HomeMy WebLinkAboutIII Tab 4 Economic Impact StudyH.
Economi
c im
pact Analysi
Submitted to:
City of Miami
Prepared For:
GC HOMES, INC.
Prepared by:
SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A.
One Southeast Third Avenue
Suite 2100
Miami, Florida 33131
(305) 374-1574
HIAWATHA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Project Overview
Executive Summary
Introduction
Summary of Benefits
PAGE(S)
1
2
3
Objectives And Definitions
Objectives 5
Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 5
Direct and Indirect Effects 5
Measures of Economic Impact 6
Description of Results 7
Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators
Impact Indicators 8
Results of Indicators 8
Impact of Construction 8
Impact of Ongoing Operations 9
Impact on Local Tax Revenues 9
Analysis by Economic Indicators 9
Employment 9
Wages 10
Output 10
Local Taxes 11
Public Sector Cost 12
Impact Fees 12
Exhibits
Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact 13
Exhibit II: Impact and Other Fees 14
Project. Overview
Hiawatha Village is located at 3535
Hiawatha Avenue in the City of Miami,
Florida (the Project). The Project
consists of five (5) four (4) story
townhomes and a six (6) story
condominium building. The Project will
have 23 residential units and 66
parking spaces. The gross lot area is
76,335 square feet (1.75 acres) and
the net lot area is 59,023 square feet
(1.35 acres).
Townhomes
The townhomes are located at the
north portion of the site facing and
having independent access from W.
Glencoe St. Each unit consists of an
individual driveway with capacity for 2
exterior parking spaces, double car
garage, direct pedestrian access at
ground level, private elevator lobby,
and a private covered terrace and
outdoor garden facing the
condominium at ground level. The
second floor is composed by 3
bedrooms on units "a" and "d," while
units "e" accommodate the social
space: living room, den, dining room
and kitchen. The third floor of units
"a" and "d" accommodate the rooms
while units "e" accommodate the
social areas. The fourth floor consists
of private terraces overlooking the
condominium.
Condominium Tower
The Condominium tower consists of a
parking court with a capacity for nine
(9) parking spaces plus one (1)
loading space with direct access from
Hiawatha Ave; forty-one (41)
additional spaces are located at
ground level within the structure. The
ground level also accommodates the
elevator lobby, trash rooms, and the
pool deck, swimming pool and marina,
facing the bay.
Condominium Tower (cont'd)
The first livable floor will
accommodate the main lobby, a
multipurpose room with small
kitchen, rest rooms, mail room,
outdoor terraces facing the street
and the bay, and two (2) four (4)
bedroom apartment units. Typical
floors from second through fourth
levels are composed by two (2) four
(4) bedroom side units with views
towards the bay, as well as to the
street; one (1) two (2) bedroom unit
facing Hiawatha Avenue; and one
(1) two (2) plus den unit facing the
bay. The penthouse (5th floor)
consists of the same distribution of
units but the two side four (4)
bedroom units include a loft space
over the social area that will have
direct access to the roof terrace
overlooking the sea.
The townhomes and condo units
will share the amenities of the
project, bringing independence and
a sense of community at the same
time. Breathtaking views and
gardens will provide the residents
with the comfort of the countryside
within the city. The overall intention
of the Project is to enhance and
support the residential character of
the area reinforcing the villa
typology on the waterfront taking
advantage of its proximity to Villa
Viscaya. The Project blends with
the low rise scale of the
neighborhood that increases at the
water edge.
Introduction
This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the
developmental and operation of a first class condominium building and retail
facilities.
The Project currently contemplated is comprised of the following components:
U 23 units of high -quality residential.
66 parking spaces.
This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and
tax benefits for both its developmental and operational phases.
-2
Su mary of Benefits.
The Project will bring significant
economic benefits to the city of Miami
(the City). This section summarizes
the impact of the project on employ-
ment, public sector revenues and
other economic benefits as a result of
the development.
