HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMCC 10MAR05Control Growth
on
Biscayne
Boulevard.
FAR is a
maximum,
not an
entitlement.
DESIGN REVIEW
CRITERIA
1. Site & Urban
Plannin •
j1) Respond to the physical
contextual environment
taking into consideration
urban form and natural
features.
(2) Siting should minimize
the impact of automobile
INDUSTRIA
appnca�ie ianascape
ordinances.
••••• 0 y....ww.t, ..•..w..--..,..,. --•. —. .......o-..-.., .••••.•" yat•,
L2) Respond to the
nei. hborhood context.
3 Create a transition in
bulk and scale.
4 Use architectural st les
nriri r1t2ik (Rlirh as roof
"04
L
1J . %R.0 lam'
/ „„I
d`o 14,
/
71/7 , ,!C. it f
/ol
1r. lAra£3t'f,y,q'
o o Cow, f
V/5T,94,54
%/ /,!/!5 .��' q J L' _"" .-77 TT} /7-77 rry /-7ri .TT r77'/ 777
2i.ff oijk7 e /A
47/ /,/
.� -fIVER
{
)11
rC
0/44P/t/se 707 E477
,y/c/rY
fic-cilie.se4, 0000.-it
kO‘ \-:\
0ce
OMMERCIAL STREET SECTIONS
100 FOOT R.O.W.
URBAN DESIGN MANUAL
Prepared by the Miami -Dade County
Department of Planning and Zoning
February, 1999
Reprinted June, 2000
ERCIAL STREET SECTIONS
100 FOOT R.O.W.
ti
T 12 6" ivy 12'6- 14'O' 12.6- 11'0- 12'6" 7
eepfi le
1L
Preferred
fro" 12.6" 14'O12'6' 1r0" 12'6" 5
Development adjacent to this 100' R.O.W. results in a
width to height ratio of approximately I to 14, over twice
the maximum ratio of 1 to 6. Without a definitive sense
ofenclosure, human scale does not exist.
In this acceptable example the ratio is approximately the
I to 6 maximum. Trees, three-story buildings, and an
arcade increase the sense of human scale. The use of
trees reduces the impact of this relatively wide section.
In this preferred example, the ratio is slightly less than
to 3. Human scale is achieved by a tight section,
including landscape, three-story buildings, and an
arcade and awnings which result in a comfortable space.
With the landscaped median, the scale is further reduced.
n this preferred example, the ratio is slightly less than 1
to 3. Human scale is achieved by a tight section,
including landscape, three-story buildings, and an
arcade and awnings which result in a comfortable space.
With the landscaped median, the scale is further reduced.
f
th
Preferred
This mixed -use center fronts on a section line road. Uniformity of the street fa
e result of similar building heights, definition of the building base, window detailing,
;aural detailing and the placement of articulated entrances at block corners, creating a
The Urban
Form of
Biscayne:
From 48 to 87
street, only 14
buildings of 3
stories or more.
95%
are only 2 stories
or less.
Only 2 buildings
in 2.48 miles are
as tall as those
proposed.
' ft q3.4Fpft:
Charsette Schedule
t9
r4 an1 .14,04 Stall
C,la3ti,.. is„14arming
Conlmuar5 tnWrtnw,n
TabVenyttca
a+a '.tSOlPe"
Zy>uony. Val 20
11'1
�ymgi.c.ar
tneof tly. n of ,1do r
ept
v znog sn.n a mate go
•
Lrltlnlarel..
nopants
Sxri yunilPla'm'nk of the Ward w„rd
A4 The iae " w. tntueis 3M,d5 .t V.ufcaR
The tccart- lnYana lssed with l,ttk < 1d
�ngtls
tat the ne oreBeaus Art` cinv nv:. ton,. , wto
ou
e de tmarannk p} 1M`r
at on un tWe e- t ilni rung tone
Ole
�s„� rx7c da^coOcctfuul ,.
