The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTraffic Impact Study IIII 41, II II II II 1 II II II IP I. II II II II II IIAlk OW II Signal Timings PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 3507 S MIAMI AVE @ 250 BLK FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 25) TIME PT OFF SG G Y EG Y S Y M CYC MIN: 7 7 0 23 0 31 1 4 20 4 6 60LATE NIG 600 13 11 25 1 4 26 4 60NITE 0/1 630 7 21 28 1 4 23 4 60PRE AM M 720 8 29 43 1 4 38 4 90AM PEAK 930 9 41 25 1 4 56 4 90MID-BAY 1130 10 47 25 1 4 56 4 90MID-DAY 1345 9 41 25 1 4 56 4 90MID-DAY 1545 11 36 28 1 4 63 4 100PM PEAK 1800 12 38 35 1 4 46 4 90PQST PM 1900 13 11 25 1 4 26 4 60NITE 0/1 2300 23 0 31 1 4 20 4 6 60LATE NIG ENTER THE DAY #, CONTROLLER # (/ = STOP) PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 3449 S MIAMI AVE & 7 ST FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 24) TIME PT OFF NW F Y WW F Y R S Y M CYC MIN: 7 6 4 6 0 22 45 24 6 4 15 6 4 1 60EARLY NI 30 23 7 24 6 4 15 6 4 1 60NIGHT 11 100 19 7 25 6 4 14 6 4 1 60LATE NIG 600 4 43 30 6 4 9 6 4 1 60PRE AM P 730 1 79 54 6 4 25 6 4 1 100AM PEAK 930 6 3 19 6 4 20 6 4 1 60AVERAGE 1530 7 64 29 6 4 30 6 4 1 80PM PEAK 1830 8 33 19 6 4 20 6 4 1 60POST PM 2130 9 7 24 6 4 15 6 4 1 60EVENING 2300 22 45 24 6 4 15 6 4 1 60EARLY NI ENTER THE DAY #, CONTROLLER # (/ = STOP) PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 5813 SW 2 AV & SW 3 ST FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 27) TIME PT OFF NSG G Y R EWG Y R S Y M CYC 13 - FRIDAY (NO SCHOOL,) 0 23 0 25 1 4 1 34 4 1 6 70NIGHT 20 600 13 46 46 1 4 1 13 4 1 70NIGHT 1/ 730 8 76 58 1 4 1 21 4 I 90AM PEAK 900 9 29 58 1 4 1 21 4 I 90MID-DAY 1145 10 8 58 1 4 1 21 4 1 90NOON 1/0 1315 9 29 58 1 4 1 21 4 1 90MID-DAY 1545 11 81 68 1 4 1 21 4 1 100PM PEAK 1800 12 3 60 1 4 1 19 4 1 90P0ST PM 1900 13 46 46 1 4 1 13 4 1 70NIGHT 1/ 2100 17 46 46 1 4 1 13 4 1 70NIGHT 5/ 2300 23 0 25 1 4 1 34 4 1 6 70NIGHT 20 ENTER THE DAY #, CONTROLLER # (/ = STOP) 1 / � Appendix C • • • FDOT's Quality/LOS Handbook • Generalized Tables • • i Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • Transit Ridership • • • • • • • • wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwww 415, • • LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE CLASSIFICATION TYPE FDOT'S 2002 QUALITY / LEVEL OF SERVICE PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE A I B 1 C D E A 1 B C D E CLASS 4 ARTERIAL 1 LU 0 0 270 720 780 0 0 0.35 0.92 1.00 2LD 0 0 650 1580 1660 0 0 0.39 0.95 1.00 3LD 0 0 1000 2390 2490 0 0 0.40 0.96 1.00 4LD 0 0 1350 3130 3250 0 0 0.42 0.96 1.00 Source: FDOTs 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook NOTES: [1] THE PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE IS DERIVED BY DIVIDING THE FDOTS 2002 LEVEL OF SERVICE BY THE LOS E FOR EACH TYPE OF ROADWAY. TABLE 4 - 7 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided Level of Service A B C D E 100 340 670 950 1,300 1,060 1,720 2,500 3,230 3,670 1,600 2,590 3,740 4,840 5,500 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 1 Undivided •* 220 720 2 Divided 250 1,530 1,810 3 Divided 380 2,330 2,720 4 Divided 490 3,030 3,460 860 1,860 2,790 3,540 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C 1 Undivided ** 100 590 810 2 Divided ** 220 1,360 1,710 3 Divided *• 340 2,110 2,570 4 Divided •• 440 2,790 3,330 E 890 •*» *•* D E 850 1,800 2,710 3,500 Class 111(more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not within primary city central business district of an urbanized area over 750,000) Lance Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided 4 Divided A ** Level of Service B C D ** ** ** ** 280 650 1,020 1,350 660 1,510 2,330 3,070 E 810 1,720 2,580 3,330 Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within primary city central business district of an urbanized area ever 750,000) Lanes Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided 4 Divided A ** ** ** ** B ** *• ** Level of Service C D 270 720 650 1,580 1,000 2,390 1,350 3,130 E 780 1,660 2,490 3,250 Lanes Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided 3 Divided Lanes Divided 1 Undivided 2 Divided NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways Level of Service A B C D *• ** ** ** ** ** 480 760 1,120 1,620 1,740 2,450 Other Signalized Roadways (signalized intersection analysis) Level of Service A B C D ** ** 250 530 ** ** 580 1,140 E 810 1,720 2,580 E 660 1,320 FREEWAYS Interchange spacing? 2 mi. apart Level of Service Lanes A B C 1) E 2 1,270 2,110 2,940 3,580 3,980 3 1,970 3,260 4,550 5,530 6,150 4 5 6 2,660 3,360 4,050 4,410 5,560 6,710 6,150 7,760 9,360 7,480 9,440 11,390 8,320 10,480 12,650 Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 2 1,130 1,840 2,660 3,440 3,910 3 1,780 2,890 4,180 5,410 6,150 4 2,340 3,940 5,700 7,380 8,380 5 3,080 4,990 7,220 9,340 10,620 3,730 6,040 8,740 11,310 12,850 6 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Coverage 0-49% 50-84% 85-100% A »* ** 160 Level of Service B C *• 170 130 210 380 >380 D 720 >210 *** E >720 **• **r PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not the number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes,) Sidewalk Coverage 0-49% 50-84% 85-100% Sidewalk Coverage 0-84% 85-100% A ** B ** 120 Level of Service C D ** 330 ** 520 590 >590 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) (Buses per hour) Level of Service A B C ** >5 ?4 >6 >4 >3 D >3 >2 E 810 990 E >2 >1 Source: Florida Department of Transportation Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 http://www11,myflorida.com/planning/systems/sm/losidefaulthtm 02/22/02 ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED (alter corresponding volumes by the indicated percent) Lanes Median 1 Divided 1 Undivided Multi Undivided Multi Undivided Lett Turns Lanes Yes No Yes No Adjustment Factors +5% ONE WAY FACILITIES Increase corresponding volume 20% -20% -5% -25% •This table does not constitute a standard and should bo used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific phaeton applications. The sable and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intemertion design, where more refined techniques exist. Values shown ere hourly dirootionat volumes for levels of service and are for the auWamobilefouck modes unless specifically stated Level of service totter grade thresholds are ptobsbly not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be mad* with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway Level of service is not recommended To convert to annual avenge daily traffic volumes, thesh voiasosa must be divided by appropriate O and K factors The table's input value defaults and level of service criteria appear oo the following page. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Mutual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian t.OS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes •'Coamt be achieved wing table input value defaults. •,•Not applicable for that level of service letter ,grade. For sutonsebile/ouck modes, volumes grater than level of service 0 become F because intersection capacities hoe been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian anodes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, beceuso there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 97 .... �...................... .ww j w !A 077w11TOWN MIA D6110067E E711571NG M U5 R/OERSNI► ANa PERSON. TRIP GA►6CI7Y ►5l1ONMEpl1s 2P NA 2001 RnAOweY FROM 7o ME 7651REET NE 17 STREET WE 17 STREET WE IA STREET NE 14 STREET 74E655SEET NE65TREE7 NE aS791EE9 NE . STREET N AGLER 51REE FLAMER STREET SE6 STREET SE 6 STREET 5E 6 STREET SE 6 STREET Sw 12 STREET SW12 STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET SE 15 R000 11,111 AVESWE WE II STREET NE 7 STREET NE 1STREET ELAOLER STREET NE 7 STREET NE 1 STREET FLAMER STREET SE 7 STREET sp. 1 AVEMui N 5551 AVENUE SW 7 STREET SW 1 STREET Sw 'STREET SW E STREET 5w13 STREET 116.17 AVEIRIE NW II STREET kw {STREET 1ANE5TREET 06,0 I57REE1 Nw6stem rev SSTREEI RNES STREE! NW 151REE1 NW 3 STREET Nw tSTREET NW t STREEI SW 1 S7REE7 SW 7 Sint EI SW 7579fE7 5w75TREET Sw757E1E(T Sw7STREET 5W• 61REET SW a STREET Sw 11 STREET 5W It STREET 5W 7I STREET 5W13 STREET Sw 150O60 IIR 56 SR S6 SR 59 N6 FACILITY 7Y►E EXISTING LA N6 NIT NS SR 11S SR NS SR t16 56 NR 56 S16 56 Se N6 56 NS Se NS 56 NR SET N6 56 NS SS N6 SS N6 SR NS SS NS 54) 04s. SS N6 56 IL 3L 3L 3L IL A 77 21 n 7LV ETD .10 11 76 QU 27 R h 2167 24.16 2L0 7[0 2 11, 21 17 .Au 710 45 U 7Lu hV .LV 6 a e 6 a 6 6 a 9S 95 91 95 6 i 7 21 71 21 2 1) 7 9S 9S 6175 ROUTE! !ERYi#a 1406o1At SEG EMENTS 95 95 95 95 95 9S 7 9S 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 91 95 95 95 771 115 95 91 9S 95 95 7 71 Y 71 6 I 9S . 150 5 150 5 2.6 2 Rs 167 .07 } 6 6 i 760 6 7.0 I 6 7 Il cab 66 1)6 T26 66 7S 5. 776 6e S. 210 16 .5 I 1. .6 173 56 F 45 17 46 16 t5 ,2 6 6 75 1241 6V5 *0076S 640 R I0ERlNIP ►ER SE GEMEN7^ TOTAL ARS j 61>9 R111ER914► - 76►Att1Y _ _ _.: LPERsaNs7 124E65(1745) 67C • Tye 0075 4 156 0079 4 15S 0076 .54 514 076! BSI 41t 1:1;11.1t 251 57.0.7C 6e Su 0,27 1e7 '60 0 Ito 167 7t0 0740 2.6, 51. 0 461 2.6; 51. 61t6, 116' 115 0.'2 6e 3,5 071E 164. 1 675 0 441 141' 510 0 740 767, + 6f4 01E7 TR7 111,1 0 t77 P S n7a 0157 R19 1 A74 071n . T .74 0140 174 .n '1k' t.7. 111410 56 0!119 ,16 0014 SOSJPCE 5E1114 ARID 9CNN7As ► 6 N 1161.A644LA49P1407E0 15•R171 767 75,1*MS., 1t.1a *Fit Nv. PM. 4 W 5 wwwwwwww wwwwwwwww wwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWIPWIPWCPWWW E� s 70+br7001— OWN NE 4[1 OM UPDATE ROADWAY FRO,* IISCATE RLVO NE 7 AVENUE ME / AVENUE N SWAN AYE NUE NW 2 AVENUE N! STOUT R15C4v1E I[ V0 NE 2 AVENUE N MAN AVENUE NE 1 STREET I11CA9NE. RL4O NE 7 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE ELAO(4U ITREET IRSCArNE BAND NE 2 AVENUE N E IAVENUE PAY 1 AVENUE NW 7 4VIFIN E TO NE 7 AVENUE NE 14VENUE N WAIN AV£f4/! NW 7 AVENUE 1-95 NE 7 AV EN17E N MAAR AVENUE NW 3AVE.41E NE 2 AVENUE MW 2 AVENUE 1.95 NE 2 AVE7IUE NE 1 AVENUE PAV F AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE I.17 SE 1 STREET BISCAYNE BLVO 5E 1 AVENUE SE 1 AVENUE SW 7 AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE SW 7AVENUE 1 9S IE 2 ITR4fl as r4.I IR54:49NE 4 v0 If 3AVENUE SE 4 7AR9A3I-5 •ISC4YNE 6Lvo EE 7 STREET IRICREI( AVENL7E 5E 3 AVENUE NE 7 AVENUE SE 7AVE/Rif SW I AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE ISS Soma REIT14 AND SC.R44RS. P A aR ER E9 EI E9 ER 30 W9 E6 WR ER v.9 WI we, WR WI WR WI WI E9 EI ER E9 ER, W9 WI I 48 WR FACILITY TYPE EXISTING 4L 3E 3L ll 3l 71n 2l0 24L7 7L 2L 71 2L 21 2L 7L 11 3L n 44 54 4L 3l 3l 3L 5, 11 7, 7T 9 '0 11 SI 3 21 3 7 7 11 16 13 11 1 SI 4e 14 71i.e 9j _L A EXISTING ►M IUI 4110113709ANO PERSON TRW CAPACITY 4.14IC7NIE N7l SUS AOITTE9 SERVING _ R0A0rr59 SEGE4.