Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceNote: The following document was received by the City Clerk's Office on March 7, 2005. The document has been filed as correspondence relating to Items PZ.8 (File No. 04-01268a) and PZ.9 (File No. 04-01268b) listed on the February 24, 2005 Commission Meeting agenda. March 2, 2005 Commissioner Johnny L. Winton City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Dear Commissioner Winton: We, the group of Biscayne 21 residents, who went to City Hall last Thursday would like to thank you for hearing our concerns and deferring decisions about the land use and zoning variances applied for on behalf of Royal Palm Communities. Based on your statements, we think you would prefer to approve the land use variance allowing them "Restricted Commercial" and to make our community more dynamic in terms of more local businesses. This would be fine with us. You also expressed your concerns about allowing them to pay a bonus to increase FAR density and allow them the zoning variance necessary to build the project proposed to the City in December 2004. You did not seem to have time to address the issue of the alleyway that Ms. Hemandez-Acosta had expressed concern about on January 10, 2005 in the Zoning Board hearing. We would welcome an opportunity to speak with you or a representative of your staff in the near future at our home at Biscayne 21. We know that development and many new hi -rise condos are well on their way and as you said, "the horse is out of the barn." We are all for progress, but we are just concerned about negative impacts on our quality of life in Edgewater. We are grateful to the many positive developments that have taken place in recent years, such as renovations of Margaret Pace Park, opening of North Bayshore Dr from NE 20th Terr to NE 20th St, and of course the eventual grand opening of our Performing Arts Center. We are enclosing about 70 petitions that were signed by many residents in the 36 hours prior to the meeting. Most of these residents wanted to attend but could not due to work obligations. Many others did not yet sign the petition, but have now indicated willingness to do so. Our intention last Thursday was for one of us to conclude by reading this statement and give the copies to the City Clerk for the record, but we did not have time to do so. In conclusion, we thank you for all you have done for our community, and we support you and the Commission with all of these positive improvements to our area, and appreciate your hearing our voices last Thursday at City Hall. With kind regards Name LA) Name UT113) Coola Name QoetA Coov.e Name e4-c- &e.-/e Name C —1T, Name resident since owner since Signature/Date rqc f7 resident since owner since 'VSignature/Date esident s nce q‘C) resident since gei6 resident since le2 resident since c•-° resident since I R9-7 Name resident since Name resident since 0 9c2 owner since owner since 7 9 77 owner since Yre-s.a.s..4�f Signature Date owner since Signa owner since owner since Name resident since owner since Name Name Si a re/Da Si Signature/Date resident since owner since Signature/Date resident since owner since Signature/Date -05 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Na e S C) 1f Owner of Unit - - SignDate ��J�UU ��~����.�m*�"��~��" "��"~~ Date: weu' z» Febznns zaza:no -0800 (PST) From: "Dennis Scott" <,cuttnfc@vohuo.com, Subject: nv note u,Commissioners re: Paramount utEdgewater project. To: ^nngue. Cxrisonpoers.^ </tingue@miami.egu,.csonnue@noLcnr Dear Respected Commissioners: Phn\-C|oseVWndmw My name is Dennis Scott and \ um the owner of two apartments in the Biscayne 21 [oudnnoioiurn located at North Buyahour [)dvr & 21'' Street. { ucgnci that } cannot address you folks personally today; for the aunoe reason l have not been able to voice my opinion in past hearing meetings, my work demands preclude noefrom appearing before you. Again, omyapologies! In the past however, } have been able N attend several Edgewater neighborhood meetings, some beaded by our own distinguished Commissioner Jnbooy Winton, where it appeared that sincere opinions and dialog v/oa �ou�b( pc�oioiu� to ourcomnmouoi�y b� {����wu(�r. Time and �ioo� u�uiu we voiced our disdain for the encroachment o/ sky -scraper monoliths that �ou h>1kx mni�b\ call residential living, especially at the vvutcr`s edge. Our building and many others in the immediate area are low tomid-rise buUdin-xand are not ioline with this type o[proposed skyline. We are not Manhattan NY and we do not vvuoi to become one. The bottom line is that hundreds of families in our area could be negatively affected for many years by the decisions that you h`|kx make here in these cbuoobcco. It is terribly unncoxonuh|c and downright iumu|dog for you to u||ov/ u40-atocy building to be erected less than |OOyuods from our modest 14 sto?y Condominium. The dramatic difference in height and ruusx will scar our i,uoVu)| area forcvcr, not to mention the parking nightmares that have already begun to plague our area because of some ,cccni1y finished projects nearby. And in icxu than u hu1[ nmUc to the xOuib of us on Buysbo[c [)rive you already have the nnusoivc projects of the ()uuotucu & the 1800C|uh underway. lumo also not up/u,c ibu( any significant traffic -flow studies have been compiled or published to date. On top of that, l urn also not uvvuoo of any guarantees by the City or anyone else that our provided utilities of Water & Sewer, Electric, and Emergency Fire Lines will not be negatively impacted by such an enormous project on our corner in addition to the Quantum & the t800 Club. Please do not uUov/ this project to continue as it currently stands and most certainly oheusc do not pconi\ any higher density zoning to change the dynamic o[ou, immediate neighborhood and make us to suffer forever. The Cit6 project was u nice addition toour neighborhood because it blends in with the dynamics of it; the Paramount project will no(! 91cuac STOP, L[)()K & LISTEN to you, Design Review and Planning Advisory Boards. After all, your own appointed Pnc'Au/o|\cckinm[bsign Rcv)cvv Cnmo,itk:c for Urban Dcaioo and Land [}cve|opolrut was strongly against the current plans of the Paramount project as presented (and approved) this past [}ccernbc,. P|raxc keep the buildings in our neighborhood in perspective with one another and in line with the current surroundings and dynamics! Thank you for you valuable time and your kind consideration. [euois5co\\ httn:/b\a.