Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Impact Analysis - Part IIr r r r P • r r r r r r r r r r r r r I. 1 r r r r r r r r r r r I r r Adjusted Traffic Counts 1 r r r r r r r 1 1 r r r 1 1 1 1 DAVID PLUMMER E. ASSOCIATES. INC. 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name: Biacayne Park Project No.: 04188 Location: Biscayne Boulevard between NE 36 Street and NE 29 Street Count Date; 7/13/2004 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. BEGIN TIME NORTHBOUND TOTAL lst 1/4 2nd 1f4'r3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 12:00 AM 130 106 76 90 402 01:00 AM 55 65 52 38 210 02:00 AM 47 24 32 27 130 03:00 AM 29 21 26 27 103 04:00 AM 16 22 28 26 92 05:00 AM 29 30 46 55 160 06:00 AM 71 76 85 99 331 07:00 AM 122 138 157 176 593 08:00 AMmm' 189 187 192 218 786 09:00 AM 220 207 193 225 845 10:00 AM 208 236 230 197 871 11:00AM 239 264 318 321 1,142 12:00 PM 320 323 308 354 1,305 01:00 PM 326 300 344 318 1,288 02:00 PM 304 267 296 312 1,179 03:00 PM 345 328 368 355 1,396 04:0o PM 392 395 421 430 1,638 05:00 PM 330 397 407 434 1,568 06:00 PM 454 375 304 320 1,453 07:00 PM 271 250 229 222 972 08:00 PM 197 206 188 183 774 09:00 PM 223 186 207 199 815 10:00 PM 174 168 139 157 638 11:00 PM 143 149 114 109 515 24-HOUR TOTAL 19,206 AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: NORTHBOUND BEGIN TIME SOUTHBOUND 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM 85 63 77 54 279 0€:00AM 58 47 44 24 173 02:00 AM 38 39 28 29 134 03:00 AM 14 22 17 26 79 04:00 AM 27 26 32 37 122 05:00 AM 38 56 62 101 257 06:00 AM 113 144 208 305 770 07:00 AM 296 286 389 449 1,420 08:00 AM 386 427 416 457 1,686 09:00 AM 462 337 384 330 1,513 10:00AM 324 307 288 301 1,220 11:06 AM 311 292 323 298 1,224 12:00 PM 308 288 333 388 1,317 01:00 PM 308 295 326 331 1,260 02:00 PM 331 299 304 317 1,251 03:DO PM 279 259 295 333 1,166 04:00PM 309 364 396 419 1,488 05:00 PM 378 408 448 384 1,618 06:00 PM 386 265 241 256 1,148 07:00 PM 240 201 216 172 829 08:00 PM 178 201 164 201 744 09:00 PM 158 141 188 153 640 10:00 PM 174 163 130 145 612 11:00 PM 132 126 96 89 443 24-HOUR TOTAL 21,393 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY Time: 11:30 AM Volume: 1,282 Time: 05:15 PM Volume: 1,692 AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND Time: K-factor: D-factor: Time: K-factor: D•tactor: 08:15 AM 6.4% 68.3°! 56 05:15 PM 8.2% 51.0% NB `i WO• W A1( TOTAL 681 383 264 182 214 417 1,101 2,013 2,472 2,358 2,091 2,366 2,622 2,548 2,430 2,562 3,126 3,186 2,601 1,801 1,518 1,455 1,250 958 40,599 Time: 08:15 AM Volume: 1,762 T€me: 04:45 PM Volume: 1,653 Volume: 2,579 PHF: 0.95 Volume: 3,318 PHF: 0.97 r Biscayne Blvd - NE 36 St _ NE 29 St.xls r r r DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name: Blacayne Park Project No.: 04188 Location: Biscayne Boulevard between NE 29 Street and NE 20 Street Count Date: 7/13/2004 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. BEGIN TIME NORTHBOUND lst 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM 110 103 73 80 366 01:00 AM 52 64 48 39 203 02:00 AM 35 25 30 24 114 03:00 AM 30 20 22 24 96 04:00 AM 15 19 22 22 78 05:00 AM 30 22 • 45 43 140 06:00 AM 59 61 57 96 273 07:00 AM 109 131 139 153 532 08:00 AM 175 177 196 205 753 09:00 AM 212 207 196 218 833 10:00 AM 208 237 205 204 854 11:00AM 222 265 289 301 1,077 12:00 PM 285 315 301 336 1,237 01:00PM 280 288 289 276 1,133 02:00 PM 294 245 273 301 1,113 03:00 PM 312 298 345 303 1,258 04:00 PM 398 339 382 374 1,493 05:00 PM 375 407 363 349 1,494 06:00 PM 367 366 297 318 1,348 07:00 PM 236 235 228 209 908 08:00 PM 190 212 189 178 769 09:00 PM 192 162 188 184 726 10:00 PM 182 159 135 139 615 11:00 PM 141 136 129 _ 101 507 24-HOUR TOTAL 17,920 AM Peak Hour. PM Peak Hour: NORTHBOUND BEGIN TIME SOUTHBOUND TOTAL' 1st 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 12:00 AM 84 " 44 56 55 239 01:oo AM 48 42 35 29 154 02:00 AM 32 30 21 34 117 03:00 AM 10 19 14 25 68 04:00 AM 26 28 26 35 115 05:00 AM 34 46 70 92 242 06:ih7 AM 104 129 180 223 636 07:00 AM 238 298 328 388 1,252 08:00 AM 369 355 358 402 1,484 09:00 AM 376 333 328 295 1,332 10:00 AM 286 248 252 252 1,038 11:0o AM 276 279 267 271 1,093 12:00 PM 251 267 292 311 1,121 01:00 PM 281 223 280 275 1,059 02:00 PM 285 296 260 278 1,117 03:00 PM 238 234 240 246 958 04:00 PM 244 241 276 254 1,015 05:00PM 287 297 302 259 1,145 06:00 PM 235 223 253 232 943 07:00 PM 216 180 190 159 745 06:00 PM 177 153 161 168 659 09:00 PM 135 136 138 130 539 10.00 PM 152 126 119 125 522 11:OO PM 107 117 94 77 395 . 24-HOUR TOTAL 17,988 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY Time: 11:45 AM Volume: 1,202 Time: 04:30 PM Volume: 1,53E AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND *TWO-WAV# TOTAL 605 357 231 164 193 382 909 1,784 2,237 2,185 1,892 2,170 2,358 2,192 2,230 2,216 2,508 2,639 2,291 1,653 1,428 1,265 1,137 902 35,908 4 Time: 0B:15 AM Volume: 1,491 Time: 12:15 PM Volume: 1,151 Time: 08;30 AM Volume: 2,289 K-factor: 6.4% PHF: 0.94 0-factor: 64.2% 58 Time: 04:45 PM Volume: 2,659 K-factor: 7.4% PHF: 0.94 0-factor: 57.1% NB Biscayne Blvd - NE 29 St _ NE 20 St.xls 1• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DAVi0 PLUMMER 8 ASSOCIATES, INC, 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name: Biacayne Park Project No.: 04188 Location: NE 20 Street between NE 2 Avenue and North Miami Avenue Count Date: 7/13/2004W Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. BEGIN TIME ° EASTBOUND 1st 1/4 2nd 114 3rd 11e4th 1/4r TOTAL 12:00 AM 7 6 10 7 30 01:00 AM 6 3 8 8 25 02:00 AM 4 7 7 3 21 03:00 AM 3 4 3 3 13 04:00 AM 3 5 5 10 23 05:00 AM 3 7 16 16 42 06:00 AM 18 36 27 38 119 07:DO AM 48 38 56 65 207 08:00 AM 53 51 50 50 204 09.00 AM 57 52 78 58 245 10;00 AM 63 61 45 59 228 11:00 AM 74 70 67 62 273 12:00 PM 61 65 57 52 235 01;00 PM 61 61 57 76 255 02:OO PM 69 54 64 49 236 03:00 PM 56 65 48 81 250 04:00 PM 63 66 58 80 267 05:00 PM 72 65 69 60 266 06:00 PM 53 53 55 47 208 07:00 PM 39 19 28 36 122 08:00 PM 48 34 22 29 133 09:00 PM 27 23 19 19 88 10:00 PM 21 17 21 18 77 I1:cOPM 17 15 10 _ 12 54 24-HOUR TOTAL 3,621 AM Peek Hour: PM Peak Hour: EASTBOUND BEGIN TIME WESTBOUND 1st 1/4 2nd 114 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4T TOTAL 12:00 AM 7 7 6 6 26 01:00 AM 2 2 6 4 14 02:00 AM 1 5 5 7 18 03:00 AM 1 2 0 7 10 04:00 AM 3 4 2 5 14 05:00 AM 8 4 7 7 26 06:00 AM 16 12 21 29 78 07:00 AM 24 24 44 59 151 08:00 AM 57 57 44 53 211 09:00 AM 66 50 54 41 211 10:00 AM 58 44 48 40 190 11:00 AM 57 61 69 52 239 12:0o PM 64 56 67 46 233 01:00 PM 47 53 60 48 208 0200 PM 61 49 52 66 228 03:00 PM 50 64 51 50 215 04:00 PM 63 53 68 71 255 05:00 PM 77 39 65 55 236 06:00 PM 47 52 38 38 . 175 07:00 PM 40 25 29 34 128 08:00 PM 19 24 33 21 97 09:00 PM 15 14 18 15 62 10:00 PM 20 25 15 8 68 11:00 PM 13 11 14 12 i 50 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY Time: 11:00 AM Volume: 273 Time: 04:45 PM Volume: 286 AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: 24-HOUR TOTALI 3,143 TWO-WAY TOTAL 56 39 39 23 37 68 197 358 415 456 418 512 468 463 464 465 522 502 383 250 230 150 145 104 r 6764 AM Peak Hour: Time: 11:15 AM Volume: 246 PM Peak Hour: Time: 04:15 PM Volume: 269 EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND Time: K-factor: D•factor. Time: K-factor: b-factor: 11:00 AM 7.6% 53.3% EB 04:15 PM 8.1% 50.6% EB Volume: 512 PHF: 0.94 Volume: 545 PHF: 0.90 NE 20 St - NE 2 Ave_N Miami Ave.xls wwwwIwwwwwwMP' 'MI wwwImp III wwig,wwwwwwwwwwwwIII MP' wMR" wwwII. DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PMT 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park Biscayne Boulevard / NE 24 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: 04188 7/13/2004 Tuesday 06:00 PM 5 4 4 9 9 6 4 Biscayne Boulevard NORTHBOUND T 382 336 387 377 365 397 361 352 R 10 3 1 3 5 4 3 NE 24 Street TOTAL 397 343 389 382 377 411 371 359 6 7 9 10 8 8 10 7 SOUTHBOUND T 235 245 264 246 270 265 308 251 R _ TOTAL 4 245 4 256 2 275 2 258 281 7 280 7 325 3 261 L 2 4 2 0 0 2 EASTBOUND 1 R 1 4 O 1 O 2 O 8 0 3 9 TOTAL L 7 5 4 9 • 10 2 1 0 3 1 6 2 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON WESTBOUND T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 1i 9 9 9 8 8 7 8 TOTAL 12 11 10 9 9 8 8 10 'GRAND TOTAL Biscayne Boulevard NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NE 24 Street WESTBOUND 