Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 2Gannett Fleming CONSULTANT WORK ORDER PROPOSAL GANNETT FLEMING, INC. ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS Suite 701 7300 Corporate Center Drive Miami, Florida 33126 E-mail: ccejas@gfnet.com Fax: (786) 845-6802 Office: (798) 845-9540 {April 3, 2006 Gannett Fleming, Inc. proposes to provide the services identified below for the project entitled "City of Miami Overtown Station Redevelopment Environmental Assessment (EA)", pursuant to its Professional Service Agreement with the City of Miami for Transportation and Transit Professional Services services, dated October 25, 2004. 1. GENERAL This scope of work provides the services necessary to progress the City of Miami Overtown Station Redevelopment project forward through the completion of an EA: 1. Program Management and Set-up; 2. Agency Coordination; 3. Public Involvement; 4. Data Collection and Existing Conditions; 5.. Purpose of and Need for Action; 6. Alternatives Development and Analysis; 7. Affected Environment; and 8. Environmental Consequences Project Description The City of Miami, Florida is proposing to allow redevelopment of an area between the MetroRail Overtown Station and 1-95 to construct a Crosswinds Communities 1,050 residential and 75,000 square feet of retail, eliminating hotel and office space originally proposed in the 1982 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). This EA will document the existing environmental and socio-economic conditions in the study area, the proposed impacts from the currently proposed development plan, and general differences from the pre-existing conditions documented in the 1982 FEIS in order to prepare a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The primary purpose of this study is to document for the City of Miami that the project is substantively similar in scope, scale and minority participation that an EA/FONSI is sufficient to document compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Study Objectives The overall objectives of this study include the following: • Determine existing environmental and socio-economic conditions in the study area, as well as a summary of baseline conditions prior to residential and business relocations enacted as a result of approved 1982 FEIS and utilization of funding from the Urban Mass Transit Administration (UMTA). • Document the data collection and analysis of impacts to the environment as well as the social environment, including coordination with a diverse group of project stakeholders such as the local community, public interest and/or activist groups, project developers, and public agencies. • Prepare and circulate an EA/FONSI for the City. 2. SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1: Project Management and Set -Up The project set up and structure will be designed to responsibly report the status of the project budget, work effort, progress and schedule. The project team will use project management software that is compatible with already established City of Miami systems, policies, procedures and practices. All project systems and procedures will be compatible with City of Miami systems and software. Reports will be straightforward, easy to read and understand, logically organized and structured to provide the relevant and important information. Reports will provide the needed information to assure the City of Miami that the work is being accomplished as required and to facilitate invoice review and approval. The project management system will feature safeguards for the early identification of issues and their effective resolution. Deliverables: • City of Miami Overtown Station Redevelopment EA Project Management Plan (PMP) • Progress meetings, meeting minutes, and action item lists • Preliminary and final Project Master Schedules in graphic form with descriptive text • Monthly progress reports and invoices • Project QA/QC procedures • Document control plan/filing system 1.1 General Protect Management The project team will develop a system for the management of the EA study, including the required Project Management Plan (PMP), and a system for project control including necessary procedures for conducting the work and managing the resources, communications, budget and schedule controls and monitoring, reporting project status and progress, document control quality assurance/ quality control and administration. The project team is responsible for reacting to indications made by the various management information system . reports, as needed, to correct or adjust project activities which are diverting from adapted scope, schedule, or quality and to bring them to the attention of the City of Miami. 1.2 Project Management Plan The project team will develop a PMP for the management of the EA study consistent with existing City of Miami procedures. The PMP will be periodically updated and maintained as needed and will define the following: •. Project organization • Work Scope and schedule • Project management, control and monitoring, communications program • Quality management plan/procedures The Overtown Station Redevelopment EA PMP will be reviewed and approved by City of Miami. The project team will be responsible for incorporating comments from the City of Miami into the PMP. 1.3 Project Management Progress Meetings The project team will conduct joint progress meetings with the City of Miami to manage and track the work. These meetings will be scheduled monthly. It is assumed that the City of Miami and the project team project managers will be in close communication, removing the need for more frequent meetings. The progress meetings will highlight specific tasks and issues which have become critical, or could otherwise affect orderly performance of the work. The minutes and an action item list will be kept and distributed (electronically) to a standard list of recipients. Minutes will be distributed within three working days of the meeting. 