HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Exception ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No,: 2005-1026
Monday, May 23, 2005
Mr. Miguel Gabela offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE IN LIEU OF SPECIAL EXCEPTION (WITH CITY
COMMISSION APPROVAL) AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE URBAN
RIVER PROJECT, AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 9, SECTION 949, TO BRING A LEGALLY
NONCONFORMING FREESTANDING PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY
MONOPOLE INTO COMPLIANCE FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY
THE ENTIRE BLOCK BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST 6TH AVENUE ON THE EAST,
NORTHWEST 7TH AVENUE ON THE WEST, NORTHWEST 8TH STREET ON THE NORTH AND
NORTHWEST 7TH STREET ON THE SOUTH, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A"
(HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED I
INDUSTRIAL. THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO
THE CITY COMMISSION WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS IN WHICH
A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT: 1) THE EXISTING PERSONAL WIRELESS FACILITY
(PWSF) (MONOPOLE) MAY REMAIN IN ITS CURRENT LOCATION UNTIL SUCH TIME AS
THE FIRST OF THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL TOWERS RECEIVES A CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY; AT THAT TIME, THE APPLICANT AND THE FACILITY'S OWNER SHALL USE
THEIR BEST EFFORTS TO RELOCATE THE FACILITY TO THE ROOFTOP OF THE
RESIDENTIAL TOWER AND 2) THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR
THE AREA OF THE PROPERTY UPON WHICH THE CURRENT PERSONAL WIRELESS
SERVICE FACILITY (PWSF) IS LOCATED.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Georges William,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers
Mr. Miguel Gabela
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta
Ms. Chloe Keidaish
Mr. Carlos Martell
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina
Mr. Angel Urquiola
Mr. Georges William
AYE:
NAY:
ABSTENTIONS:
NO VOTES:
ABSENT:
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-0
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Abst
Away
Yes
Away
Yes
7
0
1
0
2
Teresita L. Fernan`det, Executive Sary
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2005-0985
Item Nbr:
5
k41 i- "A, "
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 1 through 24, Block 50 N of "Miami North" according to the
Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public
Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida.
Motion:
Zoning Board Action for Special Exception
that the request on agenda item # be (denied)
n that the requirements of Article 1 (were not)
satisfied by relevant evidence in the record of the public hearing
a) as stated in the City's finds or fact, or
b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or
c) on the basis of the following:
The Zoning Board, in its decision to (grant) (deny) the special exception, shall
make written findings that the applicable requirements of this zoning Ordinance,
Section 1305 (have) (have not) been met.
Circle appropriate condition(s):
1305.1 Ingress and Egress
Due consideration shall be given to adequacy of ingress and
egress to the property and structure and uses thereon, with
particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and
convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of fire and
emergency.
1305.2 Offstreet Parking and Loading
Due consideration shall be given to offstreet parking and loading
facilities as related to adjacent street, with particular reference to
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, internal traffic
flow and control, arrangement in relation to access in case of fire or
other emergency and screening and landscaping.
1305.3 Refuse and Service Ares
Due consideration shall be given to the location, scale, design and
screening of refuse and service areas to the manner in which
refuse is to be stored and to the manner and timing of refuse
collection and deliveries, shipments or other service activities, as
such matters relate to the location and nature of uses on adjoining
properties and to the location and character of adjoining public
ways.
1305.4 Signs and Lighting
Due consideration shall be given to the number, size, character,
location and orientation of proposed signs and of proposed lighting
for signs and premises, with particular reference to traffic safety,
glare and compatibility and harmony with adjoining and nearby
property and the character of the area.
1305.5 Utilities
Due consideration shall be given to utilities required, with particular
reference to availability and capacity of systems, location of
connections and potentially adverse appearance or other adverse
effects on adjoining and nearby property and the character of the
area.
1305.6 Drainage
Due consideration shall be given for drainage, with particular
reference to effect on adjoining and nearby properties and on
general drainage systems in the area. Where major drainage
volumes appear likely and capacity of available systems is found
marginal or inadequate, consideration shall be given to possibilities
for recharge of groundwater supply on the property, temporary
retention with gradual discharge, or other remedial measures.
1305.7 Preservation of Natural Features
Due consideration shall be given to provision for the preservation of
existing vegetation and geological features whenever possible.
1305.8 Control of Potentially Adverse Effects Generally
In addition to consideration of detailed elements indicated above,
as appropriate to the particular class or kind of special permit and
the circumstances of the particular case, due consideration shall be
given to potentially adverse effects generally on adjoining and
nearby properties, the area, the neighborhood or the City of use or
occupancy as proposed, or its locations, construction, design,
character, scale or manner of operation. Where such potentially
adverse effects are found, consideration shall be given to special
remedial measures appropriate in the particular circumstances of
the case, including screening or buffering, landscaping, control of
manner or hours of operation, alteration of use of such space, or
such other measures as are required to assure that such potential
adverse effects will be eliminated or minimized to the maximum
extent reasonably feasible and that the use of occupancy will be
compatible and harmonious with other development in the area to a
degree which will avoid substantial depreciation of the value of
nearby property.
Sign
Print Name
Agenda Item Date