Employment
Employment considerations include
the direct employment resulting from
the Project. Average developmental
construction phase employment will
be for approximately 122 employees
and the Project management is
expected to employ 3 people for on-
going maintenance and operations of
the facilities.
Wages
To compute the wages associated
with the new employment we started
with budgeted data directly related to
the developmental and operational
phases of the Project, and we
incorporated data from our research
on retail sales. Total direct and
indirect impacts expected from wages
associated with the new development
approximate the following:
One Time $10,824,192
Annual $ 180,000
Tax Revenue
The estimate of the public sector
revenues associated with the
development includes taxes and other
revenues generated directly by the
Project. Although public sector costs
are important elements in measuring
fiscal impact, these benefits have not
been quantified in this document.
This analysis only measures the
benefits derived from the develop-
ment. Annual tax revenue expected
to be created totals $807,859.
Output
The estimate of total economic
impact is measured by total output.
This analysis measures the economic
impact of developmental costs and
ongoing, operational expenditures. To
determine the effect of respending
within the City, we utilized a multiplier
to compute total direct and indirect
benefits. Total output expected to be
generated, as a result of the develop-
mental and operational phases of the
Project will approximate the following:
One Time $ 49,243,701
Annual $ 120,269
.. 3
•
•
Summary Of Benefits
Significant Community Benefits:
Jobs
‘p- Wages
• Taxes
• Economic Activity
ResidentsSpending Impacting Local Businesses:
• Food
• Recreation/Entertainment
• Transportation
Retail
The following table and charts summarize the economic impact of the Hiawatha
development.
CONSTRUCTION ANNUAL
PERIOD IMPACT RECURRING
Economic Activity Stimulated
Output $ 49,243,701 $ 120,269
Wages 10,824,192 180,403
Taxes 807,859
Jobs Created
$ 60,067,893
122
$ 1,108,531
3
- 4 -
Object
ves And Defi
n t ons
Objectives
The objective of this analysis is to provide
information on the various benefits
created by the Project and to prepare an
estimate of such benefits to the City.
Our analysis is based on an economic
model, which estimates economic and tax
impacts of various projects on a desig-
nated area. The model is specifically
tailored to the City of Miami (the City).
Definition of Economic and Tax Impact
The construction and subsequent oper-
ation of the Project will create important
benefits within the City. These benefits
include new income, new jobs, new tax
revenue and new economic activity
impacting upon every sector of the local
economy. Moreover, through the multi-
plier effect of respending and reinvesting,
indirect economic benefits are added to
the direct benefits brought about by initial
construction expenditures, the expendi-
tures from ongoing operations and new
spending at the retail enterprises.
Direct and Indirect Effects
The total economic impact of public and
private projects and policies on a region
does not end with the impact from the
initial construction expenditures; the
continued benefits to the local economy
must also be considered. Income to firms
furnishing construction materials and
services is subsequently converted into
employee salaries, material purchases,
investment in plant and equipment,
savings, profits, purchases of services,
and a variety of other economic activities.
Income to laborers is subsequently
respent for purchasing of food,
housing, transportation, education,
entertainment, medical and dental
services, clothing, personal services,
and a wide variety of other goods
and services.
Furthermore, income to the govern-
mental unit is respent as salaries,
purchases, and support of a variety
of programs, including education,
transportation, and social services.
In turn, individuals, firms, and
governments furnishing these goods
and services again spend their
income for more purchases,
salaries, investments, and savings.
In this manner, indirect benefits
result each time the initial sum is
respent, and the additional sum
available in the local economy
induces further job creation,
business development and savings.
Quantification of these indirect
benefits has been the object of
considerable economic study.
Because economic relationships are
so complex in our modern society,
no single area or political unit is a
completely self-contained economic
unit. Therefore, purchases from
other areas and political units are
necessary, and goods services are
exported in return.
As purchases are made from other
units, some of the benefits of
economic respending are lost to the
local economy. Ultimately, a smaller
and smaller portion of the initial sum
would remain, until, after several
rounds of respending, an insignifi-
cant sum is left.
