Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Impact Study II• • ATTACHMENT F INTERSECTION ANALYSES Existing Conditions 2008 Conditions without Proposed Project & 2008 Conditions with Proposed Project 1100 Biscayne Boulevard (Marquis) MUSP Traffic Impact Study ATTACHMENTS September 2004 Keith and Schnars, P.A. Project No. 17342.00 Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 iod: AM PEAK HOUR 0/W 0ect ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane width RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #2--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(2) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (2) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 0 1 1 T R 364 429 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 LT 1 778 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 8 EB Left NB Left Thru p I Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left i SE Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right 1 EE Right P liRight WE Right en 36.0 39.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Larne Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 7 Eastbound T 760 1900 R 700 1615 Westbound Northbound Southbound LT • 1564 3610 0.53 0.40 23.2 C 24.6 C 0.68 0.43 25.8 C 0.55 Intersection Delay = 22.5 0.43 20.4 C 20.4 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 41riod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD /W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #3--NE 2 AVE & I-395 Ramp(1) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI PEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTIN N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (1) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 1 0 T 572 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 LT 20 1189 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right Right Peds Peds WE Left SE Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right WRight WE Right en 36.0 39.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T Westbound 760 1900 0.84 0.40 35.0- C 35.0- C Northbound Southbound LT • 2246 5183 0.60 0.43 20.7 C 20.7 C Intersection Delay = 25.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Wen Yellow All Red Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 0/W iod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD St: NE 11 STREET No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #4---NE 2 AVE & NE 11 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 0 38 0 2 0 LT 188 12.0 0 3 0 TR 1678 303 ?2.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right Right WB Right 8 16.0 66.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 636 3580 0.39 0.18 34.6 C 34.6 C Northbound Southbound TR • 3717 5068 0.59 0.73 6.4 A 6.4 A Intersection Delay - 9.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 AM PEAK fr OUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD �iod: St: NE 11TH STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: ##5--BISCAYNE BLVD & NE 11TH ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound T R 0 0 0 1 3 0 L T 182 829 12.0 12.0 0 3 0 TR 1526 49 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right 41lien 76.0 6.0 Yellow 4.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS NB Left P P Thru P P Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WE Right 7 Delay LOS 90.0 secs Eastbound Westbound. Northbound 408 1805 T 5014 5187 Southbound TR • 4360 5163 0.50 0.97 7.7 A 0.18 0.40 Intersection Delay - 1.8 0.97 0.2 A 1.5 A 0.84 1.9 A 1.9 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: Date: rind: ject /W St: K & S 9/23/2004 AM PEAK HOUR ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD 11TH TERRACE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Duration Inter.: 46--BISCAYNE BLVD & 11TH TR Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 -- EXISTING N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 2 0 0 L 765 12.0 0.25 0 0 0 0 3 0 T 610 12.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 3 4 Phase Combination 1 2 EB Left Thru Right Peds WE Left Thru Right Peds NE Right Right Illeen Yellow All Red 39.0 4.0 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Eastbound L 1518 Westbound Northbound T 2363 Southbound T 2363 • Intersection Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) 3502 Ratios v/c g/C 0.56 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 T 1338 12.0 5 6 NB Left Thru P Right Peds SE Left Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right 41.0 4.0 1.0 7 Cycle Length: 90.0 Performance Summary Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 8 secs 0.43 20.6 C 20.6 C 5187 0.29 0.46 15.7 B 15.7 B 5187 0.63 0.46 20.0- B 20.0- B Intersection Delay = 19.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 111) riod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD /W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTQR Vol In.ter.: #1-- NE 2 AVE & NE 12 Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 ST r41" t - %4 1AeI< Southbound L T R 0 3 0 T 465 12.0 0 0 0 0 2 1 TR R 1005 516 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru P Right Peds NB Right WRight en 36.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Intersect Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C 6 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peels EB Right WB Right 39.0 4.0 6.0 7 8 K. 2468_ Wicu?tiD Cycle Length: 90.0 ion Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group Approach Eastbound Westbound T 207S 5187 Northbound Southbound TR i Delay LOS Delay LOS secs 0.25 0.40 18.3 B 18.3 B 1564 3610 0.71 700 1615 0.82 Intersection Delay = 24.8 0.43 23.7 C 26.8 C 0.43 32.7 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 410riod: AM PEAK HOUR Gject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #2--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(2) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (2) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R L T R 0 1 1 T R 394 667 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 LT 41 843 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right liken Yellow All Red Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 5 NB Left p Thru 36.0 4.0 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Intersection Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right P WE Right P p 39.0 4.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group Approach v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 760 R 700 Westbound Northbound Southbound LT • 1900 0.58 1615 1.06 1561 3602 0.63 Intersection Delay = 40.9 0.40 24.2 C 56.8 E 0.43 76.1 E 0.43 21.8 C 21.8 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D 8 secs Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 riod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD /W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #3--NE 2 AVE & I-395 Ramp(1) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (1) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 1 0 T 620 12.0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 122 3 0 LT 1397 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 EB Left N:3 Left Thru P Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right "lRight 1 WB Right een 36.0 39.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T Westbound 760 1900 0.91 Northbound Southbound LT • 2246 5183 0.40 41.9 D 41.9 D 0.70 0.43 22.6 C 22.6 C Intersection Delay = 28.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 ilvrod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 11 STREET No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: #4--NE 2 AVE & NE 11 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND MIS St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 2 0 LT 44 216 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right "ken Yellow All Red 0 Sou L hbound T R 0 3 0 LTR 423 2052 328 12.0 0 Area Type: A11 other areas Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 P p 16.0 4.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Eastbound Westbound LT Intersection Adj Sat Flow Rate NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WE Right 5 P P P 66.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group Approach (s) v/c 636 3580 Northbound Southbound LTR • 3709 5058 0.45 Delay LOS Delay LOS 0.18 35.4 D 35.4 D 0.84 0.73 10.8 B 10.8 B Intersection Delay = 12.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 Illiod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD W St: NE 11TH STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Duration Inter.: *5--BISCAYNE BLVD & NE 11TH ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound Northbound L T R ! L 1 0 1 L R 148 275 12.0 12.0 0 T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 1 3 0 L T 197 1089 12.0 12.0 0 3 0 TR 1928 53 12.0 0 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left P Thru Right P Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right een 12.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C 5 6 7 8 NB Left P P Thru P P Right Peds SE Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 61.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: Intersection Performance Summary Approach 90.0 secs Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 241 R 215 Westbound Northbound L 306 T 4150 Southbound TR 3501 • 1805 1615 0.68 1.42 0.13 51.6 D 0.13 254.4 F 183.6 F 1805 0.72 0.80 41.7 D 5187 0.29 0.80 2.5 A 8.5 A 5166 0.63 0.68 9.0 A 9.0 A Intersection Delay = 28.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Comae Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 41iod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD W St: 11TH TERRACE Inter.: ##6--BISCAYNE BLVD & 11TH TR Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound 1 Northbound L T R L T R 1 l 0 0 0 0 0 [ No. Lanes 1 2 LGConfig 1 L Volume 1829 Lane Width 12.0 RTOR Vol Southbound L T R ( L T R 0 3 0 T 1115 12.0 3 0 T 1656 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left P NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NE Right EB Right Right WE Right en 39.0 41.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 8 Eastbound L 1518 3502 0.61 0.43 21.4 C 21.4 C Westbound Northbound 2363 5187 0.52 0.46 18.4 B 18.4 B Southbound T 2363 5187 0.78 0.46 23.3 C 23.3 C Intersection Delay = 21.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 �iod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD �/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: #1-- NE 2 AVE & NE 12 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 3 0 T 465 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Weneen Yellow All Red Southbound 1 L T R 0 0 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 0 2 1 TR R 1006 516 12.0 12.0 0 NB Left Thru Right Peds SE Left p ( Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 36.0 39.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 7 //t4 Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c Eastbound Westbound g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 2075 5187 0.25 Northbound Southbound TR � 1564 3610 0.71 700 1615 0.82 Intersection Delay = 24.8 0.40 18.3 B 18.3 0.43 23.8 C 26.8 C 0.43 32.7 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Inter.: #2--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(2) Agency: K & S Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/28/2004 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH riod: AM PEAK HOUR Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD /W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol N/S St: I-395 OFF RAMP (2) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 1 1 T R 394 674 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left Thru P Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right WRight en 36.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 0 2 0 LT 41 844 12.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right P WE Right 39.0 4.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) astbound T 760 R 700 Westbound Northbound Southbound LT • Ratios Lane Group Approach g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1900 0.58 0.40 24.2 C 59.3 E 1615 1.07 0.43 79.8 E 1561 3602 0.63 0.43 21.8 C 21.8 C Intersection Delay = 42.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Analyst: Eman. Gomaa Agency: Date: 41viod: jest E/W St: K & S 10/28/2004 AM PEAK HOUR ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound R HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #3--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(1) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: I-395 OFF RAMP (1) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 1 T 620 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 LT 22 1404 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Phase Combination. 1 2 EB Left Thru P Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right een 36.0 Yellow 4,0 All Red 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right Intersection Adj Sat Flow Rate 39.0 4.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group Approach (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 760 1900 0.91 0.40 41.9 D 41.9 D Northbound Southbound LT 2246 • 5183 0.71 0.43 22.7 C 22.7 Intersection Delay - 28.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 1! iod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD W St: NE 11 STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #4---NE 2 AVE & NE 11 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 LT 47 272 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 3 0 LTR 439 2052 328 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left P SE Left P Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NE Right j EB Right IllikRight ( WE Right en 16.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 7 8 secs Westbound LT 637 3584 0.56 0.18 37.2 D 37.2 D Northbound Southbound LTR • 3708 5057 0.84 0.73 11.0 B 11.0 B Intersection Delay = 13.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 rlod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE I1TH STREET No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #5--BISCAYNE BLVD & NE 11TH ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 0 L 162 12.0 1 R 289 12.0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 L T 205 1089 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right een Yellow All Red 1 2 3 4 P 12.0 3.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) Southbound L T R 3 0 TR 1928 58 12.0 0 5 NB Left P Thru P Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 6 7 8 P P 61.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group Approach v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L, 241 R 215 Westbound Northbound T 306 T 4150 Southbound TR 3500 • 1805 1615 1805 5187 0.75 1.49 0.75 0.29 0.13 56.4 E 202.1 0.13 283.8 F 0.80 44.0 D 0.80 2.5 A 9.1 A 5164 0.63 0.68 9.0 A 9.0 A Intersection Delay = 32.