Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Impact Analysis - Part II• Appendix D Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets • • • Existing Conditions 0 0 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e • Analyst: DPA Agency: Date: 3/31/05 Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Inter.: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 17 STREET Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Year : 2005 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - #04265 E/W St: NE 17 STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 L Sorthbound L T R 26 0 0 0 LR 28 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 12 2 9 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 2 0 L T 33 1208 12.0 12.0 0 2 0 TR 826 34 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru Thru A Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left Thru A A Thru A Right A A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SE Right WB Right Green 18.0 16.0 68.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LR 235 1502 0.34 0.16 44.0 D 44.0 D Westbound L 585 1770 0.04 0.33 26.1 C T 616 1863 0.01 0.33 25.8 C 26.1 C R 523 1583 0.03 0.33 26.0 C Northbound L 266 450 0.12 0.59 10.6 B T 2097 3547 0.58 0.59 15.1 B 14.9 B Southbound TR 2085 3526 0.46 0.59 13.3 B 13.3 B Intersection Delay = 15.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO --WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 16 STREET Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2005 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - ##04265 East/West Street: NE 16 STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 1271 861 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96. 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 13 1323 967 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 --- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 [ 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HER Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 13 C(m) (vph) 700 v/c 0.02 95%- queue length 0.06 Control Delay 10.2 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e • • • Analyst: DPA Inter.: NE 2 AVE / NE 17 STREET (WEST) Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/31/05 Jurisd: Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2005 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 E/W St: NE 17 STREET N/S St: NE 2 AVENUE No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound L T R Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R 2 0 1 L R 319 19 12.0 12.0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 T 384 12.0 0 2 0 T 499 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left Thru Thru A Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru A Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 15.0 77.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 516 3437 0.66 0.15 43.1 D 42.8 D R 237 1583 0.08 0.15 36.7 0 Wes tbouncl Northbound T 2731 3547 0.16 0.77 3.1 A 3.1 A Southbound T 2731 3547 0.23 0.77 3.3 A 3.3 A Intersection Delay = 13.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d • illStreet: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R TWO --WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA Agency/Ca.: Date Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 AVE / NE 17 STREET (EAST) Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2005 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 East/West Street: NE 17 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R Southbound 4 5 6 L T R Volume 384 25 30 469 Peak --lour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 446 29 37 586 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- ---- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 2 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Volume 18 36 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 37 67 C (m) (vph) 1083 430 v/c 0.03 0.16 95% queue length 0.11 0.55 Control Delay 8.4 14.9 LOS A B 410Approach Delay 14.9 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d • 410 Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 16 STREET / NE 2 AVENUE Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2005 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - #04265 East/West Street: NE 16 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Sorthbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 298 475 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.83 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 382 572 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 2 0 Configuration LT T TR Upstream Signal? No No Volume 27 36 75 45 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.50 0.83 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 54 72 90 54 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade () 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Movement 1 4 Lane Config LT Westbound 7 8 LR 9 Eastbound 10 11 12 LR v (vph) 16 126 144 C(m) (vph) 981 