21 T 1509 R 15 TOTAL 1545 34 T 1063 R 16 TOTAL 1113 L 6 T R 17 TOTAL 24 4 0 R 36 TOTAL- 40 661 615 678 658 670 709 707 636 GRAND TOTAL 2722 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.92 0.84 Note: 2003 FDOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor - 1.02 0.60 0.81 0.97 Biscayne Bivd_NE 24 St.xls ___ mire Ivor _mar ____ Inv low ___ low _ low IF DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES. INC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park Biscayne Boulevard / NE 25 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: 04188 7/13/2004 Tuesday Biscayne Boulevard NE 25 Street NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L 2 T 386 R 8 TOTAL L 396 9 T 232 R 4 TOTAL 245 0 T 0 R 3 TOTAL 3 13 T R 0 18 TOTAL 31 GRAND TOTAL 675 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 7 333 11 351 8 247 5 260 0 1 1 5 20 27 639 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 4 388 3 395 3 258 5 266 0 0 2 2 0 10 18 681 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 7 4 9 7 349 355 394 349 1 6 4 9 357 9 NIA- A 365 10 407 2 365 11 227 282 274 312 2 2 4 3 238 2 294 2 280 I 0 326 0 1 1 y 0 0 4 1 2 2 7 4 2 2 4 1 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 9 9 13 6 15 18 615 669 704 711 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 5 347 7 359 6 263 3 272 0 0 3 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON 0 10 13 Biscayne Boulevard NE 25 Street 645 TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 06:00 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23 T 1480 R 26 TOTAL 1528 0.92 30 1069 le 14 T R .a. TOTAL 1113 0.84 L 2 R 8 TOTAL 11 0.39 26 T R 46 TOTAL 72 0.57 GRAND TOTAL 2724 0.96 Note: 2003 FDOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor 1.02 Biscayne Bivd._NE 25 S#.xls IV NIP I! w I/ I I 7 w 7 w I MI w w w w >! lir w I w NV w w I w w l l w i w w ip w w w mor 4 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park Biscayne Boulevard / NE 26 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: 04188 7/13/2004 Tuesday Biscayne Boulevard NORTHBOUND 5 T 394 Fj 7 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NE 26 Street -WESTBOUND TOTAL L 406 0 T 224 R 5 TOTAL 229 6 T 4 110. R 9 TOTAL 19 10 T 0 R Tt L 4 14 GRAND TOTAL 668 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 2 9 8 8 19 352 392 378 354 418 4 4 2 4 5 358 3 405 5 388 3 366 3 442 1 249 264 252 289 284 3 3 3 3 255 272 257 295 288 2 2 9 6 5 4 3 4 2 5 4 4 5 3 2 10 9 18 11 12 2 5 2 3 1 0 1 5 3 3 4 4 6 9 6 9 3 11 629 695 669 681 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 8 6 377 361 3 2 388 7 369 2 308 254 9 4 324 260 5 4 5 2 5 5 15 11 9 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON Biscayne Boulevard NE 26 Street TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 7 734 19 659 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 34 T 1543 R 16 TOTAL 1592 u 12 T 1083 R 16 TOTAL 1112 L 20 T 15 R 19 TOTAL 54 20 T 5 R 16 TOTAL 42 GRAND TOTAL 2800 PEAK HOUR FACTOR Note: 0.88 2003 FOOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 1.02 0.84 0.70 0.54 0.94 Biscayne Blvd_NE 26 St.xis w w I_ w 7• w w w IF l w w w w NW s l w 11 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park NE 2 Court / NE 24 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: 04188 Count Date: 7/1412004 Day of Week: Wednesday NE 2 Court NE 24 Street TIME INTERVAL NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND T R TOTAL L T R 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 ry TOTAL T R TOTAL T R TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 0 0 1 2 3 5 3 0 8 15 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 9 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM' 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 1 2 0 0 0 3 7 0 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 2 4 1 4 5 7 1 3 2 4 9 7 0 0 0 5 12 9 13 25 18 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 3 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 9 1 8 9 23 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 4 3 0 0 5 9 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 2 4 13 6 5 3 8 10 0 0 13 13 35 24 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON NE 2 Court NE 24 Street TIME INTERVAL NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 04:00 PM 06:00 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 8 9 J 0 12 21 0,58 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 13 12 26 0.48 10 27 0 37 0.69 84 0.72 Note: 2003 FDOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 1.02 NE 2 Ct_NE 24 St.xls w 11 s s : Ns NW s s Nor IMP NW Mir Mr NW NWNW Nor w s I w s s s s w w s s s' s III M DAVID PLUMMEF; & ASSOCIATES. INC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park NE 2 Avenue / NE 24 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: 04188 7/13/2004 Tuesday NORTHBOUND 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 T 167 173 240 231 262 274 209 205 R 3 2 4 2 6 0 2 NE 2 Avenue TOTAL .� 171 179 243 236 265 282 210 208 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NE 24 Street WESTBOUND 6 3 3 4 6 2 10 4 T 98 108 118 110 109 114 103 99 R 3 0 2 1 4 4 3 1 TOTAL L 107 111 3 123 2 115 3 119 4 120 6 116 2 104 3 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 1 2 1 3 7 2 TOTAL 2 4 4 9 9 5 4 0 5 0 1 1 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 6 7 4 7 15 5 8 TOTAL 11 8 6 4 12 16 6 9 GRAND TOTAL 291 302 376 359 407 427 341 326 TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 106:00 PM AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON 7 NORTHBOUND T 899 R 10 NE 2 Avenue TOTAL 915 19 SORTHBOUND T 439 R 9 TOTAL 467 L 12 EASTBOUND T 0 R 12 NE 24 Street TOTAL 24 7 WESTBOUND T 1 R 30 TOTAL 37 GRAND TOTAL 1443 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.80 0.93 Note: 2003 FOOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 1.02 0.55 0.56 0.92 NE 2 Ave NE 24 St.xls wwwwIwNI, wwwwwIMP' 'IMF wwwwwgar Ivor wwimp lwwwlip wwNI. www Mgr MP' lww DAVID PLUMMEiR & ASSOCSATES, iNC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park NE 2 Avenue / NE 25 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: 04188 Count Date: 7/14/2004 Day of Week: Wednesday NE 2 Avenue 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 06:00 PM 3 1 2 5 0 1 1 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND T_ R 193 216 236 234 214 233 214 189 1 197 1 115 5 0 217 3 100 6 1 239 2 102 3 1 240 2 139 2 1 215 2 125 2 0 234 1 122 0 5 220 4 125 1 1 193 1 100 1 - TOTAL 121 109 107 143 129 123 130 102 3 2 3 6 3 0 3 NE 25 Street EASTBOUND- 1 a 0 0 R 2 1 2 4 4 2 TOTAL 4 6 11 5 5 2 5 L 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON T 4---40 0 0 1 0 0 TBOUND 3 1 5 7 9 7 6 5 TOTAL 5 3 8 8 11 9 8 5 PEAK HOUR FACTOR1 J 8 NORTHBOUND T 882 NE 2 Avenue R1 896 TOTAL L 0.91 8 SOUTHBOUND T 473 10 Note: 2003 FDOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 1.02 TOTAL 492 0.84 L 11 EASTBOUND T 3 R 9 NE 25 Street TOTAL 22 0.50 6 WESTBOUND T 2 R 22 TOTAL 30 0.66 GRAND' TOTAL 329 333 360 402 360 371 360 305 GRAND TOTAL 1439 0.93 R TOTAL L NE 2 Ave_NE 25 St.xls • • i • P • • • • i r • • • • • • r • 1. 