Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Traffic Impact Analysis
• March 22, 2005 Via Fax and US Mail Ms. Lille I. Medina, AICP Assistant Transportation Coordinator City of Miami, Office of the City Manager/Transportation 444 SW 2nd Avenue (10th Floor) Miami, Florida 33130 Re: One 8rickell Plaza (WO # 92) Sufficiency Letter Dear Ms. Medina: Subsequent to our January 10, 2005 review comments for the subject project, we have received a revised report along with a response letter dated March 17'' 2005, prepared by David Plummer and Associates Inc. (DPA). Photocopy of the response letter is attached herewith. Please note that the applicant has proposed to modify the signal tinning/phasing at the SE 8th Street/Brickell Avenue intersection. The applicant needs to coordinate with the Miami Dade County Traffic Control' and Signs Division to secure appropriate approval as this project goes through the review process. However, at this time, we conclude that the revised traffic impact report meet all the traffic requirements and the report is found to be sufficient. Should you have any questions, please call Quazi Masood or me at 954,739.1581. Sincerely, URS n Southern Raj ^hanmugam, '.E. Seni• r Traffic Engineer Attachment cc: Mr. Kevin Walford, Planner I, City of Miami (Fax: 305.416.1443) Mr. Juan Espinosa, OPA, (Fax: 305.444.4986) JFiS Ccrporatior. Lakeshore Complex 5100 ! lW 33rd Avenue, Suite 150 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-e375 Tel: 954.739.1889. Fax: 954.739.1789 • One Brickell Plaza Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 1750 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Coral Gables, Florida 33134 March 2005 DPA Project #04239 • • One Brickell Plaza MUST' Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Exhibits Ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Study Area 2 1.2 Study Objective 2 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4 2.1 Data Collection 4 2. 1.1 Roadway Characteristics 4 2.1.2 Traffic Counts 5 2.1.3 Intersection Data 5 2.2 Corridor Capacity Analysis 8 2.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis 10 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 12 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Background Traffic 4.2 Committed Developments 4.3 Project Traffic 4.3.1 Project Trip Generation 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment 4.4 Future Corridor Capacity Analysis 4.5 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis 13 13 13 13 13 16 20 20 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 24 Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Approved Transportation Methodology & Site Plan Traffic Counts & Signal Timing FDOT's Quality/LOS Handbook — Generalized Tables Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 Transit Ridership Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets Committed Development Information Page • One Brickell Plaza MUSP Traffic Impact Study LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Page 1 Location Map 3 2 2004 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 3 Existing Lane Configurations 7 4 Existing Corridor and Transit Conditions 9 5 Person -trip Volume and Capacity — Existing Conditions Matrix 11 6 2004 Intersection Capacity Analysis Results 10 7 Committed Development Map 14 8 Future PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without Project 15 9 PM Peak Hour Project Trip Generation 17 10 Cardinal Distribution 18 11 PM Peak Hour Project Vehicular Trips Assignment 19 12 Person -trip Volume and Capacity — Future Conditions Matrix 21 13 Project PM Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes 22 14 Future with project PM Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes 23 15 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis 20 Page ii One Brickell Plaza MUSP Traffic Impact Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The One Brickell Plaza project is a proposed mixed use development located on east side of Brickell Avenue between NE 5 Street and the Miami River in Miami, Florida (see Exhibit 1). The project consists of 1,700 residential dwelling units, 100 hotel rooms and approximately 25,000 square feet (SF) of restaurant space. Primary access to the site is proposed at the existing Brickell Avenue / NE 5 Street signalized intersection. The existing hotel on -site will be demolished. A copy of the site plan is included in Appendix A. Build out of the project is anticipated by the year 2008. The subject site is located within the boundaries of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. Existing and future traffic conditions for the project area corridors were established using the person -trip based corridor capacity method. This method, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, promotes improved transportation efficiency through increased private vehicle occupancies and makes mass transit a full partner in the urban transportation system. Analysis results show that the project area corridors are projected to operate within the established corridor threshold. The intersection capacity analysis was performed at the intersections under study using vehicular volumes and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Results of the future intersection analysis show that all intersections operate within the standard adopted by the city. Page 1 One Brickell Plaza MUSP Traffic Impact Study • • 1.0 INTRODUCTION The One Brickell Plaza project is a proposed mixed use development located on east side of Brickell Avenue between NE 5 Street and the Miami River in Miami, Florida (see Exhibit 1). The project consists of 1,700 residential dwelling units, 100 hotel rooms and approximately 25,000 square feet (SF) of restaurant space. Primary access to the site is proposed at the existing Brickell Avenue / NE 5 Street signalized intersection. The existing hotel on -site will be demolished. A copy of the site plan is included in Appendix A. Build out of the project is anticipated by the year 2008. The subject site is located within the boundaries of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. 1.1 Study Area Consistent with the approved methodology for this project (See Appendix A) the traffic study was performed for PM peak conditions. For traffic analysis purposes, the study area has been defined as Flagler Street to the north, SE 8 Street to the south, Miami Avenue to the west and Biscayne Bay to the east. Corridor capacity analysis was performed for several segments of Brickell Avenue/Biscayne Boulevard, SE 8 Street and SE 7 Street. Intersection capacity analysis was performed for the following intersections: SE 4 Street / Brickell Avenue SE 5 Street / Brickell Avenue SE 7 Street / Brickell Avenue SE 8 Street / Brickell Avenue 1.2 Study Objective The objective of this traffic study is to assess possible PM peak hour impacts on the project area corridors using the person -trip corridor capacity method. This method is designed to meet the challenges posed by Florida's growth management laws: to promote compact urban development, discourage suburban sprawl and improve urban mobility. This method is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and promotes improved transportation efficiency through increased private vehicle occupancies, making mass transit a full partner in the urban transportation system. age 2 1 v tO NW 1 ST FLAGLEF 5T SE 1 ST SW 7 ST SE 2 ST SE 3 ST SESSr 1 se6Sr SW 8 ST SW9ST vl SW la ST N CO SW12ST 1)41 SW 13 ST { SW14ST SW11ST 0 0 40 sE 1 sr sE Sr 5E 74 Sr SE4ST N.T.S. PROJECT` SITE 'BRICKEL . KEY One Brtckell Plaza MUSP Traffic Impact Study • 2.1 Data Collection • • 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Data collection for this study included roadway characteristics, intersection data, intersection volumes, and signal timing. The data collection effort is described in detail in the following sections. 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics Brickell Avenue Brickell Avenue (US-1) is a major arterial that provides north/south access throughout Downtown Miami. Brickell Avenue connects the Central Business District (CBD) with the financial and residential district on Brickell. Between SE 8 Street and SE 5 Street, Brickell Avenue is a two-way 4-lane, divided roadway. Brickell Avenue south of SE 4 Street over the Miami River) operates as a two-way, 5-lane (2-northbound lanes and 3-southbound lanes), divided roadway. The bridge is 6 lanes wide but the northbound lanes narrow to 2 lanes due to right-of-way constraints. The extension of Brickell Avenue north of SE 4 Street is SE 2 Avenue. Northbound traffic on Brickell Avenue must turn right onto eastbound SE 4 Street, which extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. On -street parking is not permitted along Brickell Avenue within the study limits. Biscayne Boulevard Biscayne Boulevard (US-1) is also a major arterial in Downtown Miami. It is a two-way, divided arterial. The number of lanes varies from 6 to 8 within the downtown area. Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2 Street and NE 5 Street has a wide median, which operates as a municipal parking lot by the Miami Parking System. It provides the CBD area with connectivity to I-395 and Miami Beach. On -street metered parking is permitted on limited portions of the Biscayne Boulevard southbound approach. The elevated Metromover runs along the Biscayne Boulevard median between SE 2 Street and NE 1 Street. The Metrornover's Bayfront Park Station is located on Biscayne Boulevard in the vicinity of SE 2 Street. Biscayne Boulevard becomes a one-way northbound roadway between SE 4 Street and SE 2 Street. The posted speed limit within the study area is 30 mph. Page 4 One Brickell Piaa MUST Traffic Impact Study • SE/SW 8 Street South 8 Street between SW 1 Avenue and Brickell Avenue is a one-way, 3-lane roadway in the eastbound direction. There is no posted speed limit within the study area. On -street parking is not permitted along SW 8 Street within the study limits. SE/SW 7 Street South 7 Street between SW 1 Avenue and Brickell Avenue is a one-way, 3-lane roadway in the westbound direction. There is no posted speed limit within the study area. On -street parking is not permitted along SW 7 Street within the study limits. 2.1.2 Traffic Counts Consistent with the methodology submitted to and approved by the City, peak period vehicle turning movement counts and 24-hour directional counts were collected at the intersections and segments under study. Seasonal adjustment factors were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Traffic counts are included in Appendix B. Exhibit 2 shows the adjusted 2004 PM peak season, peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. 2.1.3 Intersection Data A field survey was conducted to determine the lane configurations for the roadways and intersections under study. Existing signal timing data was obtained from Miami -Dade County for the analyzed intersection. Signal information is included in Appendix B. This information provided the signal phasing and timing used in the intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations for the intersections and roadways studied. Page 5 • • ILLEGAL MOVEMENT SF 5 ST L.„ 4. L. 50 2 — 65 SE 6 ST SE 7 ST BRICKEIL AVE 40 -.4--9 54 ?69 74 SE 8 ST 236 --- 3.32 226 — clpa RC1EG: ONE BRICKELL PLAZA MUSP nnE; 2004 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES Page 6 SE .7 ST • SOUTH MIAMI AVE SE.5ST SE 4 ,ST 7 BRICKELL AVE V SE 6 S! SE 7 ST c4. 1 SE PST H. NIS. PRO1tCT: ONE BRICKELL PLAZA MUSP EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION EXHIBIT No. 3 ,... j Page 7 One Briekell Plaza MUST' Traffic. Impact Study • 2.2 Corridor Capacity Analysis Existing traffic conditions for the project area corridors have been established using the person - trip based corridor capacity method_ The methodology for this analysis is outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The existing traffic conditions analysis identifies the person -trip volumes and person -trip capacities of the corridors, establishes existing person -trip usage and identifies whether or not person -trip deficiencies exist. An adopted standard of LOS E applies to the transportation corridors as measured by the person -trip method. The existing conditions analysis establishes the multi -modal corridor conditions within the project area. The person -trip capacities and volumes for the study corridors have been developed consistent with the approved methodology for this project as described below: Person -Trip Volumes Link volumes collected were adjusted to peak season traffic conditions using seasonal adjustment factors provided by FDOT. Peak hour maximum service volumes were obtained from FDOT's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Transit (bus and fixed rail) ridership and capacity were obtained from Increment II of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. An analysis of existing vehicle roadway and transit conditions is shown in Exhibit 4, supporting information included in Appendix C. Person -Trip Capacity Vehicle occupancy for the person -trip capacity calculations is based upon a comprehensive study performed for the City of Miami. The vehicle occupancy factor of 1.6 persons per vehicle is approved for use as the practical capacity of a private passenger vehicle to determine the person - trip capacity of the vehicular traffic system. Bus and fixed rail capacity for each corridor was determined based on the number of transit vehicles per hour and the person -trip capacity of each transit vehicle. This information was obtained directly from Increment II of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. Page 8 • • Exhibit 4 Existing Corridor and Transit Conditions Corridor From To Roadway Conditions (vehicles) Transit Conditions (persons) Dir Existing Lanes Count Source/ Period Raw PM Peak Hour Volume Peak Season Factor PM Peak Hour Volume Dir Max Service Volume [1] Total Bus Ridership [2] Bus Capacity [2] Total Metrorail Ridership [3] Motrorail Capacity [3j Total Metromover Ridership [3] Metromover Capacity [3] Total Transit Ridership Transit Capacity Brickelt Ave/Biscayne Blvd NE 1 Street SE 1 Street NB 4LD DPA PM 1442 1.01 1456 3250 1106 3434 74 1440 1180 4874 SB 4LD 758 1.01 766 3250 61 306 80 1440 141 1746 SE 1 Street SE 2 Street NB 4LD DPA - PM 1442 1.01 1456 3250 187 780 106 1440 293 2220 SB 4LD 758 1.01 766 3250 73 1440 73 1440 SE 2 Street SE 4 Street NB 2L DPA - PM 773 1.01 781 1992 187 780 211 2880 398 3660 Biscayne Blvd SE 2 Avenue EB 3L DPA - PM 757 1.01 765 2988 341 1346 106 1440 447 2786 SE 4 Street SE 8 Street NB 2L DPA - PM 1748 1.02 1783 1660 365 1346 164 960 529 2306 SB 3L 1067 1.02 1088 2490 115 566 360 1920 475 2486 0 SE 7 Street [3] Britkelt Ave SW 1 Ave WB 3L DPA - PM 1114 1.02 1136 2988 24 276 24 276 SE 8 Street Brickell Ave S, Miami Ave EB 3L DPA - PM 746 1.02 761 2988 200 276 200 276 Notes: [1) Peak Hour Directional Maximum Service Volumes are obtained from FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook [2] Transit information obtained from the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 9 (See Table 21-A5 included in Appendix C) [3] Transit information obtained from the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (See Table 21-A6 included in Appendix C) One Brickell Plaza h7 LISP Traffic Impact Study • • Available Person -Trip Capacity The available person -trip capacity for each corridor is shown in Exhibit 5 based on the following: Person -trip capacity — Person -trip volume = Available Person -trip capacity. A general level of service designation is provided for each study corridor based on the calculated available person -trip capacity. A person -trip level of service look -up table was developed based on the ratios derived from the FDOT's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix C). Based upon the person -trip evaluation for existing traffic conditions, no study corridor operates below the acceptable "person -trip" level of service standards. 2.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis The intersection capacity analysis was performed using vehicular volumes and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Exhibit 6 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions at the intersections under study, analysis worksheets are included in Appendix D. All three intersections operate within the standard adopted by the city. Exhibit 6 2004 Intersection Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection S/U Existing LOS SE 4 Street / SE 2 Avenue S A SE 5 Street / Brickell Avenue S B SE 7 Street / Brickell Avenue S C SE 8 Street / Brickell Avenue S D* Source: DPA U- unsignalized S= signalized; * = with minor signal timing improvements Note: LOS for unsignalized intersection is based on the delay of the stop -controlled movements. Page 10 • • • Exhibit 5 Person -Trip Volume and Capacity Existing Conditions Matrix Corridor From To Roadway Mode Transit Mode Segment Total Dir (a) Roadway Vehicular Capacity (b) Pers-Trip Capacity @PPV=1.6 (a)' 1.6 (c) Roadway Vehicular Volume (d) Pers-Trip Volume @PPV=1.4 (c) * 1.4 (e) Excess Pers-Trip Capacity (b) - (d) (f) Total Pers-Trip Capacity (9) Total Pers-Trip Volume (h) Pers-Trip Excess Capacity (f)-(g) (i) Segment Pers-Trip Capacity (b)+(f) (ii) Segment Pers-Trip Volume (d)+(g) (k) Pers-Trip Excess Capacity (i)-(]) (I) Segment Person Trip LOS v/c (j)/(i) Brickell AvelBlscayne Blvd NE 1 Street SE 1 Street SE 1 Street SE 2 Street SE 2 Street SE 4 Street Biscayne Blvd SE 2 Avenue SE 4 Street SE 8 Street SE 7 Street [3] Brickell Ave SW 1 Ave SE 8 Street Brickell Ave S. Miami Ave NB SB NB SB NB EB NB SB WB EB [1] 3250 3250 3250 3250 1992 2988 1660 2490 2988 2988 (2] 5200 5200 5200 5200 3187 4781 2656 3984 4780.8 4780.8 [3] 1456 766 1456 766 781 765 1783 1088 1136 761 [4] 2039 1072 2039 1072 1093 1070 2496 1524 1591 1065 3161 4128 3161 4128 2094 3710 160 2460 3190 3716 [5] 4874 1746 2220 1440 3660 2786 2306 2486 276 276 [6] 1180 141 293 73 398 447 529 475 24 200 3694 1605 1927 1367 3262 2339 1777 2011 252 76 10074 6946 7420 6640 6847 7567 4962 6470 5057 5057 3219 1213 2332 1145 1491 1517 3025 1999 1615 1265 6855 5733 5088 5495 5356 6049 1937 4471 3442 3792 0.32 0.17 0.31 0.17 0.22 0.20 0.61 0.31 0.32 0.25 IE.