HomeMy WebLinkAboutpre resolution1J-02-'' 11
2 /4 /02
RESOLUTION NO, 0 2 ~ 144
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION,
WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS
:E THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED
FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR
PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "B" DESIGNATED PROJECTS
FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY N
RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENTS WITS; EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A"
FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING
FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAM_I,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recommendata,on of the City .Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional engineering construction management services for
Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. The Corradino Group, Inc.
2. Nova Consulting Inc,
3. Marlin Engineering Inc,
4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc.
5. CES Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. PBS&J (ALTERNATE)
CITY COI'IIKISSION
MEETLIM
FEB 1 Ai 2002
amazon.Nix
-.0 2 - 144... .
Section. 2. The recommendation of the City Manager
to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant
to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firir.s to
provide professional ADA requirement services for Public
Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. PBS&J
2. R 0 Architects f Partners, Inc.
3. Gurri Mature, P. A. (ALTERNATE)
Section 3. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architectural engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. C$A Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Consultants, Inc,)
Indigo Service Corporation
Section 4. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architecture services for Public Works Category "B"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank
order, are accepted:
1. Gurri Natute PA
2. Zyscovich, Inc.
3. R.J, Heisenbott:e Architects, P.A.
4, R.E. C:iisholm Architects, Inc.
5, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6,. P$SJ (ALTERNATE)
Page 2 of 7
02- 144
Section, 5.
The recommendation of the City Nanager tc
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant ro
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional environmental engineering services for Pubic Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. ATC Group Services Inc.
2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc.
3. URS Corporation
9. END Engineers, Inc.
5. Nova Consulting :nc. (ALTERNATE)
6. Consulting Engineering & Science, ;nc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional general engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc.
2, Kunde, Sprecner & Associates, Inc.
3. Metric Engineering, Inc.
4. nS&J
5.. Marlin Engineering, =nc.
6. PFS tngineering Corp,
7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE)
8. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 7, The recommendation, of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 3 of 7
O2- 144
professional landscape architecture services for Pubic Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein: in rank order, are accepted;
1. falcon & Bueno
2. Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc.
3. Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
4, EDRW, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 8.
The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional mechanical engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A.
2. Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc,
3. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE)
Section 9. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional structural engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein it rank order, are accepted:
1. San Martin Associates, Inc.
2. Avert, Inc.
3. EAC Consulting, Inc,
Section 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to
aPProve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 4 of 7
n Me �'AA
professional surveying and mapping services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. PBS&J
2. Fernando Z. Gate11 P. L. $., Inc.
3. Weidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A.
4, Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc,
5. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc.
6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc.
Section 1.. The recommendation or the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee,
pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional value analysis and cost estimate services for Public
Works Category "8" designated projects for 2002 through 2004,
listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. A2 Group, Inc.
2. 2BS&J
3. Grace & Naeem Uddin (ALTERNATE)
Section 12. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approVe the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide
professional air conditioning services for Public Works Category
"B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is
accepted:
1. Grace & Naeem Uddir
Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to
the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide
approve
Page 5 of 7
02- 144
'professional life safety services for Public Works Category "B"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, 1_sted herein is
accepted:
1. Gurri Matute, P.A.
Section 14. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional roofing services for Pubic Works Category "B"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank
order, are accepted:
1. Building Diagnostics Associates, PA
2. International Logistics Group
Section 15. The City Manager is authorizedW to negotiate
and execute Professional Services Agreements, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, with each firm in an amount riot
to exceed the amount indicated
in
Attachment "A" for each
specialty for each firm, with funds ala,ocated from individual
project accounts.
The herein authorization is further subject to comp'iance with all
requirements that may be imposed by the city Attorney, including but not
iLmited tc those prescribed by applicable City Charter and Code
provisions.
Page 6 of 7
02- 114
Section 16. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon .its adoption and signature of the Mayor./
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February
ATTEST:
Sylvpa Scheider
Acting Cit lerk �}.,
AP?RO D A TO ,FORM AND CQRRE': TNESS : V
AND VILARELLO
TY ATTORNEY
W5975:LB
, 20C2.
MetNUEL A, DIAZ, MA
If the May does not sin this Resolution, it shall become effective at
:he end of ten calendar days from tha date it was passed and adopted. If
the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately
upon override of the veto by the City Commission.
Page 7 of 7
02! 144