; ye; ] q.A 23 } 0.8 . 3.8 ; 19.6 24 ! 0.8; y8. 49.6 O 5 0.5 O 5 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 o.1 06 0.6 O 6 0.6 0.3 0.! A£ O 5 05 C5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 3-00 - 4:00 PM DAY 28 ELAPSED AVG PEAK AVG 6-'HOUR : T;MM'sE IN 1 -HOUR CO E1.,'ufP H OURS i-:0 ;from»; , TEMP .'�.prn) 1. 1 4 5 6 9 9 10 11 17 13 14 1!5 16 17 18 .9 20 21 ?3 '74 10. 1.0 14' 1 .3 >>. 1 .5 1 .1 1 7 i r 0 6 0.4 0. 9 0.6 0.6 15 4.1 4.7 1 .9 1.4 1.4 1 1.9 1.0 40 9 9.0 7.1 14.9 93 4.6 4.1 45 9 7 1 1 .6 0.7 8.2 8.3 7 b._ ? 11.6 1:1 n .0 A.6 7.9 7.9 06 1' 20.E 1 .7 20.9 1 7 20.8. 16 90.7 1.0 20.8 09 1 , 9 21 3 0 3 214 12 91 9 1 21.9 1.8 71.9 1.9 21.9 ?_0 ? 1 _8 2.1 ? 1 .8 2.1 91 .7 C' 21.9 1 .6 91.5 1 •� 9.5 1.1 ':=1 +' 1 3 �.17 ?1 .6 1 .4 21.6 1.4 916 1.5 3:00 - 4:00 PM KEITH and SCHNARS., P.A. _ •• ,•• „, - t. , - , ATTACHMENT 2 TECO MODEL 49 ACCURACY CALCULATIONS ON -GO I NG MONITORING MULTI -POINT CALIBRATIONS Measured Concentration (PPm) Known Concentration (PPm) Percent Error 6.57 8.67 1.13 17.43 17.28 0.87 7. 39.80 40 -0.50 ON- GO I NC MON I TO.R I N6 MULTI -POINT CALIBRATIONS Measured Ccncer: yrat:.on (Wpm) K,nrnwn Concentration torn) Percent Error 3.97 8.9 0.79 17.43 17.27 0.93 :R.80 40 -0.50 (Known Concentration - Measured Concentration) ;! Error = x 100 ( Known Concentration TECO MODEL 48 ACCURACY CALCULATIONS ❑N-GOING MONITORING MULTI -POINT CALIBRATIONS Measured Known Concentration Concentration (PPm) (ppm) 8.97 17.43 39.80 8.87 17.3 40.3 Percent Error ON -GOING MONITORING MULTI -POINT CALIBRATIONS Measured Concentration (Porn) 8.97 17.43 39.80 Known Concentration ( oPr ) 8.89 17.33 39.9 Percent Error (Known Concentration - Measured Concentration) is Error = x 100 ( Known Concentration TECO MODEL 4e ACCURACY CALCULATIONS PRE -MONITORING MULTI --POINT CALIBRATIONS Measured Concentration (PPm) 8.97 17.43 39.60 Known Concentration (ppm) 8.9 17.33 40.1 Percent Error ON -GOING MONITORING MULTI -POINT CALIBRATIONS Measured Known Concentration Concentration (GPm) (PPr) 0.79 0.58 -0.75 Percent Error 8.97 8.81 1.8_ 17.43 17.24 1.10 39.60 40 --0 . 50 (Known Concentration - Measured Concentration) Error = x 100 ( Known Concentration POST --MONITORING MULTI -POINT CALIBRATIONS Measured Known Concentration Concentration (PPm) (PPm) 8.97 17.43 39.80 8.9 17.28 40.1 Percent Error 0.79 0.87 -0.75 (Known Concentration - Measured Concentration) V. Error = x 100 Known Concentration SENT BY : DEV/IjOUS I NG-ASSI~'I' MG T ; 6- 8-05 ; 14 : 47 ; CITY OF MIAMI-, ;# 2/11 6 19.5s DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES region and requires additional regional infrastructure; (9) To the extent that net new development places demands upon regional public facil. ities and services, those demands should be, satisfied by developments actually creating the demands; (10), The limiting factors determining the amount of potential development in the project area are the effects of net new development on transportation facilities and air quality. 11) The downtown DRT and the downtown mas- ter plan are of benefit to all new develop- nient in the project area and expenses in- curred by the city in connection with the preparation and adoption el* the downtown DM/master plan and for the enforcement of the development orders should be reim- bursed to the city by the new development benefiting therefrom. (12) The total amount of the downtown devel- opment supplemental fee is determined by the cost of the four (4) components of the fee: 1) transportation mitigation fee; 2) air quality fee; 3) downtown D11I/master plan recovery fee; and 4) administration fee. The most appropriate measure to distribute the proportionate share of the cost of the trans- portation mitigation fee and the air qual- ity fee shall be the average rate of genera tion of PM peak hour external motor vehi- cle trips for net new development in each land use category, as utilized in the CADA. DRIlmaster plan recovery fees and admin. ietration fees are most appropriately allo- cated to all new development at an equal rate for all land use categories. (13) The downtown development supplemental fee is being imposed on all ,new develop- went in order to pay the oasts of certain, development order related requirements, ae'. described above. Since the demand for such development order related requiketnenta,are,. uniquely created by the' rieardavelopment, the downtown 'development supplementary fee is equitable and doer notqmpose an, unfair burden on such developinent is in Sul*. No. 30 513-62 the best interest of the city and its real. dents. (Ord. No. 10461, f 1, 7-14.88) Secs. 13456--13-60. Reserved. ARTICLE III. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/ PARE WEST DEVELOPMENT SUPPLEMENTAL FEE* Sec. 13-61. Short title. This article shall be known and cited as the "City of Miami Southeast Overtown/Park West Development Supplemental Fee Ordinance," (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7-21-BB) Sec. 13.62. Intent.. This article is intended to impose the Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fee as a supplemental fee on a new development within the Southeast Overtown/Park West project area, utilizing the defined terms in section 13.66, below, The Southeast Overtown/Park West devel- opment supplemental fee comprises four (4) com- ponents including a transportation mitigation fee, an air quality fee, a DRI/master plan recovery fee and an administration fee. The Southeast Overtown/ Park West development supplemental fee is pay able prior to the time of building permit issuance or upon approval of certain permits, as provided for herein, in an amount based upon the appro• priate units of land use, in order to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development in the project area as described in exhibit 1, since the demand for the mitigation is uniquely attributable to such new development and net new development on an area wide basis. This article shall be uniformly applicable to all new development and net new development within the project area. However, certain fees applicable "Editor's note —Ord, No. t0466 enacted provisions relat- ing tothe i5cutheast Overtown/Park West development sup. plemental foe, numbered as 13.B.I--13.E-13. For purpeeee of claiSiiicatitm, the editor has inc)nded thin material as art. III - of-k:. 23, numbering it 13-61-13-73, The exhibits referred to in this article ere not reproduced in the Code but'ean be found on file in the ofi",tx of the city clerk. 80- SENT BY:DEV/HOUSING-ASSET MGMT; 6- 8-95 ; 14:48 : CITY OF MIAMI-f ;# 3/11 § 13.62 MIAMI CODE § 13-63 to affordable housing, as defined herein, shall be borne by the City of Miami through the South- east Overtown/Park West community redevelopment project, as provided in section 13-66, below. This fee shall not be uniformly applicable to any activ- ity which is not classified as new development or net new development es defined herein or which has, on the effective date of the Southeast Overtown/ Park West DR1 development orders, a valid build- ing permit or currently effective DRI development order., (Ord. No, 10468, § 1, 7-21-88) See. 13-63. Findings. The city commission of Miami, Florida (herein- after "commission") hereby finds and declares that: (1) The real property which is the subject of this article, the project area, is legally described in exhibit 1; (2) The city has filed a CADA with the city, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs; (3) The purpose of the CADA is to identify and assess regional impacts and to obtain approval for total allowable development in accordance with the general guidelines set forth in the development orders and the CADA. The city has recognized the project area as a single area of high intensity development and fo- cused on the impacts that the total allowable development within the project area will have on Iand, water, transportation, environmen- tal, community services, energy and other resources and systems of regional significance. The CADA seeks a single state DR1 review process for overall phased development of the project area rather than requiring each indi- vidual DRI scale development within the project area to be reviewed separately other than for a major use special permit and as a means of accommodating the impacts of the non-DRI scale cumulative growth on the project area; (4) Development within the project area is ex• pocted to continue to be accomplished over an extended period of time by a variety of devel- opers, which may include the city. These de- velopers may respond to market demand and technologies that: can only be estimated in Supp. No. 3D the CADA. The CADA and the DO are in- tended to serve as flexible guides for planned development of the project area rather than a precise blueprint for its development. There- fore, pursuant to Florida Statutes, section 380.06(b) (1967), the CADA seeks master de- velopment approval for three incrennents of development over a period of approximately twenty (20) years and specific development approval for increment I, which is the first phase of development projected for a period of approximately six (6) years. Subsequent in- cremental applications may need to be ad- justed to more nearly serve the evolution of market demand and technologies; (8) The project area contains a total of approxi- mately two hundred nine (209) acres. The CADA has propoeed a quantity of net new development within the project area for the land uses and phases defined herein as total allowable development; (6) A comprehensive assessment of the probable impacts that will be generated by the total allowable development has been conducted by various city departments, as reflected in the CADA, and as reviewed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff; (7) The impacts found in the development order are consistent with the report and recommen- dations of the South Florida Regional Plan- ning Council, entitled "Development of Re- gional Impact Assessment for Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevel• opment Area," dated January 4, 1988; (8) Net new development imposes demands upon public facilities and services benefiting the region and requires additiorwi regional infra- structure; (9) To the extent that net new development places demands upon regional public facilities and services, those demands should be satisfied by developments actually creating the demands; (10) The limiting factors determining the amount of potential development in the project area are the effects of net new development on transportation facilities and air quality; 894 SENT I3Y: DEV/HODS I NG-ASSET MGMT; 6- 8-95 ; 14 :49 ; CITY OF MIAMI-, ;# 4/11 § 13-6'3 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (11) The Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI and the Southeast Overtown/Park West master plan are of benefit to all new development in the project area, and expanses incurred by the city in connection with, the preparation and adoption of the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRl/master plan and for the enforce- ment of the development orders should be reimbursed to the city by the new develop- ment benefiting therefrom; (12) The total amount of the Southeast Overtown/ Park West development supplemental fee is determined by the cost of the four (4) compo- nents of the fee: 1) transportation mitigation fee; 2) air quality fee; 3) Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRlimaster plan recovery fee; and 4) administrative fee. The most appropriate measure to distribute the proportionate share of the cost of the transportation mitigation fee and the air quality fee Hhall be the aver- age rate of generation of PM peak hour ex- ternal motor vehicle trips for net new devel- opment in each land use category, as utilized in the CADA. DRl/master plan recovery fees and administration fees are not appropriately allocated to all new development at an equal rate for all land use categories; (13) The Southeast Overtneen/Park West develop- ment supplemental fee is being imposed on all new development in order to pay the costs of certain development order related require- ments, as described above. Since the demand for such development order related require- ments are uniquely created by the new de- velopment, the Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplementary fee is equitable and does not impose on unfair burden on such development is in the best interest of the city and its residents; (14) The primary objectives of the Southeast Overtown/Park West community development plan are the removal of slum and blight and encouragement of affordable housing develop- ment; (15) The city commission, via Resolution No. 87-619, has found that a housing emergency exists within the city. This condition continues to Sup13. No. 30 895 fi 13.96 exist. Thus, the findings and conclusions of Resolution No. 87-619 are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. (Ord, No. 10465, § 1, 7-21-88) See. 13-64, Authority. The city commission is authorized to establish and adopt a Southeast Overtown/Park West de- velopment supplemental fee pursuant to the au- thority granted by the Florida Constitution, Arti. ' cle VII, sections 1(f), 1(g) and 2(b), the Municipal Home Rule Powers Act, Florida Statutes, chapter 166 (1985), the city Charter, the Local Govern- ment Comprehensive Planning and Land Devel- opment Regulation Act (Florida Statutes, section 163.3161, amended by Florida Statutes, section 163.3177 in 1986) and the Southeast Overtown/Park West development of regional impact development order issued February 11, 1988, by resolution num- bers 88-110 and 88-111. The provisions of thia article shall not be construed to limit the power of the city to adopt such article pursuant to any other source of authority nor to utilize any other methods or powers otherwise available for accomp- lishing lishing the purposes set forth herein, either in substitution of, or in conjunction with this article. (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7-21-88) Sec. 13-65_ Imposition of fee. No building permits or moor use special per- mits shall be issued for any new development as herein defined unless the applicant therefor has paid the Southeast Overtown/Park West develop- ment supplemental fee imposed by and calculated pursuant to this article or payment of such fee as been borne by the city. (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7-21-88) See. 13-66. Definitions. As used in this artiele, the following words and terms shall have the following meaning, unless another meaning is plainly intended ADA or application for development approval shall mean the original application for develop. meant approval for the Southeast Overtown/Park West community redevelopment project area filed by the city on February 6, 1987, pursuant to Flor- ida Statutes, section 380.0q (1987). SENT BY : DEV/IiOUS l N'G-ASSET MGD1T ; 8- 8-95 : 14 : 50 ; CITY OF MIAMI-* ;# 5/11 MfAMt CQ[)E 4 13.66 Administrative fees shall mean a fee charged to all new development to pay for the city's admin- istrative costs for enforcing the terms and condi- tions of the Southeast OvertownfPark West de- velopment orders, including but not limited to preparation of ordinances and procedures, review of permit applications, monitoring compliance with requirements, and enforcing violations; and which shall be a component of the Southeast Overtown/ lark West development supplemental fee. Affordable housing shall mean housing for fami- lies and individuals with incomes under one hun- dred twenty (120) percent of the medium [median) income in Dade County. The cost of such housing is calculated to represent thirty (30) percent of said individuals' and families' gross income, as defined by the United Slates Department of hous- ing and Urban Development. Air quality fees shall mean a fee charged to all net new development to pay for the city's costs for air quality monitoring, modeling and mitigation measures as required in the increment 1 devel- opment order for Southeast OvertownfPark West; and which shall be a component of the Southeast Overtown/Park Wet development supplemental fee. Applicant shall mean individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, associa- tion, two (2) or more persona acting as co -applicants, any county or state agency, any other legal enti- ty, or the authorized representative of any of the aforementioned, signing on application for a build- ing permit. Building permit shall mean any permit required for new construction and additions pursuant to Section 301 of the South Florida Building Code. CADA or consolidated application for develop- ment approval shall mean the revised ADA pre- pared pwwunnt to tho roquiromontc of section 380.06, Florida Statutes (1987). Certificate of occupancy shall mean a perma- nent or temporary and/or partial certificate of occupancy issued, pursuant to Section 307 of the South Florida Building Code City shall mean the City of Miami, Florida. Supp. Nu. 30 Class C special permit shall have the meaning given within city Ordinance No. 9500, as amend- ed, the zoning ordinance for the City of Miami. Commission shall mean the city cotniniseion of Miami, Florida. Comprehensive plan shall mean the city's plan for future development adopted by city Ordinance No, 10167, and as may be amended and updated from time to time. Convention use shall mean meeting rooms, ban- quet halls, exhibition halls, auditoriums, and their auxiliary spaces intended for use by conventions, seminars, exhibitions, and the like; which shall exceed the minimum standard for ancillary facil- ities within the definition of hotel use. DO or Southeast Ouertown/Park West develop. ment order shall mean the master and/or incre- ment I development orders for the Southeast Overtown/Park West community redevelopment area as a development of regional impact, issued by the city on February 11, 1988, by resolution numbers 88-110 and 88-111. DRI shall mean development of regional impact. DRIImaster plan recouery fee shall mean a fee charged to all new development to reimburse the city for costs incurred in the DELI/master plan study and future related studies in accordance with the CADA and the Southeast Overtown/Park West development orders; and which shall be a component of the Southeast OvertownfPark West development supplemental fee. DU or dwelling unit shall have the meaning given to "dwelling unit" in the zoning ordinance, Hotel use shall mean any facility containing more than one (1) "lodging unit," as defined in the zoning ordinance; and may include meeting and banquet facilities and convenience goods and services for hotel guests, provaaea tnat the total. of such ancillary facilities shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of proposed hotel. MUSP or major use special permit shall mean a special permit issued by the city commission pure scant to Ordinance No. 9500, the zoning ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended. 896 SENT BY:DEV/HQUSING-ASSET MGMT; 6- 8-95 ; 14:50 ; CITY OF D11A1111- ;# 6/11 § 13.6e DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES § 1a-66 Net new development shall mean any develop- ment which will result in a net increase, within any parcel of land, of residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facili- ties or gross square footage for office, government office, retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be removed by demolition of a building or structure may be cred- ited against the proposed new land uses for pur- poses of calculating the net increase, if the plan- ning director det rminee that there was a valid certificate of occupancy existing on the effective date of the development order for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is pro- posed, the planning director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by PM peak hour external motor vehicle trip generation. Any ac- tivity which has on the effective date of the de- velopment order a valid building permit or any currently effective development order shall not be included as net new development. The plan- ning director may exclude from net new devel- opment any small development under ten thou- sand (10,000) square feet in gross floor area, if he/she finds that such development would have no regional impact as measured by PM peak hour external motor vehicle trips. Net new development shall be considered to be a subset of "new devel. opment" as defined herein. New development shall mean any new construc- tion; or development which will result in an in- crease, within any parcel of land, of residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/ recreation facilities, or gross square footage for office, retai fservico, convention, wholesalerzndustrial, or institutional uses. The term "new development" as used herein shall not be deemed to include remodeling, rehabilitation, or other improvements to an existing structure, provided that there is not a change in land use and/or not on an in. crease of more than one thousand (1,000) square feet in grass floor area resulting therefrom. if a change of land use is proposed within an existing structure, the planning director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by PM peak hour external motor vehicle trip generation. Rupp. No. 00 Office use shall mean space for the conduct of the administrative functions of government or busi- ness and professional activities not including sales of Merchandise of the premises, and not including personal services as defined herein under "retail/ service use." Parcel of land shall mean, pursuant to chapter 380 Florida Statutes, any quantity of land caps. ble of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. PM peak hour external motor vehicle trips means the average number of trips per hour during the afternoon peak period from 4:00 to 6:00 p.rn. gen• erated by motor vehicles, excluding public transit vehicles, that have either an origin or a destina- tion within the project area. Project area shall mean the area included within the legal description in exhibit 1, including all property within the boundaries of the Southeast Overtown/Park West community redevelopment area, as designated in 1982 by city commission Resolution No. 82.75 . Residential use shall mean any "dwelling units" as defined in the zoning ordinance. Retail/service use shall mean space for the sale of merchandise, eating and/or drinking establish- ments, and personal services such as but not lim• ited to hair salons, travel agencies, laundries, dry cleaners, bank tellers, photographers, shoe repair, tailoring, etc. Room shall have the meaning given to "lodg- ing unit" in the zoning ordinance. SF, gross square feet, or gross square footage shall have the meaning given to "floor area" in Section 2012.3 of the zoning ordinance. Site shall mean a legally described parcel of property capable of development pursuant to ap- plicable city ordinances and regulations. Southeast Ouertown/Park West development sup- plemental fee shall mean a fee charged to new development in the project area comprising cam- 897 SENT BY : DEV/F OUS I NG-ASSET AiGMT: 6- 8-95 : 14 : 51 ; CITY OF I1iIAA1I-; ;# 7/11 111 13.5 iMI1AM7 CODE ponents including a transportation mitigation fee, an air quality fee, an administration fee, and a Dill/master plan recovery fee -which are assessa- ble to new development according to the provi- sions of this article. • Southeast Ouertnum/Park West development sup- plemental fee coefficient shall mean the charge per unit of land use as calculated for each compo- nent of the. Southeast Overtown/Park West de- velopment supplemental fee. Total allowable development shall mean the gi1an• tity of net..xtew.development for which certificates of occupancy may be .issued under the terms and conditions Of the clelopment order, as may be modified pursuant to Florida Statutes, section 380:06(19):(1987). ffiransportation mitigation fee shall mean a fee charged to all net .new development to ,pay for improvements to mitigate for imfrachs on the re- gional transportation:system+in accordance with requirements of the CADA and the increment I development order for Southeast Overtown/Park West Miami; and which shall be a component of the Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fee. Zoning ordinance shall mean city Ordinance No. 9500, as amended, or a successor ordinance, the zoning ordinance of the City of Miami. (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7-21-88) 598 naimportation I.alurUn 14iifii;arion Air Quality 13s7 Sec. 1367- Southeast Overtownll'ark West de- velopment supplemental fee coeffi- cients. •(a) The following shall be the .coefficients, by land use,: for each oftbefour<4) co mponents:ofthe Southeast Overtown7Purk West development sup- plemental fee. Table 1. Fes Coefficient,' (per gross square footage of floor area) DRAW:ler DIU Wan Adrnfniarru• Taral Fey RlMorry lion Cc.cfficient Office $0.900 $0,112 ;0,0SO $0.050 1.0.660 netniv..rvicc $0.2110 10,149 30.059 $0.050 $oat? Convention 5Q_08a 6o.fras .$0.068 SO.4750 SOnE ✓ iieafentiol 0.061' 60.0113' Taos& 10.050 .$0204' Note: ' These fee coefficients for residential u50 are based upon an assumed average of 100o SP per UU, and shall be adjusted for each development haled upon a transporta- tion mitigation fee of $61.009 per DU and an air quality fee of $35.062 poi DU. (b) The proportionate share for each unit of land use is calculated as follows: (1) Transportation mitigation. The increment I development order requires the city to widen Northwest let Avenue from Northwest loth Street to Northwest 2nd Street at an esti- mated cost of two hundred eight thousand eight hundred six dollars ($268,806.00), in order to mitigate the regional transportation impacts of total allowable development. The regional transportation mitigation estimated cost of two hundred thousand eight hundred six dollars ($208,806,00) is distributed among units of land use in total allowable develop- ment based upon the average rate of genera- tion of PM peak hour external motor vehicle trips, as utilized in the CADA (see exhibit 2). This cost has been borne by the City of Miami, through the Southeast OvertowniPark West project, endue fee will be charged applicants, as delineated in the Southeast Overtown/Park West development order, for increment T. All development subsequent to increment I shall be subject to payment of said fee by applicants. SENT BY : DEV/HOUS I NG--ASSET MGMT; 6- 8-05 ; 14 : 52 ; CITY OF tailAMI-. ;# 8/11 DEVELOPMENT 1MFACT FEES S 1 13-68 (2) Air quality. The increment I development order requires the city to perform monitoring and modeling for future carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations, and to take appropriate ac- tions to provent violations of tho minimum standard for CO concentrations. The city es- timates its total cost for compliance with the air quality requirements of the increment I development order to be one hundred twenty thousand dollars ($120,000.00) (see exhibit 3), which is distributed among units of land use in total allowable development based upon the average rate of generation of PM peak hour external motor vehicle trips, as utilized in the CADA (see exhibit 4). This cost shall be borne by the City of Miami, through the Southeast Overtown/Park West project, for fees attributable to applicants if such fee is generated by affordable housing development. All other applicants shall be subject to pay- ment of said fee, All development subsequent to increment I shall be subject to payment of said fee by applicants. (3) DRI/master plan recouery. The total costs to the City for preparing the Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI, master plan and related stud- ies is estimated to be one hundred forty-six thousand dollars ($146,000.00), which shall be distributed equally among all new devel- opment on the basis of gross square footage of floor area. The total amount of new devel- opment is estimated to be two million, five hundred twenty-two thousand, two hundred (2,522,200) SF during the time that the in- crement l development order is in effect. This cost will be borne by the City of Miami South- east Overtown/Park West project, and no fee will be charged applicants, as delineated in the Southeast Overtown/Park West devel- opment order, for increment I. All develop- ment subsequent to increment I shall be sub- ject to payment of said fee by applicants. (4) Administration. The administrative cost to the city for enforcing the requirements of the development order is estimated to be twenty- one thousand dollars ($21,000,00) per year or a total of one hundred twenty-six thousand dollars ($128,000.00) during the six (63 years that the increment II development order is Sapp. No. 30 projected to be in effect. These administra- tive costs shall be distributed equally among all new development on the basis of gross square footage of floor area. The total amount of new development is estimated to be two mullion,five hundred twenty-two thousand, two hundred (2,522,200) SF during the time that the increment 1 development order is in effect. This cost shall be borne by the City of Miami, through the Southeast Overtown/Park West project, for fees attributable to appli- cants if such fee is generated by affordable housing development. All other applicants shall be subject to payment of said fee. All devel- opment subsequent to increment I shall be subject to payment of said fee by applicants. (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7-21-88) Sec. 13.68. Procedure for calculation of South- east Overtown/Park West develop- ment supplemental fee. Upon receipt of approval of a building permit or MUSP for a new development, the planning department shall determine the amount of South- east Overtown/Park West development supplemen- tal fee due pursuant to the following procedure: (1) 899 (2) (3) (4) (5) Determine whether the development is exempt by virtue of the conditions specified herein; Determine the applicable land use(s) based upon the applicant's intended use and the design and configuration of the space, and in the event that a proposed use is not included in one of the land use categories defined here- in, apply the defined land use category most similar to the proposed use in terms of the average rate of generation of PM peak hour external motor vehicle trips; Calculate the gross square footage, number of dwelling units, and/or nutuber of hotel rooms as appropriate for each land use; Multiply the appropriate units of each land use in the development by the appropriate Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fee coefficients; Upon written request of the applicant, review and reduce the amount of Southeast Overtown/ SENT BY : DEV/HOUSING-ASSET Ma; ; 6- 8-95 ; 14 : 58 ; CITY OF MIAMI-' 6 13.68 MIAMI CODE Park West development supplemental fee cal- culated, if appropriate. (Ord. No. 10488, § 1, 7-21-88) Sec. 13-69. Adtninistration of Southeast Over- town/Park West development sup- plemental fee. (a) Collection of Southeast OuertowntPark West development supplemental fee Southeast Overtowni Park West development supplemental fees due pursuant to this article for administration fees and DRK/master plan recovery fees shall be col- lected by the planning department at the time of approval of a MUSP, or if a MUST' is not required, at any time prior to issuance of a building permit. Southeast OvcrtowniPark West development sup• plemental fees due pursuant to this article for transportation impacts and air quality impacts shall be collected by the planning department at any time prior to issuance of a building permit. (b) Transfer of funds to finance department Upon receipt of Southeast Overtown/Park West devel. opulent supplemental fees, the planning depart. ment shall transfer such funds to the city finance department which shall be responsible for place. ment of such funds into separate accounts as here. inafter specified. All such funds shall be depos- ited in interest -bearing accounts in a ban author• ized to receive deposits of city funds. Interest earned by each account shall be credited to that account and shall be used solely for the purposes specified for funds of such account. (c) Establishment and maintenance of accounts. The city finance department shall establish sepa- rate accounts and maintain records for each such account, whereby Southeast Overton n/f'ark West development supplemental fees collected can be segregated by each of the four (4) fee components: Transportation mitigation fees, air quality fees, DRI/master plan recovery fees, and administra• tion fees. (d) Maintenance of records The city finance de- partment shall maintain and keep adequate fi- nancial records for each such account which shall show the source and disbursement of all revenues, which shall account for all moneys received; and which shall ensure that the disbursement of funds Supp. Nu. 30 § 13-eE from each account shall be used solely and exclu- sively for the provision of projects specified in the Southeast Overtown/Park West development or• tiers, administration fee and the DRl/master plan recovery fee. In connection with capital improve. ment projects, funds may be used for planning, design, construction, land acquisition, financing, financial and legal services, and administrative costs. (e) Refund of Southeast Overtocun/Park. West de• velopmeirt supplemental fee; (1) The current owner of a property on which a Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fee for transportation mitiga- tion and air quality has been paid may apply for a refund of ouch fee if: the city has failed to encumber or spend the collected fees by the end of the calendar quarter immediately following six (6) years of the date of payment of the fee; or the building permit for which the transportation mitigation or air quality fee has been paid, has been terminated or expired for noncornmencelnent of construction; or the project for which a building permit has been issued has been altered resulting in a decrease in the amount of the transportation mitigation or air quality fee due. Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemen- tal fees paid for administration and DRUmaster plan recovery are not refundable_ (2) Only a current owner of property may peti- tion for a refund. A petition for refund shall be filed within one (1) year of any of the above specked events giving rise to the right to claim a refund. (3) The petition for refund shall be submitted to the city manager or his duly designated agency on a form provided by the city for such pur- pose. The petition shall contain: a notarized affidavit that petitioner is the current owner of the property; a certified copy of latest tax records of Metropolitan Dade County show- ing the owner of the euhject property; a copy of the dated receipt for payment of the fee issued by the city's planning department; and a statement of the basis upon which the re- fund is sought. 900 SENT BY : DE.V/HODS I N'G-ASSi T MGMT; 6- 8-95 ; 14 : 54 ; CITY OF 11i[A141i- ;#10/11 I3.69 DF..VELOPN'IENT IMPACT FEES (4) Within one (1) month of the date of receipt of a petition for refund, the city manager or his duly designated agent must provide the peti- tioner, in writing, with a decision on the re- fund request. The decision roust include the reasons for the decision including, as may be appropriate, a determination of whether the collected fees have been encumbered or spent in accordance with the requirements of this article. If a refund is due to the petitioner. The city manager or his duly designated agent. shall notify the city's finance director and request that a refund payment be made to the petitioner. Any. money returned pursuant to this subsec- tion shall be returned with interest at the rate of three (3) percent per annum. (6) Petitioner may appeal the determination of the city manager to the impact fee board of review subject to the time limitations and procedures.for appeals to that board set forth in section 13.16 of the City Code. (f) Annual review and modificatiorc. The city shall annually review Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fee ordinance pro. cedures, assumptions, formulas, and fee assess- ments and make such modifications as are deemed necessary as a result of: (I) Development occurring in the prior year; (2) Amendments to the development order; (3) Changing needs for facilities and/or services; (4) Inflation and ether economic factors; (5) Revised cost estimates for public improvements and/or services: (6) Changes in the availability of other funding sources; (7) Such other factors as may be relevant. (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7.21.88) (5) See. 13-70. Bonding of capital improvement projects. The city may issue bonds, revenue certificates and other obligations of indebtedness in such man- ner and subject to such limitations as may be Sapp. No, 36 { 13.73 provided by law, in furtherance of the provision of Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fee related projects. Funds pledged toward retirement of bonds, revenue certificates or other obligations of indebtedness for such pro- jects inay include impact fees and other city rev- enues as may be allocated by the city commie. lion. Fees paid pursuant to this article, however, shall be restricted to use solely and exclusively for the purposes of the article and for financing, directly, or as a pledge against bonds, revenue certificates and other obligations of indebtedness, (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7-21-6B) 901 See. 13.71. Appeal procedures; impact fee board of review. The Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fce ordinance hereby incorporates by reference the appeals board and procedure as set forth in sections 13-16,13-17, 13.18, 13-19 and 13-20 of the City Code and hereby establishes their applicability for any appeals undertaken pur- suant to this article. (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7 21-88) Sec. 13-72. Effect of Southeast Overtow&Parh West development supplemental fee on planning, zoning, subdivision, and other regulations. This article shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density of develop- ment, design and improvement standards and re. quirements or any other aspect of the develop- ment of land or provision of public improvements subject to the city's comprel►enuive plan, zoning regulations, subdivision regulations, or other regu- lations of the city, all of which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limi- - tation with respect to all such development. (Ord. No. 10465, § 1, 7.21-88) Sec. 13-73. Southeast Overtown/Park West de- velopment supplemental fee as ad- ditional and euppietnentai require. tnent. The City of Miami Southeast Overtown/Park West development supplemental fee is additional and supplemental to and not in substitution or duplication of any other requirements imposed by -. h.. r. u J - U L 1; 1 J V L v ... U- 1 1 1 v, .iJ A :1.r1t 13.72 MIAMI CODE the city on the development of land or the issu- ance of' building permits. It is intended to be con- sistent with and to further the objectives and pol- icies of the Southeast Overtown/Park West develop - merit order, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and to be coordinated with the city's capital improvement program and other city poli- cies, ordinances and resolutions by which the city seeks to ensure the provision of public facility im- provements and services in conjunction with the development of land, while also encouraging the development of affordable housing. In no event shall a property owner be obligated to pay for the same improvernent(s) in an amount in excess of the amount calculated pursuant to this article; provided, however, that a property owner may he required to pay, pursuant to Metropolitan Dade County, state, and/or city regulations, for other public facilities in addition to the supplemental feci related improvements as specified herein. (Ord. No, 10465, § 1, 7-21.88) Sees. 13-74-13-100. Reserved. ARTICLE IV. INTERIM PROPRIETARY AND GENERAL SERVICES FEE" Sec. 13-101. Fee established. A fee to be known as the "interim proprietary and general services fee" is hereby established. (Ord. No. 10601, § 1, 7-13-89) See. 13-102. Purpose. It is recognized that the costa of providing cer- tain city services exceed the fees charged for said services and that those costs are borne in large part through ad valorem taxation. Those services which the city provides include, hut are not lim- ited to police protection, fire protection, parks and recreational facilities and administrative services. It is further recognized that, from the time that a new building or structure is completed and oc- cupied until the itnprovemente are reflected on •Edltor'e note —Ord. No. 10601, adopted July 19, 1989, preserve the alphabetical order or chapter titles, the editor hue added Ch. 46A to the Code. For purposes of cltsaaification and to redesignate the material originally numbered §§ 4SA•1--45A•9 as Art. IV, f § 13-101-13-109. Supp. rlv. 36 902 if 13104 the tax roll as of the ensuing January 1, services are provided for which no part of the cost of said services is compensated. The purpose of the in- terim proprietary and general services fees, there- fore, is to defray the cost to the city in providing city services to newly improved property prior to the imposition of ad valorem taxes on such im- proved property. The fee is not in any manner, directly or indirectly, intended as an ad valorem tax, nor is the amount of the fee established herein related in any way to the valuation of the prop- erty receiving said services. (Ord. No. 10601, § 1, 7-13-69) Sec. 13-103. Fee levied for services to certain properties. There is hereby levied an interim proprietary and general services fee which shall apply to those properties for which a certificate of occupancy is issued, either permanent or temporary, for full or partial use of the premises, and which shall be payable on a monthly basis from the first day of the month following the date upon which such certificate of occupancy is issued until the enau- ing January 1. There is hereby levied an interim proprietary and general services fee which shell apply to thane properties for which a certificate of occupancy is issued, either permanent or temporary, for full or partial use of the premises, and which shall be payable on a monthly basis from the first day of the month following the date upon which such certificate of occupancy is issued until the en- suing January 1, or until such time as the im- provement necessitating said certificate of occ.-u- pancy is assessed by the Dade County Property Appraiser and extended on the tax roll. (Ord. No. 10601, 4 1, 7-13-69; Ord. No. 10705, § 1, 2.7.90) See. 13-104. When fee paid. The first month'a interim proprietary and gen- eral services fee shall be paid upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, either permanent or temporary, and no certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until such time as the interim pro- prietary and general services fen has been paid. (Ord,. No. 10601, § 1, 7.13.89) SOUTH FLORIDA APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL QUESTIONNAIRE FOR DOWNTOWN/AREAWIDE DRI'S QUESTION 1: APPLICANT INFORMATION A. I, Cesar H. Odio, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE City of Miami HEREBY PROPOSE TO UNDERTAKE A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CHAPTER 27F-2, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. IN SUPPORT THEREOF I SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project Development of Regional Impact, WHICH INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. --�% DATE SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE B. APPLICANT (NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE). The City of Miami, Florida, P. 0. Box 330708, Miami, Florida 33233-0708, 305/579-6366. C. AUTHORIZED AGENT(S), (NAME, Herbert J. Bailey City Manager's Office 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Phone: 305/ 37 2-4526 ADDRESS, PHONE). Lucia A. Dougherty/ Joel Maxwell City of Miami Law Department 169 E. F1agi.e,r_ Street M az i Florida. 331.31 Phone:, 305/579-6700 Regina{1 . P$are,r..; City, of Depar e ' Y of Develop ent 30.0 '8iscay'eL83,.\d Way Suite, :-4i0 M,iarni, •'. '3.or a 33-7.31 Phone:' 305./ 57-�33.66. D. ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. (INCLUDE SECTION, TOWNSHIP, AND RANGE OR SUBDIVISION). See the following page. E. LIST AGENCIES (LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL) FROM WHICH APPROVAL AND/OR A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF DEVELOPMENT. SPECIFY THE PERMIT(S) OR APPROVAL(S) BY AGENCY. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY SUBMITTED PERMIT APPLICATIONS. Because of the nonspecific nature of the development approval applied for herein, this question is not applicable. - 2 PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project area boundaries are N.W. 5th Street on the south, 1-95 on the west, 1-395 on the north, and Biscayne Boulevard on the east (see Maps A-1 and A-2) ; or Beginning at a point at the intersection of the center line of N.E. 5th Street; thence west on the center line on N.E. 5th Street (and N.W. 5th Street) to the east ROW line of 1-95; thence northwesterly on the east ROW line of 1-95 to the south ROW line of 1-395; thence easterly on the south ROW line of 1-395 to the center line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence southerly on the center line of Biscayne Boulevard to the point of beginning, comprising + 209.38 acres more or less; or Blocks 2N, 3N, 4N, 5N, 6N, 7N, 14N, 15N, 17N, 18N, 19N, 20N, 21N, 22N, 23N, 24N, 25N, 34N, 35N, 36N, 37N, 38N, 39N, 40N, 41N, 42N, 43N, 44N, 45N, 55N, 56N, 57N, 58N, 59N, 60N, 61N, 62N, 65N, 65E, 66N, a portion of 27N, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami (B-41) ; and Blocks 7, 8, 9, 10, 19, 20., 21, portions of blocks 6, 11, 16, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, Alice Baldwin, Jenny M., and Charles E. Oxar Subdivision A-57 Amended (B-87); and Blocks 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, a portion of block 3, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 36, Township 53, Range 41 East, Sosts Subdivision (B-27); and Blocks 1, 8, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; Section 36, Township 53, Range 41 East, Perry Division (B-163); and Greyhound Center (77-98); Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L. Knowlton Map of Miami (B-41); and Block 46N, Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, G.G. Bolles (1-16); and Blocks 16N, 26N, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks; S37, Township 53, Range 41 East, P.W. White Re -Subdivision (B-34); and Blocks 59N, 60N, and all existing street rights -of -way between said blocks, Section 37, Township 53, Range 41 East, Miami South Half - Blocks (1-185); and RTY SEC CORPS 3-172, J.A. Danns Sub 7-36 Blocks C and D, Howard Johnson Sub 79-87, Jones Resub 3-176, Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East, A.L. Knowlton Mafia of Mimi. (B-41). 1-3 iV QRTh NW 79 ST NW 71 ST NW 62 ST NW 54 ST' NW 36 ST SW 16 Sri d CORAL WAY In BIRO AVE GRAND AVE POINCIANA AVE HARDEE AVE �_ ry DINNER KEY x a ISCAYNE BLVD w 0 ;NORTH BAY i CAUSEWAY JULIA TUTTLEi CAUSEWAY i W ;• VENETIAN ›- CAUSEWAY sZ 0 i ,f to ' C4V f� U• q m RICKENBACKER ! CAUSEWAY O 04-; 0 ` u 0 Irt OF VIRGINIA KEY © 0 0 otrt S A r 0 1/2 1 1/2 Miles Graphic Scale MAP I A-1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST I.4ETRpRJIL RIGHT OF WAY "'ax�'`'"".$ P!tASE I-0CM LOCATION MAP ® Overtown # Park West SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST METROAPtL RIGHT OF 'MAY �,• PHASE 1 - D C M VICINITY MAP MAP 1A-21 11111 0 750 1500 6?jcc Vividr: QUESTION 2: MAPS AND GRAPHICS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING MAPS AND GRAPHICS, AT REDUCED SCALE, IN THE TEXT WHERE REFERENCED. A. A general location map (Map A). B. Recent dated aerial photos of the development area showing any sub -area boundaries. C. A map of the area with any project or sub -area boundaries. Show 100-year flood prone areas (including hurricane flood zones and V-zones) and major natural and man-made features (Map C) D. A generalized land use map showing existing uses (use categories in Table 3.1). historical/archaeological sites (Map D). E. A soils map of the area, based on USDA Soil Service (SCS) published soil surveys (Map E). F. A..map showing vegetation (Map F). in the area Show all Conservation G. A map of the area showing existing and proposed general runoff routing, drainage outfalls, canals, and other major drainage features (Map G). H. A master plan for the area showing proposed uses (use categories in Table 12.2), roads, and other significant elements (Map(s) H). I. A map showing existing and proposed public facilities (e.g., sewage, water supply, fire protection, public transit, solid waste disposal, hospitals, police, emergency medical facilities, etc.) that serve the area (Map I). Show existing and proposed pipeline and transmission lines for water supply, sewage, electric, and gas. J. A map of the existing transportation network within the primary impact area. The primary impact area includes the area and normally extends at least five miles beyond the development boundary; however, this area will be defined in consultation with the Regional Planning Council and clearly delineated on this map. Map J will be the base for transportation maps (Map J). K. Provide display graphics and boards for presentation (consult with Council staff). 2-1 2-2 c5•,,,ic4.11- a c/cr: aCSirnv) 3 QUESTION 3: PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROGRAM. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project entails the redevelopment of 200 acres of prime real estate (see Maps A-1 and A-2) adjacent to the Miami Central Business District for new residential, office and commercial activity. Representing the culmination of a ten-year planning process by both the City of Miami and Metropolitan Dade County, the general redevelopment concept for the project is directed toward the provision of a wide range of housing opportunities for moderate income families (e.g., families with incomes ranging from $15,000 to $50,000) within a downtown setting. Also incorporated in the development plan is the provision of support services necessary to serve the area's future population. In conformance with the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Plan (adopted by both the Miami City Commission Resolution No. 82-755, and the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 1677-82), the role of the public sector will not be to undertake specific building programs but rather to facilitate overall development using a variety of positive investment incentives including special zoning designations, public land acquisition,- financial subsidies and the provision of new public facilities and amenities. The City of Miami has initiated the redevelopment effort with a Phase I development action surrounding the Overtown Metroraii Transit Station. Land acquisition (Appendix 3-1) and relocation activities (Appendix 3-2) are nearly complete for the nine (9) Phase I development parcels. (See Map H-3). Developers and development programs (see Appendix 3-3) have been selected for these parcels, with a combined construction cost estimated at over $190 million. Phase I development activities are scheduled to occur between 1986 and 1992, and result in approximately 2000 housing units, 166,000 square feet of office space, 66,200 square feet of retail space and a 16,500 seat sports arena. (The Application for Development Approval for the Miami Arena DRI has been submitted by the Miami Sports and Exhibition Authority). Also, Phase I anticipates the development of an exhibition hall containing 290,000 sqLare feet. When all phases have been completed (estimated to occur by the year 2005), the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project is intended to transform a presently blighted, under-utilized land area into a socially and economically integrated community providing unique living and working opportunities in downtown Miami. 3-1 W ST SW NW 57 AVE NORTH AGLER BST I SW 16 ST CORAL WAY t•7 BIRD AVE GRAND AVI POINCIANA AVE HAROEE AVE NW 79 ST NW 71 ST NW 62 ST NW 54 ST, NW 36 ST 1 1SCAYNE BLVD W 0 ti N NW 46 NW 2O ST 1111 N.W 7 STD ST � Mini L :111ST 1r ice/ Pia!, r19' DINNER KEY 3 i 1ST yF: N RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY NORTH BAY iCAUSEWAY JULIA TUTTLEi CAUSEWAY i T Co � .1 CAUSEWAVENETIANY i 0 rCM4C C7 pSE4'P A, Rr op • VIRGINIA KEY i t p o,, 0 o a + en0 N L ri C .7-47-17'*j Graphic Scale SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST METSORAl1 RIGHT OF WAY P,+ASE 1 - 0 C M LOCATION MAP GARMENT CENTER CIVIC CENTER LITTLE HAVANA OV ERTOWN •aura 3N)V3 iF OMNI MID TOWN 39 N. 5 ST GOVERNMENT CENTER I CBD BRICKELL I BAYS DE WATSON ISL:ND OF 12223 Overtown Park West MAP A-2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST METgORM. RIGHT OF WAY "'.• PHASE1-0CM VICINITY MAP 11111 0 750 1500 w .P W. IF 0T ,45 sa=:=,': 24 -~"iTM� s but Jet ;�,M..r 37 "� — - ":3-.''r3, a. T..H +x r � 44 .-e Pa H.E. 0 ET N.E. 0 0T. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST ME TRORAII RIGHT OF WAY P`1ASEI--0GM N.E 7 0T N. 0 ST BICENTENNIAL 7.7 1 WI:H-3f PHASE I REDEVELOPMENT AREA ---� BLOCK/PARCEL NUMBER it I 0 Study Methodology The analysis has been conducted for three phases of development. The first phase of projected new development is planned to occur between 1986 and 1992. Phases II and III cover the periods 1992-1997 and 1997-2005, respectively. The Development Order being sought will only entertain Phase I. Phases II and III are to be viewed as long range (10-20 year) planning that requires updating and more detailed evaluation in the future. The amount of development projected for each phase is based upon both market analysis and the intent of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan. The growth projections and overall planning methodology employed, e.g., the debiting and crediting of capacity accounts, are compatible with projections and methodologies included in the ADA for the Downtown Miami DRI. B. COMPLETE TABLE 3.1. Table 3.1-A depicts existing and future (Phase III or buildout) land uses by acreage. Table 3.1-B presents phase and cumulative development for the proposed Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project by land use with variables such as square feet, number of rooms, number of units, etc. C. DESCRIBE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROJECT TO EXISTING ZONING, COMPREHENSIVE PLANS, AND ANY SPECIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS (E.G., BISCAYNE BAY AQUATIC PRESERVE ACT, SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN). The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project originated in 1973 as an approved element of the Downtown Miami 1973-1985 plan. It subsequently evolved as a component of the City of Miami's Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The planning studies and regulatory framework shaping the Redevelopment Project appear below: Downtown Miami 1973-1985 (Plan) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1976-1986 Park West Plan Overtown Redevelopment Plan Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan City of Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance S.F. Overtown/Park West Special Public Interest District S.E. Overtown/Park West Urban Design Guidelines With the exception of zoning and enacted land use to cover the proposed exhibition hall site and Special Public Interest District zoning to include the Redevelopment Project area outside of Phase I, all land use regulations are in place to implement the future land use plan. 3-5 TABLE 3.1-A: EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES Land Use Existing Acreage - Proposed Acreage Residential 40.48 96.19 Commercial* 26.40 43.66 Industrial 25.90 4.44 Parks and Open Space** 59.61 12.06 Institutional*** 5.54 5.54 Trans., Comm., Util. 51.45 47.49 209.38 209.38 *Includes arena and exhibition hall under column heading "Proposed Acreage." **Includes vacant land slated for future development. ***Includes schools and churches. TABLE 3.1-B: PERIOD & CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM I. Period (Phased) Program Office (sq. ft.) Retail/Service (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (units) Convention (sq. ft.) II. Cumulative Program Phase T (1986--1992)A 166,000 66,200 2000 290,000 Phase I ('1986-1992 ) Phase II (1992-1997) Phase III (1 ��--200 �) 0 205,000 632,500 37,300 90,600 500 600 2000 5000 310,000 Phase II Phase III (1986-1997) (1986-2005) Office (sq. ft.) 166,000 371,000 1,003,500 Retail/Service (sq. ft.) 66,200 103,500 194,100 Hotel (rooms) - 500 1,100 Residential (units) 2000 4000 9,000 Convention (sq. ft.) 290,000 600,000 600,000 3-7 The future land use categories contemplated for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project are as follows: 1. Moderate Density Residential. Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for moderate density residential development (20-60 d.u. per net acre). 2. Moderate Density Residential -Neighborhood Commercial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for moderate density residential (40-60 d.u. per net acre) and neighborhood oriented commercial development, as defined by the CR-1 District of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) shall not exceed 1.72 for residential and commercial structures. 3. Moderate/High Density Residential -Neighborhood Commercial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for high density (90- - 120 d.u. per net acre) and neighborhood oriented commercial development as defined by the RG-3 and CR-1 Districts of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for structures shall not exceed 4.32 with a maximum residential FAR of 2.6 and 1.72 commercial FAR. 4 Moderate/High Density Residential -Community Commercial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for moderate/high density residential (70-90 d.u. per net acre) and commercial development as defined by the CR-2 and RG-3 Districts of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for residential structures and commercial structures shall not exceed 4.0. 2.0 each for residential and commercial uses. 5. High Density Residential-Moderate/High Density Community Commercial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for high density residential (100-300 d.u. per net acre) and moderate/high density community commercial development as defined by the RG-3 and CR-2 Districts of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) shall not exceed 5.0. 3-8 6. High Intensity CBD Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for high density residential and commercial development as defined by the CBD-1 District (Central Business District) of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. 7. General Commercial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for commercial and industrial development as defined by the CG-2 District (General Commercial) of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning ordinance. Commercial Floor Area Ratios (FARs) will not exceed 2. 8. Transportation Future Development in areas so designated shall be limited to uses related to the Dade County rapid transit system and the railroad rights -of -way, and future rights - of -way. 9. Parks/Open Space Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to uses related to parks and open space. 10. Institutional Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to institutional uses such as schools and churches. 11. Governmental Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to national, state and local governmental activities 12. Special Use Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to uses which reinforce downtown as the Financial, cultural and entertainment hub of the metropolitan area. Appendix 3-4 contains exerts from the "Schedule of District Regulations" (Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance) for those zoning districts which will be used to implement the Future Land Use Plan. Appendix 3-5 contains the Special Public Interest District (SPI) zoning adopted for Phase 1 of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project. 3-9 II IID oo1 1 k [. t{ Ot. I /7 yam.' �~�:.�}�ti��.h�.�.i 'i•.'�.:�:i _ •��...��.. ..ryiL41�.�.wS�wyS .•r L'[yf7TtilJ MAP (o-1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST METRORA3L RIGFET OF WAY "' .. P4ASEI-0CM EXISTING LAND USE MAP 00 d00 6 00 N 17 ) sT . r 7 T. frrn U-A IA4, „Up 'Ern= N.E. 13 TE4A. N,E. t3 ST. N.E. t2 0T. N.E. 10 5T N.E. 0 ST i 1 I11 I11NI1f I1111101”1"I N E. 1 111,14I11,I1IIil111 NI11 1I -\•N N.E. 13 ST. CR-3/7 BICENTENNIAL PAN( PR CR-3/7 CR-2/7 -a PORT BOULEVARD �^ t1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST F'AETRORAIL 1:11GHT OF WAY -2111111- Pl+A$E1-0CM EXISTING ZONING MAP } 81SCAYNE AP D-2 Hill j� l 0 1 KS, 14 IT. I PM. ,c6W,WWW1.0 A94,4§".fti .00.14M1 „..catthatuuN 1 II. 40, I. IL S SI auaaaal a 0 ISO 6 LI a an iktaWee: 14 MODERATE DENSITY; RESIDENTIAL MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL—NEIGHBORHCOD CCMERCIAL MODERATE/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL —NEIGHBORHOOD COf4ERCIAL MODERATE/HIGH DMSITY RESIDENTIAL—COKMUNITY COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL— MODERATE/HIGH DENSITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT GENERAL COWERCIAL TRANSPORTATION GOVERNMENTAL PARKS/OPEN SPACE INSTITUTIONAL SPECIAL USE t.`•Tli),'-‘c1,7.-, MAP SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST mETRORAIL RIGHT OF WAY P.iASE 1-0 CM FUTURE LAND USE MAP SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST 1,4ETRORAIL RIGHT OF WAY "AUF0' PASE1-GCM PROPOSED ZONING MAP 1PN Pi Lt. APPENDIX 3 Appendix 3-1 ACQUISITION PROGRAM The City of Miami, in conjunction with Dade County, has completed 95 percent of the land acquisition for Phase I of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project. The funding programs and strategies used in acquiring these parcels are presented below. 1. UMTA Acquisition. The four blocks located west of the Overtown Metrorail Transit Station were purchased by Metro -Dade County using a grant from the Urban Mass Transit Administration. This area is bounded by NW 8 Street, NW 6 Street, NW 1 Court and NW 3 Avenue. It contains blocks 45, 46, 55 and 56. Relocation and demolition are complete. 2. North Block. (Block 36) Three quarters of this block is owned by Dade County. The remaining portion of Block 36 located along NW 2 Avenue is in private ownership. Portions of Block 36 within -public ownership were purchased with Community Development Block Grant Funds. 3. Affordable dousing Sites. (Blocks 24, 25 and 37) Thes.e blocks were acquired with General Obligation Dousing Bond Funds allocated to the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project as part of the City's Affordable Rental Housing Program. 4. Arena Site Acquisition. The Arena Site (Block 44) was acquired with proceeds from a HUD Section 108 Loan and monies from the Miami Sports and exhibition Authority's one-third interest in the Convention Development Tax. Appendix 3-2 RELOCATION PROGRAM (All relocation activities for Phase 1 of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project have been completed. As previously noted, Phase I entails a development action surrounding the Overtown Metrorail Station (9 blocks). These parcels where acquired with public funds thereby necessitating the public relocation effort. As envisioned, development parcels for Phases 11 and III of the Redevelopment Program will be acquired by the private sector. Therefore, relocation efforts will not be the direct responsibility of the City of Miami. Provided below is a discussion on the relocation effort for the nine (9) redevelopment parcels (blocks) acquired by governmental entities.) Within the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project area the Dade County Department of Housing and Urban Development (DCHUD) is responsible for providing relocation assistance to displacees. The Dade County Board of County Commissioners provided assurances that DCHUD comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970-PL91-646 ct. These assurances also included the proviso that relocation payments shall be made with Community Development Block Grant Funds and other HUD assisted programs. Payments were provided to individuals and families in relocating to standard housing and to business concerns and non-profit organizations in relocating to replacement accommodations. These payments were provided under the HUD Handbook 1371.1 Rev., Relocation Policies and Procedures. DCHUD relocation staff provided all families, individuals and businesses anticipated to be displaced with a copy of the Information Statement and Relocation payment brochure with full explanation of each by a relocation advisor. The advisors informed displacees on the availability of relocation payments, the office where detailed information about payments could be obtained. and dates governing eligibility for payments. Relocation advisors assisted all displacees in preparing their claims. Relocation supervisors worked closely with advsors regarding eligibility requirements and computing payments. Supervisors, in turn, worked with the Relocation Officer in determining the amounts to be paid for replacement housing payments for homeowners or replacement housing payments for tenants and certain others. An inventory of relocation resources was compiled by the City of Miami from newspaper classified ads, multiple listing services, real estate brokers, property owners, rental agents, FHA foreclosures, and a survey of the area. Relocation staff familiarized themselves with the inventory of available relocation resources for displacees. All units were inspected to guarantee that they met the relocation standard outlined in the Relocation Handbook 1371.1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 3B, or the Dade County housing code, whichever is higher. Relocation staff provided transportation to displacees and other assistance in order to find suitable replacement housing. All displaced families and individuals were referred to replacement units within their ability to pay. Eligible displacees received priority placement in public housing and Section 8 units. Many of the businesses located within the Phase I Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project area were not functionally related to business activity within and surrounding the area and have benefited from a move to locations more consistent with current industrial location parameters. The fragmented ownership patterns, abundance of obsolete commercial structures, lack of adequate on -site loading space, escalating land -values and rents, incompatible land uses and the socio- economic factors related to the overall "skid row" characteristics of the area, are amplified reasons for relocation. The City of Miami developed a business relocation program with county and state assistance having as its primary objective the retention of business within the City and/or in close proximity to serve the local labor force. This supplemented business relocation activities undertaken by DHUD. Elements of the City's program included: -Funding business retention counselors to work with affected businesses. -Contacting all businesses and providing assistance in identifying specific relocation sites within the City. -Providing financial assistance over and above standard relocation payments to facilitate retention within the City. This included financial packaging assistance for loans from Miami Capital, Inc., use of Industrial Revenue Bonds, utilization of the Urban Development Action Grant Program, priority disposition of city -owned land as in the Garment District, etc. -Facilitating needed zoning changes when consistent with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan to meet relocation demand. -Utilizing flexible capital funds to initiate needed public improvements to accommodate business relocation needs, e.g., street improvements. To date, the City has relocated 520 families and individuals from the Phase I Redevelopment Project area. Also, 33 businesses have been relocated. These businesses have primarily been relocated to other areas of the City including Wynwood and the Little River Industrial Park. Most families and individuals have been relocated to public or Section 8 housing within the 0vertown community. Appendix 3-3 PHASE I APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project PARCEL 24 25 36 37 44 45 46 55 56 DEVELOPER Cruz Dev. Co. Cruz Dev. Co. Cruz Dev. Co. Can -American Decoma Venture/ City of Miami Circa/Barness/ Sawyer Indian River Circa/Barness/ Sawyer Circa/Barness/ Sawyer PROGRAM 386 Rental Units 199 Rental Units 221 Condo Units 350 Rental Units 16 , 500-seat sports arena 225 Condo Units 152 Condo Units 150 Rental Units 142 Condo Units 91 Rental Units 60 Condo Units TOTAL EST. COST $ 29,612,005 15,063,155 17.217,003 21,256,625 40,000,000 25,500,000 8,283,000 21,000,000 12,600,000 TOTAL 1,176 Rental Units $190,531,788 800 Condo Units Appendix 3-4 SUMMARY OF SOUTHEAST OV RTOWN/PARK WEST ZONING DISTRICTS District Intent PR: Parks & Recreation GU: Government I-1: Light Industrial This designation is intended for application to areas where public park and recreation uses, and no other use, are to be permitted. This designation is intended to apply to certain lands where national, state, or local governmental activities are conducted (admin. & judicial). By special exception: public schools, fire stations, governmental uses that are proprietary in nature, etc. This designation is intended for application in areas appropriately located for a range of activities extending beyond those permissible in the CG-2 district to include additional manufacturing and processing operations, and to remove limitations on scale or capacity of equipment applying in more restricted districts. RG-2: General Residential This designation is intended to apply in areas suitable for general residential development including attached one- and two- family dwellings and multiple dwellings. Building forms may be expected to range from 2 to 10 stories, and density will range from approximately 20 to 60 units per net acre. CR-2: Commercial-Res(comm) This designation is intended to apply where the existing pattern of development is predominantly strip commercial. It is intended that this designation encourage new residential uses and increased support for commercial activities. Building forms may be expected to range from 2 to 10 stories, and density will range from approximately 20 to 60 units per net acre. CR-3: Commercial-Res(gen) This designation is intended to apply where the existing pattern of development is predominantly strip commercial. It is intended that this designation encourage new residential uses and increased support for commercial activities. Building forms may be expected to range up to 16 stories, and density will range from approximately 50 to 80 units per net acre. CG-1: Commercial General This designation is intended to apply to strip commercial areas. Because of the location of such districts, and the added uses permitted, it is not intended to permit general residential use. CG-2: Commercial General This designation is intended to apply to strip commercial areas. Wholesaling, warehousing and limited manufacturing are permitted. Because of the location of such districts, and the added uses permitted, it is not intended to permit general residential use. CBD-1: Central Business Dist.This designation is intended to apply to central commercial, financial, and office core of the metropolitan area. Range on non- residential uses permitted is appropriate to function of the district as a regional center, and residential use is permitted to allow for high density housing. Appendix 3-5 Special Public Interest Zoning SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE SOUTHEAST OYERTOWM/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REOEYELOPMENT AREA March 21, 1985 City of Miami Office of the City Manager Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project P.O. Box 330708 Miami, .Florida 33232-0708 (305) 579-3355 SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOIiN/PARK VEST COl1MUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA March 21. 1985 SECTION 15150. SPI-15: SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST OVERLAY DISTRICT SECTION 15151. INTENT. The Southeast Overtown/Park West area is of special and substantial interest because of its official designation as• a residential redevelopment area with supporting commercial uses that will provide housing and employment opportunities in close proximity to the Central Business District, Bicenten- nial Park, expressways, and the rapid transit system. In the interest of conservation of energy, maintenance and enrichment of principal upper and lower level viers, noise reduction, safe and convenient pedestrian movement. the provision of attractively landscaped areas for the enjoyment of residents, workers and visitors, these special regulations are intended to provide certain requirements and area -wide standards that will enhance future public and private development and add to the area's desira- bility as a place to live and work. SECTION 15152. EFFECT OF SPi-is DISTRICT DESIGNATION. The effect of these SPI-IS regulations shall be to modify regulations, to the extent indicated herein, within the portions of the existing zoning districts as shown in the Official Zoning Atlas. SECTION 1S153. CLASS C SPECIAL PERMIT. 15153.1 When Required. No building permit shall be issued within the boundaries of the SPi-I5 district affecting the height, bulk, location or exterior configuration with a value in excess of S10,000 for any existing structure, the construction of any new structure, or the location or relocation or enlargement of vehicular ways or parking areas on private property, without authorization by Class C Special Permit. 15153.2. Materials to be Submitted with Applications. Materials to be submitted with applications for Class C Special Permits in this class of cases shall include such site plans, landscaping plans, building plans and elevations, surveys and reports as are required to make determinations in the particular case as to conformity with the principles established below, and to the Southeast Overtown/Park West Design Standards and Guidelines. 15153.3. Considerations Generally, and on Buffer Zones, Arcades, View Corridors, Driveways, Parking Structures, Principal Building Rom- Appearance; Ottsite Signs Pronioited. 15153.3.1. Considerations Generally. The general purpose of such special permit considerations shall be to determine conformity of the application as submitted, or with such conditions and safeguards as may reasonably be attached to assure such conformity, with the requirements and expressed intent of these and other regulations as apply- ing generally or specifically in this district and other underlying districts as well as to any conditions, limitations or requirements specified for par- ticular uses or locations. 15153.3.2. Landscaped Buffer Zones Required Adjacent to I-95, I-395. Metrorail Right -of -Way. Adjacent to the 1-95, I-395, and Metrorail Right -of -Way, no residential building shall be erected closer than fifty (50) feet to any structure within such right-of-way. In addition, the yard between any building and the right- of-way line shall be a minimum depth.of ten (10) feet. Further, the lot area between a building and the right-of-way line shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plant material to screen and buffer the building from the adjacent right-of-way. 15153.3.3. Arcades, Mandatory and Optional. 1. Mandatory arcades shall be provided or optional arcades may be provided at ground level. Arcades are required along Biscayne Boulevard; the north side of N.K. and N.E. Sth Street; and N.W. 2nd Avenue between Sth Street and 9th Street. Optional arcades are encouraged along other north -south rights -of -way. Arcades shall be continuous, accessible to the general public at all times, adjacent to the public right-of-way and fronting on the public sidewalk, with the floor of the arcade at the same level as the public sidewalk. Arcades shall have a minimum clear width of twelve (12) feet, a minimum height of ten (10) feet, and shall be unobstructed by building columns, utilities and the like. 15153.3.4. View Corridors. Orientation and design of principal buildings and related site design and improvements shall be such as to protect views of Bicentennial Park and Biscayne Say from principal public viewpoints and provide visual access appropriate to public needs and needs of occupants of adjoining or nearby properties. Major portions of principal buildings that are above plane II and the light plane in 5PI districts shall be oriented in an east -west direction and Shall be in the form of slender towers with consideration given to the shade Cast by the tower on nearby structures and open spaces. Particular attention shall be directed toward the need for solar access an the property and adjoin- ing or nearby properties, and the desirable effect of the prevailing southeast air currents. 15153.3.5. Driveways, Pedestrian Loading Areas and Related Parking, as Affected by Location of Pedestrian Circulation, Plazas, and Major FuoFic R gnts-or-4ay. 1. Driveways providing access to parking structures, offstreet load- ing, or lots shall not cross designated pedestrian ways (arcades or the like) on north -south public rights -of -way if other access is reasonably feasible. Where no other access is available, meas- ures as will minimize interruption of pedestrian flow shall be required. 2. In general, access driveways to offstreet parking or loading shall be provided an east -west public rights -of -way, except where such streets contain designated pedestrian ways (N.V. 7th Street and N.E. and li.W. 9th Street). The location and number of access points to public rights -of -way, separation of vehicular and pedes- trian traffic, and the arrangement of parking area shall be safe, secure, and convenient. 15153.3.6. Reserved. 15153.3.7. Accessory Parking Structures; Pedestrian Open Space and/or Livability Space Required an Accessory Offstreet Parking Roof Decks; Other Offstreet Parking Structures. 1. Accessory parking structures shall be low in profile and their top decks, where exposed to upper level viers, shall be improved, maintained, and used as pedestrian open space and/or livability space for the enjoyment of residents, workers, or visitors as the case may be. -2- 2. Above ground accessory parking structures shall be visually com- patible with the principal structure. and vehicle storage shall be suitably screened from exterior public view. Offstreet parking and loading shall be located in the interior of the principal structure and shall be surrounded by residential and/or commercial uses, where feasible. Offstreet parking structures shall not fronton N.W. and N.E. 9th Street, but shall be permissible behind commercial and/or residential uses which front on the pedestrian mall. 3. Parking structures shall present an attractive appearance in accord with design guidelines for the district, and shall be designed to screen the storage of vehicles from exterior view. 15I53.3.B. Principal Building Roof Deck Appearance and Use. All principle building roof tops shall present an attractive appearance as viewed from adjacent or nearby buildings. Roof top mechanical equipment and utility areas shall be appropriately screened with landscape or architec-, tural materials. where possible, equipment and utility areas shall be grouped together, and rooftop areas shall be improved and maintained as pedestrian open space and/or livability space. 15153.3.9. Landscaping, Screening and Open Space. Landscaping and paving shall be provided for ground level pedestrian open space within the public right-of-way in accord with applicable require- ments and standards. All accessory areas which need screening to avoid adverse effects on adjoining areas shall be adequately concealed by appro- priate plantings or other screening. 15153.3.10. Offsite Signs Prohibited. Offsita signs are prohibited in this district. SECTION 15160. SPI-15, I6.1, 16.2: SOUTHEAST OYERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. SECTION 15161. INTENT. 'It is of special and substantial public interest to guide redevelopment in accord with the Southeast Overtawn/Park West redevelopment plan in the area north of the Central Business District, west of Bicentennial Park, south of I-395, and east of I-45 by regulations encouraging a quality residential living environment with direct access to shopping, recreation, transportation and employment. It is intended that development at appropriate high intensity will provide a variety of housing opportunities, open character, attractive and secure pedestrian open space, appropriately located livability space serving residential uses, adequate retail and service support facilities, and a safe pedestrian movement system. 15151.1. Intent Co,cerning Uses. It is intended that multifamily residential occupancy fn this area is to be promoted and encouraged, either in separate buildings or In combination with office and supporting retail and service uses, and that such supporting uses shall be scaled and designed to serve the needs of the districts. 15161.2. Character, Site Planning and Architectural Design. It is intended that the character of the development shalt be moderate to high intensity that provides an attractive, secure environment for resi- dents and workers with a variety of forms for spatial interest. Site planning and orientation shall protect and enhance view corridors, and shall take max- imum advantage of potential views and preeaiting air currents. In general, to maintain continuity between buildings and adjacent blacks, developments shall adhere to applicable yard, setback and landscaping standards. In consideration of the proposed concentration of residential occupancy and supporting commercial uses and the availability of mass transit, these -3- regulations are intended to promote pedestrian comfort and convenience. Developments shalt provide barrier -free movement on pedestrian ways, desirable shade and shelter in pedestrian areas, and solar access where necessary for the provision of recreation, energy or other purposes. Consideration shall be given to ground and upper level pedestrian connections to adjacent or nearby developments. SECTION 15152. PERMISSIBLE PRIHC!PAL USES AND STRUCTURES. 15162.1. SPI-16: Permissible Principal Uses and Structures; Limitations on Nonresidential Uses Within District. Except as otherwise provided herein for nonresidential uses (Sections 15162.1.1 and .1.2) or for the ground level frontage on N.E. and N.W. 9th Street (Section 15162.1.3), the following principal uses shall be permissible. 1. As for RG-2.2, for uses permitted or permissible therein, except for commercial marinas and occupancy of private pleasure craft, and provided that in this district, regardless of special permits required in RG-Z.2, all uses require a Class C special permit (see Section 15153). 2. Hotels and other facilities for transient dwelling or lodging. 3. Offices. 4. banks, saving and loan associations, and similar financial institutions. 5. Retail establishments as follows: Antique stores, art stores and commercial art galleries; book and stationary stores open to the general public; card and gift shops; china and crockery stores; drug stores; floor covering, paint, and wallpaper stores; florist; food• stores, including bakeries, confectionaries, delicatessens, fruit and vegetable markets, and groceries; ice cream stares; general merchandise and furniture stores; gift shops; hardware stores; jewelry stores; leather goods and luggage shops; meat and fish markets; news stands; plant stores; office supply stores; package liquor stores (without drive in facilities); pet and pet. supply stores; photographic supply stores; sporting good and bicycles; Z.Y. and radio stores; variety and sundry stores; and wearing apparel shops. Such establishments may provide incidental repair, maintenance, alteration, or adjustment services as appro- priate. but facilities, operation and storage for such services shall not be visible frcm any street or pedestrian walkway. 6. Service establishments including barber and beauty shoos; custom tailoring, dressmaking and millinery shops, except where products are made for off premises sale; coin operated laundry and dry cleaning facilities with rated capacity limited to 25 pounds per machine, 5OO pounds total for laundry, and 10 pounds per machine, 40 pounds total for dry cleaning; laundry and dry cleaning estab- lishment with total capacity limited as for coin operated facil- ities; duplicating centers including letter and photostating services (work areas far such services shall not be visible from adjacent pedestrian walkways); photographic studio; shoe repair stores. 7. Art galleries, museums and libraries. S. Bars, saloons, and taverns, including those with dancing or 'live entertainment. 9. Supper clubs and night clubs. 10. Restaurants, tea rooms, and cafes, including these with dancing, live entertainment and/or outdoor table service (where appropriate). 11. Theaters, other than drive in. 12. Health studios and spas. 13. Educational institutions of a business, professional or scientific nature. 14. Private clubs, lodges, fraternities, and sororities. 15. Auction galleries for sale of antiques. art objects, jewelry and the like, but not second hand merchandise generally. 16. Commercial recreation establishments such as pool halls, billiard parlors and game rooms. -4- 17. Clinics, studios (other than dance), laboratories, travel agencies and ticket agencies. 18. , Parking facilities. 15162.1.1. SPI-16: Nonresidential Uses Permissible Only in Mixed Use Buildings. Nonresidential uses listed in Section 15162.1. (3 through 17) shall be permissible only in mixed use buildings (see Section 15165.3,1 for floor area limitations). 15162.1.2 SPI-16: Limitations on Principal Uses Permissible Fronting on East-West Rights -of -Way; Exception. Except as provided in Section 15162.1.3- below, (N.E. and N.W. 9th Street) ' and on the ground level frontage on N.W. 7th Street, only the resi- dential or office uses listed in Section 15162.1 (1 through 3) shall be permissible fronting on east -west rights -of -way. 15162.1.3. 5PI-16: Limitations on Principal Uses Permissible on -Ground Floor rrontage or N.z. and I.W. 9tn atreet. Except as provided in Section 15162.1.4 below, only the nonresidential uses listed in Section 15162.1 (3 through 17) shall be permissible on the ground floor frontage of N.E. and N.W. 9th Street. 15162.1.4. SPI-16: Special Rules Concerning Extent and Location of Certain Uses on Ground Floor Frontage of N.E. and N.W. 9th Street. At least 85% of the lot width ground floor frontage shall be occupied by principal uses permissible in Section 15162.1.3 and the remaining frontage may be occupied by other uses in Section 15162.1. At least 851 of the required 851 frontage shall have transparent window or door openings and such openings shall be maintained in such a manner as to permit full and clear view of the interior. Each use shall have convenient direct access from the adjacent public walkway. 15162.2. SPI-16.1: Permissible Principal Uses and Structures; Limitations on Principal Uses Permissible an Ground Floor Frontage of Biscayne Boulevard. Except as otherwise provided herein for the ground floor frontage on Biscayne Boulevard (Section 15162.2.1), permissible uses and structures shall be as for Section 15162.1 without limitations for mixed use, and in addition: 1. Retail establishments for sale of motorcycles and or parts, equipment and accessories. 15162.2.1. SPI-16.1: Principal Uses Permissible on the Ground Floor Frontage or Biscayne 8aulevaro. Permissible principal uses on the ground floor frontage of Biscayne Boulevard shall be as listed in Section 15162.1 (3 through 17) and in Section 15162.2 above. 15162.2.2. SPI-16.1: Special Rules Concerning Extent and Location of Certain Uses en Ground Floor Frontage of Biscayne Boulevard. At /east 851. of the lot width ground floor frontage shall be occupied by principal uses permissible in Section 15162.2.1 and the remaining frontage may be occupied by other uses in Section 15162.1. At least 851 of the required 851 frontage shall have transparent window or door openings and such openings shall be maintained in such a manner .as to permit full and clear view of the interior. Each use shall have convenient direct access from the adjacent public walkway. -5- 15162.3. SPI-16.2: Permissible Principal Uses and Structures. Permissible principal uses and structures shall be as for Section 15162.2 without limitations on location and in addition: . 1. Sports arenas and exhibition halls. 2. Repair service establishments including appliance and office equipment* but not repair garages, repair of heavy equipment or paint and body shops. 15162.4. SPI-16, 16.1, 16.2: Limitations on loses. 1. Except for outdoor dining places, exhibits of arts and crafts, flowers and plants, interim parking lots, parking garages, and other uses as authorized by special permit, all activities shall be conducted within completely enclosed buildings. 2. Aside from antique stores, art galleries, jewelry, and book stores, no establishment shall deal in second hand merchandise. 3. All products shall be sold at retail on the premises. No whole- saling or jobbing shall be conducted from within the district. SECTION 15163. PERMISSIBLE ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES. Uses and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly inci- dental to permissible principal uses and structures. approved in the same special permit proceedings, and initiated or completed within any time limits established generally or in relation to the special permit, shall be permitted subject to limitations established by these or generally applicable regula- tions. The following special limitations or exceptions shall apply to accessory uses and structures in this district: 1. Outdoor displays, exhibits, sales, service of food and drinks, or other activities may be conducted in pedestrian open spaces, including required plaza area, whether or .not such activities are customarily accessory to the adjacent principal use. Areas, activities, and facilities so approved may be used for regular, intermittent, or temporary special events without further permit- ting which might otherwise be required under these zoning regula- tions, but shall not be exempted from requirements for other permits. 2. Temporary shelters, bulletin boards, kiosks, signs, exhibit and display stands, and facilities for service of food and drink may be permitted in appropriate locations in pedestrian open space or in required plazas. If so approved, such structures shall be exempted from limitations generally applying to yards, pedestrian open space, and floor area. SECTION 15164. RESERVED. SECTION 15165. MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS; FLOOR AZEA LIMITATIONS. 15165.1. SPI-16: Minimum Lot Requirements. Minimum lot requirements for all uses shall be a minimum gross lot area of 15,000 square feet, and a minimum lot width of 90 feet. 15155.2. SPI-16.1, 16.2: Minimum Lot Requirements. There shall be no specific dimensional requirements, but lots shall be of sufficient size to conform with other requirements and limitations of these and other lawful regulations. 15165.3. SP€-16, 16.1, 16.2: Floor Area Limitations. Floor area limitations for SP€-16, 16.1, 16.2 shall be as follows subject to the limitations and requirements of Section 2000.1. -6- 15165.3.1. SPI.16: Floor Area Limitations, Restrictions on Nonresidential rloor Area. 1. The maximum floor area for a mixed use building shall not exceed 4.32 times gross land area. 2. The maximum floor area for a residential building shall not exceed 4,32 times gross land area. 3. The maximum floor area for nonresidential use shall not exceed 1.72 times gross land area, provided however, that nonresidential use shall be permissible only in a mixed use building where at least one and one-half square feet of residential use shall be provided for every one square foot of nonresidential use. 15165.3.2. SPI-16.1: Floor Area Limitations, Exceptions, 1. The maximum floor area for a mixed use building shall not exceed 5.0 times gross land area. 2. The maximum floor area for a residential use shall not exceed 5.0 times gross land area. 3. Except as modified by Section 15165.3.2.1 below, nonresidential use shall not exceed 2.0 times the gross land area. 15165.3.2.1.SPI-16.1: Allowable Increase in Nonresidential Floor Area for the Provision of Onsite or Offsite Residential Use. 1. For every square foot of residential use provided either onsite in a mixed use building or offsite within the boundaries of the SPI- 15 district and provided concurrently with nonresidential use, the nonresidential floor area shall be increased by one square foot, provided, however, that the maximum increase in floor area shall not exceed 3.0 times gross land area. Maximum total nonresiden- tial Floor Area Ratio shall not exceed 5.0 of the SPI-16.1 site. 15165.3.3. SPi-I5.2: Floor Area Limitations. 1. The maximum floor area in a mixed use building shall not exceed 4.0 times gross land area. 2. The maximum floor area for a residential building shall not exceed 2.0 times gross land area. 3. The maximum floor area for nonresidential use shall not exceed 2.0 times gross land area. 15165.4. LUI Ratings and Ratios Applying Within District. The LUI tables as shown in Section 2011.1.1 shall apply to residential, nonresidential and mixed use buildings within these districts. The tables are based on gross lot area and all computations concerning increases in floor area as allowed in Section 15165.3.2.1 shall be converted into floor area ratio, as derived from gross lot area, to apply the correct LUI number and its related ratios. For example, assume a gross lot area of 20,000 sq.ft., an FAR of 2.25, and an allowed increase of 5,000 sq.ft.; the computation would be 20,000 x 2.25 + 5,000 ; 45,000 f 5,000 • 50,000 + 20,000 a 2.5 times gross lot area with a LUI rating number of 76 (the closest number). SECTION 15166. MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. 15166.1. SPI-16, 16.2: Yards; Setbacks; Arcades; Gateway Features: Special- Requirements and Limitations. 15166.1.1. Front and Street Side Yards; Other Yards. 1. Adjacent to N.E. and N.W. 9th Street, the yard shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in depth. 2. Except for H.E. and N.W. 9th Street, or as greater dimensions are required for building spacing, there are no minimum yard require- ments (front, street side, interior and rear). -7- 15166.1.2. Setbacks; Arcades; Special Requirements and Limitations. Except. as modified by Section 15166.3, following are the setback requirements and limitations: I. Except: (1) adjacent to N.W. 2nd Avenue, N. Miami Avenue, and N.E. 1 arid 2 Avenues where a gateway feature is required; and (2) for manda- tory and optional arcades (see Sections 15153.3.3. and L5166.6.2.), adjacent to public rights -of -way, setbacks shall not be permissible for the first forty (40) feet of height above ground level. 15166.2. SPI-16.1: Yards; Setbacks; Arcades; Special Requirements and Limitations. 15166.2.1. Front and Street Side Yards; Other Yards. 1. Adjacent to Biscayne Boulevard, all yards shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet in depth. 2. Except for Biscayne Boulevard, or as greater dimensions are required for building spacing. there are no minimum requirements for all other yards (front, street side, interior and rear). 15166.2.2. Setbacks, Arcades; Requirements and Limitations on Location. Except as modified by Section 15166.3, following are the setback requirements and limitations: 1. Except for mandatory and optional arcades (see Section 15153.3.3), adjacent to public rights -of -way, setbacks shall not be permis- sible for the first forty (40) feet in height above ground level. 15166.3. SPI-16, 16.1, 16.2: Exemptions from Yard and Setback Requirements. Where approved by Class C Special Permit in connection with original development or in subsequent Class'C action, intrusions into the N.W. and H.E. 9thh Street Pedestrian Mall yard requirement, or other exemption from set- back requirements, may be granted provided that such exemptions meet the gen- eral objectives as stated in the VI-15, 16, 16.1 and 16.2 Intent sections or in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Design Standards and Guidelines. 15166.4. Parking Prohibited in Required Yards and Setbacks Adjacent to Public Rights -of -Way; Landscaping Required. I. Required yards and setbacks adjacent to public rights -of -way shall not be used for offstreet parking or loading. Except far portions authorized for vehicular access, all required yards, setbacks, arcades, and sidewalk area within the public right-of-way shall be appropriately landscaped and provided with pedestrian ways. See Section 15153.3.5 for permissible vehicular access. 15165.5. Reserved. 15166.6. SPI-16, 16.1, 16.2: Open Space. Pedestrian open Space, Livability Space; Gateway Features, Special Requirements and Limitations. 15166.6.1. Pedestrian Open Space, Livability Space; Gateway Features, Special Requirements and Limitations. Pedestrian open space and livability space shall be provided, improved and maintained as generally or especially required in these districts and in addition: 1. All improvements shall be in accord with City of Miami Standards and Guidelines. 2. Where the top decks of accessory parking structures are exposed to view from above they shall be improved and maintained as pedes- trian open space or livability space. See Section 15153.7. -8- uN 41 C 1�� qH UP I ! SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST -^--i- "6"' a IGHt OF wAr. EXISTING ZONING 3/21/85 TWA hill SPE-IS CR-3/7 CR-2/7 .r 3. The yard adjacent to•N.E. and N.W. 9th Street shall be improved and maintained as pedestrian open space. Landscaping, sculpture, fountains, street furniture, and the like shall be provided as appropriate to the overall design of the pedestrian mall. All improvements are subject to approval in connection with class C Special Permit actions. 4. Street trees and street furniture shall be provided in the side- walk area of the public rights -of -way. Street furniture shall be so arranged as to not impede pedestrian flow_ 5. Pedestrian open space and livability space shall be located to take maximum advantage of desirable views, especially as they relate to view corridors. 6. Where feasible, roof tops (other than mandatory improvement of parking deck roof tops) eshall be improved and maintained as pedestrian open space and/or livability space (see Section 15153.8): 15166.6.2. Gateway Features; Special Requirements. Adjacent to N.W. 2 Avenue, N. Miami Avenue, and N.E. I and 2 Avenues, on N.E. and H.N. 5 Street frontages, gateway features shall be provided, improved and maintained as a portion of pedestrian open space. Such features shall be in accord with the Southeast 0vertown/Park West Design Standards and Guidelines. 15166.5.3. view Corridors; Special Requirements for Open Spaces. Where building towers are provided above the 30 degree light plane, the tower shall be oriented in an east -west direction and shall provide ample upper level open,space to enhance and preserve view corridors as they relate to other developments in the districts. See .Section 15153.3.4 and the Southeast Overtewn/Park West Design Standards and Guidelines. 15156.6.4. Pedestrian Through Block Connections; Requirements and Limitations. Whenever a development includes a pedestrian through block connection, it shall be open and accessible to the public during normal business hours. The walkway shall have a minimum width of twenty (20) feet and a minimum height of ten (10) feet. The walkway shall be appropriately improved and maintained for pedestrian comfort and convenience. SECTION 15167. HEIGHT LIMITATIONS. 15167.1. SPI-16, 16.2: Height Limitations; Special Requirements. Adjacent to north -south public rights -of -way there are no height limitations. 15167.1.1 Special Height Limitations Adjacent to East-West Public Rights -of -Way. Adjacent to east -west public rights -of -way, plane II shall be forty (40) feet; from that paint a thirty(30) degree light plane shall extend inward and upward for a distance of fifty (50) feet as measured in a horizontal direc- tion. Above that point there are no height limitations; however, no portion of a building sha1, be closer than fifty (50) feet to the base building line. 15167.2. SPI-16.1: Height Limitations; Special Requirements. Adjacent to north -south public rights -of -way, there are no height limitations. 15167.2.1. Special Height Limitations Adjacent to East-West Public Rlgnts-of-Way. Adjacent to east -west public rights -of -way, plane II shall be fifty (50) feet; from that point, a thirty (30) degree light plane shall extend inward and upward for a distance of fifty (50) feet as measured in a horizontal direction. Above that paint, there are no height limitations, provided how- ever, no portion of a building shall be closer than fifty (50) feet to the base building line. SECTION 15168.. OFFFSTREET PARKING AN0.LDADING. Since it is intended that automobile traffic be minimized in these dis- tricts because of the districts close proximity to 3Metrorail and the downtown Metronover, except for particular uses indicated in the Schedule of District Regulations that are not modified below, special offstreet parking require- ments and limitations are as follows, and in addition: offstreet parking and loading and offsite parking shall be as required in Sections 2017, 2018, 2022 and 2023, except as modified below. 15168.1. SPI-16: offstreet Parking. I. For office, retail and service establishments and -other nonres- idential uses permissible in this district, there shall be a min- imum of 1 parking space per 800 square feet of floor area. 2. For dwelling units, there shall be a minimum of .9 parking space per dwelling unit. 15168.2. SPI-16.1; Offstreet Parting. 1. For office, retail and service establishments and other nonresi- dential uses permissible in this district, there shall be a min- imum of I parking space per 1,000 square feet of floor area. 2. For dwelling units, there shall be a minimum of .7 parking space per dwelling unit. 3. Offsite parking shall be permissible in this district as provided in Section 2018, but without any demonstration or required find- ings as to the practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship in providing required parking onsite, further provided that in this district Class C Special Permit may cover matters requiring other special permits as In the case of offstreet loading. 15168.3. SPI-16.2: Offstreet Parking. I. For office, retail and service establishments and other nonresi- dential uses permissible in this district, there shall be a min- imum of 1 parking space per 1,000 square feet of floor area. 2. For dwelling units, there shall be a minimum of .6 parking space per dwelling unit. 15168.4. Special Offstreet Parking Requirements; Limitations. Except for offstreet interim parking facilities or parking lots, all offstreet parking and loading as related to a principal use, required or other, shall be in an enclosed structure so designed to screen automobiles from public view. See Section 15153.7. SECTION 15169. LIMITATIONS ON SIGNS. Sign limitations shall be as set forth fn Section 1529, except in SPI-16 and 15.1, animated and flashing signs and banners shall be permissible for ground level nonresidential uses fronting an N.E. and N.W. 9 Street. 325.2 -10- I El- inn= miwz L-ir-u. .l lY 1,114 r-1-i SF . 3 ■�r i■ - Ip i —ii.- i .. 1111ty � lix\ 1. 3 t Fit .iU 1I 1Io,. II 111 11 1 i , IL \‘ . t ill '1* ' , i 1 IM11141WEI 1 111111 idt N I 1/7 0 i1111 In _.I I _ I II E.I ' Hi1I L CR-3/7 CR-2/7 Ilt 1111 !lI II'Ii IUIL' IA difilifi Plum Ill 1111111 I IIIIG t .� 111!wl11 _L1I1 I IIIIN1111111111 = SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST I4EIIIOfAIL H GIU OF WAY EXISTING ZONING `um^PHASE 1 - D C 14 1111HU 5PC-15 4 7•IM{�:17 3/21/85 1 • .5iiie-cdf.- 4.5,03, ,..de..„, QUESTION 4 QUESTION Al ENVIRONMENT AND NAT€1R8L RFSOURCFS: AIR A. DESCRIBE EXISTING AIR QUALITY, MONITORING PROGRAMS, AND TRENDS. INCLUDE MONITOR LOCATIONS, TYPE OF EQUIPMENT USED, AND POLLUTANTS MONITORED; AND SPECIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXISTING AIR QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAMS. SPECIFY WHETHER OR NOT ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WILL CAUSE EXCEEDANCE OF AIR QUALITY STANDARDS. INCLUDE POLLUTANTS MONITORED ON A MACRO LEVEL OUTSIDE THE STUDY BOUNDARY IN THE DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS (E.G., OZONE MONITORING ON VIRGINIA KEY). IDENTIFY ANY ADDITIONAL ACTIONS OR FACILITIES NEEDED TO PROPERLY MONITOR AND ABATE THE IMPACT OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON AIR QUALITY. I. Introduction Congress enacted amendments to The Clean Air Act in 1970. These amendments required the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate national ambient air quality standards for known air pollutants. In 1971, EPA promulgated primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for six criteria air pollutants. National primary standards were designed to protect the public health, whereas, secondary standards were designed to protect public welfare. Since the initial promulgation of air quality standards, standards for hydrocarbons were rescinded and standards for lead adopted. The six criteria air pollutants and their respective standards are shown in Table 4.1. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has the ultimate responsibility for protecting the ambient air quality. To achieve the goal of clean air, EPA has required each state to prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that attains and maintains ambient air quality standards. The agency responsible for implementing the SIP in Florida is the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER). To assist the State in maintaining air quality standards, the State has entered into inter -local agreements with municipalities to allow local agencies to act as an arm of the State. The Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) has entered into agreement with the FDER and is the local air pollution control agency responsible for the enforcement of air quality regulations and monitoring of the six criteria air pollutants in Dade County. II. Dade ,ounty Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network. Exhibited in Figures 4.1 thru 4.6 is the location of each air monitoring site operated by DERM. For consistency, site numbers coincide with Dade County station numbers. Table 4.2 lists the address of each monitoring site. Dade County's ambient air monitoring program meets EPA's network design criteria for State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) and National Air Monitoring Stations (NAMS). In addition, station probe siting meets federal ambient air quality monitoring regulations. 4-i Dade County uses either federal reference or designated equivalent methods to monitor air pollution levels. A quality assurance program has been implemented to validate the air monitoring data generated by DERM. bade County follows the FDER's Quality Assurance Plan and is audited annually by the State to ensure that the air monitoring program has been operated in accordance with standard operating procedures. III. .fair Quality Monitoring Data Ambient air quality data generated by DERM is validated by the FDER prior to submittal to the state data bank and ultimately to the national data storage and retrieval system. Air quality data developed for this report is prepared from the State's air quality ALSUM statistical report. Tables 4.3 thru 4.8 summarize Dade County's air quality for the years 1983, 1984, and 1985. a. Particulate Matter Table 4.3 summarizes Dade County's particulate matter air quality data. There appears to be no dramatic change in TSP concentrations over the past three years. The differences in concentration could be attributed .to year to year variations in meteorology and local conditions. The exceedance of the 24-hour standard in 1985 at Station 32 can be attributed to a muck fire in the northwest portion of the county. The cause of the exceedance of the 24-hour standard at Station 10 is undetermined at this time. Because neither station exceeded the 24- hour standard twice, a violation of the 24-hour TSP standard has not occurred in 1985. The exceedance of the annual geometric mean standard at Station 34 is a violation of the state standard. The cause for consistently high values at this site is due to local construction activities. When construction is complete, particulate concentrations will probably return to pre -construction levels of 40 to SO micrograms per cubic meter. The high annual geometric mean measured at Station 38, which is the only TSP air monitoring station within the City of Miami, is based on nine months (April -December) of data. Therefore, no violation of the annual standard has been recorded. The reason for consistently high concentrations at this site has not been determined to date. The existing TSP network (Figure 4.1) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAMS. The network is adequate to monitor particulate concentration trends in Dade County. However, the TSP network should be expanded to include one site in the central business district of Miami for trend analysis. b. lasul Table 4.4 summarizes lead levels in Dade County. There have been no exceedances of the lead standard for the past three years. The trend 4-2 in lead concentrations for Dade County appears to be a county -wide decrease. The most dramatic reduction has occurred at Station 44. In 1983, the maximum concentration is 1.4 micrograms per cubic meter, whereas, the maximum concentration in 1985 is 0.6 micrograms per cubic meter. Because the automobile is the major source of lead In Dade County, it is generally believed that the reduction in ambient lead levels can be attributed to the phasing -out of leaded gasoline. The existing lead network (Figure 4.2) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAMS. The network is adequate to monitor lead concentrations in Dade County. However, the lead network should be expanded to include one site in the central business district of Miami for trend analysis. • c. Sulfur Dioxide Table 4.5 summarizes sulfur dioxide concentrations in Dade County. There have been no exceedances of the sulfur dioxide standards for the past three years. The trend appears to be a small reduction in ambient sulfur dioxide levels. However, the lower concentrations measured in 1985 could be due to variations in meteorology. The existing sulfur dioxide network (Figure 4.3) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAMS. The network is adequate to monitor sulfur dioxide concentrations in Dade County and the City of Miami. The network should not be expanded unless new major point sources of sulfur dioxide locate in Dade County. d. Nitrogen Dioxide Table 4.6 summarizes nitrogen dioxide concentrations in Dade County. There have been no exceedances of the nitrogen -dioxide standard for the past three years. The trend appears- to be a reduction in ambient nitrogen dioxide levels. Decreases in nitrogen dioxide concentrations could be attributed to improved emissions controls on automobiles. The existing nitrogen dioxide network (Figure 4.4) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAMS. The network is adequate to monitor nitrogen dioxide concentrations in Dade County and the City of Miami. The network should not be expanded as it would not be a cost-effective expenditure of government funds. e. Ozone Table 4.7 summarizes ozone levels in Dade County. There have not been violations of the ozone standard from 1983 through 1985. However, if either station 36A or 50 measures another exceedance of the .12 parts per million standard in 1986, then Dade County will be re -designated a nonattainment area for ozone. 4-3 In 1979, Dade County was declared a nonattainment area for ozone by EPA. As a result of that designation, Dade County was required to submit a revision to the State Implementation Plan to show how they would attain and maintain the ozone standard by 1982. Through point source emissions controls, as well as, implementing transportation control measures, such as, exclusive bus and carpool lanes, park and ride fringe lots, doubling the bus fleet and adding auto -free zones, Dade County was able to achieve and maintain the standard through 1984. However, it appears that Dade County will again be designated nonattainment for ozone. At this point, DERM is waiting until the end of 1986 to determine their compliance status. Additional traffic generated by development will increase hydrocarbon emissions, which are precursors for ozone formation. Since ozone is an area --wide problem, implementation of county -wide transportation control measures, such as, a vehicle inspection and maintenance program, additional expressways, and improved public transit will be necessary to abate elevated levels of ozone. Traffic flow improvements that coincide with major development will provide only small reductions in area -wide hydrocarbon emissions. The primary benefit of widening roadways, improving intersections, and adding traffic signals in the primary impact area of a development is mitigation of carbon monoxide hot spots. The existing ozone network (Figure 4.5) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAMS. The network is adequate to monitor ozone concentrations in Dade County and the City of Miami. f. Carbgn PoRexide Table 4.8 summarizes the carbon monoxide levels in Dade County. From 1983 through 1985, two monitoring sites, Stations 41 and 42, have recorded violations of the eight -hour standard. However,'since 1986, neither site has recorded a -violation of the carbon monoxide .standards. Because violations of the carbon monoxide standard were recorded, the FDER is required to revise the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to show attainment and maintenance of the carbon monoxide standard. The carbon monoxide modeling study for the SIP revision concludes that the Flagler Street site (Station 42) and Little Havana site (Station 42) will shown attainment of the standard by 1987, which is the EPA mandated deadline. The modeling study analysis is supported by the fact that violations of the carbon monoxide standard have not been recorded at the Flagler Street site in 1985, 1986 and the first three months of 1987. Monitoring data for the Little Havana site also shows no violations for 1986 and 1987. In addition to the SIP revision modeling study, a recent carbon monoxide emissions density study was conducted in December 1986 for the areas surrounding the Flagler and Little Havana monitoring sites. The conclusions of the study were that the carbon monoxide levels at the Flagler Street site will decline through the year 2000, and carbon monoxide emissions at the Little Havana site will show no change from 4-4 1987 to 1992. From 1992 to year 2000, emissions at the Little Havana site could possibly increase under the high traffic growth scenario. Since the decline in carbon monoxide emissions at the Flagler Street site is primarily attributed to the Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program, it is reasonable to assume that the entire downtown area will also see a decline in carbon monoxide levels over the next ten to fifteen years. Therefore, planned development for the City of Miami should not cause violations of the carbon monoxide standards. The existing carbon monoxide network (Figure 4.6) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAMS. However, the network is not adequate to monitor neighborhood or microscale trends for the entire county. Two existing neighborhood scale sites, Stations 1 and 44, should be relocated to new growth centers in the Southwest and Northwest portions of the county. Also, several additional microscale sites are needed to adequately characterize maximum ambient carbon monoxide levels in the City of Miami. 4-5 TABLE 4.1 NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR DUALITY STANDARDS A. National Primary $tansi rds for Sulfur Dioxide 80 micrograms per cubic meter - annual arithmetic mean. 365 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. B. Nationa] secondary Standard for Sulfur Dioxide 1300 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 3-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. 260 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. 60 micrograms per cubic meter annual arithmetic mean. C. National Primary Standards for Particulate Matter 75 micrograms per cubic meter annual geometric mean. 260 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. O. National ,Secondary ,St ndards for Particulate Matter 60 micrograms per cubic meter annual geometric mean. * 150 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. E. Rational Primary and Secondary Standards for Carbon Monoxide * 10 milligrams per cubic meter - maximum 8-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. * 40 milligrams per cubic meter - maximum 1-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. 4-6 TABLE 4.1 (CONTINUED) F. National Primary and Secondary .Standard for Ozoptct 235 micrograms per cubic meter •- maximum 1-hour concentration. G. National Primary _and Secondary Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide 100 micrograms per cubic meter annual arithmetric mean. H. National Primary and Secondary Standard for Lead 1.5 _micrograms per cubic meter - maximum arithmetric mean averaged over a calendar quarter. Florida Ambient Air Quality Standards 4-7 TABLE 4.2 AIR MONITORING STATION LOCATION Station Saroad No. Address, 1 10-2700-002 864 N.W. 23rd Street 10 10-0860-001 6400 N.W. 27th Avenue 11 10-1760-001 251 E. 47th Street (Hialeah) 15 10-2720-007 2100 Washington Avenue (Miami Beach) 23 10-1880-001 325 N.W. 2nd Street (Homestead) 24 10-3040-001 17011 N.E. 19th Avenue (N. Miami Beach) 31 10-3560-002 9201 S.W. 152 Street (Perrine) 32 10-0860-020 7050 N.W. 36th Street 33 10-0860-022 6135 S.W. 66th Street 34 10-0860-019 S.R. 821 and U.S. 27 (Pennsuco) 35 10-0860-021 Thompson Park 36 10-0860-023 Virginia Key 36A 10-0860-027 Rosenstiel School 38 10-2700-016 1200 N.W. 20th Street 41 10-2700-019 2201 S.W. 4th Street 42 10-2700-018 101 E. Flagler Street 44 10-0860-024 S.R. 826 & S,W. 4th Street 45 10-0860-025 S.W. 104th Street E U.S. 1 46 10-2700-020 2121 N.W. 2lst Street 49 10-0860-028 Haulover Beach 50 10-0860-029 Perdue Medical Center 4-8 o.w r+,n..+.r Amt A..baarda ► r. e.rm-t. ?cued • - ;- y+ . Y m- .ra ! r! .khnarri,tc ••••4 & •• y [Ar+a lark", Inc. x 0 O SOU i HEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of utAJ.N O6PAN7A►4EMT • 4--9 Tfir • rang. • O s • d; 0 Figure 4.2 EAD SITE LOCATIONS .. i M+003s194a b_ xis And v..z ems. NYSIr .a And Antr .c.,. Vic. El.ot-ovIverka Enclnorr+n, Cormitarom s1c. SOU i HEAST OVERTOWN!PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL I M PACT crrr of DEPARTAaaEHT 4-10 -' L1 • 0 at Figure 4.3 • /1SO2 SITE LOCATIONS) And A.1.eiCiet/Yr. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of wow p€PAATA'EHT • 4-11 w :'"r �t aw7. a 1 • • Figure 4.4 NO2 SITE LOCATIONS, Ptarrrot Ilekor +a I t And Y.- ha , > SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT x x CITY Of 11A141 DEPARTAI EMT • :4-12 p: t 1 ;tee 1 I1. . 1 L., I 1I._ L Ia( NI !. I.._ tie 'i r Figure 4.5 ` 9 'OZONE SITE LOCATIONS) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT • >c...O•. o- CITY of UNAU1 OEPAATA++EA4T • 4-13 • sow Figure 4.6 CO SITE LOCATIONS xuu .tia v..n. Vet YrIlierr.-tea ka Erwlharnonesi Erbairar•OngCcrodurn, SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Station No. TABLE 4.3 ANNUAL TSP CONCENTRATIONS MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER 1983 1984105. - 24—hr. Maxima Geo. 24—hr. Maxima Geo. 24-hr. Maxima Geo. 1st 2nd Mean 1st 2nd Mean 1st 2nd Mean ** 10 97 96 56 88 84 49 161 122 56 11 89 83 46 84 80 46 109 97 50 15 123 86 38 74 70 40 * * * ' 23 130 88 44 86 82 45 121 77 47 24 138 84 40 75 71 39 95 79 39 31 * * * 67 63 34 84 65 36 **• 32 141 108 • 50 104 89 50 212 118 52 33 141 106 46 111 78 45 60 60 38 ** 34 130 79 40 113 111 48 131 124 61 35 124 63 27 56 50 27 70 64 31 ** 38 * * * * * * 116 107 73 45 123 76 35 69 65 37 64 60 36 46 148 103 48 86 86 50 87 85 51 * Not available ** Exceedance of standard Station No. TABLE 4.4 QUARTERLY LEAD CONCENTRATIONS MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER 1983 1984 .1985. Quarter Quarter Quarter II III IV I II III IV I IS III IV 10 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 11 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 15 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 * * * * 23 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 24 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 31 * * * * 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 i' 32 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 a, 33 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 34 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 35 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 38 * * * * * * * * 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 44 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 46 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 * Not available Station No. TABLE 4.5 ANNUAL SULFUR DIOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER 1213 Maxima 3-Hour 24-Hour 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Arth. Mean 1214 Maxima 3-Hour 24-Hour 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Arth. Mean ,985 Maxima 3-Hour 24-Hour 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Arth. Mean 1 26 26 25 23 6 35 31 19 17 6 22 17 12 11 3 TABLE 4.6 ANNUAL NITROGEN DIOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER 19.B3. Station No. Arith. Mean 1984 1985 Arith. Mean Arith. Mean 1 42 35 31 36 34 17 13 U. Station No. TABLE 4.7 ANNUAL OZONE CONCENTRATIONS PARTS/MILLION 19 1984 195_ 1-hr. Maxima No. of 1-hr. Maxima No. of 1-hr. Maxima No. of 1st 2nd Exceed. 1st 2nd Exceed. 1st 2nd Exceed. 35 36 36A 49 50 CIS * Not available .115 .095 0 .090 .085 0 .106 .105 0 .110 .110 0 .110 .095 0 * * * * * * .100 .090 0 .150 .125 2 * * * * * * .124 .114 0 * * * * * * .135 .131 2 TABLE 4.8 ANNUAL CARBON MONOXIDE CONCNETRATIONS MILLIGRAMS/CUBIC METER 1984 1933. Maxima Maxima Maxima 1-Hour 8-Hour Exceed. 1-Hour 8-Hour Exceed. 1-Hour 8-Hour Exceed. Station No. 1st 2nd lst 2nd 8-Hour lst 2nd 1st 2nd 8-Hour 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 8-Hour 1 17 16 9 8 0 18 18 15 9 1 20 17 9 8 0 41 23 21 11 10 1 22 22 17 10 1 30 23 15 11 2 42 24 21 14 13 13 17 17 12 11 3 14 14 12 10 1 44 17 16 8 7 0 14 13 10 7 0 17 17 8 8 0 B. SPECIFY THE STRUCTURAL AND OPERATION CONDITIONS THAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN ALL DEVELOPMENT ORDERS TO MINIMIZE AIR QUALITY IMPACTS; AND SPECIFY WHAT ADDITIONAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN, AND BY WHOM, IF AN EXCEEDANCE(S) OF AIR QUALITY STANDARDS OCCURS. To ensure that planned growth for the City of Miami does not cause a violation of the State Ambient Air Quality Standards for carbon monoxide, the city will implement a carbon monoxide monitoring network. The network will consist of one monitoring site for each of the following sub -areas: Brickell, Central Business District, Omni and Southeast Overtown/Park Test. The carbon monoxide monitors will be placed at the worst case intersection in each sub -area. The locations of the monitoring sites will be selected by FDER and DERM with the assistance of city consultants. In addition to the monitoring program, the city will implement a program of Transportation Control Measures (TCM) that will be staged according to the level of carbon monoxide concentrations measured by the monitors. A list of potential TCMs is shown in Table 4.9. The TCM program will be described in the Development Order. The updated analysis required for Phase II development, which will take place sometime between 1992 and 1997, will include an evaluation of carbon monoxide data and the effectiveness of the TCM program. If necessary, adjustments to the monitoring and TCM programs will be implemented as a Development order condition in Phase II. 4-21 TABLE 4.9 POTENTTA1 TRANSPORTATION CO1TROL PEASURES (TCM' S) ma SOUTHEAST DKERDIYIVBVIKWESI I. Ridersharing related A. Participate in locally sponsored ride -matching service. B. Conduct in-house ridershare matching. C. Provide preferential parking for HOV's. D. Reduce parking cost for HOV's. E. Operate vanpool or buspool service. F. Monitor employee travel modes. II. Public transit related A. Employer -subsidized transit passes. B. Elimination of parking cost subsidies. C. Private developer shuttle service: implementation or expansion. D. Developer transit amenities: bus shelter, intermodal terminal, Metrorail or Metromover station. E. Enhanced bus service. F. Park and Ride parking facilities. III. Traffic flow related A. Peak hour restriction of on -street parking. B. Peak hour restriction of on -street loading zones, C. Roadway capacity improvements. D. Reduced bus route circulation through downtown streets/ increased bus interface with Metrorail/Metromover stations or consolidated bus terminals. E. Strict enforcement of traffic laws by Miami Police Department. IV. Parking related A. Downtown fringe parking. B. Developer shuttle services to off -site parking. C. Limitations on on -site parking. V. Other TCM actions A. Computer bicycle and pedestrian facilities: showers and lockers. B. Employment or designation of an employee transportation coordinator (ETC). C. Implementation of flex -time or other work schedule conducive to ridersharing and transit use. D. Enhanced enforcement of Dade County anti -tampering and fuel switching ordinance. E. Mandatory emissions control device inspection program. 4-22 C. SPECIFY REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE AIR QUALITY IMPACTS, ENSURE THAT ABATEMENT MEASURES DESCRIBED IN B. ARE IMPLEMENTED, AND ENSURE THAT AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS ARE NOT EXCEEDED. I. Mor j tar i rg Bro r • : Four monitoring stations are recommended for the carbon monoxide monitoring network. Each sub -area should have one monitoring site located at the worst -case intersection. The CBD sub -area has an existing worse -case microscale carbon monoxide monitoring site operated by DERM. This site is located at 101 East Flagler Street and is adequate to characterize maximum carbon monoxide levels in the CBD. The other three sub -areas, Brickell, Omni, and Southeast 0vertown/Park West do not have an existing worse -case monitoring station. The location of the Southeast Overtown/Park West site will be described in the Development order. Since Dade County has an EPA approved air .monitoring program, operation of the Southeast 0vertown carbon monoxide site by DERM would be the most cost-effective solution to site operation. In addition, data collection would be consistent with the FDER quality assurance plan and standard operating procedures. II. Program Budget Capital Costa Annual ,Cost; 1. Salary and Benefits (1/8 man-year) $3,000.00 2. Analyzers (2) $ 8,500.00 3. Calibrators (2) $ 7,000.00 4. Data Loggers (2) $ 5,000.00 5. Recorders (2) $ 2,500.00 6. Misc. Supplies, Expenses and Equipment $ 5,000.00 7. Annual Operating Expenses: electric, rent, telephone and supplies S3,000.00 8. System fabrication, installation, and initial operation by contractor (3-6 months) $10,000.00 9. Site Selection (Consultant) $ 1,000.00 Total = $39,000.00 $6,000.00 4-23 III. Sources DI Funding The city will fund the capital and annual operating costs for the one additional carbon monoxide Or monitoring station. To recuperate expenses for the monitoring program, the city could assess a development fee based an the number of parking spaces required for the development project or the number of vehicle trips generated by the project. Also, monies committed by existing development for carbon monoxide monitoring could be diverted to assist in funding the monitoring program. IY. Air Quality .Standards, Local Ordinances and inter -local Agreements. The City of Miami should not adopt by ordinance carbon monoxide ambient air quality standards. The State of Florida has adopted national standards as state air quality standards and has the responsibility for attainment and maintenance of those standards. BERM is an arm of the state and has the responsibility for enforcement of those standards in Dade County. The city should enter into an inter —local agreement with Dade County specifying responsibilites for carbon monoxide monitoring. This agreement should delineate funding responsibilities, as well as administrative responsibilities. 4=1;f6/7;001 QUESTION WATER QUALITY/DRAINAGE A. EXISTING CONDITIONS . DESCRIBE THE COMPOSITION AND QUANTITY OF RUNOFF CURRENTLY BEING DIRECTLY DISCHARGED TO .ANY SURFACE WATER BODY OR THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER. ALSO, DESCRIBE ANY STORIWATER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS DUE TO EXISTING SOILS OR HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS. COMPOSITION AND QUANTITY OF RUNOFF Stormwater runoff is generally known to contain contaminants in varying concentrations. The amount of contaminants is a function of the type of surface coverage producing the runoff and the nature of activities which have left residues on impervious areas that can be carried by flowing water. The contaminants are the residuals of the following activities. 1. Street surface deterioration. 2. Motor Vehicle Waste (Fuels, lubricants, fluids, coolants, tire and brake particles, exhaust emissions, collision scrap, dirt and rust.) 3. Careless public and private solid waste collection. 4. Atmospheric fallout. 5. Vegetative droppings (Including leaves, grass, herbicides and pesticides). 6. Animal and bird droppings. 7. Particles from windblown dirt. 8. Soil from erosion of land surfaces. 9. Construction debris. Source: Sartor, et al 1972, Lazaro 1979 The amount of the material carried in the runoff is also determined by street cleaning practices, street slopes, the intensity and duration of rainfall, the season and the time elapsed from the last rainfall event. It is estimated that 90% of the surface pollutants are removed by runoff in the first 0.5 hour of a storm event of 1.0 in/hr intensity (Overton and Meadows). Many studies have been performed around the country in urban settings to determine the constituents of urban runoff. A selection of the results from some of the most pertinent studies appears in Exhibit 5-1. These pollutant load concentrations are based on lbs/acre/day as a means of comparing the differing areas and land uses. The chief task herein is to 5-1 select those studies most closely allied to the project study area in function and characteristics to best determine the stormwater runoff load. The loadings estimated for the downtown area shown in Exhibit 5-2 are selected from studies in Tampa, Fort Lauderdale and Miami. The existing land use and area is shown in Exhibit 5-3. Existing and projected pollutants loads are shown for Existing, Phase I, Phase II and Phase III in Exhibits 5-4, 5-5, 5-6 and 5-7 respectively. Water laden with these pollutants could be expected to produce intense, short term water quality violations at the outfall. Zones of reasonable mixing have not been established for these outfalls, yet good circulation and tidal flushing provide dilution of these contaminants. The predominant mode of runoff disposal is through positive outfall drainage to surface waters. The entire study area runoff flows east to Biscayne Bay. Map G indicates the major drainage outfalls to surface waters. Projects in the study area that have undergone development or redevelopment since 1980 have had to meet new design standards for stormwater runoff and -these projects have minimal effect on the surrounding surface waters. These developments collect stormwater and discharge, as a minimum, the first inch of runoff to on -site drainage wells. In addition, sane streets have been retrofitted with sub -surface exfiltration systems which divert street flow to the water table aquifer for attenuation of surface water pollutant discharge. Approximately 1.19% of the study area flows to the various depths of the Biscayne Aquifer in 1986. By Phase III it is estimated that 94.24% will be directed to the aquifer. See Exhibits 5-4 through 5-7. There is a high water table in the study area which inhibits percolation as a means of total stormwater runoff disposal. The design rainfall accumulation of 60 inches per year is significant and forces development to augment percolation systems with underdrain facilities or drainage wells. 