The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTab 2 - Traffic Impact Analysis02/28/2006 18:25 FAX URS 4h002/002 February 27, 2006 Via Fax and US Mai! Ms. Lilo I. Medina, AICP Assistant Transportation Coordinator City of Miami, office of the City Manager/Transportation 444 SW 2m1 Avenue (1e Floor) Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Electra on the Bay Sufficiency Letter-- W.O. # 148 Dear Ms. Medina; Subsequent to our January 13, 2006 review comments for the subject project, we have received a response letter on February 1, 2006 prepared by Richard Garcia and Associates (RGA). We have also receivod a revised site plan from the architect and a satisfactory letter (via a -mail) from FDOT planning office. Photocopy of the response letter, revised site plan from the architect and the e-mail from FDOT are attached herewith. At this time, we conclude that the traffic impact report along with the subsequent submittal - meets all the traffic requirements and the study is found to be sufficient. Should you have any questions, please call Quazi Masood or me at 954.739.1881. Si U� Cc�r+a,'.tion authern R : Shanmuga Se for Traffic Engineer Attachment cc: Mr. Kevin Watford, Planner II, City of Miami Planning (Fax- 305.416.1443) Mr. Manny A. Vega, Engineer City of Miarrii Zoning (Fax- 305, 416.27 53) Mr. Richard Garcia, F.E., RGA inc. (Fax- 305.6756474) URS Careuratien Lakeehore Comp 5100 NW 33rd Avenue, Suite 150 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33305.6375 Tel; 954.739.1881 fax: 954.73€.1769 AJA ON THE BAY jar Use Special Permit (MUSP) Traffic Impact Study 700:N.E...26th Terr. Miami, Florida By: INC. Aia on the Ba- MUSP Traffic 11 act Stud • • • ENGINEER'SCERT F CATION I, Richard Garcia, P.E. # 54886, certify that I currently hold an active Professional Engineers License in the State of Florida and am competent through education and experience to provide engineering services in the civil and traffic engineering disciplines contained in this report. In addition, the firm Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. holds a Certificate of Authorization # 9592 in the State of Florida. l further certify that this report was prepared by me or under my responsible charge as defined in Chapter 6 t G15-18.001 F.A.G. and that all statements, conclusions and recommendations made herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and ability. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Aja on the Bay MUSP - Traffic Impact Study PROJECT LOCATION: 700 N.E. 26th Terrace Miami, Florida Florida Registration No, 54886 Date RICHARD GARCfA soc TES, INC. • • A'a on the Ba MUSP Traffic Im act Stud TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION / LOCATION 2 3.0 TRIP GENERATION 5 4.0 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 7 5.0 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 8 6.0 TRAFFIC COUNTS 9 7.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 12 8.0 TRANSIT SERVICES 16 9.0 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 17 10.0 COMMITTED DEVELOPMENTS 18 11.0 CORRIDOR LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 19 12.0 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 21 13.0 TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PLAN (TCMP) 25 14.0 RECOMMENDATION 26 RlCHA .D GARCIA ASSOCIATES, ES, INC. ii Aia on the Sav - MUSP Traffic Ong act Stud • • LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Map 3 Figure 2: Site Plan 4 Figure 3: Existing PM Peak Hour TMC's 11 Figure 4: Existing Lane Geometry 13 Figure 5: Proposed PM Peak TMC (2008) 22 Figure 6: Driveway Volume 24 UST OF TABLES Table 1: Intersection Level of Service Summary v Table 2: Trip Generation Summary 6 Table 3: Cardinal Distribution 7 Table 4: PM Peak Hour Traffic Distribution 8 Table 5: PM Peak Hour Volume 9 Table 6: Committed Developments 18 Table 7: Person Trip Corridor Analysis Summary 20 Table 8: Intersection LOS 21 APPENDICES Appendix A: Trip Generation Appendix B: Trip Distribution Appendix C: Signal Timing & Adjustment Factors Appendix D: Traffic Counts (TMC's & ATR) Appendix E: Committed Developments Appendix F: Transit Appendix G: Corridor Analysis (Person Trip) Appendix H: Intersection & Driveway Analysis RIcHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, I ce iii Aia on the Bav —MUSP Traffic IpatStud . • Executive Summary The subject project is located at 700 NE 26th Terrace in the City of Miami, Florida. The subject development is a High -Rise Residential Condo / Townhouse with 129 dwelling units. The existing use was not analyzed nor have the existing trips been reduced from the future proposed development. The Trip Generation calculations of this project reveal there will be 29 net vehicles per hour (vph) in the PM peak hour. The subject project is located in TAZ 505 and has had the traffic assigned to the surrounding roadway and transit system using the MUATS Cardinal distribution. Link and intersection traffic counts were collected, averaged and adjusted for seasonal variations and used in the link analysis and intersection analysis. This analysis was performed for the existing condition, background, committed and background and with the cumulative effects of the above and the project traffic. The results indicated the corridor person trip analysis will not fail below LOS B for all scenarios. i RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, NC, iv Aia on the3a�3-1►ZI.SP Traffic €n act Stud • • The intersection analysis revealed the following results: Table 1: Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Existin Proposed Delay LOS Delay LOS Biscayne Blvd & NE 26th St Biscayne Blvd & NE 26th Terr Biscayne Blvd & NE 29th St NE 26th St & NE 5th Ave NE 26th Terr & NE 5th Ave 3.3 A 4.0 A 0.6 A 0.9** A 9.8 A 9.9 A 1.7 A 2 A 4.6 A 3.9* A Note; Although delay went down vlc increased. **Critical Appraoch has 53.3s. The results of the analysis contained in this report find that the levels of service thresholds are maintained within the LOS standard of E for the Person -Trip methodology. As such, sufficient person -trip roadway capacity exists to support this development. The additional analysis performed consisted on intersection and driveway analysis. The results indicated the intersections analyzed will remain at their existing LOS with only a minimal increase in delay and/or volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, iNC, v Aia on the Bay — MUSP • 1.0 Introduction The purpose of this study is to evaluate the associated traffic impacts with the proposed re -development of the site located at 700 NE 26Th Terrace in the City of Miami. This report follows the methodology for Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) utilized in the City of Miami. The traffic impacts to the adjacent roadways were evaluated as well as signalized and unsignalized intersections that were most affected by this re -development. This analysis was performed for the existing and proposed conditions during the PM Peak Hour. This report follows the methodologies adopted by the City of Miami's Person -Trip Analysis and conforms to the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation, and Traffic Impact Studies Manual. Lastly, this report has evaluated the following: • Trip Generation • Traffic Distribution • Traffic Assignment • Traffic Counts: ATR & TMC • Existing Level of Service • Proposed Level of Service • Existing Intersection LOS • Proposed Intersection LOS • Recommendation RICHARD GARC#A & ASSOCIATES, INC. Aia on the Bap —MUSP Traffic Iannact Stu • • 2.0 Project Description / Location The following land use, as identified by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), most closely resembles the proposed development. This land use is as follows: Land Use 2 High-rise Residential Condo wi 129 DU t eIiing Units) Site access is provided via a single driveway on NE 26th Street. Figure 1 depicts the site's location map while Figure 2 is a site plan. This project is expected to have a build -out of 3 years. R cHARo GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, NC4 A'aontheBa —? USP c Irnnact Stud • Figure 1: Location Map 3 RIC ARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, ihic, 3 on the Ba _ M -SP Traffic in act Study • • Figure 2: Site Plan N.E. 26TH TERRACE AV 'NAVO N.E. 26TH STREET RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC Aia on the Bav — MUSP Tr aiic Im act Stud • 3.0 Trip Generation The trip generation