HomeMy WebLinkAboutOLD ZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No,: 2005-1003
Monday, March 14, 2005
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED DENIAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CHANGE OF ZONING IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, PAGE 14, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-9 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD
NORTH OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 632
AND 634 NE 68TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED),
PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Carlos Martell,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta Away
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Away
Mr. Georges William Yes
AYE: 7
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 2
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-0
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Se
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2004-0914
Item Nbr:
5
Exhibit "A"
Lots 2, less the West 8 feet for Right of Wray, A, 6 and 8, of PLM3RA,. a subdivision according to the plat
thereof, as recorded in Plat Book '6" at Page 262, of the Public Records of Miami -Cade County, Florida-,
and Les: the foli4wing:
Begin at a point of intersection of the North line of said Lot 2 with the East right-of-way line of State
Road 5 (Biscayne Boulevard), as shown on the Florida Department of Transportation Maintenance Maps
for Section 87030-M1C-1 as recorded in Road Plat Book 152, page 10 of the Public Records of Miami -
Dade County, Florida„ said point being 2.438 meters (8.00 feet) East of the Northwest corner of Lot 2, (a.
measured along the North line of said Lot 2); thence North 876,18'57" Bast, along said North line of Lot 2,
a distance of 7.070 meters (23.20 feet) to the point of cusp with a tangent circular curve, concave to the
Southeast, having a radius. of 8.534 afters (28.00 feet); thence, from a tangent bearing of South
57`48'57" West, Southwesterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of 55`48'14", for an
arc ienoth of 8.312 meters (27.27 feet) to a point of intersection with said Bast right-of-way line of State
Road 5; thence North 02t21'31" West, along said Fast right-of-way line, for 3.738 meters (12.26 feet) to
the Point of Beginning.
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc_
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other
alreadyermitting such us
er considering
genda item #
adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
e.
t e actors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, 1 move that the
be recommended to the City Commission for (approval) (denial).
. (2'G
Print Name (�
far 1 1 ` o A
Date
Aaenda Item