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 riod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD W St: 11TH TERRACE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #6--BISCAYNE BLVD & 11TH TR Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 L 829 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right Wen Yellow All Red T 1127 12.0 0 3 0 T 1661 12.0 p NB Left Thru P Right Peds SE Left Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right 39.0 41.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 90 0 Intersection Performance Summary APpr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) Ratios Lane Group Approach v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1518 Westbound Northbound T 2363 Southbound T 2363 • 3502 0.61 0.43 21.4 C secs 21.4 C 5187 0.53 0.46 18.4 B 18.4 B 5187 0.78 0.46 23.4 C 23.4 C Intersection Delay = 21.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: EMAN GOMAA ency/Co.: K & S e Performed: 10/28/2004 nalysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: #7 PROJECT ACCESS & NE 11 ST Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC Project ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD East/West Street: NE I1TH STREET North/South Street: PROJECT ACCESS Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R _ Volume_-- --- 16 423 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 16 423 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 0 1 LT No Ilikr Street: Approach Northbound Movement 7 8 9 L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration 0 Westbound 4 5 6 L T R 260 13 1.00 1.00 260 13 2 0 T TR No Southbound 10 11 12 L T R 28 60 1.00 1.00 28 60 O 0 0 / 1 L R 1 Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WE Northbound Southbound 1 4 ( 7 8 9 10 11 12 LT L R v (vph) 16 28 C(m) (vph) 1302 362 v/c 0.01 0.08 95% queue length 0.04 0.25 Control Delay 7.8 15.8 OS A C proach Delay proach LOS 60 894 0.07 0.22 9.3 A 11.4 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Ethan Gomaa Agency: K & S .te: 9/23%2004 riod: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #1--- NE 2 AVE & NE 12 ST Area Type: All other areas Curisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R L T R L T R 0 0 3 0 T 587 12.0 0 0 0 0 2 1 TR R 375 828 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds 411.t Right Right Green Yellow All Red NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 29.0 56.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary PM 2ooL /o scat'`` vbs Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 1504 5187 0.43 0.29 29.7 C 29.7 C Northbound Southbound 2022 3610 0.21 0.56 11.2 B 42.3 D 904 1615 1.02 0.56 56.4 E Intersection Delay = 38.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S 0r ate: 9/23/2004 riod: PM PEAK HOUR oject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED Westbound 0 1 1 T R 358 353 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 Inter.: #2--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(2)_ Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (2) INTERSECTION SUMMARY Northbound L T R 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 2 0 LT 6 363 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds 111,B Right B Right Green 29.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 Intersection Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) Eastbound T 551 R 904 Westbound Northbound Southbound •LT 5 6 7 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right P WB Right 56.0 4.0 6.0 8 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Performance Summary Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 1900 0.72 0.29 39.9 D 27.2 C 1615 0.43 0.56 14.3 B 2020 3607 0.20 0.56 11.1 B 11.1 B Intersection Delay = 21.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & 5 Date: 9/23/2004 •iod: PM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: ##3--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(1) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (1) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound 0 1 0 T 364 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 LT 44 674 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination. 1 2 3 4 8 EB Left Thru P Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Wen 29.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 100 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds ES Right WB Right 5 6 7 Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c Eastbound T 551 1900 Westbound Northbound Southbound LT • 2896 5171 g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 0.73 0.29 40.4 D 40.4 D 0.28 0.56 11.7 B 11.7 3 Intersection Delay = 21.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gornaa Agency: K & S Date 9/23/2004 .rind: PM PEAK HOUR oject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 11 STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 4--NE 2 AVE & NE 11 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R 0 0 0 2 0 LT 23 380 12.0 0 0 0 3 0 TR 820 171 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds 41 Right Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 1 2 3 4 42.0 4.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 5 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 50.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) 7 8 Length: 100 0 secs Ratios Lane Group Approach g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1512 Northbound Southbound •TR 3600 0.30 0.42 19.7 B 19.7 B 2527 5053 0.44 0.50 16.5 B 16.5 B Intersection Delay = 17.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 •riod: PM PEAK HOUR oject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 11TH STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inter.: #5--BISCAYNE BLVD & NE 11TH ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Southbound L T R 1 3 0 I 0 3 0 L T ( TR 341 1860 917 50 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds Right Right Green Yellow All Red Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 5 NB Left P Thru P Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WE Right 6 7 P 101.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 8 115 0 secs Eastbound Westbound Northbound L 588 i 5052 Southbound AhR 1805 0.64 0.97 6.3 A 5187 0.41 0.97 0.4 A 1.3 A 4520 5146 0.24 0.88 1.2 A 1.2 A Intersection Delay = 1.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 411triad: PM PEAK HOUR oject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: 11TH TERRACE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED Westbound L T 2 0 0 L 742 12.0 Inter.: #6--BISCAYNE BLVD & 11TH TR Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION SUMMARY Northbound R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 3 0 T 1173 12.0 0 3 0 T 942 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left P Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds �B Right B Right Green 51.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Intersection Adj Sat Ratios Flaw Rate (s) v/c 5 6 7 NB Left Thru P Right Peds SE Left Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right 54.0 4.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115 0 secs Performance Summary Lane Group Approach g/C Delay LOS Delay LO Eastbound L 1553 3502 Westbound Northbound T 2436 5187 Southbound oT 2436 5187 0.53 0.44 24.6 C 24.6 C 0.53 0.47 22.5 C 22.5 C 0.43 0.47 20.8 C 20.8 C Intersection Delay = 22.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S �te: 9/23/2004 riod: PM PEAK HOUR oject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #1-- NE 2 AVE & NE 12 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 3 0 T 636 12.0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 2 1 TR R 500 897 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left Thru Right Peds WE Left Thru Right Peds etRight Right Green Yellow All Red NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left p Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 29.0 56.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 100 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ,2-007 `Z'cmine, 6; Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 1504 5187 0.47 0.29 30.2 C 30.2 C Northbound Southbound 2022 3610 0.27 0.56 11.8 B 58.3 E 904 1615 1.10 0.56 84.2 F Intersection Delay = 49.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & 5 Date: 9/23/2004 .riod: PM PEAK HOUR oject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter,: #2--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(2) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (2) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 1 1 T R 388 560 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 2 0 LT 39 393 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru p Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds 41, Right EB Right P Right WB Right Green 29.0 S6.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) Ratios Lane Group Approach v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 551 904 Westbound Northbound Southbound 1900 0.78 0.29 43.2 D 29.5 C 1615 0.69 0.56 20.0+ C •LT 2013 3594 0.24 0.56 11.5 B 11.5 B Intersection Delay = 23.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4,1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 4° riod: PM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD /W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #3--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(1) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (1) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 0 T 394 12.0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 LT 48 820 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NE Left Thru P Thru Right Right Peds Peds WE Left SE Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right liRight WE Right ken 29.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T Westbound 551 1900 0.79 0.29 44.0 D 44.0 D Northbound Southbound LT • 2897 5173 0.33 0.56 12.2 B 12.2 B Intersection Delay = 22.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gornaa Agency: K & S 4ate: 9/23/2004 riod: PM PEAK HOUR roject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 11 STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: $*4 - -NE 2 AVE & NE 11. ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 LT 25 412 12.0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 LTR 260 1081 185 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WE Left Thru P Right Peds AKE Right B Right Green Yellow All Red NB Left Thru Right Peds 5 p SE Left P Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WE Right 42.0 50.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1512 3600 0.32 0.42 20.0+ C 20.0+ C Northbound Southbound OLTR 2525 5049 0.67 0.50 20.3 C 20.3 C Intersection Delay = 20.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S 1 ate: 9/23/2004 riod: PM PEAK HOUR roject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 11TH STREET HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #5--BISCAYNE BLVD & NE 11TH ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound I T R L T R L 169 12.0 0 1 R 91 12.0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 L T 369 2173 12.0 12.0 Southbound L T R Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 103 Green Yellow All Red Phase Combination 1 EB Left P Thru Right P Peds WE Left Thru Right Peds Right Right 20.0 3.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 3 4 0 3 0 TR 1220 54 12.0 0 5 6 7 8 NB Left P Thru P P Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WE Right 78.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate Eastbound L 314 R 281 Westbound Northbound L 366 T 4014 (s) 1805 1615 v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 0.60 0.36 0.17 52.0 D 0.17 45.4 49.7 1805 1.12 0.77 115.4 F 5187 0.60 0.77 6.2 A 22.0 Southbound 410TR 3496 5154 0.41 Intersection Delay = 19.6 0.68 8.6 A 8.6 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S te: 9/23/2004 riod: PM PEAK HOUR roject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: 11TH TERRACE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #6--BISCAYNE BLVD & 11TH TR Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 2 0 0 L 804 12.0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 T 1588 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other Signal Operat Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left P N3 Thru Right Pods WE Left SE Thru Right Peds Right EB Right WB Green 51.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Intersection areas ions 0 3 0 T 1191 12.0 5 6 7 Left Thru P Right Peds Left Thru P Right Peds Right Right 8 54.0 4.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Lane Group Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS Eastbound L 1553 Westbound Northbound 2436 Southbound 2436 3502 5187 5187 0.58 0.44 0.72 0.47 0.54 0.47 Intersection Delay = 24.9 25.5 C 26.4 22.6 C 25.5 C 26.4 C 22.6 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Ernan Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 iod: PM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: #1-- NE 2 AVE & NE 12 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound ( Northbound Southbound 0 0 0 3 0 T 636 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left Thru Right Peds WE Left Thru Right Peds NE Right Right ilken Yellow All Red 0 0 0 0 2 1 TR R 502 897 12.0 12.0 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 NB Left Thru Right Peds SE Left 5 6 7 8 p Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 29.0 56.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 6.n Cycle Length: 100 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary P� 206'Y row 1' ; 5ca yie Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 1504 5187 0.47 0.29 30.2 C 30.2 C Northbound Southbound TR i 2022 3610 0.28 0.56 11.8 B 58.2 E 904 1615 1.10 0.56 84.2 F Intersection Delay = 49.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 Iiod: PM PEAK HOUR 'ect ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #2--NE 2 AVE & I-395 Ramp(2) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (2) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R j L T R L R 0 1 1 T R 388 584 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal. Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru P Right Peds WE Left Thru Right Peds NE Right WRight en 29.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 0 0 0 2 0 LT 39 395 12.0 5 NE Left Thru Right Peds SE Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right P WE Right 6 7 8 56.0 4.