1.4 Project Master Schedule The project team will develop and maintain a Project Master Schedule using Microsoft Project software (or another acceptable/compatible tool as specified by the City of Miami). Time allowances will be made for various reviews, approvals, permits, and clearances and, as may be necessary, funding actions. The schedule will include work tasks, the schedule for work performance, deliverables and due dates. 1.6 ProgresslStatus Reporting and Invoicing A project progress report will be submitted to the City of Miami with each invoice. The report will document the hours spent by task during the previous month, the cumulative hours to date, a comparison to the budgeted hours, and a description of tasks or deliverables completed during that month. The report will also include a statement of resolution or action for identified problems that may have been encountered during the past month. The report will include the complete project financial picture with dollars spent during the month, total dollars spent and a comparison to the budget. Progress reports will be issued in the first week of each month for the preceding month and should accompany the project invoice. The monthly project invoice will be prepared in a format acceptable to the City of Miami. 1.6 QA/QC Procedures The project team will be responsible. for insuring that all work products conform to City of Miami QA standards. The project team will develop the Overtown Station Redevelopment EA QA Plan in cooperation with the City of Miami. This will be accomplished through.an internal QC process performed by the project team. This QC process will ensure that quality is achieved through checking, reviewing, and surveillance of work activities. 1.7 Document Control and Project Files The project team will utilize the document control system that is in place for the City of Miami Capital Improvement Program. Initially it is thought that this will be primarily to track correspondence and relevant project materials and will need to evolve as the project advances to other phases of work. The project correspondence procedure will control the distribution of written correspondence and will require that copies of all written correspondence pertaining specifically to this Project be provided to the City of Miami for its records. TASK 2: Agency Coordination As currently planned, the City of Miami Overtown Station Area Redevelopment EA will include facilities that must be coordinated closely with a number of agencies, such as several departments of Miami -Dade County, and utility providers such as Florida Power & Light (FPL), to ensure successful, efficient and timely implementation of the project. The agency coordination is intended to secure the participation of appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies that have a stake in the outcome of the EAIFONSI. Agencies will be involved to facilitate successful project development and implementation. Deliverables: • Minutes of meetings with key stakeholders (as necessary) 2.1 HUD Coordination Meetings An initial activity of the EA will be a project coordination meeting/conference calls with the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) staff in local or regional offices. These meetings will provide details on the project scope and schedule to the HUD. Input will be sought from HUD on the project and the NEPA requirements for the project. 2.2 Meetings with Key Stakeholders As part of the study process, it is envisioned that meetings will be held with the following groups: • Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) • City of Miami Community Redevelopment Agency • Miami Parking Authority • Miami Housing • Miami -Dade County Housing • Miami -Dade Transit (MDT) .One set of meetings will occur at the beginning of the study process (project definition), and the second set will occur near the end of the study process (evaluation). TASK 3: Public Involvement The purpose of the public involvement program is 1) to solicit information from public (including residents, land owners, employers, employees, developers, and decision makers), and exchange ideas with that public; 2) to establish and maintain dialogue among public officials, residents, transportation planners, and special interest groups (i,e., employers, environmentalists, transit users, etc.); and 3) to meet the public hearing requirements of the HUD project development process. Deliverables: • Public involvement Strategies: Community Partnering, Public Outreach, and Public Awareness (in coordination with the City of Miami) • Corridor Database/Mail/E-mail List — Both Hard Copy and Microsoft Access Format (in coordination with the City of Miami) • Public Comments/Hearing Transcription • Project -Specific Website Coordination, as necessary to support the City of Miami • Fact Sheet(s), Presentation Materials 3.1 Public Involvement Plan The project team will develop a public involvement program that takes full advantage of the results of the committees and structures already in place. The public involvement effort will be comprised of formal and informal public involvement strategies developed in coordination with the City of Miami and will be consistent with its existing public involvement plans and policies. The City will implement any public meetings with support of the project team. To accomplish this, the project team will implement a variety of public involvement strategies in support of the City of Miami public involvement activities to insure the public is fully informed and engaged in the study process. 