Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutexhibitATTACHMENT E-4 WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING FORM The applicant is to complete this form by entering the project title, applicant name and answers to the applicable questions. Do not answer with more than three sentences. All applicants will answer the first part of the form, which includes questions 1 through 11. Each applicant will then complete the questions in one and only one attachment according to the. applicant's project type. The applicant should determine his project type (if the project incorporates more than one project type) by determining which project type is dominant in terms of project cost. The attachments that are not applicable to an applicant's project should not be included in the submitted application. APPLICATION TITLE: Bicentennial Park Shoreline Stabilization Project — Phase III APPLICANT: City of Miami CATEGORY RATING & RATING POINTS POINTS AVAILABLE EVALUATION CRITERIA PRIORITY LIST List the PRIMARY category for which this project will be considered (Applicant should refer to Attachment C in the application to determine project priority list ranking. The application may only be of one type based upon the dominant costs of the elements of the project.) This project responds to Florida Inland Navigation District's (FIND) public shoreline stabilization criteria; Rank #4 on the priority listing. It completes the seawall on City owned properties on the Intracoastal Waterway and the FEC slip at Bicentennial Park that have been funded, in part, by FIND. The project supports future work by Miami Dade County on its seawall adjacent to the City's property along the Intracoastal Waterway. (For reviewer only) Max. Available Score Commissioner Score (1) Where does the project rank on this years' approved project priority list? How does the project relate to the Intracoastal Waterway and the mission of the Navigation District? ,,)i) /950 DRAFT — 1-19-05 WATERWAY RELATIONSHIP Explain the relationship of the project to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Describe how the project will benefit the Navigation District's Waterways. The project site is located along the Intracoastal Waterway on the southern shoreline of the FEC slip, south of Miami's downtown Bicentennial Park. These Intracoastal waters provide the turning basin for cruise ships as well as attract local and visiting recreational boaters. Given the area's importance to commercial and recreational navigation, any failure of the seawall which provides stabilization of the shoreline, poses risks to mariners from an eroding shoreline and damage to marine habitats from storm water outfalls. Segments of the existing seawall have already failed. The rest are damaged and likely to fail with the next storm. The completed seawall will offer protection against storm surges keeping navigable waters of the Intracoastal Waterway free from debris and contaminated outflows from land. (For reviewer only) (1-3 points) (2) (1-3 points) (3) Does the project directly relate to the AICW ? Does the project benefit public navigation on the District's Waterways? PUBLIC USAGE & BENEFIT Discuss the regional public benefits and access to be provided by the project, the 'local benefits and public access offered by the project, and estimate the amount of total public use. The Intracoastal Waterway offshore from downtown Miami has regional and Atlantic seaboard importance given the volume of commercial shipping, cruise line traffic, and recreational boating in these waters. Further, this volume includes transient vessels seeking shelter during storms from other locations in the District and wintering boaters from other states on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Locally, for Miami and South Florida, the project is the final critical clement for a redevelopment of Bicentennial Park as a multi -purpose recreational amenity that provides public access to the 13ay, outdoor recreation, with cultural and learning opportunities at two museums within the park. The seawall will support these and other activities that bring visitors and residents to downtown and the Biscayne Bay shoreline, the Performing Arts Center, a public plaza at the west end of the FEC Slip and other regional attractions. In addition two 50-story residential towers arc being construtcd within 2 blocks of the project, which will further increase the number of people accessing the Biscayne Bay shoreline in this arca. Consequently, the stability of the shoreline by the seawall becomes critical given the increased number of persons living or visiting this bayfront area. The existing structures would provide insufficient protection to the public during a major hurricane event. (For reviewer only) (1-3 points) (4) Is the public usage of this project clearly quantified? (1-5 points) (5) Does the project demonstrate regional benefits and can residents from other counties of the District reasonably use the project? 2 — DRAFT 1-19-05 TIMELINESS Describe the timeline and current status of the project. Briefly explain any unique aspects of this project that could influence the project timeline (as presented in Attachment E-8). The City contracted Edwards and Kelcey to design the proposed shoreline stabilization project. This work is a continuation of the Bicentennial Park/FEC slip seawall replacement project and is included in the project milestones for Bicentennial Park redevelopment. Phase I construction is scheduled for completion in early 2005 and Phase II construction is scheduled to begin in spring 2005. This project serves as Phase III (the final phase) for work on the City owned seawall. (See timeline for details on planned work products and activities.) Phases I and II construction is on time or ahead of schedule and no delays are anticipated for Phase III. (For reviewer only) (1-3 points) (6) Has the applicant presented a reasonable and effective timeline for the completion of the project? COST- EFFECTIVENESS List any additional funding sources, the corresponding amount of funding, and the status of the additional funding that will be utilized to complete this project. Describe any methods to be utilized to increase the cost efficiency of this project. The City of Miami has allOcate4,',$2, ,000 from a voter -approved issuance of Homeland Defense/Neighborhood Improvement bonds to this third stage of a multi -stage seawall reconstruction program for the Bicentennial Park - American Airlines Arena area. (see Budget). The scale of this project and the need to use a diversity of funding sources requires that it be divided into stages. The severely damaged seawall at the southeastern corner of Bicentennial Park was addressed through Phase [, construction of seawalls around the western end of the FEC slip were addressed in Phase II, and Phase III completes this project addressing the severely damaged seawall at the southeastern corner of the FEC Slip on the Intracoastal Waterway as well replacing substandard rock rubble on the southern edge of the FEC slip. (For reviewer only) (1-3 points) (1-3 points) (7) (8) Does the project provide a cost-effective, beneficial public service for the money requested? To what degree does the project demonstrate secured project funding from other sources? 