-, 00000000 0 Notes: [1] The Roadway Vehicular Capacity is obtained from Exhibit 4. [2] Person -Trip capacity is derived by applying a 1.6 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. [3] The Roadway Vehicular Volume is obtained from Exhibit 4. [4] Person -Trip Volume is derived by applying a 1.4 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. [5] The Total Transit Person -Trip Capacity is obtained by adding bus, metrorail and metromover capacities (see Exhibit 4), [6] The Total Transit Person -Trip Volume is obtained by adding bus and metromover volumes (see Exhibit 4). [7] The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix C). 0 One Br ckell Plaza IvfUSP Traffic Impact Study • • 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The 2005 Miami -Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the 2025 Metro - Dade Transportation Plan Long Range Element, were reviewed to identify any programmed or planned projects within the limits of the study area established. These documents show no officially programmed or planned capacity improvement projects within the study area prior to completion of the proposed project. Page 12 One Bricke11.P1a, a MUSE Traffic Impact Study • 4.1 Background Traffic 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FDOT maintains several traffic count stations within the study area. The average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes for the period of I998-2002 were reviewed (see Appendix E). The overall traffic growth rate at these locations was close to zero (-0.6%). However, in consideration of potential development in the area, a conservative one (1) percent growth factor was added to existing traffic volumes. 4.2 Committed Developments A Iist of projects was obtained from city staff, City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department Report on Private Development From 1996 to Present (Updated through March 12. 2004. These projects are approved and are either under construction or about to break ground. Other projects are approved by City Commission but with no building permits, or in the application stage. The projects in the vicinity of One Brickell Plaza are shown in Exhibit 7. These projects size and trip generation are included in Appendix E. Traffic generated by these developments was distributed using the Cardinal Distribution from the appropriate TAZ. For estimating trip distribution from committed projects, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network, roadway available to travel in the desired direction and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. This information and a matrix showing segment volumes from the committed developments are also included in Appendix E. Future traffic volumes were projected for the build -out year 2008. Exhibit 8 shows the projected turning movement volumes without the proj ect 4.3 Project Traffic 4.3.1 Project Trip Generation Project trip generation will be based on the calculation of person -trips consistent with the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan. Person -trips generated by the project were established using the Page 13 • • NW r S T PROJECT .57TE BRICKELL. KEY LEGEND N.T.S. 1 - BRICKELL ON THE RIVER 2 — BRICKELL COMMONS 3 - 500 BRICKELL 4 — ONE RIVERVIEW SQUARE 5 - DUPONT TOWERS 6 - ONE MIAMI 7 — MET MIAMI PARCELS B, C. & D 8 COLUMBUS TOWER PROJECT ONE BRICKELL PLAZA MUSP COMMITED DEVELOPMENTS 1 EXHIBIT No. 7 Page 14 E 3 7 • • ILLEGAL MOVEMENT 147 in v4. 41 SE 5 S 7 91 2-1- 1r2 SE 6 ST 66 195 76 SE 7 ST - 4651 —.— 1 293 SE 3 ST 272 342 233 N.T.S. ROJEGT: ONE BRICKELL PLAZA MUSP TITLE: FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES EXHIBIT No. 8� Page 15 One Brfckell Plaza MUSP Traffic Impact Study • • • following procedure consistent with Increment II of the Downtown DRI and the approved methodology: • The gross vehicular trip generation for each land use was determined using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation 7th Edition rates or formulas. • Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 16% based upon the use of the ITE trip rates (City of Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/vehj. • Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 14.10% to reflect transit usage based on projected modal splits from Increment II of the Downtown DRI. • Gross vehicular trips were also reduced by 15% for pedestrianfbicycle based on estimates from Increment II of the Downtown DRI. • The net external vehicle trips were converted to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. • The vehicular trips assigned to transit were converted back to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. • The net external person -trips were obtained by adding together the project net external person -trips for the vehicle and transit modes. A trip generation summary for the project is provided in Exhibit 9. 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 569, shown in Exhibit 10. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. For estimating the trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 11 shows the project vehicular trip assignment to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. Page 16 • • • Exhibit 9 One Brickell Plaza PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips High -Rise Condominium Hotel Quality Restaurant 1,700 DU 100 Rooms 25,000 SF 232 310 931 62% 58% 63% 408 31 125 38% 42% 37% 238 28 62 646 59 187 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 63% 564 137% 328 I 892 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment cL'b 16.00% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.10% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction c 15.00% of Gross External Trips (1) (2) (3) 63% 63% 63% 90 80 85 37% 37% 37% 52 46 49 143 126 134 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 63°/a 310 37% 180 490 1 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 63% 63% 433 111 37% 37% 252 65 686 176 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 63% 545 37% 317 862 . I I T Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1 63% 118 37% 69 I 187 Notes (1) A 16a/a reduction to adjust for the difference between 1TE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DR1 increment II A A 4 One Brrckell Plaza MUSP Traffic Impact Study • • Exhibit 10 Cardinal Distribution of Trips TAZ 569 Cardinal Direction Distribution TAZ 569 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW Total 14.05% 4.00% 1.37% 0.97% 8.98% 25.48% 18.70% 26.46% 100% Page 18 rn (35;) LEGEND IN - XX% OUT - (XX%) --� - ONEWAY (ICJ%) (35%) .SE 7 5 �5 .3 ST SE 5 ST SE 4 ST 4o;a c_h SE 8 ST St 4 U (30X) (60/. ) �E 6 .5T C: BISr AYNE. BLVD • L4a 45X Cc) 5X 40% 40% c lV N PROJECT: ONE BRICKELL PLAZE MUSP PROJECT VEHICULAR TRIP ASSIGNMENTS EXHIBIT No. 11 Page 19 One Brickell Plaza MUSP Traffic Impact Study • • • 4.4 Future Corridor Capacity Analysis The existing person -trip volumes were combined with the committed development and background growth person -trips to obtain the total year 2008 person -trip volume without project. The net external project person -trips were then added to get the future person -trip volumes with project. These volumes were compared to the future person -trips capacities to determined future level of service. The future person -trip volume and capacity matrix is shown in Exhibit 12. All corridors analyzed are projected to operate within the established LOS E threshold. 4.5 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Background growth and committed development trips were combined with the adjusted 2004 existing traffic to get the total year 2008 vehicular traffic without project on the study intersections. The project trips were then added to obtain the future with traffic volumes. Exhibit 13 shows the project PM peak hour vehicular volumes and Exhibit 14 shows the total (with project) PM peak hour vehicular traffic volumes at the intersections under study. Results of the future intersection analysis show that all intersections operate within the LOS E standard adopted by the city. Exhibit 15 shows the resulting LOS at the intersections under study. Intersection capacity analysis worksheets and a matrix showing the committed development and project trip distribution are provided in Appendix D. Exhibit 15 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection Sill LOS Future Without Project LOS Future with Project SE 4 Street / SE 2 Avenue S A A SE 5 Street / Brickell Avenue S B C SE 7 Street / Brickell Avenue S C C SE 8 Street / Brickell Avenue S D* D* Source: DPA, U= unsignalized S= signalized; * = with minor signal timing improvements Page 20 • • • Corridor From To Brickell Ave/Biscayne Blvd NE 1 Street SE 1 Street SE 1 Street SE 2 Street SE 2 Street SE 4 Street Biscayne Blvd SE 2 Avenue SE 4 Street SE 8 Street SE 7 Street [3] Brickell Ave SW 1 Ave SE 8 Street Brickell Ave S. Miami Ave Exhibit 12 Person -Trip Volume and Capacity Future Conditions Matrix Without Project With Project (a) Existing Pers-Trip (b) Yr 2008 Bkg. (c) Committed Development (d) 2008 Total (e) Projected (f) Future (g) Future w/out Proj (h) Project (i) Total (J) Future (k) Future with Proj Dir Volumes Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Transit Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Pers-Trip Volumes Capacity Capacity