1 i r • • • • • • M • t i i i 10 • • r Signal Timings r Signal Timing PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 3597 US 1 & NE 26 ST FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) TIME PT OFF NSG G Y EWP Y MIN: 20 12 0 11 70 66 1 4 15 4 15 21 0 30 1 4 12 4 115 23 0 30 1 4 12 4 500 19 0 30 1 4 12 4 545 1 70 66 1 4 15 4 615 2 16 55 1 4 26 4 745 12 23 61 1 4 20 4 845 16 103 88 1 4 13 4 1200 17 102 88 1 4 13 4 1345 10 102 88 1 4 13 4 1545 9 102 93 1 4 13 4 1630 18 102 93 1 4 13 4 1800 3 77 63 1 4 18 4 1900 1 70 66 1 4 15 4 2130 11 70 66 1 4 15 4 S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 6 51NITE M2 6 51LATE NIG 6 51DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOQN M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI Appendix C FDOT's Quality/LOS Handbook Generalized Tables Downtown Miami DRI Increment II Transit Ridership w w w Napo ....... w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE CLASSIFICATION TYPE FDOT'S 2002 QUALITY / LEVEL OF SERVICE (Peak Hour Directional Volumes) (1) PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE (Threshold volume to capacity ratio) A B 1 C D E A B C D E CLASS 2 ARTERIAL 1LU 0 100 590 810 850 0 0.12 0.69 0.95 1.00 2LD 0 220 1,360 1,710 1,800 0 0.12 0.76 0.95 1.00 3LD 0 340 2,110 2,570 2,710 0 0.13 0.78 0.95 1.00 4LD 0 440 2,790 3,330 3,500 0 0.13 0.80 0.95 1.00 CLASS 4 ARTERIAL 1LU 0 0 270 720 780 0 0 0.35 0.92 1.00 2LD 0 0 650 1,580 1,660 0 0 0.39 0.95 1.00 3LD 0 0 1,000 2,390 2,490 0 0 0.40 0.96 1.00 4LD 0 0 1,350 3,130 3,250 0 0 0.42 0.96 1.00 uaiity/Level of Service Handboo NOTES: (t) THE PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE IS DERIVED BY DIVIDING THE FDOT'S 2002 LEVEL OF SERVICE BY THE LOS E FOR EACH TYPE OF ROADWAY. w,w w msE ...... w w w w w w w w w MI w w w w w w w w w w w w w w wMI tw w 00 20-Nov-2001_,_ ROADWAY FROM 70 B1SCAYNE 9LV0 NE 54 STREET NE 46 STRET NE 46 STREET 1.195 1.195 NE 38 STREET NE 36 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 15 STREET NE s4 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 13 STREET NE 13 STREET 1-395 I.395 NE 6 STREET NE 0 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE I STREET NE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 4 STREET NE 2 AV513.1E10RICREL4, AVENUE NE 20 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 13 STREET NE 13 STREET 1-395 1-395 NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 1 STREET FLAMER STREET FLAGLER STREET SE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 4 STREET 5E 4 STREET SE B STREET SE 0 STREET $W 13 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 15 ROAD SW 15 ROAD RICKENBACKER CSWY NE 1 AVENUE NE 17 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET €-995 1.395 NE 8 STREET NE 6 STREET FLAGLER STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET FL.AGLER STREET 5E 1 STREET 09R N8 S8 N8 se N8 SB N6 66 N8 S8 NB BB NB 58 NB 5B N8 SB NB 5B NS S8 NB 56 NB S8 NB 58 NB SS NO NB SB NB SB NB SB SB S8 58 S8 SB 56 58 NB 38 NB SB NEI SS NB S8 NB SB NB NB NB NB NB FACILITY TYPE EIOSTO G LANES 4L0 4L0 4L0 4L0 4L0 4L0 4L0 4L0 6L0 6L0 44. 3L OLD 8L0 61.0 61A now 4LU 444.1 4LU 3L 34 31. 31 3L 3L 4L 2L 34 4L0 410 4L0 2LU 3L 38. at. 3L 31, 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a 3 3 46 95 95 9 9 9 6 9 9 9 6 24 24 24 24 24 24 48 48 4a 4a 6 2 2 6 18 16 16 18 16 18 16 16 16 16 16 18 32 32 48 48 18 16 16 I6 18 to 16 16 1a 18 11 93 95 95 1O 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 B 48 45 46 46 46 8 8 B B 9 9 9 6 6 6 62 62 62 62 62 62 38 38 36 36 36 36 36 82 82 46 4B 4a 4a 46 4B 46 46 48 4a 16 0y 95 32 32 K K K 51 B 95 B 8 10 10 10 7 7 91 93 93 93 93 93 62 62 62 82 62 62 52 62 93 93 51 51 51 51 51 51 61 51 51 99 4a 7 T K 95 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 95 93 93 93 93 93 93 43 91 93 95 77 95 T 9 T 45 7 95 T 95 7 95 95 C 95 C 65 C 95 C 95 95 95 51 B 10 16 TAME 51A5 DOWNTOW94 9A4A9E ow UPDATE /S06T140 179 DI19 9IDERS 11P AND P4R50281R39 CAPACITY A8SKIIN9ENTS 95 95 95 95 95 S 95 5 95 S 95 5 95 95 95 93 K K BUS ROUTES SERVING ROADWAY 9EGUMENT$ 95 95 95 95 7 95 95 95 95 95 C 95 T T 95 C 5 44 111 86 111 68 113 66 111 19 111 86 111 54 111 45 111 45 111 45 11Y 45 04 45 94 240 ! 10 132 48 72 20 66 f 18 86 f 45 66 € 10 66 E to 46 32 2 6 4 4 4 66 4 40 2 2 $smsws:sssal 99 42 99 42 99 42 75 42 75 75 24 78 76 97 SB as 92 7 76 33 32 18 18 32 1a 27 6 48 66 66 36 nnvs2tngN 46 E 6 0 3 6 2 6 6 9 132 132 139 114 68 811E ROUTES AND 91085594048814 99059969(7 46 6 0 1 0 0 6 51 52 10 46 48 48 46 48 51 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 48 52 46 55 137 K 156 112 18 76 62 21 13 21 13 21 13 21 13 21 13 21 13 21 13 21 13 8 12 12 80 24 144 24 145 24 132 16 126 132 124 76 17 42 R 96 96 96 54 84 6,1 108 100 108 100 106 100 106 100 100 100 106 100 100 100 104 76 t04 70 100 96 100 as so sa all 80 50 60 T 126 128 126 108 106 TOTAL BUS IUOFRBMP BUS CAPACITY 15 C 0 T 339 926 0.3611 246 920 0.270 339 920 0.36E 246 926 0.270 339 920 0.366 246 920 0.270 452 523 1372 0.355 0 14a 416 2,252 0.165 152 523 1,472 0.355 0 148 416 2,252 0135 f52 523 t,472 6365 0 F41 416 2,252 0.1E5 152 442 1,4E9 0.301 16 149 393 2,249 0.170 290 152 676 1,020 0.660 38 200 132 465 1,808 0266 9e 290 752 1,70E1 0-441 to 72 200 506 2,456 0204 90 290 748 1,706 11438 16 72 200 496 2,466 0200 96 290 740 1,786 0.438 18 72 200 498 2,486 0.260 96 290 677 1.766 0.397 16 93 200 469 2,499 0.197 76 295 657 2.466 0.264 10 63 170 394 2,226 0.177 167 75 275 1,106 3,434 0922 61 306 0.199 167 167 700 0240 137 187 780 0.240 198 713 0,378 119 713 0.167 84 51A R 162 306 1.070 0266 308 1,070 6.268 303 1,070 6.280 304 1,330 0229 192 552 0.346 8 536 0.164 94 566 0.166 385 1,346 0.271 116 566 0.203 240 566 0424 119 566 0.210 156 308 0.510 26 306 11.015 130 306 0451 22 303 0.072 164 a74 0,273 468 €.220 0.362 434 1,229 0354 578 2,114 0273 405 2,114 0.192 66 534 0,127 SOURCE. KEITN AND SCI1NSR5. PA. NATRANPLAMPR0.1ECT54200141a7184TA8LEBi11 MATRIK.WK4 wwwwywwwwwwwwwwwwwwwIFwwwwwwwwwwIll, wwww Mr/ www P464 3 of 5 20•N04.2001 ROADWAY TROY wan Amur TO NW 20 STREET INN 17 STREET NW 17 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 5 STREET SW 1 STREET E 26 ITREET NE 2 AVENUE N. MIAMI AVENUE N. hIAMI AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE 195 NE 1S STREETIVENETIIN COW BISCAYNE ISLAND BAYSHORE DRIVE BAYSItoRE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLVD BISCAYNE BLVD N. MIAMI AVENUE E 14 STREET BAYSNORE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLVD BISCAVNE 81V0 NE 1 AVENUE NE 1 AVENUE N LIMA AVENUE N MIAMI AVENIIE MN 2 AVENUE PAN AVENUE NW3AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE 195 NE ti STREET NW3AVENUE 1-95 NE 10 STREET MN AVENUE 195 NE 6 ITREETJPORT BOULEVARD E. Of PORT BRIDGE BISCAYNE BLVD BlSCAYNE B1.310 NE 1 AVENUE NE I AVENUE N MI MI AVENUE N MIAMI AVENUE NW I AVENUE NWIAVENUE NNTCT NW 1 CT NW AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NW3AVENUE 1.05 -] j 0 FACILITY TYPE EXISTING DIR LANES NB SB S8 NB SS NB EB YOB EB W8 EB WB EB WB EB WB EB W8 iB wit EB WB EB WB E0 WB WB EB WB WB EB EB WB WB WB VV6 W WB WB WB 2LU 21.4.1 2LU 3L 2L 2LU 4LU 4113 2 21 21 32 32 32 32 32 32 210 A A 2LD 32 32 2LU 4LU 2L K 1L K 21 M 11 M 2LU M M 211.1 2 2 2LU 31 21 2L 21 TAKE 21AS DOWNTOWN 541AY113R1 UPDATE EIIISTI140 PM BUTS RIDERSISP AND PEREON.TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENTS 21 21 M M 36 48 48 56 51 16 51 M T M T M M 6LD 31 2L 2 7 6 2L 2 7 21 2L 2 21 7 21 31 7 21 A A 62 C 62 K K M M BUS ROUTES SERVING ROADWAY 8E0EY4:NTs s S T T 32 93 124 72 32 27 18 27 16- 7 16 56 22 56 18 14 46 32 36 48 A 24 18 16 32 0 24 1e 1 to 2 3 1s 32 99 45 48 18 68 126 21 16 21 54 2 5 75 76 7 66 66 7e 48 21 S1 52 52 243 42 13 21 NUS ROUTES AND RIDERSHIP SEGEYEN7 93 76 C K Y 75 112 66 72 96 14 112 46 98 14 46 14 46 14 46 14 s 275 200 T 152 132 128 128 TOTAL 8i56 8Us CAPACITY VAC 196 559 0.354 140 559 0.250 114 0.509 114 0.156 27 105 0.136 16 195 0.092 27 195 0.136 18 195 0062 27 195 0138 18 195 0.092 24 45 0.533 16 45 0.400 74 546 0.136 37 270 0.137 646 2,006 0.42f 774 2,739 0.283 208 687 0.419 238 052 0 340 46 130 0.354 14 139 0.100 48 130 0.354 14 130 0.108 134 445 0.256 142 445 0.319 £6 114 0.140 54 114 0 474 189 555 0213 141 510 0278 75 315 0.236 132 304 4.427 132 306 0.427 SOURCE: KEITH AND SCINIAR6, P.A. N:iT•Fbd PLAMPROJECT9200111671S1TAKESt1IMATR1X.WIU ! ! w W 7 w w II w w vs lairyr mop ler my. w ll p Pap 1of7 20-Nov2001 ROADWAY FROM TO BISCAYNE BLVD NE 54 STREET NE 46 STRET NE 46 STREET 1-195 1-195 NE 36 STREET NE 36 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 13 STREET NE 13 STREET 1.395 1.395 NE 6 STREET NE 6 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 4 STREET NE 2 AVENUE/BRICKELL AVENUE NE 20 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 13 STREET NE 13 STREET 1395 1-395 NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 1 STREET FLAGLER STREET FLAGLER STREET SE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET 5E 2 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 4 STREET SE 4 STREET SE B STREET . SE 8 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 13 STREET SW IS ROAD SW 15ROAD RICKENBACKERCSWY TABLE 21.A6 DOWNTOWN IMMI DR/ UPDATE EXISTING AM AND PM METRORAII. AND METROMOVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON -TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT FACILITY TYPE EXISTING DI R LANES NB 4LD SB N9 4LD SB NB 4LD Se NB 4LD 5s NB 41.0 5B N8 4LD SB NB 4LD SB NB 4LD 58 NB 6LD SB NB 6LD Se NB 4L S8 3L NB 8LD se NB 8LD S8 NB 8LD SB NB 6LD S8 NB 2LOW NB SB NB SB NH Se SB SB Se 5B S8 Se S NB 58 NB SB NB S8 NB Se 4LU 4U 4LU 3L 3L 3L 3L 3E 3L 4L 2L 3L 4LD 4LD 4LD MASS TRANSIT -METRbRA.A. SIT•METROMOVER ...