HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 2005-0962
Monday, January 10, 2005
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CHANGE OF ZONING AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, PAGE NO. 36, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE
OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM I INDUSTRIAL AND C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL
TO SD-7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR
THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 244 & 252 SOUTHWEST 6TH STREET,
219, 233, 243, 253 AND 257-259 SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF M1AMI-DADE COUNTY,
FLORIDA; ZONED 1 INDUSTRIAL AND C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Carlos Martell,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza No
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
Mr. Georges William No
AYE: 7
NAY: 2
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-2
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secret
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2004-0912
Item Nbr:
4
s.w. 6fi s1.
Exhibit "A"
11prilk
1
r'Pofor
4,„,
1
to
--- S.W.7'Ih-.r'i—==---
LOCATION MAP
Scale: 1' =1LC/
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Loh 6. 7. 33.14. 15.le. 17 and 10. Blode 40. MAP OF MAM. DADE Co FLA.also know as CRY OF MAM
SOUTH. according to the plot thereat. as recorded In Plot Book B. at Page 41. of the Pubic Record:. of
Marnl Erode Courtly. Florida.
Containing: 52.492 Squore Feet or 12 Aces. more or leas
Folios:
Property Address:
Legd Deserp4orc
o1-02o4.0041040
257.259 S.W. 7th Skeet.
Lot 13, Bloeie.m
01-0204 :00-11W
253rd W. 7tb Street
Lot 14/. Beek Al
01-0204-000-1110
243rdS.W. 7th Street.
Lot 15. Block A)
01.0204-00041120
233rd S.W. 71h Skeet.
Lot 16. track 43
01-02040004130
2191h S.W. 7Ih Street
Lot 17. Block 43
01-0204-030.10330
244th S.W. 61h Steet
Loth. Block 40
o I-0204-0004043
252nd S.W. 61s Skeet
Lot 7.1 oak 44
A
he
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adapted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, I move that the
request on agenda it # be recommended to the City Commission for (approval) (denial).
Signature
Print Name
Agenda Item Date
I JI o �c�S