HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 06-1181
Monday, May 22, 2006
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING AMENDING PAGE NO. 26, OF THE
ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401,
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO C-2 LIBERAL
COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1 851
DELAWARE PARKWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY
ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-1
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
Upon being seconded by Ms. Chloe Keidaish,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Ron Cordon No
Mr, Miguel Gabela No
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Ms. Chloe Keidaish Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Away
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Away
AYE: 5
NAY: 2
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 2
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 5-2
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secreta
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-00615zc(a)
Z.3
Exhibit "A"
(Rezoning of 0.009)
Int1-21EREISQ11
A porifon e **it s'e", 11:41E KAGellos, 6,--re). to Ott Plot
thereat a rowdy" * PICIt BO* 704 P99111 1541 Pubile Meads
of Wand -Cade Cooky, florid*, Irsemi more part1ou1oi4y doecribed oo
laws:
COMANCE. of the Moat SAWA 5I:44Nya' Ater of add Tract 'A"; the
nowt aserford four (4) courses and ,istonvote beano Idon s the Vieetetty
ami florthirooterly lines of void Tree gits; 1) thyme N4=inilbsooW
for a distanos trf 5%21 fiet a Witt of 4xer4Pre- of any to
the right., ;oleo* to the tiorthoost;2 theme Sorttarseteoratioleaktise
aro of add curve, nadmo far it" fiemonts o rx
adius. of
etakt* anglo of lickfiPinin1lice for on arc distance of
404. feet to a point of compound cunroivro al o *stair curve -t0 1115
reigesolgrOrop toih ftioattooniter coroarctrod t Ono Ming the MOO er
%rid tooftw Puma 64 Laitek two*
tiorthwatoyiy_olierts the arc of sold arm hoing for Its okeenonte o
melds of 20311.26 inj. through antral anolo lof 10darideddlecc for
orc &forme oi 32.13 foiet to o paint of compound curvature o
oircoldr dime to the At totworto to the SwthoeW *lotto fiarindflY
aiorgg the WC got add our" hos‘ing for Its *ornate o rakes of MOO
foet, throoth MATTA gin% of Ildoal7milolloos for an oto &tonal of
Feet to It literettOtion with the ere of ezetItar tor* to this ifft,
concave to Ow Nec rodicf ifite *Ego Stki OW beat
N674442mInfiSsear.. sold ofc being coinaldotrt !fhb an misting Zoning
Una; enenoc Sootheasterit oleo the ono of ook0 oorm took* fr
iti
-ohiMeihts radio; of 2637=26 tWto thtt41111 6 66.11:61 OOP GI
ti •Ilt1101CISCO 'tor an CM distonoe of Wm rim; thathce
fointiorealf to a dlotospoo of 1.01 foot to tar POW CPT
N.,
.7.4
gl of the oboe dosaftood good situated, helm and trk Itto City of
Wksn". hilfertl-Ciode County, Ftorido and tantaining V Sauer* Foci
gYnijor 0.1300 otOrei Tnefe lee",
rcle appropriate con
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to .adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motif)
request
ig
ering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, I move that the
em # be recommended to the City Commission for (approval) (denial).
Print Name
2 '"`
Agenda em Date