v/c LOS Volume Volumes Capacity vlc LOS 1 % 4 (b)+(c) (d)1€f? (d)+(h) (i)I(J) [f i [2] 131 [4] [61 [61 [41 [51 NB SB 3219 1213 3350 1262 580 3930 1866 11940 0.33 C 95 4025 11940 0.34 C NB 2332 415 1677 488 7434 0.23 C 164 1841 7434 0.25 C SB 1145 2427 580 3007 1899 9319 0.32 C 95 3102 9319 0.33 C NB 1491 1191 420 1611 480 7120 0.23 C 164 1775 7120 0.25 C EB 1517 1552 649 2201 960 7807 0.28 C 95 2296 7807 0.29 C NB 3025 1579 801 2380 476 8043 0.30 C 95 2475 8043 0.31 C SB 1999 3148 586 3734 1448 6410 0.58 D 95 3829 6410 0.60 D 2080 541 2621 -4 6466 0.41 D 164 2784 6466 0.43 D W]3 1615 1680 274 1954 -28 5029 0.39 C 127 2081 5029 0.41 D EB 1265 1317 172 1489 -28 5029 0.30 C 218 1707 5029 0.34 C Notes: [1] The Existing Person Trip Volume is obtained from Exhibit 5, column (j) [2] Year 2008 Background Person Trip Volume is derived by applying a 1 % growth factor to the existing person -trip volume [3] Projected Transit Capacity was obtained from the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II [4] The Total Future Peak Hour Person Trip Capacity is obtained by adding all modes of transportation (Exhibit 5, column (i)) and the projected transit capacity (Exhibit 12, column e) [5] The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix C) [6] Project Person Trip Volumes are derived from Trip Generation Analysis C7 SE 3 ST • SOUTH MfAM1 AVE SE5ST 5E 4 ST BR!r_'KELL AVE 54 =4 18 IN =310 OUT = 180 3! ---}•- ;n SE6ST SF 7 ST lir SE 8 57 !24 N PROJECT: ONE BRICKELL PLAZA MUSP PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES EXHIBIT Na 13 Page 22 ( .55 5T • • • ILLEGAL MOVEMENT SE 5 .S T SE 4 ST L r cn 55 fa ffEJ t 3; 5 S7 SE 7 SI 5E 8 S I — 65/ � 1 293 39E 342 —t- 233 N.F.S. dP° PROJECT: ONE BRICKELL PLAZA MUSP TRiE: FUTURE WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUMES EXHIBIT Na. 14 Page 23 One Brickell Plaza MUST' Traffic Impact Study • • • 5.0 CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the PM peak hour traffic associated with the development of One Brickell Plaza was performed in accordance with the approved methodology submitted to the city. Analysis of future (2008) traffic conditions with the project during the PM peak hour shows that the City of Miami's adopted Level of Service standards will not be exceeded. Adequate capacity during the PM peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips within the study area at the intersections and on the transportation corridors segments analyzed. A traffic control measures plan has been developed for this project. The plan is included in Appendix F. musp report_dec04.doc Page 24 • Appendix A Approved Transportation • Methodology & Site Plan • • DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION • CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • ENVIRONMENTAL To: Affiliation: From: RE: cc: Facsimile Transmission Mr. Raj Shanmugam, PE URS Corporation Juan Espinosa, PE Brickell Gateway - #04239 Lilia Medina, Bill Thompson, file Fax #: Phone #: Date: Pages: (954) 739-1789 (954) 739-1881 October 8, 2004 2 page(s), including cover REVISED 10/13/04 The Related Group is pursuing City of Miami approvals for a mixed use project located on the northeast corner of Brickell Avenue and SE 5th Street in Miami, Florida. The development program includes 1,100 dwelling units and 600,000 square feet of office space. The existing Sheraton hotel will be removed from the site. Primary access to the site is proposed at the Brickell Avenue / SE 5 Street intersection via a two-way driveway. The study area is Flagler Street to the north, Miami Avenue to the west, Biscayne Bay to the east and SE 8 Street to the south. The subject site is located within the limits of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. • This will serve as our methodology for the subject MUSP traffic impact study, Turning movement traffic counts will be collected during the PM (4:00-6:00) peak period at three major intersections in the immediate project vicinity. 1. Brickell Avenue / SE 5 Street (signalized) 2. Brickell Avenue / SE 7 Street (signalized) 3. Brickell Avenue / SE 8 Street (signalized) 4, Brickell Avenue / SE 4 Street (signalized) In addition to these intersections, we will analyze the project driveway. • Segment traffic volumes will be collected as 24 hour machine counts at the following locations: 1. Brickell Avenue / Biscayne Boulevard / US 1 o between SE 8 Street and SE 4 Street o between SE 2 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard o between SE 4 Street and SE 2 Street o between SE 2 Street and Flagler 2. SW/SE 7 Street 750 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TELEPHONE: 305 447-0900, FAX: 305 444-4986 E-MAIL: dpa@dplummer.com a o between Brickell Avenue and SW 1 Avenue 3. SW/SE 8 Street o between Brickell Avenue and S. Miami Avenue SO. Available Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) counts will be consulted where appropriate. • Raw traffic counts will be adjusted to peak season (for the peak hour period). • The signal timing and phasing at the study signalized intersections will be obtained from Miami -Dade County. • Existing and future traffic conditions for the project area corridors will be established using the person -trip method. The methodology for this method is outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. • Corridor capacity will be estimated using generalized vehicular capacities (converted to person -trips) from the FDOT LOS Manual, or other acceptable equivalent. • Project Traffic — project trip generation will be based on the calculation of person -trips consistent with the city of Miami Comprehensive Plan. Person -trips generated by the project will be established using the following procedure: 1. Determine the gross vehicular trip generation for each land use using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates or formulas. 2. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a vehicle occupancy adjustment based upon the use of the ITE trip rates (City of Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh). 3. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a transit reduction based on projected modal splits. 4. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a pedestrian/bicycle reduction. 5. Establish the net external vehicle trips. 6. Convert the net external vehicle trips to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. • 7. Convert the vehicular trips assigned to transit back to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. 8. Add together the project net external person -trips for the vehicle and transit modes. • Background Traffic. A growth factor consistent with historical annual growth in the area will be applied to the existing traffic volumes. * Committed Developments. Will be based on the list ofrelevant projects provided by the city. Committed development trips will also be converted to person -trips based on the methodology described above. • Highway Capacity Software (HCS) based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) will be used for existing and future intersection capacity analysis. Project and committed development net external vehicle trips (adjusted for transit, pedestrian and occupancy as described above) will be used for the intersection capacity analysis. Intersection capacity analyses will be performed at the three study intersections and the proposed project driveway(s). • Trip Assignment. Net new external project traffic will be assigned to the adjacent street network using the appropriate cardinal distribution from the Metro -Dade Long Range Transportation Plan Update, published by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Normal traffic patterns will also be considered when assigning project trips. If you have any questions you can contact me at (305) 447-0900. traffic_meth fax,doc •50 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TELEPHONE: 305 447-0900, FAX: 305 444-4986 E-MAIL: dpa7idplummer.com d a • • • Appendix B Traffic Counts & Signal Timings • Raw Traffic Counts • • SE 4TE STREET & BRICIELL AVENUE MIANI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: PRASE SAHCHBZ ALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX {5611 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES 4 PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I.D. : 4ST_BRIC Page ; 1 SE HD AVENUE From North Peds Thru Left Date 10/21/04 16:00 0 257 16:15 0 258 16:30 0 299 16:45 9 286 Er Total 9 1100 17:00 7 315 17:15 1 382 17:30 2 359 27:45 7 324 Er Total 17 1380 25 42 30 41 138 28 25 31 28 112 SE 4TH STREET Fro] East Peds Right Left BRICKHLL AVENUE Fro South Pods Right Thru Vehicle Other Total Total 4 7 13 18 42 12 12 11 6 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 197 0 276 0 274 1 235 4 982 0 315 0 330 0 293 0 278 0 1216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 479 576 603 562 2220 658 737 683 630 2708 7 7 13 21 55 19 13 13 13 58 *TOTAL* 26 2480 250 I 83 0 0 • • 4 2198 0 I 4928 113 SR 4TH STREET & BRICABLL AVENUE NIANI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: FRANI SANCBBZ •ALIZRD TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BRACE, FLORIDA 33444 (56I) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VERICLES R PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I.D. : 4ST_BRIC Page : 2 SE 2ND AVRIVE Frain North Peds Thru Left Date 10/21/04 • SE 4T8 STREET Eros Bast Peds Right Left BRICKELL AVRNUE Pros South Peds Right Thru Vehicle Other Total Total 26 26 0 SE 2ND AVENUE • 2,480 2,480 2,730 250 250 2,730 0 0 0 0 ALL VEHICLES & PEDS 2,44 Intersection Total 4,928 0 2,480 0 2,480 4,678 0 BRICKELL AVENUE 2,198 0 0 83 83 0 0 0 0 0 2,448 250 0 2,198 SE 4TH STREET 4 • 2,198 2,198 4 4 SE 4TH STREET K ERICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: FRANX SANCHEZ •ALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I.D. : 4ST BRIC Page : 3 S8 2ND AVENUE From North Peds Thru Left Date 10/21/04 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Peak start 17:00 Volume - 1380 112 Percent - 92% 8t Pk total 1492 Highest 17:15 Volume - 382 25 Hi total 407 PET .92 • • 58 4TH STREET From Bast Peds Right Left BRICKELL AVENUE From South Peds light Thru Vehicle Other Total Total Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 17:00 17:00 0 0 - 1216 0 01 0% - 1001 01 0 1216 16:00 17:15 0 0 - 330 0 0 330 .0 .92 17 17 0 SE 2ND AVENUE • 1,380 1,380 1,492 112 112 1,492 n 10/21/04 0 0 0 0 • ALL VEHICLES & PEDS 1,32 Intersection Total 2,708 0 1,380 0 1,380 2,596 0 BRICKELL AVENUE 1,216 0 0 0 41 41 0 0 0 0 1,328 112 0 1,216 SE 4TH STREET 0 0 0 km( iFt.06<la. ©L*obey zi 20- CiaV.A0Ab : { s geriwivro 5;3914ai te44 SE 5TH STREET/SEERATON i BRICRELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA •TED BY: LUIS PALOMINO ALISED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00040024 Start Date: 01/27/04 File I.D. : 5ST BRIC Page :1 BRICIELL AVENUE Prom North Peds Right Thru Left Date 01/27/04 16:00 1 14 329 21 16:15 10 11 210 13 16:30 2 15 253 13 16:45 0 14 244 14 Br Total 13 54 1036 61 17:00 3 10 264 3 17:15 2 9 306 5 17:30 7 8 306 11 I7:45 4 10 306 12 Hr Total 16 37 1184 31 SHERATON DRIVEWAY From last Peds Right Thru Left BRICIILL AVENUE From South Peds Right Thru Left SE 5TH STREET Fro1 West Peds Right Thru Left Vehicle Total 11 17 2 15 9 23 1 17 7 13 0 15 14 11 2 9 37 64 5 56 4 7 4 10 6 9 2 6 5 13 2 7 6 1 1 5 21 39 9 21 2 8 355 8 1 7 219 12 0 4 204 10 2 4 242 12 5 23 1020 42 1 1 322 16 1 11 321 13 6 2 290 6 1 6 239 6 9 20 1172 41 8 8 0 12 7 17 1 19 12 23 0 7 7 15 0 7 34 63 1 45 5 13 0 9 5 14 1 20 7 19 0 7 6 19 1 13 23 65 2 49 789 550 557 574 2470 659 717 671 630 2677 *TOTAL* 29 91 2220 92 C 58 103 14 84 I 14 43 2192 83 1 57 128 3 94 5147 • • SB 5TE STREET/SHERATON I BIICISLL AVENUE MIANI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO •ALIZBD TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TEIRACB DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561} 272-3255 FAI (561) 272-4361 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00640024 Start Date: 01/27/04 File I.D. : SST BIIC Page : 2 B1ICIELL AVENUE Pros North Peds light Thru Left Date 01/27/04 29 29 SE 5TH STREET 83 14 188 91 94 94 3 SHERATON DRIVENAI Frost Bast Peds light Thru Left BRICIELL AVENUE From South Peds Right Thru Left SE 5TH STREET Frog West Peda Right Thru Left Vehicle Total 91 91 BRICKELL AVENUE 2,220 2,220 2,403 13 3 225 128 57 • 128 57 92 92 4,792 94 2,192 103 2,389 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 5,147 84 2,220 128 2,432 4,750 83 83 HRICKELL AVENUE 33 201 2,318 • 2,192 2,192 I 43 43 58 58 103 103 14 14 84 84 138 92 3 43 SHERATON DRIVEWAY • 14 14 SE 5TH STREET/SHERATON i BRICIELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA EIFED BI: LUIS PALOMINO LIiID TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DRLRII BEACH, FLOIIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561; 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00040021 Start Date: 01/27/04 File I.D. : 5ST_BRIC Page : 3 BRICIELL AVENUE Frot North SHBRITO8 DRIVEWAY Frost last BRICE8LL AVENUE Fro' South Polls Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds light Thru Left Date 01/27/04 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 01/27/04 Peak start 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volute - 37 1184 31 39 Percent 31 951 21 - 511 Pk total 1252 76 Highest 17:45 17:30 Volute - 10 308 12 - 13 Hi total 330 22 PHA .95 .86 16 16 SE 5TH STREET 41 9 87 37 49 49 1 2 65 23 • 65 23 37 9 28 121 371 2 7 1233 17:15 345 .89 BRICKELL AVENUE • 1,184 37 1,184 1, 252 31 31 03 116 1 2,512 20 1172 2t 951 11 321 49 1,172 39 1,260 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 2,677 28 1,184 65 1,277 2,510 12 41 31 13 SE 5TH STREET Prot West Peds Right Thru Left Vehicle Total 76 1 1,233 41 • 1,172 41 BRICKELL AVENUE 1,172 17:00 - 65 - 561 116 17:15 35 .83 14 2 49 21 424 1 20 21 21 • 39 39 9 9 28 28 53 31 2 20 SHERATON DRIVEWAY 9 9 • Se S sr • • SE 77H STREET [ BRICIELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO •ALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (5611 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES S PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I.D. : 7STBRI_L Page : 1 BRICEELL AVENUE From North Peds Right Thru Date 10/21/04 16:00 11 16:15 7 16:30 9 16:45 10 Hr Total 37 17:00 17:15 17:30 27:45 Er Total 24 12 12 8 56 53 73 61 72 259 64 71 79 69 283 166 236 242 238 882 290 346 285 295 1216 Left UTurn DRIVEWAY From Bast Peds Right Thru Left BRICEELL AVENUE From South Peds Right Thru Left. DTurn SE 7TR STREET From hest Peds Right Thru 10 1 5 1 17 6 3 2 4 15 2 2 3 5 12 1 1 7 2 11 11 3 4 2 20 12 3 6 4 25 8 9 17 11 45 25 20 19 17 81 29 29 39 33 130 70 60 64 50 244 6 3 13 16 38 33 25 23 28 109 5 8 2 6 4 13 7 6 18 33 20 6 5 5 6 7 6 6 37 24 211 259 244 222 936 298 308 250 247 1103 110 100 141 113 464 154 148 140 139 581 4 3 1 5 13 1 2 2 3 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 12 0 0 5 0 0 20 0 0 9 5 6 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tTOTAL1 93 542 2098 • • 32 23 I 45 126 374 147 I 55 57 2039 1045 21 ( 43 0 0 SE 7TH STREET & BRICICELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO •LIZD TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAA (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES 4 PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I.A. ; 7STBRI L Page : 2 BRICKELL AVENUE From North Peds Right Thru Date 10/21/04 Left UTurn DRIVEWAY From East Peds Right Thru Left BRICRELL AVENUE From South Peds Right Thru Left UTnrn SE 7TH STREET From West Peds Right Thru L 93 93 SE 7TH STREET 1,066 374 1,982 542 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 • 43 542 542 BRICKELL AVENUE • 2,098 2,098 2,695 55 55 1,982 4,860 0 2,039 126 2,165 • ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Intersection Total 6,504 147 2,098 0 2,245 5,407 75 45 45 126 126 647 374 F---W-- 3,162 • 1,066 1, 066 BRICKELL AVENUE • 2,039 2,039 374 147 147 112 DRIVEWAY 55 0 57 57 57 55 55 SE 7TH STRBBT & BRICKELL AVENUE M]IAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO •ALIBED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX {561f 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I.D. : 7STBRI_L Page : 3 BRICRBLL AVENUE From North DRIVEWAY From East Peds Right Thru Left UTurn Peds Right Thru Left Date 10/21/04 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: Peak start 17:00 17:00 Volute - 283 1216 15 1I - 81 Percent - 191 801 11 11 - 191 Pk total 1525 434 Highest 17:15 17:00 Volume - 71 346 3 1 - 25 70 33 Hi total 421 128 PEP .91 .85 411 SE 7TH STREET 56 56 589 244 1,116 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 • 23 283 283 1 BRICKELL AVENUE • 1,216 1,216 1,525 26 26 2,709 BRICEELL AVENUE From South Peds Right Thru Left [(Turn SE 7TB STRBBT From West Peds Right Thru L 16:00 to 18:00 on 10/21/04 17:00 244 109 - 24 1103 581 8 561 251 11 641 34% 01 1716 17:15 463 .93 0 1,103 81 1,184 5 308 148 2 ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Intersection Total 3,675 109 1,216 0 1,325 3,041 589 589 BRICKELL AVENUE 48 43 1,716 • 1,103 1,103 1 0 16:00 0 .0 25 17:00 0 0 01 01 0 0 25 81 81 244 244 109 109 50 DRIVEWAY 26 0 24 1411111111111111111111111111111111111111011111111111 24 24 37 37 • r 5 14,001/4. s • --OY d1.. oc* Baer` 21 U04- at-.4.,„b1/4.1-./..v,s itkizkhh ito 5i TeteLei z.e.4 TATz SE STE STREET 6 BRICYBLL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: M. MALONE & I. GONZALEZ *KIND TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VERICLES & PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I,D. : EST BRIO Page : 1 BRICLELL AVENUE From North Peds Right Thru Left Date 10j21/04 16:00 1 0 131 16:15 7 0 189 16:30 8 0 210 36:45 7 0 225 Er Total 23 0 755 17:00 3 0 260 17:15 5 0 309 17:30 4 0 245 37:45 2 0 255 Br Total 14 0 1069 24 55 50 45 174 55 60 64 65 244 SE BIT STREET From East Peds Right Thru Left BRICRBLL AVENUE From South Peds Right Thru Left SE BTB STREET From West Peels Right Thru Left Vehicle Total B 7 B 10 33 134 150 145 135 564 11 158 16 197 9 173 9 156 45 684 0 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 63 59 60 78 260 86 74 69 73 302 7 4 13 10 34 16 8 9 10 43 43 57 59 36 195 45 38 46 56 185 154 162 191 160 667 248 218 179 173 818 0 i 1 2 1 1 1 0 3 4 54 71 58 732 9 51 76 57 857 i0 53 103 58 930 6 58 89 58 885 29 216 339 231 3404 5 50 73 68 1044 10 55 86 51 1089 2 63 75 55 970 5 63 85 63 989 22 231 319 237 4092 !T0TAL* 37 0 1824 418 1 78 1248 1 562 1 77 380 1485 5 