[N7S I ' I 1 51 77 13 97 13 95 11 9 Tr 9S 1S 4S 9S 95 95 95 95 .I 11 51 10 71 95 95 95 95 95 1S 9S 95 17 93 1/ 5, 15 95 95 9 95 95 C 11 9S 9S C 111 95 95 C I 95 C 5 I6 7. 48 SI 77 77 1 i I III j � ! 5.I 5 . 5 93 C 5 57 •7 .S AS 10 17 11 11 167 SE 77 •7 147 76 60 79. ?106 13e 21 1 13 95 a7 j 40 777 60 222 47 30 7. 36 301 44 154 473 7 3 1 T 69 40 46 34 57 74 74 719 21 49 6 44 9 I 7. SUS ROUTES 4N0 RIOERINI► PEN SEGEMENT 243 I c I A ,2 6) I As I170 106 1 19 ! 56 ' 1 EO 76 39 56 110 176 9 F0 11 1 16 rl 156 60 F , 33 66 NI 160 ! 47 77 66 160 ' 17 764 1 I aI 76 95 197 ▪ ; 72 74 M i 4S SS. 7T 1 97 C '11 +0 - 16 72 75 I R 1115 . 1 40 16 1 6R .6 1 76 ! 770 76 I +0 ]6 1, 60 a0 TOTAL SUS RU9 I 0I17E44914I/ 1 Ca4A5,54 L►EASON11 0IE111ONS1 S1 57 V/C 309 0 lot :40 0 7n0 2e., nAA 717 1ST' 1 7714 0 704 S40' 1701 0447 794. 3 579 0 725 650 157E 016. 677 3•:1,1 0,44, SS,1950 0713- 651 765A 07a6 961 a. A 071e 550 775 07.1 10110,n 0v.a. 10 0 011 134 5.6 021' 341 1 7.4 0 751 7•- 774 0097 710 379 O 556 • N UNAVICAIW N102ECT512001• 147161T40F ES" 1‘.. 1..11 W W W V W l W W W IP I W W W W W W W W W W IP W W W W W w w w w w ww�� W a++rToo+ R0ADVTAY IRON._._ TO 1TICREII AVENUE S WAIN AVENUE S ASAN AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE 5w 1 49665.0E 1.95 SW 151tpfET DINCREll AVENUE 5 IwAmi ANEMIA Ee 5 MIAMI AVENUE WEE t AVENUE EB SW t 456851E WO iS Ra4p ES w8 aR ER EB E9 SR 15N-115RIACAR7NVR MOW, PAID ISLAND ENTR BAY5110RE DNVE EB vel DAY$INSIE DRIVE $ WWI AVENUE e NNudeNAVENUE 1.95 we E9 145 V18 Nw 12 AVENUE Ee A6v 17AVENUE WB NW 17 aVENtIE Ell NW t7AVEME NW71AVENUE 8 E NW 27 AVENUE 964 37 Av We ES NW 77 AVENUE we Per 97 AvET6UE E8 NW 42 AVENUE we 57 AVENUE 1E9 MN ST AVENUE NW 77 AVENUE Ell NW 77AvENUE we EA R171 WEI S Nw47 AVENUE E8 We PAY 17 456811E NW 107 kvE/ArE E8 We 1R17AVO919Nar5N Dg7RIBVTOR ;se BRICREUI AVENUE ER 4(0 we 141 FACILITY TYPE EJI+STRIC UIRES 31 tl 41.0 AIU Atu 610 61.13 610 1L0 610 41.0 110 si0 1Ip sl0 6LD Ott; 6LD 1.116 SR1)1 SR43 NW STREET ewe 5STREET SW ISTREET SW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW/STREET SW26 ROAD SW 71 RO4p 5 C451E I110MYAT NO +aD Se Ne 1qp se 101.0 58 me taw 58 me 10(0 SR 59 AID e 6 6 N 24 7A Ss St 95 1S 15 C C 95 95 B R R 75 15 M S M S 15 15 95 11 15 15 TA DOWNTOWN eel UPDATE EJI157IN0 1411 111571 R10ERSN1► AND ►ER108.TR1► CA}AC,TY A/1iGNRENT9 B1r! ROUTES SE Orville 1506DWAY anemone NOTE BUS 110117E IOCADION AN0 el/5 RI0ERSI90 041 A OR MNEO FROM 6111111 DAOE TRANSIT AU550R1751M01 Al ROeERT R ►EARSALL 7 66 7 6s 7! 17 17 17 SI 5 57 16 50 r0 95 176 771 R M 156 i66 56 15 790 700 95 140 BUS ROUTES 4643 RIDE RS5R►►ER SEaE61ENT = TOTAI - SU% I ells R10E R*Nb1 ' CA►AC4T1 _itEIISONS1y1►ERSONs).�v,C - 700! 776, 0 775 761 510 0 131 r 69� 514 0 1)7 97 760 0 354 97! 761 0 1.4 97 7F0 0 351 46?' 1 3.5. 0 191 341 0 177 140 7E0 0 536 r71' T7s s.f0 0161 SOURCE RE11N ADS 60414115_ {1 N lTRANRLASAORQ7{CT51.200,116716,i ASLE 5+1 s1151R=t 5151 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.www P qB 2e8P1 0 20 Narr2001 RT3AfWAY FROM NE'T AvemtiE T .. NE 17 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET 1.395 1.395 NE 6 STREET NE 6 STREET FLAGIER STREET FLAGLERSTREET SE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET N. WAN AVENUE +>,S. MIAMI AVENUE NE 20 STREET NE 17 STREET NE 17STREET NE 14STREET NE 14 STREET NE 6 STREET NE 6 STREET NE 4 STREET NE 4 STREET FLAGLER STREET FLAGLER STREET SE 6 STREET SE 6 STREET SE 6 STREET SE 6 STREET Sw 12 STREET SW 12 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 13 STREET SE 15 ROAD NW 1 AVENUE NE 6 STREET NE 7 STREET NE 7 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 1 STREET FLAGLER STREET FLAGLER STREET SE 2 STREET SW 1 AVENUE N. MIAMI AVENUE SW 7 STREET SW A STREET SOURCE' KEITH AND SC194AR5, P A. SW T STREET SW 8 STREET SW 13 STREET TAOL 1.AI ip NTOWN MIAMI DRI UPDATE EA1511NG AM ANO PM METRORA1L AND MEETTROA1OVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON -TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT - _ MASSTRtA1151T : MFE TR0MT3YN'� R N8 SB NB NO N8 N8 NB SB 5B 56 56 5B SB NB NB NB NA SB NB SB N6 SB NB SB NB SB SB SR 58 FAC€CITY TYPE EXISTING METRO LANES RAIL_ 21U 3L 3L x 31 31 2L x❑ 410 41.0 1L 2L 4111 3L 71 2L 6911 MR2 MR2 MR3 MR4 MR4 MR2 MR2 MR3 MR4 -- -- MASSTRANSTE- HETptRA8. -T — i Pi I PEAK 1p7AlPMPEA IIII CAPACITY RIDERSHIP Ply %1 R50N5) (PERSONS) VIC 25% 25% 25% 50% 50% 50% 1,463 7.463 1.463 2.925 2.925 2-925 692 691 691 563 553 553 0473 04T2 0 472 0.192 0 169 0 169 9011 2,925 664 0 234 SO% 2.925 1.364 0 473 50% 2.975 666 0 23S SO% 2925 1,384 0473 50% 2-925 666 0 235 5016 2.915 1.384 0 473 50% 50% 2,925 2.925 1.655 1,690 0 566 0 576 AM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP AM (PERSONS( WC 256 240 240 1.552 1 676 1,626 0.175 0F64 0,161 0531 0.556 0.556 1.266 0 433 513 0175 1,258 0 430 513 0t75 1.75A 0 430 513 0 175 530 0 161 542I 0 165 I7) PE A16 ME TRQ. 13I • CAPACITY _.,MOVER__ _% (PERSONS) MM2 MM? MM2 25% 460 25% 460 50% 960 50% 960 50% 1,440 MMT 1 50% 1,440 154441 150% 1 440 MM2 50% 1..042 : 50% MM7 i 50% MM2 50% 50% PM PEAK AM PEAK TOTAL i TOTAI, RIOERS141P I PM RlD5pSHIP AM IPERSQNS( L_VJCC (PERSONS) )_ VIC 1 22 0046 7A' 0 056 26 0 054 25' 0 052 w 0 046 57' 0 059' 47 0049 91 0063 74 0051 106 0 074 960 164 0.171 960 164 0 1 Tt 960 164 0 171 960 65 0 069 960 97 010T 61 0 06,1 138 0 06 T Mt 0 056' 1021 0071 156: 0 +65 1580 165 158. 0 165 62'' 0 0A5 93' 0 097 I4 ITRANPLAMPROJECTS120011M7161TABL E5111MATRIK 11641 w w w w ler 7 w w 70•610 2001 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ROADWAY FROM TO NW !AVENUE' _ NW 1t STREET NW 8 STREET NW 8 STREET f NW6STREET NW 5 STREET NW 3 STREET NW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 7STREET SW B STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET NW 3 AVENUE NW 20 STREET NW 17 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 5 STREET NE 76 STREET NE 7 AVENUE N. M1A7i8 AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NE 15 5TREETNENET1AN BISCAYNE ISLAND BAYSNORE DRIVE BISCAYNE etvo NW 6 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 3 STREET NW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 7 STREET SW B STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 15ROA0 NW 17 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 5 STREET SW 1 STREET TA@ B DOWNTOWN i, 0RI UPDATE EXISTING AM AND PA1 METRORAIE AND METROMOVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON -TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT FACILITY TYPE EXISTING METRO- ..—„ DIR BANES RAIL N MIAMIAVENUE NW 3AVENUE 1-95 CSWY BAYSHORE DRIVE BISCAYNE BL VO N MIAMI AVENUE SOURCE- KE(TH AND SCHNARS. PA. N8 SO NH 56 NB 56 NB SB NB SR NB 58 NB 58 NB SR NB SR 678 56 NB 5R P49 S8 2LU MR1 2LU 21.0 2E 1L 2E 1E 4EU 25.0 4LU 2LU 2LU 4L U N8 i 2EU 5B NB 2LU 58 NB 2LU 58 NB 3L NO 24 E8 WR ER YA! ER we 2LU 4LU 4L0 MRI MR2 MR2 MR13 MR3 MR4 MR4 50% 25% 50% 25% 5051 25% 50:C 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% IA -es TL9WSIt Awn/Mk Air PEAK CAPACITY PERSONS) 2.925 1.463 2.925 1!63 2.925 1.463 2.925 1.463 1.463 1.463 1!63 1,463 1463 1!63 1,463 1.463 PM PEAK .TOTAL RIDERSHIP PM [PERSONSL_V/C 666 692 684 692 686 697 686 692 281 692 281 692 276 692 276 692 0234 0 473 0 234 0 473 0 235 0473 0235 0 471 0 192 0 473 0 192 0 473 0189 0473 0189 Q 473 AM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP AM JPERSONSj V!C_ 1.766 0.43I 256 0175 t_256 0433 256 0175 1.256 0.430 256 0175 1.258 0430 256 0175 716 0 $30 756 01r5 776 0.53Q 5256 0175 B13 0556 2s6 0.175 813 0556 256 0175 METRO. MOVER wwwwwwww wwrw.w iTo MASS TRANSIT-NIE'TROMOM t71 PEAK CAPACITY ;PERSOHS, PM PEAK f0TAL RIDERSHIP PM (PERSONS] t_ .VtC___ AM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP I Au IPERSTINS) 1__VIC N-4TRANPLAMPROJECTS120011167161TABLES111MATRIX VOL! w w w w ler ler w w w w • 20-Nw-2001 wwww w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 1111,w w w w w= w w w ear co ROADWAY FROM TO NE nTREET �v BISCATNE BIND NE 2 AVENUE NE 2 AVENUE N MFAMI AVENUE N. MIAMI AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NE t'TREET BISCAYNE own NE 2 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE NE 2 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE 1-65 FLAGLER STREET BISCAYNE BLVD NE 2 AVENUE NE 2 AVENUE NE 1 AVENUE NE 1 AVENUE NW 1 AVENUE NW 1 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE 1-95 !E 1 STREET BISCAYNE BLVO 5E I AVENUE SE1AVENUE SW AVENUE SW I AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE SW 7 AVENUE 1•65 SE 2 STRFET1SRMA76-1 BISCAYNE BLVD_ SE 3AVENUE 5E 3 AVENUE NE 7 AVENUE SE 4 STREET7SRSA7S•1 BISCAYNE BLVD. SE 2 AVENUE T•.A{ NTOWN MIAMI OR1 UPDATE EXISTING AM AND PM AIETRORAND METR AIL OMDVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON•TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT FACILITY TYPE EXISTING METRO DER[ LANES RAIL EB 2L0 We EB 7l0 We ER 2L0 We we We We WB We we MB EH ER E8 Ee EB we YVB ER SE 7 STREET BRICKELL AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE WB SW I AVENUE 1.95 IVMB SOURCE: KEITH AND SCNNARS. PA. 2L 2L 2L 2L 21. 2L 2L 2L 3L x 3E 41 SL 4E 3L 31. iASSTRANSIT : wIETAiin, _ - Pi PEAK III CAPACITY x.. APERSONSI, PM PEAK �I3rTAL _ — RIOERSHIP PM IpERSONSL V1C_ AM PEAK -TOTAL- _. ` RIDERSHIP AM [I?ERSONSI VIC moss TRANSR-ME/RalAMA--- f71 PEAK METRO- 171 I CAPACITY MOVER I N,-_ 1PERSONSI_ MMI 100% LAM MM1 Sp., MM1 100% ' I 1,440 2,660 MMI 100% ! 