-5
Objectives And Defi
nitions
The indirect effects can be viewed as
a set of "ripples" in the economy.
Indirect, like direct, resources require
labor, materials, equipment and
services for their production to induce
further job creation and spending of
wages.
The "ripple" of the indirect effect
multiplies the original impact of the
purchase. The common measure of
the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is
called a multiplier. A multiplier
measures the total magnitude of the
impact on each particular economic
indicator as a multiple of the initial,
direct effect. For instance, a multiplier
of "1" would signify no "ripple" effects
as the total impact is 1 times the
initial impact, while a multiplier of "2"
would imply that the total impact is 2
times the direct effect.
The actual magnitude of a multiplier
depends on the likelihood the goods
and services purchased in a region
would be produced in, or provided
from the region.
The model we used to estimate the
total economic impact incorporates a
multiplier developed by utilizing past
consumption and production patterns
in the City.
There will be significant economic
benefit derived from the expenditures
of the residents of the Project on
eating, drinking, grocery, recreation,
retail etc. This report does not include
the economic impact of such expendi-
tures.
Measures of Economic impact
Various measures can be used to
indicate the impact of a policy or
project on a region. Specifically, for
this study, they are the increases in
local employment, wages, tax revenue
and output that result. Definitions of
these measures are as follows:
Employment is measured full-time
equivalent jobs.
Wages include wages, salaries, and
proprietor's income only. They may
include non -wage compensation, such
as pensions, insurance, and other
fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to
be expended by households in the
area at which the wage-earner works.
Local taxes include additional reve-
nues from both ad valorem and non ad
valorem assessments.
Direct expenditures include those
sums expended for land acquisition,
site preparation and all hard and soft
costs associated with a project,
Indirect expenditures are those sums
expended within the local economy as
a result of the "ripple" effect described
earlier.
Output describes total economic
activity, and is essentially equivalent to
the sum of direct and indirect expendi-
tures (exclusive of wages and taxes).
-6-
Object ves And Definit c ns
Description of Results
For the purpose of describing the
total economic benefits of the Project,
the related expenditures and econ-
omic activity stimulated have been
broken into two categories:
Developmental
Annual Recurring
Developmental expenditures include
those expenditures related to the
design and construction phase of the
Project and related amenities.
Annual recurring activities stimulated
are those expenditures incurred in
connection with the ongoing oper-
ation of the Project, and the sales
and expenditures of the retail enter-
prises leasing space at the Project.
7_
Discussion Of The Resu.Its.
By Economic Indicators
Impact Indicators
We measured the Project's impact on
four commonly used indicators of
economic activity.
Those indicators are:
Jobs
Wages
p. Total output
Local taxes
Results of Indicators
Exhibit I details the Project's direct and
indirect impact on the above economic
indicators for Miami. A summary of
such impact follows:
DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT
One Time:
Direct
Indirect
Annual:
Operational:
Direct
Indirect
$ 26,204,609
23,039,092
$ 49,243,701
The economic indicator most
commonly measured, and publicly
reported on to gauge the economic
impact of a public project is output.
The impact of a project on the
indicator output is often referred to as
the project's economic impact.
Impact of Construction
The site preparation and construction
expenditures, including soft costs and
impact fees are estimated at $32
million. Such activity will create
approximately 122 new full time
equivalent jobs and employ a
maximum of 172 workers during peak
periods. The workers will earn
approximately $5.8 million in direct
wages.
WAGES TAXES EMPLOYMENT
$ 5,760,000
5,064,192
$ 10,824,192
122
122
64,000 $ 96,000 $ 807,859 3
56,269 84,403
$ 120,269
$ 180,403 $ 807,859 3
_8-
Discussion Of The Results
By Economic Indicators
Impact of Ongoing Operations
As a result of the on -going operation
and maintenance of the Project,
Miami will gain approximately 3 new,
permanent full-time equivalent jobs.