-.-.._`12i METRO- RAIL 11j % PEAK CAPACITY ' ' SONS) PM. ""'"""- - "" AM PEAK METRO- MOVER [3j % 121 PEAK CAPACITY PM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP SONS"_ AM PEAT( ?r T � TALK RIDERSHIP (PERSONS) PM VIC f RIDERSHIP (PERSONS) AM WC z$2 82idZiE§g§1.25§5iiot'r'So'§'_o 00oE o o o�, 0 a ©000crooo 0 0 00000o aci 000 cocoo c coca a c o o a ci 66000 TOTAL RIDERSHP AM WC MM2 50% 960 44 .(PERSONS) 57 0,059 50% 960 53 50 0.052 M642 50% 960 44 57 0.059 50% 960 53 50 0.052 MM2 50% 960 44 57 0.059 50% 960 53 50 0.052 MM2 50% 9611 44 57 0.059 50% 960 53 50 0.052 M942 50% 960 47 61 0.064 50% 960 69 53 0.055 MM2 50% 960 91 68 0.092 501 960 70 68 0.071 94941 50% 1.440 83 61 0.056 50% 1,440 56 56 0.039 6,40.11 50% 1.440 74 80 0.056 50% 1,440 80 57 0.040 MM1 50% 1,440 106 102 0.071 50% 1,440 73 76 0.053 M511 100% 2,680 211 203 0.0701 94942 25% 480 22 113 0235 25% 480 26 100 0.208 MM2 25% 480 22 113 0.235 25% 480 26 100 0.206 18962 50% 960 53 100 0.104 MM2 50% 960 70 136 0.142 MM1 50% 1,440 56 111 0.077 MM1 50% 1,440 BO 114 0.079 MM1 50% 1,440 80 114 0.079 94941 501 1.440 73 151 0.105 NW 100% 2.880 146 151 0.052 MM2 501‘ 960. 164 316 0.329' 100% 1.920 360 344 0.170 MR4 25% 1,483 276 0.189 813 0.556 MM2 50% 960 164 316 0.329 25% 1,463 692 0.473 256 0.175 100% 1,920 360 344 0.179 MR4 25% 1,463 276 0.189 813 0.556 MM2 50% 960 85 163 0.170 25% 1,463 692 0.473 256 0,175 50% 960 97 185 0.193 SOURCE: KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. N:ITRANPLANApRO,IECTS20011167181TABLES111MATRIX, 14/A4 w w w w' w w w w w w w w w w w w w W mow Page 3 of 7 20-Ho -2001 ROADWAY FROM TAVENUE NW 11 STREET NW 8 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 3 STREET NW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 7 STREET SW 8 STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET NW 3 AVENUE NW 20 STREET NW 17 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 5 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 2 AVENUE N. MIAMI AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NE 15 STREETNENETIA$ BISCAYNE ISLAND BAYSHORE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLVD TO NW 8 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 3 STREET NW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 7 STREET SW 8STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 15 ROAD NW 17 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 5 STREET SW 1 STREET N. MIAMI AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE 1-95 CSWY BAYSHORE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLVD N. MIAMI AVENUE SOURCE KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. TABLE 21.AS DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI UPDATE EXISTING AM AND PM METRO -RAIL AND METROMOVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON -TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT DER FACILITY TYPE EXISTING LANES NS SB NS SB N0 SB N8 SE Na S6 NB SB N0 SB NB 58 NB 58 NB S0 NB S8 NB 58 NB 58 NB SB NB SB NB NB ES WO 60 WB ES W8 EA W13 ES WB EB WB 21.0 2LU 210 21.0 2L 1L 2L 11 4LU 2LU 4LU 2LU 2LU 4LU 2LU 2LU 2LU 31 21- 2LU 4LU 4L0 210 2LD 2LU ss ' MASSTRANSIT=Mk E+(l31160VER—.,W,,..... 121 PM PEAK AM PEAK [21 PM PEAK A#1 PEAK PEAK T: AL� •TAL PEAK —TOTAL TOTAL METRO- RAIL (f) CAPACITY RIDERSHIP PM RIDERSHIP AM METRO. [3] CAPACITY RIDERSIRP PM RIDERSHIP AM % (PERSONS PERSONSI VA; PERSONS) WC MOVER % [PERSONS1 {PERSONS) WC PERSONS)WC MR1 50% 2.925 684 0.234 1.266 0.433 j 25% 1,463 592 0.473 256 0.175 MR1 50% 2,925 684 0.234 1,266 0.433 25% 1,463 692 0.473 256 0.175 MR2 50% 2,925 686 0.235 1,258 0.430 25% 1,463 692 0.473 256 0,175 MR2 50% 2,925 686 0.235 1,258 0.430 25% 1,463 692 0.473 256 0.175 MR3 25% 1,463 281 0.192 776 0.530 25% 1.463 692 0.473 25$ 0.175 MR3 25% 1,463 281 0.192 776 0.530 25% 1.463 692 0.473 256 0.175 MR4 25% 1,483 276 0,189 813 0.556 25% 1,463 892 0.473 256 0.175 MR4 25% 1,463 276 0.189 813 0.556 25% 1,463 692 0.473 256 0.175 NATRANFLAN1PR41ECTS12001116f161TABLES111 MATRi%.WK4 r r r r p • r r r r r r r 1 r r r r r r r r r r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1 1 1 Appendix D Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets Existing Conditions 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY "Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: litto Performed: 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 24 STREET "Jurisdiction: 'U nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 "Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 " East/West Street: NE 24 STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD "Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments "Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 1 Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 1 Volume 21 1509 15 34 1063 16 'Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 1555 15 35 1095 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 -- 'Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 "RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 'Configuration L T TR L T TR "Upstream Signal? No No Ilk or Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R 'Volume 4 0 36 6 1 17 ``Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 37 6 1 17 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ``Percent Grade (%) 0 0 "Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 'Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR pproach Pavement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB 1 4 L L Westbound 7 8 9 LTR Eastbound 10 11 12 LTR Or (vph) 21 35 41 24 C(m) (vph) 624 416 258 235 Fr/c 0.03 0.08 0.16 0.10 035% queue length 0.10 0.27 0.56 0.34 'Lontrol Delay 11.0 14.4 21.6 22.1 OS B B C C Mi,-oath Delay 21.6 22.1 oach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY "Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: litto Performed: 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD/ NE 25 STREET 'Jurisdiction: "Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 "Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - it 04188 'East/West Street: NE 25 STREET ▪ North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 'Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments "Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R i "Volume 23 1480 26 30 1069 14 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 "Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 1541 27 31 1113 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 Median Type/Storage TWILL / 1 'RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR 'Upstream Signal? No No Ilk or Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume 26 1 46 2 1 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 '▪ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 1 47 2 1 8 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ▪ Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ' Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 'Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level. of Service 'Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR vv (vph) 23 31 75 11 C(m) (vph) 616 417 156 230 'C(m) 0.04 0.07 0.48 0.05 '95% queue length 0.12 0.24 2.27 0.15 `Control Delay 11.1 14.3 47.8 21.4 'LOS B B E C IIpoach Delay 47.8 21.4 ., roach LOS E C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d 'Analyst: DPA Inter.: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 26 STREET Agency: Area Type: All other areas 'Date: 7/19/04 Jurisd: Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2004 oject ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 W St: NE 26 STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD 0 Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 0 No . Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 LGConfig LTR LTR L TR L TR 1Volume 20 15 19 20 5 16 34 1543 16 12 1083 16 'Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 'Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1EB Left A NB Left A r Thru A Thru A 0 Right A Right A Peels Peds 'WB Left A SB Left A ' Thru A Thru A ' Right A Right A Peds Peds IV\IB Right EB Right Right WB Right ct en 13.0 94.0 low 4.0 4.0 A11 Red 0.0 0.0 r Cycle Length: 115.0 secs ' Intersection Performance Summary hpippr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 'Lane Group Flow Rate 3rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS kastbound NTR 178 1578 0.32 0.11 48.0 D 48.0 D 'des tbound kTR 171 1511 0.25 0.11 47.3 D 47.3 D 0 Northbound 342 418 0.11 0.82 2.2 A kR 2889 3534 0.57 0.82 3.9 A 3.9 A kouthbound 0, 187 229 0.07 0.82 2.2 A ill 2886 3531 0.41 0.82 3.0 A 3.0 A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Southbound L T R Intersection Delay = 5.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A 1 HCS2000: Uns=gnalized Intersections Release 4.1d 1 0 'Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: litto Performed: 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 COURT / NE 24 STREET 'Jurisdiction: 'Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 'Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 'East/West Street: NE 24 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 COURT 'Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 'Major Street: r Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R Westbound 4 5 6 L T R 'Volume 13 12 10 27 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 16 13 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 2 -- "Median Type/Storage Undivided / 'RT Channelized? 'Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT 'Upstream Signal? No No IF — or Street: Approach Northbound Movement 7 8 9 L T R Southbound 10 11 12 L T R 'Volume 9 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.72 0.72 "Hourly Flow Rate, HFR. 12 16 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 'Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / 'Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service kpproach EB WE Northbound Southbound "+4ovement 1 4 j 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 iLane Config LT LR '.r (vph) 13 28 C(m) (vph) 1578 982 =/c 0.01 0.03 OD5% queue length 0.02 0.09 Control Delay 7.3 8.8 OS A A oach Delay 8.8 :010roach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUNWARY Analyst: DPA `Agency/Co.: Ilkto Performed: 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 AVENUE / NE 24 STREET !Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary 'Analysis Year: 2004 'Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 24 STREET `North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE 'Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 'Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 1 L T R I L T R 'Volume 7 899 10 19 439 9 "Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 977 10 20 477 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / 'RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 'Configuration LT TR LT TR 'Upstream Signal? No No :or Street: Approach Westbound Movement 7 8 9 L T R Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R 'Volume 7 1 30 12 0 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 1 32 13 0 13 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 dared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 'Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 (Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 0Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I LTR I LTR (vph) 7 20 40 26 C(m) (vph) 1073 696 310 280 Pv/c 0.01 0.03 0.13 0.09 p5% queue length 0.02 0.09 0.44 0.30 Control Delay 8.4 10.3 18.3 19.2 !LOS A B C C oach Delay 18.3 19.2 roach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 0 Analyst: 'Agency/Co.: to Performed: salysis Time Period: Intersection: (Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary 'Analysis Year: 2004 'Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK East/West Street: NE 25 'North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE 'Intersection Orientation: NS DPA 7/19/04 EXISTING PM PEAK NE 2 AVENUE / NE - # 04188 STREET Vehicle 0Maj or Street: 1 1 Approach Movement 1 HOUR 25 STREET Study period (hrs): 0.25 Volumes and Adjustments Northbound Southbound 2 3 ( 4 5 6 T R I L T R Volume 'Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 'Median Type/Storage IRT Channelized? Lanes 'Configuration 'Upstream Signal? Ilk or Street: Approach Movement 8 0.93 8 2 Undivided 882 0.93 948 0 2 0 LT TR No 5 0.93 5 8 0.93 8 2 473 0.93 508 0 2 0 LT TR No 10 0.93 10 Westbound 7 8 L T Eastbound 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 'Volume ,Peak Hour Factor, PHF dourly Flow Rate, HFR `Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Vanes ,Configuration Exists?/Storage 6 2 22 11 3 9 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 6 2 23 11 3 9 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No / 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR No / kpproach rovement IlLane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 LT LT j LTR I LTR 07 (vph) c(m) (vph) "v/c v5% queue length Control Delay OS oach Delay oach LOS 8 8 1044 717 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 8.5 10.1 A B 31 289 0.11 0.36 18.9 C 18.9 C 23 232 0.10 0.33 22.2 C 22.2 C ► ► • • Future without Project 0 • i o o o o o o o o • o o o • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 0 "Analyst: DPA !Agency/Co.: to Performed: 7/19/04 ,alysis Time Period: FUTURE WO PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 24 STREET (Jurisdiction: ,Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK -- # 04188 'ast/West Street: NE 24 STREET orth/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ntersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 (Major 1 0 Volume 23 1680 16 36 1174 17 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 1731 16 37 1210 17 !ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 - -- 2 Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 DIRT Channelized? anes 1 2 0 1 2 0 !Configuration L T TR L T TR Jpstream Signal? No No Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R or Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L Volume 4 0 38 6 1 18 1Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 !Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 39 6 1 18 percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 dercent Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 'panes 0 1 0 0 1 0 `Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service kpproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1. 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 �ane Config L L f LTR I LTR Or (vph) 23 37 43 25 C(m) (vph) 564 355 219 200 /c 0.04 0.10 0.20 0.13 105% queue length 0.13 0.35 0.71 0.42 Control. Delay 11.7 16.3 25.4 25.6 OS B C D D oach Delay 25.4 Mi(25.6 oach LOS D D • HCS2000: tinsignalized Intersections Release 4.ld 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA , Agency/Co.: Ilkto Performed: 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: FUTURE WO PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD/ NE 25 STREET 'Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary ,Analysis Year: 2007 ,Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 25 STREET ,North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ,Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 " Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ,Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound " Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R 1 L T R " ✓ olume 25 1649 27 31 1180 15 "Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 "Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 26 1717 28 32 1229 15 ▪ Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 T Channelized? L▪ anes 1 2 0 1 2 0 'Configuration L T TR L T TR 'Upstream Signal? No No or Street: Approach Westbound/1111 Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume 27 1 49 2 1 9 ``Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 1 51 2 1 9 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 g lared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 'Configuration LTR LTR `` Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service OApproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 iLane Config L L k LTR 1 LTR `,r (vph) 26 32 80 12 1C(m) (vph) 555 356 127 202 'V/c 0.05 0.09 0.63 0.06 1'05% queue length 0.15 0.29 3.28 0.19 Control Delay 11.8 16.1 72.4 23.9 OS B C F C P11( oach Delay 72.4 23.9 oach LOS F C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d 'Analyst: DPA Inter.: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 26 STREET `Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/19/04 Jurisd: ' Period: FUTURE WO PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2007 11/ oject ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 W St: NE 26 STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD 0 N• o. Lanes FLGConfig `Volume ▪ Lane Width FRTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 1 0 LTR 22 16 21 12.0 0 0 1 0 LTR 22 5 17 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 36 1716 17 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 13 1195 17 12.0 12.0 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ,EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A ` Right A Right A Peds Peds 04B Left A SB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds TB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right en 13.0 94.0 low 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 P Cycle Length: 115.0 secs i Intersection Performance Summary ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach kAane Group Flow Rate 3rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'as tbound LTR 177 1569 0.35 0.11 48.3 D 48.3 D ONestbound ` ILTR 171 1515 0.27 0.11 47.5 D 47.5 D 0 Ciorthbound 301 368 0.13 0.82 2.3 A OCR 2889 3534 0.63 0.82 4.4 A 4.4 A kouthbound 0-, 150 183 0.09 0.82 2.3 A VI 2887 3532 0.44 0.82 3.1 A 3.1 A 411 Intersection Delay = 5.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A 1 HCS2000: Un.sianalized Intersections Release 4.1d 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 Analyst: DPA (Agency/Co.: to Performed: p 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: FUTURE WO PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR ntersection: NE 2 COURT / NE 24 STREET 0Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary ' Analysis Year: 2007 (Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 ▪ East/West Street: NE 24 STREET 'North/South Street: NE 2 COURT 1Intersectaon Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 'Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound 1 Movement 1 2 3 j 4 5 T 6 L T R j L R 'Volume 14 13 11 28 'Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 13 11 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / 'RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 'Configuration TR LT 'Upstream Signal? No No •or Street: Approach Movement Northbound 7 8 9 L T R Southbound 10 11 12 L T R 'Volume 10 13 ``Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 "Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 13 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 dared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / 'Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service lApproach EB WE Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 k 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I kk,, (vph) 11 23 C (m) (vph) 1587 997 /c 0.01 0.02 095% queue length 0.02 0.07 Control Delay 7.3 8.7 !LOS A A oach Delay :IV 8.7 oach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Ilkto Performed: 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: FUTURE WO PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 AVENUE / NE 24 STREET Jurisdiction: 'Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 'East/West Street: NE 24 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 'Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R i L T R 'V olume 8 992 11 21 519 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ',Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 1044 11 22 546 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 -- 'Median Type/Storage Undivided / "MT Channelized? 'Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Sor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 8 1 31 13 0 13 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 1 32 13 0 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 'Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 'Configuration LTR LTR t Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 'Approach NB SE Westbound Eastbound ',movement 1 4 17 8 9 ! 10 11 12 pLane Config LT LT I LTR I LTR Iv (vph) 8 22 41 26 C(m) (vph) 1011 656 261 237 'C(m) 0.01 0.03 0.16 0.11 195% queue length 0.02 0.10 0.55 0.36 `Control Delay 8.6 10.7 21.3 22.1 'LOS A E C C Proach Delay 21.3 22.1 roach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: p te Performed: 7/19/04 alysis Time Period: FUTURE WO PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR ntersection: NE 2 AVENUE / NE 25 STREET 'Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary 'Analysis Year: 2007 'Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 25 STREET 'North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE 'Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 0 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 'Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 J 4 5 6 L T R L T R r Volume 9 975 5 9 556 11 'Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 1026 5 9 585 11 `Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 -- "Median Type/Storage Undivided / 'RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 'Configuration LT TR LT TR 'Upstream Signal? No No Ilkor Street: r Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R 'Volume 6 2 24 12 3 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 2 25 12 3 10 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 dared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 'Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 'Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service kApproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT 1 LTR I LTR r (vph) 9 9 33 25 C(m) (vph) 976 670 253 193 /c 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.13 195% queue length 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.44 Control Delay 8.7 10.4 21.4 26.4 !LOS A B C D :00(oach Delay 21.4 26.4 oach LOS C D r r r r r r I r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 1 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r* r r Future with Project r HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 111 Analyst: DPA gency/Co.: 1 ate Performed: 7/19/04 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 24 STREET 1 Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary ik Analysis Year: 2007 • Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 24 STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 1 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 1 Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 Volume 27 1682 16 36 1176 19 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 1734 16 37 1212 19 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 1 RT Channelized? 1 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR 1 Upstream Signal? No No 1 nor Street: Approach Movement Westbound 7 8 9 L T R Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R 1 Volume 4 0 38 8 1 22 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 39 8 1 22 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / "Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 LTR I LTR O v (vph) 27 37 43 31 ,C(m) (vph) 562 354 216 195 v/c 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.16 095% queue length 0.15 0.35 0.72 0.55 'Control Delay 11.7 16.4 25.8 26.9 LOS B C A D roach Delay 25.8 26.9 ` proach LOS D D 0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA gency/Co.: 10 ate Performed: 7/19/04 nalysis Time Period: FUTURE W PM PEAK HOUR ▪ Intersection: BISCAYNE BLVD/ NE 25 STREET ✓ Jurisdiction: 1 Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 25 STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD P Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 1 Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 ' L T R I L T R 1 Volume 27 1651 27 31 1182 26 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 , ▪ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 1719 28 32 1231 27 MPercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 -- -- ▪ Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 P RT Channelized? 