[400.mail. vaboo.c how Lettcr?bnx=Seot& M&g739|7O_|O7|d0 ... 2/23/2005 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name k / C C-C' t Owner of Unit Signature Date /9 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. MMMMMMMMMMMMMM • 1111111111111 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name -ChA g Z6 Owner of Unit 40 3 Signa Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North BayshorehoDrive. Name -7 --//9/1/Z/�Z6 6- Signature Owner of Unit 4 (?- Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21'1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Signature Owner of Unit 4 6‘1- Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21't St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Ten-, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square" We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bhore Drive ayAi Name arHir, frGtdwc Signaturdiv Date Owner of Unit /6 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and wateifi ont restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Signature , e&k.' Owner -of Unit qi -2 Z 05 Date i pc v R:4-W76- PPec , Ait,k API Tr&V) --/-9.-- pe741_5 (9AJC(24 O 77-N5 Doc cfilersiz-t, /149-77E-P-- , Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 214 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name �f///127 6 ign Owner of Unit Date 4/7/ Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 214 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ,14/.-/-fi- 1)6 Signature Ownerof Unit C71-0 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context" Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name u e Owner of Unit Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. IIIIMIIIMMENNIO•111111111•1111111••111111NOMEMMOMINEMOWN•11111111111111•111I111111•111111M1111111111M111111MMMEll FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21sI St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. / .4.-/ tiK; v4 742_ Name of Unit Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. I r r r■ r r■■ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r■ r■ FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21 gt St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne B levard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Baysh• e Drive. Name tit G/ V/%�-�x� Owner o t"Unit z514-P-A- bAls-eil Signature Date q`ecl el o,2 /7- (,o/v -j9 ( A 7 7 /11(4m, Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21g St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bays re Drive. Na Signature Owner of Unit ��y Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. 11111111111111MENEMENOMSWINENNWM FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Sinnature Owner of Unit $-4 2_ Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. 1•111111•1111111•1111111•111111•11111110MMII•BlIMEREMINIIIIIIIIIIIROMMOMOMNIMEME11111111111MME FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21.st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. (Nz re ) Owner of Unit 2 - 5 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21'1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Pe-i-C-e0/6)5 S2°4eZOwner of Unit 023 /er Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. I MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21'1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context" Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name tgari S(o SG Signature Owner of Unit Sb Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. 111111/111111111a1111111111111111111•11111•1111111 M EUUI•IR a mamma NOa MOMOM ERESMORM.S•.U..•1111111011111111M■ FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 20 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore 1Drive. Namq _1\L{ A3\ ctL)C O Signature Owner of Unit (17 i, 3 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. u MMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMM M MMMMMMMMMMMM■■■■MMMM■MJMMMMMMMM MM■M■■MMM■MMMM■MMMMMMMM■ FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Nam Signature Owner of Uni 2--23-Q.5 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21'1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name 'L ' { i%J Owner of Unit 6.(C a13?3lo7 Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 20 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name & ea le_ Owner of Unit 2o7 Sig tur Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name C /A/ Owner of Unit 70 (7/___ Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21g St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. — rr Name Owner of Unit 70 / .2 (2 Y(c) 5— Date Name Signature Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 215 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. e Ve(E'z Owner of Unit 9 /3 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 20 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Nam Signature Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21 ° St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square" We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North B, �ore Drive. `�' Name AAQ 4 Signature � /��rj_ Date Owner of Unit c3 70 0 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square" We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. 1 ass Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. ,1-777 c /Si K 0 Name Signature Owner of Unit IQ) / ks" Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21g St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore p.ive. Name • Signature Owner of Unit Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. I MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. afv.cit_fr-Er?, Name Owner of Unit g0 6:2„,e_wf '2- 3 / 3 Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. 