HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
7921 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE &
7950 NE BAYSHORE COURT
CASE NO: 2005-1059
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an
amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
The subject property located at 7921 and 7950 NE Bayshore Drive (complete legal
description on file with the Hearing Boards Office), from R-3 "Multifamily Medium
Density Residential" to C-1 "Restricted Commercial".
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that immediately adjacent to the south, the area is designated C-1
"Restricted Commercial", to the north and west, the area is designated R-3
"Multifamily Medium Density Residential", and to the northeast, the area is
designated 0 "Office" with an SD-19 "Designated F.A.R. Overlay District" FAR .45 .
• It is found that this change of zoning is in order to develop a mixed -use project known
as Oasis on the Bay Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP").
• It is found that this application is in order to develop a portion of the site, along with
the land to the south and east, for the proposed mixed use project.
• It is found that the actual zoning designation R-3 "Multifamily Medium Density
Residential" allows 65 units per acre, and the requested designation C-1 "Restricted
Commercial" allows a density of 150 dwelling units per acre.
• It is found that the requested change to C-1 "Restricted Commercial" will allow
greater flexibility in developing the proposed mixed use project cohesively and
therefore should be changed.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the
change of zoning as a component of a Major Use Special Permit application as
presented.
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Yes No N/A
CASE NO. 2005-1059
In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment.
In harmony with established land use.
Is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City.
Maintains similar population density pattern.
Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn.
Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary.
Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood.
Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety.
Has similar impact on drainage.
Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas.
Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas.
Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification.
Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.