1 51 447 658 468 1 7496 • • SE 8TH STREET & BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: M. HALONE & I. GONZALEZ •ALIZED TRAFFIC SORYEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAI (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES & PEDS Site Code : 00040216 Start Date: 10/21/04 File I,D, BST_BRIC Page : 2 BRICISELL AVENUE From North Peds Right Thru Left Date 10/21/04 37 SE ETN STREET From East Peds Right Thru Left BRICIELL AVENUE From South Peds Right Thru Left SE BTR STREET From hest Peds Right Thru Left Vehicle Total 0 BRICKELL AVENUE 1,824 37 0 1,824 IIIMOMMENMMUMMEMMOMMIML__---2,242 1 SE 8TH STREET 5 1 0 6 • 468 468 658 /579 658 1,573 447 51 • 447 51 1 418 418 5,443 468 1,485 1,248 3,201 ALL VEHICLES & PEDS 3,26 Intersection Total 7,496 562 1,824 447 2,833 4,703 5 5 BRICKELL AVENUE 1,870 1,485 1,485 78 78 Ammilimmommmilimme 1,248 1,248 1 562 562 1,456 SE 8TH STREET 418 658 380 romminmommine 380 380 77 77 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Inter.: BRICKELL AVE / SE 5 ST Agency: Area Type: CBD or Similar Date: 10/26/04 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE W/O PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 AglikProject ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP- #04239 IIIPE/W St: SE 5 STREET N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 0 L TR 91 2 112 12.0 12.0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 LTR L T R 29 9 41 113 1412 21 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 2 Southbound L T R 1 3 0 L TR 33 1441 107 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right AIILGreen 20.0 9.0 73.0 III/Yellow 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 202 TR 249 Westbound 1160 0.49 0.17 44.7 D 1429 0.49 0.17 44.4 D 44.5 D LTR 198 1140 0.43 0.17 43.9 D 43.9 D Northbound L 233 1593 0.52 0.74 10.8 B T 2026 3192 0.75 0.63 16.2 B 15.7 B R 905 1425 0.02 0.63 7.8 A Southbound L 231 1593 0.15 0.74 9.8 A TR 2869 4519 0.58 0.63 12.4 B 12.4 B Intersection Delay = 16.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B • Analyst: Agency: Date: Period: .roject /W St: DPA 10/26/04 FUTURE W/O PROJ PM PEAK HOUR ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP - # SE 7 STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Inter.: BRICKELL AVENUE / SE 7 STREET Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Year : 2008 04239 N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NE Right 5B Right reen ellow All Red 20.0 4.0 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C 0 3 0 LTR 76 195 66 12.0 0 2 3 0 L TR 554 1311 30 12.0 12.0 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 Southbound L T R 1 2 1 L T R 29 1317 282 12.0 12.0 12.0 28 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 A A A A A A A A 6 7 8 49.0 33.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LTR 847 4870 0.43 Northbound L 1845 3437 0.32 TR 2155 5057 0.67 Southbound L 653 1770 0.05 T 1511 3547 0.94 R 674 1583 0.41 Intersection Delay = 33.1 0.17 42.7 D 42.7 D 0.76 23.2 C 0.43 27.3 C 26.1 C 0.76 0.43 0.43 (sec/veh) 13.3 42.9 23.3 B D 39.3 D C Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Agency: Date: Period: PEroject /W St: 10/26/04 FUTURE W/0 PROJ PM PEAK HOUR ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP - # 04239 SE 8 STREET N/S St: No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: BRICKELL AVENUE / SE 8 STREET Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Year : 2008 BRICKELL AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 2 2 0 1 0 1 L TR L LR R 272 342 233 293 651 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 63 0 2 1 T R 992 198 12.0 12.0 19 Southbound L T R 2 3 0 L T 218 1174 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right spreen Yellow All Red 1 A A A Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 A A 24.0 20.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru A Right A Peds SB Left A A Thru A Right Peels EB Right WB Right Intersection Performanc Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C 45.0 8.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs e Summary Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 717 3437 0.40 TR 695 3331 0.88 Westbound L 308 1770 1.01 LR 330 1900 0.00 R 275 1583 2.28 Northbound 0.21 39.7 D 0.2]. 56.7 E 51.2 D 0.17 102.1 F 0.17 39.2 D 456.6 F 0.17 633.3 F T 1388 3547 0.76 0.39 R 619 1583 0.31 0.39 Southbound L 835 3437 0.28 0.50 T 1985 5074 0.63 0.39 • 32.8 C 31.6 C 24.5 C 34.3 C 28.9 C 29.8 C Intersection Delay = 122.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Inter.: BRICKELL AVENUE / SE 8 STREET Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/26/04 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE W/O PROJ PM PK W/ IMP Year : 2008 Project ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP - # 04239 E/W St: SE 8 STREET N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 2 2 0 1 0 1 L TR L LR R 272 342 233 293 651 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 65 Southbound L T R 0 2 1 2 3 0 T R L T 992 198 218 1174 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 20 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WE Left A SB Left A Thru Thru A Right A Right Peds Peds NE Right EB Right SB Right WE Right •reen 22.0 41.0 37.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 658 3437 0.43 0.19 41.5 D TR 637 3331 0.95 0.19 69.9 E 60.8 E Westbound L 631 1770 0.49 0.36 29.4 C LR 677 1900 0.00 0.36 23.8 C 78.5 E R 564 1583 1.09 0.36 103.1 F Northbound T 1141 3547 0.91 0.32 48.8 D 46.1 D R 509 1583 0.37 0.32 30.4 C Southbound L 490 1523 0.47 0.32 31.8 C T 1633 5074 0.76 0.32 37.1 D 36.2 D • Intersection Delay = 52.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D • Future with Project • • • One Brickell Plaza Development Site Intersection Analysis Matrix 2008 Background Adjusted Traffic EasftngTraffic. Years. Growth Rate: SE 2 Ave! SE 4 Street NB L NB T NB R S8 L SOT SB R EB L EB T EB R WO L WBT WB R Brickell Ave I SE 3 Street NB L NO T NO R SB L 32 S8 T 1208 52 R _•_,_..�35:k1:: EB L 60 EB T E8 R WB L WBT WBR Brickell Ave / SE 7 Street NB L NB T NB R SB L SB T SB R ES L EB T EB R WB L W8 T W8 R Brickell Ave t 5E 8 Street NB L" NB T NB R SB L SB T SB R EB L EB T EB R WB L WBT WB R ILLEGAL MOVEMENT 28':. 1059:<r 274 3 1% Brickei8 Brickell on Commons the River Committed Developments 2008 Euture: Brickell One DuPont Met Miami DuPont Project- Gateway Riverview Towers Parcels One Miami 500 BrickellTotal Traf5c Project Square B,C & I0 .... Traffic O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1144 44 0 0 51 50 35 19 130 0 0 0 120 25 81 0 1290 52 34 14 37 67 27 34 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 34 0 0 0 0 38 1232 44 0 0 51 50 35 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1244 52 0 14 37 67 27 0 39 0 34 0 0 0 0 34 51 0 21 0 0 0 0 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 24 0 0 0 0 20 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1061 44 34 0 51 50 35 36 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1091 52 24 14 37 67 27 5 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $'. 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 773 44 34 0 51 50 35 5 192 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 949 52 24 14 37 67 27 4 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 332 342 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22B 233 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 284 293 1 630 649 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0_ :. 0 1343 54 356 0 :r.:1555:'I' 93 0 0 173,..,.. 1412 2i 33 441 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 93 0 0 0 Si 112 0 2006 :. Future wt Project Totak Traffic 0 1397,`. 356 1648 113 1412 187 94 :Ili 1441 107.; 31 112 108 -' -109 18 :'. L'181. 54 55 0 1311Li::I: 186 30 '.:: 0 29.;1i 1: 0 131:-7 36 282 72 0 =1 0' 0 0 0 78=: 0 195 0 :a5:::: 0 198 0 62 0 218 0 1174 36 ...... .,.. 0 272 342 233 1..:: 554,.'.? 1497':: 30; 29:: 1353 354 1054 198 :'. 21$:'';: 1210 124 398 I O 342::' O 233 O 1293 .I: O 1 0 • 651... #04239 intersections enalysis.xls HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e • Analyst: DPA Inter.: SE 2 AVENUE / SE 4 STREET Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 03/08/05 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE WITH PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 Project ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP - # 04239 E/W St: SE 4 STREET N/S St: SE 2 AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound j Southbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 R L T 1397 356 1648 12.0 12.0 12.0 111 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right A Peds Peds WE Left SB Left A Thru Thru A A Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SE Right WB Right Green 68.0 22.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound 11.2 B R 1906 2803 0.71 0.68 11.2 B Southbound L 756 3437 0.50 0.22 34.7 C T 4820 5074 0.36 0.95 0.2 A 6.4 A Intersection Delay = 8.