3.2 . Advance Notification An advance notification will be prepared for the project, signed by the Client and issued by the project team based on a mailing list assembled from GIS data. It will include a fact sheet describing the need for the project, the overall project description, environmental information, and a list of all NEPA-related permits potentially required. 3.3 Agency Kickoff Meeting Although a Project Scoping meeting is not required for this project consistent with Federal planning requirements, it is recommended that an agency kickoff meeting be held near the beginning of the study. This meeting may be advertised in local newspapers and other media. Detailed documentation of the meeting, including materials presented and verbal and written comments received, shall be documented in the EA, as well as in the project records. At the agency kickoff meeting, a list of potential alternatives will be presented, including but not limited to, "Ultimate Use" (maximum allowed under current zoning), "local plan" (community proposal), "original design" (approved in 1982 FEIS), and the current proposal (Crosswinds project). A No - Build alternative will also be developed, and may be presented at this meeting. This meeting will provide agency representatives, stakeholders, and the public the opportunity to review project materials and provide suggestions and identify concerns. 3.4 . Corridor Database/Mailing List The City of Miami will provide the project team a mailing list of individuals and organizations that abut the proposed developments. Additionally, an e-mail database of individuals that have expressed interest in being involved in the project will be compiled. These lists will be updated throughout the study process and will include: elected officials; transportation, environmental, civic, and business organizations; county, city, state, regional and federal agencies; residents and property owners; transportation providers; the media; and other interested groups and individuals. For targeted mailings, the project team will sort the master database for targeted mailings to a variety of groups including committees, elected and appointed federal, state, county and local officials, and the general public. 3.5 Public Workshops A formal public meeting will be conducted as the technical work progresses and concepts and alternatives are developed and analyzed prior to the completion of the EAIFONSI, The meeting will offer opportunities to present project findings, discuss all alternatives considered during the process, and receive further public comment. • The workshop will be supported by appropriate maps, graphics, and public displays and written status summaries. Comments received will be considered in the study analysis and recommendations, included in the final report, as well as presented to public officials. • After the public workshop, the project team will assist the City of Miami staff in preparing, submitting and presenting the required documentation to the Miami -Dade MPO Board or other entities, as required. 3.6 Stakeholder Interviews interviews with key regional elected officials, local neighborhood leaders, representatives of related transportation agencies, business leaders, and others will be conducted during the initial stage of the study. The interviews will be designed to identify and prioritize critical issues. The interviews will also assist in refining project goals and in selecting criteria to be used in assessing future, options. Interviews will be highly focused but not uniformly structured. The project team will recommend potential interview candidates to be screened -and selected by the City of Miami. Subsequently, the project team will develop the interview format and be available to conduct and document the interviews, as appropriate. 3.7 Business and Property Owner Meetings In addition to the above listed meetings, the project team shall be available for meetings with business and property owners adjacent to the proposed project limits. These meetings will allow for the exchange of information and input from the business and property owners. The project team shall budget for three (3) such meetings. 