HomeMy WebLinkAboutPre legislation 2• •
J-U2-111
2/4/02
02- 144
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION,
WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY. MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS
OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED
FIRMS TO PROVIDE .PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR
PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "B/' i7ESIGNATED PROJECTS
FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY IN
RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING TIE CITY MANAGER TO
NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENTS WITH EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED 1N ATTACHMENT "A"
FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING
FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS.
BE TT RESOLVED SY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recommendation or the City Manager to
approve the findings of theselection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the moat qualil;;ied firms to provide
professional engineering construction management services for
Pubic Works Ca&egory "13" designated projects for 2002 through
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. The Corradino Group, Inc.
2. Nova Consulting Inc.
3. Mer'1in Enginoeri lg Inc.
4. Civil.-Cadd Engineering Inc,
5, CES Consultants, Inc, (ALTERNATE)
6. PBS&J (ALTERNATE)
,. • . $ f '+, .. . , .•'fu . . 11
th log 11, 7. fr •
CITY
�rCO I�uN
ySIIO
MqqRT! C to
FE 33 11 2002
• •
Section 2. The recommendation of the City Manager
to approve the findings of Lhe selection committee, pursuant
to Request for Proposals, as Lo the most qualified firms to
provide professional ADA requirement services for Public
Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. 15S&J
2, R 0 Architects + Planners, Inc.
3. Gurri Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE)
Section 3. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request tor proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architec _ural engineering services for Pub1 i.c Works
Category "B" designated projocLs for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.?. Eng. Consultants, Inc.)
2. Indigo Service Corporation
Section 4. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant; to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architecture services for Public Works Category "B"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank
order, are accepted.
1. , Curri Matute PA
2. Zy,scavich, Inc.
3. R.Y. f•leisenbottle Architects, P.A.
4. R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc.
5. Ber'mello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. PBSJ (ALTERNATE)
Page 2 of 7
02- 144
• •
Section 5. The recommendation of the City Manager: to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional environmental engineering services for Public Work;
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. ATC Group Services Inc.
2, H.J. Ross.. Associates,.lnc.
3. CARS Corporation
4. BN1] Engineers, Inc..
5, Nova Consulting Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc. (11.T2RNATE)
Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional general: engineering services for Public Works
Category "S" designated projects for 2002 through 2C04, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc.
2. Kunde, Sprecher, & Associate;, Inc.
3. Metric Engineering, Inc.
4. PBS&J
5. Marlin Engineering, Inc.
6. PHs Engineering Corp.
7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE)
8. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 7. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant- to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified ffi.rms to provide
Page 3 of 7
02- 144
professional landscape architecture services for Public Works
Category " l' designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. Falcon & Bueno
2. Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc.
3. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
4. EDAW, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 6.
The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of Lhe selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional mechanical engineering services ' .fax: Public Works
Category •,a" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein
in rank order, are accepted:
1.. Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A.
2, Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc.
3. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE)
SecLIori 9. The recommendation of the City
Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant
to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional structural engineering services for
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
herein in
rank order, are accepted:
1. San Martin Associates, Inc.
2. Avart, Inc.
3. EAC Consulting, Inc.
Public Works
Section 10. The recommendation of the City
approve the findings of the selection committee,
2004, listed
Manager to
pur,3uant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 4 of 7
02." 144
• •
professional surveying and mapping services for Public Works
Category "5' designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. PBS&3
2. Fernando Z. Gatell P. L. S., Inc,
3. Weidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A.
4. Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc.
5. wi1liams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc.
6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inn.
Section 11. .The recommendation of, the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firma to provide
professional value analysis and cost estimate services for public
Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004,
listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. A2 Group, Inc,
2. PBS & ,7
3, Grace S. Naeem Uddirr (ALTERNATE)
Section 12. The recommendation of the City Manager tQ
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide
professional air conditioning services for Public Works Category
"B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is
accepted:
1. Grace & Naeem Uddin
Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, a$ to the most qualified firm to provide
Page 5 of 7•
02- 144
• 411
professional life safety services for Public Works Category "S`•
designated projects for. 2002 through 2004, listen herein is
accepted:
1. Gurri Matute, P.A.
Section 14 • The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals,
as to the most qua:.ified firms to provide
professional roofing services for Public Works Category "B"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank
order, arc: accepted:
1. Tuilding Diagnostics Associates, PP
2. International Logistic Group
Section 15.
The City Manager is authoricedl/ to negotiate
and execute Professional Services Agreements, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, with each firm in an amount not
to exceed the amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each
specialty for each firm, with funds allocated from individual
project accounts.
The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all
requirementia that may be imposed by the City Attorney, a.nciuding but: not
limited to those prescribed by app1ica.ble City Charter and Code
provisions.
Page 6 of 7
02- L14
• •
i
i
Section :15,
This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor,•'
LASSad AND ADOPTED this 4 h . day Of , elbruary. , 2002.
M'•'UEL A. DIAZ, MA
ATTEST
Syly f, Shier
Acting Ca.t - Jerk
APPRO p ' _'• 0 ARM AND CCRRJ CTNESSt
JAN ' ' D VTLARELLO
TY ATTORNEY
1,Ja975:LB
It the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall hes~ome effective at
the end of ten calendar days from the date it Was passed and adopted. Xf
the Mayoi,• vetoes this ResclsAtion, it shall become effective .immediately
upon nverride of the veto by the C3 ty Corami4sion
Page 7 of 7
02' 14,4
TOTAL. P.08