1 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR/ Upstream Signal? No No Illknor Street: Approach Movement 1 Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 j 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume 27 1 49 13 1 11 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 1 51 13 1 11 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 'Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 1 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 'Configuration LTR LTR 1 ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 Movement 1 4 r 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'Lane Config L L ( LTR I LTR 1v (vph) 28 32 80 25 'C(m) (vph) 549 355 125 130 v/c 0.05 0.09 0.64 0.19 /95% queue length 0.16 0.30 3.34 0.68 'Control Delay 11.9 16.1 74.7 39.2 LOS B C F E )roach Delay 74.7 39.2 :1011proach LOS F E ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d /Analyst: DPA Inter.: BISCAYNE BLVD / NE 26 STREET 'Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/19/04 Jurisd: Period: FUTURE W PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Year : 2007 /11 oject ID: BISCAYNE PARK - * 04188 W St: NE 26 STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY No. Lanes "LGConfig Volume ▪ Lane Width PRTOR Vol Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 1 0 LTR 22 16 21 12.0 0 0 1 0 LTR 22 5 17 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 36 1729 17 12.0 12.0 0 Southboun.d L T R 1 2 0 L TR 13 1208 17 12.0 12.0 0 `▪ Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas i Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ▪ EB Left A NB Left A P Thru A Thru A ` Right A Right A Peds Peds kB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A 1 Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Oen 13.0 94.0 low 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 I Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate 3rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS kastbound LTR 177 1569 0.35 0.11 48.3 D 48.3 D Testbound LTR 171 1515 0.27 0.11 47.5 D 47.5 D torthbound 1.4 296 362 0.13 0.82 2.3 A FR 2889 3534 0.64 0.82 4.5 A 4.4 A kouthbound 146 179 0.10 0.82 2.4 A 2887 3532 0.45 0.82 3.1 A 3.1 A 411 Intersection Delay = 5.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A IF HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 Analyst: DPA gency/Co.: Piate Performed: 7/19/04 nalysis Time Period: FUTURE W PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR ▪ Intersection: NE 2 COURT / NE 24 STREET Jurisdiction: 1 Units: U. S. Customary ▪ Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 24 STREET • North/South Street: NE 2 COURT i Intersection Orientation: EW Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R 1 Volume 8 14 13 in Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 14 13 ` Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided 1 RT Channelized? ' Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR 1 Upstream Signal? No Study period (hrs): 0.25 4 5 6 L T R 11 0.95 11 2 28 6 0.95 0.95 29 6 0 1 0 LTR No *nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 1 Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 l L T R ( L T R 1 Volume 10 4 13 6 4 9 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 4 13 6 4 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 ', Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ',Configuration LTR LTR ', Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WE Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ',Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR 1 v (vph) 8 11 27 19 1 C (rn) (vph) 1589 1587 935 922 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.02 195% queue length 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.06 ',Control Delay 7.3 7.3 9.0 9.0 LOS A A A A roach Delay 9.0 9.0 1 proach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d I 1 Analyst: DPA 10 gency/Co.: ate Performed: 7/19/04 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY nalysis Time Period: FUTURE W PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 AVENUE / NE 24 STREET 1 Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 1 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 24 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE 1 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 'Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 1 Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 ' L T R I L T R 1 Volume 8 994 15 25 521 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 1046 15 26 548 10 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / 1 RT Channelized? 1 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR 1 Upstream Signal? No No •nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ' L T R I L T R 'Volume 12 1 35 13 0 13 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 1 36 13 0 13 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 'Configuration LTR LTR 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'Lane Config LT LT I LTR 1 LTR O v (vph) 8 26 49 26 "C(m) (vph) 1009 652 234 229 v/c 0.01 0.04 0.21 0.11 095% queue length 0.02 0.12 0.77 0.38 'Control Delay 8.6 10.8 24.4 22.7 LOS A B C C roach Delay 24.4 22.7 ' proach LOS C C 0 0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' Analyst: IPA gency/Co.: Iliate Performed: 7/19/04 nalysis Time Period: FUTURE W PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR • Intersection: NE 2 AVENUE / NE 25 STREET P Jurisdiction: ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 1 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - It 04188 i East/West Street: NE 25 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE r Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments r Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 9 979 7 18 560 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ✓ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 1030 7 18 589 11 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / r RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR r Upstream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound r Movement. 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 0 L T R I L T R 'Volume 8 2 33 12 3 10 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 2 34 12 3 10 r Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / 'Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound r Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 r Lane Config LT LT I LTR I LTR Dv (vph) 9 18 44 25 r C(m) (vph) 973 666 254 182 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.17 0.14 095% queue length 0.03 0.08 0.61 0.47 'C ontrol Delay 8.7 10.6 22.1 27.9 ▪ LOS A B C D roach Delay 22.1 27.9 r proach LOS C D o o r • Project Driveway PI 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 • 1 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 7/19/04 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: NE 2 CT / DRIVEWAY / NE 24 ST Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 24 STREET North/South Street: NE 2 COURT / DRIVEWAY Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ( 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 8 14 13 11 28 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 8 14 13 11 29 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 r L T R L r Volume 10 4 13 6 4 9 r Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 10 4 13 6 4 9 r Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 rPercent Grade (°s) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / r Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 r Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WE Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ! 