2.660 MMI 100% 7.660 1,440 PM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP PM IfERSONSII rc_ 252 0 ON 106 326 0 074 0 114 146 0051 146 0051 106 0 074 AM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP I AM jRER5DN5}�vfC 255; 0 1020071' 316; 0 110 151 151 0 057 0 052, 107; 0071 N ITRANPLANIPR03ECTS120011167T61TABLESt I WA? P1X 1A1(4 w w w w w w w w w w w w • 74Nw700! II ROADWAY FROM SFE STREET - 8RICKELL AVENUE 5 MIAMIAVENVE SW 1 AVENUE SW 13 STREET 8RICKELL AVENUE S. MIAMI AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE SR 13E11.715/MACARTHUR PALM ISUWO ENTR SAYSNORE DRIVE N MIAMI AVENUE I-95 NW 17 AVENUE NW 17 AVENUE NW 27AVENUE NW 37 AVENUE NW 42 AVENUE NW 57 AVENUE NW 72 AVENUE SR1128 NW 87 AVENUE SOURCE: kEITM AND SCINARS, P A. 5. MIAMI AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE I-95 5. MIAMI AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD CSWY BAYSHORE DRIVE N. MIAMI AVENUE 1.95 NW 12 AVENUE NW 17 AVENUE NW 27 AVENUE NYE 37 AVENUE NW 42 AVENUE NW 57 AVENUE NW 72 AVENUE SR876 NW 87 AVENUE NW 107 AVENUE w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w Tn E8 EB E8 E9 W8 E8 WB ER .1.AS AND EXISTING AM AND PM ME'TRQIUIK. DOWNTOWN WAIN DR! UPDATE QMDVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON -TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT MASS TRA FACILITY TYPE EXISTING METRO.. LAMES RAIL x 31. 4L 4LU 4LU 4LU ER Et D WB E9 6LD WB Ea 6LO we E8 6LD INS EB 6LD WE F8 610 WB ES 6LO WP E8 61.0 WR E8 6LD 4VB ER 6LQ WR ES 610 WR F8 ILO WR E8 610 12( PEA% CAPACITY (_PERSONS)_ .MORAIL PM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP PM .i RSONS( vFC AM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP AM ,(PENSONS4LWC -. w !C P 11,114,91 AAAS5 TRANSIT-1.4tikOMOV£li.� -._ j E21 PEAK METRO• CAPACITY MOVER (TIER SON!! PM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP 1 PM 4PERSONS) _WC_ AM PEAK TOTAL RIDERSHIP I AM (PERSQNS4 ! _ WC ATRA IPLAµpROACTS1i001rle7i61TARLESw IMATRIA VW wwwwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWW • w WWW 0+94` 2 e41 70No, 200 7 [ROADWAY FROM NET AVENUE- ' -. NE 17 STREET TO - NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET 1.395 3395 NE6STREET NE 6STREET ELAGLERSTREET FLAGLER STREET SE 1 STREET 5E 1 STREET 5E 2 STREET N MIAMI AVENUES. MIAMI AVENUE NE 20 STREET NE 17 STREET NE 17 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 6STREET NE 6 STREET NE 4 STREET NE STREET FLAGLER STREET ELAGLER STREET SE 6STREET SE 6 STREET 5E 8 STREET SE 8 STREET 5w 12 STREET 5W 12 STREET Sw 13 STREET SW 13 STREET SE 15 ROAD NW 1 AVENUE NE 5 STREET NE 7 STREET NE 7 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 1 STREET FLAGLER STREEI FLAGLER STREET SE 2 STREET SW 1 AVENUE N MIAMI AVENUE SW 7 STREET SW T STREET SW 6 STREET SW6STREET SW 11STREFT 50URCE RE7T61 AND SCNNARS. P A TABLE 21 010 DOWNTOWN MIAM1 ORE UPDATE YEAR 7009 PERSON TRIP C077DITTONS iT� YR 7009 YR MIAMI FACILITY 7B09 AOOP- TYPE I E11IS TING BI(G j3jY TOTAL PERSON PERSON COMMI-I BKG TEO EXISTING AM) COUNT TRW TAIR TT'ED I PERSON _OM I tO5 LANES'PM OATS VOLUME VOLUME _Dry_ I TA1P N8 ! E 7LU NIA. NIA NfA SO I E NIA NB E•70 31 PM, 04725701 7.112 1 NB E•7D 1 1L 1PM,05201t01 t.370 NB E 420 31 RM 1 05701pj1 1.508 I N9 , E•74 31. 1mMEOS101/0! 1.11E E•20 I ill 3L PM 05161701 1.413 I1 • 58 E•70 3l 1jj661I0477901 58 E•70 3l ' AM, 04775,101 1 58 6•20 3L AM, 04725701 58 E•20 3L I AM04725R01 SB E • 20 2L I AM 104)75701 58 € E • 70 3L ! PM 04775701 I E NB E •7t1 71 I PM. 04725ro1 NB E • 70 2( PM 1 0472901 1 I NB E•20 71. !Pm! 04,75701 21U ; AM" 04717/01 1 I at I, AM 04/75701 NB E SO E NB 5B NI 58 N{1 SR N9 S8 SO 5B 58 4LD IL 71. 4117 E•20 13 E•70 n E•20 I 1t ill FUTURE 151 PERSON SILL TRIP PERSON CAPACITY- 1RIP TOTAL, ._ v1C • 1O55 N/A I TM) 773760 ;04]9 , 0 2717 B74 1760 '0 13) 0 3,086 6B4t `0451 ❑ 1.383 1057 2440 6843 10357 O 1 579 925 7.504 8.669 10 289 C 1,380 935 2.315 8-669 I 0 767 C 1.061 (.006 j 7.067 7.336 i 0 7117 C s 1182 924 I 413 I t 337 I 6.879 0 194 C 683 925 ; 421 1.346 5.731 10757 1,708 I 7,784 I 6;1p I 2439 I 5.416 :0450 D 2.752 ` 2.359 � 44 9 I 1.808 7.651 0 367 • O 7,434 2.549 360 7.909 9.381 ; 0 310 � D 2.434 2.525549 7 804 438T ! O l;» p 511 517 � 216 753 7.740 , 4 136 D 177 1115 134 319 . 7.740 ' 0 147 C i 553 579 1 VII ! 950 5044 I O WE C 553 579 I 319 9E8 5.044 10182 C 809 847 € 337 ; 1,179 6,50T ;0tat ' C 1 512 j 1.544 I 60 1 644 5 645 0 791 D 1,147 1,1% 66 1.2132 5645 0777 1 C AM 04775701 1 504 ? 1 515 I 70 1 64 S 5.645 I 0 29+ I AM p472YOt 1 14a I 1196 I (07 1 798 F5645 0210 C 1503.575 79 I 1.654 4.705 I0393 i 0 AM' 04725701 746 250 194 96 It',1157 ! ' 0 233 C 629 659 142 ,0 136 c 601 2.584 '0310 '. D PM 04/75701 1 650 1.128 16.4 1.892 5 416 0 349 D PM , 0472901 3.305 3.462 3 vq ] fi41 5 693 0 544 0 PM I 04725701 7.761 •2 417 i ]OS 37t9 6t89• 0570 0 I 4 ffj 181 FUTURE I i3j� ..-� YR 2009 PROJ A5 : PROJ _. ENCJ1 TOTAL ; PERSON I TOTAL I A % OE I TRIPS PROJ PERSON I TRIP I PERSON I MAX (GREATER PERSON t TRIP 'CAPACITY I TRIP I SERv,CE T14AN 1•, TRIP VOLUME TOTAL_ i WC=LOST VOLUME . YE57610 ' 120 - 892 1.7E0 I0507 ! D 6132% 7E5 104 667 1 760 ; 0 490 0 5 91'9 TES 747 3113 6611 I04A7 0 361•%. NO i 420 2860 6,041 I0415 ` 0 6 14r YES 1 337 2.84 I : 8.669 }10 328 D ' 3 89 4 NO 275 2 540 8.669 [ 6 293 i 0 ` 7 60.1. NO j70 7.117 7.336 ;0319 0 365% NO 16B T-1Tel5(M4 1O277 C 3317E N0 t57 i 1.075 5.044 0 713 C 3 11 : NO 191 I 1.370 6507 10711 t : C 7 94.7. N0 715 r (.552 6679 10 226 i C 3 13% NO 249 I 1. 595 5.231 0 305 O 4 76 . NO 559 7 996 5 416 :0 554 0 , 10 37'. YES 145 3 151 7653 : 0417 0 r1p 767 3 176 I 9.381 : 0 339 0 7 55% NO 163 2.967 9.3131 0 316 � ❑ ' 1 74.7. NQ 99 P57 2.740 ' 0 380 ; D 4 47% NO 59 378 2.246 0169 C . 2.63% NO 31 1675 5645 0297 52 1134 5.645 I0236 45 1.690 5645 I0299 75 t313 5645 10243 35 1 689 4 205 0 407 58 1 377 5645 10243 16 3810 7.584 ' 0 151 64 565 1 7,584 ; 0335 0 i 0 55.7. N(3 C 0 97% N0 0 . 0 80s. No C 133'l. NO 0 0A74. NO C 107.7. Np C r47, Np (5 2 484 NO 14) 2015 5416 ,10376 0 264.7. NO 176 3 817 6 693 ; 0 570 : O 2 637, NO 754 1 477 6.1E19 ' 0 561 ' 0 A 10'•. NO N (TRANPL5NIPROJECTS17001116716•. TA7LE5111104TRIY \r114 III wIMP wIMP IMP wIMP IMP IMP w 11,IIPwwwIMP wIMP IMP IMP IMP wIOW wII, IMP wII.PVw.wII, IMF w.wWI, w •t Poet 3617 20. N0Y.7001 ROADWAY FROM 775YTASETTE E--_._._ NW 11 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 3 STREET NW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 7 STREET SW 6 STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET I tow 3 AVENUE NW 70 STREET NW 17 STREET Nw 14 STREET NW g STREET NW 5 STREET TO NW 8 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 3 STREET NW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 7 STREET SW 8 STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 15 ROAD NW 17 STREET NW 34 STREET NW 95TREET NW 5 STREET SW t STREET 748 70 STREET NE 2 AVENUE N MIAMI AVENUE N. MIAMI AVENUE NW ] AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE I-95 NE 15 STREE TNENETIAN CSwY BISCAYNE 151 A640 DAYSHORE DRIVE BAYSHORE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLVD BISCAYNE 8LV0 N MIAMI AVENUE 153 M 01R N8 SA NB SD N8 SB NB SR NB 58 NB SB NB S8 Nil 58 NB SB ND SR NB S8 N8 S8 NB se NB SB Na SB NB NB EB WB E8 we EB we MIAMI A00P• 7E0 LOS E E E•20 E•20 TABLE I1.010 DOWNTOwrt M7AUi Dig UPDATE YEAR 2009 PERSON TRIP CONOITIONS FACILITY EkE111 STING YBK ig ' TR 7006 FUTURE 1 151 TYPE 131 TOTAL PERSON I 8KG PERSON PERSON C0MM1- BKG EXISTINGIAM7 COUNT TRIP TRIP TRIP ! PERSON TTEtl PERSON • CAPACITY LANES IPM GATE YOLUME VOLUME_OEv. TRIP _' __ , _ _ _ .� TRW TOTAL V/C .__ -- - Las ILU PM 04/24r01 1,17] 1.229 1,050 71.47 710 23.11 7L tt, 21 FL 41JU 21.0 41U 2L11 21.0 4L U PM 0472543 PM 04/75/07 PM 04725401 PM 04/75701 PM 04725701 PM 04R570t PM p4n5/01 PM , 0477y0 t pm 104175'o r PM 0405,01 PM 04/17/01 2111 PM, 07706/00 211.7 PM i 07/06100 2LU PM t 07706100 31- PM' 04725/0r 7L Pm; 64775/01 7*U 4LU ILO EB E 2LD WB E E8 E h0 W8 E E8 E 21.0 WB E *MI i04124,00 AM 104/24100 AM; 04774830 PM 109712/00 PM09732/00 PM 09/12700 2.528 1.198 7.446 1.055 2.448 1,150 1.399 456 1,026 456 967 913 t 748 € 605 r.746 1 611 1 743 1.631 1.741 1.605 307 395 1100 7648 1.255 7,564 1105 7.564 1.204 1 465 478 1.075 478 3,013 956 1 307 1,661 1,307 1687 1.302 1.687 3.302 1,681 316 474 117 364 324 374 337 435 376 506 428 294 721 196 797 710 304 363 7,7 156 202 74 90 AM I 295 20 786 307 15 ♦70 504 51 426 449 17 338 356 67 304 320 60 1,543 1,616 i 122 1.543 1,616 754 876 923 148 715 , 753 98 876 9?3 219 715 753 141 876 1 923 175 715 I 753 134 450 469 550 570 755 357 474 494 579 546 26g 376 435 1.66i4 376 1 476 374 3.022 1.587 2.978 1429 7.938 1.536 1.900 854 1.581 906 1,307 1 179 705 1.978 1 537 1,991 1 465 1.899 1,458 1-683 390 504 4515 j 0369 € 0 3.053 I 0 483 . 0 8 979 I 0 337 O 3.739 ;0490 0 6B57 0331 ! 0 2.807 j0509, D 8.857 , 0 337 ; 0 3427 0448 1 0 7-172 0 765 ' C 1.900 0 449 I 0 2.708 0 5d4 i 0 1.900 0477 0 2.584 0 506 ' 0 2.584 0 4s6 $ 0 2.743 06.71 i 0 2 743 0 77, 1 0 4 047 0 360 D 4 179 0476 ! ❑ 2 743 0 534 ; O 2675 0661 '• O 2. 743 0 532 0 2,743 0686 0 2.58A 0153 C 2.584 0 195 C 315 1.700 07' 6 0 316 1.280 0247 0 555 1,838 0 307 0 486 1836 0?EA ; 0 438 1 404 0 3€2 O 380 I 1.404 0 771 i 0 1,738 4.912 0 354 ' 0 1,870 3.264 f.071 85i 1.142 894 1 096 887 0573 ; 0 ,.406 0 737 O 1.466 0 580 1 0 2770 0412 D 2.770 0 373 0 2.906 . 0 376 i 0 2906 0305 0 6o 534 1443 6? 576 1,443 386 765 1.1143 255 803 1.695 13? 3D1 1.780 153 579 1.280 0 370 0399 0 394 0474 3 0 298 04,3 , 0 0 0 T1 0 {41 _. _ _ 161 YR 2009 FUTURE 151 ' PRO.) A5 i PROD INCH TOTAL PERSON TOTAL A 7.OF i TRIPS PBa3 I PERSON TRIP PERSON II MAX 'GREATER PER5014 TRIP CAPACITY _ TRIP ! SERVICE ,THAN 5'. TR,P- , YOLUM� I TOTAL VoC L.OS: VOLUME€ YESMO 202 i 1 8 66 4,5s5 0413 O 1 4479. . 176 1 657 1051 0 541 0 ' 5 76 €12 3 1 iA 8.979 0 349 0 I 1 75Y, 98 tfi85 3.739 0520 D 1 303. 97 85 1 € 514 8 857 0 342 1 E3 t 7 11YI. 28.607 0 539 j 0 3039. 112 1 3 050 8.657 0 344 E 0! 1 26% 98 1 € 631 3 477 0 477 0 7 8fi'A 76R7 7372 0291 0 I 261% 163 1.n,r 1.900 0 515 D 1 858 172 1 753 2-768 11647 ##' 6 3 6 35%. 350 1 056 1,900 0 556 { 0 1 7 R9•. 150 1-457 7.581 I.309 0 564 D i 5 80% 130 30 2544 0507 0 1 5039. 247 , 930 2,741 0 77T I 0 9005. 71i 7.191 7741 0799I 0 17MN. 150 1 7. 1 63 4047 0417 ! D i ]71y. 9 0 516 � E7 I 4 17 . °8 t.563 7 743 0 570 0 .l 57'•4 *17 70f1 7875 0699 0 J 9nY. 91 1.549 2.743 0.565 ; 0 3 37% 105 1.988 2.743 0 725 D ! 26 41 i i 7875. 