3.8 . Other Public Involvement Activities In addition to the above listed meetings, other activities are anticipated in support of the City's Public Involvement Program. These activities include: • Preparation of project fact sheet(s) 3.9 Public Hearing It is recommended that a Public Hearing be held at the end of the EA to satisfy both Federal planning requirements and local interests to ensure an open and public involvement outreach effort. This Public Hearing shall be held after the Draft EA has been completed, reviewed and Final EA has been approved. This meeting shall be legally noticed via Notice of Availability in a paper of record, and detailed documentation of the meeting, including materials presented and verbal and written comments received, shall be documented in the FONSI, for use in the presentation of a recommendation to public officials, as well as for the project records. A court reporter shall be present to record public comments. 3.10 Final Public Involvement Report A Public Involvement Report will be prepared by the City of Miami with assistance by the project team at the completion of the EA to document all public outreach activities and input received from community leaders, stakeholders, other interested parties, and the general public. TASK 4: Data Collection and Existing Conditions The project team will assemble an inventory of data to assist in the evaluation of alternatives in the City of Miami Overtown Station Area Redevelopment EA. Information will be collected as necessary from the appropriate South Florida agencies, including short and long range planning documents of local jurisdictions and agencies such as City of Miami, Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization, Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -Dade County Public Works, FDOT District VI, South Florida Regional Planning Council, and others to define and document the current and future needs of this area of the City. This information will be presented in a way to exhibit the community mobility and economic development needs and opportunities that may be addressed by the project resulting from the EA. The project team shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of environmental analysis for this project as outlined herein. The project team shall utilize the Florida Geographic Data Library (FGDL), or other appropriate, database that includes all existing features. This data base information shall be compatible for use on base maps used for public presentations, corridor maps, and alternative plans. The project team shall review relevant information from prior studies and data collection efforts from this study to establish the substantive environmental issues that must be addressed at the level of effort appropriate for this study. The project team shall define and collect the specific environmental baseline information necessary to perform the development and evaluation of the study alternatives. The project team will also initiate the formal consultation process with all relevant regulatory agencies. The project team will develop a description of the existing conditions within the project study area. The description will utilize data from previous studies and readily available public information. The description will include an overall description of the existing planning, engineering, environmental, social and economic conditions that pertain to the project. Much of the information needed for a description of the existing condition within the project study were compiled in the City of Miami initial Streetcar Feasibility Study completed in May 2005. This document included information such as: • Population, Households and Employment Trends • Attractions and Important Destinations • Area Redevelopment • Programmed Transportation System Improvements • Characteristics of North -South Streets (physical and operational) and adjacent development • Characteristics of East-West Streets (physical and operational) and adjacent development • Horizontal and Vertical Clearances • Economic Development Opportunities a Land Use Plans, Zoning and incentive Programs o Current Development o Development Proposals o Population and Employment Forecasts o Real Estate Development Revenue Projections While the description of existing conditions within the project study area will utilize much of this previous work, it will be updated to reflect current conditions. Additional data from prior studies such as the FDOT District VI Port of Miami Access Study will be sought and utilized as applicable. Specific additional and more detailed data to be collected by the Developer and/or the City for the study area and facilities within the study includes: • Traffic data (volumes and mix), • Signal and signal timing plans, • Crash data (5 year history of vehicular and pedestrian crashes), • Parking supply, utilization and cost data (on and off street parking), • Bus and rail transit service and ridership data, • Private jitney service and ridership data, Deliverables: • Existing Conditions Summary Technical Memorandum 4.1 Field Review The project team shall conduct three (3) field trips as needed to collect the most recent planning, preliminary engineering and environmental data. 4.2 Review Previous Site Development Studies and Plans. The project team will assemble, review, and summarize all previous site development studies prepared in the area conducted over, including: pertinent information from the previous City of Miami Initial Streetcar Corridor Feasibility Study, the FDOT Port of Miami Access Study, the DDA Downtown Miami Master Plan and the Regional Systems Plan Update conducted by Miami -Dade MPO as part of the 2030 Long Range Plan. The details of nearby or adjacent planned and proposed site developments will be summarized graphically on a corridor base map, prepared by the project team, Narrative summaries of the proposed projects will also be prepared. 