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ — Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 551 R 904 Westbound Northbound Southbound 1900 0.78 0.29 43.2 D 29.9 C 1615 0.72 0.56 21.1 C LT 2013 3594 0.24 0.56 11.5 B 11.5 B • Intersection Delay = 24.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right liken Yellow All Red Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 r±od: PM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #3--NE 2 AVE & 1-395 Ramp(1) Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: 1-395 OFF RAMP (1) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound R L T R I L T R 1 0 1 0 T 394 12.0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 Southbound L T R LT 48 846 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NB Left p Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right 29.0 56.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 100 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T Westbound 551 1900 0.79 0.29 44.0 D 44.0 D Northbound Southbound LT • 2897 5173 0.34 0.56 12.3 B 12.3 B Intersection Delay 22.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 411rod: PM PEAK HOUR ect ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD E/W St: NE 11 STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol L T R 0 0 0 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #4--NE 2 AVE & NE 11 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - BACKGROUND N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound L T R L T R 1 L T R 0 2 0 LT 28 454 12.0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Right een Yellow All Red 1317 0 3 0 LTR 1081 185 12.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 NB Left Thru Right Peds p SB Left p Thru 42.0 4.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) Right Peds EB Right WB Right Intersection Performance Ratios Lane Group Approach P P 6 7 50.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Summary g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1512 3600 0.35 Northbound Southbound LTR 2523 5045 • 0.42 20.4 C 20.4 C 0.70 0.50 20.8 C 20.8 C Intersection Delay = 20.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 riod: PM PEAK HOUR 410/3 ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD /W St: NE 11TH STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: ##5 --BISCAYNE BLVD & NE 11TH ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALLED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 0 1 L R 179 101 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 1 3 0 L T 399 2173 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 EB Left P Thru Right P Peds WE Left Thru Right Peds NB Right (bRight een 20.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 2 3 4 0 3 0 TR 1220 70 12.0 0 5 NB Left P Thru P Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WE Right 78.0 4.0 1.0 6 P P 6.0 3.0 0.0 7 8 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 314 R 281 Westbound Northbound L 362 T 4014 Southbound TR 3490 • 1805 0.63 0.17 53.5 D 50.9 D 1615 0.40 0.17 46.3 D 1805 1.22 0.77 154.9 F 5187 0.60 0.77 6.2 A 29.2 C 5145 0.41 0.68 8.6 A 8.6 A Intersection Delay = 24.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HC52000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Eman Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 10/28/2004 0W iod: PM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD St: 11TH TERRACE No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R 2 0 0 L 804 12.0 Duration 0.25 0 0 0 Inter.: 446--BISCAYNE BLVD & 11TH TR Area Type: All other areas uurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC N/S St: BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION SUMMARY Northbound L T R 0 3 0 T 1597 12.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 5 Phase Combination 1 2 EB Left P Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right IlliRight en 51.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) NB 5B EB WB Southbound L _ R 3 T 1207 12.0 0 Left Thru P Right Peds Left Thru P Right Peds Right Right 54.0 4.0 1.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group v/c g/C Eastbound 1553 Westbound Northbound T 2436 Southbound T 2436 • 3502 5187 5187 0.58 0.44 0.73 . 0.47 0.55 0.47 Intersection Delay = 25.0 Delay LOS 8 Length: 115 0 secs Approach Delay LOS 25.5 C 26.5 22.7 C 25.5 C 26.5 C 22.7 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: EMAN GOMAA ency/Co.: K & S e Performed: 10/28/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: #7 PROJECT ACCESS & NE 11 ST Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Units: U. 5. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 - TOTAL TRAFFIC Project ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD East/West Street: NE 11TH STREET North/South Street: PROJECT ACCESS Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 € 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume --- 57 260 423 46 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 260 423 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 2 0 Configuration LT T TR U stream Signal? No No Il- or__ —Street --Approach � Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration 0 21 1.00 21 0 1 L 0 1 44 1.00 44 0 / Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 i 7 8 9 Lane Config LT f Service Southbound 10 11 12 L R v (vph) 57 21 44 C(m) (vph) 1103 301 774 v/c 0.05 0.07 0.06 9596 queue length 0.16 0.22 0.18 Control Delay 8.4 17.9 9.9 �S A C A roach Delay proach LOS 12.5 B 10/28/2004 INTERSECTION 1 NE 2ND AVE AND NE 12TH STREET SIGNALIZED 2 NE2NDAVE AND 1.395 OFF RAMP(2) SIGNALIZED 3 NE2NDAVE AND 1-395 OFF RAMP(1) 4 NE2NDAVE AND NE 11TH STREET SIGNALIZED 5 BISCAYNE BLVD AND NE 11TH STREET 6 BISCAYNE BLVD AND NE 11TH TERRACE SIGNALIZED 7 PROJECT ACCESS AND NE 11TH STREET UNSIGNALIZED MVMT WE T 58 L [1] T 2004 AM RAW VOLUME TABLE F-1 1100 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK SEASON 2004 PEAK SEASON VOLUME 421 1,02 429 T R EB L R SB L _T^ R EB L T R SB L T WB L T R SB L R EB L NB L T R SB L T R EB L T R FNB L T R SB L T EB L T WE T R SB L R [2] 2008 BKGD VOLUME (3] COMMITTED DEVELOP- MENT TOTAL 2008 BKGD VOLUME 1100 BISCAYNE PROJECT TRIPS 0 465 - U0 TRIPS 117 TOTAL AM 2008 VOLUME 0 465 760 1.02 775 640._ 0 1,005 [4] 2.1% I 1 1,006 467 1.02 476 516w 0 516 --� '____. 0 516 357 1.02 •_ 364 394 0 394 0 394 421 1.02 429 109 667 [4] 23.4% I 7 674 1 1,02 1 1 40 41 0 41 763 1.02 778 843 0 643 2.1% I 1 844 561 1.02 572 620 0 620 0 620 756 1.02 771 835 125 1,125 [4] 29.5% I 9 1,134 20 1.02 20 . - 022 ....._ 0 22 1,166 1.02 1,189 1,288 109 1,397 25.5% € 7 1,404 37 1.02 38 41 0 44 [4j 3.91 0 3 47 6 B 0 1.02 0 0 0 423 [4] 55.01 I 16 439 1,645 1.02 A 1,678 1,818 234 2,052 0 2,052 297 1.02 303 328 0 1.02 0 0 465 184 1.02 188 204 0 1.02 0 0 0 1.02 0 0 328 0 328 0 148 [4] 16,0% 0 14 162 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 0 0 0 275 [4] 15.9% 0 14 289 178 1.02 182 197 0 197 29.0% I 8 205 813 1.02 829 898 191 1,089 0 1,089 0 1.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,496 1.02 1,526 1,653 275 1,928 0 1,928 48 1.02 49 53 0 53 16.0% I 58 750 t.02 765 829 0 529 0 829 0 1,02 0 0 0 0 0 1) 188 1.02 192 208 0 208 r - - 208 590 1.02 610 661 179 1,115 [4] 14.2% 0 12 1,127 214 1.02 218 236 0 230 1.8% 0 2 238 Notes [1 ] AM and PM Peak Hour volumes obtained from actual counts performed on September 9, 2004. [2] Year 2006 Background Volume derived by applying a 2.02% growth rate to year 2004 volumes. [3] PM Peak Hour Committed developments obtained from the City of Miami Large Scale Development Report dated September 1, 2004. AM Peak Hour Committed trips derived by increasing the PM Peak trips by a factor at 1.21. 0 216 [4] 64.2% 0 56 272 0 0 1,312 1.02 1,338 1,449 207 1,656 , 16,01 I 5 1,661 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 55.0% I 16 16 0 0.00 0 0 0 423 [4) 0 423 0 0.00 0 0 0 260 [4] 0 260 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 45.0% I 13 13 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 31.9% 0 28 28 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 68.11 0 60 60 MVMT [1] 2004PM RAW VOLUME PEAK SEASON 2004 PEAK SEASON [2] 2008 BKGD [3] COMMITTED DEVELOP- TOTAL 2008 BKGD 1100 BISCAYNE PROJECT TRIPS TX. 111 [98 TRIPS FACTOR VOLUME VOLUME MENT VOLUME % U0 168 Vf ME WO T 575 1.02 587 636 0 636 _ 0 636 S8� ,,,_-- T 368 1.02 375 406 0 500 [4] 2.1% I 2 502 ii 812 1.02 828 61977 0 897 0 897 EB L - '-‘1,Pr T 351 1.02 358 388 0 388 0 388 R 346 1.02 353 382 90 560 [4] 23.4% I 24 584 SB L 6 1.02 6 6 33 39 0 39 T p 356 - 1.02 363 393 0 393 2.1% I 2 395 . Es L 7 357 1.02 364 "' 394 0 394 -' 0 am, 394 R 309 1.02 315 341 103 522 [4] 29.5% I 30 se,a 552 SB L 43 i.o2 44 a8 0 48 0 g� 48 T 661 1.02 674 730 90 820 25.5 % _ I 26 846 R WB L 23 1.02 23 25 0 25 3.9% 0 3 28 T 373 1.02 380 412 0 412 64.21 0 42 454 R 0 1_©2 0 .__-• 0 0 0 0 0 SB L 0 1.02 0 0 0 260 [4] 55.0% I 57 317 T 804 1.02 820 888 193 1,081 0 1.081 R 168 1.02 171 185 0 185 0..,_R165 EB L 0 1.02 0 0 0 169 [4] 16.0% 0 10 119 T 0 1.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 1.02 0 0 0 91 [4] 15.9% 0 10 101 NB L 334 1.02 341 369 0 359 ---29.011_- 30 •.393 , T 1,824 1.02 1,860 2,015 158 2,173 0 ',3,173 R 0 1.02 0 0 0 0 0 i---0 SB L 0 1.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 899 1.02 917 .-----------.-----5' 993 227 1,220 0 220 R 49 1.02 0 54 16.0 % } 16 70 EB L 727 1.02 742 504 0 804 0 804 T 0 1.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 1.02 24 26 0 26 0 26 -R NB �__ ....___.•- •- __T _. 1,150^ 02m 1,173 1,271 146 1,588 [4] 14.2°1 0 9 R 652 1.02 665 720 0 720 18 % 0 1T 721 SB L pan T 924 1.02 942 1,020 171 1,191 16.0% I 16 "[[,207 EB L 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 55.0% I 57 '"` 57 T 0 0.00 0 0 0 260 [4] ___-_ --• 0 260 WB T 0 0.00 0 0 0 423 [4] 0 4.23 R 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 45.0 % I 46 46 SB L 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 319% T0T 21 21 R 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 68.11 0 44" 44 KEITH AND•ARS, P.A. N'1T'RANPI AN\Prninr1e 19nnAl-1711Ao iinn a ar_u__ n-...., .,., • ATTACHMENT G LIST OF SELECTED COMMITTED DEVELOPMENTS (As established through Methodology — See Attachment A) 1100 Biscayne Boulevard (Marquis) MUSP Traffic Impact Study ATTACHMENTS September 2004 Keith and Schnars, P.A. Project No. 17342.00 KE]TH AND•ARS, P.A. 10728/2004 TABLE F-1 1100 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT 41TUUY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING M0VE44ENT8 INTERSECTION VMT 11 2004 AM RAW VOLUME 1 NE 2ND AVE AND NE 12TH STREET SIGNALIZED 2 NE 2ND AVE AND 1.395 OFF RAMP(2) SIGNALIZED WB T SB L EB L PEAK SEASON 2004 PEAK SEASON VOLUME 421 1.02 429 760 1.02 775 467 1.02 476 357 1.02 364 421 1.02 429 S8 L 1.02 1 763 1.02 778 3 NE2NDAVE AND 1-395 OFF RAMP(1) EB L T 561 1.02 572 ]2) 2008 BKGD VOLUME SB L T 755 1.02 771 20 1.02 20 1,166 1.02 1,169 4 NE2NDAVE AND NE 11TH STREET SIGNALIZED 5 BISCAYNE BLVD AND NE 11TH STREET 6 BISCAYNE BLVD AND NE 11TH TERRACE SIGNALIZED 7 PROJECT ACCESS AND NE11TF1STREET UNSIONAL1ZED WB L T SB L 37 1.02 38 184 1.02 188 [3] COMMITTED DEVELOP- MENT TOTAL 2008 BKGD VOLUME 1100 BISCAYNE TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS AM TRIPS 2008 1/0 117 VOLUME V [1] 2604 PM PEAK RAW SEASON VOW NIO FACTOR 0 .,.455 0 405 WB T 576 1.02 56 L 2004 [2] PEAK 2008 SEASON BKGD VOLUME VOLUME 587 [3] TOTAL 1100 BISCAYNE VITAL COMMITTED 2008 PROJECT TRIPS DEVELOP• BKGD TRIPS Op MENT VOLUME % 00 168 V ME 0 1,005141 2.1% I 1 1,00d T 368 1.02 375 406 0 516 0 „01 ., 516812 p 1,02 828 897 1 _ - EU L 0 394 . _____•_ -r____ 0.-- T 351 1,02 358 398 109 667 [4 23.4% I 7 ..----•.,,.____.-------2 � 474 R 34635 1 02 353 382 40 41 0 41 513 L 0 1.02 6 6 0 843 2.1% I 1 844 T ;l56 1.02 363 393 11 h U L 620 0 620 0 020 1 367 1,02 835 125 1,125 [4] 29.5% 1 9 1,134 01 309 1.02 1,288 109 1,397 41 204 0 1,02 0 T EB L 0 1.02 0 7,645 1.02 1,678 297 1.02 303 1.02 0 1.02 1,818 328 0 1.02 0 N8 L 178 1.02 182 813 1.02 B29 R SB L EB T R NB L T 598 1.02 610 R 214 1.02 218 0 1.02 0 0 1.02 0 1,496 48 1.02 1.02 1,526 49 750 1.02 765 25.5% I 7 1,404 _-_ T 661 1.02 R 0 44 [4] 3.9% 0 3 4f WB I, 23 1.02 0 216 [4] 64.2% 0 so 2/2 1 373 1,02 0 0 0 0 R 0 102 0 423 [4] , 55.0% I 16 439 SU L 0 1.02 234 2,052 0 328 0 2.802 T 904 1,02 0 3213 1 168 1.0 0 535 0 6361 0 500 [4] 2.1% I 2 502 0 897 0 "" 897 w 0 388 0 " 388 90 560 [4] 23.4% I 24 584 33 39 0 .mge_ 39 0 393 2.1% I 364 394 315 341 44 48 674 730 23 25 380 412 0 0 820 888 171 185 0 394 0 TMm394 103 522 [4] 29.5% 1 30 ,gs 552 0 48 0 4 48 90 820 25.59'. ____._.26 •, 046 0 25 3.9% 0 3 '"28 0 412 64.2% 0 42 454 0 0 0 0 0 260 [4] 55.0% 1 57 317 193 1,081 0 185 0 1,081 0 185 1 1,02 0 T 0 1.02 0 14 289 R 0 1.02 0 0 197 0 197 29.0% I 8 205 NO L 334 102 341 369 898 191 1,089 0 1,089 1' 1,1124 1,02 1,860 2,015 0 0 0 0 R 0 1.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8B L 0 1.02 0 0 1,653, 275 1,928 .................. .....---- 53 0 53 16.0% 1 0 0 146 [4] 18.0% 0 14 0 0 275 [4] 15.9% 0 829 0 1.02 0 188 1.02 192 208 0 829 0 0 0 208 58 L EB L ' R 49 1.02 50 54 0 i129 02 L 127 1.02 742 804 0 0 T 0 1.02 0 0 206 R 24 1.02 24 26 169 [4] 16.0% 0 10 17 0 0 158 2,173 0 0 91 [4] 15.9% 0 10 'V 10 0 369 29,0% I 30 399 0 0 0 O`„•�4,17', 0 0 227 1,220 NB L 881 179 1,115 [4] 14.2% 0 12 1,127 T' 1,150 1.02 1,173 1,271 236 0 236 1.8% 0 2 238 R 652 1.02 665 720 ,312 1.02 1,338 0.00 MT 0 0.00 0 W8 T 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 ___._ 5B L 0 0.00 0 R 0 0.00 0 »_ ,449 207 1,656 16 OK- I Notes: 0 423 [4] 55.0% I 5B L 0 54 16.0% I 0 804 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 1 220 804 0 4 ,_„,. 25 148 1,588 [4] 1421 0 9 1,597 0 720 1.8% 0 1 " 721 1,661 24 t.02 942 6 EB L 0 0.00 4 423 T 0 0.00 0 0 2(30 WB I 0 0.00 0 0 0 45.0% 1 13 13 R 0 0.00 0 0 0 31.9% 0 26 28 55 L 0 0.00 0 0 0 68.1% 0 60 60 R 0 0.00 0 260 14] 1,020 [1] AM and PM Peak Hour volumes obtained from actual counts performed on September 9, 2004. [2] Year 2008 Background Volume derived by applying a 2.02% growth rate to year 2004 volumes. [3] PM Peak Hour Committed developments obtained from the City of Miami Large Scale Development Report dated September 1, 2004, AM Peak Hour Committed Sop, derived by inr;rnuaing the PM Peak trips by a lector of 1,21. 1 171 1 191 16.0% I 16 " 1,207 0 55.0% ! 57 57 0 260 [4] 0 26C 0 423 [4] 0 423 0 0 45.0% I 46 "' 46 0 0 31.9% 0 21 " 21 0 0 68.1% 0 447_44 • N:ITRANPLAN`Pro(6 IuliEH14S17 19 Z inn rs,,.,-In n, „ „..__:__ ..