HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Approximately 26 NW 30th STREET
CASE NO: 2005-1027
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida; the subject proposal for an amendment to the
Zoning Atlas has been reviewed as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
Lot 4, Block 4 of "AMENDED PLAT OF ST. JAMES PARK", according to Plat
Book 4 at Page 41; from R-3 "Multifamily Medium Density Residential" with an
SD-12 "Buffer Overlay District" to C-2 "Liberal Commercial".
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that the area immediately north and west of the subject lot is designated
R-3 "Multifamily Medium Density Residential" and lots immediately to the south and
east are designated C-2 "Liberal Commercial".
• It is found that the character of this section of NW 30th Street is residential,
specifically R-3 "Multifamily Medium Density Residential", and a change to C-2
"Liberal Commercial" will bring a more intense commercial uses to a residential
street and potentially create a "domino effect" in regards to future zoning change
applications.
• It is found that the requested zoning change designation is not inconsistent with the
underlying land use designation and therefore it requires an amendment to the Future
Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending denial of the
application as presented.
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Yes No N/A
CASE NO. 2005-1027
In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment.
In harmony with established land use.
Is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City.
Maintains similar population density pattern.
Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn.
Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary.
Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood.
Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety.
Has similar impact on drainage.
Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas.
Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas.
Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification.
Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.