4.3 Social Data Social features data that will be collected, compiled and utilized to screen the alternatives will include the following: • Land Use and Changes: The project team will obtain existing and future land use plans, zoning codes/regulations, information on recent and planned developments, capital improvement projects, CRA areas and characteristics, Federal Enterprise/Empowerment zone areas and characteristics, and brownfields. • Community Cohesion • Community Services • Social And Economic Impacts • Relocation Potential • 4(f) Potential, including: o Wildlife Refuges, and, o Recreational/Parkland. • Visual Impacts and Aesthetics • Utilities and Railroads • Archaeological and Historical Sites: The project team will review any Cultural Resource Analysis Reports, Technical Memoranda, or other similar studies to document information conducted within the study area. If any significant historic resources listed in or previously determined eligible for designation in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are identified, they will be documented in the EA/FONSI and coordinated the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). This will not, for the purposes of this study, involve background research or a judgmental "windshield survey" to assist in the identification of new resources that may be eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. The locations of the previously identified and documented significant historic resources will be plotted on aerial maps and/or USGS Quadrangle maps. Photographs will be provided of a sample of significant resources or key resources identified during the judgmental windshield survey. A desktop archaeological review, will be performed by the project team to identify NRHP- listed archaeological resources as well as the potential for archaeological resources eligible for listing in the NRHP in the project area. It will also determine what level of archaeological testing (most likely monitoring) will be required to satisfy the current Florida Division of Historical Resources site identification/survey recommendations. The methods, findings, historical overview, evaluations, and recommendations will be documented in the EAIFONSI. This write up will contain the results of the historic resources area level review and archaeological desktop review, which will identify the NRHP-listed or NRHP-eligible historic and archaeological resources- within the study area. This EAIFONSI will not include FMSF forms for the identified resources. 4.4 Natural Data Natural features data to be collected, compiled and utilized to screen the alternatives will include the following: • Wetlands and Potential Mitigation • Water Quality • Outstanding Florida Waters, Wild And Scenic Rivers, And Aquatic Preserves • Floodplains • Coastal Barrier Resources And Coastal Zone Consistency • Wildlife And Habitat • Identify Permit Conditions • Farmlands 4.6 Physical Data Physical features data to be collected, compiled and utilized to screen the alternatives will include the following: • • Noise & Vibration • ' Air Quality o Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities o Scenic Highways; • Construction Impact Analysis • Contamination: The project team will perform the following activities: o Review recent Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) reports available for nearby City of Miami projects (e.g. Downtown Transit Circulator project) will be utilized to screen study area for known or potentially contaminated sites or parcels; o The project team will review the electronic database (or geodatabase) files, integrating the data into the project Geographic Information System (GIS) geodatabase; a The project team will then "ground truth" this geodatabase of potential or known contamination risks in the study area via "windshield survey", noting any new potential risks; and, o The project team will then conduct selective reviews of regulatory agency site files for any insufficiently documented, or newly observed, sites, facilities, or activities within the study area. 4.6 Traffic and Pedestrian Traffic Data The project team will review available data from resources such as the City of Miami Initial Streetcar Feasibility Study and FOOT Port of Miami Access Study (as available). Existing Traffic Data Collection The project team will collect all transportation information that will be used for the EA: • Roadway enforcement regulation on all roadways that will be impacted. • Parking inventories and access/egress counts of affected parking lot and garage driveways. • Existing location and frequency of on and off street service delivery areas. • Assessment of available Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and AM and PM peak hour intersection data for impacted intersections. Traffic data information will include: ADT counts for both existing and forecast years and weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic counts. 4.7 Street Network Capacity Analysis A capacity analysis will be conducted for all the signalized intersections located within the study area. This analysis will be conducted to identify existing levels of service and identify intersection deficiencies resulting from existing traffic conditions. All analyses will be conducted in. accordance with the methodologies outlined in the latest version of Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board. Signal coordination analysis will be completed for all signalized intersections in the study area and they will be analyzed as a system using SYNCHRO 'software. The SYNCHRO software mode! will be used to evaluate and optimize the existing traffic operation conditions. 