- CITY 01" MIAMI LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT REPORT:1995•Present Citywide Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) and applicable Class II, Special Exception & Exempt Projects (Listed Alphabetically by NET Area then by Project Name September 1,2004 Name T9dKat Permit Address (Status: A -Completed; LonninuaE inrnrnntu,n Description B-Under Net Area Construction; Ades Pg C-Appraverl; Zoning tiislriet(s) C.C. Dist D t�i Wu Condo Application; ii� Botd R-Preliminary; bylL Mire Mall 9-Cannelled) Parking Spucde 1leiE;l3i Feet Stories PAR CnsElRr,e,eor Construction DRI Date itcrion CC. Resolution Smrea Comments I. 330 Biscayne [1] MUSP 330 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: Residential & Retail 2 buildin• Downtown 36 CBD 2 924 0 0 18,470 1,130 659 56 Information not given DTOWN 3-Aug-04 E 2. 50 Biscayne (Columbus Residential Tower/Columbus Office Tower), 50 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed -use: Residential & Retail Downtown CBD 523 --..0 -_ 15,727 722 554 $273,748,563 DTOWN 17-Aug-04 ■�" PAB (Sep-04) 3. 900 Biscayne MUSP 900 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: residential wlaccessory recreation; retail & office Downtown SD-6 516 0 t 69,204 0 14,375 38,000 1,114 740 5.87 $363,958,779 SEOPW 22-1u1-04 04501 4. Dupont Towers (Dupont Plaza) MUSP 300 Biscayne Bouelvard Way Mixed Use: Residential, Retail, Restaurant, Condo/Hotel Downtown • CBD I,228 62 1,481 609 60 8.20 $767,054,570 DTOWN 22-Apr-04 04-0277 C 5. Everglades on the Bay MUSP 244 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Downtown • CBD 866 0 0 65,549 i,146 538 49 $376,767,008 DTOWN 25-Mar-04 04-0I96 C 6. Joint Development - Miami [i) Parking Darage No, I 40 NW 3rd Street Mixed Use: Residential & Retail; Demolish existing Municipal Parking Garage No. 1 Downtown CBD 308 0 0 15,854 29,300 236,700 22,760 0 17,)08) 1,253 357 33 infotman n not given DTOWN 22-Jun-04 6 ?. Marina Blue (The Mist) MUSP 888 Biscayne Boulevard -Retail Mixed Ilse: Residential & Downtown 23 SD-6 2 516 0 10,700 803 615 57 $347,247,529 SEOPW 23.Oct-03 03,1109 B 8, Metropolitan Miami: Parcels 8, C, D (Met One) MUSP 300 SE 3rd Street (B) 200 SE 3rd Street (C) 200 S.E. 2nd Street (1.9) Mixed Use: residential, retail & entertainment (4 buildings) Downtown 36 CBD 2 1,500 0 500,000 3.716 550 53 DTOWN 24-Jun-04 04-0576 C 9. Miacentralis Tower I+11 Class II 2002-280 50 SE 2nd Street Mixed Use: residential & retail Downtown CBD © 404 Il 0 60,000 24,31)0 471 Information not ven DTOWN 3-Dec-02 C 10. Office Building [1] 27 NE 9th Street Office Building Downtown ®®© 0 0 300 1.72 information not ; ven SEOPW 16-➢ee-03 E I I. One Miami (Parcel A) 205 South Biscayne Blvd. Mixed Use: office, residential, commercial Downtown e CBD 896 0 1,200 480 45 $274,474,625 DTOWN 25-Ju1-02 02-0858 B I . RiverFront East (Miami River Village) SW Corner of SW 3rd Street & South Miami Avenue Mixed Use: Residential, Retail & Office (3 Bnildings) Downtown e SD-6 1,424 t) 52,809 203,000 41,994 1,671 602 54 8.40 4nformalian not given DTOWN 27-Jut-04 03-1235 E UDRB (9-1-04) I3. River Front West (Miami River Village) ' SE Corner of SW 3111 Street and Metrorail right-uf-way Mixed Use: Residential, Retail & Office (4 Buildings) Downtown 0/SD-6 1,436 0 38,728 1,867 630 55 8.40 Information not given DTOWN 27401-04 E CC (9-7-04) Zoning Change 14, Ten Museum Park (Core) [1] Class]] 2003.204 1040 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: residential, commercial & office Downtown CBD, SO- 6 200 0 12,840 10,850 399 525 48 4.72 Infoanauon not given SEOPW 26 Aug-03 D 15. The Loft (Related) [1] Class B 2003-019 230 NE 3rd Street Residential & Retail Downtown COD 196 0 0 2,150 0 274 23 Information not • lucre DTOWN 26-Mar-03 C 16. The Loft 2 (Related Lofts 11) 133 NE 2 Avenue Mixed Use: Residential & Retail with Metremover Station (First Street) funning through buildin: Downtown CBD 496 0 0 4,675 0 433 ' ' e $137,026,949 DTOWN l-Sep-04 D PAB (9-I-04) CC (9.7.04) 17. Lyric Village & Lyric oaks " Residential Overtown 23 R 3, SD- 96 0 0 0 66 $ 5,200,000 SEOPW 1948 C 18. Oveftown Transit VillageMixed g [1] (Miami-DadeCounty){Overiown! MUSP IOv NW nth net Arena Metrorail Station M xed Ose:Off Office/Retail Oveatowa 0 0 110 341.00i1 4,001 :0 588 17 Information not given SEOPW 2001 B (I ] Information regarding traffic not a aiIable al Miami Planning and Zoning Department or not required based on category of development.. N:ITRANPLAN,Proil 0 4173421100 gircmne1TaMes Rev 19-27.97tCopy of Madmen! G Table CaardnedProjectr(Seprember 2000. h (Listing} Page 1 • • Cell: Z9 Comment; Columbus Residential Tower: 6.22-04: Substantial Modification submitted to replace appraved office development wllh residential units 2-26-04: Columbus office Tower approved (Res. 04-0111) that contained 661,393 sq ft Office; 29,508 sq ft Retail and 1,260 parking spaces lenCell:Z14 ment: Marina Blue: 30-Mar-04 Revision to to reduce Office square footage tram 22,500 sf to 10,700 sf and increase parking from 800 to 803 spaces, Cell: Z15 Comment: Metropolitan Miami: (1) Current proposal consists of : Tract B - (East) Met 1 (447 units 440-foot140 stories) & (West) Met Square (90,590 recall, 60,000) with total 01641 parking spaces Tract C - Met 2 (653 units, 30,000 retail, 975 parking spaces in 550.1ooll53 story tower) Tract D - Mel (400 units, 500,000 office, 56,200 retail, 2,100 parking spaces in 540-foot/49 story (west) and 39 story (east). (2) (Res. 02.1249) 11.19-02 The Metropolitan. Parcels B, C, 0 consist of 1,500 units, 300 hotel rooms, 9,000 sq. ft office, and 230,000 sq. 15 retail (3) (Res. 02.0858) Bifurcation with Parcel A (one Miami) which now consisted el 900 units, 28,000 sq. ft office, and 17,000 sq. ft. retail (4) (Res. 98-1151) Original Approval consisted of 1,500 units, 300 hotel rooms, 1,200,000 sq. tL office, and 400,000 sq. ft retail Celt: Z18 Comment: one Miami: (1) (Res. 02-0858) Bifurcation from Parcels 51,0, and D creating One Miami (Parcel A) which now consisted of 900 units, 28,000 sq. ft. office, and 17,000 sq, ti raid (2) (Res. 98-1151) original Approval consisted of 1,500 units, 300 halal rooms, 1,200,000 sq. ft. office, and 400,000 sq. ft. retail Cell: Z19 Comment River Front East (Miami River Village): 5-5.04: Submitted Modification for review to split Miami River Village into project now known as River Front East and West, which would be two separate entities. diver krno L irai, c€41pi2ng 01 1,403 resldranllal units, f12,i1/07 ;,q II of etfire, 41,994 sq of retail and 1,648 parking spaces in throe buildings ranging in height from 448 -- 552 feet; and River Front West, consisting 011,416 residential units, 203,090 sq ft o1 office, 38,728 sq of retail and 1,807 parking 4p4(,e4 In leer belictings ranging in Insight Irani 33'1 580 Ivet. Total usage on site is seven buildings consisting of 2,819 rer ntiai units, 255,800 sq 11 of office, 80,722 sq o1 retail and 3,515 parking spaces. 12-18-03: (Res. 03-1235) Original Approval for $235 million Miami River Viilage which consisted of 1,304 residential units, 92,043 sq ft of aloe, 32,532 sq, ft el rolnit, Trutt 1,002 perking specea in thru0 buildings. Cell: 220 •mment; River Front West (Miami River Village): 5-5-04: Submitted Modification for review to split Miami River Village into project now known as River Front East and West, which would be two separate cable 4, B1V ar f`n0n1 gust, cor oisIIN of 1,403 rusldentlal units, 52,000 sq It ol Oleo, 41,994 sq of retail and 1,848 parking spaces in three buildings ranging In height from 448 - 552 feet; and River Front West, consisting of 1,416 residential units, 203,000 sq ft of office, 38,728 sq of retail and 1,567 parking npaccan in four buildings ranging In height from 337 -• 580 lent, Tutel usage on site is seven buildings consisting of 2,819 refefnal units, 255,800 sq ft of office, 80,722 sq of retail and 3,515 parking spaces. 12-18-03: (Res. 03-1235) Original Approval for $235 million Miami River Village which consisted of 1,304 residential units, 92,043 sq 1t of office, 32,532 so, ft of Intuit, rind 1,9}02 park1ttg spaces In three buildings. Cell; Z22 Comment: The Loft No on -site parking will be provided. Parking will be provided through valet parking in adjacent municipal parking garages (Article 4, Section 401, CB0, 011struet Pai king) Cell: Z23 Comment: The Loft II: No on -site parking will be provided. Fifty Percent of Parking (500 spaces) will be provided through valet parking in adjacent municipal parking garages {Article 4, Suction 491, GM, 011streel Parking) • VATRANPMN'Pro' 060'f73421100Biscrrvn6Tablel Rrvl0-27-04Copv ofAuueh,ntnt G 7aNe Corrriued Prnftoi(Seme„ter2G04}.Aafs ifisriegj Pap • • goo a Exhibit 9 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis PROPOSED USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code , PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips High -Rise Condominuim 516 DU 230 62% 155 38% 76 231 Office 70,000 SQ. FT 710 44% 27 56% 130 157 Quality Restaurant 11,000 SQ. FT. 931 44% 55 56% 27 82 Specialty Retail 9,000 SQ. FT. 814 - 16% 11 84% 14 25 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 1 50% 248 50% 247 1 495 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16% of Gross External Trips (1) 50% 40 50% 40 79 Transit Trip Reduction @ 22.60% of Gross External Trips (2) 50% 56 50% 56 112 Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 50% 25 50% 25 50 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 50% 127 50% 127 254 1 1 1 1 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 50% 178 50% 178 356 Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 50% 78 50% 78 157 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 50% 257 50% 256 513 1 1 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1 50% 1 35 1 50% 35 I 69 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami-DRI Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • 1 thTerraee f -- : #17 -- Lyric Village fix Lyric Oaks - 950 NW 2nd Ave Miami, FL 33136 VUd-9th St \-NW-6th, St- t3rd :SC:m:__ L.ummus Park ._.i,65 Exrt • lOfzi j,;ff rl ;I i5 NE 13tfi 5t Itiil-lath-, 5t€"+ mz1 # 14- 10 Museum Park 1040 Biscayne Blvd Miami, FL 33132 fitT [ #7--Marina Blue . „ 888 Biscayne Blvd —' Miami, FL 33132 - 041'flt l r 9€h Si N IT : I Il #10--OFficeBuilding NE 27NE9thSt 18 -- Overtown Transit Village EL 33132 100NW6thSt Miami, FL 33136 #6--Joint Dsvelrprnen 40 NW 3rd St Miami, FL 33128 II 11W1�2n' Stll t E._2n St : Ntiarrli Ji trsiE:7th1St t i , Araenn a , I Freedom\ Arro Tower \ #15 - The Loft 230 NE 3rd 5t Miami, FL 33132 # 16 Tha Loft 2 133 NE 2nd Ave Mliami, FL 33132 *5—Everglades on 244 Biscayne Blvd Miami, FL 33132 Wi"Fla :Et. 1� €•85 'Exit4 ! 1 united States, _ ; #12--River Front East 105W3rd St Miami, FL 33130 j 9-5—Exit e SW 3rd #3 — 900 Biscayne 900 Biscayne Blvd Miami, FL 33132 1100 Biscayne Blvd Proje Greyhound -Miami- American Airlines Arena ' S \ #1-330 Biscayne Hlvd l t, 330 Biscayne Blvd Miami, FL 33132 San,Villa Restaurant. -- erglades Hate fkmerita-- Historic I 6a1e1 8esu Chur> 1 ?.i-tanoj nd Rave Cafet ri,� County Restaurant 3: Dad - Probate Court I ®'- w:: E...F� r St 18ig Mayarmi 11BE 1Wst St #E-dMet One i Giacomo 308 SE 3rd St Miami, 9,35131 SE ! holiday '.. Inn•Doaunt. Convention.Ctr #9--Micentrais Tower 50 5E 2nd St Miami, FL 33131 #13 - River Front West X 10SW 3rd St tiled, FL 33130 #enry's C;aleieiia- Jerem1sinternatianai Cafes; �.aE eatoaml� . l�� Stirti #2-50 Biscayne (Columbus) X 7.7 50 Biscayne Blvd Miami, FL 33132 r�' I 1 #4--(Dupont Towers) 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way Miami, FL 33131 Dupont P1228 Hotel Bay ,trayr?e 9, 11--One Miami 205 5 Biscayne Blvd Miami, FL 33131 • N NTS 2nd Avenue . — 35 1 -4-- 66 6 N 1-� 3rd Avenue 1TE 21.83 11.97 22.65 6.59 25.42 1.22 03 Elagler Street SE 1st Street SE 2nd Street Chopin Plaza SE 3rd Street SE 4th Street �'�j f Phase 2 TAZ 557 PM PEAK HOUR CONDITION IN OUT TOTAL Phase 185 133 319 Phase 2 98 60 157 Total 283 193 476 9.59 0.7 4511 DUPONT PLAZA Figure 3 PM Peak Hour Site Traffic DUPONT PLAZA • Al tarlal 1CnOttnr Nem= FLAOLER CORRIDOR EASTBOUND SE 1 Stramt TABLE 6 FUTURE YEAR (2007) PEAK SEASON CORRIDOR ANALYSIS with GROWTH, COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT AND SITE TRAFFIC (NOIas) Adomete plowable L.20 ) 7390 skit€ L1x17 COltll TYPE. 11) LS .., ROADWAY VEHICULAR CAPACITY' (2) 1.990 ROADWAY MOOS I10ADWAY ROADWAY PER TRIP _ _�_ PLR. TRIP ROADWAY CAPACITY ROADWAY VO1TME PER 1RIP ROADWAY LP 49'V.VEIIJCULAII siIPV- L°-x.111.5 PE1KiON . 14 PFi* TRIP T€iIP.. .. _.. (3) (4) )51 __. - (5) (7 ' 1114 1.201 16041.600 0.53 L05 Melr0Bus Flagler Melt Metro Bus R1e 11_(E8) _ =_ .....___. ...._Total — 1 MASS TRANSIT MOOS LCCAL BUS PER TRIP CAPACITY V LOAD - DESIGN t6) EXPRESS HAIL 1RAN 1DT AL PER, TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT, CAPACITYCAPACITY CAPACITY U LOAD . U COAO > (E LOAD DESIGN OCSIGN DESIGN (9j 00) 119 610 TOTAL TRANSIT PERSON TRIP VOLUME (12) TRANSIT PERSON TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY ((3) WT AVG AVG I1EADWAY SEATS RIDERSHIP DESIGN _ PER PER PAX LOAD PAX PERCENT DIRECTION VEIL PER HOUR FACTOR CAPACITY i5IDERS11IP 20 380 58 t5000% 171 _..__..8-..-...._ —. 39.0 144 150.00% 439 5 71 38.7 200 150.0011. 610 28% 72% 100"_ 01111113014 TOTALS CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP CAPACITY (14) 3.7r64 CORR100R CORRIDOR _PERSON CORRIDOR PERSON_ _-THLP PERSON._ TRIP _EXCESS _ TRIP ,_ I.UM VOE� CAPACITY WC- _. 115) {€6) 1171 1 884 _ AUTO PERSON THteS » !_6A7 318.9% 1 R.40511 PER 50NIMP S a m...- 200 379% TOTAL PERSON TRIPS = 1.584 356 6:1. 5 FLAULER CORRIDOR WESTBOUND Flaylar Surat Ado(lled �LS AtlowahW (23901440 1,990 . 3:184� 270 7 2.596 0.17 Matra Bus Rla1I (W0) FLAOLER CORR9OOR-TWO WAY TOTAL BISCAYNE CORRIDOR NORTHBOUND Blacaytaa 1Toulesard (118) BISCAYNE CO(1T11O0R SOLIT€1BOUND Brlckell Asanua (sal Adopted Allowable_ 3.960 6,368 1,473 2,062 LS /V1001130 Aauwahle _ 1,990 3.184 1,022 1.990 _ 3484� 4.306 0.32 C 1,431 ` 1,753045 Maticaue Flaslar Mao --a- Mistrals. Rauta 3 ---a MetroBu a Route 16 =? TWAT _ (,765 1,419 5 Mahatlua Raptor May MetruBua Roma 1— MauoUua Rouse 1e -- Total — BISCAYNE CORR100R - TWO.WAY TOTAL 0 3.980 6,36(1 2,283 3.196 3,172 050 I. OS TABLE'- FOOT Baas Onu•Way Fat:. V/C Iinw COS Tllool of r•' 20%. AII)u i Tleushrl0 C 650 750 0 39 D 1560 jog 0 95 E 1660 1990 1,00 Ea20 1990 2390 120 -•• Puri. Olrec110ndl FOOT Class 11/ COD Condition 456 0 WT AVG HEADWAY SEATS PER PER Di IECT(ON VE11 75 35 0 0 456 AVG 150 306 RIDERSHIP DESIGN PAX LOAD PER MOOR FACTOR 550 15000% PAX PERCENT CAPACITY RIDENSs5P 456 100% 1,086 0 0 1,066 350 716 522 522 144 WT AVG AVG_ HEADWAY SEATS RIDERSHIP DESIGN PER PER PAX LOAD_ DIRECTION VEF1 ,PER HOUR FACTOR 20 39.9 46 15000% 20 38.0 51 15000% _....-20 _...� 380 47 T5000% 6 67 _38 6 144.0 378 PAX CAPACITY 180 t71 171 150130 522 PERCENT R10ERSIl1P 32% 35% 33% 100% 581 (HEADWAY PER DiRECT(0N .581 VAT AVG AVG___ SEATS RIDERSHIP DESIGN PER PAX LOAD _ VErt PER HOUR FACTOR CAPACITY R1432% 150 00% 239 15000% 171 36% 150.00% 171 32% 00`S� --�152 429 39 9 38 0 38 0 38 6 49 54 152.0 150 00% PAX 581 PERCEN 1.103 0 0 1,103 296 807 3,640 528 3,112 5 FACTORS:' _ _—......