5_2 DESCRIBE ANY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS DUE TO EXISTING SOIL OR HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS. Based on available recent soil borings, percolation tests and other geo- technical studies conducted by local soils engineering and testing firms, there are no subsurface conditions throughout the study area and environs, which should pose any unusual limitations or constraints to storm water management and development. The subsurface materials encountered through - ought the study area are consistent with South Florida's geologic environ- ment and are similar to those encountered throughout the Miami area as discussed below: Dade County is located on the southern flank of a stable carbonate platform on which thick deposits of limestones, dolomites and e vaporites have accumulated. The upper two hundred feet of the soil profile is composed predominately of limestone and quartz sand. These sediments were deposited during several glacial and interglacial stages when the ocean was at elevations higher than present. Florida can be divided into two geologic provinces - the Central Highlands and the Coastal Lowlands. The Coastal Lowlands encompass all of South Florida and consist of plains representing marine terraces which have been modified by erosion. The coastal lowlands can be further subdivided into regions called Everglades, the Big Cypress Swamp, The Mangrove and Coastal Glades, the Sandy Flatlands and the Atlantic Coastal Ridge. The Atlantic Coastal Ridge and the Sandy Flatlands represent the majority of the Miami area. The Atlantic Coastal Ridge approximates U.S. High- way #1 or a high elevation ridge. The Sandy Flatlands are bordered by the Atlantic Coastal Ridge on the east and by the Everglades on the south and the west. In many portions of Dade County, surface sand deposits of the Pamlico Formation are encountered. The Pamlico sands have a thick- ness of two to five feet and overlie the Miami Limestone. The Miami Limestone is a soft to moderately hard, white, porous to very porous, sometimes sandy, oolitic calcareous cemented grainstone. The Miami Limestone outcrops in portions of Dade County. The Miami Limestone has a maximum thickness of about 35 feet along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge and thins sharply near the coastline and in a westerly direction. The Miami limestone was formed about 130,000 years ago at a time when the sea level was twenty-five feet higher than it is today. This environment facilitated formation of concentrically 5-3 layered sand sized carbonate grains called oolites. These grains formed by repeated precipitation of calcium carbonate around the nucleus of a sand or shell grain. The Miami Limestone can be separated into two facies: the barrier bar oolitic facies and the tidal shoal limestone facies. The barrier bar facies is characterized by lenses of oolitic limestone separated by intermittent, one inch thick or less, uncemented sand layers (cross -bedded limestone). Zones of higher porosity are characteristic and parallel to the bedding plains of the cross -bedded limestone. The tidal shoal limestone facies is characterized by a distinct lack of bedding planes. In addition, burrowing organisms have churned pre- viously deposited sediments, which has resulted in high porosity channels in the rock. These ancient channels give the rock an ap- pearance of a hardened sponge in some areas. The Miami Limestone is underlain by the Ft. Thompson Formation. The Ft. Thompson Formation includes sand, sandstone and limestone. The upper reaches of the Ft. Thompson Formation contain non -cemented sand. The Ft. Thompson Formation is wedge shaped, having a thick- ness of about sixty feet in the Miami area and thinning to a thick- ness of about ten feet in western Dade County. The top portions of the Ft. Thompson Formation consist of sand having a thickness ranging from five to twenty-five feet. The remainder of the formation con- sists of coralline limestone, quartz sandstone, sandy limestone and freshwater limestone. The type of material within the formation and the degree of cementation is variable with lateral extent and depth. Within the Dade County area the Ft. Thompson Formation is underlain by the Tamiami Formation. The Tamiami Formation consists of sands, silts and clays and sometimes fossiliferous limestone. The upper portions of the Tamiami Formation are permeable and make up the lower Biscayne Aquifer. This Formation ranges in thickness from zero to three hundred feet in South Florida. Throughout the study area the subsurface conditions may be sum- marized as consisting of five (5) geologic layers: Layer 1, Fill Soils - Surface soils to depths of one to 5 feet consists of silty fine to medium sand fill. Deposits of sand fill up to 10 feet. Laver 2, Miami Limestone Formation - Directly beneath the fill and persisting to a depth of about 25 feet is the Miami Limestone Forma- tion. The Miami Limestone (also known as Miami oolite) is a Pleisto- cene deposit which underlies much of southeast Florida. It is a soft, porous sandy to oolitic carbonate rock which has been extensively solutioned. As a consequence of solutioning, the rock mass con- tains many sand filled vugs, small voids, and depressions. Layer 3, Fine to Medium Sand - Immediately underlying the Miami Limestone is a layer of fine to medium carbonate sand. The thickness of the sand layer varies from 2 to 10 feet. The sand is in a medium condition and contains shells and small limestone fragments. Layer 4, Fort Thompson Formation - Occurring below the carbonate sands is the limestone of the Fort Thompson Formation. The limestone of this formation varies from sandy to Shelly and contains some dis- continuous sand filled zones, small voids and channels. It is a compact rock with unconfined compressive strengths near those of con- crete. The bottom of the Fort Thompson limestones is approximately 150 feet below grade. Layer 52 Tamiami Formation - Beneath the Fort Thompson limestones lies the Tamiami Formation. In this area, the Tamiami Formation is composed of well -cemented sandstone. The Miami limestone provides adequate bearing capacity to shallow spread foundations or mats which support light to moderately heavy structural loads. For large to heavy structural loads, deep foundations established in the Fort Thompson Formation and consisting of driven piling or drilled cast in place caissons would be appropriate. Depending on the specific location, ground water will be generally found anywhere from 5 - 7 feet below existing grade. Due to the proximity to Biscayne Bay and resulting salt water intrusion problems, ground water throughout the study area is unfit for potable water supply. The study area is also outside the "cone -of -influence" of any existing or proposed well fields or other water supply sources. Consequently, developments within the study area will not present any significant effects on water quality or quantity. The accompanying soils map (Map E) illustrates the various soil formations and soil boring locations utilized as base data for this analysis. :.1MIY111._ Rw .4.T T + 1 1 Ern ikft. w1RhEli Iw _ IIIIII H Rw ,s I' r 1 44 ,* ► • .i. .1 T` 4 silt' p a �.n,rlstiri • 1 • • T Lin glA taTE IIIS 4 4na 0--- ilii'11• 11 VIZ 41111111 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT David Plummer And Associate*, Inc_ Bormello, Kurki And Vera, Inc. r 1. '. 7T. tt� megoll N 1Y 0 lir UK. MAP E - SOILS MAP SYMBOL SOIL IDENTIFICATION a DESCRIPTION Q R a Ma ROCKDALE FINE SAND, LEVEL PHASE - LIMESTONE COMPLEX MADE LAND SOIL BORING LOCATION source/soils data: u.s. dept. of agriculture, 8Oi1 conservation service. it. rt. sitY. 1I a 1N1 ■ui! It lid miun MIK 113t 1 l 11111111 1var sittiP x 1 • ►.G►>wTIw.MAL •ARK RART 004616466 W x 4 u a CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTAMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IIIII I I Williams—tivacell And Johnson, Inc. Environmental Enginsariny Con*uitants, Inc. 2. DESCRIBE THE COMPOSITION AND SPECIFY THE QUANTITY OF ANY NON- STORMWATER DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATER BODIES OR THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER. COMPOSITION OF NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES The types of non-stormwater discharges to the stormwater conveyance system have been identified as follows: A. Construction Dewaterinq: This intermittent contribution would have the predominant characteristics of the water table aquifer, typically this is fresh water comprised of surface runoff infiltration which mixes with the salt water aquifer underlying the downtown area. To the extent the water is pumped via street surface prior to discharge to the storm system it could contact and entrain residual components. However, after flushing and assuming continuous flow it would resume its groundwater characteristics. If erosion and turbidity controls are not taken suspended solids could be a significant component of this non-stormwater discharge. B. Fire Hydrant Flushing: This process could be expected to produce generally high quality water with perhaps abnormal concentrations of iron and hardness due to scaling and decomposition of iron water distribution pipes. This is not considered a significant overall contribution. C. Street Washing: To the extent streets are purged of contaminants without retrieval by street cleaning operations, runoff from street washing can approximate the first flush concentrations of stormwater. D. Garage Washdown. This wastewater would have many of the characteristics of normal runoff from streets except that it could be expected to have more oil, grease and other drippage associated with parked cars. Building code requirements now dictate this waste to be discharged to the sanitary sewer. E. Cross Connections: Wastes from permitted and illegal discharges of sanitary and commerical/industrial waste to the stormwater system must be considered as a possibility, however, documentation is difficult. Interconnection of storm and sanitary sewers for highwater overflow is an ongoing national problem of older urbanized areas. The City of Miami Drainage Atlas indicate points where sanitary and storm lines join though these are to be phased out. Recent evidence from Schmidt and Spencer, 1986 indicate large municipal drainage systems may have far more point source discharges than would normally be expected. The direction of these non-stormwater discharges must be assumed to be predominately to the surface water. However, some isolated septic systems or seepage pits could be making discharges to the water table aquifer. 5-7 QUANTITY OF NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATER BODIES OR THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER. Presently non-stormwater discharge to surface water bodies or the Biscayne Aquifer can be contributed to the following: A. Construction Dewatering: Discharge due to construction is a major contributor of non-stormwater to the Biscayne Aquifer. Due to the nature and frequency of this type of operation it is very hard to quantify the water volume. produced from construction dewatering. If proper erosion and turbity controls are taken, utilizing filtering systems as required by local building codes this type of non-stormwater discharge will not deteriorate the water quality. 8. Fire Department Practices: The Fire Department contributes to non-stormwater discharges under the following conditions. 1. Regular Fire Hydrant Flushing: Fire hydrant flushing is done every 4 months using 200 gal. per operation for approximately 200 fire hydrants within the study area. Fire hydrant flushing will generate approximately 160,000 gallons of non-stormwater discharge a year. 2. Flow Tests: Flow tests are performed every 5 years for two minutes using an average flow of 800 GPM per hydrant. This practice will generate a volume of 320,000 gallons of non- stormwater discharge every 5 years or 64,000 gallons of non-stormwater discharge every year. 3. Water From Fires: Based on information from the City of Miami Fire Dept., an estimated average flow of 130,000 gallons of water a year is used in extinguishing fires. The amount varies considerably every year and is very hard to be quantified. 4. System Flow Test: System flow tests are performed on a regular basis by the City of Miami Fire Department prior to issuing of water permits. An estimated average of 150,000 gallon per year is discharged through the drainage system into the Biscayne Aquifer or Biscayne Bay. C. Cross Connection: It is extremely difficult to quantify waste discharge from connection of Sanitary and Commerical/ Industrial waste to the stormwater system. The majority of connections were either permitted a long time ago or were done illegally by different parties. Recent inquires to the department of Environment Regulation concluded that it would be very hard to identify evey connection to be able to calculate the discharged volume. 5-9 3) CCMPLETE TABLE 5.1 (EXISTING WATER QUALITY) AND DESCRIBE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXISTING WATER QUALITY MONITORING. SPECIFY IF EXISTING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS HAVE BEEN EXCEEDED AND WHAT PRCGRAMS, IF ANY, ARE IN PLACE TO IMPROVE EXISTING WATER QUALITY. ALSO, SPECIFY WHETHER. OR NOT CURRENT WATER QUALITY CAN. TOLERATE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WITHOUT EXCEEDING STANDARDS. Surface VatQr Biscayne Bay has been the subject of numerous studies related to its physical, chemical and biological integrity. The Bay is defined and regulated in Chapter 17-3 as Outstanding Florida Waters. It is also a designated Aquatic Preserve by Florida Statute. The primary ongoing water qualitycharacterization is being conducted by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM). A monthly sampling of a 48 station surface water monitoring network has been conducted by DERM since 1979. A baseline data and trend analysis report was issued for the first four years of operation 2 (Al Leman 1985) . Along the eastern shore of the study area DERM operates monitoring stations which detect discharge impacts of stormwater runoff (see Figure 5-2). These stations are effective in monitoring the existing water quality from the study area. The overall water quality of Biscayne Bay is good and meets the most stringent of EPA, State and Dade County standards (See Exhibit 5-9). However, within the bay some of the "poorest water quality was located at the mouth of the Miami River". This was characterized by elevated levels of nitrogen, copper, iron, lead, turbidity and bacteria. Additionaly, there were infrequent occurances of low dissolved oxygen. These water quality problems have been associated with urban stormwater runoff some of which originates in the study area. Many ongoing and short term programs are underway which relate to existing water quality or advocate plans to improve it. There has been established a Biscayne Bay Management Committee (BBMC) which annually reports on the condition of the bay. The 1985/86 "State of the Bay" report indicates "stormwater runoff represents one of the largest pollution threats to Biscayne Bay". Some of that organizations stated goals which relate this study area are: 1. Initiate comprehensive program to clean up tributaries to the bay. 2. Remove toxic sediments in the Miami River. 3. Redesign detrimental stormwater outfalls and eliminate all outfalls by 2005. A Biscayne Bay Hydrocarbon Study was commissioned and executed. The final report of Corcoran, et al indicated that the greatest threats of hydrocarbon sediment pollution stemmed from two sources: 1) shipping and boating activities and 2) urban runoff. Surface waters in canals draining developed areas contained petrogenic (fuel and oil derived) hydrocarbons. Some of the highest levels were observed in the Miami River. • In summary, there is ample water quality data available on Biscayne Bay. Evidence points to the conclusion that general water quality is not a 5-10 TABLE 5.1: EXISTING WATER QUALITY Groundwater: Sample Location Groundwater USGS Well G-3143 (Index #391) Parameters Oil and Grease 1 mg/1. Total Nitrogen .90 mg/1 Total Phosphorus .01 mg/1 Cobalt 3 ug/1 Copper 3 ug/1 Iron 340 ug/1 Lead 2 ug/1 Nickel 3 ug/1 Strontium 1200 ug/1 Zinc 20 ug/1 Aluminum 60 ugl/1 Phenols 23 ug/1 Surface Water: Sample Location: Say Station #16 5.3 #19 5.3 0.0. mg/1 1984 Annual Average per GERM For Water Quality Standards See Exhibit 5-9 Fecal Col. TNR Turb. MF/organlsms per 100 mil. 4 4 2.8 17 3.1 63 0utfalls to Surface Water: No existing analytical data, See Exhibit 5-4 for existing stormwater pollutant loads. See Figure 5-2 for monitoring sites. problem, however, the bottom sediments in some areas have been adversely affected by stormwater runoff. In addition, short term water quality problems arise at outfall points prior to diffusion and tidal mixing. DE1i has in place adequate sampling stations to determine the long term impact of the study area on water quality. Current development guidelines to be outlined later, require any project in the study area to contain stormwater that is currently being discharged to surface water. For this reason, additional development in the study area is seen as a means of improving surface water quality. Gleudwater_ The Biscayne Aquifer is a hydrologic unit of water bearing rock that carries unconfined ground water in southeastern Florida. In the Miami area the aquifer is approximately 120 to 130 feet thick and is located at virtually ground level. The base of the aquifer can be determined in the Miami area by an impervious marl of the Tamiami formation. This unconfined aquifer is recharged mostly from local rainfall events. An average of 60 inches of precipitation annually fall in Dade County. Of the 60 inches it is estimated that 22 inches are discharged by evapotranspiration and surface runoff. Of the 38 inches reaching the water table, 20 inches is discharged as groundwater flow and 18 inches is discharged by evapotranspiration of groundwater and by pumping from wells (Schroeder, et al). Water table in the study area fluctuates about 2.0 ft. on an annual basis. The- only other recharge to the Biscayne Aquifer comes from contaminated stormwater runoff that filters through retention pond sands and exf iltration systems to the aquifer or overland flow of stormwater that enters canals which recharge the aquifer. The quality of the water is one of the most troublesome factors for the aquifer. Contaminants are easily transported into the aquifer by various means. One of the most troublesome mineral constituents in the aquifer is iron. The other is salt water. In the Miami area salt water has encroached the fresh water aquifer by leaking in to contaminate the aquifer along the coast and canal systems. Other contaminants found in the aquifer are characterized by a USGS well in the study area (see Table 5.1 and Figure 5-2). The presence of these contaminants indicate man induced pollution may be occuring. This 1977 sample indicates none of these contaminants exceed maximum contamination levels; and since the aquifer in the study area is east of the salt barrier line there is no existing regulatory concern for pollution of this portion of the aquifer. It is unlikely that potable aquifers could be affected. However, the long term effects of introducing polluted stormwater into this aquifer are unknown. A freshwater curtain of drainage wells in the study area could help inhibit further salt water intrusion, or it could provide a pool of contamination which might eventually migrate inland or seaward. These pollutants introduced into the surficial aquifer could also empty into the canals that discharge to surface waters and the Biscayne Bay. 1 1 II, IF =11 th 1..08. 30 31. ■ r 1 ST. II1111111I IN BIM 0 I1. n MIIIIIIIII 111111111 33 T i 11 ■ i 1 1 ©C ©LIE] } • 13.11. 1f 01., M.O. 3 01. u I I�I#�Ilfflfllllf fl! 111- OUTFALL 36" AND UNDER 0- OUTFALL OVER 36" t1111111 IIIIIIIII 11111111111 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT David Plummer And Aseoaialee, Inc. Barmello, Kurki And Vera, Ina. IL 0 ■.i. 10 0T, 11.i. 1 IT. 13.1. i if. L IIIII 111111: 0 ►0w3 10utl1Aan A.EI.Irra 0 CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTAMENT OF DEVELOP NT EXISTING DRAINAGE Hifi 1 ( 1 WIIIIama—Russell And Johnson, Inc. Environmental Engineering Consultants, Inc. MAP G-1 iCI=lItsa le moo= • ar■ MIN [�� ■QH7 19 GROUNDWATER U8GS WELLS 9* SURFACE WATER . STATION 18 INTRACOASTAL WATER WAY (ICW) MARKER 44 (RED}. STATION 10 - .10.1 rn (1G6') SOUTH OF BRIDGE TO 0000E ISLANO IN ion David Pf.enwr And Aoorturno, h . EwnwitL Kars! Arc! Yolk to Wtra+a-Agri Ard - runs. tC E tri a oolroi E+wgrrwwing Csoollantr. hr. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 5}-I4 CITY Of I.wANI OEPARTAI.IENT FIGURE 5-2 B. PLAN AND PROGRAM 1. SPECIFY HOW THE WATER QUALITY PLAN WILL MITIGATE OR ELIMINATE EXISTING ADVERSE IMPACTS FROM STORMWATER RUNOFF INCORPORATING SOME OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 1) ELIMINATING ALL DIRECT DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS, 2) INCREASING ON -SITE RETENTION OF STORMWATER, 3) REMOVING POLLUTANTS FROM STORMWATER RUNOFF THROUGH OPERATIONAL MEASURES (E.G., PARKING LOT AND STREET VACUUMING) AND STRUCTURAL MEASURES (E.G., USE OF GRASS SWALES FOR RUNOFF RETENTION), AND 4) REQUIRING ALL CATCH BASINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED SO THAT OILS AND GREASES ARE SEPARATED FROM RUNOFF AND POLLUTANTS ARE PERIODICALLY REMOVED FROM CATCH BASINS FOR PROPER DISPOSAL. In order to answer this question completely it will be beneficial to review the development procedures as they exist in terms of stormwater permitting. It has been a Dade County requirement since 1974, limited in some instances due to poor soils, that the first inch of runoff be retained on -site in Dade County. This policy was further defined by DERM in "Design of Drainage Structures" 1980 which prohibited the discharge of the first inch of stormwater runoff and encouraged total on -site retention where feasible. No direct "positive drainage" to surface water was to be allowed. Since it has been estimated that 90%-100% of the pollutant loading is carried by the "first flush" in the first inch of runoff, this was seen as a major step toward preventing further water quality degradation from this source. In 1983, the FDER further accelerated stormwater treatment requirements with the addition of Chapter 17-25 Stormwater Permitting of the Florida Administrative Code. The implementation of the permitting of this rule has been delegated to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). In April 1982, the City of Miami Public Works Department adopted rules that are more restrictive than the Florida Administrative Code. City regulations prohibit the direct and/or indirect flow of rainwater from new development to public storm sewers. Also, existing development is required to have an on -site stormwater disposal system when the property is improved in the value of $5,000.00 or more by addition or renovation, In the study area, the City of Miami, Dade County and the State of Florida all have transportation and associated drainage systems which flow to surface water. If the City's stormwater disposal criteria are met, then usually the SFWMD and DERM permitting requirements are satisfied as well. Through the use of on -site stormwater collection systems, two -stage sedimentation tanks, drainage wells and pop -off overflow, new developments have been able to meet the Public Works Department's regulations. These developments have greatly reduced the discharge of stormwater pollutants to surface waters. These pollutants are being discharged into the Biscayne Aquifer at depths where the chloride content is greater than 1500 ppm. This portion of the aquifer is not considered to be a potential source of drinking water and therefore not harmed by the discharge. There may also be some benefit to retarding further saltwater intrusion through increased use of drainage wells. However, the SFWMD has recently promulgated new groundwater rules affecting discharges to Outstanding Florida Waters which may modify this mode of disposal. The new criteria may require the retention and treatment of the 5-15 first one-half inch of runoff prior to discharge into any groundwater system. Yet, the deeper Biscayne aquifer in the study area could qualify for exemption from this rule due to its high saltwater content. The extent of enforcement of this new rule and its effect on the study area is unclear at this time. It is apparent that any new development or re -development within the study area will require a substantial emphasis on stormwater retention which will greatly reduce the pollutant load currently going to surface waters. Improved techniques and equipment for litter control, street and parking lot cleaning will help remove pollutants at.the source so they are not carried into the stormwater system. The City of Miami is constantly upgrading its public works cleaning equipment and private developers by development order will be required to clean their parking facilities. Within the study area there remains a rather large segment of surface area dedicated to road right-of-ways for street, sidewalk and utility purposes. About 50 acres of the study area is dedicated to this purpose. No substantial water quality improvement plan could be offered without dealing with the existing roadways and their associated drainage systems. Current DERM interpretation of the 1980 drainage criteria treats the existing roadways as a "grandfathered" entity and exempt from the current prohibition on positive drainage. However, when any substantial reworking of the roadway or utilities within the roadway occurs, the segment is required to upgrade in terms of stormwater retention. This process has already occured on a segment of N.W. 2nd Avenue by the County and a portion of FDOT's right-of-way being refurbished to include french drains (see Exhibit 5-12). The City of Miami Public Works Department currently has plans to re -work 11.52 acres of streets in the next 5 years. 0utfalls to which these areas are tributary can expect an improvement in water quality. Once roads are refurbished, a maintenance program through Miami Public Works will insure that any french drains or other control devices will be operational to remove the maximum. Improved designs such as adding floating debris baffles to french drains or utilizing underdrains will keep the amount of oil and grease and other insoluble pollutants retained to a maximum. Exhibit 5-10 indicated the generic types of stormwater options available for downtown Miami and they are listed in decreasing order of preference. Due to poor soils and lack of economical space the first two options may be more difficult to attain. The third and fourth are the prevailing options at this time utilizing discharge to the deep and shallow aquifers respectively and upon which all study area pollutant load projections are made. Exhibits 5-5, 5-6 & 5-7 show the projected stormwater loads by sub - districts for the Phase I, II and III milestones. 2. DEFINE A WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT WILL ADEQUATELY MONITOR THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON SURFACE AND GROUND WATER QUALITY. IDENTIFY CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS. There are currently 2 surface water monitoring stations in proximity to the study area (see Figure 5-2). These stations are adequate in number and location to give information as to general surface water quality trends in the study area. It would seers prudent to further define the extent of stormwater impact in these areas by correlating data shifts at DER.i's established stations for samples taken after significant rainfall events. This information would help determine the extent of impact of stormwater. To further define the irrpact it would also be critical to quantify flow at the largest outfalls from the planning area during the same storm events. Map G-1 indicates the location of all outfalls and especially those 36" and greater. It is recommended these largest outfalls be checked for stormwater flow at six separate storm events. The coordination of this type of sampling could help define the impact on surface waters. The estimated capital and operating costs are listed on Exhibit 5-11. The Biscayne aquifer currently has several monitoring wells operated by the USGS in the study area. The number and sampling of these wells is not deemed adequate for proposed water quality impacts. It is proposed that 3 existing USGS wells in the study area be tested twice a year for parameters indicative of stormwater runoff so that the overall impact and movement of these contaminants may be monitored. The USGS currently has other studies on --going concerning french drains which should provide useful data for the water quality impact of these systems proposed -in downtown Miami. It is also recommended that one short term monitoring project be instituted by development order to evaluate the efficiency of future retention systems. Since USGS data will address french drains, one drainage well installation should be evaluated in the study area as to groundwater impact. The system should have an upgradient and two downgradient wells to be monitored for specified parameters monthly for the first year of operation and thereafter semi-annually for a total of 5 years. The results of these studies can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of design standards (see Exhibit 5-11 for capital and operating costs). The data generated in the above sampling should be coordinated by DEW at the request of the City of Miami and should be reported to USGS, SFWMD and FDER. It should also be evaluated by these and the City of Miami toward possibly modifying the retention systems design criteria. 5-17 3. SPECIFY WHAT STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR INCLUSION IN ALL DEVELOPMENT ORDERS TO MINIMIZE WATER QUALITY IMPACTS; AND SPECIFY WHAT ADDITIONAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN, AND BY WHOM, IF WATER QUALITY DETERIORATION CCCURS. All new development and redeveloped areas in the Southeast Overtown/Paris West study area are required to retain all runoff on -site from a six inch rainfall event. Where percolation is not adequate to provide the required 48 hour drawdown of this storage volume then underdrains should be utilized. Drainage wells or covered exfiltration trenches could be utilized to dispose of the underdrain volume. This volume could also be discharged back to stormwater outfalls according to DEFT guidelines. The new SFWMD stormwater rule may require the first one-half inch of runoff to be pre-treated in the above manner prior to discharge to the aquifer. This would enhance existing drainage well designs and keep pollutants out of the aquifer. However, pre-treated water may be discharged to surface waters and may eliminate the need for costly drainage wells. Developers that cannot practically comply with the above should be allowed to consider the drainage well as another option. However, at least one such project should have a monitoring program as discussed previously to determine the long term effects of aquifer discharge. The existing acreage committed to street right-of-ways must have a priority list of refurbishments which are to take place. The list can be made up of projects currently budgeted by the City of Miami, Dade County and the FOOT. To this list can be added the streets under which existing outfalls that cause the most water pollution as determined from the intensive surveys outlined above, If public lands abut an existing street with an outfall slated for upgrading then grassed retention areas should be considered as the optimum treatment mode (see Case I Exhibit 5-13). However, due to the lack of availability of such land, and the depths at which outfalls exist this may not be practical. In lieu of this approach, the existing streets to be refurbished should have detention areas designed to accept the first inch of runoff with drawdown by percolation or exfiltration underdrains which could flow back to the outfalls (see Case II Exhibit 5-13). The system must be designed to allow maintenance of the percolation area or underdrain surface to insure periodic removal of sediment that will inhibit outflow and render the unit ineffective. Drainage wells should be considered the retrofit option of least preference. As a secondary choice the refurbished streets could utilize the french drain or covered trench exfiltration systems discharging to the shallow aquifer. Maintenance of these systems is essential so that accumulating contaminants do not breakthrough absorptive layers and flow to surface water. Outfalls carrying substantial flows that do not originate in the planning area, but yet, which discharge in it must also be addressed. Mitigation of these outfalls must be studied by the City of Miami to further determine if upstream retention of the first inch of runoff is feasible. Once collected, however, the only downstream alternatives are costly retrofit 5-18 programs to provide sedimentation and retention basins or more costly treatment designs. Non-structural control measures such as litter control programs, street sweeping operations and stormwater system maintenance within the authority of the appropriate municipalities primarily the City of Miami should be maintained and upgraded if practicable. It is not anticipated that any surface water quality deterioration will occur. Impacts to the groundwaters must be monitored accurately and as soon as feasible so that any undesirable changes could be detected early and further stormwater treatment be required in following development orders. C. SPECIFY REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO IMPROVE WATER QUALITY; ENSURE THAT ABATEMENT MEASURES DESCRIBED IN B.3 ARE IMPLEMENTED AND THAT COUNTY AND STATE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ARE NOT VIOLATED. The current regulatory framework encompassing the South Florida Building Codes, }ERMis 1980 Design Policy, and SFWMDIs Design Criteria regarding stormwater control of new development is deemed adequate to improve water quality during the planning period. The extent to which contaminants taken off surface water systems and deposited in the goundwater systems have a detrimental effect on the aquifer must be monitored by future developers. A monitoring program for the major stormwater outfalls is recommended to be undertaken by the City of Miami to help prioritize them for further abatement action. The sequence and extent of street refurbishment must be coordinated between Miami, Dade County and FDOT so that designs might be standardized and assessed for water quality impact. In addition, the major outfalls which are scheduled to be retrofitted for pollution control must be coordinated with the agency that owns the right-of-way that system lies in. It is recommended that the City of Miami assist the FDOT and County in coordinating the transfer of data, scheduling and permitting of retrofit through DERM, SFWMD, FDER and other regulatory entities. Should water quality violations persist further sampling efforts could be undertaken to isolate the causes and a plan of action developed toward a specific location. Further work must be done to concentrate efforts to prioritize the existing outfalls for retrofit. The logical entity for this task is the City of Miami Public Works Department since the majority of outfalls to Biscayne Bay are under their authority. The city currently has a S30,000,000 bond for upgrading the storm sewer system. Some of these funds are earmarked for pollution control in the form of french drains and outfall retrofitting. Other outfall improvement programs may be eligible for future FDER water quality project grants. Toward further action on abatement work it must be planned that the levels of retrofit of existing outfalls, dictated by outfall monitoring and prioritization, will be limited by funds available. Sources of State funds have been found and more are sought. As part of the development orders for individual future projects within the planning area it must oe stipulated that not only are the stormwater management systems to be designed to meet DERM and SFWMD standards, but that these must also be maintained in a routine program to insure their efficiencies. Detention/Retention exfiltration, french drain and drainage wells with two -stage separators will not function properly without sustained maintenance. In so far as the stormwater pollutant load to Biscayne Bay is mitigated by the redevelopment of private and public tracts meeting new standards and the potential for groundwater contamination is minimized by further monitoring, the Southeast Overtown/Park West development area should only see enhancement of water quality. These efforts will be accelerated by the investigation, planning and funding of pollution control retrofit for 5-20 existing stormwater outfalls. Implementing these measures will insure that no degradation of the unique Biscayne Bay water resource will result from the continued development of the downtown area. 5-21 QUESTION 5 WATER QUALITY/DRAINAGE EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 5-1 STOFMWATER POLLUTANT LOADS lbs/acre/day Oil li SS TNR BOO TOC COD TN TP Cl Ph Zn Fe Cu Cd Cr Ni TVS Grease FHWA Study 6 Highway Runoff Sites 14.0 --- 0.88 2.1 6.9 0.84 0.05 13.0 0.06. 0.02 0.50 0.006 0.002 0.003 0.27 9.34 USGS Broward County 2.0 ---- 0.41 0.94 0.02 0.002 ---- 0.007 0.002 A. Highway B. Commercial Land Use 3.6 ---- 0.40 1.8 0.02 0.002 ----- 0.010 0.003 C. Residential 3.9 ---- 0.42 0.70 0.046 0.009 ---- 0.003 0.003 EPA Durham N.C. Urban Runoff 18.3 ---- ---- 0.51 2.57 0.02 0.013 ---- 0.008 0.005 0.28 0.004 EPA Cincinatti 2.0 --- 0.09 ---- 0.66 0.024 0.007 Urban Runoff Tampa NURP A. Highway B. Commercial C. Residential Miami I-95 Bridge USGS SFWMD Commercial Estimate 3.02 1.18 0.07 ---- ---- 0.036 0.005 ---- 0.007 0.004 ---- 0.001 1.55 0.14 ---- ---- 0.036 0.005 ---- 0.007 0.003 ----- 0.001 0.295 0.052 0.025 0.005 ----- 0.0007 0.0007 ---- 0.0001 0.004 0.003 3.99 2.87 8.3 0.153 0.006 ---- 0.025 0.014 -- 0.002 BDL BDL 9.9 --- 0.447 - 0.031 0.011 "Stormwater Management, an update" Waniellsta and Yousef - July 1985 per City Miami Public Works BDL Below Detection Limit 7.26 0.26 EXHIBIT 5-2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI STORMWATER POLLUTANT LOADING FACTORS lbs/acre/yr Impervious 011 & COD TNR/SS TN TP Pb Zn Cu Grease Park/Open Areas(3) 10% 7.4(4) 15.1(4) 3.99 0.69 0 0 0 0 Low Density Residential(2) 30% 256 1424 16.8 3.29 1.09 1.09 0 0 School/Institutional(3) 60% 23.0 377 3.99 0.69 0 0 0 0 Medium Density Residential(3) 40% 23.0 377 10.9 2.27 0.29 0.31 0.06 0 Commercial/Office(2) 90% 657 1314 7.3 0.73 3.65 1.10 0 0 High Density Urban(2) 95% 657 1314 7.3 0.73 3.65 1.10 0 0 Development Highway(1) 95% 3030 1102 55.8 2.19 9.13 5.11 0.73 94.9 (1) USGS I-95 Bridge Study - Close to study area, only hydrocarbon data available, recent sampling. (2) USGS Broward County - Close to study area, commercial district similar to highly developed urban area. (3) Tampa NURP Study - Only proximate data available for these land uses, recent sampling. (4) Estimated from Wanielista and Yousef, July 1985. EXHIBIT 5-3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI LAND USE ESTIMATES -1986 Study Area Acres . Total Park/Open Space 59.61 28.4% Low Density Residential 8.10 3.9% Institutional/Schools, Churches 5.54 2.6% Med/Density Residential 32.38 15.5% Commercial/Office 26.40 12.6% Industrial 25.90 12.4% Transportation, Communications, Utilities 51.45 24.6% Total - 209.38 100% Per City of Miami Public Works and David Plummer & Associates EXHIBIT 5-4 STORMWATER POLLUTANT LOADS lbs/yr Exi�ti0g Surface Water Discharge Oil & Acres COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Grease Park Open/Space 59.61 441 900 238 41 0 0 0 0 Low/Density Resd. 8.10 2074 11534 136 27 9 9 0 0 Institutional 5.54 127 2089 22 4 0 0 0 0 Medium/Density Resd. 32.38 745 12207 353 74 9 10 2 0 Commercial/Office 26.40 17345 34690 193 19 96 29 0 0 Industrial 25.90 78477 28542 1445 57 236 132 19 2458 Transportation 48.95 148319 53943 2731 107 447 250 36 4645 Sub Totals 206.88 247528 143905 5118 329 797 430 57 7103 Groundwater Discharges Oil & Acres COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Grease Park Open/Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low/Density Resd. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Medium/Density Resd. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial/Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation 2.50 7575 2755 140 5 23 13 2 237 Sub Totals 2.50 7575 2755 140 5 23 13 2 237 Totals 209.38 255103 146660 5258 334 820 443 59 7340 Based Upon; Industrial land use equaling highway runoff generation. EXHIBIT 5-5 STORMWATER POLLUTANT LOADS lbs/yr El -Lase I Surface Water Discharge Oil & Acres COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Grease Park Open/Space 47.72 353 721 190 33 0 0 0 0 Low/Density Resd. 6.08 1556 8658 102 20 7 7 0 0 Institutional 4.15 95 1565 17 3 0 0 0 0 Medium/Density Resd. 24.29 559 9157 265 55 7 8 2 0 Commercial/Office 19.80 13009 26017 145 14 72 22 0 0 Industrial 19.43 12766 25531 142 14 71 21 0 0 Transportation 36.70 111201 40443 2048 80 335 188 27 3483 Sub Totals 158.17 139539 112092 2909 219 492 246 29 3483 Groundwater Discharges Oil & Acres COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Grease Park Open/Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low/Density Resd. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Institutional 1.39 32 524 6 1 0 0 0 0 Medium/Density Resd. 24.04 553 9063 262 55 7 7 1 0 Commercial/Office 10.92 7174 14349 80 8 40 12 0 0 Industrial 1.11 729 1459 8 1 4 1 0 0 Transportation 13.75 41663 15153 767 30 126 70 10 1305 Sub Totals 51.21 50151 40548 1123 95 177 90 11 1305 Totals 209.38 189690 152640 4032 314 669 336 40 4788 Based Upon: Industrial land use equaling highway runoff generation. EXHIBIT 5-6 STORMWATER POLLUTANT LOADS lbs/yr Ehase 11 Surface Water Discharge Acres COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Oil & Grease Park Open/Space Low/Density Resd. Institutional Medium/Density Resd. Commercial/Office Industrial Transportation 35.84 4.05 2.77 16.19 13.20 12.95 24.48 265 1037 64 372 8672 8508 74174 541 5767 1044 6104 17345 17016 26977 143 68 11 176 96 95 1366 25 13 2 37 10 10 54 0 4 0 5 48 47 224 0 4 0 5 15 14 125 0 0 0 1 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 2323 Sub Totals 109.48 93092 74794 1955 151 328 163 19 2323 Groundwater Discharges Acres 01l & COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Grease Park Open/Space Low/Density Resd. Institutional Medium/Density Resd. Commercial/office Industrial Transportation 0 0 2.77 48.09 21.83 2.22 24.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 1014 11 1106 18130 524 14342 28684 159 1459 2917 16 75720 27539 1394 0 0 2 109 16 2 219 0 0 0 14 80 8 228 0 0 0 15 24 2 128 0 0 0 3 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 2372 Sub Totals Totals Based Upon: Industrial land use equaling highway runoff generation. 99.90 92691 78314 2104 346 330 169 21 2372 209.38 185783 153108 4059 497 658 332 40 4695 EXHIBIT 5-7 STORMWATER POLLUTANT LOADS lbs/yr E ase III Surface Water Discharge Acres COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Oil & Grease Park Open/Space Low/Density Resd. Institutional Medium/Density Resd. Commercial/Office Industrial Transportation 12.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub Totals 12.0E 89 182 48 8 0 0 0 0 Groundwater Discharges Acres COD TNR TN TP Pb Zn Cu Oil & Grease Park Open/Space Low/Density Resd. Institutional Medium/Density Resd. Commercial/Office Industrial Transportation 0 0 5.54 96.19 43.66 0 0 127 2212 28685 4.44 2917 47.49* 143895 0 0 0 0 2089 22 36264 1048 57369 319 5834 32 52334 2650 0 0 4 218 32 3 104 0 0 0 28 159 16 434 0 0 0 30 48 5 243 0 0 0 6 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 4507 Sub Totals Totals Based Upon: Industrial land use equaling highway runoff generation. * 197.32 177836 153890 4071 361 637 326 41 4507 209.38 177925 154072 4119 369 637 326 41 4507 Based on 1.9 miles of right-of-way refurbishment per 5 years. EXHIBIT 5-8 SOUTHEAST OVERTCWN/PARK WEST DRI PUBLIC AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS WITH WATER QUALITY INTERESTS Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management, DERM Florida Department of Environmenal Regulation, FDER United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA South Florida Water Management District, SFWMD Florida Department of Natural Resources, FDNR - Florida Marine Patrol Florida Coastal Zone Management South Florida Regional Planning Council, SFRPC United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Geological Survey, USGS United States Department of Interior National Parks Service, NPS United States Department of Commerce - National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, NOAA Biscayne Bay Management Committee, B1C Miami River Management Committee, MRMC City of Miami Public Works Dade County Public Works Florida Department of Transportation, FDOT Waterfront Control Board Port of Miami Downtown Development Authority University of Miami Rosenstiel Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences Aluminum 1.5 mg/ 1 Amonia 0.5 mg/1 as Antimony 0.2 " Arsenic 0.5 " (1) Bacteria 200 / 100 ml - 70/100 ml Shellfish Waters (1) Beryllium 1.1 mg/1 Biological Integrity >75Z Bromine 100 mg/1 Cadmium 5.0 " Chlorides <110% background (1) Chromium 0.05 mg/1 (1) Copper 0.015 " Cyanide 5.0 " - None detectable (1) Dissolved Oxygen 5.0 Dissolved Oxygen 4.0 " No Event < Flouride 5.0 " Iron 0.3 " (daily average) EXHIBIT 5-9 BISCAYNE BAY WATER QUALITY STANDARDS MARINE WATERS Nickel 0.1 mg/1 N (1) Nutrients No Imbalance of natural flora and fauna Oil and Grease Pthalate Esters 3.0 ug/1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls 0.001 ug/1 Radioactive Substances - Gross Beta <1000 Uuc (1) Selenium 0.025 mg/1 Silver 0.05 ug/1 Specific Conductance <20O% Background (1) Sulfides 1.0 mg/1 (1) Total Dissolved Gases <110% saturation Transparency >90% background Turbidity 50, except after heavy rains (1; Zinc 0.03 mg/1 Source: (1) Dade more Lead 0.03 " (Fresh water standard) - 0.35 (1) Mercury 0.1 ug/1 - None Detectable (1) Pesticides: Aldrin 0.003 ug/1 Chlordane 0.004" DDT 0.001" Demeton 0.1" Endosulfan 0.001" Endrin 0.004" Guthion 0.01" Chapter 17-3.121 FAC County Standard where stringent Heptaclor 0.001 ug/1 Lindane 0.004" Malathion 0.1" Methoxychlor 0.03" Myrex O.001" Parathion 0.04" Toxaphene 0.0O5" EXHIBIT 5-10 STORMWATER OPTIONS WATER QUALITY IMPACT SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Most Desirable 1. On -site Retention in grassed swales/dry retention area with infiltration by percolation. 2. On -site Detention in grassed swales/dry retention area with infiltration by underdrain to stormwater outfalls. 3. On -site Retention with grease interceptor and drainage well to saltwater aquifer. 4. 0n-site Retention with seepage systems (french drain, enfiltration trench, soakage pit) to shallow freshwater aquifer. Note: 1. Systems required for regulatory compliance. 2. Ongoing maintenance of system and periodic water quality testing for efficiency is required of all systems EXHIBIT 5-11 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST Surface Water Monitoring: I. Capital Expense : Flow measurement equipment $ 1,000 $ 1,000 II. Operating Expense: $ -0- First Year Operation Total $ 1,000 Note: Flow measurements at 5 outfalis will be carried out by Public Works Staff. Groundwater Sampling: Deep well and retention system - 5 year test. One Site (Four sample points each: 1 surface water, 3 wells) Sampling schedule 1 per quarter for 1 year then twice per year for 4 year. I. Capital Expense: 3 wells @ $2,000 = $ 6,000 II. Operating Expense: A. First year sampling 4 (4 x 750) = $12,000 Next 4 year 4 (2 x $750) = $ 6,000 Sampling parameters: COD, TNR, TN, TP, Pb, Cu, Zn, Cl, TDS, and Oil and Grease 6. Upgrade USGS Annual Well Sampling Expense 10 parameters Cost of sampling and reporting 1,000/sample 3 existing wells 2 times/year x $1,000 = $ 6,000 First Year Operation Total $18,000 Year 2-5 Operation Total $12,000 Annual $ 6,000 Note: Groundwater Investigations to be Private Developer Responsibility per Development Order. i I Of DeVELOPf.1ENT FRAME ANO COVER 1S.U.- 2.31- TYP, fl.ASTIC f1I.TI:11"" FADING O CORRUGATED METAL C.D 1SFI: St) I.3 SHEETS 2 0,4111t van1 PERFORATED PIPE SECTIONS.ISEE NOTE 3) FOR OPEN JOINT I Ih" USE 12" WIDE RANDS W/NO GASKET, EXFILTRATION TRENCH LENGTH LONGITUDINAL SECTION !JOT ES• I.1.1.A5TIC FILTER FADRIC, EACH SIDE, OVERLAPPED 011 TOP, SHALL DE USED IN SANDY AREAS AS NOTED 011 PLANS A11D/OR AS DIRECTED AY THE ENGINEER, 2, TIIE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF INSTALLING THE FOLLOWING PIPE TYPES I A, CORRO13ATE5 STEEL - P1TUUlUGUs COATED POT1I SIDES Il'EfifORATED1. 11, CORROGATED ALU►1111U31 IPERFORATEDI. U11A1IIAGE PIPE SEEPAGE DR 6O11ST DESIGIi WATER TAOtE DALLASi ROCK PAVE i1ESTOlIA1l011 SEC. 320 SEC SGO DES. 1AAt1 R-2t.l CROSS 1IEF. SEC. 360 SPEC. REF. G"PEA ROCK -SLOPE AS REQUIRED TRANSVERSE SECTION 3. PERFORATIONS 1 ACCORDING TO AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS M36-74 AND MI9 -74. 4. EXFILTI1ATION TRENCH DUTTON ELEVATION 1--)6.0I OR AS OTHERWISE DETERMINED THROUGH APPROVED DESIGN METHODS AND TESJS. 5. PIPES FROM 15" UP TO 24 0 DIAMETER CAN RE USED. # F1ELD CONDITIONS PERMITTING, METRO DADE PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS FRENCH DRAIN DETAIL STREET RUNOFF UPGRADE DETAIL •NOTE: DESIGNED TO CAPTURE TO 1st INCH FLOW FROM DRA1;IAGE -Y,tA T ERSHED. CASE T STORMWATER DETENTION CBASIN •) ,UNDERDRAIN it 1 FLOW OVERFLOW GRASSED RETENTION. AREA OUTFALL TO CASE a BAFFLED) SHUNT FLOW SURFACE WATER EX1Sl'ING STORMWATER OUTFALL REFURBISHED STORM COLLECTION SYSTEM SIDEWALK II EXISTING ROAD EXIST.II STORM OUTFALLIt SIDEWALK PROPOSED PERCOLATION OR EXFILTRAT1ON UNDERDRAIN OR DEEP DRAINAGE WELL ALTERNATE. TO SURFACE WATER Or.Na rinn+wr And Aa odatsa ha br nnin. Kund And York ray 1ellior+yr-Puoisi And Jotr on. tw. Li+.rern+u.u+ Endlne rrrp Car Moon s. ha SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY of YIAIM O PARTAYENT EXHIBIT 5-- 1 3 Exhibit 5-14 water ,duality Bibs ioaraohv Alleman, R, Biscayne Bay Water O.ualitvs Baseline Data and Trend Analysis Report 1979-1983, DERM 1985. Beaver, T.R., and McPherson, B.F., duality the Water IA borrow ponds pear major highway_ interchange, Dade County, Florida, October - November 1977, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 78-1029. Biscayne Bay Management Committee, Annual Report "State .41 the .Bay" 1985/86. City of Miami Storm Sewer Program ( Storm Outfall Modifications) City of Tampa, Tampa Nationwide Urban Runoff Program Phase II Final Report, October 1983. Corcoran, Eugene F., Brown, M.S., Braddour, F., Chasens, S.A., Freay, A.D. Biscayne Bav Hydrocarbon. Study Final Report, December 1983. Dade County Public Works, Section DA.Water Control A portion of Part-2 Public Works Manual. Design 2f Drainage Structures and update policy for the design 9f storm runoff drainage structures, Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management, December 1980. Development slf Regional Impact Reports: 1221 Brickell, Brickell Square, Washer/Lincoln, Port of Miami,. S.E. Overtown/ParkWest, Tishman/Speyer. Library - South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC). Dyer, Riddle, Mills and Precourt, Inc. for City of Orlando, Orlando ijrban Storm Water Management Manual (OUSWMM) yolume a. Envirex, Inc., Constituents of Highway Runoff Volume I; Procedural Manual for monitoring of highway runoff, Federal Highway Administration, P881-- 241903, February 1981. Envirex Inc., constituents 91Licay Runoff Volume I, Federal Highway Administraton P881-241895 1981, State of the Art Report. Environmental Committee of the Miami River task force - Miami River Outfall Study. ERCO, a division of Enseco, Inc., Ecological Evaluation _of proposed oceanic discharge of Dredged Material from the Miami River, Flotida, Departmenc of the Army Jacksonville District, Corps of Engineers, September 20, 1985. ERCO, a division of Enseco, Ecological Evaluation a proposed oceanic discharge Qf Dredged Materjal from the Miami _Harbor Turning Basin, Florida Department of Army Jacksonville District, Corps of Engineers, September 20, 1985. Haire, W.J., Miller, T, Price, C., Haye, D., .Y!ater escurces ,Data Florida, Water 1983 Volume 2A, South Florida Surfee Water USGS, WDR FL-83-2A. Haire, W.J., Price, C., Hayes, D,, and Sonenshein, R. Water Resources Date Florida Water Year 1983, Volume 2B, South Florida Groundwater USGS WDR FL- 83-2B. Hardee, Jack, Miller, Robert A., Mattraw, Harold, Jr., C., Stormwater - Runoff Data for A Highway Area Broward ,count , Florida. Judge, Robert M., The Distribution .j Cadmium, Leath_ Mercury and Zinc Biscayne Bay Sediments, Department of Engineering Technology, School of Technology, Florida International University, May 1, 1980. Kohout, F.A., and Hartwell, J.H., Hydrologic Effects .j Area la Flood Control Plan a0 Urbanization of Dade County, Florida, U.S. Geological Survey Report of Investigations Number 47. Lamb, Berton L., Water Quality Administration, A Focus oil Section 208, Ann Arbor Science 1980. Lazaro, T., Urban Hydrology 1979, Ann Arbor Science. Mattraw, H., R. Miller, Stormwater Quality Processes _for Three Land - Use Areas ,jsl. Broward County,. Florida, USGS WRI 81-23. Metro Dade Environmental Resource Management - VII Miami Canal Storm Data Metropolitan Dade County, Public Works Department, ?art.', Standard Detaijs. McKenzie, D.J. and G.A. Irwin, Water Assessment of Stosmwater Runoff from heavily used urban highway bridge ja Jijami, Florida , U.S. Geological Survey WRI 83-4153. Miami River Management Committee, .Miami River, Yesterday, Sommorrow, Annual Report of the Miami River Management Committee 1985. Miami River Management Committee, Final Recommendations the Miami River Management Committee, December 14, 1984. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Climatological Data January 1985 Volume 89, No.1 December 1985, Volume 89 No. 12 and Annual Summary 1984. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Monthly Norinals p,.,.f Temperature, Precipitation. Health .and, fooling De_ree D y 1951 - 1980, Climatography of the United States No. 81. Overton, D., and Mcdaws, M., Stormwater Modeling, Academic Press, Inc. 1976. Foley, R., An Inventory of Pollutant 0ischaraes and their loadings into major surface water bodies, Metro Dade DEF1, 1981. Ryan, Jr, et al,, The Environmental Chemistry of Florida Estuaries - Peepwater Forts Maintenance Dredging Stjidy - Technical Report Number 1: Port of Miami and the Miami River, FDER 1984. Santon, et al., Water PolJ ution, Aspects of:Street Surface Contaminants 1972, EPA P0-214 408. Savannah Laboratories and Environmental Services, Inc., A,$tudy ,,the effects of drainage from the Black Creek, Lout dt s and dowry Canals of Trace Metal ADA Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Levels in Molluscs and Sediments le Lower Biscayne Bay, Funded by Jacksonville, Florida U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contract No. DACW 17-85-M-0908, February 1985. Schmidt, Stacy D., Spencer, Douglas R., The Magnitude of improper waste discharges inAa urban storwater system, Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 58 No. 9, July 1986, PP. 744-747. South Florida Regional Planning Council, Biscayne Bay Aquatic ereserve Rules, November 1978. South Florida Regional Planning Council, Natural Systems Policy Guide, July 1982. Urban Systems Policy Guide, July 1982. South Florida Water Management District, Conceptual Approval Rules Draft February 27, 1986. South Florida Water Management District, Management and Storage of Surface Waters, Permit Information Manual Volume IV, January 1984. South Florida Water Management District, Summary .f South FJorid} Water Manageeent Permit process for Surface Water Management ( rajnage) $ystems, Basis .gf review ,fj surface water management permit applications within the ,$outh Florida Water Management District, May 1, 1986. Thorhaug, Anitra ed, Biscayne Bay: past. Present, Future, A symposium presented by the University of Miami, April 2-3, 1976. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District, Draft Feasibility report oD. Miami River, Dade County Florida,, March 1986. Van de Kreeks and Wang, J.D., Results c.d. Field Measurements, Marine and Atmospheric Science, Van de Kreeks and Wang, J.D., ,Modeling, University of Miami Science, January 1984. Hydrography of North Biscayne $„g.y, Part 1, University of Miami Rosenstiel School of January 1984. idydrography sif .Nosh Biscayne Bay .per .11 Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Waller, Bradley, G., Klein, H., Lefkoff. J., A tenuktion 21 $tarrnwater Contaminants for Highway runoff within unsaturated Limestone, Dade County, Florida, US Geological Survey Water Resource Invesitgations Report 84-4083. Wanielista, Dr. Martin, P.E., Yousef, Y., P.E., Golding, B., P.E., Cassagnol, E.T., 5tormwater Management Manual, DER, University of Central Florida 1981. iallitlea4 ranc&i:. ai:/esh`cle) QUESTION 6: WETLANDS This question was deleted pursuant to the "Downtown/Areawide Agreement to Delete Question." There are no wetlands within the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project area. 5‘14‘i• 0.4,,,d,e/.. aeie$h e QUESTION 7: FL000 PRONE AREAS A. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF FLOOD ELEVATION FOR THE AREA. INCLUDE MAP AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REVISION, i!k• WELL AS EXISTING AND IDENTIFY SOURCE OF INFORMATION. The base flood elevations for the study area are shown on the Flood Zone Map. The majority of the project area is classified as Zone C and lies outside the 100 year flood and is subject to mimimal flooding. There is an area at the eastern end of.the project, mostly east of N.E. 1st Avenue, that is categorized as Zone A-15 and varies in base flood eleva- tion between 11 and 12 feet above mean sea level. Flood Zone A-15 is part of the 100 year flood area. At the southwest corner of. the project, west of N.W. 2nd Avenue and south of N.E. 9th Street, there is an area that is categorized as Zone A-14 with a base flood elevation of 10 feet above mean sea level. Flood Zone A-14 is part of the 100 year flood area. There is also a very small area of the project at the southeast corner of the project south of N.E. 6th Street, that is categorized as Zone A-17 with a base flood elevation of 11 feet above mean sea level. Flood Zone A-17 is part of the 100 year flood area. 1IIIIll 11 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT David Plummer And Asaoclates, Inc. Bermello, Kurkl And Vara, Inc. MAP C - FLOOD PRONE AREAS SYMBOL 12223 ZONE ❑ESCRIPTION A14 A15 A17 1101111111111111110111111111111.111111111111 AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING ZONES A14 TIIRU A17 ARE WITHIN THE 100 YR. FLOOD, THE FLOOD HAZARD FACTOR IS INDICATED BY THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX. THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION IS swim IN PAREi{THESIS . 100 YR. FLOOD BOUNDARY `smorM1- 1111■i1k Milifila t, e;; *".''s A---15 Milani tp.e4Avai NM Pee rmaO\t' A . '<► ��►�i�i�irl s jrMM4.4414tr 01114l044C, t i,�.1 E .• IE.I.4 AO. ' a/!�+ ..� OPPLEInaitarri,p. �i •s r.rsra+�V�a ,11 w Eigo.w.1 111 I fiIII„ A-15 CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTAMENT OF DEVELOP fills I I Williams-Rusaell And Johnson, Inc. Environmental EnginwerInd Consultants, Inc . PROVIDE FINISH FIRST FLOOR ELEVATIONS FOR STRUCTURES, ROADS AND PARKING LOTS In accordance with FEMA guidelines the lowest floor is defined to mean the lowest level of a building including a finished or unfinished base- ment, if any. However, it is important to note that the determination of the lowest floor elevation for a structure in a V-Zone, varies markedly from that of an A -Zone. For example, in a V-Zone the lowest floor eleva- tion is the underside of the supporting structure at the lowest level; whereas in an A -Zone it is the "finished floor" of the lowest level. The lowest floor elevation, or base flood elevation as shown on Mao C, is 10 ft. for Zone A-14, 11 ft. for Zone A-17, and varies from 11 to 12 ft. for Zone A-15. Grade elevation throughout the project. areas varies from a low of 5 ft. above mean sea level to a maximum elevation of 14 ft. Although FEMA regulations do not apply to roads and other impervious sur- faces such as plazas and surface parking lots, Metropolitan Dade County requires that these types of surface improvements be at or above 5 ft. above mean sea level. The minimum elevations for roads and surface parking lots, based on the County standards mentioned herein, are enforced by the City of Miami's Public Works Department. Presently the Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Re- sources Management (DERM) will review and interpret Federal guidelines on a project by project basis when construction involves the establishment of floor areas beneath the minimum or base flood elevation as illustrated in Map C. Essentially, non -habitable spaces such as a- lower parking level, mechanical equipment rooms, elevator landings and machine rooms, and simi- lar type spaces are customarily accepted as exceptions to the Federal guidelines by DERM. It is possible that a large unobstructed assembly hall or a dining area, enclosed by "break -a -way" walls, would also be permitted below the base flood elevation. However, other types of deviations from the base floor elevation will require the procurement of a variance from the Metropolitan Dade County Environmental Review Board (ERB). The ERB consists of five members appointed by the County Commission: (2) engineers and (3) scientists. The ERB meets monthly; and its decisions at County level are final. Appeals to the decision of the ERB must be filed with the Third District Court of Appeals. C PROVIDE APPLICABLE STORM SURGE ELEVATIONS_FOR THE AREA AND IDENTIFY SOURCE OF INFORMATION. There is no information available at the Metropolitan Dade County Depart- ment of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) in reference to appli- cable storm surge elevations for the area. The State of Florida Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Bureau of Beaches and Shores has a study for storm surge elevations during a 100 year storm. The study indicates that during such a storm, the storm surge elevation would reach 14 ft. NGVD at Cape Florida, Key Biscayne; and about 13.75 ft. NGVD in Miami Beach. Under such conditions both barrier islands would be under water. The study does not analyze the effect of the 100 year storm on the mainland. 7-4 D. IDENTIFY CHANGES IN REGULATIONS AND PERMITTING PROCEDURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT PROPERTY FROM FLOODING AND STORM SURGE On October 1, 1981, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) imple- mented a revised rating system for new or substantially improved buildings constructed in coastal high hazard areas of Regular Program communities, identified on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) as V-Zones. The rating system within the project area applies to: 1. Buildings in special flood hazard Zones V21 with building permit applications dated on or after October 1, 1981; and 2. V21 Zone buildings on which the building permit was issued before October 1, 1981 whose construction did not begin within 180 days of the permit date, but begins after September 30, 1981. Under the new Coastal V-Zone Rating requirements, revised or calculated flood elevations, adjusted for wave height, are used in determining ac- tuarial insurance rates for new construction. Thus to avoid very high insurance rates, new construction should be elevated above these ad- justed flood elevations. On March 4, 1986, Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners adopted Dade County Ordinance 86-16 amending Chapter 23 of the South Florida Building Code (SFBC) to comply with the Florida Coastal Zone Pro- tection Act of 1985. The adopted ordinance requires that all construction within V-Zones, com- ply with the Coastal Zone Protection Act as a pre -requisite for obtaining a building permit. In addition to the above mentioned regulations the following is a listing of possible municipal regulations which could be of assistance in as- suring that private property will be properly protected from flooding and storm surge damage: Building Permit Application Submittals: a. Letter from Department of Environmental Resources Management, stating the applicable base flood elevation for the subject property (currently not required). b. Provide a topographic survey, prepared by registered land sur- veyor establishing the elevations at critical points of the property and the elevation of adjoining streets, at their center- line (currently required). c. Provide a certificate signed and notarized, whereby the owner and applicant, if different than the owner, attest that the lowest floor elevation is in accordance with F.E.M.A. guide- lines and the 1985 Coastal Zone Protection Act. (Currently not required.) d. Provide a certificate from a land surveyor, registered in the State of Florida, certifying the elevation of the lowest floor, prior to the construction of upper levels (currently required). In the cases where the property falls within a V-Zone, the appli- cation oust also incorporate a certification by either the struc- tural engineer or architect of record, providing evidence of the depth of structure at the lowest level (i.e. difference between finished floor elevation and the bottom of supporting structural members). This would amount to a "Post Construction Elevation Certificate". (currently not required) 2._ Structural and Architectural Certification All construction which falls within a V-zone, should be certified as to its capacity in regards to the following: (1) capacity of the structure to withstand velocity waters and hurricane wash; (2) condition of any non -habitable areas which may lie beneath the base flood elevation, as being "water -tight". The certification for item (1), is to be provided by a structural engineer registered in the State of Florida; and the certification for item (2), is to be provided by an architect registered in the State of Florida. 3. Grade and Basement Elevation Permits All surface related improvements (i.e. plazas, surface parking lots and roads) which fall within the V-zone, should be at a minimum 5 ft. elevation above mean sea level. In cases where the basements or lower parking levels of buildings are located below the minimum, 5 ft. level, pumps connected to the build- ing's emergency generator must be provided to remove any potential water seepage. 7-6 4. Structural Flood Proofing In the event that the lowest floor elevation of a structure, or por- tion thereof, used for habitable purposes is situated below the minimum base flood elevation, then that portion of the structure_ below the min- imum base flood elevation rust be designed in accordance with struc- tural flood proofing guidelines entitled "Floodproofing Non -Residential Structures", May 1986 Edition, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Copies of this report may be obtained at the Dade County Department of Public Works. In particular, structural flood proofing of ground floor retail areas may be achieved through the utilization of "drop -in" panels at openings such as doors, breeze -ways, etc. Display windows and store- front may be protected through the use of watertight aluminum flood shields. Property owners who can not meet the FEMA guidelines for structurally flood proof construction of areas below the minimum base flood elevation must apply for a waiver or variance with the Department of Environmental Resources Management, Dade County. 7-7 ccy4i,c, 4gue5,,10,, QUESTION.8: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE A. IDENTIFY EXISTING VEGETATION IN THE STUDY AREA. SPECIFY ANY PLANT SPECIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT ARE LISTED AS RARE, ENDANGERED OR THREATENED. Due to the highly urbanized character of the S.E. Overtown/Park West area, there is virtually no original natural vegetation present. Landscape plants and ornamentals occur in various open spaces throughout the project area, but no significant vegetative associations can be identified. The majority of the vegetation in the project area can be found at Gibson Park, the only municipal park which is in the area (refer to Map F, Vegetation Map). The remainder of the vegetation throughout the project area is extremely localized and falls into one of the three following categories: 1. Planting Along Public Right -of; -Ways: The most prominent street tree plantings occur along Biscayne Boule- vard in the Bicentennial Park area. Throughout the project area, either the median or the median and sidewalk areas are planted with royal palms, queen palms and Washingtonian palms.. These tall speci- mens provide this portion of the project area with a distinguished landmark quality and an element of design continuity which should be enhanced and protected. A well coordinated tree planting program throughout the project area's public right-of-ways, could have a most dramatic effect in enhancing the scale and comfort of the street environment for pedestrians. Street tree planting programs are the single most im- portant vegetation element in urbanized areas. The City of Miami's proposal to develop NW 9th Street as a pedestrian mall could provide the setting for native vegetation and ornamentals. 2. Planting Along Major Public Capital Improvements: The planting of trees, shrubbery and ground cover as part of major public improvements represents the second category of localized vegetation. The following projects lend themselves to the imple- mentation of planting programs: a. The Downtown People Mover Station Areas. b, The Sports Arena. c. The Interstate Expressway/Ramp System Right -of -Ways. d. Metrorail Right -of -Way & Station. E-1 11 1 :1 i it 17117-7111111" SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT David Plummer And Associates, Inc. Somalia, Kurki And Vera, Inc. MAP F - VEGETATION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION PUBLIC PARKS PUBLIC PARKS OUTSIDE DRI BOUNDARIES source. city of miami planning dept., d.d.a. and 1906 windshield study. a JIIL.L hill ■■1 .i.!■.� 1 17117 CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTAMENT OF DEVELOP I EN II�II i I I Willlame-Auseail And Johnson, Inc. Environmental Engineering Cansultante, Inc. 3. Plantings as Part of Major Private Projects: Except for certain nearby projects such as Bayside and Bicentennial Park, the attention to vegetation and tree planting has played a minor role in private developments throughout the project area. A greater attention to street level planting and the use of natural vegetation to provide focal points, shade, transition and buffer ones, etc., should be encouraged in all new construction. There are no endangered or threatened vegetation associations throughout the study area. However, City of Miami records and surveys conducted as part of this study indicate that the following species can be found in the following public parks: I. Gibson Park: Red Mahogany, Gumbo Limbo, Silk Oak, Black Olive, Gold Malayan, Coconut Palm and Cocos Nucifera. 2. Bicentennial Park: Bicentennial Park once featured a rich variety of plant specimens such as the following" Tabebuia Argentias, Tabeburia Paliida, Delonix Regia, Sabel Palmetto, Ficus Nitida, Cocos Nurifera, Swietenia Mahogany, Roystonea Regia, etc. However with the development of sport fields and the track for. the Miami Grand Prix, the majority of these specimens have been removed by the City. B. IDENTIFY WILDLIVE SPECIES, INCLUDING BIRDS, REPTILES, AMPHIBIANS, FISH, INVERTEBRATES AND MAMMALS, THAT USE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA. SPECIFY ANY WILDLIFE SPECIES WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT ARE RARE, ENDANGERED OR THREATENED. Because of the urbanized nature of the project area, no significant, rare, endangered or threatened wildlife occur. Wildlife in the project area is restricted to species which are adaptable to an urban environment. A visual inspection of open spaces throughout the project area confirmed no evidence of burrows or nestings which might be an indication of certain rare, endangered or threatened wildlife. The only wildlife that has been seen throughout the project area has been limited to pigeons, detected mostly around the Freedom Tower building. Pelicans also inhabit the Miamarina basin marina and Plaza Venetia Marina next to the Venetian causeway. Migratory birds such as blue jays, cardinals, ducks, and on several oc- casions squirrels and possums have been seen at Bayfront Park and Bicentennial Park. 8-3 C. SPECIFY ACTIONS WHICH WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO MITIGATE OR MINIMIZE IMPACT ON VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Due to the non-existence of any rare, endangered or threatened vegetation or wildlife throughout privately owned properties within the project area, there are no specific actions which will be required to protect or mini- mize impact on such species. Existing trees planted in the public right-of-ways should be protected by the use of temporary guards during periods of construction. The temporary guards are to be furnished and installed by the contractor so that the trees in question may be protected against damage resulting from contact with moving equipment or deposits of soil/fill above exposed root systems or trunks. No specific actions need to be taken in regards to possible impacts re- garding wildlife species which inhabit the urbanized portions of the project area. 8-4 D. SPECIFY THE REGULATIONS, PERMITTING PROCEDURES AND OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT WILL PROTECT SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE. All construction plans for projects which adjoin a landscaped public right-of-way or open space system. should incorporate the following draw- ings, details and notations as a part of the permit set of construction documents as a pre -requisite to the issuance of a building permit by the City of Miami: a. Temporary tree guards are to be furnished and installed by the Con- tractor at every tree location within the public right-of-way, situated within twenty-five feet of the construction activity or limit of construction (i.e. construction fence or barricade). Exceptions would apply to interior renovations; and exterior reno- vations where the cost of construction is under ten thousand dollars ($10,000). b. Adjoining public right-of-ways and open space systemare to be kept free of any dust, debris or foreign substances. Ali landscaping material (i.e. tree planting, shrubbery and ground cover) should meet the City of Miami standards, as per Sections 2022.2 and 2008.8 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 9500. Chapter 17 of the Miami City Code, entitled Environmental Preservation requires a tree removal permit for any tree removal, relocation or development activity affecting trees on pri- vate property within commercial and multifamily districts. The Criteria for Tree Removal in Section 17-9(A) should be strictly enforced and the conditions for tree relocation and replacement in Section 17-9(B) should be maximized. The standards for tree protection during construction, contained in Section 17-10 should be enforced. Dade County Ordinance #82-68 prohibiting the planting of cajeput (Melaleuca Quinquenervia), Australian Pine (Casuarina Spp) & Brazilian Pepper (Schinus Terebinthifolius) should also be strictly enforced. It is recommended that landscaping design guidelines be established to assist in the development of well balanced landscaped treatments along public right-of-ways and private property. The design guidelines should provide for type of planting, spacing, etc. for different urban locations. Specific attention should be paid to edge conditions: curb/pavement; sidewalk/private property; median planting; corner & intersection; pedestrian crosswalks, plazas, etc. A suggested landscaping list of native plants and ornamentals suitable for use in South Florida urban environments developed during the planning and design process of the Dade County mass transit system by the County con- sultants (i.e. KTG) and staff: 8--5 SUGGESTED PLANT LIST (DADE COUNTY MASS TRANSIT) BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS (COMMON NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Achras zapota Sapodilla Allamanda hendersoni Brown Bud Allamanda Alpinia nutans Shell Ginger Anthurium huegelii N.C.N Archontophoenix alexandraw Alexandra Palm 12 ft. 30 in. 5 ft. 30 in. Bauhinia Blaleana Hong Kong Orchid 12 ft. Bougainvillea (variety) Bougainvillea Caladium bicolor (Hort. Var) Caladium Callistemon rigidus Stiff Bottlebrush Callistemon virinalis Weeping Bottlebrush Calophyllum antillanum Calaba 3 ft. 6 ft.. 24 in. 6 ft. 24 in. 10 ft. 8 ft. 3 ft. 12 in. 12 ft. 6 ft. 12 ft. 8 ft. 8-6 12 ft. 3-1/2 in. 3-1/2 in 8 ft. 3 in. BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS (COMMON NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Cassia beareana Bears Shower Cassia fistula Golden Shower Chamaedorea erumpens Bamboo Palm Chamaedorea seifritzii N.C.N Chamaerops humilis European Fan Palm Chrysalidocarpus lutescens Areca Palm Chrysotalanus Coco Plum icaco (green) Chrysotalanus Icaco (Red Tip) • Red Tip Coco Plum Chrysophyllum oliviforme Satin leaf Citris mitis Calamondin Coccolobis diversifolia (Floridana) Pigeon Plum Coccolobis uvifera Seagrape Cocos nucifera (Malayan Green) Malayan Coconut Codiaeum variegatum (Broadleaf) Croton (variety) Conocarpus erecta Green Buttonwood 8 ft. 8 ft. 14 ft. 9 ft. 3 in. 8 ft. 5 ft. 8 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 6 ft. .12 ft. 24 in. 18 in. 12 ft. 12 ft. 12 ft. 8 ft. 9 ft. 18 in. 12 in. 7 ft. 7 ft. 6 ft. 5 ft. 24 in. 15 in. 12 ft. 9 ft. 2 1/2 in. 3 in. 3 1/2 in. 8-7 BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS (COMMON NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Cortaderia selloana Pampasgrass Crinum asiaticum Crinum lily Delonix regia Royal Poinciana Dizygotheca elegantissima Threadleaf Falsearalia Dracaena aborea N.G.N. Dracaena draco Dragon dracaena Dracaena marginata Dracena Eriobotrya japonica Loquat Eugenia jambos Rose Apple Ficus Jacquiniaefolia Jacquinia fig Ficus rubiginosa Rusty fig Garcinia spicata Garcinia Gymnanthes lucida Oysterwood 11 ex vomitoria (nana) Dwarf Yaupon Holly Ixora coccinea Jungleflame Ixora 8-8 3 ft. 3 ft. 4 ft. 4 ft. 16 ft. 16 ft. 4 in. 10 ft. 5 ft. 4 ft. 2 ft. 4 ft. 3 ft. 6 ft. 3 1/2 ft. 12 ft. 8 ft. 2 1/2 in. 12 ft. 8 ft. 2 1/2 in. 12 ft. 10 ft. 3 in. 12 ft 8 ft. 3 in. 8 ft. 4 ft. 6 ft. 3 ft. 10 in. 16 in. 24 in. 16 in. BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS (QOMVION NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Jacaranda acutifolia Jacaranda Jasminum multiflorum (putescens) Furry Jasmine Lagerstroemia indica Crapemyrtle Lagerstroemia speciosa Queen Crapemyrtle Leea coccinea 12 ft. 7 ft. 2 1/2 in. 18 in. 20 in. 12 ft. 7 ft. 12 ft. 8 ft. N.C.N. 4 ft. 3 ft. Ligustrum lucidum 12 ft. 10 ft. Glossy Privet Liriope muscari (evergreen giant) 14 in.Malpighia coccigera 15 in. 16 in. Holly Malpighia Mimusop roxburghiana 12 ft. 8 ft. Mimusops Murraya paniculata 30 in. 20 in. Orange Jasmine Murraya paniculata (Lakeview) 36 in. 30 in. N.C.N. Myrica cerifera 12 ft. 10 ft. Southern Waxmyrtle Noronhia emarginata 12 ft. Noronhia 7 ft. 3 in. BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS (COMMON NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Ophiopogon japonica Monco Grass Paurotis wrighti Paurotis Palm Philodendron selloum Self -heading Philodendron Phoenix roebeleni ➢warf Date Palm Pittosporum tobira (green) Pittosporum Pittosporum tobir (Variegata) Varigated Pittosporum Pleomela reflexa N.C.N. Podocarpus graciliar Weeping Podocarpus Podocarpus macrophyllus Podocarpus Psidium cattlelanum Cattley Guave Ptychosperma macarthuri Macarthur Palm Quercus virginiana Live 0ak Raphiolepsis Indica Indio Hawthorn Ravenala madagascariensis Travelers Palm Rhoeo bermudiana Dwarf Oyster Plant Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm Spathyphyllum (clevelandii) N.C.N. 8 in. 8 in. 20 ft. 15 ft. 2 ft. 3 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 24 in. 24 in. 24 in. 24 in. 6 ft. 3 ft. 8 ft. 5 ft. 8ft. aft. 10 ft. 6 ft. 10 ft. 6 ft. 12 ft. 6 ft. 24 in. 24 in. 12 ft. 10 ft. 10 in. 10 in. 12 in. 12 in. 8-10 3 in. BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS (COMMON NAME) Strelitzia nicolai White Bird of Paradise Strelitzia reginae Bird of Paradise Swietenia mahagoni Mahogany Tabebuia argentea Gold Tree Tabebuia pallida Cuban Trumpet Tamarindus indica Tamarind Thrinas_parviflora Thatch Key Palm Trachelospermum jasminoides Confiderate Jasmine Viburnum suspensum Sandankwa Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm Wedelia trilobata Wedelia Yucca elephantipes Bulbstem Yucca Zamia floridana Coontie Zamia Furfuracea Scurfy Zamia Zebrina pendula Wandering Jew Sodding (Bahia)/Bitter Blue Grass Seed (Bahia) / Argentine HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER 30in. 18 in. 12 in. 12 ft. 16 ft. .12 ft. 12 ft. 5 ft. 3 ft. 30 in. 6 in. 6 ft. 18 in. 18 in. 24 in. 30 in. 6 in. 7 ft. 3 in. 8 ft. 7 ft. 4 in. 7 ft. 2 1/2 in. 18 in. NM 8•-11 Another list of suggested native landscape material that has been prepared by the Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) of Dade County follows: NATIVE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN SOUTH FLORIDA (Compiled by DERM) TREES Acacia, Sweet Alvaradoa Bald Cypress Blolly Buttonwood Cat's Claw Crabwood Dahoon Holly Fiddlewood Geiger Tree Guiana Plum Gulf Licaria Gumbo Limbo Hercules Club inkwood Jamaica Caper Jamaica Dogwood Joewood Lancewood Lignum Vitae Mahogany Mangrove, Black Mangrove, Red Mangrove, White Maple, Southern Red Marlberry Mastic Milkbark Myrsine Myrtle of the River Oak, Live Palm, Cabbage Palm, Brittle Thatch Palm, Florida Thatch Palm, Paurotis *Highly salt tolerant (Acacia farnesiana) (Alvaradoa amorphoides) (Taxodium distichum) (Pisonia discolor)* (Conocarpus erecta)* (Pithecellobium unguis-cati)* (Gymnanthes lucida)* (Llex cassine)* (Citharexylum fruitocosum) (Cordia sebestena)* (Drypetes lateriflora) (Licaria triandra) (Bursera simaruba)* (Zanthoxylum clava-herculis)* (Exothea paniculata) (Capparis jamaicensis) (Piscidia piscipula) (Jacquinia keyensis)* (Nectandra coriacea) (Guaiacum sanctum)* (Swietenia mahogoni)* (Avicennia germinans)* (Rhizophora mangle)* (Laguncularia racemosa)* (Acer rubrum) (Ardesia escallonioides) (Mastichodendron foetidissimum) (Drypetes diversifolia) (Myrsine guianensis) (Calyptranthes zuzygium) (Quercus virginiana)* (Sable palmetto)* (Thrinax microcarpa)* (Thrinax parviflora)* (Acoelorraphe wrightii) 8-12 Palm, Royal Palm, Silver Paradise Tree Pigeon Plum Pine, Slash Pitch Apple Pop Ash Red Bay Red Mulberry Satinieaf Seagrape Soapberry Soldierwood Spicewood Stopper, Redberry Strongbark, Rough Sweet Bay Tamarind, Wild Tawnyberry Holly Torchwood West Indian Cherry West Indian Trema Wild Cinnamon Wild Coffee Tree Wild Dilly Wild Lime Willow Bustic * Highly salt tolerant (Roystonea elata) (Coccothrinax argentata) (Simarouba glauca) (Coccoloba diversifolia)* (Pines elliottii) (Clusia rosea)* (Fraxinus caroliniana) (Persea borbonia) (Morus rubra) (Crysophyllum oliviforme) (Coccoloba uvifera)* (Sapindus saponaria)* (Colubrina elliptica)* (Calyptranthes pallens) (Eugenia axillaris) (Bourreria succelenta var. revoluta) (Magnolia virginiana) (Lysiloma latisiliqua)* (Llex krugiana) (Amyris balsamifera or A. elemifera) (Prunus myrtifolia) (Trema lamarckiana) (Canella alba) (Colubrina arborescens) (Manilkara bahamensis) (Zanthoxylum fagara) (Bumelia salicifolia) SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS Bay Cedar Beautyberry Bitterbush Blackbead Black Torch Boston Fern Christmas Berry C(,copl um Coontie Coral Bean Darling Plum Firebush Florida Boxwood Florida Key Lily Florida Privet Gaillardia Golden Dewdrop Hibiscus Ironwood, Black Ironwood, White Key Lime Lantana Leather Fern Limber Caper Locust Berry. Moss Rose Peperomia Railroad Vine Rhacoma Sea Lavender Sea Oats Sea Oxeye Scaevola or Inkberry Seven -Year -Apple Shield Fern Snowberry Stopper, Red Stopper, Simpson Stopper, Spanish Strap Fern Tetrazygia Varnishleaf Velvetseed Wax Myrtle White Indian Berry Wild Coffee. Wild Coffee Yellow Elder *Highly salt tolerant (5uriana maritima)* (Callicarpa americana) (Picramnia pentandra) (Pithecellobium guadelupense)* (Erithalis fruticosa) (Nephrolepsis biserrata) (Lycium carolinianum)* (Chrysobalanus icaco) (Zamia floridana) (Erythring herbacea) (Reynosia septentrionalis) (Hamelia patens) (Schaefferia frutescens) (Hymenocallis keyensis)* (Forestiera segregata) (Gaillardia pulchelia) (Duranta repens) (Hibiscus eetveldeanus) (Krugiodendron ferreum) (Hypelate trifoliata) (Citrus aurantiifolia) (Lantana camara) (Acrostichum aureum)* (Capparis flexuosa) (Byrsonima cuneata) (Portulaca pilosa) (Peperomia floridana and P. obtusifolia) (Ipomoea pes-caprae)* (Crossopetalum rhacoma) (Tournefortia gnaphalodes)* (Uniola paniculata)* (Borrichia arborescens)* (Scaevola plumieri)* (Casasia clusiifolia)* (Dryopteris ludaviciana) (Chiococca alba) (Eugenia rhombea) (Myrcianthes fragrans var. simpsonii) (Eugenia foetida)* (Campyloneurum angustifolium) (Tetrazygia bicolor) (Dodonaea viscosa) (Guettarda elliptica) (Myrica cerifera)* (Randia aculeata) (Psychotria nervosa) (Psychotria sulzneri) (Tacoma stans) s--14 ccx� avid6,. eiele5h.eln QUESTION 9: HISTORICAL, AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES A. IDENTIFY AND DESCRIBE EACH SITE SHOWN ON MAP D. SPECIFY THE SITES THAT ARE LISTED IN OR APPEAR TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES; THOSE SITES THAT HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED OR APPEAR TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR DESIGNATION UNDER A MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE; THOSE SITES THAT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN A COUNTY HISTORIC SURVEY; THOSE SITES IDENTIFIED BY THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES, HISTORY, AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT; AND ANY SITES IDENTIFIED BY A COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGIST. Between 1978 and 1980, the Metro -Dade Historic Preservation Division conducted the Dade County Historic Survey. Florida Master Site File forms were completed for each property and forwarded to the Florida Division of Archives, History and Record Management (DAHRM). Included within the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project area were 169 individual properties of varying degrees of significance. In 1986 the Metro -Dade Historic Preservation Division reviewed the Dade County Historic Survey for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project area. It was determined that more than 50% of the original properties identified between 1978 and 1980 had been demolished. Of the remaining properties one (1) building is listed in the National Register of Historic Places and eight (8) appear to be eligible for listing. Five (5) properties have been designated as local historic sites under the City of Miami's Heritage Conservation Ordinance . Listed in Table 9-1 and located on Map D-3 are properties located within Southeast Overtown/Park West included in the Dade County Historic Survey. (These properties have not been demolished.) Table 9-2 lists those properties listed in the National Register and those that appear to be eligible for the Register. Table 9-3 lists those properties designated under Miami's Heritage Conservation Ordinance. At the request of the City of Miami Department of Development, the Dade County Archeologist has identified one (1) archeological zone within Southeast Overtown/Park West. The zone is located on Map D-4. B. INCLUDE A LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES, HISTORY AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT, AND THE COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE, INDICATING THE COMPLETENESS OF THE LIST. A letter from DAHRM indicating the completeness of the last is included as Exhibit 9-1. A similar letter from the Metro - Dade Historic Preservation Division is included as Exhibit 9- 2. 9- C. SPECIFY ACTIONS THAT WILL BE TAKEN TO COMPLETE THE RESEARCH NECESSARY TO NOMINATE AND/OR DESIGNATE THE SITES LISTED ABOVE. SPECIFY THE REGULATIONS AND PERMITTING PROCEDURES NEEDED TO PROTECT AND ENCOURAGE THE PRESERVATION OR THOROUGH EXCAVATION OF THE SITES LISTED ABOVE. The City of Miami Planning Department, in conjunction with the DA.HRM and the Dade County Archeologist, has developed management plans for both historic and archeological sites. These plans are included as Exhibits 9-3 and 9-4. 9- 2 SITE # ADDRESS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 1121 NW 1133 NW 1141 NW 1149 NW 1161 NW 1213 NW 1235-37 1301 NW Table 9-1 PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN THE DADE COUNTY HISTORIC SURVEY 1 Place 1 Place 1 Place 1 Place 1 Place 1 Place NW 1 Place 1 Place 9 1211 NW 1 Place 10 1318 NW 1 Place 11 819 NW 2 Avenue 12 829 NW 2 Avenue 13 920 NW 2 Avenue 14 1022 NW 2 Avenue 15 801 NW 3 Avenue 16 824 NW 3 Avenue 17 841 NW 3 Avenue 18 1042-50 NW 3 Avenue 19 1328 NW 3 Avenue 20 245 NW 8 Street 21 227 NW 9 Street 22 250 NW 9 Street 23 301 NW 9 Street 24 226 NW 10 Street 25 230 NW 10 Street 26 947 NW 3 Avenue 27 173.5 NW 11 Street 28 234 NW 11 Street 29 145,152,154 NW 12 St 30 211 NW 12 Street 31 229 NW 12 Street 32 145-47 NW 13th Street 33 540 Biscayne Blvd 34 600 Biscayne Blvd 35 666 Biscayne Blvd 36 1040 Biscayne Blvd 37 699 N. Miami Avenue 9-3 HISTORIC NAME New Hope Primitive Baptist Church Lyric Theatre Rockland Place Hotel Carver Ebenezer Methodist Church St. John The Baptist Bethel AME Church J & S Building D. A. Dorsey House Mt. Zion Baptist Church Texaco Freedom Tower Hertz Rent-A-Car Biscayne Bldg. Lane Bryant Inc. CATEGORY DOE DOE DOE DOE/CMHS DOE/CMHS DOE NR/CMHS 38 943 N. Miami Avenue 39 1036 N. Miami Avenue 40 1050 N. Miami Avenue 41 500 NE 1 Avenue 42 501 NE 1 Avenue 43 529 NE 1 Avenue 44 547 NE 1 Avenue 45 601-03 NE 1 Avenue 46 701 NE 1 Avenue 47 708 NE 1 Avenue 48 814 NE 1 Avenue 49 824 NE 1 Avenue 50 906 NE 1 Avenue 51 927 NE 1 Avenue 52 937 NE 1 Avenue 53 938,942 NE 1 Avenue 54 700 NE 2 Avenue 55 722 NE 2 Avenue 56 724-44 NE 2 Avenue 57 901 NE 2 Avenue 58 121 NE 5 Street 59 127 NE 5 Street 60 135 NE 5 Street 61 151 NE 5 Street 62 233 NE 5 Street 63 49 NW 5 Street 64 52 NE 9 Street 65 53 NE 9 Street 66 111 NE 9 Street 67 121 NE 9 Street 68 154 NE 9 Street 69 50 NE 10 Street 70 133 NE 10 Street 71 67 NW 10 Street 72 85 NW 10 Street 73 200 NE 11 Street 74 44 NE 11 Terrace Category Legend: Central Baptist Church Shaw Maritime Bldg Hotel Greystone Reality Apartments Continental Belt Corp. Little Brown Jug Studio of Lighting Nassau Bargain Store Oleum Shoe Corp. June Apartments Miami Labor Temple Hotel Dolphin Ship Supply of Fla. Inc. & Industrial Marine Engineering of Florida Sandra J. Osborne & Company Hotel Centre America Orr Williams Apartments The Longs Salvation Army Citadel Cameo Machine Co. AAA Chair Florida Sunwear Mirror Poster The Grover Stewart Drug Company NR - National Register - listed DOE - National Register - determination CMHS - City of Miami Historic Site 9-4 of eligibility DOE DOE/CMHS N w 14 nT r IIN NW. 13 ST It- —110 -- 7 5 3 4 2 NW. 11 5T. •y.4., ; 11128111114 � IIIN W51111 1 23 16 S 24 26 N.W. Y i22 i. 15 r 1 I/ 21 31. 0 1i N.W. 4 11II!I1III N.W T 4 11 w c at 3 .44441 .1.144 ATMS lallaa ImMa 12 1 9- 3 • NM Mat WM MN MI MN 1 EN MN SOIN 72 71 m 74 39 38 111111 111111 w 4 4 0 a N. is TERR 1 N.E. 13 OT. NMI 'HHuuii/%1 N.E 12 8T. 11.6 15 3T. MOM Mik fir _11 I111l11111 1 ! I-315 H.E. I/ ST. 7'3 36 691 f70 1 1 N.E. ID ST. 1111111111 `r 111111 1119 52 53 50 37 47 1t• 4 45 44 49as 66 66 6869 N.E. a ST. 1111111111 111 1111,_i az 11111 41 43 N W a ST lti�<,�. {tt,tittttt w 1t,!!t{fnttltft,tgtit,tgttt,f �t Nittltu 1111�11 1111 i�� �� 1TT 56 55 54 11 0 et 4 57_ -J I ° 0 n W z r 4 111 35 111 u e a10ENTENNIAL RAR,1 1/11118/1 ITO Fri 1 inar3 3 N RT 601.0.E44114 58 MAP 11.E. a aT N, ar. 34 N SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES MAP {}I� too � METRORAIL RIGHT OF WAY ! I PHASE I - D C N5 0 { NW. 14 ST, // /) 1 I . W 1] 5T. N.W +3 ST li ii1 N W. 10 ST, 11 F L .T ! N W T ST. N W E ST �i —I1 n 1 ' I I — MIME 1111111111 { i N,E. 11 ST. N.E. /1 TERN, E. 11 ST, sed1.E. 10 ST N.E. 0 ST. N.E. E ST, EMMEN NUS N W ] 51 ,t,{it,t,tt,ft,tlttef,f,H flfl tliilt it,arfnif 111 ifl,fflait, t,tl,t,~Iio ..- fir, _ ��`1—iF' 11 1.1 r TT1 in—T jg`1.I o a I �I 1 % T PONT 90ULGVAna L_ -ram C \ . MAP ID--4 818CAYNE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST METRORAtL RIGHT OF WAY mfw PHASE t—DGM BISCAYNE ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE PI 00 400 00 Table 9-2 PROPERTIES LISTED IN OR POTENTIALLY ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Lyric Theatre St. John The Baptist Bethel AME Church J & S Building D. A. Dorsey House Mt. Zion Baptist Ch. Freedom Tower Central Baptist Ch. Salvation Army Citadel 819 NW 2 Avenue 1328 NW 3 Avenue 245 NW 8 Street 227 NW 9 Street 250 NW 9 Street 301 NW 9 Street 600 Biscayne Blvd. 500 NE I Avenue 49 NW 5 Street 9-7 Eligible Eligible Eligible Eligible Eligible Eligible Listed Eligible Eligible 11 ■ M W b 17 a M a 1T . q11 i1n11111n HnlHlu ull.ngnlanolln M E a bT. 1 r11ri 1 1 1 i 11 1 �f111i 111111. 11110.1.111n11111111ph 1 U 111 1111 ! i. k l -� — �1 j 1I T11111 I I --a C 1 \-\, [4 I-=1 r i Iluiiuuii ®® L $.1. 14 Si. AI 41 N.E. II ST. N.E. Tp 1T. M.E. 1 31. N.E. 1 fY E.13 M.1- a ST. 1 �3FLII3 13 3 iii -k EN= -a► iI111111111IlI1111 Z.!Mg*TLy1: 111 P10EMTENN1At. PARK Pont pgVIEVA33` MAP O-5 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST HISTORIC PROPERTIES LISTED/ELIGIBLE METRORAIL RIGHT OF WAY F1iASE1—DCM FOR NATIONAL REGISTER —MAP 00 Table 9-3 PROPERTIES DESIGNATED UNDER CITY OF MIAMI HERITAGE CONSERVATION ORDINANCE J & S Building O. A. Dorsey House Freedom Tower Salvation Army Citadel 9-9 227 NW 9 Street 250 NW 9 Street 600 Biscayne Blvd. 49 NW 5 Street Exhibit 9-1 LETTER FROM DAHRM IS FORTHCOMING gitiaatri ,OHN E. GILCHRIST Director February 2, 1987 Mr. George Percy, Chief Bureau of Historic Preservation Division of Historical Resources R. A. Gray Building Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 RE: ADA for Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI Exhibit 9-1 CESAR H. 0010 City &tanager Dear Mr. Percy: The City of Miami, through the Department of Development, is completing an Application for Development Approval (ADA) for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project DRI. The ADA Questionnaire (designed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council) asks that a letter be included from the Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management (DAHRM) indicating the completeness of the list of historical and archeological sites within the Development of Regional Impact. We are transmitting portions of our response to Question 9 (Historica]. 'and Archeological Sites) for your consideration. Specifically, we are enclosing Table 9-1 (Properties Included In The Dade County Historic Survey), Table 9-2 (Properties Listed In Or Potentially Eligible For The National Register of Historic Places) and Table 9-3 (Properties Designated Under City of Miami Heritage Conservation Ordinance). Additionally, we are forwarding Map D-3 (Historical Sites) and Map _D--4 (Archeological Sites). We have worked closely with Ivan Rodriguez, Dade County Historic Preservation Officer, in updating the above tables and maps. You may note that several historical sites (properties) have been demolished since the 1978-1980 Dade County Historic Survey, per Mr. Rodriguez' update. However, please be advised that management plans for both historic and archeological sites are recommended in the Overtown/Park West ADA that mirror those (plans) contained in the ADA for Downtown Miami. See Exhibits 9- 3 and 9-4. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT/DUPONT PLAZA CENTER/300 Biscayne Blvd. Way, Suite 400 Miami. FL 33131/(305) 579-3366 Mr. George Percy Page 2 We would appreciate a letter from your office indicating the completeness of the listing of properties in Question 9, as required by the ADA. For your use we are enclosing a letter from Ivan Rodriguez indicating that the listing of properties in Question 9 is complete. If you have any questions concerning the ADA for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project DRI, please call Reginald Barker at (305) 579-3366. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Matthew Schwartz Deputy Director /rb Attachment METROPOLITAN DADECOUNTY, FLORIDA METR}•DADE Deceuber 5, 1986 Mr. Matthew Schwartz Deputy Director City of Miami Department of Development D.O. Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Dear Mr. Swartz: DEPT. OF ',t.V ! { N•!Lid I ExhibiOFFICE OAF uO NTY MANAGER RECEIVED COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION (966 DEC —9 PM 12: 19 WARNER PLACE 111 S.W. 5th AVENUE, SUITE 101 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130 (305) 545-4228 This is in reference to your request for the opinion of this office regarding the historic preservation element of the DRL application for the South East Overtown/Park West project. We have reviewed the information prepared by the City of Miami and our input has been incorporated through our communication with Mr. Barker. The original list has been modified to reflect current status of sites, deleting those which have been demolished and add4ng a few sites of potential eligibility for National Register listing. One of these added sites is a proposed "archeological zone", from N.E. 5 Street to N.E. 8 Street, and from Biscayne Boulevard to N.E. 2 Avenue. We request as a mitigation measure that our office be notified of any construction or devel- opment on that site so that w-e may survey and monitor subsurface activities. Otherwise our office concurs with the canpleteness and accuracy of the 1-kt. Please, call us should you require additional information. Sincerely, Ian A. RodripPz Director Exhibit 9-3 HISTORIC SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN The City of Miami has had a heritage conservation program since October 1981, when an Interim Heritage Conservation Zoning District Ordinance was adopted to protect existing National Register properties. This ordinance was strengthened in May 1952 with the passage of a permanent Heritage Conservation Ordinance. The ordinance provides a mechanism to designate historic sites, historic districts, and archeological zones and to review proposed alterations, demolitions, an new construction. The City of Miami's Heritage Conservation Ordinance is currently the most effective means of encouraging the preservation of historic sites and districts within the City. Designation of properties takes the form of a Heritage Conservation (HC) Zoning Overlay District. Properties designated under this ordinance cannot be altered, added to, or demolished without the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Heritage Conservation Board of City of Miami Planning Department. Review is triggered by the building permit process and insures that all future changes to a property are in keeping with its historic character. The Heritage Conservation Board, however, does not have the authority to deny the demolition of a historic site, but can delay -the demolition for up to six (6) months. While regulating future changes to historic sites, the ordinance also provides certain zoning incentives for selected properties. Incentives can include change of use, FAR or density bonuses, and modification of height, setback, and parking regulations. To date, the four (4) properties listed in Table 9-3 have been designated HC by the City Commission. To encourage the preservation of all properties listed in Table 9-2: Properties Listed In or Potentially Eligible For The National Register of Historic Places, the Department of Development will recommend to the Planning Department that it recommend to the City Commission the HC designation for these sites. The Department of Development will also request that the Planning Department explore the appropriateness of offering specific zoning incentives for individual properties. A copy of the City's Heritage Conservation Ordinance (Article 16 of Zoning Ordinance 9500) is included as Appendix 9-1. The City of Miami has been recognized as a Certified Local Government by the Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management (DAHRM) and the National Park Service. Also, as a part of its heritage conservation program, the City's Planning Department prepares National. Register nominations for selected properties and works with other agencies, neighborhood organizations, and the general public in promoting preservation. Exhibit 9-4 ARCHEOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT PLAN BACKGROUND: The management guidelines included in this proposed Archeological Management Plan have, in fact, already been in use in planning review made of specific projects since 1980 by the Metro -Dade Historic Preservation Division and the State of Florida's Division of Archives, History and Records Management. This management plan is based on data compiled during the Dade County Historic Survey in 1978-1980. Additional data that resulted from the County Archeologist's field monitoring of construction projects in the Central Business District of Miami since 1980 have also supplemented this management plan. DEFINITIONS: An archeological zone is a property area that does or is likely to include archeological sites, features, or artifacts that are of local, state, or national historic significance. BOUNDARY JUSTIFICATION: The primary intent of the archeological zone(s) is to fully encompass significant sites, features, and artifacts. Often, specific boundaries for these resources are unknown because they are buried under concrete or fill, or hidden beneath existing structures. The archeological zones attempt to reasonably encompass these unknown site boundaries. Secondly, archeological zone boundaries of specific zones utilize existing property lines, streets, and geographic feature to facilitate this management. INTENT: The Archeological Management Plan is designed to provide a vehicle for protecting historic resources from uncontrolled destruction and developers from unwanted delays and obstructions. The availability of a plan with specific guidelines allows the developer to consider those historic resources prior to their possible discovery during construction work when it could cause delays. The plan provides for the recording and recovery of significant archeological artifacts, features, and human interments prior to their destruction. IMPLEMENTATION: To implement the recommendations of this management plan, the Department of Development through the C.ity's Planning Department will request the assistance of the County Archeologist in preparing designation reports for the archeological zone(s) specified herein. Upon completion, the Department of Development in conjunction with the Planning Department will recommend to the City Commission the designation of each zone as an archeological zone under the City of Miami Heritage Conservation Ordinance. Once designated as an archeological zone, on permits will be issued for construction, filling, digging, tree removal, or any other activity that may alter or reveal an archeological site, without first having a Certificate of Appropriateness issued in compliance with this management plan (see Appendix 9-1, Sections 1605.1.2 and 1605.3.5). BISCAYNE ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE There is only one archeological zone within the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project area. This site ks known as the Biscayne Archeological Zone. Boundaries: Generally bounded by N.E. 5th Street on the south, N.E. 2nd Avenue on the west, N.E. lath Street on the north, and Biscayne Boulevard on the east. Site Probability: Moderate Possibility of prehistoric or early historic sites near what once was the historic shoreline' of Biscayne Bay. An elevated ridge within the zone (suggestive of a prehistoric midden) and scattered shell refuse has been observed there during archeological monitoring of lot clearing during recent years. Management: Archeological monitoring during clearing, excavation, and construction work. Possible sub- surface testing in areas of shell refuse and ridge prior to development. APPENDIX 9 Appendix 9-- I ZONING § 1600 ARTICLE 16: $C HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 1600, Intent concerning creation of HC districts. Within districts now existing or hereafter created, it is intended to permit creation of HC heritage conservation districts, in general areas having concentrations of structures or sites or individual structures and premises of significance in the historic, cultural, archeological, aesthetic, and/or architectural heritage of the city, state or nation. AC districts are intended to: (a) Effect and accnmpliah the protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of struc- tures, landscape features, archeological resources, areas, neighborhoods, and scenic vistas which represent distinctive elements of the city's historical, cultural, archeo- logical, aesthetic and architectural heritage; (b) Safeguard the city's historical, cultural, archeological, aesthetic and architectural heritage, as embodied and reilectedia historic sites, historic districts and archeologi. cal zones; _ (c) Foster civic pride in the accosnplishmenta of the past; (d) Protect and enhance the aesthetic and environmental character, diversity, and interest of neighborhoods; (e) Stabilize and improve property values in neighborhoods and in the city as a whole; (f) Protect and enhance the city's attraction to residents, tourists, and visitors end thereby serve as a support and stimulus to the economy; (g) Promote the use of historic sites, historic districts and archeological zones for the education, pleasure and welfare of the people of the City of Miami. 1600.1. Purposes of regulations relating to HC districts. The purposes of regulations relating to HC districts are to: (a) Prevent destruction of historic features within HC districts without due consider- ation for values represented therein or the possibility of preservation of such features for use in an economically productive way; (b) Assure that alterations to existing features within HC districts are compatible with the historic character of the HC district; (c) Assure that new structures, uses or lender -ye features within IIC districts or their visual environs will be compatible with the character of the HC district; (d) Promote the preservation of historic features by providing for incentives such as, but not limited to, economically productive adaptive uses, transfer of development rights, floor area bonuses, and special regulations relating to parking, yards, and other elements of zoning authority, 135 § 1601 MIAMI, FLORIDA Sec. 1601. Effect of HC district designation. Such HC districts and their designated transitional areas may either: 1. Supplant districts or portions of districts and the regulations applying therein, at the time of creation of a particular HC district, or 2. Have the effect of modifying requirements, regulations, and procedures applying in existing districts or districts hereafter created, and remaining after HC districts and their designated transitional areas are superimposed, to the extent indicated in the particular HC amendment. Sec. 1602. Defifnttions. The following definitions shall apply only to this article: Alterations. An alteration is any change affecting the exterior appearance of an existing structure by additions, reconstruction, remodeling, or maintenance involving change in color, form, texture, or materials, or any such changes in appearance of specially designated interiors. Applicant An applicant is the record owner of a property and/or structures located thereon, or his legal representative. Archeological zone. An archeological zone is a geographically defined area, designated pursuant to this article, which may reasonably be expected to yield information on local history or prehistory based upon broad prehistoric or historic settlement patterns. Archeological site. An archeological site is a single specific location which has yielded or is likely to yield information on local history or prehistory. Archeological sites may be found within archeological zones, historic sites, or historic districts. Certificate of appropriateness. A certificate of appropriateness is a written document, issued pursuant to thi9 article, permitting specified alterations, demolitions, or other work within an HC district property. Certificates of appropriateness shall be divided into two (2) classifications as follows: (a) Standard certificates of appropriateness. Standard certificates of appropriateness are those based on such specific guides and standards as may be officially adopted by the heritage conservation board and for which issuance has been authorized by the heritage conservation board upon findings by the heritage conservation officer that proposed actions are in accord with such official guides and standards. (b) Special certificates of appropriateness. Special certificates of appropriateness are those involving situations where the heritage conservation board has not officially author- ized the heritage conservation officer to issue certificates and/or where the scope or complexity of a particular situation requires detailed determination by the board. Demolition. Demolition is the complete constructive removal of a structure, or any part thereof. 136 ZONING § 1604 Historic district, A historic distct is a geographically defined area, designated pursuant to this article, possessing a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, struc• tares, ar landscape features united by past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development. Historic site. A historic site is a single lot or portion of a lot containing a structure, landscape feature or archeological site, or a historically related camples of structures, land- scape features or archeological sites, as designated pursuant to this article. Landscape Feature. Landscape feature mews all vegetation., geological features, ground elevation, bodies of water, or other natural or environmental features. Major exterior surfaces Major exterior surfaces are those outside surfaces of any structure listed in the designation. report as having significant value to the historic character of the historic site or district. Ordinary maintenance or repair. Ordinary maintenance or repair :means work done to prevent or to correct any physical deterioration or damage of a structure, or any part thereof by restoring it, as nearly as practicable, to its appearance prior to such deterioration or damage. Structure. A structure is anything constructed or erected., the use of which requires a fixed location on the ground or attachment to something having fixed location on the ground. Transitional area. A transitional area is a subarea within ar adjoining the boundaries of a HC district which does not necessarily qualify as a historic site, historic district, or archeolog- ical zone in itself; but which is visually related to a historic site or historic district such that regulation is required to control major adverse impacts on a historic site or historic district. Unreasonable or undue economic hardship. Unreasonable or endue economic hardship is an onerous and excessive aeaecial burden which destroys reasonable and bene%cial use of property and that would amount to the taking of property without just compensation, or failure to achieve a reasonable economic return in the case of income producing properties. Sec. 1603. Heritage conservation board; heritage conservation officer. The heritage conservation board (hereinafter referred to as the "board") and the heritage conservation officer as established under chapter 62, article VII of the Mliazni City Code shall carry out duties as assigned by this article and the City Code. Sec. 1604. Procedures for designation and adoption of HC districts. 1604.1. Criteria for designation of HC districts To qualify as a historic site, historic district, or archeological zone with an HC zoning classification, individual properties or groups of properties must have significant character, interest or value as part of the historical, cultural, archeological, aesthetic, or architectural heritage of the city, state, or nation; must possess integrity of design, setting, materials, work neeehip, feeing, and association; and shall meet one (1) or more of the following criteria: 137 § 1604 I IAMI, FLORIDA Historical, Cultural Signlficance 1. Is associated in a significant way with the life of a person important in the past; or 2. Is the site of a historic event with significant effect upon the community, city, state, or nation; or 3. Exemplifies the historical, cultural, political, economic, or social trends of the com- munity; or Architectural Significance 4. Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one (1) or more distinctive architectural styles; 5. Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, or period, or method of construction; or 6. Is an outstanding work of a prominent designer or builder; or 7. Contains elements of design., detail, materials or rraftn,anship of outstanding quality or which represent a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment Aesthetic Significance 8. By being part of or related to a subdivision, park, environmental feature, or other distinctive area, should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic, cultural or architectural motif; 9. Because of its prominence or spatial location, contrasts of siting, age, or scale, is an easily identifiable visual feature of a neighborhood or the city and contributes to the distinctive quality or identity of such neighborhood or the city; Archeological Significance 10. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. 1604.2. Procedures for designation of HC districts; preparation of recommendations for specific HC rezoning; procedures for adoption of HC rezoning. Properties which meet the criteria for historic sites, historic districts or archeological zones set forth in section 1604.1 may be zoned HC according to the following procedures: 1604.2.1. Proposals and preliminary evaluation. Proposals for rezoning of potential his- toric sites, historic districts, and archeological zones to the HC district clasaificatiou may be made to the board by any one (1) of its members, the punning department, the Dade County Historic Preservation Board, or any interested citizen. The board shall conduct a preliminary evaluation of the data provided in the proposal for conformance with criteria set forth in section 1604.1; and may, if appropriate, direst the planning department to prepare recommendations for a formal designation report and HC zoning amendment. The board znay require the party initiating such pro- posal to provide any necessary documentation, and to pay any applicable fees. 138 ZONING § 1604 1604.2.2- Preparation of recommendations for individual HC district amendments. For every proposed historic site, historic district, and archeological zone the planning department shAil prepare recommendations for a specific HC district amendment and a historic designation report conteiring tits following. 16 4.12.1. Proposed boundaries. The recomznendatiocs shall include a asap or maps indicating: 1. Historic district boundaries Boundaries for individual historic sites which shAll generally include the entire property or tract of land, unlesssuch tract is so large that portions thereof are visually and functionally unrelated to any significant historic structure. Proposed historic district boundaries shall in general be drawn to include all appropriate properties reasonably contig- uous within an area and may include properties which individually do not conform to the historic character of the district, but which require regulation in order to control potentially adverse influences on the character and integ- rity of the district. Where reasonably feasible in relation to the purpose of HC zoning, historic district boundaries shall include frontage on both sides of streets, and divide the proposed historic district from other zoning dis- tricts at rear lot lines, side street lines, or at other points where divisions will create minimum interdistrict frictions. Archeological zone boundaries ahAll generally conform to natural phyaiographic features which were the focal points for prehistoric and historic activities. 2. Optional boundaries. Boundaries may subdivide the HC zoning district into subareas and transitional areas as appropriate for regulatory purposes. If a proposed historic site or historic district is visually related to surround- ing areas in such a way that actions in the su reerei"rg area would have potentially adverse environmental influences on its character and integrity, proposed boundaries for such transitional areas may be included. 1604.222. Recommendations concerning detailed regulations, 1. Every historic site, historic district, and archeological zone shall be assigned a set of detailed zoning district regulations, identified by the prefix EC and a classification number identifying the particular set of regulations, as for example HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, etc. The recommended zoning amendment des- ignating eeel+ individual historic site, historic district, or archeological zone shAil either assign a previously existing elas:rifeation of HC regulations, or it may set forth a new set of regulations as appropriate for the particular situation. Such regulations may be designed to supplant or modify any element of existing zoning regulations as provided at section 1601, including but not limited to use, floor area ratio, density, height, yards, offstreet parking, minimum lot size, minimum open space; or create any Additional regulations provided for in this article. The recommended zoning amendment may iden- 139 § 1604 FLORIDA tify individual properties, improvements, landscape features, or archeologi- cal sites or categories of properties, improvements, landscape features, or archeological sites for which different regulations, standards, and Proce- dures may be required. 2. Normally, anterior spaces shall not be subject to regulation under thie sec- tion; however, in cases of existing structures having exceptional architec- tural, artistic, or historical importance, interior spaces which are customar- ily open to the public may be specially designated. The zoning amendment shall describe precisely those features subject to review and shall set forth standards and guidelines for such regulations. 1604.« 2.3. Designation report A report shell be submitted with the recommenda- tions for the specific zoning amendment which shall establish and der .ne the historic significance and eheractar of the proposed historic site, historic district, or archeological zone, setting forth the criteria upon which the designation of the HC district and its boundaries are based, and describing the structures and landscape features of public significance, present trends and conditions, and desirable public objectives for future conservation, development, or redevelop- ment. The report shall identify the major exterior surfaces of any structures or landscape features which contribute significantly to the historic character of the historic site or historic district. -1604.2.3. Heritage conservation board public hearing; findings and recommendation. The board shall conduct a public hearing with notice as set forth in chapter 166, Florida Statutes, as amended. If the board finds that the proposed HC district meets the criteria set forth in section 1604.1 for a historic site, historic district, or archeological zone, it shall transmit such findings to the planning advisory board and the city commission along with its recommendation for an HC zoning amendment. If the board finds that the proposed HC district does not meet the criteria for a historic site, historic district, or archeological zone in section 1604.1, no further action shell be required unless the property owner files an amendment for an HC zoning amend- ment; or a community based nonprofit organization makes written request to proceed with the HC zoning amendment process in section 1604.2.4.below. The board may rehear proposals based upon policies set forth in its rules of procedure. 16042.4. Procedure for adoption of HC zoning amendment; exception. Where consider- ation of an HC zoning amendment is required by section16042.3 above, actions and procedures shall be as provided in article 35, "Amendments," except recommenda- tions of the planning advisory board or zoning beard shall be based upon effects of the proposed HC district regulations on the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan or other adopted planning and zoning policies, but should not involve an evaluation of the historic significance of the proposed AC district. 1604.2.5. Moratorium following affirmative recommendation by heritage conservation board; limitations. Following the date of a public hearing which shall be noticed in accord- ance with chapter 166, Florida Statutes, as amended, wherein the heritage conserva- 140 ZONING 1605 tion board issues an affirmative recommendation for HC zoning pursuant to section 1604.2.4 above, no permits shall be issued by the building department for any new construction, alteration, moving, or demolition on the real property which is the subject matter of the recommendation, until one of the fallowing has occurred: 1. The proposed HC zoning amendment is adapted and a certificate of appropriate- ness is issued under the provisions section 1605; or 2. The proposed HC zoning amendment is denied by the city commission; or 3. The property owner has applied for an accelerated approval of a certificate of appropriateness prior to final enactment of the proposed HC zoning amendment; and such certificate of appropriateness bas been issued tinder the provisions of section 1605; and the property owner has voluntarily proffered a covenant bind- ing him to comply with all terms and conditions af the certificate of appropriate- ness, which will cease to be effective should the city corntoiseion deny the HC zoning amendment. See. 1605. Certificates of appropriateness. 1605.1. Certificates of appropriateness, when required No person representing either private or public parties shall carry out or cause to be carried out any of the following actions within a historic site or historic district zoned HC, without first obtaining a certificate of appropriateness (and any other special permits and approvals required in particular HC districts). 160a 1.1. Certificates of appropriateness within historic sites and historic districts. 1. Changes in exterior appearance of an existing structure by additions, reconstruc- tion, remodeling, or maintenance involving change in color, form, texture, or materials, or aziy such changes in appearance of specially designated interiors; or 2. Construction, erection, or installation of new structures or landscape features; or 3. Demolition or moving, in whole or in part, of existing strums; or 4. Removal, relocation, concealment, or effective destruction by damage of any existing landscape features, or archeological sites especially designated as signif- icant within a historic site or historic district. 1605.1.2. Certificates of appropriateness within archeological zones. Within an archeolog- ical zone zoned HC, no person shall carry out or cause to be carried out any new construction, filling, digging, the removal of trees, or any other activity that may alter or reveal an interred archeological site, without first obtaining a certificate of appropriateness. 1605.1.3. Certificate of appropriateness required before issuutce of building permit No permits shall be issued by the department of lire, rescue and inspection services for any work requiring a certificate of appropriateness unless such work is in confor- mance with an approved certificate. The certificate of appropriateness shall be posted on the site at all times during construction, along with posting af the building permit. 141 11605 MIAMI, FLORIDA 1605.2. Procedures of issuing certi ficn res of appropriateness. Where a certificate of appropriateness is required, the following procedures shell govern: 1605.2.1. Prvapplication conference(s). Before submitting an application for a certificate of appropriateness, an applicant 41e11 confer with the heritage conservation officer to obtain information and guidance before entering into binding commitments or incur- ring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys, and other data. At the request of the applicant, the heritage conservation officer, or any member of the board, an additional preapplication conference shall be held between the applicant and the board or its designated representative. The purpose of such conference is to further discuss and clarify conservation objectives and design guidelines in cases that do not conform to established objectives and guidelines. In no case, however, shall any statement or representation made prior to the official application review be binding on the board, the city commission or any city department. 1605.2.Z Application for certificate of appropriateness. The applicant shall submit to the heritage conservation officer an application together with supporting exhibits and other materials required by the rules of procedure of the board, No application shell be deemed to be filed until all supporting materials required shall have been provid- _ ed, and any established fees paid. 1605.2.3. Standard crrtifrc**tos of appropriateness. Where the action proposed in an appli- cation is clearly in accord with official guides and standards for standard certificates of appropriateness officially adopted by the board, the heritage conservation officer shah within five (5) working days of receipt of the completed application, issue a standard certificate of appropriateness, indicating in writing, conformity with speci- fied guides and standards. Following such certification, permits dependent upon it may be issued if otherwise lawful. Where the heritage conservation officer finds that the action proposed in an applica- tion is not clearly in accord with official guides and standards for standard certifi- cates of appropriateness, such application shall be classified for a special certificate of appropriateness. 1605.2.4 Special certificates of appropriateness. 1605.2.4.1. Tinting of heritage conservation board meeting When an application for a special certificate of appropriateness is received in Niue form, with all required supporting materials, the heritage conservation offices shall place the applica- tion on the next regularly scheduled meeting of the board, subject to the notifica- tion requirements of section 1605.2.42. 1605 2.4.2. Notice and hearings, generally. The board shall hold a public hearing with notice of the application to be considered and the brae and place of the hearing as follows: 1. The applicant shall be notified by mail at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 142 ZONING § 1605 2. Any individual or orgenieetion requesting such notification and paying any established fees therefor shall be notified by mail at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 3. An advertisement shall be placed in a newspaper general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 4. Any additional notice deemed appropriate by the board. 1605.2.4.3. .rdearing: decision of the heritage conservation beard. The hearing shall be held at the time and place indicated in the notice. The derision of the board shall be based upon the guidelines set forth in section 1605.3, as well as the general purpose and intent of this article and any specific planning objectives and design guidelines officially adopted for the particular HC district No decision of the board shall result in an tinreasoxxable or undue economic hardship for the owner. The decision of the board shall include a complete description of the reasons for such finding', and shall direct one (1) or more of the following actions: 1. Issuance of a special certificate of appropriateness for the work proposed by the applicant; or 2. Issuance of a special certificate of appropriateness with specified modifica- tions and cenditiona; at 3. Deri'l of a special certificate of appropriateness, subject to the limitations in section 1605.3-2-1; or 4. Issuance of a special certificate of appropriateness with a deferred effective date up to six (6) months in cases of demolition or moving of a significant structure or landscape feature, pursuant to the provisions of sections 1605.3.2 and 3, or up to forty-five (45) days for any work potentially affecting an archeological site, pursuant to the provisions of sections 1605.3.4 and 5. 1605.2.4.4. Time lirrcitrstions. If no action is taken upon an application by the board within sixty (60) days, except the month of August, from the receipt of a com- pleted application in due form, such application shall be deemed to have been approved; and the heritage conservation officer shall authorize issuance of any permit dependent upon such certification, if otherwise lawful, recording as au- thorization the provisions of this section. This time limit may be waived at any time by mutual written consent of the applicant and the board. 1605.2.4.5. Recorder Written copies of alI decisions and certificates of appropriate- ness shall be filed with the city clerk, the building department and the board. 1605.2.4.5. Appeals Any citizen may appeal any decision of the board on matters relating to certificates of appropriateness to the city commission by filing within fifteen (15) days after the date of the decision, a written, notice of appeal with the officer or agent designated by the city rnnnap,,er, with a copy to the city clerk, which shall set forth concisely the decision appealed tram and the reasons or grounds for the appeal. Each appeal shall be accompanied by a fee established by the city corm eeion to cover cost of publishing and mailing notices of hearing. The city commission shall hear and consider all facts material to the appeal and 143 1605 NEL31YII, FL°RIDA render a decision promptly. The city commission may affirm, modify.' or reverse the board's decision. The decision of the city co,,ecession ahefl constitute final admits'5trative review, and no petition for rehearing or reconsideration small be considered by the tity. Appeals from decisions of the city coyemiasion may be made to the courts as provided by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. 1605.2.4.7. Changes in approved work. Any change in work proposed subsequent to the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness shall be reviewed by the heritage conservation officer. If the heritage canservatioa officer finds that the proposed change does not materially affect the historic character or the proposed change is in accord with approved guidelines, standards, and certificates of appronriate- nese, the officer may isms a supplementary standard certificate of appropriate- ness for such change. If the proposed change may not be in accord wins, guide- lines, standards, or cereincates of appropriateness previously approved by the board, a new application for a special certificate of appropriateness shell be required. 1605.3. Guidelines for issuing certificate of appropriateness. 1605.2.1. Alteration of esrsting structures, new construction. Generally, for applications relating to alterations or new construction as required in sections 1605.1.14 and 2, the proposed worst shall not adversely affect the historic, architectural, or aesthetic character of the subject strt=aire or the relationship and congruity between the subject structure and its neighboring structures and sumo„ecliegg, including but not limited to form, spacing, height, yards, materials, color, or rhythm and pattern of window and door openings in building facades; nor ellen the proposed work adversely affect the special character or special historical, architectural or aesthetic interest or value of the overall HC district. Except where special standards and guidelines have been specified in the antendrxxent creating a particular HC district, or where the board has subsequently adopted additional standards and gaidelfees for a particular HC district, decisions relating to alteration or new construction shall be guided by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for Rehabilitation." .1605 3.2. Demolition of existing struct,ires. 1. The board shall have authority to deny a demolition permit only where such authority is provided within applicable HC district regulations as a result of granting special incentives for preservation of a historic improvement, such as but not limited to transfer of development rights, Floor area ratio incentive, and special exceptions for yards, lot coverage, o5street parking, etc. 2. The board may grant a certificate of appropriateness with a delayed effective date up to six (6) months. The effective date shall be determined by the board based upon the relative sigrxificenre of the structure, the probable time required to arrange an alternative to demolition, and whether the applicant has made a clear determination of urareesonab,e or undue economic hardship. 