421 228 v/c 0.02 0.30 0.63 95%. queue length 0.05 1.24 3.78 Control Delay 8.7 17.2 44.5 LOS A C E SApproach Delay 17.2 44.5 Approach DOS C E • Future without Project • • HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Inter.: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 17 STREET Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/31/05 Jurisd: 4111 Period: FUTURE W/OUT PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - #04265 E/W St: NE 17 STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R Southbound L T R 28 0 0 LR 30 12.0 0 1 1 L T 13 2 12.0 12.0 1 R 10 12.0 1 1 2 0 L T 35 1374 12.0 12.0 0 2 0 TR 946 36 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peels WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right 4111SB Right Green Yellow All Red A A A A A A A A 18.0 16.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp • Lane Group Capacity 5 6 NB Left A Thru A Right Peds 5B Left Thru A Right A Peds EB Right WB Right 7 8 68.0 4.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LR 238 Westbound L 585 T 616 R 523 Northbound L 237 T 2097 Southbound TR 2086 1523 0.26 0.16 43.2 D 43.2 D 1770 0.02 0.33 26.0 C 1863 0.00 0.33 25.8 C 26.0 C 1583 0.02 0.33 25.9 C 401 0.16 0.59 10.9 B 3547 0.69 0.59 17.2 B 17.0 B 3527 0.50 Intersection Delay = 16.4 0.59 13.8 13.8 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO --WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • IIIMinor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/DUT PROD PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 16 STREET Jurisdiction: ❑nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - #04265 East/West Street: NE 16 STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 } 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 15 1441 983 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 1516 1034 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I 1 v (vph) 15 C (m.) (vph) 660 v/c 0.02 95a queue length 0.07 Control Delay 10.6 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.le • • Analyst: DPA Inter.: NE 2 AVE / NE 17 STREET (WEST) Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/31/05 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE W/OUT PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - ## 04265 E/W St: NE 17 STREET N/S St: NE 2 AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound L T R L T R L T R ( L T R 2 L 339 12.0 1 R 20 12.0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 T 454 12.0 0 2 0 T 572 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right A A NB Left Thru A Right Peds SB Left Thru A Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 15.0 77.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 516 3437 0.69 0.15 44.3 9 43.9 D R 237 1583 0.08 0.15 36.7 D Westbound Northbound T 2731 3547 0.18 0.77 3.1 A 3.1 A Southbound 2731 3547 0.22 0.77 3.2 A 3.2 A Intersection Delay = 13.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d • 41/1Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R { L T R TWO --WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/OUT PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 AVE / NE 17 STREET (EAST) Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 East/West Street: NE 17 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 454 27 32 540 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 477 28 33 568 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 2 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Volume 19 38 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (a) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I v (vph) 33 60 C(m) (vph) 1056 415 v/c 0.03 0.14 95o queue length 0.10 0.50 Control Delay 8.5 15.1 LOS A C Approach Delay 15.1 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • • Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/OUT PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 16 STREET / NE 2 AVENUE Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - #04265 East/West Street: NE 16 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R Southbound 4 5 6 L T R Volume 14 362 546 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 381 574 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 2 0 Configuration LT T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 29 40 80 48 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 30 42 84 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SR Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 Lane Config LT { LR 1 LR v (vph) 14 72 134 C (m) (vph) 981 428 245 v/c 0.01 0.17 0.55 95o queue length 0.04 0.60 2.98 Control Delay 8.7 15.1 36.1 LOS A C E 1111 Approach Delay 15.1 36.1 Approach LOS C E • Future with Project • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard -Intersection Assignment INTERSECTION MOVEMENT EXISTING PM PEAK HR FUTURE W/O PROJECT PROJECT TRIPS FUTURE WITH PROJECT Total 299 NBL - 33 35- - 4 NBT 1208 - 1374: 4 1314' NBR' - 1 1 0 1 SBL' 1...... 1 0 1 SBT - 826' 941. 