1111111111111111111MOMMO aOVIII• ■■■1111MMOMMOMORSOMORII II•■•■11111■■•Ma O FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21' St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name L)L•t td\ Owner of Unit Ck I Signature \a5 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. as•••••••••■rnamaimarammaammommassamaaaar manassususeammatar FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 20 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Teri-, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Owner of Unit 90 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21° St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context" Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Na e �tfL.t,W 0,4-6 l S ignature Owner of Unit j t 0 ;z/?3f25 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context" Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square", We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Bo corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bays Name Zhz,Owner of Unit 9° Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. IIMUMIRM•1111••■••••••••••11111111•••••••111111111111111111••••••111111•11 • 1111111111•111•••••••••••••••••••• FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Ten, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Na Co Sig if, e Owner of Unit Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and wateifiont restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Perrifr5Tr7d Date 2_3A Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Ba hore Drive Name LA (UN Owner of Uni Cr-0 \it\I 1.9, J Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 2151 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Name Q e Signs Owner of Unit (0 (2 0 v2 3(OES Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Signature Owner of Unit Dat Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. I UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name 1i Owner of Unit 2 l flcC_.)b Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore rive. Na4,7,1 4 Owner of Unit / 1 P-7 Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. 1 M M M M M■ M M■ M M■ M M M M■ M M M M M M M M M M M M M MJ M M M M MJ M M M M M M M M M MJ M M M M M MJ M M M M M M M MJ M M M M M M M M M M FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s` St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Na Signature Owner of Unit ! f Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Baysh• e Drive. Name Sign Owner of Unit (r? Date ( Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name m-e(is Signature Owner of Unit ( 07 02- .2.3 0 6-- Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable, We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005, We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and water fi ont restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. n Name Rti-tAG-- � A, !1".4 O LI d) t Owner of Unit I D o ll ©L- z3 -o6— Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 214 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Bisc Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 No Baysho e Drive. Na Signature Owner of Unit %//Z 2 L 3f4.1 Da e residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name /1/ a. no... Owner of Unit I/O/ gna e Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21g St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. (3 Name L L 4/ J`//r1 C / it/ Owner of Unit # //0 ignature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Ten-, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Owner of Unit (( o Date -c)/ t� Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. MM a MMMMMEMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM a MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM■ a MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21 ° St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayhore Driv . Name Z. � Owner of Unit Signature 2- 23 - 06 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. MMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21' St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name eT Owner of Unit /// gnatur Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name � E,t,t '�--� Owner of Unit Signature Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and wateifiont restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Signature 01114 jutS-fc unit +k 11- (I-5/6(5 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21m St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and watel ont restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North B or Drive. Name 1 Sign. re Ownerof Unit i 21 D — Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 211 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the Toss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name j j t o r, JJ r\l L Owner of Unit 12.(5 S VLCA DG(Zz�2Cri5 Date Signature ,� Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. Ir ERR III r r SRN r r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rr r r rrrrr FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 20 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Crreater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshorerive. Name Signature Owner of Unit/(L Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21a St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ,I.af 4/ Owner of Unit l / / ature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. ssaassaasassassasassarsarassaaaarasaassssssarsarasaasassssasasasrssaaaaassa FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 211 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Owner of Unit /Z9 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. uMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMJMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMJMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM■ FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context" Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name �6\ N _. \C1C1 LNDISlt. Owner of Unit I -1 U\ Signature b1S C F�O vcb a 3S Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square" We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Si natur Owner of Unit / 3 ? 7 3 - S Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ t ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ t • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ • ■ FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 214 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name -' ' U - `" Owner of Unit 1 L+ Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. 1•111111111•111111••111•••••••••M••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name A -2C ej c) Owner of Unit /40 7l Signature Date