The wages of the workers who
obtain these positions will provide an
impact of approximately $96
thousand annually.
The total expenditures for the
Project's operations, will provide a
new, permanent impact of $120
thousand annually to the City's
economy. This impact consists of
the effects of the direct expenditures
from the maintenance, security and
day-to-day operation of the Project,
and the multiplied effects of such
spending thus creating indirect
benefits.
Impact on Local Tax Revenues
As a result of the construction and
operation of the Project, various
state, city and city governments and
agencies would gain an estimated
annual tax benefit of $808 thousand.
Analysis by Economic Indicators
Our analysis of the economic and
tax benefits of the Project was done
by each major phase of the Project.
We identified the major phases to be
developmental and operational.
This analysis determines the econ-
omic benefits to the City by
identifying such benefits for each of
the phases.
The effects on economic indicators
used to measure benefits (employ-
ment, wages, output and taxes) were
computed for each phase.
Employment
Employment is one of the most
important economic benefits of the
Project. It is one of the most
accessible and direct benefits for the
City's residents and it's residents and
is a primary means by which develop-
mental, operational and maintenance
expenditures generate indirect econ-
omic benefits. A portion of this
employment occurs on -site as a result
of new spending at the retail enter-
prises, and a portion is derived from
on -going operations of the Project.
Further employment is generated off -
site by the expenditures of employees
of the Project and businesses located
in the Project, at area businesses.
As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-
term (developmental) employment will
average 122 employees over a thirty
month period and the total on -going
employment will average 3.
The total on -going positions can be
summarized as follows:
Management
Security
Parking
Maintenance/Facilities
- 9 -
Discussion Of The Results
By Economic Indicators
Wages
The analysis deemed wages are a
direct by-product of employment. As
discussed in the above section, both
on -site and off -site jobs are created.
There were both temporary and
permanent in nature.
To compute the wages associated
with the new employment we started
with budgeted data directly related to
the developmental and operational
phases of the Project.
Employment, such as construction
related employment, was obtained
directly from construction estimates.
These numbers were tested for
reasonableness.
Output
The output generated, as a result of
the development and operations of
the Project, is caused by the follow-
ing type of expenditures:
➢ Development costs expended in
the City (100%)
➢ Annual operational expenditures
of management company
New spending in the locality by
employees of businesses
located in the Project
To incorporate the impact of dollars
being respent and/or reinvested in
the City, a multiplier was applied to
total direct output.
A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to
determine total direct and indirect
output created by the Project. This
multiplier indicates that for every $100
spent in Miami, another $187.92 will
be respent or reinvested in Miami.
This multiplier was obtained from the
Dade City Planning Department.
Direct output from the developmental
phase of the Project is primarily a
result of developer costs. These costs
include land acquisition, site prep-
aration and soft and hard costs
relating to the Project's construction.
To determine the total output we
determined what development costs
were expected to be or had been
spent in Miami.
Total direct output during the
development phase is $26 million.
Total indirect output created by the
direct respending in Miami is $23
million. Thus total Miami output from
the development of the Project is $49
million.
The final component of output results
from the direct operating expenditures
of the Project, and the indirect
benefits created as a result of the
multiplier effect on direct output.
The Developer provided us with an
annual operating budget for the
Project. An overall assumption was
made that all expenditures would be
spent initially in the City.
-10-
Discussion 0
By Economic
The Results
ndicators
Output (Contd.)
The total operating expenditures
incorporate all estimated expenses of
the ongoing operation of the Project.
The impact of the retail enterprises
was measured separately as an econ-
omic indicator.
To incorporate the potential respen-
ding and reinvesting in Miami, the
multiplier effect was measured. By
applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the
total direct output from operating
expenditures and the retail enterprises,
we determined total output (direct and
indirect) from on -going operating
expenditures and retail sales.
Local Taxes
A key and significant benefit generated
from the development and operation of
the Project is taxes. Several types of
tax revenue will be generated from this
project including ad valorem taxes.