6 2.564 0 161 C 3 (13 % 30 514 2.584 0 207 C ; 1 16% N3 YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES IFS NO ff{1 NO NO NO NO No NO 27 337 1-780 0 263 0 r 77% NO 70 336 1.280 0 261 D 1 56% NC. 30 585 1 8.18 `0 318 0 1 63'h NO 76 512 48173 '0779 0 i 1415; NO 52 490 1 7.404 0 349 0 I 3 70Y. NO 404 0 303 D 1 3 2tw, O 97 { 1.835 4.917 0 374 0 , 1 979. NO 480 2 350 I 3.164 1 0 770 ' 0 14 719. YES 46 1,117 29 87g 99 7 241 59 953 104 7 202 63 950 57 596 60 636 704 869 ,70 973 174 505 .47 671 1 466 0 762 0 ; 3 14% NU 7 466 0 600 i 0 1 1 91% Np 2 770 0448 1 0 1 3 579. - NO 7.770 ' 0 344 i 0 1 2 13% NO 7.906 , 0 414 1 0 1 3 569. NO 2.906 1 0 327 1 0 1 7.179. ' NO 1,443 0 406 ,443 0441 1,943 0447 4.645 0 545 780 ' 0 395 1780 1 0 524 n 360v. 0 ! 4 16•. 0 '. 5 15% D I 7 08% D 969h. D 1109% NO NO YES YES YE .5 YES SOURCE: KEITH 2.240 SCHNAPS, P A N 4T R7174PLAN3PRD2EC T S1i.00,116T, 63T A8LES1117761851l 94114 w w w w w w w w w • w w w w w w w w w W wr w w w wI w w w w MP w w w w w w w w w wI w w w w • PApr 4 64i 20ti N0• 700 f TABLE 71.040 OO W74TOW74 MIAMI 0R1 17P0A 1 E YEAR 2009 PERSON TRIP CONDITIONS MIAMI FACILITY I 11i YRP7009 'ER 1009 VIOURE 1 [ ROADWAY AOQP. YYPE EXISTING BKG 134 TOTAL PERSON 1 NAG Fkit.ROM �,,,�'7O ._.. _-....»_.._ TEO if MISTING AM/I COUNT PERSON PERSON COMMI. BKG i TRIP E PERSON 75T.1,_ OS�LANES PM: DATE VOLUME yVOLUME � I PERSON CAPACITYI TRIP • BAY5FICIRE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLVD I I I _ TRIP EB E I 4L PM 0970)rp0 YN BISCAE BLvp W8 E U NE S AVENUE f WB E 2L PM; 09r07l00 E IL N MIAMI AVENUE I 4 2L pM ' 097071n0 W9 E 13 NW ? AVEN1L F 7L U I UE. PM 04l07100 E NW J AVENUE YYB EB E 211.1 PM 09/02000 195 wB ! E ES # E 2LU t P114, 0477470Q WB I E NE I AVENUE N MIAMI AVENUE NW 2AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NE 1t STREET NW 3 AvENUE I.95 10 STREET NW 3 AVENUE 1.95 NE 1 STREETIPORT BOULEVARD E OF PORT 8R,OGE BISCAYNE 8LV0 BISCAYNE BLVO NE 1 AVENUE NE f AVENUE N ARAM AVENUE N M1A4,0 AVENUE NW 1 AVENUE NW 1 AVENUE NW I CT NW 1 CT NW 2 AVENUE NW 7 AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE 195 NE 9 STREET BISCAYNE SLID NE 2 AVENUE NE 2 AVENUE NE i AVENUE NE 'AVENUE N MIAMI AVENUE N MIAMI AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE NW 2 AVENUE 1.95 SOURCE' KEITN AN0 SC444AR5, P A. W9 E • 20 7L , PM 04774700 tk 1 I ES E•10 ] 2L tpM'04r247g9 E8 E w8 E vV8 E•20 WB £•70 wB E E•20 WB E•70 ti+g E•70 9B E+20 WB E•70 LB ! E•70 EB E•20 EB E+20 EB E+70 EB [ E•20 610 AM 04/06799 3L PM 04125117! 2L PM 0412901 7L PM 04725/04 71. PMI04r7Y01 21 PM 04/25/01 7L 11,441 04715rt3 3L PM 04r75701 4L 3L 3L 3E 13 1,743 921 510 432 270 253 270 75a 13a 386 74 , 274 1.704 970 537 508 274 777 784 272 356 407 754 289 260 367 365 499 741 194 1g4 265 141 494 30 41 TOTAL I V/C : LOS 1,0'23)7 I 4 767 ! Q 309 0 I 5 444 : 0 746 c 907 I 3 204 :0 707 Ll 1 007 1.900 1 0 5141 0 425 100 10 157 C 466 1 404 0 332 0 478 1-404 11340 _ 0 537 FAN 0 382 0 491 491 1 1 714 0 790 D 1 1,714 0357 0 7844 1.780 0 772 C 331280 0?58 0 768 282 518 B00 3,388 0 776 C 240 f 25A 1 498 752 3 188 0 272 1.i89 1.896 180 832 882 240 7.074 1.125 273 2 276 1, 122 1,398 4.096 4.096 8.757 0 5S6 , 0 0274 ! C n 160 C 1.263 4.323 191 1.514 7972 0 190 C 1,245 1,773 191 1 464 7 j 600 ' n 193 C 1.074 1,125 171 1.796 1.404 ' 0 18? C 9)5 979 171 i 1 1t5p - 1 574 10372 �° q 99z 1.039 177 1210 3 574 , 0 339 0 997 1,039 461 1.700 5.222 ' 0 230 ' C PM i 04625101 1 1 529 I 1-601 1 I` PM 104775/01 1,579 ((j 1,601 PM 04/25/01 1.529 1 1.601 PMi 047 ypt i 4_770 ! 44T 8.44. 94174701 1,610 1.686 154 1.737 9.872 ' 0 477 ' C S50 1 759 i 1 8.752 : 0201 . C f 36 iS, 777 8.757 : Q 19a C I 116 I 1579 ! 4917 .0371 p 57 1.718 527? • 0333 0 ; (41 151 YR 7009 FUTURE IS]1 INC.,, TOTAL ' PERSON I TOTAL ' PA ROJ %OFS TRIPS PROS 1 PERSON j TRIP ! PERSON • PERSON TRIP CAIAC,TY' TRIP ' MAX GREATER _TRIP VOLUME TOTAL SERVICE THAN 0 .._ . __ Y!c 1 LOs , VOLUME YE SI7EC3 228 7T•2 73) 137 144 127 208 740 169 195 187 210 1 100 4.761 0 357 ' 0 4 79x• Our) 1 599 5 444 i 0 294 D 4 j31!; N() 1 195 3 704 1! 0 471 1) 9 14•'• pn 7 4 144 1 0 4.1., 0 707 p 1 7 74k YES 536 70a # 0 198 - :GO I 4 10•. NCI 691 1 404 ^ 0 477 i 09 OS. 4,714 YE 5 686 1 404 1 0 489 i 1) : 14 81. YES 777 1 IQ4 I04455)JB9 0 U - 479860g.k 'FS fi�F6! YFS 796 1 714 0 464 ! 0 1 I179: YES 466 1 7A0 '41E•4 0 i 14 725. rFg 540 1780 '0427 0 1641•, YES 177 977 1.398 0 774 C 3 75k No 1 78 830 . . 3.388 �0245 C 2 JO". NO 139 2.415 ' 4 096 : 0 590 0 3 39% NO 1706 ! 4096 i0294 1 0 ?OSk N0 127 1-525 8-752 ' 0 174 C 1 455. NO 105 1619 7,97I 0 201 C 1 370• N0 60 1,574 7,600 0 701 C 0 79% NO 45 4,344 7,104 10 189 C 0 63'.: NO 37 1187 3,574 ' 0 337 I 0 3 1 04. Np 37 1.247 3 574 0 349 � D 1 04 : NO 57 1 757 5.222 ! 0 240 C , 1005. NO 59 t ow r 9812 0 183 C 0 60'/. NE3 77 1.831 6 757 10 209 C 0 art. NO 46 1.783 8,751 0 204 C 0 i]N. NO 91 r 670 4,912 0 N0 0 1 85% NO 35 1.773 5.222 ' 0 340 D 0 67 : N O N 5TR4NPLANIPFIO)ECTS42001116716TABt£5111#1ATR19. V41L4 P119e6o1r I MI N w IP w w w MP IV IF IP w w w Mr IF IF w! IP MP IIP V IP IF I w VP IV I Mr IP w Mr w M I w w w w 4151 • 10-NOr 7001 � 1 � MIAMI !FACILITY ROADWAY 1 A00P.g TYPE yr iR_pM TO ' TEO EXISTt14G Au7 COUNT _ -� OtR�LOS�tAN{ 51PML[lAFE BRICKELI AVENUE 5 MIAMI AVENUE Efl ' E•70 3L AM, 08703/99 5 MIAMI AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE EH SW I AVENUE I.95 E8 SW 13 STREET 8RICI4EEt AVENUE 5 MIAMI AVENUE 5 MIAMI AVENUE SW t AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE SW 15 ROAD SR 81611-195/MACARTNUR CSWY PALM 'SLANU ENTR SAYSHORE ORivE BAYSNORE mom N MIAMI AVENUE N MIAMI AVENUE 1-95 I.95 NW I? AVENUE NW 17 AVENUE NW 17 AVENUE NW 17 AVENUE NW 27 AVENUE NW 71 AVENUE NW 37 AVENUE NW 37 AVENUE NW 42 AVENUE NW 42 AVENUE NW 57 AVENUE NW 57 AVENUE NW 72 AVENUE NW 72 AVENUE 58876 SR826 NW 87 AVENUE NW 67 AVENUE NW 107 AVENUE SR! 70+T70W74TOW5 OISTRRIUTOR 1.95 $RICKEII AVENUE N A SOURCE REIN AND SCNNARS. P A ER Wg Eft W8 EB W8 ER 1N8 E8 W9 ER 555 E8 W8 Ee 4•r9 E.8 W8 £8 vYR ER we E8 we E.8 YYB E8 WB EB W6 ES WE E•20 1 3l AM 04/25/01 E•70 4E AM 04/17f01 431.1 AM 05,15299 4112 AMI0571gg9 41.0 pm 0918/99 61.0 PM 08110799 63.0 PM 09/17/99 610 PM 06/17749 8113 AMI 06/ty99 610 PM 0605199 8L0 AM 0910S00 81.13 AM 06/24090 67.D AM 09/05/00 6L0 AM 6L0 AM 6ED PM 510 PM 09/ 12/00 09/05/00 06705799 08717/99 6LD Eau 06108799 E6 E ILO PM 05/19/99 W8 E TA 0t0 OOWNT0WN MPAM1 ORi UPDATE YEAR 2009 PERSON TRIP CONDITIONS ill ill rR 2909 . _- ____ EXISriNG YR 2009 FUTURE 1. I41 _ ..__ ._ _ .. T _ _. - - PERSON PERSON 1'31 tOTAt pERSOM K Iq rR 7ao� F17 T47RE i'i]MMI- OKG EKG (SI 1 pRQ1 AS PROD INC JI TOTAL ' PERSON TOTAL E A :OE : TRIPS 7Rtp TRty TTEO PERSON CAPACITY PERSON PAGJ VOLUME VQLUME riE TRIP 7 TRIP PERSON P TR,p7i TRIP ' PERSON i MAX 'GREATER 4.41% TOTAL _ /C . L05 TRIP 'CAPACITY] TRep VOLUME tNAN o 2089 __ �YOtUME TOTAL V7[ EDS VOLUME YESMO 7.713 394 2,607 5160 0 505 • 0 751 2868 3 370 3,530 49tl 4.070 5.160 '05% ' D 506% YES 5.6b4 0 710 0 33i 4 351 , 34 615 4.764 651h 661 0 76R 0 5 A4% YE ].4I4 3 6 0 652 O 400 4 664 } 6.516 !0714 0 6t7. rES 1.264 860 1.764 673 674 1 870 3 613 4.074 3 709 6.068 3 709 9.068 8.t20 6.877 5891 6 714 5.687 6.617 7-379 6.345 4,434 5.751 8.674 7 640 4.416 7.537 8.105 8,271 5.760 8-604 4,515 7.41g 1 319 88 411 53 1 339 167 713 101 661 305 1928 418 4 167 4.370 4.033 6.597 4.033 6,597 6.878 7417 6.405 7.300 6,132 7 167 7.902 6.895 4,7711 7,279 9.357 8 737 476I 8 121 8.817 8.993 6.763 7,398 4,909 8.066 1 771 1,858 1.942 2.097 279 274 1 446 1,812 1.447 1.811 1.187 779 1,134 t!69 1.159 764 1.228 795 t 173 762 1 147 738 1,104 705 1.044 1 390 378 488 307 400 1.477 964 1 506 614 966 7.346 4 446 4 594 5.47g 8,409 5 460 8408 147010 8,196 7.539 8.769 7.790 7-937 9.1]0 7,690 5 954 8041 11.499 8.975 5 865 8 875 9856 10 353 6641 7886 5716 8.466 290 7148 397 2 4y4 2.817 3.576 2.837 7.812 2 584 2.837 10 956 10,956 9.584 9.584 9.584 9 594 13.072 13.836 9- 584 9-564 13.077 13.072 t 1072 13.072 9 584 9 554 9584 9.584 9.584 9.564 9 584 9.584 13,072 13.072 9 584 9.584 05M 0 0 270 C 0 532 Q 0 787 0 0 ]74 ' 0 0878 ' 0 0 406 8 84,9 8 0 572 I C 0877 E 0572 ' C 0877 1 E 0 766 1 D ,0593 C 0 78/ o '0915 E 0 558 i C 0607 ! C 0 698 ' 0 0 588 C 0621 i C 0839 1 0 10951 E 0 936 ! E I0612 1 C 0971 i E 1078, E 1 OA] F 0508 C 0 603 1 G 0544 C 0681 ' E 6 240 0 144 8 6.740 : 0 400 a 46 1 473 7.617 0 520 . 176% N 28 992 O 178 3576 C :0277 C � 077. NO 8934 2 8,37 : 0.577 I CI; 4 57% NO n 171.4 1770 ! 25M !011S ; 0 : 2.77% NO I047? 797 7638 2837 i 0 ' 983.7• rE5 �09), € E 1R 3t•4 YES 147 4!5 10956 ' n 4t9 8 , 130. Nil 'I4 1 4,715 10956 0433 9 1 1 13, NO 468 1 9.584 0 671 C ' 4 88% NO 5 947 540 9,584 0 934 877 6 357 i 0 ' 5 13 : YES 1 1?04 9 4 17 9.584 0 963 6{ 19 t 8. Y E S 754 10764 0873 0 • 104% - YES 453 A 649 13 13.972 0676 C i 3 7 5. YES 7(.41 8367 9504 0557 C ' 378%. NO 984 g sti'I n 86, I E � N n, �; r 4.653 9 ES 777 8062 1SBA 1617f t. 99'*' YE5*F 464 l 077 1 0 517 e.395 73072 061 555% rE5 NO 630 9 960 138377 i 0 767 0. 6 15!7. '2.5 499 9189 13.072 1 '0626 C 3 795 6 74 30' , NO 4 rA 9 9.58k 17i 704 � D ', 9 30•'. � YE s 7� _ t8 7 9 9.584 ' 0 889 1 E 4 99% NO 464 9439 . 9.584 , 1 176 E 806 : , YE • E 744 9419 9584 i0985 E. 4945. NO 10 69 619.584 i 0 690 ! 0 7 N0. r E 5 9.504 0968 E ' 4 70•, N 9� 10.I 9.554 ? 1 117 1 E 8 35% rE5. E 754 22 11 65 (3 , 9.584 ! 1 180 E 9 67. ' r E S • E 613072 '0527 , C 1945. 713) 792 6,178 I) 077 ! 0 676 C , 271N. • NO 715 5431 9 594 ; 0 WI C 27.13, NO 747 8,713 9584 , 0909 E . 758. 7/0 467 2 610 6.240 53? 3 026 6 740 114te ' 0 485 7 40 8 53% 175 rE5 N ITRANPU4NIP10JEC 75V0011167161117g11. t IMATR1X W144 Appendix D Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets i 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 le 10 10 II PO II lk II 10 10 10 Oa II Existing Conditions HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: DPA 141,,ncy/Co.: e Performed: 6/21/2004 'Analysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PK Intersection: S MIAMI AVENUE/SW 'Jurisdiction: MIAMI, FL 3 STREET 'Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 'Project ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 ' East/West Street: SW 3 STREET North/South Street: S MIAMI AVENUE 'Intersection Orientation: NS 'Major Street: ' ' Vehicle Approach Movement 1 L Study period (hrs): 0.25 Volumes and Adjustments Northbound Southbound 2 3 ( 4 5 6 T R I L T R 'Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage 'RT Channelized? 