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Inter.: BRICKELL AVE / SE 5 ST Agency: Area Type: CBD or Similar Date: 03/08/05 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE WITH PROD PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 Project ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP- #04239 E/W St: SE 5 STREET N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol • • SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 0 L TR 91 31 112 12.0 12.0 0 0 1 0 LTR 109 18 56 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 1 L T R 113 1412 187 12.0 12.0 12.0 2 1 3 0 L TR 94 1441 107 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WE Left A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right ES Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0 9.0 73.0 Yellow 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 180 1036 0.53 0.17 46.3 D TR 257 1480 0.59 0.17 47.2 D 46.9 D Westbound LTR 119 583 1.61 0.17 358.8 F 358.6 F Northbound L 238 1593 0.50 0.74 9.7 A T 2026 3192 0.73 0.63 15.8 B 14.6 B R 905 1425 0.22 0.63 9.0 A Southbound L 238 1593 0.42 0.74 12.1 B TR 2869 4519 0.57 0.63 12.3 B 12.3 B Intersection Delay = 32.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e • Analyst: DPA Inter.: BRICKELL AVE / SE 5 ST Agency: Area Type: CBD or Similar Date: 03/08/05 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PK W/ IMP Year : 2008 Project ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP- #04239 E/W St: SE 5 STREET N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 0 L TR 91 31 112 12.0 12.0 0 0 1 0 LTR 109 18 55 12.0 0 1 2 1 L T R 113 1412 187 12.0 12.0 12.0 16 Southbound L T R 1 3 0 L TR 94 1441 107 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NE Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SS Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SS Right WB Right Green 30.0 9.0 63.0 Yellow 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 274 TR 386 Westbound 1052 0.35 0.26 35.4 D 1480 0.39 0.26 35.6 D 35.5 D LTR 236 905 0.81 0.26 59.1 E 59.1 E Northbound L 207 1593 0.57 0.65 17.3 B T 1749 3192 0.85 0.55 26.2 C 24.3 C R 781 1425 0.23 0.55 13.6 B Southbound L 192 1593 0.52 0.65 20.2 C TR 2476 4519 0.66 0.55 19.0 B 19.1 B Intersection Delay = 24.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Inter.: BRICKELL AVENUE / SE 7 STREET Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 03/08/05 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE WITH PROF PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 Project ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP - # 04239 E/W St: SE 7 STREET N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width 1 RTOR Vol Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 3 0 LTR 76 195 66 12.0 0 2 3 0 L TR 554 1497 30 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 1 L T R 29 1353 354 12.0 12.0 12.0 34 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left A A Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SE Right WB Right Green 20.0 49.0 33.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LTR 847 4871 0.42 0.17 42.7 0 42.7 D Northbound L 1855 3437 0.31 0.76 23.4 C TR 2156 5059 0.75 0.43 29.2 C 27.7 C Southbound L 650 1770 0.05 0.76 15.5 B T 1511 3547 0.94 0.43 43.7 D 39.7 D R 674 1583 0.50 0.43 24.7 C Intersection Delay = 33.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C • HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e • • Analyst: DPA Inter.: BRICKELL AVENUE / SE 8 STREET Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 03/08/05 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE WITH PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 Project ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP - # 04239 E/W St: SE 8 STREET N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 2 2 0 L TR 396 342 233 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 0 1 L LR R 293 651 12.0 12.0 12.0 63 0 2 1 T R 1054 198 12.0 12.0 19 2 3 0 L T 218 1210 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A A Thru Thru A Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 24.0 20.0 45.0 8.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 717 3437 0.58 0.21 42.2 D TR 695 3331 0.87 0.21 55.6 E 50.1 D Westbound L 308 1770 1.00 0.17 98.8 F LR 330 1900 0.00 0.17 39.2 D 448.1 F R 275 1583 2.25 ❑.17 622.0 F Northbound T 1388 3547 0.80 0.39 34.4 C 33.0 C R 619 1583 0.30 0.39 24.5 C Southbound L 870 3437 0.26 0.50 35.6 D T 1985 5074 0.64 0.39 29.2 C 30.1 C Intersection Delay = 116.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Agency: Date: 03/08/05 Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PK W/ IMP IIIProject ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP - E/W St: SE 8 STREET • • No. Lanes LGConf i g Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: BRICKELL AVENUE / SE 8 STREET Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Year : 2008 # 04239 N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R Southbound L T R 2 2 0 1 0 1 L TR L LR R 396 342 233 293 651 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 65 0 2 1 2 3 0 T R L T 1054 198 218 1210 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 20 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 7 8 A NB Left A Thru A A Right A Peds A SB Left A Thru A A Right Peds EB Right WB Right 22.0 41.0 37.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) 5 6 Ratios Lane Group Approach v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 658 TR 637 Westbound L 631 LR 677 R 564 Northbound T 1141 R 509 Southbound L 553 T 1633 3437 0.63 0.19 44.8 D 3331 0.95 0.19 69.9 E 59.6 1770 1900 1583 0.49 0.00 1.09 0.36 0.36 0.36 29.4 C 23.8 C 78.5 103.1 F 3547 0.97 0.32 58.6 E 54,6 D 1583 0.37 0.32 30.4 C 1719 0.41 0.32 31.0 C 5074 0.78 0.32 37.8 D 36.8 D Intersection Delay = 54.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D • Project Driveway 0 • HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Agency: Date: 03/08/05 Inter.: BRICKELL AVE / SE 5 ST Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PK W/ IMP Year : 2008 41I1Project ID: BRICKELL GATEWAY MUSP- 404239 E/W St: SE 5 STREET (PROJECT DRIVEWAY) N/S St: BRICKELL AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 0 L TR 91 31 112 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 1 0 LTR 109 18 55 12.0 0 1 2 1 L T R 113 1412 187 12.0 12.0 12.0 16 1 3 0 L TR 94 1441 107 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right 41I1Green 30.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds SB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds EB Right WE Right 9.0 3.0 0.0 63.0 4.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity Es) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 274 1052 0.35 0.26 35.4 D TR 386 1480 0.39 0.26 35.6 D 35.5 D Westbound LTR 236 905 0.81 0.26 59.1 E 59.1 Northbound L 207 1593 0.57 0.65 17.3 B T 1749 3192 0.85 0.55 26.2 C 24.3 C R 781 1425 0.23 0.55 13.6 B Southbound L 192 1593 0.52 0.65 20.2 C TR 2476 4519 0.66 0.55 19.0 B 19.1 B Intersection Delay = 24.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C • Appendix E Committed Development Information • • • • • Stadon dumber Location 1998 Volume 1999 Valume 100 EB SE 1 Street 200' West of Biscayne Blvd 11,000 10,000 101 WB Flagler Street 200' West of Biscayne Blvd 6,100 4,800 550 I JS-1 200' South of Miami River Bridge 39,000 21 500 32,500 22,500 5045 NB US-1 200' East of SE 2 Avenue cm SE 4 Street 5046 SB US-1 200' East of SE 2 Avenue on SE 2 Street 23,500 25,000 5047 US-1 100' South of Flagler Street 34,500 36,000 5090 EB SW 8 Street 200' West of US-1 13,000 13,500 5091 WB SW 7 Street 200' West of US-1 8,900 9,900 154,200 Total 157,500 Growth Rate -2.1% per year Average a I904104 -0.6% One Brickell Plaza Growth Rates 1999 Volume 2000 Volume 10,000 13,000 4,800 4 500 32,500 39,000 22,500 21,000 25,000 24,500 36,000 42,000 13,500 14,500 9,900 10,000 154,200 168,500 9.3% per year 2000 Volume 2001 Volume 13,000 11,000 4,500 39,000 21,000 24,500 42,000 14,500 10,000 168,500 4,700 36,000 22,500 26,000 35,500 13,500 10,500 159,700 4.2% per year 2001 Volume 11,000 4700 36,000 Volume 10,500 4,300 35,000 22,500 22,500 26,000 35,500 13,500 10,500 159,700 23,500 34,000 13,000 9,900 152,700 -4A% per year 1998 Volume 2002 Volume 11,000 10 500 6,t00 39,000 4,300 35 000 21,500 22,500 23,500 34,500 13,000 8,900 157,500 23,500 34,000 13,000 9,900 152,700 -0,8°% per year Growth Rabe e o • • One Brickell Plaza Committed Develoment Trip Assignment Segment Project From To Direction Brickell Commons Brickell on the River One Riverview Square DuPont Towers Met Miami Parcels B C81 D ' one Miami 500 Brickell Total Brickell Ave/Biscayne Blvd NE 1 Street SE 1 Street NB 130 102 19 87 135 74 33 580 SB 92 97 26 52 100 35 13 415 SE 1 Street SE 2 Street NB 130 102 19 87 135 74 33 580 SB 92 97 26 52 100 35 18 420 SE 2 Street SE 4 Street NB 130 102 19 212 135 18 33 649 Biscayne Blvd SE 2 Avenue EB 130 102 19 344 150 23 33 801 SE 4 Street SE 8 Street NB 130 102 19 103 100 70 62 586 SB 92 97 26 75 135 55 61 541 SE 7 Street [3] Brickell Ave SW 1 Ave WB 162 35 77 0 0 0 0 274 SE 8 Street Brickell Ave S. Miami Ave EB 120 52 0 0 0 0 0 172 • • • One Brickell Plaza 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 568 NNE 15.14% ENE 6.64% ESE 2.17% SSE 4.68% SSW 5.64% WSW 23.74% WNW 17.93% NNW 2 24.06% TOTAL 00.00% 41.99% 21.78% 29.38% 6.85% #04104 - TAZ 588 TAZ.xls Brickell on the River TAZ 568 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 1TE Land Use Code IN OUT TOTAL % Trips Trips Trips Residential Retail / Service GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment Transit Trip Reduction t Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction i -NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS Net External Person Trips in Vehicles 712 DU 2,600 SF 232 62% 160 814 44% 3 38% 56% 98 4 258 7 62% 163 16.00% of Gross External Trips (1) 62% 26 14.10% of Gross External Trips (2) 52% 23 15.