-- 2003-2007 Mn�GI 442'Xlyl 1c:r1mTJ) - 1..0624'" Nule. Seasenal(y All(451e4 Rase frtrn Table 4 PROJECT VOLUMEASSRl8 5 P€ 0MED TranSe cadidoi Lrl0 801J P101)111126:1 )P 22.6% 60 29 20.. 22 6% ._. 59 - 7 Tinier Counts' Inbound (ER SE Outbound IWB Flaule*L. 11iscayne lounond I5R)— [)oOxwRd irlt1) 18 TRAMSIT PERSON TRIPS e TOTAL PERSON TRIPS =' 1.575 272 0% AUTO PERSON TRIPS a 378 1n0NSIT PERSON MPS - 150 TOTAL PERSON TRIPS = 528 71.6% 28.4% 100 0% 7.434 2.412 50222 032 C 3,706 � 1,575 2,131 0 43 AUTO PERSON TRIPS = 1,431 271.0% 144 1.015 b .765 1_917 1,548 51 AUTO PERSON TRIPS = 1,765 THAte51T PERSON TRIPS = 152 TOTAL PERSON TRIPS = 1,917 334.3:x 1.0% 335 3% 7,471 3,492 3.979 047 0 Volume is from Ina year 2002 FOOT LOS ladles ANowabie LOS E. on 815cayne and E• 20% on Fla0181 and SE 1 St per Miami .Molded LOS LOS A d 0 not possible undat assumpeons - 011su1 yin c1tu115 use 1-DOT LOS 1aUta ralws LOOK) yUketle adiosic0 to peak season PM bus rldersnip per se0me0l kom Table 21.A5 Downtown 011€ Upda18 Noe' Floater Mao has mulled slops but heated as (OCalservice and Melrorail serve other 1111er5, MUIroMuver nearby. Nota. 0auclional project Vaillsls ewe deeded u1(ual1y :11nund tJus rerrtu5 Selein01101000 . 1 ran.{... A..elyx.r Y,.�IJa.+..art.. lne • • NE3ST NE6ST 9(33 4.2.1)/34 F-24/29 NE2ST SE2ST 17/5 E- 44/63 -19/84 �I 53/30 56/30 60/85 20/65 FIGURE 8 AM & PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY Mist ' MUSP Traffic Impact Study MIST Meuviy ,a__ (31(a_. 0415T) — SS.a 6i v - (44,Qu4 • C2„t›,c0 • The gross vehicular trip generation for each land use was deteiiiiined using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates or formulas. • Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 16% based upon the use of the ITE trip rates (City of Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh). • Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 22.6% to reflect transit usage based on projected modal splits from Increment II of the Downtown DRI. • Gross vehicular trips were also reduced by 10% for pedestrian/bicycle based on estimates from Increment II of the Downtown DRI. • The net external vehicle trips were converted to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. • The vehicular trips assigned to transit were converted back to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. • The net external person -trips were obtained by adding together the project net external person -trips for the vehicle and transit modes. A trip generation summary for the project is provided in Exhibit 9. ) 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment ) ) ) Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for ) TAZ 517, shown in Exhibit 10. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of 5 trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. 5 For estimating the trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired 5 direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 11 shows the project 7 vehicular trip assignment to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. Exhibit 11 shows 5 the total PM peak hour traffic volumes (with project) at the intersections under study. Page 16 5 • NW 9 S T (35X) NW 8 ST .T.S. 30X 70% co Q PROJECT SITE NW 7 ST KaJECT, .E 35X I5X MIST TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ITLEe co LEGEND tr ) IN = (XXX) OUT = XX% ONE WA PROJECT VEHICULAR TRIP ASSIGNMENT EXHIBIT No 11 Page 19 I I I I I I I N4 --- (18O ) YTS -rt— (398 M poi r (ie- i) a 0b 3Y6� r -4--- (180 ) 55 (403) Ar--180 d al It) el co --- (195 ) TRACT D In = 316 Out = (589) Total = 885 (198) u1 •c— (16) -4-- 131415) 57 ti N Chopin Plaza SE 2nd Street SE 3rd Street 447 --0- HYATT SE 2nd Avenue (124) 419 —►- 125--I( TRACT C In = 125 Out = (94) Total = 219 (87) 217 --' (181) 202 --- -- SE 3rd Avenue ,101 vr. (329)--4- ( (515)--1 25a TRACT B In = 252 Out = (189) Total = 441 SE 4th Street PM Peak Hour In = 693 Out = (852) Total = 1545 70 -- TAZ 555 Quo 19.94 10.77 23.45 / 4.53 47, t 4.0"' Metropolitan PM Peak Hour Figure 3 3 ' 4 Site Traffic 3 TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS 3 4 n TABLO FUTURE YEAR (2007) PEAK SEASON CORRIDOR ANALYSIS with GROWTH, COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT AND SITE TRAFFIC „Arler1817:Corridor Nante FLAGLER CORRIDOR S.TBOUNO i Street FLAGLER CORRIDOR IT-13Q.UNCI pier Street Adopted Allowetlld C+20 12300 voh) Adopted Allowable. F.20 t2390 vpn) 2007 CORR ft) t S L S ROADWAY VEHICULAR I tOADWAY PER. TRIP CAPACITY er'Pv CAPACIIV". 1.6 _ 1?) (3) 1,090 1,090 _ 3.104 ROADWAY MODE _ . ROADWAY PER. TRIP ROADWAY ROADWAY, _ VOLUME PER. TRIP ROADWAY VEHICULAR ePPV= .._ EXCESS _ PERSON . VOLUME 7'• _ -PFR TRLP TRIP 14) 15/ 1,25? MetroBus Eintor Max -a Metro BUS Rle 11 (Eill 2.006 Tctall 0.12 Metro Dux Rte 11 [W13) ACLER CORRIDOR - T1NO.WAY TOTAL 3,980 • . . • . • BISCAYNE CORRIDOR 111.11.1P-09.__RO icayne Boulevard IND IIISCAVHE cc:autumn ILI !III/QS:RA? chell Avenue (SO) Adopted LS , Allowable h 2i31..kt Muwabte 3CAYNE CORRIDOR -- TwO.WAY TOTAL 1 ti 1,990 1.090 6,306 1,522 2,131 4,237 0.33 1,431 75-13 1•753 MASS TRANSIT MODE LOCAL HUS EXPRESS RAIL T RAN _ TOTAL TOTAL _TRANSIT pER. TR:P PE.R. TRIP PER. TRIP .7tRANSIT TRANSIT- PERSON cAPAzi-n.r. CAPACITY :CAPACTTy CAPACITY pER9011 TRIP LOAD ._. 4!?L.C.A0=_ d 16Ao 4 LoXiin. TRIP --0i(car-a.- DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN_ DESIGN:. _ y9dimE, --CAP:eb-rii ___PL___,......__In___ (IA_ 4.,1_2_} ill), _ 610 0 0 610 2 _ WTAVG AVG HEADWAY SEATS RIDERSHIP DESIGN PER PER PAX LOAD P.:40.( PERCENT. DIRECTION VE11 PER HOUR FACTOR-1 CAPACITY RIDERSHIP 20 36 0 79 150.00% 171 33% a 39 0 164 150 00% 439 87% 5.71 3fi.7 150.00% 610 100% 456 0 az7 0 456 1112 274 WT AVG AVG HEADWAY SEATS RIDERSHIP DESIGN PEN PER PAX LOAD FAX PERCENT . . _- DIRECTION VON PER HOUR FACTOR CAPACITY RICIERsHIP 15a 00% 1 456 I 100% i 066 MetroDua Elagler Max -a. MetroBus Route 3 -a Motu:Ova Route 1E. -a Total -a 1.74P5 1,419 0 55 11 MoiroBus Hauler Mali-1-> Merano* Route 71 MotroBus Boole 16 Total -> 3,960 6,368 2,263 3.191: 3,172 0 56 t.o5 TAnLE-• 000 C 000 c op° c oat C 000 - C 0 39 C__ OE40 D 0.95 E 1 00 1 EDO I Base Cele,Way F Ix WC Rano LOS Thresnotd- 2O%. Adiusl llwtlstlull C 650 760 0 39 D 1580 19011 0.95 E 1660 109a 1.00 E•20 1990 2390 1.2(1 Peak Dicactional FOOT Ciao IV CREI Condition 522 HEADWAY F'ER DIRECTION 20 20 2D 6 el 581 0 1,060 425 641 0 522 288 234 HEADWAY PER DIRECTION 15 20 20 6 00 1,103 WTAVG AVG SEATS RIDERSHIP DESIGN PER PAX LOAD PAX PERCENT vEll PER HOUR FACTOR CAPACITY RIDERSHIP 39.9 94 150.00% 180 33% 38,0 99150.00% 171 34% 38 0 75 150.00% 171 33.% 3116_ 860 150.00%., 572___. _100:%_, r-..) '0 - N.1. ----'-'-- ....„,j,t_. , :_501 263 ... . AVG RIDERSHIP DESIGN PAX LOAD PAX_ PER HOUR FACTOR cailkifi 0 VrT AVG SEATS PER VEli 3111 39.9 30.0 3110 33 8 a 66 150.00% 239 91 150,00% 171 150.00% 171 . 150.00% .. 561. ._ -3-5t1t 0 1,103 PERCENT RIDERSHIP 33% 35% 33% 100% . 1 551 552 .2093-2007 Ana Gr 11 961yr (comp) _ 1,0406 _ Now: Seasonaly Adjusted Ba4e roinTable..4 PROJECTVOLUME ASSIGNED_ Transit t Direction Pro AUI,0 Trips FlaglerCorridur__ _ Inbound (ED SE 1 pi) Cortiaor inboond (S13) 169 Ourbound 199 VI et Person Tti 153 79 i -Mr 167 ctiiiibbii 564666 ii i'ERSON Pf.RSON TRIP TRIP .-.C.ARACiTy VOLUME 4 1-- 15 • CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR PERSON_ 61:011fitlii TRIP PERSON EXCESS TRIP___ CAPACITY ViC 16 17J Los AUTO PERSON TRIPS TRApERSDN 'EATS TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 0.13 p__ 12.2% 100.6% AUTO PERSON TRIPS 1RANSIT PERSON TRiPS TOTAL. PERSON TRIPS e 67.5% 7,434 2,556 AUTO PERSON TRIPS = MAN= PERSON TRiPS TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 1 719 4,076 0.34 33.2% 6.8% AUTO PERSON TRIPS a ...__TRARSITpER3ON TRIPS TOTAL PERSON TRIPS = 100.0% 1.785 87.05 263 028 7,471 3.747 3..724 0 50 Volume is from !ha year 2002 FOOT LOS tables Allowable LOS E on Biscayne and E .20% on Flagfer and SE 1 SI per Miami Adopted L01 LOS A d. 0 not possible under assumptions - other vlc cutoffs use rooT LOS table ratios Existing volume adjusted to peak season PM bus ridership par segment born Table 21.A5 Dowrgown DRI Update Note: 511113101 Max has limited stops bul treated as focal service and Mel/visa serve other riders - MistroMovor nearby, Note: Directional project transil taps divided equally Belong bus routes serving corridor. Mot 1 taps from Figure 3. Committed trips from-Committaa Taps VYontshaer in appendix Transport Analyars Pralosslonals, .114 470r • • 12-Nov-2002 LAND USE TABLE 2 MIACENTRALIS DAILY AND AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS TOWER I AND TOWER II UNITS ITE LAND USE CODE HIGH-RISE CONDO RETAIL -FIRST FLOOR RETAIL -UPPER FLOOR 404 UNITS 14,703 SO.FT. 7,368 SQ.FT. 232 814 814 DAILY TRIPS ITE 6TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION RATE OR FORMULA T = 3.771 Ln(X)+223.657 T=40.67(X) T = 40.67 (X) GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS INTERNAL TRIPS BTW 1ST FLOOR RETAIL & CONDO [1) INTERNAL TRIPS BTW UPPER FL. RETAIL & CONDO [1] PASS -BY REDUCTION FROM 1ST FLOOR RETAIL EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS TRANSIT REDUCTION IN CBD [21 LESS TRIPS FROM EXISTING PARKING LOT 10.0% 30.0% 25.0% 23.3% GROSS EHICLE TRIPS 1,747 598 300 2,645 120 180 135 2,210 515 100 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS ITE 6TH EDITION AM ITE 6TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION N OUT PEAK TRIP GENERATION RATE OR FORMULA % TRIPS % TRIPS TRIPS RATE OR FORMULA T = 0.288 (X)+28.861 T=6.41 (X) T=6.41 (X) I 19% 48% 48% 34% 26% 25% 48% 34% 34% 80% 28 46 23 97 81% 52% 52% 117 49 24 66% 190 145 95 47 287 14 19 21 28 11 21 75, 66% 144 219 5 74% 7 75% 10 52% 17 16 66% 20% 34 4 51 20 T = 0.342 (X)+15.466 T = 2.59 (X) T = 2.59 (X) PM OUT PEAK 62% 43% 43% 56% 25% 18% 44% TRIPS 95 16 8 119 38% 57% 57% 44% 2 75% 2 82% 4 56% NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS NET EXTERNAL VEHICLES ASSIGNED TO I-95 [31 34.0% NET EXTERNAL VEHICLES ON DOWNTOWN ROADS EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS [41 66.0% 1.4 PERSONS/VEHICLE LESS PERSON TRIPS FROM FROM EXISTING PARKING LOT 1,595 542 1,053 3,094 140 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS INCLUDING TRANSIT 2,954 28% 42 14 28 105 22 83 72% 106 36 70 202 6 196 148 50 98 307 26 279 NOTES: IN THE FORMULAS. (X) MAY BE THE AREA PER 1.000 SQUARE FEET OR CONDO UNITS. [1] TRIP INTERNALIZATION 15 BASED ON A PERCENT OF RETAIL BUT IS APPLIED TO BOTH RETAIL AND CONDO TRIPS. [2] TRANSIT TRIP REDUCTION 1S BASED ON THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI DES[ INCREMENT II STUDY. [3] PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT 1S BASED ON 1999 MUATS FSUTMS MODEL. [41 AVERAGE VEHICLE OCCUPANCY IN CBD IS 1.4 PERSONS PER VEHICLE. NO ADJUSTMENT WAS MADE TO ITE RATES TO ACCOUNT FOR ACTUAL VEHICLE OCCUPANCY. n:llranpla rilprojeclst20021170721Trallicltg-2.wk4 TRIPS TRIPS 59 22 11 92 6 9 5 61% 111 39% 61% 20% 68% 26 4 39% 80% 72 17 16 8 11 9 183 81 28 53 32% 39 13 26 41 79 • 11-Nov-2002 TABLE 3 MIACENTRALIS TOWER 1 & II . MUSP EXISTING VEHICLE ROADWAY CONDITIONS ROADWAY FROM r TO SE 1 AVENUE SE 2 STREET DIR SE 4 AVENUE S. MIAMI AVENUE SE 2 STREET SE 4 AVENUE SE 2 STREET S. MIAMI AVENUE SE 1 AVENUE SE 4 STREET S. MIAMI AVENUE SE 1 AVENUE NB SB WB EB FACILITY TYPE EXISTING LAN ES 3L 3L 2L 2L COUNT STATION N/A NIA NIA N/A COUNT SOURCE AND PERIOD K&S-AM K&S-PM K&S-PM K&S-AM COUNT DATE 10/291102 10/29/02 10/29/02 10/29/02 VEHICULAR ROADWAY COND PERIOD TIME 8:00-10:00 4:30-6:30 5:00-7:00 8:00-10:00 RAW PEAK HOUR PERIOD VOLUME 1,192 711 [3] 1,034 1,073 PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 TIONS AXLE FACTOR 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 [2] PEAK PEAK HOUR MIAMI PEAK HOUR DIR MAX ADOP- HOUR PERIOD SERVICE TED DIR VOLUME VOL LOS LOS 1,204 718 1,044 1,084 2,990 2,990 1,990 1,990 E-OneWay E-OneWay E-OneWay E-OneWay NOTES.; K&S - KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. [11 PEAK PERIOD COUNT DATA OBTAINED FROM COUNTS COLLECTED BY THE APPLICANT. [21 PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL MAXIMUM SERVICE VOLUMES ARE OBTAINED FROM FDOTS 2000 QUALITY/ LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK OR FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNME OF JURISDICTION'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. [31 DERIVED BY ADDING THE PEAK PERIOD FROM THE MACHINE COUNT AND RAMP VOLUME FROM INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT TO OBTAIN THE HIGHEST VOLUME ON THE ROADWAY SEGMENT. n:ltraplanlprpjects120021170721Trafflclme In-3,wk4 ;OURCE: KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. • E— Ado SW2SL SW3St. a) LEGEND )p( = AM Peak Hour [XXj = PM Peak Hour »»»�« — Metranover nao-e=Metraraii —.- = One Way Street Direction = Metrorail4Metmr rnover Stations SW 1 St. ftl N P j °9 77] 44`.* 770 (293 4 a) SE4 St. SE 5 St. m W Miami River a 001 1091 37 [01 J-3' SE 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. Way. �(7) 0 [t21j 4-0 to 'itr. . tb-as. oam 8) 1t' Not to Scale Z 119 €1691 4 ---332 [620] j`0 €01 N:ltdnplanlprojects12 W 21176720-411K5 M IACENTRALIS MUSP Year 2004 Total Intersection Turning Movements %M"MMIL EKEF#T� and SC BARS, P.A. : I ►1 ��: ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 411111.0 FIGURE 6 11/4/02 • • 12-Nov-02 TABLE 8 MIACENTRALIS MUSP TRAFFIC STUDY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR PKS 2002 [21 [3] TOTAL MIACENTRAUS [1] VOLUMES YR 2004 COMMITTED YR 2004 PROJECT TRIPS TOTAL [1] 2002 PSCF= BKGD DEVELOP- BKGD TRIPS YR 2004 2002 INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES 1.01 VOLUME MENT VOLUME % I/O 148 VOLUME VOLUMES 0 699 1 SE 1ST AVENUE NB L 442 446 464 106 570 23% 1 10 580 488 ---� 493 573 286 799 59% I ...___ 48847 ._.r T 766 774 805 183 988 _-- - --- 0 988 428 432 _449 250 699 _ ___� 0 - 9 AND —_0 0 � 61 _0 . m 0 0 SE 2ND STREET R 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 10/29/02 WB L ..._....,._ 332 558 %.�._- 0 20 T _ 172 174 181 149330 5°/n 1 .,...., 2 •...•- 119. 114J 115 120 23248 813S8 9% ( 7 820 R 61 62 65 54' 119 0 O 0 00 0 0 2 S. MIAMI AVENUE Se L 0 0— AND T 247 249 259 255 514 6% I 3 517, r 2894 _� 292 304 364 668 3°/n I 2 670 117 SE 2ND STREET R 50 51 53 52 'i05 0 105 _50 51 -__5364 _ M -117 WB L 104 105 109 45 154 30% 0 32 186 259 262 273 59 - 332 13% 0 5 337 10/29/02 T 359 363 378 203 581 42% 0 45 62Q. 977 987 1,0277 280 1,3077 18% 0 7 1,314 4 R4n o 0 4 a � 0 3 S. MIAMI AVENUE NB L ----- 0 D 0 _--_--- 0 0 0 ----- 0 MIACENTRAUS PROJECT TRIPS TOTAL AND SE 3ND STREET/RAMP 10/29/02 SB L EB L 4 SE 4TH STREET NB AND SE 1ST AVE/HOTELlRAMP 10/29/02 SB L EB L WB L R 0 0 O 0 0 _.. 0 0i 286 289 301 260 5613016 0 32 593 479 52 53 55 47 102 0 102 10 O 0 0 7% 666 673 740 70 770 0 770 O 0 - __. 