'Lanes Configuration "'Upstream Signal? ' or ' Undivided No 263 0.88 298 0 415 0.88 471 0 2 0 LT TR No 8 0.88 9 Street: Approach Movement Westbound 7 8 L T Eastbound 9 I 10 11 12 R L T R Volume 'Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 'Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage 'Lanes configuration 0 0 1 78 0.88 88 0 ' ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1ovement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'pane Config LT 1 I R 'r (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c "5% queue length pilitrot Delay Ipproach Delay 298 1636 0.18 0.67 7.7 A 10.0+ 1pproach LOS B 88 804 0.11 0.37 10.0+ ' ' 1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d .Analyst: Agency: IDate: god: ject ,E/14 St: • DPA Inter.: 1-95 OFF-RAMP/S MIAMI AVENUE Area Type: All other areas 6/21/2004 Jurisd: MIAMI, FL EXISTING PM PK Year : 2004 ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 1-95 OFF -RAMP N/S St: S MIAMI AVENUE INo. Lanes ,LGConfig Volume `Lane Width ,RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 2 R 286 12.0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 3 0 T 397 12.0 ('Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ,Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DEB Left NB Left 111/ Thru Thru Right A Right 1111 Peds Peds ,WB Left SB Left Thru Thru A Right Right Peds Peds IvNB Right EB Right plill Right WB Right en 63.0 29.0 ,Yellow 4.0 4.0 "11 Red 0.0 0.0 11 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary PAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach IW,ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 110 Vastbound I 1756 2787 0.16 0.63 7.7 A Kestbound I I ',Northbound 1 1 ISouthbound 1475 5085 0.30 0.29 27.7 C 27.7 C :14I° 1 1 7.7 A Intersection Delay = 19.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d 'Analyst: DPA Agency: 'Date: 6/21/2004 oillmod: EXISTING PM PK ject ID: RIVER FRONT 1E/W St: S 7 STREET 1 1 1 'No. Lanes 1 LGConfig Volume 'Lane Width 'RTOR Vol Inter.: S 7 STREET/S MIAMI AVENUEE Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: MIAMI, FL Year : 2004 (EAST PARCEL) - *04153 N/S St: S MIAMI AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound i Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 1 T R 964 83 12.0 12.0 8 1 2 0 L T 460 309 12.0 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 'Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations °Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 PEE Left 1 1 Thru Right Pods 'WB Left Thru 1 Right Peds OTB Right 1� Right C_ en �ellow 04,.11 Red A A NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 A A 36.0 35.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 ' Cycle Length: 80.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Nppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach lipone Group Flow Rate PUrp Capacity (s) v/c g/C 6 7 8 1 Delay LOS Delay LOS IlEastbound 1 ` �rlestbound 1 j 1425 638 '3orthbound k. 693 1386 1 1Vouthbound 3167 0.78 0.45 21.4 C 1417 0.13 0.45 13.0 B 1583 0.76 0.44 24.0 C 3167 0.26 0.44 14.4 B Intersection Delay = 20.5 20.8 C 20.2 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 1 1 ' Analyst: inter.: SW 3 STREET/SW 2 AVENUE Agency: Area Type: All other areas "Date: 6/21/2004 Jurisd: MIAMI, FL god: EXISTING PM PK Year : 2004 ject ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 tE/W St: SW 3 STREET N/S St: SW 2 AVENUE 1 "No. Lanes LGConfig 'Volume "Lane Width 1RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 0 L TR 20 24 111 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0 L TR 53 17 44 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 81 197 12 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 10 284 5 12.0 12.0 0 'Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OEB Left A NE Left A 1 Thru A Thru A Right A Right A 1 Peds Peds 1WB Left A SE Left A Thru A Thru A 1 Right A Right A Peds Peds .E Right EB Right !aRight WE Right n 21.0 69.0 ' Yellow 4.0 4.0 Oh11 Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1 Intersection Performance Summary "kppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ``Lane Group Flow Rate 'Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 285 1355 0.08 0.21 31.8 C I`R 348 1659 0.43 0.21 35.1 D 34.7 C Jestbound 1' 238 1135 0.24 0.21 33.4 C 1TR 354 1686 0.19 0.21 32.8 C 33.1 C porthbound 719 1042 0.12 0.69 5.3 A R 2421 3509 0.09 0.69 5.2 A 5.2 A 1 ,outhbound 782 1134 0.01 0.69 4.9 A Fill 2436 3531 0.13 0.69 5.3 A 5.3 A 1 1 Intersection Delay = 14.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B • • • • i 1 M r i • • • • • • • • 1 IS • 1 • • 10 Future without Project HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL,, SUMMARY 'Analyst: DPA 1411ncy/Co.: e Performed: 6/21/2004 'Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK Intersection: S MIAMI AVENUE/SW 3 STREET ' Jurisdiction: MIAMI, FL 'Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2012 'Project ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 'East/West Street: SW 3 STREET North/South Street: S MIAMI AVENUE 'Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 'Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 j 4 5 6 L T R I L T R 'Volume ImnPeak-Hour Factor, PHF 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage !VT Channelized? 'Lanes Configuration 'Upstream Signal? Undivided No 328 584 18 0.95 0.95 0.95 345 614 18 0 -- -- 0 2 0 LT TR No or Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume W eak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ,Percent Heavy Vehicles ▪ ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / 'Lanes Wonfiguration 1 103 0.95 108 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ,Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ; 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'pane Config LT I ! R (vph) 345 108 IF(m) (vph) 1636 729 v/c 0.21 0.15 15% queue length 0.80 0.52 �trol Delay 7.8 10.8 A B 'approach Delay 10.8 1pproach LOS B ' ' ' 1 D Analyst: IJPA Inter.: 1-95 OFF-RAMP/S MIAMI AVENUE Agency: Area Type: All other areas "Date: 6/21/2004 Jurisd: MIAMI, FL Yod: FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK Year : 2012 Illtject ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 D E/W St: 1-95 OFF -RAMP N/S St: S MIAMI AVENUE 1 1 1 "No. Lanes D LGConfig Volume "Lane Width D RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 2 R 416 12.0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 T 510 12.0 'Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations D Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DEB Left NB Left I Thru Thru Right A Right 1 Peds Peds DWB Left SB Left Thru Thru A 1 Right Right Peds Peds DNB Right EB Right 1 Right WB Right en 63.0 29.0 DYellow 4.0 4.0 1All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs D Intersection Performance Summary DAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach L▪ ane Group Flow Rate 'Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ""Eastbound D 8.0 A 1756 2787 0.22 0.63 8.0 A W Restbound 1 1 piorthbound r r Irouthbound 1� 1475 5085 0.36 0.29 28.3 C 28.3 C r Intersection Delay = 19.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B r r 1 1 ▪ Analyst: DPA Inter.: S 7 STREET/,S MIAMI AVENUEE lir Agency: Area Type: All other areas "Date: 6/21/2004 Jurisd: MIAMI, EL iod: FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK Year : 2012 ject ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 " E/W St: S 7 STREET N/S St: S MIAMI AVENUE 1 1 "No. Lanes , LGConfig Volume "Lane Width ,RTOR Vol HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 1 T R 1234 101 12.0 12.0 10 1 2 0 L T 550 430 12.0 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 "Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ,Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "EB Left NB Left A " Thru Thru A Right Right 1 Peds Peds "WE Left SE Left Thru A Thru 1 Right A Right Peds Peds WN▪ B Right EB Right 14. Right WE Right `en 36.0 35.0 "Yellow 4.0 4.0 "All Red 1.0 0.0 1 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary IIP.ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Mtrp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 ,Eastbound 1 Ikestbound 1 1425 3167 1.00 0.45 44.5 D 42.4 D 638 1417 0.16 0.45 13.2 B 1Jorthbound 693 1583 0.91 0.44 37.5 D 1386 3167 0.36 0.44 15.2 B 27.7 C 1 iouthbound 410 Intersection Delay = 36.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D 1 1 1 1 0 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: DPA Inter.: SW 3 STREET/SW 2 AVENUE Agency: Area Type: All other areas 'Date: 6/21/2004 Jurisd: MIAMI, FL Iiigod: FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK Year : 2012 ject ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 ' E/W St: SW 3 STREET N/S St: SW 2 AVENUE 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 O No. Lanes LGConfig 'Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 "Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ',Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OEB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A 1 Right A Right A 1 Peds Peds WB Left A SE Left A 1 Thru A Thru A 1 Right A Right A Peds Peds INB Right EB Right 1 Right WB Right Ogren 21.0 69.0 lYellow 4.0 4.0 0All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1 Intersection Performance Summary 1ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate 12rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS tEastbound 1L 232 1106 0.10 0.21 32.1 C O['R 348 1659 0.48 0.21 35.7 D 35.3 D Westbound IP 223 1060 0.37 0.21 34.8 C 1TR 346 1649 0.45 0.21 35.4 D 35.2 D !orthbound 676 979 0.15 0.69 5.5 A IkR 2372 3438 0.14 0.69 5.3 A 5.4 A Southbound I, 709 1028 0.05 0.69 5.0 A 01 2436 3531 0.16 0.69 5.4 A 5.4 A 1 Intersection Delay = 15.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 0 L TR 23 28 130 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0 L TR 78 20 127 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 95 255 60 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 30 357 6 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 1 • • r r IW Future with Project HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: DPA ,ncyl Co.: e Performed: 6/21/2004 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJECT PM PEAK ▪ Intersection: S MIAMI AVENUE/SW 3 STREET Jurisdiction: MIAMI, FL Units: U. S. Customary ▪ Analysis Year: 2012 Project ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 'East/West Street: SW 3 STREET North/South Street: S MIAMI AVENUE 'Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 I Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ,Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound i Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 ' L T R I L T R ,Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR !Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage WRT Channelized? `Lanes Configuration 'Upstream Signal? Undivided No 328 0.95 345 0 643 0.95 676 0 2 0 LT TR No 28 0.95 29 I or Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 1 L T R I L T R "Volume !Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR "Percent Heavy Vehicles ,Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ``Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / "Lanes Oponfiguration 1 115 0.95 121 0 1 r Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound .'pproach 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Ipane Config LT I I R k (vph) 345 121 Op(m) (vph) 1636 696 ■■v/c 0.21 0.17 ,5% queue length 0.80 0.63 p' trol Delay 7.8 11.3 A B pproach Delay 11.3 pproach LOS B 1 1 1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d 1 'A nalyst: DPA Agency: Date: 6/21/2004 olgiod: FUTURE W/ PROJECT PM PEAK Year : 2012 ject ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 "E/W St: 1-95 OFF -RAMP 1 "No. Lanes LGConfig tVolume "Lane Width "RTOR Vol Inter.: I-95 OFF-RAMP/S MIAMI AVENUE Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: MIAMI, FL N/S St: S MIAMI AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 2 R 465 12.0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 T 530 12.0 "Duration 0.25 "Phase Combination "EB Left " Thru Right Peds "WB Left Thru Right Peds 'NE Right Right 00Wen ▪ Yellow 1411 Red 1 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru A Right Peds SB Left Thru A Right Peds EB Right WB Right 63.0 29.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ;pp r / .Dane rp Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ,,Eastbound • 1756 ' Westbound 1 1 'Northbound 1 ♦Southbound 1 1 1475 8.2 A 2787 0.25 0.63 8.2 A 5085 0.38 0.29 28.5 C 28.5 C Intersection Delay = 19.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B 1 1 1 II HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • Analyst: DPA Inter.: S 7 STREET/S MIAMI AVENUEE Agency: Area Type: All other areas irate: 6/21/2004 Jurisd: MIAMI, FL - iod: FUTURE W/ PROJECT PM PEAK Year : 2012 ject ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 " St: S 7 STREET N/S St: S MIAMI AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R ,No. Lanes I 0 0 0 LGConfig Volume ,Lane Width "RTOR Vol 2 1 T R 1243 101 12.0 12.0 10 1 2 0 L T 560 430 12.0 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 ,Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations "Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "EB Left NB Left A Thru Thru A " Right Right Peds Peds "WB Left SB Left " Thru A Thru , Right A Right Peds Peds DNB Right EB Right BilleRight wB Right n 36.0 35.0 "Yellow 4.0 4.0 ,A11 Red 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs " Intersection Performance Summary mi,ippr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ane Group Flow Rate "rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound II "Westbound 1425 3167 1.00 0.45 46.5 D 44.2 D P. 638 1417 0.16 0.45 13.2 B Corthbound 693 1583 0.93 0.44 40.3 D IV 1386 3167 0.36 0.44 15.2 B 29.4 C 1outhbound Ilw Intersection Delay = 37.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D 1 1 1 1 .Analyst: DPA Inter.: SW 3 STREET/SW 2 AVENUE Agency: Area Type: All other areas !Date: 6/21/2004 Jurisd: MIAMI, FL 1FUTURE W/ PROJECT PM PEAK Year : 2012 ject ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 1E/W St: SW 3 STREET N/S St: SW 2 AVENUE HCS2000: Signalized intersections Release 4.1d • SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 1 "No. Lanes &LGConfig Volume !Lane Width DRTOR Vol Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 0 L TR 23 28 130 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0 L TR 95 20 207 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 95 255 109 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 49 357 6 12.0 12.0 0 !Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations !Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1EB Left A NB Left A ! Thru A Thru A Right A Right A 1 Peds Peds 1WB Left A SE Left A Thru A Thru A 1 Right A Right A ■■ Peds Peds tNB Right EB Right Right WB Right en 21.0 69.0 �ellow 4.0 4.0 1R11 Red 1.0 1.0 , Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 1PIPPr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach cane Group Flow Rate rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Itastbound 161 768 0.15 0.21 32.6 C I'R 348 1659 0.48 0.21 35.7 D 35.3 D kestbound IP 223 1060 0.45 0.21 35.9 D jR 344 1637 0.69 0.21 42.5 D 40.6 D 11orthbound 676 979 0.15 0.69 5.5 A CR 2332 3380 0.16 0.69 5.5 A 5.5 A 0 Iouthbound 675 978 0.08 0.69 5.1 A Pill 2436 3531 0.16 0.69 5.4 A 5.4 A 111 Intersection Delay = 17.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1 • 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ow 1 Project 1 1 111 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . Analyst: DPA owiiency/Co.: #04103 e Performed: 4/2004 nalysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJECT PM PEAK Intersection: DRIVEWAY'S MIAMI AVENUE Jurisdiction: MIAMI, FL "Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2012 Project ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 i East/West Street: DRIVEWAY North/South Street: S MIAMI AVENUE M Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 'Major " " Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R "Volume 16 114 'Hourly Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 120 "Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage Undivided / "RT Channelized? 'Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No or Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound 1 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R i L T R 'Volume 'Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR /Percent Heavy Vehicles 'percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / "Lanes oponfiguration 1 113 0.95 118 3 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service kpproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 r%ane Config I R or (vph) f(m) (vPh) /c k5% queue length ontrol Delay 0,-, roach Delay .pproach LOS 9.1 A 118 992 0.12 0.40 9.1 A r HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY "Analyst: DPA illicncy/Co.: #04103 e Performed: 6/21/2004 "Analysis Time Period: FUTURE W/ PROJECT PM PEAK r Intersection: SW 3 STREET/DRIVEWAY Jurisdiction: MIAMI, FL "Units: U. S. Customary ▪ Analysis Year: 2012 ▪ Project ID: RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) - #04153 "East/West Street: SW 3 STREET P North/South Street: DRIVEWAY Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 r Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound . Movement 1 2 3 J 4 5 6 II L T R 1 L T R ,Volume 118 113 143 225 Teak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ,Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 124 118 150 236 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 0 ,Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? ,Lanes 1 0 0 1 ,Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No ,Wor Street: Ap proach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I 1, T R 'Volume 188 23 ,Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 197 24 � ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 "Percent Grade (%) 0 0 F▪ lared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / 'tapes 0 0 'Configuration LR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ▪ pproach EB WE Northbound Southbound Approach 1 4 f 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 sane Config LT 1 LR k (vph) 150 221 OP(m) (vph) 1336 377 ``v/c 0.11 0.59 55% queue length 0.38 3.59 tiiitrol Delay 8.0 27.2 A D pproach Delay 27.2 pproach LOS D Appendix E Committed Development Information • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ro, • • RIVER FRONT (EAST PARCEL) Committed Develoment Person -Trip Assignment CORRIDOR Pro ect FROM TO Direction BHtiwll Commons Br[ckMI RFrar NEO Lrlltitiuds Myr Front (Nest) Ons RiVsrrisw Squats won won Villein TOTAL SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE SW 3 STREET SW 6 STREET SW 6 STREET SW 8 STREET SB 14 0 8 55 126 0 1 0 203 NB 30 0 6 54 0 13 1 7 110 SW 2 AVENUE SW 2 STREET SW 8 STREET NB 21 0 2 i 174 92 0 0 289 SB 182 5 4 324 32 0 3 550 SW 7 STREET SW 2AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE SW 1 AVENUE BRICKELL AVENUE WB 569 55 81 101 119 33 23 981 WB 569 55 43 101 101 33 30 932 SW 8 STREET BRICKELL AVENUE S MIAMI AVE S MIAMI AVE SW 1 AVENUE EB 120 52 26 90 9 0 55 352 EB 857 83 80 144 0 10 55 1029 SW 1 AVENUE SW 2 AVENUE EB 657 83 80 144 0 10 55 1029 W.1045041581asbkexceASEGMENT ANALYSIS YieCOMMITTED DEVELOPMENT MATRIX One Riverview Square TAZ 558 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS, IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips Office Retail / Service 157 478 SF 8,749 SF 710 814 17% 43% 43 10 63% 57% 212 13 , 255 23 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 19% 53 81% 225 278 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16.00% of Gross External Trips (1) Transit Trip Reduction @ 22.60% of Gross External Trips (2) Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 19% 19% 19% 8 12 5 81% 81% 61 % 36 51 23 44 63 42 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 19% 27 81% 116 129 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 19% 19°/6 34 17 81% 81% 146 71 181 88 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 19% 51 81% 217 269 Net External Person trips walking 1 using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1 9% 11 81 % 47 58 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 perslveh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle tnp reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • RIVER FRONT 2010 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 558 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 14.60% 8.55% 5.32% 7.19% 7.25% 17.88% 18.04% 21.17% TOTAL 100.00% #04104 - TAZ 558 TAZ R.xls Brickell Commons TAZ 568 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips Movie Theatre Retail / Service 5000 seats 138,800 SF 443 820 71 % 48% 250 480 29% 52% 100 520 350 1000 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 1 54% 730 1 46% 620 ! 