6 .946. NE 17 Street! SBR - 34 - 36 49 85 Biscayne Boulevard EBL 26- 28 39 67 EBT 0 0 0 EBR . 28. 35 . 27 57 WBL 12 13. 0 13. WBT 2. - 2 0 2- W13E - 8. 10. '. -. 0 10 . . TOTAL ._.. 2180.. . .. .2475'.-:. 115 2591 '. NBL 13. - - _15 -- 46 - 61 NBT 1271 t441 0 1441'.. NEB €3. 0 0 - 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 5BI 861. 983 0 383 NE 16 Street! SBA 12 13 0 '/3 Biscayne Boulevard EEL' 1 - - - 1. 0 EBT 0 0 - 0 0 ERR Ct.. -0 0 WBL 4. Q...: 0 WET 0:: .,4 ::. 0 WBR 0 -. 0- 0 TOTAL 2158 ` - 2453- 46 -:2499 NBL' 1. 1.. 0 .1:. NET 384 454.-`. 0 NEB 25- 27 .E 3 :. 16) �. BBL 30.. ..32 65 97 SOT 469 546 0 540 NE 17 Streetf SBR' 7t- 0 i. NE2Avenue EEL 319 .339- 0 339 EBT 0 0. 0 0 EBR 111 : 20- 0 20 -, WBL 18 19-.:` 4 WET 0 0 D0.. WBR 36 38-. 23 ..-. 81 TOTAL - 1302 -: 1470." 96 : 1566:. NBL - i3.... ,.14..... 0 NOT 298 367 3 385 .' NOR' T..: 1 - . 0 56L 0.;-. 0... 0 0 58T 475 546 0 546. NE 16 Street! SBR 16- 17-. 0 17 NE 2 Avenue EEL 75. - 80 0 80: EST 0 0-- 0.0' EBR 45.` 48 0 40. WBL 27 ' 73 11 39 W BT 0 J 0 0 WEB _ 36- :.. -40 31 71 TOTAL ..-386 --1135 '-. 45 1180 NBL 6 27 - 27 NBT Ci 0 0 NBA 4 66 66 Set. 0 0 SBT t3 0 .0 . NE 17 Street l SBR :1 . 0 West Driveway EEL 0 0 0 EBT - 58'.: 0 58 EBR 0 62 : 62 WEL R. ' 44 -44.'. WET &6.... 0 -..60 Wan 0%. 0 TOTAL .. 1t7`:-: 124 ':.-'.. 200 . 324 NBL ._f3..-.- -.6'.-.. • O to J O n n p n n n n o-o-o.o NET 2 - - 0 NBA - D.- 0' SBL .Q: :. ,0. _. SBT 6- 0. NE 17 Street! SBA - - 0 - - 0 - East Driveway EEL 0- - -0 EBT. 55. .. se- EBR (3. 2' WBL 0-. 0: WBT 62:.. '66., .. WEE '.-. .-.0... TOTAL 117 :. 124 11- NBL D. ` D' _. a -.-0. NET 0- 0 0 0 NEE .. 0 . . 0 .. 9 0 EEL 0 0 0 0 SBT . . 0 0 0 = -0 NE 16 Street! SBA 0 0 42 42 Driveway EEL 0. - - 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 EBR 0. - 0 0 0 WBL 0. - 0 0 0 WET 44 48 0 -. 48 WBR 0 - 0 46 ..46. TOTAL .. :44 .`.48 88 136. 'ILLEGAL MOVEMENT Intersection analysis rev.xis HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Inter.: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 17 STREET Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/31/05 Jurisd: .riod: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 oject ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - 404265 E/W St: NE 17 STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 1 1 1 LR L T R 67 57 13 2 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 2 0 L T 35 1374 12.0 12.0 0 2 0 TR 946 85 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru Thru A Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left Thru A A Thru A Right A A Right A Peds Peds 110 B Right EB Right Right WE Right een 18.0 16.0 68.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LR 227 1450 0.58 0.16 48.6 D 48.6 D Westbound L 585 1770 0.02 0.33 26.0 C T 616 1863 0.00 0.33 25.8 C 26.0 C R 523 1583 0.02 0.33 25.9 C Northbound L 219 370 0.17 0.59 11.0 B T 2097 3547 0.69 0.59 17.2 B 17.0 B Southbound TR • 2071 3503 0.52 0.59 14.2 B 14.2 B Intersection Delay = 17.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA •enCy/CO .: to Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 16 STREET Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - #04265 East/West Street: NE 16 STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R Southbound 4 5 6 L T R Volume 61 1441 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 64 1516 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration stream Signal? 4110 1 2 L T No 983 0.95 1034 2 0 T TR No 13 0.95 13 nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 i 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 i v (vph) 64 C(m) (vph) 660 v/c 0.10 95% queue length 0.32 Control Delay 11.0 S B broach Delay pproach LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPA Inter.: NE 2 AVE / NE 17 STREET (WEST) Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/31/05 Jurisd: .rind: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 oject ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 E/W St: NE 17 STREET N/S St: NE 2 AVENUE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound I Southbound L T R L T R L T R I L T R 2 0 1 L R 339 20 12.0 12.0 1 0 0 2 0 T 515 12.0 0 2 0 T 634 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A Thru Right A Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds illB Right Right een 15.0 77.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS NB Left Thru A Right Peds SE Left Thru A Right Peds EB Right WB Right Eastbound L 516 3437 0.69 0.15 44.3 D 43.9 D R 237 1583 0.08 0.15 36.7 D Westbound Northbound 2731 3547 0.20 0.77 3.2 A 3.2 A Southbound • 2731 3547 0.24 0.77 3.3 A 3.3 A Intersection Delay = 12.