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 82% 24 1.40 Net External Person Trips using Transit Q 1.40 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 62% 89 Persons/ Vehicle 62% 125 Persons/ Vehicle 62% 32 62% 157 Net External Person tri walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 62% 34 38% ) 38% 38% 38% 38% 38% 38% 38% 38% Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami`s 1.4 vs. ITE`s 1.2 persiveh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II le(3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • 102 16 14 15 56 78 20 99 21 265 42 37 40 145 204 52 256 56 Brickell Commons TAZ 568 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES Movie Theatre Retail 1 Service UNITS 5000 seats 138,800 SF ITE Land Use Code 443 820 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL 71% 48% Trips 250 480 29% 52% Trips 100 520 Trips 350 1000 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 54% 730 46% 620 1350 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment Transit Trip Reduction Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 16.00% of Gross External Trips (1) 14.10% of Gross External Trips (2) 15.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 54% 54% 54% 54% 117 103 110 401 46% 46% 46% 46% 99 87 93 340 216 190 203 741 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles Net External Person Trips using Transit fa Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 54% 54% 54% 561 144 705 46% 46% 46% 477 122 599 1038 266 1304 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 54% 153 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miarni DRI Increment II 40 (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • 46% 130 284 500 Bricked TAZ 568 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES Proposed - High -Rise Condominuim Proposed - Retail Existing - General Office UNITS 633 DU 25,000 SQ. FT. 29,900 SQ. FT. ITE Land Use Code 232 814 710 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT 62% 44% 16% Trips 143 30 -7 38% 56% 84% Trips 88 38 -37 TOTAL Trips 231 68 -44 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment ek Transit Trip Reduction .. Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 16% of Gross External Trips (1) 14.10% of Gross External Trips (2) 15.00% of Gross External Trips (3) Net External Person Trips in Vehicles © 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 166 27 23 25 91 128 33 160 v 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 89 14 13 13 49 68 18 86 255 41 36 38 140 196 50 246 Net External Person trips walking / usinLbicycie 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 65% 35 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 perslveh) •(2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami OM Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • 35% 19 54 o • One Brickell Plaza 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 558 NNE 14.66% ENE 8.83% ESE 5.34% SSE 7.52% SSW 7,14% WSW 17.00% WNW 18.47% NNW 21.04% TOTAL 100.00% #04104 - TAZ 568 TAZ.xIs One Riverview Square TAZ 558 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES Office Speciality Retail UNITS 150,865 SF 8,750 SF ITE Land Use Code 710 814 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL 17% 44% Trips % 42 83% 10 56% NEP Trips 206 13 Trips 248 23 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 19% 52 81% 219 271 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS Net External Person Trips in Vehicles Net External Person Trips using Transit @ Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) Net External Person trips walking / usin9 bicycle 16.00% of Gross External Trips (1) 22.60% of Gross External Trips (2) 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 1.40 1.40 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Persons/ Vehicle Persons/ Vehicle 19% 19% 19% 9 19% 19% 19% 19% 8 81% 12 81% 5 81% 2i' 81% 34 81% 16 81% 50 81% 11 81% ates (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami ORI Increment II 0 (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRl Increment II • 35 49 22 113 142 69 212 46 43 61 41 126 176 86 262 57 • • • One Brickell Plaza 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 555 NNE 11.29% ENE 4.61% ESE 2.08% SSE 1.24% SSW 11.33% WSW 24.87% WNW 23.42% NNW 21.17% TOTAL 100.01 % 44.59% 15.90% 36.20% 3.32% #04104 - TAZ 555 TAZ.xls • TAZ 555 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES High -Rise Condominuim Hotel Office Speciality Retail Shopping Center UNITS 1728 DU 6'2 ROOMS 150,865 SF 8,750 SF 8,750 SF ITE Land Use Code 232 310 710 814 820 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % 62% 53% 17% 44% 48% Trips 415 19 125 45 531 irk 38% 47% 83% 56% 52% Trips Trips 242 657 17 36 620 745 58 103 575 1106 'GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment ITransit Trip Reduction t Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 16.00% 22.60% 10.00% of Gross External Trips (1) of Gross External Trips (2) of Gross External Trips (3) 58% 58% 58% 58% 58% 1135 182 257 114 583 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 1512 1954 242 313 342 442 151 293 777 907 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles ;% 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 58% 58% 58% 737 359 1096 77% 77% 77% 982 1269 478 618 1461 1888 ,Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle III Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) TAZ 543 included DuPont Towers and Met Miami Parcels B, C & D • 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 58% 238 l 77% 318 410 • • • One Brickell Plaza 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 543 NNE 10.85% ENE 5.47% ESE 2.82% SSE 6.70% SSW 9.79% WSW 25.49% WNW 19.84% NNW 19.05% TOTAL 100.01% 38.89% 16.32% 35.28% 9.52% #04104 - TAZ 543 TAZ.xfs One Miami TAZ 543 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS UNITS ITE Land Use Code IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips High -Rise Condominuim Office Speciality Retail 896 DU 24,000 SF 17,000 SF 232 62% 215 38% 125 340 710 17% 18 83% 88 106 614 44% 20 56% 26 46 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS ehicle Occupancy Adjustment Transit Trip Reduction a Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 16.00% of Gross External Trips (1) 22.60% of Gross External Trips (2) 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles © 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit ft 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) Net External Person trips walking / usin9 bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 66% 166% 166% 166% 166% 166% 166% 166% 166% 253 40 57 25 157% 157% 157% 157% 157% 164 80 244 157% 157% 157% 53 157% Notes ill(1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DR! Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • 239 38 54 24 23 155 76 231 152 24 34 23 71 99 48 147 32 • Appendix F Traffic Control Measures Plan • • One Brickell Plaza TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES PLAN The project's design and location will reduce the project vehicular traffic volumes as follows: • The project is a proposed residential development which includes retail. This type of development will result in a portion of the trips being captured within the development, or internal to the site. • The project will also provide residential units with accessibility to mass transit. This feature will allow residents to use mass transit for their trip to work. The development will also do the following to further reduce peak hour vehicle trips: • Will encourage employers/landlords to participate in ridesharing programs through South Florida Commuter Services. Available information will be obtained and distributed to all employers/landlords in the development. • Miami -Dade County Transportation Agency current local and regional mass transit route and schedule information will be provided to potential transit users in a prominent public area of the development. The information provided and maintained on the premises will be updated, when necessary, at no less than six month intervals. • Promote mass transit use by encouraging employers/landlords to purchase transit passes and make them available to employees and residents at discounted prices or no charge, or in lieu of subsidized parking. • Encourage employers to implement staggered work hours. Implementation of these items will result in a minimum of ten percent (10%) reduction of peak hour vehicle trips. The performance of the plan will be monitored by measuring actual afternoon peak hour volumes at the project driveways and comparing the counts against total project trips based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates. 03150/JE/TRAFFICCONTROL DOC •