,morns and l t[su tick drel,as II]
ayl r
:aa1Pm�'� S
m
ts�,Maal,nr. _ ,pDl'S511;$TL'; ng
y,q des9" t;ntniM C(yhC5Yf'lT ' P)1 Wit.�1.f o` ere S""c`rm at a . iM
� G *"5 ar a 11x pytl4W aS O k, S.T."stet• "- Curs, It
at l.uth[ran `fits itrnn-
d Me r _ - fox s n t-tnteuewill�dc vncw } am ,.[r). Steascd Flius} We> nd at laa .tpor't n 1cnlun d
tt
- llama tal+da TM t31c4u? nsittc[_ i ai Ca,can. ri'1" u and var clop to x aftc l, Walton
f uililx ,cgrisin, t ttk toy ,[ mil,
*At de.e ° � L'YF'e } neftnlu w, uP with 6.ars+1`x which+ Ms+vd"'ulo m[la q Hi,ca,l awar[rMt
S[d Plsn l }Y) Yc
ux L: t"P=tlk
mun't1e'
mµ cmd'a`"n dtj,al LR tm - .c,Vxx. i iy... M• r r $ 8
Kxm71y to re,l"n'f stc ^`a ,f Ox ci+n ntnt<Y llc Te Dlt
eva d � arrdL,tlk }anaul� � sh� {,nnre.d � nd whk� owit 'utde KamiC 1 li SI ltis boo. AaF`Sen '{
i4s+ Wawa.. The srMl *hide ince'Na + I,, cauld ac c,uimun}1)'"'st TM m e'
VS:ISIth two
north. $kF
mYa„[
arch Sl
.rnPat du,pr"`c"becauseore ""`t �rw� IH�u.s*d� �Kyh�1
frxdk 8 U `z yWctw•n LhaLI.,tt1"tjct+'sluVxi ayonliwkt m+Icn4 woes 7 a. �ji^R
lcs �
li 5^+'rb[d tra,v 1 mote p ,iay f tM Y[rt diate 7Rxt. ,K•1•.::
nhc g with str+lg h�� n +htng 1tM F'�'t,c sy11e lx Cc", nk�
ved" It 1 � rc i�yrta at>1 i� � ty� g an'd*a 1„ K 4W1tjd pn. hir- �1 wtkna° tt `{ tf+[ �m+nwt
Hoge )na. use. to l'tani` ttt it CM1fO Cenur-- nd nt tka¢h i Ax°r[+u
iy,wksat t +i°c. r w'il �,uler . ^CrStIY .
p,t53attk`'a k s.tn,n, '. an,m- nwn`Ogcwmtet .., reN 8.3 Liv'r Ppee;BuiidtA$
r+>rr+ali gY' JStudS " and Pre, to 5
S°ct
�SStpHpA tM *.-ter
cvtsksl a17iin8 ,-ehKtnxnt' wan Y'asnc � Cum n ,l am 8i.. ` d firlh,n,< tat *KIT
,.
13i,caY^e " tu,irk.+ 'rk> Atcryo establish n p c4 Yl 'V m TM' �+riF �
The d Corridor s1Cs are , amtnit) +' a w mu- ,ire a tar tM 1""n'n) gakwa“ . x. d"" y[vstis ar tYk
V
a ak
't'r1e P
sway
t
C
arirlx [e1
tan wilt e+NM
human ���
use
i,caYrk l
xri'1°f town
.a+rtk° ar+d
alrc[9 tU the which enc
e►
o 1eV
13jSJso
\5'uhl'it:ni ul:\laxit Yl:vt<*nngTreSniavltieivhk IV,,
otLtkY �Y
90on.m..1R34xm is
Otte gtateholdt
Pante Woof
it_to a.m-. ttia)P
Po upst„ tttencw
Yntx"c Lmitca
12
ThltOdaY, WO
nr;,m
,nslYrvt rahlie oiled
-Wyo. z:.yrYm
u tin
NanSn s:1 Uponf nc
6445 E_'1h trn
0.1001,
lt"wal ta•I{e t w l' M 11' t„d ed1RaPdPlops, . .
,nnh, 2 Gcllin8 dnv°tvme41:i uiriseflSn6w!! n
ant csmmtP,. b
-.,...,g'• Ciwrretler'arl lediOnsrrtr' KeY$
FROM THE COMMISSIONER
By Johnny L. Winton
The Biscayne
Boulevard Corridor
Study will develop a
detailed plan for the
Biscayne Boulevard
Corridor from I-395 to
the south and NE 87th
Street to the north,
which encompasses
the Upper Eastside and the Edgewater com-
munities, The plan will establish standards
that emphasize a human -scaled, pedestrian -
friendly Boulevard that promotes compat-
ible development to respond to the context
of the Boulevard and its immediate sur-
rounding neighborhoods.
The Biscayne Boulevard Study is an im-
portant component for the Upper Eastside
.11
for a number of reasons. The outs
the Boulevard Charrette will define t
acter and establish standards for ne
patible and contributing developrn
new businesses and boutique res
in the area are certainly a welcomt
the Upper Eastside community as
Our hope is to join efforts with the
nity and the consultants to cone
standards that represent of a long-
sion for the Upper Eastside. The
the Biscayne Boulevard corridor wi
part be guided by the outcomi
charette. It is with strong convict
encourage you, the residents and
owners of the Upper Eastside, to f
in this process because of the grea
will have on the future continued"
ment of the Boulevard.
The Edgewater community, wl
SEEWivrr'? .AGE5
. 2 Getting InvolVt
1
_ r r V i 11. 1 1
3IV1
which encompasses the
the Upper Eastside and the Edgewater corn- pa
munities. The plan will establish standards ch
that emphasize a human -scaled, pedestrian- en
friendly Boulevard that promotes compat- ON
ible development to respond to the context in
of the Boulevard and its immediate sur-
rounding neighborhoods. m
The Biscayne Boulevard Study is an im-
portant component for the Upper Eastside
... — !Asida ... 101
rttrrurttt�..,�
;it him
lutPrit and
et y ttit
riy Arne
or l(rrl t Al
r $f , hhort,r;;
fin r
it r lr; (;I 1'..„
11')()(Ci',f,f1.,
e; to tart;
1J 4 rJ(h;rrt
,jft;r
frrlr% r%%r^X492 ,/f'lr 41
ri+1✓rf4i�
rr
t t,itw;,i t iiD
!jowl l fans tt t,Aitirooro, 11�• , h v: tMor► resvit lwisd
AL Ar.{4,I'arr'Iif(IU (J tCl IP, (.tip jlrli11
1 hp
pr.,bi'n',
Stu
en, a JO
isting c
{rPrP0rt&
final rei
tr, two-
rrtr;ft.$ a
!ant, 01
vertzd t
With ad
vt ,d ai
cxampll
Comers
rebuild
trIrtrt ly
Shaded streets with storefronts intermixed with
_ma�aa 11ek 1
•
a a
•
mi-
tts
ees
eas
tce,
re-
gat -
se rt
ate!