4.8 Parking Data The project team will collect on and off-street public and private parking data (supply, costs and utilization) for facilities along the various streets where parking is present and could potentially be impacted by transit. Data will be collected for 2 typical weekdays in the AM, Midday and PM and on 1 typical weekend day and will distinguish between short-term and long-term parking utilization. The lack of available vehicular parking and the cost for parking will be summarized. Recommendations for removal and/or reconfiguration of on -street parking will be performed and documented within the EA/FONSI. 4.9 Socioeconomic Data Socioeconomic data will be collected from the appropriate South Florida agencies, including local jurisdictions and agencies such as City of Miami, Miami -Dade County, South Florida Regional Planning Council, Downtown 'Development Authority, the Omni Community Redevelopment Agency, the Southeast Overtown Park West Community Redevelopment Agency, etc. to define and document the current and future socioeconomic conditions of this corridor. This data collection effort will include documentation of current and future development activities within the corridor. Current and anticipated development activities within the corridor include public facilities, retail space, office space, hotels, parking, and residential units. • The socioeconomic data collection and analysis will also include the identification of all potential transit dependent /friendly populations such as youth/students, elderly, self reported disabled, Cl- ear households and low income households. This information will be presented in a way to exhibit the community housing, economic, and mobility needs and opportunities that may be addressed by the options evaluated in the EA. A plot of this data will be made graphically on a corridor base map to provide an overview of existing and planned development patterns, including population and employment as well as density and intensity of residential and commercial development. Land use and zoning data will also be considered in the development of the map. 4.10 Utilities Data The City will provide the project team information on existing overhead and underground utilities along all streets located within the study area by the Developer. This information will be provided in summary form in electronic CADD format. 4.11 Summary of Existing Environmental Conditions The project team will prepare a draft and final Summary of Existing Environmental Conditions Technical Memorandum. TASK 5: Purpose of and Need for Action The project team will develop a purpose and need statement for the project based on the information gathered and input generalized obtained through the agency coordination and the public involvement program. 5.1 Goals and Objectives Goals and objectives will be identified during the Public Involvement and Agency Coordination tasks and from. any previously adopted goals.and objectives that are still relevant, The project team will also develop project goals and objectives in cooperation with the City of Miami. The goals and objectives will be documented in the EAIFONSI. 5.2 Project Purpose and Need Statement Based upon information collected during the preparation and circulation of the AN, the project team shall develop a project purpose and need statement for the proposed redevelopment project. The Purpose and Need Statement will form the basis against which the No Build Alternative will be measured. The statement will clearly identify the problem to be solved by the proposed project. It will break down the issues into elements contributing to the problems, which must be addressed by proposed solutions. The Statement of Purpose and Need will draw on information developed during the EA including existing and projected travel conditions, environmental quality concerns, and community characteristics in the study area. The following activities will be performed to develop the Purpose and Need Statement: • Assess the need for redevelopment in the proposed study area, including associated transportation improvements based on consideration of study area limits; existing and proposed facilities and services. • Identify opportunities and constraints. • Document the planning and project development process in terms of key decision points. • Coordinate the development of the Purpose and Need Statement with federal, state and local agencies and the public through the public outreach program. TASK 6: Alternatives Development and Analysis In this task, the project team, with the assistance of the City of Miami, will define project alternatives to be analyzed in the selection of a preferred project to meet the purpose and need. It is anticipated that alternatives to be analyzed will include but not be limited to, "Ultimate Use" (maximum allowed under current zoning), "local plan" (community proposal), "original design" (approved in 1982 FEIS), and the current proposal (Crosswinds project). A No -Build alternative will also be developed. All work done on the development of EA will be in accordance with all prior work. The project team will become familiar with the work previously completed and use it as a basis for the work to be accomplished in the study area. Deliverables: • Evaluation Methodology Technical Memorandum (Draft and Final). • Comparative cost estimates in support of evaluation of alternatives in the EA process (in coordination with the City of Miami and/or the Crosswinds Developer). 