HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Approximately 1720 & 1.771 NW 33" STREET.
CASE NO: 2005-1.046
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an
amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
Three (3) lots fronting NW 33r"/ Street and one (1) lot to the west of NW 1.7'' Avenue
(complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office) from Gil
"Government and Institutional" and R-2 "Two -Family .Residential" to C-1
"Restricted Commercial".
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that the character of NW 33`d Street is residential, specifically R-2 "Two -
Family Residential".
• It is found that immediately adjacent to the eastern boundary of the subject properties,
the area is designated C- 1 "Restricted Commercial".
• It is found that the requested change is not a logical extension of the commercial
activities existing immediately to the east and it will be a commercial intrusion into a
residential street.
• It is found that a zoning change at this location may set a negative precedent and
create a "domino effect" in regards to future zoning change applications.
• It is found that the R-2 "Two -Family Residential" designation allows 18 residential
units per acre and the requested C-1 "Restricted Commercial" designation will allow
a maximum density of 150 residential units per acre.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending denial of the
application as presented.
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
CASE NO. 2005-1046
Yes No N/A
In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment.
In harmony with established land use.
Is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City.
Maintains similar population density pattern.
Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn.
Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary.
Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood.
Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety.
Has similar impact on drainage.
Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas.
Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas.
Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification.
Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.