HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 06-1183
Monday, May 22, 2006
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD DENIED THE VARIANCES FROM
ORDINANCE NO, 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS,
REQUIRED SIDE YARD, TO ALLOW A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 3'8" (5'0"
REQUIRED) AND REQUIRED REAR YARD, TO ALLOW A REAR YARD SETBACK OF
2'3" (20'0" REQUIRED, ALLEY CREDIT 6'0", TOTAL ALLOWED 14'0") FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 2150 SOUTHWEST 17TH STREET,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 6, BLOCK 3, EAST VEDADO (16-80), PUBLIC
RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL.
Upon being seconded by Ms. Chloe Keidaish,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Ron Cordon Yes
Mr. Miguel Gaela No
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza No
Mr. Charles A. Garauaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Ms, Chloe Keidaish Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pine Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Away
AYE: 6
NAY: 2
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 6-2
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secreta
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-00616v
Z.6
Zoning Board Action on Petition for Variance
Motion: I move that the request on agenda item # be
(granted) in that the requirements of Section 1903.1 (were) (u:.er
satisfied by relevant evidence in the record of the public
hearing.
a) as stated in the City's finds or fact, or
b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or
c) on the basis of the following:
The Zoning Board shall make findings that all of the requirements and standards
of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been) demonstrated.
Circle appropriate condition(s):
a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do not exist),
which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and
which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in
the same zoning district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
b) The special conditions and circumstances (do) (do not) result
from the actions of the petitioner
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of zoning ordinance
(would) (would not) deprive the applicant of rights commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the
terms of the zoning ordinance and work unnecessary and undue
hardships on the petitioner
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
d) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same
treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands,
buildings or structures in the same zoning district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
e) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same
treatment, any special privilege that is denied by the zoning
ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning
district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
f) If granted, the variance (will be) (will not be) in harmony with the
general intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance and will not be
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public
welfare
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
Print Name
Agenda Item Date