0 - O 0 _ 0 8 8 8 8 0 107 108 112 11 123 9% i 4 1274 0 O 0 809 617 850 144 303 306 318 6 6 54 26 26 27 D 0 6 0 0 994 17% I 372 6 27 Notes: [1] AM and PM Peak Hour volumes obtained from actual counts performed on November 29, 2002. rate to year [3] Committed 5 devellopm devackground elopments obtained from Downtowe derived by nM Miami Increment II DM report. volumes. 1,001 0 372 0 6 27 PKS 2002 VOLUMES PSCE 1.01 (2] YR 2004 BKGO VOLUME n 0 484 10 0 0 504 10 0, 0 0 [3] COMMITTED DEVELOP- MENT 420 253 256 266 27 8 8 8 12 12 12 0 0 756 764 795 266 1,061 a 3716 1 _ .43n 1.091 78 79 _- 82 27 - -- 109 _ 0 109 7 7 7 0 7 7 --- -- 0 0 n W 0 0 0 0 TOTAL YR 2004 BKGD VOLUME TRIPS YR 2004 % 110 120 VOLUME 0 0 0 924 6% 0 ▪ 2 926 18 0 18 0 8% I 6 6 0 _ 0 ---- - 0 293 0 293 0 — - 0 _- 0 8 0 8 13 22 % I • 18 31 n------- - -- _!_2 _ — --- --- 0 0 0 u © 0 121 0 121 115 �__ 116 121 it. TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, INC. ON Him/ 265.5,(16eane_ 8701 S,W. 1371h AVENUE • SUITE 210 • MIAMI, FL 33183-4498 • TEL 305/385-0777 • FAX 305/385-9997 FAX & MAIL July 2, 2002 Mr. Clark P. Turner Chief, Community Planning City of Miami Planning Building & Zoning Department 444 SW 2nd Avenue Third Floor Miami, Florida 33130 RE: One Miami — Traffic Report Major Use Special Permit 0 Dear Mr. Turner: • Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc., (TAP) has been requested to prepare a traffic report regarding the proposed One Miami development near the Dupont Plaza area in downtown Miami. The proposed development will be located on three city blocks known as tracts B, C and D (Per Attached Figure). The purpose of this traffic report is to depict traffic conditions between a proposed new development. and a development that was never built, but was approved by the city in a MUSP application. The approved MUSP traffic report (attached) was performed by David Plummer and Associates --Master Traffic Study for Major Conditional Use Permit (The Plummer Report) and submitted to the city in September 1998 and subsequently upgraded with new data in July 2000. Background The approved aforementioned MUSP is for a development that included tracts A, B, C and D, adjacent to the Dupont Plaza Hotel in downtown Miami. (The proposed new development does not include tract A.) The approved MUSP included the following land uses and their respective size. Hotel — 300 Rooms Retail — 400,000 sf Condos — 300 Units Apartments — 1,200 Units Office — 1,200,000 sf Nanning • Design and Engineering Accident ReconstructIon • Stcte of Florida EB 3766 Mr. Clark P. Turner July 2, 2002 II Page 2 • The trip generation for the approved MUSP development used trip rates that were approved by the South Florida Regional Planning Council as part of the Downtown Miami DRI in September 1994. The rates are also known as Increment One Rates as published in SFRPC's Attachment D-2 and shown in The Plummer Report as Exhibit 5 -Trip Generation, in the approved MUSP for the One Miami project. The rates include a reduction of primary trips to account for internal, transit and pass -by characteristics for all proposed land uses in Downtown Miami. The Plummer Report estimated that 1,202 new primary trips would be generated by the proposed aad approved One Miami project for tracts A through D. The report analyzed existing conditions for the following intersections and roadway links: Intersections: SE 2nd Avenue & SE 2nd Street SE 3rd Avenue & SE 2nd Street SE 2nd Avenue & SE 3rd Street SE 3`d Avenue & SE 3`d Street SE 2nd Avenue & SE 4th Street SE 3rd Avenue and SE 4th Street Biscayne Boulevard & SE 3`d Street Links: Biscayne Boulevard just north of SE 2nd Street Brickell Avenue just south of SE 4th Street SE 2nd Avenue just north of SE 2nd Street SE 2nd Street just west of SE 2nd Avenue SE 3rd Street just west of SE 2nd Avenue In March 2000, David Plummer and Associates produced a preliminary plan for the city of Miami called the Revitalization of the Economic Gateway to Downtown Miami. The plan outlines possible two-way traffic patterns where one-way patterns exist today. Also, the plan suggests other possible changes such as, acquiring additional right of way and relocating the MetroMover. The New One Miami Development The new One Miami project will be considerably smaller than the approved development discussed above. At this writing, the following land uses are being considered: Tract C: Residential - 450 units Athletic Club - 15,000 sf Retail - 38,275 sf Mr. Clark P. Turner • July 2, 2002 Page 3 • Tract B - Entertainment Complex: Retail - 50,000 sf Theaters - 70,000 sf Tract D: Residential - 650 Units - Retail - 27,025 sf Tract B: Residential — 400 units - Retail - 31,000 sf A summary of all uses is as follows: Residential - 1,500 Units Retail & Theater - 216,300 sf Athletic Club - 15,000 sf Trip Generation The estimated trip generation between the existing/approved MUST and the proposed new One Miami development is as follows: (Note: The number of seats for the theater are not known at this time. ITE rates for square feet were used and reduced by 50% to account for internal, transit and pass -by trips. PM Peak Hour Estimated Trip Generation Volume Using Increment One DRI Rates Approved Proposed Land Use One Miami One Miarni Hotel* 72 N/A Retail 208 76 Condos 41 54 Apartments 163 150 Theater N/A 133 Office 718 NIA Totals 1,202 413 ' Includes 100,000 sf Conference Center. briTtscoy 1 t I 3L 4u 33 2l c2 sS � S 2) 4`-1 41 Mr. Clark P. Turner July 2, 2002 Page 4 As can be seen above, the proposed new One Miami project without the office component will generate about 66% less traffic than the formerly approved One Miami development. Future Considerations The proposed development will be designed to accommodate either the existing one-way or the proposed two-way traffic circulation. At this juncture, the developer is ready to move forward with the development plan to work with the one-way traffic pattern with the thought that a two-way plan may be in place prior to obtaining construction permits for the city. However, the developer is in full support of the two-way traffic patterns, if deemed to be acceptable by the city. • RPE/mp/2718 cc: Robert Moreira Timothy 'Weller Bruce Brosch • Sincerely, TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, INC. E.B. No. 3766 Richard P. Eichinger Senior Traffic Engineer N.T.S. •• f1 SE 2 ST .....,-._ ., ._-.. ... nrrr...-.. • o` 1k flS1 u441 MIA Y51. i'4[111 tS'=1t11IAI v - 3 ST Zi GV E .30 -, P yr/rrs MINNOW rA4wr+: NNEM - SY4 ST - BIS_ AY ...• _-- ---- LVC} DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL MIAMI RIVER BISCAYNE BAY One Miami Site Location CHOPIN PLAZA INTERCONTINENTAL OFFICE £3AYFRONT PARK INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL A (NOT A PART OF) LEGEND B ONE MIAMI PROJECT PARCEL DESIGNATION - TRAFFIC LANE DESIGNATION DQD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1 0NLMIAML • • ONE MIAMI - MASTER TRAFFIC STUDY FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (MUSP) Project #98157 TRAF3.RPT September 8, 1998 Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, inc. 1750 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Coral Gables, FL 33134 ONEMIAML • • Exhibit 7 - Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 664 & 665 Cardinal Direction Distribution NNE 11.86% ENE 6.14% ESE 0.96% SSE 1.50% SSW 12.24% WSW 25.86% WNW 20.40% NNW 21.08% Total 100.00% Exhibit 8: Project Trip Assignment Roadway Segment Percent of Project Traffic Entrance Exit Biscayne Boulevard north of SE 2nd St. 18% (SB) 28% (NB) Brickell Avenue south of SE 4th St. 28% (NB) 28% (SB) SE 2nd Avenue north of SE 2nd St. 21 % (SB) N/A* SE 2nd Street west of SE 2nd Ave N/A* 11% (WB) SE 3rd Street west of SE 2nd Ave 33% (EB) 33% (WB) Total 100% 100% (*) N/A: Not applicable because roadway is a one-way street One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 15 • (6?- RtArce0 Exhibit 9 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips Residential (High -Rise Condominuim) General Office Retail 1,403 DU 52,800 SQ. FT. 41,994 SQ. FT. 232 710 620 62% 17% 48% 305 13 169 38% 83% 52% 187 65 184 492 78 353 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 53% 487 47% 436 923 Internalization Pass -by (Retail Only) -46 -57 -46 -63 -92 -120 PROJECT VEHICLE TRIPS 54% 384 46% 327 1 711 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 22.60% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips (1) (2) (3) 54% 54% 54% 61 87 38 46% 46% 46% 52 74 33 114 161 71 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 54% 197 46% 168 365 1 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 54% 54% 54% 276 121 397 46% 46% 46% 236 104 339 512 225 737 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 154% 54 I 46% 46 100 Lutes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • • -4,-- 73 SW3 ST a i OAM/ RIVER �✓ rj \ E t 1 u f • 1.95 PROJECT 29-. SITE Cs 0 SW! ST MIAMI RIVER RENAISSANCE PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENTS 11 LU c\I 73 - 95 SW 3 ST 4- 46 29 2 1 1 1 1 i 1 3 .i 3 ..,..... ; 3 t t i I . I i I t•-•rott..... .- I ..k. . ..., 7...."'; "........................; ........t . II,.........., 1 1 ! MIIIMI R I VER 1 i I i i !. 1 ....',. 1 i .....,..,....., I ' t I I .....,"""••••• "..............333 I / j rIti, i St . r."-••••••• A I A • ............... r!,-) ! r-- 29 PROJECT SITE i ' 1 1. 4 SVV 7 ST S. MIAMI AVE N. EX-11E,!ti No. Pa MIAMI RIVER RENAISSANCE PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENTS • • Table L-1 The Lofts Downtown PM Peak Hour Trip generation ITE Land Enter Exit Total Land Use Units Size Use Code Trips Trips Trips Residential - Condo units 196 230 73 35 108 Retail sf 8,000 814 9 12 21 Gross Total Vehicle Trips 82 47 129 'Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16% (13) (8) (21) Transit Trip Reduction @ 22.6% (19) (11) (30) Pedestrian/Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10% (8) (5) (13) Net External Trips 42 23 65 Lo fi6 Dow 13 3 N e 2,,.dt_ k ev d.e MU v . 2oz? • • The Lofts Downtown Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 196 Dwelling Units of Residential Condominium November 25, 2003 / Townhouse Average Rate Standard Deviation Adjustment Factor Driveway Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 7-9 AM 7-9 AM 7-9 AM 4-6 PM 4-6 PM 4-6 PM Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Saturday 2-Way Volume Saturday Saturday Saturday Peak Peak Peak Hour Enter Hour Exit Hour Total 5.88 0.00 0.08 0.37 0.44 0.37 0.18 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.80 0.00 0.27 0.23 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1152 16 73 86 73 35 108 1137 53 45 98 Note: A zero indicates no data available. The above rates were calculated from these equations: 24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) 7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) R^2 = 4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) R^2 = AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) R"2 = PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) Sat. Sat. Sun. Sun. 2-Way Volume: Pk Hr. Total: 2-Way Volume: Pk Hr. Total: = .85LN(X) + 2.564, R^2 = 0.83 = .79LN(X) + .298 0.74 , 0.17 Enter, 0.83 Exit = .827LN(X) + .309 0.79 , 0.67 Enter, 0.33 Exit = . 808LN (X) + .209 0.78 , 0.18 Enter, 0.82 Exit = . 777LN (X) + .59 R^2 = 0.8 , 0.65 Enter, 0.35 T - 3.615(X) + 427.925, R'2 = T = .286(X) + 42.627 T = 3. 132 (X) + 357.258, R'2 = T = .232(X) + 50.009 R'2 = 0.78 , 0.49 Enter, 0.51 Exit Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS Exit 0.84 0.88 • • • The Lofts Downtown Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 8 T.G.L.A. of Specialty Retail Center November 25, 2003 Average Standard Rate Deviation Adjustment Factor Driveway Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 40.67 13.70 1.00 325 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 1.11 0.00 1.00 9 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 1.48 0.00 1.00 12 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 2.59 1.74 1.00 21 Saturday 2-Way Volume 42.04 13.97 1.00 336 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Saturday Peak Hour Total 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS • THE LOFTS CARDINAL DISTRIBUTION PM ENTER TAZ # 538 TOTALS TRIPS 42 NNE 11.08% ENE 4.38% ESE 3.32% SSE 6.64% • SSW 15.46°/a WSW 25.23% WNW 19.67% NNW 14.22% • • THE LOFTS CARDINAL DISTRIBUTION PM EXIT TAZ # 538 TOTALS TRIPS 23 NNE 11.08% ENE 4.38% ESE 3.32% SSE 6.64% SSW 15.46% WSW 25.23% WNW 19.67% NNW 14.22% THE LOFTS CARDINAL DISTRIBUTION OF PERSON TRIPS ON TRANSIT DURING THE PM PEAK PERIOD TAZ # 538 TOTALS TRIPS 21 .65 AUTO TRIPS X 22.6%X1.4 ppv NNE 11.08% ENE 4.38% ESE 3.32% SSE 6.64% . SSW 15.46% WSW 25.23% WNW 19.67% NNW 14.22% • • APPENDIX H LIST OF PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS Source: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Fiscal Years 2005 — 2009 Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization For Approval May 2004 1100 Biscayne Boulevard (Marquis) MUSP Traffic Impact Study ATTACHMENTS September 2004 Keith and Schnars, P.A. Project No. 17342.00 • MIAMI-DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAYS AND INTERMODAL HIGHWAYS MPO Project Num. Facility/Project Name Bicycle Accam. Type of Work Project Cost ($000s) Prior Years Cost ($000s) .ikk. .., _.-. Agency Project Num, From/Location To/Location Length (miles) Remarks DT2498352 SR 51US-11BISC BLVD FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCT. Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2498352 FROM NE 5TH STREET TO NE 13TH STR 0.576 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 20Ub - 2007 20Uf - 2008 2008 - 2009 CST XU 7,052 0 0 0 0 INC XU 0 0 600 0 0 RRU XU 345 0 0 0 0 DT2498403 SR 5/US-1/BISC BLVD LANDSCAPING Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 249B403 FROM W. OF NE16TH TO WEST DIX1E H 0.087 2UU4 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 20U1 - 2008 2006 - 2009 CST DIH 5 0 0 0 0 DT2498561 SR 5/US-1 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCT. Activity 1Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2498561 FROM S OF STR S 18, TO CARD SND RD 7.78 12UU4 - 2005 2UU5 - 2006 2006 - 2007 ZOO/ - 2008 Z0U8 - 2009 DSB DDR 0 22,286 0 0 0 PE DDR 0 300 0 0 0 DSB DS 0 27,135 0 0 0 DSB DIH 0 100 0 0 0 DSB DS .1 0 3,456 0 0 0 D72499111 SR 907/ALTON ROAD RESURFACING mm Activ€ty /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2499111 FROM 5TH STREET TO MICHIGAN AV 1.54 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 ZUO0 - 2007 2001 - 2008 2008 - 2009 CST DDR 0 0 0 1,625 0 CST DIH 0 0 0 25 0 CST DS 0 0 . 