HomeMy WebLinkAboutexhibit5J-02-111
2/4 02
RE50L'JT ION NO,
A RESO_UTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION,
WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS
OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS,. FOR THE MCST QUALIFIED
FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR
PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "B" DESIGNATED PROJECTS
FOR 2002 THROUGH 2O04 LISTED BY SPECIALTY II'J
RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENTS WITF. EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A"
E'OR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING
FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL, PROJECT ACCOUNTS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recommendation of the Ci.zy Manager
to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional engineering construction management services fox
Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
2004, listed hie;ein in rank order, are accepted:
1. Tne Corradino Group, Inc,
2. Nova Consulting Inc,
3. Marlin Engineering Inc.
4, Cavil-Cadd Engineering Inc.
5. CES Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. PHS&J (ALTERNATE)
CITY COMXI SJON
ME'ET/1;C OF
1
FED 1 it 2002
-11
1
Section. 2. The recommendation of the City Manager
to approve to findings of the selection committee, pursuant
to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms tc
provide professional ADA requirement services for Public
Works Category "B" designated projects for 2C2 through
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted;
1. PBS&J
2. F, 0 Architects * Planners, Inc.
3. Gurri Natute, P. A. (ALTERNATE)
Section 3. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant t'o
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional Architectural engineering services for Public Works
Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted;
1. GSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Consultants, Inc.
)
2. Indigo'Service Corporation
Section 4. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architecture services for Public Works Category "5"
designated projects for 2002 through: 2004, listed herein in rank
order, are accepted:
1. Gurri Matute PA
2. Zyscovicl:, Inc.
3. R.J. Heisenbott_e Architects, P.A.
4. R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc.
5, Sermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc (ALTERNATE)
6 PESJ (ALTERNATE)
Page 2 of 7
02 -- 144
Section. 5. The recommendation of the City !Manager to
approve the findings of the selection: committee, pursuant `o
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional env:.conrnental engineering services far Pubic Works
Category "B" desi.gr,ated projects for 2002 through 2005, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. ATC Group Services Inc.
2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc.
3. URS Corporation
4. END Engineers, Inc.
5. Nova Consulting_nc. (ALTERNATE)
6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide.
professional general engineering services woe Public Works
Category "rB" designated projects far 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
l . H.J. Ross Associates, Inc.
2. Kunde, Sprecher & Associates, Inc.
3. Metric Engineering, Inc.
4. P'BS&J
5. Marlin Engineering, Inc.
6. PHS engineering Corp.
7, URS Corporation ;ALTERNATE)
8. Kimiey-Horn_ and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 7.
The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings ;:f the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
02- 14
professional landscape architecture services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, lisreV
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. Falcon & Bueno
2. Curtis & Rogers Design. Studio, Inc.
3. Ki:nlev-horn and Associates, Inc.
4, EGAW, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional mechanical engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A.
2. Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc,
3. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE)
Section 9. The recommendation of the Ci :y :tanager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, an to the most qualified firms to provide
professional structural engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein it rank order, are accepted:
1. San Martin Associates, Inc.
2. Avart, Inc.
3. EAC Consulting, Inc,
Section 10.
The recommendation of the City Manager
tp
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 4 of 7
f1dl.. f A
professional surveying and mapping services for Public Works,
Category "B" designated projects for 20C2 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. PBS&J
2. Fernando Z. Gatell 2. L. S., Inc.
3, Weidener Surveying and Mapping, F. A.
4, Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc.
5. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc.
6. Le:.ter, Perez & Associates, Inc.
Section 11. The recommendation of the City Nonage.: to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional value analysis and cost estimate services for Public
Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004,
listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. A2 Group, Inc.
2. PBS&J
3. Grace & Naeem Uddin (ALTERNATE)
Section 22. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide
professional air conditioning services for Public Works Category
"S" designated pro3ects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is
accepted:
1. Grace & Naeem Uddin
Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide
Page 5 of 7
- 1t1
�T1 1 L J LG�c�t
{
professional life safety services for Public Works Category "B"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is
accepted:
1. Gurri Mature, P.A.
Section 14.
The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional roofing services for Public Works Category "2"
designated projects fcr 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank
order, are accepted:
1. Building Diagnostics Associates, PA
2. International Logistics Group
Section 15. The City Manager is authorized'11 to negotiate
and execute Professional Services Agreements, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, w-th each firm in an amount r.ot
to exceed the amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each
specialty for each firm, with funds allocated from individual
project accounts.
The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all
requirements that may be imposed by the City Attorney, :r.cluding bur_ not
1-:nixed tc those prescribed by applIcab14.3 City Charter and Code
provisions.
Pale 5 of 7
- 44601
Section 26. This Resolution sha_1 became effecti.ve
immediately upon 'ts adopl.icn and signature cf the Mayor,-`'
PASSEn AND ADO?.ED this 14th
day of February , 20C2
/.
l'•
(\: µ
MANUEL A, DIAZ, MA
ATTEST:
syly6A 5cheider
Acring Cit ierk ,}'
AP?RO D A TO FORM AND CORRe CTNESS ; tJ
uANDRO VILARELLO
TY ATTORNEY
w597 `,: LE
If the Mayor does not slon this Resclucion, Lr shall become effective a:
.he end of ten caler.daz days from the date it was passed and adopted. If
the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, It shall become effective immediately
upon override of [he veto by the City Caniissicn.
Page 7 of 7
A 144