HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 06-1180
Monday, May 22, 2006
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING AMENDING PAGE NO. 26, OF THE
ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401,
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 0 OFFICE AND C-2
LIBERAL COMMERCIAL TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1701, 1801, 1825 AND 1851
DELAWARE PARKWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY
A I i ACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-1
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 0 OFFICE AND C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL.
Upon being seconded by Ms. Chloe Keidaish,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Ron Cordon Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Ms. Chloe Keidaish Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Away
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Away
AYE: 7
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 2
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-0
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-00615zc Z.2
dMl ��ALIZe
EXHIBIT 'A'
(rezoning Of 9.32 acres)
A portiere of Tract we, of "DADE REAGENTS', according to the Plat
thereof,, as reoorded . fn Plat Book 70, at Page 56 of the Public Records
of .Miami —Dade County, Florida, being more portloulariy described as
follows:.
BEGIN at the Most South Southwest Corner of said Tract "A"; the next
described two (2) courses and distances being along the westerly,
Northwesterly and Northerly Boundary lines of sold Tract "A"; 1) thence
N45degOOrnin45secW" for a distance of 5121 feet a, point of .curvature
of a circular curve to the right, concave to the Northeast; 2) thence
Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having for its elements a
radius of 2038.25 feet, through a central angle of 11deg22rnin2laec for
an arc .distance of 404,57 feet to its intersection with a non —tangent
line; thence N5Odeg31 min59eecE for a distance of 382.86 feet; the next
three (3) courses and distances being along the Northeasterly Lines of
said Tract "A"; 1) thence S3#idegl8min41se+cE for a distance of 238.79
feet; 2) thence NOldeg49min52secE for a distance of 53.17 feet; 3)
thence S39deg30min2Oser,E for a distance of 22 L39 feet; thence
S44deg59min25eecw, along the Southeasterly Line of said Tract "Al. for
a distance of 410.57 feet to the POINT OF SWIMMING.
TOGETHER WITH:
That portion of Tracts "D" and "E", cif "DELAWARE PARK — SECTION
ONE", according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plot Book 40, at Page
17 of the Public Records of Mioml ede County, Florida, which Iles
Southeasterly of that port of said "BELAWARE PARK — SECTION ONE",
replotted as "DADE REAGENTS", recorded in Plat Book 70, at Page 56
of the Public Records of Miami —Dade County, Florida.
TOGETHER WITH:
Tract "r, of 'DELAWARE PARK -- SECTION ONE", accord_lli to the t
thereof, recorded In Plat Book 4O at Page 17 of the Pubic Records of
Miami -Dade County, florido. LESS that portion of Tract "A", of "JOHN
SANDERS REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OF PARADISE PARK SECTION 2",,
according to the plot thereof, as recorded' in Plat Bonk 40,_ at Page 86
of the Public Records of Miami —Dade County, Florida, that lays within
said Tract "F", said portion of said Tract "A" being more particularly
described as folios
COMMENCE at the Northwest Comer of said Tract "F"; the next two(2)
courses and dietances being along the Northeasterly tine of said Tract
"F"; 1) thence S39deg30rnin2OsccE for a distance of 20.33 feet to the
POINT OF BEOINNINt ; 2) thane continue S39deg30min20secE for a
distance of 97.96 feet; thence Northwesterly along a meander line for a
distance of 103 feet more or leas to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Alf of the above described land eltu#ed, being and lying in The City of
Miami, Miami —Dade County, F1arida and containing 408,018.21 Square
Feet and/or• 9,32 Acres more or less.
Circle appropriate conditions):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on Tight and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Mo i •' :�fter considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, I move that the
repst; = enda item # be recommended to the City Commission for (approval) (denial).
P i 96, 7
Print Name
Agenda Item Date