**7.4tN\%\ \\\\\
There are public spaces for all with a variety of
shops and services provided.
:m-
and
ings
with
the
the
L(Jnal
ided
l:t-
and
This drawing, prepared for a charrette in Fort Myers, Fla., illustrates the disposition of mixed -use
buildings within the neighborhood.
hoods and developing plans with flexibil- adopting traditional neighborhood devel-
ity. This is not always easy: In order to oprnent (TND) ordinances that restore the
accomplish mixed -use planning, local gov- option of creating new development in tra-
.Y-. enable
•
fl‘,;•ti_jf 1/i
JJJ
4r4
fro;
),r1
?AI
abk
i
NE 37 St to
NE 62 St
miramumminimmoranunimmill
I-395i
3 Sty or less on New
east side but level
may be taller - shoul
1 n ..L.....,.n Apm,
1305.2 Re:
Master Plan
llUdLlUll in aactition to any other specific
jisiderat10ns ) set forth elsewhere " w In this
°ping ordinance, the City Code, or anyother
applicable regulations) o Special consic�erati
�p o n
-hall also_ be given redevelopment activit
y
within Community Revitalization Districts and/or
here a -plan is in place, For the -purposes of
lis Section a "plan"shall mean a masterplan,
esign Guides and Standards or s oecial zoning
istrict.
INDUSTRIAL
LIBERAL
RESTRICTED
OFFICE AND
MULTIFAMILY
LOW DENSITY
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
INSTITUTIONAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
101.
al
111
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
1
�
TQt
INK
.�
,roso�
a/\M
?LPv )
reviiaiizatjon and redeve]
On March 28,1996, M
Revitalization (CPR) coy
master plan for the futurc
Numerous studies have t
the 1 Inner Eastside are er.
Id be analyzed and evaluated for pc
family (townhouse or PUD type) I
maximum height of 30 feet foi
vard. Additionally, there have bf
pace within this area.
ea west of Biscayne Boulevard
Eastside. This area is sounded
_ rlicebei•-
Neighborhood
Context,
Transition in
Bulk and Scale.
Mornin • side Historic District
.114,4610' •
wsrOftmjuAc-Vg, --14'400°'
, . . .
GLASS
BALCONI'
STUCCO
METAL
MESH
WALL
7E.Eht
TH METAL TRW
SOUTH ELEVAIJON
STUCCO
sri TH ELEVATION
•
r ROOF LEVEL
EL. +95'-0"
jib MEZZANINE LEVEL
EL. +85'-0"
EIGHTH LEVEL
Y EL. +75`-0"
kSEVENTH LEVEL
EL, +65'-0"
J SIXTH LEVEL
EL. +55'-0"
FIFTH LEVEL
EL. +45.-0`
gib FOURTH LEVEL
EL. +35`-Ow
kTHIRD LEVEL.
EL +25'-5"
SECOND LEVEL
VEL
629 So.2d 161
18 Fla. L. Weekly D2117
(Cite as: 629 So.2d 161)
414k40
Zoning s
District Court of Appeal of Florida, from com
Fifth District. compensa
of intere!
BATTAGLIA PROPERTIES, LTD., safety, an
Appellant, constitutic
v. property c
FLORIDA LAND AND WATER seq.
ADJUDICATOR' COMMISSION, et al.,
Appellees. 2f Zonin
414k27 N
No. 92-88.
All incid
with its plan to develop the area east of I-4
as a residential area. The 35-foot height
requirement appears to be reasonably related
to the stated policies of both Orange County
and Maitland, to preserve the residential
nature of the area.
In sum, the conditions imposed by Orange
County's rezoning for the Lakepointe project
appear to be rationally related to maintaining
a residential feel and atmosphere for the
project. Similar limitations have been
imposed by the County for commercial
developments for similar reasons. In this
case, the primary justification for the
conditions was to preserve the residential
Traffic rated:
F
by FDOT
Legend
Level Of Service
B
c
E
Local Roads
Objective
standards &
evidence
supports 35 feet.
Amended SD-9, with 45 degree angle.
FAR is a
maximum,
not an
entitlement.
Upper Eastside
Neighbors:
Our 20th
appearance.
Thank you.
5101 & 5225:
made to
comply with
the new SD-9
When is 95
actually 110?
8 floors x 10 = 80
80+15 95
SD-9: "Building
height
maximum", not
roof height
maximum.
Please approve
our appeal.
Thank you.