6.1 Alternatives Development The project team, with the assistance of the City of Miami will define the project alternatives including No Build and Build for four scenarios: "Ultimate Use" (maximum allowed under current zoning), "local plan" (community proposal), "original design" (approved in 1982 FEIS), and the current proposal (Crosswinds project). 6.2 Evaluation Criteria Development Based upon the initial screening of the alternatives, a set of evaluation criteria will be developed for use in the evaluation of the alternatives to be further developed. Credible evaluation criteria and a "defendable", rational, and logical evaluation and screening process will be conducted using HUD, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and state guidelines as well as local plans and programs. Evaluation measures will be developed in partnership with the stakeholders to correspond to the defined study Purpose and Need Statement. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation measures will include, but not be limited to, categories of system characteristics, physical/geometric constraints, right-of-way requirements, infrastructure, access, urban/regional compatibility,. potential cost, and environmental assessment, including environmental justice. Deliverables: • Criteria Measures. • Matrices of Evaluation. 6.3 Alternatives Refinement The five viable alternatives will be further refined as necessary to develop sufficient information for evaluation based on the previously developed evaluation criteria. The refinement will include conceptual engineering as necessary. Conceptual Capital Cost Estimate Conceptual, order -of -magnitude estimates of capital costs will be developed by the City (and/or the Developer for the Crosswinds project alternative) for each of the five final alternatives in support of alternative evaluations and comparative studies as well as cost comparisons. The capital cost estimate will use a methodology accepted by HUD. Deliverables: • Capital cost estimates in support of alternative evaluations during the EA process. 6.4 Patronage Forecasting The project team will review the existing Major Use Traffic Permit (MUSP) Traffic Impact Analysis of July, 2005 for the proposed Crosswinds Development. Similar information for all other viable alternatives will be provided by the City and/or the Developer. The results will be documented in the EA/FONSI. TASK 7: Affected Environment Application of the evaluation measures to 'each of the alternatives under consideration for environmental impacts will be documented in the EA/FONSI. This evaluation of environmental impacts for the proposed alternatives will utilize the information developed during the previous subtasks and document them in the EA/FONSI. 7.0 Affected Environment Analysis A comparative analysis of the various project alternatives against information compiled and analyzed in Task 4, Data Collection and Existing Conditions, will be conducted by the project team. Those environmental issues affected by the proposed project will be addressed and the results will be documented in the EA/FONSI, TASK 8: Environmental Consequences 8.0 Environmental Consequences A comparative analysis of the various project alternatives against information compiled and analyzed in Task 4, Data Collection and Existing Conditions, and assessed in Task 7, Affected Environment Analysis, will be conducted by the project team. 8.1 The results of the study will be documented in the Draft and Final EA/FONSI. --TIME OF PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE OF WORK Task Task Name and/or Activity Description Hours Deliverable Schedule 1 Program Management and Set-up 129 PMP, Meetings, Minutes, Schedule, Progress Reports, QAIQC Procedures, Doc Control System 1-2 weeks after NTP 2 Agency Coordination 98 Meetings, Minutes Throughout study 3 Public involvement 433 Strategies, Stakeholder Interview Report, Corridor Database, Public Hearing Comments and Transcription, Fact Sheet(s), Presentation materials, Throughout study 4 Data Collection and Existing Conditions 279 Existing Conditions Survey Tech Memo 2-3 weeks after NTP 5 Purpose of and Need for Action 18 Purpose and Needs 3 to 4 weeks after NTP 6 Alternatives Development and Analysis 70 Evaluation Methodology Technical Memorandum, Comparative Capital Costs estimates, Crllerla Measures and Evaluation Matrices 4-5 weeks after NTP 7 Affected Environment Analysis 26 EAJFONSI text 5-6 weeks after NTP 8 Environmental Consequences 118 EAIFONSI text, Draft/Final EA!FONSI 6-8 weeks after NTP TOTAL 11T1 4. COMPENSATION Consultant shall perform the Work detailed in this Proposal for a Hourly Rate, Not to Exceed fee of $162,636,40— .One Hundred and Sixty -Two Thousand, Six Hundred Thirty -Six Dollars and forty cents. 5, PROJECT MANAGER CONSULTANT'S Project, Manager for this Work Order assignment will be Carlos M. Cejas, P.E. Submitted by: Carlos M. Cejas,, .E. Vice -President, Gannett Fleming, Inc.