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO --WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY_ Analyst: DPA envy/Co.: to Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 AVE / NE 17 STREET (EAST) Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 East/West Street: NE 17 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R Southbound 4 5 6 L T R Volume 454 30 97 540 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 477 31 102 568 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 2 Configuration TR LT T stream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 24 66 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NE SE Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 102 94 C(m) (vph) 1053 385 v/c 0.10 0.24 95% queue length 0.32 0.94 Control Delay 8.8 17.3 S A C roach Delay 17.3 proach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY_ Analyst: DPA Illiency/Co.: to Performed: 3/31/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 16 STREET / NE 2 AVENUE Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - #04265 East/West Street: NE 16 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 i 4 5 6 L T R i L T R Volume 14 365 546 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 384 574 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 2 0 Configuration LT T TR stream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 39 71 80 48 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 74 84 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NE SE Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 i 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 Lane Contig LT i LR # LR v (vph) 14 115 134 C(m) (vph) 981 446 227 v/c 0.01 0.26 0.59 95% queue length 0.04 1.02 3.35 Control Delay 8.7 15.9 41.4 S A C E roach Delay 15.9 41.4 proach LOS C E • Project Driveway • • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA .ency/Co :: to Performed: 4/5/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 17 STREET / WEST DRIVEWAY Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 East/West Street: PROJECT DRIVEWAY North/South Street: NE 17 STREET Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 58 62 44 66 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 61 65 46 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles --- 2 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT stream Signal? No No 410 nor Street: Approach Northbound Movement 7 8 9 L T R Southbound 10 11 12 L T R Volume 27 66 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach ER WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I v (vph) 46 97 C(m) (vph) 1460 874 v/c 0.03 0.11 95% queue length 0.10 0.37 Control Delay 7.5 9.6 A A roach. Delay 9.6 1.pproach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA ency/Co.: to Performed: 4/5/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 17 STREET / EAST DRIVEWAY Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 East/West Street: PROJECT DRIVEWAY North/South Street: NE 17 STREET Intersection Orientation: EW Major Street: Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Eastbound Westbound 1 2 3 r 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Approach Movement Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? 58 0.95 61 Undivided 6 7 66 0.95 0.95 0.95 6 7 69 2 Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT stream Signal? No No 46- nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT v (vph) 7 C(m) (vph) 1535 v/c 0.00 95% queue length 0.01 Control Delay 7.4 S A roach Delay proach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA ency/Co.: to Performed: 4/5/05 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJ PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 16 STREET / DRIVEWAY Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: 1650 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - # 04265 East/West Street: PROJECT DRIVEWAY North/South Street: NE 16 STREET Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R f L T R Volume 48 46 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 48 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 Configuration TR stream Signal? No No 4 nor Street: Approach Northbound Movement 7 8 9 L T R Southbound 10 11 12 L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration 0 / 0 R 1 42 0.95 44 2 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ! 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 R v (vph) 44 C(m) (vph) 988 v/c 0.04 95% queue length 0.14 Control Delay 8.8 AtIS A roach Delay 8.8 proach LOS A • Appendix E Committed Development Information • • • • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard Committed Develoment Person -Trip Assignment CORRIDOR Project FROM TO Direction TAZ 505 Ellipse TAZ 507 PAC TOTAL BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 20 STREET (NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET INE 15 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 15 STREET / VENETIAN CSWY N. BAYSHORE DRIBISCAYNE BLVD BISCAYNE BLVD N. MIAMI AVENUE NB 41 22 165 13 240 SB 26 19 199 13 256 NB 41 30 80 26 176 SB 26 45 80 18 168 NB 41 15 239 36 330 SE 26 10 198 36 269 EB 0 0 239 0 239 WB 0 0 198 0 198 EB 0 4 159 18 181 WB 0 2 132 10 144 • • TAZ 505 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis • USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips High -Rise Residential Condominium Office 807 DU 8,907 SF 232 710 62% 17% 194 2 38% 83% 113 11 307 13 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS ( 61% 196 1 39% 124 320 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16.00% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.90% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction © 10.00% of Gross External Trips (2) (3) (4) 61% 61% 61 % 31 29 20 39% 39% 39% 20 18 12 51 48 32 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 61 % 116 39% 73 189 f 1 f Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 61 % 61% 162 41 39% 39% 103 26 265 67 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 61% 203 39% 128 332 I 1 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1 61% 27 1 39% 17 1 45 Notes (1) Based on Traffic Impact Study provided by City of Miami (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II # 04265 - TAZ 505 T-gen_PM_rev.xls • • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 505 NNE 10.60% ENE 3.67% ESE 4.79% SSE 3.75% SSW 20.88% WSW 22.71% WNW 17.12% NNW 17.02% TOTAL 100.54% 34.14% 4.27% 43.59% 8.54% #04265 -TAZ 505 TAZ.xis • • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard Commited Developments - TAZ 505 Locational Information Units Sq Ft. Name pPermitf Address Description Net Area Condo Hotel Office Retail Onyx (Biscayne Bay Lofts) MUSP 685 NE 25 Street Residential project w/ accessory recreational uses Wynwoodl Edgewater 118 0 0 0 Onyx II MUSP NE 28 Street & N, Bayshore Drive Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 117 0 0 0 Star Lofts MUSP 704-712 NE 25 Street 19 story residential complex Wynwood/ Edgewater 55 0 0 0 Gallery Art Condominium MUSP NE corner of Biscayne Blvd and NE 24 Street Residential Wynwoodl Edgewater 164 0 8,907 0 SOHO Rosabella Lofts MUSP MUSP 601-615 NE 23 Street 421, 425, 447 NE 22 Street; 418, 442, 446 NE 22 Terr; 2221 NE 4 Avenue Residential Project Residential & 4,200 sq. ft Place of Worship with 11 parking spaces Wynwood/ Edgewater Wynwood / Edgewater 95 258 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 807 0 8,907 0 # 04265 -TAZ 505 Comm_ Developments.xls • • • ELLIPSE TAZ 506 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips High -Rise Residential Condominium Specialty Retail 267 DU 6,793 SQ. FT. 232 814 62% 44% 64 8 38% 56% 37 10 101 18 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 1 61% 72 139% 47 [ 119 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16,00°/0 of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.90% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips (2) (3) (4) 61% 61% 61 % 12 11 7 39% 39% 39% 8 7 5 19 18 12 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 61 % 43 39% 28 70 I J I Net External Person Trips in Vehicles © 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 61% 61% 60 15 39% 39% 39 10 98 25 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 61% 75 39% 49 123 I Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 61 % 10 139% 7 ( 17 Notes (1) Based on Traffic Impact Study provided by City of Miami (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between 1TE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II #04265 - ELLIPSE T-gen_PM_rev.xls • o • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 506 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 12.89% 4.94% 4.43% 6.84% 12.34% 22.99% 17.31% 18.26% TOTAL 100.00% #04265 - TAZ 506 TAZ _xis • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard Ellipse - TAZ 506 • w Locational Information Units Sq Ft. Name of Permit Address Description Net Area Res Condo Hotel Office Retail Ellipse MUSP 1776 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Wynwood / Edgewater 267 0 0 6,793 Total 267 0 0 6,793 # 04265 - Ellipse Comm_ Developments.xls TAZ 507 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL Trips % Trips Trips High -Rise Residential Condominium 1,856 DU 232 62% 445 38% 260 705 Quality Restaurant 12,335 SF 931 67% 62 33% 30 92 High -Turnover Restaurant 3,000 SF 932 61% 20 39% 13 33 Convenience Market 1,700 SF 852 49% 29 51% 30 59 Jr/Comm College 99,000 SF 540 64% 146 36% 106 252 Office 119,864 5F 710 17% 30 83% 149 179 Specialty Retail 31,454 SQ FT. 814 44% 37 56% 48 85 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 155% 769 145% 636 I 1405 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16.00% of Gross External Trips (2) 55% 123 45% 102 225 Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.90% of Gross External Trips (3) 55% 115 45% 95 209 Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips (4) 55% 77 45% 64 141 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 55% 454 45% 376 830 1 I 1 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 55% 636 45% 526 1162 Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1,40 Persons/ Vehicle 55% 160 45% 133 293 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 55% 797 45% 659 1456 I. [ I Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1 55% 108 1 