Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetterh�K Martin's Lamar Uniforms Attn: Mr. Ron Klepner 2150 NW 21 Street Miami, FL 33142 Litg 41liamY SENT VIA FAX February 14, 2006 10E ARRIOI-A Cfly Manager Subject; Bid No. 03-04-009 - Uniforms and Accessories for Police Dear Mr. Klepner: We are in receipt of your letter dated January 31, 2006, and in an effort to further investigate the issues of concern, the Purchasing Department conducted a visual inspection and comparison between the newly received pants and shirts and the pants and shirts submitted as control samples. The following was our Department's findings: Color Matching Visual inspection revealed the color of the shirts and pants do not match those of the control samples. You mentioned in your., letter that test results were attached; however, there was no attachment with your letter. Nevertheless, these test results would not be acceptable to the City, because we cannot verify these test were conducted comparing the controlled sample with what is now being received by the Miami Police Department. Furthermore, comparing the sample shirt you submitted- upon the City changing from your alternate bid to your base bid- to the shirt picked up on January 11, 2006, it is obvious to the human eye that the colors are not a match. This prompted the City to inform you about this problem and other areas of non-compliance outlined below in the letter dated January 27, 2006. Collar Stay — Visual inspection revealed that they were not sewn to specifications or to match that of the sample; therefore, not acceptable. Pocket Flaps — Visual inspection and measurements taken revealed the flaps of the newly received shirts were 5-9/16" in width and 2 V2." in length; in comparison to the sample shirt flup which measures 5-15/16" in width and 2-15/16 in length. This 6.7% and 17.2% difference, respectively, is not within acceptable tolerances. Although Martin's Lamar Uniforms may feel these are acceptable deviations to the specifications and tolerances, the City is not in agreement and is the "sole judge of approved equal and nonperformance" as stipulated throughout our contract, which include any failure on the part of the successful bidder to accept award, to furnish required documents, and/or fulfill any portion of this contract within the time stipulated." During the past twelve months, the Police Department in conjunction with the Purchasing Department have had several meetings with Martin's Lamar Uniforms to address different issues of concern with the uniforms being provided under this contract. It is evident to the City of Miami that Martin' Lamar Uniforms lack of quality control to meet the City's uniform specifications has been a major contributing factor of nonperformance. In accordance with Sections 1,24 and 2.27 of the contract and your inability to remedy the default as evidenced above, please be advised that the Purchasing Department will proceed with its recommendation to terminate the contract between the City of Miami and Martin's Lamar Uniforms for the furnishing of uniforms and accessories for Police, pursuant to Bid No. 03-04-009. The termination of this contract shall not be effective untilsuch time as the City Commission takes official action. Due to the position that Martin's Lamar Uniforms has placed the City in, ail existing or future orders which may be placed up to the official termination date are expected to be fulfilled. These orders shall in no way be construed as meeting the contract specifications or have no bearing on the City's position regarding the default of the contract. Such orders shall only be filled to alleviate the urgent need to equip our Police Officers with uniforms until a new contract is awarded. arcos, Diector t Officer GM:MR:ms c: Major M. Exposito, Miami Police Departure Jay Pollen, MPD, Property Unit DEPARTM ; CHASING 444 S,W. 21 d Avenue, 6''' Floor Miami, 1`I.. 331:30 (305) 416-1900 Fax: (305) 416-1925 / Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3.307013 Miami, Florida 332.33-0708 Addre s: purc:haselk:l.miami.Fl.us Werbsite: hiipalci.mleimi.fl.us