3. During the demolition delay period, the board may take such steps as it deems necessary to preserve the structure concerned, in accordance with the purposes of 144 ZONING . § 1605 this article. Such steps may include, but shall not be )ietited to, consultation with civic groups, public agencies and interested citizens, recommendations for acqui- sition of property by public or private bodies or agencies, and exploration of the possibility of moving the subject structure. 4. During the demolition delay period, the owner shall perznat access to the subject property for the purpose of appraisals and inspections required by the board. If the board finds that the owner has refused a "boxier fide" offer to purchase or otherwise provide compensation for the subject structure or property for fair market value by any public or private person or agency which gives reasonable assurance of its willingness to preserve such sL. ucture on its original site or on a site approved by the board, it may invalidate the certificate of appropriateness, following a public hearing. 5. In connection with any certificate of appropriateness, standard or special, for demolition of structures in an HC district, the board may require, at the owner's expense, salvage and preservation of specified rinsses of building materials, architectural details and ornaments, fixtures, and the like for reuse in restora- tion of other historic properties. The board may also require at the owner's expense the recording of the structure for archival purposes prior to demolition. The recording may include, but shall not be limited to, photographs and mea- sured architectural drawings. 1605.3.3. Moving of existing structures. Generally, moving of significant structures from • their original location shall be discouraged; however, the board may grant a certifi- cate of appropriateness if it fiirds that no reasonable alternative is available for preserving the structure on its original site and that the proposed relocation site is compatible with the historic and architectural integrity of the structure. The board may issue a certificate with a delayed effective date up to six (6) months in order to explore alternatives to moving the structure in question. 1605.3.4. Removal or destruction of existing landscaped features 1. No certificate of appropriateness shall be granted for removal, relocation, con- reelment or effective destruction by damage of any landscape features or archeo- logical sites especially designated as significant within a historic site or historic district zoned HC unless one (1) of the following conditions exists: (a) The designated landscape feature or archeological site is located in the buildable area or yard area where a structure may be placed and unreasonably restricts the permitted use of the property; or (b) The designated vegetation is inappropriate in a historical context or other- wise detracts from, the character of an HC district; or (c) The designated vegetation is diseased, injured, or in danger of falling; un- reasonably interferes with utility service; creates i'rtaafe vision clearance or conflicts vrith other applicable laws and regulations. 2. As a condition contained in the certificate of appropriateness, the applicant may be required to relocate or replace designated vegetation. 145 5 1605 M A.MI, FLORIDA 1605.3.5. Construction, excavation or other disturbance in archeological zones In cases where new construction, excavation, tree removal, or any other activity may disturb or reveal on interred archeological site, the board may issue a certificate of appropri- ateness, standard or special, with a delayed effective date up to forty-five (45) days. During the delay period the applicant shall permit the subject site to be examined under the supervision of an archeologist approved by the board. A certificate of appropriateness may be denied if the site is of exceptional importance and such denial would not unreasonably restrict the primary use of the property. Sec. 1606. Reserved. Sec. 1607. Special provisions for variances, amendments to existing $C districts, u miniltxation and enforcement in HC districts. 1607.1. Variances; exemption from provisions of article 31; limitations Because of the nature and purpose of heritage conservation, the general provisions for HC districts and the regulations provided within individual $C districts shall not be subject to the provisions of article 31, "Appeals for Variance from Terms of Ordinance " Instead, where by reason of particular site conditions and constraints, or because of unusual circumstances applicable solely to the particular application or where strict enforcement of the provisions of HC district regulations would result in an unnecessary, unreasonable and undue hardship or where the strict application of the regulation or regulations is not necessary for the accom- plishment of public purposes or the provision of public protection, the board shall have the power to modify adherence to particular HC district regulations; provided that the modifica- tions ensure harmony with the intent and purposes of this article and will not adversely affect the public welfare. Any such modifications shall only be made through the granting of a special certificate of appropriateness as provided in section 1605.2.4. 1607.2. Amendments for existing HC districts; .ception. Applications for amendments to existing HC districts shall be processed according to the provisions of article 35, "Amendments"; except that all such applications shall be submitted to the board for review and recommendation at a regularly scheduled meeting and transmit- ted to the planning advisory board prior to any public hearing on such application by the planning advisory board; and provided that no action resulting from such application shall have the effect of elirninating the requirement for certifirntp of appropriateness as provided in section 1605. Where the board has issued a certificate of appropriateness for demolition or moving of the structure or feature of principal historic significance on a historic site, the application of the particular HC district classification to the site may be eliTN, inated through the amendment process. 146 ZONING § 1607 1607.3. Ordinary maintenance and repair. Nothing in this article shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any structure which does not involve an alteration; or to prevent ordinary maintenance of landscape features. 1607.3.1. Enforcement of raintenance and repair provisions Where the board or the heritage conservation officer determines that any structure within an HC district is endangered by lack of maintenance and repair, or that [any] other structure in visual pro imity to an HC district lacks maintenance and repair to such an extent as to detract from the desirable character of the HC district, the board or the officer shall request appropriate officials or agencies of the city to require correction of such deficiencies under authority of applicable laws and regulations. 1607.4. Unsafe structures In the event the building official 'determines that any structure within an HC district is uneefe pursuant to section 202 of the South Florida Building Code, he shell immediately notify the board with copies of such findings. Where reasonably feasible within applicable Laws and regulations, the building official shall endeavor to have the structure repaired rather than demolished and shall take into consideration any comments and recominexxda- tions by the board. The board may take appropriate actions to effect and accomplish preserva- tion of such structure, including but not limited to negotiations with the owner and other interested parties, provided that such actions do not interfere with procedures in section 202 of the building code. 1607.5. Emergency conditions. For the purpose of remedying emergency conditions determined to be imminently dan- gerous to life, health or property, nothing contained herein shall prevent the making of any temporary construction, reconstruction, deinalition or other repairs to a structure, landscape feature, or site in an HC district pursuant to an order of a government agency or a court of competent jurisdiction, provided that only such work as is reasonably necessary to correct the haeardous condition may be carried out. The owner of a structure damaged by fire or natural calamity shall be permitted to stabilize the structure immediately and to rehabilitate it later under the normal review procedures of this article. 1607.6. Inspections. The department of fire, rescue and inspection services shall assist the board by making necessary inspections in connection with enforcement of this article. The director of the department of fire, rescue and inspection services shall be responsible to promptly stop any work attempted to be done without or contrary to any certificate of appropriateness required under this article; and shall further be responsible for ensuring that any work not in accord- ance with an issued certificate of appropriateness shall be voluntarily corrected to comply with the certificate, or that authorized civil and criminal prosecution is initiated promptly. 147 § 1607 1rIIAMI, FLORIDA 1607.7. Violations Any person who carries out or causes to be carried out any work in violation of this article shall be required to restore the subject structure, landscape feature, or site either to its appearance prior to the violation or in accordance with a certificate of appropriateness approved by the board. This civil, remedy shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any criminal prosecution and penalty otherwise provided in article 34 of this comprehensive zoning ordinance 1607.8. Conflicts. Where there axe conflicts between the requirements of this article and other provisions of this comprehensive zoning ordinance, the provisions of this article and of the particular HC district shall apply. 1607.9. FI'C zoning applies equally to private parties and public bodies The provisions of HC zoning shall apply equally to plans, projects or work executed or assisted by any private party, governmental body or agency, department, authority or board of the city, county or state. Secs. 1608, 16439. Reserved. PROVISIONS RELATING TO SPECIFIC HC DISTRICTS Sec. 1610. RC-1 general use Heritage conservation overlay district. 1610.1 Intent. This district is intended to carry out the intent and purposes of heritage conservation zoning districts as set forth in section 1600, for qualified historic sites which are in govern- mental or institutional use, or which do not require special modifications of the underlying zoning district in order to assure preservation of significant historic features. 1610.2. Effect of HG1 overlay. The HC-1 overlay district shall have the effect of modifying requirements and procedures applying in pet Ling zoning districts indicated in the official zoning atlas, or zoning districts hereafter created and remaining after the HC-1 overlay district is superimposed, to the extent provided herein. All zoning requirements, regulations, and procedures not specifically modi- fied by the BC-1 overlay shall remain in full force and effect, • I610.3. Certificates of appropriateness. A11 applicable actions within the HC-1 overlay district she rt be subject to the require- ments, procedures, and guidelines for certificates of appropriateness, as set forth in section 1605. (Ord. No. 9550, § 1, 1-13-83) 148 ZONING $ 1611 Sec. 1611. HC-2 residential -office heritage conservation overlay ay district. 1611,1. Intent This district is intended to carry out the intent and purposes of heritage conservation zoning districts as set forth in section 1600, for qualified historic sites in appropriate locations within residential zoning districts. It is intended to promote preservation of such historically significant buildings and their grounds by providing for an eaonoreie 1y productive adaptive reuse. This district is further intended to provide tle ibility to permit development in an orderly manner consistent with the special significance and visual character of such buildings and grounds; and is intended to ensure that development is within the scope and geele of the surrounding area; and is not intended to create transitional neee 1621.2. Effect of HC-2 avericy. The HC-2 overlay district shall have the effect of modifying requirements and procedures applying in existing zoning districts indicated in the official zoning atlas, or zoning districts hereafter created and rerne ping after the HC-2 overlay district is superimposed, to the extent provided herein. All zoning requirements, regulations, and procedures not specifically modi- fied by the HC-2 overlay shell remain in full force and effect. 1611.3. Permissible principal uses and structures. 1621.3.1. Permissible generally, without limitation on location within the overlay district Any use permitted within the underlying zoning district 4/4A71 be permissible gener- ally, without specific limitation on location within the.HC-2 overlay district, subject to any special permits required by the underlying district. 1621.32. Permissible subject to limitations within the overlay district The following uses, as principal uses, shall be permissible only within existing structures which contrib- ute to the historic character of the site as identified in the designation report; and shall not be permissible in any case where the structure(s) of principal historic significance within a historic site have been destroyed or riarn aged beyond repair for any reason: 1. Offices for the conduct of real estate, mortgage financing (excluding bane and savings and loans), insurance, or offices of architects, attorneys, accountants, tax consultants, engineers, dentists or doctors (exclurli.g riinics), designers, decora- tors, appraisers or artist studios. 2. Retail sale of items related to local histary and historic preservation, including but not limited to antiques, books, art, and hAridicrafts; provided that such use is clearly incidental to all other principal uses on the site and does not exceed seven hundred (700) square feet in floor area. 1611.4. Regulations concerning minimum lot requirements, floor area limitation, minim.im open space, height, brLilding spacing, offstreet parking landscaping. 1611.4.1. Regulations concerning historic structures Any structure of historic signifi- cance, as defined in the designation report, shall be permitted to be repaired, re- 149 § 1611 MIA/YE, FLORIDA stored, structurally altered, or changed to any use permitted within this district; notwithstanding any conflicts with provisions of the underlying zoning district per- teinir,, to minimum tot requirements, floor area limitations, ,rieimun open space, height, building spacing, offsLreet parleina, or landscaping; subject to a certificate of appropriateness as provided in section 1611.5. New or existing accessory structures, excluding new buildings, shall likewise be permitted where necessary to serve exist- ing historic strums. 1611.4_2. Regulations concerning additions and netu buildings Additions to existing buildings and erection of new buildings sbail in all cases be subject to the floor area ratio Iireitations of the underlying zoning district; however, in cases where the configuration of a historic structure precludes reasonable and appropriate use of the property within other dements of the underlying zoning district envelope, and a greater public purpose would be served by modifying such regulations in order to permit appropriate preservation of a historic structure, then a special certificate of appropriateness may authorize the following, subject to the standards in section 1611.5: 1. A deviation of up to twenty (20) percent from the underlying zoning district requirements for minimum lot size, minitouatv open space, height, landscaping, and maximum tot coverage; 2. An exemption from all builr4irg spsaeing requirements; and 3. A reduction of offstreet parking requirements not to exceed eight (8) parsing spaces or provision of offsite parking, as provided in section 2018, except that such offsite parking may also be located within any adjacent zoning district other than RS or RG, subject to a Claws C special permit. 161I.5. Certificates of appropriateness, All applicable actions within the HC-2 overlay district shall be subject to the require- ments, procedures, and guidelines for certificates of appropriateness, as set forth in section 1605. In addition to the guidelines set forth in section 1605.3, the following standards shall be observed in issuing certificates of appropriateness within this district: 1. The project shall not cause undue negative impact an the surrounding area in terms of compatibility with adjacent land uses, vehicular ingress and egress, pedestrian safety and convenience, parking, public utilities and services, lighting, noise, or other potentially adverse impacts on adjacent residential areas; 2. The location and arrangement of parking and access drives shell be compatible with special historic integrity and visual character of the struetuze(s); and the spacing and dimensions of such parking and access drives shall provide at least minin urn safety standards for compact automobiles; 3. Parking and service areas shell be adequately screened from view of adjacent properties. 150 ZONING § 1612 4. All signs, lighting fixtures, landscaping and other appurtenant elements shall be suitable for the historic character of the site and compatible with the surrounding area; and 5- All plans shall be in accord with the intent and purpose of this district and to the benefit of the general public. (Ord. No. 9604, § i, 4.28-83) Sec. 1612. HC-3 residential -office heritage conservation overlay district. 1622.1. Intent This district is intended to carry out the intent and purposes of heritage conservation zoning districts, as set forth in section 1600, for qualified historic sites. It is further intended to promote preservation of such historically signiica.nt buildings and their grounds by provid- ing for economically productive adaptive use of historically significant buildings; greater flexibility to permit site development in an orderly rranr+er consistent with the special significance and visirtai character of such buildings and grounds; and safeguards against unnecessary destruction of the special historic significance and visual character of such buildings and grounds. I612.2. Elect ot.HC-3 overlay. The HC-3 overlay district shall have the effect of modifying requirements and procedures applying in existing zoning districts indicated in the official zoning atlas, or zoning districts hereafter created and rernabiirrg after the HC-3 overlay district is superimposed, to the extent provided herein. All zoning requirements, regulations, and procedures not specifically modi. 6.ed by the HC-3 overlay shall remain in full force and effect. 2612.3. Permissible principal risen and structures. 1612.3.1. Permissible generally, without limitation on location within the overlay district Any use permitted within the underlying zoning district shall be permissible gener- ally, without specific limitation on location within the HC.3 overlay district, subject to any special permits required by the underlying district. 1612.3.2. Permissible subject to limitation within the overlay district The following uses, as principal uses, shall be permissible only within existing structures which contrib- ute to the historic character of the site as identified in .the designation report; and shall not be permissible in any case where the structure(s) of principal historic significAnne within a historic site have been destroyed or damaged beyond repair for any reason: 1. Business and professional ofl:"i.es now selling merchandise on the premises, and not including bank,;, savings and loans, and similar financial institutions. 2. Retail sale of items related to local history and historic preservation, including, but not limited to antiques, books, art, and handicrafts; provided that such use is clearly incidental to all other principal uses on the site and does not exceed seven hundred (700) square feet in floor area. 151 1612 MIAMI, FLORIDA 1612.4. Regulations concerning minimum lot requirements, floor area. limitations, minimum open space, height, building spacing o jfstr eet purizing landscaping. 1612.4.1. Regulations concerning historic structures. Any structure of historic signifi- cance, as identified in the designation report, shall be permitted to be repaired, restored, structurally altered, or changed to any use permitted 1vithin this district; notwithstanding any conflicts with provisions of the underlying zoning district per. taming to minimum lot requirements, floor area limitations, minimum open space, height, building spacing, ofi'street parking, or landscaping; subject to a certificate of appropriateness as provided in section 1612.5. New or existing accessory structures, excluding new buildings, shall likewise be permitted where necessary to serve exist- ing historic structures. 1612 4.2. Regulations concerning additions and new buildings. Additions to existing buildings and erection of new buildings shall be subject to all requirements of the underlying zoning district. 16I2.5. Certificates of appropriateness. All applicable actions within the HC-3 overlay district shall be subject to the require- ments, procedures, and guidelines for certificates of appropriateness, as set forth in section 1605. In addition to the guidelines set forth in section 1605.3, the following standards shall, be observed in issuing certificates of appropriateness within this district: 1. The project shall not cause undue negative impact on the surrounding area in terms of compatibility with adjacent land uses, vehicular ingress and egress, pedestrian safety and convenience, parking, public utilities and services, lighting, noise, or other potent;a(ly adverse impacts on adjacent residential areas; 2. Not less than two-thirds (%) of the number of parking spaces that would ordinarily be required for a new structure of equivalent use and floor area shall be provided for existing structures either onsite or at a remote location within six hundred (600) feet of the subject site; 3. The location and arrangement of parking and access drives shall be compatible with special historic integrity and visual character of the strtucture(s); and the spacing and dimensions of such parking and access drives shall provide at least minimum safety standards far compact automobiles; 4. Parking and service areas shall be adequately screened from view of adjacent properties; 5. AU signs, lighting fixtures, landscaping and other appurtenant elements shall be suitable for the historic character of the site and compatible with the surrounding area; and 6. All plans shall be in accord with the intent and purpose of this district and to the benefit of the general public. (Ord. No. 9608, § 1, 4-2S-83) 152 ZONING $ 1613 Sec. 1613. HC--4 commercial area heritage conservation overlay district. 1613.1. Intent This overlay district is intended to carry out the intent and purposes of heritage conserva- tion zoning districts as set forth in section 1600. It is to be applied to historic sites or historic districts located within office or commercial zoning districts where it is appropriate to encour- age preservation of historic structures by providing for construction of additional new devel- opment on the site or elsewhere within the underlying zoning district. 1613.2. Effect of HC-4 overlay. The HC4 overlay district shall have the effect of modifying requirements and procedures applying in existing zoning districts indicated in the official zoning atlas, or zoning districts hereafter created and remaining after the 11C-4 overlay district is superimposed, to the extent provided herein. All zoning requirements, regulations, and procedures not specifically modi- fied by the 1 0-4 overlay shall remain in full force and effect. 1613.3. Regulations concerning maximum floor w-ea. The maximum floor area ratio shall be as set forth in the underlying zoning district, except that where a structure or portion of a structure of historic significance, as identified in the designation report, is preserved as a pant of an overall development plan, the heritage conservation board may approve one (1) of the following through a certificate of appropriateness: a. The existing floor area of the subject historic structure sbqn be exempted from calculation of maximum floor area for the lot, provided that the exempted floor area shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the maximum allowable floor area; or b. The maximum floor area ratio may be increased by twenty -five -hundredths (.25) FAR; or c. The maximum floor area ratio may be increased by ten (10) percent. Wherever a floor area ratio bonus for preservation of a historic structure has been provided within an underlying zoning district, the provisions of this section shall govern; and the bonuses shall not be cumulative. 1613.4. Regulations concerning minimum lot requirements, minimum open space, maximum height, offstreet parking. 1613.4.1. Regulations concerning historic structures Any 'structure of historic signifi- cance, as defined in the designation report, shall be permitted to be repaired, re- stored, struc,.urally altered, or changed to any use permitted within this district; notwithstanding any conflicts with provisions of the underlying zoning district per- taining to minimum lot requirements, minimum open space, minimum yards, build- ing sparing, or landscaping, mraxirnu n height and off-street parking; subject to a certificate of appropriateness as provided in section 1613.5. New or existing accessory structures, excluding new buildings, shall likewise be permitted where necessary to serve existing historic structures, subject to a certificate of appropriateness. Subject to the standards for a certificate of appropriateness in section 1613.5, existing his- § 1613 M2AMI, FLORIDA toz-ic structures may be exempted from offstreet parking requirements where the size and configuration of the site does not permit offstreet parking consistent with, the historic character and integrity of the site. 2613.4.2. Regulations concerning additions and new buildings. Additions to existing buildings and erection of new buildings shall generally be subject to the provisions of the underlying zoning district; However, in cases where the configuration of a historic structure precludes reasonable and appropriate use of the property within the under- lying zoning district envelope; and a greater public purpose would be served by modifying such regulations in order to permit appropriate preservation of a historic structure, then a special certificate of appropriateness may authorize the following, subject to the standards in section 1613.5: a. A deviation of up to twenty (20) percent from the underlying zoning district requirements for minimum lot size, minimum open space, minimum yard area, maximum height and landscaping; and b. An exemption from all building sparing requirements. 1613.5. Certificates of appropriateness. 1613.5.1. Certificates of appropriateness required; special standards. All applicable ac- tions within the HC-4 overlay district shall be subject to the requirements, proce- dures, and guidelines for certificates of appropriateness, as set forth in section 1605. In addition to the guidelines set forth in section 1605.3, the following standards shall be observed in issuing certificates of appropriateness within this district 1. The project shall not cause undue negative impacts on the surrounding area in terms of compatibility with adjacent land uses, vehicular ingress and egress, pedestrian safety and convenience, parking, public utilities and services, scale, lighting, noise, or other potentially adverse impacts on adjacent residential areas; 2. The location and arrangement of parking and access drives shall be compatible with special historic integrity and visual character of the structure(s); and the spacing and dimensions of such parking and access drives shall provide at least zuinimum safety standards for compact automobiles; 3. Parking and service areas shall be adequately screened from view of adjacent properties; 4. All signs, lighting fixtures, landscaping and other appurtenant elements shall be suitable for the historic character of the site and compatible with the surround- ing area; and 5. All plans shall be in accord with the intent and purpose of this district and to the benefit of the general public. 1613.6.2. Special regulations concerning denzoUtion. In cases where a property owner has voluntarily elected to utilize provisions in sections 1613.3., 1613.4, or 2014 to in- crease total floor area., increase the zoning envelope, decrease parking requirements, or any other such benefit available in consideration of preserving a historic structure; 154 ZONING § 1613 then the heritage conservation board shall have the authority to deny a certificate of appropriateness for demolition of the subject historic structure under the provisions of section 1605.32.1, if the board finds that structures and improvements remaining after the proposed demolition would continue to benefit from the provisions of the HC-4 overlay. (Ord. No. 9734, § 1, 10-27-83) 155 0/e05/40/7 /' (Note: Table 10.1 (Construction Costs), Table 10.2 (Construction Employment), Table 10.3.1 (Permanent Retail Employment), Table 10.3.2 (Permanent Office Employment) and Table 10.5 (Ad Valorem Revenues) are subject to revision pending the execution of land disposition agreements between the City of Miami and selected Phase l developers. All land disposition agreements are scheduled to be ratified by February 12, 1987.) QUESTION 10: EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS A) COMPLETE TABLES 10.1 AND 10.2 Table 10.1. CONSTRUCTION COSTS (SOUTHEAST OVERTOVNIPARJWEST SUBAREA) Total % In Cost Item Phase I Phase 11 Phase 1I1 Total Region Land S 99,316,800 $ 67,953,600 Labor 138,025,755 87,726,803 Material 275,393,427 204,695,875 Interest 35,407,716 26,318,014 Preliminary Planning 13,769,671 10,234,794 S 57,499,200 62,677,201 146,246,803 18,803,160 7,312,340 Total S541,913,379 $396,929,113 S292,538,704 Employment Phase I Phase 11 Phase III Total Source: Hammer, Stier, George $ 224,769,600 268,429,769 626,336,105 80,528,927 31,316.805 $1,231,381,196 Associates. 100% 100% 70% 70% Dollars S 224,759,600 268,429,759 438,435,274 56,370,249 50% 15,658,403 82% $1,003,663,284 Table 10.2. CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT, (SOUTHEAST OVERTOWH/PARKWEST SUBAREA) Under S8,000 fEa Reg 112 $8,000-514,999 1 5 $16 000-524,999 S25,000-549,999 S50,000 & Over a x � g Eme Reg Total 0 100% 167 100% 3,065 100% 2,342 100% 0 1005 5.575 0 100% 124 100% 2,287 100% 1,732 100% 0 100% 4,144 0 100% 89 100% 1.634 100% 1.238 100% 0 100% 2,161 0 100% 380 1005 6,986 Source: Hammer, Stler. 100% 5,312 100% 0 100% 12,680 George Associates. B) COMPLETE TABU 10.3 FOR EACH PHASE, ESTIMATING THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BY THREE -DIGIT SIC CODE AND BY LAND USE SECTOR (COL. 1, # EMP.) AND THE PERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYEES THAT WILL COME FROM WITH THE REGION (COL. 2, & REGION). FOR MIXED -USE PROJECTS WITH A RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS EXPEXTED TO BE EMPLOYED WITH THE PROJECT (COL. 3, RES. EMP.). Table 10.3 has been provided on the following pages. Retail Catepry Phase 1 Specialty Foods 549 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Chug Store 591 1 1 14 12 10 9 1 1 0 0 26 23 Supermarket 541 3 3 42 37 32 29 2 2 1 1 80 72 Liquor/Wine 592 0 0 6 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 6 Cards/Gifts 594 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 • Beauty Salon 723 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Cleaners/Shoe Repair 721 0 0 6 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 10 9 Barber Shop 724 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 a Department Stores 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z- Costume Jewelry 594 0 0 1 1 1 I 0 0 0 0 2 2 Jewelry 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fast Foods 581 1 1 22 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 24 22 Restaurant W/L1c or 581 1 1 14 12 11 10 1 1 1 1 28 25 Ladies` Speciality 563 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shoes, Ladies' 566 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sporting Goods 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Toy Store 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Decorative Accessories 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fabric Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plant Store 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Optical 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Curtains and Drapes 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Automotive 553 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hobby Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arts & Crafts 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health Spa 729 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movie Theater 783 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bank 602 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 dens' Clear 561 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mens' Shoes & Athletic Wear 566 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Calera Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 10.3,1. PERMANENT RETAIL EMPLOYMENT (SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARQdEST) Under $8,000 $8z000-$14,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000 or More Total Employment # % # % # I # % # % # SIC Code p Reg 4 g9 P2R t Emp f Enp Pig Ii12 Biqa Retail Category SIC Code Phase 1 (cont.) Books & Stationery 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bath Shop 571 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Audio/Visual 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records & Tapes 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 6 6 114 100 66 61 4 4 2 2 192 173 Table 10.3.1. PERMANENT RETAIL EMPLOYMENT (Sc$J1 iEJ\ST OVERTOWN PARKWEST) (Continued) Under $8L000 $8,000-414,999 $15,000-424,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000 or Mere Total Employment EiP E r Phase 11 a Jr. Department Stor: 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `" Speciality Foods 549 0 0 4 5 3 4 4 0 0 1 11 10 Costume Foods 563 0 0 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 6 Jewelry 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fast Foods 581 0 0 7 6 5 5 5 0 0 0 12 11 Restaurant W/Liquor 581 1 1 10 9 7 6 0 0 0 0 18 16 Ladies' Speciality 563 0 0 6 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 10 9 Shoes, Ladies' 566 0 0 5 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 8 7 Sporting Goods 594 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5. Toy Store 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Decorative Accessories 593 0 0 7 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 12 11 Fabric Shop 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Plant Store 526 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Optical 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Curtains and Drapes 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Automotive 559 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hobby Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arts & Crafts 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health Spa 729 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movie Theater 783 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bank 602 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 hens' Wear 561 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t4Lns' Shoes & Athletic Wear 566 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Category Phase II (cont.) Camera Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Books & Stationery 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bath Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Audio/Visual 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records & Tapes 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal I I 50 45 34 34 4 0 0 1 89 81 r Phase III °` Jr. Department Store 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Speciality Foods 549 0 0 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 6 Costume Jewelry 563 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Jewelry 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fast Foods 581 0 0 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 6 Restaurant W/Liquor 581 1 2 13 12 10 8 0 0 0 0 24 22 Ladies' Speciality 563 0 0 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 6 Shoes, Ladies' 56G 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sporting Goods 594 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Toy Store 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Decorative Accessories 593 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 Fabric Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plant Store 526 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Optical 599 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 Curtains and Drapes 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Automotive 559 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 icy Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arts & Crafts 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health Spa 729 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 Movie Theater 783 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bank 602 0 0 3 3 4 3 1 1 0. 0 8 7 Pens' Wear 561 0 0 5 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 9 8 liens' Shoes & Athletic Wear 566 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 SIC Code Table 10.3.1. PEIi 4NINT RETAIL giPLOY LENT (SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARKWEST) (Continued) Under $8,000 $8 000-3141999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000$49,999 $50,000 or More Total Employment n)n [ pg F1 [ il-e9 Elk fl �n Table 10.3.1. PERMANENT RETAIL EMPLOYMENT (SOUTHEAST OVERTO N PJ 4FST) (Continued) tinder $8,000 $8,000414,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000449,999 $50,000 or More Total Employment # % # % # % # % # % # Retail Category SIC Code fnp Reg Ewp Reg E,tr l Rem gip R4 gR Rey Phase III (cont.j Camera Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Books & Stationery 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bath Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Audio/Visual. 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records & Tapes 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal T 2 52 46 41 38 T T 0 0 95 86 Grand Total 8 9 216 191 141 133 9 5 2 3 376 340 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. T Table 10.3.2. PERMANENT OFFICE EMPLOYMENT (SOUTHEAST OVERIOIN PAR(WEST) Under $8,000 $8,000-$14,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000 or Mere Total Employment # % # % # % 1 % # % # SIC Code Errp Rea Enp Reg Errp EN E Red Reg Phase I Miscellaneous Services 739 4 4 7 6 31 27 32 30 8 7 82 74 Medical Services 801 8 7 13 12 61 55 67 60 16 14 165 148 Legal Services 811 25 23 40 36 183 165 198 177 49 44 495 445 Real Estate Services 661 8 7 13 12 61 55 67 60 16 14 165 148 Insurance 641 4 4 7 6 31 27 32 30 8 7 82 74 Finance 602,12 25 23 40 36 183 165 198 177 49 44 495 445 Investments 621 8 7 13 12 61 55 67 60 16 14 165 148 co Subtotal 82 75 133 120 611 549 661 594 162 144 1,649 1,482 Phase II Miscellaneous Services 739 3 3 5 3 24 22 26 24 6 5 64 57 Medical Services 801 6 5 10 9 47 42 51 47 13 12 127 115 Legal Services 811 6 5 10 9 47 42 51 47 13 12 127 115 Real Estate Services 661 19 17 31 28 141 127 153 138 38 34 382 344 Finance 605 6 5 10 9 47 42 51 47 13 12 127 115 Finance 602,12 3 3 5 " 3 24 22 26 24 6 5 64 57 Investr:nts 621 19 17 31 28 141 127 153 138. . 38 34 382 344 Subtotal 82 55 102 89 471 424 511 465 127 114 1,273 1,147 Type Table 10.3.2. PEMJNT CFE10E E14101fi4ENT (SOH -FAST Q IERT044 PfU WEST) (Continued) (.kder $8,000 $8,000-$14,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000 or fibre Total Employment SIC Code EnQ EnP EN, Phase III Miscellaneous Services 739 4 4 6 5 28 25 31 28 8 7 77 69 Medical Services 801 8 7 12 I1 57 51 62 55 15 14 154 138 Legal Services 811 8 7 12 11 57 51 62 55 15 14 154 138 Real Estate Services 661 23 21 37 33 171 154 184 166 46 41 461 415 Finance 605 8 7 12 11 57 51 62 55 15 14 154 138 o Finance 602,112 4 4 6 5 28 25 31 28 8 7 77 69 Investments 621 23 21 37 33 171 154 184 166 46 41 461 415 Subtotal 78 71 122 109 569 511 616 553 153 138 1,538 1,382 Grand Total 222 201 357 318 1,651 1,4E4 1,7.. 1,612 442 396 4,460 4,011 Source: Harmer, Sher, George Associates. C) COMPLETE TABLE 10.4: SEASONAL EMPLOYMENT There is no significant amount of seasonal employment in the project area. D) IF ASSISTANCE FOR NON -INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SOUGHT FROM FEDERAL, STATE, OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING PROGRAMS (E.G., GRANT MONEY FOR APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION) SPECIFY FROM WHAT AGENCY, UNDER WHAT PROGRAM, AND IN WHAT AMOUNT. Agency US-DHUD US -DOT US-DHUD City of Miami City of Miami City of Miami City of Miami City of Miami Dade County Dade County *initial Sale Program Anticipated Amt Section 108 Loan against CDBG entilt. UMTA-Urban Initiatives Program Urban Development Action Grant General Obligation Highway Bonds General Obligation Housing Bonds CDBG Funds - CD Float Program CDBG Funds Tax Increment Revenue Bonds Homeownership Assis- tance Program CDBG Funds 10-10 $ 5,958,400.00 6,700,000.00 10,100,000.00 2,300,000.00 13,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 8,000,000.00* 4,500,000.00 570,000.00 E) FOR PUBLIC PROJECTS, SPECIFY THE FUNDING SOURCE(S) AND AMOUNTS. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project entails the use of both public and private financial resources. Public funds to be utilized are summarized in Question 10.D. A discussion on private funding is included in Question 3. F) COMPLETE TABLES 10.5 AND 10.6. Tables 10.5.and 10.6 are provided on the following pages. G) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MARKET STUDY PREPARED AS THE BASIS FOR PROJECTING THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT IN EACH PHASE. A copy of the market study prepared for the project area by Hammer Siler George Associates is included in Appendix 10-1. H) COMPLETE TABLE 10.7 TO SHOW THE ESTIMATED CAPITAL CASTS FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDED TO SERVE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. Please reference the City of Miami's adopted Capital Improvements Program (Appendix 10-2). I) COMPLETE TABLE 10.8. Please reference specific ADA Questions for operating costs for proposed public facilities. 10-1t Table 10.5. AD VALOREM REVENUES, (SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNJPARKWEST SUBAREA) Phase I Phase II Total Value $541,913,379 $396,929,113 Assessment Ratio 0.75 0.75 Homestead $60,000,000 $37,500,000 Exemption 1 Taxable Value Tax Rate ($/1000) Ad Valorem Taxes Revenues To: City J $3,414,845 School J $2,534,519 SFWMO / . $152,085 DDA / $173,218 Library 6/ $157,974 County 2/ $2,589,255 County -Debt 6/ $448,287 City-0ebt / $710,885 $346,435,034 $260,196,835 29.3881 $10,181,067 29.3881 $7,646,691 $2,564,786 $1,903,600 $114,226 $130,098 $118,650 $1,994,711 $336,695 $533,924 Phase III Total $292,538,704 $1,231,381,196 0.75 0.75 $37,500,000 $135,000,000 $181,904,028 29.3881 $5,345,814 $788,535,897 29.3881 $23,173,572 $1,793,046 $7,772,677 $1,330,810 $5,768,929 $79,856 $346,167 $90,952 $394,268 $82,948 $359,572 $1,359,551 $5,893,517 $235,384 $1,020,365 $373,267 $1,618,076 Assumes that 60% of the units will be owner -occupied at $15,000 per ownership unit. Millage rate equals 9.8571 Millage rate equals 7.316 Millage rate equals 0.439 Millage rate equals 0.5 Millage rate equals 0.456 Millage rate equals 7.474 County debt millage rate equals 1.294 City debt millage rate equals 2.052 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. TABLE 10.6: NON -AD VALOREM REVENUES FEES PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III L. BLDG. PERMIT (COM.) (RES.) 2. ENERGY 3. WAT .Z `;: WER 4. FIRE FLOW 5. PLUMBING_ 6. ACRCONDITIONING 7. ELECTRICAL 8. ZONING VARIANCE 9. MAJOR USE 10. PEOPLE MOVER $41,776 5132,000 $31,384 $132,000 $72,248 $330,000 $173,776 $163,384 $402,248 $73,055 $69,808 $172,578 $34, 200 $25, 200 $59,400 $1,140 $840 $1,980 $1,880 $9,000 10, 880 $65,750 $52,600 $87,666 $29,222 $199,878 TOTAL FEES $728,167 $9,512 $9,000 $2,250 $20,762 $62,827 $50,261 $83,769 $27,923 $190,993 $3,251 $22,500 $25,751 $155,320 $124,256 $207,093 $69,031 $472,172 $695,767 $1,689,828 APPENDIX 10 Appendix 10-1 SUMMARY REPORT DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN MIAMI, FLORIDA ' ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND GROWTH PROJECTIONS Prepared for the City of Miami Planning Department March 1986 • HAMMER,SILER, GEORGE ASSOCIATES Atlanta/Denver/Silver Spring/Washington 1111 Bonifant Street Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I. ECONOMIC OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN MIAMI MARKET 1 Demographic Profile of Oade County 1 Population Growth Trends 1 Households and Household Size Trends 1 Household Income 2 Latin American Impact 2 Demographic Profile of Downtown Miami 3 Population and Households 4 Household Income 4 Population Projections 4 Dade County Projections 5 Downtown Miami Projections 5 Employment Trends and Projections 5 Future Latin American Economic Impact 6 Section II. DOWNTOWN MIAMI HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Overall County Housing Structure Tenure Vacancy Rates New Residential Construction Activity Absorption Competitive Market Downtown Housing Demand Downtown Population Projections 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 11 Section III. DOWNTOWN OFFICE MARKET ANALYSIS 12 Dade County's Overall Market Trends 12 Office Submarket Trends and Conditions 13 Future Office Market Demand 13 Alternative I: Downtown Office Demand 14 Dade County Employment -Generated Office Space Demand 14 Dade County New and Replacement Office Space Demand 14 H - jilkH (.Ft.sit.F • a.,, INS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I. ECONOMIC OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN MIAMI MARKET 1 Demographic Profile of Dade County Population Growth Trends 1 Households and Household Size Trends 1 Household Income 2 Latin American Impact 2 Demographic Profile of Downtown Miami 3 Population and Households 4 Household Income 4 Population Projections 4 Dade County Projections 5 Downtown Miami Projections . 5 Employment Trends and Projections 5 Future Latin American Economic Impact 6 Section II. DOWNTOWN MIAMI HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS 7 Overall County Housing Structure 7 Tenure 7 Vacancy Rates 7 New Residential Construction Activity 7 Absorption 8 Competitive Market 8 Downtown Housing Demand 9 Downtown Population Projections 11 Section III. DOWNTOWN OFFICE MARKET ANALYSIS 12 Dade County's Overall Market Trends 12 h Office Submarket Trends and Conditions 13 Future Office Market Demand 13 Alternative I: Downtown Office Demand 14 Dade County Employment -Generated Office Space Demand 14 Dade County New and Replacement Office Space Demand 14 H MOSikK SILhK- t.h l lltl.\L1� 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Paae Downtown Office Market Potential 15 Subarea Market Potential 15 Alternative II: Downtown Office Demand 16 Present Downtown Competitive Situation 17 Section IV. DOWNTOWN MIAMI HOTEL MARKET ANALYSIS 19 Overview of the Hotel Market 19 Demand Sources 20 Tourist Trends 20 Commercial/Business Trends 21 Convention/Conference Demand 21 The Downtown Competitive Framework 22 Hotel Demand Trends and Projections Z4 Commercial Room Demand Trends 24 Downtown Hotel Room Demand Projections 24 - Alternative I 25 25 Alternative II Section V. DOWNTOWN MIAMI RETAIL/ENTERTAINMENT MARKET ANALYSIS 29 Sub -Regional Downtown Retail Potential 29 Downtown Miami Retail Consumer and Expenditure Potentials 30 Additional Downtown Retail Expenditure Potential 34 Recommended Distribution of New Retail Space by Subarea 36 0vertown/Park West and Brickell Neighborhood 39 Retail Potentials 39 0vertown/Park. West 40 Brickell Avenue t{ K • ',ALA. K - C•1.1 sRt.k • s FOREWORD Hammer, Slier, George Associates (HSGA) was retained by the City of Miami Planning Department to conduct economic analyses and growth projections in connection with a Downtown Development Plan for Miami, Florida. Growth projections and future demand forecasts to 2005 are developed for each of the following land uses: housing, office, hotel, and retail/entertainment. The projections in each land use case are on alternative forecasts. Generally, the first alternative reflects the current level of Latin American impact on the Miami area and Dade County economues. The second alternative reflects an increased impact of Latin American investment and tourism, reflective of the impact in evidence darning the period of the early 1980s. Effectively, the first alterna- tive projects economic trends into the future and the second alternative presents an optimum for future growth. This report represents a summarization of the extensive data collection and market analyses conducted by HSGA during the course of this assignment. A brief market overview is provided for each land use, followed by a description of the downtown submarket, recent trends and future projections. For each land use, projections are presented for four downtown subareas: Omni, Overtown/Park West, CBD Core and 8rickell. The projections are for five-year increments to 2005 as well as cumulative. Much of the supporting data used to arrive at the various projec- tions have not been included in this summary document. The reader is referred to the Technical Report for more detailed explanations of the market descriptions and methodologies used. All supporting data are contained in the respective sections of the technical report. There is also an Appendix. HAMMER, SILER, GEORGE ASSOCIATES Silver Spring, Maryland March 14, 1986 -_ H.\�I+SkN • Stl1H - 1, d+ PRl •t - +•+n I�iF Section I. ECONOMIC OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN MIAMI MARKET 1 j 7 H ♦'t tr - H • t .r t I \ € I. Section I. ECONOMIC OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN MIAMI MARKET This section of the report presents an overview of economic trends in the metropolitan Miami -Dade County area since 1970. The first part of this section examines demographic trends for the entire county; this is followed by a subsection which deals specifically with downtown Miami demographics, including the subareas of Omni, Overtown/Park West, CBO and Brickell. 0n the basis of these trends, coupled with forecasts calculated by local sources, population, households, and employment are forecasted for selected years through the year 2005. These demographic forecasts are subsequently used to assist in determining potential demand projections and future land use needs for downtown Miami. Specifically, future space demand for five major land use categories will be derived: residential, office, hotel, retail and entertainment. Additional demographic data necessary to this analysis, notably visitor trends and projections, are presented in subsequent sections of the report. Demographic Profile of Dade County Population Growth Trends According to the U.S. Bureau of Census, there were approximately 1,267,800 residents in Dade County in 1970. County -wide population increased during the decade of the 1970s, reaching approximately 1,625,800 by 1980, an increase of 28.2 percent. Population increased another 5.5 percent between 1980 and 1982 to 1,716,000. Dade County's population increased by another 3.1 percent between 1982 and 1985, to 1,770,000. Households and Household Size Trends National trends over the past 15 years have indicated a decline in the overa1,1 average household size. Between 1970 and 1985, the average household size fell from 2.91 to 2.56. Population, household and household size trends are shown in the following table. -1- Hii}u•( r oRk.i • a.,4.i\tr Table 1. Year 1970 1980 1982 1985 Source: POPULATION ANO HOUSEHOLD TRENDS, DADE COUNTY, 1970-1985 Total Population In Population Households 1,267,800 1,244,300 1,625,800 1,602,700 1,716,000 1,688,500 1,770,000 1,741,700 Households 427,600 609,800 649,000 680,300 Persons Per Household 2.91 2.63 2.60 2.56 1970, 198C and 1982 estimates by U.S. Bureau of Census; 1985 estimate by Metro -Dade County Planning Department; changes and percentages by Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Household Income Average household income for the Miami metropolitan area was S23,335 in 1979, which was higher than both the state average of S19,572 and the nationwide average of S20,373. At the time, 6.1 percent of Miami's households earned 550,000 or more, as compared with 4.3 percent and 4.6 percent of the state and nation respectively. However, the largest concentration of households, 32.4 percent, earned less than S10,000. It is important to note, however, that although household incomes have been shifting upwards, there has been minimal real income growth in recent years. Rather, much of the income increase, particularly for the lower income groups, can be attributed to inflationary factors. Latin American Impact 0f particular significance to the Dade County and downtown Miami economy is the impact of the resident Hispanic community. The growth of the permanent Hispanic population is an increasing positive economic factor, as reflected by the following statistics:1/ o In 1983, the ethnic Hispanic population was estimated to be 785,100, an increase of nearly 200,000, or 34.1 percent, since the 1980 Census. o There were approximately 232,300 Hispanic households in Dade County in 1982, representing 36.1 percent of total households. 1/ Source: 1983 Dade County Latin Market Strategy Research Corporation. -2- H k • StttK • (.1<+kt.1 • loo.ix 113, Key: ammo Submarkets E2 Outside DDA Boundaries Map Downtown Miami Study Area Miami, Florida HAMMER • SILER • GEORGE • ALSSOCIATES o Nearly 30 percent of all heads of Hispanic households hold white-collar jobs. o Average Hispanic household income was approximately S23,200 in 1983, consistent with the overall household income average of S23,300, This represented approximately $5.4 billion in total household income for the Hispanic community alone in 1983. The external Latin American economy has in the past also been a positive force in the Dade County economy. However, this impact has declined somewhat in recent years. unstable economic conditions in several Central and South American countries over the past few years have adversely affected growth trends for Dade County land uses. There has been a decrease in business and trade with Latin countries. Also, economic conditions have caused a similar decline in the number of Latin American tourists coming to Dade County and other parts of South Florida. Land use activities in downtown Miami have been negatively impacted by these conditions. Demographic Profile of Downtown Miami Although currently there is limited residential development in downtown, the exception generally being the high-rise condominiums located in the southernmost downtown area along Brickell Avenue, this analysis offers some insight into the types of people which, for any number of reasons, have chosen to live downtown. Also, it is important for planning the development of appropriate retail, recreation and entertainment amenities which will attract more residents to the downtown area. For the purposes of this analysis, the downtown Miami market area has been divided into four market subareas. Each area can be defined as follows: Omni is the northernmost subarea in downtown, bounded by NE 20th Street on the north, the East Coast Railroad on the west, 1-395 to the south and the bay to the east, The Omni shopping and hotel complex is located in this subarea. Downtown's only new rental residential property, V•Inetia, is also located here. Overto;tn/Park West is located south of Omni and, as its name implies, encompasses the Overtown/Park West redevelopment area. This subarea ex:Ends from 1-395 an the north to NE Sth Street to the south, and extends west to 1-95. The redevelopment of this area for residential and commercial uses is in progress. -3- t.t. • -1...x I,I �. Table 2. POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS BY SUBAREA, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1980 Subarea Omni 0vertown/Park West CBD Brickell Total Source: Total PopuLati on 2,190 4,458 1,652 4,907 Table 3. Income Range Less Than $15,000 $1&,000-$19,000 $20,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 S50,000 and Over Total 13,207 Population In Households 2,171 4,346 1,337 4,904 12,758 Households 1,285 2,252 1,013 2,477 7,027 Metro -Dade County Planning Department. DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY SUBAREA, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1979 Subarea Omni Park West CBD Brickell Total Percent 912 2,013 910 1,291 5,126 72.9% 84 81 20 295 480 6.8 89 95 37 226 447 6.4 87 34 22 216 359 5.1 59 11 3 164 237 3.4 54 18 21 285 378 5.4 1,285 2,252 1,013 2,477 7,027 100.0% Household Size 1.69 1.93 1.32 1.98 1.82 Source: Metro -Dade by Hammer, Total County Planning Department; percentages' Siler, George Ass0ciates. 11 A\t,it k • >It r R • to 'Kt .t \ \t i, 11 CBD/Core contains the traditional "downtown" area of Miami. This subarea is bounded by NE 5th Street to the north, the river to the south and west, and the bay to the east. Brickell is the southernmost subarea of downtown. This area is comprised primarily of new high-rise office and condominium structures, and is considered the financial district of Miami. This subarea is bounded by the river to the north, I-95 to the west, SE 15th Street to the south, and the bay to the east. Claughton Island is also considered a part of this subarea. Population and Households At the time of the 1980 Census, there were 13,207 people residing in the total downtown area. This figure represented only 3.8 percent of the City of Miami's 346,865 residents, and less than one percent of all Dade County residents. There were 7,027 households in the downtown area at the time of the Census. Overall average household size in 1980 was 1.82 in the downtown area, ranging from 1.32 in the CBD to 1.98 in Brickeli. All of these figures are relatively low, as compared to the average household size of 2.54 for the City of Miami and 2,63 for Dade County. Population and household estimates by subarea are shown in Table 2. Household Income With a few exceptions, downtown Miami is a relatively low-income residential area. Nearly 73 percent of all downtown residents earned less than 515,000 in 1979. The average household income for downtown Miami ($8,200) was significantly less than the average household income of both the City of Miami and Dade County, S15,500 and S20,400, respectively. The distribution of household income for downtown Miami is shown in Table 3. Population Projections For the purposes of this analysis, HSGA has used recently published population projections forecasted by the Metro -Dade County Planning Department. These projections are assumed to be the most reasonably accurate projections on the basis of historical trend data, as well as assumed future occurrences. First, county -wide projections for 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 arP set forth, followed by population projections for the downtown area specifically. -4_ 1 J i Dade County Projections A "component method" was used to formulate county -wide projections for Dade County. Under this methodology, projections of births, deaths and net migration were calculated independently, and then combined to obtain a total projected population. It has been projected that Dade County population will increase as follows. Table 4. POPULATION PROJECTIONS, DADE COUNTY, 1985-2005 Projected Percent Year Population Change 1985 1,770,000 - 1990 1,932,700 9.2% 1995 2,034,400 5.3% 2000 2,125,200 4.5% 2005 2,210,200 4.0% Note: More detailed populated projections are shown in Appendix A of the technical report. Source: Metro -Dade County Planning Depart- - ment (low -range projections). Downtown Miami Projections Downtown Miami's resident in -household population is projected to increase from 13,207 in 1980 to between 27,800 and 33,300 persons by the year 2005. This range represents the difference between HSG's low and high estimates contained in the housing portion of this report. Housing demand is converted to households and population in that analysis. Throughout this study, two alternative scenarios have been created to project future land use demand projections. The major difference between the two is the anticipated future impact of the Latin American economy on the local economy, The assumptions inherent in the downtown population projections for each alternative, along with the projected distribution of downtown population' by subarea, are discussed in detail in Section II of the technical report. Employment Trends and Projections The future demand for office space in both Dade County and downtown Miami is tied to future employment projections, especially for the major office -using employment categories. The first step in this process is -5_ 1-1 i11 t1}i( - y3/41 k N ' (.1,.K(.3 AN, 41kir to examine past population/employment participation relationships and project them into the future. With an increasing diversification of the County economy, particularly in business and manufacturing, we have projected employment in Dade County to increase from approximately 681,000 in 1985 to over 939,000 in 2005. Future Latin American Economic Impact For each land use studied in this report, two alternative develop- ment scenarios have been calculated. The first alternative assumes a status quo scenario, where Latin American economic activity remains relatively stable as it has in the past two to three years. On the other hand, the second alternative assumes a significant increase in the level of Latin American involvement in the Dade County market. In some instances, the second alternative assumes that the Latin American impact will ultimately equal that of the early 198Os. In assessing the impact which an expanded Latin American economic involvement could exert, we have formed the following general conclu- sions. In the past, international business and trade, much of it with Latin -America and the Caribbean, accounted for 20-25 percent of personal income in Dade County. 1/ This level has, of course, declined from the peak reached in 1981. During the last year, growth in trade -related industries and tourism has occurred in Dade County and it is expected to continue. The high degree of integration of the Dade County economy with Latin America and the Caribbean is likely to maximize the County's employment and income on a longer -term basis, given that Dade County has a competitive advantage in the provision of Latin American services through an increasingly Hispanic population, geographical proximity to the region, and well defined transportation links. Therefore, the corning years should see improved levels of performance in the trade -related and tourist industries. 2/ 1/ Economic Update. Southeast Bank, May, 1985 7/ Economic Update. Southeast Bank, May 1985 and Economic News, AmeriFirst, March, 1985. -6- 1 1 �i \�1 lShH •.'Itt.!k (.F. 4134 j•"...•\:!. Section II. DOWNTOWN MIAMI HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Section II. DOWNTOWN MIAMI HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS The housing market analysis for downtown Miami is predicated upon downtown's residential potential as a share of Dade County's housing demand. Our analysis of past and present trends in the county -wide housing market for both sale and rental units is followed by a projection of future residential demand. Residential development potential for each of the downtown subareas is identified. Overall County Housing Structure According to the 1980 Census, there were nearly 665,400 housing units in Dade County, an increase of 46.6 percent from the 1970 Census count of 453,900. This represented a total increase of 211,500 units, with an average annual increase of over 21,000 units per year. Tenure Of the 609,800 occupied units in Dade County, 54.5 percent, or 332,500, were owner -occupied in 1980. Renters occupied 45.5 percent of all occupied units. Eight percent of the total housing inventory units were vacant. This represents a 3.7 percent rise in the number of vacant units from 1970 and a 43.6 percent and 41.1 percent increase in owner -occupied and rental units, respectively. Vacancy Rates Vacancy rates in the County have fluctuated during the past few decades, with vacancies in the rental market remaining consistently higher than those in the sale market. The 1970 rental vacancy rate dropped to 5.2 percent from 13.8 percent in 1960. The rate then rose to 5.4 percent in 1980. The vacancy rate for sale units has been consistently lower, indicating a tighter sales market. The rates dropped from three percent in 1960 to one percent in 1970. They then rose to 2.5 percent by 1980. New Residential Construction Activity Residential building permit activity has been cyclical over the past several years. According to the Metro -Dade County Planning Department, permit activity in Dade County was heaviest in 1972, when -7- }ia.,.:t It • >tt I K • [,r 0w1..t A...N I 11. 1 the total number of residential building permits issued equalled 34,865. The number of permits issued reached a low point in 1982, when the number fell to 6,378. The number of permits nearly doubled to 12,386 in 1983, but then fell to 10,647 in 1984. The number of multi -family permits issued has been greater than the number of single-family permits issued throughout the period since 1972, with the exception of 1976 through 1978. It should be noted, however, that the gap has been narrowing over the past few years and, in 1984, the number of multi -family and single-family permits issued were quite similar. Absorption The absorption of new condominium units throughout Dade County has particular significance here, as condominium units represent the majority of new residential development in the City of Miami, particu- larly in the downtown area. A total of 57,079 new condominium units have been built in Dade County between 1979 and April 1925. During the same period, 45,633 of these units, or nearly 80 percent, have been absorbed. This represents an absorption of approximately 7,000 new con- dominiums throughout Dade County each year. The resulting unsold inventory consisted of 13,561 condominium units in April 1985. Competitive Market For the purposes of this study, competitive projects are defined as condominium projects located in downtown Miami which are priced at $70,000 or more. Dade County has been experiencing growth in the construction of condominium units, with less emphasis on single-family homes, This has been true throughout South Florida. With the exception of one rental property, all of the new competitive projects identified within the study area are high-rise condominiums along Brickell Avenue. The competitive projects in downtown Miami have generally been designed with the middle- to upper -income professional and retirees in mind. The units are mostly large two- and three -bedroom high-rise con- dominiums. Recent resales prices range from $74,000 for a studio to $550,000 for a five -bedroom unit. Prices per square foot range from S80 to 5126. Standard amenities for almost all the condominiums included security, pools, saunas, party rooms, washer/dryers and fully -equipped kitchens, including dishwashers and frost -free refrigerators. Most have balconies or patios. -8- Most of the projects surveyed boast fairly heterogeneous tenant mixes. Many tenants are young professionals, singles or divorcees, and have few, if any, children. Most of the market orientation for advertising these developments seems geared toward those segments. It should be noted that many of these luxury properties were designed for the wealthy Latin Americans who played such an important role in the local economy during the early 1980s. Their typically large families necessitated the development of four-, five-, and six -bedroom units. Many Latin Americans also purchased units for investment pur- poses. However, economic problems within the Latin American economies have forced much of •this segment to pull out of the market. As a result, many of these condominiums were put on the market for sale, at reduced prices. Currently, vacancies are high and many units are being rented rather than sold. Downtown Housing Demand Certain assumptions were made by HSGA in order to calculate the number of additional housing units required to meet the needs of future downtown residents. For the purposes of these calculations, household size and vacancy rate forecasts were made as shown in Table 6. As a result, the number of additional Dade County housing units required is expected to be 61,900 between 1985 and 1990. Throughout the 20-year period, the total number of new housing units required is 193,100. For Alternative I of this method it has been assumed that the downtown area will capture approximately five percent of county -wide demand for additional housing units between 1985 and 1990, 7.5 percent between 1991 and 1995, and 10.5 percent between 1996 and 2000 and between 2001 and 2005. The increased shares reflect an increasing desirability for downtown housing as a result of additional amenities and an improved living environment as the study period progresses. Alternative II of this methodology awards downtown an additional 20 percent housing demand over that of Alternative I in recognition of renewed Latin American investment and its impact. As a result, cumulative demand equals approximately 15,430 new units under♦ Alternative I and 18,520 new units under Alternative II. Total demand for the downtown area has been distributed among the four subareas. This distribution is shown following Table 5, along with the 20-year cumulative demand by subareas. -9- 1 1-1 \?I.\IF,R • Alit k • (.Ft 0141,4 • .\..tx 1 U Fa Table Dade County Population Household 5. HOUSING DEMAND PROJECTIONS, DADE COUNTY AND DOWNTOWN MIAMI AREA, 1985-2005 (Based on population projections) 1985 1,770,000 Population 1,745,220 Household Size 2.56 Vacancy 10.0% Households 681,727 Total Units 757,500 Additional Units Required A. Period Demand Dade County Demand Downtown Share of Dade County Alternative I: Trend @ 5.0% @ 7.5% @ 10.5% OMNI Overtown/Park West CBD Brickell 1990 1,932,700 1,905,642 2.55 8.8% 747,311 819,400 Alternative II: Latin Impact @ Plus 20% OMNI 0vertown/Park West CBD Brickeil • 61,900 1985-1990 61,900 1995 2,034,400 2,005,918 2.53 8.6% 792,853 867,500 48,100 1991-1995 48,100 2000 2,125,200 2,095,447 2.52 8.4% 831,527 907,800 40,300 1996-2000 40,300 2005 2,210,200 2,179,257 2.50 8.3% 871,703 950,600 42,800 2001-2005 42,800 3,100 -- -- -- -- 3,610 -- -- -- -- 4,230 4,490 350 800 900 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 150 200 230 250 600 610 600 740 3,720 4,330 5,080 5,390 700 1,130 1,380 1,480 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 220 300 300 410 800 900 900 1,000 HAM...ItH • :Ill I. K • C;Ftlµl•F ���th ! k; 1 j Table 5. HOUSING DEMAND PROJECTIONS, OAOE COUNTY AND DOWNTOWN MIAMI AREA, 1985-2005 (based on population projections) (Continued) B. Cumulative Housing Demand 1985-1990 1991-1995 1996.2000 2001-2005 Alternative I: Trend MNI 350 1,150 2,050 3,050 Overtown/Paris West 2,000 4,000 6,500 9,000 CBD 150 350 580 830 Brickell 600 1,210 1,810 2,550 Alternative I I : Latin Impact OMNI 700 1,830 3,210 4,690 0vertown/Park West 2,000 4,000 6,500 9,000 CBD 220 520 820 1,230 Brickell 800 1,700 2,600 3,600 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Cumulative Subarea Housing Summary Absorption, 1985-2005 Alternative I Alternative II OMNI 3,050 4,690 Overtown Park West 9,000 9,000 CBD 830 1,230 Brickell 2,550 3,600 Total 15,430 18,520 -10- H 40.1%1kk • Slk lk l.kt ikf•l N3t• Downtown Population Projections Finally, housing units demanded in each subarea can be translated into projected population estimates based on a projected average household size. At the time of the 1980 Census, the overall average household size for the entire downtown area was 1.82. It is assumed that average household size will not drop below 1.80. Therefore, the 1.80 estimate has been used for all of the downtown population projections which are presented in Table 6. Table 6. POPULATION PROJECTIONS 8Y SUBAREA, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1985-2005 I. Period Demand 1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 Alternative I Downtown 5,580 6,500 7,610 8,080 OMNI 630 1,440 1,620 1,800 0vertown/Paris West 3,510 3,600 4,500 4,500 C80 270 360 410 450 Brickell 1,080 1,100 1,080 1,330 Alternative II Downtown 6,700 7,790 9,140 9,700 OMNI 1,260 2,030 2,480 2,660 0vertown/Paris West 3,600 3,600 4,500 4,500 CBD 400 540 540 740 Brickell 1,440 1,620 1,620 1,800 II. Cumulative Demand Alternative I Downtown 5,580 12,080 19,690 27,770 OMNI 630 2,070 3,690 5,490 0vertown/Paris West 3,600 7,200 11,700 16,200 CBD 270 630 1,040 1,490 Brickell 1,080 2,180 3,260 4,590 Alternative,Il Downtown 6,700 14,490 23,630 33,330 OMNI 1,260 3,290 5,770 8,430 Overtown/Park West 3,600 7,200 11,700 16,200 CBD 400 940 1,480 2,200 Brickell 1,440 3,060 4,680 6,480 Note: Assumes an average household size of 1.8 persons. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. -11- H t‘It H • Sii, 1 Section III. DOWNTOWN OFFICE MARKET ANALYSIS H Nko.o K • Sit ; K • 11/( . \ Section III. DOWNTOWN OFFICE MARKET ANALYSIS This section of the report identifies the potential for office space development in downtown Miami and in each of the four downtown subareas. Downtown Miami represents the center for international finance and commerce in the southeast, and, although there has been explosive growth in office development in other areas of Dade County in recent years, downtown Miami remains the predominant location for overall office market. Dade County's Overall Market Trends The Miami area has experienced a cyclical pattern of office space development over the past ten-year period. During the mid-1970s, overall occupancy levels in Dade County remained relatively stationary at 80 percent and leasing strength was beginning to concentrate in the outlying areas of Miami at the expense of the established central area office cores. Diversification of population, cheaper land and lower rent levels, convenient accessibility, and aggressive leasing policies were among the basic reasons for a dramatic increase in office building demand and occupancy levels in areas other than downtown Miami. As of early-1985, the Dade County office market included approxi- mately 27,166,200 square feet of competitive, general occupancy office space (which excludes government -owned, medical and single -occupancy buildings). Discrepancies between data sources may occur when non- competitive, general tenant, single -purpose, and government space is added to the inventory. General tenant space includes retail -type space used for office purposes. The County is typically divided into eight primary subareas: Miami Core (CBD), Brickell, Coral Gables, Airport/West Dade, South Miami/ Dadeland/Kendall, Coconut Grove, Miami Lakes and SE/NE Miami. In terms of existing square footage of competitive, general tenant office space, the Airport/West Dade submarket contains the largest share of the Dade County market, with over 7.1 million square feet of space. The Miami CBD and Southeast/Northeast Miami areas represent the second and third largest concentrations of office space, respectively. The CBD submarket con- tains the highest percentage of finance, insurance and real estate employees among the five submarkets. In addition to the 27.2 million square feet of competitive, general tenant office space in Dade County in early 1985, there was a total of over 4.8 million square feet of space under construction. -12- HANI..IF K • Stl.t. k • ( .1•,()K(.F • A%-4.5 l-\ I t.� Table 7. DISTRIBUTION OF OFFICE SPACE, DADE COUNTY, 1983 AND EARLY 1985 Submarket Miami Core (CBD) Bricker! Avenue Coral Gables Airport/W. Dade S. Miami/Kendall/Dadeland Balance of County Total Source: Coldwell Banker Table 8. Submarket Miami Care (CBD) Brickell Avenue Coral Gables Airport/W. Dade S. Miami/Kendall/ Dadeland Total 1983. Early-1985 21.0% 22.3% 11.3 9.4 12.7 11.3 25.5 26.4 9.7 8.8 19.8 21.8 100.0% 100.0% Real Estate Services. PROFILE OF OFFICE SPACE CHARACTERISTICS BY MAJOR SUBMARKETS, DADE COUNTY, EARLY 1985 Total Space 6,002,400 2,522,600 3,288,800 7,107,100 2) 359,700 21,280,600 Percent Occupied Space Vacant Space Vacant 1/ 4,756,400 2,405,500 2,911,400 6,140,800 1,714,600 17,928,700 1,246,000 117,100 377,400 966 ,3 00 645,100 3,351,900 Note: Table does not include office space in Coconut northeast and southeast Miami and Miami Lakes. 20.8% 4.6% 11.5% 13.6% 27.3% 15.8% Grove, 1/ Vacancies here reflect early 1985; as of June, 1985, downtown vacant space was estimated at 25 percent; Brickell Avenue at 21 percent and the county as a whole at 20 percent. Source: Early 1985 data by Caldwell Banker Real Estate Services; later 1985 update by Clark -Biondi Realtors. r_ r r f r f C C FHAM ME_K • SnAK • (.FORCE A,un lNir.S 1- The distribution of office space in Dade County over the past two and one-half years is presented in Table 7. Downtown Miami's share of the entire County's office market has decreased slightly during this period from 32.3 percent to 31.7 percent of the total. This decline has coincided with an increase in other areas of the County -- namely, the Airport/West Dade submarket and the County at large. Office Submarket Trends and Conditions The early 1985 market conditions in each of the major submarkets are described in the following table. Table 8 illustrates that of the approximately 21.3 million square feet of office space in Dade County, nearly 3.4 million square feet were vacant, an amount which represents an average vacancy of 15.8 percent. The greeted percentage vacancy existed in the South Miami/Oadeland/Kendall submarket where aver 27 percent of the existing office inventory was vacant. At the other end of the spectrum, the Brickell Avenue submarket was experiencing the lowest vacancy level of 4.5 percent. However, a considerable amount of speculative office space was under construction along Brickell and most was unleased. The vacancy level along Brickell could equal or surpass 25 percent in 1986.1/ Future Office Market Demand The future for office space in Dade County and downtown Miami will be directly related to the growth of employment, particularly in the office -oriented employment sectors of the economy. The trends and forecasts for non-agricultural employment in Dade County were indicated in the first section of this report. Based on these trends, the office - oriented employment for Dade County has been determined. The forecasts of this type of employment will be the primary source of office space demand in the County and, subsequently, anticipated absorption of office space through the year 2005. The basic factor influencing the demand for office space is growth in the service industries. The increasing importance of services (finance, insurance, real estate, medical services, and other profes- sional organizations) was obtained from official public data. Forecasts of future employment in these industries were developed for the years 1985 through 2005. Based on estimates published by County Business Reports, approxi- mately 36 percent of all service employment and roughly 16 percent of 1/ A survey by Clark Biondi, a Grubb & Ellis Company, indicated that in June, 1985 the vacancy level on Brickell Avenue had reached 21 percent. For the county as a whole it had increased to 20 percent. -13- H.Awlk_14 • Sli, k.R • C.F.I,KCF • I I k. Table 9. ALTERNATIVE I: PROJECTED NET NEIN DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DADE COUNTY, 1985-2005 Change In Office Period Eiip ent 1985-1990 26,800 1991-1995 24,000 1996-2000 27,000 2001-2005 29,700 Increase in Employment-1/ Generated Office Space Total/Period. Cumulative 6,030,000 5,400,000 6,075,000 6,682,500 6,030,000 11,430,000 17,505,000 24,187,500 1/ Based on 225 square feet per employee. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. k • 5„ F. x • G t nlif.r - a,,,4.4 lair , the total non-agricultural employment in Dade County was office -related in 1970. In 1980, these ratios were 38 percent and 19 percent, respec- tively. In numerical terms, total office -oriented employment increased from 83,370 jobs in 1970 to 127,090 jobs in 1980, an increase of 52.4 percent. Office -oriented employment is expected to continue to increase as a share of all non-agricultural employment during the study period between 1985 and 2005. By 1990, 23 percent of total non-agricultural employment in Dade County will be office -based, which translates into an additional 26,760 jobs during the five-year period. Office -oriented employment will increase to a total of 254,580 jobs by 2005 which will represent over 27 percent of total non-agricultural employment in Dade County. These estimates provide the basis for forecasting the demand for general -occupancy space in both Dade County and the downtown Miami study area. The projections are presented under two scenarios. Alternative I projects office space based on previously presented forecasts. This is a trend projection. Alternative II presents an accelerated projection based on job creation above that used in Alternative I, as a result of an increased level of Latin American investment and trade. Alternative I: Downtown office Demand Dade County Employment -Generated Office Space Demand As a result of our local Dade County investigations, we have used the figure of 225 square feet per employee as appropriate for determin- ing the employee -generated' demand for new office space in the County. Assuming that this 225 square feet figure will remain constant through- out the study period, the increase of 25,800 employees which is pro- jected in office -using employment between 1985 and 1990 would generate a County -wide demand for 6,030,000 square feet of competitive, general - occupancy space. This yields an annual average of 1,206,000 square feet of net new space. For the years 1985 to 2005, approximately 24,187,500 square feet of net new space is projected to be generated by office - using employment in Dade County. This is a 20-year annual average of 1,209,400 square feet of new space. These projections are summarized in Table 9. Dade County New and Replacement Office Space Demand In addition to this new growth demand, there will also be a need to replace existing office space that is obsolete due to its age or loca- tion, a shift to other uses, or due to demolition to allow for alterna- tive development. In other markets, this demand typically ranges from one to three percent of the inventory on an average annual basis when a major office building has a life expectancy of 40 to 50 years. For this -14- i"i,At1N7•.K • S77.2,7t • (_31,.1)14l4. • A,Nul'7..1) . Table 10. ALTERNATIVE I: TOTAL DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DADE COUNTY, 1985-2005 Increase in Employment -Generated Office Space Period Total/Period Average Annual Cumulative 1985-1990 7,390,000 1,478,000 7,390,000 1991-1995 6,760,000 1,352,000 14,150,000 1996-2000 7,435,000 1,487,000 21,585,000 2001-2005 8,042,500 1,608,500 29,627,500 1/ Assumes a 1 percent average annual replacement factor of existing Dade County office inventory. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Table 11. ALTERNATIVE I: PROJECTED DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1985-2005 Dade Downtown Downtown Office Demand County Market Total Average Period Demand Share 1/ Period Annual Cumulative 1985-1990 7,390,000 32.5% 2,401,800 480,400 2,401,800 1991-1995 6,760,000 33.0% 2,230,800 446,200 4,632,600 1996-2000 7,435,000 33.5% 2,490,700 498,100 7,123,300 2001-2005 8,042,500 34.0% 2,734,500 546,900 9,857,800 1/ Includes all four subareas. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Fi.AMMER • til( }.K GE,( 1RFE • A.�LR study, we have assumed a conservative one percent replacement factor for Dade County recognizing that most of the space in downtown Miami is of a more recent vintage and is unlikely to be replaced for some years to come. It should be noted that replacement space has been made a con- stant for purposes of this analysis. In fact, these will probably be "peaks and valleys" relating to the time period when older office space is removed from the market. The total demand for competitive general occupancy space is presented in Table 10 and includes the replacement and employment - generated demand for office space. The cumulative demand for new and replacement office space is 7,390,000 square feet between 1985 and 1990 and 29,627,500 square feet between 1985 and 2005 (1,481,350 square feet on the average annually for 20 years). Downtown Office Market Potential In early-1985, the downtown Miami study area comprised of the Miami CBD and Brickell Avenue submarkets captured approximately 32 percent of all _competitive office space in Dade County. The combined downtown study area leased 32 percent of all office space under construction in the county at that time. however, it can reasonably be projected that downtown Miami can increase its share of the County's total demand for office space to 32.5 percent by 1990, 33.0 percent by 1995, 33.5 percent between 1996 and 2000, and 34.0 percent by the year 2005. This increase is related to several factors, including the ability of both the CBD and Brickell Avenue to remain competitive with other submarkets in Dade County, particularly as a center for international and regional finance and commerce. In the near -term, induced lower rents and increased tenant amenities (already in evidence along Brickell Avenue) can be expected to become prevalent in the downtown as a measure for retaining and attract- ing financial and business service tenants. Also, the emergence of the Omni and 0vertown/Park West submarkets as office locations will enable the overall downtown area to increase its county office share somewhat. By increasing its share of the total market, the downtown could expect to generate an average annual absorption rate of from 446,200 to 546,900 square feat annually through the year 2005 as shown in Table 11. Subarea Market Potential Over the next two decades, both the Omni and the Overtown/Paris West subareas of the downtown office market will be influenced by a number of important factors which will allow these subareas to achieve a share of the downtown Miami office market. These factors include: the develop- ment of the 21-mile Metrorail system extending south to north from Dadeland through downtown Miami to Hialeah, including a station at -15- HAMMEN • SU-tit • (4( )4ll.F • ..4. ,LX Table 12. ALTERNATIVE I: PROJECTED DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DOWNTOWN MIAMI BY SUBAREA, 1985-2005 Annual Downtown Annual Square Feet 0f Office Space Demand Period Demand Omni Overtown Core Brickell 1985-1990 480,400 24,000 28,800 288,300 139,300 1991-1995 446,200 26,800 35,700 258,800 124,900 1996-2000 498,100 34,900 49,800 283,900 •129,500 2001-2005 546,900 43,800 60,200 306,200 136,700 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Table 13. ALTERNATIVE I: CUMULATIVE PROJECTED DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DOWNTOWN MIAMI BY SUBAREA, 1985-2005 Downtown Period Demand Omni 1985-1990 2,402,000 120,000 1991-1995 4,633,000 254,000 1996-2000 7,123,500 428,500 2001-2005 9,858,000 647,500 Downtown Demand By Subarea 0vertown Core Brickell 144,000 1,441,500 696,500 322,500 2,735,500 1,321,000 571,500 4,155,000 1,968,500 872,500 5,686,000 2,652,000 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Table 14. ALTERNATIVE II: PROJECTED DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1985-2005 Dade Downtown County Market Downtown Office Demand Period Demand Share Total/Period Cumulative 1985-1990 8,498,500 32.5% 2,762,000 2,762,000 1991-1995 7,774,000 33.0% 2,565,400 5,327,400 1996-2000 8,550,300 33.5% 2,864,300 8,191,700 2001-2005 9,248,900 34.0% 3,144,600 11,336,300 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. H.k NISIER • 5ti.r.11 • (4 I)Kc.r • A.ax I.I r. 1 1 1 1 1 Overtown; Dade County is also constructing an automated people mover to provide access to downtown Miami's business, retail and government centers; two major retail nodes will be developed -- the Bayside Specialty Center, which will include restaurants, retail boutiques, and entertainment areas and the specialty mall in Park West which should serve downtown office workers, employees and residents in the area; the Government Center is being developed as a concentrated node for major governmental and quasi -governmental agencies; and finally, there are plans for quality residential development in 0vertown/Park West which should provide an increased labor supply base for the downtown and surrounding areas. Omni will absorb 24,000 square feet on an average annual basis be- tween 1985-1990, increasing to nearly 44,000 square feet annually by the 2000-2005 period. For 0vertown, the corresponding figures are 28,800 square feet and 60,200 square feet, respectively. For the CBD core, it is 288,300 square feet and 306,200 square feet, respectively. And, for Brickell, the average annual absorption is 139,300 square feet and 136,700 square feet, respectively. This is shown in detail in Table 12. - Cumulative projected demand for office space throughout downtown between 1985 and 2005 is shown in Table 13. Alternative II: Downtown Office Demand Conceivable that the influence of Latin American/ Caribbean trade and investment will increase significantly when economic conditions improve in those counties. Therefore, for Alternative II of the analysis, HSGA has assumed that there will be a 15 percent increase in the Dade County office employment base which, in turn, will affect the demand for office space in downtown Miami. Table 14 reflects the increase in Dade County demand as a result of the increase in employment under the Alternative II scenario. Dade County office space demand will increase from 7.4 million square feet in the 1985-1990 period under Alternative I to nearly 8.5 million square feet under the second alternative. By the 2001-2005 period, Dade County demand will increase to over 9.2 million square feet. The market share for downtown Miami will remain the same, resulting in a downtown office space demand of 11.3 million square feet over the 20-year study period. This compares with 9.9 million square feet between 1985-2005 under the first scenario. The projected demand for office space under the second scenario is presented in Table 14. The projected demand for office space in downtown Miami was then distributed among the four subareas as in the case of Alternative I. We have assumed that the shares will remain consistent with those under Alternative I. Projected average annual office demand in the Omni -16- I •V‘tti€t•.K • 1t1_:it • (4t)14,t.t • A...x Table 15. ALTERNATIVE II: PROJECTED DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DOWNTOWN MIAMI BY SUBAREA, 1985-2005 Annual Downtown Annual Square Feat Of Office Space Demand Period Demand Dmni Overtown Core Brickell 1985-1990 552,400 27,600 33,200 331,400 160,200 1991-1995 513,100 30,800 41,000 297,600 143,700 1996-2000 572,900 40,100 57,300 326,500 149,000 2001-2005 628,900 50,300 69,200 352,200 157,200 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Table 16. ALTERNATIVE II: CUMULATIVE PROJECTED DEMAND FOR OFFICE SPACE, DOWNTOWN MIAMI BY SUBAREA, 1985-2005 Downtown Downtown Demand By Subarea Period Demand Omni Overtown Core Brickell 1985-1990 2,767,000 138,000 166,000 1,657,000 801,000 1991-1995 5,327,500 292,000 371,000 3,145,000 1,519,500 1996-2000 8,192,700 492,500 657,500 4,777,500 2,264,500 2001-2005 11,336,300 744,000 1,003,500 6,538,500 3,050,500 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. • HA•Ahlk.it • Sil.h,u • Gk(7R[:1. L subarea will be 27,600 square feet in the 1985-1990 period, increasing to 50,300 square feet annually by the 2000-2005 period. Similarly, the projected demand for office space will be 33,200 square feet annually in Overtown/Park West between 1985-1990, increasing to 69,200 square feet annually during the 2000-2005 period. For Brickell, the corresponding demand is 160,200 square feet annually between 1985 and 1990 and 157,200 square feet annually between 2000 and 2005; for the C80 core, 331,400 square feet and 352,200 square feet (see Table 15), respectively. Cumulative projected demand for downtown Miami by subarea is shown in Table 16. Present Downtown Competitive Situation The downtown Miami office market has maintained its status as the primary office market in Dade County despite increasing competition from suburban office markets. However, there is an increasing vacancy prob- lem and evidence of temporary overbuilding in the downtown. In early-1985, downtown Miami contained 8,525,000 square feet of competitive general -tenant office space, which represented 31.7 percent of the total Dade County market. 0f that space, 1,363,100 square feet was vacant, or 16 percent of the existing inventory. An additional 2,807,000 square feet of office space was under construction -- of which nearly 2 million square feet is located in the Brickell submarket. Only 130,000 square feet of the space which is under construction had been pre -leased, however. This means that up to 2,667,000 square feet of office space which will enter the downtown office market in the next year has yet to be leased. In addition to existing vacant or unleased space in buildings under construction, tentative plans have been announced for 5,362,000 square feet of new office space in the form of construction planned over the next several years. The timetable and precise construction plans are, at present, indefinite for much of this third category of office space. Ever when DRI's have been obtained, the title "proposed construction" is deceptive, since changing economic conditions can delay the commencement of new projects indefinitely. The total amount of office space which could be available in downtown Miami over the next several years is summarized below: Existing Vacant, June 1985 Under Construction, Available June 1986 Announced Projects, Available 1987-1989 (DRrs) Total, 1985-1989 -17- 2,111,000 square feet 2,667,000 square feet 5,362,000 square feet 1/ 10,140,000 square feet HAHMEa • S LLR G.ivar.r. • As.0 sa3t, Table 17. PROJECTED OFFICE SPACE CONSTRUCTION UNDER ASSUMED VACANCY LEVELS, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1985-2005 (Gross Square Feet) Alternative I Period 1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 Alternative 11 Period Cumulative Downtown New Construction (1) New Construction Demand @15% Vac. @20% Vac. @25i Vac. @30% Vac. Low Vac. High Vac. 2,401,800 -- 3,202,400 3,431,000 3,202,400 3,431,100 2,230,800 2,974,400 3,186,900 6,176,800 6,618,000 2,490,700 3,113,400 3,320,900 9,290,200 9,938,900 2,734,500 3,217,100 3,418,100 12,507,300 13,357,000 Overall New Construction Vacancy Rate, 2005 21% 26% Cumulative Downtown New Construction (1) New Construction Demand @15% Vac. 020% Vac. 625%' Vac. 030% Vac. 1.ow Vac. Nigh Vac. 1985-1990 2,762,000 --- 3,682,700 3,945,700 3,682,700 3,945,700 1991-1995 2,565,400 -- 3,420,500 3,664,900 7,103,200 7,610,600 1996-2000 2,864,400 3,580,500 3,819,200 -- 10,683,700 11,429,800 2001-2005 3,144,600 3,699,500 3,930,800 -- -- 14,383,200 15,360,600 Overall New Construction Vacancy Rate, 2005 21% 26% 1/ Assumes present downtown space at existing vacancy throughout the period. J j If all planned construction is built, a total of over 10.0 million square feet of new space could be available to accommodate additional demand through 1990. The demand analysis earlier in this section con- cluded that, under Alternative I, the overall downtown demand for general -occupancy office space for the five-year period between 1985 and 1990 will average 480,400 square feet annually, or total 2,402,000 square feet for the period. By 1995, a total of 4,633,000 square feet could be supported by the market. Based on the forecasts of demand, there will be a large inventory of available space in the downtown mar- ket to service needs until 1995 or beyond. The perception of overbuild- ing in this market, of course, may discourage developers and investors from commencing construction of announced office development until the market begins to balance. Nevertheless, at best, it could be seven years or more before existing and unleased office space under con- struction is absorbed. The Alternative II scenario for general -tenant office space indicates an average 552,400 square feet annually, or 22,762,000 square feet for the 1985-1990 period. By 1995, a total of 5,327,500 square feet could be supported by the market. Under this scenario, existing vacant and unleased office space under construction in the downtown market could be absorbed somewhat faster -- possibly within the next six to seven years. - At this point, a projection of supply in terms of new construction is made based on assumed future vacancy levels. However, it should be noted that some projects for which DRI approval has been given will likely be delayed or not built at all because of the current soft market conditions. Therefore, this analysis is theoretical in that it assumes building will continue in line with new vacancy tolerance levels. As shown in Table 17 under a sliding vacancy assumption level, the total amount of new office construction downtown between 1985 and 2005 would range between 12.5 to 13.4 million square feet under Alternative I and between 14.4 to 15.3 million square feet under Alternative II. This analysis assumes that present downtown space would stay at existing vacancy levels throughout the period. 1/ From 'an updated Clark -Biondi office survey dated June, 1985. -18- H a.i>it u • r x • C,t. tui.r • i , i r Section IV. ONNTOWN MIAMI HOTEL MARKET ANALYSIS Fl4,\a'atst-Sit rY.•l.tt,ki.r • �...� i‘It Section IV. DOWNTOWN MIAMI HOTEL MARKET ANALYSIS Miami's strategic location and sunny climate have traditionally made it a prime destination or stop -over point for tourists. Historically, tourists congregated in Miami Beach where the hotels catered almost exclusively to the resort segment of the hotel market. At the same time, downtown Miami's hotel support came primarily from the commercial traveler. The simultaneous overbuilding of hotel rooms and the decline in domestic and international tourism has since caused occupancy problems for the Dade County hotel market. This section will examine historical trends with respect to sources of hotel room demand and existing hotel room inventory. Subsequently, future hotel demand will be projected on the basis of alternative demand scenarios. Overview of the Hotel Market The downtown Miami hotel market is remaining stable despite steady decreases in the level of international tourism, once a major source of market support for hotels throughout Dade County. Domestic tourism has suffered dramatic declines as well. The number of domestic tourists to Dade County fell from approximately 8.6 million in 1982 to 3.5 million in the following year. However, since 1983, the level of domestic tourism has been increasing modestly, but steadily. Several new hotels were developed in downtown Miami during the early 1980s in response to the tremendous international and domestic tourist market at that time. However, downtown hotels are now faced with fierce competition for a share of the declining market. As a result, downtown hotels have had to accept lower occupancy rates, as well as lower room rates, in order to remain in operation. Despite declines in the number of tourists, the Dade County hotel industry, nevertheless, remains a significant contributor to the area economy. to fiscal year (FY) 1983-84, Dade County's gross sales by tourist accommodations amounted to nearly $453.2 million, excluding Miami Beach, Surfside and Bel Harbour. By FY 1984-1985, gross sales had fallen to nearly $381.0 million, a loss of 15.9 percent. However, higher tax rates and lower administrative costs have resulted in a 13.3 percent increase in the total amount of resort tax revenues collected over the past fiscal year. In FY 1983-84, just over $3 million in taxes -19- H'04..1 X • '11 t k 44t:kt.f - •t I ctr+ were received; by FY 1984-85, taxes collected had risen to $3.4 million. 1/ Demand Sources The market segments which support Dade County area hotels can be broadly classified into three groups: commercial or business, tourist and conference/convention. Each of these groups requires different types, locations and quality/price levels of accommodation. Seasonal demand cycles also vary with each group. While the area's hotel demand was primarily generated by the tourism market at one time, the commer- cial/business market has been increasing steadily over the past decade or more. This shift in market orientation occurred simultaneously with the introduction of several new hotels, particularly in the downtown and airport areas, which were geared towards serving the business traveler. Tourist Trends Historically, Miami has been a popular tourist attraction, both as a destination and as a stop -over before continuing on to the Caribbean, Central or South America. Although both domestic and international tourism still constitute a significant share of demand for hotel facilities, the tourism industry is cyclical and has only recently begun to show modest annual increases after a dramatic drop of nearly 50 percent between 1982 and 1982. The domestic tourist market was at its highest between 1979 and 1982. This market segment peaked in excess of 10.3 million domestic visitors in 1980. In 1983, however, the domestic tourist market experienced a dramatic decrease, falling to 3.5 million visitors, down from 8.6 million the previous year. However, domestic tourism has been increasing slowly since 1983, Over 4.0 million domestic tourists are projected to visit Dade County in 1985. The international tourist market has been cyclical as well. This market peaked in 1981, with nearly 2.6 million visitors. Since that time, the number of international tourists has been declining steadily, and is estimated at only about 1.9 million in 1985. Though the decline in international tourism is typically thought of as the major reason for the current' hotel glut, in reality, the loss in the number of interna- tional tourists is not as great as that for domestic tourists. Despite a small gain in the total amount of international tourism during recent years, there has been a drop in the number of tourists in every category since 1982-1983. Overall, international tourism 1/ Gross sales and resort tax collections are shown in Appendix Table 8-1 of the technical report. -20- H%",1'11.K Si 1�•[ increased slightly between 1979 and 1985, by 3.7 percent; but it has decreased in total since peaking in 1981. Since 1983, the largest number of foreign travelers has consistently come from the Caribbean. Commercial/Business Trends Although tourism is still a major part of the County's economy, international trade and commerce is now the number one industry. Other major industries include international finance, shipping and high technology industries, such as medical care. As with the tourism industry, geographic location is a key reason for the region's success in the international arena. As the southernmost major city and seaport in the United States, Miami has become the "economic gateway" to trade with the Caribbean and Central and South America. Commercial and business visitors to the Miami area are increasing and becoming a significant source of the area's hotel room demand. Convention/Conference Demand The convention/conference and trade show industry provides the third major source of market support of Dade County hotels. According to the Miami Beach Visitor and Convention Authority, the number of conferences and conventions held in the City of Miami has increased by 78.6 percent between 1980 and 1984, rising from 248 to 443. The rate of growth in the number of conventions held annually has been higher for the City of Miami than for Dade County as a whole. The number of con- ventions throughout Dade County rose from 548 in 1980 to 733 in 1984, a gain of 33.8 percent. The faster rate of growth for the City suggests that the City is capturing larger shares of the total county convention market. In fact, while the City of Miami hosted 45.3 percent of the county's conventions in 1980, the City's share rose to 60.4 percent in 1984. Likewise, the City of Miami has also seen a significant increase in the total number of convention delegates. The number of delegates for conventions held in the City of Miami grew from 115,000 in 1980 to 354,400 in 1984, a dramatic increase of 208.2 percent. The total number of convent ton delegates throughout Dade County grew by 51 percent, from 440,000 in 1980 to 664,400 in 1984. More importantly, however, is the fact that over the four-year period, Miami's share of convention delegates was smaller than its share of conventions. For example, the City of Miami hosted 45.3 percent of all conventions in 1980, but only 26.1 percent of all delegates. By 1984, Miami hosted 60.4 percent of all conventions and 53.8 percent of all delegates. These statistics indicate that the City of Miami has consistently held more conventions, but with smaller attendances. This trend is consistent with the -21- H 1.tF•FF.R • \f(.1- - (.F{1ii(.l 1 1 i 1 3 7 7 7 7 7 1 prevailing complaint among local industry experts that there is a serious deficit of meeting and exhibit space in Miami. Although the number of convention delegates staying in Miami has been growing steadily over the past several years, that market segment will continue to be limited for the next few years at least. The limited amount of contiguous meeting and exhibition space has restricted the convention market to small to moderate -sized conventions. It is hoped that the development of the proposed Exhibition Center by 1990 will stimulate growth in Miami's convention market. The Downtown Competitive Framework For the purposes of this analysis, seven downtown hotels have been identified as competitive with any new hotel development which may take place in downtown Miami. These hotels and their respective number of rooms are as follows: OMNI International (556), Plaza Venetia (50), Marriott (605), Hyatt Regency (608), The Paviilion (636), Riverparc (135), and Holiday Inn (600). - Three competitive hotels with 1,211 rooms are located in the Omni subarea. Three hotels are also located in the CBD subarea. These hotels contain 1,386 rooms. The seventh hotel is located in the 8rickell subarea and has 600 rooms. There are no competitive hotel facilities in the Overtown/Park West subarea. The distribution of com- petitive hotel facilities is shown in Table 18. Each hotel is keyed to the accompanying map. -22- L1JLP DED :! JEEE3Z-JI LI.JJSIEVER fan L Subarea A� � J�m = DLJ ,nnnn Subarea B J(l ti PORT OF MIAMI I L KEY: f. OMNI 2. Plaza Venetia 3. Marriott 4. Hyatt Regency 5. Paviliion 6. Rivcrparc 7. Holiday Inn Map 2 Existing Competitive Hotel Facilities Downtown Miami, Florida HAMMER • SILER • GEORGE • ASSOCIATES E Table 18. COMPETITIVE HOTEL FACILITIES, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1985 Map Key Name/Location Year Rooms Subarea A -Omni 1 OMNI International 1978 556 Biscayne Blvd. @ N.E. 15th Street 2 Plaza Venetia 1981 50 1/ No. Bayshore @ N.E. 16th Street 3 Marriott No. Bayshore @ N.E. 15th Street 1984 605 Subtotal 1,211 Subarea B-Overtown/Park West (none) Subarea C-CBD -4 Hyatt Regency 1982 615 Miami River @ Brickell Avenue 5 The Pavilion 1983 636 Bayfront Park @ Miami River 6 Riverparc 1983 2/ 135 Subtotal T776 Subarea C-Brickell 7 Holiday Inn @ Brickell Point 1982 600 444 Brickell Avenue Total Rooms 3,197 1/ .These 50 suites are located within thE. Plaza Venetia residential complex. 2/ Renovation. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates field interviews. Demand for future hotel development must be considered in light of the existing hotel market. With occupancy levels currently less than 50 percent throughout the county, and 55 percent in downtown, future demand, over the next few years at least, should not tax existing -23- H.N.%4Mk i • S11.1.x • C:r.c,R(.} • ...;,:•0,)t IA.I County Year Employment 1980 645,100 1981 646,016 i982 646,932 1983 658,438 1984 669,944 1985 2/ 681,450 Table 19. COMMERCIAL ROOM/N1GNT DEMAND, DOWNTOWN HIAMI COMPETITIVE HOTELS? 1980-1985 Competitive Room Inventory 456 606 1,821 2,592 3,197 3;197 Average Annual Occupancy 82% 66% 53% 45% 53% 56% Annual Occupied Room/Nights 136,481 145,985 352,272 425,736 618,460 653,467 Commercial Room/Nights to Commercial Employment Room/Nights 1/ Ratio 88,713 94,891 228,977 276,728 401,999 424,753 0.14 0.15 0.35 0.42 0.60 0.62 1/ Estimated at 65 percent of total room/night demand. 2/ Annual estimate. Source: County employment estimates by County Business Patterns and Metro -Dade Planning Department; competitive room inventory based on Hamner, Si1er, George Associates field interviews; average annual occupancy rate cal- culated by Hammer, Siler, George Associates, based on data provided by Downtown Development Authority; other calculations by Hammer, Siler, George Associates. c r--7 ?-.._._..r capacity. At present there appears to be sufficient hotel capacity to serve the market at least through 1990. Hotel Demand Trends and Projections Commercial Rcom Demand Trends Because reliable estimates are not available on future convention and delegate activity and, also, future tourist levels are difficult to predict, the future demand for hotel rooms is forecast based on commercial room demand relationships to other demand sources. Based on average annual occupancy rates supplied by the Downtown Development Authority, commercially generated room/night demand for the seven downtown competitive hotels has been calculated. Annual commer- cial room/nights in these hotels grew from 88,700 in 1980 to 402,000 in 1984. Approximately 424,800 room/nights have been estimated for the downtown hotels for 1985. These estimates assume that approximately 65 percent of total room/night demand in downtown hotels is now generated from the commercial segment of the market. The 65 percent estimate resulted from recent interviews with major downtown hotel managements. In order to forecast future hotel room/night demand, historical trends of the relationship between county non-agricultural employment and commercial room/night demand were examined. The ratio was estimated for each year between 1980 and 1985. The ratio of commercial room/ nights to county employment has risen from 0.14 rooms per employee in 1980 to an estimated 0.62 rooms per employee in 1985. These calcula- tions are detailed in Table 19. Downtown Hotel Room Demand Projections The demand for future hotel rooms in downtown Miami has been pro- jected under two alternatives. The first alternative is based upon more conservative projections relating to tourism trends. For Alternative I, domestic tourism is gradually increased from two percent to three per- cent annually throughout the 20-year study period. International tourism is gradually increased from one percent to two percent annually, Under this alternative, total tourism will increase 56 percent between 1985 and 2005, or from 5.9 million in 1985 to 9.2 million by 2005. An alternative hotel development scenario has also been formulated to take into consideration the possibility of substantial increases in the level of international and domestic tourism as a result of improve- ments in economic conditions, as well as the opening of the Bayside project, which is expected to be a major tourist attraction. _24_ H It • 1tl t R - • .•�••. � i \I . 1 Such a scenario appears reasonable in light of recent trends over the past couple of years. Domestic tourism has grown seven percent over the past two years. During the same period, declines in the level of international tourism have slowed. HSGA has assumed, for the purposes of the Alternative II analysis, that domestic tourism will gradually increase from three percent to five percent annually over the 20-year period. Likewise, international tourism is projected to increase from two percent to three percent annually. Projected increases in tourism under both development scenarios are illustrated in Table 20. Table 20. PROJECTIONS OF DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TOURISM, DADE 'COUNTY, 1985-2005 Year Domestic International •Trend Projection 1985 1/ 4,037,300 1,868,300 5,905,600 1990 — 4,440,600 1,961,700 6,402,300 1995 5,106,700 2,108,800 7,215,500 20U0 5,872,700 2,267,800 8,140,500 2005 6,753,600 2,494,600 9,248,200 Accelerated Projections 1985 1/ 4,037,300 1,868,300 5,905,600 1990 _ 4,642,900 2,055,100 6,698,000 1995 5,571,500 2,312,000 7,883,500 2000 6,825,100 2,658,800 9,483,900 2005 8,531,400 3,057,600 11,589,000 Total 1/ Based on Metro -Dade County Department of Tourism figures. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Alternative I Based upon county -wide non-agricultural employment projections presented previously in this report, HSGA has forecasted commercial hotel room demand for new hotel development in downtown Miami. In turn, the ~elationship between commercially generated demand and other demand sources has been projected. It has been assumed that the resulting total hotel room demand will be for first-class hotel development comparable with existing competitive facilities. In formulating these projections, HSGA has several assumptions as follows: -25- r"{.��I - 5IS kit • (:,t g(;t-.3.tio.x I.\t A.: Table 21. ALTERNATIVE I; PROJECTED ROOM DEMAND, COMPETITIVE DOWNTOWN HOTELS, 1985-2005 Commercial Room/Nights to Commercial Convention Tourist Total Total County Employment Room/Nights Room/Nights Room/Nights Occupied Occupied Occupancy Total Additional Rooms Year Employment Ratio % Number % Number % Number Room/Nights Rooms Rate Rooms Period Cumulative 1985 681,450 0.62 65% 424,800 15% 98,000 20% 130,700 653,467 1,790 56% 3,197 -- -- 1990 763,400 0.65 64% 496,200 18% 139,600 18% 139,600 775,300 2,124 66% 3,218 21 21 1995 823,900 0.70 62% 576,700 20% 186,000 18% 167,400 930,200 2,548 66% 3,861 643 664 2000 882,000 0.75 60% 661,500 20% 220,500 18% 198,500 1,102,500 3,021 65% 4,647 786 1,450 2005 939,300 0.80 60% 751,400 22% 275,500 18% 225,400 1,252,300 3,431 65`k 5,278 631 2,081 Source: hammer, Slier, George Associates. o The commercial room/night-to-employment ratio will increase from 0.62 room/nights per employee per year in 1985 to 0.80 room/ nights per employee per year by the year 2005. This increase represents a conservative estimated increase in this ratio based on the experience of the past five years. o Commercial demand which, according to hotel managers, now accounts for approximately 65 percent of occupancy, will decrease somewhat as a share of total demand as convention business grows. o Convention demand will increase as a percentage of total room/ night demand as a result of the development of the ExhibitionT Center. There are no reliable statistics on the number of delegates who will attend conventions at the proposed Exhibition Center. However, after reviewing a recent survey for a downtown convention center in Miami, we have made some projections as to the amount of room/night demand to be generated by convention delegates. Convention demand is projected to increase from approximately 15 percent in 1985 to 22 percent by the year 2005. o Tourism demand will decrease from 20 percent of total room/night demand in 1985 to 18 percent in 2005. However, the actual levels of tourism in Dade County will increase from 5.9 million in 1985 to 9.2 million in the year 2005. Subsequently, tourist hotel room/nights will also increase in absolute numbers, if not in percent. These projections are based an a trend -line analy- sis of recent patterns in international and domestic tourism. o Occupancy rates will increase to approximately 66 percent by 1990. Since no new hotels are programmed for completion during this period, additional demand will increase the occupancy levels of existing hotel facilities. It is generally assumed that an overall occupancy level of 65 to 68 percent represents the "break-even point" which justifies the ability of a local market to support an additional hotel. Projected room/nights and total rooms supportable in downtown Miami are shown in Table 21. Due to the relatively low overall occupancy rate, no new hotels are justified before 1990. Up until this time, any increase in demand will be accommodated by increased occupancy rates in existing facilities. Between 1990 and 1995, an additional 600-room hotel can be supported in the downtown area. Assuming a new convention center, it is probable that the new facility will be located in the CBD subsector. By -26- 1ia•�n�rK • Su .x • C;ri,x<.r • Table 23. ALTERNATIVE 11: PROJECTED ROOM REMAND, COMPETITIVE DOWNTOWN HOTELS, 1985-2005 Room/Night Demand Occupied Year Commercial Convention Tourism Total Rooms 1985 424,800 98,000 130,700 653,500 1,790 1990 496,200 139,600 252,500 888,300 2,434 1995 576,700 186,000 304,600 1,067,300 2,924 2000 661,500 220,500 514,800 1,396,800 3,827 2005 751,400 275,500 620,900 1,647,800 4,515 Occupancy Total Rate Rooms Additional Rooms Period Cumulative 56% 3,197 68% 3,579 382 382 66% 4,430 852 1,233 65% 5,887 1,457 2,690 65% 6,945 1,058 3,748 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. 2005, over 2,000 additional rooms can be supported by growing commer- cial, convention, and tourist demand. The future hotel room demand is distributed by subarea in Table 22. Table 22. ALTERNATIVE I: PROJECTED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT BY SUBAREA, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1985-2005 No. Hotels and Rooms by Subarea Overtown/ Period Omni Park West CBD Brickell Total 1985-1990 -- -- -- -- 1991-1995 -- -- 1 = 600 -- 1 = 600 1996-2000 1 = 400 1 = 400 -- -- 2 = 800 2001-2005 -- 1 = 600 1 = 600 Total 1 = 400 1 = 400 1 = 600 1 = 600 4 = 2,000 Source: hammer, Slier, George Associates. A number of factors were taken into consideration when allocating future hotel room demand, particularly anticipated developments and existing competitive facilities in each subarea. The abundance of existing hotels within the CBD area are believed to be sufficient to handle additional demand in the near term through increased occupancy levels. However, DRI's have been approved for 634 rooms in the CBD subarea by 1990. For this reason, 600 rooms have been allocated to the CBD for the 1991-1995 period. The major factor which will generate demand in the Overtown/Park West subarea is the exhibition center/sports area and the Bayside project. There are no existing competitive hotels in that subarea at present. The Omni and Brickell subareas would then capture convention spillover demand, as well as the anticipated increase in commercial demand, respectively. Alternative II Under this alternative, the number of room/nights demanded for commercial and convention use would remain constant, while tourist - generated demand would increase greatly as a result of the degree of increased tourism reflected in Table 21 (from 5.9 million in 1985 to 11.E million by 2005). As a result, the total number of competitive hotel rooms justified in downtown Miami would increase from 3,197 in 1985 to approximately 6,945 by 2005. This is shown in Table 23. Under Alternative I1, seven new hotels, totalling 3,700 additional hotel rooms, could be supported in downtown by 2005. The distribution of these facilities is shown in Table 24 on the following page. -27- H \t,tFH • Sii tx - (.tt,Kt.r 3 3 3 The same rationale was used in allocating hotel facilities and hotel rooms under Alternative II as for Alternative I. However, the substantial increase in tourist -generated room/nights justified the development of more hotel rooms. An initial major hotel of 500 rooms would be justified somewhat earlier than under Alternative I and, presumably, would be located in the CBD subarea. Table 24. PROJECTED ALTERNATIVE II. (INCREASED TOURISM): HOTEL DEVELOPMENT BY SUBAREA, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1985-2005 No. Hotels and Rooms by Subarea 0vertown/ Period Omni Park West C80 Brickell 1985-1990 -- 1 = 600 -- 1 = 600 1991-1995 1 = 400 1 = 500 -- -- 2 = 900 1996-2000 -- 1 = 600 1 = 500 -- 2 = 1,100 2001-2005 -- 1 = 500 1 600 2 = 1,100 Total 1 = 400 2 =1,100 3 = 600 1 = 600 7 - 3,700 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Total -2 8- 1 7 1 1 1 l 7 Section V. M TfWN MIAMI RETAIL/ENTERTAINMENT SARKET ANALYSIS H ail ♦IF k . SU.=K i•>t *H..1. • h••• 1\Sim Section V. DOWNTOWN MIAMI RETAIL/ENTERTAINMENT MARKET ANALYSIS The retail analysis begins with an overview of the major existing downtown retail structure. It then examines sales potentials by con- sumer sources: a delineated retail trade area for sub -regional shoppers' goodsl/ facilities, downtown employees and visitors. The latter two consumer sources are examined under alternative scenarios dealing with future levels of downtown employment and tourist visita- tions. Future levels of sub -regional retail opportunities are then projected for the downtown core and OMNI areas. Sub -Regional Downtown Retail Potential Downtown Miami is characterized by two distinct shoppers' goods nodes which have department store anchors. The traditional retail core is that of the Central Business District (CBD) fronting on Flagler Street. A second major retail complex, The OMNI, was developed a short distance north of the CBD in 1977. - A 1982 study prepared by the Downtown Development Authorityi/ indicated that there were a total 2,705,268 square feet of retail space in the core at the time and that sales in 1981 averaged $187 per square foot. The core retail establishments have developed a strong appeal to international visitors. In 1982, the highest percentage of shoppers came from the Carribean, South America and Central America. Only 4O percent of the customers were Miami area residents. The percentage of international customers was highest for stores fronting on Flagler Street. Over time, the appeal to international visitors has resulted in a shift in the area's merchandising to promote hard goods (especially electronic goods) and soft goods sought by visitors (especially Latin Americans). 1/ Shoppers' goods merchandise is typified by that found in department stores, variety stores, apparel and accessory stores, home furnishings stores and miscellaneous stores such as gift, jewelry, card and stationery, book, china and silver, craft, toys, hobby, sporting goods, music/record and similar type stores. -29- H \ 1 k H . ti 11 1 t; h t • 3+. •••-. . E \ i , -' c 1 1 The CBD core general merchandise sales (including department stores) declined dramatically from $56.9 million to $35.9 million between 1977 and 1982. This was a result of the closing of two of the three downtown department stores and the impact of the OMNI, with two new department stores, on the CBD market position, especially in regard to resident population. No accurate sales information is available since the 1982 Census. However, interviews conducted by HSGA with several merchants, as well as with Burdine's management, indicate that sales have declined steadily for at least some merchants. This condition is reflective of the sharp decline in tourism to Dade County in recent years. Specifically, businesses relying heavily on the Latin American tourist market have been negatively impacted by the decline. Some merchants are attempting to adjust to this problem by expanding their market appeal to downtown employees and Miami area residents. In general, the CBD retail core needs to bring tenants and land- lords together in an action program designed to present a retail mix which will appeal more to the existing and future market area population and downtown employment base. The OMNI International complex opened in 1977 and represented a major retail expansion to the downtown area. The complex contains about 900,000 square feet GLA, including two department store anchors. Jordan Marsh has a 395,000-square-foot unit and J.C. Penney has a unit of 220,000 square feet. In general, the merchandising of the OMNI is more upscale than the CBD and it appeals to residents of the area as well as visitors seeking middle- to better -quality merchandise. While, well over one-half of the CBD's sales came from international tourists in 1982, only one-half of the 0mni`s sales were estimated to be derived from international visitors in 1983, 1/ Estimated total sales of S122,470,000 in 1982 represented an average sales level of approximately $140 per square foot. According to OMNI management, sales have increased since 1982, up an average of 10 percent annually for some stores. Downtown Miami Retail Consumer and Expenditure Potentials Support for downtown retailing comes from three major consumer sources: residents of a geographical trade area, downtown employees, and tourists and visitors. This portion of the analysis examines the 1/ Interviews conducted by The Rouse Company for the Bayside project. _30- H\ 1I •[ t k ' 11 % 1 k )4(t. } • A,,f H 1 11 i• orA•LOCKA AIRPORT Hialeub MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Coral Cables South Miami Miami Shores North Miami it 11 John F. Kennedy virgtnta Key Z liami each Map ,3 Key: misio Regional Trade Arca Southeast Ovcrtow•n/ ® Park West Trade Area 13rickeli Avenue Track Area 1 Retail Trade Areas t Miami, Florida mAmmrR • •It rR • I.r„Iti:r • >•cK. 1 rt-. market base and expenditure potential generated from each consumer source between now and 2005. The expenditure potentials indicated are available for capture by all appropriate facilities not only downtown, but throughout the region, depending upon the consumer base being considered. The analysis for the trade area is conducted under a single scenario, that is, there are no variations in the key demographics of population and households. The analyses for the employees and the visitors, however, are conducted under two scenarios each. These alternatives reflect different levels of future downtown employment and Dade County visitation as discussed and projected in Sections I and IV of the report. In each case, Alternative I reflects a more conservative demographic projection and Alternative II reflects an• accelerated demographic projection. Alternative II projections assume greater economic impact an Miami by foreign economies, resulting in increased job opportunities (employees) and increased foreign visitation. Trade Area. The trade area for downtown Miami retail is shown on the accompanying map. Generally, it includes a large portion of the City of Miami as well as Miami Beach. It is bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east; Little River Drive and the Little River on the north; NW 37th Avenue on the west and it extends several miles to the south-southwest. The estimated current and future expenditure potentials to be generated by residents of the downtown Miami regional trade area are shown for selected years in Table 25. Presently, the trade area generates about $344 million in shoppers' goods expenditure potential. This will increase to more than $472 million by 2005. Department stores are estimated to be capturing $165 million and non -department store outlets are estimated to be capturing almost $179 million. By 2005, the potential will be nearly $227 million for department stores and more than $245 million for non -department store outlets. Similarly, trade area residents now generate $110.1 million in sales for eating/drinking facilities. This is projected to increase to $151.1 million by 2005. Expenditures will also increase from $35.8 million to $49.1 million for entertainment between 1985 and 2005. For convenience goods, expenditures by trade area residents will increase from $412.8 million in 1985 to $566.7 million by 2005. Downtown Employees. Employees in downtown Miami are and will continue to be an important source for retail sales support. At present, the Downtown Development Authority estimates that employment within the area is 82,240 persons. -31- H iNi:11-H 51I.1 H • •Ht .h 4..ti.tt i \f t Future levels of downtown employment are based upon projected increases in downtown office space as outlined in Section III of the report. Future downtown office space demand is converted to employees based on an assumption of 225 square feet per person of office space. This ratio is in line with national trends and the experience of several cities elsewhere. In turn, the projected additional downtown office employees are assumed to represent. only 70 percent of total new downtown private - sector employees. The additional employees resulting from this equation are those holding retail, hotel, entertainment, industrial, housing and other jobs. Finally, future government employment, as indicated by the Government Center DRI, is added. The derivation of retail expenditure potential by categories is undertaken under two alternative scenarios. Alternative I represents employment levels for 1985 and the year 2005 with interval estimates projected by HSGA. Under Alternative I the current downtown employment force of 82,240 would increase to 156,800 by 2005. The estimated current and future expenditure potentials to be generated by downtown employees under Alternative I are detailed in Table 26. Downtown employees now generate over $67.4 million in shoppers' goods sales. Under Alternative I, this will increase to $161.1 million by 2005. Similarly, downtown employees now generate $32.1• million in sales for eating/drinking facilities. This is projected to increase to $80.6 million by 2005. Inasmuch as employees are downtown primarily for the purpose of work, they do not generate significant entertainment expenditures. Accordingly, none have been calculated, although this could represent a small "plus" factor for any new facilities in downtown. The same holds for convenience goods. The estimated future expenditure potentials to be generated by downtown employees under Alternative II are detailed in Table 27. Under Alternative II, the number of downtown employees increases from the current 82,240 to 166,200 in 2005. Annual expenditures, however, are the same as for Alternative I. Under Alternative II downtown employees will generate nearly $170.8 million in shoppers' goods expenditure potential by 2005. Further, downtown employees will generate 585.5 million in eating/drinking expenditure potential by 2005. -32- H i .l ' I 1 4 ti l l l It • t. F - n I Visitors. Visitors to Dade County are the third source of retail sales support for downtown Miami. It is estimated that 5,905,600 visitors will come to Dade County this year. 1/ Future levels of visitation to Dade County have been estimated under alternative assumptions regarding international visitation, particularly Latin Americans. Hence, the derivation of retail expenditure potential by categories is undertaken under two alternative scenarios. Alternative I is based an annual visitation to Dade County increasing from an estimated 5.9 million in 1985 to aver 9.2 million by 2005. Alternative II is based on annual visitation to Dade County increasing to nearly 11.6 million by 2005 (a level still below past peak years). The estimated current and future expenditure potentials to be generated by visitors under Alternative I are detailed in Table 28. Future visitors expenditures per day and per trip have been derived by HSGA based on an evaluation of annual data on visitor expenditure habits in Dade County for the last several years. 2/ A share of those expenditures have been allocated to retail, entertainment and eating/ drinking (outside of hotels) based on information available through the same source. These data are the same for both scenarios. Visitors to Dade County now generate Si billion in eating/drinking (outside hotel) sales. Under Alternative I, this will increase to $1.6 billion by 2005. Similarly, visitors now generate $680 million in entertainment sales. This will increase to $1.1 billion of expenditure potential by 2005. And, current generated retail sales of $200 million will increase to $327 million by 2005. The estimated future expenditure potentials to be generated by Dade County visitors under Alternative II are detailed in Table 29 on the following page. Under Alternative 1I, Dade County visitors will generate $2.0 billion in eating/drinking (outside hotels) expenditure potential by 2005. They will also generate $1.3 billion in entertainment expenditure potential and $410 million in retail expenditure potential by 2005. 