Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 4Agenda -3- ATTACHMENT E-4 WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING WORKSHEET The applicant is to complete this worksheet by entering the project title, applicant name and answers to the applicable questions. **Do not answer with more than three sentences.** All applicants must answer a total of ten questions. All applicants will complete Attachment E-4 of the worksheet, which includes questions 1 through 6. Each applicant will then complete one and only one sub -Attachment (E-4 A, B, C, D or E, questions 7-10) according to the applicant's project type in reference to Attachment B. The applicant should determine their project type (if the project incorporates more than one project type) by determining which project type is dominant in terms of project cost. All other sub -attachments that are not applicable to an applicant's project should not be included in the submitted application. APPLICATION TITLE: APPLICANT: CATEGORY RATING & RATING POINTS POINTS AVAILABLE EVALUATION CRITERIA 1) PRIORITY LIST; a) List the priority list category of this project from Attachment C in the application. (The application may only be of one type based upon the predominant cost of the project elements.) b) Explain how the project fits this priority category. (For reviewer only) Max. Available Score Range of Score (0to8points) 1 Agenda -4- 2) WATERWAY RELATIONSHIP: a) Explain how the project directly relates to the ICW and the mission of the Navigation District. b) How does the project benefit public navigation or access to the ICW or adjoining waterways? (For reviewer only) (0-6 points) 3) PUBLIC USAGE & BENEFITS: a) How is the public usage of this project clearly identified and quantified? b) Discuss the regional local public benefits and access to be provided by the project. c) Estimate the amount of total public use. d) Can residents from other counties of the District reasonably use the project? Explain. (For reviewer only) (0-8 points) 2 Agenda -5- 4) TIMELINESS a) Describe current status of the project and present a reasonable and effective timeline for the completion of the project consistent with Attachment E-8. b) Briefly explain any unique aspects of this project that could influence the project timeline. (For reviewer only) (0-3 points) 5) COSTS & EFFICIENCY: a) List any additional funding sources and the status and amount of the corresponding funding that will be utilized to complete this project. b) Identify and describe any project costs that may be increased because of the materials utilized or specific site conditions. c) Describe any methods to be utilized to increase the cost efficiency of this project. (For reviewer only) (0-6 points) 3 Agenda -6- 6) PROJECT VIABILITY: a) Does the project fill a specific need in the community? b) Clearly demonstrate how the project will continue to be maintained after District funding is completed. c) Will the program result in significant and lasting benefits? (For reviewer only) (0-7 points) SUB -TOTAL FIND FORM NO. 91-25 (Effective Date: 3-21-01, Revised -J Agenda -7- ATTACHMENT E-4A WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING WORKSHEET DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS THIS ATTACHMENT IS TO BE COMPLETED IF YOUR PROJECT IS A DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BUT IS NOT AN INLET MANAGEMENT OR BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT. CATEGORY RATING & RATING POINTS POINTS AVAILABLE EVALUATION CRITERIA 7) PERMITTING: a) Have all required environmental permits been applied for? If permits are NOT required, explain why not. b) If the project is a Phase I project, list the tasks scheduled to obtain the necessary permits and engineering work. c) Detail any significant impediments that may have been identified that would potentially delay the timely issuance of the required permits. (For reviewer only) (0-4 points) 5 Agenda - 8 - 8) PROJECT DESIGN: a) Has the design work been completed? If this is a Phase I project, has a preliminary design been developed? b) Are there unique beneficial aspects to the proposed design that enhance public usage or access, decrease environmental impacts, improve water quality or reduce costs? (For reviewer only) (0-2 points) 9) CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES: a) Briefly explain the construction techniques to be utilized for this project. b) How are the construction techniques utilized appropriate for the project site? c) Identify any unusual construction techniques that may increase or decrease the costs of the project. (For reviewer only) (0-3 points) 6 Agenda -9- 10) CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: a) List the materials to be utilized for this project. What is the design life of the proposed materials? b) Describe any recyclable material to be utilized. How does the recyclable material (if any) compare to other available material? c) Identify any unique construction materials that may significantly alter the project costs. (For reviewer only) (0-3 points) RATING POINT TOTAL (Note: The total maximum score possible is dependent upon the project priority category but cannot exceed 50 points unless the project qualifies as an emergency -related project. The minimum score possible is 0 points. A score of 35 points or more is required to be considered for funding.) Form No. 91-25A (Effective Date: 3-21-01, revised - ) 7 Agenda -7- ATTACHMENT E-4B WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING WORKSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROJECTS THIS ATTACHMENT IS TO BE COMPLETED IF YOUR PROJECT IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROJECT CATEGORY RATING & RATING POINTS POINTS AVAILABLE EVALUATION CRITERIA 7) THOROUGHNESS: a) Who is the primary target audience or user group for the project and bow were they identified? b) How have the needs of the target audience been evaluated and met? c) How many people will the program serve on an annual basis? What will be the measurable results? (For reviewer only) (0-5 points) 8 Agenda -8- 8) DELIVERABLES: a) Describe the materials and project deliverables to be produced by this project. b) Is there a clear and effective plan of dissemination of the materials produced through the project? (For reviewer only) (0-2 points) 9) EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS: a) Please briefly describe the qualifications of the program administrator(s), including prior experience, and areas of expertise. b) How is the program manager sufficiently capable and qualified to conduct the proposed project successfully? c) What previous projects of this nature have been completed by the program manager? (For reviewer only) (0-3 points) 9 Agenda -9- 10) PROJECT GOALS: a) What are the long -terms goals of this project as it relates to the ICW? (For reviewer only) (0-2 points) RATING POINT TOTAL (Note: The total maximum score possible is dependent upon the project priority category but cannot exceed 50 points unless the project qualifies as an emergency -related project. The minimum score possible is 0 points. A score of 35 points or more is required to be considered for funding.) Form No. 91-25B (Effective Date: 3-21-01, Revised _-_-06) 10