Specific ad valorem taxes include real
and personal property taxes. Other
taxes include occupational taxes and
community development taxes.
New real property taxes will be as-
sessed on the Project. The assess-
ment is based on a predetermined
mileage rate being applied to the
taxable value of the real property. We
computed real property taxes for the
developmental phase based on the
cost of the development of the Project.
This assessment base is very
conservative since tax on real
property typically is assessed on
appraised values and not actual cost.
The basis for ongoing taxes is also
overall cost. The mileage rate was
obtained from the City Tax Collectors
office relative to the Project's location.
The projected annual real property
taxes are approximately $808
thousand.
Total ad valorem taxes assessed by
Miami -Dade County are allocated
based on mileage rates to certain
governmental entities. Listed below is
the allocation of projected tax
revenue.
City Operating
School Operating
County Operating
Debt Service - City
Debt Service - County
South Florida Water
Library Operating
School Debt Service
Florida Inland Navigation
Environmental Projects
Children's Trust
TOTAL
$269,557
252,036
185,055
24,262
9,039
18,934
15,413
15,572
1,221
3,171
13.599
$807,859
Discussion Of The Results
By Economic Indicators
Local Taxes (Contd.)
Although not quantified, the City, through its
receipt of allocated state sales taxes will
receive an additional benefit as a result of the
development and operation of the Project, and
from the retail enterprises.
Public Sector Costs
Impact fees
Very significant factors in measuring the
economic impact on a specific region of a
project are impact and other required develop-
ment fees. A summary of these fees are listed
below:
City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee
City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee
➢ Miami -Dade County Roadway Impact Fee
➢ Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee
➢ Building Permit Fee
• Installation Energy Fee
• Other Fees
For the purpose of this economic impact
analysis, fees are included as a part of the
direct development cost (output). Impact fees
total approximately $166 thousand and other
fees total approximately $109 thousand. These
fees are shown in detail in Exhibit II.
-12-
Exhibit List
Exhibit I
Exhibit!(
Summary of Economic Impact
Impact and Other Fees
Exhibit-1
Summary of Economic Impact
OUTPUT
WAGES
EMPLOYMENT TAXES
DIRECT
DEVELOPMENTAL
OPERATIONAL
TOTAL DIRECT
26,204,609 $ 5,760,000 122
64,000 96,000 3 $ 807,859
26,268,609 5,856,000 125 807,859
INDIRECT
DEVELOPMENTAL 23,039,092
OPERATIONAL 56,269
5,064,192
84,403
TOTAL INDIRECT 23,095,361 5,148,595 -
TOTAL BENEFITS
$ 49.363,970 $ 11,004,595 125 $ 807,859
TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL $ 49,243,701 $ 10.824,192 122
TOTAL OPERATIONAL 120,269 180,403 3 $ 807,859
TOTAL. BENEFITS $ 49,363,970 $ 11,004,595 125 $ 807,859
-13
Exhibit - II
IMPACT AND OTHER FEES:
A. Development Square Footages: Square Footage
1) Total gross building area (with parking) 162,608
2) Maximum development area (FAR) 82,994
3) Gross parking area 25,600
B. Impact Fees: Amount
1) City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee $ 64,791
2) Developmental Impact Administration Fee 1,944
3) Miami -Dade County Roadway Impact Fee 21,528
4) Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee 77,418
Total of all Impact Fees $ 165,681
C. Non -Impact Fees:
1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" $ 32,154
2) Building Permit Fee 18,920
3) Installation Energy Fee 16,261
4) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 30,000
5) Miami -Dade County Code Compliance 8,000
6) Radon Gas Fee 813
7) Fire Plan Review Fee 1,545
8) Ground Cover Fee 300
9) Land Use/Zoning 590
10) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 60
11) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250
12) Application Fee 35
Total of all Non -Impact Fees $ 108,928
Total of all Fees for Project $ 274,609
Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department.
Miami Dade County Impact Fees
- 14 -