1/ Metro -Dade Department of Tourism. 2/ Source: Tourism Facts and Figures, prepared by Metro -Dade County Department of Tourism. _33_ HAMXI!.It • 11[.!R • • A•••••••Ul I Xil.•• Table 30. WARRANTED ADDITIONAL RETAIL SPACE IN DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1990-2005 A. Alternative I Department Store Shoppers' Goods Cumulative Floor Area 1990 1995 2000 2005 @ $140 S.F. GLA 129,000 250,600 403,800 602,000 @ $150 S.F. GLA 120,400 233,900 376,800• 561,800 Non -Department Store Shoppers Goods @ $175 S.F. GLA 93,100 197,800 322,100 504,900 @ $185 S.F. GLA 88,100 187,100 304,700 477,600 Eating/Drinking @ $250 S.F. GLA 40,800 91,400 135,800 219,400 @ $300 S.F. GLA 34,000 76,100 113,200 182,800 Entertainment @ $200 S.F. GLA 21,300 37,400 49,900 67,400 @ $225 S.F. GLA 19,000 33,300 44,400 59,900 Supportable Retail Space High Estimate 284,200 577,200 911,600 1,393,700 Low Estimate 261,500 530,400 839,100 1,282,100 8. Alternative II Department Store Shoppers' Goods @ $140 S.F. GLA @ $150 S.F. GLA Non -Department Store Shoppers Goods @ $175 S.F. GLA @ $185 S.F. GLA Eating/Drinking @ $250 S.F. GLA @ $300 S.F. GLA Entertainment @ $200 S.F. GLA @ $225 S.F. GLA Supportable Retail Space High Estimate Low Estimate 139,300 268,800 435,300 647,900 130,000 250,900 406,300 604,700 104,500 217,700 357,300 544,100 98,800 206,000 338,000 514,700 50,900 107,600 164,400 259,600 42,400 89,700 137,000 216,300 26,400 44,000 62,700 85,200 23,500 39,100 55,800 75,700 321,100 638,100 1,019,700 1,536,800 294,700 585,700 937,100 1,411,400 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. HAVI'^-1 33. • Su H • (., KRC.r • .'kti•t• \I k� i• 1 s 1 1 1 j Additional Downtown Retail Expenditure Potential The expenditure potentials generated by the various consumer sources are available to all competitive facilities existing now or in the future, including downtown, This portion of the analysis is con- cerned with determining a reasonable share of future expenditure poten- tial which would be available to new facilities by allocating a part of future expenditure potential to existing facilities in order to derive a residual and, also, by estimating the sales which the new Bayside Specialty Center will capture from the three consumer market segments supportive of downtown retailing.1/ The sales potentials available for new retail facilities represent an aggregation of residuals with additional calculations as detailed in the technical report (but not repeated in this Summary). The sales po- tentials are summarized below for both Alternative I and Alternative II. Department Store Non -Department Store Shopper Goods Eating/Drinking Entertainment Alternative I Alternative II Millions Millions 1990 2005 1990 2005 $18.1 $84.3 $16.3 $10.2 $4.3 $88.4 $54.8 $13.5 S19.5 $90,7 $18.3 $12.7 $5.3 $95.2 $64.9 $17.0 The warranted floor areas which can be supported by available potentials is derived by applying accepted industry standards of sales per square foot operating levels to sales potentials. This is shown in Table 30 for both Alternative I and II. Under Alternative I, for example, new department store space totaling 120,400 square feet could be supported by 1990 at an operating level of $150 per square foot. By 2005, a total of 561,800 square feet of new department store space is supportable at the same operating level. Under Alternative I1, the corresponding warranted floor areas would be 130,000 square feet in 1990 and nearly 604,700 square feet by 2005. 1/ The latter analysis is based on a calculation of the proportion of sales derived from various consumer sources which is part of The Rouse Company study entitled Bayside Specialty Center, dated September 1983. HSGA reworked these sales estimates against current numerical consumer estimates. -34- H\\1tiShf.• tiiitk • C.t,.104 • I\I1. Recommended Distribution of New Retail Space By Subarea The warranted floor space for downtown Miami should be encouraged for development by subareas in accordance with a strategy to strengthen current retail offerings and improve upon weaknesses and voids in the marketplace. CBD Core. The CBD care, over the years, has become -stratified in its orientation toward the international visitors market, especially Latin Americans. Many stores are merchandised with big ticket elec- tronic and houseware .items. With the decline in tourism, some stores have experienced sales losses.. The void created by the tourist decline has not begin filled by sales generated from local residents and downtown employees to any significant degree. There is a need for downtown retailing to expand its consumer appeal and, especially, attract the more stable components of its market base (residents and employees). In order to do so, at least one major new department store anchor and a wide assortment of supportive shoppers' goods space must be added. Entertainment facilities, such as movies and night clubs, should also be developed. Two department stores would give downtown more balance and clout in competing with other malls and centers for trade area residents' expen- ditures. It would also encourage more shopping trips by downtown employees. Therefore, a new department store -anchored mall should be encouraged at a location within several blocks of Burdine's. If possi- ble, there should be direct pedestrian linkage. The mall should be designed to be capable of expansion later. Currently, downtown Miami offers little in the way of entertainment and recreational facilities. Gusman Hall, an arts center, is the most notable entertainment facility. There are numerous small bars and clubs, but no concentration or entertainment theme inherent in them. Bayside Specialty Center will attract large numbers of residents, tourists and downtown employees when opened. The existence of it offers an opportunity to expand the entertainment offerings of the CBD core area. A six -to -nine screen cinema complex should be developed in proximity to' Bayside (within two to three blocks). The complex might include a theme family type restaurant (i.e., Bennigan's, Friday's, Chi Chi's, etc.) and a nightclub. It could be developed in conjunction with a parking garage, if desired. (A complex of this nature is being developed near Baltimore's Harborplace). Additional pubs, nightclubs and restaurants might be grouped in an entertainment complex featuring a variety of music and events. -36- H awst H • 111,4 H (0.++41.4 With increased residential development as well as visitors to the area other entertainment facilities could be developed. A dinner theatre is being developed which should expand upon and complement the cultural offerings at Gusman Hall. A small thematic museum would be an additional cultural attraction. Also, in recognition of increased daytime and nighttime population levels, a sporting club or health club with racquetball, swimming, jogging, nautilus and gymnasium facilities would appeal to the growing consciousness of physical fitness and be attractive to many residents and employees alike. Omni, The Omni area has a balanced, upscale retail offering which should probably not be significantly enlarged, especially if the C8O core is to be enlarged and up -merchandised. As office development begins to grow in the area, additional eating/drinking and entertainment facilities should be encouraged. Some satellite shoppers' goods facilities might also be added. 0vertown/Park West. As residential development increases, this area will be able to support retail development. Residents and nearby employees of the government center will support some shoppers' goods space and eating/drinking facilities. A planned 8th Street Mall could support 45,000 square feet of the above type space, plus some conveni- ence -space by the early 1990s. (Convenience potential is discussed later). Brickell. As office development increases, some additional shoppers' goods space and eating/drinking facilities can be supported, probably at ground level in office structures. This does not include consideration of residential -generated convenience space which is discussed later. A recommended planning guideline for additional retail space in downtown by subarea is presented in Table 31. It utilizes and rounds the information presented in Table 30 previously. -37- HANStili.N • j11,1. H. • (4 t,141.4 Alternative I Table 31. RECOMMENDED RETAIL SPATIAL PROGRAM FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BY SUBAREA, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1995-2005 1/ Cumulative Square Feet 1995 2005 CBE/ Department Store 240,000 Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods 150,000 Eating/Drinking 15,000 Entertainment 35,000 Subtotal 440,000 Omni Department Store Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods Eating/Drinking Entertainment Subtotal 0vertown/Park West Department Store -Non-Department Store Shoppers' Goods 25,000 40,000 Eating/Drinking • 20,000 35,000 Entertainment - - Subtotai 45,000 75,000 15,000 15,000 575,000 370,000 50,000 50,000 1,045,000 40,000 35,000 . 10,000 85,000 Brickell Department Store Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods 15,000 40,000 Eating/Drinking 35,000 80,000 Entertainment - - Subtotai 50,000 120,000 Downtown - Total Department 240,000 575,000 Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods 190,000 490,000 Eating/Drinking 85,000 200,000 Entertainment 35,000 60,000 Total 550,000 1,325,000 HAMMl-.x • ltc rx • (et„x,.r i.,u, t{t r. C Table 31. RECOMMENDED RETAIL SPATIAL PROGRAM FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BY SUBAREA, DOWNTOWN MIAMI, 1995-2005 1/ (Continued) Cumulative Square Feet Alternative II 1995 2005 CBD Department Store 250,000 Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods 160,000 Eating/Drinking 20,000 Entertainment 40 000 Subtotal 47CUOT5 Omni Department Store Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods Eating/Drinking Entertainment Subtotal 20,000 20,000 600,000 400,000 65,000 60,000 1,125,000 50,000 45,000 20,000 115,000 Overtown/Paris West -Department Store - - -Non-Department Store Shoppers' Goods 30,000 45,000 Eating/thinking 25,000 40,000 Entertainment - 5,000 Subtotal 55,000 90,000 Brickell Department - - Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods 25,000 60,000 Eating/Drinking 45,000 100,000 Entertainment - - Subtotal 70,000 160,000 Downtown - Total Department Store 250,000 Non -Department Store Shoppers' Goods 215,000 Eating/Drinking 110,000 Enterta,nment 40,000 Total 600,000 555,000 250,000 85,000 615,000 1,490,000 1/ Does not include Bayside which, although not open, has been considered as "in place of" for this analysis. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. -38- H \.1.IrK•51€tK• (ir.tIKt.r •-\,Wx ICI r.,.. Households Table 32. OVERTOWN/PARK WEST TRADE AREA CONVENIENCE G00DS EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL, 1985-2005 1990 1995 2000 9,000 11,000 13,500 Average Household Income (TPI) $14,700 $18,000 $21,600 2005 16,000 $23,800 Total Personal Income ($000) $132,300,000 $198,000,000 $291,600,000 $380,800,000 Convenience Goods Exp. Pot. @ 15% of TPI ($000) $19,845,000 $29,700,000 $43,740,000 $57,120,000 Note: All dollars expressed as 1985.constant dollars. Source: Hammer, Slier, George Associates. Overtown/Park West and Brickeli Neighborhood Retail Potentials The distribution of a share of shoppers' goods and eating/drinking retail potential generated by study area residents and employees was performed in the preceding part of this analysis. Because of the residential character of the10/vertown/Park West and much of the Brickell subareas, convenience goods — facilities are also warranted for devel- opment in the years ahead. This analysis deals with the convenience goods expenditure potential generated by residents of trade areas co- extensive with the 0vertown/Park West and Brickell study areas. 0vertown/Park West The Overtown/Park West convenience trade area is delineated by NW 20th Street on the north, NW 7th Avenue on the West, the Miami River on the south and Biscayne Bay on the east. It includes the Omni, 0vertown/ Park West and C80 study areas and an additional small area north/north- west of Overtown. Much of the western part of the trade area is currently blighted. In 1980, the population was 17,594 and the average household income (1979) was $8,555 (8,475 households). The 0vertown/Park West redevelopment program, now in implemen- tatfon, will significantly alter the trade area's demographic profile in years to come. We have allowed for new household growth in accordance with that in the housing section (9,000 additional households to 2005) and have adjusted average household incomes for the new households from our 1983 0vertown/Paris West study to determine the magnitude of new growth and expenditure potential. Table 32 presents the projections of demographic data leading to the derivation of convenience goods expenditure potential for the trade area. The 0vertown/Paris West trade area will generate $19.8 million in convenience goods expenditure potential by 1990, increasing to $57.1 million by 2005. 1/ Includes food, drug, hardware, liquor, florist, tobacco, and similar types of convenience facilities. -39- ..I C5.-.14e..ei Div;e/e/ 4tietlien 1/ Table 33. WARRANTED ADDITIONAL CONVENIENCE GOODS RETAIL POTENTIAL, OVERTOWN/PARK WEST TRADE AREA, 1990-2005 Cumulative Dollars 1990 1995 2000 2005 Convenience Goods Potential (000) $19,845,000 $29,700,000 - $43,740,000 $57,120,000 Available for New Stores (000) $9,945,000 $13,345,000 $21,425,000 $28,615,000 Cumulative Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) Additional Convenience Goods Space @ $275 s.f. 36,200 48,500 77,900 104,100 Note: All dollars are expressed in 1985 constant dollars. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. r i• 4 Table 33 presents the convenience goods sales projections and warranted floor area that can be supported in the 0vertown/park West trade area over the study period. A total of over 36,000 square feet of convenience goods space is supportable in the trade area by 1990. By 2005, the available sales will support convenience goods facilities totaling over 104,000 square feet. A major supermarket can be supported between 1995 and 2005. The convenience goods space can be developed as a separate center or inte- grated with shoppers' goods and eating/drinking space outlined earlier in the analysis. Because a major redevelopment program is under implementation with definite build -out objectives, it is not believed that an alternative projection is appropriate in this case. Brickell Avenue The resident trade area for convenience retail in the Brickell neighborhood i5 generally defined as that area bounded by the Miami River and SW 6th Street on the north, 12th Avenue on the west, and the bayfront on the south and east. This neighborhood contains a concentration of high -income residents living in either high-rise condominiums along Brickell Avenue or in single-family detached residences west of Brickell. There are some modest income household living in the trade area as well. In 1980, the Brickell Avenue trade area contained 18,184 people and 8,258 households. The average household income (1979) of $20,045 was considerably higher than for 0vertown/Park West. The Brickell Avenue trade area may be impacted by future Latin American economic investment and, therefore, two alternative projections are made based only on differences in households. The additional households represent those computed in the housing analysis section. The analysis proceeds in format the same as for 0vertown. • -40- H t•it • 51(,F.K • Gt )12C4. • A.,tiU( F-!1t Table 34. A. Alternative 1 Households Average Household Income Total Personal Income (TP1) (000) Convenience Goods Potential @ 15% of TPI (000) B. Alternative II Households Average Households Income Total Personal Income (TPI) (000) Convenience Good Potential @ 15% of TP1 (000) BRICKEIL AVENUE TRADE AREA CONVENIENCE GOODS EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL, 1990-2005 1990 8,680 $30,400 $263,872,000 1995 9,140 $33,000 $301,620,000 $39,580,800 $45,243,000 9,200 10,090 $30,400 $33,000 $279,680,000 $332,970,000 $41,952,000 2000 9,640 $35,900 $346,076,000 $51,911,400 11,040 $35,900 $396,336,000 2005 10,310 $38,900 $401,059,000 $60,158,850 12,290 $38,900 $478,081,000 $9,945,500 $59,450,400 $71,712,150 Source: Hammer, Slier, George Associates. Table 34 presents the basic demographic data deriving the con- venience goods expenditure potential for the Brickell Avenue trade area under the alternative scenarios. As for Overtown/Park West, it has been assumed that new facilities can compete for 50 percent of the potential generated in 1990 and thereafter. The resulting sales potential and warranted floor area for convenience retailing in the Brickell Avenue trade area is shown in Table 35 on the rollowng page. Under Alternative I, the Brickell Avenue trade area can support 72,100 square feet of new convenience goods facilities by 1990. By 2005, it can support 109,400 square feet. A major supermarket can be supported by 1995. Under Alternative 1I, the Brickell Avenue trade area can support 76,500 square feet of new convenience goods space by 1990. By 2005, it can support over 130,000 square feet. A major supermarket can be supported between 1990 and 1995. -41- H 11,E3K ,t• Ak / a • 1 f a a , A I i ! • Table 35. WARRANTED ADDITIONAL CONVENIENCE GOODS POTENTIAL. DRICKELL TRADE AREA, 1900-2005 Cumulative [Dollars Alternative 1 1990 1995 2000 2005 Convenience Goods Potential (000) $39,580,800 $45,243,000 $51,911,400 $60,158,850 Available for New Stores (000) $19,815,000 $22,650,000 $25,920,000 $30,080,000 Cumulative Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) Additional Convenience Goods Space @ $275 s.f. Alternative 11 Convenience Goods Potential (000) Available for New Stores (000) Additional Convenience Goods Space @ $275 s f. 72,100 82,400 Cumulative Dollars 94,300 109,400 $41,952,200 $49,945,500 $59,450,400 $71.712,150 $21,030,000 $25,000,000 $29,690,000 $35,850,000 Cumulative Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 76,500 90,900 108,000 130,400 Note: All dollars are expressed in 1985 constant dollars. Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Appendix 10-2 1 / 1 3 1 3 Capital Improvement grogram J986 92 VOLUME 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM r. - •. --• . .».. — .. • E.. �......�. xS�tr:�.At^i-`"s:!!�;f.:.'R'�"'-:aq•?'.4✓._.,...;:„'^�i,"`_�r_;°.�."`r„--'�S -PAC W=.„V-i•r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IN MIAMI `S NEIGHBORHOODS Page The Capital Improvement Program in Miami's Neighborhoods 1 Overview 2 Planning District A 8 Planning District 8 16 Planning District C 32 Planning District 0 40 Planning District E 52 Planning District F 58 Planning District G 66 Citywide 72 Site Undetermined 78 In addition to the projects located within a particular Planning District, some projects by their nature, e.g. communications projects, cannot be assigned a location but, in fact, benefit the entire City. These projects are presented in the Citywide Section following District G. Information on remaining projects that have an undetermined location is provided in the last set of tables following the Citywide section. The allocation of funds.required to implement the 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program is shown by Planning District in the pie chart, in Figure 1. Also shorn is the percentage of funds required to mpfemen -japital projects for proposed Citywide programs and those that do not have a determined location. 4U. 04 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DISTRICTS •MAP- 1 a= NEIGHBORH00D PROGRAM The 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program for each of Miami's Planning Districts, Neighborhoods, and Community Development Target Areas is presented in this section. The information provided for each Planning District includes a map of neighborhood and target area boundaries, a summary of the 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program by major program area and functional category, and a list of capital projects located within thq City's neighborhoods and target areas that includes funding schedules for project implementation. In addition to the information provided for each Planning District, proposed project funding schedules are included for Citywide projects and for those projects that have an as yet undetermined location. S0 r )0; OVERVIEW The 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program in Miami's neighborhoods is presented in this section. This neighborhood section provides an easy cross reference system to assess capital projects by their geographic location. The proposed projects and funding schedules for the 1986-1992 Capital Program are organized by each of the City's Planning Dis,tricts. The tables and maps provided herein are `intended to be used in conjunction with detailed project descriptions and maps included in Volume III. The first set of maps show the City of Miami and all Planning District, Neighborhood, and Community Development Target Area boundaries. The City is divided into seven Planning Districts as shown on Map I. These districts are further divided into smaller neighborhoods - 63 in all, as shown on Map 2. Community Development Target Area boundaries are overlaid onto a map of the City's neighborhoods, Map 3. Generally, target areas consist of groups of neighborhoods, which are characterized by a concentration of socio- economic needs and physical blighting influences. For purposes of Community Development program expenditures, these sections of the City constitute target or priority areas for funded activities and projects. Each of the Planning District sections include a map depicting geographic boundaries of the district's neighborhoods and target areas. A funding summary by program and functional category accompanies the map. Only those categories that have capital projects proposed for the district are included. The table that follows the summary material includes a list of capital projects proposed for the 1986-1992 program by neighborhood. The use of the term "multi" or "single" in the column headed "Project Location" signifies that the projects listed within that category are located in more than one neighborhood (multi) or are physically located within the boundaries of only that neighborhood (single). It is important to note that since projects overlap neighborhood boundaries in some cases, a total of all proposed capital project costs would not be a true comparative figure to use with respect to other neighborhoods. The project cost figures are intended for informational use only. Community Development Target Areas are located in Planning Districts A, B. C, 0, and F. These five district sections additionally include a list of capital projects by target area along with fundinc schedules for the six -year program. CITY OF MIAMI NEIGHBORHOODS MAP 2 a m w U LEGEND CODE NEIGHBOAAEIOOD i11 EMU R(iI R 112 HEM IIAI11 111 W1Cw1 v151,1IIf5I 1! Edith VISIA IASI 115 BKIt$11 2D 121 LlR1A1Y SIKLVLL 122 KIRL tuFILii15 121 t0J111R PARK Sit NUL MADE 19_ 1Yllulltl,511[1R1Yk9llal 191 1KIKLh Pltilii ISIALIGS 29' FYh9Ii11R 291 fanEVAi'u 291 lULt11AItR Uvl it111uh :61 SPRIUL LAk9tKS 265 ELRItUM tUtRt1OtM 2G4 1111111151'ARK 291 hk1CKtF49IESI 292 31tlCK1(l :OHM 29t IIRII AYIa9k 29- '411401i Saul9 29S I9IIRSLAIUS 296 •ASIA MIAMI 291 .:19E Ill IaNti Se 1 :151 41tt1il 39l WA1i,1AS PARK 392 Sktvl9 Wulf 391 h11A 111 LFara 194 LASE LIu1ll 395 LISu1Il L1wvt 91L 1.B11vk I'1CN1( 1S1A995 47i 4T51 Cl1IliS LR(19E 972 /St Whitt 111911 971 ;Ou1M 9AS1 11111E MOW. :011 AUB11u1BI1 E LORAL CAA 149S II1 l UllaSAll Ott RMADS 991 1d51 Watt! 592 FALNIAla1 591 KI'.E1M(t1 PAIu 599 L1i1 IlC LAMA AS 41! SAt11A (IAPA 412 Lt9t.luti L31 11111M191 114 Luk1I5l'AFK L1ti LIv1L Llal(a LIG 1AL1Sla L91 4M111115 L11A1'11Aa9E 4IT1i ' 612 IXJKIIl "-I ULEL PARK L'kS Milli Kihi, IIIL11 L9$ S9%111t 921191E E'A9K 695 Shull 1,RAP1lAhp hllta115 )11 LASI iiiKUS LP.DvL 722 ORAtth9 hl)t1 7/3 Ul isllEk9Mi E'AAK 2/9 1111111 9119 411 10111 7i1. :uullt CIA 1YRP111 //I. R(v1ta1f 111 l+llu 1111nP1111 lth 1A'.1 911.91i I111.Il �1l v;uali.l* 111 05 iO6 CITY OF MIAMI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREAS MAP 3 Coconut Grove CITY OF MIAMI CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ALLOCATION OF FUNDS BY PLANNING DISTRICT 1986-1992 0( slow) C -DA- $124799.3 r)istQic $52490.2' DISTRICT C 9.1% $51571.0 DISTRICT B 34.0% y._ $193191.1 L/'' SITE UNDETERMINED 0.4% $2449.0" 1 1570.0 -- DISTRICT E 7.6% $43266.5 ..% DISTRICT A 7.8% $44057.9 „r' DISTRICT F 7.9% $44855.1 FIGURE I :(1 ( PA117 TIO(rF LEFT BLANK THIS Gik • MI Ma 1114111 111;31 SW UMW Ma MI adail KM FM LL.12 ELLIJ PLANNING DISTRICT A Summary Planning District A comprises the northern- most portion of the City north of 36th Street. The proposed 1986-1992 Capital improvement Program for District A includes projects in..ejjht� functional categories that amount to a total value of $44,057,900, approximately 7.8% of the capital program. Planning District A is comprised of eleven neighborhoods and two Community Development Target Areas as shown on the map. Major program emphasis is placed on Street Improvement projects ongoing or scheduled to begin in the Little River, Little Haiti, Buena Vista West, Buena Vista East, Brentwood, Liberty Square, Manor Park, Belle Meade, and Morningside/Baypoint neighborhoods. Proposed street improvements total $25,020,000. Parks and Park Facilities improvements valued at $2,530,000 are programmed for the 1986- 1992 Capital Improvement Program in District A. These projects are in Little Haiti. Storm Sewers improvements are ongoing or proposed in Little Haiti, Liberty Square, Belle Meade and Morningslde/8aypoint. These projects total $5,150,000. L'-0 dal Other significant projects include the construction of a full service police substation and marina improvements. Community development target areas located within Planning District A include Edison -Little River and Model City. In the Model City target area ongoing capital projects include the construction of the Liberty City Educational Center and the hew Christian hospital. Other proposed capital projects include street and park improvements, storm sewers improvements and fire station renovations. Districtwide functional category summaries, detailed project listings and funding schedules by neighborhoods and target areas are presented in the following tables. PLANNING DISTRICT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 4 N.W.71 ST. N.W. 82 ST. MLK BLVD N.W. 54 ST. N.W. 17 AVE AIRPORT EXPRESSWAY N.W. 2 AVE. 4 I1 4 4 NORTH BAY CSWY SR-1U5 JULIA TUTTLE CSWY LEGEND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREA CODE NEIGHBORHOOD 111 L11IIf RIVER 112 LIME IIAI11 113 BUERA VISTA IIESI 119 BUENA VISTA EASE 115 BBE11LO 1 121 LI1ttRTY SOUA1tE 122 KING IIEIG111S 121 NANO PAPI 191 BEEIf lsiARE 192 WJt1Ilt1GSIl[/BAYP011(I 113 BORIII I'1CHIC ISIAROS J` MI WI =II nu no ma LOB EMI OM tillEal EZ:13 ELM L1-47- Ef: _r.-- It1G 01, Inter T A 1506-S2 CAPITAL i PROVEt4ENT PROGRAM PLANNING DISTRICT HARTIING SUMMARY DY A40R PROGRAM AND fuactioUAL CATEGORY TOTAL P PROGRAM FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY FUNDING A TOR + APPROP FUTURE fUt1DING - PROP 1906-07 1907-00 1900-09 1509-50 1540-91 1991-52 PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE 5,000.0 2,i32.0 2.160.0 FIRE RESCUE 997.5 472,0 526.5 PROGRAM IOTAL 5,997,5 3,104.0 2,653.5 SOCIAL A110 ECON_ EHVIRUNM HOUSING 4,500.4 1,00.0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 000.0 1100.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 5,300,4 1 00.0 PARKS A1RO RECREATION PARKS AND RECREATION 2,530.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 2.530.0 PDOLIC fACRL111E9 MARINA 60.0 TRANSPORTATION PHYSICAL ENNIR0HHENT PROGRAM TOTAL STREETS PROGRAM TOTAL STORM SEWERS PROGRAM TOTAL 45.0 45,0 60.0 (i 11 1000) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600.4 1.000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.4 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,032.5 452.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,032.5 452.9 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25,020.0 2 670.0 5,600.0 2,050.0 3.400.0 4,200.0 3,600.0 3.000.0 26,020,0 2 670.0 5,600.0 2.060.0 3,500.0 4,200.0 3.600.0 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.050.0 100.0 4,000.0 5.150.0 60,0 0.0 5,160.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,050.0 100.0 4,000,0 DISTRICT TOTAL 44.057.5 R79.0 0,153.0 5,002.5 5,352.5 6,250.0 3,700,0 '7.000.0 1 0 PLANIIItIG 01II10101 A 4206-92 CAPITAL IM ROVEMEILT P0UG0AM PROJECT FONOINO SUMMARY FO0 PLAN 1110 0151RIC15 UY NE100000110002 t4EI6110000000 GE001APIIIC PROJECT CDOE NAME COVERAGE Nt1M0ER pROJECI TITLE TOTAL FNN01N0 PJ(100 AP 00P APPRDP FOTURE f0N0JHG tb00207 1907-00 1800-09 1902-90 1920.21 1991-9a 1t1 1.11146 01VE0 HULA 041143 1.71.0V.2I.IMP.PN. 11 1,000.0 1 1 2 WILE 0.4111 51401.E 031074 A_ RANGE PARK REIIAO. 1,722.0 041131 20190H 50 IMP P1i-J1 0.100.0 052190 FAIRW, 6T0M 9. 07/92 400.0 0.0 331030 LEMON C. PARK IMP0V. 176.0 5.0 MOLT) 031065 OAT CARE C. SLOG REP 600,0 0.0 041143 LTT.RV,9T.IMP.PN. II 1,000,0 0.0 313010 0E11. FIRE 91A11005 697.5 4 2.0 113 OtjEt1A V1.51A WE0I MULTI 041146 0 VISTA 2E. TM. P--1V 1,000.0 0.0 341100 0 VISTA SI. IM. P-11 1,100.0 1,70.0 341122 O. VSTA ST IMP P-III 0,400.0 0.0 114 0UEIIA VISTA EAST MULTI 041146 0 VISTA SI. IM. P-IV 1,000.0 0.0 041161 DIN PLL OT IMP P11 11 900.0 0.0 341090 0E20, PL2. 6T. -PH I 020.0 0120.0 341100 0 VISTA Sr. J04, P-71 1,700.0 1,700.0 344122 B. VSTA 5T IMP P-111 2.100.0 0.0 115 BRENTW000 wall 041146 0 V19TA 91. IM. p-IV 1,000.0 041107 08H PLZ 9I IMP P11 II 900.0 0.0 0.0 t o k3_ L E �2 „�---.Ml "U LE� y 0.0 (5 K 1000) 0.0 0,0 0.0 1,755,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.5 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 225.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 2,050,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.060.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 0,0 400.0 0.0 02,6 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 $.000,0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 1.0013.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 000.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 200,0 �1 iffie UM Sae WI UM I= LW L I LUZLi4 E .....1 �;... .. L PLAIIILING 019TR1C1 A 1900-92 CAPITA& IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT FuNOING SUHMARY fart PLANNING 015111IC1S 0Y NEIG110011110O40S NE 1G11001i11000 GEOGRAPIt1C 1'RO.+cCl CODE NAME COVERAGE N0M0E11 PROJECT TITLE TOIAL f uN01NG PRIOR APPROP fultlE F0I101116 APPROP, ,1906-07 1902-00 1940-09 1909-50 1550-91 1991-52 115 00fUTW00D (5 K 1000) MULTI 341090 0E56. PLI. 9T. -PO I 020,0 020.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341100 0 VISTA ST. IM. P-II 1,200.0 1,700.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 341122 0. VSTA 21 IMP P-111 2,100.0 0.0 60,0 2,050.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 121 LIBERTY 50LARE SINGLE 041126 M00EL C.ST IMPRV P-I 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,100,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 052146 N.W. 9T0RM SEWERS 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0,0 0.0 452192 110E610 511511. 25W09. 250,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 850.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 421030 101500 C LN.ACO.P0.1 3,000,0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 041154 M0L CY ST IMPM PO 11 2,100.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 2,100.0 321025 MO.CY./&T.IIV.OM.PRO. 1,500,4 1,000.0 500.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 122 KING 11E140T5' 123 MANOR PARK SLNc(E 322039 1. C111 5D11CT. CHUB 500.0 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 322040 NEW CHI)RISTIAN 110SP. 340,0 300.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBLT1 021034 E01900 C LN.ACO.Pk1.1 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0,0 0.0 041154 MO& CY ST 1MPM P11 11 2,100.0 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 321025 H0_CY./1.T.11V.OM.PRO. 1,500.4 1,000.4 000.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5I06LE 041134 MANOR ST IMP PN-V 5,100,0 0.0 , 0.0 313221 EKP, i REH. 0f FA 91 300.0 0.0 300.0 341119 MANOR S1 IMP. PH -IV 2,700.0 50.0 2,650.0 MULTI 031065 OAT CARE C. SLOG REP 600.0 0.0 0.0 313010 RE0. FIRE 9141'1005 692,5 472.0 225.5 0.0 0.0 2,100,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 400,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 PLANI11116 DISTRICT A 1906-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEHENI PROGRAM PROJEC1 FUIIOING 5UFIMARY f0R PLA11U1U0 DISTRICTS or HEIGIIUOIIUO009 uflah0ORR000 GEOGRAPHIC PROJECT COOS NAfiE CRVf1AGf NUAIOfl PR0JEC1 11[LE TOTAL FORDING PRIOR, APPROP ,APPROP fUFURE FU110171G 1906,07 1907-00 1900-09. 1948-50 1590-91 1991-52 129 S11E ONDEIERH1UED StUGLE 3t2it07 a. 0151. PLiLC. SUDS! 5,000.0 2,032.0 2,160.0 15t DfLLf 7f40f SINGLE 041129 DELLS HEADE 91 IHPRV 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 052210 DELLS MEASE Siam SEW 4,000.0 0.0 0.0 34111T 01041 31 IMPRV PO -II 1,500.0 50.0 1,450.0 MU1.11 341116 MORN1N6510E ST IMIR. 1,500.0 50.0 1,450.0 i92 HOR11lIG9I0E/0AYP0IHI SINGLE 052204 HE 55 ST. STORH SEW. 100.0 0.0 0.0 m7Llt 334004 MARINA OIOP. IHPROV. 60.0 60.0 0.0 341116 m0RNING910E ST IMPR, 1,500.0 60.0 1,454.0 ($ X t000) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 INN On On ION INN KW Mil ling 15= MI SUM MN 110151 gala MEI MI PLANNING DI 111IC1 A 1946-02 CAPITAL IMPIOVEMENI PROGRAM PR0JEC1 Ful0ING 90MI4ARY FOR PLAN1111G OISIIIICIS ANO TARGET AREAS TARGET AREA PR0JECI 001.10ED PRDJEGI T111E TOTAL f UNOING P R 1 11 APP 10P1 APPROP 1006-0) F6IORE fUNOt1,G 1407-00 1940--09 1909-90 1990-91 1941-92 E0190h-LI11LE RIVER 1100EL CITY 31065 OAY CARE C. WAR REP 31070 A. RANGE PARK REHAB. 4 1 1 3 1 101500 91 IMP PH-11 41143 L17.RV.51,IMP.P11. II 41146 0 V15IA 31. 7M, P-IV 41157 09ri PLx ST IMP P11 11 62190 FAIHLJ. 9t1M 9. 07/92 313015 RE11. FIRE STAT1411S 331030 LEMON C. PARK IMPRV. 34109B 0£SG. P12. 91. -Ph I 341104 R VISIA ST. IM, P--It 341122 0. VSIA ST IMP P-III TOTALS 8t030 E'DISON G LN.ACO.PR.1 31065 DAY GARS C. BLDG REP 41126 MODEL C.S1 IMPRV P-I 4 1 134 I4AIIOR 91 IMP P11-V 4 1 154 M0L CY 91 1MPM P11 It 52156 H.W. STORM SEWERS 52T97 LINEOTT Stem. SEU113, 312407 N. D1St. POLO. 3t109t 600.0 1,755.0 4,144.5 1,000.0 1,000.4 940,0 440.0 697.5 175.0 B20.0 1.700.0 2.104.0 14,047.E 3,037. 4.0 0.0 0 0 472 0 45 11 020 0 1,700. 0.0 0.0 0.0 (5 X 10441 240.0 f,755.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 828.E 0.0 0.0 0,0 60,0 275.E 3.040.4 0.0 0,0 600.0 0.0 0.0 2.100.4 0.0 0.0 2.100.0 0 0 0,0 2,100.0 4 0 0.0 400.0 0 0 0.0 650.0 0 0 0.0 5,000.0 2,43210 2.164,0 -1)( TABLE 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.5 0.0 0.0 2,050.0 4,002.5 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 1,000,0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 900.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 02.5 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 452.5 2,500.0 3,600.4 900.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1.004,4 200.4 400.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 250.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1E10,0 0,0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PLANNING BI3IOICT A 1206-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PR04EI;1 FUNDING 9u1MAOY fDR PLANNING DISTRICTS AND TA11G2T AREAS 15 PROJECT IARGEJ AREA 0ut40ER PODJECT TITLE TOTAL FUNDING PRIOR APPROP I1PPROP $306-07 FUTURE f41ND1NG 1907-00 1900-09 1909-00 1990-91 t091-92 (5 N 1001.0 tiOOEL CITY 313010 OOEN. fiHE BTAII00S 697.5 472.0 225.E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313221 ( JCP. I. REN, OF fR SI 300,0 0.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32(02S MO.CY_/L1.fv.011.PR0. 1,500.4 1.000.0 600.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 322039 L. OIIY ETHIC'. CUTER 500.0 500.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 322040 HEW CHRISTIAN ROSP. 300,0 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 341119 MANOn SI IMP. PH -IV 2.700.0 50.0 2,650.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS e1,641,9 6,164.0 5,043.9 1,e00.0 3,600.0 3,750.0 0.0 2.100,0 11014-00 TARGET AREA 41125 BELLE MEADE ST IMPRv 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 62204 HE 55 2T, STORM SEW. 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 52210 BELLE MEASE STOM SEW 4,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.000.0 334004 MARINA 9TRP. IMP00v. 60.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3411(6 MOOT41NGS10£ ST TMPR, 1,500.0 50.0 1,460.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341117 WIGS! SI IMPRV PII-II 1,600.0 5a.0 t,J50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 0,060.0 150.0 2,900.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 100.0 4,000.0 MN - i il:X EMI ilk illy ilkrra .® i i=1 i;1 t'i-=7 E PLANNING DISTRICT Q Summary Planning District B is defined as the area east of 1-95 between the Airport Expressway and the Rickenbacker Causeway and west of 1-95 between SR 836 and the Miami River. It encompasses Miami's Central Business District, the Brickell area, the Port of Miami, Watson Island, and the neighborhoods north and west of Downtown. The proposed 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program for District 8 includes projects classified in thirteen functional categories. The total value of projects, both ongoing and proposed, for the six year program is $193,191,100. Since this is the core area of the City, major emphasis is placed on funding capital projects in Planning District B. The total value of projects represents 34:'0i; of the proposed 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Progrr'm. The district is divided into fourteen neighborhoods and includes the three Community Development Target Areas of Wynwood, Overtown and Downtown, as shown on the map. The Southeast/Overtown Park West Redevelopment project, valued at $28,875,400, is the major capital improvement project ongoing in Planning District 8. The remaining component of the Miami Convention Center project yet to be completed is the 1450 space Parking Garage. Parks and Park Facilities projects valued at $23,907,000 are either ongoing or scheduled in the 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program. Included in this category is the redevelopment of 8ayfront Park in Central Downtown. Other Parks and Park Facilities projects are programmed for Wynwood, Lummus Park and Brickell West and North. Capital projects in the Parking Facilities category amount to $32,708,000 and are ongoing or scheduled in Overtown and Central Downtown. G°i idD Community (j development projects for Planning District' 8 are valued at $4875797600. In addition to the S.E. 0vertown/Park West Redevelopment, the expansion of the Garment Center in Wynwood, the development of the 8ayside Specialty Center in Central Downtown and the development of Watson Island are also included in this category. Street Improvements projects valued at $19,220,000 are programmed in Wynwood, Boulevard, Edgewater, Overtown, Spring Gardens, Central Downtown, Lummus Park, Brickell North and Brickell South. Projects in the General Government category are valued at S26,000. 1 G lu Clot ? Transit protect included in the 1986- 1992 Capital Improvement 1rogram are in District 8. The City of Miami is committed to financing a portion of the Downtown Component of Metrorail (People Mover) that will link with Metrorail. Fire Improvement projects include renovation of existing fire stations in several neighborhoods as well as the expansion of the Fire Alarm Office located in the City Administration building. Other capital improvement projects in Planning District 8 include improvements to Marinas as well as Sanitary and Storm Sewers improvements. 1 `7 si? d'Aid The three other projects are scheduled for the later years of the. Capit 1 improvement Program. Included in the Downtown target area are forty- ' eight projects, of which frt tYESeven are ongoing or scheduled to begin during FY 1966-1987. The remaining Abe are programmed to begin during the later years of the program. In Plar)n n"i g district 8. three community Development/ target areas are designated. In ;,�, /1;,64.....:_ Ws' . capital projects are proposed.>4"'�'"" FP dAr? are ongoing or scheduled to begin during FY 1986- 1987--ynwood, and-cf'oiir are proposed for later years. In Overtown, a total of pig rojects�-are.,sehe¢u.led— for the 1986-1992 C1P`:4 The—Southeast/Overtown „Fark_West.—Redevelopmeep1 -project is- -ongoing . and. -the_Overtown_P ar.k ipg_..Garage--Feas.ib.il-ity-»Study .project—is-.s hedu1ed—to—begin—dur-ing—FY-1986- tt z 0. crLie c.rs4.4-0(.4.4..5 err 01,c1ttAtiel ttl ,, �, i -/9t . Districtwide funding suuinaries by functional category for District a and a listing of proposed capital projects with accompanying funding schedules by neighborhoods and target areas are presented in the following tables. r. .M EU UZI is Elia MI MS Bin EMI Ma OM UZI ELMS RIM Elia Eall r` — — N NEII UM ® VOX la PLANNING DISTRICT B CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 5 N.W. 29 ST N.W. 20 ST. us a r- N.W. 14 ST. N.Y11.'1' N.W. 5 s • ELAGLER 8 8.W. 8 8T. . A / lliC1(tNilACi(EI1 CSWY JULIA TUTTLE CSWY CLAUGHTON ISLAND SOH ISLAND LEGEND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREA CODE NEIGHBORHOOD 241 242 243 251 252 261 264 291 292 2:11 294 295 29G 297 UYI1NWU 6011111611 066111111 0101111111 SPICING 4ARftI S C(N1UAL !WHIM MIMS PARK B11I04U1 UiS1 6I11K€fl1 IIIS6111 MIAMI AVLNUC 1.1111€K€1i. SUU111 U1d11!ISlAlIUS IIAISIFli 121fNU 19111 61 111An1 PLANNING 019TRICt 0 1906-92 CAPITAL JHPROVEM PLANNING 0131RICT FUNDING 9UMMAItY OY MAJOR P NI POJJGRAH OGRAM AJ10 FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY TOTAL 1 ROGRAM FUNCILQHA,L CATEGORY fI11DING PRT00 APPROP APPROP FUTURE FIINDING '1906-07 1907-00 1900-09 1909-90 1900-91 1991-92 i.ENERAL GOVERIIME111 FtJOLIC BAILEY GENERAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM TOTAL FIRE 0E9C4E PROGRAM TOTAL `(OCTAL A00 EC0U. E"NVTRDUH 00U91NG cot -minim 0EVELOPMENT ECONOHTC OEVELOPHENT PARKS .U0 RECREATION P001.12 FACILIIIE9 IRAt15PORTATION PR0GRAM TOTAL PARKS ANO RECREATION PO0GRAH TOTAL AUO11031UFI9 MARINA 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 1,214.2 1,642.0 1,214.E 1.592.0 6,000.0 0.0 34.204.4 22,507.4 9.370.2 9.090,0 54,579.6 31,577.4 23,907.0 10,614.0 23,907.0 10,019.0 49,000,0 49,000.0 945,0 945.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 49,545,0 49,945.0 STREETS MASS TRA14311 PARKING 14,220.0 4,643,0 7,239.3 0.0 32,700.0 25,207.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 59,167.3 34,750.0 PHYSICAL EIIVIR01IHEIIT $ANITARY 9EWER9 5T0RH SEWERS P11OG11AH TOTAL 0191111C1 TOTAL 1,950.0 150.0 2,400.0 0.0 (9 K 1000) O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 377.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 377.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 650,0 230.2 2.000.0 14.0/9.0 0.0 2,000.0 1.043.0 0.0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 p.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 930.E 16,079.0 3,043.0 2,000.0 0.0 11.0 3.160,0 4,365.0 4,963.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 3,960.0 4,355.0 4,963.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,957.0 1,020.0 1.000.0 2,500.0 1,200.0 1,200.0 0.0 1,959.0 1.759.0 1,759.0 1,759.9 0.0 1,359.0- 0,360.0 0.0 600.0 0.0 0.D 690,0 12.139.0 2,759.E 4,759.0 0,059.9 1,200.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600.0 000.0 200.0 600.0 200,0 4,350.0 i5o.1f 51.0 000,0 2,600.0 200.0 600.0 200.0 113,141.1 120,761. 6,110.4 33,103.0 14,215.0 6,950.9 3,5L9.9 1,400.0 1 :1:i WO MIMI MX WV LW IVES BM SW EMI EU MO kW NEIG000R0300 GE6G0AP111C PRDJECI COOS UAFIE COVERAGE NUH0E0 015 HiG IMP IOV£ 1906-92 CAPLTAL HENI PROGRAM PROJECT fUNOUNG SUMMARY FOR PLANt1NG DISIBICI5 OV NEIGII00RNOGUS TA1AL PR€DI) APP110P F01UI1E FUIIOTNG PROJECT TITLE FUNDING APPIOP 1906-07 1007-00 4900-00 1209-90 1960--D1 1591-52 241 WY0I11000 242 UOUL£VARO 241 EDGEWAIER 251 OVENTDWN SINGLE 031056 R. CLEI4EUTE PARK REN 500.0 041150 WYNWO 9I IMPRV PH 1€ 1,200.0 052203 RUEUA VSI. SIAM SfW. 200.0 322025 GPM. 01.12514. 01.E11. 3,504.0 3. 322047 BAK.ARIS COMPLK C0N1 150.0 341113 WYNN, 9T. 114PR. P.-1 600.0 2 6O .0 SINGLE 044190 LNSY IIPKS 00R11 J3 GP 0,150.0 r.. 444193 OR JS/SC11 00 fEA 91Y 35.0 0.0 MULTI 041132 EOGEWTER SI IMP P 11 1,500.0 11.0 313010 REN. FIRE STATIONS 687.E 472.0 SINGLE 052192 HIIIAHAR SIRH S.P00J. 600.0 ' 0.0 341096 E66,1. SI. IHPV. P11-1 2,000.0 2.0110.0 MULTI 041132 EOGEWTER ST IMP P II 1,500.0 0.0 9111GLE 021032 OVIN. tun. ACO. PII-1 3,000.0 0.0 021033 OVIU. L0. AGO. P11.I1 3.000.0 lj/0.0 044195 OG11 ARN PKG LT LO AO 200.0 0.0 444179 OVIII.PKW.GAR.FEA.9Y. 235.0 315.0 MULTI 041144 OVIU. 51. IMP. P11.I1 1.200.0 052253 PUMP SIAJSI RE110VATT0 1.000.0 �0.0 0.0 (5 11 1000) 0.0 295.0 205.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0,11 0.0 1,200 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200,0 0.0 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 . 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,160.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 1,500.0 0.0 0.0 225.E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600.0 0,0 0.0 0,C 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,500.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 1,000-0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1.000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0,0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,200.0 0.0 0,0 200.0 200,0 200.0 200.0 200.0 PLANNINGI B TAM. F 5 21 PLANNING 0151111C4 O 1906-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRUJECI fUN01tlG SUMMARY FOR PLANNING U1S1RIGf5 OY NEIGNRURI10009 CIE IG1i00R11000 GEOGRAPNiC PROJECT COOS HAHE COVERAGE UUMOER PROJECT 1111.E TOTAL 'DEWING PRIOR APPROP APPROP FUTURE FNN0ING 1,906-07 1907-00 1900-09 1509-90 1990-91 1991-92 ;i N 1000) 251 OvERIOWN HUITI 322029 SE 0vER1. P.W R. P-1 20,075.4 22,535.4 0.0 4,443,0 1,093.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 341105 5E OVERT/P W 51. IMP 400.0 400.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 444101 SPORTS 4 EX. f50.5TY 0.0 39,0 35.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 252 SPRING GARDENS SINGLE 052205 S. GARDEN 9IAM SWER9 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 200.0 0.0 341111 NW 0 S1. RO NWY IMP. 600,0 400.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 140111 041144 OVTti, SI. IMP. P11.11 1,200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,200.0 0.0 413004 RIV. 14ARIN. ENNANCI4. 130.0 130.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 263 CENTRAL DOWNTOWN SINGLE 031301 OICENI. PARK SIANIL2 400.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 041135 DOWN' 9T IMP Pil-III 1,000.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 1,000,0 0.0 0.0 041136 DOWN'. LAt1OSC. OEATF 200.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 041142 fIOER. PD. TMPROVM1. )1.0 0.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 041161 NW 1 ST AVE. 31 IMPV 2,020.0 0.0 0.0 1,020.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 044152 OAYSIDE SPLIT C. GAR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 044159 MUNCPL GARAGE N0, 1 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 044200 HUNCTPL GARAGE N0. 2 100.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 311001 CITY ADM. OLOG P11 II 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313020 E1P. Of FIRE AL. Off 516.7 1,120.0 603.3- 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 322030 4AY410E SPEC. CENTER 4.0017.0 4,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 322033 CO11G_ OUICOIMG --LOAN 815.0 615.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331035 FT, OALLAS PK, 0EVL. 390,0 390.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.4 0.0 0.0 PLAfINlliG 0I91R1C1 0 1906-62 CAPITAL IMPI10VEMEIII PROGRAM P110.tEC1 FUN011.1G 9UHMARY FOR PLAIINING 0191RIC15 UY NE140000110005 NE IGNO(RIi000 GIOGRAPI11C PR0.ECl roof NAME COvfOAGE IiUFs0E0 P110.IECT TITLE TOTAL PRIOR APPROP FUTURE FUNDING FUt101NG AP,1 B0P' 1506-07 1001-00 1900-09 1909-90 1930-94 1551-92 ($ 1( 1000) 253 CET4I0,I ODWN10WII SINGLE 331052 H. RtVERWALK P0-11 60.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331221 41AYFR0111 PARK 1411. 1 1,000.0 905.0 103.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331220 OAYFI. P. ADV. AR. 0 912.0 912.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331229 EIAYFI. P. ROV. AR. A 300.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 331230 OFRI PK ROV LGR1 low 1,600.0 1.650.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33%23i OYFI. PK. ROW AHPT14 6,116.0 6,013.0 103.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331232 OAYfI. PARK 11E0EVPH1 110,0 110.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331302 0AYF00111 PARK 1411. 11 7,116.0 0.0 3,674,0 0.0 3,442.0 0.0 341102 0W10. 94. IHPV. PR.1 2,000.0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341115 04411491. 41114. 1414-11 2.000.0 43.0 1,957.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341162 Din 015C OLV 0E9 PIA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341163 0TN 1115 LILV RECONSTC 6,300.0 0.0 0.0 5.350.0 0.0 0,0 351164 060E141 PARK 9ANT 524J 1,550,0 150,0 0.0 0.0 1,0013,0 0.0 354001 46A4I1 ARENA 40.000.0 40.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 413006 PIER 5 1NIEM HARIN F 500.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 420002 H. CONV. C. PK6 DARR 41,674.Q R1,514.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444144 OUST_ P1(6. A0M_ Off 0.0 2,300.0 2,300.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 444147 HNCP. LOT 10 1MPi1VH. 45.0 30.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444165 HuCP. GAR. N0. 2 '40.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 444166 MCP. GAR. N0. 1 160.0 40.0 120.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444172 0FFST. PKG. AO. OFF. 0.0 600.0 500,0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 444173 TILIERCEPT PR1(. G14AGE OS.0 35.0 60,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 • PLANII!NG OISTRICI 0 1900-52 CAPIIAL IMPROVEMEUI pROGRAM PROJECT FUU0IUG SUMriAOY FOR PLAUt11UG 0ISIRICT9 UT NEIG1100IIIIOOUS UE1G1100RI1000 GEOGRAPHIC PROJECT COOE NAME COVERAGE UUMOER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL F UMO I UG PRIOR APPROP APPROP + 1905-07 1907-00 FUTURE FU10OIUG 1500-09 1909--90 1990-9$ 1 9,7 T-92 (3 X 1000) 263 CEITTRAL 00WN1UWt1 95I1GLE 444175 POLO. OEPT, PKG, 1.01 255.4 05.0 231.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 444175 GRAPHIC L SONG, P0RT4 50.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 444170 SKY BRIDGES FIA. SIY 0.0 36.0 35.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444103 DTA P001: H1R PIN IMP 1 225,0 400.0 025.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0%0 444104 WC PARKIUG LOT 42 50.0 0.0 50,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444107 OUPT. P1.2. EX11, HALL 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444100 G0911U ROVLM PROGRAM 1,500.0 0.0 450.0 650.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 043229 OCM(PEOPLE-MOVR)S-11 7.039.3 0.0 0,0 1,959.0 1,759.0 1,759,0 1,755.s 0.0 313010 REN, FIRE STATTOh.1 597.5 472.0 225.5 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 322025 5E OVERT. P.W R. P-1 20,075.4 22,535.4 0.0 4,443.0 1,093.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 341105 9E 0VER1/P W St. IMP 400.0 400.0 4.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 443003 M./WT30N 1. M. Want 255.0 055.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444101 9PORT5 I EX. F90.311 0,0 35.0 30.0- 0,0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 264 LUMMU9 PARK 8111133.E 331034 LUMMU9 P.AREA 02.101. 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 331042 LLLMMU7 PARK REAEYEL. 593.0 03.0 0.0 250,0 210.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 341101 U. RIVER OR. ST. IM. 2,000.0 1.500.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444405 AOJMTS 10 LOT NOS, 25.0 0.0 R5.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 443004 RtV. HAR1N. ENIOANCH. 130.0 130.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E9t ORICKELL W09T MLLLTI 031042 90LLTk19i00 OK RfOYPMT 700.4 0.0 0.4 700,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 4.0 043242 OCM(PE0P0.E-M0V11)5-11 7,239.3 0.0 0.0 1,955,0 1.159.0 4,705.0 1,755.5 0.0 PLAUNING 075111JCT 0 1006-92 CAPITAL II.IPROVEMEIIT PROGRAM PROJECT PUROLRG SUMMARY fOn PLAt1NIMG DISTRICTS BY 0EI6110011110005 NEIGNOOttW000 GEOGRAPHIC PROJECT CODE OAI•IE COVERAGE NUt1t1E1; PROJEGI TITLE TOTAL P1110R APPROP FUTURE FUNDING - - - - _ - - - F000106 APPOOP� 1306-07 1907-00 1900-03 1509-30 1990-91 1931.42 IS X 1000) 291 ORICI:ELL WEST MULTI 052252 SW 6 St STORM-1 SEWERS 400.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313010 81N. FIRE STAII0t19 697.6 472.0 425.E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341033 OR. 10T11 ST PE0 MALL 2.463.0 40.0 0.0 2,4/5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341101 OP1C. T.S. SI. 1MPRV 900.0 900.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 292 ORICKELL NORTH 9INOLE 022037 ADAPTIVE R. fflE 91-4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 031063 1E010 31. PK. DEVPN. 3,706.0 0.0 0.0 2,600.0 1,106.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341099 041EK. PLAZA IMPROV. 0.0 100.0 100.0.. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 031062 90UIR91DE PK REOVP111 700.0 0.0 0.0 700.0 0.0 0.0 (3.0 0.0 043223 DON(PE0P1E-M0V1)5-11 7.234.3 0.0 0.0 1,359.0 1,769.0 1,754.0 1.755.9 0.0 341033 OR. 10TH 9T PEA NALL 2,463.0 40.0 0.0 2,415.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 341101 OR1C. T.e. ST. IMPRV 900.0 900,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 444170 U$ICL. AREA PKG. LDOS 0.0 100.0 100.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 293 MtAHT AVENUE riUL11 341100 WICK. AV, B.R. IriPVM 0.0 600.0 600.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 0.0 294 ORICKELL 301.110 MULTI 341100 OflGK. AV. S,fl. IMPVM 0.0 600.0 600.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444170 ORCL. AREA PKG. L015 0.0 190.0 000.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 295 01•U1tit5LAN09 MULTI 041132 EOGEWIER 9I IMP P II 1.600.0 043229 OCM(PEOPLE-140VR)9-l1 7.234.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,959.0 1,759.0 1,759.0 1,755.9 0.0 PI-ANNLIIG O1S1111cI 0 1906-92 CAPITAL IMPU..JEMEIIT PROGRAH PROJECT FURRING SUMMARY FOR ALAHNIIIG P151RLCT$ OY 11E1GIIUORII0005 HEIGIIOOR=I000 GEOGRAPHIC PROJECT calif NAME COYE8AGE NUMAEA PROJECT TITLE TOTAL PUNTING PRIOR APPROP ----- FUTURE FUNIU11G APPROP , 1906-07 1907-00 1900-09 1000-90 1090-85 199t-92 895 1/A15011 ISLAM) SINGLE 322026 LJAISOII 101. UEVELOPH 1,001.E 049.0 62.2 MULTI 334004 HARLIIA OTRP. IMPROV. 60.0 60.0 0.0 413003 M./N150N I. M. HALM 255.0 265.0 0.0 ($ 1I 1000) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 25 ...r-- IMPfiOV PLANNING D151n CI R 1906-92 CAPITAL PROGRA PR0JEC1 FUNDING SUMMARY FOR PLANN1ifMEF3; I4 G DISTRICTS AND TARGET AREAS PROJECT TARCEI AnEA N01I0E0 PROJECT 11TLE TO1AL FUNDING PRIORI APHID APPROP 1906-0) FUIOIIE FUNDING 1907-00 1000-00 4009-00 1990-91 1991-92 WYRW000 ❑vERTOwN 31056. A. CLEMEOJE PARK RE1i 41132 EOGEWEER 91 IMP P II 41 150 tJfliWO Sr 11-1PRV PR 11 44190 LUST NPKS OOnn J9 GP 52192 MIRAMAA SLAM S.PROJ, 52203 BUENA V5T. Sroi SEW. 373010 REN. FIRE STATIONS 322025 GRM. CI./F50, OT.EI(. 322(14) DAK.ARI9 COMPL% GONE' 341096 EGw1. 51. IMPV. P11-1 341113 WY11W. 9T. TMPR. P.-I 44.193 0R JS/5CN 110 FFA STY TOTALS 21032 OVIN. 1.00. AC0. P11-1 21033 OVIN. LD. ACO. PN.IT 41144 OVIN. UT. IMP. PN.11 44195 DCM Ann PI(G lI LO AO 62206 9. 6480EN SIAM 5wER5 52253 POMP STAIN RENOVAIIO 322029 SE OVERT. P.W A. P-I 341105 SE OVERT/P W SI. IMP (5 X 1000) 500.0 0,0 0.0 205.0 205.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,600.0 0.0 0.0 1.200.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,200.0 0,160.0 0 0 0.0 0,i60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600,0 0 0 0.0 0.0 600,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200,0 0.0 697.E 472 0 225.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 3,604.0 3,526 0 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 0 0 150,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,,0130,0 2,000 O 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 890,0 000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33,0 O 0 35,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 e0,1346,5 7,590 0 400.5 0,455.0 005.0 1,500.0 200.0 1,200.0 3.000.0 0•.0 3,000.0 0.0� 1,200.0 0.0 200.0 01.0 200.0 01.0 1,000.0 0,0 26,675.4 22,6301.4f 400.0 400t0 4 TABLE 6 0.0 1,004.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 1,000,0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,200.0 0,0 200,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 0.0 4.443.0 1,09.1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 O2 PLANNING 0i5IRICT O IS06.92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT FONOING StMMARY f0R PLANNING OISTRICI9 AMU EARGEI AREAS PROJECT TAR6E1 AREA NUMBER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL PR10Rtr APPROP FUTURE FUNDING - - FUNOING APPROP 1906-0) 1907-00 1900-09 1909-90 1990-,91 1991-92 OvER1awN 00wUIOwl 34 1 1 1 1 NW 0 SI RO ti41Y IMP 413004 REV MARIN. EHIIANCM 444179 OVTN.PKW.GAR.FEA. Sr 444101 SPORIS 6 ex F50 51Y 101AL5 31301 OICEHI PARK 91A0IL2 41135 00w111 SI IMP P11-111 41136 00t1NT LAROSE BEM 41142 fLGER. PO IMPROVM1 4116) Nv 1 9I AVE 51 IMPV 43229 OCM(PE0PLE-M0VRT9-II 44152 BAY910E SPL/Y C GAR 441.99 MUHCPL GARAGE NO 1 44200 MUHCIPL GARAGE HO 2 311001 CITY 40M OL0G P11 11 317010 OEN FIRE 01Ai)ONS 313020 ExP OF FIRE AL OFF 322029 SE OVERT P w R 0-1 322030 04r910E •SPEC CE141E0 322033 cOHG 01111.610E -LOAN 331034 L11MM43 P AREA OEAur 600.0 130.0 235.0 0.0 400 0 130.0 35.0 35.0 30,040 4 23,539.4 400 0 ' 0 0 1.000,0 0.0 200-D D. 0.0 71 0 0.0 2.020.0 0.0 7.239.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 100 0 0 _ 0 20.a 20.01 097.5 472.0a 516 7 1,120.0. 20.075.4 44.539 4 4,000. 0 4,000 0 • 615-4 615.0 100.0 1100.04 (5 X 10001 200.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0. 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0- 0.0 0_0 0.0 0.0 0.0 305.0 G.043.0 4.093.0 2.200-0 1,600.0 200 0 D.0 400 a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 0 a 0 0 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.0 0,0 0.0 0 0 0.0 O .0 1,020 0 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,959.0 1,759.0 1.759.0 1,759 9 0.6 a.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a 400,0 0.0 0.0 O .0 0.0 n 0 too a a 0 0.4 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.11 225.5, % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 003.3- 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0_0 4,443.0 1,093 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 O . 0 0 0 0 a o_ o 11 0 0 a 0.0 a 0 0.0 0 a 0 0 0. 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0. 0 0.0 PLANNTNG 0151RICI 11 1906-52 CAPITAL ]l4PA0VEHENI PHOGRAtd P00JEC1 Fu11A1t1G SUMMARY f011 PLA11UifG 015101015 AND TAR0ET AREAS PROJECT 1:.RGE1 AREA 41UI'10E0 PHOJECI 1111E TOIAL PI1101I APPROP FUTURE fu1U1NG F000100 APPAUP 1906-01 4501-440 1900-09 1009-90 4990-91 1991-92 00WN 10410 331035 FT. OALLAS PK. OEVL. 334042 I.UHMU9 PARK RELEVEL. 334050 H. 01VERWALK en-11 334221 OAYFRONT PARK PR. 1 334220 OAYIT. P. AOV. AR. 0 331225 OAYfi. P. ROV. AR. A 331230 Rffir PK AOV 4_041 6OW 331231 OYf6, PK. NOMr AMPFU 331232 GAYfl. PARK Rf0EVPMT 334302 11AYfRONT PARK P11. II 341402 burn, 51. 11-tpV, P4I.1 341403 N. RIVER AR. ST. 1M. 341105 SE OVERT/P 11 ST. IMP 341115 OWN! 51, IMP. PH-41 344162 0111 0150 OLV 0E5 P111 341163 0111015 DO/ 11E110115111 35114.4 OICENT PARK 6A141 Sew 354001 M1AM1 ARENA 413003 M./w15111 I. M. MA111T 413004 411V. MA41114. ECIIIANCM. 413006 PIER 6 INIEM NAR111 F 420002 M. G011V. C. PKG 0A11G (5 N 1000) 350.0 350.0 * 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 653.0 93.0 L 0.0 250.0 210.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 50.0r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 905.04 103.0• 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 912.0. 912,0• 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 300.0 300.0. 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.650.0 1.650.0 , 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,116.0 6,043.0 . 403.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 110.0 110,0 . 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,116.0 0.0 3.674.0 . 0.0 3,442.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,000.0 0,000.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.000,0 1,500.0. 500.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 400.0 1 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.000.0 43.0 . 1.557.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •0.0 5.300.0. 0.0 0.0 6,300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,950.0 150.0 . 0.0 0.0 4,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.000.0' 49,000.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 265.0. 255.0t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 130.0 130.0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600.0 600.0 , 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.074.0 21.674.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' "fb PLANNING DISTRICT D 1906-92 CAPITAL IMP110VEHENT PIIGGRAt4 PROJECT fUt101NG SUMMARY FOR PLANNING 015/01015 AND 1A1IGE1 AREAS 2) PRDJ£CT 1I.I) 1T AREA t1DOI0ER PRO.IECT TITLE T01A1 PU110ENG PRIOR LAPPROP APPROP 19:06-07 FUTURE FUNDING 1947-00 1900-09 E009-90 1990-91 1591-92 (5 X 1000) 0D1d111 OWN 444144 Offal, PKG. AOM_ Off 0.0 0.300,0 8,300.0- • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444147 MRCP. LOJ 1a IHPRVM. 45.0 30.0.• 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444165 HNCP. GAR. H0. 0 40.0 40.0. 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 ..0.0 0.0 444166 HNCP. GAR. NO. I 160.0 40.0- 120.0 0.0 0,0 O.0 0.0 0.0 444172 OUST. PKG. AO, Off. 0.0 600.0 000.0- ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444173 INTERCEPT PRK. DRAGS 05.0 35.0- 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444175 POLC, DIPI. PKG. LOI 256.0 26.0- 041.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444t76 GRAPHIC C 9GNG. PGRM 50.0 50.0'r 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444170 SKY 0RJ00E9 f0A. STY 0.0 35.0 35.0- - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444101 9PORT9 L EX. f50.9TY a.0 35.0 35.0- • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444103 OTA PROC M1R PLH TMP 1,225.0 aoa.a- 025.0 0.0 0_0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444104 WIC PARx1NG LOT 42 60.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444105 A0J419 TO LOT N05. 05.0 0.0. 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444107 OUPT. PL2. E71J1. NALL 50.0 0.13 60,0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444180 GD9MN 80VL1q PROGRAM 4.300,0 0.0. 550.0 650.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 TOTALS 154.976.9 118,443.4 5.195.2 16,213.0 10,104.8 3,059.8 8,759.9 0.0 00H-CD JARGEI AREA 22037 ADAPTIVE R, FRE 51-4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31062 SO17TIISTCE PK REDVPHJ 700,0 0.0 0.0 700.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 31063 TENTH 91. PK. OEVPM. 3.706.0 0.0 0.0 0,600.0 1,106.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 41132 EO0ENIER 9T 1MP P II 1,500,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,500,0 U.0 0.0 43229 DCM(PEOPLE-M0V11)5-11 7,239.3 0.0 0.0 1,959.0 1,759.0 1,759.0 1,705,8 0.0 PLANNING 0T51NIC1 0 190E-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT FUNDING SU1•MMARY FOR PLANNING Ri6TRICTS ANO TARGET AREAS PROJECT IAREEI AREA NubtlER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL Fu110u i0 PR10R APPROP1 APPROP 1,90E-07 *907-O0 F01URE FUNOING 1900-09 1909-90 1990-91 1991-92 t101)-CO 1ARGE1 AREA 52252 SW 6 51 STORM SEWERS 313010 REM, FIRE 91ATIO09 322026 4A150H ISL. OEVELOPM 334004 MARINA 11RP, IMPROV. 341033 OR. 10111 9T PER MALL 341090 ORTCK. PLAZA IMPROV, 341100 ORCK. AV. S.R. IMPVM 341101 URIC. I.S. 51, EMPRV 413003 M./W15ON I. H. MAINT 444110 ORCL. AREA P)Ctl. LOIS IOIAL9 (5 x 1000) 400.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 607.5 412.0 225.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,001.E 049.0 52.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 60.0 60.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,463.0 40.0 0,0 2,415.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600.0 600.0- 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 900.0 500.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 255.0 255.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10,022,0 3,404.0 522.3- 0,0/4.0 2,465.0 3.259.0 1,759.5 0.0 30 ( THIS PAGCWAS-1NT NTIONALLY LEFT BLANK : 31 PLANNING DISTRICT C Summary Planning District C is the southern portion of the city south of Coral Way and east to Biscayne Bay. The proposed 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program for District C includes projects in ten functional categories with a total value of $51,571,000. This represents approximately 9.1% of the capital program. Planning District C is comprised of seven neighborhoods including the off -shore picnic islands in Biscayne Bay. The Coconut Grove Community Development Target Area lies within the district as shown on the map. The Sanitary Sewers category is the largest proposed program area with projects valued at $10,000,000. Sanitary Sewer Improvements in South Grove are scheduled to commence in 1986- 1987. Parks and Recreation projects are valued at $1,699,000. Renovation of parks and park 490 facilitiesli Douglas Park �tNorth Grove AWAV,a-J4j 02114� oti) ory o+. 7w1 A-4-4,44-6 aft 0v rea,gi Marinas improvements total $7,260,000. The renovation and expansion of Dinner Key Marina I valued at $7,200,000 is ongoing in tyre East Fy(a. Grove. Parking Facilities projects amounting to $6,545,000 are ongoing or scheduled over the next six years in North Grove, East Grove and South Grove. Fire Improvement projects valued at $5,233,000 are ongoing in district C. One major project in this category is the development of a fire training facility with a closed circuit television system in the West Grove neighborhood. Street Improvements are ongoing or scheduled in West Grove, Douglas Park, and Silver Bluff. Storm sewers valued at $5,600,000 are programmed for Douglas Park, Silver Bluff and East Grove. Auditoriums improvements to the Coconut Grove Exhibition Center are valued at $3,563,000. Two projects are scheduled for the Coconut Grove Target Area. Both are ongoing and include street and fire improvement projects. A districtwide funding summary by functional category and detailed project listings with accompanying funding schedules for all neighborhoods and the Coconut Grove Target Area are included in the following tables. ,)4 PLANNING DISTRICT C CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 6 ui 4 Cl 43 CORAL WAY S.W. 22 Sr. BIRD RD S.W. 40 ST. GRAND AVE a POINCIANA AVE. of HARDEE AVE. w w DOUGLAS RD S.W. 32 AVE. 4 N l4 396 P� 0 LEGEND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREA CODE NEIGHBORHOOD 331 39I 392 393 394 395 356 33 PLANNING DI TRIG' C 1906-92 CAPITAL IIJPRcVEMENT PROGRAM PLANNING 015TRICT fU1dOTHG SuItMARY DY MAJOR PROGRAM AND fUNC11011AL CATEGORY 1 IOIAL PF11011 APPRDP iuruRE FUNOTNG-»--------- __ PROGRAM fuUCUTONAL CATEGORY f1NOIHG ANPRdP 1906-07 1907-00 1900-09 1909-90 1990-91 199%-92 GENERAL GOVERNMENT GENERAL GGVERHHENT - PROGRAM TOTAL Punt lC SAfE1Y MG RESCUE , PROGRAM TOTAL SOCIAL At/O ECON. EHVIRUNH ECONOMIC DEV£LOPFHENT_ PROGRAM 101AL PARKS At10 11EC0EA110U PARKS AND RECREATION, PROGRAI 101AL PUBLIC FACILITIES AUOII041UI9- HARINA PROGRAM TOTAL TRANSPORIAIION 9TREET9- PARKING- PROGRAM TOTAL 0,645.0 PISYS1CAL E1IVIRONHEl1► SANITARY SEWERS . STORM SEWERS IS N 1000) 0.071.0 461.0 1,4)0,11 1,470.0 1,470.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9,071.0 f, 41 D 1,170,0 1,1)0.0 1,410.O 0,0 0.A 0.0 6,233.0 3t791.0 1,441.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,233.0 3,791.0 1,441.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500,0 0.0 O0u.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500,0 1,666.0 0.0 500.0 0.0 R34.0 1,599.0 534.0 d,567.0 1,400.0 7,260.0 7„260.0 0.0 1,065.0 0.0 1,065.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 963.0 1,200.0 0.0 O.0 0.11 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 10,023,0 6 660.0 0,0 963.0 1,200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,IOA.O 1 600.0 1.550.0- 2,050.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,915.0 675.0 5,070.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 4.0 p_0 1.175.0 10.000.0 0.0 5.600.0 / 600.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 15,600.0 019TRICI 1U1AL 4,420.0 2,050.0 429.0 0.0 0.0 6,571.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 600.0 429.0 5i,571.0 21,121.0 7 ( TABLE . 71 5,5)1.0 0.0 0,260.2 15,119.0 1,070.0 0.0 0,6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0,0 0.0 6.0015.0 0.0 0.0 5,1100.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 +.35 PLANNING 0I91R11C1 C 1906--52 CAPITAL 1HPROMEHEN1 PROGRAM pROIECI FUNUIn6 SUMMARY f0R PLANNIN[j 0191R1Ct5 0Y NEJG1100Ri100i19 NEIG110OR11000 GEOG8AP711C PROJECT CG0£ NAME COVERAGE UUFTLIER PROJECT 111LE 10*Al. FUNDING APPAOP 1506-0) PRIOR a APPROp FllIuli2 F17N01HG 1507-00 1900-09 1909-50 1990-91 1991-62 (5 X 1000) 301 WEST GROVE 'SINGLE 313016 FIRE TRAIN. fACILI*Y 4,630.6 3,315 0 1,210.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 322046 6A PL2 COMM 01111 A591 600.0 0 0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341110 C. GROVE S1. I1.IPROV. 0.0 1.600,0 1.600.0- 0.0 0.0 ,0.0 0.0 0.0 444191 G1119 PARKING LOT 170.0 0.0 170.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 391 OOUGLA9 PARK 5IP*G(E 0SE200 AVALOU S10RM SELLERS 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,000.0 HULII 031065 UAY CARE C. BLOG REP 600.0 0,0 0.0 200.0 400,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 392 S1tVER BLUft SINGLE 341121 S. OLuff SI IMPROV, 2,100.0 0.0 60.0 2.050.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 393 NORT)1 GROVE TINGLE 022049 GRVE HARNA HARKI L10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 331046 KENNOY PK. IHPRvMI... 34.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 331049 WAINwRIG*E1 PAK RENOV 200.0* 00.0 0.0 100,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 434007 OLP SAIL k 1RANG CRT 100.0 00.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 44414E COC1. ORV. L01 N0. 1 0.0 I:00.0 200.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444150 COC1, ORV. LOT NO. 2 175.0 74.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.54 EAST GROVE SINGLE 031051 01N0ER K SEAWALL IMP 765.0• 0.0 O,0 T66,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 033233 C.G.E.0 f0E40 611A109 225.0 0.0 0.0 225.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 033234 C. GROVE E.C. 19ARO. 203.0 0.0 0.0 203,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 033236 CG EX CEN HV WAL PAR 225.0 0.0 0.0 225,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 316231 kLO. COMP. 6 PERIp*I. 0,071,0 4,661.0 1,470.0 1,470.0 1,470.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PLANNING DISTRICT C 1006-52 GAPITAL 1MPR0VEMENT PROGflAI P004EC1 f13N01NG SUMI'IAOY f00 PLANNING DISIRICIS 01 ttEtGNN0A1IVO0S NEIG110001I000 GEOGOAP111C PROJECT C00f NAmE COVERAGE NUMOEfl PROJECT TITLE 134 EAST GROVE 395 500TN GR0VE 101AL PR1011 APPROP FUTURE IUNDING fUUOING APP110+P '1506-07 1501-00 1900-09 1309-50 15310-51 1991-92 SINGLE 333002 COCN.GV.EX0,C1.-AD0. 1,230.0 1,230.0 0.0 333234 C.G.E.C.fLE5C. SEAIL 1,600.0 110.0 0.0 352107 COCNT. GV. 3TM. 9E11. 600.0 600.0 0.0 414005 000. KEY MAR. REN)EX 7,200.0 7,200.0 0.0 444156 COCT. GRV. LO1 NO. 4 0.0 200.0 200.0- MOLT1 3;3010 REN. EIRE STATIONS 657.5 472.0 225.5 334004 MARINA 01IP. IMPROV. 60.0 60.0 0.0 SINGLE 351t74 9. GROVE SAIIIT. SE11. 10.000.0 444154 COCNUI. GOV. GARAGE 6.200.0 ($ N 1000) 0.0 0.0 210.0 1,200.0 0.0 n.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 429.0 9,5711.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PLAHIIING 015TOTG1I 1906-52 CAPITAL IMP1{CIVEItENT PROGRAM PROJECT FUNDING SUMMAFlV FOR PLANNING DISTRICTS AND TARGET AREAS 3? PR0JEC1 1.RGE 1 AREA Nut10ER PROJECT II ILE TOTAL FUNDING PR100 APPROP C,lcONuT GROVE .A.PPROP FUTURE FUNDING 1006-07 1507-00 1900-09 1505-90 1550-51 1951-92 313016 FIRE TRAIN. FACILITY 4,535.5 3.319.0J 1.215.7 322046 60 ni COMM moo A55T 500.0 0. /! 600.0 341110 C. GROVE 41. IMPRQV. 0.0 1,600. 1,600.tl- 444151 GUTS PARKING LOT 170.0 0. 170,0 TOTALS 5.205.5 4,111510 205.7 I��rl-CO TARGET AREA 22045 GRVE MARNA MARK1 LTO 31051 DINNER 1C $EAWALL TMP 31065 1AY CARE C. 0L1G REP 33233 C.G.E.0 FOLOG C11ATR5 33234 C. GROVE E.E. MAAG. 33235 Co E% CEN MV um. PAR S2200 AVALOH 510RM 3E14E1'5 3 13010 HEN. F 1Rk 91AT IONS 315231 ACO. GOMP. 6 PERIPH. 331046 KENHOY PK. IMPRVMT. 331049 WAINWRIGHT PRK REHOV 333002 C000.0V.E11u.CT.-A60. 333232 C.G.E.C.TLESC. SEATO 334004 MAR1NA OTRP. IMPRQV. 341121 3, BLUFF 41 IMPRQV. 351174 6. GROVE 5AN11. SEW. (5 X 1000) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 765,0 .0 4.0 765.0 0.0 0.0 600.0 .0 0.0 200,0 400.0 0.0 225.0 0.0 0.0 225.0 0.0 0.0 203.0 0.0 0.0 203.0 0.0 0.0 226.0 0.0 0.0 225.0 0.0 0.0 6,0A0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 657.5 4)2.0 226.E 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.071.0 4.J61.0 1,470.0 1,470.0 1,470.0 0.0 34.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 4.230.0 1,2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,600.0 1 0.0 0.0 230.0 1,200.0 0.0 60.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 50.0 2,060.0 0.0 0.0 10,000.0 0.0 429.0 9,1171.0 0,0 0.0 TABLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PLA1IHING DISrlticr C 190&-92 CAPITAL TMItGVEMENT PRO&4At1 PROJECT FUU0I0G SUMMARY FOR PLAH111UG DISTRICTS ADD TARGE) AREAS PROJECT IARCEI AREA HU140ER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL FUtIOItHG P0,1011 APPROP APPROP )au6-07 fU1U11E fL1001IEG 1S0)-40 1540-09 1909-00 1954-91 1551-52 (f K 1000) 11011-00 TARGET AREA 352107 COCtIT. GV. SIM. SEW. 600.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 414005 OUH. KEY MAR. REUuEX 7,200.0 ),200.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 434007 OLP SAIL i IRAHG Cti1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 444149 COCE. GRV. LOT 110. 1 0.0 200,0 240.0-- 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0-0 444150 COOT. GRV, LOF NO. 2 115.0 175,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.11 0.0 444154 CIICHUT. GRV. GARAGE 6,200.0 0.0 6,200.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 444156 COCT_ GRV. LOT 110. 4 0.0 240.0 200,0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IOVALS 44,365.5 16,202.0 1.574.5 15,115.0 3.0/0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 3 R 39 -3€ THIS PAGE- AS NTENTI*NAL.Y L F( BLANK was HSI NM WM NEN Val NE4 NSW EBEI NEN VHS RIM Rai ION MO EMI V1S3 lir Mill ® MIMI.IMMI WM REM IMO . EMI Via 1 ELZI`.:..,. • PLANNING DISTRICT 0 Summary The area west of I-95 from Coral Way north to NW 7th Street defines Planning District D. The proposed 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program for this district includes projects in eleven functional categories. The total value of improvements, $52,490,200, represents approximately 9.2' of the six year program. Planning District D is comprised of fifteen neighborhoods. The Little Havana Community Development Target Area lies within the District as shown on the map. Emphasis is placed on street improvements proposed throughout District D. Projects totaling $16,860,000 are ongoing or scheduled to begin during the six years of the program in all neighborhoods with the exception of Auburndale and S. E. Lithe Havana. Parks and Park facilities projects are valued at $900,000. This funding is appropriated to Jose Marti Park in the North Ada Merritt neighborhood. Storm sewer improvements totaling $5,208,000 are scheduled for seven neighborhoods: Audurndale, Coral Gate, Shenandoah, East Citrus Grove, South Ada Merritt, Riverside, and East Miami High. One project in the Auditoriums functional category is scheduled to begin in FY 1988-1989 in Riverside. This project, modernization of Manuel Artime Community Center, is valued at $1,800,000. Other projects include construction of a full service police substation in the Little Havana Target Area, improvements to marinas and stadiums in Henderson Park and Orange Bowl and new parking facilities in Latin Quarter, Shenandoah and South Ada Merritt. District D encompasses the Little Havana Target Area. These projects include park improvements, street improvements, parking facilities, construction of a police sub- station, stadiums and marinas improvements and the installation of a storm sewer pump station. A districtwide funding summary by functional category follows. In addition a listing of projects with their accompanying funding schedules for all neighborhoods and target areas is presented in the following tables. 1 PLANNING DISTRICT D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 7 INN INN N.W. 7 ST. W. FLAOLER ST. S.W. 8 ST. S.W. 16 ST. CORAL WAY S.W. 22 ST. t9 .no NMI ® Ma OM MU N S.W. 17 a ui a isr OMR Ploy 410 w• ,// IA LEGEND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREA CODE NEIGHBORHOOD 411 4/2 471 491 422 103 494 111 112 11s 714 11S 774 ISINI KM WM utS1 11111uS GPM HEST HIA7S! SUII{II fAS1 LIME IIAvAliA A3!buf.IlilA! E CORAL GAIE SHEH111111M ROAM EAST illkuS 1014JVi UAW L'IPIL IIE1tl1111S11It PARK 131111111 POP. niiutlll Sllclii! MIA t!I'f'lii Plvia:I1A 11:1I1'lea iimcruni Hl+,u PLANNING 019TRICJ 0 1906-02 CAPITAL 1MPROV MENT 1'1t0GRAM PLANNING 0151RICT FUNDING SUMMARY RY HAJORIPROGRAM AND Futtc11011A1_ CATEGORY PROGRAM TOTAL FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY FUNDING PRIOR, APPROP APPROP 1506-07 1907-U0 ' FuTuRE FOli01NG 1900-09 1909-90 1990-51 1'51-52 PUBLIC SAFETY I;OLICE - 'FIRE RESCUE - PROGRAM TOTAL SOCIAL AND ECOtt. ENVIRONM if. ,COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PARKS AN0 RECREATION PUBLIC FACILITIES IRAI15PQRTATION PHYSICAL ENVIRutIM£N1 PROGRAM TOTAL PARKS ANO RECREATIONt PROGRAM TOTAL STAOIUM9, 1AU0110RI11M9 i. /MARINA - PROGRAM TOTAL STREETS • 'PARKING • PROGRAM TOTAL J610RM 9£%ER9• PROGRAM TOTAL (9 X 1000) 5,000.0 2,044.0J 2,156.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 657.6 472.0 225.5 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0 0 5,691.6 3,316 c 2,301.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,000.0 D. 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1.000 0 0 0 14.604.0 0. 335,0 4,463.0 2,306.0 4,750.0 2,750 0 0 0 17,604.0 0.1 335.0 4,463.0 3,306.0 6,750.0 3,750.0 0.0 900.0 0 (1 0.0 674.0 226.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 500.0 0.,`0 0.0 574.0 226.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2,690,7 1,446.(0 604.7 640.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1,600,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 900.0 0 0 430,0 1'30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 4,520.7 1,576.{0 504.7 640.0 0.0 500.0 900 0 0 0 16,660.0 6,065.p 1,005.0- 4,100.0 2.660.0 460.0 1,000.0 6 0 1,620.0 35.0 476.0 600.0 0.0 610.0 0.0 0 0 10,400,0 0.504. 634.0-- 4,700.0 2,560.0 970.0 1,000.0 0.0 6.200.0 760.0 100.0 600.0 200.0 590.0 2,352.0 200 0 6,200,0 750!f0 100,0 600.0 200.0 950.0 2,352.0 200.0 DISTRICT TOTAL 52,490,2 14,554 0 2,707.2 TABLE 10) 11,157.0 6,372.0 0,610.0 0,002.0 200.0 PLANNING 11I51RIC1 1906-92 CAPITAL IMPROVE101 PROGRAM PROJECT FUN0111G 90M 14991 FOR PLANNING Q'i51111Ci3 NY 11E14110O13110009 11E IG1108411000 GEOGRAPHIC PA0JEC1 1'OOE NAME COVERAGE NU1.18E0 PROJEC1 ITILE TOTAL FUNDING PR14R APPROd APPROP 1'906-07 190)-00 FUTURE FU80100 1000-09 1909-90 1990-51 1991-92 411 WEST CITRUS GROVE MU1.11 041127 W.L.R. SI IMP PH -II 11,10U.0 341109 W.L.HV. SI. 1MP.PH 1 2,000.0 2,000. 472 WEST M1AM1 MULTI 041127 W.L.N. 9T IMP PH -II 2,100.0 O.h 313010 AEN. FINE S1A1TON9 697.5 472.�0 341109 W,L.IIV. SI. IMP.PO I 2.000.0 2,400.0 473 5.E LITTLE HAVANA SINGLE 322045 L11LE FIVAN 9EHR Cr 8 400.0 0.0 444190 LT HV SPCL CT FEA 9Y 35.0 0.0 MULTI 021029 LT8. 1181. MIX UPE PJ 3.200.4 0.10 022034 LIN. 001, HOTEL 2,000.0 0.11 022036 LT. 0T. SPLIT. CIR. 3.000.0 0.0 0411]0 LIN. 441, SSAUTII'CT. 1,000.0 0 451 A0001100411 492 CORAL GATE 493 511ENAt10OAH 91NGLE 044201 FGER 51 TO CY LM-5 L 052200 AUORN_ 9T0074 SEWERS 91N6L£ 044197 5W 0 91 TO CY LIMITS 052193 ENGLEW000 9TRM. AEU. 510.0 300.0 01.0 0..0 (5 X 10001 0.0 0.0 2.100,0 0.0 4.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 225.5 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 D.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 3.200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 1,000.0 1,0110.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 250.0 250.0 250,0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 610.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 600,0 .0 0.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 SINGLE 041140 CO, ME. PL2./M£.61..v. 149.0 341129 911400 91 IMPMT PH 11 2,100.0 0 0 .0 .0 0.0 13.4 136.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2,050.0 0.o 4.0 0.0 0.? TABLE 11 g pyI E, MI I -WIM EON on EMI KM era WM - MA LIM rt' ,1 _�,; , .I PLANNING 0151RJC1 0 1906-92 CAPITAL 1MPOOVEME111 PROGRAM PROJECT FUNOENG SUMMARY fail PLANNING alsfRlCT9 UY NEIGI10ORN0005 NElGN0011N000 GEOGRAP111C PROJEC1 TOIAL C00£ t4AME COVERAGE U9MUEII POOJECI 1111.E FUNDING P010R APPROP APPROP 1906-07 1907-00 f01011E futi01tiG 1940-09 1909-90 1960-91 1991-92 (5 11 1000) 493 SIIENANDOAIH SINGLE 352176 9NEtiAN. 9100A1 5iWfAS 600,0 500,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 O.0 0.0 444100 P0.9U0.31A.PK.GA4.f. 0.0 35.0 35.0- 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 MULTI 021029 LIN, DAI. MIX OPE Pi 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 3,200.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 022034 L10. OR!. HOTEL 2,000.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.000.0 1,000.0 0,0 0.0 022036 LT. 01. 9PLIY. CTR. 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 t.400.0 1.000,0 0.0 0.0 041127 W.L.R. 31 IMP PH--I1 2,100,0 0.6 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 441130 ITN. 0111. NEAUTIfC1, 1,000.0 4.0 0.0 250,0 250,0 250.0 250.0 0.0 041147 E.L.IIVN.9I.IMP.P-111 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 341109 W,L.11V. UT. IMP.PI1 I 2,000,0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 491 ROA65 SINGLE 341112 R05. AR. 91. IMPRMI. 0.0 1,200.0 1,200.0- O,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 771 EA51 CITRUS GROVE 912101.E 05220t GLENRYI. 9TOAM SEWI1. 600.0 0.0 O,6 0.0 0.0 33.0 567.0 0,0 MULTI 021029 LIN. ORI, MIX UPE Pi 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 022034 LIN. OR!. HOTEL 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 1,000.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 022036 11. 01. 5P1.TY. 9111. 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000,0 0.0 0.0 041127 W.L.N. 51 IMP PN-II 2,100.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 041130 1,221. 0111. 5EAU1I1C1, 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250,0 0.0 341109 W.L,1IV. 31. IMP.PII I 2,0160.0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 772 ORANGE (OWL SINGLE 032229 ORAGE OWL WNELCIIR f. 032231 ORtio OWL AOONAL PR f 115.0 0.0 0,0 115,0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.0 0.0 : '# NLAl1HIHG 0151R4C1 0 t505-1)2 CAPI14L 1MPfiOVEMEli1 PnOGRAM PR0,E01 FUti01H6 2Ur161ARY FOR PLAHH1HG 015111ICT5 OY HEIG1100n110005 11E 1G1100RU004 GE0GRAPl11C PROJECT Cont 11At1E COVERAGE HUHOER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL FUH01HG PntOR APPROP APPOOP FUIUIiE P0110111G 1300-07 1207-00 1500-09 '1909-90 1490-91 1251-92 772 ORANGE 0011E (5 11 1000) 5111LLE 332001 OOHGE 0 SEAT. n P 11 1.343.4 560,0 250.0 625,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 332220 ORANGE OOWL CIIAROACK 254.) 0.0 234.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 332230 01110 BWL-9LA4,JOISI 420.0 420.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 332232 0000 OWL RECIP/PfES9 450.0 450,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 M0111 021029 L111, 001. HIT( UPI PJ 3.200.0 0.0 0.0 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 022034 Liu. an!. HOTEL 2,000,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 1,000,0 1,000.6 0.0 0.0 022030 1.1. OI, SPLIT. CTR_ 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 1,000,0 1,000.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 041130 Llti. O2i1. BEAUIIFCI, 4,000.0 0.0 0,0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.4 0.0 041147 E.L.i1V1f.91.IMN.P-I11 1,000.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000 0 0.0 052253 PUHP IIAIH REIiOVAIIO 1.000,0 0.0 0.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 344022 4. LIT. NAY. 31. 1f1. 2.040.0 2,059.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341124 E.L.HAV 31 TMP PH 21 2.100.0 0.0 60.0 2,050.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 773 IIE00ER500 PARK 4ULT2 021029 11H. OOT. MIN UP( PJ 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 3,204.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 022034 Lyn. 001. 1101E1 2,000.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.4 022035 LI, 01. SPLIT. CTR. 3,000,0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000,0 0,11 041130 LIN. act. UEAUTTFC(. 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 254.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 041147 E.L.HVH.01,1MP,P-111 1,000.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 341052 E. L11. 1IAV. 61. IM. 2,960,0 2.869.0 04.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341124 E.L,IIAV 91 114P pa i1 2.T00.0 0.0 60.0 2,050,0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 413004 fily. MARTH. EtiHANCM. 130.0 130.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 15 11111 SIN Nei ISM MI EMI 111111 1111111 11111 11111 MN NMI LW UM MR Oa MEM1 it on m - is Asa Um sue au. ass WI CM MU ciaa L3L,;1 I'LAt1HU11G 013111ICE 0 1906-32 CAPIEAL THPROVEMEtt7 PROGRAM P00JEC1 FUfilluG SUMMIT FUR PLAt11iIN4 DlSTIIICIS 0Y t1EI6I100000005 11E101100011000 6E000APAIC PROJE0E COOS ukmk COVERAGE WINDER PAOJECI TITLE IOIAL FUNU106 APPROP 19.06-07 PR4OR ,. APPROP FUIUIIE FUH01110 1907-00 l900-01 1202-90 19'J11-91 1991-92 (5 2 i000j 7)4 Ha0r0 AOA MEORITI SINGLE 031226 J.M. RVA P. OV P-III 900.0 0.0 0.0 674.0 226.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NULTI 021020 E. LIT. 11VA. HIOu9, 3 000,4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 022035 MIA. RIFAi. RET2A111. 6,000.0 0.4 0.0 0,0 0.0 2,600.0 2,500.1E 0.0 041147 E.L.IIVH.9E.IMP.P-111 1,000.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.D 0.0 341092 E. LTI. W.V. SI. IM. 2.660.0 2,065.0 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 341124 E.L.IIAV 5T IMP pH 11 2,100.0 0.0 60.0 0,050.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 413004 REV. MAR1H. EHIIA7CM_ 130.0 130.0 0.4 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 775 SOUTH AOA NERRITT SINGLE 352104 LAWREHCE PUMP 57A17f. 350.0 260.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 MItLII 021020 E. LTI. 11VA. 0009. 3.000,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 022035 141A. RIFRI. REIZATR. 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,600.0 2,500,0 0,0 041147 E_L.IiV71.ST.IMP.P-I11 1,000,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 052252 SW 6 St 9100M SEWERS 400.0 0.0 0.0 400,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 052253 PUMP STATII AEIIOVATI0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 200,0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 341062 E, LIT. IIAV. 51. IM. 2.560.0 2,565.0 51.0 .0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341124 E.L.HAV St IMP PH II 2.100.0 0.0 60.0 0.050.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 776 RIVERSIDE 3111GLE 033003 MOZT. OF MU. AR. COM 1,000.0 052202 LAWREtICE SIRH 9 P 7E 1,500.0 MOLT1 021029 LIN, OA1. HIx UPE Pi 3,200,0 022034 1111. 001. HOTEL 2,000,0 D22036 LT. 0T. SPLTY. CIR. 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 900.0 S00.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.0 1,435.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,200.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0,D 0,0 0.0 0.0 1,1100.0 1,000.0 1,000,0 0.0 0.0 1E 1'7 PLAHHIHG DiS4flicf 0 1906-92 CAPITAL 1HPROVENEHT PR0G11AM PROJECT FUNDING SUt9HAflY FOR PLANNING 0I81Ai0T5 BY HEILHOOflHO005 NEI00U040000 GEOGAAPIIIC PROJECT COOS NAME COVERAGE NUFIOER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL FATOH rAP1'10P FUTURE FU110ING FUNDING APPROP 1506-07 1907-00 i500-09 1909-.50 1990-91 1591-92 (S )1 1000) 776 RIVERSIDE Mull! 041130 LIH. OAT. OEAUTI1CT. 1,000.0 0,0 0.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 0.0 041147 E.L.NVN.9T.IMP.P-1I1 1,000,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 341092 E. LIT. 3AV. 9T. TM. 2,560.0 2,063.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34t124 E.L.IIAV 91 IMP Pit IT 2,100.0 0.0 60.0 2,050,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 )7) LATIN QUARTER 512406E 041141 47. FOL. ;ERR. 00110. 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 460.0 460.0 0.0 0.0 341006 LATH. QUA. 51. IHPR. 2,000.0 2,000.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444150 LITTLE NAVANA LOT 3 610.0 0.0 U10.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI ..4102E LTN. 0A1. HIM UPE pi 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 022034 6121. not. H0261, 2,000,0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 022036 LT. OT. SPLIT. CIA. 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1.000.0 1.400.0 0.0 0.0 041130 LID, OAT. OEAOTTFCT. 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 250.0 250,0 260.0 250.0 0.0 041147 E.L.HVH.91.ihlp.P-11I 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 1 400.0 0.0 341092 E. L1T. HAY. UT. TM. 2,560.0 2,065.0 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341124 E.6.11A6 91-1116 611 11 2,100.0 0.0 50.0 2,050.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 770 EASE MIAMi H150 012406E 052209 LANIIVIEW 51RM 9E54EA9 450.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 150.0 0.0 MULTI 021029 LIB. OAT. NIX UPE PJ 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 3,200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 022034 LIH, OAT, HOTEL 2,000.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 022036 LT. 0T. 9PLTY. CTR. 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 04112) U.L.H. 91 imp P11-11 2,i00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 041130 LIH. ORT. OEAUTIFCT. 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 250.0 250.0 050.0 250.0 0.0 M01.11 34i106 l7.1.11V. 5T. IMP.Pii I 2,000.0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 779 Silk UN06TEAHi11E0 510151E 312000 S. 111510. 6016. 61105 5,000.0 0.044.0 R.106.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IISMI OaEMI INSMS OSlaa 1611 SinMS EN UV Ingin - 11261 N MI fJ;ia PLANNING DISSTRICT 0 1906-92 CAPITAL IMP OVEHEH1 PROGRAM PROJECT FUNDING SUIII4AIr( FOR PLANING 019101C15 AIIO TARGET AREAS PROJECT TARGET AREA H1IHOER PROJECT TITLE 10TAL PO1001 APPOOP FUNDING APP,Il0'P 1906-07 F010RE FUNDING 1901-00 1900-09 1509-90 1990-51 1991-52 LITTLE t£AVANA 21020 E. LIT. OVA. 110U9, 21029 LIH, ORT. H111 OPE PJ 22034 crU. OAT. HOTEL 22035 HIA. R1FRT. RETZATN. 22036 L1. 01. SPLIY. C1R. 31225 J.H. RVR P, 0V P-III 32229 ORAGE OWL WIIELCIIR F, 32231 OOt1G OWL ADONAL PR F 33003 HOZ1. Of MU. AR COH 41127 W,L.11. 91 IMP PH -II 41130 LIN. 0AI. ILEA0111C1. 41141 W. f6L. 'ERR. Ou1FG. 41147 E.k.I1VH.9T.IMP.P-111 52201 GLEHRYL. 510RH 9EWR. u2202 LAWREIICE S1RM 9 P 11 52209 LAWIIVIEW SIAM SEWERS 52252 SW 6 5T 910RM 9EWER9 52253 PUHP 91ATN RENOVAIZO 312000 5. 019111. POLC. 9005 313015 RE0. f1RE BTAT1ON5 322045 LTTLE £IVAH BEHR CT 0 3320111 00110E 0 SEAI. R P II 3.000.0 0.0 0.0 3.200.0 0.0 0.0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 6.000.0 0,0 0.0 3.000,0 0,0 0,0 500,0 .0.0 0.0 ' 115,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 1 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 1,On0,0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 O.O 0.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 1,500,0 0.0 0.0 1 150.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 1.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 5.000.0 2,04.0 2,166.0 69).5 4).0 225.5 300.0 C.0 300.0 1,343.0 66E1.0 250.0 TABLE 12 i (5 K 1004) 0.0 1,000.0 1.000.0 1,000.0 0.0 3,200.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.500.0 2,500.0 0.0 1.000.0 1.000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 674.0 226.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 415.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 900.0 900.0 0.0 0.0 2.100.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 250,0 250.0 250.0 250.0 0.0 00.0 460.0 460.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 33.0 667.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.0 1,435-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 0.0, 400.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 525.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 R PLANNING 015TNICT 0 1106-U2 CAPITAL IMPROVENENT P000LU4 P1y0JECT FUN01116 501.1MARY FOR pLANNIHG 015101C15 AHD IARGET AREAS PROJECT TARGET AREA HUMQER PROJECT TITLE T01AL F UN0 106 PO1011 APPROP 1,pPOOP FUTURE P0110106 1005.07 1907-00 1900-09 1909-90 1390-91 1901-92 (S It 10001 LITTLE IIAVANA 332220 011ANGE 00WL CIIAROACi4 294.) 0.0 254.7 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 332230 ORNG OWL-9LAO,J019T 420.0 420.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 332232 ORNG Ova RECEPIPRE99 450.0 450.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341006 LATH. 0411. 9T. IMPR_ 2,0110.0 2.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341092 E. LIT. IIAV, 9T, IM. 2.360.0 2,065.0 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34ti09 W,L.HV. 0T. 1HP.P0 1 2,000.0 2.000.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 341124 E.L.HAV Si IMP 1111 II 2,100,0 0,0 50.0 2,050.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352iO4 LAWREUCE PUMP STAIN. 350.0 250.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41)004 RIV. MARTH. ENNANCM_ 130.0 130.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444150 LITTLE HAVANA LOT 3 510.0 0.0 610.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444190 LI 11V RAGE. C1 fEA 9Y 35.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IO1AL3 47,023,2 42,0;1.0 3.072.2 0,494.0 6,236,0 7,400.0 0,002,0 200.0 N0t1-CO TAR0E1 AREA 21029 LTH. ORT. MIX UPE PJ 3,200,0 0.0 0.0 3,200.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22034 LIH. 0R1. NOTEL 2.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 $.000,0 0,0 0.0 22036 LT. 0T. 9PLTY. CIR. 3,000,0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 41127 W.L.H. 9T (HP PR -II 2,100,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4i130 L1N. 001. REAIITIFCI. 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 050.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 0.0 41140 £O. HE. PL2./HE.OLV. 149,0 0.0 0.0 13.0 136.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41147 E.L.RVt:.S1.IMP.P-I11 1.000,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 44'57 SW 0 ST TO CY L1MI19 600,0 0.0 0.0 600.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 44201 F6ER 9T ID CY L1.1-3 1 510,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 510.0 0,0 0.0 1.9 INN OM UN MI SEMI *MI IOW .Es3 mu ECMLW CO 134)04. PLAt1HIt4G D13TRICT D 1406-92 CAPITAL 1MPROVEMEHT PROGRAM Pfl0.1EC1 FUNDING SUMMARY F011 ',EARRING 015T111015 AHO 'TARGET AREAS PROJECT )ARGEI AREA HUF10Efl 14104fCt T17LE TRIAL FIRMING PRIOR APPROP FUTURE FUNDING APFROP`+ 1506-0) 1007-00 1900.-05 1900-50 1090-51 1001-52 (S x 1000) tiON-co URGE) AREA 52155 ER61E14000 SI014. SEW. 400.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 52200 AUOIIN. 0100M SEWERS 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 300.0 0.1E 0.0 341104 W.L.I1V, 01. 114P.PN 1 2,000,0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341112 R05. AR. 41. TMPRMI. 0.0 1,200.0 1,200.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341123 SIIADII 51 1MPMT P11 11 2.100.0 0.0 50.0 2,050,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352176 SIIEHAN. 910RM 5E4ER5 500.0 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 444100 P0.5U0,514.P(.GAA.E. 0.0 35.0 35.0- 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IOl'ALS 20,467.0 4,543.0 1,105.0- 7,113,0 4,406.0 3,460.0 2,050.0 0.0 50 51 THIS PAGE WAS LLY mo Oa MS Vial NO CO so CM Ca Oa GO CM IIIII 41111 N MN 1 t WIZ mil/ V,1^. ANHING DISTRICT E wary Planning District E is the western portion the City of Miami. The proposed 1986-1992 pital Improvement Program for District E cludes projects in five functional categories at are valued at $43,266,500. This represents proximately 7.6% of the capital program. Planning District E is comprised of four !ighhorhoods as shown on the map. There Is no rget area within the district. The majority of funding for District E is •ogrammed for sanitary sewer improvements. iese projects valued at $20,100,000 are :heduled in all four of the district's :ighborhoods; West Flagami, Fairlawn, Kinloch irk, and LeJeune Gardens, The area encompassing tanning District E is one of the last sections the City to obtain sanitary sewer service. Storm Sewer projects are valued at i6,600,000 and programmed in all four _ighborhoods. Parks and Park Facilities projects total 1,035,000 and are ongoing or proposed in West iagami, and LeJeune Gardens. The following tables include a districtwide funding summary ,by functional category for District E and a list of projects and! their accompanying funding schedules for each of the district's neighborhoods. N I NG DISTRICT E IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ELAQLEI St 7f N.W. T ST. 2- 1ji I , , • , r Sit S.W. 67 AVE. !1 5 a 10 u7 r S.W. 8 ST. S.W. 47 AVE. S.W. 42 AVE. N.W. 14 ST. AYE. DOUGLAS R LEGEND CODE NEIGIi6ORII00D tail Ill •.l I I N.tS I :'11 1AIPIfall 11110111 f'4111: 'rt14 11 111911 1.A1'It 1iS 53 r .. M IOW ON . . . E . WI PLANN1RG OT9110IC1 E 1906-92 CAPt TA1 imewvEnenr PAOGAAy4 PLANNING DISTRICT FUNOutG SUMMARY OY MA OR PROGRAM A00 FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY TOTAL 1'110CRAM FUHCTTONAL CAI£GORY FUt1OT1lG POT.11 APPROP APPIIOP FRIUIIE FUNOING 190E-07 1907-04 1900-09 1'305-90 1990-91 1991.92 P110LIC SAFELY FiHE RESCUE)/ PROGRAM 101AL PARKS A110 RECREATION PARK ANO RECREATION PROGRAM TOTAL TRANSPOAIAtION STREETS/ PROGRAM TRIAL PIIYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 9AN[IARY SENEAS 910RM SEVERS PROGRAM 101AL DISTRICT YOTAL (5 X 1000) 1,031.E 47.0 1,450.E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,931.fi 47Z.0 1.459.E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.035,0 2.015.0 0.0 1.961.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,035.0 2.074.0 600.0 600.0 600.0 20.100.0 16,600.0 0.0 1.561.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i 6Q0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, tl.0 10.300.0 1.B00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.691.0 1.300.0 609.0 2,720.0 1.800.0 1.210.0 1.450.0 36.700.0 26,091.0 2,500.0 43,266.5 29.37.0 3,959.5 1 TABLE 13 1) 609.0 2.720.0 1,500,0 1,210,0 1,450.0 2.650,0 2.720.0 1,600.0 1,210.0 1,480.0 54 PLANNING OIST IICI E 1506-92 CAPITAL INi'l1O)EP1E111 PROGRAM PROJECT fU1lDING SUMMARY FDR PLAIIIILNG 0151RIC1S ay NE1G1100R110009 ItE 1GIIU01111000 GEOGRAPOIC PROJECT I:lfI NAME COVERAGE NUMDER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL FUNDING , P11101 AAPRDP FDIORE FUNDING APPR02' 1906-07 1907-00 1900-09 15119-50 1990-91 1991-92 (5 1 1000) MULTI 351273 N. FLAGR SNIRY SEWER 4,515.0 4,616.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59i W£51 FLAGA14( SINGLE 031061 FLAGM PARK RCR. 0L0G 250.0 0 0 0.0 250,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 052211 FLGAMI STR74 5WR P 11 300.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a51173 FLOM. SOTO. 5£W£RS 3,700.0 3,200 0 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 352102 FLAGM. S10RM S. P11 1 1,600.0 1,600 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 592 fAIRLANi1 51NGLE 042155 W. END 51. 9EW.PR.11 1,500.0 052200 WE31 END P1MPG. 51A. 2,000,0 301169 WTti0NA 9ANIT. SEWERS 4,900.0 351176 FATRLAWN S. 9AN S. I 2,000.0 MULTI 313010 REN. FIRE 9IA110h9 057.5 352102 FLAGM. 810RM 9. PN 1 1,50(1,0 352190 1A.11. Of. SEW. PII.II 1,000.0 5S3 KINLOCR PARK O 6.50 .0 1.71.0 4r .o 1,60 .0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1,500,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0./5).D 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 300.0 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 225.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SINGLE 052207 GRANADA STORM SEWERS 400,0 0,0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 19.0 341104 NW 47111 AV. I14PROV. 600,0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352177 LEJ. 31. SEW. PM.51. 0.0 2.500 0 2,600,0- 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 352101 LEJNE, STORM SEWERS 0.000,0 3.600.0 2,000,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352105 f0LWN. STORM. SEWERS 3,000.0 91.1 0,0 609,0 2,2220.0 0.0 0.0 mini! 351160 S. FLGLER SANTY SEWR 2,905,0 2,905.1i(i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352190 IAI•I1, SI. SEW. PN.11 1,900.0 0.0 1,000.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 : RBLE 0.0 0,0 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 009.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 381.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PLANNING OISEAICT E 1005-02 CAPITAL IMpAOVFMENI PAOGAAM PROJECI FU110ING S14PIIIAAY FOR PLANNING O15IRICTS BY EIEIGI1U1RII000S 1EIGNU0011000 GEOGAAPIEIC PROJECT CFIQE MARE COVEAAGF NUNOER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL F01101NG PRIOR APPROP APPROP 1ea5-o7 11107-0a FUTURE FU,1010G 1000-00 1909-10 1990-91 1951�-92 ($ x 1000) SSA LEJIUN£ GAR01U9 SINGLE 052103 DURNAM 9I0AM SEWERS 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 313220 EXP. i MO0. OF FA S1 1,234.0 0,0 1,234.0 0.0 0.0 331143 AN101110 MCO OK OEVFM 3.205,0 1,054.0 0.0 1,431.0 0.0 416047 MYLREISE G. C. IAR. 500,0 220.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 MULTI 361160 3. FI.GLER SA44IY SEN0 2,905,0 2.005.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 351273 N. FLAGA SNIAY SEWER 4,515.0 4,515.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 157 PLANNING OISIHICfT E 1906-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT pRAGRAM PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY FOR PLANNING DISTRICTS AND TARGET AREAS PROJECT 1A06E1 AREA NUMBER PROJECT TITLE L11TLE HHAVANA TOTAL FUNDING PRIOR APPROP APPROP 150GL07 1507-00 FUTURE FUNDING 1900-09 1909-90 1590-91 1991-92 351273 N. FLAGR 9N1AY SEWER 4,515.0 4,615.0 TOTALS 4,515.0 4.015,0 NON -CO TARGET AREA 0.0 0.0 (5 X 1000) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31061 FLACK PARK RCA. 8400 250.0 0.0 0.0 260.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 52193 OURHAH STORM SEWERS 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,600.0 0.0 0.0 52159 W. EHO S1. 5E11.P11.1T 1,600.6 0.0 0.0 3 52206 WEST ENO PUHPG. STA. 2.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,151.0 t3a9.o 52207 GRANAOA STORK SEWERS 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 0 301.0 62211 FLGAMT 9111M SWR P I1 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 300.0 313010 HEN. FIRE 51A11082 697.E 472.0 225.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313220 ExP. i H00. Of FR SI 1,234.0 0.0 1,234.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331143 ANTOH1a MCO PK OEvPH 3,205.0 1,051.0 0.0 1,4 31.0 0.0 0.0 0,a 0.0 341104 HW 4710 AV. 1H5001/. 600.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 351160 5. FLGLEH SANTY SEWR 2,505.0 2.905.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 351169 WINO1NA 9ANIT. SEWERS 6,500.0 6.500.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 351173 FLGH. 9NTH. SEWERS 3,700.0 3,200.0 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35117E FAIRLAWN 9. SAN 5. 1 2,000.0 1,700.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 351273 N. FLAGR 9NTRY SEWER 4.615.0 4.015.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352177 LEJ. ST. SEW. PH.ST. 0.0 '2,500.0 2,500.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352101 4EJNE. STORM SEWERS 5,500.0 3,500.0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 352102 FLAGH. STORK S. P11 1 1,500.0 1,800.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35210E FH1.Wt1. STORM. SEWERS 3,000.0 91.0 0.0 609.0 2.220.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352150 TnMt. 51. SEW. pil.Il 1,000.0 0,0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 416047 AiELREE9E 6. C. IRR. 600.0 220.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 43,266.6 29,737.0 3.055.5 2,650.0 2.7:'0.0 1.5110,0 1,210.0 1,490.0 TABLE 15 Les Oil Mill On ea an PLANNING DISTRICT F Summary Planning District F comprises the area of the City north of NW 7th Street to the Airport Expressway and east of 1-95 to the western City limits. The Proposed 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program for District F includes projects _.in- j jne1 functional categories that amount to a total of $44,855,100. This represents an approximate r.1.9% share of the proposed capital program. Planning District F is comprised of eleven neighborhoods and the Allapattah Community Development target area as shown on the map. Street improvements valued at $12,400.000 are scheduled for the 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program in most neighborhoods. Parking Facilities projects valued at $6,935,000 are scheduled for the 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program. One project, the .ivic_ Center Garage, valued at $6.500,000, is scheduled to begin during FY 1986.1987. Storm Sewers improvements are programmed for Santa Clara, Civic Center, N. Grapeland Heights, North and South Sewell park and S. Grapeland Heights. These projects are valued at $13,400,000. � , One q Irmo llt -4 evelopinent project, the Allapattah Mercado involves the development of a shopping center facility to become a major neighborhood commercial center and is valued at $3,500,000. Parks and Park Facilities projects are valued at $2,860,000 and are ongoing or scheduled for the six year program in Santa Clara, Comstock, Curtis Park and North Sewall Park. Renovations of fire stations are ongoing in three neighborhoods: Santa Clara, Civic Center and Robert King high. These projects are valued at $3,349,700. Other capital projects programmed for neighborhoods in District F include Stadiums, Marinas, General Government and Storm Sewers improvements. A districtwide funding summary by functional category for District F and a listing of projects with their accompanying funding schedules for all neighborhoods and target area are presented in the following tables. aimAIP ILA) CaAA9661 PLANNING D STRICT F CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 9 I. t) N.W. 38 ST. Ili 4 N.W. 20 ST. -P- N.W. 14 ST.: N.W. 7 ST. WW. 27 AVE. N.W. 28 ST. r- .W. 22 AVE. ui Id C.1 AIRPORT EXPRESSWAY N.W. 7 AVE. co N.W. 20 ST. 59 LEGEND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREA CODE NEIGHBORHOOD 631 SABI?. (I Alti 632 (WWII: 633 NI MU 634 CEVIE pARK 635 ClvIC WHO( 636 lAtrait 691 WWI 61:110intl 692 1101.111 SEM 693 AMIN ElfI6 111611 694 9.413 PDX 69S 963 1 6PAPLI.A.N9 i11I6111S PLANNING 019TRIC 1506-92 CAPIIAL IMPROVE ENT PROGRAM PLAHUING 1719TRICT ERODING SU1•IHANY By MAJOR Pj1UGRAM ANO EUNCI l011AL CATEGORY 101AL PNOGt1Al1 fUNC1IONAL CATEGORY #UN01NG PRT911 APPII1IP GLNECAL GOVERNMENT J GENERAL GUVERNMEIII • $05.4 PR0GRAMJ TOTAL O PULIC SAFETY FIRE RESCUE a PROGRAM TOTAL SOCIAL AND ECON. ENVIROUM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PROGRAM TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION Pu13LIG FAGILITIE5 TRANSPORTATION PIIYSIOAL ENVIRONMENT PARKS ANO RECREATION / PROGRAM TOTAL /9IAOIU3-15 MARINA PROGRAM TOTAL 9IREET9 6 PARKING •- PROGRAM TOTAL SANITARY SEWERS j STORM SEwER9 • 0.0 105.4 0.0 APPI1OP --- EUIUNE FUNNING 19013-07 1907-00 19011-05 1505-50 1950-91 1991-92 (5 X 10001 0.0 105.4 0.0 0.0 105.4 5,345,7 3,040.0 j 307.7 0.0 5,349.7 3;042.0 3,000,0 307.7 0.0 2,000.0 12,500.0- 5,000,0 6.000.0 2,060.0 1,450,0 2,060.0 1,490.0 775.0 775.0 130,0 130.0 905.0 905.n 12,400.6 6.335.0 50.0 300.0 2.500.0- 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,010.0 0.0 1,010,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,651.0 1,945.0 0.0 0.0 1.551.0 1,949.0 0.0 360.0 0.0 360.0 0.0 0.0 , 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 2,450.0 0.0 9,100.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 4,260.0 9,635.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19,335.0 360.0 (5,005.0 0.0 2,100.0 1.040.0 1,000.0 4,200.0 1,100.0 13,400.0 0.0 ( 0.0 1,100.0 5.114.0 ( 113.0- P130011A14 TOTAL 14,500-0 5.414.0 0151R1C1 101AL 44,055.1 13,701,0 0.0 G.0 3,555.0 1,000.0 0,600.0 115,0- 4,539.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 200.0 1,000.0 9,600,0 200.0 200.0 6,775.7 6,014.4 4,260.0 5,951.0 3,949.0 4,400.0 TA8LE 16 ) PLANNING 0I5I111cr f 1006-02 CAPITAL 7MPROVFMEtI PROGRAM PROJECT FUROIHG SUMMARY FOR PLAI4HIHG 0I5 RICT9 By HEIGIIH110110009 HEIG0110RR000 GEOGRAPHIC PIIoJEC1 COOE HAIIE COVERAGE HUPIUER PR0JEC1 TITLE IOIAL FUNDING PRIOR PpllOP FUTURE FUtib1HG APPROP 1`'06-07 1507-00 1900-00 1009-90 1050-61 103i-92 63I 9A4UA CLAIM 632 C014STOCK 633 MELROSE 91NGLE 052191 1.10E11UIIST 9TRM. SEW. 1,500.0 ' 0,0 0.0 322032 ALLPli. 91i0PHG CEI,IER 0.0 2,000.0 ',000.0- 322043 LIVE L LET LIVE PROJ 300.0 0.0 300.0 331039 1400RE PK. REIIEVLPMI. 1,050.0 1,150.0 0.0 332236 HIAMI 510. ROOF RPR. 415,0 475.0 0.0 352103 WGHER CREEK RN. P-II 8,000.0 $,000.0 0.0 403004 M 92. P0251 .008 RPRS 300.0 300,0 0,0 MULTI 022040 MERCA00 IN ALLAPAIAN 0.500.0 0.0 0.0 041120 E. ALLAP 9T IMP p it 2,100.0 0.00.0 041155 E ALLP SI 114P PH III 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 313010 R£N. FIRE HTAT10H9 69T.5 472.0 225,5 444159 ALLP. R0. PRJ. PH. I 200.0 200.0 0.0 MULTI 022040 MERCADO 11i ALLAPAFAH 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 041149 ALLP. SI. IMP.PII.IIJ 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 34111D ALLP, 5T IMPR. p11 II 2,600,0 50.0 2,450.0 444159 ALLP. RO. PRJ. pH. I 200.0 200.0 0.0 SINGLE 051276 HW 36 SI 9AH 9EW IMP 1,100.0 HULff 022040 HERCA00 1H ALLAPAIAN 3,500.0 041145 ALLP. ST. IMP.PII.111 4,000.0 341110 ALLP, 9T IHPR. PH IF 2,800.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2,450,0 TABLE 17 WM MS We KMIna eV 11121111 OS NSW Mill Wig IS K 1000) 0.0 1;500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 w 0.0 0.0 1,551'.0 1,949.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,551.0 1,949.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,004.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,100.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,051.0 1.549.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ICU gaZa eta Ma iln= PLANNING 01STI11C1 F 1505-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM P110JEC1 fuNRING SUM1TA*Y FOR PLANNING 0151RTCT9 OY NEIGN00R110005 NEIGIIU000U00 GEOGRAPHIC PROJECT coo NAIIE COVERAGE NUMOER PRO.IECI TITLE 101AL FUNDING PRIOR APPIIOP APPIIDP 1905-07 1901-00 FUiuRE FUNDING 1500-09 1009-90 1950-31 1991-'92 633 MELROSE 634 CU11115 PARK F1UL11 444153 ALLP. 00. PI*J. PH. 1 200.0 200.0 (s X 1000) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 51NGLE 331043 CUR115 PARK IMPROV. 970.0 300,0 0.0 310.0 360.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 MOLII 041145 ALLP. 51. IMP.P11.111 1,000- 0 0,0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000,0 4.0 341110 ALLP. S1 TWA. P11 II 2,500.0 50.0 2.450.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 635 CIVIC CENTER SINGLE 352230 W6. CK. KENOV. P-111 1.000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444174 101 140. 0 11. TECH 60 25.0 05.0 0.0 0.0 , 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 041120 E. ALLAP ST IMP P 11 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 041i55 E ALLP ST IMP P11 111 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 313010 REN. FIRE STATIONS 697,5 422.0 225,5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 656 JACKSON SINGLE 011002 CM14. MAINI S.A. P-11 50.0 0.0 0.0 60,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 011003 M. POOL O.S. A0 P I1 95,4 0.0 0.0 55.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444i53 .1K9. MEMRL. PKG. L01 75.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444194 MOCC MEW. CMPS Ff 5Y 35,0 0.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444202 MOCC MEOCL CMPS GARO 6.500.0 0.0 6,500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 041120 E. ALLAP ST IMP P II 2.100,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.100.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 041155 E ALLP S1 1MP PR III 2,100.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100,0 651 N. GRAPELANO HEIGHTS SINGLE 352100 GRAPELANO 9100M 3EWR 4,500,0 1.101.0 0.0 3,399.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352109 GPLAO. PMPG, 91AT1RN 0.0 113.0 113.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PLANNIUG 0151111C1 F 1906-52 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT fUt€01NG SUMMARY FOR PLANNIIEG DISTRICTS OY UE1G110001I0003 1UE 1GR001111000 GEOGRAPI€IC PROJECT COLIC NAME COVERAGE DUMBER PROJECT TITLE 101AL F111101NG PRIOR `APPROP APPRUP 1906-0) FUTURE FUrtila& 1Bal-Oa 1900-00 1909-90 1930-91 1391-92 (S K 1000) 691 N. GRAPELARD 11E1GIIIS titan 041156 GRAPELAIIO $1 IMPIIVMI 2,I00.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G92 N0R1€I SEWELL PARK MULTI 041133 9EWEL PART( 91 IMPR0V 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 052194 LAO. WIWY. ORG./DKIi. 2,600.0 0.D 0,0 0.0 100.0 R,400.0 693 R00ERT KItIG RICH SINGLE 313015 F. OR. 9T, 3 MO. EX. 2,652.E 2,530.0 02.2 0.0 0,0 0.0 MULTI 413004 RIV. HARTN. ENIIAIECM. 130.0 130.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 694 SOUTI1 SEWELL PARK SINGLE ]521/5 0G, Bt. PMP. 57. MD. 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 041133 SEWEL PARK 9T IMPRaV 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000.0 052134 LAN. W4WY. DRG./BKU. 2,500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2.400.0 052253 PUMP STAIN RENOVAII0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 .200.0 200.0 200.0 695 S. GRAPELA€I0 NE141i19 9111GLE 444160 ALLP. R0. PRJ. PO.II 100.,0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MULTI 041156 GRAPELA€40 ST IMPRVt41 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a 200,0 200,0 a.0 0.4 0.0 2,100.0 G3 PLA1i11lf1 1S1R1` fj tsa6-sa CAPITAL iMPROVEMr"HIt PROGRAM PROJECT F0110ING SUMMARY FOR PLANNING 1119 111CT5 AI10 TARGET AREAS PROJECT IARGE1 AREA I10HRER PROJECT 111LE 10IAL FUNDING ,PRIOR APPROP` APROP EUTORE FURRING 4-07 1903-00 1900--09 1909-911 1990-01 1501-02 ALLAPAITA II 11002, CHI4. MA111T S.P. P-II 11003 M. POOL 11,9. AO P II EZ0411 MERCA00 IN ALLAPATA1 41120 E. ALIAP ST IMP P II 41145 ALL?. St. IMP.PII.I11 41155 E ALLP Si IMP P11 III 5i2T6 nw 36 ST SAN SEW IMP 52191 PINEIIORST 51RM. SEW. 313010 REN. FIRE 51.4110145 322032 ALLP11. SIIOPNG CENTER 322043 LIVE 6 LET LIVE PROD 331039 moose PK. REOEVLPMI. 331043 C0011S PARK IMPI,OV. 332236 MIAMI 310, A00? NPR. 341110 ALLP. 91 1MPR. Pli 11 352103 wGNER CREEK RN. P-11 352230 WG. OK. RENOV. P-111 403004 M ST. PRESS 00K RPR9 444153 JKS. MEMRL. PKG. L01 444159 AL1.P. All. PRJ. P11. I 444174 LOT N0. 0 R, IECU GR 444194 HOGG MEOL CHPS FF SY 50.0 0.0 0.0 66.4 0.0 0.0 3,500.0 0.0 0.0 2.100.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 2.100.0 0.0 0,0 1,100.0 0.0 0,13 1,500.0 0.0 0.0 697.5 472,0 225.5 0.0 2.000.0 2 000.0- 300.0 0.0 300,0 1.090.0 1,100.0 0.0 970.0 ,'t00.0 11.0 475.0 475.0 0.0 2,500.0 •60.0 2,450.0 2,000,0 2,000.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,1100.0 0.0 300.0 300.0 0.0 75.0 75.0 0.0 200,0 200.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 35.0 TABLE 18 ) (4 71 1000) 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 1,551,0 1,945.0 0,0 0.0 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,100.0 1.100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.500.0 0.0 0,0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 700.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 310.0 360,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 d.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `65 PLAUntua UiSrntCT F 1506-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT Fun01NG IIIMMARY FOR PLANNT NG DISTRICTS ARO TARGET AREAS PROJECT TARGET AREA nuHOER PROJECT 111LE TOTAL PRIOR APPROP FUTURE FINIIRG P4n01R0 APP110P ' 190E-I) IS07-00 1900--09 (909-90 1990-91 1991-92 ALLAPAF TA11 444202 mace HEOCL CMP9 GROG TOTALS fQR-CO 'TARGET AREA ($ x 1000) 6,600.0 0.0 6.600,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0,11 25.0)2.0 9,60),0 6,)10.5 2,215.4 3,960,0 1,651,0 3.745.0 2,100,0 41133 9EWEL PART( OT IMPR0V 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 411.56 GRAPELANO ST IMPRVME 2,100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 2,100,0 52194 LAO. WEWY. ORG./OKR. 2,600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2,400.a ' 0.0 0.0 52253 PIMP STAIN RENOVATED 1,060.E 0,0 0.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 313015 F. GR. 21. 3 HO, EX. 2,652.E 2,670.0 112.2 0,0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 ]521)5 06. 111. PMP. 9T. M0, 100,0 100.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 312100 0RAPELA00 9TOID1 9E140 4,600.0 1,101;0 0.0 3,355.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352100 GALAD. PIIAG. STATION 0.0 113.0 111.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 413004 111V. MAOER. EnIIANCM, 130.0 130.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444160 ALLP. RO. PRJ, PR.I1 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 TOTALS 14,002.2 4,014.0 69.2 3,699.0 300.0 4,400,0 200.0 2,300.0 PLANNING DISTRICT G Summary Virginia Key. the 1500 acre barrier island off the Rickenbacker Causeway in Biscayne Bay. defines Planning District G. The smallest of the planning districts in land area, District G is comprised of one neighborhood - Virginia Key . Three projects valued at $11,570,000 are proposed for this district in the )986-1992 Capital Improvement Program. This represents 2.0% of the proposed, capital program. Of these three projects, one is ongoing and two are scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 1987-1988. The ongoing project is the Virginia Key Park Development project and is valued at $10.750,000. The two other' projects include marine stadium improvements. The following tables include a funding summary by functional category for District G as well as a project listing with their proposed funding schedules. PLANNING DISTRICT G CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 10 LEGEND CODE NEIGHBORkiOOD B11 YIIU.i[!IA KEY 67 PLANNING DI !MCI G 1006-52 CAPITAL IPPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLANNING DISTRICT fUNA1NG 811t•i$ARV fly AJAR PIIOGRAI4 A1111 FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY PROGRAM TOTAL, PRIgII APPR1P FUTURE FOURTt1G FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY F01101100 APPROP 1506-47 1507-00 1900-00 1949-90 1050-51• 1091-52 PARKS AND RECREATION PUALIC FACILJIJIS IS x 1000) PARKS ADO RECREATION 10.750.0 50.0 0.0 4,240.0 2,700,0 1,570.0 750.0 340.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 10,790.0 50.0 0.0 4,240,0 2,700,0 1,5/0.0 750,0 340.0 STADIUMS 520,0 0.0 0.0 020.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 PROGRAM TOTAL 020.0 0.0 0.0 020.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0,0 DISTRICT TOTAL 11,570.0 1750.0 0.0 5,OG0.0 2,700.0 1,910.0 740.0 340.0 PLARRTNG 019TR{CT G 1906--92 CAPITAL IHPRO,J MEIiU PROCRAiI PRoJEC1 FUilOIGG SUMMARY FOR PLARRIN'G 0T5TRIC15 By NEIGII00Rt10003 NEIGUOORU000 GE0GIIAPOIC PROJECI GOOF NAME COVERAGE I(UfIRER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL FUUOITIG PRIOR APPRAP APPHOP 1506-07 FUTORE 1OiiOIUG 1907-00 1900-09 1901-90 1990-91 $994-92 09$ VIRGINIA KEY SINGLE 032000 MARINE 9TA01U1.1 1MPRV 470.0 032233 MRNE 51A0I1 CONC PL R 350.0 331044 Y. KEY PARK OFVELOP. 15,750.0 50.0 TBLE 20" (5 X 1000) 0.0 410,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 350.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.240.0 2.700.0 1,970.0 750.0 340.0 69 PLAfTNIfIG I4i51RIC1 G 1906-92 CAPITAL IHIROVEHENT PROGRAl1 PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY FUR PLA%IUIIIG DISIR1CT$ AND TARGET AREAS PROJECT TARGET AREA NUMOER PROJECT TIILE TOTAL FUNOIRG Piildn APPROP - - - - - - FUTURE FUNDING 1901-00 1960-09 1909-90 APPROP 1006-07 1940--91 1991-92 (5 X 1000) NOR -CO TARGET AREA 32000 MARIIIE STADIUM 1I4PRV 470.0 0.0 0.0 470.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 32233 HRNE 91ADIi CONE PL 0 350.0 0.0 0.0 360,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331044 V. KEY PARK DEVELOP. 10,750.0 750.0 0.0 4.240.0 2,i00.0 1,970.0 750.0 340.0 TOTALS 11.5)0.0 750,0 0.0 5.050.0 2.700.0 I,0)0.0 750.0 340,0 { TAME 21' -------- - ,---- "\\ ...-- (7, THIS PAGE WAS IrtTEHT19,140,,LitET BUM/ '-'---) / (-) .p I) (i. .,---- ,,,,, N. CITYWIDE Summary The 1986-1992 Capital Improvement Program projects found in this Citywide portion include those projects that cannot be attributed to a specific location. These capital projects benefit all of the City of Miami's 63 neighborhoods and are listed separately from the projects presented by district, neighborhood, and target area. Citywide projects are classified within eleven functional categories and are valued at $124,799,300, approximately 22.0% of the capital program. Housing Programs improvements valued at $74,400,000 are scheduled Citywide. All of the Housing Programs projects are ongoing. Included in the 1986-1992 CIP are the Citywide Land Acquisition Program and the Affordable Rental Housing Development Program. Fire projects that are to be implemented Citywide are valued at $10,362,800. Citywide Police projects total $4,821,000. These projects include improvement of the police computer system and operating facilities. Storm Sewer projects, valued at $8,411,00C are proposed Citywide. Sanitary Sewer projects proposed Citywide are valued at $3,009,000 an( include modifications to the existing sewet system where required. Street Improvement projects that an implemented throughout the City are valued a $7,400,000. They include rebuilding loca streets, paving improvements, and th beautification of streets. The following tables present the 1986-199 Capital Improvement Program by functiona category and a detailed listing of all Citywid projects including the proposed fundiri schedules. GI1Y TOE 1906-02 CAPl1AL 1 PROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAtJn*nG T119TRIC1 funoltG S11pIMARY OY AJO0 POGGIIAM AND FunCTI0t1Ai GAIEG00Y TOTAL. PROGRAM FUIIGTIONAL GAT1GORY FORDING PR OR APPROP . AP ROPi 119D6-07 1907-00 FUtU11E ftROMIG 19110-05 1905-90 1590-91 1591-92 (5 11 1000) i.1RERAL GUVERNI4ENI GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,003.0 0.0 0.0 1,523,0 640.0 503.0 217.0 0.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 0,003.0 0.0 0.0 1,523.0 640.0 503.0 217.0 0.0 PUOLIC SAFETY POLICE 4.021.0 4,044.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 EIRE RESCUE /f 10,362.0 0,5226.0 035.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -Mµµ 0.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 10.103.0 14,3)7.0 036.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 / / 500!AL AHD EGgN. ENV[RONM II0091NG / 74,400.0 41,500.0 32,500.0- 32,500.0 32,500.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 COMMUNITY OEvELOPMENI 579.0 379.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 74,579.0 42,279.0 32,500.0- 32,705.0 32,600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PARKS AND RECREATION PARKS AND RECREAFIOI*/ 10,274,0 2,622.0 3,950.0 300.0 3,452.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r 1 PROGRAM TOTAL 10,074.0 2,5542.0 3,960,0 300.0 3,452.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAOSPORIATION STREETS l 7,400.0 700.0 1,700.0 1,000.0 1.000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 PARKING/ 357.0 202.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , 1 PROGRAM TOTAL 7,757.0 002.0 1,775.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 1 f PJJySICAL EtlVIREmmENT SANITARY 5EWE05/ 3,009.0 1,000.0 2,005,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 STORM SEWERS^ 0,411.0 3,811.0 000.0 000,0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000,0 001.10 WASTE i i,302.5 0.0 2,302.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROGRAM TOTAL 13,722.5 4,811.0 11,111.5 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 01S1RICT TOTAL 124,799.3 54.741.0 20,016.7- 36,323.0 30,432.0 2,303.0 2.017.0 1.000.0 ABLE 22 ) f *7 3 f ASQ-' GITY17IUE 1906-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT. PROGRAM PROJECT FUNI3Ettl SUMMARY FOR PLANNING 0I91R1C19 OY NEIG11R0R1ID005 NE1600091(000 GEOGRAPHIC PROJECT COPE NAME COVERA•'£ HUE•10ER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL FUNDING PR IMOR APP110P APPROP 1906-57 1907-44 FUTURE FUtttL1iG 1900-09 1909-90 1990-91 1991-92 900 CITYWIDE (S 11 1000) SINGLE 031466 C. ACCE99I0. IMPROV, 2.060.0 0.0 0.0 700,0 640.0 031079 PK9. LGItIG. SYSTEM 100.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 60.0 041139 CTWO. GIWY, BEAU. P. 200.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 041159 RED OOWK5 6 ST 07/32 2,500.0 0,4 0,0 600.0 500.0 041160 CYWO PVG IMPRV 07/92 2,600.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 600.0 052231 LC. DR. PRJ. FY00/91 4.000.0 0,0 0.0 000.0 000,0 312004 POL. P11. IV SYS. EHP 1,747.1 2,725.0 977.9- 0.D 0.0 312005 PUGH. OF POL. IIELCOP 0.0 1,200.0 1,200,0- 0.0 0.0 312010 MOD. 061, TEAM. RFM. 977.9 0.0 977.5 0,0 0.0 312014 POLC. COMPIER EtIIIA6IC 096.0 096.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 312015 POL. FAC. EXP./REMO. 1,200.0 0.0 1,200,0 0.0 0.0 313212 fR.OEPT.G0M,A0,015P. 2,216,0 2,216.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313213 FR. DEPI. APP. RPLI#. 56.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313214 FIRE ;RAF. L.C. 5YST 450.0 350.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 313215 ADV. FIRE PROD. EYES 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313216 PROT. BREATH. MART 300,0 300.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 313217 F. RISC. AP. 20. AC0 1,792,5 800.0 092.E 0.0 0.0 313210 Ff. APPL EQUIPMENT 631.3 390.0 141.3 0.0 0.0 313219 FR,AP.ACO.REP.fi MOO. 5,003.0 6,300.0 297.0- 0.0 0.0 314232 GEOGR. INFORM. 9Y9T. 023.0 0.0 0.0 023.0 0.0 321022 0EM0L. 0f SUDS. 0L0. 379.4 379.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 321024 AFFOR. RENTAL (USING 73,400.0 0,400-0 0.0 32,500.0 32,500.0 903.0 217.0 0.0 0.0 11,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500,0 500.0 600.0 500,0 500.0 600.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0'0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 c1 CITYWIDE 1906-92 CAPITAL EMP110VEMEN1 PRIIGOAM PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY FUN PLANITIOG DISTRICTS BY NEIGHBORHOODS 0E1000000000 GEOGRAPHIC PROJECT CODE HAPIE COVERAGE NUMOER PROJECT TITLE TOTAL P4100 , APPROP FUTURE FUNDING 2111101140 APPROP' 1906-07 1907-00 1900-99 1905-90 1590-91 1951-92 100 CITYWIDE IS X 1000) SINGLE 321.026 CYWO. L0. ACO. PRO. 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 321027 AF. RI. HOU. O. PRO. 0.0 32,600.0 32.500,0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 331095 SWMNO. POOL AEMOPM.1. 600.0 650.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 331259 FLA. E.C.A 6ETTLEMNT 2.002.0 1,032.0 0.0 250,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 331303 HEIGH. PARK RENOVAT. 7,402.0 0.0 3,960,0 0,0 3.442.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341150 AEO. SW. 6 Si. 06/0) 500.0 0.0 600,0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.4 0.0 341152 CYWO ST. IMPVM 06-07 1,200.0 0.0 1.200,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 341153 CW. PVG. IMP. FY/06 700.0 700.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 351170 CIWO. Sli. SW, EXAM. 1,505.0 900.0 609.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 351171 CIYW 9All) LATER *5002 0.0 75.0 75.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 351100 CW. SN. SEW. LT. MO, 0.0 21.0 25.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 351274 CW SAHTY SEW EX IMPV 500.0 0.0 940.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 351275 CTlYWO SANTRY REPLAC 1,000.0 0.0 1.000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352100 LOCAL ORANGG PR0JCT9 2.011.0 2,011,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 4.0 0.0 352232 LOC. 04H, PAO. FY 06 000.0 000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 352251 LOCAL ORANGE PROJECT 000.0 0.0 000.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 373001 6LO WST COL EOP AOST 792.0 0.0 752.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 373002 FE9 i STC 90Y INC PA 110.0 0.0 110.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 373003 WSTE C0LLCH MIN SITE 363.0 4.0 363.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 373004 WST COLLCT MIMI-911E 363.0 0.0 363.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 373005 Si C SOWK 9WPG E0 PR 714.5 0.0 714.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 444171 PKG. LOT MAIN1E. 467.0 157.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5111GLE 444177 MTA. VEC. 11EP1. P06- 200.0 125.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75 YW�E G11 1906-92 CAPlIAL 11iPRUVEtiE tll YIIUGRAM PROJECT FUNOIUG SUMMARY f0R PLANNING 01SIR1CTS AIUO TARGET AREAS PROJEGI TA0CET AREA NUMUER PROJECI TITLE TOTAL PRIOR, , APPROP FUNDING APPROP 1906-07 FUTURE fUNUING 1507-00 1900-09 1909-00 1990-91 1991-92 CIi¥W10E 31(366 C. ACCESSITI, II•*PROV, 3107E PK9. LGTNG. SYSIEM 41139 GTWO, 0TWY. OEAu. P. 41169 0E0 90WKS 6 ST 07/92 41160 CYWO PVG 1liPRV 67/92 52231 LC. OR. PRJ. FY00/9i 312004 POL. PU. IV 9Y9. EXp 312005 POC11. OF POL . 11ELCOP 312010 M00. 041. TERM. R1M. 312014 POLO, COMPIER ENNANC 312015 P0L- FAC. EXP./REM0. 313212 F11.OEPI_C0M.A0.019P. 313213 FR. OEPI. APP. RPLM. 313214 FIRE TRAF. L.C. SYSI 313215 ADV. FIRE PROD. EYES 313216 PROT. BREATH, APPART 313217 F. RESC. AP. EU. *co 313210 ff. APPL EQUIPMENT 313219 FR.AP.ACO.REP.6 MOO, 314232 GEOGR. INFORM. SYSI. 321022 OEMOL. Of SUDS. OLD. 321024 AFFOR. RENIAL 091116 2,060.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 200,0 0.0 2,500.0 0.0 2,500.0 0.0 4,000.0 0.0 1,747.1 2,725,0 0.0 1,200.0 871.9 0.0 096.0 096.0 1,200.0 2,216.0 2,2i6.0 50.0 60.0 450.0 350.0 20,0 20.0 300.0 300.0 1.792.6 900,0 531.3 390.0 6,003.0 6,300.0 023.0 0.0 3)0.0 379.0 73,404.0 0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 077.9- .200.0- 977.9 E5 X 1000) 700.0 50.0 200,0 000.0 604.0 000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 11,200.0 0.0 640.0 60,0 0.0 500.0 500.0 000.0 503.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 600.0 000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 092.5 0.0 0.0 0,0 141.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 297.0- 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.4 023.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32,500.0 32,500.0 0.0 ( J I L E 2 f) 217.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 600.0 500.0 500,0 000.0 000.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 j:; CITYWIUE 1906-S2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT P000IIAM PROJECI FUIIDIUG SUMMARY f00 PLAHHIHG DISTRICTS AIIO TARGET AREAS P004ECI 1A4GEf AREA HAt10E0 PROJECT TITLE TOTAL PRIOR , APPROP FUTURE FUH0TIIG PUII01816 APPROP 1906-07 1007-00 1500-05 1909-90 1990--01 1951-92 C11YW10£ 321026 CYWD. L0. AC.O. P00, 1,000.0 1,000.0 0.0 321027 Af. RT. H0U_ D. PRO. 0,0 32,500.0 32,500.0- 331099 9WMNG. POOL RE110VIH, 650.0 690,0 0.0 331259 FLA. E.C.H 9ETlLEMHT 2,002.0 1,032,0 0.0 331303 HEIGH. PARK REHOVA0. 7,400.0 0.0 3,050.0 341150 REO. 9W, i ST• O6107 400.0 0.0 500.0 341152 CYWO 91. IMPV14 05-07 1,200.0 0.0 1,200.0 341i53 CW. PVG. 1MP. FY/05 700.0 700.0 0.0 351170 CTWA. 9H. 01.4. EXAM. 1,609,0 500.0 609.0 351171 CTYW 3AHT LATER MODE 0.0 75.0 75.0- 351100 CW. 941. SEW. LI. M10. 0.0 25.0 25.0- 351274 CW SAHTY SEW EX IMPV 600.0 0.0 500.0 351275 CITYWO SAHIRY REPLAC 1,000.0 0.0 1,000.0 352t00 LOCAL ORAIHG PROJC19 2,011.0 2,011.0 0.0 352232 LOC. ORH. PRO. FY 06 000.0 800.0 0.0 352251 LOCAL 11RAHGE PA0JEC1 000.0 0.0 000.0 373001 9L0 WS1 COL E0P AOST 752.0 0.0 752.0 373002 'Es 4 51C SOY 1HC PR 110.0 0.0 110.0 373003 WSTE COLLCH MIN SITE 363.0 0,0 363.0 373004 WST COLLCT M1H1-3ITE 363.0 0.0 363.0 373005 5T 6 90WK SWPG E0 PR 714.5 0.0 714.5 444171 PKG. LOT MAIHTE. 