characteristic for the subject project was obtained from ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 7'h Ed. ITE's Land Use 232: High -Rise Residential Condominium was used to determine the trip generation rates for the proposed development. The Trip Generation calculations results of the proposed re -development are summarized below. The ITE rates and percentages for PM Peak Hour Trips are included in Corresponding tab. Table 1 below summarizes the greatest traffic impact associated with the subject development, which occurs during the PM peak. No existing traffic was assumed for the existing buildings). As such, this report did not deduct the existing traffic from the future trip generation results. Lastly, the trip generation was converted to net vehicle trip by utilizing the City's Person Trip Methodology. This methodology uses a 16 % vehicle occupancy and an 14.9 % transit reduction factors. Lastly, a 10 pedestrian and bicycle trip reduction was used These factors are consistent with the values used in the City's DRI - Increment II for the Omni Area. 's R cHAw 3 GARCIA ASSOC A i ES$ INC. Air, on the Bar S — MUSP a"i ilrr� act Stud • • • Table 2: Trip Generation Summary Land Use (LU) High -Rise Residential Condo / Townhouse Units 129 DU ITE LU CODE 232 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS ITE TRIP GENERATION RATE 0.38 IN OUT TOTAL. Trips 31 Trips TRIPS 18 49 Gross Vehicle Trips 31 18 49 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16.0% Of Gross Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.9% Of Gross Trips Pedestrian/Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.0% Of Gross Trips Net Vehicle Trip 5 3 8 5 3 7 3 2 5 18 11 29 Net Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net Person Tri.s in Transit o 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 26 15 41 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 6 4 10 Net Person Trips (Vehicle and Transit Modes) 32 19 51 Net Person Trips (Walking/Bicycling) @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle \_ RICHARD GARCiA & ASSOCIATES, !NC. 6 Aia on the Ba4111SP Traffic Impact Study A • 4.0 Traffic Distribution The Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for the subject development is TAZ 505 as assigned by the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO). The County's TAZ are included in the Corresponding tab. The corresponding traffic distribution being assigned to the following directions are outlined in Table 2. The Corresponding tab includes a TAZ Map and the corresponding Directional Distribution Summary for this zone utilizing the 2005 Cost Affordable Plan. Table 3: Cardinal Distribution DIRECTION DISTRIBUTION % 9.34 3.80 5.70 4.00 21.48 24.99 15.67 15.02 100.00 RICHAR GARC A o iA .. I . 7 Aia on the Ba> MUSP 'Traffic Irraa act St • • • 5.0 Traffic Assignment The PM peak hour trips from Table 1 have been distributed and assigned to the existing adjacent roads. As evident from trip generation calculations, the PM peak hour represents the worse case. Table 3 was developed to depict the PM Peak Hour Assignments. Table 4: PM Peak Hour Traffic Distribution DIRECTION IN OUT Total 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 2 5 3 3 2 3 2 18 11 3 0 2 0 6 8 5 5 29 I RICHARD GARC A & ASSOCIATES, INC. • A'a an the Ba - MUSP Traffic Isrw act Stud • 6.0 Traffic Counts For the purposes of the corridor analysis, continuous 72-hour Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) were collected on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday July 26 thru July 28, 2005. These counts were averaged, adjusted for seasonal variations and corrected for multi -axle traffic by utilizing the Florida Department of Transportation Seasonal Factor (SF) and Axle Correction Factors (ACF) of 1.03 and 0.97, respectively. Table 4 depicts the results of the seasonally adjusted existing PM Peak hour traffic volume. Lastly, these calculations were similarly performed for the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) and are included in the tab labeled TMC's/ATR in the appendix. Table 5: PM Peak Hour Volume ROADWAY NAME AT DIR PM Peak Hour Tuesday Wednesday Thursday AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME Biscayne Blvd. (SR 5) Between NE 26th & NE 29th Street NB 1229 1259 1331 1273 1,309 SB 1244 1197 1213 1218 1,252 LINK 2473 2456 2544 2491 2,561 NE 2nd Avenue Between NE 26th & NE 29th Street NB 997 1077 972 1015 1,044 5t3 621 666 660 649 667 LINK 1618 1743 1632 1664 1,711 NE 29th Street Between Biscayne Blvd & NE 2 Ave. EB 156 190 180 185 190 WB 161 258 217 238 244 LINK 317 448 397 423 434 1 RICHARD GARC A ASSOCIATES, ANC. Aia on the Bud - WISP Traf%c Im act Stud • • • Additionally, manual Turning Movement Counts (TMC) were taken at the nearby intersections surrounding the subject site. These intersections were discussed and developed during the scoping phase of the project the City of Miami's Traffic Consultant. Moreover, since these intersections are not signalized, the nearby signalized intersection of Biscayne Boulevard & NE 26t" and NE 29th Street was also included. Figure 3 is a graphical representation of the existing TMC that have been seasonally adjusted. R!CHARD GARCIA ASSOCIATES, 1 C. 10 Aia on tl e Bav- 41IUSP Traffic Imact Stn,.!d • • • Figure 3: Existing PM Peak Hour TMC's A RICHARD GARCIA ASSOCIATES, itkIC. 1 1 • • A'a on the &a - MUSP Traffic Im act Stud 7.0 Existing Conditions Geometry: Biscayne Boulevard (SR 5 / US 1) Biscayne Boulevard (SR 5) is a four lane divided State Road. It provides connectivity in the north -south direction and has auxiliary left turn lanes at most intersections. On -street parking is not allowed, however bus stop do exist. Geometry: NE 2nd Avenue NE 2nd Avenue is a 4 lane non -divided, non -state roadway -arterial. It also provides connectivity in the north -south direction and has a mixture of two-way left turn lane and auxiliary left turn lanes at most intersections. On -street parking is not permitted, however some parking has been observed. Bus routes/stops do exist within this corridor. Existing Lane Geometry The existing approach lanes are depicted in Figure 4 below. RICHARD GARCIA ASSOCIATES, 12 Aiu on the .Bav — MUSP Traffic Impact Stud • • • Figure 4: Existing Lane Geometry RIC€ ARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 13 • • • A'a on the Ba - MUSP Traffic Itn act Stud Signalization: Biscayne Blvd. & NE 26th Street The existing signal timing was obtained from Miami -Dade County Signals and Signs division. The existing PM Peak hour condition has a 115 second cycle length. The Signal Operating Plan (SOP) consists of a two-phase operation. The first phase provides for a north -south through with permissive left turns. This phase has 94 seconds of green indication followed by 4 seconds of yellow. The second phase is the East-West through movement which also allows permissive left turns. This phase has 13 seconds of green indication followed by 4 seconds of yellow. An all red is not utilized at this intersection. This is further documented in the Timing/Factors tab as Asset ID 3597. Biscayne Blvd. & NE 29th Street Similarly, the signal timing was obtained from Miami -Dade County Signals and Signs division. The existing PM Peak hour condition also has a 115 second cycle length. The Signal Operating Plan (SOP) consists of a two-phase operation. The first phase provides for a north -south through with permissive left turns. This phase has a 91 seconds of green indication followed by 4 seconds of yellow and 1 second of all red. The second phase is the East-West through movement which also allows permissive left turns. This phase has 13 Aia on the Ba - MUST' traffiact Stud • • seconds of green indication followed by 4 seconds of yellow and 1 second of all red. Again, this is further documented in the Timing/Factors tab as Ass& ID 2417. RICHARD GARc A & ASSOCIATES, NC, 15 Aia on the Ba, — MUST raffic ern act Stud • • • 8.0 Transit Services Transit services were not obtained since the person trip methodology yielded an acceptable Level of Service. As such, the capacity available in the transit modes was not needed to meet the LOS standard. That notwithstanding, if this information is needed it will be provided in the final version of this report. ti RICHARD GARC A ASSOCIATES, INC. 16 Aia on the Bctt_-MU,SP Traffic Ire act Stud e • 9.0 Planned Roadway Improvements The 2006 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was