1350 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 16.00% of Gross External Trips 14.10% of Gross External Trips 15.00% of Gross External Trips (1) (2) (3) 54% 54% 54% 117 103 110 46% 46% 46% 99 87 93 216 190 203 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 54% 401 46% 340 741 l Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 54% 54% 561 144 46% 46% 477 122 1038 266 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 54% 705 46% 599 1304 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle I 54% 153 1 46% 130 [ 284 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment Il (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment it Neo 11 TAZ 568 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips High Rise Apt 1 Condo Specialty Retail Quality Restaurant 327 DU 12,935 SF 6512 SF 232 814 931 62% 43% 67% w 79 15 33 38% 57% 33% 48 20 16 127 35 49 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 1 60% 127 ' 40% 84 211 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment C§) 16.00% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction @ 14.10% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction © 15.00% of Gross External Trips (1) (2) (3) 60% 60% 60% 20 18 19 40% 40% 40% 13 12 13 34 30 32 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS • 60% 70 40% 46 116 f Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit 6 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 60% 60% 98 25 40% 40% 65 17 162 42 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 60% 123 40% 81 204 [ 1. Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 60% 27 140% 18 44 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI increment 14 (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 r Brickell on the River TAZ 568 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL ° Trips % Trips , Trips Residential Retail 1 Service 712 DU 2,600 SF 232 814 62% 43% 160 3 Y 38% 57% 98 4 258 7 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS l 62% 163 [ 38% 102 J 265 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment © 16,00% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction [cif 14.10% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 15.00% of Gross External Trips (1) (2) (3) 62% 62% 62% 26 23 24 38% 38% 38% 16 14 15 42 37 40 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 62% 89 38% 56 145 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles § 1.40 Persons! Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons! Vehicle 62% 62% 125 32 38% 38% 78 20 204 52 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 62% 157 38% 99 256 Net External Person trips walking 1 using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle ! 62% I 34 1 38% 21 I 56 Notes ND(1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ETE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 persiveh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miarni DRI Increment 1I (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • 411 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ow 1 RIVER FRONT 2010 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 568 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 14.95% 6.62% 2.11% 4.55% 5.70% 23.66% 18.11% 24.10% TOTAL 100.00% 42.21% 21.57% 29.56% 6.66% #04104 - TAZ 568 TAZ R.xls ifrfb Latitude on the River TAZ 567 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips % Trips Trips High Rise Apt 1 Condo Office Retail 1 Service 455 DU 225,000 SF 20,000 SF 232 710 814 63% 17% 44% 109 56 24 37% 83% 56% 64 279 30 173 335 54 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS E 34% 189 j 66% 373 562 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16.00% of Gross External Trips Transit Trip Reduction C 14.10% of Gross External Trips Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ 15.00% of Gross External Trips (1) (2) (3) 34% 34% 34% 30 27 28 66% 66% 66% 60 53 56 90 79 84 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 34% 104 66% 205 309 I I I Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Net External Person Trips using Transit !fp 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 34% 34% 145 37 66% 66% 287 74 432 111 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 34% 183 4 66% 360 543 I 1 1 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 134°% 1 40 [ 66% 78 ( 118 1410 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between tTE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment Il 1 1 1 1 •00 1 1 r 1 1 1 I. 1 1 1 1 r r r 1 1 1 1 1 1 rito r Latitude on the River 2010 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 567 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 17.36% 11.20% 4.93% 3.14% 5.04% 20.38% 18.59% 19.37% TOTAL 100.01% 37.96% 28.56% 25.42% 8.07% r r #04 1 01 - TAZ 567 TAZ 567.xis ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rio ! ! River Front (West Parcel) TAZ 662 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL % Trips .. % w Trips Trips M Residential (High -Rise Condominuim) 900 DU 232 62% 200 38% 123 323 Residential (High -Rise Apartment) 450 DU 222 61% 94 39% 60 154 General Office 80,000 SO. FT. 710 17% 20 83% 99 119 Health Club 5,000 SO. FT. 493 61% 13 39% 8 21 Retail (Supermarket) 5,000 5O. FT. 850 51% 29 49% 28 57 Retail (Quality Restaurant) 5,000 SO. FT. 831 67% 25 33% 12 37 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 54% 381 r -4 46% 330 711 Internalization -8 -8 -16 Pass -by (Retail Only) -18 -18 •36 PROJECT VEHICLE TRIPS 54% 355 4651. 4 304 659 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ 16% of Gross External Trips (1) 54% 57 46°% 49 105 Transit Trip Reduction 0 22.60% of Gross External Trips (2) 54% 80 46% 69 149 Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction 0 10.00% of Gross External Trips (3) 54% 36 46% 30 66 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 54% 182 46% 156 339 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles 0 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 54% 255 46% 219 474 Net External Person Trips using Transit 0 1,40 Persons Vehicle 54% 112 46% 96 209 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 54% 368 _ 46% 315 683 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle _ 54% _ 50 46% 43 92 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II ! • • RIVER FRONT YEAR 2010 Direction TAZ 662 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 23.10% 33.53% 18.67% 13.53% 6.74% 0.27% 0.00% 4,17% TOTAL 100.01 TAZ 662 4.17% 7.01 % #02175 - TAZ 662 TAZ-662.xjs • io• Beacon Brickell Village TAZ 572 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES UNITS ITE Land Use Code PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL Trips % Trips Trips High Rise Apt ! Condo Retail 1 Service 260 DU 5,745 SF 232 814 62% 44% 64 7 38% 56% 39 9 103 16 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS I 60% 71 40% 48 J 119 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction (di Pedestrian 1 Bicycle Trip Reduction [cQ 16.00% of Gross External Trips 14.10% of Gross External Trips 15.00% of Gross External Trips (1) (2) (3) 60% 60% 60% 11 10 11 40% 40% 40% 8 7 7 19 17 18 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 60% 39 40% 26 65 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net External Person Trips using Transit t 1.40 Persons! Vehicle 1.40 Persons! Vehicle 60% 60% 55 14 40% 40% 37 9 91 23 Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 60% 69 40% 46 115 I T 1 [Net External Person trips walking 1 using bicycle 1,40 Persons/ Vehicle l 60% 15 40% 1 10 25 hats (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based an projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DR! Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II • r M 1 1 1 #04104- TAZ 572 RIVER FRONT 2010 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 572 NNE 17.20% ENE 4.46% ESE 2.78% SSE 2.35% SSW 4.17% WSW 27.87% WNW 17.48% NNW 23.69% TOTAL 100.00% 41.17% 21.66% 32.04% 5.13% TAZ R.xls October 4, 2004 Ms. Lilia I. Medina, AICP Assistant Transportation Coordinator City of Miami, Office of the City Manager/Transportation 444 SW 2nd Avenue (10th Floor) , Miami, Florida 33130 �.. Re: River Front (East) Sufficient Letter — W.O. # 70 Dear Ms. Medina: Via Fax and US Mali OCT 6 2Ca4 We have reviewed the traffic impact study dated July 2004 for the River Front (East) project prepared by David Plummer and Associates, Inc. (DPA). On September 22nd 2004, we contacted DPA over the phone and requested supplemental information in order to complete the review. Please note this is an updated report to address the modifications the applicant has proposed for this site. The original report named Miami River Renaissance was submitted by DPA in April 2003 and approved. Attached please find our detail review comments and the supplemental information provided by DPA. We conclude the traffic report along with the supplemental information provided by DPA adequately addresses all the traffic issues and are found to be sufficient. Please note the report does not provide any information regarding delivery vehicle maneuverability within the project site. As this project progresses through the review process, the applicant must submit an acceptable site circulation plan for approval by the City staff. Should you have any questions, please call me or Quazi Masood at 954.739.1881. Since u tion Southern Raj +hanm .. ` E. Sen or Traffic r ineer cc: Mr. Kevin Walford, Planner I, City of Miami Ms. Sonia Shreffler-Bogart, PE, David Plummer & Associates Attachment: URS Corporation Lakeshore Complex 5100 NW 33rd Avenue, Suite 150 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-6375 Tel: 954.739,1881 Fax: 954.739.1789 • • MEMORANDUM To: Lilia 1. Medina From: Raj Shanmugam, P.E. Date: October 1, 2004 Subject: River Front (East) MUSP Traffic Impact Analysis Review — W.O. # 70 VIA FAX and US Mail We have