HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResosMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 2005-0964
Monday, January 10, 2005
Mr. Georges William offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CHANGE OF ZONING AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, PAGE NO, 21, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE
OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH
AN SD-20 EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT AND C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL WITH
AN SD-20/SD-20.1 EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL
WITH AN SD-20/SD-20.1 EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT AND SD-19 DESIGNATED
F,A.R. OVERLAY DISTRICT, F.A.R. OF 2.4 FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 340 & 348 NORTHEAST 218T STREET, 317, 341, 345 & 363 NORTHEAST
20TH TERRACE, AND 2040, 2066 & 2072 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED
AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,
FLORIDA; ZONED R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN SD-20
EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT AND C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-
201SD-20.1 EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT. (PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL BY ZB RESO. 2004-0936 ON OCTOBER 18, 2004)
Upon being seconded by Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers Abst
Mr, Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pins Yes
Mr. Angel Urquioia Yes
Mr. Georges William Yes
AYE: 8
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 1
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 8-0
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secre ary
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2004-0934
Item Nbr:
6
EXHIBIT "A„
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (ZONED: R-4):
LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, AND THE EAST ONE-HALF (E. 3) OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, AMENDED PLAT
OF BAYSIDE PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN 2, AT PAGE 40, 01
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND:
LOTS 1 THROUGH 3, BLOCK 3, BAYONNE SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,
AS RECORDED IN 2, AT PAGE 35, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,
FLORIDA,
AND:
LOT 4, BLOCK 3, BAYONNE SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED
IN 2, AT PAGE 35, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE
SOUTH 48 FEET THEREOF,
TOGETHER WITH:
THE EAST 13 INCHES OF THE SOUTH 28 FEET OF SAID LOT 4, BLOCK 3, BAYONNE
SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN 2, AT PAGE 35, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
k) The proposed change has the same
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance
request on agenda item # be recommended to the City Commission fo'
€L a- `lA
Print Name
Sig ure
0. I move that the
enial).
Ar, nrin itam
Date
Miami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 2004-0936
Monday, October 18, 2004
Mr. Carlos Martell offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CHANGE OF ZONING IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, PAGE 21, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN SD-20 EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT TO C-1
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-20 EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT. FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 345 & 363 NORTHEAST 20TH TERRACE, 338
& 348 NORTHEAST 21ST STREET AND 2040, 2066 & 2072 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
WITH AN SD-20 EDGEWATER OVERLAY DISTRICT.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Miguel Gabela,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers Abst
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza No
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pine No
Mr. Allan Shulman Abst
Mr. Angel Urquiola No
Mr. Georges William Yes
AYE: 5
NAY: 3
ABSTENTIONS: 2
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 5-3
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Se
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2004-0878
item Nbr:
4
EXHIBIT "A„
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (ZONED: R AMENDED );PLAN
LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, AND rHE EAST ONE-HALF (E. 3) OF LOT 5, BLOC
K 1, OF BAYSIDE PARK,
ACCORDING MIT DADE COUNTY, THEREOF,
FLORIDA,
RECORDED IN 2, AT PAGE 40, OI
THE PUBLICRECORDSor
AND:
ON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
LOTS 1 THROUGH 3, LCK 3, BAYONNE ORDED IN 2, ATO AGE 35, OF THE PUBLICI THEREOF,
RECORDS OF MIAM! DADE COUNTY,
AS REC
FLORIDA,
AND:
NG TO 'THE RAT THEREOF, AS
DE
LOT 4, BLOCK PAGE 35,8OF THE PUBLICS
RECORDS aOF! MIAMII-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FLORIDA, LESS THE
IN 2, AT
SOUTH 48 FEET THEREOF,
TOGETHER WITH:
THE EAST 13 INCHES OF THE SOUTH 28 FEET OF SAID LOT 4, BLOCK 3, BAYONNE
SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING
TO
THE DADE PLAT THEREOF,
FLORIDA,,AS
RECORDED IN 2, AT PAGE 35, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS
OF