157.0 157.0 0.0 4441)7 MLR. VE0. REFL. P11G. 200.0 125,0 75.0 TOTALS 124,799.3 64,741.0 20,016.7.- (5 X 1000) 0.0 0,0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 250,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,442.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 36,323.0 30,432.0 0,303.0 2,017.0 1,000.0 1`77 SITE UNDETERMINED Summary The projects listed in this section include those proposed capital projects that as yet do not have a determined location, and are valued at $2,449,000, approximately .4% of the Capital Program. Projects that have an undetermined location include: three:,,.poklceylmpr!ovement,aprojects: --a- Pal_ice mm-Suppor.tu.Senv-lee--Fac_ij�jty,�a�rlew,�Police ©utdoor---Firearm Tra ining.-Range.::=and a Pol ice Property Unit and Aka Pound Facility. -Tice-one .project--pripased in ,the-Stadiums..Categoryljscth. - / onstrucirion--ofr a-4ifelodrome;'.a\-::.bicyle-<racingt- r facility. -Also included in- t is —sectlon fis) the' construction f�a` new fire station -to service the Lsouthwestern_part..o'-f.:,the-City:service A funding summary by functional category and a listing of the projects and their accompanying funding schedules are included in the following tables. 511E UHOIRM01001Si0E CITY 1906-92 CAPITAL IMPi1OVE EHT PROGRAM PLAHNTRG UI51RIC1 fUH01NG 5LH1HARY 0Y MAJOR 1{RO6RAif ARD FD1:F11011AL CAIEGOAY TOTAL PROOFFAM 'IMMORAL CAIEGORY FUHOING µ0100 APP1JOsi APPROP -•-- F11URE F01((JjNG 1506-02 1997-00 1900-05 , 1509-50 19U0-51 1591-52 pURLIC SAUEIY PUULIC fACILITIfS POLICE 2.145.0 4,6,1.0 fiff fif9CUE 0.0 2,500.0 PROGRAM 101AL 514010p15 PROGRAM 10TAL 2,405.0- 2,500,0- (5 )1 1000( 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 2,105.0 7,171.0 4,905.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 264.0 14.1 0.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,5 L r1 264.0 14I0 0.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.55 019101C1 TOTAL 2,440.0 7,1 (T: 4,905,0- 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D,D 911E UN0141-I0/4111 IOE CiiY 1906--92 CAP1[AL 1MPOOVEMENr PftOGOAH PROJECT FunD1NG 9UMMA111( Fait PLAI1NIRG U191111CT5 OY NE10II004110005 101AL P1110a FU1fD1RG APPft0P NE1Gt100RUi000 GEGGOAPIIIC PROJECT C00[ RAW COVERAGE flutt4ER POOJECr rrreE APPIIOP FuflftE FUH0111G 1906-117 1007-04 1400--09 1940-90 1900-91 1091-92 ($ x 1000) 95 stlE uI0EIEOHINEa sit-0LE 012006 PULICE SUP. SER. FA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 312011 POLL. OUTO, F. RANGE 0.0 1, 99.0 1,594.0- 0,0 312012 POLCICE P00P41. UN11 E.t09.0 3, 72.0 007.0- 0,0 313017 REW FIRE 9A110N a 10 0.0 2 400.0 2.500.0- 0,0 332227 VEL00IiOME 264,0 14.0 0 0 250.0 f//TABLE 241 i I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 a.0 0.0 0.0 Slit UOOIRMO/OUTDT0ElCUT. 1006--92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT fUHOTtJG 91J•tAOY fon PLAUUJJTHG a141RICTS AND TARGET AREAP PROJECT TARGEI AREA HUMLIER PROJECT 1TIiE TOTAL FUNDING P,RT0R APP00P APPROP 190fi-07 FUTURE f0N01NG 1907-00 1900--00 1404-00 1040-91 1051-9E HOJ1-00 TARGET AREA tape's POLICE PUP. DER. FA. 312011 POLO. OUTO. F. RANGE 31a012 POLCICE POOPRT. UNIT 313017 NEW FIRE OA€IOt1 M to 332221 VELOOROME 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,094.0 1.099.0- 0,07E.0 007.0- 0.0 e.600.0 E.B00.0- E64.0 14.0 0.0 E,445.0 7.104.0 4,406.0- (s X 1000) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 250.0 0,0 250.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DRI Project #6197 JAN86R Revised May, 1986 RESPONSE TOAUESTION 11 TRANSPORTATION Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 4225 Salzedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 S.E. OVERTOWN/PARK, WEST NOTICE The response to Question 11 - Transportation, has been revised in its entirety. With the exception of approximately ten (10) pages in Section 11-A all other pages have been revised. However, the magnitude of the revisions vary considerably. For example, Section 11-D has been rewritten with substantial changes in the content and analysis. In conjunction with this, Table 11.9 has been revised and a new Table 11.9A has been added. Tables 11.3, 11.5 and 11.5A have also been revised by providing traffic data not included in the original submittal. Information previously contained in Appendix 11-2 (Permitted Developments) has been included in Appendix 11-3(R) (Permitted Development Data) and all other Appendices moved ahead one number. (i.e. Appendix 11-9 is now Appendix 11-8(R). Information on mitigation costs have been included in Appendix 11-5(R) and discussed in Section 11-D. The remaining sections of this Question (11-A, 11-8, 11-C, 11-E, 11-F and 11-G) have had only minor spelling, grammatical or page numbering revisions. Typically, page numbers have increased due to the inclusion of additional data on Tables 11.5, 11.5A, 11.9 and 11.9A. Detailed intersection capacity analyses (Appendix 11-8(R) have had minor changes due to some modification in traffic projections. 0487RL QUESTION 11: - TRANSPORTATION A. COMMITTED, PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 1. ON MAP J, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA DEFINED AT THE PREAPPLICATION CON- FERENCE, HIGHLIGHT THE ROADWAY SEGMENTS AND CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS INCLUDED IN THE RESPONSE TO QUESTION 11. The traffic impact area was mutually agreed upon, during the preappli- cation conference, with the staff of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. The traffic impact area (Map J-A) is a combination of three components. First, is the major street network within the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment DRI study area (Map J-B) which is generally defined as 1-395 on the north, North 5th Street on the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east and, I-95 on the west. Included within this area is the Miami Arena located on a parcel of land bounded on the north by N.W. 8th Street, on the south by the FEC railroad right-of-way, on the east by N. Miami Avenue, and, on the west by N.W. 1st Avenue. The Miami Arena DRI Application for Development Approval was submitted during April, 1986. The second component of the traffic impact area is the major roadway system serving the Downtown Miami DRI study area (Map J-C). The Downtown Miami DRI study area which includes the Omni, CBD and Brickell sub -areas, and is generally defined as North l7th Street on the north, South 15th Road on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and Metrorial, I-95 and the FEC Railroad on the west. An Application for Development Approval (ADA) for the Downtown Miami DRI was submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on November 25, 1986. The ADA is presently under review by Council staff. The Port of Miami, although outside the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment DRI and Downtown Miami DRI study areas, has to be included for traffic analysis purposes, because all. Port related traffic utilizes the street system within these areas. A Development Order for the Port of Miami was issued in December, 1979 and amended in May, 1982 by the City of Miami. The third component of the traffic impact area is the major arterial and expressway system serving Downtown. These regionally significant roadways, also defined during the preapplication conference, include; Port Boulevard, Brickell Avenue/Bayshore Drive, S.W. 3rd Avenue/Coral Way, S.W. 7th and 8th Streets, West Flagler Street, Biscayne Boulevard and MacArthur Causeway for a distance of three miles outside the Redevelopment area boundary and Interstate 95, S.R. 836 and U.S. 1 for a distance of five miles outside the Redevelopment area boundary. Based on these criteria, the traffic impact area is generally defined as North 79th Street on the north, Biscayne Bay on the south, LeJeune Road (West 42nd Avenue) on the west and, Alton Road on the east. lRY rrl•i)T\ r 1 i�• fY RR. } ]R} ��• MN iR R !� RM• PrC4 pu4GC}a *Ai ROADWAY LINKS ►} }t CW}CRAY Pets TVTTg( C4UUICky • • • y jf�• CsUUw4T OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT AREA. David KarrAnd Aaaodz►.a, ha @anssmq Ku4d And V}Tt ;- 1M1 q And Jetrmon 1rc ETn#arrnartal Enotneeeno he MAP J-A TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA. • SOUTHEAST. OVERTOP/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of MAW OFPAATALEENT 11--2 1: Nuiii raTT ..........., ---u- I [ SOUTHEAST' OVERTOWN/PARK WEST MAP J-B REDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT STUDY AREA. 1 E i David Plummer And Associates, Inc. Bermallo, Kurkl And Vera, Inc. micilacnilLIMIU947.101:11.14 kw Williams -Russell And Johnson, Inc. i MN --n �� CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTAMENT OF DEVELOPIr,ENT 1111 I I I Environmental Engineering Consultants. Ino. 1 III i:TflP'J'I1;TI iii or me is Liii- - I IIIf7 yli liIf i [OM� a -A � rx��a it----Nirk\---4,-1 i ;a ik ii i I ilic .„--,„.4,......,,,.._. r •.. a ,g,- all , , goal il C : :1•11 t'1 ' .. r 1 91E ■ k- "wam 1111,,i .'' hell. t.. ill AlirgV - fir NI aim 1 WIZ 1flii & rn I r`�''t ■ III iiii O ■[ �■�► 1 CBD BRICKELL O INTERSECTIONS Da.id Mortar Md AmoacMtm4. h . Saxit¢o. KuiJ Md Vart h4 -Rznal And Jc rwi. Ha. tea: Enghbai-va Catatents, to MAP J-C DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI STUDY AREA. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of 1dAkt1 DEPARTALa€h[T 11 - 4 Map J-A, the traffic impact area, highlights the roadway segments be to analyzed in this study. Critical intersections (Map J-C) to be analyzed were defined during the preapplication conference and subsequent discussions with Council staff. The concept used in defining these intersections was one of trying to provide a cordon line around each of the Downtown DRI sub -areas and the Redevelopment study area and also to provide a few intersections internal to these areas, A list of roadway segments and critical intersections analyzed in this study are contained in Appendix 11-1(R). 2. ON MAP J-1, HIGHLIGHT ALL COMMITTED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ADOPTED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) OR FUNDED PRIVATELY. Maps J-1A and J-18 show committed transportation improvements within the traffic impact area. These improvements have been obtained from the Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (1987), the Florida Department of Transportation's Five Year Construction Program, the City of Miami's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Development Orders issued for major projects within the Downtown area. Committed transpor- tation improvements, for the purposes of this study, are defined as (1) those having construction funds allocated for the current year in the Capital or Transportation Improvement Program (2) projects which are currently underway and (3) those required by a Development Order, 3. ON MAP J-2, HIGHLIGHT ALL PROGRAMMED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT. Maps J-2A and J-2B show the programmed improvements that are included in the Five Year Transportation Improvement Programs and the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Program. The City of Miami has $3,000,000 programmed for roadway improvements during the next 5 years. The roadways to be improved have not been identified. 4. COMPLETE TABLE 11.1: COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTS. Table 11.1(R) - Committed Improvements, has been completed as requested. 5. COMPLETE TABLE 11.2: PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS. Table 11.2(R) - Programmed Improvements, has been completed as requested. A letter from the Florida Department of Transportation confirming Committed and Programmed roadway improvements is contained in Appendix 11-1. 6. IDENTIFY ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE NETWORK FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. For Phase 1 development, only those improvements which are identified on Maps J-1A and J-1B and Table 11-1(R) which have been committed are included for analysis purposes. These include the following Downtown improvements. 11 - 5 TABLE 11.1(R) C'YYMMTlaw IMPROVEMENTS COST LOCATION IMPROVEMENT RIGHT -OF --WAY CONSTRUCTION2 CONS'rRUCPION S.W. 8th St. Reconstruction $ 3,300,000 Underway 1-95 to U.S. 1 1-95 Downtown Distributor Add N.B Lane ----- $ 2,797,000 Underway to I-395/SR 836 Widen entrance ramp North 2 Street, North 3 Street & Reconstruct --- $ 1,775,000 1986/1987 North 4 Street Biscayne Blvd. to N.W. 1 Ave. Port Bridge U.S. 1 to Dodge Island S.R. 972/S.W. 13 St. S.W. 1 Ave. to S.W. 12 Ave. S.R. 112 N.W. 22 Ave. to N.W. 12 Ave. 1-95 N.W. 54 St. to N.W. 62 St. 1-95 N.W. 39 St. to NW. 58 St. 1-95 SR 112 to N.W. 49 St. New 6 Lane Bridge Drainage Road Reconstruction Southbound Frontage Road Road reconstruction HOV Bridge $25,769,000 1986/1988 $ 228,000 $ 3,390,000 $ 830,000 $ 7,598,000 $24,450,000 1986/1987 1986/1987 1986/1987 1986/1987 1986/1987 TABLE 11.1: COMMI'1T U IMPROVES (CONTINUED) COST 1 LOCATION IMPROVEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION2 CONSTRUCTION 1-95 Widen to S.W. 25 Rd. 2 Lane Rates -- $ 599,000 1986/1987 N.W. 14 Street 4 Lane $ 650,000 1986/1987 N.W. 10 Ave. to 1-95 S.W. 17 Ave. 4 Lane $ 3,600,000 1986/1987 U.S. 1 to Flagler Street Metrorail Parking 2,545 Spaces --- $20,662,000 1986/1987 Metrobus 50 buses -- $ 7,875,000 1986/1987 Brickell Ave.! Turn Lane & $ 95,000 1986/1987 S.W. 10th St. Signalization Brickell Ave./ S.E. 12th ST. Signalization $ 70,000 1986/1987 Brickell Ave./ Signalization --- $ 90,000 1986/1987 S.E. 14th St. S.W. 13th St./ S.W. 15th Rd./ Signalization ---- $ 70,000 1986/1987 S.W. 3 Ave. Striping 1. Cost in 1986 Dollars. 2. Includes design, construciton and construction inspection. LOCATION MacArthur Causeway Watson Island to East Bridge S.W. 8th St. S.W. 27 Ave. to S.W. 42 Ave. SR 112 Airport to N.W. 36 St. Bri ckel l Bridge Downtown Distributor N.W. 27 Ave. N.W. 11 St. to N.W. 43 St. N.W. 7 St. Seybold Canal I-95 N.W. 54th St. to N.W. 62 St. 1-95 SR 836 Interchange SR 836 to SR 112 I-95 SR 112 to NW 54th St. TABLE 11.2 (R) PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS C 0 S T 1 CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT D e-SI GN RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION2 BEGIN END Reconstruction --- $13,376,000 1989/1990 Reconstruction --- $ 4,941,000 4 Lanes Connector --- $17,914,000 Replace Bridge $ 410,000 $3,750,000 $ 8,320,000 Surface St. Improvements $ 2,519,000 1988/1989 1987/1988 1988/1989 1987/1988 Add Lanes --- $2,220,000 $ 6,421,000 1988/1989 Low Level $ 200,000 --- $ 2,207,000 1990/1991 Bridge Northbound $ 100,000 $3,052,000 $ 2,553,000 1989/1990 Frontage Rd. Ramp to N.W. 8 St. --- $ 178,000 $ 6,446,000 1988/1989 Auxiliary Lanes --- --- $10,473,000 1990/1991 N.B. Exit Ramp $ 300,000 $ 65,000 $ 2,205,000 1989/1990 TABLE 11.2(R) PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS COST1 CONSTRUCTION LOCATION IMPROVEMENT N` BEGIN END 1-95 N.W. 32 St. to Widen Bridge $ 175,000 --- $ 4,187,000 1990/1991 N.W. 42 St. Downtown Streets Rebuild $ 3,000,000 1987/1990 Metrorail Parking 1,650 Spaces $11,200,000 1987/1988 1-,Metromover Brickell & Omni $8,000,000 $17,500,000 $214,500,000 1988/1990 Y Stage II Extensions 1 w Metrobus 428 Buses $ 73,674,000 1987/1991 1. Cost in 1986 Dollars. 2. Includes construction and construction inspection. wry 70 }T PP ROADWAYS ithOLGC1 CAu$C *A! II IT CAVIC,TAT \\A David Pummel And Aaaccialrl. ha. 8a,rwio, Kirld And Vera. he. Vrt"_arna-fiasedt And Jotrwrxi ErrArc rrmntar Engnea_vrq CatxilAnee. tic. MAP J-1 A COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTS. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Ci4Y Of MIAMI DEPAATAUE144 Da it=iiILO 1JLl�i'_JW 0 INTERSECTIONS , And ifwu, W Md Mantel. kat MAP J-1B COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTS. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ri S7 CAUSEWAY MIS .Ulu FUME CAUSEWAT A\ Darkt Pkm7Ter And Assads[aa. Inc. Bameic, IEuid And Vert ha. Yalens-flasoll Ard ,k r4on he Erniron*mnid ENInaerk,F Carn+irnnll. L� MAP J-2A PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 1- 2 2 0 6 CITY Of L AMI DEPARTAIAEkT oaYsa Pkn:nar kw! Asaocdst.q Ihrmata, Kula M Yin, ►,n Ml tw-gyp And s:tnmon has. bcmmt7enta, inc. MAP J-2B PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of Me AMI OEPAATAMENT 1. Reconstruction of S.W. 8th Street from I-95 to U.S. 1 to provide four lanes (under construction). 2. Reconstruction of the I-95 mainline from the Downtown Distributor to I-395/S.R. 836 and the widening of the Downtown Distributor north- bound entrance ramp onto 1-95. This reconstruction will provide an additional lane on the mainline and also on the entrance ramp (under construction). 3. The new Port bridge connecting the Port of Miami to U.S. 1. The improvement includes a new six lane high-level bridge and also major modifications to the Biscayne Boulevard/Port Boulevard Intersection. 4. Brickell Avenue/S.E. 10th Street. Signalization and southbound left turn lane. 5. Brickell Avenue/S.E. 12th Street. Roadway modification and signalization. 6. Brickell Avenue/S.E. 14th Street. Signalization and intersection modification. 7. S.W. 13th Street/S.W. 15th Road/S.W. 3rd Avenue. Intersection signalization and restriping. These last five improvements are required by Development Orders for major projects within the Downtown Study area. 8. EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETWORK 1. COMPLETE TABLE 11.3 BY PROVIDING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FOR THOSE REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY LINKS DEFINED AT THE PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE THAT ARE OUTSIDE THE DOWNTOWN DRI BOUNDARY AND ALL MAJOR COLLECTORS AND ARTERIALS INSIDE THE DOWNTOWN DRI BOUNDARY. FOR ALL ONE-WAY STREETS AND ROADWAY LINKS WHERE VOLUMES ARE IMPACTED BY EXPRESSWAY ACCESS PROVIDE AM PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES. Table 11.3(R) - Existing Traffic on Committed Roadway Network, has been completed to show peak -hour traffic volumes, capacities, peak hour volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and peak hour levels of service as required. For ease of analysis and projecting future excess capacity, as required by the Downtown/Areawide DRI questionaire, Table 11.3(R) has been divided based on roadway links generally serving the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment area and each of the Downtown DRI sub -areas. Therefore Table 11.3(R) has been provided for the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment area, Omni sub -area, CBD sub -area and the Brickell sub -area for the PM peak hour and AM peak hour as applicable. Traffic volumes shown on Table 11.3(R) were obtained from various sources. A majority of the volumes shown, for the Downtown study area roadway links, are from peak hour manual turning movement counts conducted at 37 intersections by David Plummer and Associates. These counts were completed during June and July 1986. Existing volumes shown for roadway links within the remainder of the traffic impact area were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation and Metro -Dade Public Works Department. Traffic counts taken form Metro -Dade Transportation Administration as part of Metromover before and after study were also used where applicable. Typically these were twenty-four hour hourly counts. Based on the volume to capacity (V/C) ratio analysis procedures used in this study, almost all the roadway segments within the impact area exhibit very good operating conditions. In fact, only Coral Way between Brickell Avenue and S.W. 15th Road (westbound LO5 "E"), Biscayne Boulevard between N.E. 62nd Street and 1395 (northbound LOS "F" and "E" respectively), U.S. 1 between 1-95 and S.W. l7th Avenue and between S.W. l7th Avenue and Douglas Road (southbound LOS "F"), in the PM peak hour and, N.E. 2nd Avenue between I-395 and Flagler Street (southbound LOS "F"), in the AM peak hour have poor operating conditions. Northeast 2nd Avenue is the only roadway link within the Redevelopment study area which exhibits poor operating conditions. It is important to understand that these operating conditions are measured over a one hour period. This type of analysis is therefore not sensitive to peak 15 and 30 minute surges which occur on the Downtown streets. Volume to capacity ratio (V/C) analysis techniques provide only a general condition of traffic and resultant levels of service can be very misleading when applied to Expressway links. Generally, this analysis methodology will show operating conditions to be better than perceived or actually exist. This occurs because the assigned capacity is based 05l1I/87 16:53:07 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.3: EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETNORK 1R1 Area: S.E. 0 MR Scenario: ', AM Sagaent 1 1 Frog 1 To 1 Nuaber 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 of Lanes:Directionl VolarelCapacityiExcess C.1 V/C 1LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 31 EB 470 1920 1450 0.24 A 01 WB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St, Biscayne Blvd. I 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 210 1170 960 0.18 A Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB NA MA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA W.E. 2 Ave. I 395 Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 2135 1920 -215 J.I1 F M.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 31 NB 680 1920 1240 0.35 A OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Masi Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 500 1920 1420 0.26 A K.W. I Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA NA NA NA N.W. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA NA NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one -Kay streets only. 05/12187 OB:21:19 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWH PARK WEST DRI Table 11.3: EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETWORK 1R1 Area: S.E. 0 P\W Scenario: ":.ONE PM Segaent 1 1 Huber 1 1 Peak —Hour 1 1 1 Froa 1 Ta 1 of Lanes1Directioni Volume:Capacity:Excess C.1 V/C 1LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 31 EB 620 1920 1300 0,32 A 0L WB 0 0 0 HA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 0L EB 0 0 0 NA HA 2L WB 387 1170 783 0.33 A Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB 1626 2920 1294 0.56 A 3LO SB 922 2280 1358 0.40 A M.E, 2 Ave. 1395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA HA 3L SB 701 1920 1219 0.37 A N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1185 1920 735 0.62 B OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Mimi Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 01 NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 255 1920 1665 0.13 A N.K. 1 Are. N.H. 20 5t. Flagler St. IL NB 93 625 532 0.15 A 1L SB 57 625 568 0.09 A N.H. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 459 625 166 0,73 C 1L SB 70 625 555 0,11 A 11-11ay-87 11:31:10 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWH/PARK NEST DRI Table 11.3: EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETIIORK 4R) Area: OMNI Scenario: PM Segaent F 1 , F 1„„--- 1 1 1 F caber 1 � Peak -Hour 1 ; Fros 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl Volure:CapacitylEicess C.1 V/C 1LOS SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 195 2L FW EB 2300 3800 1500 0.61 B 2L F11 NB 1880 3800 1920 0.49 A I 95 N.W. 27 Ave. 31 FN EB 2540 5700 3160 0.45 A 31 FW WB 3820 5700 1880 0.67 8 N.K. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. 31. FW EB 3190 5700 2510 0.56 A 3L FW WB 4790 5700 910 0.84 D McArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne BIvd. 31 Fif EB 2100 5700 3600 0.37 A 3L FM NB 1720 5700 3980 0.30 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 1809 1800 -9 1.01 F 2LD SB 1290 1800 510 0.72 C N.E, 36 St. 1 395 2L0 NB 1634 1800 166 0.91 E 2LD SB 1031 1800 769 0.57 A 11iasi Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 465 1360 895 0.34 A 2L SB 384 1360 976 0.28 A 195 N.N. 79 St. SR 112 5L FW NB 8560 9500 940 0.90 D 5L F11 SB 5010 9500 4490 0.53 A SR 112 SR 836/1 395 51 FW NB 6440 9500 3060 0.68 B 5L FW SB 5060 9500 4440 0.53 A 11-May-87 09:52:15 SOUTHEAST OVERTORN PARK WEST DRt Table 11.3: EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETWORK IR1 Area: CBD Scenario: AM Segment : From I Number I Peak -Hour 1 To I of Lanes:Directionl Volume:Capacity:Excess C.I V/C ILOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3L➢ EB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD WB NA NA NA NA RA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 260 1170 910 0.22 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 325 1170 845 0.28 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. 1L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L WB NA NA NA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 31 EB 1150 1920 770 0.60 A 01 WB 0 0 0 HA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 930 2180 1250 0.43 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4L➢ NB NA NA NA NA NA 4LD 58 NA NA NA NA NA V. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L S8 NA NA NA NA NA 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LFW SB NA NA NA NA NA + NA: Not Applicable - AN data required for one way streets only. 13-May-87 08:51:34 SOUTHEAST OVERTOW€NIPARK REST DRI Table 11.3: EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETWORK Area: COD Scenario.' PM Segnent 1 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl VolunelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C 1L05 Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 340 2280 1940 0.15 A 3LD NB 700 2280 1580 0.31 A N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 445 1170 725 0.38 A Flag3er St. Biscayne Blvd. R. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 507 1170 663 0.43 A R. 2 Ave. R. 27 Ave. 1L EB 152 785 633 0.19 A 2L WB 920 1360 440 0.68 B S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd, S.R. 2 Ave. 3L EB B50 1920 1070 0.44 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.N. 2 Ave. S.R. 27 Ave. 3L EB 568 2180 1612 0.26 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA MA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 5t. 4LD N8 1500 2920 1420 0.51 A 4LD SB 1294 2920 1626 0.44 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.R. 7/8 St. IL NB 406 625 219 0,65 B IL SB 304 625 321 0.49 A 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.N. 8 St. 3LFW NB 4470 5700 1230 0.78 C 3LFW SB 4260 5700 1440 0.75 C II-Nay-87 12:01:18 SOUTHEAST 0VERTDNN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.3: EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETWORK 1R) Area: BRICKELL Scenario: 'AM Segsent 1 Fro 1 Rustier 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction) YoluselCapacitylE:cess C.1 V/C 1LDS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 YB 248 2180 1932 0.11 A 195 S.B. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L YB 335 2180 1845 0.15 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 922 3240 2318 0.28 A 0L MB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 41 EB 1338 3240 1902 0.41 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Nay Brickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L NB NA NA NA NA NA S.M. 15 Rd. S.Y. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 21.11 NB NA NA NA NA NA S.M. 12 Ave. S.Y. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD S8 NA NA NA NA NA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD S8 NA NA NA NA NA Niasi Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB NA NA NA NA NA 3L SB NA NA NA NA NA S. 15 Rd, Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD S8 NA NA NA NA NA 1 45 S.Y. 8 St. US 1 2LFN NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LFW SB NA NA NA NA NA US 1 I 95 S.Y. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA 11A NA NA NA 3LD SB NA KA NA NA NA S.N. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD 88 NA NA NA NA NA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD S8 NA NA NA NA NA 4 NA: Not Applicable - Ali data required for one -say streets only. 12-Nay-87 13:37:35 SOUTHEAST OVERTONNJPARK NEST DR1 Table 11.3: EXISTING TRAFFIC ON CONNITTED ROADWAY NETWORK (Rl Area: BRICY.ELL Scenario: - '.PN I I Number I I Peak -Hour Segment 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction: Volume:Capacity:Excess C.I V/C ILOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 195 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 702 2180 1478 0.32 A 195 S.W. 27 Ave. 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 837 2180 1343 0.38 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 508 3240 2732 D.16 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1012 3240 2228 0.31 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA WA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 2L EB 282 1360 1078 0.21 A 2L NB 1240 1360 120 0.91 E S.W. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave, 2LD EB 316 1800 1484 0.18 A 210 WB 962 1800 818 0.55 A S.M. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave, 2LD EB 1361 1800 439 0.76 C 2LD WB 1545 1800 255 0.86 D Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 1221 2785 1564 0.44 A 3LD SB 1489 2785 1296 0.53 A S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 377 1800 1423 0.21 A 2LD SB 1579 1800 221 0.88 D Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB 299 2180 1881 0.14 A 3L 88 223 2180 1957 0.10 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 213 1800 1587 0.12 A 2LD SB 953 1800 847 0.53 A 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 2150 3800 1650 0.57 A 2LFW SB 3220 3800 580 0.85 D US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 2270 2785 515 0.82 0 3LD 88 3400 2785 -615 1.22 F S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 2237 2785 548 0.80 C 310 88 3418 2785 -633 1.23 F Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 506 1800 1294 0.28 A 2LD SB 1114 1800 686 0.62 8 on the number of thru lanes and ideal operating conditions. V/C analysis does not account for excessive weaving conditions, interference from exit ramp queues and constraints from expressway to arterial connections. However, Council Staff has traditionally used level of service (LOS) based on V/C ratios as a major criteria to determine if additional improvements are needed. Despite these potential technical difficulties, LOS information based on V/C ratios has been provided for all roadway links including the expressway system. C. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 1. COMPLETE TABLE 11.4: PERMITTED DEVELOPMENTS Table 11.4 has been completed for the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment area, for each of the three Downtown DRI sub -areas, and for the Port of Miami. Permitted Developments as shown on Table 11,4 include the following types of development. 1. Projects which are complete and less than 90 percent occupied. 2. Projects which are under construction. 3. Projects which have received prior approvals. More detailed information on projects included on Table 11.4 is contained in Appendix 11-3(R). The projection of traffic volumes associated with Permitted Developments as well as Additional Approvable Development is based on the trip generation model equations used by Metro -Dade Transportation Administration in its Transportation Plan Update (1986). These equations are shown in Appendix 11-1 (R). 0ther parameters, used in the traffic projections, including vehicle occupancy and mode splits by development phase and sub -area were also provided by Metro -Dade Transportation Administration, The general methodology for generating traffic using the trip generation model equations is outlined below. Trip generation worksheets for permitted development and each development phase are contained in Appendix 11-2(R). Step #1: Define development parameters in terms of square footage of office space, retail space, the number of dwelling units and other uses as applicable. - Step #2: Using data provided by the City of Miami and obtained from Dade County convert development parameters to retail employment, total employment, residential population and other variables required for the trip generation model equations. This step provides the total number of daily home -based and non -home based person trips. Step #3: Apply a mode split to the total daily person trips derived in Step #2. Mode split percentages, provided by Metro -Dade County Transportation Administration (see Appendix 11-1(R)), vary by development phase and by sub -area. Application of the anode split percentage to total daily person trips provides the total number of daily auto person trips. 11--24 TABLE 11.4: PERMITTED DEVELOPHCNT5 (1) LAND GENERATION RATES {4) AM PEAK -HOUR TRIPS PM PEAK -HOUR TRIPS PHASE {2) LOCATION USE SCALE(3) AM PEAK PM PEAK TRANSIT(5) rNTERNAL(6) CXTERNAL(6} TOTAL(6) TRANSIT(5) INTERNAL(6) ES(TERNRL(6) TOTAL (G) T SE 0vertown/Park West 0TTTEe 55.160 "i5 13 52 65 20 13 52 6S Redevelopment Area Arena 16.000 Seats Anna Sub -Area (7) C80 Sub -Area (7) Office 111,400 Retail 8,600 Residential 810 Du's Office 2.577.600 Government Office 1,987,400 Retail 395.500 Residential 324 Du's See Appendix 355 10 191 201 435 10 191 201 4,325 119 7,256 2,375 5,405 I19 2,256 2.375 Brickell-Sub Area (7) Office 5,077,800 3.135 220 4,187 4,407 3,920 220 4,187 4,407 Retail 314,100 Residential 2774 Du's Port of Miami(8) Shipping 2,200 2,200 2,700 2,700 Footnotes ]} Includes the following developments �-, a) Projects which are complete and less than 90% occupied. b) Projects which are under construction. 1 c) Projects which have received prior approvals. 2) All developments assumed to be fullyoccupied bythe end of Phase 1. lJ'i Pme P 3) Square feet of Gross Floor Area unless noted otherwise. 4) MUATS Trip Generation Factors were utilized. 5) Person Trips. 6) Vehicle Trips. 7) Permitted Development only. 8) Port ADA and supplemental reports. Step #4: Convert daily auto person trips to daily auto trips. For this step an overall vehicle occupancy rate of 1.43 was used. This vehicle occupancy rate is consistent with that used by Metro -Dade Transportation Administration in their Long -Range Transportation Planning Process. Step 45: This step involves the application of an internal factor to the total number of auto trips. For the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment area, a 20 percent internalization factor was applied. The result of this procedure is the total number of daily external auto trips. Step 46: Apply a peak hour factor to the total number of external auto trips to determine the number of auto trips entering and exiting Downtown during the AM and PM peak hours. This factor was derived by analyzing traffic counts conducted in the Downtown area over the last five year period. Based on this analysis it was determined that the existing peak hour is 8.6 percent of the total daily traffic. Worksheets supporting this factor for both the AM and PM peak hours are included in Appendix 11-1(R). Step 47: This step involves determining the number of inbound and outbound trips to the study area during the peak hours. Recent AM and PM peak hour traffic counts were used to determine this inbound/ outbound split. For the AM peak hour a 70 percent inbound factor and a 30 percent outbound factor were utilized. During the PM peak hour the outbound factor is 70 percent and the inbound is. 30 percent. Worksheets documenting this inbound/outbound split of traffic volumes are also contained in Appendix 11-1(R) of the report. Although an 8.6 percent peak hour factor was used for vehicle trips, an analysis to determine the overall peak hour person trips was undertaken to validate the peak hour factor. This involves converting the total number of peak hour vehicle trips back to person trips using the 1.43 vehicle occupancy rate previously discussed. Peak hour transit trips, obtained by analyzing recent daily (by hour) Metrorail passenger acti- vity for the Government Center Station, are then added to this. Using this methodology and analyzing the peak hour person trip projections for the Redevelopment area as well as the Omni, CBD and Brickell sub -areas the actual number of peak hour person trips is 12 percent. This peak hour factor of 12 percent for the total number of person trips is, in fact, consistent with the ITE trip generation factors for office uses. Because the Downtown area is predominately an office area and the Permitted Developments are 90 percent office use it would indicate that the methodology and the projections agree. 2. IN AN APPENDIX, PROVIDE TWO MAPS OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA (J-3 SERIES) FOR EACH PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT (ONE FOR THE AM PEAK HOUR AND ONE FOR THE PM PEAK HOUR) SHOWING DEVELOPMENT LOCATION AND THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF PEAK HOUR TRIPS. 11-26 The Map J-3(R) series has been provided in Appendix 11-3(R) for each of the three sub -areas, as well as for the Port of Miami and S.E. Overtown/ Park West. Two (2) maps have been provided for each sub -area. Map J-3A(R) shows the location of Permitted Developments within each sub -area, and Map J--3B(R) shows the number and percentage distribution of peak hour trips. In addition to the Map J-3(R) series two Tables; Table 11.4A and Table 11.4E have been included in Appendix 11-3(R). Table 11.4A provides development parameters for each of the Permitted Developments. Each development shown on this Table has been keyed to Map J-3A(R). Table 11.4E provides a summary of the Permitted Development directional traffic assignment to the roadway links being analyzed. 3. PROVIDE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE TRAFFIC AT ALL COUNT LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 11.3 FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE BY COMPLETING TABLE 11.5, USING LINK CAPACITIES OF EACH PUBLICLY -PROGRAMMED OR PRIVATELY FUNDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT. DO NOT INCREASE CAPACITY FOR ANY IMPROVEMENT IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 11.8 AS "RECOMMENDED", Future traffic conditions for all roadway links are shown on Table 11.5(R) for each of the three development phases. The roadway link volumes, V/C ratios and levels of service shown on these tables represent future traffic conditions without traffic generated by proposed development within these S.E. Overtown/Park West DRI study area. Table 11.5(R) includes existing traffic, traffic generated by Permitted Development including the Port of Miami, and a background growth factor for roadway links outside the Downtown Miami DRI study area. It is important to note that all Permitted Development .traffic (Table 11.4) has been included in the Phase 1 traffic projections. By including all this traffic in the Phase I Future Traffic projections, a baseline is established from which the impacts of Additional Development (Question 11-D) can be measured. Table 11.5(R) has been provided for each development phase because the background growth factor varies for each development phase. It is important to note that a background growth factor has not been applied to roadway links within the Southeast Overtown/Park West study area (Map J-B). The future traffic volumes on these roadway links are projected to remain relatively constant for two reasons. First, these volumes include traffic generated by existing vacant, under construction and approved developments (Permitted Developments) as well as traffic from development planned for S.E. Overtown/Park West and the Port of Miami. Second, although there may be an increase in background traffic (i.e. external to external trips), this increase will be balanced by a diversion of existing thru trips from the study area roadways. As Downtown roadways carry higher volumes, motorist who could normally travel through the area may find it more convenient to travel around the study area. A background growth factor has been applied to all Expressway links with no assumption of diversions. 11 - - 2 7 05/13/87 16:32:13 SOUTHEAST OVERTOYN PARK WEST Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMIT' Area: S.E. 0 P1Y Scenario: PHASE ONE An Segment W. 1R} 1 Number 1 ;^ :ak-Hour 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Directionl V acity1Excess C.1 VIC ILOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 31 EB 1920 691 0.64 8 OL YB 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 NA NA 2L NB I170 808 0.31 A Biscayne Blvd. 1.395 Part Blvd. 4L0 NB NA NA NA NA 3L0 SB NA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL N8 0 0 NA NA 31 SO 1920 -855 1.45 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 31 NB 1920 817 0.57 A 0L SB 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 1920 1363 0.29 A N.Y. 1 Ave. N.Y. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA 1L S8 NA NA NA NA N.Y. 2 Ave. H.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA 1L SB .NA NA NA NA * NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way : ,1y. Segment 05/13/87 16:27:48 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST ➢RI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (RI Area: S.E. 0 PEN Scenario: PHASE ONE PM 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction; VoluaelCapacity:Excess C.1 V/C 1LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 31 EB 1050 1920 870 0.55 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA MA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 WB 717 1170 453 0.61 B Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4L0 NB 2330 2920 590 0.80 C 3L0 SB 1216 2280 1064 0.53 A N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 1031 1920 889 0.54 A N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2462 1920 -542 1.28 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA M. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 280 1920 1640 0.15 A N.N. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 109 625 516 0.17 A 1L SB 64 625 561 0.10 A N.W. 2 Ave. N.I. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB 488 625 137 0.78 C IL SB 83 625 542 0.13 A 13-Nay-87 14:47:09 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK 1R) Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE ONE AM Segment 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour --- 1 Fraa 1 Ta 1 of Lanes1Dirertionl VoluaelCapacitylEiress C.1 VIC 1LOS 1 Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 3L0 NB NA NA NA NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 WB 312 1170 858 0.27 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 388 1170 782 0.33 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. 1L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L WB NA HA NA NA MA S. 1 5t. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1250 1920 670 0.65 B 0L WB 0 0 0 NA MA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1173 2180 1007 0.54 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA 4L0 SB NA NA NA NA W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA NA NA NA 3LFW SB NA NA NA NA 1 NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. gcgcEog 13-May-87 14:04:28 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segment 1 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directianl VoluaelCapacitylExcess C.: Y/C :LOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 535 1170 635 0.46 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. N. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 653 1170 517 0.56 A W. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. 1L EB 189 785 596 0.24 A 2L WB 1170 1360 190 0.86 D 8. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.N. 2 Ave. 3L EB 932 1920 988 0.49 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 31 EB 682 2180 1498 0.31 A 0L NB 0 0 0 NA MA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 1838 2920 1082 0.63 8 4LD SB 1477 2920 1443 0.51 A W. 2 Ave, Flagler St. S.N. 7/8 St. 1L NB 590 625 35 0.94 E IL 58 458 625 167 0.73 C 1 95 SR 836/I 345 S.N. 8 St. 3LFN NB 5624 5700 76 0.99 E 31Fii SB 4937 5700 763 0.87 0 Segoent 11-hay-87 11:57:05 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI Table 11.5; FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (RI Area: DRICKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE AM 1 1 Nuaber 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Direction1 Voluae:Capacity1Ezcess C.1 VIC 1LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 655 2180 1525 0.30 A I 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L NB 489 2180 1691 0.22 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 2169 3240 1071 0.67 B OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.N. 27 Ave. 41 EB 1740 3240 1500 0.54 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA HA Coral Nay Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L WB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD NB NA NA NA HA NA S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA WA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA Cali Ave. Nagler St. S. 15 Rd. 31. NB NA NA HA NA HA M. SB NA NA NA HA NA S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB HA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA 195 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB HA NA NA NA RA 2LFW SB NA NA HA NA IA US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 31.D SB NA NA NA NA kA S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB NA NA HA NA NA 3LD SB NA HA HA NA NA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA NA; Not Applicable. AN data required for one -Kay streets only. 14-Nay-87 09:15:45 SOUTHEAST OVERTQWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: BR1CKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segoent 1 1 ?iueber 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl VoluaelCapacity1Excess C,1 V/C 1L08 5. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 1651 2180 529 0.76 C 1 95 S.K. 27 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 1179 2180 1001 0.54 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. I 95 4L EB 1042 3240 2198 0.32 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1181 3240 2059 0.36 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB 370 1360 990 0.27 A 2L WB 1446 1360 -86 1.06 F S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 416 1800 1384 0.23 A 2LD WB 1224 1800 576 0.68 B S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1485 1800 315 0.83 D 2LD WB 1775 1800 25 0.99 E Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 1460 2785 1325 0.52 A 3LD S8 1675 2785 1110 0.60 A S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 689 1800 1111 0.38 A 2LD SB 2276 1800 -476 1.26 F Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB 802 2180 1378 0.37 A 3L SB 405 2180 1775 0.19 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 425 1800 1375 0.24 A 2LD 88 1484 1800 316 0.82 D 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 2437 3800 1363 0.64 B 21.FW SB 3851 3800 -51 1.01 F US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 31,D N8 2850 2785 -65 1.02 F 3LD SB 4710 2785 -1925 1.69 F S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 2699 2785 86 0.97 E 3LD SS 4450 2785 -1665 1,60 F Bayshore Dr, Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 656 1800 1144 0.36 A 2LD S8 1463 1800 337 0.81 D 05/13/87 16:56:40 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DR! Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (R) Area: S.E. 0 P\W Scenario: PHASE TWO AM Segment 1 1 1 1 1 From 1 To 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 : of Lanes1Directionl Voluse1CapacitylExcess C.1 WC :LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 31 EB 1229 1920 691 0.64 B 01. WB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 362 1170 808 0.31 A Biscayne Blvd. 1395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3L0 SB NA NA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1395 Flagler St. 0L NO 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 2775 1920 -855 1.45 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1103 1920 817 0.57 A 0L 5B 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 557 1920 1363 0.29 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA KA 1L 58 NA NA NA NA NA N.W. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL lib MA NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA NA . NA: Hot Applicable. A31 data required For one -Kay streets only. 11--35 05/12/87 14:18:20 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN HEST DR1 Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETNDRK IR) Area: S.E. © PIN Scenario: PHASE TWO PM Segment 1 Number 1 : Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Direction: Voluae;Capacity:Excess C.1 V/C 1L0S N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1050 1920 I84 0.59 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 717 1170 290 0.75 C Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB 2330 2920 5 1.00 E 3L0 SB 1216 2200 797 0.65 B M.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L 58 1031 1920 787 0.59 A M.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2462 1920 -841 1.44 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 SB 280 1920 1580 0.18 A N.M. 1 Ave. N.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 109 625 487 0.22 A 1L SB 64 625 550 0.12 A N.M. 2 Ave, N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 488 625 50 0,92 E 11 58 83 625 505 0.19 A 13-May-87 13:39:30 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK 10 Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE TWO PM Segment 1 1 1 Number 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction; VoluaelCapacity:Ercess C.1 VIC 1LOS SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. I 95 2L FW EB 2843 3800 957 0.75 C 2L FW WB 3300 3800 .500 0.87 D I 95 N.W. 27 Ave. 3L FM EB 3197 5700 2503 0.56 A 3L FM WB 5145 5700 555 0.90 D N.W, 27 Ave. Leieune Rd. 3L FK EB 3807 5700 1893 0.67 B 31 FW WB 5996 5700 -296 1.05 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FW EB 2389 5700 3311 0.42 A 3L FW WB 1933 5700 3767 0.34 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. W.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 2198 1800 -398 1.22 F 2LD SB 1496 1800 304 0.83 D W.E. 36 St. I 395 2LB NB 2164 1800 -364 1.20 F 2L0 S8 1288 1800 512 0.72 C Miami Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 513 1360 847 0.38 A 2L 58 417 1360 943 0.31 A 1 95 N.N. 79 St. SR 112 5L FW NB 9722 9500 -222 1.02 F 5L FW 58 5601 9500 3899 0.59 A SR 112 SR 836/1 395 5L FW NB 7727 9500 1773 0,81 D 5L FW SB 5772 9500 3728 0.61 0 13-nay-87 14:48:59 SOUTHEAST OVERTONN/PARK WEST DR' Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: CH Scenario: PHASE TWO AM Segment 1 1 Number 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Birectionl VolumelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C 1LOS 1 Port Bridge Port of Nia'i Biscayne Blvd. 3LB EB NA NA NA NA KA 3LB WB NA NA NA NA 1tA N. 1 St, Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0l EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 WB 312 1170 858 0.27 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. N. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 388 1170 782 0,33 A U. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. 1L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L WB NA NA NA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.N. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1250 1920 670 0.65 B 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1202 2180 978 0.55 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LB NB NA NA NA NA 40 5B NA NA NA NA W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/B St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.N. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA NA NA NA 3LFW 5B NA NA NA NA f NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets on1y. ggggggg 13-May-87 14:01:5B SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE TWO PH Segment 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 From 1 To : of Lanes:Direction) VoluaelCapacity:Excess C. V/C 1L05 Port Bridge Port of Mimi Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD NB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 535 1170 635 0.46 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 653 1170 517 0.56 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB 194 785 591 0.25 A 2L WB 1199 1360 161 0.88 D S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 31 EB 932 1920 988 0.49 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 31 EB 700 2180 1480 0.32 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 1838 2920 1082 0.63 0 4L0 SB 1477 2920 1443 0.51 A W. 2 Ave. Flagier St. S.W. 7/8 St. 1L NB 590 625 35 0.94 E 11 SB 458 625 167 0.73 C 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 5763 5700 -63 1.01 F 3LFW SB 5069 5700 631 0.89 D 13-May-87 15:35:08 SOUTHEAST 0VERTONNIPARK NEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETNORKIRI Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE TWO AM Segment I Mustier 1 1------ ---Peak-Hour l l 1 Fro' I To 1 of Lanes1Directionl VolumelCapacitylEzcess C.l V/C IL05 S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 248 2180 1932 0.11 A 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 358 2180 1822 0.16 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 41 EB 922 3240 2318 0.28 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.N. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1429 3240 1811 0.44 A 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 2L ES NA NA NA NA NA 21 NB NA NA NA NA NA S.M. 15 Rd. S.N. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA HA 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 12 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L0 NB NA NA NA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD 5B NA KA NA NA NA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB HA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB MA NA NA NA NA 31 5B NA NA HA NA NA S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD 5B NA NA NA NA NA 1 95 S.N. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LFW SB NA NA NA NA NA U5 1 1 95 S.N. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD 5B NA NA NA NA NA S.N. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD 5B NA NA NA NA NA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 11 — 40 0 £ �0 ZO£ 0081 861.t OS 01Z d WO LZ11 0081 £L9 8N au 'aAd LZ 'M'S Ja13equa33td '.J0 aJogs1e0 3 t9'1 LBLI- SBLZ ZLSi 8S O1£ 3 00'1 t- SBLZ 68LZ 8N 81£ `Pa sel6n°a 'and L1 'N"S 3 WI £SOZ- 58LZ B£Bt BS 01£ d 90'1 t9I- SBLZ 6f6Z 8N O1£ 'aAV LI 'N'S S6 1 1 SA d S01 £Li- 008£ £L6£ OS M31Z 8 L9'0 8911 008£ 'NZ 8N M.d1Z I Sit 'IS 8 'N'S S6 1 0 i8'0 98Z 0081 VIM 8S 01Z V kZ'0 89£1 0081 Zit 8N OfZ 1a33equal3ta 'PH SI 'S V 61'0 SLLI 081Z SOP 8S 1£ V L£'0 8L£1 081Z Z08 8N 1£ 'PH SI 'S '3S JalBe13 .any mg' 3 LZ1 80- 0081 BLZZ 85 01Z V B£'0 6011 0081 169 8N au Jal}equamy 'IS L '3'S d 09'0 8011 58LZ LL91 OS O1£ d WO ZZ£1 SBLZ £9f1 ON O1£ 'IS L '3'S '1S Z '3'S 'any 'maps 3 10'1 ZZ- 0081 ZZBI 8N 01Z 8 S8'0 £LZ 0081 LZS1 83 au 'any LZ 'N'S 'and 11 'N'S 8 OL'0 9tS 008i HZ! 811 81Z d WZ'0 fL£1 0081 9lt 83 81Z 'any 11 'N'S 'Pd SI 'N'S 3 90'I 98- 09£1 9tti 814 1Z V LZ'0 066 09£1 Ott 83 11 'PS SI 'N'S 'any 11al3t-18 AEI( p.m UN dN 0 0 0 8N 10 y 8£'0 £ZOZ Olt LIZ1 83 1t 'any LZ 'N'S S6 1 dN dN 0 0 0 8N 10 d Z£'0 861Z 0tZ£ Zt01 83 if S6 [ 'any 11aV S '15 8 'S d S5'0 116 0811 6011 814 1t UN VN 0 0 0 83 10 'any LZ 'N'S S6 1 3 91'0 6ZS 0811 1591 814 1£ dN dN 0 0 0 83 10 S6 1 'and lla-l3P8 '1S L 'S 5011 3/A 1'3 ssam31,41pede31agni0A ;uall3aJ!y,sauel }o inOH-3ead _-----9 1 JaganN al ' , , Zuacfias Rd OM1 3SVHd ,01aeua3s 113A3Iti8 :eaJV f8l Ad0N13N 03111W1103 - 3I33da1 3ailift3 :S'i1 algel IH8 1S3N A111dINMO183A0 1Sd3N1fl0S £Z:9I:£I LB-AeN-£I 05/12/97 06:54:08 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (R1 Area: S.E. 0 PMW Scenario: PHASE THREE AM 1 ! 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 Segment : From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Directianl Valume1CapacitylEzcess C.1 Y/C 1L05 N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1229 1920 505 0.74 C OL HB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 WB 362 1170 603 0.48 A Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB HA HA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 2775 1920 -1170 1.61 F K.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 31. NB 1103 1920 602 0.69 B 01 SB 0 0 0 NA NA K. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA KA 3L SB 557 1920 1154 0.40 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L SB HA NA NA NA KA N.W. 2 Ave. N.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA KA * NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one -may streets only. 05/13/87 17:31:10 • SOUTHEAST OVERTURN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK 1R1 Area: S.E. 0 PIN Scenario: PHASE THREE P11 Segment . . . . 1 From 1 To I Number 1 I Peak -Hour 1 1 of Lanes;Direction1 VolumeICapacity1Ezcess C.I V/C ILOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 31 EB 1050 1920 870 0.55 A 01, NB 0 0 0 NA NA 1i. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 717 1170 453 0.61 B Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB 2330 2920 590 0.80 C 3LD 88 1216 2280 1064 0.53 A N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. 01 NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 SB 1031 1920 889 0.54 A N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2462 1920 -542 1.28 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L 88 280 1920 1640 0.15 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.14. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 109 625 516 0.17 A 1L SB 64 625 561 0.10 A 14.11, 2 Ave. N.K. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 488 625 137 0.78 C 11 SB 83 625 542 0.13 A 13-May-87 13:35:14 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK {R1 Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Seggent 1 I Number 1 I Peak -Hour --------..---.---I i From 1 To I of Lanes1Direction1 VoluaelCapacitylExcess C.I V/C 1LOS SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 21 FW EB 2963 3800 837 0.78 C 2L FW WO 3398 3800 402 0.89 D 195 N.W. 27 Ave. 3L FW EB 3329 5700 2371 0.58 A 3L FW 118 5344 5700 356 0.94 E N.W. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. 31 FW EB 3973 5700 1727 0.70 B 3L FW 118 6245 5700 -545 1.10 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd, 3L FW EB 2498 5700 3202 0.44 A 31 FW WB 2023 5700 3677 0.35 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 2292 1800 492 1.27 F 2LD SB 1563 1800 237 0.87 D M.E. 36 St. 1 395 21.D NB 2249 1800 -449 1.25 F 2LD SB 1342 1800 458 0.75 C Miani Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 537 1360 823 0.40 A 2L SB 437 1360 923 0.32 A 195 N.W. 79 St. SR 112 5L FW NB 10167 9500 -667 1.07 F 51_ FW SB 5862 9500 3638 0.62 B SR 112 SR 836/1 395 5L FW NB 8062 9500 1438 0.85 D 5L FW 58 6035 9500 3465 0.64 8 13-May-87 14:51:48 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK NEST DRl Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IRl Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE THREE AM Segeent 1 1 I Nueber 1 Peak -flour FroA 1 To l of LaneslDirectionl Vo1uoe;CapacitylErcess C.1 V/C 1LOS Port Bridge Port of Miasi Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB NA NA NA NA XA 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 312 1170 858 0.27 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. N. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 388 1170 782 0.33 A Y. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. 1L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L Y8 NA NA NA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.N. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1250 1920 670 0.65 8 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1250 2180 930 0.57 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LO NB NA NA NA NA 4LD 5B NA NA NA NA N. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.N. 718 St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA 1 95 SR 83611 395 S.N. 8 St. 3LFW MB MA NA NA NA 31F11 SB NA NA NA NA * NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one -nay streets only. mcgcgog 13-May-B7 13:56:13 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR} Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Segaent 1 1 : Frog Huber 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 To 1 of Lanes:Directionl VoluaelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C 1LOS Port Bridge Port of Miati Biscayne BIvd, 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F W. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 535 1170 635 0.46 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 653 1170 517 0.56 A V. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB 201 785 584 0.26 A 2L WB 1247 1360 113 0.92 E S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 31 EB 932 1920 988 0.49 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 729 2180 1451 0.33 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St, 4LD NB 1838 2920 1082 0.63 B 4LD SB 1477 2920 1443 0.51 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB 590 625 35 0.94 E IL 53 458 625 167 0.73 C 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. B St. 3LFW NB 5995 5700 -295 1.05 F 3LFW SB 5291 5700 409 0.93 E 13-May-97 15:31:12 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNJPARK WEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK(R} Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE THREE AM Segment E 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl VolumelCapacitylExcess C.l VJC 1L05 S. I St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 248 2180 1932 0.11 A 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 NB 375 2180 1805 0.17 A S. B St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 922 3240 23€8 0.28 A 01 WB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1499 3240 1741 0.46 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 21 EB HA HA NA NA NA 2L WB NA NA NA NA NA S.N. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD NB NA NA NA NA HA S.N. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB HA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St, S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB HA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA HA NA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA HA NA Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB HA NA NA HA NA 31 S8 NA NA HA NA NA S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA HA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA RA 1 95 S.X. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB NA NA NA HA NA 2LFW S8 NA NA NA NA NA US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB HA NA NA NA NA S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB NA MA NA NA NA 3LD S8 HA NA HA NA NA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB HA HA RA NA NA 2LD SB HA NA - NA HA NA + NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 14-May-87 09:12:43 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWHIPARK NEST DRI Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Segment 1 Number 1 1 Peak-Hour-1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction1 Voluae:Capacity:Excess C.1 VFC 1LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Are. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA MA 3L WB 1651 2180 529 0.76 C 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 MA NA 31 48 1249 2180 931 0.57 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. I 95 41 EB 1042 3240 219E 0.32 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA I 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1265 3240 1975 0,39 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA MA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.M. I5 Rd. 2L EB 370 1360 990 0.27 A 2L MB 1446 1360 -86 1.06 F S.M. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2L4 EB 442 1800 135E 0,25 A 2LD WB 1305 1800 495 0.73 C S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1598 I80O 202 0,89 D 2LD WB 1903 1800 -103 1.06 F Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 1460 2785 1325 0.52 A 3LD SB 1675 2785 1110 0.60 A S.E. 7 5t. Rickenbacker 2L0 NB 689 1800 1111 0.38 A 21.8 58 2276 1800 -476 1.26 F Miami Are. Flagler St:' S. 15 Rd. 31 MB 802 2180 1378 0,37 A 31. SB 405 2180 1775 0.19 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 443 1800 1357 0.25 A 2LD SB 1563 1800 237 0,87 D 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 21F11 MB 2616 3800 1184 0,69 B 2LFW SB 4118 3800 -318 1.08 F US 1 195 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 3038 2785 -253 1.09 F 3LD SB 4992 2785 -2207 1.79 F S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD MB 2885 2785 -100 1.04 F 310 SB 4733 2785 -1948 1.70 F Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD MB 698 1800 1102 0.39 A 2L0 SB 1555 1800 245 0.86 D The historic growth rate for the traffic impact area (Map J-A) is seven tenths of one percent (O.7%) per year (compounded). The traffic projections for Phase I represents a yearly compounded growth rate in excess of four percent (4%) without the Additional Approvable Development. A growth rate of more than four times the historic growth rate would represent a very conservative estimate (i.e. potential over -estimation) of Future Traffic volumes and operating conditions. 4. EXPLAIN THE BASIS FOR ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO VOLUMES SHOWN IN TABLE 11.5 TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY REDUCTION OR INCREASE IN VOLUME DUE TO TRANSIT RIDERSHIP, VEHICLE OCCUPANCY, OR TRIP DIVERSION. For Phase I there are no adjustments to the volumes shown in Table 11.5(R) to account for increased transit ridership or higher vehicle occupancies. Transit ridership percentages and vehicle occupancy rates used in projecting traffic generated by Permitted Developments as well as each development phase are those provided by Metro -Dade County. Although transit ridership percentages vary by development phase, vehicle occupancy rates remain constant. However, there was a minor diversion, of trips from Brickell Avenue to I-95 and S.W. 8th Street to account for construction activity. Table 11.5A(R), reflective of this diversion has been provided for each development phase. 5. FOR THE ROADWAY SEGMENTS IN TABLE 11.5 (TABLE 11.5A IF APPLICABLE) PRO- JECTED TO OPERATE BELOW PEAK HOUR LOS "D" (LOS "E" IN DOWNTOWN) DURING PHASE 1, IDENTIFY THOSE CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ALONG EACH SEGMENT THAT WERE NOT DEFINED IN THE PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE. FOR EACH CRITICAL INTERSECTION PROVIDE A DETAILED PEAK -HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS (USING FHWA'S 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL OPERATIONS METHODOLOGY). PROVIDE CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS AND COMPUTER PRINTOUTS FOR ALL INTERSECTION IN AN APPENDIX. BOTH AM AND PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS ARE NEEDED FOR EXPRESSWAY RAMP TERMINI, ONE-WAY STREETS, OR INTERSECTIONS WHERE AM VOLUMES ARE PROJECTED TO BE HIGHER THAN PM VOLUMES. The critical intersections to be analyzed in the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment DRI are those defined during the preapplication conference and subsequent discussions with Council Staff. It was also mutually agreed between the City of Miami and staff of the Regional Planning Council to use the Circular 212 Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Methodology for intersection capacity analysis. AM and PM peak -hour capacity analysis worksheets for the critical intersections are contained in Appendix 11-8(R) of this report. 6. COMPLETE TABLE 11.6 TOTAL TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS - COMMITTED NETWORK. 05/13/87 16:32:13 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK NEST DR1 Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - CDINITTED NETWORK (R) Area: S.E. 0 PIN Scenario: PHASE ONE AN Segeent l 1 Waller 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directioni VolunelCapacityPEccess C.l V/C ;LDS M. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd, 1 95 31 EB 1229 1920 691 0.64 B 01 NB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 362 1170 808 0.31 A Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA H.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA WA 31 SB 2775 1920 -855 1.45 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L ND 1103 1920 817 0.57 A 01 SB 0 0 0 NA NA W. Mimi Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 557 1920 1363 0.29 A N.W. I Ave. M.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA NA N.N. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA NA NA NA i NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 05/13/87 16:27:48 SOUTHEAST 0VERTOWN PARK WEST DR1 Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (RI Area: S.E. 0 PMW Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segeent 1 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour I 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction: Vo1uee:CapacitylExcess C.1 Y/C :LDS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 45 31. EB 1050 1920 870 0.55 A 0L WO 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 0L EB 0 0 0 MA NA 2L WB 717 1170 453 0.61 B Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LO NB 2330 2920 590 0.80 C 3LD SB 1216 2280 1064 0.53 A M.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 1031 1920 889 0.54 A W.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler 5t. 3L NB 2462 1920 -542 1.28 F OL 9 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. M.E. 17 St. Flagler Si. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31. 58 260 1420 1640 0.15 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 109 625 516 0.17 A IL SB 64 625 561 0.10 A N.M. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 488 625 137 0.78 C IL SB 83 625 542 0.13 A 13-May-87 13:43:01 SOUTHEAST DVERTOWN PARK NEST DR1 Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segaent . 0 t 1 Nuaber 1 1----- ---Peak-Hour l From i To i of Lanes:Directioni Voluae:Capacity:Eicess C.I V/C ;LDS SR B36/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 21 FW EB 2772 3800 1028 0.73 C 21 FW W8 3242 3800 558 0.85 D 1 95 N.N. 27 Ave. 31 FW EB 3118 5700 2582 0.55 A 3L FW NB 5027 5700 673 0.88 8 M.N. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. 31 FW EB 3709 5700 1991 0.65 8 31 FW NB 5848 5700 -148 1.03 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 31 FW EB 2324 5700 3376 0.41 A 31 FW NB 1880 5700 3820 0.33 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. H.E. 36 St. 21D NB 2142 1800 -342 1.15 F 211) SB 1456 1800 344 0.81 D N.E. 36 St. 1 395 2LD NB 2114 1800 -314 1.17 F 2LD SB 1256 1800 544 0.70 B Mimi Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 21 NB 499 1360 861 0.37 A 21 SB 405 1360 955 0.30 A I 95 N.W. 79 St. SR 112 51 FW NB 9456 9500 44 1.00 E 51 FW 58 5446 9500 4054 0.57 A SR 112 SR 836/1 395 51 FW NB 7527 9500 1973 0.79 C 51 FW 58 5615 9500 3885 0.59 A 13-May-87 14:47:09 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN1PARK NEST BRI Table II.SA: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (RI Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE ONE AM 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 Segment 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl VolumelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C 1L0S Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB NA 2280 NA HA HA 3LD WB NA 2280 NA HA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA HA 21 WB 312 1170 858 0.27 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 388 1170 782 0.33 A W. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. IL EB NA 785 HA NA NA 2L WB NA 1170 NA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.H. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1250 1920 670 0.65 B 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.H. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1173 2180 1007 0.54 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB NA 2920 HA NA 4LD SB HA 2920 NA KA W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.H. 7/8 St. IL NB NA 625 NA NA IL SB NA 625 HA NA 195 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA 5700 HA NA 3LFW SB NA 5700 NA NA + NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 11-53 tgggxtN 13-May-87 14:04:28 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COM1l1TTED NETWORK (R) Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segment 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Maur 1 1 From 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectionl Voluce1CapacitylExcess C.1 V/C 1LOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. I St, Biscayne Blvd. 195 0L EB 0 0 0 NA KA 2L WB 535 1170 635 0.46 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 653 1170 517 0.56 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB 189 785 596 0.24 A 2L WB 1170 1360 190 0.86 D S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 932 1920 988 0.49 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 682 2180 1498 0.31 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA MA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4L8 NB 1838 2920 1082 0.63 B 4L0 68 1477 2920 1443 0.51 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. 1L NB 590 625 35 0.94 E IL SB 758 625 -133 1.21 F 195 SR 836/I 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 5624 5700 76 0.99 E 3LFW SB 4937 5700 763 0.87 0 13-May-87 15: 45: 45 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DR1 Table II.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE AM 1 Number 1 l Peak -Hour 1 Segment 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes!Directinni Volume1CapacityExcess C. V/C 4LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31. NB 655 2180 1525 0.30 A 1 95 S.N. 27 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L W8 489 2180 1691 0.22 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 2169 3240 1071 0.67 8 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA I 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 41 EB 1740 3240 1500 0.54 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA NA NA HA NA 2L WB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 15 Rd. S.N. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA HA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA S.E. 7 St. Ritkenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB HA NA NA NA NA 31. SB NA NA NA NA HA S. 15 Rd. Ritkenbacker 211 NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA 1 95 S.N. 8 St. US 1 2LF11 NB HA NA NA NA NA 2LFW SB NA NA HA NA HA US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3L0 NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD S8 NA NA NA NA NA 8ayshore Dr. Ritkenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA t NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 14-May-87 09:15:45 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR} Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE PN 1 1 1 Nunber ; Peak -Hour Segaent 1 Fro 1 Tn ; of Lanes:Direction; VolunelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C 1LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 1651 2180 529 0.76 C 195 S.M. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 1179 2180 1001 0.54 A S. 8 St. BrickelI Ave. 195 4L EB 1042 3240 2198 0.32 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA 195 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1181 3240 2059 0.36 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA MA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB 370 1360 990 0.27 A 2L WB 1446 1360 -86 1.06 F S.W, 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 416 I800 1384 0.23 A 2LD WB 1224 1800 576 0.68 B S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1485 1800 315 0.83 D 2LO WB 1775 1800 25 0.99 E Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 1460 2785 1325 0.52 A 3LD 53 1375 2785 1410 0.49 A S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 689 1800 1111 0.38 A 2LD SB 1976 1800 -176 1.10 F Biagi Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB 802 2180 1378 0.37 A 3L SB 405 2180 1775 0.19 A 5. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 425 1800 1375 0.24 A 21.0 SB 1484 1800 316 0.82 D I 95 S.M. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 2437 3800 1363 0.64 B 2LFW SB 4151 3800 -351 1.09 F US 1 195 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 2850 2785 -65 1.02 F 3LD 58 4710 2785 -1925 1.69 F S.N. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 2699 2785 86 0.97 E 3LD 53 4450 2785 -1665 1.60 F Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 656 1800 1144 0.36 A 2LD 58 1463 1800 337 0.81 D 05/13/B7 16:56:40 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR} Area: S.E. 0 Pili Scenario: PHASE TWO AM 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 ; Segment 1 From 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectionl Voluae:CaparitylFxcess C. V/C ;LDS 1 N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 3L EB 1229 1920 691 0.64 B OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 362 1170 808 0.31 A Biscayne Blvd. 1395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1395 Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 2715 1920 -855 1.45 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1103 1920 817 0.57 A 0L SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 557 1920 1363 0,29 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St, Flagler St, IL NB NA NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA NA NA NA N.W. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L 9B NA NA NA NA NA * NA: Not Applicable. AK data required for one -may streets only. 05/12/87 14:18:20 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NEIWORK 1R1 Area: S.E. 0 PIN Scenario: PHASE TKO PM Segment 1 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Directionl Volume:Capacity:Excess C.1 V/C 1LOS 1 N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1136 1920 784 0.59 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA HA 2L WB 080 1170 290 0.75 C Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4L0 MB 2915 2920 5 1.00 E 3LD 88 1483 2280 797 0.65 B M.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL KB 0 0 0 NA HA 31 SB 1133 1920 787 0.59 A W.E. 1 Ave. M.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 31 NB 2761 1920 -641 1.44 F 0L SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. M.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 S8 340 1920 1580 0.18 A N.W. I Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL KB 138 625 487 0.22 A 1L SR 75 625 550 0.12 A N.W. 2 Ave. K.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL MB 575 625 50 0.92 E 11 SB 120 625 505 0.19 A 13-May-87 13:39:30 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DR1 Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK 1111 Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE TWO PM Segment 1 : From 1 1 To : Number : 1 Peak -Hour : : of Lanes:Direction: Volume:Capacity:Excess C.1 VIC :LOS SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 2L FW EB 2843 3800 957 0.75 C 21 FW WB 3300 3800 500 0.87 D 1 95 N.W. 27 Ave. 3L FW EB 3197 5700 2503 0.56 A 3L FW WB 5145 5700 555 0.90 D N.W. 27 Ave. Ledeune Rd. 3L FW EB 3807 5700 1893 0.67 B 3L FW WB 5996 5700 -296 1.05 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FW EB 2389 5700 3311 0.42 A 31 FW WB 1933 5700 3767 0.34 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 2198 1800 -398 1.22 F 2LD SB 1496 1800 304 0.83 D N.E. 36 St. 1 395 2LD NB 2164 1900 -364 1.20 F 2LD 58 1288 1800 512 0.72 C Miami Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2E NB 513 1360 847 0.38 A 2L 58 417 1360 943 0.31 A 1 95 N.W. 79 St. SR 112 51. FW NB 9722 9500 -222 1.02 F 51 FW SB 5601 9500 3899 0.59 A SR 112 SR 836/1 395 5L FW NB 7727 9500 1773 0.81 D 51. FW SB 5772 9500 3728 0.61 B 13-May-87 14:48:59 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5R: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR1 Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE TWO AM Segment 1 Number 1 1 ----- ----Peak-Hour l 1 Fro■ 1 To 1 of Lanes/Directionl Voluae1CapacitylEicess C.1 V/C 1LOS Port Bridge Port of Mini Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB NA 2280 NA NA NA 3L0 WB NA 2280 NA NA 11A N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA TEA 2L WB 312 1170 858 0.27 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. N. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 388 11I0 782 0.33 A W. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. IL EB NA 785 NA NA KA 2L NB NA 1170 NA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.N. 2 Ave. 31 EB 1250 1920 670 0.65 B OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.N. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1202 2180 978 0.55 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB NA 2920 NA NA 4LD SB NA 2920 NA NA W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.N. 7/8 St. IL NB NA 625 NA NA IL SB NA 625 NA NA 195 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA 5700 NA NA 3LFW SB NA 5700 NA NA f NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one -May streets only. tgcomtz 13-May-87 14:01:58 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE TWO PM 1 1 Segaent 1 Fro 1 To 1 Nuaber 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 of Lanes:Direction; VOluae1CapacitylExcess C.1 VIC 1LOS Port Bridge Port of Milli Biscayne Blvd. 310 EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. I St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 535 1170 635 0.46 A Flagier St, Biscayne Blvd, W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 653 1170 517 0.56 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. 1L EB 194 765 591 0.25 A 2L WB 1199 1360 161 0.88 ➢ S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 31. EB 932 1920 988 0.49 A OL W8 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 3L EB 700 2180 1480 0.32 A 01 WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4L➢ NB 183E 2920 1082 0.63 B 418 88 1477 2720 1443 0.51 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W, 7/8 St. IL NB 590 625 35 0.94 E 11 SB 758 625 -133 1.21 F I 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 5763 5700 -63 1.0! F 31F1 88 5069 5700 631 0.89 D 13-14ay-87 15:35:08 SOUTHEAST OVERTDW}UPARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR1 Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE TWO Alt Segeent 1 ; 1 Number 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To -1 of Lanes1Directionl Vo1use1Capacity1Escess C.1 V/C ILOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 MB 248 2180 1932 0.11 A 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 01. EB 0 0 0 NA WA 3L MB 358 2180 1822 0.16 A 5. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 195 41 EB 922 3240 2318 0.28 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA WA 195 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1429 3240 1811 0,44 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L MB NA NA NA NA WA S.M. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD W8 NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA MA NA NA NA 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA 11A NA 3LD 5B NA NA NA NA NA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD 5B NA NA NA NA WA Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB NA NA NA NA NA 3L SB NA NA NA NA NA S. 15 Rd, Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD 5B NA NA NA NA NA 1 95 S.W. 8 St. 11S 1 2LFW NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LFW S8 NA NA NA NA WA US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 1%A %A %A 1%A NA 3L0 S8 HA NA NA NA NA S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB HA NA NA NA NA 3L0 5B NA NA NA NA MA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Aye. 2LD NB HA NA NA NA NA 2L0 58 NA NA WA NA NA f MA: Not Applicable. Ali data required for one-way streets only. Seotat 13-May-87 13:16:23 SOUTHEAST OVERTONNIPARK WESI DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (R) Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE TWO PM From I Rubber 1 1 Peak -Hour I To 1 of Lanes1Directioni VolueelCapacitylEztess C.I VIC ILOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. I 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L MB 1651 2180 529 0.76 C 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 1209 2180 971 0.55 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 195 4L EB 1042 3240 219E 0.32 A 01 MB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 41 EB 1217 3240 2023 0.38 A 0L MB 0 0 0 NA MA Coral hays Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB 370 1360 990 0.27 A 2L MB 1446 1360 -86 1.06 F S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 426 1600 1374 0.24 A 210 WB 1254 1800 546 0.70 B S.M. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1527 1800 273 0.85 D 2LD MB 1822 1800 -22 1.01 F Brickell Ave. S.E, 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 31.0 NB 1463 2785 1322 0.53 A 310 58 1377 2785 1408 0.49 A S.E. 7 8t. Rickenbacker 2L8 NB 691 1800 1109 0.38 A 21.0 SB 1978 1800 -178 1.10 F Masi Ave. Flagler St. 5. 15 Rd. 3L NB 802 2180 1378 0.37 A 3L SB 405 2180 1775 0.19 A 8. 15 Rd, Rickenbacker 2LD MB 432 1800 1368 0.24 A 210 SB 1514 1800 286 0.84 D 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 2532 3800 1268 0.67 B 2LFW 58 4273 3800 -473 1.12 F US 1 I 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 2949 2785 -164 1.06 F 3LD 58 4838 2785 -2053 1.74 F S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 2789 2785 -4 1.00 E 3LO S8 4572 2785 -1787 1.64 F Bayshoce Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 673 1800 1127 0.37 A 2LD SB 1498 1800 302 0.83 0 05/12/87 08:54:08 SOUTHEAST 0VERTQWH PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (R) Area: S.E. 0 P\W Scenario: PHASE THREE AM 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour Segment 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl YolumelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C :LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1415 1920 505 0.74 C 01 KB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 01. EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 567 1170 603 0.40 A Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LB NB NA HA NA NA NA 31.0 SB NA NA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1395 Flagler St. 01 NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 3090 1920 -1170 1.61 F M.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1318 1920 602 0.69 B 0L SS 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 SB 766 1920 1154 0.40 A N.W. I Ave. M.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA NA IL S8 NA NA NA NA NA N.M. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L 88 NA NA NA NA NA t NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 05/13/B7 17:31:10 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (RI Area: S.E. 0 Plli Scenario: PHASE THREE P11 Segment 1 From 1 To 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 of Lanes:Direction: VolumelCapacity:Excess C.1 V/C 1LOS M. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 31 EB 1050 1920 870 0.55 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA RA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 717 1170 453 0.61 8 Biscayne Blvd. I 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB 2330 2920 590 0.80 C 3LD SB 1216 2280 1064 0.53 A M.E. 2 Ave. I 395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 HA NA 3L SB 1031 1920 889 0.54 A M.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2462 1920 -542 1.28 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA M. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31. SB 280 1920 1640 0.15 A K.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 109 625 516 0.17 A IL S8 64 625 561 0.10 A N.W. 2 Ave. 11.11. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB 488 625 137 0.78 C 1L SB 83 625 542 0.13 A 13-May-87 13:35:14 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR) Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Segeent 1 1 1 Nuober 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 n4 Lanes1Direction: Voluse:Capacity:Excess C. V/C ILOS SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 2L FM EB 2963 3800 837 0.78 C 2L FW WB 3398 3800 402 0.89 D 1 95 N.W. 27 Ave. 31 FW EB 3329 5700 2371 0.58 A 3L FW 11B 5344 5700 356 0.94 E N.W. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. 3L FW EB 3973 5700 1727 0.70 8 3L FW WB 6245 5700 -545 1.10 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FW EB 249B 5700 3202 0.44 A 3L FW WB 2023 5700 3677 0.35 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 2292 1800 -492 1.27 F 21.0 SB 1563 1800 237 0.87 D X.E. 36 St. 1 395 2LD NB 2249 1800 -449 1.25 F 2LD SB 1342 1800 458 0.75 C Mali Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 537 1360 823 0.40 A 2L SB 437 1360 923 0.32 A 1 95 N.W. 79 St. SR 112 5L Fit NB 10167 9500 -667 1.07 F 5L FW SB 5862 9500 3638 0.62 B SR 112 SR 836/1 395 5L FW NB 8062 9500 1438 0.85 D 5L FW SB 6035 9500 3465 0.64 B 13-May-87 14:51:48 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWH/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IR1 Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE THREE AM Segment I I Number I I Peak -Hour 1 From 1 To I of Lanes:Direction: Vo1ume:Capacity:Excess C.: VIC 1LOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB NA 2280 NA NA NA 3LD WB NA 2280 NA NA WA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 WB 312 1170 B58 0.27 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 388 1170 782 0.33 A W. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. 1L EB NA 785 NA NA NA 2L WB NA 1170 MA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1250 1920 670 0.65 B 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1250 2180 930 0.57 A oL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB NA 2920 NA NA NA 4LD SB NA 2920 NA NA NA V. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. 1L NB NA 625 NA NA NA IL SB NA 625 NA NA MA I 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA 5700 NA HA WA 3LFW SB HA 5700 NA NA NA * NA: Not Applicable. AN data required for one-way streets only. 11 — 67 13-May-87 13:56:13 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK NEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK (Ri Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Segment F 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Directionl VoluaelCapacity1EIcess C.1 V/C ;LDS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd, 3LD ES 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 535 1170 635 0.46 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 653 1170 517 0.56 A N. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. 1L EB 201 785 584 0.26 A 2L WB 1247 1360 113 0.92 E S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 932 1920 988 0.49 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA HA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 729 2180 1451 0.33 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 1838 2920 1082 0.63 B 4LD SB 1477 2920 1443 0.51 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB 590 625 35 0.94 E IL SB 758 625 -133 1.21 F I 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 5995 5700 -295 1.05 F 3LFW SB 5291 5700 409 0.93 E 13-May-87 15:31:12 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK HEST DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK IRI Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE THREE AM Segment 1 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl Vo1uie1Capacity1Escess C.! V!C :LOS 5. 7 St, Brickell Ave, 195 0L ER 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 248 2180 1932 0.11 A 1 95 S.H. 27 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 375 2180 1805 0.17 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. I 95 4L EB 922 3240 2318 0.28 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.K. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1499 3240 1741 0.46 A 0L WB 0 0 0 HA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA HA NA NA NA 2L WB NA NA HA NA NA S.W. 15 Rd. S.H. 12 Ave. 20 EB NA NA NA NA NA 20 WB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA HA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 31.D NB NA HA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA S.E. 7 5t. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA HA NA NA 2LD SB NA MA NA NA HA Nia.i Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB NA NA NA NA HA 3L SB NA NA HA NA NA 5. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA 195 S.W. 8 5t. US 1 2LFW NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LFW SB NA NA HA NA NA U5 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 30 NB NA NA HA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA HA HA NA S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA MA HA NA HA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA HA NA NA NA 2LD 5B MA NA NA HA NA f NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 0 98'0 SiZ 0081 SCSI 8S 01Z U 6£'0 Z011 0081 869 8N 01Z 'aAU LZ 'A'S 1243equa1318 •18 alaysAeg d 0L'1 8661- S8LZ ££Lb BS 0l£ d 601 00I- SBLZ S88Z 8N 01£ 'P8 selbna0 'aAU L1 'M'S 3 6L'1 LOZZ- SBLZ Z666 85 01£ d 60'1 £SZ- SBLZ 8£0£ 8N 01£ 'aAU LI 'M'S S6 1 1 50 J 91'1 819- 008£ 816t 8S Md1Z 8 69'0 6811 008£ 919Z 8N Md1Z 1 SO '4S 8 'M'S S6 1 0 L8'0 L£Z 0081 £9S1 as an V SZ'0 LS£1 0081 £66 8N 01Z 1213e9021391 'PH Si '5 U 61'0 SLL1 081Z SOt 8S 1£ V L£'0 8L£1 081Z ZOB ON 1£ 'PH Sj 'S '1S 1215e1d 'am, laelil d 011 9L1- 0081 9161 89 01Z U 8£'0 1111 0081 689 ON QlZ 1a13equa131H '1S L '3'S V 66"O OIiI S8LZ SL£1 8S Olt V ZS'0 SZ£1 SBLZ 0961 HN O1£ 15 L '3'S '45 Z '3'5 'all 1ia13118 A 901 201- 0081 2061 8M 01Z 0 68'0 ZOZ 0081 8651 03 01Z '2AU LZ 'A'S '2AU ZI 'M'S 3 £L'0 S66 0081 SO£1 8M au U SZ'0 8S£1 0081 Z66 83 111Z 'aAU ZI 'M'S 'P8 Si 'M'S 3 90'1 98- 0921 9661 8M 1Z U LZ'0 066 09£1 Ott 83 1Z 'P8 S1 'M'S 'am, 11aXa110 AEM 1e1a3 UN UN 0 0 0 8M 10 V 6£'0 SL61 oil£ S9ZI 83 lr '2AU LZ 'M'S 56 1 VN VN 0 0 0 8M l0 U Z£'0 861Z M£ Z601 83 16 S6 1 '2A0 112P118 1S 8 'S V L5'0 126 081Z 66-Z1 8M 1£ UN UN 0 0 0 03 10 'aAU LZ 'M'S 56 1 3 9L'0 6ZS 0B1Z 1S9I BM 1£ VN UN 0 0 0 83 10 S6 1 '2AU 11243110 '1S L 'S 501E 3IA 1'3 ssa)x31A1TDede31asinIn6 ;ua113a11Q;sauel fa 1 1 1n0H-lead 1 1 _aganH 1 01 1 , 1011 1 ;uai lay , 7 Wd 338H1 3SUHd :o11eua35 11143180 :e21U 1131 )01011138 8311116103 - 3Id3U81 3180104 0315111'OU :U511 21ge1 IN 1S3M A8Ud/HM0183A0 15U3H11105 £Y'==ZI:60 L8-Aei1-61 Table 11.6 has been completed as requested. Please note that the title of Table 11-6 reads "Future Traffic" in order to provide a consistent terminology for this section (11-C) of Question 11. Based on the agreement to use Circular 212, Table 11.6 has been modified to show percent saturation (V/C ratios) as well as excess capacity. Excess capacity shown on this table is the capacity available after all Permitted Development plus development anticipated to occur in the other Downtown sub -areas (Omni, CBD and Brickell) is constructed and fully occupied. Inclusion of all Permitted Development at this point in the analysis provides a baseline from which to evaluate the impacts of proposed development. Even if all Permitted Development is not constructed and fully occupied at the end of Phase 1 (as the procedure implies) its impacts have been accounted for. A majority of the intersections have existing and projected operating conditions at LOS "A", "B" and "C". These levels of service may appear too good to be true but actually reflect field conditions. Field surveys and traffic counts show that traffic volumes have very short (15 to 30 minute) peaking characteristics (see Appendix 11-4(R)). Field surveys indicated that by 5:30 pm to 5:45 pm there is very little or no queue on many of the intersection approaches. Only one intersection is projected to operate below Level of Service "E" when the traffic generated by all Permitted Development is added to the Downtown Transportation network. This intersection, N.E. 1st Avenue and the 1-395 on -bound ramp (north) is presently operating at LOS "E" and is projected to operate at LOS "F". Geometric improvements at this intersection are physically constrained. D. ADDITIONAL APPROVABLE DEVELOPMENT 1) PROVIDE A MAP OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA FOR EACH PHASE (J-4 series) SHOWING PROJECTED AVAILABLE EXCESS CAPACITY. FOR PHASE 1: EXCESS CAPACITY SHOULD BE BASED ON A COMBINATION OF PROJECTED VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS FOR INTERSECTIONS AS A WHOLE, AS A MEASURE OF INTER- SECTION CAPACITY; AND AVERAGE STOPPED TIME DELAYS FOR INTERSECTIONS AS A WHOLE, AS A MEASURE OF LEVEL OF SERVICE (EXCEPT FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND ARTERIALS WHERE TRAFFIC FLOW IS NOT INTERRUPTED BY SIGNALS AND DRIVE- WAYS, WHERE EXCESS CAPACITY SHOULD BE BASED ON PROJECTED EXCESS LOS "D" (LOS "E" IN DOWNTOWNS) LINK CAPACITY. FOR ALL OTHER PHASES, EXCESS CAPACITY SHOULD BE BASED ON PROJECTED EXCESS LOS "D" (LOS "E" IN DOWNTOWNS) LINK CAPACITY. ALTHOUGH THE DATA MAY BE AGGREGATED GEOGRAPHICALLY FOR EASE OF PRESENTATION, IT MUST ALSO BE PRESENTED FOR EACH CRITICAL INTERSECTION AND LINK. The Map J-4(R) series identifying excess capacity of roadway links and intersections (Phase I only) has been provided. Map J-4.1A(R) shows excess link capacity for Phase I and Map J-4.1B shows excess intersections capacity for Phase I. Maps J-4.2(R) and J-4.3(R) show excess link capacity for Phases II and III respectively. Excess Capacity shown one the Map J-4(R) series is the capacity available prior to the traffic assignment for additional approvable development for the particular phase. Map J-4.1A(R) Excess Capacity - Roadway Links (PM) prior to Phase I indicates an excess capacity of 1,001 on S.W. 7th Street west of 1-95. This means that after adding existing traffic plus background traffic plus Permitted Development traffic there is capacity on this roadway link for an additional 1,001 vehicles per hour. This excess capacity figure can be found on Table 11.5(R) Adjusted Future -Traffic Committed Network, Brickell, Phase one PM. To help in reviewing the Map J-4(R) series, the following is a summary of this map series and the corresponding table where the excess capacities are shown. Map Table J- .1A(R) 11.5A(R) J-4.1B(R) 11.6(R) J-4.2A(R) 11.9(R) Phase 0ne J-4.3A(R) 11.9(R) Phase Two The agreement between Council staff and the applicant to use the Circular 212 Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Methodology, for detailed intersection capacity analysis, precludes using volume to capacity ratios and average stopped delay in calculating excess capacity. However, excess capacity, at critical intersections, can be calculated from the CMA worksheets. Excess capacity, using this methodology, is expressed in terms of the additional number of Critical Movements that can travel thru an intersection at Level of Service "E". Level of Service "E" represents capacity and therefore full utilization of the carrying capacity of the intersection. A sample calculation of excess Critical Movements is shown below. 11-72 De,id Kr:mm And Maocialat M+a Bens* Kaki And Very, krc. Widrrie-fail And .khsaL Yyc Errhamald Envineerho Comellanis. Inc MAP J-4.1A(R)EXCESS CAPACITY -ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE 1 (AM) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 0 8 CITY Of MIAMI DEPARTAFaEHT 11--73 i!o Zmiiill 11n itt--.---1:11.:...._-_=_-----_-_,....,, FA 11t 11111� ►1 �.,.�11. = gliii ii\� Milt IIt �,�, L 6 1 1 I I ft z Ilr i IMP s_•._ ,.1\. Er - u`I'_ aim J 3I!L1J11 JLIJIliW t� -Q:- f ■ I EA ■i 808 as 1 110 ►ii 'w mimic mak( f_ .i'- I, town 1111 Ni it 111 = t r,El = 1 • • 1525 1071 Ar* r 4/4104.14, 1 1 LIM1 4.1./1110 .Q[‘7 David PUrmnsr And Asaoclata. t,a Emormallo, KuMd Arm/ Vera, to. MIllwra-tread And Janson. t4 Envirorruest21 Erciromery Ceti. Ina MAP J-4.1A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY --ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE 1 (AM) g SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT COTV Of MIAMI DEPAATAMNT — 74 David Fkfmier And Aasocferat BanTre o. Kull And Vera, lnd. '/Yti7ernr-fka And .ldrnsen. t+c. Erntorraxxd E CaratlwMe. hC, MAP J--4.1A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY --ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE I (PM) o w SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of MIAMI DEPAPTAIsEMT 11 — 75 1LIR 1.411 gym=kI JJuE1J4QR Eiu .►.! i D i-i1 l.111f1l-li1 I riMmoim 111111111"- MN J1(call woo ai f•T•_�I• • 'ar.1 as is aux mow Wool.MI Iwo Lim i 1sf- 111111 ri 4 w �ll � i3Jr- 8 7r Er �C co II.�' 529 2198 —86 itl Wool~ Wool 4,141* D* 4d Pirmw And M.oc4 tr►. tro. Bormrea, )aid Ard Yarn. Inc. Wawa-RW*4i And .idnsut h . MAP J-4.1A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY: -ROADWAY SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Engrorrnentel, LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE I (PM) WEST CITY OF MIAMI Q£PAATAMENT ti r. iUkfI11J;WEI ..IE[uhroILIIII 11-1 1!=' I �,IIIII II ,1.i_r Ir1III__ a . 7 cup, 1 fr = Eft Netwm uw __r; 1 11Jli Dui Ia =I;LIJi 1 iLIJ 3 _ 1� is [- - 148' 91R 1. if. grfi, r dn w i r 6 5. NW- f 0671 001 DivAd P .n mr "old Associates, he. Bennd4 Kuid And Yam IFS And Jotneon. Ira Erreirorrnote Enaineorkv Caleatan[0. ha MAP J-4.1B EXCESS CAPACITY -INTERSECTIONS (AM). PH I SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY OF WAID OEPARTAL.ENT 11 - 77 �.. 11 1 [11 El1 <<,l1i1 I ltl1i'1l 1[i111]illl al 1 -I J1 I Illi iiii, . i TiiiOn er r �`I+td74 J it 1243 A\ 4 << 1344 • .gym hilt -a7 230 QEJ t'10 J L7a nl .% I! r •nr 1 10781 774 414 tatirt 1220 1 C11 464."_ 253 MIS 814 David l'kmnor And A..aodat... k+ . }4rld And Y. bses. Ar+d Erwformotal Enaho4rb+p Cc.iSl.rt% b o. MAP J-4.1B EXCESS CAPACITY -INTERSECTIONS (PM). PH 1 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT F2?I D1 CITY Of LRALit D€PARTA0E1T David Pummel And Aasoclataa. Nc, Ba-+neb. Ku1d And Vert..• Wittrns-Russet And Minton. t,c. EnvtorrnarM& ErgMnrrt,q Ca' 41x*1s. f+c. MAP J-4.2A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY —ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE II (AM)o J SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTALFENT 11-79 ' 1 it JL. ii:= Willi 1JLIi i V i [ I 1 BEI [U Ili N T/, . II1111111NIIII -�;_ .�I I ,IZ111I1tIFItIIj1Iw>_. Qv'., :I a) David firnhar And Acoodeava. ha. Srentao. K W And And Johvon. >,h. Enelrormonia/ Ercincolv Canheltrts.t MAP J-4.2A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY --ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE II (AM) E SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST 3 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of MAIM DEPAATALEMT 11-80 Oerid Pt+mmr And oc 1 l.L he Barmeo. Kwkl Add Vies. Inc, VVElams-f 4 AM Johnson. he. Erara*nard EnSd^serN Ca>xfinr ly ► r• MAP J-4.2A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY -ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE II (PM) g SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY OF MVeIAN[ OEIAnt AI €NT D..4d Ptrrw Arai Moodat.o. 1n eam40. toxi4 And Vert. h. W6 a-fiooa! Mi Jolr*on, Ins ,4«..td Ervirsearixt Cux,Hants l+c r MAPJ-4.2A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY -ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TOz PHASE II (PM) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY OF !MAW DEPARTA►EWT 11-82 7f S! CauSL.rar Nw 17 Se SN !17 licK(H6+CA.ER CavS[wAe N13 M1a 'WPM CAUS[war YilcARiMIFt CAUSE .7•• -\)ok a O.i 4a PUcrrexx Ana Aa1wC1*1I1. M'C. Bs n*4o. Kcr1d And Vt.L he. ri"ttmla—Ru**a1 And .jOtY>♦L \ 11C. EPncc!>r enlPr ewineC+a7 Ca lall3 *n7*. hG 7- MAP J-4.3A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY -ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TOi PHASE III (AM)!,, SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of M1AUt DEPARTA►1@NT 11 - 83 ir I[ 1 it 11101P.'' tl� .11111V. 1mm, itimmar- ��gm ��� ' t, owl_ .•i4. c4 Om 1 iiiami IN 1 � . , 'K iZP■ �, l lr:►,$I'.kOW MINI um ii i1 11111 J1 Jc'_J1-0 �[i[U rm l T T 1 ■i1 • A CO Ism lipp: 660 of MM owls 1Q L 0 785 846 ❑❑ 526 ]E 1318 BMW' _f fp-m -Eft t 483 it‘? S‘.• 404111 I •)-\<\A 4 ice J� 1 David Manner And Aaeocicley bp. Derma*, KWQ Arid Ysv, h4 ►,iam-re-flufteol Aral Jetnstrb.b. Errirorrnaegai Ercheinttg CoraLkUnta, MAP J-4.3A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY —ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO PHASE III (AM) t SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of MHAMH DEPARTAM4ENT 11 — 84 David Plummer er And Associates, he. 8arw.ikt. kLrki And Vera. tx Wilerns-iiueaei And Johnson, Inc. FnvUornw++at eng'ne.efIng Cc nutthnts. r� MAP J-4.3A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY -ROADWAY LINKS PRIOR TO i PHASE III (PM) a • N SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RJ ;I] Q ]Q Il L it _ tl;LJii 11 if i l ni1i T 1 1iFV mai TA �f A141.ai - �•1� It.f1=f1�11Trim C C m \ria 11-1 \'� Mk 11 111 IP IRE wamovI isat NI P maim 1 i 1{ I4 3 4 In% LU ti 271l, — � 1111 779 = ill: ti (63 •- 1..• 45 13 r 1 co 6 0 561 791 Emmr nut 1946 —322 • 6 /J O bit . . 9 f f NEE 1 r, David PAnd AaraaOstraa. ha, liermalka. Kati Ifftl Vero. ha, MAP J-4.3A (R) EXCESS CAPACITY--ROADWA SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Errolnarrmantsi Enchearbg C«ail.rt.. Y LINKS PRIOR TOi PHASE III (PM) , WEST CITY Of IMAMt OEPAATAM N1 11 - 86 Calculation of Excess Intersection Capacity Intersection Type: Two one-way streets. Signal Phasing: Two Phase Sum of Critical Volumes @ LOS "E" - 1,800 Sum of Critical Volumes from analysis = 1,450 Excess Capacity = 350 The general methodology for generating traffic associated with the Additional Approvable Development is the same as that discussed in section C-1. Trip generation for each development phase is contained in Appendix 11-2(R). As has been discussed in previous sections of this study, traffic projections for Additional Approval Development are based on modal split and vehicle occupancy rates provided by Metro -Dade Transportation Administration. These modal splits and vehicle occupancies are expected to be achieved in Phase I. Consistent with current County policy and transportation funding programs this rates assumes the extension of Metromover to Omni and Brickell. The Metromover extension to Omni includes three stations located within the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area. Metromover station locations are shown on Map J-6 (Section F-3). Presently over $100,000,000 has been appropriated (by the Federal Government) and/or programmed by other governmental entities for the Metromover extensions. A more detailed discussion of the funding status of this system is contained in section F3. 2. IDENTIFY, BY COMPLETING TABLE 11.7, THE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL DEVELOP- MENT, USING A LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ACCEPTABLE TO COUNCIL STAFF, THAT COULD BE PERMITTED WITHOUT FALLING BELOW THE VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO AND LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA SPECIFIED. Table 11-7 identifies the proposed development program i.e. Additional Approvable Development by land use, for S.E. Overtown/Park West by phase. The land uses and development intensities identified on this table are in addition to presently permitted development. The traffic generated by these land uses are analyzed in this section of the report. The peak -hour Level of Service for S.E. Overtown Park West, as specified in the DRI Questionnaire, is LOS "E". However, the Questionnaire also allows for a certain percentage of roadway links and/or intersections to fall below LOS "E". No more than 20 percent of roadway links and intersections can be below LOS "E". It is important to understand that LOS "E", as used in this document, represents the fully utilized capacity of the roadway link or intersection being analyzed. Although the S.E. 0vertown Park West DRI Questionnaire allows no more than 20 percent of the roadway links and/or intersection below LOS "E", the City of Miami and Downtown Development Authority have an agreement with the South Florida Regional Planning Council which specifies that "The goal for the street system is to maintain Level of Service (LOS) 11 -- 87 TABLE 11.7 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR S.E. OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOP-MENT M A DRr A.. CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT Land Use Office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Phase I 166,000 sq. ft. 66,200 sq. ft. 2,000 D.U.'s 290,000 sq. ft. B. DEVELOPMENT BY PHASE Land Use Office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Phase I 166,000 sq. ft. 66,200 sq. ft. 2,000 D.U.'s 290,000 sq. ft. Phase II 371,000 sq. ft. 103,000 sq. ft. 500 Rooms 4,000 D.U.'s 600,000 sq. ft. Phase II 205,000 sq. ft. 37,300 sq. ft. 500 Rooms 2,000 D.U.'s 310,000 sq. ft. Phase III 1,003,500 sq. ft. 194,100 sq. ft. 1,100 Rooms 9,000 D.U.'s 600,000 sq. ft. Phase III 632,500 sq. ft. 90,600 sq. ft. 600 Rooms 5,000 D.U.'s "D" or better, wherever possible within the limitations of "physical, historic, or aesthetic constraints". This agreement allows intersections and roadway links to drop below the specified LOS if relevant and feasible management techniques have been applied." Given the existence of this agreement, a discussion of possible improvement alternatives and management techniques is provided. This discussion is provided in the response to D-6 for intersection and roadway links projected to operate at or below LOS "E". 'regardless of the above requirements and agreements, there is an apparent conflict between the level of service criteria of the Downtown/ Areawide DRI Questionaire and that contained in the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP). Level of service criteria from the FTP is shown below. STATEWIDE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE OPERATING LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS FOR STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Rural/Ur ate- Urbanized Areas Special With Population With Population Transportation Roadway Type Less than 50,000 50,000 or More Area Freeways C D E Rural Arterials and Extension of Rural Principal Arterials Into and Through Urban Areas C D E Other Urban Arterials Not Included Above O E E According to the FTP Special Transportation Areas are defined as areas which may: include central business districts, outlying business districts, and approved Areawide Developments of Regional Impact; however, they do not apply to strip development along highway corridors. Based on this definition, the Metro -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has been requested to designate the entire traffic impact area (Map J-A) as a Special Transportation Area. A letter to the MPO containing this request and outlining the reasons for this designation is contained in Appendix 11-1(R). To date, no action has been taken by the MPO on this request. However, on April 10, 1987 the Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Committee (TPTAC) met to review this request. At that meeting, a much smaller area was discussed. This smaller area is defined as North 20th Street on the north, South 26th Road and Rickenbacker Causeway on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and West 7th and 9th Avenues on the west. For purposes of this analysis it is assumed that this area will be designated a Special Transportation Area. 11. -- 89 The Florida Department of Transportation is presently reconsidering the LOS "E" designation for Freeways in Special Transportation Areas. This reconsideration is based on a desire to ensure a higher level of service standard on roadways which provide for regional mobility. Typically, this would be the access -controlled roadway system including travel corridors to and through urban areas, The LOS "D" standard being contemplated for these facilities would be applicable to 1-95, 1-395 and S.R. 836 within the traffic impact area. This modification to the Special Transportation Area LOS designations was also discussed by the TPTAC. This report assumes LOS "D" on the expressways. However, there is recognition within the Florida Department of Transportation and also in the Florida Transportation Plan that there are physical and financial limitations to the continued expansion of the state highway system. This is particularly true in rapidly growing urban areas where a "threshold" is reached beyond which expansion is no longer cost-effective. This has led to the adoption of new policy defining these "thresholds" which will be used to define "constrained" facilities. This policy also allows for the redirection of funds from a specific state highway to an alternate facility (usually parallel) or mode such as transit. The new policy and approach will be used in the S.E. 0vertown/Park West DRI in order to determine mitigative measures for impacts resulting from the redevelopment of the area. -The first step in this analysis is to identify those roadways which are considered "constrained". This list of roadways has not been finalized by the State. Therefore, certain assumptions have to be made based on a knowledge of the physical, historical and aesthetic constraints within the traffic impact area. For purposes of this study the following roadways are considered to be constrained. Roadway State Route Designation Constraint 1-95 S.R. 9A Physical 1-395 S.R. 836 Physical Dolphin Expressway S.R. 836 Physical* Biscayne Boulevard S.R. 5 Physical Brickell Avenue S.R. 5 Physical & Aesthetic U.S. 1 S.R. 5 Physical Flagler Street S.R. 968 Physical Coral Way S.R. 972 Physical & Historical S.W. 7th/8th Street S.R. 90 Historical & Physical Additional right-of-way is available along Biscayne Boulevard between N.E. 5th Street and 1-395. The remaining process for the S.E. 0vertown/Park West DRI mitigation procedures, as it applies to the State Road system, is as follows: 11--90 1. Identify all roadway links and intersections analyzed in the S.E. Overtown/Park West DRI presently operating and projected, by Phase 1, to operate at or below LOS "E". 2. Describe the improvements required to maintain Level of Service "E" and/or "D" operation, whichever is applicable, or based on logical increments of construction, the resultant LOS. For roadways and/or intersections presently operating below LOS "E", only the improvements required to maintain the existing V/C ratio will be included. The methodology for calculating this implied cost has been agreed upon with FDOT. Roadway improvements required for constrained facilities will be termed' "theoretical" and improvements for non -constrained roadways will be recommended. 3. Develop cost estimates (1987 dollars) for all improvements described in item #2. Where right-of-way is not available or is impractical to purchase only construction costs will be developed. Where right-of-way is available or can be purchased both right-of-way and construction cost will be estimated. 4. Calculate the Phase I proportionate share of the "theoretical" and recommended regional network improvements for the S.E. Overtown/Park West development intensities following the South Florida Regional Planning Council Guidelines as noted below. A. Programmed and Planned Improvements. Project Traffic x Improvement Cost Total Traffic Including Right-of-way. B. Recommended and "Theoretical" Improvements Project Traffic x Improvement Cost Total Traffic -Existing Traffic 5. Sum the proportionate share total costs for all of the above regional improvements within the traffic area. Divide this total cost by the total Phase I development intensities (in square feet). This value will be the "Regional Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee" per square foot for the S.E. Overtown/Park West Phase I Redevelopment program. 6. The City will prepare the appropriate Ordinance(s) to assess Developers for their proportionate share of the below LOS "D" and "E" Regional Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee. This Ordinance may be included as a part of the City's Impact Fee Ordinance, which does not address any regional impacts, or as a condition within the S.E. Overtown/Park West DRI Development Order. 7. If Metro Dade County adopts a countywide transportation (roadway) impact fee ordinance, impact fees collected within the S.E. Overtown/ Park West study area will be credited toward the County's transportation impact fee. The proportionate share fee cannot exceed the transportation impact fee assessed by Dade County. 11 — 91 8. The City will develop an interlocal agreement with Dade County which will allow the City to use the Mitigation dollars (Impact fees) to fund or provide matching funds for regionally significant improvements including but not limited to motor vehicle, transit and/or parking. 9. When the City of Miami updates the traffic section of the S.R. Overtown/Park West DRI a Regionally Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee for the S.E. Overtown/Park West Development will be calculated, Calculation of the Phase I proportionate and the Regional Trans- portation Impact Mitigation Fee is contained in Appendix 11.5 (R). 3. FOR ANY PHASE, THE APPLICANT WISHES MORE DEVELOPMENT BY LAND USE (TABLE 11.7) RECOMMEND THE NETWORK/INTERSECTION/ SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR REGULATORY CHANGES THAT WOULD IMPROVE PROJECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE AND VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS TO ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS. For Phase 1, only the roadway and intersection improvements identified as Committed Improvements (Table 11.1(R)) have been included. Although there are no physical intersection and/or roadway link improvements required for Phase I, other than those that are committed, it is the City of Miami's intent to institute a number of regulatory changes. These regulatory changes include; Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies and parking strategies which are aimed at encouraging transit ridership and ridesharing and improving projected operating conditions. One TSM strategy that is of particular interest to the City is a program to encourage developers and/or employers to purchase transit passes in lieu of subsidizing employee parking. Dade County Parking/Transit Ridership Study (Technical Report #1), August 1986 estimates that 50 percent (28,000) of CBD sub -area employees receive parking subsidies (full or part). Assuming a vehicle occupancy of 1.25 persons this represents some 22,400 parked vehicles. It is estimated that reducing the subsidy to 40 percent would reduce the number of parked vehicles by 1,250 (1,560 employees) and increase the number of transit riders by 1,300. The remaining employees would either pay for parking themselves or find alternate modes (i.e. car pooling). As can be seen the 20 percent reduction in employee parking subsidies could have a significant impact on the number vehicles of entering and exiting Downtown during the AM and PM peak hours. Obviously, the greater the subsidy reduction the higher the number of employees shifting to transit and car-pools. The applicant also intends to limit the number of on -site parking spaces associated with future development. The on -site parking supply will be controlled by the recently enacted zoning districts which cover a majority of the redevelopment area. More detailed information on parking demand and requirements is contained in section E-Parking. A conceptual description of a Transportation System Management (TSM) Strategies Ordinance, including a list of potential TSM's and an On -Site Parking Ordinance are contained in Appendix 11-6(R). It is the intent 11- 92 that appropriate combinations be implemented for Phase I development. As future development phases are analyzed in more detail, based on changing mode splits, vehicle occupancies and peak hour arrival and departure rates, these ordinances will be modified to reflect changing conditions. , Consistent with the interim/interim transportation policy and the agreement between the City of Miami, Downtown Development Authority and, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, only Committed Improvements have been included in the Phase I, II and III analyses. 4. COMPLETE TABLE 11.8: RECOMMENDED ROADWAY/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Table 11.8(R) has been modified to shown only "Theoretical" improvements. Additional improvements which are programmed in the County's TIP or for which there are partial funding commitments are not shown. These improvements have been identified in previous studies, more detailed than this one, and therefore, should be implemented as scheduled. Based on the level of service operations and roadway constraint criteria discussed in previous sections, no improvements are recommended. However, it is important to note that the City of Miami and/or other governmental entities may adopt more rigid traffic operations policies in the Downtown area. If this occurs, many additional improvements, not identified in this study may be required. The analysis contained in this study has addressed regional transportation issues. The findings, of this study do not preclude the City or any other governmental entity from requiring a developer to mitigate impacts of -a more localized nature or at locations not analyzed in this study. The V/C analysis methodology used in this report will identify improvements necessary due to capacity constraints. Improvements required due to traffic operation concerns, mechanical failures and physical deterioration cannot, therefore, be identified. Improvements failing within these categories have been identified in other transportation studies and may be undertaken during the Phase I development time frame. 5. SHOW EXISTING GEOMETRICS AND PROVIDE A CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND COST ESTIMATE, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, FOR EACH IMPROVEMENT, REGULATORY CHANGE (IF APPLICABLE), OR MODIFICATION REQUIRED. Geometries for Committed Improvements included in the Phase I analysis are described, in narrative format, on Table 11.1(R). This table also provides cost estimates for both private and public improvements. Geometries for Phase II and III improvements are described in Table 11.8(R). Cost estimates have also been provided in this Table. 6. NUMERICALLY DOCUMENT THE LEVEL OF SERVICE EFFECT OF ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ALL REGULATORY OR SYSTEM CHANGES. FOR EACH PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGE, DESCRIBE A RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE THAT WOULD ACCOMPLISH 11 - 93 PHASE 1 LOCATION "Theoretical" TABLE 11.8(R) "THEORETICAL" ROADWAY/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS COST(1) IMPROVEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION (2) S.R. 836/I-395 N.W. 27th Ave. to LeJeune Road. S.R. 836/1-395 Biscayne Blvd. to 1-95 S.R. 836/1-395 1-95 to N.W. 27th Ave. Biscayne Blvd. - N.E. 62nd Street to N.E. 36th St. Biscayne Blvd. - N.E. 36th Street to 1-395 Brickell Ave. S.E. 7th St. to Rickenbacker Cswy. Add one lane each direction NA Add one lane each direction Add one lane each direction Add one lane each direction Add one lane each direction Add one lane each direction 1-95 - N.W. 79th St. Add one lane each direction to S.R. 112 1-95 - S.R. 836/1-395 to Add one lane each direction S.W. 8th Street 1-95 - S.W. 8th St. Add one lane each direction to U.S. 1. Coral Way - Brickell Ave. to S.W. 15th Road Coral Way - Brickell Ave. to S.W. 15th Road Coral Way - S.W. 12th Ave. to S.W. 27th Ave. Add turn lanes Add one lane each direction Add one lane each direction NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA $ 1,830,000 $ 1,220,000 $ 2,806,000 $ 624,000 $ 960,000 $ 960,000 $ 3,126,250 $ 5,462,500 $ 1,372,500 $ 200,000 $ 960,000 PHASE LOCATION TABLE 11.8(R) "THEORETICAL" ROADWAY/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS COST(1) IMPROVEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION (2) U.S. 1-1-95 to S.W. 17th Ave. U.S. 1-S.W. 17th Ave. to Douglas Road. N.E. 1st Ave./I-395 (North Ramp) Add two lanes each direction NA Add two lanes each direction NA Add one lane to westbound NA ramp and restripe. (1) 1986 Dollars. (2) Includes Construction and Construction Inspections. $ 896,120 $ 2,400,000 $ 76,950 THE CHANGE. COMPLETE TABLES 11.9 AND 11.10, AND PROVIDE IN AN APPENDIX INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES (INCLUDE EACH INTERSECTION SHOWN IN THE RESPONSE TO C5) ILLUSTRATING THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO THAT WOULD RESULT FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS AND REGULATORY CHANGES PROPOSED. As has been indicated the City intends to implement policies to encourage transit ridership and ridesharing, regulate parking supply and fund transportation improvements. Descriptions of these ordinances are contained in Appendix 11-6(R). Table 11.9(R) Total Traffic - Recommended Network shows future conditions without any of the "Theoretical" improvements. Tables 11.9A and 11.10 have been provided showing the level of service operating conditions if the "Theoretical" improvements were implemented. These tables are provided to show that mitigative measure do meet the LOS criteria. Intersection capacity Analysis is contained in Appendix 11-8(R). Excess capacity shown on Table 11.9A and Table 11.10 _ is the capacity available at the end of Phase I development. A total of 22 intersections were analyzed to determine operating conditions at the end of Phase I development. All 22 intersections, except one, were subjected to P.M. peak hour analysis and 7 were also analyzed for the A.M. peak hour. The results of these analyses (Table 11-10) are that 2 intersections will operate at or below LOS "E" One (1) intersection is projected to operate at LOS "E" and one (1) is projected to operate below LOS "E". This one (1) intersection represent only five (5) percent of the 22 intersections analyzed and is well below the 20 percent allowed under the Downtown/Areawide DRI Questionnaire. Both intersections projected to operate at or below LOS "E" were investigated to determine if there were any geometric or operational improvements which would improve the projected levels of service. This investigation revealed that a majority of these intersections are built to the maximum cross-section within existing physical constraints. Appendix 11-5(R) provides a listing of both intersections projected to operate at or below LOS "E". This listing also identifies the physical, historical or aesthetic constraints which preclude geometric modifications to improve the projected level of service operating conditions. Potential improvements are also described, where appropriate. 0f 28 directional roadway links analyzed, during the P.M. peak hour within the Downtown study area, six (6) are projected to operate at or below LOS "E" at the end of Phase I. One (1) roadway link is projected to operate at LOS "E" and five (5) are projected to operate below LOS "E". Based on the Downtown/Areawide DRI Questionnaire, which allows 20 percent of roadway links to fall below LOS "E" it is permissible to have six (6) roadway links operating below "E". During the A.M. peak hour only one (1) link is projected to operate below LOS "E". This is also below the established criteria. 11 " 96 05/11/87 16:53:07 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IR) Area: S.E. 0 P111 Scenario: PHASE ONE AM Segment 1 Number l 1 Peak -Hour ---1 l From To 1 of LanesiDirectionl Volume1Capacity1Excess C.I V/C LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 3L EB 1313 1920 607 0.68 B OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 NB 450 1170 720 0.38 A Biscayne Blvd. 1395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA' NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 SB 3031 1920 -1111 1.58 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1203 1920 717 0,63 B 01 SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N,E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 654 1920 1266 0.34 A N.N. 1 Ave. N.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA NA NA MA N.M. 2 Ave. N.R. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA NA ' NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 11 - 97 05112/87 14:15:29 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK, WEST ➢RI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOHHENDE➢ NETWORK IR) Area: S.E. 0 P\W Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segsent 1 Nusber 1 ; Peak -Hour 1 1 Fros 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directi©nl VoluselCapacitylExcess C.1 YWC LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1086 1920 834 0.57 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA WA 2L WB 829 1170 341 0.71 C Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4L8 NB 2726 2920 194 0.93 E 3LD 53 1396 2280 B84 0.61 8 N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 1147 1920 773 0.60 A N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2669 1920 -749 1.39 F 0L SB 0 0 0 NA MA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 SB 328 1920 1592 0.17 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 11 NB 138 625 487 0.22 A 1L SB 76 625 549 0.12 A N.W. 2 Ave. N.V. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 569 625 56 0.91 E IL 98 139 625 486 0.22 A 11-May-87 10:15:02 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK 1R1 Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE ONE PM 1 Number 1 Peak -Hour Segaent i From I To I of LanesEDirectioni Volume>CapacitylExcess C.1 V/C LOS SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 195 21 FW EB 2990 3800 810 0.79 C 2L FW NB 3697 3800 103 0.97 E 195 N.W. 27 Ave. 3L FM EB 3293 5700 2407 0.58 A 3L FW WB 5435 5700 265 0.95 E N.W. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. 31 FW EB 3853 5700 1847 0.68 B 3L FW WB 6184 5700 -484 1.08 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FM EB 2452 5700 3248 0.43 A 3L FW NB 1956 5700 3744 0.34 A Biscayne Blvd. M.E. 62 St. H.E. 36 St. 21.D NB 235E 1800 -558 1.31 F 2LD SB 1549 1800 251 0.86 D N.E. 36 St. I 395 2LD NB 2421 1800 -621 1,34 F 2LD 58 1388 1800 412 0.77 C Miami Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 21 NB 527 1360 833 0.39 A 2L SB 417 1360 943 0.31 A 195 N.N. 79 St. SR 112 51 FW NB 10004 9500 -504 1.05 F 5L FW SB 5680 9500 3820 0.60 A SR 112 SR 836/1 395 5L FW NB 8269 9500 1231 0.87 D 5L FW SB 5937 9500 3563 0.62 B 11-Nay-87 15:27:08 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DR1 Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDE➢ NETWORK (R1 Area: CB➢ Scenario: PHASE ONE AM Segnent I From 1 Number 1 ; Peak -Hour To 1 of Lanes:Direction: VolumelCapacitylE:cess C.l V/C LOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3L➢ EB NA NA NA NA MA 3LD WB NA NA NA HA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0l EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 382 1170 788 0.33 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA MA 2L WB 487 1170 683 0.42 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB NA NA NA NA HA 2L WB NA NA NA HA MA 5. 1 St. Biscayne BIvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1362 1920 558 0.71 C OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1355 2180 825 0.62 8 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4L➢ NB NA HA NA NA NA 4LD SB NA HA NA NA NA V. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA 1l 5B NA NA NA NA NA 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LFW SB NA NA NA NA NA f NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one -Kay streets only. 11 - 100 13-May-87 09:51:34 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DR1 Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK CRY Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segaent 1 1 1 Nuaber 1 I Peak -Hour 1 Frail 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectionl VoluielCapacitylExcess C.: VIC LOS Port Bridge Port of Masi Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 585 1170 585 0.50 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 885 1170 2B5 0.76 C H. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB 224 785 561 0.29 A 2L WB 1357 1360 3 1.00 E S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1100 1920 820 0.57 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 760 2180 1420 0.35 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 2141 2920 779 0.73 C 4LD SB 1615 2920 1305 0.55 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.N. 7/8 St. IL NB 740 625 -115 1.18 F IL SB 926 625 -301 1.48 F 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 6431 5700 -731 1.13 F 3LFW SB 5322 5700 378 0.93 E Segment 11-May-87 12:01:18 SOUTHEAST UYERTOWN/PARK. WEST DR1 Table 11.9: FUTURE IRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IR) Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE AM Fro' : Number : : Peak -Hour : To : of Lanes:Direction: YoluseFCapacity1Excess C.1 Y/C LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L KB 785 2180 1395 0.36 A 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 583 2180 1597 0.27 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 41 EB 2541 3240 696 0.79 C OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.K. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1942 3240 1298 0.60 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Kay Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L WB NA' NA NA NA NA S.K. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA HA NA NA S.N. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA Brickell Ave, S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3L0 SB NA NA HA NA NA S.E. 7 St, Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA MA Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB NA NA NA NA NA 3L SB NA NA NA NA NA S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA HA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB NA HA NA NA NA 2LFW SB NA NA NA NA NA US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD S8 NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 31.0 5B NA NA NA NA NA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.K. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA + NA: Not Applicable - Ali data required for one-way streets only. 11 ` 102 12-May-87 13:37:35 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK 1111 Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segeent 1 Fro■ I I Number I I Peak -Hour 1 To I of Lanes:Direction: Voluee:CapacitylExcess C.1 V/C LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. I 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 1956 2180 224 0.90 0 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 1427 2180 753 0.65 B 5. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 1203 3240 2037 0.37 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1290 3240 1950 0.40 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA RA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.Y. 15 Rd. 21 EB 436 1360 924 0.32 A 2L W8 1598 1360 -238 1.18 F S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 481 1800 1319 0.27 A 210 WB 1377 1800 423 0.76 C S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1539 1800 261 0.86 0 210 WB 1901 1800 -101 1.06 F Brictell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 1644 2785 1141 0.59 A 310 SB 1557 2785 122E 0.56 A S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 909 1800 891 0.50 A 210 SB 2336 1800 -536 1.30 F Miati Ave, Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 31 NB 1180 2180 1000 0.54 A 3L SB 630 2180 1550 0.29 A 5. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2L0 NB 584 1800 1216 0.32 A 2LD 58 1940 1800 -140 1.08 F 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 2612 3800 1188 0.69 B 21F11 SB 4513 3800 -713 1.19 F US 1 I 95 S.Y. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 3220 2785 -435 1.16 F 3L0 50 5529 2785 -2744 1.99 F S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 2988 2785 -203 1.07 F 3LD SB 5092 2785 -2307 1.83 F Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 757 1800 1043 0.42 A 210 50 1697 1800 103 0.94 E 11 — 103 05/11/87 17:00:28 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DR! Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IR) Area: S.E. 0 PIW Scenario: PHASE TWO AI! 1 Number : : Peak -Hour Segment 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction: Volume:Capacity:Excess C.: VIC LOS I N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1369 1920 551 0.71 C 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L El 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 510 1170 660 0.44 A Biscayne Blvd. 1395 Part Blvd. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 3160 1920 -1240 1.65 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1249 1920 671 0.65 8 OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA MA 3L SB 692 1920 1228 0.36 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA NA NA NA N.W. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA NA NA NA + NA: Not Applicable. All data required for one-way streets only. 11 "" 104 05112/87 14:18:20 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN WEST DR1 Table 11.9. FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECONNENDED NETWORK IR) Area: S.E. 0 P\W Scenario: PHASE TWO II I Number I I Peak -Hour Segment I From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Directionl Volume:CapacitylExcess C.I V/C LDS 1 N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 3L EB 1141 1920 779 0.59 A OL WB 0 0 0 MA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 899 1170 271 0.77 C Biscayne Blvd. 1395 Port Blvd. 4LD NO 2922 2920 -2 1.00 E 31.0 SB 1486 2280 794 0.65 8 N.E. 2 Ave. 1395 Flagler St. 01 NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 SB 1215 1920 705 0.63 8 N.E. 1 Ave. K.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2762 1920 -842 1.44 F 0L 5B 0 0 0 NA NA W. Niami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 352 1920 1568 0.18 A H.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler 5t. IL NB 162 625 463 0.26 A IL 5B 85 625 540 0.14 A N.W. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 595 625 30 0.95 E 11. 58 168 625 457 0.27 A — 305 11-flay-87 11:31:10 SOUTHEAST DVERTUWN/PARY. WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK (R1 Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE TWO PM 1 1 Humber 1 1 Peak -Hour Segment 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directioni VolumelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C L05 SR 8361I 395 Biscayne Blvd. I 95 2L FW EB 3185 3800 615 0,84 D 2L FW WB 4017 3800 -217 1.06 F I 95 H.W. 27 Ave. 3L FW EB 3469 5700 2231 0,61 8 31 FW WB 5781 5700 -81 1.01 F H.H. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. 3L FW EB 4032 5700 1668 0.71 C 3L FW WB 6521 5700 -821 1.14 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 31 FN EB 2592 5700 3108 0.45 A 3L FW WB 2052 5700 3648 0.36 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E, 62 St. H.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 2533 1800 -733 1.41 F 210 SB 1639 1800 161 0.91 E W.E. 36 St. 1395 2LD NB 2643 1800 -843 1.47 F 2L0 SB 1493 1800 307 0.83 D Miami Ave. H. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 565 1360 795 0.42 A 21 SB 438 1360 922 0.32 A 1 95 N.H. 79 St. SR 112 5L FW NB 10594 9500 -1094 1.12 F 5L FW 58 5975 9500 3525 0.63 B SR 112 SR 83611 395 5L FW NB 8913 9500 587 0,94 E 51 FW SB 6285 9500 3215 0.66 B 11 — 106 11-nay-B7 14:53:42 SOUTHEAST OVERTDWNIPARK WSET DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IR) Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE TWO AM Segment From F To l Humber l Peak -Hour 1 of Lanes:Direction! VolumelCapacitylExcess C. V/C LOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3RD EB NA NA NA NA MA 313 WB NA NA NA NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 WB 405 1170 765 0.35 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 21 NB 524 1170 646 0.45 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L NB NA NA NA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.N. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1394 1920 526 0.73 C 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.N. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1496 2180 684 0.69 8 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB NA NA MA NA NA 4LD SB NA NA NA NA NA W, 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 718 St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA HA 1L 58 NA NA NA NA HA 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFK NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LFW SB NA NA NA NA NA t NA: Not Applicable. AN data required far one -may streets only, 11 - 107 131lay-87 15:57:56 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK NEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IR) Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE TWO PP Segment 1 1 From 1 Maher 1 Peak -Hour I To 1 of LaneslNirectinnl VoluselCapacitylExcess t.1 V/C LOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F H. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 609 1170 561 0.52 A Flagler St, Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 970 1170 200 0.83 D W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB 245 785 540 0.31 A 2L WB 1523 1360 -163 1.12 F S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1129 1920 791 0.59 A OL WB 0 0 0 HA NA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 31 EB 833 2180 1347 0.38 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Part Blvd, S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 2281 2920 639 0.78 C 4L0 50 1679 2920 1241 0.58 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB 816 625 -191 1.31 F IL 58 1010 625 -385 1.62 F 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 6961 5700 -1261 1.22 F 3LFW SB 5646 5700 54 0.99 E 11-May-87 11:45:23 SOUTHEAST OYERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK (10 Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE TWO AM Segment 1 1 1 Number 1 1---------Peak-Hour 1 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction: Voluee1Capacity:E1cess C.1 V!C LOS I S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 3L W8 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 31 WB S. 8 St. Brickell Ave, I 95 4L EB OL W8 I 95 S.N. 27 Ave. 4L EB 0 0 0 HA 14A 862 2180 1318 0.40 A 0 0 0 NA NA 650 2180 1530 0.30 A 2757 3240 483 0.85 D 0 0 0 NA NA 2115 3240 1125 0.65 B 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L WB NA NA NA NA NA S.N. 15 Rd. S.N. 12 Ave. 21.D EB NA HA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA S.N. 12 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB HA NA NA NA HA Brickell Ave, S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD 5B NA NA NA NA WA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD 5B NA NA NA NA MA Iliad Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB NA NA NA NA NA 31 SB NA NA NA NA NA S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA HA NA NA NA 2LD 58 NA NA HA NA NA 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB HA NA HA NA NA 2LFW 5B NA NA NA NA HA US 1 195 S.N. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA HA NA NA NA 3LD 58 NA HA NA NA NA S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD 58 NA NA NA NA HA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA NA HA NA NA 2L0 5B NA HA NA NA NA t NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 11 — 109 12-May-87 13:55:10 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK 111} Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE TWO PM Segment 1 From 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectianl VelumeiCapacitylEYcess C.1 V/C LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L NB 2135 2180 45 0.98 E 195 S.W. 27 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 1584 2180 596 0.73 C S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 195 4L EB 1294 3240 1946 0.40 A 0L W8 0 0 0 RA NA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1378 3240 1862 0.43 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2L EB 471 1360 889 0.35 A 2L KB 1682 1360 -322 1.24 F S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 527 1800 1273 0.29 A 2LD WB 1491 , 1800 309 0.83 0 S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1611 1800 189 0.89 D 2LD KB 2017 1800 -217 1.12 F Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 Si, S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 1739 2785 1046 0.62 B 3LD SB 1648 2785 1137 0.59 A S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 1019 1800 781 0.57 A 2L0 58 2508 1800 -708 1.39 F Miami Ave. Flagier St. S. 15 Rd. 3L KB 1369 2180 811 0.63 8 3L SB 709 2180 1471 0.33 A 5. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 652 1800 1148 0.36 A 2LD S8 2162 1800 -362 1.20 F 195 S.M. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 2789 3800 1011 0.73 C 2LFW 58 4873 3800 -1073 1.28 F US 1 195 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 3476 2785 -691 1.25 F 3LD S8 6070 2785 -3285 2.18 F S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3L11 NB 3204 2785 -419 1.15 F 3LD SB 5540 2785 -2755 1.99 F Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 828 1800 972 0.46 A 2LD 58 1860 1800 -60 1.03 F Segsent 05/12/87 OB:54::00 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST ➢R1 Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IR1 Area: S.E. 0 P1W Scenario: PHASE THREE AM [ 1 Number t 1 Peak -Hoer 1 Fro 1 To 1 of Lanes:➢irectionl VolumelCapacitylEzcess C. V/C LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 31 EB 1448 1920 472 0.75 C 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 614 1170 556 0.52 A Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD • NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L S8 3473 1920 -1553 1.81 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1323 1920 597 0.69 8 OL 5B 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. M.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 01 NB 0 0 0 NA MA 3L 88 778 1920 1142 0.41 A N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA MA 1L SB NA HA NA NA NA M.W. 2 Ave. H.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB NA NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA NA NA * NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 05/11/87 18:24:09 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IR} Area: S.E. 0 PIW Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Segient 1 Frog 1 Nuaber 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction: Voluae1CapacitylEzcess C.1 V/C LOS N. 5 St. N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 2 Ave. N.E. 1 Ave. N. Niati Ave. N.W. 1 Ave. N.W. 2 Ave. Biscayne Blvd. 195 3L EB 912 1920 1008 0.48 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 914 1170 256 0.78 C 1395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB 3202 2920 -282 1.10 F 3LD 58 1674 2280 606 0.73 C 1395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 58 1591 1920 329 0.83 D N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2913 1920 -993 1.52 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 404 1920 1516 0.21 A N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 206 625 419 0.33 A 11 SB 104 625 521 0.17 A N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB 663 625 -38 1.06 F 11. SB 236 625 389 0.38 A a 11 — 112 13-May-87 16:07:13 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARY WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK 1R) Area: OMNI Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Segment 1 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction: VolumelCapacitylExcess C.1 V/C LOS SR 836/I 395 Biscayne B1vd, 1 95 21 FW EB 3516 3800 284 0.93 E 2L FW WB 4583 3800 -783 1.21 F I 95 N.W. 27 Ave. 31 FW EB 3743 5700 1957 0.66 B 3L FW WB 6310 5700 -610 1.11 F W.W. 27 Ave, LeJeune Rd. 31 FW EB 4315 5700 1385 0.76 C 3L FW WB 7042 5700 -1342 1.24 F MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 31 FW EB 2813 5700 2887 0.49 A 3L FW WB 2200 5700 3500 0.39 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 2797 1800 -997 1.55 F 2LD SB 1779 1800 2! 0.99 E W.E. 36 5t. 1 395 2LD NB 2970 1800 -1170 1.65 F 2LD 58 1650 1800 150 0.92 E Miami Ave. N. 36 St. K. 17 St. 2L NB 634 1360 726 0.47 A 2L 58 477 1360 883 0.35 A 1 95 N.W. 79 St. SR 112 5L FW NB 11522 9500 -2022 1.21 F 5L FW 58 6442 9500 3058 0.68 B SR 112 SR 836/1 395 5L FW NB 9880 9500 -380 1.04 F 5L FW SB 6822 9500 2678 0.72 C 13-flay-87 14:26:33 SOUTHEAST QVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK (RI Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE THREE AM Segaent 1 Nuaber I I Peak -Hour --- I From I To I of Lanes1Directionl VoluneiCapacitylExceas C.1 V/C LOS Port Bridge Port of Mini Biscayne Blvd. 3L0 EB NA NA NA NA NA 3L0 WB NA NA NA NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 476 1170 694 0.41 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 584 1170 586 0.50 A W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB NA NA NA NA NA 2L NB NA NA NA NA NA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1493 1920 427 0.78 C OL KB • 0 0 0 NA KA S.M. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1765 2180 415 0.81 D 01 WB 0 0 0 NA Biscayne BIvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB NA NA NA NA 4L0 SB NA NA NA NA V. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB NA NA NA NA 1L SB NA NA NA HA I 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB NA NA NA NA 3LFW SB NA NA NA NA f HA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. ggg€ggc 11 — 114 13-May-87 16:16:04 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK NEST DRl Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK IRI Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE THREE PM Segment 1 From I I Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 To 1 of Lanes1Direction1 VolumelCapacity1Excess C.1 V/C LOS Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 310 WB 2540 2280 -260 1.I1 F N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 685 1170 485 0.59 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L WB 1166 1170 4 1.00 E W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave, IL EB 272 785 513 0.35 A 2L WB 1789 1360 -429 1.32 F S. I St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1263 1920 657 0.66 B 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA S.W. 7 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 950 2180 1230 0.44 A 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St, 4L0 NB 2461 2920 459 0.84 D 410 SB 1819 2920 1101 0.62 B W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. IL NB 913 625 -288 1.46 F 11 SB 1146 625 -521 1.83 F I 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 7861 5700 -2161 1.38 F 3LFW 58 6142 5700 -442 1.08 F 13-Nay-87 15:22:44 SOUTHEAST DVERTDWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORK 1R} Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE THREE AM Segment ! From 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction! VoluaelCapacitylErcess C.1 WC LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 961 2180 1219 0.44 A 1 95 S.N. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 NB 741 2160 1439 0.34 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L E8 3082 3240 158 0.95 E OL NB 0 0 0 NA WA 195 S.M. 27 Ave. 41 EB 2356 3240 884 0.73 C OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 2L EB NA NA NA NA NA 21. NB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA NA 21D W8 NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB NA NA NA NA WA 2L➢ WB NA NA HA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 31D SB NA NA NA NA MA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 21➢ NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA NA Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB NA NA NA NA NA 31. SB NA NA NA NA MA S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 21➢ NB NA NA NA NA NA 21D SB NA NA NA NA NA 195 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LFW 68 NA NA NA NA NA US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA S.W. 17 Ave. ➢ouglas Rd. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 21D NB NA NA NA NA WA 2LD 5B NA NA NA NA NA f NA: Not Applicable. All data required for one-way streets only. Sea5ent 14-May-87 08:55:00 SOUTHEAST OUERT0WNIPARK REST DRl Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETWORKIRI Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE THREE PM 1 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour 1 From 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectioni Uoluae;CapacitylExcess C.1 V/C LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31 WB 2366 2160 -186 1.09 F 195 S.W. 27 Ave. 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 31, NB 1799 2180 381 0.83 D S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. I 95 4L EB 1422 3240 1818 0.44 A 01 MB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.R. 27 Ave. 41 EB 1504 3240 1736 0.46 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 21 EB 512 1360 848 0.38 A 21 MB 1778 1360 -418 1.31 F S.M. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LO EB 584 1800 1216 0,32 A 210 MB 1638 1800 162 0.91 E S.W. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1715 1800 85 0.95 E 210 WB 2175 1800 -375 1.21 F Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 31D NB 1843 2785 942 0.66 B 3LD SB 1772 2785 1013 0.64 8 S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 211 NB 1141 1800 659 0.63 B 21.1) SB 2739 1800 -939 1.52 F Masi Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 31 NB 1572 2180 608 0.72 C 31 SB 846 2180 1334 0.39 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 21D NB 752 1800 1048 0.42 A 20 SB 2449 1800 -649 1.36 F 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 3031 3800 769 0.80 C 2LFW SB 5343 3800 -1543 1.41 F US 1 195 S.W. 17 Ave. 31.D NB 3815 2785 -1030 1.37 F 31D 58 6761 2785 -3976 2.43 F S.R. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 3497 2785 -712 1.26 F 310 SB 6129 2785 -3344 2.20 F Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 920 1800 880 0.51 A 21.0 SB 2072 1800 -272 1.15 F 12-Nay-87 13:48:05 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9A: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOKNENDED AND 'THEORETICAL' INPRDVENEHTS Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE PH Segient 1 1 1 Number 1 1---- ----- Peak -Hour 1 1 Fro. 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl VolutelCapacitylEzcess C.1 WC LDS 1 S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA MA 3L WB 702 2180 1478 0.32 A 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 868 2180 1312 0.40 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. € 95 41 EB 500 3240 2732 0.16 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA MA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1049 3240 2191 0.32 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. 2LD EB 282 1800 1518 0.16 A 2LD WB 1240 1800 560 0.69 8 S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 328 1800 1472 0.18 A 2LD WB 1018 1800 782 0.57 A S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3LD EB 1411 2785 1374 0.51 A 3LD WB 1602 2785 1183 0.58 A Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 1221 2785 1564 0.44 A 3LD SS 1189 2785 1596 0.43 A S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 3LD NB 377 2785 2408 0.14 A 3LD 80 1279 2785 1506 0.46 A Niati Ave. Elagier St. S. 15 Rd. 31 NB 299 2180 1881 0.14 A 31 SB 223 2180 1957 0.10 A 5. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 221 1800 1579 0.12 A 2LD S8 988 1800 812 0.55 A 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 3L FW NB 2230 5700 3470 0.39 A 3L FW SB 3639 5700 2061 0.64 B US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. 5LD NB 2354 4585 2231 0.51 A 5LD SB 3526 4585 1059 0.77 C S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 5LD NB 2320 4585 2265 0.51 A 5LD 98 3544 4585 €041 0.77 C Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 525 1800 1275 0.29 A 2LD 88 1155 1800 645 0.64 B 11 — 118 05/12/87 08:29:50 SOUTHEAST OVERTURN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9A: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED AND `THEORETICAL' IMPROVEMENTS Area: S.E. 0 P111 Scenario: PHASE DIE AM i Number I 1 Peak -flour Segment From 1 To i of LanesFOirectioni VoIuee1CapacityiExcess C.I VIC LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 31 EB 1313 1920 607 0.68 B 01 lf8 0 0 0 NA NA N. b St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 450 1170 120 0.38 A Biscayne Blvd. I 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB NA NA HA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA N.E. 2 Ave. 1395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 3031 1920 -1111 1.58 F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 31 NB 1203 1920 717 0,63 B 0L S8 0 0 0 NA NA N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 654 1920 1266 0.34 A M.1. 1 Ave. N.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA NA IL S8 NA NA NA NA NA N.Y. 2 Ave. N.W. 20 St. Flagler St. IL KB NA NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA HA NA HA * NA: Not Applicable. AM data required for one-way streets only. 05/12/87 14:15:29 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9A: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED AND 'THEORETICAL' IMPROVEMENTS Area: S.E. 0 NI Scenario: PHASE ONE PM Segsent 1 1 Fros To : Nusher 1 1 Peak -Hour I of Lanes: Direction: Voluse:Capacity1Excess C. V/C LOS N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1086 1920 834 0.57 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 01 EB 0 0 0 NA MA 2L MB 829 1170 341 0.71 C Biscayne Blvd. 1395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB 2726 2920 194 0.93 E 3LD SB 1396 2280 884 0,61 8 N.E. 2 Ave. 1395 FIagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 1147 1920 773 0.60 A N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2669 1920 -749 1.39 F 0L SB 0 0 0 NA MA M. Mari Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 328 1920 1592 0,17 A N.M. 1 Ave. N.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 138 625 487 0.22 A 11 98 76 625 549 0.12 A N.W. 2 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB 569 625 56 0.91 E IL 98 139 625 486 0.22 A 11-May-87 10:15:02 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK NEST DRI Table 11.9A: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDE➢ AND 'THEORETICAL' IMPROVEMENTS Area: OM11I Scenario: PHASE ONE PM 1 1 Number 1 1 Peak -Hour Segment 1 Eros 1 To 1 of Lanes1Directionl Voluse,CapacitylExcess C.I V/C LOS SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L FW EB 2990 5700 2710 0.52 A 3L FW NB 3697 5700 2003 0.65 B 1 95 N.B. 27 Ave. 41 F11 EB 3293 7600 4307 0.43 A 4L FW WB 5435 7600 2165 0.72 C N.K. 27 Ave. Le3eune Rd. 4L Fil EB 3853 7600 3747 0.51 A 4L FW WB 6184 7600 1416 0.81 0 MacArthur CsNy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FW EB 2452 5700 3248 0.43 A 3L FW WB 1956 5700 3744 0.34 A Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 3LD KB 2358 2785 427 0.85 0 3LD SB 1549 2785 1236 0.56 A N.E. 36 St. 1 395 3LD NB 2421 2785 364 0.87 D 3L0 S8 1388 2785 1397 0.50 A Miami Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 527 1360 833 0.39 A 2L SB 417 1360 943 0.31 A 1 95 N.W. 79 St. SR 112 6L FN NB 10004 11400 1396 0.88 D 61 FW SB 5680 11400 5720 0.50 A SR 112 SR 836/1 395 51 FW NB 8269 9500 1231 0.87 D 5L FR SB 5937 9500 3563 0.62 B Segeent II-May-87 09:52:15 SOUTHEAST OVERTURN PARK NEST DRI Table 11.9A: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED AND 'THEORETICAL' IMPROVEMENTS Area: CBD Scenario: PHASE ONE AM 1 From 1 To 1 Number 1 1- Peak -Hour 1 of Lanes1Directionl VoluaelCapacitylEicess C.1 V/C LDS 1 Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3L0 EB NA NA NA NA KA 3L0 NB NA NA NA NA KA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA KA 2L NB 382 1170 788 0.33 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. N. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 487 1170 683 0.42 A W. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. IL EB NA NA NA NA KA 2L NB NA NA NA NA KA S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.N. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1362 1920 558 0.71 C 0L YB 0 0 0 NA S.N. 2 Ave. S.Y. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1355 2180 825 0.62 B 0L YB 0 0 0 NA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4L0 NB NA NA NA NA 4LD SB NA NA NA NA Y. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.N. 7/8 St. 1L NB NA NA NA NA IL SB NA NA NA HA 1 95 SR 836/1 395 S.N. 8 St. 4L FW NB NA NA NA NA 4L FN SB NA NA NA HA * NA: Not Applicable - AN data required for one way streets only. KA gCNNNNN 13-Hay-87 08:51:34 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9A: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED AND 'THEORETICAL' IMPROVEMENTS Area:: CBD Scenario: PHASE ONE PM : 1 Number 1 : Peak -Hour Segment : From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction: Voluse1Capacity:Excess C.1 V/C LDS Part Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD WB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd, 195 OL EB 0 0 0 HA NA 2L WB 585 1170 585 0.50 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 01 EB 0 0 0 HA HA 2L WB 885 1170 285 0.76 C W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. IL EB 224 785 561 0.29 A 2L WB 1357 1360 3 1.00 E S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1100 1920 820 0.57 A 0L WB 0 0 0 NA HA S.W. 2 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 3L EB 760 2180 1420 0.35 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA HA Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 2141 2920 779 0.73 C 4LD SB 1615 2920 1305 0.55 A W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. 1L KB 740 625 -115 1.18 F IL SB 926 625 -301 1.48 F I 95 SR 836/1 395 S.W. 8 St. 4L FW NB 6431 7600 1169 0.85 D 4L FW SB 5322 7600 2278 0.70 B 11 — 123 11-May-87 12:56;51 SOUTHEAST OVERTONN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.9A; FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED AND `THEORETICAL` IMPROVEMENTS Area; BRICKELL Scenario; PHASE ONE AM Segment 1 Number 1 Peak -Hour 1 From 1 To 1 of Lanes:Direction! Voluee1CapacitylExcess C.1 V/C LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L NB 785 2180 1395 0.36 A 195 S.N. 27 Ave. 01 EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L WB 583 2180 1597 0.27 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 2544 3240 696 0.79 C 0L NB 0 0 0 NA NA 195 S.N. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1942 3240 1298 0.60 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.W, 15 Rd, 21.1) EB NA MA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA S.N. 15 Rd. S.N. 12 Ave. 2111 EB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD WB NA NA NA NA NA S.N. 12 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 3LD EB NA NA RA NA NA 31.D NB NA NA NA NA NA Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 3LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 3LD SB NA NA NA NA NA Miami Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 31 NB WA NA NA NA NA 31. SB NA NA NA NA NA S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB NA HA NA NA NA 2LD SB NA NA NA NA MA 1 95 S.N. 8 St. US 1 3L F11 NB NA NA NA NA NA 3L FN SB NA NA NA NA NA US 1 I 95 S.N. 17 Ave. 5LD NB NA NA NA HA NA 5LD SB NA NA NA NA NA S.N. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 5LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 5LD SB NA NA NA NA NA Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD NB NA NA NA NA NA 2LD 5B NA NA NA HA KA { NA; Nat Applicable. AM data required for one -may streets only. TABLE 11.10 FUTURE TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS RECOMMENDED NETWORK Critical Time Level of Percent Excess Intersection Period Service Saturation Capacity N. Miami Avenue/ PM D 83 278 N. 15th Street N.W. 1st Avenue/ PM A 48 887 N.W. 14th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/ PM A 55 803 N.W. 14th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/ PM F 108 -143 1-395 (North Ramp) AM A 41 1,054 N.E. 1st Avenue/ PM E 90 188 1-395 (South Ramp) AM A 38 1,118 N.E. 2nd Avenue/ PM A 40 1,072 I-395 (North Ramp) AM C 72 499 H.E. 2nd Avenue/ PM A 33 1,207 1-395 (South Ramp) AM D 80 364 Biscayne Boulevard/ PM C 73 478 1-395 Biscayne Boulevard/ PM B 61 746 N.E 12th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/ PM C 76 418 N.W. 8th Street H.W. 3rd Court/ AM C 69 555 N.W. 8th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/ PM D 89 190 N.E. 6th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/ PM A 46 978 N.W. 6th Street AM A 17 1,496 N.W.'3rd Court/ PM A 31 1,240 N.W. 6th Street AM A 36 1,147 Biscayne Boulevard/ PM D 86 253 N.E. 5th Street 11 — 125 TABLE 11.10 (Continued) FUTURE TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS RECOMMENDED NETWORK Critical Intersection N.E. 2nd Avenue/ N.E. 5th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/ N.E. 5th Street N. Miami Avenue/ N. 5th Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/ N.W. 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard/ N.E. 1st Street N. Miami Avenue/ N. 1st Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/ N.W. 1st Street Time Level of Percent Excess Period Service Saturation Capacity PM A 47 949 PM A 51 875 PM A 30 1,268 PM B 63 641 PM A 53 813 PM A 44 1,003 PM A 53 843 11 — 126 All roadway links, projected to operate at or below LOS "E" were examined to determine if there were viable improvements. Where physical, historical or aesthetic constraints were encountered, alternate roadway improvements were investigated. More detailed information on roadway improvement constraints and potential improvements is contained in Appendix 11-5(R). 7. SPECIFY HOW SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO COVER THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING ALL NECESSARY TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INCLUDING ANY TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED, WILL BE PROVIDED IN A TIMELY MANNER. Both Dade County and the City of Miami are in the process of developing impact fee ordinances for transportation improvements. These fees, which will be applied to all developments irregardless of size, are to be used to fund transportation improvements. County impact fees collected by the City of Miami can be used to mitigated impacts of the Regionally significant road network. Consequently these funds could be applied to the construction of S.W. 2nd Avenue bridge and approaches or the programmed transportation (roadway, transit and parking) improvements. 8. TO EQUATE AN AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL APPROVABLE DEVELOPMENT TO THE DOLLAR COST OF SYSTEM CHANGES PROPOSED (SEE TABLE 11.8 ABOVE), ITERATIVELY REPEAT STEPS 01 THROUGH D7 UNTIL A FEASIBLE SET OF RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND REGULATORY OR SYSTEM CHANGES IS IDENTIFIED THAT ALLOW THE LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA SPECIFIED IN D2 ABOVE TO BE MET. FOR THE FIRST ITERATION, WHERE THE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL APPROVABLE DEVELOPMENT IS BASED ON THE COMMITTED ROADWAY NETWORK AND EXISTING REGULATORY STRUCTURE, PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO 01 AND D2 ONLY. FOR THE FINAL ITERATION, WHERE THE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL APPROVABLE DEVELOPMENT IS BASED ON THE FINAL SET OF ROADWAY SYSTEM AND REGULATORY CHANGES PROPOSED, PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO D1 (J-4A SERIES), 02 (TABLE 11.7A), 04, 05, 06, AND D7. Responses have been provided for D1 thru D7. 11 "" 127 E. PARKING 1. FOR THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT PHASE, SPECIFY THE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES BY PLANNING AREA NECESSARY TO SERVE THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT OUTLINED IN TABLE 11.7. WHERE AT -GRADE PARKING IS NOT INTENDED, SHOW PROPOSED GARAGE SITES AND SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES TO BE PROVIDED. It is possible to calculate the additional parking spaces necessary to serve the Phase I development program shown on Table 11.7. However, the calculation of parking demand is based on numerous assumptions which vary by land use type. A general list of the assumptions required to make these calculations is as follows. Gross Floor Area (GFA) per Employee. Mode Splits. Employees away from the site during the Peak Parking Period. Vehicle Occupancies, Captive Market. These assumptions are based on data contained in previous sections of this report, recent parking studies for Downtown Miami and parking studies for other areas of the country. It is also recognized that ranges, rather than point estimates, of the parking demand were necessary because of the technical assumptions made in many of the input values. Office 'Office development represents approximately 70 percent of the non-resi- dential gross floor area proposed for Phase I. Because of this and the high employee densities associated with office development the bulk of the parking demand will be for office uses. The calculation of employee peak parking demand is contained in Appendix 11-7(R). Visitor peak period parking of 2.0 spaces 100 per employees (0.08 space/1000 GFA) is per the Dade County Parking/ Transit Ridership Study, Technical Report #1 (August 1986). Total peak period parking demand is summarized below, Peak Period Demand -Office Parking per 1,000 GFA High Median Low 2.57 2.18 1:82 Based on the above parking rates and the Phase 1 office use GFA the number of parking spaces is shown below. The median value is used in this calculation. The assumed rate for short-term visitor parking is 0.08 space/1000 GFA. 11 — 128 Projected Office Parking Demand - Median Value Parking Spaces Long -Term Short -Term 350 15 Retail Parking demand for retail employees is based on the same general assumption as for office employees. The parking demand for retail patrons is more complicated because it has to consider the effect of the "captive market". Research in other urban areas has shown a range of 0 percent to 85 percent. A conservative estimate of 10 percent to 30 percent is used in this report. Calculations of employee and patron parking demand are contained in Appendix 11-7(R), and summarized below. Employee Peak Period Parking Demand -Retail Parking per 1000 GFA High Median Low 1.69' 1.50 I.32 Patron Peak Period Parking Demand -Retail Parking per 1000 GFA High Median Low 1.76 1.49 1.21 Land use intensities shown on Table 11.7 were used in estimating parking needs. The calculation of the median parking demand, shown below, assumes that employee parking is long-term parking and patron parking is short-term. Projected Retail Parking Demand - Median Value Parking Spaces Long -Term Short -Term 100 100 Residential The Institute of Transportation Engineers report entitled arParkin Generation (An Interim Report), (1985), shows peak parking for multi- family residential units as 0.55 space/unit to 1.0 space/unit. Other recent studies have shown a range of 0.5/unit to 1.5/unit based on location. The lower value being in the CBD area. Residential rates particularly in CBD settings can vary substantially depending an such factors as transit service, auto ownership and parking availability. The greater availability of transit services and employment opportunities in Downtown would suggest that a rate of 0.5 space/unit to 1.0 space/unit would be appropriate, 11 — 129 Projected Residential Parking Demand Parking Spaces High Median Low 2,000 1,500 1,000 Convention Parking demand for convention facilities can vary considerably depending on the type of function taking place and the time of day that peak demand occurs. The access modes of patrons using the facility also has a major impact on parking needs. Assuming 100 percent auto usage and a vehicle occupancy of 2.0, parking demand varies from a low of 10 spaces/1000 GFA for conference and meeting activities to a high of 30 spaces/1000 GFA for convention activities. Because of transit availability and accessibility to hotel facilities, auto usage could be in the range of 50 percent to 70 percent. Under these conditions, parking demand would range from a low of 5 spaces/1000 GFA to a high of 21 spaces/1000 GFA with a median value of 12 spaces/1000 GFA. Based on these assumptions, parking demand is summarized below. Projected Convention Parking Demand Parking Spaces High Median Low 6,090 3,480 1,450 The convention facilities proposed in the Phase I development program are projected to have peak parking demand during evening hours or on weekends. Consequently, the parking rates should be reduced and the additional demand met by utilizing parking facilities located throughout the Downtown area which are underutilized in the evening and on weekends. Total Parking Based on the assumptions used in calculating parking needs for each of the land use classifications the median long-term and short-term parking needs are summarized below by sub -area. Total Median Parking Demand Parking Spaces Long-term Short-term 1,950 3,595 As indicated in the beginning of this section the calculation of parking demand is based on numerous assumptions. Several of these, including modal splits and vehicle occupancies, were provided by MDTA and are projected to be achievable during Phase I. Others, such as the effect of the captive market, should be subjected to detailed study and field verification. Consequently, the projected parking spaces should be used as a guideline rather than an absolute maximum or minimum. 11 — 130 The parking supply associated with individual development projects should be calculated using the procedures in this report. In- put variables, including but not limited to mode split, vehicle occupancy and GFA/employee should be based on site location and the unique characteristics of an individual development. 2. INCLUDE IN AN APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF A RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE THAT WOULD LIMIT PARKING IN AREAS PROJECTED TO HAVE POOR ACCESSIBILITY (AS DETERMINED IN SECTION D ABOVE) IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE, REDUCE CARBON MONOXIDE LEVELS, AND INCREASE TRANSIT RIDERSHIP. A majority of the Redevelopment area has recently been rezoned to the SPI-16, SPI-16.1 and SPI-16.2 zoning districts. In general these zoning districts encompass the entire redevelopment area south of North llth Street. These new zoning districts have been enacted in order to encourage new residential and commercial development consistent with the redevelopment program. Each zoning category provides specific minimum requirements regulating the on -site parking supply. Minimum parking requirements are summarized below, for the predominant zoning districts within the Redevelopment area. S.E. 0vertown/Park West Minimum Parking Requirements Zoning District SPI-16 SPI-16.1 SPI-16.2 Parking Supply Nonresidential Residential 1 space/800 GFA 0.9 space/D.U. 1 space/1000 GFA 0.7 spaces/D.U. 1 space/1000 GFA 0.6 space/D.U. The intent of these zoning districts is to minimize automobile traffic due to the districts' close proximity to Metrorail and Metromover systems. The parking requirements are consistent with recent approvals for on -site parking within the Downtown area. Recent office development in the CBD has received the special exception required to allow on -site parking. The on -site supply has ranged from a high of 1 space/450 GFA to a low of 1 space/1200 GFA with an average of approximately 1 space/900 GFA. Three of these development projects have been located in Dupont Plaza, one of the more congested areas Downtown. The parking supply at these developments has ranged from a high of 1 space/1000 GFA to a low of 1 space/1200 GFA. Two recently approved large office developments in the Brickell area have requested and received approvals to provide on -site parking at ratios (1 space/850 GFA) less than the maximum allowable. Both of these projects are located on Brickell Avenue, the most congested roadway in the Brickell area. It is apparent that the City of Miami has been successful, through enforcement of its zoning code, in limiting parking in areas of present and projected vehicular congestion. These decisions, to limit parking supply in particular areas, were based on the knowledge that the existing Metrorail and Metromover systems would be in place. This type of progressive planning and decision making process is necessary to ensure the continued development of Downtown Miami. The City should continue its policy of restricting the parking supply on a site basis in areas projected to have increased vehicular congestion. The decision to restrict on -site parking should also consider future transit accessibility. With the proposed extensions of Metromover to Omni and Brickell the concept of peripheral parking in conjunction with Metromover stations should be viewed as an areawide opportunity. Maintaining an areawide parking supply while restricting the on -site supply can be accomplished by requiring or providing additional parking off -site. This off -site supply should be located in areas projected to have good vehicular accessibility and which provide transit service to the area where the on -site supply is restricted. A conceptual description of an ordinance identifying TSM Techniques to limit parking in areas projected to have poor accessibility and/or high transit availability and increase transit ridership and ridesharing is contained in Appendix 11-6(R). This Appendix also contains a description of an ordinance relating to the provision of on -site parking. This description also discusses parking restrictions for areas of projected poor accessibility. An additional 2000 parking spaces will be provided in the vicinity of the Miami Arena. A portion of those spaces will be allocated in an intern basis to provide parking for the Arena. Therefore, no problem is anticipated based on parking for this project. 11 - 132 F. ALTERNATIVE MODES 1. SPECIFY THE TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE. MAP CURRENT MODE SPLITS, RELEVANT ROUTES, AND STOPS (J-5 SERIES). Current transit service to Downtown Miami including the S.E. 0vertown/ Park West Redevelopment DRI study area is provided via a combination of Metrorail, Metromover, and Metrobus service. There are three Metrorail Stations located within this area. The Brickell Metrorail Station serving the Brickell sub -area, the Government Center Station serving the CBD sub -area and the 0vertown Station serving the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment area. The Metromover Loop system with nine stations provides transit service around the CBD sub -area. Two (2) Metromover stations (State Plaza and Edcom) are located on North 5th Street, the southern boundary of the S.E. 0vertown/Park West Redevelopment area. The Metromover extension to Omni will provide three additional stations (Map J-6) in the S.E. 0vertown/Park West Redevelopment area. Current public transit service is shown on Map J-5. METRORAIL the twenty mile, twenty station Metrorail system presently provides ser- vice from 6:00 AM in the morning to 9:00 PM in the evening. Headways in this system vary from six minutes during the peak hours to a maximum of thirty minutes during the evening off-peak hours. Existing headways and hours of service are summarized below. Existing Metrorail Service Headways Hours of Service 6 Minutes 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 15 Minutes 6:00 AM to 7:00 AM 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM 30 Minutes 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM The existing peak -hour capacity of the Metrorail System can be calculated based on existing headways during the peak hours. As indicated Metrorail presently operates on six minute headways during the AM and PM peak hours. Typically peak hour service is provided with a four -car train with a capacity of 175 people per car. Based on these criteria the peak hour capacity of Metrorail is calculated as follows. Metrorail Existing Peak Hour Capacity Vehicle Capacity = 175 Persons 6 minutes Headways = 10 Trains/Hour one direction 4 Car Trains = 40 vehicles/Hour Capacity = 40 x 175 = 7,000/Hour one-way =14,000/Hour two-way 11 - 133 osmium IIIl11hl1A1leacvzimaoa 1111A111A111111111411 ..111111t11A METRORAIL METROMOVEA BUS ROUTE BRICKELL SHUTTLE Der Ad P►„enar Are! A.s acief.e, tiarrmAa, K++Sd Ard Vim P. rs r+ An4 .k3.aa. !m MAP J-5 CURRENT PUBLIC TRANSIT �,tird zrog Ca aterao, 1+0. SOUTHEAST OVERTO1/WWN4/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT OP DIV LOPMrHT CITY OP MAUI DEPARTAIENT The maximum theoretical capacity of the Metrorail system can be calcu- lated based on system specifications. Under this scenario the system would run at three minute headways with six -car trains. Based on these conditions the theoretical capacity of Metrorail is calculated as follows. Metrorail Maximum Theoretical Peak Hour Capacity Vehicle Capacity = 175 Persons 3 Minute Headways = 20 Trains/Hour one direction 6 Car Trains = 120 vehicles/Hour one direction Capacity = 120 x 175 = 21,000/Hour one-way = 42,000/Hour two-way METROMOVER The existing 1.9 mile, 9 station Metromover system provides service on 90 second headways within the CBD sub -area. Based on an existing service at 90 second headways the Metromover has an hourly capacity of 4,640. The maximum theoretical capacity of the Metromover system can be calculated based on an assumption of 75 second headways with an 11 vehicle fleet. Under these conditions the existing system would have a theoretical capacity of approximately 7,656 persons per hour. Metromover Existing Capacity 90 seconds Headways = 40 vehicles/hour LOS "E" Capacity = 116 persons 40 vehicles/hour x 116 persons = 4,640 persons/hour Metromover Maximum Capacity 75 second Headways/11 vehicle fleet = 66 vehicles/hour LOS "E" Capacity = 116 persons 66 vehicles/hour x 116 persons = 7,656 persons/hour METROBUS Presently, there are approximately twenty-two (22) Metrobus routes which provided service into and through the study area. The twenty-two (22) routes presently serving Downtown represents approximately 35 percent of the total Metrobus routes. The existing headways on the Metrobus system into the study area range from eight (8) minute headways to as great as sixty (60) minute headways with an average of approximately twenty (20) minutes. A majority of these routes provide service into the CBD sub -area. 11 — 135 In the last year Metro -Dade Transportation Administration has undertaken a thorough analysis of current transit ridership into the study area. This analysis includes detailed estimates of the number of daily trip ends on both the Metrorail system and also the Metrobus system. Current mode splits are summarized below. Existing Daily Modes Splits Sub -Area Work Trips Total Trips Omni 11% 6% CBD 30% 15% Brickell 7% 6% S.E. Overtown/ Park West 13% 8% 2. MAP PROJECTED MODE SPLITS AND SPECIFY ALL CHANGES IN TRANSIT SERVICE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROJECTED RIDERSHIP (J-6 SERIES). NUMERICALLY ILLUSTRATE THE PEAK HOUR LINK CAPACITY OF THE PROPOSED TRANSIT SYSTEM AND DEMONSTRATE THAT THE CAPACITY IS NOT EXCEEDED BY PROJECTED DEMAND. Future transit service into the study area will be provided by the same three systems that currently exist. The future level of Metrobus service is very difficult to predict since this service is revised on a regular basis. However, Metro Dade County Transportation Administration is presently in the process of preparing final alignment drawings and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for extensions to the Metromover system. These extensions include a leg north to the Omni area and also a leg south into the Brickell area as shown on Map J-6. It is projected that modes splits (transit ridership) in the Downtown Study area will continue to increase. This increase is the result of two conditions. First, is that by Phase 1 development the extensions of Metromover to Omni and Brickell will have occurred. Second, as development continues to increase in Downtown and the roadway system serving the study area becomes more congested, the number of people using the transit service will also increase. Projected modes splits, by sub -area for each phase of development are summarized below. Projected Daily Mode Splits Sub -Area Phase I II III Omni 11.7% 14.9% 19.0i CBD 23.3% 22.6% 22.4% Brickell 14.3% 14.1% 14.2% S.E. Overtown/ 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% Park West Overall 17.9% 17.9% 18.5 11-136 METROMOVER EXTENSION 1 Der lti.rr,mr And Anea 40,t4. ha 0errneta, was And Vsr6 ho. VIVaro-NaGai het set,+ecrt ha MAP J-6 FUTURE PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM Fn+, =+ux.+ EnQtramtv Coned+elf& r,c } a 0 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 0 CITY Of fHlAtil OE?AATA1.ENT 11137 Based on the above modes splits and the previously identified capacities of the Metrorail and Metromover systems it can be demonstrated that the capacity will not be exceeded by the projected demand. This projection is based on the assumed transit ridership splits between Metrorail and Metrobus shown on the Downtown travel characteristics projections contained in Appendix 11-1 of this report. The projection of peak hour Metrorail trips is based on an analysis of current peaking characteris- tics at the Downtown Government Center Station. The Downtown Government Station Center was used because this is the only station for which existing hourly exiting and entering volumes are available. The calculation of future demand is shown below. Projected Peak Hour Metrorail Ridership Formula Daily Transit Ridership x Metrorail Percent x Peak Hour Percent. Phase I 170,400 x 0.20 x 0.19 = 6,470 Peak Hour Trips Phase II 187,750 x 0.22 x 0.19 = 7,850 Peak Hour Trips Phase III 214,817 x 0.24 x 0.19 = 9,800 Peak Hour Trips The peak hour capacity can serve the projected demand under its current configuration. In order to increase Metrorail ridership there are two actions which need to be taken at certain transit stations. The first is to provide additional Metrorail parking particularly at stations on the south leg. Second, is the need for additional feeder buses to serve the transit system. The Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program has funds allocated in the current fiscal year (1986/1987) as well as fiscal years 1987/1988 thru 1990/1991 for additional Metrorail parking as well as additional buses (see Tables 11.1(R) and 11.2(R)). 3. FOR ANY NEEDED CHANGES IN SERVICE INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF WHATEVER ACTION (S) ARE NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE CHANGE. There are no projected changes in Metrorail or Metromover services other than those that have previously been described. The Metrobus system as previously discussed is a continuously planned system that can be rerouted and changed to meet the Downtown demands. However, it is anticipated that when the Phase 2 Metromover system is in place a number of the bus routes presently serving Downtown may be diverted to the Metromover stations on the periphery of the study area. This policy is consistent with the present transit planning philosophy of routing the bus system into Metrorail and Downtown Metromover stations. 11 — 138 Metro -Dade County is in the process of finalizing the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) including alignment drawings for the Omni and Metromover extensions. Funds for these extensions have received conceptual Congressional approval. This approval requires that the County identify a source of funds for the local share of capital and operating expenses and obtain an approved Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). To date, in excess of $1O0,000,000 has been appropriated by the Federal Government. Dade County has approved a special assessment district to assess Downtown properties to pay for a $23,000,000 construction bond. The City of Miami has passed a resolution earmarking $7,000,000 for their share of the construction funds. The State of Florida has programmed $30,000,000 as their share of the construction funds. 4. PROVIDE A MAP (J-7) SHOWING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED BIKEWAYS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DRI BOUNDARY AND SPECIFY THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING BIKEWAYS TO CONNECT WITH THE EXISTING SYSTEMS. AT MINIMUM, BIKEWAYS SHOULD CONNECT MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS AND TRANSIT STATIONS WITH THE BIKEWAY SYSTEM. BICYCLE STORAGE FACILITY SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS. Presently, there are no existing or proposed bikeways within the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment area or the Downtown DRI study area. Several years ago portions of Biscayne Boulevard were signed for bikeways on the adjacent sidewalks. However, this system has fallen into disrepair and for all practical purposes does not exist. Bike paths and/or bike lanes are not desirable and in most instances are impossible to develop in Downtown areas. It is illegal to ride bikes on sidewalks in Downtown Business districts. The provisions of bike lanes is very difficult due to limited right-of-way and can be dangerous to the bike rider due to the many curbside obstacles. Consequently, it is more practical to allow bikes to use the car lane where slow moving traffic typical occurs in the Downtown area. The typical Downtown biker is a commuter cyclist as opposed to a recreational cyclist. Although commuter cyclist do not need separate travel facilities there is a need for secure bike storage lockers and shower facilities. Presently, several Department of Off-street Parking garages have bike storage lockers. However, shower facilities are limited to private health clubs. One other consideration for encouraging cycling to Downtown is the need for shoulders on the bridges over the Miami River. Cyclist cannot travel in the same lane as vehicles on the bridge up -grades. The replacement of the Brickell Avenue and S.W. 2nd Avenue Bridges should provide shoulders similar to those on the new Miami Avenue Bridge. 5. PROVIDE A MAP (J-a) SHOWING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER TRANSIT ROUTES AND THE COST OF IMPLEMENTING AND MAINTAINING SERVICE. ILLUSTRATE HOW FARES WOULD COVER OPERATING COSTS. This question is not applicable. 11 - 139 Map J-7 Existing or Proposed Bikeway Paths Not Applicable 11-140 6. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The S.E. Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan has a very strong pedestrian emphasis. Major pedestrian facilities are proposed to provide direct linkages between transit systems and the commercial and residential components of the project as well as between residential uses and the employment centers of Downtown. The core of the pedestrian system is the Central Mall extending from Biscayne Boulevard to N.W. 3rd Avenue within the North 9th Street corridor. Consequently, North 9th Street through the Redevelopment area will be closed to vehicular traffic. A second component of the pedestrian system is the N.W. 7th Street mall between the Overtown Metroraii station and N.W. 3rd Avenue. The Urban Design Guidelines and Standards for the Redevelopment area established a hierarchy of pedestrian circulation corridors. Pedestrian malls, primary and secondary avenue corridors, local street corridors and pedestrian easements (as discussed below) have been designated to serve a variety of types and scales of pedestrian circulation. Pedestrian Malls Major pedestrian traffic generators. Primary Avenue Corridors Major north -south links to Downtown activity centers and the Omni Area. Secondary Avenue Corridors Other north -south links of lesser activity with a more local orientation. Local Streets Corridors East -west connectors between area neighborhoods with low -density activities. Pedestrian Easements Through block connections linking development to each other or to activity nodes. Major features of the pedestrian circulation system are shown on Map J-9. 11 — 141 41. M 'EMw NON VEIN VINO C� i=1mm� 1111111111 rr aw. /A IT. • • • ■ • • • M • • ▪ IN 1 •.w. 11 ST. 111111111� 11111111i 11 11111111I • • a • M.w. • • 1. 11111111 mum Mw F11T r • • to 1111 ®® Mt, TA •T, r1 at ..111 1 irs un�„Iluuul M•. If FT. •.a. IT ■T. sls s1 I MINIM �sNI 11111111111111111 0 1 • 11111111 ,a11111111 r� `1 1111, "11�111f11{11 • 111111111=:i11111111 • -11111111f -111111111 • • CC • 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 • • ■ • M.1. 11 1!. • ■ • • 1111111� now T F y ' 111111 .• �f so • tar' 1ff 1A1 1111 1111: -A 3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT MAP J 9' PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION • Environmental Engineering Consultants, Ina. HC•wl1MwrAt $4111 root •ouaar,•• 1. i l�idll:l� 11.1 David Plummer And Assoolatss, Inc. ' Bermello. Kurid And Vera. Inc. WII1Iams-Russell And Johnson. Inc. CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTAMENT OF DEVELOP ENT G. Capacity Monitoring 1. DESIGN CAPACITY MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR ROADWAYS, INTERSECTIONS, AND TRANSIT THAT DETERMINE USE AND ALLOW CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE UNUSED CAPACITY, AND THAT USE "CAPACITY ACCOUNTS" TO SHOW THE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT THAT MAY BE PERMITTED WITHOUT OVERBURDENING* THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. TWO TYPES OF CAPACITY ACCOUNTS SHOULD BE: 1) PLANNING ACCOUNT, DEBITED WHEN ANY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT** IS ISSUED AND CREDITED WHEN A ROADWAY OR TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT IS "COMMITTED" (SEE A2 ABOVE FOR DEFINITION OF COMMITTED); AND 2) A MONITORING ACCOUNT, DEBITED WHEN BUILDING SPACE IS OCCUPIED AND CREDITED WHEN THE ROADWAY OR TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT IS OPENED FOR SERVICE. THE MONITORING PROGRAM MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES. Develpment Monitoring The implementation and success of any capacity monitoring program has to be a joint effort between the private and public sectors. The private sector would be responsible for providing the public agency with their particular development's. The public agency would be responsible for providing the private sector with the procedures and methodologies for calculating capacity consumption. The traffic analysis contained in this report has indicated that with committed roadway improvements the Phase I development program (Table 11.7) can be implemented without violating the level of service criteria established by the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Therefore, a monitoring program which monitors a total development bank rather than specific intersection and/or roadway link capacities is the most effective and easiest program to administer. The monitoring program is based on daily two-way auto person trip ends. These available capacities have been calculated, by sub -area, using the trip generation procedures discussed in previous section of this report. These values are contained in Appendix 11-2(R) (Trip Generation) and summarized below. Phase I Development Trip Bank Two-way Daily Auto Person Trip Ends 10,096 As each additional development is approved the number of two-way daily auto person trip ends attributable to that development will be deducted from the above totals. Depending on the size of the particular development either the City of Miami or the developer will be responsible for calculating project consumption. For projects below the Lower Limits of the Major Use Special Permit threshold the City will be responsible for the calculation. For projects above this threshold the developer will make the calculation and provide the City with the appropriate information. 11 — 143 A conceptual description of a monitoring ordinance and a traffic studies ordinance providing additional details an this process is contained in Appendix 11-6.(R) A program to monitoring transit capacity consumption will follow the same procedures discussed above and in Appendix 11-6(R) with the following available capacities. Phase I Development Transit Bank Two-way Daily Transit Person Trip Ends 878 For developments below the threshold requiring a traffic study the City will calculate transit consumption. This consumption is calculated by applying a factor of 0.09 to the two-way daily auto person trip ends. 11 — 144 11-1(R) 11-2(R) 11-3(R) 11-4(R) 11-5(R) 11-6(R) 11-7(R) 11-8(R) LIST OF APPENDICES Transportation Documentation Trip Generation Permitted Development Data Intersection Volume Peaking Characteristics Intersection and Roadway Link Capacity Improvement Constraints Conceptual Description of Ordinances Parking Calculations Critical Movement Analysis APPENDIX 11.1 (R) TRANSPORTATION DOCUMENTATION S.E. OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT AREA DRI INTERSECTIONS TO BE ANALYZED Intersections N. Miami Avenue/N. 15th Street N.W. 1st Avenue/N.W. 14th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/N.W. 14th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/I-395 (North Ramp) N.E. 1st Avenue/I-395 (South Ramp) N.E. 2nd Avenue/I-395 (North Ramp) N.E. 2nd Avenue/I-395 (South Ramp) Biscayne Boulevard/I-395 Biscayne Boulevard/N.E 12th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/N.W. 8th Street N.W. 3rd Court/N.W. 8th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/N.E. 6th Street N.W. 3rd Avenue/N.W. 6th Street N.W. 3rd Court/N.W. 6th Street Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 5th Street N.E. 2nd Avenue/N.E. 5th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/N.E. 5th Street N. Miami Avenue/N. 5th Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/N.W. 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 1st Street N. Miami Avenue/N. 1st Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/N.W. 1st Street DOWNTOWN DRI ROADWAY LINKS Roadway From To SR 836/1-395 Biscayne Boulevard 1-95 1-95 N.W. 27th Avenue N.W. 27th Avenue LeJeune Road MacArthur Cswy. Port Bridge N. 6th Street N. 5th Street N. 1st Street Flagler Street S. 1st Street S. 7th Street S.W. 8th Street Coral Way Biscayne Boulevard Alton Road Biscayne Boulevard Port of Miami Biscayne Boulevard Biscayne Boulevard 1-95 Biscayne Boulevard 1-95 Biscayne Boulevard 1-95 Biscayne Boulevard W. 2nd Avenue W. 2nd Avenue W. 27th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard S.W. 2nd Avenue S.W. 2nd Avenue S.W. 27th Avenue Brickell Avenue 1-95 1-95 S.W. 27th Avenue Brickell Avenue 1-95 1-95 S.W. 27th Avenue Brickell Avenue S.W. 15th Road S.W. 12th Avenue N.E. 62nd Street N.E. 36th Street 1-395 Port Boulevard S.W. 15th Road S.W. 12th Avenue S.W. 27th Avenue N.E. 36th Street 1-395 Port Boulevard S.E. 2nd Street DOWNTOWN DRI ROADWAY LINKS (CONTINUED) N.E. 2nd Avenue Brickell. Avenue N.E. 1st Avenue Miami Avenue N.W. 1st Avenue W. 2nd Avenue 1-95 U.S. 1 1-395 S.E. 2nd Street S.E. 7th Street N.E. 17th Street N. 36th Street N. 17th Street Flagler Street 5. 15th Road N.E. 20th Street N.W. 20th Street Flagler Street N.W. 79th Street SR 112 SR 836/I--395 S.W. 8th Street 1-95 S.W. 17th Avenue Bayshore Drive Rickenbacker Cswy. Flagler Street S.E. 7th Street Rickenbacker Cswy. Flagler Street N. 17th Street Flagler Street 5. 15th Road Rickenbacker Cswy. Flagler Street Flagler Street S.W. 7/8th Streets SR 112 SR 836/1-395 S.W. 8th Street U.S.1 S.W. 17th Avenue Douglas Road S.W. 27th Avenue 29-Ju1-86 14136 Pn DOYRIOYN TRAVEL CIHiRRC!ERUSIICS -- AVERAGE YEEKDAY 110 1185 a..__aisat. 1,1.a Ztsa3III Z552.I5ani11333s5i4n5455.s assn..i.;LFa31L313a S..i L 1.5.2.;si_._-ESL Lii 2-...=53L553.3334455o551155_.LasII.L5SL53a5.5...33.3..._a.L.F_..1 11 11 TRIPS i1 PAWNS DENa42 11 t4 -4 4..« .. _ _. . -*-- _ _._ --14._ _ .. -- 4 DOI1H10101 11 11 TOTAL PERSON INIP ENDS 1 18101511 1RIP ENDS 1 AUTO PERSON TRIP ERRS I A1110 DRIVER TRIP ENDS 11 • DAILY SPACES USED 1 PEAK HOUR PARK1Y3 USEA5E AREA :1 106 /I * 4 4 D15TRICIS 11 1; AT10ACT10N5 PROD11115 TOTAL 1 811 PURPOSE AY MODE 1 AY PURPOSE ; by PURPOSE II YORK OTHER 1 WORK PIER 11 1; 1 TOTAL 1 TOTAL 1 TOTAL 11---_.__ ---- -- 4 11 11 RORK OTHER 1 40160 OTHER RAIL NUS 4 YORK OTHER 1 YORK OILIER It TIME 1100E 111E TIME 1 TINE TirE TIME TIr.5 1; 11 1 I 1 11 RE51R 1RR5 RES1R UNRS 1 RESIR UISS 8EETR U4ni «.'`._yIISix----- .,4s.acssaus3ZxsslZliFScali7.5..5:si4i4isaa LLi-sSiLLn5...-1a33scss sal.»Laa33a-5--a3LLaflafa.3s4.----.-.... azn fatz54 ..a 1 ;i ;1 3 1 1 i1 ; C881E51 11 8,229 II 12,344 11,491 4,460 35,312 1 1,262 1,113 624 1,714 2,334 1 11,182 21,883 32,967 1 8,865 14,189 23,154 11 301 4,133 3,3111 3,794 '1 IN 2,246 322 1,524 1; 11 1 111 51 711 11 3.8 1 1.8 a 11.0 a 2.5 11 II I 1 I I; C60 EAST 01 51,549 11 71,324 162,381 38,112 271,766 125,541 10,758 1,681 36,619 44,299 1 51,182 181,644 233,466 141,426 121,818 163,263 11 608 28,113 5,518 55,419 1 108 5,747 5E0 1,253 11 11 1 331 92 1611 I 11 6.8 a 3.5 a 11.1 a 1.6 e1 11 11 1 I ----- ------ 1 11 _. __ .._. 1 5u610IAL 11 59,718 ;I 89,661 184,817 42,521 311,167 1 26,813 19,811 8,311 38,331 46,633 I 62,064 213,576 266,434 1 51,291 136,126 186,317 11 908 24,246 1,811 59,211 1 200 8,142 003 8,750 ,or C60 1; 1; 1 311 11 1511 1 11 1 1: ;; 1 I 11 1 Onwl 1; 16,151 1; 25,127 94,231 27,615 147,142 1 2,852 6,162 211 0,714 8,914 1 22,275 115,043 138,117 1 17,821 78,766 96,585 1; 2,758 6,165 1,651 37,733 1 520 2,853 153 5,247 11 11 1 111 51 611 1 11 5.5 a 3.1 a 41.1 a 7.4 e1 ;1 1 1 11 ; PAkI 6511 11 5,1,31 11 8,447 14,111 5,784 24,312 1 1,1112 1,321 601 1,712 2,312 1 7,315 18,535 25,911 1 5,911 12,219 18,119 11 1,181 1,958 025 5,284 1 250 696 75 1,204 OvEk om ;1 ;1 1 131 71 011 1 11 4.8 a 2.0 a 11.8 a 4.4 4; 11 1 1 11 1 161CIELL 11 27,313 11 41,161 54,4i5 29,111 124,546 1 2,959 4,311 1,321 5,949 1,269 L 38,111 79,116 111,271 1 38,481 51,531 82,112 ;I 1,288 14,048 825 24,941 1 200 4,680 75 2,521 11 1 71 51 411 1 11 4.8 a 2.8 a 1E.8 a 9.9 i1: 1: 11 1 1 1 11 1 ;; ; 1 1----- 1 ----- ------ - --' i----- ----- ------ 1----- ---- - .. ._... ...-...__- 101AL 11 119,533 11 164,311 343,593 115,153 612,941 1 33,646 31,523 11,511 54,788 65,200 1 131,614 417,123 547,737 1114,491 278,542 383,113 1; 5,851 46,396 12,100 121,171 11,151 15,472 1,11E 11,578 .. 11 1 211 71 1111 1 11 11 ----- M-L3La...11.54.tasa45.4 l6 o,1U.W EMPLOYEE lkiP 6A1E; Aull OiLLFANLIES; ..s..c aF ;.s L 44 F..s..L_,..._..ta.s:.L3LLss4 I.541 a AVERAGE TORNOVER OF PARKINS SPACES WORK 1.251 OTHER 1.490 TOTAL 1.431 OO6NIORN TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS -- AVERAGE NEEKDAY IN 1992 iaaasa22 44 44 ia_u _-_ sa...4a2as222ss a4a2 a.ia-Yea---i is s.a.Q.41.a,, ..aaa a 4 :; IMPS ;i PARKING QEHi,iID 4+ r 1- 1 r4 r 11 TOTAL PERSON TRIPS ENDS TRANSIT TRIP ENDS I AUTO PERSON TRIP ENDS 1 AOID DRIVER IRIP ENDS I; DAILY SPACES USED I PEAK HCIR PARKING USEASE DIIINICIIN :: JOB44 4 1 1 44 4 ALA 11 11 AIIRACII0N5 1 BY PURPOSE BY RODE 1 BY PURPOSE 1 BY PURPOSE 11 WORK OTHER 1 310RK 0Ti P D15161E15 ;; 1I PROD9INS TOTAL I 101AL I TOTAL 1 TOTAL 44 4 11 ROAK 01HE1 1 YDRK O,NER RAIL BOS i YORK OTHER 1 MARK DIRER It TIME TIRE T1HE TITRE 1 TIME TM TIDE 110E 11 .05 11 1 1 1 i1 PESIA ONRS RESTA MS I RESTR 011.5 0ES7R CI:r:_ 44 4422aa:as:aiia:a:maaa2a2aca22aa222asi4. a...a a.a.a A._..l a -a a 4 40 4 a 11 1 1 1 11 1 CPO 0E51 11 11,70 11 16,168 21,954 5,034 42,056 1 1,876 2,638 1,518 2,945 4,514 I 14,192 24,149 31,341 1 11,353 15,459 26,812 11 380 5,352 3,300 4,652 1 102 2,973 32D 1,860 I1 1 121 71 911 1 II 3.0 4 1.8 r 11.0 4 2.5 11 11 ;1 1 ; 11 060 EAST 1: 58,315 11 07,518 107,610 41 915 111,139 1 16,791 31,930 11,606 52,842 62,726 1 56,727 197,505 251,312 1 45,302 132,454 471,841 11 620 21,991 5,51D 62,332 1 118 6,283 528 0,202 11 1 351 121 1801 6.8 4 3.5 1 11.8 4 7.6 41 .1 i; 1 I 1 11 ----- 1 -- ---- CID IQIAL ;1 69,857 11 111,514 218,541 47,749 359,095 1 32,666 34,576 12,255 54,981 47,242 1 71,919 221,715 292,654 1 56,735 147,918 214,651 It 983 21,342 8,038 66,901 1 I12 9,256 812 12,061 11 I 321 131 1911 1 11 I ;; 11 1 1 l 11 1 1: 11 1 1 11 1 OW 11 11,233 11 25,051 91,181 32,111 155,146 1 I,017 8,299 471 11,135 12,185 ; 22,141 128,848 142,941 1 17,614 02,324 99,959 11 2,75D 6,056 1,651 41,205 1 580 2,019 152 5,579 11 151 71 811 1 II 5.5 4 3.0 4 11.1 4. 7.4 41 1 ; , 1: 1 PARK *05111; 6,665 11 9,998 15,054 8,32D 34,182 1 1,269 1,595 1,143 1,121 2,644 I 8,729 22,509 31,110 ; 6,913 14,517 21,911 I1 1,160 2,492 825 6,610 1 250 898 75 1,510 OeE81048;: 11 1 111 61 811 1 11 4.8 4 2.8 4 11.1 4 4.4 41 ,_ 1; 1 1 1 I 1 0110.E11 ;1 17,645 11 54,468 83,251 31,654 151,375 1 5,169 8,270 4,297 9,851 11,347 ; 51,399 88,629 141,820 1 41,119 56,003 41,922 11 1,22$ 19,235 825 20,058 I 200 6,870 75 2,033 11 ; 91 71 811 11 6.0 4 2.8 4 11.1 4 9.9 +1 11 1 f 1; 1 1, 11 a a 2a222X. s- --aa 1 aaaa-i .aaa-- -a-ssa aa--ss a 1 aaaaaa; a »_»_ jaaaaaaa s ;: ssa:a a-asaa atasaa Ysaasaa a-aaa 11 I 4 ; 11 1 00119 101AL1; 111,681 11 195,911 184,058 121,741 182,499 1 42,811 52,748 18,665 76,893 95,558 1153,189 453,151 616,948 1122,471 301,962 424,434 11 5,651 55,125 12,111 142,994 1 1,151 19,234 1,160 19,992 11 1 221 141 1401 1 11 11+4aaxasisai---------a---a-aaaaaaaaaaalssa a : 4-------------.F------------+------------------------4 _»»...._».....,-.. .saas.a + fir_•;'' 29-Ji.I -14 13.54 Pm DOWNTOWN TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS -- AVERASE YEAR 2110 WEEKDAY a.14a3 i 4..11aaa333xa XX a a_rraaiiaaaaxaxa.aas x--a.x4+xaa-ntaaixa -2Yixaaaalaia xaaa 44 DL.N16a4 1; PLO- „ IOIAL PERSON IR1P ENDS 1 ➢1i1,91CT ;; 0ET<lec0 1; ARTA I; DYRINR 1; A1IRACIi0N5 II JOBS 11 II „ WORK 01HER 1 PRDOUINS 1111AL 1 TRIPS TRANSIT T81P ENDS 8Y PURPOSE a S3ax3aaaaia WORK OTHER it^ 4 11 AUTO PERSON TRIP ENDS 1 44 8Y RO➢E it BY PURPOSE TOTAL II RAIL BUS 11 WORK OTHER 1 11 1 TOTAL I AUTO DRIVER TRIP ENDS 11 44 11 4+ a-- xaaa.s33sa PARKINS DEMAHJ BY PURPOSE 11 T01AL ++ BORK OTHER 11 It aaaacxaaax-aaaaisaaauaiixaaanaaaaasaaaaxsx.sacaaxaas.iaaxaxaaaa-satraaaaxxa:x aaaaaaasaziaa II ;1 I 11 i 168 REST ;I 13,551 11 21,325 23,781 1,113 51,489 1 2,711 3,594 2,655 3,151 5,816 II 17,614 28,171 45,681 1 ., 11 t 13I 111 11111 1 11 680 EAST 66,111 11 19,165 215,419 46,114 311,923 1 31,325 37,261 14,121 61,463 74,584 II 61,141 225,498 207,319 1 381 141 21111 1 660 TOTAL 11 19,641 11 119,491 241,211 53,122 411,412 1 41,236 41,354 14,11d .: :. I 341 141 is 1 OHM II 17,744 I; 26,416 111,564 36,964 164,214 1 4,954 12,111 1,154 15,169 11 II I 191 91 iI 1 PARK NES1l11 7,041 11 11,771 11,8 7 11,235 41,911 1 1,494 1,639 1,672 1,461 Ot'ERTONN;; 11 I 111 61 11 1 D61CT.E.1 11 49,185 4; 14,118 73,354 30,892 185,324 1 8,149 11,018 7,699 11,450 11 1 11I 91 „ 1 }} „ xxxxxl, _-..Saa C a Ssxsiii I taaaat saaasa _:t2aa u Ii ORIN IO10L1; 154,414 11 232,114 432,117 141,813 014,044 1 54,636 64,042 27,997 91,711 ;; I 24i 111 4, . xaa---•---.------saaaxu axa4aaaasm axaa3: aaaac:--a maaa3aat, aa------x3iaaaaa 61,414 01,391 11 79,454 253,560 333,122 I 1911; 1 It 1 11 17,019 11 21,118 137,511 151,241 1 11111 1 tt 1,132 It 11,277 27,493 37,711 1 8111 11 1 10,157 11 65,929 112,218 168,164 I 11111 1 .. 1 i_._.a 11 xxXx?ra xi__.xa mix..aa 1 i ai_.aa aaixxsa t1 'aaaa n T it 111,690 11 1/7,378 521,129 690,287 1 141,912 146,154 410,256 tt 5,050 15111 1 11 as DAILY SPACES USED BORK OTHER 1 TIME TIRE TIME TIME I T16E T13E T11E TIME RES1R UNRS RESTR GRRS , RE51R U:4i3 6E51R lJ LS PEAK HOUR PARRIES USEg6E WORK OTHER a_-__-a+t-.a aa.....�---._-..._.+ t1 14,191 17,855 31,946 11 308 6,745 3,310 5,628 112 3,747 32Z 2,221 11 3.d t LB t 11.6 t 2.5 t 1 49,472 151,464 281,136 11 620 24036 II 6.1 t 3.5 t 63,563 169,119 212,003 II 92i 12,082 II 11 5,5112 71,212 , 183 6,896 513 9,255 11.0 t 1.6 1 I 1,005 75,868 , 202 18,444 821 11,472 t1 11,374 93,908 111,362 11 2,7E0 5,937 1,650 45,344 581 1,919 158 6,128 II 5.5 t 3.0 4 11.1 t 7.4 t t 11 8,221 18,191 28,413 11 1,811 3,111 825 8,271 I 253 1,111 75 1,038 11 4.1 t 2.8 t 11.B t 4.4 + I II 1 52,743 64,058 117,591 11 1,233 25,112 825 31,681 , 248 0,032 15 3,192 11 6.4 t 2.0 * 11.8 t 9.9 + 1 11 3 aa-_aax saaar.A3 a 65,111 12,115 161,177 11,152 22,5.48 1,182 22,672 x.4/1a3ss2anasaaasa3xsixssxx x Florida e08 GRAIIA&4 Department of Transportation THOPAS E. DRAWQY SECRETARY Office of Planning and Programs Miami Regional Service Center 401 N.W. Second Avenue, Suite 510 Miami, Florida 33128 September 19, 1986 Mr. Kahart M. Pinder David Plummer &. Associates, Inc. 4225 Seizedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Re: Programmed Improvements in the Downtown Miami DRI Study Area Dear Mr. Pinder: In response to your recent request for information on FDOT planned and programmed improvements in and around the Downtown Miami. DPI Study Area, Michael J. Pal ozz i (District Program Development Administrator) and I_have researched the Department's Five -Year Work Program and offer the following list of pertinent projects: WPI No. Protect Location 6113038 SR AIA fr. Watson Island to w. end of E. Channel Bridge 6113279 6113376 Brickell Avenue over Miami River Bifurcated Ramps Surface Streets 6113617 Biscayne Blvd. at N.E. 6th Avenue 6122821 Port of Miami Bridge 6123072 Port of Miami Bridge 6123145 Port of Miami Bridge Fiscal Year, Work Mix Cost (S000) road recon- 89/90 struction - CST 12,545 2 lane replace mov- 88/89 able span bridge CST 7,572 road recon- 87/88 struction - CST 2,077 2 lane intersection (major) 86/87 CST 111 construct high 87/88 level bridge CST 19,826 construct high 86/87 level bridge CST 3,230 construct high 86/87 level bridge CST 1,870 Mr. Kahart M. Pinder September 19, 1986 Page Two WPI Now Protect Location 614176/ I-95/SR 836 Interchange from NW 8 St. to SR 836 6141773 1-95 southbound exit ramp to 5W 25th Rd. 6141774 1-95 from SR 836 to SR 112 6141846 1-95 HOV Bridge from NW 12 Ave. on SR 122 to NW 49 St. on SR 9A Work Mix widen bridge provide 2 lane ramps to & from SW 26th Rd. Fiscal Year, Cost ($000) B8/B9 CST 5,454 86/87 CST 600 add 6th lane each 90/91 side + sauthbound CST 15,375 exit to NW 14 St. construct 86/87 medium level CST 22,227 bridge Please be advised that there are other projects in the work program that are either unfunded for construction, or area minor in the nature of their work mix (i.e., drainage, lighting, railroad signal). The Department routinely transmits only those projects which are (1) funded for construction in the next five years and (2) roadway widening and intersection improvement projects (those projects which may increase or decrease capacity on roadways which the consultant may be analyzing). Also, information is available on right-of-way and preliminary engineering costs for each project with funding source information for each phase. Should you require this or any other information, please do not hesitate in calling my office at (305) 377-5682. Sincerely, Michael T. Moore Transportation Planner CC] Michael J. Palozzi TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION MODEL EQUATIONS METRO DADE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE PROJECT HOME -BASED PERSON TRIP PRODUCTIONS Work Au +1.51592 (Resident Labor Force) Shopping _ + 1.05694 (Autos Available to Residents).. +0.15161 (Resident Dwelling Units) Au + 4.05553 (Autos Available to Residents) +0.94028 (Hotel -Motes Units) • +0.59639 (Autos Available to Residents) •g + 1.22731 (Autos Available to Residents) +0.63507 (Hotel -Motel Units) Soc. Rec. School Miscellaneous ATTRACTIONS Work Shopping Soc. Rec. School Miscellaneous _ +1.15657 (Total. Employment) +4.56067 (Retail Employment) • + 344.62769 +0.12355 (Residential Population) +0.35032 (Commercial Employment) + 0.47913 (Hotel -Motes Units)- • +0.78897 (K-9lh Enrollment) +0.93520 (40th-College Enrollment). R +311.86060 + 1.04484 (Commercial Employment) +0.31910 (Total Employment) NON -HOME BASED TRIP PRODUCTIONS OR ATTRACTIONS Person a + 133.64201 +0.16273 (Total Home -Based Attractions) Taxi - +0.02823 (Total Employment) +0.04067 (Hotel -Motel Units) Truck + 93.36358 +0.41745 (Autos Available to Residents) +0.16255 (Total Employment) SOURCE: Reference 1 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS May 22, 1986 Mr. Rod Arroyo, Assistant Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard - Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 Re: Downtown Miami DRI - 15151 Dear Mr. Arroyo: This letter will confirm our conversation of today during which we discussed the appropriate capacity analysis methodology to be used in preparing the ADA for the Downtown Miami DRI. As we discussed, intersection capacity analysis required for the first 5-year increment will be conducted using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) procedures from Circular 212. Rod, your attention and expeditious response to this matter is appreciated. Very truly your anart M.l Pinder KMP/vml - MAY86V cc: Mr. Joyce Meyers Mr, Thomas Thomson Mr. Charles Baldwin Mr. Jorge Southworth 42 F SALZEDO STREET • COFAL GABLES • FLORIDA 33146 (306) 444-2116 9/9/86 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF AM PEAK HOUR Daily AM Peak Hour Year Count Location 2-Way In but `--Total 1986 Downtown Distributor 47,514 4,285 679 4,964 1986 Biscayne Blvd. (4th-5th Sts.) 33,642 1,458 817 2,275 1986 N.E. 2 Ave. (4th-5th Sts.) 17,167 1,252 386 1,638 1986 N.W. 1 Ave. (4th-5th Sts.) 2,531 205 49 254 1985 N.W. 3 St. (E. of 2nd Ave.) 8,046 395 208 603 1986 N.W. 1 St., Flagler, S.W. 1st. 21,305 1,140 590 1,730 1986 S.W. 2nd + 3rd Sts. 6,350 197 173 370 Sub Total 136,555 8,932 2,902 11,834 75.5% 24.5% 8.67% 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 12th St. 26,306 1,156 779 1,935 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 19th St. 21,518 1,253 436 1,689 1984 7th & 8th Sts. (E. of Miami) 19,492 1,567 460 2,027 1984 7th & 8th Sts. (W. of Miami) 22,364 1,682 493 2,175 1984 Miami Ave. @ S. 18 St. 5,489 298 147 445 1984 Miami Ave. @ S. 10 St. 7,385 641 200 841 1983 Miami Ave. @ 5. 17 Rd. 8,154 233 129 362 1985 Biscayne Blvd. & N.E. 8th St. 37,859 1,515 1,038 2,553 Sub Total 148,567 8,345 3,682 12,027 69.4% 30.6% 8.1% Total 285,122 17,277 6,584 23,861 72.4% 27.6% 8.37% USE 70% 30 0 8.6% DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF PM PEAK HOUR Year Count Location ADT 1986 Downtown Distributor 47,514 1986 Biscayne Blvd. (4th - 5th Sts.) 33,642 1986 N.B. 1st & 2nd Aves. (4th - 5th Sts.) 17,167 1986 N.W. 1st Ave. (4th - 5th Sts.) 2,531 1986 N.W. 3rd St. (E of 2nd Ave.) 8,046 1986 N.W. 1st, Flagler, S.W. 1st St. 21,305 1986 S.W. 2nd & 3rd Streets 6,350 Sub Total 136,555 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 12th St. 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 19th St. 1984 7th & 8th Sts (E of Miami) 1984 7th & 8th Sts (W of Miami) 1984 Miami Ave. @ S. 18th St. 1984 Miami Ave. @ S. 10th St. 1983 Miami Ave. @ S. 17th St. 1985 Biscayne Blvd. @ N.E. 8th St. Sub Total Total 26,306 21,518 19,492 22,364 5,489 7,385 8,154 37,859 148,567 in 1,013 1,047 679 83 91 707 57 3,677 PM Peak Out Total 2,784 3,797 1,673 2,720 1,022 1,701 117 200 807 898 1,015 1,722 474 531 7,892 11,569 31.8% 68.2% 8.47% 765 515 590 653 271 144 216 922 4,076 1,801 1,464 937 1,080 266 782 858 1,626 8,814 2,566 1,979 1,527 1,733 537 926 1,074 2,548 12,890 31.6% 68.4% 8.68% 285,122 7,753 16,706 24,459 31.7% 68.3% 8.58% USE 30% 70% 8.6% 9/9/86 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF A.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS AM Peak Hour Year Count Location In - Out Total 1986 Brickell/7/8th St. 6,026 4,482 10,508 1986 S. Miami/7/8th St. 922 240 1,162 1,126 195 1,321 1986 S.W. 4th Ave/7/8th St. 1,338 337 1,675 2,083 251 2,334 1986 S.W. 7th St./2/3 Ave. 1,404 825 2,229 12,899 6,330 19,229 67.1% 32.9% 1985/1986 I 395/N.E. 2nd & 1st Aves. 3,393 1,321 4,714 1986 N.W. 3rd Ct./3rd. Ave./6 St. 2,074 598 2,672 Sub Total 5,467 74% 26% 1,919 7,386 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF A.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS Year Count Location In 1984 Biscayne Blvd./I 395 2,335 1,426 1981 Brickell/14th St. 1,280 1,147 1983 Brickell/13th St. 1,125 1,476 AM Peak Hour Out 1983 Bricke1l/15th Rd. 1,343 1,312 1984 S. Miami Ave./E of 15 Rd. 791 717 1983 Coral Way/3 Ave, 2,485 Sub Total 15,437 72.7% Totals Grand Total USE 12,899 8,932 8,345 5,467 15,437 51,080 71.2% 807 841 423 671 577 683 365 309 146 82 Total 3,142 2,267 1,703 1,818 1,702 2,159 1,708 1,621 937 799 895 3,380 5,799 21,236 27.3% 6,330 19,229 2,902 11,834 3,682 12,027 1,919 7,386 5,799 21,236 20,632 71,712 28.8% 70% 30% 9/9/86 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF P.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS PM Peak Hour Year Count Location In Out Total 1985/1986 1 395/N.E. 2nd & 1st Ayes. 1,354 3,803 5,157 1986 S.W. 3rd Ave./15 Rd./13st 486 1,277 1,763 445 1,193 1,638 1986 Brickell/15th Rd. 377 1,446 1,823 333 1,579 1,912 1986 Brickell/13th St. 545 1,850 2,395 681 1,637 2,318 1986 Miami Ave./15th Rd. 213 495 708 152 953 1,105 1986 N.W. 2nd Ave./3rd St. 248 821 1,069 206 835 1,041 1986 Flagler/W. 2nd Ave. 152 539 691 1986 N.W. 3 Ct/3rd Ave./6th St 809 1,904 2,713 1986 N.W. 1 Ave/14th St. 57 91 148 81 93 174 1986 Biscayne Blvd./N.E. 19th St. 1,031 1,500 2,531 1,033 1,644 2,677 1986 Biscayne Blvd./N.E. 15th St. 1,093 1,681 2,774 1,044 1,614 2,658 10,340 24,955 35,295 29.3% 70.7% DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF PM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS Year Count Location In 1981 Brickell/14th St. 468 352 1981 • Brickell/13th St. 704 541 1983 Brickel1/15th Rd. 369 420 1983 Miami Ave/15th Rd. 131 172 1983 Coral Way/3rd Ave. 486 488 1984 Biscayne Bivd./I-395 1,041 1,061 6,233 Grand Totals USE PM Peak Hour Out Total 1,304 1,339 2,039 1,452 1,448 1,500 514 896 1,488 1,386 2,023 1,830 17,219 26.6% 73.45% 1,772 1,691 2,743 1,993 1,817 1,920 645 1,068 1,974 1,874 3,064 2,891 23,452 6,233 17,219 23,452 10,340 24,955 35,295 7,753 16,706 24,459 24,326 58,880 83,206 29.2% 70.8% 30% 70% DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS March 4, 1987 Mr. Jose Luis Mesa Metropolitan Planning Organization Secretariat 111 N.W. 1st Street Suite 910 Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Downtown DRI - 15151 Dear Mr. Mesa: David Plummer & Associates has been retained by the City of Miami to assist the City in preparing the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Application for Development Approval. In addition to being the prime consultant to the City, our firm is responsible for preparing the response to Question 11 - Transportation. The purpose of this letter is to request that the Traffic Impact Area for the Downtown Miami DRI be designated a Special Transportation Area. This area, which was mutually agreed upon during the pre -application conference, is defined as North 79th Street on the north, Biscayne Bay on the south, Alton Road on the east and LeJeune Road (West 42nd Avenue) on the west. The major roadway systems in this area and the roadway links analyzed in the Downtown DRI are shown on the attached map. The Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) specifies that 4225 SALZEDO STREET • CORAL GABLES • FLORIDA 33146 Il1IC.1 AAA n.... Mr. Jose Luis Mesa Re: Downtown DRI - #5151 March 4, 1987 Page 2 Special Transportation Areas and the State Highway System segments to which the special minimum standards apply or do not apply will be identified by Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Regional Planning Councils, or local governments, but must be approved by the Department. On behalf of the City of Miami we would request that both the State Highway System and the County Highway System be included in this designation. The minimum _acceptable peak hour operating level of service a Special Transportation operating conditions at or the 1989 Highway Capacity (LOS) for the State Highway System in Area is LOS "E" which represents near the capacity level as defined in Manual. We would also request that this minimum level of service be adopted for the County Highway System. The FTP further states that Special Transportation Areas may include central business districts, outlying business districts, and approved Areawide Developments of Regional Impact; however, they do not apply to strip development along highway corridors. It is our opinion that there are numerous compelling reason, in addition to those listed above, which indicate that this is a Special Transportation Area. Several of these reasons are as follows: Mr. Jose Luis Mesa Re: Downtown DRI -- #5151 March 4, 1987 Page 3 1) The area includes the CBDTs of the Cities of Miami and Coral Gables. 2) The area also includes the main business areas of Coconut Grove, Little Havana, Overtown and Allapattah as well as the Civic Center. 3) Many of the roadways within this area are presently operating at or near capacity during the peak hour. 4) The area is well served by Transit including 14 of 20 Metrorail Stations. The City of Miami would like to process this request through the various advisory and technical committees as quickly as possible. If you require additional information from our firm or any of the other governmental agencies involved please contact me as soon as possible. Looking forward to working with you on this request. I remain, KMP/em-MAR87E cc: Ms. Joyce Meyers Mr. Tom Thomson Mr. Jack Osterholt (David Planner Arid Assodafes, t,c. Bentr4Q. Ku1.1 And Vora. ht. DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Wnems`fivasaa And Jo*ruon. tv- CAUSE via Y K7l C.vxwAr IacAR 7-Lin CAUSE wA7 or/Dermal Enginoertg CormhaniI, t+. MASTERPLAN DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS May 13, 1987 Mr. Michael Moore Transportation Planner Office of Planning and Programs Florida Department of Transportation 401 N.W. 2nd Avenue, Suite 510 Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI - #6197 Dear Mr. Moore, This letter is in response to the comments offered by your office about the Application for Development Approval for the above referenced project. 1. Regarding the list of committed improvements in response to Question 11. A6 (p. 11-6), the Applicant should note that the transmittal from this office dated September 19, 1986 listing programmed improvements in the subject study area was based upon the Department's Five Year Work Program which was adopted June 30, 1986. Within the last five months, the Department has proceeded to update this adopted program. Therefore, the existing Work Program is about to change, the new Work Program is tentatively scheduled to be adopted in mid -July. The Applicant may wish to confer with the Department to review any changes proposed to the Five -Year Work Program. For purposes of this study it is our opinion that only the adopted Program can be used. However, the final draft of the proposed Metropolitan Dade County 1988 Transportation Improvement Program has been reviewed. The improvement cost estimates have been updated based on the more recent information. It is also important to note that the proposed TIP does not include any "capacity" improvements for the roadway links analyzed in the Southeast Overtown/Park West ADA. 4225 SALZEDO STREET • CORAL GABLES • FLORIDA 33146 1305) 444-2116 Mr. Michael Moore Page 2 2. The Applicant has not clearly defined their meaning of the word "committed" in this Application. For purposes of our analysis, this office has assumed that the Applicant refers to "committed" projects as being those projects being funded through the construction phase in the Department's Five Year Work Program. Should this definition be incorrect, the Applicant should clarify their meaning in an expeditious manner. "Committed" Roadway Improvements for purposes of this study are defined in Page 11-4 as (1) those having construction funds allocated for the current year in the Capital or Transportation Improvement Program (2) projects which are currently underway and (3) those required by a development order. 3. Several inconsistencies were discovered in Table 11-1 (p. 11-11) regarding project costs as compared to the Department's current funding information in District Six. It is understood that project cost estimates are frequently being updated, therefore this office is prepared to thoroughly address these inconsistencies with the Applicant and the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff should Council staff deem necessary. Roadway improvement costs in. Table 11-1(R) have been revised as requested. Cost estimates were obtained from the proposed Dade County TIP. 4. As Item #6 on page 11-6 alludes to a list of Downtown transportation improvements, this office made the assumption that this corresponds to the list on page 11-4, which then seems to be out of sequence. These pages have been rearranged. Mr. Michael Moore Page 3 5. The response to Question 11.E.1 describes the Applicant's procedures for arriving at existing traffic on the committed roadway network. However, the Applicant does not fully address what source methodology was utilized. Existing traffic volumes were obtained from various sources. A majority of the volumes shown for roadway links within the Downtown area are from peak hour manual turning movement counts conducted at 37 intersections by David Plummer and Associates during June and July 1986. Existing volumes shown for roadway links within the remainder of the traffic impact area were obtained form the Florida Department of Transportation and Metro -Dade Public Works Department. Traffic counts taken for Metro -Dade Transportation Administration as part of the metromover before and after study were also used where applicable. Typically, these were twenty four hour hourly counts. 6. Table 11.3 from pages 11-16 to 11-22 contains a significant amount of missing data (either "NA's" or blank columns) for many segments within the study area. The Applicant should better justify why it was presented this way. The level of service (LOS) data for 1-95, S.R. 836/1-395 and MacArthur Causeway has been provided on Tables 11.3(R), 11.5(R), 11.5A(R) and 11.9(R) based on V/C ratio analysis techniques. Providing LOS data based on V/C ratios for expressway links provides consistency with all other roadway links which are analyzed. Mr. Michael Moore Page 4 7. Mode split assumptions, as described under Question 11.C.1, appear reasonable. Mode split assumptions were obtained from Metro -Dade Transportation Administration. 8. The response to Question 11.C.3 (Future Traffic on Committed Network), that baseline future traffic is projected to remain constant does not seem adequate. The Applicant should provide additional information to support this assumption. The response to Question 11.C.3 does not mean that traffic volumes on the traffic impact area streets will not continue to increase. To the contrary, it is anticipated that traffic volumes will increase due to the construction and occupancy of permitted developments in the Downtown study area (North 20th Street, South 15th Road, 1-95 and Biscayne Bay), as well as from continued development within the traffic impact area. For the Downtown study area street system the Phase I, II and III Future Traffic Volumes on the Committed Network (Table 11.5(R) and 11.5A(R)) are projected to remain the same based on the following; 1) All Permitted Developments are assumed to be constructed and fully occupied by the end of Phase I. By including all traffic generated by this development in the Phase 1 Future Traffic projections, a baseline is established from which the impacts of Additional Approvable Development can be measured. Mr. Michael Moore Page 5 2) The study methodology assumes that although there may be an increase in background traffic (i.e. external to external trips) this increase will be balanced by a diversion of existing thru trips from the study area roadways. As downtown roadways carry higher volumes, motorist who would normally travel through the area may find it more convenient to travel around the study area. A background growth rate has been applied to all roadway links in the balance of the traffic impact area and to all expressway links. This factor accounts for continued development within the traffic impact area and vehicle trips thru the area. Therefore, the baseline volumes for Future Traffic (Table 11.5(R)) are slightly different for each phase and a Table has been provided for each phase. 9. According to the results obtained by the Applicant in response to Question 11.D.6, one intersection and several roadway segments on the State Highway System would fall below Level of Service "E" by the completion of Phase T development. Should these results hold true, these roadway segments would not be in compliance with the State of Florida Transportation Plan's "Statewide Minimum Acceptable Operating Level of Service Standards for the State Highway System" (Table 4-2). Based on numerous discussions with FDOT staff mitigative measures have been identified for state roadway links as necessary. This information is discussed in detail in the revised Application for Development Approval (ADA). Mr. Michael Moore Page 6 T hope all of your questions have been answered in this letter. Should you have any more comments, please do not hesitate in calling this office. Sincer Kahar . Pinder KMP/r1-0587EM APPENDIX 11 Q2 (R) TRIP GENERATION DI-kt-06 11r2I 11 50018E641 O'JEt10Y4 16404 4E01 911 SOC10.E{Oo011C 0611 t1EN 010E10r6011 lNCt1.0191 11101015 14E1E8E6111 Ste4u1oo 1 4----•i 1112 • I i l YEAS LEY IIUE£ PA 1pport4111 : 1997 1 : 0aoi (11 4444 CIO 1441 0rrctfrll 1140111 411o446111 1 : 2005 • 1: 1 2 1 4 S S : 6E1, OFFICE----: 609. 1f111---: OEW111 : ki510F111k- -------- - - •I L006t16 3 Ep15'E13101- S SE11104 : 1N019111AL/MoxxESALE i110/1E1 1 :: 10161. ruul Ace, 1 floor 0111c9 : Flcar kraaai : fiv0e : floor 94401 talon 164,11ta0 14464r 0.ti0iot Pa,. 1 loots Nat93 : floor Coanta : floor forol.sol kt0Ool : floor 14*464t. NFoteute; Sea16 44Lr11.41:: 1300e Hotel D.9111n0 IOlal £o..err, 1s4444 . Area E.piar.ot: Arai E.Dlaywti Area : ken E.ptor4olfyko0nki llo0t4 Antos labor F. 1 Eaployooll kit Eylar.nt: Arch IC0I1640 04pl079a4: Area E4plar.ntf.610yso11 fgtoyr4l:: ken Roast darts Ee014.ntF.OloywlE.pl0rs0l sxiiti D 501, Jobs 54.ft. lobs S4.Ft. Soft. Jos Jolt I.O. A0a7. labor F. ?op. Roos JObs 54.f1. Jols St.ft. Sl.dsnts Jac sot. Jobs J044 Ail* 6644 51•ft. boast 0.0.s Jobs 1064 Jobs {an,er44da factor••1 1.14 Ir.115f 4.41 fir.1a5f 2.11 5.00 rsr.f657 rer.I650 0.445 0.451 1.127 144ot/0U ror,100 rer.1113 1.40 rsr.11ooa 1.00 Per,ll5f 11.4000 1,51 1.41 1.42 0.07 Sto.115f 1rr,16Sf Per.I15F Per.f15f 14r.1464.1 OAAI 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gag 2 1 711400 445 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 104090 0 0 495 445 0 1461 1 1 0 0 0 0 06009 0 231 0 110 117 521 1015 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 86004 0 8l0 I13 231 2A 0971 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014N 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 05000 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15000 0 0 655 85 9 Uhl i 55100 145 0 0 9 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 35100 0 0 115 I45 0 (10 1 1 9 0 0411400 811i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1907440 4 0 8824 4 0 C19 2 1 141100 1521 0 0 15000 0 41 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 157500 0 0 1551 ISYI 41 C17 1 3 191100 1124 0 9 21000 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 110200 0 0 1114 1184 60 CID i 1 0 0 0 0 0 215000 0 1175 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 733000 0 0 1115 1115 L175 CIO 5 1 1517409 6026 0 0 111500 0 131 0 374 ISl 111ISO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 t45i4D0 0 12i It44 2144 110 011 6 1 199500 1114 0 0 4000 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 4 40150D 0 0 1240 1749 16 1110.11401 5 41100 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 61190 0 0 111 272 0 IA IEILLL 2 5 1711000 Ilbd 4 0 Isom0 407 0 1114 3240 1404 3601 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1121000 0 1111 0211 0712 111/ 0910.1011 S 5 2N5300 11141 0 0 117400 0 345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 2112400 0 0 11711 17111 315 001C011E 1 5 414100 2440 0 0 1000 9 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 444100 0 0 7159 1119 49 P011 0 0 0 9 0 ,9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0041 111400 405 0 0 84000 0 231 0 010 111 521 1075 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 4 4 111400 0 110 121 171 23S 00011041 i511100 11141 1111400 1824 110500 215900 435 1123 121 151 211 430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4140300 0 324 21179 11014 1610 1.11C1E11 5011600 22115 0 0 114100 0 051 4 2111 1210 1104 lilt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5191900 0 7711 21101 11147 851 00(910YN7PN 30109 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 45000 03 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 140100 0 0 0S0 100 0 1001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 rr 0 0 0190r 61E4 7421400 14114 1101400 0121 560440 215000 1511 1075 1101 1817 2514 5116 0 a 15000 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10464400 0 1e0 10190 17306 7441 08-Der-86 17:29:45 SOUTHEAST 0VE8TOWN PARK WEST DR' PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION HEW ATTR (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCREMENTS) Ishopl Scenario: 1 < 11992 = 1 Constant Approved(X) 11997 = 2 iiiiiiiiiii Allnxablel 1 12005 W 3 41.368201 i I HOME -BASED PRODUCTIONS I HOME -BASED ATTRACTIONS I NON -HOME BASED : TOTAL Parcel Area I Work Shop Soc.Rer. School Misc. Total I Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total 1 Person Taxi Truck Total 1 OMNI 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mt 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 572 0 173 0 676 1421 231 14 80 326 1141 014H1 3 1 799 521 398 225 462 2405 270 319 214 0 318 1121 182 l 82 271 3797 OTPW 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTPW 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 30 0 116 244 40 2 14 56 300 OTPW 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 283 0 66 0 334 703 114 1 40 161 864 COD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10206 0 0 0 2816 13021 2119 249 1434 3802 16824 CBD 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1806 56 547 0 2133 4541 739 44 254 1037 5578 CBD 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 82 485 0 1890 4057 660 39 225 924 4981 C80 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1359 1608 412 0 1605 4983 811 33 191 1035 6018 CDD 5 3 320 208 159 90 185 962 8263 436 2556 0 9759 21014 3420 202 1179 4800 26776 COD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2070 22 627 0 2445 5165 840 51 291 1182 6347 BRICKELL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 0 95 0 372 782 127 8 44 179 961 BRICKELL 2 5 2738 1784 1362 769 1583 B235 9568 556 3353 0 11300 24776 4032 234 1496 5762 38773 BRICKELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14703 472 4454 0 17365 36994 6020 359 2066 0445 45440 BRICKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2414 136 749 0 2922 6282 1022 60 340 1430 7712 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OMNI 799 521 398 225 462 2405 842 319 388 0 994 2542 414 21 163 597 5544 DOWNTOWN 320 20B 159 90 185 962 25304 2203 4626 0 20647 52781 8589 618 3574 12781 66523 BRICKELL 2738 1784 1362 769 1583 8235 27060 1165 8651 0 31958 60034 11201 660 3955 15816 92086 OVERTOINNIPW 0 0 0 0 0 0 381 0 115 0 450 947 154 9 54 217 1164 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 3052 2513 1918 1084 2230 11602 53587 3686 13781 0 54050 125104 20358 1308 7745 29411 166117 08-Dec-86 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 17:29:47 Area nave Null 0ini CBD Nest COD East Overt/Pi Brickell SOUTHEAST OVERIONN PARK NEST DOI Area i 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 MS 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.461 0.080 0.211 (NEN DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCREMEN11997 MS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.189 Year; 1 ( 1 1992 = 1 2005 MS 0.00 0.412 0.=245 0.360 0.059 0.176 ApprovediX} 1 1997 = 2 Allowable' ) : 2005 = 3 0AILY TRIPS 1 PfAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECK Parcel Person Mode Auto Auto lntraz.l External Two -Nay Inbound Outbound Het Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Int.1 Auto 1. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF) Conversion Factor ) 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.70 Two -Nay Inbound Outbound (Transit) Per./AutoOverall X PH/Daily lnhnd 2 Outdnd X OMNI 1 1 0 0.40 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 2 1 1747 0.40 1051 135 51 698 60 18 42 0.539 0.162 0.377 01111I 3 1 3797 0.40 2286 1590 51 1519 131 39 91 1.514 0.456 1.063 OTPN 1 4 0 0.08 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 01P14 2 4 300 0.08 216 193 20X 154 13 4 9 0.156 0.047 0.109 OTPW 3 4 864 0.08 795 556 201 445 38 11 27 0.694 0.208 0.486 CBD 1 2 16824 0.29 11962 8365 51 7947 683 205 478 0.344 0.103 0.241 CBD 2 3 5578 0.47 2962 2071 51 1968 169 51 118 0.473 0.142 0.331 COD 3 3 4981 0.47 2645 1849 51 1757 151 45 106 0.472 0.142 0.330 CBD 4 3 6018 0.47 3196 2235 51 2123 183 55 128 0.777 0.233 0.544 CBD 5 3 26776 0.47 14218 9943 51 9446 812 244 569 0.491 0.147 0.344 CBD 6 2 6347 0.29 4512 3156 51 2998 258 17 180 0.636 0.191 0.445 BRICKELL 1 5 961 0.21 758 530 51 504 43 13 30 0.70/ 0.212 0.495 BRICKELL 2 5 38773 0.21 30592 21393 51 20323 1748 524 1223 0.910 0.273 0.637 BR1CKELL 3 5 45440 0.21 35852 25011 51 23818 2048 614 1434 0.703 0.211 0.492 BRICKELL 4 5 7712 0.21 6085 4255 51 4042 348 104 243 0.701 0.210 0.491 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 Unlit 5544 3337 2334 2217 191 57 133 2 1 I 0010001IN 66523 39494 27619 26238 2256 677 1580 3 1 2 BRICKELL 92886 73207 51250 48687 4187 1256 2931 3 1 2 OVERIONH/PW 1164 1071 749 599 52 15 36 1 0 1 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 166117 117190 81951 77741 6686 2006 4600 PORT 860 1840 IAll PORE 1670 580 1 94-114-1► 11r52431 SOU /1E 451 000010e111 P401 6E 11 041 10Ct0-i[614o1C 10I4 IlE4 OE0ELOP4(41 I1(Lu1146 MUMS 1105,.101151 Suaxoel 1 4 : 1112 • 1 ; : 0IE41 [E1 1A1LE t JpFrer►44 1 1 1117 • 2 ; 1 Boil CIO bast C01 Earl Orerti7l1 kis►all ; Pri 611c+a6111t1 : 2001 a 1: 1 7 3 4 1 1 IE1. OfflCU—••-; 40V. OFFICE----1 4#141L----- ---------- ------------: 4E510E111AL 1 1016116i ; CO40Et1104 J 501004 i 110'J51111LA&0E15AEi 4114114(C !-^.-^-,-1: 1014L larral Aria : floor 011114 ; floor introit ; floor i floor Art441 triad 10reltheq Mader 4aslie0l Pop. 1 taoxt I1ole2 1 floor Coarale 1 floor Eiu0laal School 1 floor lal o7s. lrolt4alet Seals 01tr114sr;: floor Valet Iallrai 14161 Coawrt. 4e1641 kea Eployentl koo C6610,644: Arai ; Area Erplaraatfplaysal: Units Autos Labe f. t (oplo7oot; Arta Eploleet; Area ttotlegelfepl0yan11 Area f601616e4f661,6041 E1,010401:: ku Roars 41nr44 Eplc0401Ee012044Eapl0yaal mitt ) 51.ft. Jolt 54.ft. 4:44 50.Ft. Sq.fl. Jo04 /as O.U. 401ot labor f. Pap. loss 1004 S9.f0. Jot/. Sq.ft. Steirots Jo04 Sq.ft. Jobs Joss Sias Jobs 504. 0404 6.6.4 1044 100t Jolt .0a,ertso Factor--1 4,44 4.44 fer.J0¢ Pq.115f 2.71 5.00 0.411 0.151 1.327 1.00 1.00 Per.145f Per.1ASf hai44100 P.r.190 Per.1411 Per.11oot Per.lt5f 31.4000 1.53 Ste.1131 Per .J4S1 1.42 1.42 0.02 Per./(5f Per.145f Per./Seat 0.701 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0000 2 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0041 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 000e 1 4 144000 137 0 0 15000 0 41 0 1240 571 BO) 1145 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 01000 0 1240 It& 774 41 01P4 3 4 0 0 0 0 41700 0 112 0 710 153 415 1001 4 0 290000 210 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 131700 0 260 407 442 112 0J1,e 1 4 0 0 0 4 10000 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10000 0 0 21 21 27 CID 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 1 11 9 0 0 4 0 0 0 (10 2 3 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0113 3 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C111 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ID 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 CID 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I110EEtl 1 1 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 341C11112 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 041CYELL 3 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 IRI(IE€.t 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 P011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 6 0 0 OOeallalr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 WIC[ELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04(110e401 160040 131 6 0 16200 4 111 0 7000 410 1302 7154 0 0 210000 240 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 572700 0 7400 1706 1746 Ili 1,041 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 31001 0E4 116000 331 0 0 46700 0 179 0 2000 130 1107 I134 0 0 714004 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57.200 0 2400 1744 1204 114 04-Dec-86 11:57:37 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNJPARK WEST ORI PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION ROW ATTR (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDIWB PREVIOUS INCREMENISI lshopl Scenario: 1 ( : 1992 = 1 Constant Approvedl 1 : 1997 = 2 iifiiiiii** Allo*ahlellll : 2005 = 3 41.368201 i : HOME -BASED PRODUCTIONS : HOME -BASED ATTRACTIONS : NON -HOME BASED : TOTAL Parcel Area : Wort Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total : Work Shop Soc.Rec. school Misc. Total : Person Taxi 'Truck Total 1 OMNI 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011H1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01N1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTPW 1 4 1224 797 609 344 708 36BI 899 56 476 0 1062 2493 406 22 194 622 6796 OTPW 2 4 750 489 373 211 434 2256 465 153 265 0 549 1431 233 11 107 351 4039 OTPW 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 37 9 0 37 115 19 I 4 24 139 COD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRICKELL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRICKELL 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRICKELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRICKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OMNI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OVERTOWNIPW 1974 1286 902 555 1141 5938 1395 245 751 0 1648 4039 657 34 305 997 10974 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 1974 1286 982 555 1141 5738 1395 245 751 0 1648 4039 657 34 305 977 10974 04-Dec-86 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 11:57:39 Area name Null Oini COD West COD East OvertlPW Brickell SOUTHEAST OVERrOWW/PART( WEST ORT Area If 0 1'' 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 MS 0.00 0.398 0.209 0.469 0.080 0.211 THEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCREIlEN11991 MS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.189 Year: 1 ( 11992 = 1 2005 NS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.176 Approved( 1 l 1997 = 2 Allowableltl 12005 = 3 I DAILY TRIPS l PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECK Parcel Person hole Auto Auto Intra:,/ External Two -Way Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Irips Trips 1nt.I Auto I. Mute Trips per 1000 SF) Conversion Factor 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.70 Two -Way Inbound Outbound (Transit} Per./AutoOverall I PH/Daily Inbnd 1 Outbnd 1 OMNI 1 1 0 0,40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 2 1 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 3 l 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 DIPW 1 4 6796 0.08 6252 4372 201 3498 301 90 211 1.662 0.449 1.183 OUR 2 4 4039 0.08 3715 2598 201 2079 119 54 125 0.540 0.162 0.378 OTPW 3 4 139 0.08 128 89 201 71 6 2 4 0.614 0.184 0.430 C80 1 2 0 0,29 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBB 2 3 0 0.47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBO 3 3 0 0.47 0 0 5I 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 180 4 3 0 0.47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 180 5 3 0 0,47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 180 6 2 0 0.29 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0,000 BRICKELL 1 5 0 0.21 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0,000 0.000 0.000 BRICKELL 2 5 0 0.21 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0,000 BRICKELL 3 5 0 0.21 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 BRICKELL 4 5 0 0.21 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0,000 0.000 0.000 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0,000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OVERTOWN/PW 10974 10096 7060 5648 486 146 340 3 1 2 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 10974 10096 7060 564E 486 146 340 29-4et-10 14136:23 10111CoSl 0vi11011 PAW 11953 041 SIC10-4C15e43e9C 0411 41f/ IEvil0Pl9E11 EIEl440106 41E41005 11CAE041131 54tom to; 4 4 * 1492 • I : ALSO 4E4 1414E P4 10pro.N1 1 : 144E • 2 : e Daot C11 MA E00lost 0ver1lri Irauall I A130.4410III : 2005 • 3: e I 2 3 4 5 Pu 1e 1 : 6E6. off3EE : 60v. Ofi1CI I Amu : IESi0E11IK--t 1 L00611A--•------1 E0144E111019- I Sum 1 E104S111AL11601fSAtE A111111E4 1--------11 101E1 trot : Floor 0414tt : floor 6o4a4.e11 : fluor i F109‘ 00101E 1.4441 :0031114 1040e0 Aasideat Co.pt 10044. 00164 I floor CPPYPIA 1 floor foroltan3 St90o1 : now 10d4.43L, 040101,41.e4 5.F14 A1lrrl0r:: Floor Hotel 9.411tn1 101.1 Coulon. area E411016nt: .rea Esolo14n41 0rta : Mee EwlOye•tlypor•ol: 1654£4 Actor Labor F. Etpioy4At: Area tooloysntl keg ItalltptIfylo9ull Mta Ey1o,u1t. 30ytn1: £6,14.160.411 1•64 ALA/5 Mitt Ey10t.111y101161140 'uat ts•••-•-^•^-^-1 34.11. Jolt S4.0l. Jars 59.Ft. Sq.FI, Jobs loaf D.u. atlas Libor F. Pop. lass Sots Sq.FI. Jols 54.it. 5406846 2*40 Sq.fl. Jens 14.1.4 6.46E Jun, Sq.Ft. Roo.* 0.0.4 Jobs Joys CPa.Hte04 fatter--; 1.44 Per.2l5F 4.1 Per.7LSf 2.11 0.00 Pet.105F Per.l0S4 0.41S 0.151 1.321 1.04 1.00 37.4000 1.53 141o4101J Per.100 Per.111F P66.74000 ftr.la5f 510.A15F 40.14SF 1.12 1.42 0.02 Pi .11$f Ler.11SE 744./500 94441 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200000 142 142 4 0 209042 0 0 201 142 04.1 2 1 100000 1337 150000 601 192000 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250000 750 0 0 0 004000 560 560 I 0 1511000 0 0 3425 2194 4141E 1 1 300040 3101 0 0 35000 0 9; 0 500 711 321 464 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3120041 0 5u0 1203 1203 015e 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 91002 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 011-1 3 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 4 0 0 0 4 C69 1 0 u 11 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 0 I 4 J 0 0 0 0 560 2 1 550400 2442 0 0 50400 0 114 0 0 D 0 0 200 200 0 0 100000 44220 454 50900 11 36 4 0 450040 240 0 3560 7313 0.66 3 . 550000 2442 0 0 250400 0 414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1444 Y 900000 0 0 5108 1181 CID 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 566 1 S 104000 4440 0 0 150000 0 401 0 0 0 0 0 450 450 250000 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 140000 450 0 5542 3547 00 6 2 14140000 4440 0 0 244000 0 342 0 IWO 415 451 1321 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 P 1200000 4 3000 4932 4937 641(.091 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1050 418 104 1191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1050 0 0 60114114 1 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 219 191 1116 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 0 4 0 0 0 600 0 0 1910.0f11 1 5 1050000 1412 0 0 215000 4 711 0 0 0 0 0 61: 175 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1315040 OS 0 5555 5555 181€119u 4 5 1954400 6458 0 0 05000 0 213 0 400 lib 240 511 115 175 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 2651000 175 400 90e1 9063 Fail v 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 D 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 41 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0001 i404900 4460 150000 64 54000 0 114 0 500 213 Ill 144 0 9 250000 100 0 0 0 1000000 710 146 0 4 2450000 0 500 6412 5216 446014644 3104000 13164 0 0 650000 D 1167 0 1000 415 151 1527 65D 450 250000 150 100000 11220 454 50000 36 16 1404 61 4150040 650 1000 11024 14524 011154E11 3004400 111ID 0 0 150000 0 Id 7050 953 4315 2720 300 150 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3350004 350 2050 14619 14111 0v(01D4JPt 0 00 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f{Ilt 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 eo 0 5100E 4001 110191'90 13514 €5,090 eat 1010900 2140 0 1550 165E 2111 4111 1000 1000 000000 500 100000 11220 454 1050000 744 146 1400 611114150000 4000 3550 11554 3408) 29-0ec-86 10:36:27 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE Area one Null Om C80 West C80 East Overt/PR 8rickell SOUTHEAST OVERTURN PARK WEST DRI Area i 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 MS 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.469 0.080 0.211 (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCREMENTE997 M5 0.00 0.442 0.241, 0.400 0.067 0.189 Year: 1 ( : 1992 = 1 2005 115 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.176 Approvedl ) 1 1997 = 2 Allowab1e1X) : 2005 = 3 : DAILY TRIPS : PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECK Parcel Person Mode Auto Auto lntraz./ External Two -Way Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Int.X Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF1 Conversion Factor 3 1.43 OX 0.086 0.30 0.70 Two -Way Inbound Outbound 1Transit) Per./AutoOverall X PH/Daily Inbnd X 0utbnd X OMNI 1 1 772 0.40 465 325 51 309 27 8 19 0.133 0.040 0.093 OMNI 2 1 10153 0.40 6112 4274 51 4060 349 105 244 0.230 0.069 0.161 OMNI 3 1 13068 0.40 7867 5501 5X 5226 449 135 315 0.611 0.183 0.428 OTPW 1 4 0 0.08 0 0 20X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OUR 2 4 0 0.08 0 0 20X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OTPW 3 4 0 0.08 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 1 2 0 0.29 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 2 3 23726 0.47 12599 8810 51 8370 720 216 504 0.758 0.227 0.530 CBD 3 3 12333 0.47 6549 4580 5X 4351 374 112 262 0.468 0.140 0.327 COD 4 3 0 0.47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 5 3 21210 0.47 11262 7876 5X 7482 643 193 450 0.460 0.138 0.322 CBD 6 2 21668 0.29 15406 10774 51 10235 880 264 616 0.733 0.220 0.513 681C11ELL 1 5 3375 0.21 2663 1862 5X 1769 152 46 106 0.000 0.000 0.000 E+R1CKE1L 2 5 1928 0.21 1522 1064 51 1011 87 26 61 0.000 0.000 0.000 ER1CKELL 3 5 21139 0.21 16678 11663 51 11080 953 286 667 0.725 0.217 0.507 6R1CKELL 4 5 34036 0.21 26854 18779 51 17840 1534 460 1074 0.154 0.226 0.528 POkI 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 23992 14443 10100 9595 825 248 578 1 0 1 DOWNTOWN 18938 45816 32039 30437 2618 785 1832 2 1 2 DRICKELL 60478 41717 33368 31700 2726 818 1908 1 0 1 OVERTOWN/PW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 163400 107177 75508 71733 6169 1851 4318 29-Dec-B4 10:36:25 SOUIHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION HBW ATTR (HEM DEVELOP/1E8T INCLU0HN8 PREVIOUS 1NCREME!(TS1 Ishapl Scenario: 1 < 1 1992 = 1 Constant Approved; 1 1 1997 = 2 ximi xxxxi Allouable(X) 1 2005 = 3 41.368201 s 1 HOME -BASED PRODUCTIONS I NOME-BASED ATTRACTIONS 1 NON -HOME BASED Parcel Area l Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Mist. Total I Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total 1 Person Taxi Truck Total TOTAL OMNI 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 328 0 50 0 239 617 100 8 46 155 772 OMNI 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 3961 56 761 0 3306 8170 1329 97 557 1983 10153 OMNI 3 I 493 322 245 139 265 1484 3704 130 1204 0 4375 9413 1532 90 548 2170 13068 OTPN 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fl 0 0 0 OTPW 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OUR 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD l 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 2 3 0 0 188 0 127 315 3825 185 1061 10493 4000 19585 3181 102 538 3826 23726 COD 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3687 927 1117 0 4354 10084 1641 90 518 2249 12333 CBD 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COD 5 3 0 0 423 0 284 109 6415 556 2159 0 7576 16706 2719 175 902 3795 21210 CBD 6 2 987 643 491 271 571 2969 5762 742 1909 0 6805 15218 2476 141 864 3481 21668 BRICKELL l 5 1036 675 515 291 599 3117 0 0 172 0 0 172 28 0 51 85 3375 BRICKELL 2 5 592 386 294 166 342 1701 0 0 98 0 0 98 16 0 33 49 1928 BRICKELL 3 5 0 0 165 0 111 276 6425 983 2030 0 7588 17025 2771 164 903 3837 21139 BRICKELL 4 5 395 257 361 111 339 1463 10462 315 3325 0 12380 24502 4313 263 1495 6071 34036 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OMNI 493 322 245 139 285 1484 7994 185 2021 0 9000 18200 2962 195 1151 4308 23992 DOWNTOWN 987 643 1102 277 983 3993 19689 2410 6266 10493 22735 61593 10023 507 2822 13352 78938 BRICKELL 2023 1310 1335 549 1392 6637 16907 1290 5625 0 19968 43796 7127 421 2408 10042 60470 OVERTOWN/PW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 3503 2283 2663 984 2661 12115 44590 3893 13912 10493 50704 123592 20112 1129 6461 27702 163408 01.Orc -It 14114171 SCUIRE451 04E113141 tall lE 51 lY l 50[10-EC0401E 4414 tiE4 00.E4te0EAT I14.1110144 t0E1rl40G I4C7tf19El1Si tori1 7 5csrariai 1 1---- 1 1111 • 1 1 1 WAS 119 141E to Apprn,idl1) : 1411 • 2 1 0461 CIO 64i1 CN 1141 04er11111 Snail' 1 4116.44141 1 1 2003 • 1: 1 1 3 1 3: : fit!. OFFICE--1 109. OfflEi : tETAIi t OES[6EMTlA1 : 107fiEY6---•----- ; COMYF1130111- i ------ ----I FMW51lIJy,fYittESACE AIFi1RAt! :: 1pTY----------•..........................._---- tu ui Mrs : floor 011444 1 Flour 4Ur1r0s1 1 floor 1 1I00c 14440 1141411 :11+411i44 Wit/ arislrat Pop. 1 4044 11pts1 1 flow Co*o*In 1 Flow Wafted 544641 1 F166( lOdustr. tarsals; 54411 Allrllrcrll floc Hotel 0.411440 fatal Cwasrt. !+tall Arsa Eylojwll Arta Eop1o1i.1: Ou 1 Aru 146191.060101.4441 [hits A4144 t0A* F. 140149s4t: Arse Esolers011 Ora 1c611.4111461or *ti Aria Eaplo144114910yn611 Erp1044r11: leµ !coat Watt EsAl4rs04E461014411.4p104wl Jnr ------- 1 50.f1. 704t 50.ft. Jats 54.FI. Sq,ft. lops 7014 0.0. 64144 labor f. 14. 1004c Jots 50.11. 1644 54.01. 51004.6ti J.O* 54.Ft. 1004 JaAb 1611s Jogs 54.19. I004t 0.2.1 lot 444 Jobs [onrrr4404 11146r--4 4.44 4.44 Pa.J45f Irr.115F 2.11 3.94 0.115 0.111 1.321 1.00 1.00 P4r.J15f trr.1ISF 44t0sf00 P•r.101i Prr.lWU P4r.11000 01r.115F 11.1000 1.33 1.47 1.47 110.14 f Prr.JISF Prr.liS1 tsr.IISf 4.4I Prr.15u1 1441 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0. 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0523 2 1 111400 445 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111400 0 0 443 415 0 Oool 1 1 0 0 0 0 86000 0 711 0 110 10 321 1015 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14069 0 810 225 20 211 01i111 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0114 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 45000 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15000 0 0 15 85 0 01111 4 51160 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55104 0 0 245 20 0 [11 1 0 0 190)400 6014 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141/100 0 0 9174 0 0 E00 2 S 142500 1571 0 0 15004 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 111500 0 0 1541 1541 41 [10 3 1 741200 1574 0 0 27000 0 40 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120200 4 0 1181 E144 40 [00 4 1 4 0 0 0 4 715000 0 7113 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235000 0 9 lin 1115 4175 CAD 5 7 121)400 4174 0 0 111100 0 10 4 374 151 211 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1424904 0 124 1144 1141 111 C10 4 2 194504 1114 0 0 1000 0 14 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 445500 4 0 040 1190 14 islaEtt 1 5 41104 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11100 4 0 212 712 0 92lCIE41. 2 1 1111400 111.4 0 0 150000 0 40) 0 2114 1290 1606 3611 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1421600 0 2114 0277 0212 101 611E410 3 5 7715500 123111 0 0 121404 0 341 6 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1142904 4 0 42113 12113 343 001[aCll 4 5 159140 2040 0 0 14104 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 414100 0 4 2159 2119 99 Po41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 6 0 20 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 001 111400 491 0 0 14000 0 711 0 044 11) 171 1015 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 597400 0 110 2I1 128 211 :amigos 252)400 11445 1917400 11121 110500 215000 415 1115 121 151 211 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4940500 0 124 21119 11051 1410 3141C1E45 1011100 22145 0 0 111100 0 051 0 2174 1240 480i 3411 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2341400 0 2124 21191 71391 051 P4C0104446 55100 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13000 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 114140 0 0 110 310 4 1041 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51601 IAEA 1071900 341 4 011400 4021 510100 253000 1519 1115 1401 t411 7344 3114 0 0 15000 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10489440 0 1906 14131 3)500 1494 08-➢ec-86 11c36:31 SOUTHEAST OVERTDWN PARK WEST DR1 PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION HOW ATIR INEM DEVELOPMENT 1NCLUDIN5 PREVIOUS INCREMENTS/ Isl:apl Scenario: 1 ( : 1992 = 1 Constant Approvedlli 1 1997 = 2 mamma Al1o�+ablel ) : 2005 = 3 41.360201 t I HOME -BASED PRODUCTIONS : HOME -BASED ATTRACTIONS NON -HOME BASED t TOTAL Parcel Area : Mork Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total I Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total : Person Taxi Truck Total : 011111 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OMNI 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 572 0 173 0 676 1421 231 14 80 326 1747 OMNI 3 1 799 521 348 225 462 2405 270 319 214 0 318 1121 182 7 82 271 3797 OTPW I 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DIN 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 30 0 116 244 40 2 14 56 300 0TP4 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 283 0 86 0 334 703 114 7 40 161 864 COD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10206 0 0 0 2816 i3021 2119 249 1434 3802 16824 COD 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1806 56 547 0 2133 4541 739 44 254 1037 5578 CBD 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 82 485 0 1890 4057 660 39 225 924 4981 CBD 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1359 1606 412 0 1605 4983 811 33 191 1035 6018 CBD 5 3 320 208 159 90 185 962 8263 436 2556 0 9759 21014 3420 202 1179 4600 26776 CBD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2070 22 627 0 2445 5165 840 51 291 1102 6347 BRICKELL 1 5 0 0 n 0 0 0 315 0 95 0 372 782 127 8 44 179 961 BRICKELL 2 5 2738 1704 1362 769 1583 8235 9568 556 3353 0 11300 24176 4032 234 1496 5762 38773 BRICKELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14703 472 4454 0 17365 36994 6020 359 2066 6445 45440 BRICKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2474 136 749 0 2922 6282 1022 60 348 1430 7712 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OnNi 799 521 398 225 462 2405 842 319 388 0 994 2542 414 21 163 597 5544 DOWNTOWN 320 208 159 90 185 962 25304 2203 4626 0 20647 52781 8589 618 3574 12781 66523 BRICKELL 2738 1784 (362 769 1583 0235 21060 1165 6651 0 31956 60834 11201 660 3955 15816 92866 0VE01011117P11 0 0 0 0 0 0 381 0 115 0 450 947 154 9 54 217 1164 PORI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 3857 2513 1916 1064 2230 11602 53567 1686 13781 0 54050 125104 20358 1308 1745 29411 166117 OR-Dec-06 !BODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 17:36:33 Area nape Null Osni COD West COD East Overt7PW Brickelt SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DOl Area 1 0 1 , 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION .1992 MS 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.469 0.080 0.211 (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDIHO PREVIOUS INCREMENT1997 MS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.061 0.189 Year: 1 ( 11992 = 1 2005 MS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.176 Approved(X) 11991 = 2 Allowable( 1 1 2005 = 3 DAILY TRIPS i PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECK Parcel Person Mode Auto Auto Intraz.l External Two -Way Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Intl Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF) Conversion Factor 1 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.10 Two -Way Inbound Outbound (Transit) Per./AutoOverall 1 PH/Daily lnbnd 1 Outbnd 1 OMNI 1 I 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 2 1 1747 0.40 1051 735 51 698 60 18 42 0.539 0.162 0.371 OM11 3 1 3797 0,40 2286 1598 51 1519 131 39 91 1.517 0.456 1.063 OTPW 1 4 0 0.08 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OTPW 2 4 300 0.08 276 193 20X 154 13 4 9 0.156 0.047 0.109 OTPW 3 4 864 0.08 795 556 201 445 38 11 27 0.694 0.208 0.406 CBO 1 2 16824 0.29 11962 8365 51 7947 683 205 478 0.344 0.103 0.241 COD 2 3 5578 0.47 L962 2071 51 1960 169 51 118 0.473 0.142 0.331 CEO 3 3 4981 0.47 2645 1849 5X 1757 151 45 106 0.472 0.142 0.330 COD 4 3 6018 0.47 3196 2235 51 2123 183 55 128 0.777 0.233 0.544 CBD 5 3 26776 0.47 14218 9943 51 9446 812 244 569 0.491 0.147 0.344 COO 6 2 6347 0.29 4512 3156 51 2998 258 77 100 0.636 0.191 0.445 BRICKELL 1 5 961 0.21 758 530 51 504 41 13 30 0.707 0.212 0.495 BRICKELL 2 5 30773 0.21 30592 21393 51 20323 1748 524 1223 0.910 0.273 0.637 ORICKELL 3 5 45440 0.21 35852 25071 51 23818 2048 614 1434 0.703 0.211 0.492 BRICKELL 4 5 7712 0.21 6085 4255 51 4042 348 104 243 0.701 0.210 0.491 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 5544 3337 2334 2217 191 57 133 2 1 1 DOWNTOWN 66523 39494 27619 26238 2256 677 1580 3 1 2 BRICKELL 92886 73287 51250 48687 4187 1256 2931 3 1 2 OVERTOWHIPW 1164 1071 749 599 52 15 36 I 0 1 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 166117 117190 81951 77741 6686 2006 4680 11-Oas-U 30:10t11 5000 E451 91EA10610 f01.1 IE51 081 S4C10-4016041C 61r1 15E9 1,1111 P0E111 I10:100111i 11141.11.13 11[8f10104----_---.......___-^------.-__________ _. Scrams' 2 t i 1112 • I 1 t 04E05 KEY 149U APIrQ.011 1 : 1111 • 2 1 1 aril CIO Nest CIO Dal evortlP14 11,444411 1 PA 0110e4414111 1 2045 • 1: i 2 1 4 5 t : Wm. Off3CE—•-•i 60Y. riffle/ - --1 Ulan •— - --I RESlOERiIAI-------•1 L0061145 t C1149E61[01------i 5G100t 11R041S1A1AlJRICLESALE A311/0E({ :i 1034E faresl Area : Floor allscr : Floor iastraal 1 Floor i Floor 1144411 161411 10 i11ia' I4.146er Rubbed Pot. 1 Mows 610646 1 floor Cosmla i floor Eara4aeat 549001 : floor 1444slr. Olotrislat Beals Allrltla i1 floor Hold 6.411441 told Cuaaerc. Rrlall Ara Lyloyanit Arta Eyi*yeat: Arta : Ares E•p1o9e41Eipltyaa11 Units Antos tabor F. Esployant7 Arlo faplooaal: Area 1calleitl0apiay4t1 kit Eaplayaalfapl6ylot: EapUyeal:: Arta Rooks Unlit laploosatE4Olar44tE•fiolant �mis 3 54.41. 1414 S;.FI. Iolt 54.Il. 54.ft. Jobs Jobs O.U. Autos Libor F. Pop. Rows Jobs 51.ft. Jobs 5{.f1. Studentt Jabs Slit. Jobs Jobs 5,44s Jots 51+FL. Roast 0.0.4 100s loot Jobs [0661111/00 Faclar-.1. 4.41 4.44 2.11 5.00 0.445 9.451 1.331 1.00 1.00 3/.4100 1.51 1.42 1.42 14t./45F Ptr.11if Ptt.l1c5F 0ut45!60 Ptr.JO) Per.JWU fer.ftooa fu.113E 510.715F ttr.JASF Ptr.IKSF Per.1R5F 0.02 P4r.1S4a1 0+24 1 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200000 142 142 4 0 200000 9 0 784 142 0 0v9 2 t 450000 2146 0 0 40001 0 101 0 100 140 103 340 0 0 250000 250 0 0 0 000000 560 541 0 0 1740000 0 304 4319 3842 108 Gel 3 1 1050000 4542 150000 444 40000 0 183 0 500 133 321 644 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1140040 500 504 5941 3315 163 0/Pt 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 4 0 0 4 0 0 01747 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O1P1t 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIO 1 2 700040 3108 0 0 125000 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 175040 0 0 3441 1447 311 C10 2 3 550000 2442 0 0 50000 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 200 200 0 0 300044 11220 459 50000 14 34 0 4 030000 200 0 1308 2113 434 410 3 3 550000 2442 0 0 250000 4 01 0 400 114 240 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5004 404 100004 0 404 3220 3220 476 [ID 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 9 9 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 3 1 1700000 1548 0 0 215000 0 745 0 0 0 0 0 450 450 250000 250 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1125000 450 0 8993 0911 745 [10 l I 4000000 4440 0 0 200000 0 542 0 1100 A11 141 1050 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 1200000 4 1400 4911 4911 512 01114E14 1 3 500000 1220 0 0 50000 0 114 0 1540 110 1601 7044 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330040 0 1540 2154 2351 114 121CLEL12 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 400 219 111 194 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 400 0 0 0 661C0E36 3 5 1050900 4612 D 0 245000 0 711 0 SOO 213 120 864 413 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9113000 113 500 1513 5555 136 141E1E114 5 7950000 11019 0 0 113000 0 164 0 840 400 540 144E 313 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 34715000 E75 040 11414 11614 144 1091 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 ' 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 20 0 9 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00R1 1100000 1540 150040 11a 100000 0 711 0 840 312 571 1447 500 500 250000 270 0 0 0 1000000 130 110 0 0 1260000 540 000 10455 9179 211 006011700 4500000 14940 0 0 100000 0 2411 0 1000 811 1112 2309 170 650 150000 150 100000 11120 459 50000 3i 14 5000 100 4400000 610 1800 11441 21155 2119 141EEE11 4106000 14480 0 0 450000 0 1120 0 1500 1470 2119 4645 150 150 0 0 0 90 0 9 0 0 0 4150000 130 1504 11550 11510 1229 09EA11811P1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 9003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SWOT AF00 10200040 17306 150000 444 1150000 0 1114 0 4100 2831 3011 8095 1590 1500 500000 500 100000 11I10 459 1050009 144 714 5000 100 14110000 1500 4100 56154 51203 14)0 l3-Nov-66 10:30:21 SOUTH EAST OVERIOWN PARK WEST DRI PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION HBW AT1R (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCREMENTS) (shop) 5[enana: 2 ( 1992 = 1 Constant Approved( ) 1 1991 = 2 ififfiiifif Allawahhll) 1 2005 = 3 11.368201 1 I HOME -BASED PRODUCTIONS 1 HOME -BASED ATTRACTIONS NON -HOME BASED 1*TOTAL Parcel Area I Work Shop Soc.Rec. School M15c. Total 1 Work Shop Sac.Rec. School disc. Total : Person Taxi Truck Total OMNI 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 326 0 50 0 239 617 100 8 46 155 772 OMNI 2 1 296 193 147 63 171 891 5066 148 1385 0 5389 11988 1951 124 728 2803 15682 OMNI 3 1 493 322 716 139 603 2272 6929 222 2187 0 7486 16823 773E 189 1001 3928 23024 DUN 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UTPW 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DPW 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3986 463 1207 0 4708 10365 1687 97 560 2344 12710 COD 2 3 0 0 188 0 127 315 3825 185 1061 10493 4000 19585 3187 102 530 3626 23726 COD 3 3 395 257 196 111 228 1188 3724 927 1193 0 4396 10242 1667 91 545 2303 13732 CBD 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COD 5 3 0 0 423 0 286 709 10401 1020 3366 0 12284 27071 4405 272 1462 6139 33920 CBD 6 2 1382 900 687 386 794 4156 5762 742 1915 0 6805 15284 2487 141 886 3514 22954 BRICKELL 1 5 1520 990 756 427 679 4572 2724 165 1078 0 3217 7205 1172 66 467 1706 13483 BRICKELL 2 5 592 386 294 166 342 1781 0 0 98 0 0 98 16 0 33 49 1928 BRICKELL 3 5 493 322 410 139 396 1760 6425 983 2112 0 7566 17107 2784 164 930 3878 22746 0R1CKELL 4 5 849 553 587 238 602 2829 15774 501 5003 0 18630 39907 6494 392 2264 9150 51881 PORI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OMNI 789 514 863 222 774 3163 12323 371 3621 0 13114 29429 478? 