HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 2005-1052
Monday, July 11, 2005
Mr. Angel Urquiola offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CHANGE OF ZONING IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, PAGE 25, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM SD-4 WATERFRONT
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO C-1
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL (FOR PARCEL 2) AND R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (FOR PARCEL 1) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1583
NORTHWEST 24TH AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" (HEREBY
ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED SD-4
WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Carlos Martell,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers No
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Ms, Chloe Keidaish Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pine Away
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
Mr. Georges William Yes
AYE: 8
NAY: 1
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 8-1
Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2005-0969
Item Nbr:
8
•
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PARCEL No. 1
COMENCE AT THE S0UTH11IEST CORNER OF TRACT 2 " ALIENS
IN PLAT ACCORDING
PAGE 58 OF THE �C RECORD RECORDEDOf AS F
DADE COUNTY FLORIDA SAID POINT LYING AND BEING 1N THE
OTT OF M1ANI, FLORIDA. THENCE NORTH 01421'13" WEST FOR
275.81 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 75.00
FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70' 28' 45` F'OR AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 92.28 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY ALSO
BEING THE PONT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE NORTH 71'49'58" WEST
ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY UNE OF N.W.
16th STREET. CTY OF MIAMI. FOR 108..50 FEET; THENCE NORTH
01'21'13" %EST FOR 340.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56' 08' 06'
EAST FOR 53.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80' 41'54" EAST FOR
58.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0111'13" EAST FOR 85.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88' 34'47' WE5T FOR 48.31 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 01' 21' 13 EAST FOR 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88
38'47' EAST FOR 51.19 FIST; THENCE SOUTH 0121'13' SST
FOR 45.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 23099.282 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS OR 0.53
ACRES MORE OR LESS.
•
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL DInsCRIPT1QN OF PROPOSED PARCEL No. 2
BEGIN AT NE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 2 ' AWNS
SUBDIVISION' ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RED IN PLAT BOCK 60. AT PAGE 56 OF' THE PUBLIC RECORD OF
OADE COUNTY FLORIDA SAID POINT LING AND BEING IN THE
CITY OF WAN. FLORIDA. THENCE NORTH 0121'13" WEST FOR
275.87 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 75.00
FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70' 28' 45' FOR AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 92.26 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY THENCE
NORTH 01-21'13` WEST FOR 45.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'38'
47" WEST FOR 51.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0121' 13' WEST
FOR 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'36' 47' EAST FOR 48.31
FEET; THENCE NORTH 0171' 13" WEST FOR 85.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 8041'54" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY
RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF THE iIA E—RI1+ER FOR 383.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 63' 49' 37' EAST FOR 291.81 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH of 11' 15" EAST FOR 630.54 FEET THENCE SOUTH
:lair 02' WEST FOR 41.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'21' 13`
WEST FOR 34.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8817' 02' WEST FOR
50.00 FEET; THRICE NORTH 01'21' 13* WEST FOR 123.50 FEET THENCE SOUTH 89'17" Or WEST FOR 490.00 FEET; TO THE E POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 388001.538 SQUARE FEET *. 8.91 ACRES *
r �
•
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When pertaining to the rezoning of {and under appltheion made under Arcle Zon Zoning Board has studied ,andthe
co considered,
ed,
rt and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance N rov 0,1 move that the
requesjen agenda item # � be recommended to the ity ommisslon fo app (denial).
Print Name