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR 1 LTR v (vph) 8 11 27 19 C(m) (vph) 1589 1587 935 922 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.02 95% queue length 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.06 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 9.0 9.0 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.0 9.0 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 7/19/04 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: DRIVEWAY / NE 25 STREET Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: BISCAYNE PARK - # 04188 East/West Street: NE 25 STREET North/South Street: DRIVEWAY Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R Westbound 4 5 6 Volume 17 11 13 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 11 13 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 11 13 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR r r Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Approach EB WB Northbound r Movement 1 4 17 8 9 ' Lane Config LT I LR Service Southbound 10 11 12 v (vph) 13 24 r C(m) (vph) 1585 979 v/c 0.01 0.02 ' 95% queue length 0.02 0.08 ' Control Delay 7.3 8.8 LOS A A r. Approach Delay 8.8 ' Approach LOS A • • • r 1 • • Appendix E • • Committed Development Information i PO • • • • • • Biscayne Park r141) r NE 24 Street / Biscayne Blvd NB L NB 7 NB R 5B L SB 7 SB EB L EB 7 EBR 17 PM Peak Hour Background Committed Development Future w/o Future w/ Peak Season Traffic Sno©s a1 2 Midtown P10leCt Project Traffic Project Volumes 2.00 Midtown Miami V01umes volumes 3 21 1509 15 NE 25 Street / Biscayne Blvd NB NB T NB R SB L SB 7 SB R EB L EB7 EB R WEL 26 WBT 1 WBR 46 23 0 9 23 4 27. 1601 61 17 1680 2 1682 16 0 0 16 0 18 36 0 0 36 0 36.E 1126 37 8 1174 2 1176' 17 0 0 : 17 2 19 6 0 0 fi 2 1 0 0 1 0 1B 0 0 '18 : 4 22 . 4 0 0 4 0 . 4 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 38 0 25 0 1571 61 27 0 0 31 0 0 1134 37 8 15 0 0 20 0 1 O 0 9 0 0 27 0 0 O 0 40 0 0 0 25 2 17 #649 2 0 31 1180 27: 8 27 1651 27 O 31. 2 1182 11 26 11 1 O 1 2 11 O 27 O 1 O 49 NE 26 Street / Biscayne Blvd NB L : •34• 36 0 0 36 - 0 36 NB T 1543 1638 61 17 1716 13 1729 N8R 16: 17 0 0 17 0 - 17 Se L. : : 12. 13 0 0 13 0 13 58 T 1083 1150 37 8 1195 13 1208 SBR 16 17 0 0 17 0 - 17 E8 L 20 22 0 0 . 22 0 - 22 EST is 16 0 0 16 0 16 RI -.19 21 0 0 21. 0 : 21. WO L 20 - 22 0 0 - : 22 . 0 22 WBT 5 5 0 0 5 0 5 WBR . :16 : 17 0 0 17 0 17 NE 24 Street! NE 2 Court N8 L N8 T NB0 SB L S8 7 56 R EB L EB T rEB R WB L WBT WBR NE 24 Street ( NE 2 Avenue N8 L NB T N8 R SBL SB 7 SB R EB L EB T EB R WBL WB T We NE 25 Street! NE 2 Avenue I■ NBL T N8 7 NB R SB L 5B7 SBR E8 L EB T EB Ft WBL WB T WBR 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 14 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 0 28 0 0 O 0 0 8 0 0 954 33 6 11 0 0 21 0 0 465 47 7 10 0 0 13 0 0 O 0 0 13 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 9 0 0 936 33 6 : 975 5 0 0 --- 5. 13 9 0 0 502 47 7 11 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 3 0 0 3 0 10 0 0 10 0 6 0 0 6 2 2 0 0 2 0 24 0 0 --24 9 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 2 556 9 4 11:: 0 r ____ii,_____low ____s__NWNV____s_____s____11F____ Shops at Midtown PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL Trips % Trips Trips Commercial Retail High -Turnover Restaurant 296,895 SF 27,999 SF 820 932 48% 61% 618 182 52% 39% 670 122 1288 304 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 150% 800 1 50% 792 1592 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction CO 14.90% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips (2) (3) (4) 50% 50% 50% 128 119 80 50% 50% 50% 127 118 79 255 237 159 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 50% 473 50% 468 941 1 1F I Net External Person Trips in Vehicles r° 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 50% 50% 662 167 50% 50% 655 165 1317 332 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 50% 829 50% 821 1649 1- T 1 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1 50% 112 1 50% 111 1 223 Notes (1) Based on Traffic Impact Study provided by City of Miami (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 #04188 - Shops at Midtown T-gen.xls 0± I i 5°!° IE 36th St US 27 6%--40 0 I)) 11%—k (1 I%)—'`1 ! cvv on �` `` 1 1 1 L—(7%) f1a! 491 ct$1 1 • I1 1 ;1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 r.,4 o j�g)/c(IS%) 1 1�� L 4. "(3g/a} �F..�., r,:�'.°tee 34th St Extension 4... 1i7. 1 1 a--.�11: Q- . c� a i i (10%)--). 40 0_L cr 1 1 M ! 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 d o 0-, t_ 0 I 1 1/ i Q i ; . ... .....� .t��t.S.,ed N132 d St E�tSnslSn e.l..,...a .i.. ! r j 0--'"� i i 1/' A1 ! 52 m 0 �_1 1 1� ° 0 f li al of —1---1-- FEC Railroad 1 Existing Roads 1 o 1 -- -- -- - Proposed Roads 1 1 Site Boundary e— 1 Q r` $ 13% j 1` 11 L—a% "-- i 3% NE 29th St 0 5% 0.025 0.05 0 20%1 r o t 0.075 Mites 0.1 Prowsed NE 31st St Extension ©•--' (3%)---* Figure 4 Shops at Midtown Miami Project Assignment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Legend 15% Entering Assignment (B%) Exiting Assignment /1 Kimiey-Hortr anti Assoaates. Inc. April 2, 2004 ...... w w� w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w lw IP IP W W WIllir VP IF w I MP 2 Midtown PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL Trips % Trips Trips Multi FamilyResidential Commercial Retail 328 DU 9,759 SF 220 820 65% 48% 129 65 35% 52% 69 70 198 135 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS (1) 58% 194 1 42% 139 I 333 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment r 16% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.90% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction i 10.00% of Gross External Trips (2) (3) (4) 58% 58% 58% 31 29 19 42% 42% 42% 22 21 14 53 50 33 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 58% 115 42% 82 197 1 1 1 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 58% 58% 161 40 42% 42% 115 29 276 69 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 58% 201 42% 144 345 I I I Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 158% 27 1 42% 19 1 47 Notes (1) Based on Traffic Impact Study provided by City of Miami (2) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (3) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II #04188 - 2 Midtown T-gen.xls 1 1 ` I • • • 0.025 0.05 0.075 jf6 0 , 24 /° i i 23°�°-►i iQ° ©-ale �� 1 /,.� l 1- l 1 t ! I 41,t 1 t a fr. . ....... 31 l e1 1 gt is 1 col l 1 1 1„ ai 1 ► l 1 _ 1 i -�� 0 pru ossd tVEl34th St Extension 4 .. t)8%) ...1.E.....�.F��..�*r (t0%?. L 0--►01e 1 l 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I l l Il 1 ll t + 0 ..�. � Prrowsed.Nd32nd St xtan,,, gp,,,,l1���y 1 .......... �./ ... 0.. „�e r 1 o-L I 1 1 t 1 iit Legend 4 el 1 1 l 15% Entering Assignment r 0ptazosedNE31sts,i,^ {B%) Ezting Assignment ..�..�.. 11 i FECRailroad Exsting Roads I oIU ..—..proposed Roads 1I Ste Boundartu U. -(]0%) j..pNE29thSt t0% ) 0%-^ 0 Miles 0.1 Figure A 2 Midtown Class 11 Project Assignment r . and Associates, Ind April 2, 2004 1 r 1 1 1 1 0 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 04° i • Appendix F Traffic Control Measures Plan Biscayne Park TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES PLAN The project's design and location will reduce the project vehicular traffic volumes as follows: • The project is a proposed residential development which includes some retail and office space. This type of development will result in a portion of the trips being captured within the development, or internal to the site. • The project will also provide residential units with accessibility to mass transit. This feature will allow residents to use mass transit for their trip to work. The development will also do the following to further reduce peak hour vehicle trips: • Will encourage employers/landlords to participate in ridesharing programs through South Florida Commuter Services. Available information will be obtained and distributed to all employers/landlords in the development. • Miami -Dade County Transportation Agency current local and regional mass transit route and schedule information will be provided to potential transit users in a prominent public area of the development. The information provided and maintained on the premises will be updated, when necessary, at no less than six month intervals. • Promote mass transit use by encouraging employers/landlords to purchase transit passes and make them available to employees and residents at discounted prices or no charge, or in lieu of subsidized parking. • Encourage employers to implement staggered work hours. Implementation of these items will result in a minimum of ten percent (10%) reduction of peak hour vehicle trips. The performance of the plan will be monitored by measuring actual afternoon peak hour volumes at the project driveways and comparing the counts against total project trips based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates. TRAFFICCONTROLDOC