321 1776 6086 39478 DOWNTOWN 1776 1158 1495 499 1440 636B 21699 3337 6823 10493 32195 02547 13433 703 3991 18127 107041 BR1CKELL 3454 2251 2047 911 2270 10942 24924 1669 8291 0 29435 64318 10456 623 3694 14183 90043 OVERTOWN/PW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 6020 3923 4404 1692 4434 20473 64945 5316 20735 10493 74744 176294 28666 1646 9461 39795 236562 13-Nov-86 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 10:30:23 Area name Hull Omni CBD West COD East Overt/PR Drirkell SOUTH EAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 1(S 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.469 0.080 0.211 (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCRE1lENTl997 KS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.189 Veal : 2 ( 1992 = 1 2005 MS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.176 Approved( 1 : 1997 W 2 Allawablel11 : 2005 = 3 : DAILY TRIPS 1 PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CRECK---------_,._____-_-- Parcel Person Mode Auto ' Auto Intraz.7 External Two -Way Inbound Outbound Het Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Int.1 Auto.T. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF1 Conversion Factor ) 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.70 Two -Way inbound Outbound (Transit) Per./AutoOverall I Pll/Daily Iobnd 1 0ntbnd 1 DUI 1 1 772 0.44 431 301 51 286 25 7 17 0.123 0.037 0.086 O(IN! 2 1 15682 0.44 8750 6119 51 5813 500 150 350 0.287 0.086 0.201 OHNI 3 1 23024 0.44 12847 8984 51 8535 734 220 514 0.583 0.175 0.408 O11'W 1 4 0 0.01 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OM 2 4 0 0.01 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OTPW 3 4 0 0.07 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0,000 0.000 0.000 CID 1 2 12710 0.24 9647 6746 51 6409 551 165 306 0.668 0.200 0.468 C8D 2 3 23726 0.40 14236 9955 51 9457 813 244 569 0.056 0.257 0.599 CID 3 3 13732 0.40 8239 5762 51 5474 471 141 330 0.588 0.177 0.412 COD 4 3 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 COD 5 3 33920 0.40 20352 14232 51 13520 1163 349 814 0.523 0.157 0.366 CID 6 2 22954 0.24 17422 12183 51 11574 995 299 691 0.829 0.249 0.501 BRICKELL 1 5 13483 0.19 10934 7646 51 7264 625 187 437 1.136 0.341 0.795 BRICFELL 2 5 1928 0.19 1564 1094 51 1039 89 27 63 0.000 0.000 0.000 IRICAELL 3 5 22746 0.19 1844/ 12900 51 12255 1054 316 738 0.801 0.240 0.561 ORICKELL 4 5 51887 0.19 42080 29427 51 27955 2404 721 1683 0.777 0.234 0.546 'IJ1 J 0 0 0.00 0 0 5I 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 39478 22028 15405 14634 1251 378 061 1 0 1 DOWNTOWN 107041 69895 48878 46434 3993 1198 2795 3 l 2 IRICKELL 90043 73025 51067 46513 4172 1252 2920 3 1 2 OVERTOWNIPW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 236562 164141 115349 109581 9424 2027 6591 44-Oec-44 11:51:13 500110.41 01E9101U04.09 0E51 601 5oC10-ECOIG01C 0411 4144 OE4ELOP0E41 110201014,5 PREVIOUS liesiAE4131 Sosea(l41 2 0-----: 1912 • 1 1 l MIA 9E1 MALE Pew osetl 1 1 1917 • 2 1 Oros WP Vest CEO 1411 Osu11P4 4rualell 1 PA 111o.0030,11 2005 • 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 5 1 ,, I WA. OFFICE ---I UN, OrfICE 1 REIAIL• -. ._--- T...._-__1 9E511E011k I EMIR& 1 C049E111108----1 SCHOOL-- ------------I 14605111Pt11RE11E5ALE 1 i -- I10111. Paul wee : fiDor 01134e 1 f100r &Hemet 0 floor 1 Floor idol Aetotl 10. 114tj 4440.r 4e4:dtat POF. : Roots 14aia1 1 floor Coastla 1 float E4rolta0l Bohol L flaw ladastr. 40oleu1el Stott 1410114xe14 floor Hotel 0,4ll o4 total COuerc. Gaul s .a Ey1o1.oI1 Arta Fefla3eatt 4ta 1 Area EpIar.etEselaoMll Units Aalai LEtta'F. s E.pia7eatl A114 Eaeloyull Arai IralleyelEt&lorwll kea El.10lu101f14FIot1 Ea4lpatill kea loon Omit FylorlalEtplorulEplgrsal Aria ua:tt------------ --f S9.11. Jala 5j.fl. fait 54.11. 54.f1. Jut late P.Y. Autos l40Or F. Pol. Roots Jots 51.Ft. Jobs 54.1.1. Slodtatl loos 54.f0. J441 Jots Stale feat S4.ft. loots 0.11.4 Joes 1044 204 [0oseruas Faclor--4 4.44 Per.lx5f 4.14 Ptr.lxff 2.11 5.00 Pe.11$f Par.lx5f 4.445 0,139 1.321 Aolo1100 Ptt.100 Per.100 1.00 ter./Root 1.00 P.r.105F 11,4400 1.53 S11.195 Ptr.IESF 1.41 1.4I 0.02 Per./ISP Per.115f atr.lSta4 Cowl 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 WI 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 9.4E1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 3124 1 4 221000 981 0 0 20000 0 54 0 2500 4103 1470 3111 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 711000 0 7500 1015 1015 51 pIh 2 4 50000 227 0 0 51504 0 143 0 1500 E94 917 1191 0 0 710000 790 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 313500 0 1500 151 451 445 012'. 3 4 100000 444 0 0 10000 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 500 500 110000 310 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 440040 500 0 1335 1315 it CID 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EGO 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CID 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.90 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 090 4 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 (01€00011 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 NMI. 2 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9413.001E 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 02100E3.3.4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 PORI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 4 0 4 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 00.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 04eM10oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0413.1E1E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 000110441P1 311000 1141 0 0 401500 • 0 780 0 4049 1140 I404 3300 500 300 460046 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1024500 500 4000 1010 1020 200 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 51001 43E0 311040 1141 0 101500 0 780 0 4000 1040 2404 5104 SOO 500 400000 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1414500 500 1000 1078 1028 280 04-Dec-B6 11:54117 SOUTHEAST OVERTDWH(PARK WEST OR[ PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION HOW ATTR (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCREMENTS) Tshopi Scenario: 2 ( 11992 = 1 Constant Approved( 1 : 1991 = 2 iiiiii4iiai Allo able1X) : 2005 = 3 11.368201 i Parcel I HOME-IIASED PRODUCTIONS I HOME -BASED ATTRACTIONS I NON -HOME BASED I TOTAL Area I Work Shop Soc.Kec. School Misc. total I Work Shop Sac.Rec, School Misc. Total : Persorr Taxi Truck Total I O8H1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onto 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011111 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTFW 1 4 2461 1608 1227 693 1427 7422 1198 74 773 0 1414 3459 563 29 305 897 11778 OTPW 2 4 1480 965 736 416 856 4453 760 198 476 0 697 2332 379 19 189 587 7372 OTFW 3 4 0 0 470 0 318 788 1544 111 107 0 1824 4187 681 58 217 956 5931 CBD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C80 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C803 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COD 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ERICKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OMNI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OVERTOWNIPW 3947 2572 2433 1109 2600 12663 3502 364 1956 0 4136 9977 1624 106 711 2440 25080 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 3947 2572 2433 1109 2600 12663 3502 384 1956 0 4136 7977 1624 106 711 2440 25080 04-Dec-86 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 11;51:19 Area name Null Omni CBD West COD East Overt/Pi Brickell SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 MS 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.469 0.080 0.211 (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS IHCREMENT1997 M5 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.189 Year; 2 ( 1 1992 = 1 2005 005 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.176 Approved( l : 1997 = 2 Allomable1X1 3 2005 = 3 DAILY TRIPS ; PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECK Parcel Person Mode Auto Auto Tntraz./ External Imo -Way Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Int.X Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF) Conversion Factor 1.43 OX 0.006 0.30 0.70 Tma-Way Inbound Outbound (Transit( Per.7Auto0verall 1 PH/Daily lnbnd X Outbnd 1 0001t1 1 1 0 0.44 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 2 1 0 0.44 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 3 1 0 0.44. 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OIPW 1 4 11778 0.07 10988 7684 201 6147 529 159 370 2.194 0.658 1.536 OTPW 2 4 7372 0.07 68711 4810 201 3848 331 99 232 0.841 0.252 0.589 DIN( 3 4 5931 0.07 5534 3870 201 3096 266 80 186 0.605 0.182 0.424 COD 1 2 0 0.24 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBB 2 3 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 COD 3 3 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 4 3 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 5 3 0 0,40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 COD 6 2 0 0.24 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 i<R0CKE1L 1 5 0 0.19 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 BRICKELL 2 5 0 0.19 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 BRICKELL 3 5 0 0.19 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 BRICKELL 4 5 0 0.19 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0111(1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OVERTOWN/PW 25080 23400 16363 13091 1126 338 788 4 1 3 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 25080 21400 16363 13091 1126 338 788 011let-101 1h44:50 54011111.451 011161006 CI= 1E51 061 socloicommic 1414 nOm DEVELOP:3Di 1404014 tfeltlii 1101111115t lease 1 ttat 1 I- ---- -1 1012 • 1 : : WAS 419 fo Apptcyrg[11 ; 111) . itma Lit grit fig fast Prot/hi 111444111 411oeaslit : 7045 3 : 3 2 1 4 1; : 6E0. efflti-- -- -1 609. ortici . 111114 • 4/61110111116. LOOOI 0 Cl/IME6111111- 1 SCHOU 1 11104151116Lf9*tf5A11 41116111ft 0 1;000t------------ --------------- e...,41ki; floor Ofius 1 (toot (,tut t floor t floor Artat1 lat441 :0.411141 tiesOet Res10t4t fog. Nooas hotel (tow Coevals floor tAfOilitrit 505041 : float Isgestr. 0fisle1s10: Seats At1.140arr0; floor 09390 11e91I400 10l43 L091A14.. 610.4s1. Art. Esplorset: Arsa Eaf1oraot: Aies : Area fooloye4tfesl0eI911 Units Astos Labor f. E9419re411 Ares Egoloyeett Area 1co37sialEsolo409l; Area Em4'4oraetEaploga041 folgoreett.: hrea 6099s Units (4914y601141414•11126041964 0.111. 0 11.11. (e.ft. Jobs 501. 09114 .1006 1.6. Was 140or 1. fa,. boas Jolts 51.11. Jobs 44.01. Studtett Jobs 501. Joos Jot Seats fo0,4e1tae Fictor--) 4.14 Pet .I0V 4.11 Pit .445F 2.21 5.00 Ffr ./1151 04111 0.111 1,122 1.00 041104110 ret./011 Per.11141 0e4./0004 1.00 Per .145$ 11.4000 1.53 1.42 4.42 Ste. teSF 041„MI fir 25f ?sr . ;KU Jobs 504. Roots 0.4.t 1o0s Jobs lop 0.02 etc.lisat Ogal 1 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 4 C001 2 t MIA91 115 0 0 4 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 a a 0 o 0 111440 0 0 493 4, 114441 1 1 0 0 0 0 84700 0 211 0 614 1/1 52/ 1075 9 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 a 0 0 0 aa000 4 010 211 213 21! 0120 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 01/0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65000 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65000 0 0 es 05 .( : Iwo 1 4 11100 241 0 0 a 0 a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 55100 0 0 24$ 241 , CID 1 1 0 0 1901460 6411 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t907100 0 0 11614 0 t : fil: 1 1 312500 1521 0 0 15000 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 o o a Isisoo 0 1 1541 1541 4 ill) 1 1 248700 1171 0 0 12000 0 iD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120200 0 0 131( 1164 (1 100 4 1 a D 0 6 1.$30.043 0 1115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 215000 0 0 1175 1115 397: C10 5 1 1511400 6338 0 0 11/100 0 110 0 121 111 211 450 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 404900 0 124 7114 1144 317 Cl: 1 7 114500 1/14 0 0 4000 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a 0 6 4 40550 0 a olo ma 11 14100ELL t 5 41300 172 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 41300 0 0 2/1 212 I Iglitfil 2 5 1111400 /144 0 0 150000 0 401 0 2111 1740 1101 WU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 1921100 0 2114 0211 0212 40, 4131.ai. 3 5 2765500 11348 0 0 111400 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2411900 0 D 12211 12/1r 141 10100011 4 5 459100 2040 0 0 10100 0 94 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 191100 0 0 /134 7114 94 fair 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 R 0 4 II 0 0 9 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 44 0 0 0 0 0 o a a 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 00 a 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Out 311400 491 0 0 aapoo 0 21$ 0 010 17/ 521 10/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o i 14/100 0 BO /711 .26 11! 001.10404 71/1600 11111 vioiaaa 6311 140300 215000 411 105 124 151 214 430 0 0 0 0 0 a 4 0 0 0 0 I 4440500 0 321 11014 11151 1431 19101E11 51141109 22515 0 0 111100 0 051 0 2724 1290 1004 1111 0 4 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 5111100 0 2111 21341 25117 151 84t010140.10 51100 215 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65000 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110100 0 0 130 310 4 r.,,or 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Mai 8011 11211110 14119 116/400 11614 13000 213000 1541 1175 4900 111/ 2594 334 0 4 0000 01 0 0 101.6140 0 0008 4033 MOO 20, 08-Uec-86 11:46:53 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION HBW ATTR (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUOIN6 PREVIOUS 11ICREMENTSI Ishopl Scenario: 1 E 1 1992 = 1 Constant Appravedl111 1 1997 = 2 iiiiii#iiii Allowable) 1 1 2005 = 3 i1.366201'i` 1 HOME -BASED PRODUCTIONS--- 1 HOME -BASED ATTRACTIONS : NON -HOME BASED 1 TOTAL Parcel Area : Work Shop Sac.Rec. School Misc. Total : Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total 1 Person Taxi Truck Total 1 O14N1 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i4N1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 572 0 173 0 616 1421 231 14 60 326 1747 OMNI 3 1 799 521 398 225 462 2405 270 319 214 0 318 1121 182 1 82 271 3797 OTPW 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTPW 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 30 0 116 244 40 2 14 56 300 OUR 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 86 0 334 103 114 7 40 I6i 864 CBD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10206 0 0 0 2616 13021 2114 249 1434 3802 16824 CBD 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1806 56 547 0 2133 4541 739 44 254 1037 5578 CBD 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 62 485 0 1890 4057 660 39 225 924 4981 CBD 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1359 1600 412 0 1605 4983 811 33 191 1035 6016 C80 5 3 320 208 154 40 185 962 6243 436 2556 0 9759 21014 342D 202 1179 4800 2076 C006 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2070 22 627 0 2445 5165 840 51 291 1182 6347 6R1CKELL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 0 95 0 372 782 121 8 44 179 961 BRICKEtL 2 5 2738 1764 1362 769 1583 8235 9568 556 3353 0 11300 24776 4032 734 1496 5762 38113 BRiCKEEL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14703 472 4454 0 17365 36994 6020 359 2066 0445 45440 6R1CKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2414 136 749 0 2922 6282 1022 60 348 1430 7712 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011N1 799 521 398 225 462 2405 842 319 388 0 994 2542 414 21 163 597 5544 DOWNTOWN 320 200 159 90 185 962 25304 2203 4626 0 20647 52701 8589 618 3574 12781 665233 BR1CKELL 2738 1784 1362 769 1583 6235 27060 1165 8651 0 31958 68834 11201 660 3955 15816 92866 OVERTOWNIPW 0 0 0 0 0 0 381 0 115 0 450 947 154 9 54 217 1164 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 3857 2511 19111 1084 2230 11602 53587 3666 13781 0 54050 125104 20358 1306 7745 24411 166117 08-Dec-86 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 17:46:55 Area name Null Omni CBD West C88 East I3vertIPW Brickell SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DR1 Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 MS 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.469 0.000 0.211 (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCRENENTI997 M5 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.109 Year: 1 < 1 1992 = 1 2005 045 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.176 Approvedllt) 1 1997 = 2 Allowable( I 1 2005 = 3 1 DAILY TRIPS 1 PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECK Parcel Person Mode Auto Auto intraz./ External Two -stay Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Int./ Auto 1. (Auto Trips per 1000 SFI Conversion Factor 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.70 Two -Way Inbound Outbound ITransit} Per./AutoOverall 1 PN10aily (nbnd 1 Outbnd 1 OMHI 1 1 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 2 1 1747 0.40 1051 735 51 698 60 18 42 0.539 0.162 0.371 OMNI 3 I 3797 0,40 2206 1598 51 1519 131 39 91 1.519 0.456 1,063 OTPW 1 4 0 0.0B 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OTPW 2 4 300 0.08 776 193 201 154 13 4 9 0.156 0.047 0.109 OTPW I 4 864 0.08 795 556 201 445 38 11 27 0.694 0.200 0.486 COD I 2 16824 0.29 11962 8365 51 7947 683 205 478 0.344 0.103 0.241 CBD 2 3 5578 0.47 2962 2011 51 1960 169 51 118 0.473 0.142 0.331 CBD 3 3 4981 0.47 2645 1849 51 1757 151 45 106 0.472 0.142 0.330 CB& 4 3 6018 0.47 3196 2235 51 2123 183 55 128 0.117 0.233 0.544 COD 5 3 26776 0.47 14218 9943 51 9446 812 244 569 0.491 0.147 0.344 CBO 6 2 6347 0.29 4512 3156 51 2998 258 71 180 0.636 0.191 0.445 BRICKELL I 5 961 0.21 750 530 51 504 43 13 30 0.707 0.212 0.495 BRICKELL 2 5 38773 0,21 30592 21393 51 20323 1748 524 1223 0.910 0.273 0.637 1.R1CKELL 3 5 45440 0.21 35852 25011 51 23818 2048 614 1434 0.703 0.211 0.492 BRICKELL 4 5 7712 0.21 6085 4255 51 4042 348 104 241 0.701 0.210 0.491 PORT si 0 0,00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 5544 3331 2334 2217 191 57 133 2 1 1 DOWNTOWN 66523 39494 27619 26238 2256 671 1580 3 1 2 BRICKELL 92886 73287 51250 48687 4187 1256 2931 3 ( 2 OVERIOWN/PW 1164 1071 749 599 52 15 36 1 0 1 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S1UDY AREA 166117 117190 81951 77741 6606 2006 4680 PORI 860 1040 (Al PORI 1420 540 ) 01.0ec-44 11:43:51 50:1111.431 0101)0e1 1616 1E52 041 50C10,ECOr0A1C 041a 31(1 0E;TI.Cr G1 Iat1670106 P1EY*O10 E1CRE19E0151 ' 141.0141 3 4----.: 1142 • 1 : : 6Y115 61Y 1416.E 4094ove41 1 : 1441 • 2 : Owt C41 0011 E40 E4.t Orlrl11Y ktrlall : 10 4110.141011 2405 • 32 1 2 1 1 1: : i41. OFFICE--•-•: 604. 11FFICE-----I !MIL S IlES11F313141 1 400644 : C014E11100-----1 SLSIOOE--•.---^----1 1114031110LIIMELESALE 1E1711ECI---.----1: 90141 turd 4re4 : floor 011441 : floor &swan : Floor 1 Floor 141419 AsU1l :0.e11t19 Ilus0e1 11Itdtnt top. 1 10o*t 0otei 1 floor Coarntn 1 Hoar Ear*lwat 5c400i I Floor 144444r. 11tolst4lt: 50444 Altr11ecr:t Floor tlalrl 6.411144 10141 to..4ft. 4t1411 Art4 (0107.01 Ors. 7o iaysat: ky4 : Irr1 fsOl0F•st(W10y1nt1 lkrl It 4.t*s Litaa F. 1 E441091n1: ke4 E0910y1n11 Ito/ Itallr9rifsploluttl ire4 E+QFof14t0111oy1att F441040.1:I Nu Roan wilt f/9loysa114ployt.if0Ploy4o1 Writ ) 54.11. loot S4.19. loot 14.Ft. S4.Ft. 1054 1044 0.0. A0404 L64w f. Pap.. loom Jolt S4.11. 1044 61.16. £E.64411 Jabs Sy.fi. Jaa1 Joot Sett J0i1 54.14. boat O.IF.s Job. J00. 1o6t E0n.r1110A FI(10r--) 4.41 4.14 14r.1151 Ptr.l4S( 2.71 5.04 0.165 0.611 1.327 4.00 4.04 33.4000 1.51 P1r.105F Ptr.145F 4utot1D41 Ptr.100 P6r.100 tel./Roos Prr.19SF 59e.i[3 Ptr.1ISF 1.41 1.42 0.02 1sr.115F 1er.145F P.r.1Se41 2001 I 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 404000 214 711 0 0 400400 4 0 560 104 0 01011 7 t 4140000 1414 0 0 15004 0 201 4 100 140 113 341 4 0 250004 750 0 0 0 2600004 1134 1434 4 0 1425000 0 340 1404 6413 203 07611 3 4 9100004 1561 150000 441 115000 0 131 0 900 411 544 1144 300 540 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 4 4125000 300 400 4053 1307 314 0111 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 0171 2 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 a 0 0111 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 a 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2110 I 2 1100000 4111 0 0 115000 0 311 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5444 100 4521000 0 0 6635 6455 119 2111 2 1 554000 2447 0 0 54400 0 411 0 420 193 211 157 200 200 0 0 400000 21140 111 100040 11 74 4 4 1100000 100 420 3030 7444 134 CIO 3 1 550000 2447 0 0 250404 0 411 0 400 311 391 744 400 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a $000 104 200000 600 400 3124 3420 679 2110 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIO 5 3 1100604 9541 0 0 415000 0 1711 0 0 0 4 4 450 430 300000 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7115000 450 0 9705 9141 4207 2110 1 1 160000 7104 0 0 250000 0 4717 0 1800 431 1122 1114 500 300 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1050004 504 1400 0101 0702 171 1110.6214 5 500000 7270 4 0 50400 0 ill 0 2140 1001 1573 1103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 a 330000 0 1340 7154 215a 134 0410.E11 2 1 500000 2220 0 0 30000 0 134 0 400 271 312 716 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 550400 0 600 235E 231E 314 UIC7.CL1 1 3 1350400 5444 0 0 245000 0 194 0 504 411 124 444 415 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1145000 215 500 4010 5400 119 14177(46 4 5 1450000 15114 0 a 741000 0 534 0 1540 125 1014 2070 115 911 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3455000 975 4540 10049 16049 551. F411 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C001 7860000 11412 110600 b64 700000 0 312 4 1200 558 101 1542 500 300 150000 230 0 0 0 2000000 1420 4410 1 0 1400000 540 1700 11310 15144 542 40.41014 1800001 11257 0 0 1130604 0 1197 0 1920 1311 1154 1742 1230 050 100000 564 404000 22140 914 100000 71 11 10900 200 1450000 050 2420 17319 11140 1117 111211E11 5000600 25752 0 0 100000 0 141E 0 5000 1175 3235 6413 130 150 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0400004 150 1000 2)770 21120 1421 04E11010410 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 F041 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51001 iota 44400100 41151 150000 444 4914000 3713 4070 1144 3112 *Ella 2400 2400 730000 750 400000 22440 111 1100400 1491 1411 40044 244 19910040 7640 4010 11331 12762 5101 0B-Dec-86 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 18:06:00 Area oape Null Oani CBD West CBD East Overt/PK Brickell SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST DRI Area I 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 MS 0.00 0.39E 0.289 0.469 0.080 0.211 (NEW DEVELOPMENT TWCLUDIN6 PREVIOUS INCREME1111997 MS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.189 Year: 3 ( 1 1992 = 1 2005 MS 0.00 0.412 0.215 0.360 0.057 0.176 Approved( ) 1 1997 = 2 Allowable(X) 1 2005 = 3 : DAILY TRIPS 1 PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECK Parcel Person Mode Auto Auto Intraz.l External Iwo -Way Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Int.1 Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF) Conversion Factor > 1.43 01 0.086 0,30 0,70 Iwo -Way inbound Outbound (Transit) Per./Autollverall I PH/Daily Inbnd I Dutbnd 2 OMNI 1 I 1544 0.47 816 510 51 542 47 14 33 0.116 0.035 0.082 OMNI 2 1 26311 0.47 13895 9717 5I 9231 794 238 556 0.262 0.079 0.184 OMNI 3 1 35402 0.47 18696 13074 51 12420 1068 320 748 0.541 0.162 0.319 NPR 1 4 0 0.06 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OIPW 2 4 0 0.06 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OIPW 3 4 0 0.06 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 COD I 2 24038 0.21 18881 13204 51 12544 1079 324 755 0.101 0.212 0.495 CBD 2 3 38345 0.36 24545 17164 51 16306 1402 421 982 1.079 0.324 0.755 CBD 3 3 17797 0.36 11392 7966 51 7568 651 195 456 0.014 0.244 0.567 CBD 4 3 0 0.36 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBI) 5 3 37578 0.36 24054 16821 51 15980 1374 412 962 0.514 0.154 0.360 COD 6 2 37192 0.21 29215 20430 51 19408 1669 501 1160 0.902 0.271 0,632 BRICKELL 1 5 16054 0.18 13225 9248 51 8786 756 221 529 1.314 0.412 0.962 BRICKELL 2 5 10462 0.18 8618 6027 51 5725 492 148 345 0.095 0.269 0.627 BRICKELL 3 5 27865 0.18 22956 16053 51 15250 1312 393 918 0.791 0.239 0.558 BRICKELL 4 5 62947 0.16 51856 36263 51 34450 2963 889 2074 0.611 0.243 0.567 PORI 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0,000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0,00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 63258 33406 23361 22193 1907 573 1336 1 0 1 DOWNTOWN 154951 108087 75585 71806 6175 1053 4323 4 I 3 BRICKELL 117328 96655 67591 64211 5522 1657 3866 4 1 3 OVERIOWRIP/I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 335536 236140 166537 150210 13606 4082 9524 08-Dec-86 18:05:58 SOUTHEAST OVERTOVN PARK VEST DR1 PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION H8V ATTR (NEW DEVELOPMENT IHCLTAD1H6 PREVIOUS IHCREISEHTS1 lshopV Scenario: 3 t 1 1992 = 1 Constant Approved( 1 : 1997 = 2 1ittttitt4t Alioxable(11 1 2005 = 3 41.368201 a HOME -BASED PRODUCTIONS 1 HOME -BASED ATTRACTIONS 1 NON -HOME BASED 1 rOrAL Parcel Area : Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. total 1 Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total 1 Person Taxi Truck Total 1 OMN1 1 1 0 D 0 0 0 0 657 0 99 0 479 1235 201 16 92 309 1544 OMNI 2 1 296 193 147 83 171 891 8001 218 2317 0 9205 20600 3352 215 1253 4820 26311 OMNI 3 1 880 579 912 250 831 3460 10470 463 3325 0 11668 2592? 4219 276 1521 6016 35402 OTPM 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OUR 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OUR 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1697 463 2331 0 9090 19501 3166 188 1002 4456 24038 CBD 2 3 414 270 394 116 367 1562 4438 185 1163 20906 4206 30979 5041 116 647 5804 38345 CBD 3 3 592 386 659 166 123 2726 4418 927 1124 0 5217 12286 1999 132 654 2785 17797 CBD 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 5 3 0 0 423 0 206 709 11317 1761 3644 0 13366 30000 4896 295 1591 6781 37578 CBD 6 2 1776 1158 1354 499 1345 6132 9578 927 3436 0 11312 25253 4109 254 1444 5008 37192 BRICKELL 1 5 2309 1505 1149 649 1335 6947 2724 185 1209 0 3217 7336 1194 66 511 1771 16054 BRICKELL 2 5 592 386 294 166 342 1761 2724 185 924 0 3217 7051 1147 66 416 1630 10462 BRICKELL 3 5 493 322 410 139 396 1760 6060 1094 2607 0 9518 21279 3463 204 1160 4627 27865 BRICKELL 4 5 1540 1003 930 433 1001 4907 18561 760 5962 0 21921 47204 7682 460 2694 10836 62947 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011011 1184 772 1059 333 1002 4350 19928 742 5742 0 21351 47762 7772 507 2066 11145 63258 DOWNTOWN 2783 1814 3030 782 2721 11129 37448 4264 12297 20986 43192 118187 19233 985 5411 25635 154951 BRICKELL 4934 3215 2763 1367 3076 15395 32069 2225 10101 0 37875 82870 13485 797 4760 19063 117328 OVERTONH/PV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 6902 5801 6872 2501 6799 30874 89445 7230 20740 20986 102416 240819 40490 2284 13064 55643 335536 11-014-14 11110414 50J1K.1651 0040106u1101 1491 041 so-ECOtOtIC 00141 14411104.101V014114C1.1.9116611111119114.1100101411 5cesatiot 1 - -1 1102 • 1: 14212414141144i 10pro.4044 1411 • 1 1 15sa41 CIO Rusk CH (4st 0,s(42Pli Bricitlk 1 11 Alloct111114 : 2005 • 3 : 0 1 3 4 4141 I 616. - -I ay. Cfflii-----1 4(1111. ---- US1111141111. 1100144 : (0441411(11 41 P44111. : IR0MIRIA1.2111001S1t# 1141/91C11-:::::: -11 40111 lase' Area 1 floor Gila! : Floor 66V1[4.11i 1 floor Floor Attest itstatl 141os14ici 0161dt01 Poo. loos; Rotel I floor Consols t Floor EMI:1114110 52400l now Isdestr. ttiolts4101 0004 41tr1fles21-1 flax Kolel Nolltos 10tA1 COlbtfC. hiss: t Atli tsflalontt Ares (apiarist; 0P/1 41 hrt0 4s6loyost(s#044ant: htils 4atot Libor F. fooloysolt Arta foployont; Oral kollasslEopialsolt 644.4 (oplolontEoplaysatl Looloro04:1 Arts Roost 0nits EsplorsntEspio,00ttiploysal Rods 4 5411. 4o6t SI.F4. Jois 4.Ft. Sq.fl. Jobs Jobs 0.0. Altos libot F. Pod. 00041 Jobs 54.ft. lobs 91.44. Students Jobs 54.4t. Jobs Jois Seta lolts 504. Roast 0,0.t Jolt 41064. Jos' Caostrtsaa factor •-4 1.11 fer.11ISF 4.44 Par.11.Si 2.11 5.04 Pes.215f Prt./151 0.415 0.151 1.1/2 0410t.160 P0.100 Per./1141 1.00 ter.(Boaa 1.00 Pir.JX5F 31.4000 1.53 St Is.29Sf P00.14S4 1.42 1.42 0.62 P00,1440 0er.11SF Per.l$444 004111 I a 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 30*42 $ 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ('41*12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 014111 4 411000 1121 0 0 10440 0 II 0 3400 104 2144 4111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 441000 0 3600 19o4 1101 41 altt 41 4 212500 1291 0 0 91104 * 214 0 2.960 1144 111414 3449 00 400 240000 140 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 6/0100 600 ROO 2443 2441 251 Clfs 41 4 100000 1152 0 0 10100 0 Ili 0 2000 1142 1124 1310 500 MO limo 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1110300 300 2500 211/ 2131 II; CH 1 2 0 0 o 0 4 0 0 o 0 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 C11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 C10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD i 1 0 0 0 0 0 a 4 0 a 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 (110 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 C19 1 7 a 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 4 0 0 0 0 0 o 111E1I11 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 o 0 a 0 o 0 0 o 0 4 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 UMW. 2 5 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 o o 0 0 a 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ulttiii 3 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 a 0 4 0 41 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 a 0 0 4 lAlatELL 4 5 a 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 a 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 mai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 9 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 9 0 a 0 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 i a o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 ta 0 o 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 u a 4 41 u 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Oul 0 4 1. 0 0 40 0 ii 0 0 0 U 0 , 0 II 0 0 9 0 0 00 0 o 0 0 0 0 oak•tioot 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 U u4 4 U i.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 00 RICER', 0 0 0 o i 0 ‘: 0 i, 0 o u 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 419(410t44141t 103543 44141 4 0 /44100 ) 526 0740 4185 41609 11041 6100 0100 400000 090 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6140340 1100 7000 4002 6.642 126 rd.' 0 41 0 0 0 4 0 41 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 1'001 1154 :)014140 404 0 0 114100 0 526 0 1009 4100 1411 11443 1104 1100 109000 000 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 6 111/400 1140 1000 u01 4142 121 Ov-Oe:-05 16:10:36 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DR1 PERSON TRIPS CALCULATION HOW ATTR (NEW DEVELOPMENT 1NCLUOINB PREVIOUS INCREMENTS] Ishopl Scenario: 3 ( 1 1992 = 1 Constant Appravc.11 1 1 1997 = 2 iiiiiliiili Al1ooableU1 1 2005 = 3 ai.368201 + I NOME-BASED PRODUCTIONS 1 NOME-BASED ATTRACTIONS : NON -HOME BASED 1 TOTAL Parcel Area t Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total I Work Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total Person Taxi Truck Total 011111 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ONNI 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OMNI 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DTPM 1 4 3553 2315 1767 998 2055 10688 2205 111 1258 0 2604 6177 1005 54 506 1566 18431 OIPM 2 4 2862 1865 1988 804 2036 9555 2825 348 1619 0 3337 8129 1323 93 555 1972 19655 OTPM 3 4 2467 1608 1697 693 1744 0210 2698 261 1467 0 3106 7611 1239 86 516 1840 17661 CBD 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E00 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C80 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 i; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0VER10WN0PN 8882 5788 5452 2496 5835 28452 7728 720 4343 0 9127 21917 3567 233 1578 5378 55747 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA 8882 5788 5452 2496 5835 28452 7728 720 4343 0 9127 21917 3567 233 1578 5378 55747 03-0ec-86 MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TABLE 16:10:38 Area use Null DEni CBD West CBD East Overt/PW Brickell "SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DR1 Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 MS 0.00 0.390 0.28? 0.469 0.080 0.211 (NEW DEVELOPMENT INCLUGHN6 PREVIOUS INCREMENT1997 MS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.189 Year; 3 ( 1 1992 = 1 2005 MS , 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0,059 0.176 Approved( 1 t 1997 = 2 AllowahlelX) t 2005 = 3 1 DAILY TRIPS t PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS CHECE Parcel Person Node Auto Auto Intraz.! External Two -Way Inbound outbound Net Trip Rate Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips lnt.1 Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1000 SFI Conversion Factor ) 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.70 Two -Way inbound outbound (Transit) Per./AutoOverall 1 PH/Daily lnbnd 1 Outbnd 1 0MN1 1 1 0 0.47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI 2 1 0 0.47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0,000 0.000 0.000 ow 3 1 0 0.47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 UTPW 1 4 18431 0.06 17343 12128 201 9703 834 250 584 1.892 0.568 1.324 OTPW 2 4 19655 0.06 18495 12934 201 10347 890 267 623 1.316 0.395 0.921 UTPW 3 4 17661 0.06 16619 11622 201 9297 800 240 560 1.175 0.353 0.823 CBD 1 2 0 0.21 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 C80 2 3 0 0.36 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 3 3 0 0.36 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 4 3 0 0.36 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 5 3 0 0.36 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 CBD 6 2 0 0.21 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 BRICKELL 1 5 0 0.18 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 8RICKELL 2 5 0 0.18 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 8R1CKELL 3 5 0 0.18 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0,000 0.000 8RICKELL 4 5 0 0.18 0 0 5Z 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 5X 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OMNI DOWNTOWN BR1C(ELL OVFRT811N/Pk PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55747 52458 36684 29347 2524 757 1767 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --------------- STUDY AREA 55747 52458 36684 29347 2524 757 1767 APPENDIX 11.3 (R) PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT DATA 1iRI ) 1 I it _11_ T 1111``!1 i1.1111 IIW n II i ►..._ iTliilil liati\ 11111:94 m_Pd silis •; ems. .,._ ' �CII I[L C_ C � ' C l� Im al lam iii Vi [Di► IMO..1\MNfl11 CDE ICC= L�J LI IJ c=::1 20 ICl rl now i 1rCta LU1 I � •...—r iwill 101.1111 i''.! I i Sala Al OP on* if 1-10 voit =gm T 1 �I 1 �1 lip I I � 1• r .-- 4- ip ., t v Nor Iii *c, , ,,# 4 :Np I-F,' 11:* WiP I 4 Pi Alt 4 r.. .,.. glW Se71 4 1P Aut.„ -f‘ \mod: s • David Ff,rrrrmr Peel As.actatea.1+c. !forma*, Kur1t And Vora. 111,3, Wiasme-Rosed And .b. Envirornoritid E^C4rtnrirci C>� MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS. (S.E. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY OF MIAIlI O/P W) IY a OE? A F TAMENT 1 :i1111J1JJll ll jV R1 I r ]Q,�� ni11oo�e _., _ ;;1 111Ijtl It 111 1111 a: :: 1►�I i T 11•IG 11�11.11��111 It 3 1 I F� LI 0:111; \i a ` v: "... � e -ml Ill ,mill WIll "II II -- ID F EEG 1 f 1 111111.) a lam Q O m1 n 1 T 1 PA 111 Wri al Mk- \c/N1C 1111 i Mal t i■\'��c' 'II MI! r M• I 111: Fir nii •ii 11 \\\)11i• -<\X Ayl" mow Pftirti 14‘ DeAd Ptemer ki4 Aseeciega.hc. 64111Mft Kurid And V. Ttlftrrisrftuata And Johloon. � Englnimartia �wt4 h. MAP J3—A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS. (OMNI) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of MIAII1 DEPARTAMVIT 5 8 Donk! Pirrmor kid Aeoocytma b Damao. Kurkl Ord V. t,c, Y Sn -a,ta t )4 ,arbor. VW. Mu. Y+c MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS. (CBD) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 1LIi1 ANNE I II NIA 1111 M1 =I11L1111IL1I Div 1 M anion ili `1If11r1Im(IMull -; C lip'! GO J ] OOP- AOMMI= Mlarsi=a: 4 ■r m 1 m IL, m m CID Nalt7it I IP sum Nut 1\, 1 1 1 i r I tors 11■ IN 510 Qfj yetimam l El DD 1 t if• 41* CY' 4011 i1 \c\ i la wpm QO D� J 184 +s Nil avit r aI. 7 3,17 DR+sd Ptirnmer Irr! Assodsloa, kr, bsrmelo, KuSd And Vers, h . And Johrxon, ErwlmrrW L EmIn..4r110 Carnal:Left kr.. MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS. (BRICKELL) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of AMAMI DEPAfTAIAENT David Rawer And Assoclata; tr a bermego, Rudd Ard Yak tw YfIIsro-Pmsmil __ Almon, EmtarrnerMi ErviramtgCo 1+c MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS (PORT) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 1• x 0 11 0 ti .0 CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTMENT fDsrld Ptsnner And AssadsWok. Ix Serrrdn Kutd And Vsrs. he And Jerwri hc. 6whxnxrld Ersge wisp CaraAsnls. MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. 5 (S.E. O/P W) 5 SOUTHEAST.OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT C$TY Of al7AMi D pa,Axm P(r David f4491*10 Ard AaaadNoa Ft lrr 3, Ku# led Ywt ft. Memo -Fluted Ira, . angle+. he, Erlip.acest2 Cawmilerda Y+� MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. (OMNI) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY Of r9Aat COPAN!Abgfti Pfmv.i And AaeoWiaa, b RuLd Md Vera, ft. -Ruagel And Jehovah, Inc. En*Imm red E, o oarho C4wIeenla k+e MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. (CBD) SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 1 8 city Of 101A4:4 D PANTA D(T Osvld PUm+.x And Aa.oc*Hva. And Vera }+e IMSEerra4Aaao And Jaime.% 1x, bwta+*mttd Er acrt+q Coneurrertte, MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. (BRICKELL) 5 SOUTHEAST.OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CITY OP !?FAO DEPART AMEN/ David PASTMer And &asocial**, Inc. Barrnelo,oal Peal Vara. kic. And JotalSco.x. Erreromeolat Engineering Carts/last*. tc. MAP ..1-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION (PORT)., z SOUTHEAST- OVERTOWN/PARK - WEST bEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 0 efTY OF MIAMI DEPARTMENT Office Retail Residential Recreational Number Area Name Location Status (Sq. Feet) (Sq. Feet) (D.U.'s) (Seats) 14 Brickell 1221 Brickell 1221 Brickell Avenue Under Const. 409,700 10,000 15 Brickell Lincoln Tower S.W. 7th Street E. of Under Const. 737,600 12,000 Brickell 16 Brickell Brickell Station Tower 90th S.W. 8th Street Under Const. 280,000 18,000 17 Brickell Coorvoisier Centre Brickell Key Under Const. 110,000 18 Brickell Fire Station #4 1000 S. Miami Avenue Under Const. --- 6,700 Brickell Vacant 888,700 27,400 BRICKELL SUB TOTAL 5.077,800 314,100 2,774 19 Port Seamark at the Port Port of Miami Under Const. 227,700 PORT SUB TOTAL 227,700 --- --- 20 SEOPW Miami Arena Under Const. »»- --- 16,000 SEOPW Vacant 55,100 SEOPW SUB TOTAL 55,100 --- 16,000 TOTAL PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT 10,037,000 795,600 3,908 Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Area OMNI CBD CBD C8D CBD CBD CBD CBD CBD CBD C80 Brickell Brickell Brickell Brickell Name Vacant OMNI SUB TOTAL City Administration Building #2 State Regional Service Center Dade County Administration Building #2 Other Government Use Centrust Tower Museum Tower Courthouse Center Bayside Miami Center - Phase lI Vacant CBD SUB TOTAL Two Brickell Square Three Brickell Square 1111 Brickell Brickell Key TABLE 11.4A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENTS Location Government Center Government Center Government Center 100 S.E. 2nd St. 150 W. Flagler Street 125 N.W. 1st Avenue Biscayne/N.E.4th St. 100 Chopin Plaza Brickell/S.W. 9th St. Brickell/S.W. 10th St. 1111 Brickell Avenue Brickell Key Office Retail Residential Recreational Status (Sq. Feet) (Sq. Feet) (D.U.'s) (Seats) 111,400 86,000 810 111,400 86,000 810 Approved 318,400 --- Approved 300,000 Under Const. 169,000 Approved 400,000 Approved 800,000 Under Const. 580,000 Under Const. 262,000 Under Const. 231,000 Under Const. --- Approved - 1.504,600 4,565,000 Approved 438,000 Approved 500,000 Approved 789,800 Approved 924,000 Under Const. 26,500 6,000 15,000 235,000 324 113,000 395,500 324 17,000. 26,000 47,000 150,000 2,440 --- 334 05/12/81 08:54:0B SOUTHEAST OVERTONN PARK WEST DRI Table 1I.4B: PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Area: S.E. 0 Ptit Scenario: PM PEAK Segment l l Number E 1-Peak-Hour-1 1 From 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectionl Volume l N. 5 St. Biscayne Slvd, 195 3L EB 430 0L NB 0 N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 2L NB 330 Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 4LD NB 704 3LD SB 294 N,E. 2 Ave. I 395 Flagler St. 01 NB 0 3L SB 330 N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 1277 0L SB 0 N. Miami Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 0L NB 0 3L SB 25 N.N. 1 Ave. N.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 16 IL SB 7 N.N. 2 Ave, N.N. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 29 IL SB 13 11-May-87 13:27:23 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST DRI Table 11.48: PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Area: 0 NI Scenario: PM PEAK Segient 1 1 flusher 1 1-Peak-Hour-1 1 From 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectionl Volume 1 SR 836/1 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 21 FW EB 387 2L FW WB 1292 195 N.W. 27 Ave. 31 FW EB 484 3L FW WB 1065 N.W. 27 Ave. ledeune Rd. 3L FW EB 400 3L FW WB 881 MacArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 31 FW EB 146 3L FW WB 96 Biscayne Blvd. H.E. 62 St. H.E. 36 St. 2LD NB 266 2LD S8 118 H.E. 36 St. 1 395 2LD NB 419 2LD SB 187 Miaei Ave. N. 36 St. W. 17 St. 21 NB 70 2L 58 31 1 95 N.W. 79 St. SR 112 5L FW NB 579 5L FW SB 250 SR 112 SR 836/1 395 5L FW NB 849 5L FW SB 368 12-May-87 13:09:40 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.4B: PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Area: CBD Scenario: PM PEAK 1 1 Number 1 1-Peak-Hour-1 Segment 1 From 1 To t of LanestDirectionl Volume 1 Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 860 3LD WB 1840 N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 0L EB 0 2L WB 90 Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. W. 2 Ave. 0L EB 0 2L WB 146 W. 2 Ave. W. 27 Ave. 1L EB 31 2L WB 216 S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.W. 2 Ave. 3L EB 82 0L WB 0 S.W. 2 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 31 EB 93 0L WB 0 Biscayne Blvd. Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4L0 NB 338 4L0 SB 183 W. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.W. 7/8 St. 1L NB 184 1L SB 154 1 95 SR 836l1 395 S.W. 8 St. 3LFW NB 989 3LFW 5B 520 13-May-87 13:00:14 SOUTHEAST DVERTOKN/PARK WEST DRI Table 11.4B: PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Area: BRICKELL Scenario: PM PEAK 1 I Number I I -Peak -Hour -I Segment I From ; To I of Lanes1Directionl Volume I 5. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 0L EB 0 3L WB 949 1 95 S.Y. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 3L WB 315 5. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 534 0L WB 0 I 95 S.N. 27 Ave. 4L EB 136 OL WB 0 Coral Way Brickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 2L EB 88 2L WB 206 S.W. 15 Rd. S.N. 12 Ave. 2L0 EB 88 2LD WB 206 S.Y. 12 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 74 2LD NB 172 Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3LD NB 242 3LD 5B 188 S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 314 2LD SB 699 Miami Ave. Flagler St. 5. 15 Rd. 3L NB 503 3L SB 182 S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 204 2LD 5B 496 1 95 S.W. 8 St. US 1 2LFW NB 236 2LFW 5B 534 US 1 1 95 S.N. 17 Ave. 3LD NB 524 3LD 5B 1207 S.W. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 400 3LD 5B 921 Bayshore Dr. Rickenbacker S.N. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 133 2LD 5B 309 APPENDIX 11.4 (R) INTERSECTION VOLUME PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS VEHICLES 600 NW 2 AVE/NW S ST EXISTING PM PEAK 500 - 400 -�- 300 - 200 --- 100 -- 0 4. 15 4030 4045 5. 00 5. 15 5030 5. 45 6. 00 LEGEND NB THRU WB THRU TOTAL TIME VEHICLES 200 NW 1 AVE/NW 14 ST EXISTING PM PPAK 180 -- 180 140 - 120 --- 100 m 80 -- 80- 40 - 20-- '/ `� /. \/ / ,/ 0 1 E 41015 4.00 44 45 54 00 1 5415 54SO i 5. 45 8* 00 LEGEND NB THRU EB THRU TOTAL TIME VEHICLES 500 NE 1 AVE/NE 6 ST EXISTING PM PEAK 450-- 400 — 350 --- 300 -- 250 --- 200 --- 150 — 100 --- 50 ---- 7 7 r 4115 4830 4. 45 5800 1 1 1 5t 15 5,30 Ss 45 61 00 LEGEN❑ NB THRU WB THRU TOTAL TIME VEHICLES 400 N MIAMI AVE/N 5 ST EXISTING PM PEAK 350 — SOO — 250 — 200 150 100 — 50 — 0 411 4ts SO 4t 45 500 5$ 5s 30 545 (7400 LEGEND SB THRU EB THRU TOTAL TIME VEHICLES 500 NW 3 AVE/NW 6 ST EXISTING PM PEAK 450 — 400 — 350 - 300 — 250 — 200 — 150 — 100 — 50 — • 0 ......•-•".-.." 7 ....------..- e -----•"'.. / 4a 15 4130 41145 54 M 5a 15 51 30 5a 45 t- 64 00 LEGEND — NB THRU _ WB THRU TOTAL TIME VEHICLES 400 NE 2 AVE/NE 5 ST EXISTING PM PF AK 350M-- 300 --- 250 — 200 — 150--- 100 — 50 — 0 4815 4130 4845 5. 00 5.15 5.30 5e 45 si 00 LEGEN❑ — SB THRU EB THRU TOTAL TIME VEHICLES 500 NW 3 CT/NW 8 ST FXISTING AM PEAK 450-- 400 — 350 — 300 -- 250 -•- 200 --- 150 — 100 --- 50 -- 0 / / / 7115 7. 30 7. 45 8. 00 8.15 8s30 8s 45 9. 00 LEGEND — 58 THRU ---- EB THRU TOTAL TIME VEHICLES 500 NW 3 AVE/NW 8 ST EXISTING PM PFAK 450 - 400 -- 350 -- 300 - 250 - 200 -- 150 - 100 - 50 ---- 0 l 4.15 4.30 4.45 5.00 5.15 5.30 5.45 6.00 L.EGEN❑ NB THRU EB THRU TOTAL TIME APPENDIX 11 Q5 (R) INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY LINK CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT CONSTRAINTS LEVEL OF SERVICE "E" AND "F" CONSTRAINTS ROADWAY LINKS Roadwair Links at LOS "F: N.E. lst Avenue from V.E. l7th Street to Flagler Street. (P.M. Northbound). Constraints: Physically constrained within existing right-of-way. Alternate: An improvement that has been proposed which would improve projected pooroperating condition on N.E. lst Avenue is a new on -ramp from N.W. 8th Street to S.R. 836. This ramp would divert traffic, destined to the west on S.R. 836, which presently has to access I-395/ S.R. 836 via N.E. lst Avenue, from N.E. 1st Avenue. N.E. 2nd Avenue from 1-395 to Flagler Street (A.M. Southbound). Constraint: Physically constrained within existing right-of-way. Alternate: Vehicular trips destined to Downtown along S.R. 836. presently have to continue east to 1-395 and enter Downtown on N.E. 2nd Avenue. The proposed off -ramp from eastbound S.R. 836 to N.W. 8th Street will divert traffic from N.E. 2nd Avenue. This new off -ramp is programmed for construction during Fiscal Year 1988/1989. S.W. 2nd Avenue from Flagler Street to S.W. 7th/8th Streets (P.M. Northbound & Southbound). Proposed Improvement: Preliminary Engineering and alternative alignment studies have been completed. It is the County's intention to move forward with construction documents when an alternate has been selected. Presently unfunded. Brickell Avenue from S.E. 7th Street to Rickenbacker Causeway. (P.M. Southhound). Constraint: Aesthetic constraints. The widening of Brickell Avenue south of S.E. 8th Street cannot be consider as a viable improvement. Alternate: A review of the projected traffic conditions indicates very good operating conditions on the Miami Avenue link parallel to Brickell Avenue. Consequently, there may be a natural diversion of traffic which will result in balanced operating conditions on both roadways. Coral Way from Brickell Avenue to S.W. 15th Road. (P.M. Westbound). Constraint: Physically constrained within existing right-of-way. Alternate: No viable alternate. Roadway Links at LOS "E" Biscayne Boulevard from 1-395 to Port Boulevard (PM Northbound). Constraint: Maximum number of lanes presently exist. However, right- of-way is available to allow reconstruction of this section of the Boulevard to match the section south of N.E. 5th Street. Alternate: The previously discussed on -ramp from N.W. 8th Street to S.R. 836 may also divert some traffic from Biscayne Boulevard. APPENDIX 1 t6 (R) ORDINANCES #6197 CONCEPTUAL DESCRIPTIONS OF ON -SITE PARKING ORDINANCE The City of Miami, in order to encourage transit usage and ridersharing and, reduce vehicular traffic, will limit the number of on -site parking spaces at all Downtown locations. This ordinance has to be reviewed together with the TSM ordinance in order to achieve a balanced solution. The parking rates that will be applied are as follows: Land Use Office (1) Retail (1) Residential (2) Convention (1) Parking Rate Max. Min. 1) Parking Spaces per 1,000 GFA. 2) Parking Spaces per Dwelling Unit. In areas of projected poor accessibility and/or high transit availability within Downtown the City will encourage transit ridership and ridersharing and- reduce air pollution, noise and motor vehicle traffic by further reducing the parking rates. The boundaries of these areas are provided below and followed by the parking rates that would be applied. Areas of Poor Accessibility and/or High Transit Availability Name Bounder (1) Br ckell Avenue Corridor Miami ever, S.E. 15 Road, Biscayne Bay, S.E. 1st Ave. Government Center N.W. 5th Street, Flagler Street, 1-95, N.W. 1st Avenue. River Quadrant(2) Miami River, Downtown Distri- butor, 1-95, S.W. 2nd Avenue. DuPont Plaza S.E. 2nd Street, Miami River S.E. 2nd Avenue, Biscayne Bay Omni N.E. 17th Street, N.W. 12th Street, Biscayne Boulevard, Biscayne Bay. 1) When street used as boundary the limits apply to both sides of the street. 2) Included based on potential for future transit station. Areas of Poor Accessibility and/or High Transit Availability Parking Requirements Land Use General Office (1) Large Scale Retail (I) Residential (2) 1) Parking Spaces per 1,000 GFA. 2) Parking Spaces per D.U. Room. Parking Rate Maximum Off -site Parking Requirement For developments located in these restricted areas on -site parking will be restricted and additional off -site parking will be required. This off - site parking should be located in areas projected to have adequate motor vehicle accessibility and proximity to the Downtown transit collector/ distributor system, The off -site parking requirement should be the difference between that provided on -site and the parking rates previously identified. Off -Site Locations Areas for potential off -site parking would generally include locations adjacent to existing and/or proposed transit stations (Metrorail and/or Metromover) and adjacent to expressway exits/entrances. Potential locations are highlighted on the attached map. CONCEPTUAL DESCRIPTION OF S.E. OVERTOWN/PARK WEST DEVELOPMENT MONITORING The future development program for S.E 0vertown/Park West is a three (3) phase program. The City is allowed to proceed through Phase I of the program as long as the criteria and conditions of the Development Order are met. The Phase I development consists of a variety of land uses totaling approximately 522,200 square feet gross floor area of commercial uses as well as 2,000 residential units. This development, which can be supported with the Phase I committed improvements, has been converted to two-way daily auto person trips ends which, become the Phase I Development Trip Bank. Phase I Development Trip Bank Two-way Daily Auto Person Trip Ends 10,096 The City of Miami, in order to assure the South Florida Regional Planning Council that the cumulative Development traffic does not exceed the Phase I Development Trip Bank limits, will prepare an annual (quarterly) report. This_ report will provide the total two-way daily auto person trip ends generated by new development greater than 10,000 GFA during that period. The total will be added to any previous Phase I trip end generation and compared to the total Development Trip Bank. The annual (quarterly) report and comparison will be submitted to the SFRPC along with other reports required of the City. When new projects replace existing uses the City will report the net difference in trip and generation. The two-way daily auto person trip ends generated by development will be calculated as follows: Case 1 - Projects from 10,000 GFA to the Lower Limits of the Major Use Special Permit Threshold Two-way Daily Auto Person Trip Ends Trip Ends = Project Size (1) x Trip Generation Rate (2) 1) Project size is measured using the following units. Project Size Unit 1,000 square feet of GFA Dwelling Units (DU's) Land Use Office Retail Convention Residential 2) The trip generation rates for this calculation are listed in the latter part of this ordinance. Adjustments to the number of Daily Auto Person Trip Ends to account for internalization and/or trips already on the road will only be made after special studies. Case 2 - Projects from Lower Limit of Major Use Special Permit Threshold to Lower Limit of DRI Threshold 1) The Daily Auto Person Trip ends will be taken from the traffic study prepared as part of the Major Use Special Permit Traffic Study. Under this alternative allowances would be made for internalization and trips already on the road. 2) If a Major Use Special Permit Study is not available the Daily Auto Person trip ends will be calculated using the methodology under Case 1. Case 3 - Projects above the DRI Threshold Projects in this category will be required to provide a traffic study which at a minimum will include intersection analysis as well as the information necessary to update the Phase I Development Trip Bank. TRIP GENERATION RATES DAILY AUTO PERSON TRIP ENDS/UNIT OF DEVELOPMENT LAND USE DEVELOPMENT UNIT TRIP ENDS Office 1,000 GFA 14.42 Retail 1,000 GFA 12.76 Convention 1,000 GFA 3.25 Residential DU 2.96 #6197 CONCEPTUAL DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC STUDIES ORDINANCE The Development Order for Downtown Miami removes developers from the burden of studying traffic impacts of their facilities on the regionally significant transportation network in the Downtown area. However, that same Development Order requires the City of Miami to assume the burden of resolving localized traffic impacts and of extracting the appropriate fees to mitigate impacts on the system created by the generation of motor vehicle traffic. The intent of this Ordinance is to assure that significant development is studying the need to mitigate traffic impacts in the Downtown area but at the same time to assure the development community that acceptance of the Development Order for the Downtown DRI did not increase the need for individual study. For this reason the traffic studies are divided into three categories as described below. Case 1 - Projects from 10,000 GFA to the Lower Limits of the Major Use Special Permit Threshold. No traffic studies of any type will be required of developments of this size. These developments will, of course, be required to pay any and all traffic, transportation, transit, or parking impact fees developed under other Ordinances by the City of Miami or other governmental entities. Traffic Studies - Case 2 - Projects from the Lower Limit of the Major Use Special Permit Threshold to the Lower Limits of the DRI Threshold. The objective of traffic studies for this category of project is to assess the projected traffic conditions at the site driveways and at adjacent (boundary) intersections. The traffic studies for this category of projects will also include drawings showing the schematics of the internal motor vehicle and pedestrian circulation (including parking garage) as well as the geometries of the driveway connections to exterior streets. As a minimum this type of traffic study would include: 1. Total PM peak hour trip generation by direction. 2. Calculation showing the internalization between compatible uses. 3. Documentation for the percentage of trips "On the Road" from the site. 4. Documentation of modal splits, drop-off, walk-ins and the like. 5. Projections of growth on the exterior street adjacent to the site without the project volume. This would include Phase I growth. 6. Directional distribution and trip assignment. 7. Intersection capacity analysis for the driveway connections to the external street system, and for adjacent arterial intersections, for existing conditions, construction phasing, and buildout conditions. At the option of the author these calculations can separate the conditions with and without the subject project's traffic. 8 . Daily two-way auto person trip ends. 9. Provide conceptual engineering drawings showing the transportation improvements necessary to mitigate impacts. Cost estimates for improvements are required. 10. Reports and supporting graphics to portray the results of the study. Case 3 - Projects Which Exceed the Lower Limits of the DRI Threshold The traffic study for Case 3 will include all of the on -site issues for Case 2 traffic studies, analysis of the driveway connections to the external street systems and the adjacent major arterial intersections, and will be extended to include the next major intersection (Signalized) for all four points of the project. The elements included in this traffic study are as follows. 1. Total PM peak hour trip generation by direction. 2. Calculation showing the internalization between compatible uses. 3. Documentation for the percentage of trips "0n the Road" from the site. 4. Documentation of modal splits, drop-offs, walk-ins and the like. S. Projections of growth on the exterior street adjacent to the site without the project volume. This would include background growth as well as growth from other committed projects (Phase 1 growth). 6. Directional distribution and trip assignment (project) to the Arterial and Expressway network in enough detail to calculate proportionate share as required by the DCA Transportation Rule. . 7. Intersection capacity analysis for the driveway connections to the external street system, and for the adjacent and next arterial intersections, for existing conditions, construction phasing, and buildout conditions. At the option of the author these calculations can separate the conditions with and without the subject projects traffic. 8, Daily two-way auto person trip ends. 9. Provide conceptual engineering drawings showing the transportation improvements necessary to mitigate impacts. Cost estimates for improvements are required. 10. Reports and supporting graphics to portray the results of the study. The City of Miami will impose a requirement on the Case 2 and Case 3 Traffic Studies that the intersections analyzed (driveway as well as arterial) will not change the future level of service projected with and without the project. In addition those studies will determine which site related improvements will be required to be fully funded including but not limited to items such as site turn lanes, site signalization, signing and marking, and other site related issues as determined by the City of Miami. In cases where the study intersections levels of service change the developer will be required to make corresponding improvements to mitigate impacts or, if it is historically, aesthetically or physically impossible to make those improvements, fund or make a corresponding improvement at a nearby intersection. Case 2 and Case 3 projects, in addition to completing the site related and level of service changed improvements at adjacent intersections, will also be responsible for the payment of all traffic, transportation, transit and parking impact fees. APPENDIX 11.7 (R) PARKING CALCULATIONS CALCULATION OF EMPLOYEE PARKING DEMAND OFFICE USE S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Phase I Overall Building Size 100,000 GFA 225 GFA/Employee 400 Employees Away from office 5% to 10% Transit 13% Other Modes 5% to 15% Not on site during Peak Parking Period 10% to 20% Vehicle Occupancy 1.25 Persons per Vehicle HIGH MEDIUM LOW Employees 444 444 444 Away from office - 22 - 44 - 67 422 400 377 Transit - 55 - 52 - 49 367 348 328 Other Modes - 21 - 40 - 57 Employees Requiring Parking 346 308 271 Non -Peak Parking - 35 - 46 - 54 Vehicle Occupancy 311 262 217 ;1.25 =1.25 r1.25 Employee Spaces 249 210 174 Parking Spaces/1000 GFA 2.49 2.10 1.74 GFA/Parking Space 400 475 575 CALCULATION OF EMPLOYEE PARKING DEMAND RETAIL USE S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area Phase I Increment Building Size 100,000 GFA 369 GFA/Employee 271 Employees Away from site 5% to 15% Transit @ 14% Other Modes 5% to 15% Vehicle Occupancy 1.25 Persons per Vehicle HIGH MEDIAN LOW Employees 271 271 271 Away from site - 14 - 27 - 41. 257 244 230 Transit 33 - 32 - 30 224 212 200 Other Modes - 13 - 24 - 35 Employees Requiring Parking 211 188 165 Vehicle Occupancy :1.25 =1.25 +1.25 Employee Spaces 169 150 132 Parking Spaces/1000 GFA 1.69 1.50 1.32 GFA/Parking Space 590 665 760 CALCULATION OF PATRON PARKING DEMAND RETAIL USE S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area Phase I Increment Building Size 100,000 GFA Peak Parking Demand(1) 3.8 Spaces/1000 GFA Employment 271 Employees Transit 45% Vehicle Occupancy 1.5 persons per vehicle Captive Market 30% to 50% Total Parking Spaces Total Persons Employees Patrons Transit Captive Market High Median Low 380 380 380 x 1.8 x 1.8 x 1.8 684 684 684 - 271 - 271 - 271 413 413 - 25 - 25 388 388 - 124 - 165 264 223 Vehicle Occupancy = 1.5 1.5 Patron Spaces 176 Parking Spaces/1000 GFA 1.76 GFA/Parking Space 570 149 413 - 25 388 - 207 181 ;1.5 121 1.49 1.21 670 825 (1) Based on 100 percent auto usage and 1.8 persons per vehicle. APPENDIX 11.8 (R) CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS ' -1- I 1:3 -r--- ]=42.I:ENJF -r 1 DATE EX I ST I NG PM PEAK LEEL OF SERVICE 3,24 SATURATION 46 CR I T 'CAL N/S VOL e'n 7,7 CRITI CAL E/W VOL ,,."2 CR T I CAL SUN LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE9TBOUHD LANE MO WIDTH MO V WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH RTL 17.0 RTL 12.0 R., 12,0 RTL LT, 71; 4 4 17 • 71 4 4 to, ft 11. 17 4 I. 41 • • 4 rt 4 II 4. 4 4 41 4 NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT 23 71 THRU 224 171 RIGHT 38 41 .79 142 36 WESTBOUND 117 4e TRUCKS 7,!.,) LOCAL BUSES A:/HR) PEAK HntF FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .89 SOUTHBOUND 9 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 10 0 .39 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 0.4PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THPU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 71.20 297 I.0 217. 0 0 NORTHBOUND INPUT VOLUME 23 ADJUSTED VOL CAPACIMI 59 MOVEMENT WA LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ,,,iEsTenumD 71 29 25 A 57 N/A OK OK � ������������� ���T�� DATE PH 1 'M LEVEL OF !3ERVI1=- S�TURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL ������ CRITICAL E/W -7 CRITICAL BUM IL�5 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOv WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH r-lOV WI�TH 1 IRTRTL 12.0 R. 12.0 F;:TL Z ... '... ...' LT' 12.0 4 .... .... -^^^ 5 TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT 28 71 29 25 THRL] 297 202 151 14(:j RIGHT 33 41 37 48 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOP NORTHBOUND 4 EOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBUUND FHASING M/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2, 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 'SECON[1S THRU -��6�T LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMEPIT WORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 377 331 163 207 0 0 0 LEFT TUF,,N [HEC� NDRTMBOUND SO�jTHBBUND EHSTBOUND iHPUT VOLUME �B r1 29 �DJUSTED ;OL [APACITi 59 � MOvEUEHT C/A �EST�GUV� 25 ����������T������ ��E�3 E--- ;A FR �-1 ���-71- ;F—= F;� �I .17��� ���������� ����_��Z� DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE FM +********************************* LEVEL OF 5E��ICE /� SATURATION 55 CRITICAL N�S VOL �����2 CRITICAL E/W VOL �E� CRITICAL SUM ������ LANE GEOMETRY NORT�BOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBO! HD L�NE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOY WIDTH �OV �l�TH 1 R"TL 12.0 RTL 12.D R.' 12.0 TL LT. 12.0 _ 4 5 6 .,. .., ~~^ '^^~ ..., ,.. .., TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND 3OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUIND LEFT 2B 7l 29 25 THRU 337 22� 159 RIGHT 38 �1 TRUCKS LOCAL BU5ES PEAK HOUR FACTOF- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EABTFOUND �ESTBOUND 10 0 ,95 PMAsING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 1(J0 - 599 (#PEDB/Hr-.') CvCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THRU -RlGHT LEFT NORTHP.OUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 41ESTBOUND �20 352 172 225 0 � 0 LEFT TURH CHECK NDRTHBOUN� GOUTHBOU�D E�ST8OUN� MZ. TNP�T vULUME 28 7i 29 25 ADJUSTED VOL 0 a8 9 CriPACITf MO'/E�EHT H/� M � [u� UK T��������������� ���������� �����E� ��f�.Z�T 4::� P-1 I:Z�4tL����� ���� ������ F���� DATE EXIBT[NS PM PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE I=- SATURATIO� 9z1 �RITICAL N/S VOL CRITI��L E/W uOL ���-- '75 CRITI(--'AL SUM I *********************+*************** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHB0JND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MO� WlD[� 1 T. 12.0 ..- .... ... -... R.. 2 T. 12.0 ... T.. 4 5 6 TRAFFlC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBQUN0 - LEFT THRU 667 0 0 RI8HT 0 0 0 0 693 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .91 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 Ef�-STBOi)ND WESTBOUND PHASING W/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIvlTY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND uE3TBOUND THRU -R'IBHT 470 (-I LEF72� 0 0 O LEFT TU3N CHECK NORTHBOQND SOUTHBOUND EA6TBOUMD UN� lNPUT VOLUME �DJUST�D VOL 72� 0 0 C�p�ClT, 430 V V �65 �O`/EMENT W/A N/A N/A M/A �� ���������� � � MEE P-1. -11- 4a5s Q 42il 1-- a, � t5 TN4 11-]��4- 9-11 �Z -r-; 3-11 !F=l DATE -PH 1 APPROVED PM PEAK LEVEL OF BERyICE I=— ,�-nATURATION 1[]5 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRI7ICAL E/,J VOL 1������ CRITICAL SUM I1-=; G� -7 LANE GEOMETRY MORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUWD E��TBOUND �E5TB�UND L�NE MOv WlDTH MOV WIDTH OV WIDTH � T'. 2 T. 3 L.12.0 ... .... 6 ~^` TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTB0UND D LEFT - 717 0 0 0 THRU 949 0 O 795 RlGHT 0 0 0 22 TRUCKS [%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) NORTHBOUND 12 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 EASTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUND 24 O PEAK HOUR' Ff-)CTOR .95 l 1 .95 pHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W �5. DIRECTION SEPERATIDN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1' 0 - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) C�CLE LEriGTH : 1.20 SECONDS THRU -R[BHT LEFT C�lTICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NO�THBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTUNT, 5B7 0 0 10�7 B50 � 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NO�THBOU�D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND uE�TBO�ND IMPUT »8LUME �17 0 6 ADJUSTED j 0 f.j PP,CIT", 430 � d 965 nO»EMEHT N/� T���� l—'C]l 7- -1-Z�� �"NE ���IFRI C_� 9-11 C:� E������� [��Z-IF Z��� 1-14 �D, Er"z 7- ��1PI �E3 T� �'J"I c-: 3_ _.:E �5 i­-tl �D F;� 7r i-I L�_0_1 �P=11 DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE PM PEQ:� *****************+******+********* LEVEL OF SERVICE �X­ SATURATION 108 CRITICAL N/S VOL "Fo 1 :Z� CRITICAL E/W VOL 2L<]057' CRITICAL SUM i������ LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOLND EASTBOUND WESTBOUN� LANE MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T. 12.0 R. 2 T. 12.0 ... .... T,. 3 L.' 12.0 5 ... ... ' o .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT - 768 O 0 THRU ' 997 O 0 RIGHT 0 O 0 � 7?5 22 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUTHBOQND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPEBATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 617 0 0 1037 LEFT 913 0 0 � LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTROUmD [mPoT VOLUME 709 0 � WD./USTED VOL 913 0 0 0 CAPAC|7Y 430 MOVEMENT N/A NIA N/A N/A ram, -IF :T' 8= i7�� ;:1 a s4 o.--=1 L_ 'r.`1B .J:: N iF� ai EE 1L :f= ' !ice , .r- ' =? ! ?.... DATE EXISTING PM PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 75 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E W VOL f . -- CRITICAL SUM _.4 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTi'-EBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOO WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV- ; T.. 11.:f T.. 11.0 T.. 11,.0 Pi Pi TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUNID EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L rj--r _ 0 THRU 1230 RIGHT- 0 974 TRUCKS (i:) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .SS :SOU T HBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 :I .. 8 PHASING NIS ;5.. DIRECTION SEF'ERATI1.1i'•.I E/W :5. DIRECTION SEF`EF T:ION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. - - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH _ 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE 'VOLUMES EC? MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTF-(SOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 574 0 777 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND ,_f fIJTHBBOUNII) EASTBOUND !,WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME ''.; 0 :' ADJIJETFD VOL - 1 cii GIVEEF i 1 T I I LANE .4 LEFT THRU - RIGHT ==.7t5 PATE PH 1 APPROVED PM ************************ LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 7 CRITICAL N/S VOL -7tDE3 CRITICAL E/W VOL E34:›= CRITICAL SUM I 7.7(1, ********************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBCUND MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH mny WIPTH mnv dITV7H T.. 11.0 T T . 11. 0 T.. 12.0 T.. 11.0 114d4 n >I 4 4 4 NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 0 0 0 0 1258 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES #/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND :12 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .9-, PHASING -N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) rYcLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES if MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 70a LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAFEIOUND WESTBOUND iNFUT VOLUME Al..-.:3USTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 47,0 0 0 q,-n5 MOvEMENT NSA N/A NS(..=i N/A E:34-=-' CD:IF< -.71-7.1 "Thr LID 57-1Z 47.72.: -r EE -IF "'Y'"B . INIEE 1 4L7VEE._, I ..E3C)LJTFE-1 DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE FM LEVEL OF SERVICE E. SATURATION 90 CRITICAL N/S VOL T7t-75(2) CRITICAL E. VOL CR 1 T I CAL SUM 1 1 :2 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV 4 T.. 11.0 T.. 11.0 11.0 T.. 12-0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 THRU 1736 RIGHT 0 o 0 1252 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#iHR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 n .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 , 95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THPU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 750 0 0 S62 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NURFHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 AJUSTED VOL 0 ri 0 CAPACITY 450 (..i MOVEMENT N/A NiA N/A WESTBOUND 1y. ��1=� E-11 HQ -7- KI -7-Zi�D !"-I 17-,2E:23 F—=- jl:ll Fq� C-- ��, �- �IFZ r,,j -7,F- J��7 F;� 7rZOct i.. m m ka w ps a si -r- ��t"13 1P4 3 11" ]E Z-3 NJ EZ 10 �!E: :,.r 1 .1 CA to A� C3 5-1 ���F=' DATE EXISTING PM PEAK *********+************************ LEVEL OF SERVICE 117-4 �ATDRATION 83 CRITlCAL 1, i/S; VUL C'� 1 2- CRITICAL E/W VOL InAEal-91- CRITICAL SUM o � 5 C-2, 7 7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LAME MOV WIDTH MO9 WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOv W107-i 1 T.' 12.0 R . . 12.0 2 .... LT. 12.0 T. 12.0 4 -.. .... ,.,. 5 .... .,,. .,.. � ..~ .... ... ..'. ,,. ...~ `" . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT - 0 l 0 THRU 0 332 336 RIGHT O 0 263 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTO; NORTHBOUND O 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9 EASTBOUND 3 0 .17 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHi:�iS1NG N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATIDN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 203 324 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL CAPAClTV 430 MOVEMENT N/A N/A M/A N/A C';Fz :1:: "' r�:;,1._ i'-RD NJ1I NORTHBOUND LANE rioV WIDTH 1 4 5 LEFT THRU RIGHT DATE PH 1 APPROVED FM LEVEL OF SERVICE -J: F"€RATION 440 CRITICAL FN/B VOL CRITICAL E. 'W VOL . EDK) (=F"lITIC,iL SUM LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE�: TW,OU -.it;.. f- OV WIDTH r1tJV WIDTH NOV WIT.TH T.. LT. 12.0 12.0 F:.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 0 41 B TRUCKS (';.) 443 '90 LOCAL BUSES (#/ HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR } 0 1 5 0 , c c i PHASING N./ S :5. DIRECTION SEF'ERAT I ON E!W :5. DIRECTION SEFERi TION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#F'EDS/'HF:) CYCLE LENGTH . 120 SECONDS THRU —RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHODUND EASTBOUND 242 480 0 NORTHBOUND is P!F'UT '1 =)L.JI-IE ADJUSTED VOL. CAPACLTY i•IO`-- IEMEI .IT 470 LEFT TURN CHECK. WESTBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L _ ������fD'FR --,,F -1 (.3 ��jc�j il=,, c��-j C:�EPIA 77��� ���.4=� i-I. ��I---- j"I'la r,j 7F �4� I- "�f- S� '.1 ��, ;r-,41 EE -F ������F' DATE PH 1 �LLOWABLE �M LEVEL OF SER»ICE S1--VTliRATTON 40 CR[TICAL Ni33 ;OL ���1- E3 CRITICAL E/W VOL ����Ci CRITICAL SUN ************************************+ LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MO» WIDTH MOV 1 T. 12.0 R.. 12.0 ... 2 .... LT. l2.0 T. 12.0 3 4 5 6 LEFT - THRU ' R'IGHT ~^^^ ~^^ ^^^^ NORTHBOUND 0 ; 0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 1 0 429 443 0 312 W2STBOUMD 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 ,95 EASTBOUMD 3 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 l PHASING N/B :5. DIRIECTION SEPER,ATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR/ CYCLE LEr-%IGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -R[�HT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E4BTBOUND WESTEtOUM� 0 248 420 ') 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK N(--'jF,THBOUND SOUTH8OUN1) EASTBOUND �E�TB�UND C�P�CIT7 430 118;EMENT I N. N/A 7"1 I-l� i=q �,Jl L-le, _1:3��� ��14=7 �2, _T 7i. C�P IE5 C_; �M_. u-4 - i - I P-I 1--, DATE E","ISTING PM PELK *****�******+****�***************� LEVEL OF SERVICE rPi SATkjRATIOlrl 31 CRITICAL N/S VOL ������ C�ITICAL E/W VOL ������ CF- :ITICAL 51 i1 ` I �S qt�� :7. T It LANE GEOMETRY NORTHD-OUND SOUTHD O U N D EASTBOUND �.,jEB-:-BOtD LAWE MOV WIDTH MOV WlDTH MOV �IDTH MGv �I�T� 1 4 5 6 LEFT - THRU ' RIGHT ... ... T. 12.0 T. 12.0 LT. 12.0 .... ... T,. I2.0 ... .... .,. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUBD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WIESTBOUND 0 0 0 50 575 ij 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) 'PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND O 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 EASTBOUND 4 O .82 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHING M/S :5. DIRECTTON SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATIOM PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - �?9 �#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 0 0 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 23� 0 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND �24 0 WESTBOUND 0 O mOFTHBUUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE�:_,,TGOUHD [NPUT �OLUME '] 50 0 0 �DJU6TED VOL 0 24 0 0 CAP�ClTT 43� 0 0 9�5 M0VEMENT N/� M/A T�.41-113 1�- 7F 1- -1, c', j,"Al �s iF-= 9=� F-- 1-3 ����IEE: 1--Q �ATE PH 1 �PPROVB] P� **+******************************* LEVEL OF SERVICE �� CRlTI--AL Ef ��-J VOL :7 1�� CRITICAL S-iM 15��-C-) �*����������������������������� LANE GEOMETRY NO3RTHB0Ui--|D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE:z'-,TBO|Ji 1D LNE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOv 1 T. T'. 12.0 2 ,... T. 12.O ... ...- 3 ... LT, 12.0 ... 4 ... .... ... ..'. 5 ... ,.. .... � TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT ' 0 THRU ' 0 RIGHT 0 oo 64B 0 0 284 0 '' 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 O 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 5 EASTBOUND 4 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S �5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERAT10N PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 8 - 99 CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUNES BY MOVEMEPIT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOOND EASTBOUND WESSTSOUND THRU -RIGHT 310 � LEFT LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND IMPUT VOLUME 0 50 �DJUSTED VOL 0 23 CA'PACIT-' HEYVEMENT M/H W/A 0 N/A WESTBOUND 0 0 9�5 N/A ��T--�Z7-Z�JE- 17-'lE�_F_ �������!E� I� LANE 3 4 5 � LEFT _ THRU - RIBHT DATE PH l ALLOWABLE PM ***************+******e*********e* LEVB- OF BERVICE SATURATIOt, 33 CTZlTICAL N/E, VOL CPlTI�AL E/W :OL LANE GEOMETRY NOR7HB0UND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH, ... T'. 12.0 T. 12.D LT. 12.0 .... T.. 12.'. -j ... .., TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) NORTHBOUND 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 EASTBOUND 4 WESTBOUND 0 5� 0 6B1 284 0 0 LOCAL BUSES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 .95 1 FHASING N/S :5. DIFZ.'ECTION SEPERATION E|W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDB/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL L(41E VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 2B3 310 � 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTH8OUND EASTBOUND 1_4E3TI�OUND IM�UT VOLUME 50 0 C �DJUSTED VOL 0 23 0 0 [AP*CITY 430 � 0 9�5 MOVEM�NT H/A N/A N/� N/� iY .r ii'`',1 4-H NORTHBOUND LANE MOV wID TH T E EXIST rNG FM F'EAl:. LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURATION 51 CRITICAL N/S VOL 4 c. 1:TICf1! E.' i VOL CRITICAL SUIT A.:1- LANE GEOMETRY S UTHBOUND EASTBOUND wFE ; �i_,;.i _, MaV WIDTH DTH NOV WIDTH MOV WITH F.,, . 12.0 T.. 12- 0 F:.. 12.0 ,.. T., 12.0 T.. 12.0 L,. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 19.0 4 T.. 12.0 .... . . NORTHBOUND MMO TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT - 0 0 THRU 1409 1041 RIGHT 421 0 614 20 WESTBOUND , OLUND TRUCKS CI.) LOCAL BUSES ? 1#i HF:) P'Er=IF:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND S 0 .93 SUTH> OUNi 5 0 .?1 EASTBOUND 5 0 . 90 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PH( -SING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN PLT I v I T Y 1. -99 #FEDS/ HR ) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THE:U -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT I`IDRTHBOUND SDUTHBO€JND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND :; 34 I : LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUN.D EASTBOUND E',EE'3 OUN1 1 i•iFUT VOLUME 814 1C'...if_1s E.D VOL _, '"!`'-r : , i'''AC I. 1"7 1 47.: :1 ` C� F-11 i 7- 1 1::� 4::�, L_ r-11 ID��M -rlli ir�� P� L_�sZ� ��I— 1D 1 :2!: -c�P �5 0-1 iF-, DATE PH 1 APPROVED FIN LEVEL 81' SERVICE �� SATURATION 73 CRlTlCAL CRlTICAL E/W CRlTlCAL SUN :LI�� LANE GEOMETRY NORTH8OUN0 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND t--;ESTBQUND LA�E M(-V WiDTH MOV WIDTH TH T. 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 T. l2.0 T. 3 T.T. 12.0 4 T.. �Z'� .... .... 5 .... ..'. � '..' ... .~. .., TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND 33OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT - 0 TH�U ' Z24� RIGHT 644 0 1473 0 727 0 74 8 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#iHR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EA3TBOUND 5 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING 1,1�/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5- DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIPsN ACTIVITY : 1. (#PEDB/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL 'LANE VOLLIrIPS BY NOVEMEP-IT 1',1ORTHE0UND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE'STBOUND THRU -RIGHT 596 0 0 LEFT NORTH8OUND IUPUT VOLUME AC.JUSTED VOL CApAClT/ MOVEMENT LEFT TURN CHECK sOUTHBOUND Ef-'$STBOUND WEST77�OUND 0 �27 0 0 776 � OK N/f�21 N/� F g='?1F; I�ire ! .:R DATE rE PH .1 ALLOWABLE tWAt LE PM ......, .•.:«.:i.;i..;a...i 4- 4 .. x»•. „;.y«4'4 4'-;.*... .... -. -. LEk °E L OF SERVICE 1" SATUR6- T'ION 73 T 1 C A L IS VOL :a' CF: I TIC AL 'SUM 1 _: *********4-4.********************** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBFUND LANE NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV _ D T H 1 R.. 12.0 T. , 1E.0 R.. 12.0 2 T. , 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T. - 12.0 T... 12.0 L.. 12.0 4 T.. 12.0 ..... i... .... .. ,. .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT THRU 2259 RIGHT ,554 1483 777 74 TRUCKS (":) LOCAL BUSES (#% FIR ) PE1=;F':: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 0 . 'fir~ WESTBOUND '3 0 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TUF:N PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION EEPER TION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 :#F'EDS/HR; CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS NORTHBOUND TI-1RU -RIGHT 915 LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT S0U7HBOUND EASTBOUND 601 1 i. 407 LEFT TURN CHECK WESTBOUND NORTHBOLJI`1D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 727 ADJUSTED vOL 0 776 CAF=ACIT`" 71.14 ,? &�- T. F.: r',11 1:::" riN11 C.1-11. 1:2 F1:4,71 73 E3 E31- DATE EXISTING FM PEAK LEEL OF SERVICE C2 SATURATION 7 1 R .r. TICA N / S VOL CRITICAL EtW 0 L -44 L 14 CRITICAL SUM 1222 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SQUTHBOIJND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 4 5 6 R.. 12.0 Jnn 12.0 12 ., 12.0 0.4 "we 40.1 4.1.4 T. L.. 12.0 a .0 RT, TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 10 0 179 THRU .4 0 68 72 RIGHT 3 0 0 z's .4 TRUCKS (%) NORTHBOUND SOUTHE(OUN) EASTBOUND 4 WESTBOUND LOCAL BUSES ',#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOF .74 085 .67 PHASING NIS :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (14REDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 206 NORTHBOUND INPUT VOLUME 10 ADJUSTED vni CARACIT-.( MOVEMENT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES eY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 87 27'6 140 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1:39 140 1.L-A OK P-4 �Ea F_­ T C-D a: 4---3 IR 1=, ���� Z7-1 Z �l -1 1%..jl E� P1EPj 1- fr_�, ir,i � L_E-31�� }4i 0i _0 �=..A F-= "^L.J CE-1 a-,- DATE PH l APPROVED 01 LE�EL El` SE��ICE I~ SATURmTION 73 CRITICAL MIS VOL 7 PR -,Q- CRITICAL E/W VOL mlls,� CRITICAL SUM 1:2 _E5 :1L LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R.- 12.0 T. 12.0 RT. 2 T. 12.0 .,.. L'. 3 T. 12.0 ,.. ..,, ... 4 L. 12.0 .... 5 6 ... .-. ..-. ... .., TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 10 0 139 0 THRU 1396 105 184 RIGHT 3 0 0 94 T�UCKB (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 8 & 1 EASTBOUND 4 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR} CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 794 0 114 332 LEFT 0 125 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTMBOUND EASTBOUND WE5TBOUN0 INPUT VOLUME 1O 0 139 � ADJUSTED VOL 0 V 125 CAPACITY 27,.,:L �'- 1O»EMENT H/* Hz (?, N/A �K T ,P41-, , :I=' aC;i ?_, 1— C Crl a= ' DATE F'{-I 1 ALLOWABLE PM L..E ,E-, OF SERVICE C SATURATION 7 6_ .CRITICAL N S 'VOL r 'FZ CRITICAL E/Li VOL 25() CRITICAL :SUM LANE GEOMETRY .NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L NE= NO') WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i 1OY WIDTH 12.0 . . „ T„ „ 12,.0 ET, ., T. . 12.0 .... L.. 12. - T„ 17.0 .. „ .. , TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 10 0 179 THRU 1401 0 121 21 3 RIGHT 8 0 'ID 102 TRUCKS (".) NORTHBOUND .. SOiIJTHBOLIND EASTBOUND 4 WESTBOUND 5 LOCAL BUSES { # HR: i PHASING NGz MIS :5. DIRECTION SEF'ER(- T I ON E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY . 2 . 100 — 599 #F'EDS / HR; CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THF;U —RIGHT LEFT INPUT VOLUME ADJUSTED STE_D ',ILL cApArIri MOEMFNT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT IENFT PEAK HOUR FACTOR .95 .95 NORTHBOUND SOLITHI3OUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 172 730 125 NORTHBOUND LEFT 1..UF:N CHEEh:, SOLJTHIw;(_1LIND EASTBOUND WEE:TBOUNEJ 10) 777 lJk:. T1.1i E-: � ��-,"E: .,�e' IN.! 4= &I !s_IT DATE E�ISTING PM PEA� LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURATIOM 43 CRITlCAL N/� VOL ������ C�ITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM -,q.. LANE GEOMETRY 1-,lORT!,+9OUND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND TBO��� LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WI�TH 1 T . . 11.0 2 T. 11.0 3 LT. l2.O 4 ,.. RT. 4.`� ,.. .... T.. 1Z.0 ... ,,.. ... -^` � � ... .-.' .,. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT _ 96 0 0 V THRU B71 0 0 29l RIGHT 0 0 0 314 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .s SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WEST8OUND 4 8 .87 PHASING N/N S :�. DIRECTT�SEPERATION E/W z5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEST9OUND 442 0 0 332 NO�THBOUND [NPUT VOLUME q6 AOJUSTED VOL 81 CAPACITY 314 MOYEMEMT N/A LEFT TURN CHECK S�UTHBOUND � H/A EASTBOUND 0 C � M/A WESTBOUNED 0 : 9�5 N/A ��"F:::, 0:3 FRIT10.. q,,, 11 FR F-7S3E.2-;; 41:-,Eq-q��� ������ � ���- ����E�i ������ ������L_�� �,A E=- .1 4!::�k EE:'��A 11= �6D DATE PH 1 APPROVED PM **************************e******* LEVEL OF SERYICE SATURATION 89 CRITICAL N/S VOL CR�TICAL E/W VOL I����]L CRlTICAL SUM IiEl���� LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND sOUTH8GUND EASTB8UI'll D WESTBOUN� L�NE MOV W[DTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ill O� WIDTH 1 T.. 11-3 ... ... RT. 2 T. 11.0 .... T.. 3 LT. 12.0 4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUMD EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT ` 148 THRU 1236 RIGHT 0 O 0 0 0 0 629 0 0 14'35 TRUCKS (%} LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 4 0 �HAS INB N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5' DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS THRU -RIGGT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 538 0 0 0 LEFT TURT4 CHECK, EAST8OUND 0 0 WEBT!�OUNC? O NORTHBOUND G:3(DUTH8OUND EASTBOUN1) WEESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 148 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 12B @ � � -APACITY 314 0 0 9b5 MOVEMENT N/1:� U/A �TJ!ES iF-',C) F—� -T-ZCD 01 ��������—i-E� ������C:�, �-1 1:3�/F= PQ E= VA -F afc� L_:E IE3 iN,l IE u�-b I -,.el E:,/��17--- tL� _CE�-- DATE PH 1 ALOWABLE PM **+******************************* LEVEL OF SERVICE \� SATURATION 1319 CR[TICAL N/S VOL ����{-) CplTICAL E/�.l :OL I Q,� CRlT[CAL SUll 1e� _-LC-1, LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOQN;,-, LANE MOV WIDTH MOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH mOv 4lDTH 1 T.. 11.0 .... RT. 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... ..,. T., 3 LT. l2.0 4 ..., ... .... ... 5 ... ...- .., ,... 14.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT _ 148 0 0 0 THRU - 1239 0 0 647 RIGHT 0 0 0 1495 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FIACTOP NORTHBOUND 4 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 8 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 4 .?5 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION GEFERATIOH PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : l. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS THRU —RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 540 0 0 1070 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 148 0 O 0 ADJUSTED VOL 12B CAPACITY 314 0 0 965 MOVEMENT N/A N / � N/A N/A „= Tr— i_ I^# Jl 1= ,. 1 1 _ ;s'=ti ii �� I_ T=n,: _i _T ]; 1 a'�y _ 11'»`1 1E 3'-11:�. IN.1 a_ "le' :? 1” `A '!.h!€ __ '.-A—� '�4'� .,�•.. o �d° dam• E DATE EXISTING PM PEAK .. .. -h :.;-.;i.ti>,.;.i ****.:t:.*;F;-»:i ******** «*.'w-;:-. .. .. .. LEVEL OF —SERVICE 4 SATURATION 37 CRITICAL N: ,_ VOL __ 4t_a=-'- CRITICAL F. :r•J VOL -._ •ice; CRITICAL SUM, »«L ;.**,,,,r* „s;.yr:ih.%i•.wwi.+r.ii*tir•w: * *tih+iY«i.HF«i.•w:F.:h•..** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBC!UND EASTBOUND CIE STS:i_UM LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MO'V WIDTH >•1OY WIDTH l T.. 12.,0 C T.. 1.:.0 T.. 12.0 4 LT, 12.0 LEFT THRU RIGHT F'T.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUNES NORTHBOUND SOUTHSB!UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 57 947 0 241 ws =i 0 I52 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL LOUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FAC T DR NORTHBOUND 1 0 ,77 OUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .66 PHASING N. S : 5. DIRECTION SEF`ERAT I 0h.! E.'W : 5. DIRECTION SEF`ERP,TTON PEDESTRIAN ACT I'V I Ti' . 1. .) — 99 (%F'ELiS / HR ) CYCLE LENGTH 1.0':) SECONDS NORTHBOUND I..HRU —RIGHT 504 LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT GOU"i HGOUND LEFT TLF:N CHECK EASTBOUND WF_STBCU}'.1„ NORTHBOUND GUUTHSO tND EfASTE:+OUND.D !NFSTBE'U ID INPUT VOLUME ' 7 ::j 0 r:. DJLJ STED '%ILL. 2S = :) CAPACITY _14 (: *c`) MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A !•.I: �F;� _71F 1 4:D, a"I'l la ��; F= liz4l :—r-_, 1_::� 1__�l 4-- �=_ �_4 —4 Ei=71, i= 1=�.Z-T- J- ������V\4 _'F �������� T\,A 1^0 ::�7; 4��q a: INJ L4 le� �E�-r DATE PH 1 APPROVED PM LEVEL OF SERVICE �rz� SATURATION 45 CRITICAL i%,�/B «OL ::7] C-l!S CR[TICAL E/W VOL ������ CRITICAL *************e******.It **************** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE-�3TBOUV%i.D LAME MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOv 1%:IDTH 1 2 3 4 � 6 T. 12.0 T,,. 12.0 T. 12.O LT. 12.0 NORTHBOUND ... .,. ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUMD EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT THRU 1024 0 0 647 I RBHT' 0 0 0 336 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> NORTHBOUND 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 EASTBOUND 0 � WESTBOUND 5 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR PHAS'TNG N/G :5, DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR> CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS TH�U -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL L��NE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT 1 1 .95 NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 305 0 8 504 0 0 V 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUMD SObTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNE. lHPi!T YOLUME 57 0 0 0 ADJUSTED, VOL 23 CAPACITY NO»EMENT N/A i/A �1::-" -7 -1- 1 cl d=4 R. C-7 F��-T- -�:r �-F P14 �-4 L- ��Z IS 1 2 3 4 5 6 ����j Z�� aflk~�T=— "x" qoj �in. E�-I- DATE PH 1 ALLBWABLE PM ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE SAT5RATION 46 CIS: ITICA' L N/S VOL i!�D CRITICAL E/W VOL 5 L�� Ciz,'ITICAL SUM �Z LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 1,41E5TBOUM� MOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WI:-TH T'. 12.8 ... . RT. 16.') T.12.@ ... .... ... T.. 12.0 T. . 12.O LT. 12.0 .,.. ^~.. ^^^ ^^^ TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 57 0 0 0 TH�U 102� 0 0 �57 RIGHT Q 0 0 349 TRUCKS (%) NORTHBOUND 1 SOUTHBOUND 0 EASTBOUND 0 WESTBOUND 5 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOP '95 1 1 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. O - 99 (#PEDB/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUND THRU -;'IGHT 306 0 LEFT LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUHD 0 0 NOR'THBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IUKiT VOLUME ��.&JU5TED VOL �3 0 CAFACITY 314 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A �ESTBOUN--o 51� � WEOUN� �����`Z-1 71 -:FZi=l iN4 F-,'�������� I-- -r/'�] 4.,,J 6;, -- Dz',TE EXISTING PM PE�K LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURATION 16 CRITICAL N/S VOL �L��3L CRITICAL E/W VOL �L���� C�ITICAL SUM ����*-������������������������������� LANE GEOMETRY 1',1ORTHBOUMD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ETSOUHD L�NE MOV WIDTH i"I(TV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 13.0 ,.. T,, 2 T. 3 .... T.. 4 T. 12.0 ..` 6 ... .... ^.^ NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES BOUTHBOUND . EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 155 THRU ' 0 297 0 231 RIBHT 0 60 0 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .B EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W DIRECTION SEFERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 i21 O 148 LEFT 0 0 0 16� lNP!/T »OLUME �DJUSTED �DL [APACIT/ MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND 0 0 J14 N/A LEFT TURN CHECK �OUTHBOUND V 0 O N/A EASTBOUND N/pi ����—�r 7— T 4,�� !E �E3 F!;. I--, 1-� ��;Ili —FEF;l 1 -T' 1, J::� d�� L-.. �r-1 L=.- P"A —1r Z� DATE PH 1 APPROVED PM LEuEL OF SERVICE 4�� �ATURATION 81 CHITICAL N/S VOL ��]L�� C�l[TC�L E/W VOL �Q-]L CRJTICAL GUM ff, :5�� LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND wEBT�OU�|� LANE MUV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MO: Ni�TH 1 2 3 4 6 ... .... .... RT. 13.0 T. 12.0 T.- 12.0 ~^^ ... T,. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT _ 0 THRU D RIGHT 0 0 0 339 TRUCKS <%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOP NORTHBOUI�41) 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 EASTBOUND � 0 1 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 FHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 <#PEDS/HR> CYCLE LENGTH : 1O0 SECONDS THRU —RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVENEWT NORTHBOUND GOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 21� 0 179 0 0 0 341 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EABTBN� OUD ESTGOUND IHPUT :OLUME ; � 0 33� A( JUSTED VOL CAPACITY 314 � 0 965 IDVEMENT N/A N/A 11 N/� M 17�7;: 7F 4"..1 --�- "l iD, P,4 ��E; a: -P� -T-�, I c_- 1���� 71-;� 1 7-Z� �rl-� 4�4 L_�IsZ� LA i,iE 1 2 3 4 5 � 97-7F!Ni W �n� �� �J- DATE PH 1 ALLOWAGLE PM LEVEL OF SERVICE T:�i SATURATTON CRI[ICAL �/S VOL :2 1�� CRlTICAL EVOL :7-4- -5L CRITICAL SUM LANE GEOMETRY WORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOU1 "il- NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MO� �I�T� ~^^ RT. 13.0 T.. T.I2.0 T. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT THRU - 0 695 0 RIBHT 0 60 O 1�.� 33� 363 � T�UCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 l WESTBOUND PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDE3TRIAVI N �CTITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) �Y�LE LENGTH 100 SECONDS THr-1, u -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUNES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND � 219 0 184 0 0 0 34i LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUNE) WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 Q 0 339 �DJUSTEG VOL 34i C�PAI'll 1TY 3l4 MOVEMENT N/A N.",� �D U'�� -F �PllF1 :0 .1-l"! F7� C�:B J::� 4��E� ��7- L-1 t3-- 1EEC 'T r"I i—= ���_����^/���� �57 Z-3-F JATE EXISTING PM PEAK ***********+********************e* LEt EL OF SERVICE C-- GATURATIOf, i 67 CRiTICAL N/S VOL C�lTICAL E/W VOL l�? — CR[T[CAL SUM 1 14:�-, :L LANE GEOMETRY WORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUNO ESTD O�pD LA�E MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV �IDTH MOV WI��� 1 RT. 28.O T. 13.O RT., 15.0 2 T. 12.0 T,. 13.{) T'. 1O.0 3 T. 12,0 LT. 12,0 L.. 15'0 4 T-. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... 5 ... '.,. � ~.. -... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNE- LEFT , 0 119 225 THRU 1638 1307 139 RIGHT 54 0 126 0 O TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES /HP) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .8 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .96 EASTBOUND 5 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHAS1NG N/S .5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#9EDB/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS THRU -RIBHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAST8OUND WESTBOUN-r, 547 417 142 � 0 0 197 0 LEFT TURN CHECK N0�THBOUN0 SOUTHBOUND EA5TBOUND WESTBOLiI'd G lNPUT VOLUME ACJUSTED �OL 0 95 219 0 C�PACITY 314 MOVEJvlENT N/A N/A sue;. „ = ;s • ;-=� =" ;, y sa r : r :. ]-J r`,iI =, y= ; = r ;i= : 'L.: ii—=i .7; ;I_= ?�' I : F'":.:iE —+i .: lti_r :. 9. 1'-'11f23 ""i ;i'•,.41 ,i' _ ' '` E T:g :PCY.I.NAFE ;D 5 E3. ;ATE PH 1 APPROVED PM ' ».r.:zwr �;. r.i!•-jw�.:y.::.✓».%i�«h.-p..:..:w:i--.".. i".'.:+:".. .. .. -^r y�-p.:i-:s--:;_-i-:�._-. LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 6 s. T : i=AL ;.II c.. )CL 1 8. is I .T is C - l .. E : LJ :--77. am,, _ CRITICAL SUM .. f..,zi.:* {..: .:,. * *4-i}.-Y.:N.::_ i:..: wM***.:i..ii **. *rMmF4F-:o.w.-it*_>.=i.-1-* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND 11 I:JIJh.I;_ .BUT BOUND EASTBOUND WE_RT KiJU C LANE NOV WIDTH MUDC, WIDTH ME V WIDTH ;•lCi':. WIDTH 20.0 T .. 12.0 T.. 1.7. _ T.., 12.0 r. ,. 12.0 T.. 12.0 4 T. „ 12.0 T.. 12.0 ti l.. ,... }.. 12.0 L.,. 12.0 NORTHBOUND RT. 12... T , . 12.0 LT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SCUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT _ =; 11' .7,9q THRU - 2296 1769 815 RIGHT SS 0 1:D2 TRUCKS t ",•.) LOCAL BUSES (# 7HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 . 9" SOUTHBOUND ,., 0 .96 EASTBOUND ,.., ':n! .95 WESTBOUND 0 I PHASING I'd-'S » 5. DIRECTION SEFEF:PTIONI E:`LJ r ., DIRECTION SEF`ERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY IT`( . 1. — 99 #P'ED5/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS T1-IF:I —RIGHT LI=]T CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 49 :r NO f I-ILjCu_J i.0 LL l='€Jr vnLumE ADJUSTED VOL CAPACITY MOVEMENT I N/A '_.EFT TURN CHECK SOL.t'I'HE'.IDtJND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND WESTBOUND tP! A 1'4 r N A LA'A 4 i'N:, i'•,d ;_=. i=° 1. 1 x=R. F , —I` ;r a._: -i rc,ai e C -r s a=-4,a,..„_ 1 'gym' _. }i" .rl a—=! _._.. `'1' 'E7,; ::i= _.:; ..EE= ::'C "!PTF PH 1 ALLOWABLE PM LEVEL OF SERVICE 0 SATURTEu:N 86 CRITIC i''l; VOL T' _'I i3 W; ac:i_ E-:i'"' I 11f_ -L 3: I. WVOL �`_?'- CR: I T I CAL S M 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND THE OUNID E;CUTH8OUN1J EASTBOUND _=a ..., i ' ._ ___ . NnV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH !=T„ -:>. T, , 12.0 J=.'T. 1.2_0 . T.., 12.0 T. 12,,= T.. 12.0 T.,,. 12.0 T . . 12.0 LT. 12.. T T. . 12 ,, 0 12.0 L „ ., i ;..., :7 L L. 12.0 .., , „ , .> L.. 12,_ TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOI, NID' EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT - 0 119 298 THRL - 7299 1769 915 RIGHT 9S 0 132 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/'HRi PEAK HOUR FACTC:F NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHEOUND 5 0 . 9h EASTBOUND 5 0 ,. 9.`_ WESTBOUND E+ 0 1 PHASING N/S : S. DIRECTION SEF'EF:f TION E/W :5" DIRECTION SEF'EF:A,T[C1r.i PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY „ 1. — 99 (#PEtS%HR.' CYCLE LENGTH n 100 SECONDS THR —RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND .h57 CF: I T I CAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHSOUJN1< 49 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND 363 L EalT1'_':OUNfl NDF:THBDUN D 8(=1E..1THSOIJi'ID EASTBOUND WL:=,TF.':Gi._iND INPUT '•'JL.ME. 0 119 7'99 1- 0,JL1STED _ OL. ?5 4 CAPACITY sk.ITY .1 MOVEMENT ii,'1, N/A r.1/1W, N/A �i'-,-i �:S, E=' f7i 7,F lc�NT��� EFR 4:-:� ��l 4-.:� 7F�� �J-D q �������Z� DATE EXISTING PM PEAK ********************+************* LEVEL OF SERVICE IQ SATURATION CRITICAL E/W VOL l7cTIE—R CRITICAL SUN ��IF-� IE3 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNZ LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDT-i 1 2 J 4 5 6 ... ... NORTHBOUND T.. 14.0 RT. 1l.0 T.. 13.0 T-. 12.0 LT- 11-0 T,. 12.O ..,. ,.. .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT _ 0 9.9 0 THRU 0 542 352 RIGHT O 0 218 WESTBOUND �:l TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 11 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 '75 WESTIOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PB]S/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 0 n CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 290 298 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK WESTeOUND 0 � NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTSOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 98 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL CAPACIT/ 314 q65 NOvEMEHT N/A N/A N/A NiA �=4 ,=- K"A 1—= Z5 ,H�-1- DATE PH i APPORVE3 PM ********e*****+******************* LEVEL Of SERVICE tpb SATUR�TION /17 CRITlCAL N/S VOL 41- -1�� CRlTiCAL E/� V0L 4����� CRITICAL BUM 1E;41-:CF LANE GEOMETRY NGRT8B0UN_D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND `�jESTOL�� LANE MOV WIDTH �1OV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MCV �IDTH l T.. 14.0 RT. 11.f". T. l2,0 3 LT. 11.0 T.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... ... 5 ... ... .... ^^^ ... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT _ 0 392 0 0 THRU � 634 B12 BIGHT' 0 0 248 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES <#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR' NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 11 0 .?5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHAISING HiB :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 599 (#PEDS/HR} CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECOMDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT INPUT YOLUME �DJU6TED �OL CIT� M[�EMENT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAST@OUND WE5TB0UN',_D 0 41"? 430 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 314 N. "A SOUTHBOUMD EABTBOUND WEST' OUND 39� 0 0 444 G 0 O � 965 N/A �����������-11- 1 4=1 ����"V;;: C-- FA ��-7,�� LANE 1 Z 3 4 5 6 LEFT _ THRU RIGHT a: ", &=— t5 iE�-F DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE PM ********************************e* LEVEL OF SERVICE 4�'i STURATION 47 [RITICAL N/S VOL :;a{7 CR[TICAL E/W :L CRITICAL SUM I LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTEOUND CU: - 1� T) MDV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV uIJT� T. 14.O T. 13.0 LT. 11.0 T. 12.0 ... ... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 0 0 392 0 635 B12 0 251 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 l SOUTHBOUND 11 0 .93 EASTBOUND WESTBOUN� 0 0 1 RHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION FEDESTRIAN ACTIVIT'� : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/FfR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRt-1 --RIGHT LEFT - CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND, 0 420 0 0 0 O LEFT TURN CHEC� NORTHBOUHD SOUTHB(-JUND EASTBOUND WEZ-TBOUNE, INPUT 9OLUME 041DJU5TED VOL 0 [4PAC[TY 314 0 0 965 MO»EMENT N/A �������C�����Z�� ��������� �����E� f-- F=� 1 71- l C:� J-� L_ r,9 C]I—E M I--- P'll -I- ��L- 'Y-4F� :1 E3 �:3 7- DATE EXISTING PM PEAK ********************************** LE;EL OF �ERVTCE SATURATION 34 CRITICAL N/S VOL ������ CR]TTCAL E/W VOL ������ C�ITICAL SUM 1E3 **********************************+** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUN� SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND OU�D L�WE MOV WIDTH MOV.WIDTH MOy WIDTH i%-IOV l RT. I.P.0 .... T,11.0 2 T,. 11.0 .., .... T. 11.8 3 T. ll.0 LT- 11.0 4 .,,. .... .... � ... ^... .... .^.. b... .... ... ...- L2FT - THRU R'TBHT `^^ .,. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND GOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE---TG(-DUNlD 0 0 300 730 0 332 138 0 0 o TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR' FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 SOUTHBOUMD 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 1 0 .89 WESTBOUND 0 C) t PHASING; N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1, 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 10� SECONDS THRU -RIGHT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND W EBTBOUND 376 0 242 0 0 0 O 0 LEFT TURN CHEC� NORTHBOUND 5OUTHBOUND EAST8DUND WESTBOUND iNPUT VOLUME 0 Hl'-JUSTED «OL 0 0 314 0 CAPACiTY 314 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A �/� N/4 1 —1������������ ����ZZ:� r-1 I-- f�� r14 ;r:�[ I_!H;Z�S' �� 1 dz� E�'�i--i 1EF: !S'_F DATE PH 1 APPROVED PM LEVEL OF SERuICE /\ SATDRATION �i CRITICAL N/S VOL ��-C—D 77' CRITICAL E/W VOL -�� 167, CRITICAL SUM Cp = :7� ******************************+****+* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND EST�DOUND Lt.:!NE MDV W[ElTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.A 2 T,. 11.� 3 T. 11.0 4 .,. ,... 5 ... � ^.. .... ... .... ~'^^ T. 11'0 T. 11.0 LT. 11,0 ... .... ... ,.. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND wESTBOUND LEFT _ 0 O 317 0 THRU 1131� 8 B00 RlGHT 17B 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL 8USES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 O 1 EASTBOUND l WESTBOUND 0 0 1 P�ASTNG N/S :1-5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVIT� : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : l00 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTDOUND THRU —RIGHT 507 0 416 0 LEFT 0 9 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK MORTHBOUhD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTDOUND iNPUT VOLUME 0 0 317 0 �D�USTED �OL 0 0 313 0 CAP�CITY 3�4 0 0 965 MOVEMENT �����!:-:::� ��.i 7F fD -NI �HE jc�,FR q=� i-41 �11-J, i= '=c �����Ziph I- �����N-1 -I- "I S; NO�THBOUND LANE MBY WIDTH :�� %��, 4E/'�-A r-- �5 �s_T DATE PH I. PM ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE SAT!JR"TI51 CRIT�CAL N/S VOL !fft���� CR[TICAL E/1,J VOL I�� -RITICAL LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUNI} MOV WIDTH MOV WI�TR MOx �[�T� T. 1l.O 2 T.. 11.0 T. 11.O 3 T. 11.0 LT. 11.0 4 ... .... .... NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT THRU 1144 0 B04 RIGHT 178 0 0 WESTDOUND 0 0 `[RUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOF- NORTHROUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTPOUND 1 0 ,95 WESTBOUND FHj�� SING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIV%TY : 1. 0 - 99 <#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE `)OLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHR-OUND EASTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 5417 LEFT 0 0 O LEFT TURN CHECK WESTBOUND 0 N�RTHBOUND SOUTHBOUN� EASTBOUND WESTBGUwD T�PDT VOLUME 0 0 �DJUSTED VOL 0 0 313 0 CAPACIrY 314 0 0 765 L�NE ������'��� DATE ***+****************************** LEVEL OF %3ERVICE 4-� S�TUR�TION 2/� CRlTICAL N/S VOL ]L zL�� Cp�TICAL E/W VOL C�ITICAL Sj N LANE BEOMETRY �ORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E�STE-', OUND 9OUMD 'NOV M0V WIDTH I'lOV WIDTH 1 '.' .... T.. t1.0 RT. 11'0 T.. 11.0 T,. 11.0 LT. 12.0 T.. 11.O � .,.. ..^. 5 ... ''. '-^ TRAFFIC »OLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WES -1 BC.1UNJ� LEFT THRU 176 R'IGHT- 0 0 0 541 56 0 TRUCKS ( % ) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR' FACTOF NORTHBOUND 0 O 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 V 1 PH��ING �5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W 5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PE�ESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LEN67H 10O SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 1l3 323 0 0 � � LEFT TURN CHECK NORTH8OUND GOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ESTBO0NE, [NPUT VOLUNE 0 79 0 �DJUSTED yOL 0 7i 0 MUvEMENT N/A N/A N/A ����������Z� F � �% -3 �E-- d-:4'i -FR 117- ]---1 1a!r1,11 't =E� �1 1- 1 47,' f=4 1- ���EE 1-4 I:F- T 4��A L_:!�i3 1� LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH ... ... ,... .... ,... :-f u '����^/ Tq �� -F DATE PH l APPROVED PrI LEVEL OF SERVICE .0mil SATURATION 3 Co CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 1�� CR1T[CAL E/'W VOL ��-2, 17,-, CRlT[CAL SU14 7��� LAME GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND uESTBOUNO NOV oiIDTH MOV WIDTH m8v wIDTH T.11.0 RT. 11.0 T.. 11.0 T. 11.0 LT. 12.0 T.. 11.� ~^^ ~^^^ TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND AESTBOUND LEFT _ 0 36 0 THRU 0 239 1020 0 RIGHT' O 0 73 � TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 .95 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 0 1 PHHSING N/S E/W PEDEBTRIAW ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH THRU -RIGHT LEFT �5. :�. DIRECTION SEPERATIOW DIRECTION SEPERATION 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHB8UNO EASTBOUND � i13 41cP � k:) 0 LEFT TURN CHECK WESTDOOND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ENPUT VOLUME 0 26 /) V A0JU6TE[ VOL MO�EM��T N'H N/A N/� N/A T-F a=,!: -71-1�� aF_:7;r2-4 F:R�� Z-T 1 _E� 1 !Ef�l EE�_4 DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE PM LEVEL OF SERVICF JP1 SATURATION 3{] CRIT[CAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/1.,� VOL CRlTICSUM LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SCUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 1vjEST5Oz_lND LANE MOV WIDTH M0V WIDTH t-l.OV V-1IZ--TH LEFT - THPU ' RIGHT '... ~~~ T.. 11.0 RT. 11.0 r.. 11.0 T. 11.0 LT. 12.0 T. 11.O ... ... .... ... .... .... ... .... .,. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 89 0 248 0 0 1(__ i20 76 0 0 TF;,UCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 5 WESTBOUND 1 0 l PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAt,l ACTIVITY : 1. � - 99 (#PED5/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS THRU -F-IGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOoEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAST90UMD WESTBOUND 0 117 42� 0 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND S01- IT1_18130*1) EABTBOUND WESTBOU11D [NPUT VOL�ME 0 B9 0 0 �DJBSTE D xOL tOE1'. 1ENT nrA N/� 7117=- �EE: 1::� .1-i 1C -17E� 0,�`-4�^4 :=. ll�-Jr- DATE EXTSTIgG PM PEA� +**++*****++*********************+ LEV�L OF SE�VICE SATURAT[ON CR[T[Cf'L N/S V01-. C�[TICAL SUM 2L{����L LANE GEOMETRY NO�TH�OUND SOUTHBO0ND EASTBOUND LAWE MOWITiTH MY, WIDTH MOV WILDTH RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 i�T, 4 6 ... .... ... TPAFFIC VOLUMEB NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND W ESTBOUNO LEFT THRU RIBHT 68 16 34 B9 I2Z B6 657 /o TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUI�z,, FACTOP NORTHBOUND 2 0 .78 SOUTHBDUND 3 0 .73 EASTBOUND WEST -BOUND PHASINS N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :l. NEITHER TURN F,RUTECTED PEDE�T�IAN ACTIYITY : �. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LEMGTH : I00 SECONDS THRU -RlGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 492 112 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT BOUTHBOU�D 82 0 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 278 5O� 1i2 1� V0�THB0UND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND mESTE0UN� INPUT VOLUME 15B Q 89 Bb ADJUSTE� »OL lt2 0 it2 18 CAF*ClTY 41* v � 23L p|OVEMENT O� OK NO �� �����IF;--'������I F-1 !',-!I �������; F;l 17; �R", ;TE� ��1 L— ����P-11---E ]!,J 7- DATE PH 1 APPROVED PM LEVEL OF SERVICE SATUR,ATION C- 'IRlTlCAL M/S VOL Z5 �2 CRITIC�L Ell' W VOL ������ C�ITTCAL SUM 1 lZE-5 LANE GEOMETRY WORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBO�W� LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH II!OV 1 RT. 12.0 RT' 12.0 RT' t2.O RT. 3 ,.. ... ..'. ... L'. 4 .. .. . .. . .. '. .. 5 ... ... .... ... � ... ,... '.'. .,. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT 206 16 93 118 THRU 365 1 52179 75� RIGHT 83 20 41 1lB LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTO� NORTHBOUND �OQTHBOUND EASTBOU��D 3 0 .9� WESTBOUND 1 PHASING N|S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLHP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2l599 (#PEDSiHR) [YCLE LEN(3TH 100 SECONDS FHR-U -RlGHT CRITICAL L"-NE :OLUMES BY MOVEMENT NOF.THBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUI ID WEsTBOUNr, 502 8 249 4�9 l43 0 �OFTHGOUHD �NP/�T VOLUME 2^/� A�JUSTED vOL 243 C�P�ClT/ 304 MOvEMEM� O� LEFT TURN CHE�K SOUTHpOUND 17:) 0^ EASTBOUND uESTBOUm� 93 il8 64 �i 'ID ir-77_ 6f111.?: DATE PH 1 Al LOWABLP PM LEVEL OF SERV I CE ED SATURAT I 0 N S=25 CR I T I CAL N/ 8 VOL 1 '4 CR I T ICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM 1 77 cP k*************ii-**i-***** LANF GEDNETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHEOUND EASTBOUND WES TBOUND LANE MO) WIDTH MOV WIDTH mny WIDTH NOV ii,TIDTH RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12 0 L . L , 12. 0 :::: . . . . . . 0 0 1 0 PI • 0 0 0 I .::: 4 ''': ' 1.7.. UJ 11 a 0 0 a n n a n R ., X el Ft TRAFF C VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 206 16 93 118 THRU 376 164 182 75Q R I GHT 63 20 41 118 TRUCKS ( NORTHBOUND SONTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 LOCAL BUSES ( 11 / HR) FEAk HOUR FAC"MR Q5 PHAS I NG Ni 9 : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E / 11 : 4 . BOTH TURNS PROTECTED ( M I TH OVERLAP REDESTR I AN ACT I V I TY 2. 100 - 599 ( *WEDS / HR CY CLE LENGTH 1 0 0 SECONDS HIRU -R I aHT LEF T CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 514 226 147:7 3:-,ITRTHBOUND INPUT VOLUME 2a'a MOVEMENT LEFT TURN CHECI:. SOU i Htr!DUND I EASTBOUND WES TBOUN 1 I F s4 Qi / A �E������ 1 177� E�� �� �41 1-=-- -IF DATE E%IBTIMG PM PE�K *+***********+*******************+ LEVEL F `3ERVICIE' SATURATION 41-3' [RITIi L. N/S VOL 6:i� ::�5 CRITICAL E/W VOL �- !E� CRITIC;--1L �UM �nl iE� ************************************* LANE BEOMETRY NORTH8OUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOU�D LE MOV 1,4I0TH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 17.0 RT. 12.O T,, 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 T.l2.0 T.. 12.0 4 L.. 12.0 T. 12.Q ... ... 5 ... .... ... .... .... 6 .., '.., ..., ... ... ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT 10 67 THRU 141124 B RlGHT 0 17� 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) FEAb HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 SOUTHBOUh0 EASTBOUND 5 O 1 WESTBOUN]", 5 O ,94 PHAS ING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES SY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUI'll D EASTBOUND WEBTBOUMD 623 470 O r5 BB 0 0 0 NOPTHB(,-UND ��PUT VOLUME 1k)'? �DJU�TED VOL 8B Cf-tP�ClTf 153 MO'/EMENT W/A LEFT TURN CHECK S0�THBOUMD 0 Ok EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 � � 75 ������!=­F-lt ��' -,i i�� _r.. 1 1101 P, �! �!r-- ". ;" :F-- i--�TE� � E�_F �ATE PH 1 APPROVED PM �­­."�' .7 7,���������������������������� LE�EL OF SE�VICE �� CRIT1CAL N/S VOL ���'. 1 CRITICAL ��W VOL -7 �5 CRlTICAL �UM LANE BEOMETR� 00RT1-1B01,UWD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTSOUND LANE NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WTDTH RT. 12.� 3 T.. l2.0 T. 4 L. 12.0 T. 12.0 ..., ' 5 ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT 148 0 0 67 THRU 2051 1481 0 6B RIGHT 0 246 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR �ORTHBOUND 5 SOUTHBOUND 5 EA ISTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASINB N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. l00 - 599 <#PEDS/HR) C�CLE LID : t�0 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MO»EMENT NOF'THBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEBTBOUND THRU -RISHT 831 600 @ 75 LEFT i29 0 � O LEFT TURN CHECK 0ORTHGOUND 5OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE6TB�GN� [HPUT VOLUME i�8 0 67 ADJUSTED VDL CAP*C[T� Z31 � 0 r5 MO»EME�T N�� gk OK OK LANE 4 T :: = I=. ,.= __ I"^ 1 a w, ^{ _ _ .1 11(i_ 'I^• it ... ii-"= fi _.'1 €' r 1 E a. =y ...I..,. DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE FM LEVEL OF SERVICE imN 1=1 I URA 1 L!€`J ',_' ._ CRITICAL N; S VOL E3 = CRITICAL L E: W VOL "-- CRITICAL S.[Jr1 -37' ! x LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SQ€UTHBO.UN.LI EASTBOUND _.`1EBTBoUN0 MIJ'•..' WIDTH rtov WIDTH MDV WIDTH MOv WIDTH T, , 12.0 RT. 12.0 .. . , , T., 12.0 T„„ 12.0 . ^^ i.......... T, 1.2,0 T. 12.0 L... 12.0 T .. 12.0 .... ..., • TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTH8O(JNC! EASTBOUND LtJE'ST:BoUNCt LEFT 148 0 THRU 2053 1481 RIGHT 0 24,E NORTHBOUND =OLJTHBQUN:0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TRUCKS (%) r7 67 L"11� 0 LOCAL BUSES (tk/HR) PEAT-:: HOUR FA ; T iJF 0 , : _t ,_; .95 PHASING N/8 :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TUF:fJ PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY . 2. 100 — 599 (#FEES / HF ) CYCLE LEI'I6TH 100 SECONDS rHRU —RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 8= 1..' '? CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SDUTHBOU€NCI 600 LEFT CUF.I''1 CHECK NORTHBOUND lE+Cii_ll' D :=l:U T!'-11-'(-?tJND [;..Ih'i. T vOLUME 148 0 ADJUSTED VOL 129 (; A P C I .I.. j' 272 mOvENENT N/A EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E AST8(_tuND .aJES.r4;I.:i.Jr i_, �TF-', - 7 T�1=;., 5E������ � � �� ������_ ���]��������� ������_�� Z � 'r", :1 NORTHBOUND LA,1E MOV WIDTH 1 � 3 � 5 ' LEFT THRU RIBHT '^^^ ~~~ �-i� ����� ����!�"r>� � �3-F ��TE EX�ST[N� PM P�AK ********************+********+**** NORTHBOUND NORTHBOUND GOUTHBOUi'4D EASTBOUy,iD WESTBOUiNlD PHASING 0 O 0 TRUCKS <".) 0 5 o 5 LE�EL F-F SERVICE SATUF-�ATIC1N 33 CRITICAL M/S VOL CRTTICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM e LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV W1DTH MOV WIDTH RT18.0 T.. i0.0 ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES BOUTHBOUND 0 246 85 . " I ... ~^^ .,.. .... .... EASTBOUND � 0 0 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) 0 0 0 O N/S :5, DIRECTION 5EPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDEBTRI�N ACTIyITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS uESTr-OUr,�;D MOV LIJIOTH LT. ... WESTBOUND 124 321 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 .87 1 rHPU -RTGHT LEFT [MPUT VOLUME ��DJUSTED VOL C�P�[TrY MOVEMEUT NORTHBOUND 0 0 N8RTHBOUND 0 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT �OUTHBOUND 296 0 LEFT 'FUR!',] CHECK SOUTHBOUND 0 0 29� N/A EASTBOUND '7B WESTBOUAD 292 0 LANE -T' ?- T ico ?, 37?-=R: .7� a ';I_ a . "'S 1=1 e ` i DATE _ PH I AFROVED PM ,...t E'•7EL nF SPRV I C.E a' � w,-,T,aF:r=iTIONJ 44 CRITICAL N ,- €= VI O L 43- Z5 G3 CRI=TICAL Ei w VOL 7=2E3 CRITICAL SUM "Zw:a_=• ..........;F. * -... ***--j.:.€- ..*.;r...................:..-. LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH • NORTHBOUND LEFT a THRU 0 RIGHT 0 R T , 10.0 T. 10... 4440 mono TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 415 0 114 _3 457 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES f 4*/HR: PEAK HOUF, FCT ,E:: NORTHBOUND €., 0 [ SOUTHBOUND 5 0 . EASTBOUND 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 , ' �t PHASING MIS J. DIRECTION SEF'EF: ;TI0N E/ H 5. DIRECTION SEF`ERAT I ON PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY . 2. :I00 — 599 4F'EDS/ H:F: CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NE: TBOIJND ?"HRu —RIGHT = 458 0 32::-1 LEFT r :-, INPUT '•tOLiJME t D,..f _JE` TE _1 'jl'_ I_.. i. r: ; F A r l: T 'r• N :'!E. nE:I`I.r. NORTHBOUND I,) LEFT TURN CHECK:: SOUTHBOUND F`1=i's=TFJOI.,#I`d.L; L'J[= Tti::fJ _:r LANE Y� ����I C-D rl"! i�E: -iE� ji::% l=', :F-E�,l�E�� 3 7T- ���� DATE PH PM LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURATION 44 CRlTICAL N/S VOL �4-���� [RI�ICAL E/W VOL ::f� -a CRITICAL SUM -7-1-7- -7- LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESOL!HD MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV UJIDTH MU� �IDTH i RT. 10.� T.. ... T. 4 ... 51 .... � - ... .... ~~^ TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEST BOUND LEFT 0 0 THRU 0 425 RIGHT 0 114 0 0 0 13r,7,, �57 3 TRUCLOCAL BUSES (#/HR) FEAK HOUR FACTO� NORTHBOUND O 0 l SOUTHBOUMD 5 5 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATTON E/W :5. DIRECTION BEPERATION 1::'EDESTRI�41 ACTlVITy : 2. 100 - 599 CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTT-ziOUN-D THRU -RIGHT LEFT LEFT TURN CHECK HOF:[H8OUNf, OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTZMUN� [NPUT �CLUME 0 0 0 13� �Dv�STED �OL 0 0 0 12� El [TY 4=---" to FR TIE4-'172,47F1.ir.7.!:‘ a=7...44:2):: C.:-.1—",/CENflTEi=-7=!?. l'"q r,„1 Ir2:14 r-1 T L r.Pi EE INA 1 DATE EXISTING FM PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE x==1 SATURATION 47 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E; W VOL CRITICAL SUM E37254.3 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MO') WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH T. - 10.Q R.. 15.0 10. T. 12.0 0 X .1 nignn • r1 n ri LT. 4 ... wnwa X • 11 • • F'''': It .4 I \ • • d 6 a .. • 0 LEFT THRU RIGHT TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 86 0 0 124 480 180 0 714 81 kr) 78 TRUCKS (7.', LOCAL BUSES (Ai/HP) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 ,:_i ,e4 SOUTHBOUND 7: EASTBOUND I'D WESTBOUND 1 c., . 82 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :S. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 OAPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS THRU —RIGHT LEFT NO 587 17 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 247 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND ';:zOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEETBOUND LHFUT vOLQME 86 i') 124 (---0,1UTED '.'01_ 17 0 0 1A2 MOVEMENT OP: 1TM N:i-r:, N,'=...1 LANE 2 3 4 15 6 ������T��� �������� ������ :c���3-������_ DATE PH 1 APPROvED PM LEVEL OF �ERVICE �-4 S-TUR- 'TION 53 CRITICAL N/S VOL 63, 1-41 CRITICAL E/W VOL :7� :7.�L �RI�ICAL SUM ***e*e***************+***********+*** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTPOUND WESqT�OUM� MD',`WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ,,, ..,. .... LT. .,~. .~~ ^.. .., TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SCUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 'WESTBOLk-E, LEFT 36 0 0 140 THRU 572 317 RIBHT 0 115 0 �2 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK �OU� FACTOR NORTHBOUMD Z 0 ,95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 ,95 EASTBOUND 0 0 L WESTBOUND PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER' TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDE,sTRIr-"N ACTIVITY 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHB0UND rHpU -RlGHT 614 343 LEFT 30 0 LEFT TURN CAECK WEST9O(.jND H�RTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E6ET�OUND �EST'F�0JNT! iNPUT VOLUME G6 AU'JU6TED vOL C�PAC17/ 27| �9A NO»FMENT -7����P.J !:-Sl 4.,:::: , 1:D 1FR 7F ZED $N'l �i �E3 iE—= �� 9=;� r-_� EE 11-1 ;= 11--i -F �� ���'����� � ��lF D�TE pH 1 PM LEVEL OF SERVICE A 9A1URATI01Pl 53 CRIT�CAL N/S �OL A!L� —1�5 CRITTCAL E/W VOL =. :=. =- CPlTICAL SUM !f.1 -7 *+*********************************** LANE GEOMETRY 1',10RTHB0UND SOUTHBOUMD EASTBOUND �ESTBOUw� LANE MOV wlOTH MOV WIDTH MOV Wi-oTH M(TV �IDTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND LEFT B6 THRU 583 RIBHT 0 T. LT. ~^^ ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0 322 135 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES It HP) MORTHBOijND 2 0 SOUTHBOUNG 3 0 EAST�OUy�D 0 0 0 O 0 l2-0 14; 4c�1 42 PEAK HOU� FACTGF .�5 .95 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN t:�CTIVITY : 2. 100 - 5199 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH l00 SECCNDS THPLf .-FIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NOR THBOUNE, S0UTHBOUMD EASTBOUND WESTB0UN� 625 349 0 332 LEFT TURIA CHECK NO�THBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUMD WESTGOU� � INPUT VOLUME 86 � 0 l40 A[QUSTED vOL Ll� ��P�ClTY 27� � o 390 l'-!OVEzMEHT F,-, I.J lot - 1 00111.3V-J w EEO: EF F0. ��T Z-- 4�, L- ����for ���� �r,�4 L_�T �ES � ������ ��� ����7F� j=j ;-j 1:�', DATE EXISTING AM PEAK +*****************+*************** LEVEL (.-jF SERVICE iP- SATURATION 137 CRITICAL N/S VOL n-EXAM: [R17ICAL QW VOL T"',r�� CRITICAL SUM do to 7� *****+******************************* NORTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTSOUN-�-� MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDT-i 1 T. 12.0 ... .... ... .... R.. 12.� 2 T. 12.0 .... .... T. i2'� 3 L. 12'0 . 4 5 ..- .... ... .... - LEFT _ THRU - RIGHT TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTSOUN'D 41 556 0 O o O 8 O 190 23 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 .25 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .36 PHASING N/T :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION £/W :5 DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. O - 99 <#PEDS/HR> CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 384 15 NORTHBOUND INPUT VOLUME 41 ADJUSTED VOL 15 CAPACITY 430 MOVEMENT MX-t CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 0 LEFT TURN CHE0:..' SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND O � EASTBOUND 0 � 0 N/A WESTBOUND 0 WESTBOUND 0 905 N/A �=-FD 7F- 4�� -75- ��i-=: :=� 9=-'�z f-- �-j ������ � 3: 4::� e-24 L- ��r-lE�4 7- ����fLMA L-�!S .1 !--7� I 114 Q r---�-r 1-1 !1,! !F--, DATE PH 1 APP�OVED �� *****+***************************+ LEVEL OF SERVICE �� �ATURATION 41 CRITICAL N/S VOL '1 ::2�� CRITICAL E/N VOL CRITICAL SUl 7' Z1. --fr LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTH�OUND EABTBOU�D �E�rBOU�E LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T-- 12.0 2 T. 12.O 4 .,. 5 6 ... ^^~ ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUNM WESTBDUND LEFT _ 84 THRU 693 0 0 234 RIGHT 0 0 C 23 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTOF-; NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 f-) | WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 P�ASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1, 0 - 99 <#PEDS/HR/ CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 428 66 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND ::-;[XJTHBOUilD EASTBOUND NESTBOUN� lriPUT VOLUME B4 0 0 0 PMDJUSTED VOL 66 CAPA[ITY 43o MOVEMEHT M/A M/A N/A U/A 1 -r1 1�7A L- ��ill'i EE!r14 -1 10 u -F�� DATE EXISTING AM PEAK LEVEL OF BERVICE SATDRATION 3j CRITICAL VOL CRl[ICAL E/W VOL �2 'P�� CRITICAL SUM ����-1 LANE GEOMETRY MORTHBOUND �OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND wESTBOLUD LAME MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NO OT! 1 T.. I.O ... .... T'. 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... T.. 3 T.. 11.0 ,... ... ... 4 ... 5 ... .... ^.. � ..., ..- LEFT , THRU RIGH7 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOLit N� � 555 O 0 O 0 0 0 3B3 0 0 0 TRUCKS {%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .85 BOUTHBOUN('l- 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 PH�SINB N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THPU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHOOUND EASTBOUND WESTSOUil,!D 26B 0 8 293 LEFT TURN CHECK �ORTHBOUNO SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUHD WESTBOUND lNFUT YOLUME �DJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CA` PACIT/ MO;EMEMT M/A IN A �iN,a 4E�, j--., T; c-D, ���I =- �� P� I-_-�-j T=-- IN V7 ET'.FR Z��I-- L- ���t-- 1-11 -r �������� -1� 1 ��� ��F;� -T I --- A F;� M 1=' DHTE PH 1 ALLOWABLE AM *****************+*********�****e* L�VEL OF SERVICE iC� SATQPAT ION 41 CRITICAL M/S VOL ����-1 �RITlCAL EiW VOL CRITICAL SUM ���4-:z LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SQUTH8OUN1) EASTBOU�,,ID �E8TBO�MD LANE NOV WlDTH MOV WIDTH MOy WIDTH MOV 2 T. 12.0 4 5 '.. ...' 6 LEFT ' THRU RIGHT ... NORTHBDW 1C 71 ... |MES ,.. 12.(' 12'') EASTBOUND WESTI�,OUND 0 0 0 234 0 23 ~.jES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUlrHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND Cl 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 PHASING 1\1/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :�, DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ; 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS NORTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT 441 LEFT �4 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND 0 WESTDDUND 305 NO�THBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUN� INFUT VOLUME 10� 0 0 0 �DJUBTED VOL 94 0 0 0 Pf-',CITY NOYEMENT A N/A 71- � �E�������� � �1 -3-Z1=,;=� i— ����M. E-: ��,q 7-1 ;P����L���� ��4�9 �s �C3 LJ1 '-F 1­1 DATE PH 1 APPROVED AM +***+************e**************** LEVEL OF SER«ICE SATUF"ATIOi� 1 37 CRIT[CAL N/S VOL 17' �RIT[CAL E/W «OL ���1 -�� CRITICAL SUM ��&I _:F. LANE GEDMETR'Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Etl-'$STBOUN0 uE�TBOU�� L�NE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH � 2 3 4 5 � LEFT _ THRU RIGHT 7.. 11.0 T. 1l.V T., 11.0 ... ... ... ,.. ,.. NORTHBOUND 0 TRAFFIC VOL0qES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 0 0 0 0 505 0 0 0 TRUCKS M, LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEA� HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 BOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 95 PHPjSING DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :51. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : l. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRiTICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND S8UTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THFU -RIGHT �17 0 0 3410 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK 110RTHBOUN0 SOUTHBOUND EA5TBOUND Ir,lPUT VOLUME O 0 O ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 C�PACITY 430 0 i MOVEMENT N/� .7 11��������������I=� ��FRZ-T- T C:� L- r-1 iD r-0 lr,,� -3- PA ac� I—����� ����5 ��4D �_j -T 11-1 ��1-1 ir-, DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE A�1 LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURAT3[]N 38 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRlTlCAL E/W VOL :3���� CRITICAL SUM 6����2 *****************************e******* LANE GEOMETRY NDRTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH mO� 1 T. 11.0 ... ,... ..-' T.. 12'� 2 T., 11,0 . T. l2'� 3 T.. 11.0 ... .... .... 4 ,.. .... ... ..^^ � '.. .... ^.. LEFT = 0 THRU 77B RIGHT 0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 � 0 5B5 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 SOUTHBOUND O 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LEY-IGTH I SECONDS TNRU -R'lGHT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTED (--I UND 336 0 0 34� 0 0 O O NORTHBOUI'. ID lNPUT vOLUME 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 [�PAC[ly 430 1-11-lVEMEMT LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND � EASTBOUND WEST8OUMD 0 � 0 O 0 9�5 IF' DI FRT 172, !F-7,-z' F..F.-7 :1-1,1 CT; -11- :I TN,1117-7_ ,X2,4%/EE,' I 725c.F.7„.5 DATE EXISTING AM PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 5 CRITICAL N/S VOL .72:FPE3 CRITICAL E/W VOL 21. CRITICAL SUM I 1 ************************4********** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBCUNL LANE MOV WIDTH MO.' WIDTH MOV W I DTH MOV W DTH 1 T.- 12.0 R. iiapt 4N•• 2 uMa !_T. 12.0 T . . 1.2. 0 7 M•M 441, /IV" iimmm LEFT , THRU RIGHT X n n •ft. rt./ •0•1• TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBPUND O 0 0 O 515 566 O 0 865 TRUCKS (74) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 , 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 7_7, 0 .95 WESTBOUND i-i ,:;) 1 PHASING WS ;5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : L. 0 - 99 #PEDS:HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND O 798 61: O 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED CARO1T1 ,-.LfT.0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A NSA N/A -"1 -71 Zi - - - 3 1 '7 Z �cti- A-! i-D a r-i a i'-j P,, i 0�a L- Ne' 231�� OATE PH 1 APPROVED AM LEVEL OF SERVICE c SATU��TION 71 CRlTTCAL N/S VOL -4-C3 C� CRIT[CAL EVOL ������ CR[TICAL LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE�TBO�N� LAME MOV WIDTH M�V WI�TH MOV WIDTFi MOV WI�T� � T. 12.0 R,. 