The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutexhibit4• • J-02-211 2 /4 /02 RESOLUTION NO, 0 2 r` A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "B" DESIGNATED PROJECTS FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY IN RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITS; EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A" FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recommendation of the Ci7.y Manager to approve the findings of the seiecticn committee, pursuant to Request tor Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional engineering construction management services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, 1,sted herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. he Corradino Group, Inc. 2. Nova Consulting Inc. 3. Marlin Engineering Inc. 9, Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc. 5. CES Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. PDS&J (ALTERNATE) rn r r Ft ti; r,r CITY colecrS SIGN mrEllbrC LaF FEB 1 It 2602 �E:O111S1 2Q . :�2- 14 ._ • Section. 2, The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to .he most qualified firms to provide professional ADA requirement services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2302 through 2004., listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. R 0 Architects f Planners, Inc. 3, Gurri Natute, P. A. (ALTERNATE) Section 3. The recommendation .of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architectural engineering services for Public Works Category '`B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed 0 herein in rank order, are accepted; • 1. CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Consultants, Inc.) 2. Indigo Service Corporation Section 4. The recommendation of the City Manager o approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architecture services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. Gurri Matute PA 2. Zyscovich, Inc. 3. R.J. Heisenbott_e Architects, P.A. 9, R•E. Chisholm Architects, Inc.. 5, Berrnello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. PBSJ (ALTERNATE) Page 2 of 7 02 . 144 • • • Section 5. The recommendation of the City !Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant =o Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional environmental engineering sezvices for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: I. ATC Group Services Inc. 2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 3. [JRS Corporation 4. BND Engineers, Inc. 5. Nova Consulting Inc, (ALTERNATE) 6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to. Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional general engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: .. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 2, Kunde, Sprecher & Associates, Inc. 3. Metric Engineering, Inc. 9. PBS&J 5.. Marlin Engineering, Inc. 6. PHS Engineering Corp, 7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE) 8. Kimley-Horn_ and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 7. The recommendation, of the City Manager to approve the findings ctf the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 3 of 7 02- 144 • • • professional landscape architecture serve.des for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. Falcon & Bueno 2. Curtis & Rogers Design. Studio, Inc. 3. Kirr1ey-HQrn and Associates, Inc. 4. EDAW, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 8. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional mechanical engineering services for PL:bii; Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted; Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A. 2 Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc, 3. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE) Section 9. The recommendation of the City 'tanager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional structural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. San Martin Associates, Inc. 2. Avart, Inc. 3. EAC Consulting, Inc. Section 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 4 of 7 • • • professional surveying and mapping services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. Fernando Z. Gatell P. L. S., 7nc. 3. Weidener Surveying and Mapping, F. A. 4, Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc. 5. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc, 6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc. Section 11. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional value analysis and cost estimate services for Public Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rack order, are accepted: 1. A2 Group, Inc. 2. PBS&J 3. Grace & Naeem Uddin (ALTERNATE) Section 12. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide professional air conditioning services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is accepted: 1. Grace & Naeem Uddin Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide Fage 5 of 7 02- 144 professional life safety services for Public Works Category 'B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is accepted: 1. Gurri Matute, P,A. Section 14. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional roofing services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. Building Diagnostics Associates, PA 2. International Logistics Group Section 15. The City Manager is authorized11 to negotiate and execute Professional Services Agreements, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, with -to exceed the amount indicated in specialty for each firm, with funds project accounts. each f'_rm in an Attachment "A" allocated from amount rot for each individual The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all requirements that may be imposed by the City ..ttorrey, :.ncluding but not limited tc those prescribed by applicable City Charter and Code provisions. Page 6 of 7 02- 144 Section 16. This Resoiut_on shall become effective 411 immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.` PASSED ANb' AbOP:ED this 14th ATTEST: day of February , 20C2. /l%rr� MINUEL A, DIAZ, MA Sy1v4 Scheider Acting Cit -ierk RP?RO D A) TO ,FORM AND CORRECTNESS : eV ANARO VILARELLO TY ATTORNEY W5975:LB zi • If the Mayor does not Sign this Resolution, it shall 'become effective at the end of ten calendar days from tha date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon overri da of che veto by the City Commission. Page 7 of 7 02' 144