reviewed for possible roadway improvements. Additionally, the downtown inset for Capacity, Safety and other Improvements map in addition to the Reconstruction, Rehabilitation and Resurfacing (RRR) Improvements map was evaluated for improvements within a three year horizon. The only project listed for the analyzed roadways was Financial Management (FM) Number 4146241as a resurfacing project slated for 2008. As such, the proposed conditions were based on the existing roadway geometry. The tab labeled Person Trip includes a print out of the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) TIP with said project. RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 17 Aia on the Bay -14ft SP affic lrn act Stud • 10.0 Committed Developments At the request of the City of Miami's Traffic Engineer, the planning department was contacted with a list of committed developments taken from the July 2005 City of Miami Large Scale Development Report: 1995-Present. Excerpts from that report are included in the tab labeled Committed along with the summary of the committed developments utilized here. Table 6 summarizes the committed developments utilized in the subsequent analyses. Table 6: Committed Developments Link ROADWAY NAME DIR Total Committed Traffic Person Trip Volume @ 1.4 PPV Mass Transit in Person -Trip @ 14.9% 1 Biscayne Blvd. (SR 5) NB 436 610 107 SB 477 668 117 LINK 913 1278 224 2 NE 2nd Avenue NB 131 183 32 SB 136 190 33 LINK 267 374 65 3 NE 29th Street EB 118 165 29 WB 76 106 19 LINK 194 272 48 A P�i RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 18 Aia on the Bav -MU'SP Traffic Impact Studv • 11.0 Corridor Level of Service Analysis A corridor analysis was performed that follows the City of Miami's Person Trip Methodology. This methodology has been utilized in the City's Development of Regional Impact (DRI) - Increment II and has been accepted by both the FDOT and the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Lastly, this methodology is further detailed in the City's document: Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami. The results of the corridor analysis reveal that all levels of service thresholds will be above a LOS C for the roadway mode. Table 7 is a summary of the results while the Person Trip tab contains the spreadsheet utilized to compute the seasonally adjusted existing condition, the future year (i.e. 2008) background condition, the background and committed condition and finally, the proposed condition containing the cumulative effects. A HARD GARCIA ASSOCIATES, INC. 19 Aia on the Bar -- MUSP Tra e m act StudR • • • Table 7: Person Trip Corridor Analysis Summary ROADWAY MODE ROADWAY FROM TO DIR MIAMI ADOPTED LOS ROADWAY PERSON TRIP V/C LOS Biscayne Blvd. (SR 5) NE 21 ST NE 29 ST NB E 0.64 C NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB E 0.61 C NE 2nd Avenue NE 21 ST NE 29 ST NB E 0.53 C NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB E 0,34 C NE 29th Street Miami Ave Biscayne Bay EB E 0.20 C Biscayne Bay Miami Ave WB E 0.25 C Biscayne Blvd. (SR 5) NE 21 ST NE 29 ST NB 0.68 NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB 0.65 NE 2nd Avenue NE 21 ST NE 29 ST NB 0.57 NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB 0.36 NE 29th Street Miami Ave Biscayne Bay Biscayne Bay Miami Ave EB WB 0.21 0.27 Biscayne Blvd ((: SR 5..,.:; ) ..., _ .. E29ST- NB E 0.89 D NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB E 0.88 D NE 2nd Avenue NE 21 ST NE 29 ST NB E 0.63 C NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB E 0.43 C NE 29th Street Miami Ave Biscayne Bay EB E 0.33 C YBayAve Biscayne Miami A WB E 0.35 �.. ...,T. C ......::.. ........