45% 89 197 Notes (1) Based on Traffic Impact Study provided by City of Miami (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II # 04265 - TAZ 507 T-gen_PM_rev.xls • • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 507 NNE 10.56% ENE 5.32% ESE 4.41% SSE 3.38% SSW 18.74% WSW 20.68% WNW 19.90% NNW 17.01% TOTAL 100.00% 36.91 % 15.88% 39.42% 7.79% #04265 -TAZ 507 TAZ.xts • • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard Commited Developments - TAZ 507 Locational Information Units Sq Ft. Narne Type of Permit Address Description Net Area Res ! Condo Hatei Office Retail Opera Tower (Bay Parc Plaza) MUSP 1744-56 N Bayshore Drive Mixed Use: Residential, Office & Recreation (2 buildings) Wynwood / Edgewater 635 0 92,260 0 18,112 8,470 Quantum on the Bay MUSP 1900 North Bayshore Drive Mixed Use: Residential, Retail & Restaurant Edgewater Wynwood / 9 752 469 0 The 1800 Club MUSP 1800 North Bayshore Drive Mixed Use development project 1 with accessory recreational uses Wynwood / Edgewater 0 27,604 4,872 Totaik 1,856 0 119,864 31,454 # 04265 - TAZ 507 Comm_ Developments.xls • • PAC - PERFORMING ARTS CENTER TAZ 512 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips T % Trips Trips Live Theatre 4900 seats 441 50% 49 50% 49 98 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS (1) I 50% 49 I 50% 49 I 98 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment a@ 16,00% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.90% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction c 10.00% of Gross External Trips (2) (3) (4) 50% 50% 50% 8 7 5 50% 50% 50% 8 7 5 16 15 10 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 50% 29 50% 29 58 1. I I Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit g 1,40 Persons/ Vehicle 50% 50% 41 10 50% 50% 41 10 81 20 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 50% 51 50% 51 138 1 1 1 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 50% 7 50% 7 1 14 Notes (1) Based on Traffic Impact Study provided by City of Miami (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment Il #04265 -PAC T-gen_PM_rev.xls • • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard 2005 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 512 NNE 11.01% ENE 4.70% ESE 4.80% SSE 9.31% SSW 15.24% WSW 20.32% WNW 19.19% NNW 15.43% TOTAL 100.00% #04265 - TAZ 512 TAZ.x1s e • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard Performing Arts Center - TAZ 512 • Locational Information Units Sq Ft. Name Type of Permit Address Description Net Area Res / Condo Hotel Office Retail The Performing Arts Center of Greater Miami MUSP 1300 and 1301 Biscayne Blvd, Entertainment complex with 4,595 seats Downtown 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 #04265 - PAC Comm_ Developments.xls • Appendix F Traffic Control Measures Plan • • • • • 1650 Biscayne Boulevard TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES PLAN The project's design and location will reduce the project vehicular traffic volumes as follows: • The project is a proposed residential development, which includes retail and health club components. This type of development will result in a portion of the trips being captured within the development, or internal to the site. • The project will also provide residential units with accessibility to mass transit. This feature will allow residents to use mass transit for their trip to work. The development will also do the following to further reduce peak hour vehicle trips: • Will encourage employers/landlords to participate in ridesharing programs through South Florida Commuter Services. Available information will be obtained and distributed to all employers/landlords in the development. • Miami -Dade County Transportation Agency current local and regional mass transit route and schedule information will be provided to potential transit users in a prominent public area of the development. The information provided and maintained on the premises will be updated, when necessary, at no less than six month intervals. • Promote mass transit use by encouraging employers/landlords to purchase transit passes and make them available to employees and residents at discounted prices or no charge, or in lieu of subsidized parking. • Encourage employers to implement staggered work hours. Implementation of these items will result in a minimum of ten percent (10%) reduction of peak hour vehicle trips. The performance of the plan will be monitored by measuring actual afternoon peak hour volumes at the project driveways and comparing the counts against total project trips based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1TE) trip generation rates. TRAFFIC CONTROL.DOC • • 1650 Biscayne Bou Major Use Special Perm Traffi Impact Study Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates,. Inc. April 2005 DPA Project #04265 • 1650 Biscayne Bou Major Use SpeciaITermi Traffic �m�act S tudy Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc.' April 2005 DPA Project #04265 •