0 779 0 D12499372 MIAMI INTERMODAL CTR ACCESS IMPROVEMENT Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2499372 (MIC) TERMINAL AC ROADWAYS (BRI 0,148 20U4 - 2005 MI5 - 2006 2U0b - 2007 20Uf - 2008 2UU8 - 2009 INC DDR 0 300 0 0 0 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section Al - Page 9 of 8, • MIAMI-DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAYS AND INTERMODAL HIGHWAYS MPO Project Num. Facility/Project Name Bicycle Acccm Type of Work Project Cast ($000s) Prior Years Cost, ($000s) Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles) Remarks D125 I6861 I-3951SR A1A ATMS ADV TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTM Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2516861 FROM NW 7 AVENUE_ TO ALTON ROAD 1.198 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2000 - 2007 200/ - 2008 2UU8 - 2009 CST NHAC 2,477 253 0 0 0 INC NHAC 0 0 157 0 0 0T2516881 SR 836i1-395 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCT. Activity Funding Proposed Funding (in $000s) (Phase Source 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2UU/ - 2008 - 2516881 FROM EAST OF I-95 TO MACARTHUR 1.096 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 PE DI 0 0 0 7,323 0 DT2516882 1-396 INTERIM RDWAY/ WIDEN/RESURFACE EXIST LANES Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2516882 NE 2ND AVE FROM N ST. TO NE 14 ST 0 20U4 - 2005 2UU1 - 2006 20Uti - 2007 WO/ - 2008 20013- 2009 CST DI 801 0 0 0 0 D1-4040801 SR 9N1-95 ITS FREEWAY MANAGEMENT Activity (Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 4040801 POST CONSTRUC. EVA 17.26 2004 - 2005 2VUb - 2006 2UU6 - 2007 2UUr - 2008 2008 - 2009 CST NHAC 440 165 0 0 0 s 0T4055741 MIAMI-DADE COUNTYNDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS Activity (Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2004 - 2005 2UU5 - 2006 2006 - 2007 200/ - 2008 2UU8 - 2009 4055741 (MAINTENANCE, OPER 0 OPS DOR 1,118 1,180 1,255 1,331 1,408 Thursday, February f2, 2004 Section Al - Page 19 of 8, • • • MIAMI-DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAYS AND INTERMODAL MPO Project Num. Fac4tylProject Name Bicycle Accom. Type of Work Project Cost ($000s) Prior Years Cost ($000s)-'1 > Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles} Remarks D14124701 SR 817/NW 27 AVENUE RESURFACING Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2UU4 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 20Uf - 2008 2008 2009 4124701 FROM SR 9/N.W. 27 AV TO N.W. 187 STR 2.907 CST DIH 0 0 26 0 0 PE DIH 50 30 0 0 0 CST DS 0 0 2,544 0 0 D1.4124711 SR 817/NW 27 AVENUE RESURFACING Activity !Phase - Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2004 - 2005 2UL56 - 2006 2UU6 - 2007 200( - 2008 2008 - 2009 4124711 FROM N.W. 203 STREE TO N.W. 215 STR 0.762 CST DS 0 0 1,233 0 0 PE DIH 25 25 0 0 0 CST DIH 0 0 13 0 0 014124l21 SR 860/MIA GRANS DR RESURFACING Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2UU4 - 2005 2Uu5 - 2006 2UU6 - 2007 201W - 2008 2008 - 2009 4124721 FROM N.W. 2N[7 AVEN TO N.E. 6TH AVE 1.04 CST 1)5 1,434 0 0 0 0 INC DS 72 0 0 0 0 M PE OH 25 0 0 0 0 CST DIH 17 0 0 0 0 D1-4124731 SR 5/BRICKELL AVENUE RESURFACING Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2Ui14 - 2005 2005 - 2006 20U6 - 2007 2007 - 2008 2008 - 2009 4124731 FROM S OF S.E. 25TH TO S.E. 4TH STR 1.721 PE DS 0 0 300 0 0 CST DIH 0 0 0 0 15 CST DS 0 0 0 0 1,296 PDE DS 300 0 0 0 0 PE DIH 0 0 30 0 0 Thursday, February 12, 2404 Section Al - Page 41 of • • • MIAMI-DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAYS AND INTERMODAL MPO Project Num Facility/Project Name Bicycle Accom. Type of Work Project Cost ($000s) Prior Years Cost ($000s) Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles) Remarks DT4146231 SR 5/US-1/BISC BLVD RESURFACING Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 2007 - 200/ - 2008 2008 2009 - 4146231 FROM S.E. 2ND STREE TO N.E. 5TH STR 0.426 CST DIH 0 0 0 31 0 CST DS 0 0 0 310 0 PE DIH 1 25 25 0 0 0 DT4146241 SR 5/US-1BISC BLVD RESURFACING Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 —2006 - 2007 200/ - 2008 2008 - 2009 4146241 FROM N.E. 13TH STRE TO N.E. 38TH STR 1.762 PE DIH 50 0 0 0 0 CST XA 0 0 0 2,805 0 D14146271 SR 973/SW 87 AVENUE RESURFACING Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in 2U0b - 2007 $000s) 200/ - 2008 2008 - 2009 4146271 FROM S.W. 96TH STRE TO S.W. 88TH ST 0.521 2004 -2005 2005 - 2006 CST DIH 0 0 0 29 0 PE DIH 25 25 0 0 0 CST DS 0 0 0 295 0 024146272 SR 973/SW 87 AVENUE RESURFACING Activity /Phase Funding Source ' Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 20U/ - 2008 2008 - 2009 4146272 FROM S.W. 88TH STRE TO S,W. 415T ST 3.025 PE DIH 75 0 0 0 0 CST DS 0 0 0 2,259 0 CST DIH 0 0 0 22 0 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section Al ' Page 48 of 8P • • MIAMI-DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAYS AND INTERMODAL MAINTENANCE MP° Project Num Facility/Project Name Bicycle Accom Type of Work Project Cost ($000s) Prior Years Cost ($000s).ii.'' Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles) Remarks D12523721 M VILLAGE OF BISC PARK ROUTINE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2007 - 2008 2008 - 2009 2523721 BISCAYNE CANAL N.E. 121 STREET 0.6 2004 - 2005 2UUb - 2006 2006 - 2007 MNT D 4 4 4 4 0 If asele UT2524001 M VILLAGEIBAL HARBOUR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2524001 SR 922/BROAD CSWY. SR A1A/COLLINS 0 2UU4 - 2005 2UUb - 2006 2UU6 - 2007 20U/ - 2008 2U06 - 2009 MNT D 6 6 6 6 0 DT2524141 M CITY- N MIAMI BEACH ROUTINE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS Activity /Phase Funding— Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2524141 NW 1ST AVENUE INTRACOASTAL 4.544 2004 - 2005 20U5 - 2006 2006 - 2007 20U7 - 2008 MN- 2009 MNT D 13 13 13 13 0 07252455/ M MIAMI SHORES,VILLAGE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (n $000s) 2524551 U5 1/SR 5 N.E. am AVE 0 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 2UU! - 2008 2U08 - 2009 MNT D 20 20 20 20 0 PT2524731 M CITY OF N.BAY VILLGE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTST Activity /Phase Funding Source _ Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2524731 SR 934/KENNEDY CSW 0 2004 - 2005 200b - 2006 2006 - 2007 200! - 2008 2UU8 - 2009 MNT 0 5 5 5 6 0 0T252492114 N.W. 5TH STREET DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT Addy Funding Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2524921 BRIDGE #870659 0 /Phase Source 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 2UU1 - 2008 Mild - 2009 MNT D 250 299 299 299 0 0T2524931 M S.W. 1ST STREET DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT Activity Funding Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2524931 BRIDGE #870660 0 !Phase Source 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 AT( - 2008 2008 - 2009 MNT t) 261 287 287 287 0 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section A1 - Page 67 of 8, • • MIAMI-DARE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAYS AND INTERMODAL NTENA MPO Project Num. FacilityIProject Name Bicycle Accom. Type of Work Project Cost ($000s) Prior Years Cost ($000s)_`.. iii .' Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles} Remarks 012524041 M FLAGLER STREET DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding On $000s) 2004 - 2005 Aft- 2006 2006 - 2007 200I - 2008 2UU8 - 2009 2524941 BRIDGE #870661 0 MNT D 261 287 287 287 0 012524951 M N.W. 12TH AVENUE DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT I Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2004 - 2005 2UU5 - 2006 2U0ti - 2007 2UU/ - 2008 200d - 2009 2524951 BRIDGE #870662 0 MNT D 261 287 287 287 0 0T2524961 M SR 5/BRICKELL AVE. DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 25249fi1 OVER MIAMI RIVER BR. #870001 0 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 2007 - 2008 2008 - 2009 MNT D 261 287 287 287 0 D ff2524971 M SR 9/N.W. 27TH AVE. DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT Aciivity�Funding /Phase Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2524971 0 2004 - 2005 2000 - 2006 2006 - 2007 2U0I - 2008 2008 - 2009 MNT D 261 287 287 7 287 0 DT2524081 M 79TH STREET EAST DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT w Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2004 - 2005 2000 - 2006 2006 - 2007 200(- 2008 2008 - 2009 2524981 0 MNT D 250 299 299 299 0 072524991 M 79TH STREET WEST DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT Activity )Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2524991 0 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 200/ - 2008 2008 - 2009 MNT D 250 299 299 299 0 DT2525011 M W. 63RD ST/ALTON RD, DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS CONTRACT Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2008 - 2009 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 —2UU6 - 2007 200/ - 2008 2525011 BRIDGE #870613 0� MNT 0 250 299 299 299 0 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section Al- Page 62of8, • • MIAMI-DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SECONDARY GAS TAX MPO Project Num. Facility/ProjectName Bicycle Accorn. Type of Work Project Cost ($OOOs) Prior Years Cost ($000s) MIAfviI AGE Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles) Remarks PO/610157S W 24 Avenue no Widening: 2 to 5 lanes Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2UU3 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2006 - 2006 2008 - 2007 2007 - 2008 610157S W 52 Street W 76 Street 1.5 Under Design in LOGT CST SGT 0 0 2,100 2,000 0 PO/651022S Grand Avenue no Narrowing: 4 to 2 lanes 400 350 Activity /Phas Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 20U3 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2UUb - 2007 NU/ - 2008 651022S SW 37 Avenue SW 32 Avenue Construction partially funded in LOGI; major r A SGT 0 0 0 0 0 PW662297 NW 62 Street no Reconstruction: 4 lanes Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding {in $000s) 2008 - 2007 2UU! - 2006 20U3 - 2004 2004 - 2005 MO - 2006 662297 NW 47 Avenue NW 37 Avenue 1 Design revisions CST SGT 0 1,000 1,400 1,300 0 PW662320S SW 24 Street yes Widening: 4 to 6 lanes & bridge 1,740 Activity iPhase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2003 2004 2004- 2005 21)05- 2006 2066 2007 200l- 2008 662320S SW 87 Avenue SW 77 Avenue 1 Additional funding in Road Impact Fee 01, FD CST SGT 1,600 0 0 0 0 Pw062406 NW 17 Avenue no Refurbishing: bridge Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 662400 Bridge over Miami River 2003 - 2004 2U64 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2008 - 2007 2U07 - 2008 CST SGT 2,550 0 0 0 0 PW662411 SW 2 Avenue yes New Construction: 4-lane bridge Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 200! - 2006 20113 - 2004 2U04 - 2005 2UUb - 2006 200ti - 2007 ' 662411 Bridge over Miami River A SGT 0 0 0 0 0 PW662446S W 137 Avenue yes New Construction: 6 lanes Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 200/ - 2008 2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2UOb - 2007 662446S SW 8th Street NW 12 Street 1.3 Additional funding FOOT (FM#2512941) A SGT 0 0 0 0 0 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section A4 - Page 5 of I • • MIAMI-DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ROAD IMPACT FEES Road Impact Fee District: 2 MPG Project um. NProject Facility/Project Name Bicycle Accom. Type of Work Cost ($000s) Prior Years Cost {$000s) MI kx;il DADE Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles) Remarks PW000037 Crandon Blvd yes Study 50 Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 000037 Key Biscayne 2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 2007 - 2006 A RIF 0 0 0 0 0 PW007038 Downtown Transportation Master Plan yes Study 100 Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 000038 Downtown Miami 2003- 2004 2004 - 2005 20U5 - 2006 2006 - 2007 200/ - 2008 A RIF 0 0 0 0 0 PW00003O Engineering Administration no Administration Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed 2004 - 2005 Funding (in 2005 - 2006 $000s) 2005 - 2007 200/ - 2008 000039 Countywide 1 W3 - 2004 A RIF 400 400 400 400 400 PW0o0040 Resurfacing yes Resurfacing Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in 6000s) 000040 Various Locations Continuing Program Projects 2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005.2005 2006 - 2007 200/ - 2008 al RIF 32 47 47 4 0 CST RIF 256 376 376 28 0 PE RIF 32 47 47 4 0 Pw000047 T.O.P.I.C.S. no Intersection Improvements: T.O.P.I.C.S. Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 000041 Various Locations Continuing Program Projects 2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2005 - 2007 200/ - 2008 CEI RIF 31 46 46 4 0 CST RIF 248 372 372 26 0 PE RIF 31 46 46 4 0 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section A5 - Page 4 of 24 • MIAM1-DARE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ROAD IMPACT FEES Road Impact Fee District: 2 • MPQ Project Num. Facility/Project Name Bicycle Accom. Type of Work Project Cost (Mks) Prior Years Cost ($000s) Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (miles) Remarks M14 I'll DAGE PW000042 Traffic Control Devices no Signalization Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 000042 Various Locations Status varies by project; Continuing Program P 2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 200( - 2008 CST RIF 256 372 372 24 0 CB RIF 32 46 46 3 0 PE RIF 32 46 46 3 0 PWG10140 Fiagler Street yes New Construction: from one-way to two-way 1,000 Activity /Phase , Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 610140 NW 2 Avenue Biscayne Boulevar 0.5 Major road & bridge project 2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 2007 - 2008 A RIF 0 0 0 0 0 PVt1651i)22 Grand Avenue no New Construction: 2 lanes & left turn lanes 500 Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2131:1 - 2007 200/ 2008 - 651022 SW 37 Avenue SW 32 Avenue 0.5 Construction partially unfunded 2003 2004 - 2004 2005 - 200b 2006 - A RIF 0 0 0 0 0 PW652358 NW 95 Street yes Reconstruction: 4 lanes / New construction: tur w 3,900 Activity (Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 662358 NW 27 Avenue NW 7 Avenue 2 2UU3 - 2004 2UU4 - 2005 2UU5 - 2006 2UUEi - 2007 2UU( - 2008 A RIF 0 0 0 0 0 PW562472 NE 8 Street/Bayshore Drive New Construction: 4 lanes & baywalk Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 662472 Biscayne Boulevard Port Boulevard 0.5 .200,3 - 2004 2004 - 2005 '2UU5 - 2006 2U0ti - 2007 2001 - 2008 CST RIF 0 0 0 0 1,000 PW671203 NW 14 Street yes Widening: to 3 lanes !Resurfacing I Activiy Funding Proposed Funding (in $000s) IL !Phase Source 20U3 - 2UU4 - 20U5 - 2005 - 2001 - 671203 NW 10 Avenue I-95 0.5 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 CST RIF 0 0 0 400 200 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section A5 - Page 5 of 2t • • • MIAMI—DADE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NON —MOTORIZED COMPONENT MPO Project Num. Facility/Project Name Bicycle Accom. Type of Work Project Cost ($000s) Prior Years Cost ($000s) a , MI lad I Jt€I jr. a Agency Project Num. From/Location To/Location Length (mites) Remarks PVU2512623 East Little Havana Greenway Transportation Enhancement: bike path Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2512623 Jose Marti Park NW 12 Avenue 2003 2004 - 2004 2005 - 2005 2006 - 2006 - 2007 200! 