HomeMy WebLinkAboutexhibitE4ATTACHMENT E-4
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
NAVIGATION RELATED DISTRICTS
APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING FORM
The applicant is to complete this form by entering the project title, applicant name and answers to the
applicable questions. Do not answer with more than three sentences.
All applicants will answer the first part of the form, which includes questions 1 through 11.
Each applicant will then complete the questions in one and only one attachment according to the
applicant's project type. The applicant should determine his project type (if the project incorporates
more than one project type) by determining which project type is dominant in terms of project cost.
The attachments that are not applicable to an applicant's project should not be included in the subraitt0
application.
APPLICATION TITLE:
APPLICANT:
CATEGORY RATING
& RATING POINTS
POINTS
AVAILABLE
PRIORITY LIST
(For reviewer only)
Max. Available Score
Commissioner Score
EVALUATION CRITERIA
List the PRIMARY category for which this project will be considered
(Applicant should refer to Attachment C in the application to determine project
priority list ranking. The application may only be of one type based upon the
dominant costs of the elements of the project.)
(1) Where does the project rank on this years' approved project priority list?
How does the project relate to the Intracoastal Waterway and the mission of
the Navigation District?
WATERWAY
RELATIONSHIP
Explain the relationship of the project to the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway. Describe how the project will benefit the Navigation District's
Waterways.
(For reviewer only)
(1-3 points) (2)
(1-3 points) (3)
Does the project directly relate to the AICW ?
Does the project benefit public navigation on the
District's Waterways?
PUBLIC USAGE
•
& BENEFIT
Discuss the regional public benefits and access to be provided by the
project, the local benefits and public access offered by the project,
and estimate the amount of total public use.
(For reviewer only)
(1-3 points) (4) Is the public usage of this project clearly quantified?
(1-5 points) (5) Does the project demonstrate regional benefits and can
residents from other counties of the District reasonably use the project?
TIMELINESS
Describe the current status of the project and briefly explain any unique
aspects of this project that could influence the project timeline (as
presented in Attachment E-8).
(For reviewer only)
(1-3 points) (6) Has the applicant presented a reasonable and effective
timeline for the completion of the project?
COST-
EFFECTIVENESS
List any additional funding sources, the corresponding amount of funding,
and the status of the additional funding that will be utilized to complete this
project. Describe any methods to be utilized to increase the cost efficiency of
this project.
(For reviewer only)
(1-3 points) (7)
(1-3 points) (8)
Does the project provide a cost-effective, beneficial
public service for the money requested?
To what degree does the project demonstrate secured
project funding from other sources?
•
VIABILITY Briefly explain the need for this project in the community and describe haw
the project will continue to be maintained following initial funding.
(For reviewer only)
(1-2 points)
(1-2 points)
(1-3 points)
(9) Does the project fill a specific need in the community?
(10) Does the applicant clearly demonstrate how the project
will continue to be maintained after District funding ceases?
(11) Will the program result in significant and lasting benefits?
SUB -TOTAL
FIND FORM NO. 93-25
(Effective Date:3-2]-01)