HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
7951 NE BAYSHORE COURT
CASE NO: 2005-1058
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an
amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
The subject property located at 7951 NE Bayshore Court (complete legal
description on file with the Hearing Boards Office), from 0 "Office" with an SD-19
"Designated F.A.R. Overlay District" FAR of .45 to C-1 "Restricted Commercial".
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that immediately adjacent to the south, the area is designated C-1
"Restricted Commercial" with an SD-19 "Designated F.A.R. Overlay District" FAR
.45 , to the North, the area is designated 0 "Office" with an SD-19 "Designated
F.A.R. Overlay District" FAR .45 , to the west, the designation is R-3 "Multifamily
Medium Density Residential" and to the east, is Biscayne Bay.
• It is found that this change of zoning is in order to develop a mixed -use project known
as Oasis on the Bay Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP").
• It is found that this application is in order to develop a portion of the site, along with
the land to the west, in order to introduce commercial uses for that portion of the
project fronting Biscayne Bay.
• It is found that the actual zoning designation 0 "Office" and the requested designation
C-1 "Restricted Commercial" allows the same density of 150 dwelling units per acre.
• It is found that the requested change to C-1 "Restricted Commercial" will allow
greater flexibility in developing the proposed mixed use project.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the
change of zoning as a component of a Major Use Special Permit application as
presented.
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Yes No N/A
CASE NO. 2005-1058
In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment.
in harmony with established land use.
Is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City.
Maintains similar population density pattern.
Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn.
Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary.
Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood.
Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety.
Has similar impact on drainage.
Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas.
Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas.
Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification.
Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.