2005 - CST SE 0 0 0 925 0 PE SE 0 0 0 75 0 PW251265 South Dade Greenways Transportation Enhancement: bike path --1 5,125 Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2003 - 2004 2UU4 - 2005 2UUb - 2006 2006 - 2007 2UU! - 2008 251265 Biscayne Trails Everglades Traits A 0 0 0 0 0 PW2512652 Biscayne / Black Creek Trait Transportation Enhancement: bike path Activity /Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2512652 Old Cutler Road / Black Black Point Marina 2003 2004 - 21X4 2005 - 20Ub - 2006 2006 2007 - MO/ - 2008 CST SE 0 0 850 0 0 PE SE ^ 0 0 ^ 150 0 0 PVV255I2 6 SW Homestead Transportation Enhancement: sidewalk 98�Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 200,1 - 2004 20U4 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 MY- 2008 251266 SW 10-12 Avenues SW 4-8 Streets A 0 0 0 0 0 PW251269 Venetian Causeway Transportation Enhancement: landscaping and 585 Activity Funding Proposed Funding (in $000s) —Mt /Phase Source 20U3 - 211U4 - 2005 - - 2U0/ - 251269 Bayshore Drive Purdy Avenue 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 A 0 0 0 0 0 M251270 Bayside Promenade Transportation Enhancement: Pedestrian Prom 876 Activity !Phase Funding Source Proposed Funding (in $000s) 2003 2004 - 2004 2005 - 2005 2006 - 201.16 2007 - 200! 2008 - 251270 NE 2 Avenue Biscayne Boulevar A 0 0 0 0 0 Thursday, February 12, 2004 Section A 72 - Page 2 of r • • • APPENDIX I PROGRAMMED NE 11TH STREET TWO-WAY OPERATIONS Source: Florida Department Of Transportation Metric Engineering, Inc, 1100 Biscayne Boulevard (Marquis) MUSP Traffic Impact Study ATTACHMENTS September 2004 Keith and Schnars, P.A. Project No. 17342.00 • • • BEGIN PROJECT A. 29+03.000 N.E. Nth ST. / EXISTING PAVING MARKING PROJECT 651007 EXISTING TRAFFIC MASTER ARM EXTENTION N.E. 2nd AVENUE .1 EXISTING SIGN TO REMNN R3-I IMO-40-1f 600X600 STA. 29r13.000 150 SOLD WHITE MP.) 150 3.0/9.0 J SKIP WHITE rT YP.1 R/W LINE END PI/OJECT MATCH F.D.O.T. PROJ. FIN. 249535-2-52-01 MATCH PAVEMENT MARKINGS STA. 29+74.000 N.E. Nth ST. t 25 EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN 150 DOUBLE YELLON 600 SOLO WHITE 300 SOLID WHITE 12700-46-111 EXISTING SIGN (MASTER ARM EXTENDON) TO BE REMOVED DJ, trAraRE = EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN BI-DIRECTIONAL COLORLESS/RED R.P.M.'S O 12 C.C. r7YP.3 STA. 29+65.000 a rr— -, \ N.E. Nth STREET ',F; BI-DIRECTIONAL AMBER R.P.M. S 5 12 C.0 TIT .1 EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN 127GV' -46-24 EXISTING SIGN TO BE RELOCATED 1 a2 0 II Meters 1 CONST. • 1! 11 u !1 1`.____ Al ! QF i71 rj�1 11 '..�S �� E e�% kr II 67 - I 1 ` jy I i I 'V I 1 1. HNr `'• v, ` {,yiI1C JA Iry11°i Y 1til?--_.41° ti I 't1i r1 I1 1 xk I 1-11 `•---J_::0 ip rr 1111 111 a1 1! III 1111 I I 1 r1 A; 11 f au I I! 11r ell 0l! !J inIU l 111 I ; In Il a I 1 oi� 111 --—{ / I!1 1 'fpi 111 plf I r III f!, 118 1 1 1r`, f1j 1N I/O In ,1 x— I 11I 1 r1, fii .1./3 IJ1L j1 '• • 7 REVISIONS CAFE .iV:5Cli1Pme rx 12ESG{,E+PTKW PR£PARRO RY METRIC ENGINEERING, INC. 119.1SMIF4S.I Ire ISO FLOFIV4 31146 ALFREDO REYNA PE No.447bb CUITIFFC9IE tY .1.3,0NIZAIION 0000x39i STATE OP FLORIDA DEPARTNICNT OF TRANSPORTATION PAD N0. MINTY TINAAGA,, PROJECT 10 N/A MIAMI-DADE 249835-2-52-02 SIGNING & MARKING PLAN N.G IIItb STREET SHEET Na. S-5 11.r: Mwm 03/09/20:4 02-32:47 PM F:YNGKNAF1.56105 TIC WNv5AMF"A,SICAUCWlll95WS.N/I • • Biscayne Boulevard Operational Analysis Volume 1 of 2 Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. March 2003 ®PA Project -#02197 - - - - - 1IE2AVE- I# fE II I# II i I I �' ', ICI • 66 A# 33 s ti u it L 4 ' ; I, 4141 41 41 I i II 14 i _� II l i EE J Ji Tr. NIj 40' SR. 5 / P 5. 1 / tikt.;71 murawi,r.Mr VARIE5 A8'-220' 40' Ar a VARIES r-30' CR8 AND WTPERI LCRJ AMP W!!ER Tin•F PPE 'E' TYPICAL SECTION 5fl 5 (BISCAYNE BLVD.) NOTE NO U-TURN'S PERMITTED FOR ALL SOUTHBOUND BISCAYNE BLVD. EXHIBIT 9 ALTERNATIVE 11DI1/ Page14 • • APPENDIX J TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION 1100 Biscayne Boulevard (Marquis) MUSP Traffic Impact Study ATTACHMENTS September 2004 Keith and Schnars, P.A. Project No. 17342.00 • • Table J-1 1100 Biscayne Boulevard MUSP Traffic Impact Study Project Weekday Daily Trip Generation Gr,JI L-GV V USES UNITS ITE LAND USE CODE ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION RATE OR FORMULA TOTAL TRIPS N OUT % TRIPS % TRIPS HIGH RISE CONDO 334 DU 232 T = 3.77 (X) + 223.66 1,483 50% 742 50% 741 QUALITY RESTUARANT 4,170 SF 931 T = 89.95 (X) 375 50% 188 50% 187 SPECIALTY RETAIL 1,595 SF 814 T = 42.78 (X) +37.66 106 50% 53 50% 53 HOTEL 48 ROOMS 310 T = 8.95 (X) - 373.16 56 50% 28 50% 28 TOTAL. GROSS TRIPS 2,020 50% 1,011 50% 1,009 RESIDENTIAL 49 55% 27 45% 22 QUALITY RESTUARANT 44 45% 20 55% 24 SPECIALTY RETAIL 17 47% 8 53% 9 HOTEL 12 50% 6 50% 6 LESS INTERNALIZATION @ 6.0% OF GROSS TOTAL TRIPS 122 50% 61 50% 61 LESS PASS -BY REDUCTION @ 5% FROM EXTERNAL TRIPS OF RETAIL 17 47% 8 53% 9 PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLE TRIP REDUCTION @ 10% 202 50% 101 50% 101 TOTAL NET EXTERNAL TRIPS 1,679 50% 841 50% 838 TRANSIT REDUCTION IN OMNI 11.7% 196 50% 98 50% 98 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 1,483 50% 743 50% 740 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS INCLUDING TRANSIT 1.4 2,350 50% 1,177 50% 1,173 NOTES: " BASED ON ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. n:ltranplan\projects12004117252 5T}-I & ALTON\Tripgen\REWD1026.WK4 • • • Analyst JLR Date 1012712004 Gd tv External 720]4 71J Enter From External FIGURE J-1 MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION AND INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY LAND USE A Residential - Condo ITE LU Code Size 232 334 DU Total internal External Enter 741 27 714 Exit 742 22 720 Total 1,483 49 1,434 100% 3.3% 96.7 % ( 38%1 2821 Demand 51 Balanced 9%L 51 Dernand Eric to Extern.' 1 4411 1 41 Enter Flom External 33%1 245 Demand 61 Balanced 11%T 61 Demand LAND USE C Specialty Retail Project Name 1100 Biscayne Boulevard Time Period Daily Assumed no Internalization between Residential and Hotel Demand Balanced Demand 0%1" al 1 01 1 0%1 01 a%1 9%] 17 ITE LU Code Size 814 1,595 sf Total Internal External Enter 53 8 45 Exit 53 9 44 Total 106 17 89 % 100% 16.0% 84.0% f0%1 a1 01 1 0%] o1 10%] 3] LAND USE t3 HOTEL ITE LU Code Size 310 46 ROOMS Total Internal External Enter 28 6 22 Exit 28 6 22 Total 56 12 44 100% 21A% 786% Assumed maximum 10% internalization between Resta al Assumed um 10%internalize -tween Retail and Hotel 33%1 245] Demand Demand 10%1 31 51 Balanced L Demand 0%1 01 1 0[ l 0%1 01 MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT 0.41 k_ Demand Balanced Demand Assumed no internalization between Retail and Restaurant 0%1 al LAND USEA LAND USE 13 LAND USE C LAND USED TOTAL Enter 714 22 45 168 949 Exit 720 22 44 163 949 Total 1,434 44 89 331 1,896 Single -Use Trip Gen. Est. 1,483 56 106 375 2,020 INTERNAL. CAPTURE 6.0% 0l 10%r Demand 8a 31 10%1 191 Demand LAND USE i1 Quality Fiesta ra Enter From External 221 and Hotel Exit in External 1 10%] 31 Demand 3l Balanced ITE LU Code Size 931 4,170 st Total internal External Enter - 188 20 168 Exit 187 24 163 Total 375 44 331 100% 11.7% 88.3% Source: institute of Transportation Engineers i1TE) Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998. 10%1 isl Demand Enter From External 168 1631 Exit ro Eelemal NNTRANPLANWrojecle12004t17342 1100 81acayrselTeblestnev 10-26 Daily1TE Intemalizalionl71h EdllonyAs • • • - Table J-2 1100 Biscayne Boulevard MUSP Traffic Impact Study Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Trip Generation USES UNITS ITE LAND USE CODE ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION RATE OR FORMULA TOTAL TRIPS N OUT % TRIPS % TRIPS HIGH FUSE CONDO 334 DU 232 T .- .29 (X) - 28.86 126 19% 24 81% 102 QUALITY RESTAURANT 4,170 SF 931 T = 0.81 (X) 3 50% 2 50% 1 SPECIALTY RETAIL 1,595 SF 814 T = 6.84 (X) 11 48% 5 52% 6 HOTEL 48 ROOMS 310 Ln(T) = 1.24Ln(X) -2.00 16 61% 10 39% 6 TOTAL GROSS TRIPS 156 26% 41 74% 115 RESIDENTIAL Assumed 50% of PM Peak Internalization 2 50% 1 50% 1 QUALITY RESTAURANT Assumed n4 internalization 0 0 0 SPECIALTY RETAIL Assumed 50% of PM Peak Internalization 4 50% 2 50% 2 HOTEL Assumed 50% of PM Peak Internalization 2 50% 1 50% 1 LESS INTERNALIZATION @ 5.0% OF GROSS TOTAL TRIPS 8 50% 4 50% 4 LESS PASS -BY REDUCTION @ 0% FROM EXTERNAL TRIPS OF RETAIL 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRIP REDUCTION 15 10% 15 27% 4 73% 11 TOTAL NET EXTERNAL TRIPS 133 25% 33 75% 100 TRANSIT REDUCTION IN OMNI 11.7% 16 25% 4 75% 12 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 117 25% 29 75% 88 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS INCLUDING TRANSIT 1.4 186 25% 46 75% 140 NOTES: BASED ON ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. RVAM 1026. W K4 • • • Table J-3 1100 Biscayne Boulevard MUSP Traffic Impact Study Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Generation USES UNITS ITE LAND USE CODE ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION RATE OR FORMULA TOTAL TRIPS N OUT % TRIPS % TRIPS HIGH RISE CONDO 334 DU 232 T = .34 (X) + 15.47 129 62% 80 38% 49 QUALITY RESTAURANT 4,170 SF 931 T = 7.49 (X) 53 67% 36 33% 17 SPECIALTY RETAIL 1,595 SF 814 T = 2.40 (X) + 21.48 25 44% 11 56% 14 HOTEL 48 ROOMS 310 T = 0.59 (X) 28 53% 15 47% 13 TOTAL GROSS TRIPS 235 60% 142 40% 93 RESIDENTIAL 7 43% 3 57% 4 QUALITY RESTAURANT 8 50% 4 50% 4 SPECIALTY RETAIL 4 50°/a 2 50% 2 HOTEL 5 60% 3 40% 2 LESS INTERNALIZATION @ 10.0% OF GROSS TOTAL TRIPS 24 50% 12 50% 12 LESS PASS -BY REDUCTION 0 0% FROM EXTERNAL TRIPS OF RETAIL 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLE TRIP REDUCTION Q 10% 21 62% 13 38% 8 TOTAL NET EXTERNAL TRIPS 190 62% 117 38% 73 TRANSIT REDUCTION IN OMNI 11.7% 22 62% 14 38% 8 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 166 61% 103 39% 65 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS INCLUDING TRANSIT 1.4 266 62% 164 38% 102 NOTES: BASED ON ITE '7TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. n:ltranplan\projects12004117252 5TH & ALTON\Tripgen\REPM1026.WK4 • • FIGURE J-2 PM PEAK HOUR (WEEKDAY) -- MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION AND INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY Analyst JLR Date 10/27/2004 Exit to External 1 45}I 1 77 Enter From External LAND USE A Residential - Condo ITE LU Code Size 232 334 DU Total internal External Enter 80 3 77 Exit 49 4 45 Total 129 7 122 100% 5.4% 94.6% L 53%1 261 Demand Balanced 9%1 Demand Exit to External 1 121� 91 Enter From External 31%I 25 Demand balanced 11 1 12%1 11 Demand LAND USE C Specialty Retail Demand 0%1 Balanced 01 Project Name 1100 Biscayne Boulevard Time Period PM Peak Hour Demand 0%I 01 0%I 9%I ITE LU Code Size 814 1,595 Total Internal External Enter 11 2 9 Exit 14 2 12 Total 25 4 21 100% 16.0% 84.0% 10%1 Demand Demand 01 01 0%I 10%F LAND USE B HOTEL 1TE LU Code Size 310 48 ROOMS Enter T Total Internal External 12 15 3 Exit 13 2 11 Total 28 5 23 100% 17.9% 82.1% Assumed maximum 10% internalization between Resta u '0% intern • ' : . n between Retail and Hotel 10%1 21 0%T Balanced Demand NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT 0% Demand Balanced Demand Assumed no internalization between Retail and Restaurant 0 LAND USE A LAND USE B LAND USE C LAND USED TOTAL Enter 77 12 9 32 130 Exit 45 11 12 13 81 Total 122 23 21 45 211 Single -Use Trip Gen. Est. 129 28 25 53 235 1 01 INTERNAL CAPTURE 0%i of 10%1 Demand Balanced 10%1 41 Demand LAND USE D Duality Res Enter From External 12.1 and Hotel 111 Exit to External 10%1 Demand 1 21 Balanced 10%I 21 ITE LU Code Size 931 4,170 st Total Internal External Enter 36 4 32 f Exit 17 4 13 Total 53 8 45 % 100% 15.1% 84.9% Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, October t998. Demand Enter From Ertemat 321 131 Exit to External NATRANPLAMProjects120041173421100 13iecaynetTabtea1nev 10-26.24D4 PM ITElnter.xla • • • TABLE J-4 1100 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 2008 PROJECT SOCIOECONOMIC DATA Rev. 10/27/2004 ZDATA 1: YR 2008 ZONAL DATA FOR ADJACENT TAZs HOUSEHOLD VEHICLES WORKERS NO WITH TAZ CHILDREN CHILDREN 511 0 0 512 69 30 513 49 22 517 359 133 520 0 0 NO CHILDREN 0 66 47 243 0 WITH CHILDREN 0 26 18 133 NO CHILDREN 0 50 37 344 0 WITH CHILDREN 0 14 10 92 0 PERSONS 1N HH NO WITH HOTEL CHILDREN CHILDREN (ROOMS) 0 0 0 102 99 124 76 74 7 836 493 31 0 0 340 ZDATA 1 FACTORS BASED ON 512, 513, 517 512 69.7% 30.3% 0.9565 0.8667 0.7246 513 69.0% 31.0% 0.9592 0,8182 0.7551 517 73.0% 27.0% 0.6769 1 0.9582 AVERAGE: 70.6% 29.4% 0.8642 0.895 0.8126 1468 236 14681 2361 98 98 204 ADJUSTED ZONAL DATA 15301 660 14401 3981 3158[ 2543 0.4667 0.4545 0.6917 0.5376 1.4783 3.3 1.551 3.3636 2.3287 3.7068 1.786 3.4568 STARTING ZONAL DATA FOR 88 192 53 1100 BISCAYNE: 421 339 48 ZDATA 2 YR 2008 PROJECT SQUARE FEET IND. COMM. SERVICE TOTAL 5,765 5,765 ZDATA 2 FACTORS EMPLOYEES PER 1000 50. FT. N MODEL DAILY TRIPS WITHIN 5% 481 1 0 [ 146j 0 [ 146 1.6 0 3.0 7 3.2 17 FOR 1100 BISCAYNE TO OSTA OF ITE TRIPS KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. N:ITRANPLAN\Pra]ects12004117342 1100 Biscayne\Tables Rev 10-27-041Table J-4 Revised 10-27-04.xis Analyst: Ernan Gomaa Agency: K & S Date: 9/23/2004 111 riod: AM PEAK HOUR ject ID: 1100 BISCAYNE BLVD W St: NE 12TH ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound T R HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: #1-- NE 2 AVE & NE 12 ST Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Year : 2004 - EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 Duration 0.25 t*r t ZaaV Southbound L T R 0 3 0 T 429 12.0 0 0 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 5 NE Left Thru Right Peds SE Left p Thru Right Peds EB Right WE Right Phase Combination 1 2 EB Left Thru Right Peds WE Left Thru Right Peds NB Right Weneen Yellow All Red 36.0 4.0 1.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Grp Group Capacity Eastbound Westbound T 2075 Northbound Southbound TR i 0 2 1 TR R 775 476 12.0 12.0 0 6 8 NA L. P �� 615 39.0 4.0 6.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 5187 secs 0.23 0.40 18.1 2 18.1 2 1564 3610 0.55 700 1615 0.76 Intersection Delay = 22.2 0.43 20.4 C 23.6 C 0.43 28.9 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - C