HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 3APPENDIX B
TRAFFIC CALMING STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Cty of Miamionsas
Traffic Calming Study
The Shenandoah
Neighborhood
What is Traffic Calming
Types of Measures
Alternatives
Effectiveness of Measures
Process
The Neighborhood Functional Classification
Traffic Data Collection
Existing Problems
Residents' Concerns
2
'Physical retrofit of traffic operations and
anagement strategies on existing streets,
signed to reduce adverse traffic impact such
s speeding and excessive volumes and to
prove safety and amenity."
3
-e-
Passive Control Measures
Least restrictive
Do not physically prevent an action
Easily violated by drivers
Active Control Measure
Most restrictive
Physically prevent an action
Create visual impression that streets
are not only for motorists
4
• Full & Partial Closures
•• Diveners
• Median Barriers
Forced Turn Islands
- Roundabouts
- Mini Roundabouts
• Chicanes
• Alternate Side Parking
• Speed Humps/Tablet
- Raised Crosswallcs
• Raised intersections•
- Speed Cushions.
Realigned intersection
• Center Island Medians •
5
• Curb -Extensions
• Neckdo‘vris
• ChOkers
Slows Points
• Gateways
• ped ftefuge Islands
• On -Street Parldng
• Bicyde Lanes
Narrowed Lanes
• Streetscaping
- Speed Gun w/VMS
• Special Signs
• Forced Perspective
• Rumble Strips
• Rumble Stripes
• Color Pavement
▪ Textured Pavement
• Textured Marldngs
VOLUME CONTROL'MEASURES SPEED CONTROL -MEASURES -
.Street Closures (Full /
Partial)
Semi-Diverters at
intersections
Diagonal Diverters
• Median Barriers
Forced Turn Channelization
Restrictive one-way street
.patterns
-Right-in Right -out Diverters
6
Speed Humps and Speed
Tables
Traffic Circles and
Roundabouts
Mid -Block Medians
Chicanes
Narrowings at Mid -block and
Intersection
(choker/Neckdowns)
Brick Pavers
Central Island Narrowing
Horizontal Alignment Changes
Landscaping
'vantages:
stricts all through
enforcing
isadvantages:
redirect traffic to
er local streets
increase trip length
or some drivers
increase
ergency response
es
Gainesville. FL
7
VOLUME CONTROL MEASURES
vantages
educes cut -through traffic
estricts movements while
iaintaining access for
ssidents
if enforcing and
sthetically pleasing
educes crossing distance for
edestrians
ergency vehicles can travel
e restricted direction
g antages
►everts traffic to parallel
atreets.
ncreases trip length for some
residents
restrict curbside parking
'4acentto the device
creases emergency
sponse time
Maintenance responsibility
VOLUMECONTROL MEASURES
San ose_ C._\
8
dvantages:
ective in reducing the speed
uces accident potential and
severity'
uces conflict points
rovides orderly and continuous flow
affic flows
Aesthetically appealing with
andscaping
vantages
be restrictive for some large
mergency and service vehicles
equires safety and directional signs
cause Toss of some parking
aces near the intersection
very safe for bicyclists unless
'cycle facilities are provided
applicable for many residential
treet intersections due to space
requirements
Boulder. C
9
SPEED CONTROL MEASURES
Coral Gabies.: L
'vantages:
Effective in reducing speed
educes accident potential &
verity
educes conflict points
�ovides orderly & continuous flow
raffic`flows
esthetically appealing when
andscaped
vantages:
�y be restrictive for some large
ergency and service vehicles
wires safety and directional
ns
cause Toss of parking spaces
ear intersection
of very safe for bicyclists unless
Eicycte facilities are provided
�t.applicable for many residential
feet intersections due to space
equirements
Be ,e6t n. OR
10
PEED CONTROL MEASURES
Tallahassee. FL
vantages:
sthetically appealing
uces pedestrian crossing
nce
educes speed without
L
nificantly impacting
ergency response
tsadvantages:
ensive
11
►-PEED 'CDN7 ROt MEASURES
ges:
rovides landscaping
ortunities
iscourages traffic from
ontinuing through
residential streets
ws traffic
eaks up sight -lines on
fight street
vantages:
ay direct traffic to other
sidentiaf streets
irfy•expensive
12
SPEED CONTROL MEASURES
T to
iortens pedestrian
ssing distance
ates added street
ndscaping area
iscourages truck entry
es:
►vantages:
,cause inconvenience to
cal users
affect bicycle mobility
lsafety
of very effective in reducing
geed
cause loss of some
side parking
require reworking of
ace drainage
13
EED CONTROL MEASURES
eed Hump /Choker
tverter-Closure
ral Island/Neckdown
ised Intersection
eckdown
central Island/Choker
ntral Island/Speed Table
ised Crossing/Choker
•
al Island/Speed Hump
:Lb
P.n,
14
is-rund
I'Vontgamer.:k ,Ctlunt)-
Circles
arrowings
Half Closures
Diverters
lice; Institute of Transportation Engineers
15
urce: Institute of Transportation Engineers
16
Average Change Percent
in Volume Change
Change In Collision Frequency
nterationaxperience;
Traffic Speed Stop
Circles Chicanes Narrcwings Humps Signs
(3) (2) (1) (14) (3)
Multiple
(25)
Speed Limit
Refuges Reductions
(2} (2)
Source: E. Geddes et al, Safety Benefits of Traffic Calming, Insurance
Corporation of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1996, p. 38.
as
(U.S. Experience)
Avg. Annual Collisions
Before After Change
2'Humps 50 2.6 2.3 -13%
4' Humps 5 4.4 2.6 -40%
22' Tables 8 6.7 3.7 -45%
Circles w/o Seattle 17 5.9 4.2 -28%
II Circles 130 2.2 0.6 _71%
Overall 163 2.5 1.2 -51%
Exclude Seattle 80 3.8 2.7 -25%
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
18
NO
Na
Residents Concerns
- Petition
Problem Identification
Street Network Classification
Are Streets City
Collectors or Residential
Streets?
YES
YES
Data Collection
19
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS & CONSTRAINTS
• Limited to city residential collectors & local
residential streets.
• Posted speed limit between 30 & 35 mph.
• Limited to streets with only two lanes of travel.
• Streets are not a primary emergency routes.
• May not be installed if curves streets would create
an unsafe condition.
• Streets are not a truck route.
• No adverse effect pedestrians and/or bicycles
safety.
• No adverse effect street drainage.
Traffic Volume* > 3,000 vpd
85th Percentile Speed > 5 mph
over posted Speed Limit
Cut -Through Traffic > 40%
Pedestrian Volume > 25 pph
Accidents > 6/year
NO
Traffic Volume* > 1,000 vpd
85th Percentile Speed > 5
mph over posted Speed Limit
Cut -Through Traffic > 25%
Pedestrian Volume > 15 pph
Accidents > 3/year
20
* Volume/Speed Trade-off
If the 85th Percentile Speed is greater
than 5 mph over posted Speed Limit, for
every 1 mph difference, 200 vpd should
be added to the existing daily traffic
volume.
Remove the
Device and Test
Another
4---NO
YES
Identify Traffic
Calming
Alternatives
Project Scoring
and Ranking
Installation of
Temporary Devices
Post -Implementation
Study
Is the Device
Effective?
21
INSTALL
YES- PERMANENT
DEVICE
=
Minor Arterial Collector - Principal Arterial
22