�.., Biscayne Blvd. (SR 5) NE 21 ST NE 29 ST NB 0.89 NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB 0.88 NE 2nd Avenue NE 21 ST NE 29 ST NB 0.64 NE 29 ST NE 21 ST SB E 0.44 C NE 29th Street Miami Ave Biscayne Bay Biscayne Bay Miami Ave EB WB 0.34 E 0.35 RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC, 20 • • • A'a on fhe Ba MUSP Traffic Im act Stud 12.0 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection analyses were performed for the seasonally adjusted existing condition and the proposed condition at the stop controlled and signalized intersections using the Synchro/SimTraffic software. The results indicate the LOS is within acceptable guidelines for these types of facilities. Table 8 provides a summary of the results while the . Corresponding tab provides the program output. Since the subject project's driveway is at a Cul-de-sac the future driveway volumes were estimated from the Net Vehicle Trips. The capacity analysis was done for the Existing {without site traffic) and proposed conditions (with site traffic and committed projects) for the PM peak hour for the following intersections: Biscayne Blvd. & NE 26t1" Street (Signalized) • Biscayne Blvd. & NE 26th Terrace (Stop Controlled) • Biscayne Blvd. & NE 29th Street (Signalized) ▪ NE 26th Street & NE 5th Avenue (Stop Controlled) NE 26thTerrace & NE 5th Avenue (Stop Controlled) Table 8: Intersection LOS Intersection Existing Delay LOS Proposed Delay LOS Biscayne Blvd & NE 26th St Biscayne Blvd & NE 26th Terr Biscayne Blvd & NE 29th St NE 26th St & NE 5th Ave NE 26th Terr & NE 5th Ave 3.1 A 3.9 A 0.6 A 4.6 A 9.6 A 9.4* A 1.6 A 2.3 4.6 A 3.8* A R CHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 21 Aia on the Ba - USP Traffic Stud • Figure 5 below depicts the future intersection volumes (TMC). figure 5: Proposed PM Peak TMC (2008) NE26 St 61 54---> 16 9-4 cn co co CD 0) 15Th NE 29 ST NE 26 Ter NE '26 St RicHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC, 22 Aia on theBa , — WISP Traffic lm act Stud • • 4_ RIC HARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, 23 Aia on the Bav - MUSP Traffic IcDac Stud' • • • Figure 6 depicts the driveway volumes. Lastly, the LOS analysis for the driveway resulted in an average delay of 3.3 seconds which corresponds to an LOS A. Driveway delay was calculated as 8.6 seconds. Figure 6: Driveway Volume RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24 A'n on the Bay — MUSP 'Traffic Im act Stud • 13.0 Transportation Control Measures Plan (TCMP) In keeping with the City's effort to alleviate traffic congestion, the developer will make every effort to encourage the use of the surrounding transportation system to include, but not limited to, pedestrian, bicycle and transit. During the data collection and field review phase of this report it was evident this area is highly used by pedestrians. Additionally, information will be provided to residents and patrons of the surrounding transit system. Lastly, every effort will be made to design amenities that encourage all modes of transportation. R€CHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, ltiC. 25 Ara on the Bay IS' Traffic Ire act Study • • 14.0 Recommendation The results of the analysis contained in this report find that the levels of service thresholds are maintained within the LOS standard of E for the Person -Trip methodology utilizing only the roadway mode. Additionally, all the intersections analyzed have acceptable Level of Service. The results indicated the intersections analyzed will remain at their existing LOS A condition. As such, sufficient roadway person -trip capacity exist to support this development. RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, 1I c. 26 Aja on the Bar — MUSP Tr le Study • • Appendix A: Trip Generation RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, NC. Appendix Aia on the Say --- MUSP Traffic Itn act Studv • • • Appendix B: Trip Distribution RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES NC. Appendix Aia on the Bav-1i1USP raffic Irn act Stud • • Appendix C: Signal Timing & Adjustment Factors R CHARD GARCIA ASSOCIATES, ES, Ca Appendix Apr on the Bay MUSP Traffic T act Stud • A Appendix D: Traffic Counts (TMC's & ATR) RI :HARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appendix Aia on the Ba MUSP Traffic act Stud • • Appendix E: Committed Developments RICHARD GARCIA & AssocATES, NC Appenthx Aga nn the Burr - MIISF Traffic l act Stud • Appendix F: Transit RlCHARD GARC A & ASSOCIATES, ?NC. Appendix Aja on the Bay .... ML'SP Traffic Im act Study • Appendix G: Corridor Analysis (Person Trip) RICHARD GARCIA ASSOCIATES, iNC Appendix Aia on the Bay - MUSP • • • Appendix H: Intersection & Driveway Analysis 1\ RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appendix