12,0 ... ,... LT. 12.0 T.,. 12.0 3 .... ... .... ^^,. 4 � 6 LEFT ' THRU RIGHT 0 0 O .... ..,. ~^^ TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0 0 690 BI7 0 917 Ij 0 TRUCKS (%} LOtAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND lb) E:-:TBOUND 0 0 1 PHASINB N/S :5. DIRECTION GEPERATION E/W :5DIRECTION SEPE.RATION PEDESTR'IAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEBTBOUND rHRU -R'IGHT o 400 885 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 �OP'THBOUND IUPIUT YOLUME � �D�USTED VOL 0 [�P�CIT� MO�EMEHT H/A LEFT TURN [HECK SOU}H8OUND o EASTBOUND 0 0 N/A mE2TBOUND 0 �3.=��������� �=� !-=��������� Z������_ �������],�J 7r- i-,J i�2!i L-�!S 1 !�i� -� ������-�+� P-1 P, DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE AM LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURATION 72 CRIT�CAL N/S VOL ^1 1�� CPITICAL E/W VOL ���31 15 CRITICAL BUM �L :�-C`1L LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND I]OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEBTG C-1UN� LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MO� 1 2 3 � 5 6 T.. 12'0 LT. 12.0 12-0 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEST6OUMD LEFT THRU - 0 717 Bl7 0 R'IGHT 968 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 BOUTHBOUND 95 EASTBOUND 3 WESTBOUND PHASING N/S :3. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/LA) :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS rHRU -R1 G HT LEFT NORTHBOUND o CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 416 885 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK WESTROUND 0 0 NOFTHBOUND SOUTHBOU�D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT vOL�ME O 0 4�JU5TED VOL 0 0 0 0 CPH" CITY 43O MOVEMENT N/A N/A u/� N/A 7:1= FE:i='L-i1G — := - G ,7�=: €tea'='v °J_: -I . F- ;i I F: I I C: l= a.. _ :i 1_ 'fir'' ' "1: ',= INI EE s ,,,a Z .J= -__ ' '0:5 F R ac 1'^'1 !F DATE EXISTING AM PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 71 CRITICAL NJ"S VOL. C.S1T::GAL E7W VOL q-. ' x' __- CRITIi=AL. SUM 7 ****w***a:*****ti;******ni-yi-**:i..ii-.i-.:i.*ii-.::.... *T�:. LANE !GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESI7'i-,..;N� LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV wIOTH i'If:_3'`' .., ..„, T,. 12.0 T.. 12.0 7 „., , T. 12...:' ,.. ,,. ., 4 a LT. 12.0 .,. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT - �: Ica THRU _ 0 1755 647 RIGHT 0 ;.F =! TRUCKS { l) LOCAL. BUSES (#. HR) PEAK HOUF: FACTOR: NORTHBOUND 0 :' 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 „ EASTBOUND 4 0 .97 WESTBOUND 0 1 PHASING N/S DIRECTION SEF'ERATIQN E/W : 5, DIRECTION SEF`ERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY . 1. — 99 i #F'EDS /HF: CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —F: I UHT ':::r m179 6.97 ''..; LEFT 0 0 0 LEFT TUF:N CHECF:: rNORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND INPUT JCLUME 26 ADJUSTED USTEE' v1JL_ +_, CAPACITY 410 MOVEMENT N/A N hit N/A WESTBOUND LANE s=z:11;,.ii J- I 7 r 1.- 3: ID Nil s -;' ? iC s r ,: i - 'L=..1 :. I i a_ 1(41 .._. iN1 i2 C i "H EE a= 41 IP! L ;s " 73 M EE ' .' 9 ,/ I _ 1 . D -T ?—N F: g P 1 IF:, DATE F'H 1 ;=,F'F`F:DVED Ari LEVEL OF SERVICE la SATURATION TIrON .78 CRITICAL NiS VOL :6n,1. CRITICAL E/W VOL 7.° ..,-N. CRITICAL SUM LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Er=r'STFU UND L• ES a! U D ND'V WIDTH NOV WIDTH! r'lOiV WIDTH MOV DT- NORTHBOUND T.. 12.0 T.. 12. T L T . 1'7. . TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT - 0 26 THRU 0 1582 71 RIGHT 0 0 0 WES�T!8DUN} TRUCKS () LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) F'E=;F':, HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 4 i .97 WESTBOUND 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY . 1. 0 — 99 t#F'EDS/HRJ CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THRU —RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0 b41 764 LEFT TURN CHECK WE TE OUND NORTHBOUND OUTHBOLNC} EASTBOUND WESTBOOUNi. INPUT VOLUME: 26 ADJUSTED VOL CAPACITY 470 (_0 ' ` = reaij-rr i ;I: r ciCT) "a7 -3- rP.1rLE3 EL- V I 01 fLi EH 1 ALLOWABLE psi LEVEL OF SERVICE D, SATUFT1ON 8 0 CR T I CAL N/ S VOL IS " CR I T CAL E. W VO1 41- CR I T I CAL SUM LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND wFSTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV IdEDTH 1 .4, T. 12.0 T. 12.0 7 T.. 12.0 LT. 12.0 ..• 4 R A AAAA Pr LI rt • 5 LEFT THRIJ - RIGHT TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND IC) 26 1660 713 0 TRUCKS (74) LOCAL BUSES ( # / HR ) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 . 95 EASTBOUND 4 0 .77 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING MIS 15. DIRECTION SEPERATION F/W DIRECTION SEFERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS THERU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SDUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 672 764 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT vOLUME AiUTD vOL G.APACIT MUJEMENT NJA M/A N/A N/A Ei3 !E: JC� ]=Rl i::�,��T�� �Y���� �ATE EXlSTING �M PEAK LEVEL OF 32R�ICE �� SATURATION CRITICAL E/W VOL 4E�`F CRITICAL SUM '7'1ES 4� ���������*�������� LANE GEOMETRY 11 Cl B RTHOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND �E�TBOUM� LANE MO,' WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV W[�T� � .... R�J 2 3 T. 12.0 .... 6 LEFT THRU RIBHT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0 �0 0 1021 O 246 ... 0 60 29 I 13 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES HOLR FA�TOF WORTHBOUND 0 O 1 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .B3 ESTBOUND WESTBOUND 25 O .55 PHASTNG N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. t00 - 599 (#PEDB/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS THRb -�.!GHT LEFT �.h'UT oOLUME A��U5TED '/�L I'll iEMT CRITICAL LPINE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT WOPTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 665 39 2� 0 39 0 O �OR�H�OUND , L2FT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EAST�O�ND �E6T���ND 6� 0 ii 39 0 C-�� 1Z, 71-!�aj DATEAPPROVED AN LEVEL OF SERVICE �� SATUR'ATION �-7 1 CRITI[�L N/B VOL �LC)���� TIL E/V J VOL 1 E�-, I CRITICAL SUM ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHB0UWD SBUTHBOUND EASTBOUNO uEST��UN� LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV �IDTH �OV �l�TH T'. 12.0 RT. 2 T. 12.0 T'. 4 ..., L.. 12.0 ... 5 ,... .'. LEFT THRU RIBHT TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUNC EASTBOUND WE'-:�TBOUND 0 0 ^' 70 1B23 246 0 161 29 �6 � T�UCkS (%) LOCAL BUSES HR) PEAK HOi�F. WORTHBOUND 0 0 l SOUTHBOUND EASTBGUND WESTE�OUND PHASINB 1,1/S :5. DIRECTION BEPERATI0W E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PED23TRIAN ACTIvlTY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR/ CYCLE LENGTH l2O SECOND� T LEFT NORTH30UND SOUTHBOUNI'D EASTBOUND WEST801 T.11D 0 i�37 1B1 r3 � 45 0 �ORTHBO�MD [NPi/T vOLUME 0 AD7,U5TE� »BL MOsEME�|T M/� LEFT CHECK SOUTHBOU�� E��TBOUNC './ f5 NIA �ESTB0JN� ^1 7-'71-�� -7 A ','IE�� V-4 -LA11 77 DATE PH 1 ALLOWA8LE AN LE�EL OF BERVlCE I� SATURATTON CRITIC�L N/S VOL �L������ CRlTICAL E/W E� CR[TICAL GUM 3L������ *+********************+************** LANE GEOMETRY WORTHBOUWD SOUTHBOUND MOV Wl�TH MOV WIDTH l2.0 12.0 l2.0 12.0 EASTBOUNlD WESTBOU�D M('3V WIl-TH T.. 12.,) L.. 12.0 -,.- ~... NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU R'IGHT NORTHBOUND �OUTHBOUND EASTBOUN D 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) 0 3 7 25 PHASING N/S :5. / EW :1. PEDESTRIAN A�TI»ITY : �Y-LE LEP.GTH HO�T�BOUN� T�RU -PiGHT 0 LEFT WO�THBO|�MD [NPUT »OLU�E ; *�JUSTE6 :O� [�PA/�liY v MO�EME�|T N/� 2. TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTIWESTBOUND 84 lB23 246 0 185 i6� �7 � LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUP FACTOR 8 0 DIRECTION SEPERATIDN NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) LZ0 SECONDS- CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 8Y MOVEMENT 6OUTHBOUND 6i LEFT TU�N CHECK SOUTHBOU�D 84 °i Hi( -I EASTBOUND Zo8 0 L,l f FBOUV I-,- .�, ��� ���������� ������� DATE EXISTING i-21M PEAK +**********e****+***************** LEVEL OF SE�VICE �� �ATDRATION �1 CRITICAL N/S VOL CR[TICAL E/1W VGL l l! �Z' CRITICAL �UM �L���� LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAS TP,OUND mEST�OUnE L*NE MOY WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV z T.12.0 .... RT. 2 T. 4 LT. 12.0 .... .,. f, 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES MORTHBOU�D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUN� LEFT - 61 0 0 THRU ' 247 0 0 154 RIt3HT 0 0 0 43 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR- PEAK HOUR FACTOP NORTHBOUND 1 0 96 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 ��STBOUND 5 0 8� PH��INB N/S :5. DIRECTION SBPERATIBN E/W :S. DIRECTION SEPERATICDN PEK)ESTRIAN ACTIVITY : i. O - 99 (#PEDS�HR, CYCLE LENGTH : 1-:,'ECONDS THRU -R[GHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUNI) SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEBTBOUND 78 0 0 112 0 0 O 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUN1:1 WEST77�OUr, ID [aPUT vOLUME �l 0 0 0 A�JU�TE3 »OL 27 � 0 C.APAClTY 314 MOVEMENT NN/A 7F�� I 1 4 �������1������ LA�;,jE P�,� L-J 7:� 1"—� �4..e" T—=x/ P141^3 6:p IE;—r DATE PH 1 APPROVED AM LEVEL OF �ERVICE �� �ATURATION 16 CR[TlCAL N/S VOL -1��«] CRlTICAL E/W VOL 1=p�� CRITlCAL SUM LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND wE�T8OU,|� MD'," WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WTDTH MDv �[DT� 1 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... RT. 2 T.. 12.0 ... ... T.. 3 T. 12.0 ... 4 LT. l2.0 ,.. .... ... .... 5 -... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBO�ND LEFT ' THR8 ' PIGHT 61 3Z3 0 ~`^` 0 O 0 0 0 260 O O 1Z2 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND O 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 PHASING N/S : 5 . DIRECTION BEpERATION E/W :5, DIRECTION BEPEF'ATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENBTH : tSECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES—) BY MO-IEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTB�UM� THRU —RIGHT 1V0 0 0 196 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBO�ND SOUTHBOUND EASTBO01D lNPUT VOLUNE 61 0 0 AOJUSTED YOL �7 0 0 M0VE1,lEMT A N/A WESTBOUND ������������-F��� ����I-����� ������ �I -T-Zit::' ic� L- �������,4T w"il L_��T .1-3 E3-F DATE PH 1 ALLOWABLE AM LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURATlON 17 CRITTCAL N/S VOL JL�117: C�lTICAL E/W VOL �2 I CRITICAL SUM LAME GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOL/THBOUND Ei�STBOUND WEST�O��/� LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV' WIDTH 1 T. 12.�D .... ... .... RT. 1�-u 2 T. 12.0 ,.. ..., ... T.. 3 T. 12.0 .... ~.. 4 LT. 12.0 ... ^.. 5 .... '.. 6 ... .... .... `.. '^^` TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT ' 61 0 0 THRU RIGHT 0 0 O TRUCKS (%) NORTHBOUND � SOUTHBOUND 0 EASTBOUND 0 'WESTBOUND 5 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) 0 0 0 265 127 PEAV' HOUR FACTOR 1 1 ,95 PHA5lMG N/B :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDB/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 103 0 0 Zo1 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK riORTHBOUMD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND �E�TB8U�D IHPUT VOLUME 61 0 0 0 AD,-USTED yOL 27 0 0 0 ��PAClTi 31� � �65 MOVEMENT N/A NN/A N/A ��f:2� P,JB�'CD F-1,11 7- _;F l CD P.J ��F---- !�--h F� 1:71, 1--1 �I= � - 1=� f_-ZZ��a�� �L_ �����17-, _'F ��gl�� 1_ ' X" I'� LNE 1 2 3 4 5 L_ NO�THBOUN� NO",' WIDTH ... -������� DATE E'dISTI�G AN PEAK +**************************+****** LEVEL OF SERVTCE �� SATUPATION 22 CRlTICAL m/S VOL :7: �� ::S CRlTlCAL E/W VOL 7'CJ CRlTlCAL SUM ::7 IZP ___T LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LdEST�OON� �OV �IDTH MOV WIDTH RT. 13.0 ... ,... .... T. 12.0 ,.. .... T.. 12,0 .,., T. 12.0 ~~~~ T,, T.10.{' TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEST88UND LEFT THRU - 0 953 0 13B RIBHT 0 39 0 � TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 I SOUTHBOUWD 2 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 2 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION BEFERATION E/W :5. DlRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH i00 SECONDS THRU —RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 0 0 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOYEMENT S0UTHBOUND 323 0 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUN"_C, 70 48 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBQU110 [WPUT VOLUME AOJUSTED VOL 0 48 CAPf�CIT" 314 0 965 MO�EME�T M/A N/A N/A N/A �0"I El_lZ5�=��1­4 ll—,E�4 - —,,��� E�,l -T- Pi t­A:�� L_�/�3 Jl: L:�3 P.--i L.J ::s F�,-�", P-.l lAo .6� !E�-I- DATE FH I APPROYES, AN ****+*************+***********+*** LEVEL OF SERVICE �ATUR�TIO# 36 CRITICAL ��S "'OL 'lip C�ITTCAL E/W VOL "l 1-� C�ITICAL BUM 6:11 :E3 -":2 �-j�- 4-4-4-4-* 4�4..W_���������� LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOU�D �OUTHBOUND EASTBOUN[} �ESTBOUU� LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MD'.) WIDTH MOV 1 2 3 4 5 6 ^-^ RT. 13.0 T. 12.0 ... .... T. T.. 12,0 .-., L.. T. ~^^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ~`^ TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SQUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE5TBOUND LEFT THRU ' 0 1755 RlGHT 0 89 0 137 0 136 0 (J TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR} PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOU11,1D 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 l WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHAS%NG N/S :5. DIRECTION BEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATIQN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. O - 99 (#PBJS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 S�COMDS THRU -RI( HT LFFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTH8OUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 539 0 94 0 � 0 113 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTH8OUND OUTHBOUND [HPUT u8LUME o A�JUSTED »OL � 314 MOVEMENT N/H 0 N/A EA-STBOUNO WESTBOUND 0 13r 0 1l3 � 965 1­5 �5-N-A 7F�� �7-.1 i— ���� DATE PH 1 ALLOWA8LE AM LEVEL OF SERVICE 5ATURATION 36 CRIITICAL N/S ��.4-cD CRITICAL E/W VOL ]L 1�]L- CRITICAL SUN 4!�:P!5�� LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTB0UN0, �EST��U�D LAME MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ND',.' WIDTH MOV !,i['DTH 2 3 4 � 6 ,.. ... RT. 13.0 T,, �2.0 T.. 12.0 T. l2.V ~^^ ~^^ .,. ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE-3TBOUND LEFT � 0 THRU 0 RIGHT 0 0 1759 aq 0 1�7 0 191 0 0 TRUCK5 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 8 0 1 WEESTBOUND PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION / �W '5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1' O - 99 CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS THRU -RIGHT LEFT �MPUT VOLUME ,:�iD'JU5TED VOL [APACITy M0VEMENT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES' BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND BOUTHBOUMD EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 54� 0 90 11,7 NORTHB�UND ') � 314 N/A LEFT TURN CHECK BElUTHDOUNC. EHSTBOUND 'WE5TBOUwD � 0 l37 0 0 1i3 � 0 965 Ge0.004kArt/2A, QUESTION 12 - OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES A. WASTEWATER, WATER AND SOLID WASTE 1) IDENTIFY THE UNUSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT, WATER TREATMENT, AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL CAPACITY PROJECTED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA FOR EACH PHASE. SOLID WASTE The projected average daily volumes of solid waste for the different phases of development are shown below. The projected waste generation volumes for the three stages of development were calculated- based on statistical data obtained from Dade County Department of Solid Waste. The statistical data outlining solid waste collection sources is included in the Appendix. The total projected waste generation demand for the three stages of development is anticipated to be the following. Phase I 40,608 lbs/Day or 20.30 Tons/Day Phase II 84,150 lbs/Day or 42.08 Tons/Day Phase III 179,599 lbs/Day or 89.80 Tons/Day The solid waste generated will be basically residential, retail and office waste. A negligible amount of industrial or special waste is expected to be generated. Solid waste generated will be placed in standardized on -site containers per City of Miami Code Chapter 22 for regular pick-up by the different hauling companies and/or the City of Miami's Solid Waste Department. Most of the collection in the study area is presently done by City of Miami Solid Waste Dept., and this is expected to continue in the future. The solid waste will be transported to the Central Transfer Station by the collectors. The Central Transfer Station is located at 1150 N.W. 20th Street and is serving most of the City of Miami, the City of Miami Beach and some of the unincorporated areas of Dade County. From the Central Transfer Station the solid waste will be transfered by the Dade County Solid Waste Disposal Division to the South Dade Facility, or the Resources Recovery Facility for processing. The transfer of waste is coordinated through Dade County's Solid Waste Disposal Division dispatchers based on daily traffic conditions and disposal capacity of the two sites. The existing Solid Waste Disposal Facilities referred to herein are shown on Map I-3. Currently Dade County's Solid Waste Disposal Division is undergoing an expansion plan of their existing facilities per their amended "Solid Waste Disposal and Resources Recovery Management Plan' dated November, 1984. The expansion plan 12A-1 r . r NI • CPA LCCxA we sr _t 1TL '4 Yc ;. • NORTHEJ S 't' . STAT1CN O►a•li1Cx• Minn 1 Ia1A1 1 Ik TCAM ATIONAt. AIRPORT 41811j rh • el Eiormaihavint CtkatR tICT Mai�-104( rxAPWAM pm.* PARR DADE IC1Lm 12A-2 I"AT{IC]ON NAUIOCX tulle so 16tTNC CAI[ 7{.Da1ID& PTAT[ !+tale MAP I - 3 EXISTING SCUD vAs� DISPOSAL 94aurES includes an increase in the capacities of the Resources Recovery Facility and South Dade Facility as well as an increase in the hours of operation and staffing of the facilities. An additional 30 acre landfill is already designed for the Resources Recovery Facility and additional cells are under construction at the South Dade Facility. Future expansion plans proposed by Dade County Solid Waste Department call for an additional Resources Recovery Facility at the South Dade Facility and an expansion of the existing regional transfer stations. Metro Dade's Solid Waste Generation Projections which are included in the Appendix represent projected solid waste generation up through the third phase- of development for the entire Dade County area which includes the study area. Based on projected values from Dade County Solid Waste Disposal Department, waste generated by development will be accommodated by the County's facilities. A letter from the Assistant Director . for Solid Waste Disposal indicating Dade County's ability to dispose of the waste is included in the Appendix. Water and Wastewater: The projected unused water and wastewater treatment capacities availabe within the DRI area are listed below. The unused water treatment capacity reflects capacity based on the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department Water Facilities Expansion Plan. The Expansion Plan for the various plants is included in Appendix 12A-4. During Phase I the Expansion Plan will increase water treatment capacity within the service area of the Water and Sewer Authority Department by 123 M.G.D. This increase in water treatment capacity will be achieved by rerating, construction of softeners, and construction of settling basins at the Treatment Plants. During Phase II the Expansion Plan will increase water treatment capacity by an additional 32 M.G.D. This additional increase in water treatment capacity will be achieved by rerating, construction of softeners, and construction of a reservoir at the Treatment Plants. During Phase III the Expansion Plan will increase water treatment capacity by an additional 12 M.G.D. This additional increase in water treatment capacity will be achieved by construction of filters at the Treatment Plants. The increased plant capacity will be accompanied by improvements in the transmission system. The actual current water demand within the project area is .9246 M.G.D. This was obtained from the Water and Sewer Meter Readers Route Books (See Appendix 12A--5). Based upon the current land uses and the Average Daily Flows for connection to water systems, the calculated current water demand within the project area is 1.14 M.G.D. This shows that the future calculated water demands for the three phases of development should exceed the actual amount of water consumed. Projected water and sewer demands calculated for the three phases of development are listed below and included in Appendix 12A-6. The tables in the Addendix include a detailed breakdown of water and sewer demand by subarea and land use category. These demands were obtained by using the water and sewer consumption tables for different land and occupancy uses from Dade County's Building Code, a copy of which is included in Appendix 12A--6 . WATER FUTURE DEMAND UNUSED CAPACITY PHASE: INCREASE (MGD) WITHIN DRI (MGD) Present 0.54 Phase I 0.44 0.66 Phase II 0.98 1.01 Phase III 2.17 2.30 FUTURE DEMAND PHASE: INCREASE (MGD) Present Phase I 0.36 Phase II 0.29 Phase III 1.74 SEWER AVAILABLE EXCESS CAPACITY (MGD) 0.54 0.22 0.03 0.13 UNUSED CAPACITY AVAILABLE EXCESS WITHIN DRI (MGD) CAPACITY (MGD) 0.44 0.44 0.54 0.18 0.81 0.52 1.84 0.10 A comparison between projected demand, projected generation and available treatment capacity indicated that there will be excess water and sewer treatment capacity for the projected growth scenarios for the three development phases. Presently the Downtown DRI Study area is served by five major water transmission lines. A 20" diameter and 2-26" diameter lines from the west and 30" diameter line and 42" diameter line from the south. There is a proposed 24" diameter line from the south and a 48" diameter line from the north, which are funded and planned to be constructed during Phase I. The ultimate transmission capacity of a water line varies with size as listed below: PIPE I.D. 8" 12" 16" 20" 2 417 " 30" 36" 42" 48" 54" 60" 66" 72" ULTIMATE FLOW CAPACITIES 1.0 M.G.D. 2.4 M.G.D. 4.5 M.G.D. 7.0 M.G.D. 10.0 M.G.D. 15.0 M.G.D. 22.0 M.G.D. 30.0 M.G.D. 40.0 M.G.D. 50.0 M.G.D. 60.0 M.G.D. 75.0 M.G.D. 90.0 M.G.D. 12A-4 These ultimate flows are based upon a pipe flowing full with a guaranteed pressure of 40 PSI as established by Miami Dade Uater and Sewer Authority Department. These major transmission lines provide looped water systems within the study area, outside of the study area and partially within the study area. The ultimate flow capacity of the five major transmission lines of 42 M.G.D. which greatly exceeds the needs of the study area cannot be totally committed to the area since these transmission lines serve other areas. However, this ultimate flow capacity does show that the transmission lines to the study area are in place with enough capacity. It is the current practice of the City of Miami Fire Department and the Building and Zoning Departments -to require developers. to provide adquate water service connections from the major transmission lines to their sites, prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy. 2) INCLUDE MOMITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE FACILITIES THAT DETERMINE AVAILABLE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, AND CREDIT THE" "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAMS MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND DESCRIBE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT NEEDED FACILITIES IN A TIMELY MANNER. Water and Wastewater: Since data for unused water and sewer capacity is available, a monitoring program can be established by the use of capacity banks and a facilities capacity monitoring form. Prior to permit approval the sample form (included in Appendix 12A,7) will be completed by the Owner or Owner's representative. The person in charge of the capacity bank accounts for the City of Miami will monitor and determine if there is adequate capacity available for the proposed land use. If capacity is available the permit will be issued and the capacity bank account wi l l be debited by the projected demand. When additional facilities are committed the capacity bank account will be credited by the amount of increase in capacity. If the actual growth requires more rapid expansion than anticipated and capacity reserves are decreasing rapidly, then construction projects will have to be accelerate to meet the increasing future demands. The person in charge of monitoring the capacity bank accounts will have to coordinate with Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority, the Fire Department and City of Miami's Dept of Public Works to establish the criteria for new water and sewer line extensions within a feasible time frame to make up for deficiencies used by previous projects. Solid Waste There are no existing or anticipated future disposal sites within the downtown study area. The area is served by the Central Transfer Station located outside the project area as shownion Map I-3. Anticipated future increases for the three Growth Scenarios are included in a table in Appendix 12A-1. The station was opened in May of 1973 and had a design capacity of 1,200 tons per day. Due to increase of demand the station was modified and have expanded its daily capacity by 33%. Although the Central Transfer Station was designed to support the Resources Recovery Facility it has of necessity devoted a night shift of transfer trailers to the South Dade Facility. This change is due to the daily and weekly contractual limitations of the Resources Recovery Facility and the unexpected peak volume that the station will process. 12A-6 As it is mentioned in the letter by Metro -Dade Public Works Department Division of Solid Waste, future growth will be handled as necessary by Dade County disposal facilities. There are several alternatives that can be employed individually or in combination to increase the disposal capacity of the system. New facilities can be constructed, existing facilities can be modified, and/or existing station capacity can be increased by extending their hours of operation and increasing staff. Each alternative has its attractions, limitations and most effective qualities but a combination of all available options will allow the County to achieve the necessary increase in capacity within the time frame available for development. Since most of the collection and hauling of solid waste to the station is done by private hauling companies, on contract basis, funding for purchasing of additional trucks to accommodate development will not be required. The person in charge of capacity bank accounts will have the responsibility to coordinate between Dade County Public Works Department and the City of Miami's Solid Waste Department for the proper planning of anticipated needs. By using the statistical data for solid waste generation and capacity account forms ibcl uded in Appendix 12At7 the bank accounts can be credited or debited accordingly for every new project. The Dade County Public Works Department will be notified in advance if accelerated development is anticipated and measures wi l I be taken to accommodate growth. The Dade County Public Works Department funded previous projects through the Division of Solid Waste operating budget and by bonds. It is anticipated that future projects will be funded in the same manner. 3) SPECIFY REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE. Present building code requirements and County standards have been very successful ensuring that development is permitted only when facilities are available. Both the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department and the City of Miami Fire Department wi l l not issue construction permits on water and sewer line connections and extensions unless adequate water and sewer capacities are available. If capacities are not adequate the developer is obligated to upgrade the transmission lines to conform to the authorities standards. Similarly, the Fire Department will not allow any new buildings to receive a Certificate of Occupancy unless the required fire flow is available. The present regulatory and permitting standards are adequate to permit development only when facilities are available and assure that development will not occur unless all required criteria are met. A facilities unused capacity monitoring form as proposed and included i.n the Appendix can be made a part of the permit process to be completed by the developer or his representative. The completed form would be forwarded to the City official with the responsibility of monitoring unused capacity. With predetermined usages, milestones and time frames based on unused capacity, the monitoring official would be alerted to the inpending need for facilities improvements. LIST OF REGULATORY CODES, ORDINANCES AND STANDARDS: Dade County Code Chapter 24 Dade County Code Chapter 330 South Florida Water Management Volume IV Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority (Construction Specs for Donation Water Mains) City of Miami Code Chapter 22 Florida Administration Code HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE 6) SPECIFY THE QUANTITIES AND TYPES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS USED WITHIN PLAN BOUNDARIES, AND DESCRIBE CURRENT HAZARDOUS WASTE HANDLING AND DISPOSAL PRACTICES. ALSO, SPECIFY THE QUANTITY AND TYPES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. Solid waste generated by development will consist of domestic and office building generated waste. However, a small amount of hazardous waste may be generated by development. Hazardous waste is defined by U.S. Environment Protection Agency and the State as waste that is ignitable, corrosive, reactive or toxic. A list of potential Hazardous Waste Generator by SIC Code is included in Appendix 12A-8. This list is an excerpt from the Florida Water Quality Assurance Act regulation and all facilities that fall within these SIC are required by the Act to provide information regarding types and amounts of waste generated at the facility and how this waste is being managed. Several of the SIC codes hazardous waste generators listed may be found in the downtown study area. For example research and development labs and photo finishing labs are potential small quantity hazardous waste generators. Current hazardous waste handling and disposal practices include but are not limited to the following. a. The use of covered loading areas which exclude stormwater. b. The construction of impervious floors which slope toward catch basins or depressions for detention and clean up of spills. c. The installation of Oil/Water Separators into building drainage systems to remove and store contaminants for disposal. d. Air stripping to remove contaminants and volatile organic compounds, and e. The removal and shipment of hazardous waste and contaminants to licensed dump sites by licensed contractors. In the event that a negligible amount of hazardous waste is mixed with solid waste, Dade County will use a private licensed hazardous waste hauling company to properly dispose of the waste. A letter from the Assistant Director for Solid Waste Disposal from the Dade County Public Works Department is enclosed in Appendix 12A-9 indicating the present method of handling hazardous waste. 12A-9 Presently, hazardous materials and waste usage and handling are regulated by the following codes and ordinances: Chapter 24, Environmental Protection, of the Dade County Code Chapter 17-1 b , 17-21, and 17-22 of the Florida Administrative Code Chapter 10D--4 of the Florida Administrative Code and Regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as forth in 40 C.F.R. 403 I2A-F0 7) INCLUDE A PROGRAM TO ENSURE THAT ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTES ARE HANDLED, USED, STORED, AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. INCLUDE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRETREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS EFFLUENTS, IF APPLICABLE. The incorporation of the following measures as a condition in any devlopment order issued will ensure proper handling of all hazardous materials: 1) Covered loading areas, to exclude rain, constructed with imperious floors sloped toward catch basins (without drains) for spill containment and clean-up for developments where hazardous materials are to be used or stored. This measure could be incorporporated into the local building code or zoning code. 2) Imperious floors designed to collect and hold spilled materials for clean-up where hazardous materials are used. This measure could be incorporated into the local building code or zoning code. 3) Spill response plans approved by State and local government agencies; description of emergency procedures including contacts and phone numbers; floor plans showing the location of hazardous substances. This measure could be a condition of the Development Order. 4) Prohibit storage of hazardous wastes. This measure could be incorporated into the local zoning code. 5) Prohibit the discharge of hazardous effluents to sewer systems unless adequately pretreated to meet the County standards for discharging into the sewer systems. This measure is included in Chapter 24, "Environmental Protection" of the Metropolitan Dade County Code. 6) All hazardous substances to be disposed via an approved waste disposal service meeting DER requirements. Documentation by one of the followng: a hazardous waste manifest; and a bill of lading from a bonded contractor showing shipment to a licensed hazardous waste facility or a receipt of materials from a recycl er . This measure could be a condition of the Development Order. It should be the responsibility of Metro -Dade County to monitor management methods for hazardous waste disposal. In addition, a program is already established by the Metro -Dade County Public Works Department for hazardous waste mixed with solid waste. L2A-11 Dade County employs seven full-time Waste Enforcement Officers, who are trained to spot and properly segregate such materials. This program has resulted in a reduction of unauthorized hazardous waste disposal. If hazardous waste is discovered, the removal of the material is handled by a licensed private contractor who is under contract with Metro -Dade County to provide 24-hour on call, testing, segregation, transportation and disposal services for toxic and hazardous waste. 12A-12 8) SPECIFY REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT THE PROGRAM AND REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN 7 ABOVE ARE IMPLEMENTED. In addition to the program and requi rments specified in 7 above, enforcement of proper hazardous waste disposal practices can be enhanced by requiring that all new businesses opening within the study area file an affidavit under penalty of perjury identifying any hazardous waste to be used in their operation at the time an occupational license is received. This affidavit will be forwarded to both the Dade County Department of Environment Resources Management and the Public Works Department, which presently employ enforcement officers and inspectors. The officers and inspectors can then inspect the premises to ensure that the listed hazardous waste materials are disposed of properly. 12A-13 APPENDIX 12A 12A-1 Projected Solid Waste Generation Increases 12A-2 Metro -Dade County Solid Waste Generation Projections 12A-3 Letter from Metro -Dade Public Works Department regarding Solid Waste Disposal 12A-4 Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Expansion Plan 12A-5 Overtown DRI Water and Sewer Consumption 12A-6 Projected Water and Sewer Consumption Based on Growth Scenarios 12A-7 Facilities Capacity Monitoring Forms: Water, Sewer and Solid Waste 12A-8 List of Potential Hazardous Waste Generators 12A-9 Letter from Metro.”Dade Public Works Department regarding Hazardous Waste PROJECTED SOLID WASTE GENERATION INCREASE (lbs./per day) PHASE I pHASE.II LAND USE (lbs./per day) (lbs./per day) p 0ffice 1,600 3,710 b m 0 Retail/Service 2,648 4,140 ra. x Hotel - 0- 2,500 N A ,'. Residential 33,400 66,800 ' Convention 2,900 6,000 TOTAL DAILY GENERATION 40,608 lbs. PHASE III (lbs./per day) 10,035 7,764 5,500 150,300 6,000 84,150 ]bs 179,599 lbs. Appendix 12A-2 STATISTICAL DATA -, SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SOURCE WASTE GENERATION COMMERCIAL CLASSIFICATION Industrial Buildings Commercial Buildings Institutions Hotels, Etc. Miscellaneous BUILDING TYPES Factories/Warehouses Office Buildings Department Stores Shopping Centers Supermarkets Restaruants Drug Stores Banks Grade Schools High School s Universities Hospitals Nurses or Interns Homes Homes for Aged Rest Homes Hotels r 1st Class Hotel s • Medium Class Motel s Trailer Camps Veterinary Hospital s Industrial Plants Municipalities QUANTITIES OF WASTE PRODUCED Survey must be made/2 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day 1 ib. per 100 sq.ft. per day 4 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day Study of plans or survey required 9 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day 2 lbs. per meal per day 5 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day Study of plans or survey required 10 lbs. per room & 1/4 i b . per pupil per day 8 lbs. per room & 1/4 lb. per pupil per day Survey required 8 lbs. per bed per day 3 lbs. per person per day 3 lbs. per person per day 3 lbs. per person per day 3 lbs. per room & 2 lbs. per meal per day 1 1/2 lbs. per room & 1 ib. per meal per day 2 lbs. per room per day 6 to 10 lbs. per trailer per day Study of plans or survey required RESIDENTIAL WASTE GENERATION Tons generated per household per year three (3) 3.S cubic yards per ton (garbage) 7.4 cubic yards per ton (trash) DIMENSIONS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE SERVICE Cul de Sac "T" shaped turnaround Thoroughfare 37 1/2 Radius 60' x 10' DIMENSIONS OF COUNTY OWNED DUMPSTERS 1 cubic yard rear loader 5'6" long, 2 ft. 4" wide, 3' 9 .1/2 high" 2 cubic yard rear loader 5'6" long, 4 ft. 5" wide, 3' 11 1/2 high" Provided by: Metro -Dade County Department of Solid Waste 7 Ja=ary 3, 1 r I Mr. Tnd Plat: n, Proj —c t rr-criri-er 'i la ems, P115se i l and Johnson, Inc. (D0 North Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2100 7 1 on da 33132 ne : Oval-town/Park West DT.I Study Dear Platon: 'FJ rw:C 1-1C9.:(S 111 N.W. 1:3; W - C-.05)37'-193,7 Thank you for your interest in Dade County's solid waste disposal syatPil. County -wide our system is capable of handling over 36,000 tons of waste per week. This is accomplished with a coordinated system of transfer stations and disposal sites. There are no existing or anticipated future disposal sites within the downtown area. This area is served by the Central Transfer Station. Future growth in this area can be handled by: 1) expansion of the existing transfer station; 2) building a new transfer station at another location; 3) re -defining the present service area. Alternatives 1 and 2 would require land commitments by the City of Miami. which have not been obtainable in the past. In any event, as the area's growth rate necessitates it, disposal service will be available via transfer station(s) of adequate capacity to serve the area. Regarding he disposal of hazardous waste, the Cou ty's Solid Waste Disposal Division does not generate or accept toxic waste. Small amounts may, however, be inadvertently mixed with the waste seam t on occassion. To minimize any problems that could result from unauthorized deliveries, we have instituted a Waste Enforcement Officer OWED) Program. We employ seven full. time W 0's who are trained to spot and properly segregate such material. This program: has resulted in the practical elimination of such • incidents. Should an incident arise however, the removal of the material would be handled by a licensed private contractor who is under contract with Metro -Dade County to provide 24-lour, an -call., testing, segregation, transportation and disposal services for toxic and/or hazardous wastes. Appendix 12R-3 Equal Clpportunity/Handlcap Employer/Services .i ainy1,-.7-7 5, 1987 . agam �'�"... Ted i la Wcn I hope ycu have found this information helpful, please do not hesitat: to contact this office if ycu have any ftsther inquiries. J R/Jam-/ cnxr Sincerely, Joseph A. Rui : , Jr. Assistant Director, FWD for Solid Waste Disposal 12A,3 HIALEAH AND JOHN E. PRESTON WATER TREATMENT PLANTS EXPANSION PROGRAM A Present Capacity - 190 mgd Hialeah - 60 rngd Preston - 130 mgd (filter media under constrvc t icr1) 8 Preston Uproting (1 985) - 225 mgd Hialeah - 60 mgd Preston - 165 mgd Raw Water - 225 mgd Softeners - 165 mgd Filters - 176 mgd Air Stripping - 225 mgd (both plants) Reservoir 52.9 mg (available both plants) High Pressure Service 320.3 mgd (both plarrrer C Hialeah Upra t ing (1998) 245 mgd Hialeah - 80 mgd Preston - 165 mgd ALEXANDER ORR WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION PROGRAM A Present Capacity - 160 mgd Raw Water - 200 mgd Softeners - 200 mgd Filters 160 MG (media change under construction) Reservoirs 40 mg (20 mg additional under construction) High Pressure Service - 350 mgd 3 Fourth Addition (1988) - 220 mgd Raw Water - 220 rngd Softeners - 230 mgd (2 softeners required) Filters - 256 mg Reservoir - 40 mg (20 mg reservoir required 1 990) High Pressure Service - 350 mgd C Fifth Addition (1995) - 256 mgd Raw Water - 280 rngd (Wee[t•Wellfirltt required) Softeners - 290 mgd (2 softeners required)' Filters - 256 mg Reservoir - 60 mg (20 mg reservoir required 1 997) High Pressure Servic-e - 350 mgd I! iixTlr Arklillem (?OO?) . 7130 inrltl I ltrw water - 1E10 I ntp I Softeners - 280 mc+1 Filters -352 mgd (filters required) Reservoir - 80 mg Eiitjh E ressurr Servirr . 150 ,nrltt Appendb:12A-4 2e0 260 240 220 y 200 Q cc LJ 160 N y� 160 �4 LS 0 O 140 �.t J 120 tan 60 60 40 MIAMI- DADE WATER and SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT penundShitted 1 Drr Pions 245 Propound P401 wt.] PI unified Cfaa;ity 216 2 0 Ar c>4 s r � ,_Pnck_1)4v w1t,11.er Dam nth 180 * 46 5 AvOnna E)ay Nabs' DaiaonC. me.. 1 1._.....................7 10- w rage; Wel Pei mitipd thpo ity NOTE *Pending Approval 1978 7T 76 79 e0 81 82 83 84 65 8e 87 68 09 80 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 20 01 02 03 04 03 YEAR HIALEAH / JOHN E. PRESTON WATER TREATMENT PLANTS WATER DEMAND AND WELL PERMITTED CAPACITY June 1965 MIAMI -DADE WATER and SE 'ER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT 5$0 540 500 460 >- 420 M I Li. ION GALLON 5 340 300 280 220 180 I40 100 ■■111111111111111111111■■1111111111■111111111 ■ 11.11111111111111111111 ■■■��■■� ..::1111111111111111111111111111 pc al, we MINISPREMBEII .a iAII1i° Prc as : d, �■■1.xr..w....w..«...■■11111111111 �1� III ■■ P=ok go Wal.r D-ma MINIM ■■■■ : enna ■am■ 1111111111111 . si/■ ■■■■'■■ flIII____■■11111111111 1=111111111111111111111111 aiiIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIIIMNOTE 11111111MILIN nie Wen rmilled 0"CIt ■■ ■ ■■■111111■■ ■■1.11111■ IIMOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIIMIIIIIIIIIITIIIIIMI 1111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111 Wm IIIM ■■■111111111111111111111■■■•1111111■ d 1978 77 78 T9 80 81 82 83 04 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 20 01 02 03 04 05 YEAR METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY WATER DEMAND AND WELL PERMITTED CAPACITY June 1965 MIAMI - DADE WATER and S. ,VER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT MILLION GALLONS PER DAY 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 eo 60 40 2a• '� LEGEND and111!!! ted Cop .c1Softeners 1•�1� .�`\1�% ChemicalBId�•III Add i10hFr prill 11."4a`�,"," Softeners ■�r�11�R�� 11111111 � andt_1111111111 {1), Reservoir �M�11i111 Filters III,111 „klir ■-Niaiiam. sin.■lj !iII° NOTE * Includes Stand-by Plants 1*7. 77 7i 71 .0 es ea 63 e4 e9 ea Sr se e9 90 91 92 95 94 95 96 97 96 99 20 01 02 03 04 05 YEAR ALEXANDER ORR JR. WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER DEMAND AND PLANT RATED CAPACITY Jun. 1965 280 260 240 220 Q z 00 MILLION GALLONS Ie0 160 140 1 20 100 60 60 40 MIAMI DADE WATER and SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT Derr nod ShLOId 10 Orr Floes Plant Haled Cataeiry 19 0_, 170 Peo\ Day Weser Dem nd 120 LEGEND Re -role Preston Re -role Hialeah 1976 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 05 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ZO 01 02 03 04 05 YEAR HIALEAH / JOHN E. PRESTON WATER TREATMENT PLANTS WATER DEMAND AND PLANT RATED CAPACITY Jun. 1985 GALLONS PER DAY z 0 Sao 543 500 460 420 380 540 500 260 220 180 140 100 MIAMI—DADE WATER and SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT =111111111111,11ME , 11110111111.111111111 F 1 . Plant Rai npn.iiy NMI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIBTVIIIIIIIK III _ ■I1111111 rill1111111/ IL- P(Y1y Mter Derr and LEGEND 1 Re -rain Freston 1111l 11111. � OrrBuilSofieners and Chemical `-✓ �� Orr Softdingeners Re •rate Hialeah ' ✓ III 11 111, [Hialeah/Preston Demand ;/ $hilted to Orr 6 Orr Fillers 1976 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 95 94 95 90 97 9e se 2a al 04 03 04 03 YEAR METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY WATER DEMAND AND PLANT RATED CAPACITY June 1985 MIAMI--DADE WATER and SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT MILLION GALLONS PER DAY 2L 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 1110 $0 40 �—►� I ' ADDITIONS III, cnonsi_._ . . South Miomi Haight3 > Florida Wafer t Utilities Rex Utility ++ ►++ + tL.R . + T A r. s age ay mg III.ram III .1 --�.,.... IIIIIIW ■ A - 1+. F+ i l t 1 •�� .' 187 ,,,� i.P. D. pil wppr- riiiim A ea Populatio rA A 1:. 'riff ent) � M11 111111111111r ___..l , ..� _......" .1 _Elpilip....„..iimumo Pop la11 n S rve by %.A.E. 1111.11111111111111111111111111 11176 77 76 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 90 99 20 01 02 03 04 05 Y Rt A ALEXANDER ORR JR. WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER DEMAND AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS June 1905 28 24 22 20 16 14 10 8 6 4 POPULATION X 100,000 I+IILLUON GILLLO►tS PER DAY 240 240 220 ZOO 11<0 140 140 120 100 i0 •0 40 M IAMI - DADE WATER and EWER AUTHORITY DE M1 .)Opo I i�) ADDITIONS .�-- Sunny Broword Service Norwood Wee Lacka Water , - Poet ()icy Woler Domnnd I .z ); mitiracir ON ../ i • voriioo ►Zav Iliafo1 ` Derr and. r 187 G.P.C.p. i % Ars Pc pulalion ,..1.---�-�'� iDad Co.in1011051ling Jep monil • Popu1at on $orvc d 8 14,A.S A.D. � t . 1 ► 1976 77 78 79 80 81 82 43 84 85 86 87 Be 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 20 01 02 03 04 0] YEAR HIALEAH / JOHN E. PRESTON WATER TREATMENT PLANTS WATER DEMAND AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS Jun c 1985 2b 24 22 20 8 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 POPuLATIOh x 100,000 ROUTE NO. Appendix 12A-5 OVERTOWN DRI WATER AND SEWER CONSUMPTION TABLE WATER CONSUMPTION (100 C.F.) SEWER CONSUMPTION Quarterly Monthly Average Monthly Average 02 4806 02 455B 02 5080 1225.3 980.25 02 5161 03 4022 03 2911 03 4170 910.3 728.25 03 3462 05 4240 05 4790 05 4034 1116.6 893.3 05 4802 479 969 479 379 479- 315 135.5 108 .4 479 505 • 480 1242 480 1341 480 1234 304.3 243.45 480 1052 481 4063 481 3798 481 4593 1020.38 816.3 481 3872 482 2243 432 2615 482 2597 592.75 474.2 482 2029 483 4244 483 4499 483 4468 1087.7 870.15 483 4192 484 5486 484 4123 484 4972 1560.7 1248.5 484 4147 Appendix 12A-5 ROUTE N0. Page 2 WATER CONSUMPTION (10O C.F.) SEWER CONSUMPTION Quarterly Monthly Average Monthly Average 485 2663 485 2951 435 3539 1015.8 - 812.6 485 3036 489 9828 489 7054 489 6620 2515.8 2012.67 489 6688 806 23502 806 17429 806 20259 806 22177 806 22218 806 73403 21286 22760 21569 20140 21487 20814 TOTAL AVG. MONTHLY CONSUMPTION (100 C.F.) TOTAL AVG. DAILY CONSUMPTION 25587 20369.6 37072.13 29657.67 .9 244 .7 4 INFORMATION OBTAINED: July, 1986 from Miami -Dade Water Sewer Authority Department Meter Route Books WATER CONSUMPTION BASED ON GROWTH SCENARIOS PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III LAND USE GPD GPD GPD Office 16,600 37,100 100,350 A Retail/Service 6,620 10,350 19,410 cn Hotel -0- 120,000 180,000 Residential 400,000 800,000 1,800,000 Convention 14,500 30,000 30,000 TOTAL 437,720 977,450 2,169,760 SEWER CONSUMPTION BASED ON GROWTH SCENARIOS PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III LAND USE GPD GPD GPD Office 13,280 29,680 80,280 NI p Retail/Service 5,296 8,280 15,528 vl Hotel ,O- 80,000 176,000 Residential 320,000 640,000 1,440,000 Convention 11,600 24,000 24,000 TOTAL 350,176 781 ,960 1 ,735,808 Appendix 12A-6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR S.E. OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT AREA DRI CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT: LAND USE PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III Office 166,000 sq.ft. 371,000 sq.ft. 1,000,500 sq.ft. Retail/Service 66,200 sq.ft. 103,500 sq.ft. 194,100 sq.ft. Hotel 500 Rooms 1 ,100 Rooms Residential 2,000 D.U.S. 4,000 D.U.S. 9,000 D.U.S. Convention 290,000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. Appendix 12A-6 Appendix 12A-6 AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS FOR CONNECTIONS TO. SEWERAGE TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT RESIDENTIAL Single Family . Townhouse . Apartment . Mobile Home . . Duplex or Twin Home . COMMERCIAL Barber Shop Beauty Salon or Hair Boutique . Bowling Alleys (Toilet Wastes Only) . Dentist Offices a) per dentist . . b) per wet Chair . Doctor Offices (per doctor) . . • , Full Service Restaurant (350 GPDMin.). • , Bar and Cocktail Louge . Fast Food Restaurant (350 GPO Min.) • . Take,Out Restaurant (350 GPD Min.) . Hotels and Motels . . . Laundries, self-service . . Office Building . . . Service Stations . . . Shopping Centers • Stadiums, Race Tracks, • Ball • Parks . . Stores, without Food Service , Theaters a) Indoor, Auditoriums. . b) Outdoor, Orivetins . . Camper or Trailer Parks . . INDUSTRIAL Factories (exclusive of industrial wastes) without showers with showers Airports . Churches Hospitals Nursing, Rest Homes . Parks, Public Picnic a) with toilets only . b) with bathouse, showers and toilets Public Institutions other than hospitals (Jail, Boarding School, etc.) School Swimming and bathing facilities, public Warehouse/Industrial-Speculation Bldg. Storage Warehouse or Mini -Warehouse AND WATER SYSTEMS GALLONS PER DAY (GPO) 350 (GPD/Unit) 250 200 300 250 11 . 10/100 (GAD/S.F.) • 200 (GPD/Chair) • 100 (GPO/Lane) • 250 (GPD/Dr.) and 200 (GPO/Chair) • 250 (GPO/Dr.) • 50 (GPO/Seat) • 15 (GPD/Seat) . 35 (GPD/Seat) . 50/100 (GPD/S.F.) . 200 (GPO/Room) . 400 (GPD/Washer) . 10/100 (GPO/S.F.) . 10/100 (GPO/S.F.) , 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) 3 (GPO/Seat) . 10/100 (GPD/Seat) • 3 (GPO/Seat) • 5 (GPO/Space) • 150 (GPD/Space) • 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) . 20/100 (GPD/S.F.) 5 (GPD/Passenger) and 10 (GPD/Employee) 3 (GPD/Seat) . 250 (GPD/Bed) 150 (GAD/Bed) 5 (GPO/Person) 10 (GAD/Person) • 100 (GPO/Person) . 10 (GPO/Person) . 10 (GPD/Person) . 5/100 (GPO/S.F.) .10/1000 (GPD/S.F.) Provided by: Metro. -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management WATER CONSUMPTION BASED ON GROWTH SCENARIOS PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III LAND USE GPD GPD GPD OMNI Office 100,000 < < 170,000 280,000 Retail/Service 5,000 10,000 20,000 Hotel -0- 120,000 180,000 Residential 100,000 160,000 240,000 Convention 12,500 12,500 12,500 Wholesale/Industrial 50,000 50,000 100,000 CBD: Office 310,000 450,000 580,000 NS Government Office 15,000 40,000 60,000 al Retail/Service 65,000 90,000 115,000 Hotel 180,000 230,000 300,000 Residential 300,000 460,000 664,000 Convention 12,500 12,500 25,000 Wholesale/Industrial 2,500 2,500 5,000 Attractions/Recreation 10,200 15,000 30,000 BRICKELL: Office 300,000 450,000 580,000 Retail/Service 35,000 45,000 60,000 Hotel 70,000 70,000 170,000 Residential 410,000 700,000 1,000,000 TOTAL 2,142,700 3,477 ,500 4,481 ,500 SEWER CONSUMPTION BASED ON GROWTH SCENARIOS PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III LAND USE GPD GPD GPD OMNI Office 80,000 " 136,000 244,000 Retail/Service 4,000 8,000 16,000 Hotel T0s 96,000 144,000 Residential 80,000 128,000 192,000 Convention 10,000 10,000 10,000 Wholesale/Industrial 40,000 40,000 80,000 CBD: Office 248,000 360,000 464,000 Na n Government Office 12,000 32,000 48,000 rn Retail/Service 52,000 72,000 92,000 Hotel 144,000 184,000 240,000 Residential 240,000 368,000 531,200 Convention 10,000 10,000 20,000 Whnl esal e/ Iadustri al 2,000 2,000 4,000 Attractions/Recreation 8,160 12,000 24,000 BRICKELL: Office 240,000 360,000 464,000 Retail/Service 28,000 36,000 48,000 Hotel 56,000 56,000 136,000 Residential 328,000 560,000 800,000 TOTAL 1,714,160 2,782,000 3,585,200 Appendix 12A-7 PROPOSED FACILITIES UNUSED CAPACITY WATER MONITORING FORM APPLICANT'S NAME: APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED USE: TOTAL GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREA: TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT DEVELOPMENT UNITS AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS TOTAL QUANTITY FOR PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS FOR CONNECTIONS TO WATER SYSTEMS TYPE OF ESTABLISHEMENT Full Service Restaurant (350 GPO Min.) Hotels and Motel s Office Building Stores, without Food Service Factories (exclusive of industrial wastes) QUANTITY GALLONS PER DAY (GPD) 50 (GPO/Seat) 200 (GPO/Room) 10/100 (GPO/S.F. ) 10/100 (GPO/Seat) 10/100 (GPO/S.F.) Appendix 12A-7 PROPOSED FACILITIES UNUSED WASTEWATER CAPACITY MONITORING FORM APPLICANT'S NAME: APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED USE: TOTAL GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREA: TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT DEVELOPMENT UNITS AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS TOTAL QUANTITY FOR PROJECT - - QUANTITY AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS FOR CONNECTIONS TO SEWERAGE SYSTEMS TYPE OF ESTABLISHEMENT Full Service Restaurant (350 GPD Min.) Hotels and Motel s Office Building Stores, without Food Service Factories (exclusive of industrial wastes) GALLONS PER DAY (GPO) 50 (GPD/Seat) 200 (GPD/Room) 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) 10/100 (GPD/Seat) 10/100 (GPO/S.F.) Appendix 12A-7 PROPOSED FACILITIES UNUSED SOLID WASTE CAPACITY MONITORING FORM APPLICANT'S NAME: APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED USE: TOTAL GROSS BUILDING CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION Industrial Buildings Commerical Buildings Hotels, Etc. Others FLOOR AREA: DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITIES OF WASTE PRODUCED QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY FOR PROJECT SOLID WASTE GENERATION COMMERCIAL BUILDING TYPES Factories/Warehouse Office Buildings Department Stores Restaurants Drug Stores Banks Hotels - 1st Class Hotels - Medium Class Motel s QUANTITIES OF WASTE PRODUCED Supplied by Applicant 1 ib. per 100 sq.ft. per day 4 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day 2 lbs. per meal per day 5 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day Supplied by Applicant 3 lbs. per room & 2l bs . per meal per day 1 1/2 lbs. per room & 1 lb. per meal per day 2 lbs. per room per day Supplied by Applicant LIST OF POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS .TE GENERATORS BY SIC CODE* SIC Masts Types Description Code OI1S-01I1t AGRICULTURE: 0I1S AIC Corn 0111 AIC Cotton 0112 AIC Tobacco 0111 AIC Sugar Crops 0161 AIC vegetable and Melon Termer. 411E AIC tarry Crops 0114 AIC Citrus Fruit Grover! 0111 AIC Ornamental floriculture & Nursery Products OM AIC General Faroe, pry■srily Crop 0211 AIC Reef Cattle Feedlots 0111 AIC Teel Cattle, except Feedlots (e.g.. Ranches3 0214 AIC Sheep and Coat Forms 0211 AIC Central Livestock 0111 AICT Soil Preparation Service. 0121 AICT Crop Planting. Cultivation, and Protection 0122 LINT Crop N ing, tristarlly by Machine 0124 T Cotton Ginning 0129 AT General Crop Service. 0751 A Livestock Services, except Services for Animal Specialities 0112 A Lawn and Carden Services 0711 AT Ornamental Shrub and Tree Services 0111-0R5I: FORESTRY 0111 AIC Timber Tract. 0821 AIC Forest Nurseries 1. Tree Seed Cathering 4 Extracting 01S1 AICT Foreetry Services 1611-1713: CONSTRUCTION 1611 LFWIT Highway and Street Construction 1622 MKT Bridge, Tunnel, and Elevated Highway Construction 1711 PT Plumbing, Heating (except Electric) and Air Conditioning 1711 JKLT Painting, tapir Hanging, and Decorating, heavy Construction, SIC 1141 LT Terratlo, Tile, Marble, end Mosaic Wore 1152 JKLT Floor Laying and Other Floorwork, NEC *Lech indw.try hes ►.ei identified as a Potential E}enerator of h.esrdoue vas •e tie hails thee she industry may si4.rll1e eOFraaive. reaeties ieniteble, do and text; wastes. for enamel., SIC god. 0711, Soil Ftepsr,stlon Services, Is a potential generator of toxic pesticide wastes. Each SIC code listed in fettle 1 has previously been documented in the literature as a kotential generator of katardous usage. NEC • Not elsewhere classiflyd SIC Code Waste Types Description 1161 LT Roofing and Short Metal Work 129) LI Class and Clat,ng Work t1194 LPWY Excavating and Foundal,nn Work 1799 JKLI'WY Special Trade Contractors 1012 2091 2111 IN 2251 LH 2252 in 2251 L'I 7'.S4 LH 2252 LH 2?SB in 2259 LH 2161 in 2262 LH. 2269 LI 2221 LH 2212 LH 2219 in 2434 JKLT 3435 JKLT 24)6 JKL1 245E JKLT 245E JKLT 7491 H 2492 LTY 2511 JKL4T 2514 HLOPQ 2517 JKL4T 2519 JKLIT 2521 JKLMT 2522 HLMOP 2541 JKLHT 2541 HLIIOPQ 2611 LHPTY 2621 LHPTY 26)1 LHPTY 2641 ILP 244E ILP 2645 11.0 2646 ILP 2649 ILP 2651 ILP 26 ILP 2651 1LP 203'-3999• hA4urACTUA1HC l.D1IsrAltS Canned Specialties Canned and Cured Fish and 'Seafood.' Broad cloven Fabric hilts, Wool Women* Full Length and Knre slo•tery Hosier.. except Women's FuII Length 1. Knee lrnrtt• Knit Outerwear Mill, Knit Underwear Hills Circular Knit Fabric Ht11t Wasp Knit Fabric Hills Knitting Hills. RIC Finishers of broad Worn fabric, of Cotton, Finisher. of Broad Wove. Fabric, of Fiber end Silk Finishers of Broad Woven tabitcs, hel-Hale F,her and Silk Woven Carpets and Rue. Tuned Carpets and Aug' Carpets and Rugs, REC Wood Kitchen Cabinets Hardwood Veneer end Ply.nod 5pilviVY1 Veneer and Plywood liobilE Homes Prefabricated Wood Buildings and Canpunelts Wood Preserving Particleboard Wood household Furniture, rarept Upholstered Metal Household Furniture Wood TV and Radio Cabinets Household Furniture, MC Wood Office Furniture Metal Office Furniture Wood Partitions and Nature. Metal Partitions end Future. Pulp Hills taper `fill,, Except Building Paper Hills Paperboard Mills Paper Coating and Glaring D lie, Laeept Testile Baer ble-Cut ►►pe,' and Paperboard and Ca1J0u.17 Pressed and 'Snide.' Pulp Cnoda Converted Paper and Paperboard Pr.,Jwrts, H1• Folding Paperboard $oars Set-up Paperboard Buses Corrugated and Solid Ftt.rr !mars HEC - Hot clsruhrie classifled SIC Code Vast, Types Deectiption SIC Codr Waste Trprs llrstriptinn jF.S4 ILPY Sanitary Food Containers 3111 L 6nois 4 Shne Cut St..tk 4 I.nd,nr, IiSS WV Fiber Cana. Tubes. nrums, and Similar Products 1161 L Leathet Clore, 1 Mim cos /661 IJWPTY building Paper and Building IIoard Hills )ii4 L Wum•n't Funtvrar, ear -pi A1t.lrtt; 2211 NILUPQ N,sespapers: Publishing and Printing 1161 L 1.uttgAfce 2121 NILUPQ Periodicals. Publishing 1 Printing 1111 L Wnmrn's Itandhars 4 P.,rar, 11)1 MILOPQ gooks: Publishing and Printing )11: L Personal I.eaihrr Cuot% I7)7 NILUPQ Book Printing 1199 L draftier Lands, MIi 2151 NILUPQ Commercial Printing, Letterpress and Screen 3111 FT Fla; Class 271/ N1LOPQ Commercial Printing, Lithographic 3251 J1L brick and Struct•,ral CIA, 141. Ili] HILOPQ Engraving and Plate Printing 12S3 AL Ceramic Wall and Flo,: i.I.• 1134 HILOPQ Commercial Printing, Gravure 1261 1)L vitreous Chin. Plunhelr Ftatu,e, ant 6„•,i 1281 MILOPQ Manifold Business Forms Acres•ortes )1/1 H)LOPQ Greeting Card Publishing 3241 J1L 'Witten., Chins Tabl- an.1 atici,.n eeriest.. 2181 NILUPQ Ilankboo's, Lop/deaf Binders. and Devisee 3261 JAL Fine Earthrnvarr i.rhitrvarel lent• b rite+>•, 2184 $1LOPQ Bookbinding and Related Work Articles 214) 111LOPQ Typesetting 2264 JI:L Porcelain Electrical ,S.eppltes 1611 1 Alkalies and Chlorine 2:44 J1;L Pottery Products, H1i 2616 FOPY Inorganic Pigments 1241 T Abrasive ProJ.irts 2614 IOPQRSY Industrial inorganic Chemicals. MEC 1.91 LT Caskets, Parkins And Staling Dr•.:., 21121 WI/ Plastics. Haterisls, Synthetic Resins, and 1112 Y blase Furnaces, SIC.' u.,rs,. ens R,Ilins hill, Nan-vulcaniteble Elastomers )11) Y flecIrq rcallurrrra) Pinduri, 2821 1.01T1 Synthetic /lubber 311S Y Steel titer Drawing and St.-1 Halt, and .pt1r, 181) INTT Cellulosic Han -Made fibers 3114 Y Cold Rolled Steel Sheri, Strap, an.I bark 1824 LMTY Synthetic Organic Fibers. except Cellulosic 3111 Y Steel Prpr and Tube% 2631 biological Products 101 Y sass lion Foundtses 2811 Medicine's and Botanicals 11:: Y Mallraiile Iron Ifo.nlrars 28)4 LP Pharmaceutical Preparations 1125 Y Steel roundrie*. NEC 2841 /LIM Soap and Other Detergents, except Speciality 111/ Y Prim,ry Sm-llinp .o't H.1tn,ng of Leal Cleaners 31)) Y Priinapr Smrli inH and Rrf.na'y o1 :a',: 2641 ALMPTY Specialty Cleaners, Polishes. and Sanitation )1): Y Primary Production „l ►lee*,n.0, Preparations 3114 Y Primary Smelling And A.•)ininy. nt 'w•1-ie •, 184) IL11T7 Sumacs Active Agents, finishing Agents., Metals, KC Sulfonattd Oils, and Assiatintl )141 Y 5eennd,,, Smelting. And fiettninq. nt H,e..fii.. 2844 ' FLTY Perfumes, Cosmetics. and Other Toilet Preparations halals 2611 /GIMPY Paint and Allied Products 3151 IILMi1PQY Rolling, Qravini saki Eatrodanl at Capper 2861 0097 Cum and wood Chemical. )35) HL1OPf1Y Aluminum Sheet, Hair and Foil /ASS Y Cyclic (Coe) Tar) Crudes, and Cyclic Intermediates, ))54 )ILe1OPQY Aluminum Eatr.aded Products Dyes, and Organic Pigments (Lakes and Tonere) )35S IIIMOPQY Alu.,in.am Rolling and C...int, Hit 2869 L11!TY lndu ' I Organic Chemicals. MEC )354 IiL101'QY Rolling. Drawing And E.trvd.nr of 4o.it-tree.., 251) nitrogenous fertilisers Metal. LAtept Copper an. Al.,m1.1,w. 1—" 2814 A1CLNY Pesticide end Agriculture) Chemicals, MEC 3351 FIL`1(IPQY €)raving end Insulating of Honterr,,,.ti Wert > 184) Adhesives and Stalants ))4i Y Alur.inua. Foundries (Castings) t Co 2892 Explosives 3)62 Y 6tass, 61041e, Copper and Copper base All... 284) /GIMP Printing Ink Foundries Fail LPOPTY Cl.smlesl Pe lona Fine Y Honlrrro..,s Fo,rndriel 1Csitingal, r11. Fill Y Petroleum beflning 1148 III.NOPQY 11e1a1 heat 'treating 2151 Y Asphalt Felts and Coatings 1194 111J,p,PQY Primarr Mrial Pt..duci., 41, 2991 Y Lubricating Oils and G 1411 1101i4P11Y Resat C.na 1194 Y Products, of Petroleum and Coa1. NEC 1-I? IIL4IIPPJY Mrt41 Shipping Barrel.. /seems , err• ant teams• 1079 .)LAY Miscellaneous Plastic Products 111rum Helinaah.r.r1 )111 L Leather Tanning and Finishing 14'9 tt1.M.ii't} Cut lei. NEC m Not elsewhere c3aaeilied MEC - ftnt rl,,evhrr. r1A,1tli14 SIC Code West* Types Delicription )41) HLMOPQY Hand and Edge Tools, Except Machine Tools and Mend $ews )41S HL.MOPQT Hand Saws li Saw Blades 1419 HLJ4OPQY Hardware, NEC )411 HLMOPQ Enameled Iron and Metal Sanitary Were )412 HLMOPQY Plumbing Fixture Fittings and Trim (brass Goods) )413 HLMOPQ/ Healing Equipment, except Electric and Harm Air Furnace' 1441 HLMOPQY Fabricated Structural Metal )441 NL$nPQY Metal Doors, Sash, Frames, Moldings, and Trims )44) HIMOPQT Fabricated Plate Work 1444 HLJIOPQY Sheet Metal Work 144E HLHOPQT Architectural and Ornamental Metal Work 1448 HLHOPQY Prefabricated Metal Buildings and Components )444 HIMOPQT Miicellaneous Metal Work )411 HLMOPQY Screv Machine Products )4%1 HLMOPQY Rolls. Nut*, Screws. Rivets. and Washers )461 HL)07 T 1ton and Steel Forting" )461 MLMOPQT ,Automotive Stampings 3461 IILMOPQT Metal StAmpings. NEC 1411 HLK0l Y Electroplating. Polishing, Plating, Anodizing, and Coloring 1419 HLMOPQY Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services, NEC 1482 Small Arms Ammunition )481 Ammunition, except for Small Aral, MEC 1461 Ordnance and Acceasoriea. NEC 1%1l HLMOPQ Steam, Gas, and Hydraulic Turbine' )111 HLMOPQ/ Internal Combustion Engines, NEC 1S1) HLHOPQY Farm Machinary and Equipment )526 HLHOPQY Carden Tractors 1 Lamm 1 Garden Equipment )S)1 11L140P10 Construction Machinery and Equipment 1512 HLJIOPQT Mining Machinery and Equipment, except Oil Field 1S11 NLMOPQT Oil Field Machinery and Equipment 3535 HLJSOPQ Conveyors and Conveying Equipment 15)1 HLHOPQT industrial Trucka, Tractors, Trailers. and Stackers )141 HLHOPQT Machine Tools. Metal Cutting )541 HLJtOPQT Machine Tool'. Metal Forming 1544 HIMOPQY Special Dies end Tools, Die Sets, Jigs and Fixture", and Industrial Holds 1545 ML110YQT Machine Tool Accesaorita 6 Measuring Devices 1546 HL)IDPQY Power Driven Hand Tools )144 HLHOPQT Metal Working Machinery, MEC MI HIJ*OPQT Food Products Machinery 1151 HLMOPQT Ttatile Machinery 1411 HUIOPQT Woodworking Machinery 1554 HLMOPQT Paper Industries Machinery )$55 NuinPQT Printing Trsdea Machinery and Equipment )SS1 HL110PQY Specie: Industry Machinery, NEC 1561 HLMOPQT Puapa and Pumping Equipment 3561 HLMOPQT ball and Roller bearings NEC - Not elsewhere claaeitied SIC Code Waste Types Description 346) 11I210PQ Air ■nd Cat Cnmprrcsn,s 3S6. IH.Y;1PQ 514wrt and 1.ahaust Veniilaison Fans 1561 HL401'Q5 Industrial Pruce.t Furnace t Ovens 3568 Hl.Ytsl'tjY H.•rhaniral Pu•+rr Irantm,taann ER.+,p-•.^! hi 3169 ItlytvPQ3- C.nrfal Industrial 'iachinray and 14..1;,,-•ir, •! 3511 IILHOPQ Electronic Comp.,lrnt Lq,ipmen; 141. HLYt'PQ Calculating 6 Acru•,nt ,n1• Ma. +41r,rt- Electrnnic Eq•,ipm.•nt 1519 }il'ttvPQ Office Machines, Nat )Sd_ HL1t,PQ1" Cceem+rcial Laundry. Dr, Cleaning, ant Pr.,.,,, liarhines 3185 HLM()PQ Air Conditioning and Warm AL' at i sr fq.,i;..e. and Commercial and Industrial A.fiagrratin, Equipment 15116 I(LYi)PQ Measuring and Ditprntin,[ Pur,p, 15d9 iILYOPQ Service Industry Machine*. hi( 1592 lil.4o19Y Carhur•Inrs, Pistons, Piston Pings 4 dal... 1599 LiLYl'PQY Machinery, Eacrpr Elettrr.el, NI( 1m12 it L'iUt'QY Pours, Disrr ihut inn and Sprc ti 1 , 1, '',[Lire,-r • 161 ) IILYOPQ Switchgrar and Su;tchboar t Apparat ,s 1611 111.MOPQ h..tors 6 Cenrral,rrs )622 HLMOPQ Indasl r tat' Con; rule 1613 HLYOPQ Wilding Apparatus, Electric )624 HLMOPQ Carbon 6 Graphite Ptad„cts 1629 111.H(,PQ Electrical Industrial Apparatus, N(C 3631 IILYf1PQ I1nns,•hnld Refrigerators and H.mr all rarm frer:rr. 16)4 HLHf1PQ Electric tlnusr•+arrt and fans 3616 11L1OPQ Sruing PIWiinrs )619 IILYOPQ 1louschnitf'Appltancet, NEC 364 1 IILYCIPQ E l ec t r ic: Lamp s 164) HLHOPQ Current -Carrying U,te Devices 1645 11111DPQ Residential Electric Lighting Fitiur.s 3646 HLYOPQ Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Lighting Fiaturrt )647 HLMOPQ Vehicular Lighting 1gs,p,v.nt 1451 i1L'IDPQ R.t'lin 6 Tele.isinn Recetving Sets 1651 IILMOPQ Phonograph Accords and Pre-recorded `iarn•li: Tap- 1662 11L4DPQ Radio and Television Transmitting. Stpnalin¢_ a•,t Detection Equipment and Apparatus 3614 IILMI)PQ Semiconductors and Rrisird Dryers 16)5 IILHOPQ Electronic Capacitors )5T1 I1Llifl'QY Electronic Coils, Transformers, and Othr, Ind..:arc 3679 DEMON Electronic Components, NEC )641 IIPQtr Storage batteries )691 HPQ Primary batteries, Dry and Val flit Hntat Vrhiclaa and Pistrnyer Car bud s .. )114 HLHOPQY Motor Vehicle Parts an.1 Ali, tiortet 1) 16 11LJiliI Q M„t n r iinmr s 11 2 1 ;H.HOI'Q Aircraft 1124 IiiJinPQY Aircraft Engines and Inein, facia 11215 IILM('I'QY Aircraft ParIt and A.,:iliac I.ri ..,,p.,,...1 tic. NEC • Not rlsrvh,•re Clactafied SIC Code Wavle Types Description SIC Code Usste Type, Deseripe,.in jilt MLMOPQY Ship !Wilding and Rrpairing L511 Y Air Trsnaportalton, Cetiilicaied Cariieri iml moorgY goat Building and Repairing 458? Y Airports and Flr,nx F,.l.st 361€ HLMOPQ Engineering, Scientific, Laboratory and Resesr:h 4583 LTY Airport Teresina€ Servs:et Instrument' 4612 JKLPIY Crude Prsro4r.in Pipe L.nra 3822 MLMOPQ Automatic Controls for Regulating Residential and 4611 JXLPTY Refined Petroleum Pip. lines Commercial Environments and Appliance* 4619 JttLPT Pipe Lines. HFC 3611 HLMOPQ Industrial Instruments for Measuring, Display, and 4911 LT Ielrphone Coma„nir.tinn Grime or 0a1.1t Control of Peocea, Variable*, and Related 4612 LT Radio CroadraatrnK Products 481) LT lrlevision Srssdcasrin, 1324 NLMOPQ Totaliaing Fluid Metsr,.and Counting Device* 4911 Y Elrtttic Seivscet 1613 HLMOPQ Instrument* for Measuring and Testing of 49)1 Y Electrical 1 Other Ser i;es Electricity and Electric Signata 4911 Y Cat 4 0iher Services 3611 HLIIOPQ Measuring and Controlling Devices, NEC 4939 Y Comhin■lion utilities, HFi 3311 mow() Optical Instrument, and Lenses 4952 Y Srvrrage 5rstrms 3841 ll1JIfPQ Surgical and Medical In,trumcnts and Apparatus 4911 Y Rrivae Syitt.,s 3841 8L140PQ Orthopedic, Prosthetic, and Surgical Appliances 4959 *ACT Ssnttscr Servrcai, Kir and Supplies 3641 HLMOPQ Dental Equipment and Supplies 509)-5198• WHOLESAF( TRAM 1651 KLMOPQ Ophthalmic Good* 3641 HLIOPQ Photographic Equipment and Supplies 509) Y Scrip 4 Waste H*Lrrc,ls, Ur.alrta1r 1813 HLMOPQ Watches, Clock*, etc. 5161 LPTY Cn.em,cils and Allied Pr..J..ct, 1.10,1esalr 3911 HLIIOPQT Jewelry, Precious Met*t 5191 A Firm Supplies 191E NLMOPQT Silverware, Plated Ware, and Stainless Steel Ware 5198 JKLT Prints, Varnishes, and Supplies 31i5 HJLMOPQ Jeweler`, Findings J. Malarial, 1 Lapidary Work 3961 NJKLMOPQ Costume Jewelry and Costume Novelties, except 5231-5984 arlA1L T.,k11 Precious Metal 1964 HJKUiOPQ Needles, Pins, Hooks and Eyes, and Similar 1231 JILT Paint, Class, enJ t+sllpsp-r St,rri Notions 4251 AJKT lisrd.vare Storrs, )993 NIJRLMOPQ Signs and Advertising Displays $'11 JKLP ...Hvbile Huue Dcalrrs 3995 HJXCI.MOPQ burial Carkets 5)11 AIJKI 'Department Storrs 3999 HJKLMOPQTY Manufacturing Industrie* 5199 AIJET miscellaneous Cener,l Merrhsndite St.,lei 4011-4959: TRANSPORTATION AHD PUSLIC UTILITIES 5511 LPUY mJtor Vehicle Otslers 4Hry 4 Lsr'Jr 5521 LPLIt Motor Vehicle Dealers Flied (url 4011 JItLTT Railroads, Line -Haul Operating 5511 LPW Auto t Home Supply Stares 4111 LPWY Local and Suburban Transit 55»1 LPWY Casolinr Service Stations, Retail 4013 JRLTY Switching 3 Terminal Establishments 5551 LPUY Coat Ocalcrs 4119 LW( Local Passenger Transportation, NEC 5511 LPUY Motorcycle Dealers 4121 LPUY TaaiCaba 5599 LPUY Automotive Drairrr. HEC 4111 LPWT Intercity and Rural Highway Passenger 5121 Houtehald Appliance Score., Reia.[ Transportation 5962 LT Auto.setic ritrehenitsini `tachinr Cip•ratars 4151 LP'.1Y School guars 1981 Y furl 1 ice Dr,lrrs 4112 Y Maintenance 1 Service Faculties for Motor Vehicle 5Q81 Y Fuel 0i1 Dealer. Paa*en1cr Tran*portation 5984 Y Liquefied Prat/Arun Cat Dealers 4211 JRLIVY Local Trucking without Storage. 7115-6081 SERV10E5 IHDUSTRI(S 41t3 JRLPttY Trucking, t.c.pt Local 4114 JRLPVY Laeal Trucking with Storage 111S LH Coin Operated Laund,ies 444 Of, ci,..,,nr 4131 JRPTY Trucking Terminal Facilities )214 LH Dry Cleaning Pl.nci, Facepi K. Cle.n.np 4)11 JKLPWT U.S. Postal Service tVehicle ltsintrmmncr only) 1111 LH C.rpet and Uph.+l.tr,r 4411 T Deep Sea Foreign Transportation 1218 LH lnduetrsal Launderers 4461 Marine Cargo Handling 12h1 LT Fune..1 S.ry IC . an.t I,..s..t vies 4469 JXLT'. Water Transportation Services, NEC 1112 IJKI.T Outdoor Advert stint !., r.... s NEC m Mot elrewhere classified NI.t: - Hut rlsrws.rrr clAsiii,r.f SIC Waste Type' Description Code ?lit 1JK Advertising, NEC 111l IJX Direct Nail Advertising Services 1112 LOT lliueprint and Photocopying Services MI LOT Commercial Photography Art, and Graphic* 2141 ACH Disinfecting and Extermination Services 1249 PAT Cleaning and Maintenance Services to Dwellings and Other Ruildingl, NEC 1191 LPT R h and Development Laboratories 1)91 OPQRST Photofinishing Laboratories 1391 LPT Commercial Testing Laboratories 1)99 Fire Extinguisher Charging Services 1512 LIW'l Passenger CraRental and Leasing. without Drivers 741) LPWT Truck Rental and Leasing, without drivers 15I1 LPN Utility Trailer and Recreational Vehicle Rental 1S)I LPN Top and Rod, Repair Shops, Automotive 1114 LPN Tire Retreading and Repeic Shops, Automotive 151S LPSI Paint Shops, Automotive 1518 L1'►iy Central Automotive tleptis Shops 1S)9 LPW/ Automotive Repair Shops, NEC )622 LPT Radio 1 Television Repair Shops 7613 LPT Refrigeration L Air Conditioning Service 1 Repair Shope 7629 LPT Electrical 1 Electronic Repair Shops, NEC 7611 LT Watch. Clock, and Jewelry Repair 1641 JILT Reupholster, and Furniture Repair 1692 LPN Welding Repair 1644 LT Armature Rewinding Shops 7699 LT Repair Shope and Related Services, NEC (including Taxidermists) 1JI1 LOT Services Allied to Motion Picture Production 1411 JAL? Theatrical Producers (except Motion Pictures) and Miscellaneous Theatrical Services 1412 ARC Public Golf Courses 1t41 LPT Coin -Operated Amusement Device* 7446 JKLPT Amusement Parks 1949 AJX Amusement and Recreation Servicer, NEC 8062 LPT Cenerai Medical and Surgical Hospitals 8069 LPT Specialty Hospitals, except Psychiatric 8011 LPT Medical Laboratories 107) LPT Dental Laboratories 8081 LPT Outpatient Care facilities $I11-81)1: EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 8211 JKLPT Elementary and Secondary Schools I111 JRL►T Calleses. Unlveral•Ies, Proteetionel tehool►. and Junior Colleges 8241 JXLPTT vocational Schools, cacept Vocational High Schools, NEC 11791 OUT Schools and Educational Services, NEC 8111 JRLT Job Training and Vocational Rehabilitation Services NEC a Not elsewhere classified SIC Code Waste Types Dr*rriprion 8411-8999' MISCELLANEOUS 8411 JKLPT 8uaeuaa end Art Cslleries 8421 ADC Arboreta, Botanical and Zoological Cssirn♦ 8921 LPT Honconroercrei Educational, Scientific, ant Arseetch Ortanrratrnas 8999 IX Services, NEC NEC 0 Not elsewhere classified I2A-8 CODE FOR WASTE TYPES CC .NONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SIC INDUSTRY A Waste pesticides B Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides C Empty pesticide contain4fs O Spent toxaphene solutions or sludges from dipping Iw Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than toxaphene from dipping F Dust containing heavy metals Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals H Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals I Waste ink J Ignitable paint wastes containing flammable solvents (flash Point less than I40'7) K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, mercury or lead), L Spent solvents i Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents N Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations O Cyanide wastes P Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes Q Spent plating wastes R Waste ammonia S Photographic wastes T Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 140.F) i3 Wastewater sludges containing pentachlorophenol, creosote, or arsenic ✓ waste formaldehyde W Lead -acid batteries X Waste explosives Waste oil Z Other METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA METTIO.OAOE Appendix 12A-9 4 .0. METRO.DADECENNTER PUBUC WORKS DEPA4111ENi SUTE 1610 tit N.W.1slSTREET M1A1.41, FLORIDA M12$.1970 375-3997 August 28, 1986 Mr. Ted Platon, Project Engineer Williams, Russell and Johnson, Inc. 100 North Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Platon: This is in response to your question regarding hazardous waste. Dade County's Solid Waste Disposal Division does riot generate or accept toxic waste, however, small amounts of toxic waste may be inadvertently mixed with the waste stream upon occassion. To minimize any problems that could result from unauthorized deliveries, we have instituted a Waste Enforcement Officer (WEO) Program. We employ seven full time WEO's who are trained to spot and properly segregate such material. This program has resulted in the practical elimination of such incidents. Should an incident arise, however, the removal of the material would be handled by a licensed private contractor who is under contract with Metro -Dade County to provide 24-hour, on -call, testing, segregation, transportation and disposal services for toxic and/or hazardous wastes. I hope this information is helpful to you. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any further inquiries. JA8/JMM/db Sincerely, �Jfd r;5111 A. fix, Jr. Assistant Director for Solid Waste Disposal 12A-9 Equal Opportunity/Handicap Einployra5rrrlcre 4fe$hk,,, 426 QUESTION 12B: HEALTH CARE, POLICE, AND FIRE FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE PUBLIC FACILITIES/SERVICES, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Health Care 1) IDENTIFY THE UNUSED SERVICE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA DURING EACH PLAN PHASE. ALSO, SPECIFY THE SERVICE LIMIT THRESHOLDS (E.G., MAXIMUM RESPONSE TIME) FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project is located within Sub -district 3 of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services' (HRS) District XI. It is now and will continue to be served by the following facilities that are within one mile of the Redevelopment Project Area: 1. Jackson Memorial Hospital 1611 N.W. 12th Avenue 1,250 beds 2. Cedars Medical Center - 1400 N.W. 12th Avenue 700 beds 3. Victoria Hospital 955 N.W. 3rd Street 300 beds 4. Veterans Administration Hospital 1201 N.W. 16th Street 708 beds Other facilities located within Sub -district Christian Hospital (facility permitted, but presently closed) P.L. Dodge Highland Park General Ann Bates Leach Mercy Hospital Miami Jewish Home/Hospital University of Miami Hospital/Clinics 3 include: 40 beds 39 beds 106 beds 100 beds 549 beds 32 beds 70 beds Information received from the Public Health Trust and the Health Council of South Florida (see Appendix 12B-1) indicates that the above facilities and their resources are more than adequate to serve anticipated growth created by Southeast Overtown/Park West through the year 2005. Additionally, the Health Council's 1983 Hospital Utilization Report shows that Sub -district 3 facilities are operating at only 70.5% of licensed capacity. 1213-1 2) INCLUDE MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES THAT TABULATE AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, AND CREDIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAM MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND SPECIFY THE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT FACILITIES AS NEEDED. It does not appear that existing hospital bed and services capacities will be absorbed by the projected Phase I development of Southeast Overtown/Park West; however, to moniter the sufficiency of health care facilities to serve the Redevelopment Project Area, the Public Health Trust and the .Health Council of South Florida will be contacted annually for written updates on availability of beds and services and on health care expansion plans. They will be advised of the status of new development in Southeast Overtown/Park West, e.g., number of new housing units and number of hotel rooms. They will be asked to indicate whether existing and proposed capacities and/or response times will be taxed by new development and what new or improved facilities and associated costs will be required to meet new service demands. 3) DESCRIBE REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE, AND THAT STANDARDS TO ALLOW EMERGENCY ACCESS TO ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT ARE MET. If it appears that capacities are not sufficient to accommodate further development within Southeast Overtown/Park West, until new or improved facilities are available, the City will make further development approvals contingent on the commitment of necessary health care facilities to serve the increased demand that will result from the proposed development. 12B-2 police 1) IDENTIFY THE UNUSED SERVICE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA DURING EACH PLAN PHASE. ALSO, SPECIFY THE SERVICE LIMIT THRESHOLDS (E.G., MAXIMUM RESPONSE TIME) FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES. The City of Miami Police Department currently has two facilities at the periphery of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project area: 1. The Miami Police Station 400 N.W. 2nd Avenue 2. The Overtown Mini Station 1600 N.W. 3rd Avenue Future plans include consideration of space for police mini - stations at the Bayside Project and/or in Bayfront Park. Although capital facilities are sufficient to meet the needs of future growth, correspondence from the Chief of Police (see Appendix 12B-2) indicates that police officers and civilian personnel, will have to be added to the force as new development occurs. To provide optimum service for the growth projected for Southeast Overtown/Park West for Phase I, for which a Development Order is being sought, 14 police officers and 7 civilian personnel will need to be added to the force. These estimates are based on the following ratios proposed by the Police Department. Resident Population Transient Population Civilian Personnel 3 officers/1,000 persons 1.5 officers/1,000 persons 1 civilian/3 officers 2) INCLUDE MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES THAT TABULATE AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, AND CREDIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAM MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND SPECIFY THE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT FACILITIES AS NEEDED. To moniter the sufficiency of police protection services to accomadate growth within the Redevelopment Project Area, the Police Department will be advised as new development takes place. Specifically, as plans are filed for new development within Southeast Overtown/Park West the Police Department will be advised of the number of new housing units being proposed, number of new hotel rooms, additional square feet of office/retail space, etc. They will be asked to indicate whether existing and proposed capacities and/or response times will be taxed by new development and what new or improved facilities and associated costs will be required to meet new service demands. The increase in ad valorem taxes projected in Table 10.5 that will result from the phased development of Southeast Overtown/Park West should be able to support the increase in the police force indicated for Phase I growth. Future capital facility needs of the Department, although not warranted under the Phase I growth scenario, may be realized in part from impact fees that are proposed to be assessed against new development. 3) DESCRIBE REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE, AND THAT STANDARDS TO ALLOW EMERGENCY ACCESS TO ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT ARE MET. The Police Department is a participant in the City's Major Use Special Permit Process; however, the Department has requested that it participate in preliminary site plan reviews with developers to accurately ascertain the impact upon the Department and its ability to provide effective and sufficient police protection to insure security conscious strucures are built and that emergency routes remain accessible. This request will be accommodated. Fire 1) IDENTIFY THE UNUSED SERVICE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA DURING EACH PLAN PHASE. ALSO, SPECIFY THE SERVICE LIMIT THRESHOLDS (E.G., MAXIMUM RESPONSE TIME) FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES. The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Area is served by the following fire stations: 1. Fire Station #1 144 N.E. 5th Street On Duty Force = 18 2. Fire Station #2 1901 N. Miami Avenue On Duty Force = 15 Throughout the City of Miami, fire stations are located to provide a maximum response time of four (4) minutes. According to information provided by the Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department (see Appendix 128-3), the response time in the Redevelopment Project Area is less than four (4) minutes. Based on established Department standards, this reponses time is not anticipated to change with the phased growth of Southeast Overtown/Park West. 2) INCLUDE MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES THAT TABULATE AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, AND CREDIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAM MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND SPECIFY THE ACTIONS gECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT FACILITIES AS NEEDED. The Fire Department is a participant in development site plan reviews and in the City's Major Use Special Permit Process. Through these participations the Fire Department will be able to advise the City if and when new development within Southeast Overtown/Park West will require additional Fire Department manpower and facilities to meet new growth. A maximum response time of four (4) minutes will be maintained. Funds for capital improvements (renovations) at Fire Stations 1 and #2 are slated to come from 1981 Fire General Obligation Bonds. The increase in ad valorem taxes projected in Table 10.5, that will result from the development of Southeast Overtown/Park West, will be available to the City to meet future Fire Department needs. 3) DESCRIBE REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS HEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE, AND THAT STANDARDS TO ALLOW EMERGENCY ACCESS TO ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT ARE MET. The City of Miami is presently developing an impact fee ordinance that will provide funds for the acquisition of fire fighting and emergency medical equipment. 71 Litf r. -- .."*" : ,,„_,:.....7... f2......_27.7 ,i-l',..:4- '''il I1,�'� :1.11 1 TA ! E ��— �- 1 �s� _— 4.. W�Sl ■ rallr i e ` `• � - t4'a MAP 1 - EXISTING AND PROPOSED ELECTRIC, GAS, FIRE PROTECTION, POLICE STATIONS, & CLINICS SIMPSON ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION MIAMI ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION RAILWAY ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION OVEETOWN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION MAIN TRANSMISSION - ELECTRICAL PEOPLE'S GAS - CENTRAL STATION MAIN GAS LINES FIRE STATIONS POLICE STATIONS CLINICS sources: florida , power 6 light cam. , people's gas co. , 6 city of miami planning department O&M R,n,+wr hvf A,MnaWtr, hn Canewle, Kraq And York ha. iR7MMw^lliwwd And .alnw>w hs M+Arar firfol iftriserIng Oarrwurfs. 1+a SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST r DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT �-- ? 2E 7 CJTY Of haAhOlOEPAIITMaehl APPENDIX 12B A ...1?•71.•;iv'ft • • " r . . ;•-•••••;•4--1 • " '"i'4;*1117:4*•4f4.7 -s!LX"'TZ.. • • • : = he.: L., • Appendi x • • .; • , - • •••• • •\-4441. • • • • - .1•-•,"% ••• • ,.:•••.+7r.,•••••••"' • • -.L., . 27, ".• '%.7-•••• • es: • • • • • . - - • • • :mi.::: • 77.2 ;72 ...7i; R-ae••=• • 7.1.,••• •,"•-• •«•,•-••?:.• :, • *, • . . • - • 4.7'1 • L . • • • •••.;.•••••••• • • • •••• ••!.• •••- •••••7.• •••••••'.• • •••••• • t' • • • • . --%••••...1.i...1 • '" • • •.;••• `,..r": • ,-:.••••".•.,•• HEALTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD * SUITS. 200 FLDRIDA 33137 :-..:57.:'t.7:'-''''r'77'777,'rrt7r:.f...' 7 - • - • • 7'": • ; :-.' ' ' 4.-145!:1"111114.41:23111.113:• ."141"111516411111111"-T9111111/1157f61"Irsir'- - „ ' - ..E "•-• • '--- ••..-.• --•-•444-4.-• ..44*.tri:F443 ,., ... • -- . • 10.itfr. 41 ite•Oi4eiflit'*i-It/.4i0!iltitil i ii.i.'ilitlit'it!4 0 i lit':it1.! (0i.iiiiitii!iiiiiti 4tItrr!riiii++!.'littilitii4**.iiii ;lifit;E iilii:,:, ".......r.'•:::•1.'': 'i':;..,•.?.:1', ii'iii'i'.1.:i.;':i'.;,11W,;:i'-':.:-1:7,1;lt '..::.;i7...i.t.ii';'..-.:-it-1-''''''i.:' ':::;:;.:::'::1,::1:;iii .:A.:14:..;iii217;,:i'!1:-i,...ii:;-;ifi" iiiit:::::-.ILV•i:..1:::i.:'-.: • ... -'.., '.: '. oarl.,".4..,•_::::::..' -'•i'•:;,-.-..•''',,.:''.;:......i......_:,...,"".J.:;'.;•.. :...1_.....:'''''.•";''::.,_ . ..'C.''''''.1.: : -;.:::,.:.':•i..i-., 1:•. - 7.... ::-Ei',.'. - '1,• .::.:•':•.11,..„'.':,1:''1"1:r..;.:;.1.1 - - - - ....7'.f":=..:7 1:-....:.:riza7:;:i...i41-.....:.; ' ...i . . .... ....-. ....... ..:..1.-._.- . _ .. - - -.! -- '''''' '"" 7 -"- '''' '' --.---'"--"::::,..-.."...:"::":77- '' :: '' "."7:7:"7.7.'' HEALTH COUNCIL OF SOUTH FLORIDA - SIRS DISTRICT XI SUBDISTRICT 3 City of Miami HEALTH COUNCIL OF SOUTH FLORIDA - FIRS DISTRICT XI SUBDISTRICT 3 - City of Miami + Hospitals Nursing Domes A Primary Care Centers *Community Mental Health Centers i iC-CH-3 5 SUBDISTRICT 3 - CITY OF MIAMI I. GENERAL P SCRIpTIQNt Subdistrict 3 includes all of the City of Miami. It also includes a small portion. of unincorporated county in its northwest corner --a densely populated area between Miami and Hialeah. In its southeast corner is Key Biscayne, an unincorporated community consisting mainly of upper -income homes and condo- minium developments. Besides the community of Key Biscayne„ there are tourist attractions and public parks on the Key. The Central City, .the Dade County Civic Center complex, and the Medical Center complex also lie within the Sub- district. Miami Dade Community College has two campuses in Subdistrict 3. The whole Subdistrict is characterized by a number of arterial highways and an expressway system which has removed a great deal of housing, especially in blighted areas, displacing the residents that had lived there. Almost all of these roadways handle traffic in excess of their capacity because of their use by non -area residents. Most of the major arteries are committed for improve- ment between 1980-86. The entire Subdistrict is served with public water supplies, and most of the - developed areas are part of the public sewage disposal system. Key Biscayne is an -exception, with only one-third served by public sewer system. Expansion of the Virginia Key Sewage Treatment facility is committed for completion, and will serve Key Biscayne. There are no plans for extending the sewage disposal system en the mainland for the next 5-10 years. Most of the elementary schools have enrollments exceeding their capacity, likewise, for one junior and two senior high schools in the area. Only one additional Filth school is planned, however, and it is not connnitted for con- struction before 1985. All of the area is within six minutes fire response time, and nearly all of it is within three minutes as well. Key Biscayne is not included in the three minute response time. Both the medical Center/civic center and downtown central business districts areeib-t.leis._Subdistrle lave underdone su el re eve cpment, which is planned for continuation. Also committed for economic development is much of the 1980 riot area known as Model Cities. With proposed cutbacks in fed- erally assisted development programs, local government and business support will be needed to maintain and implement these plans. More recently, develop- ment projects for the overtown area have been initiated. It Is also noteworthy that the Edison -Little River Community within this Sub- district has become home to rncst of the Haitian refugees. The demographic data from the 1980 census cannot accurately reflect this estimated additional 40- 45,000 people. 3-1 HC-CH-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 II. DEMCG 8?kJ L3 EpPULAT3.0 ZIZE ANQ E5RC5llTAGE B.7 3K II'EM32 1980 Total: White: Clack: Unspecified: Hispanic: 349,690 223,920 97,659 28,111 191,191* ro of Subdistrict 1985 Projected Population: 2000 Projected Population: 100 64 28 8 55 377.580 393,135 __af_aiatri c t X. 1 s *Hispanic is not a race category, and persons of may be of any race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Dade County Planning EEPL5�' tiGE QUEEIBLIIDD BY ASi. 21 17 34 33 32 Spanish origin Department Acre: a.:i 5 12 79-34 35-64 §B -1.5' Male 6.3 21.3 21.4 35.9 9.2 5.2 Female 5.3 18.6 20.6 36.5 11.3 7.6 Both 5.8 19.9 21.3 36.2 10.4 6.5 Source: US Census Bureau Lgtal No. 161,405 188.2ES 349,6911 3-2 HC-CH-36 SU9OISTRICT 3 III. HEALTH SERVIC, , SUBDISTRICT HOSPI T AL ST CAPAGTT'( ) 1983 UTTLIzaDi No. 1983 .Licensed yo.pitals Licensed Beds Occupancy Cedars Medical Center 700 51.5 Christian Hospital 40 Closed P.L. Dodge 39 119.1 Highland Park General 106 67.2 Jackson Memorial 1250 80.5 Anne Bates Leach 100 48.7 Mercy Hospital 549 70.7 Miami Jewish Horne & Hospital 32 80.5 Univ. of Miami Hospital 4 Clinics 70 82.3 Pun American Hospital 146 73.4 Veterans Admnistration 708 83.8 Victoria 300 38.3 TOTAL 4040 70.5 Source: Health Council of South Florida. Inc. 1983 Hospital Utilization Report 1980 atta Pi;0JECTED EED/PGP IbluJ £AIIOS Ratio 11.5/1000 Population 5.6/1000 Population (when excluding P.L. Dodge, Jackson Memorial Hospital, A.B. Leach and Veterans Administration) 10,7/1000 Population 5.1/1000 Population (when excluding P.L. Dodge, Jackson Memorial Hospital, A.B. Leach and Veterans Administration) 3-3 HC-CH-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 SUBDISTRICT NyRSING HOMES! CURRENT C, PACITY J Q Z982 uTTI TZATTON No.. 1982 Nursing Homes Li.gensQ31�.esiA .k_gu � Q Floridean 52 96.2 Human Resources Health Center 196 73.5 Jackson Heights 298 98.6 Jackson Manor 174 96.9 Miami Jewish Home & Hospital 332 98.4 Ponce de Leon 147 86.6 Riverside Care Center 80. Not Open Veterans Administration 90 N/R TOTAL 1369 92.7 N/R = Not Reported Sources: Florida HRS Nursing Home Census Report, July-Oecember, 1982 Florida HRS List of Licensed Beds, May, 1984 J-4 -CH-36- -A-F1 E 3-a I. GEN .BAL (15$QR.IPTIoN The eastern part of this area is well developed commercially and also contains some of the better old residences of Miami. There are limited tourist facili- ties in this area. Adjacent is a commercial zone which extends north from the Central City. To the west of this zone is a black area. North and west is mostly lower- and middle-class housing. Along the Miami River, there are various sorts of marina facilities for small ships and boats. The 1980 census indicates widespread proverty in the 3-a area. Nearly every census tract ir: the area shows a much higher percentage of families below poverty level than the county average. The sane is true of percentage of families, labor force unemployed, and persons residing in crowded units. The part of this area known as Overtown, just north and west of the Central Business District, is par- ticularly affected by poverty, and has been the focus of civil unrest, as well as attempts at economic solutions, in recent months. The portion of 3-a which is not part of this picture of poverty is the section lying along Biscayne Bay north of Julia Tuttle Causeway, emcompassing the communities of Bay Point, Morningside. and Belle Meade. II. OEM0GRA? tlC, PORE); ATT Ot TREND'S 8ND EM E TI O 1970 4 Change 1980 % Change 1985 5: Change 2000 1971)-80 Pop,.. 198D-8S _ P9w- 5 5-21�9 2 Pon, 178,631 -8 162,083 +4 168,408 Source: Oade County Planning Department 3-5 1 171,773 C-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA-3-A POPULATION SIZE. AWL FERCENTnE n STRTBUTTON at RACE/ ETHNICITY i9s0 Total White B ack Unsn ecified Hispanic* F pu] aiiiorl No- • No. No. „5_ No. 162,083 53,636 33 95,904 59- 12,543 8 48,373 30 *Hispanic is not a race category, and persons of Spanish origin may be of any race. Age Male Female Both Families Below Poverty level - 1979 No. 11,535 26.7 1980 FERCENTACE DISTRIBUTION Qi AM ANL la 8.5 25.3 7.9 23.4 8.4 24.4 /0-34 35-64 65-74 _Mt 24.9 24.4 24.6 Source: US Census Bureau Families Between 1008.125'of Poverty Level 1979 No. 3,305 7.6 Total No. Families 43,231 30.8 31.1 31.0 FCONOMIC INDICATORS Households Receiving Public Assistance 1979 No. 10,614 18.5 Total No. Households 57,332 6.4 3.7 7.6 5.5 7.0 4.7 Labor Force Unemployed March - 1980 No. 5,900 8.5 Total No. in Labor Force 69,739 Total No. 78,009 84,074 162,083 Population Residing in Crawdei Units No. Source: US Census Summary File Tapes 11 and i3, Metro --Dade Planning �a 65,474 40.4 Total Population 162,083 Department HC-CH-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA 3-A III. HEALTH .EgVICES Publicly supported primary health care services are provided in this area by; • Borinquen Health Care Center • Economic Opportunity Family Health Center • Liberty City Health Service Center The Dade County Public Health Department has five units in this area. The following federally qualified Health Maintenance Organizations provide primary care services in the area: • CIGNA HMO The New Horizons Community Mental Health Center has three service sites located in the area. The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services has seven regular service centers in this area, as well as a special unit at the Juvenile Justice_ Center. 1_ R E A 3_ b.. I. GENERAL GESCRIP,TIQ11 Area 3-b contains the original Little Havana and Coconut Grove, two areas both of which have been designated as health scarcity areas by the HSA of South Florida. and as poverty concentration areas by Dada County. Little Havana represents the American heart of refugee Cuba. This central area contains the poor, elderly, new arrivals and those who,for a variety of reasons, are less absorbed into the American way of life. "Land use problems involve single- family dwellings scattered throughout multi -family districts, and a heavy strip of commercial build-up along all of the major arteries. Traffic is congested throughout the area which lacks off-street parking. Coconut Grove has truly a «pocket" of poverty completely encircled by upper - middle and upper -income residential areas, a tourist -oriented shopping area, and a four -lane heavily traveled highway. The Grove is the oldest residential area in Miami. The downtown-8rickell Avenue business district is also in this area and has experienced substantial growth in the last five years. The entire bayfront from the Miami River to Vizcaya is dotted with high-rise condominiums and skyscraping office towers. Except that portion that lies along the bayfront and on islands in Eiscayne Eay, the whole of Area 3-b has a higher percentage of poverty than the Dada County average. according to the 1980 census. Percentage of households receiving public assistance was exceptionally high, compared to other areas, for the year of 1979. The census tracts having highest public assistance percentages are in the heart of Little Havana. This probably reflects the availability of refugee funds at the time. As these funds are being terminated, numbers receiving public assistance is likely failing. 11. QOGRPP11ICS pUAIIQN IP NQS Q PRPJECTIOS 1970 % Change 1980 % Change 1985 % Change 2000 ..�'DP..,. 1970-$0_ ...P9R, . 1980- 35_ Pop. 1i$5.c299O - Pop, 168,726 +11.2 187,607 +11.5 209,172 +5.8 227.,362 Source: Dade County Planning Department 3-3 HC-CH-4 36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA 3-8 POPULATION, SIZE, AND PERCENTAGE DISfRIBUTI0j ai RACE/ETHNICITY Total White Black Unspecified Hispanic Population No. ..a.. jio_- ..fa._ Na. j_. Na. _I_ 187,607 170,284 91 1,755 1 15,568 8 142,818 76 *Hispanic is not a race category, and persons of Spanish origin may be of any race. 1980 PERCENTAGE PISfRISUTIOM 5/ Ara AND, Age Q . 5-19 20-34 35-64 65-74 + 'Co t,a3 No. Male 3.9 17.5 19.3 40.7 11.9 6.7 83,396 Female 3.2 14.7 17.6 40.8 14.4 9.3 104,211 Both 3.5 16.0 18.3 40.8 13.3 8.1 187,607 Source: US Census Bureau ECDUCMTC TNDICIPRI, Families Households Families Between Receiving Below 100 & 125% of Public Labor Force Population Poverty Poverty Level Assistance Unemployed Residing in Level - 1979 1979 1979 March - 1980 Crpwde& Unit , No. Na. No. No. ..a... Jlo. ,_, 6,538 13.4 2,726 5.5 14,085 19.4 4,529 4.9 45,834 24.4 Total No. Total No. F asp i 1 1 es Ho us etto-1 ds Total No. in 1.4Qr Force Total. Population 48,677 72,762 91,810 187,607 Source: US Census Summary File Tapes 11 and 13, Metro -Dade Planning Department 3-9 HC -CH -36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA 3-0 • III. HEALTHER..YLF Publicly supported primary care services are provided in this area by: • Coconut Grove Family Health Center The Dade County Public Health Department does not have a unit in this area. The following federally qualified Health Maintenance Organizations provide primary care services in this area: • Comprehensive American Care (CAC) • International Medical Centers HMO • South Florida Group Health, Inc. The Miami Mental Health Center has two service sites located in this area. The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services has four service centers inthis area. 3-10 CITY OF M1AMI. FLOR1OA. INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Appendix 12B-2 J: FROM: Matthew Schwartz Deputy Director Department of Development L. Clarence Dickson Chief of Police DATE: SUBJECT: BEFERENCi;s: ENCLOSURES: J A N 9 1987 FILE: ADM 3-2 Southeast Overtown/Park West Staffing 1 The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment project will impact upon the service capabilities of the Miami Police Department. Over the past year there has been an increase in demand for police services and an increase in delayed displaced calls. Presently, our resources are strained by these additional demands. The progressive development of the City will necessitate additional needs for police service. The policy of the Police Department is to participate in preliminary site plan reviews with developers during the projects conceptual stage. The Department's staffing projections are above and beyond the current personnel strength of the Department. The projections have been developed by estimating the service population for the Southeast Overtown/Park West project. The ratio of police officers per resident population is figured at three officers per thousand. The ratio of officers for the transient population is based on one and a half officers per thousand. There is also a need for civilian personnel to support the officers; based on a ratio of one civilian per two officers. The optimum police staffing for the three phases of development are presented non -cumulatively as follows: Service Police Civilian Year Phase Population Officers Personnel 1986 1992 I 5,428 13.5 6.8 1992 1997 II 6,350 14.9 7.5 1997 2005 III 15,928 37.4 18.7 Approximately 66 police officers and 33 civilians will be required. Enclosed please find Appendix I which details each project and phase of development. Matthew Schwartz Deputy Director Department of Development Page 2 The additional officers will require equipment expenditures for radios, MDT's, and vehicles at a rate of one item per three officers. It is hoped the provided information will be beneficial. If further assistance is needed, please don't hesitate to call. CD:nzm Numbers are figured as followed: - Office Employees: 1 employee per 250 sq. ft. of office space. Hotel Guests: 1.5 person per room per day at a 90% occupancy rate. - Office Visitor: 1 person per 200 sq. ft. office space. - Shopper: 1 shopper per 193 sq. ft. retail space. - Retail Employee: 1 employee per 370 sq. ft. retail space. (Above figures based on information in Draft Copy of Downtown Miami Traffic Access and Mobility Improvement Study"). The below figures are not based on above study. - Convention: Not counted. Exhibition Hall: Not counted. - Police Officers: - Civilian Personnel: 1.5 Officers per 1,000 Transient Population. 3 Officers per 1,000 Resident Population. 1 Civilian per 2 Police Officers. Project Phase I 1986 W- 1992 sa rrii asr ovExurx /PARK vi sr DEVE DPIIDIP OF R GICNAL IMPACT APPLICAPICN APPENDIX I Phase II 1992 -- 1997 Five 1997 - 2005 Residential Population 3,600 3,600 9,000 Office 166,000 aq. ft. 664 Elnp./830 Vist. 205,000 sq. ft. 820 Ihrp./1,025 Vist. 632,500 sq. ft. 2,530 Elw./3,162 Vist. Hotel N/A 500 Roans 675 guests 600 Roans 810 guests Retail & Entertainment 30,000 sq. ft. 81 ip./155 Sheep. 25,000 Sq. ft. 68 ilk./129 Shopp. 35,000 sq. ft. 95 Dnp./181 Shopp. Neighborho * Retail Mat et 36,200 sq. ft. 98 E) p. 12,300 sq. ft. 33 E7np. 55,600 sq. ft. 150 Ow. Convention Center/ Exhibition Hall ** N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Transient Population/ Police Officers 1,828/02.7 2,750/04.1 6,928/10.4 Resident Population/ Police Officers 3,600/10.6 3,600/10.8 9,000/27.0 Service Population/ Police Officers/Civilians 5,42B/13.5/6.8 * Neighborhood Retail Market shoppers - Accounted for in population est.hnates. ** Convention Center/Exhibition Hall - Policing bj off -fluty officers. 6,350/14.9/7.5 15,928/37.4/16.7 CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Appendix I2B-3 FROM Matthew Schwartz Deputy Director Department of Development lv� C. H. Du4{e, Chief Acting Director Department of Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services DATE: SUBJECT: December 16, 1986 Impact of Southeast 0vertown/Park West Development REFERENCES: ENcLosuRES: FILE: In response to your request for information regarding the service capabilities of the Department of Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services to the Southeast 0vertown/Parkwest Development area and the impact on services of projected development through the year 2005, I submit the following; The Southeast Overtown/Parkwest Development area is served by Fire Station #1, located at 1444 N.F. 5th Street with an on -duty manning force of 18 firefighters. This area is also served by Fire Station #2, located at 1901 North Miami Avenue with an on -duty manning force of 15 firefighters. Response time to the area is less than four (4) minutes. Projected growth in the Southeast Overtown/Parkwest area in population, housing units and commercial square footage may have a significant impact on emergency medical services and on --going fire safety inspections. Future development may also be subjected to an impending City of Miami Impact Fee ordinance. If you require additional information, please contact Deputy Chief Floyd Jordan at the Fire Chief's office. CHD.FJ.bw ,5/4ee)a awe: QUESTION 12: OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES B. HEALTH CARE, POLICE & FIRE B.1 PREPARE MAP(S) SHOWING FIRE PROTECTION, HOSPITAL, POLICE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL FACILITIES, MAP I. C. ENERGY C.1 IDENTIFY THE PROJECTED UNUSED CAPACITIES OF THE ELECTRICAL GENERATION FACILITY AND TRANSMISSION LINE(S) TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT. The peak electrical demand for the Brickell, Downtown and Omni areas in - 1985 was approximately 290 MVA. Florida Power and Light (FPL) has a present capacity of 500 MVA to serve the area through its six (6) sub- stations and 66 feeders. Consequently there is an unused capacity of ap- proximately 210 MVA. Consequently, this signifies that FPL could serve an additional 72% demand increase with its present electrical generation and transmission line facilities.. FPL currently projects a 5% average demand load increase over the next 15 years. The peak demand by the year 2000 is expected to increase to 540 MVA. However by the year 2000, FPL will be able to serve more than twice the projected figure. Taking into account two additional substations and future feeders, the electrical generation capacity in the year 2000 could serve a demand of 1150 MVA or four (4) times the present demand. One of the future substations will be located within the Southeast Overtown Park West area. Consequently, as per the attached letter dated June llth, 1986, from Mr. Guy J. Sanchez, FPL Miami Downtown Manager, the capacities will be avail- able to serve even the most optimistic growth projections for the S.E. 0vertown Park West area and environs. C.2 INCLUDE AN ENERGY CAPACITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT TABULATES AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY. INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES. DESCRIBE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT FACILITIES COME ON LINE WHEN NEEDED. FPL`s divisions for planning and operations currently monitor the ser- vice demand of each particular substation area within the context of the combined capacity of the particular substation and feeder system. Long range planning activities project growth within each area based on historical trends and current permit/service request data. The estimated 5% average load growth per year is such a trend; and forms the basis for future electrical generation and transmission improvements. 12C-1 The ratio of electrical generation and transmission capacity to current demand load, is such that the capacity at any given time can serve the projected demand growth over a ten (10) year period. FPL is required by the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act to file Ten Year Plans. ?2C-2 C.3 PROVIDE AN ENERGY MANAGEMENT/CONSERVATION PLAN THAT PROVIDES FOR ENERGY -EFFICIENT CONSTRUCTION. ALSO, DISCUSS THE POTENTIAL USE OF ON -SITE CONGENERATION OF POWER. Currently, FPL's Marketing and Energy Conservation Department is respon- sible for assisting developers, property owners, landlords and tenants in the implementation of energy conservation programs involving "passive energy conservation techniques" such as: the use of high-energy ef- ficient HVAC units; A/C waste heat recovery; insulation both rigid and non -rigid; shade or screening devices for glazed openings, etc. It is recommended that the City of Miami, in cooperation with Metro- politan Dade County and FPL collaborate in the development of energy efficient design/construction guidelines for incorporation as part of the South Florida Building Code (SFBC). These guidelines would extend beyond the current MODEL ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE which regulates all new construction and renovations over a specified scope. In essence the guidelines would assist in the procurement of "energy credits" available from FPL and in the incorporation of energy efficiency measures not currently recognized. The following is a sample listing of energy efficient construction measures which should be considered particularly in large developments within the study area: 1. Intelligent zoning to permit varying system operations for spaces with different needs at a particular instant in time. This in- cludes isolating dampers in ductwork to permit the operation of systems from common headed units, thereby permitting operation of single or multiple floors as a function of occupancy. 2. Proper selection of air distribution devices to permit use of in- creased differentials between the space and supply air temperatures. A reduction of 1,000 cfm in a system operating at 4 inches of water lowers energy consumption by 1 kw for each hour of operation. 3. Reduction of the minimum amount of outside air brought into the building to the minimum required by the space usage to achieve a concomitant reduction in cooling loads for the summer. 4. Review of the systems to permit possible inclusion in design specifications of automatic outside air/return air switching de- vices that, based on the total heat content of the outside air and return air, use minimum, variable or 100 percent outside air, depend- ing on the least amount of energy to be consumed by the operating system. 12C-3 5. Higher ldmperature differentials in chilled water and condenser water systems to lower water flow and pumping horsepower for these systems. 6. Careful design of lighting systems with special emphasis on reduced wattage and circuiting for not only normal occupancy use, but also cleaning operations. 7. Inclusion of local switching on all lighting to permit efficient usage of energy. 8. Provide operable window sections as a conservation measure. 9. Use of alternative glazing systems, shading devices, colors of exterior materials, and location of shading to ensure overall reductions in energy consumption. 10. Provide open garage facades to reduce energy consumption for venti- lating that facility. 11. Maximize the use of flow restrictors for plumbing fixtures wherever possible. The utilization of any waste heat from kitchens to heat the water should be considered. 12. The utilization of nondepletable resource energy with particular emphasis on the possible application of solar energy to generate domestic hot water, should be considered wherever possible. 13. The selection of chillers with increased surface to lower energy consumption to less than .70 kw/ton of useful output should be encouraged. 14. Energy management systems to permit the use of computer technology to reduce overall building energy consumption should be required for any commercial office building with more than 50,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. 15. Conformance to the current issue of the Model Energy Efficiency Code for Building Construction for the State of Florida (mentioned previously herein). 5A. Sizing power company transformers closer to demand rather than con- nected load. 17. Using fluorescent lighting control within buildings controlled by local switches. 12C-4 18. Investigating various lighting alternatives, including task lighting, energy saving fluorescent lighting, and combined return air -lighting to determine which is more energy efficient. 19. Investigating the use of a central control system with the capability to control the air conditioning systems on a program mad schedule. 20. Adding power factor capacitor correction devices for improved power factor on large motors and Bete ryining most feasible installation location, i.e., at motor or at motor control switchboard. 21. Using a variabieivolume chilled water pumping system to reduce pumping horsepower. 22. -Using individual air handling units on each level to reduce fan horsepower and provide good air transport factors. 23. Using self -closing doors at locations which open into non air conditioned areas. 24. Providing wall (R-11 min) and roof (R-19 min) insulation which exceeds the energy code requirements, duct insulation, and piping insulation. 25. Using highly reflective dual -pane insulating glass wherever possible. 26. Making the building a cool light color to reflect the sun's rays. 27. Encourage site planning concepts such as east -west axis orienta- tion toqinirrize the impact of the low altitude morning and afternoon sun. 28. Utilize shade trees and plantings to provide shade to glazed areas. 29. Utilize mulch along all landscaped areas since mulch shades the soil and reduces water loss from the soil; and consequently minimizes the need for irrigation. FPL currently assists developers in connection with the use of on -site cogeneration through the planning stage in areas of applicable rates, feasibility, construction details and interconnection. However, due to economic feasibility and anticipated return on investment within a "short range perspective", cogeneration has not been a popular concept within the private sector. The option of cogeneration will continue to play a more significant role within the context of public facilities, large governmental complexes and hospitals where suitable uses fur the cogeneration by-products (i.e. steam, chilled -water and hot water) are more easily found than in single use developments. C.4 SPECIFY MONITORING PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES, AND DESCRIBE REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE. It is highly improbable that development could be permitted at a time when there was insufficient electrical generation/transmission ca- pacity to meet the new or added demand, based on the previous re- sponses C.I and C.2. In any event such an occurrence could be easily avoided simply through a City administrative order requiring that all proposed development procure a "demand/service certificate" from FPL certifying that there is capacity available to service the proposed development. The "demand/service certificate" would be a pre- requisite to the issuance of a building permit by the City of Miami's Building Department. 12C-6 ' °'i *. I I, ..^1I F i lE i i i I l u2-T.' 0 1 I it • i E 529 bihm June 11, 1986 Bermello, Kurki & Vera, Inc. 55 Almeria Avenue Coral Gables, FL 33134 Attn: Mr. Willy A. Bermello President Dear Willy: RECE cy'JU11131985 In regards to your letter dated May 13th, 1986 requesting information as to FPL's capability to service the load growth in the Downtown area (by Downtown we are referring to Cann, Overtown, Central. Downtown, Little Havana and Brickell), I am pleased to provide you with the following: Tt:.peak electrical demand for this area iri 1985 was 290MVA. The average load growth is projected to be 5.0% per year over the next 15 years. The peak demand by year 2000 is expected to increase to 540MTA. However, the potential demand that FPL can serve by year 2000 is more than twice the projected figure. This can be understood by considering the following factors: 1. FPL presently serves this area from six substations with 66 feeders. When carrying full capacity, these feeders can serve a demand of 500MVA. 2. The ultimate capability of the existing substations with all future feeders plus those now in service is 952MVA. (See attachment #2) 3. With two additional substation sites developed and all feeders installed, FPL will have the capability to serve a demand of 1150MVA. (see attachment #3) In summary, the present peak demand in the Downtown Miami area is 290MVA, and we will have facilities in place, if needed, to serve a demand of 1150MvA. This represents a load increase of approximately four times today's level, and I aim confident we can serve any load alternative presented to us. 12C- 7 I'I fPLe .. FA:my I'.QP In regards to energy management/conservation plan, I can tell you that the Marketing and Energy Conservation Dept. of FP&L is responsible for helping our customers to implement the many energy conservation programs. This includes assisting designers and developers for energy efficient buildings. In regards to the potential use of on -site cogeneration, we can assist a developer in the planning stage in the areas of applicable rates, feasibility of the project, construction details, interconnection, etc. I believe this information satisfies your request, however, should you require additional details, please do not hesitate to give me a call on 529-5061. Sincerely yours, Guy J. Sanchez Miami Downtown Manager mh v IlaimeNFIEHILIE mei PillanalltrilerwM MITI !-.1t-regsmplimmeurni MI Pill' -,t, Ilimummtm NMI WI `I�': i ink .Ei INI111111111111•11M1 .0. MOPS Ili nu 1111111111111E111111 "Arta alailsoll 1 grain' 111111NIIIIKIIIIIMIll ileiglier ......rt._ PP wpm UM ummore Ohm MI WNW' ti!i- dill ...Imo NUE till VERN !IIII l� ;,,_.` ilig-froor Nil 1.74., VIE l��. �7 atr^ tinii" I �. r�: .j.4 i s 4 tl,,. C®��i{ N' VIZCAYA 12C-9 I.HL 4.4t artp 1 Y,f!you t G Si. A.0 .aa raac f " **TV)* I$1•AIC ATTACtiNT�iI DOJiVrow,v Cf. C17:"71.7,-7,3;e:cr-.. at M4 g•-".isi ...i .t- .i.... .. , . -.At : 1.. -tm-4.41.14••••••C..:.a5 it, -,, r'''.'', .._. • ., ' • r.g....p.,721- -'ciati..-.". ' . ..."'"'' - .:IsitrattIFIELT rani EU VAIL I t= 01 Val Imo TrifWir rS1111---"7 • ..:.....0.•-...Vit.1.1.-.,* r•ro t.r. .er."et-rmIq.r*,kLi—"vI..:.,Z5..,......- 4fs.r.7:...'.1,iA..t-i..-g4..-.2.-..!.!A.:.1: 4rr=it-,1t - .-.117nrtsicr. -,1140-,1M,-; tL•-,u rg-litri- vc rl=i.7c-zrc4--r-i. . rcr: 7-.....i. im.....-.a.....— mm.., .e1.l.. CI """v"44 3., 0.,PC • ...II f 1 i c bt2CA YA 12C-10 IA 4.0 57/11PSON Sue 50435.7-4riav SERI//C" AREAS "11111.111111,..111 trillM1111 MINIM :A. fart 'Etter, E:11 EL-r!..k 1,1z, '1:.:1..- 4.7: 11:4'. . figpirliggiF ism V! isbonsi , Iiitermig No TA '' r•-- tiaRtEll EFZ.t.'re.: ..‘"4..t F-:;- Mle IlEi Prigle Mar viir:-"17;"7.:. . ---: =17'7'. nill furl .z." Age IRAK WPM= ITU ii 1•10- 1110111111ERYIMIller It gee/ ae54#4,4,-) /.2 0 QUESTION 12D: EDUCATION 1) IDENTIFY THE CAPACITY PROJECTED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ELEMENTARY, MIDDLE SCHOOL, AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AREA AT THE END OF EACH PHASE. The Dade County School Board is an elected body responsible for providing, administering, and overseeing public education facilities and needs throughout Dade County, including the Project Area. According to information received form the' Facility Planning and Construction Division of the School Board (see Appendix 12D-1), the following schools serve the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Area: F. Douglas Primary, 314 N.W. 12th Street Riverside Elementary, 221 S.W 12th Avenue Booker T. Washington, 1200 N.W. 6th Avenue Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 N.W. 36th Street (K-3) (K,4-6) (7-9) (9-12) With the exception of Booker T. Washington Junior High, all schools are operating beyond program capacity. However, the School Board is planning a new facility for Riverside Elementary and a new Booker T. Washington is currently being built which can be expanded to accommodate senior high school students. The School Board estimated the number of students that would be generated by the Redevelopment Project based on anticipated new housing units over the next twenty years. The Redevelopment Project falls within minor (geographical) statistical area 4.7, as defined by the Metro Dade County Planning Department. The student -per -unit (SPU) factor for multifamily dwelling units in this area is .25. This factor was applied to the total number of two and three bedroom units planned for the three phases of the Redevelopment Project. The calculations yield the following results: Phase I 1986-1992 292 students Phase II 1992-1997 292 students Phase III 1997-2005 792 students 2) INCLUDE A MONITORING PROGRAM THAT TABULATES AVAILABLE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, AND CREDIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAM MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND DESCRIBE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT NEEDED FACILITIES. 12.D-1 The School Board is a participant in Metro Dade County's Development Review Process. As a participant, the School Board is aware of proposed major development and its associated impact upon the public education system. The City of Miami will advise the School Board annually regarding the status of new residential development within Southeast Overtown/Park West. Information transmitted will include the number of proposed, permitted and under construction residential units by type, e.g., two bedrooms and three or more bedrooms. Additionally, as an internal element of its work program, the School Board monitors annually conditions that effect public education delivery. Facility needs are identified and measures are taken to meet needs dependent upon current policy, available and proposed funding. New ad valorem revenues generated by the development of Southeast Overtown/Park West may be available to meet facility and manpower needs of the School Board. Also, a non -capital measure available to the School Board for meeting new student demands is the adjustment of school attendance boundaries to utilize available capacities in existing schools. 3) DESCRIBE REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE. The Dade County School Board, in conjunction with Metro Dade County, may consider the application of impact fees to help meet public education system needs, APPENDIX 12D DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION Appendix 12D-1 489 EAST DRIVE DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD MIAMI SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33166 MR. ROBERT RENICK, CHAIRMAN DR. KATHLEEN B. MAGRATH, VICE-CHAIRMAN G. HOLMES BRAOOOCK ; . LEOiVARD sRIT7ON 883-0406 MR. MR. PAUL L— CEJAS SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS DR. MICHAEL KROP MS. JANET R. McALILEY nip Wu E CAM H. TURNER December 18, 1986 Mr.. Reginald A. Barker, AICP Urban Development Coordinator City of Miami Dupont Plaza Center 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way Suite 400 Miami, Florida 33132 RE: Southeast 0vertown/Park West Project Dear Mr. Barker: Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the Southeast 0vertown/Park West plan to estimate the student population generated by this proposed project and to advise you of the schools currently serving the subject area. The School Board's method of estimating student population generated by new housing is to apply the Dade County students -per -housing unit (SPU) factors by type of unit in the Planning Department's 31 minor statistical areas of the county. The SPU factors were computed by the Research Division of the Planning Department from tabulations of U.S. Bureau of the Census,1980 Census of Population and Housing, Public -Use Microdata Samples and Summary Tape File 3. These factors are indicative of the approximate public school population likely to be associated with new residential development in Dade County. The Southeast 0vertown/Park West project falls within minor statistical area 4.7. The student -per -housing unit (SPU) factor for multi -family dwelling units in this area is .25. I have applied this SPU factor to the two and three bedroom units planned for the three phases of this project. The estimated student population is as follows: Phase I 1986-1992 292 students Phase II 1992-1997 292 students Phase III 1997-2005 792 students Page 2 12-18-86 Mr. Reginald A. Barker, ACIP The schools currently serving the application area are Douglas and Riverside Elementary Schools, Booker T. Washington Junior High School and Miami Jackson Senior High School. With the exception of Booker T. Washington, all of the other schools are operating beyond program capacity. In terms of capital improvements, a new Booker T. Washington is being built and a new school facility for Riverside Elementary School is being planned. I trust this letter will provide you with sufficient information for the education section of the City's ADA. Sincerely, Leila N. Kalaf Coordinator Site Planning Section LNK: pw 514oci-D;vicizi 1,10. QUESTION 12E: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 1) COMPLETE TABLE 12.1: EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Table 12.1: Existing Public Recreation and Open Space Facility Number of Acres Responsible Entity Types Facilities Land Water- Total Ownership Operation Maintenance School Sites Elementary 1 3.19 3.19 BPI BPI BPI Middle 0 High 0 Parks Mini Parks rn Neighborhood Community Regional 1 .20 .20 C/M C/M 0 1 B.04 8.04 C/M C/M 0 Waterfront Walkways 0 Commerc'l Recreation 0 Public Open Space 0 TOTAL 3 11.43 11.43 BPI - Dade County Board of Public Instruction C/M - City of Miami C/N C/M 2) COMPLETE TABLE 12.2: PROPOSED PUBLIC RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Table 12.2: Proposed Public Recreation and Open Space (All Phases) Facility Number of Acres Responsible Entity Types Facilities Land Water Total Ownership Operation Maintenance School Sites Elementary 1 Middle 0 High 0 3.19 3.19 BPI BPI BPI Parks Mini Parks 1 .20 .20 C/M C/M C/M Neighborhood 0 Community 1 8.04 8.04 C/M C/M C/M Regional 0 y Waterfront Walkways 0 1 Commerc'l Recreation 0 Public Open Space 1 4.60 4.60 C/M C/M C/M TOTAL 4 16.03 16.03 BPI - Dade County Board of Public Instruction C/M - City of Miami Existing Recreation and Open Space The following recreation facilities are located within the boundaries of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Area: Theodore R. Gibson Park, located west of N.W. 3rd Avenue between N.W. 12th and 14th Streets, is classified as a community park. Extensive renovation during the past five years has increased the park's recreation opportunities to include a pool and bathhouse, a lighted combination softball/football field, basketball and tennis courts, a recreation "center" building, outdoor amphitheater, parking accommodations and a playground. The 8.04 acre site, which also includes a branch of the Dade County Public Library System, is 2,200 feet away from the central core of the Redevelopment Project are and is within a 15 minute walk of 75 percent of the Redevelopment Project area. Northwest 2nd Avenue Mini —Park, located between N.W. 10th and llth Streets, is a small neighborhood vestpocket park consisting of two lots of approximately .2 acres. The park site includes paved play areas, plantings, and miscellaneous street furniture. Douglas Elementary School, located west of N.W. 3rd Avenue between llth and 12th Streets, covers a 3.19 acre site that will provide both educational and recreational opportunities for residents of Southeast Overtown/Park West. Recreation facilites at the site include multipurpose playfield and basketball/volleyball courts. The following recreation facilities are located outside of the boundaries of the Redevelopment Project Area, however due their proximity they will help meet recreational needs of future Southeast Overtown/Park West residents: Dorsey Park, which is classified as a neighborhood park, is a 2.5 acre site located 3,800 feet north of the center of the Redevelopment Project Area at N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. l7th Street. This distance represents a 15 minute walk to the park which has a softball field, racquetball and basketball courts, a playground and recreation building. Williams Park is a 5.5 acre neighborhood park located at 1717 N.W. 5th Avenue, which is 4,800 feet northwest of the center of the Redevelopment Project Area, a 15 to 20 minute walk from the project area's center. It has a pool and bathhouse, recreation building, lighted softball and football fields, basketball court and playground. 12E-3 Reeves Park, located at N.W. 6th Avenue and 9th Street, is a 3.75 acre neighborhood park which is 3,600 feet from the center of the Redevelopment Project Area, a 15 minute walk. It contains the following facilities: a recreation building, basketball court, playground, picnic area and wading pool. Bayfront Park, located east of Biscaye Boulevard on Biscayne Bay, is a 39.3 acre regional park currently undergoing reconstruction. The newly designed Bayfront Park will include water fountains, leisure and play areas, a laser light tower, an open-air amphitheater and an extensive waterfront walkway system which will connect the park with the remainder of the City's waterfront. Bicentennial Park, located east of Biscayne Boulevard between N.E. 5th Street and I-395, is immediately adjacent to the Redevelopment Project Area. The 33 acre regional park is extensively landscaped and will provide passive recreation opportunites for the new residents of Southeast Overtown/Park West. Lummus Park► located at N.W. 3rd Court between 2nd and 3rd Streets, is within three blocks of the Redevelopment Project Area.- The 7 acre site is classified as a community park and is maintained by the City of Miami. Baywal.k/Riverwalk, is a continuous waterside walkway stretching from the Bayside Specialty Center south to the mouth of the Miami River and then west along the north side of the river to Fort Dallas Park, a .65 acre mini park oriented towards passive recreation use. Proposed Recreation and ©yen Space Seventh and Ninth Streets Pedestrian Malls, to be located within the public rights -of -way of Seventh Street between N.W. 3rd and 1st Avenues, and Ninth Street between N.W. 3rd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, are to add 4.6 acres of open space to Southeast Overtown/Park West. The pedestrian malls, currently under design, will include such amenities as landscaping and street furniture. Bayside Specialty Center, located at the north end of Bayfront Park will provide Southeast Overtown/Park West residents with a unique recreation opportunity within walking distance of the Redevelopment Project Area. The Specialty Center, covering approximately 20 acres, is being developed by the Rouse Company and the City of Miami. 12E-4 Additionally, the City of Miami's Zoning Ordinance 9500 and Urban Design Standards and Guidelines adopted for the Redevelopment Project Area will insure that the recreation needs of future Southeast Overtown/Park West residents are met, in part, by private developers through the provision of open space, landscaping associated with parking structures and rooftops, etc. 3) DESCRIBE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT OPEN SPACE. The existing regulations in the City of Miami's Zoning Ordinance 9500 and Urban Design Standards and Guidelines adopted for the Redevelopment Project Area are sufficient to insure adequate provision of open space, recreation space and pedestrian space in conjunction with private development. Additionally, capital costs associated with park and open space development may be covered, in part, by the City's proposed Impact Fee Ordinance. Also, consideration is being given to seek amendments to F.S., Chapter 170 which would permit municipalities to establish special assessment taxing districts to cover the costs of park development. I2E--5 c.slicrn /3 QUESTION 13: HOUSING A. COMPLETE TABLE 13.1: EXISTING HOUSING Housing Type Studio/One Bedroom Two •BedrOO s 't tee Bedrooms and More TOTAL HOUSING UNITS Table 13.1: Existing Housing Number of Persons Per Unit N/A N/A N/A 2.03 COMPLETE TABLE 13.2:. PROPOSED HOUSING .Table 13.2: Number of Persons Per Unit Studio/One Bedroom .N/A N/A Three Bedrooms and More N/A Housing Type Two Bedrooms TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 1.8 Owner Housing Units N/A N/A N/A 54 Proposed Housing Phase 1 1986-1992 Rental Housing Units N/A N/A N/A 2,284 Phase I1 .1992-1997 833 .1000 167 Phase III 1•997--2005 2084 2500 416 2000 2000 5000