3 — DRAFT 1- 1 9-05 VIABILITY The seawall gateway' corn r, .any fa implementation ofithis am serious contamination and watersarid has 04. ti�teillti Briefly explain the need for this project in the community and describe how the project will continue to be maintained following initial funding. element to preserving a shoreline along Miamt's principal downtown ure of tits a st ng wall ar c ontinued lack of function will set back itio,us,Plan for several yearn As noted, failure of the seawall:would cause Dilution 1144,es for Bisaayrt Aquatic Presrve, t1 , des »t ;l offshore Io iniOpeleInttlicoa$tatWaterway vessel traffic: This project replaces the failed seawall at the southeast corner of the FEC Slip adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway. It also replaces the substandard rock rubble on the south edge of the FEC slip with a functioning seawall. This project protects the Intracoastal Waterway from infill of potentially contaminated sediment from a callapse of the existing seawall. In addition, this final phase of the City of Maimi shoreline protection project connects to the adjacent Miami -Dade County shoreline protection project. Miami -Dade County has secured initial funding to continue replacement of the seawall along the Intracoastal Waterway east of the American Airlines Arena. Consistent with past proposals to FIND, such as Margaret Pace Park Public Waterfront Enhancement project and Phases I and II of the Bicentennial Park Shoreline Stabilization project, the City is committed to constructing and maintaining a safe downtown for City residents and a workable, navigable waterway. The funds requested from FIND will allow the City to work towards a new, rebuilt seawall which will last for many more years benefiting the City, the vessels on the intracoastal and maritime facilities in the area. (For reviewer only) (1-2 points) (9) Does the project fill a specific need in the community? (1-2 points) (10) Does the applicant clearly demonstrate how the project will continue to be maintained after District funding ceases? (1-3 points) (11) Will the program result in significant and lasting benefits? SUB -TOTAL FIND FORM NO. 91-25 (Effective Date: 3-21-01) 4 — DRAFT 1-19-05 ATTACHMENT E-4A WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING FORM DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS THIS ATTACHMENT IS TO BE COMPLETED IF YOUR PROJECT IS A DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BUT IS NOT AN INLET MANAGEMENT OF BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT. CATEGORY RATING & RATING POINTS POINTS AVAILABLE EVALUATION CRITERIA PERMITTING List all of the necessary permits that are required for the project, the date of application, and the anticipated date of receipt of the required permits. If permits are NOT required, explain why not. Permit Date of Application Anticipated Date of Receipt US Army Corps of Engineers December 1, 2004 July 15, 2005 Florida Department of Environmental Protection December 1, 2004 _ July 15, 2005 Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Class I December 1, 2004 July 15, 2005 _ City of Miami Bldg Permit May 12, 2005* September 15, 2005 ppi:ea ions are beeng prepared and are on schedule for submission as above. (For reviewer only) (1-2 points) (1-2 points) (12) Have al] permits been applied for? Is timing time sufficient to meet application deadline? (If the project is a Phase I project a minimum score of 2 points will be awarded) (13) Has the project received all of the required permits? (If the project is a Phase I project a minimum score of 2 points will be awarded) 5 — DRAFT 1-19-05 PROJECT DESIGN List the status of the design of this project. Describe any unique design aspects of this project that enhance public usage or access, decrease environmental impacts, improve water quality or reduce costs. The design stage is complete and the project is now in the permitting stage. The existing seawall is being left in place to hold material from collapsing into the bay while the replacement wall is constructed as close to existing wall as feasibible. A cantilever design is being used to avoid excavation for tie -backs. Tie -back excavation could encounter unknown obstructions that might cause project delays. Construction of the remainder of the seawall is being located landward of MHW to reduce impacts to the water environment. Standard upland erosion control measures will be installed as required to control erosion from the upland area into the bay. Turbidity control measures will include the use of a silt curtain at the FEC slip/Biscayne Bay boundary and around the portion of work on the Intracoastal Waterway. (For reviewer only) (1-2 points) (14) Has the design work been completed? (A Phase I project should be evaluated based upon the design work completed to date). Are there unique beneficial aspects to the proposed design? CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES Briefly explain the construction techniques to be utilized for this project. The construction technique of this project is a cantilever design with steel sheet piling, 'Water -based steel sheet pile driving equipment will be used for installation of the seawall and clean aggregate / lime rock backfill be placed behind the new seawall segments and compacted. This technique is more efficient for public design, it will control soil release into the waterway, save land space and be less intrusive. (For reviewer only) (1-3 points) (15) Are the construction techniques appropriate for the project site? 6 — DRAFT 1-19-05 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS List the materials to be utilized for this project. What is the design life of the proposed materials? Describe any recyclable material to be utilized. Materials to be utilized for this project are as follows: Steel sheet piling with corrosion protection (design life-50 years), reinforced concrete pile caps (design life-50 years), and granular aggregate and lime rock backfill (design life-75 years). No recyclable material is scheduled for this project. (1-3 points) (16) Are the construction materials of lasting quality? Are recyclables utilized? RATING POINT TOTAL (Note: The total maximum score possible is 50 points and the minimum score possible is 16 points. A score of 35 points or more is required to be considered for funding.) Form No. 91-25A (Effective Date: 3-21-01) 7 —DRAFT 1-19-05