reviewed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report prepared by David Plummer & Associates, Inc. (DPA) for the River Front (East) project, dated June 2004. The report is accompanied by site drawings, dated June 24th, 2004. Please note that this is an updated TIA to address the modification of original report due to the changed land use. The original report named as Miami River Renaissance was submitted by DPA in April 2003 to the City of Miami and was approved. The project will be a mixed -use development and located on the west side of South Miami Avenue between SW 3rd Street and Miami River. The project is located within the boundaries of the Downtown Miami Area -Wide DRI. Build out of the project is anticipated in 2012. The report indicates that the applicant is to build 1,403 residential condominium dwelling units, 41,994 square feet of retail space and 52,800 square feet of office space, which is consistent with the site plan. The site plan shows a total of 1,671 parking spaces will be provided for this project and they will be distributed in the nine level parking garage built within the project boundary. Our findings are as follows: General Location Map: The report includes a location map, which adequately identifies the project location and surrounding street network (Exhibit 1), 2, Study Area: According to the traffic report, SE/SW 2r'd Street to the north, SE/SW 8th Street to the south, South Miami Avenue to the east, and SW 2nd Avenue to the west define the study area boundaries. We agree with the selection of the study boundary. The report identifies three signalized (South Miami Avenue/I-95 exit ramp, South Miami Avenue/S 7th Street and SW 3rd Street/SW 2nd Avenue) and one un-signalized intersections (South Miami Avenue/S 3rd Street) and four -roadway facilities (South Miami Avenue, SW 2nd Avenue, SW 7th Street and SW 8th Street) as most significant to the project. We agree with the selection of intersections and roadway facilities. URS Corporation Lakeshore Complex 5100 NW 33rd Avenue, Suite 150 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-6375 Tel: 954.739.1881 Fax: 954.739.1789 Ms. Oita I. Medina River Front (East) - Traffic Impact Analysis Review Memo October 9, 2004 Page 2 of 4 3. Site Access: Primary access to the site is provided via a two-way driveway, connecting to SW 3rd Street. An additional secondary access to the project site will be provided through South Miami Avenue via a right -in and right -out driveway, The report does not provide any information about maneuvering of delivery trucks to the project site. However, as this project progresses through the review process, the applicant must submit an acceptable site circulation plan and approved by the City staff. Data Collection: Two-hour turning movement counts were collected during P.M. peak hour at all four -study intersections during the second week of March 2004. Also, 24-hour bi-directional machine counts were collected at five different locations on SW 2nd Avenue, SW 7th Street, SW 8th Street and couple on South Miami Avenue during the week of March 11th 2004. The existing signal timing data was collected from the Miami Dade County Traffic Control Center and the information is appended with the report. A schematic of existing lane geometry at the study intersections is also included in the report. 5. Adjustment Factors: Year 2003 FDOT peak season weekly volume adjustment factor of 1,00 was used correctly. 6. Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis: An existing level of service analysis of four roadway faciiities and all four study intersections was performed. We agree with the use of "person -trip methodology" for the roadway facility and HCS-2000 for the intersection capacity analyses. The report shows all the four intersections operate within acceptable LOS standards at existing traffic condition. The roadway facilities also operate at an acceptable V/C ratio, such as, South Miami Avenue at 0.23 between SW 3rd Street and SW 6th Street, SW 2nd Avenue at 0.51 between SW 2nd Street and SW 8th Street, SW 7th Street at 0.50 between SW 1st Avenue and Brickell Avenue and SW 8th Street at 0.32 between Brickell Avenue and South Miami Avenue. Roadway vehicular capacity and Transit (Metrobus and Metrorail) information were obtained from FDOT Q/LOS Handbook and Downtown Miami Area -Wide DRI Increment 11 respectively, and it is acceptable. 7. Planned Roadway Improvements: The 2003 Transportation Improvement- Program (TIP) and 2025 Metro -Dade Transportation Plan Long Range Element (LRTP) were reviewed for planned or programmed roadway and transit improvements within the study area. No officially programmed or planned capacity improvement projects were identified. We agree with the findings. Ms. Lila 1. Medina River Front (East) - Traffic impact Analysis Review Memo October 1, 2004 Page 3 of 4 8. Background Traffic: A two -percent (2.0%) background growth rate, compounded annually, was applied to account for future growth of un- identified developments in the area, based on existing (2004) traffic count data. We agree with the growth rate and its application. 9. Committed Developments: Seven recent major committed developments were included in the analysis, based on information from the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department Report on Private Development from 1996 to present (updated March, 2004). The committed developments are as follows: • Brickell on the River; • Brickell Commons; • The Beacon Brickell Village; • Neo II; • Miami River Renaissance; • One Riverview Square; • Latitude on the River, We agree with the applicant's list of committed developments. The trip generation, trip distribution and the Land Use Codes (LUC) for each committed developments listed above is included at the back of the report. The intersection and roadway facilities analyses for the future condition without project scenario are included in the report. The report shows all the four intersections operate within acceptable LOS standards at the build -out year traffic condition without the project. A revised intersection analysis at South Miami Avenue/SW 3rd Street is provided and the analysis shows the intersection would operate within acceptable LOS standard. The roadway facilities also operate at an acceptable WC ratio, such as, South Miami Avenue at 0.30 between SW 3rd Street and SW 6th Street, SW 2nd Avenue at 0.80 between SW 2nd Street and SW 8th Street, SW 7th Street at 0.75 between SW 1st Avenue and Brickell Avenue and SW 8th Street at 0.55 between South Miami Avenue and SW 1st Avenue. 10. Trip Generation: The trip generation for the site is calculated from the 1TE Trip Generation Manual, which is acceptable. The supplemental document explains the reason for using average trip rates instead of the fitted curve while calculating the trips for general office land use (LUC 710). We accept the approach. The gross trips were then adjusted correctly by using the vehicle occupancy adjustment factor (16%), transit trip reduction factor (22.6%) and pedestrian/bicycle trip reduction factor Ms. Lilia I. Medina River Front (East) - Traffic Impact Analysis Review Memo October 1, 2004 Page 4 of 4 (10.0%). All the adjustment factors were obtained from the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II. 11. Trip Distribution: The supplemental document shows that the current Miami Urban Area Transportation Study (MUATS) does not include any trip assignment for the corresponding TAZ. However, according to MPO's recommendation DPA used the trip assignment for the corresponding TAZ 662 based on the previous Long Range Transportation Program (LRTP). We agree with the findings. 12. Future Conditions with Project: The intersection capacity and roadway facilities analyses for the future build -out year with project scenario are included. The report shows all the four intersections operate within acceptable LOS standards at the build -out year traffic condition with the project. The roadway facilities also operate at an acceptable V/C ratio, such as, South Miami Avenue at 0.32 between SW 3rd Street and SW 6th Street, SW 2nd Avenue at 0.81 between SW 2" d Street and SW 8th Street, SW 7th Street at 0.77 between SW 1st Avenue and Brickell Avenue and SW 8th Street at 0.55 between South Miami Avenue and SW 1st Avenue. The report includes analysis of both the project driveways. A revised intersection analysis at project driveway/South Miami Avenue is provided and the analysis shows the driveway would operate within acceptable LOS standard. The original report did not include the Transportation Control Measures Plan (TCMP) according to section 14.182D of the City Code. However, upon our request the TCMP was provided as a supplemental document and it is acceptable. We conclude that the traffic report, along with the supplemental information provided, adequately addresses all the traffic issues. • n u .zL �v¢ ii ii� \7-f1 '1 HJ.aL rr�u� rai DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 TRANSPORTATION • CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • ENVIRONMENTAL • • To: Affiliation: From: RE: cc: Facsimile Transmission Mr. Quazi Masood URS Corporation Scoria Shreffler-Bogart River Front West Parcel - #04103 file Fax #: Phone #: Date: Pages: (954) 739-1789 (954) 739-1881 September 27, 2(iO4 12 page(s), including cover Quazi: Per our telephone conversation 1 am forwarding responses to your comments: 1. The peak hour factor has been revised at South Miami Avenue/SW 3 Street. The results did not change. JICM analysis output has been revised. . 2. The analysis for the South Miami Driveway has been revised; there was a typo in the i 3. The 1TE rate was used for trip generation of LUC 710, General Office, based on the siz office which is 80,000 SF. When estimating trips for general office less than approxima the equation gives results that are counterintuitive. For example, according to the e. office -is estimated to generate 79 PM_peak hour trips (calculation attached). Since it is the il'r, Trip Generation Manual, I have included a graph which shows the difference equation and rate for smaller sized offices. 4. The cardinal distribution used for this project was based, as referenced in Exhibit 10 in study, on the Long Range Transportation Plan Update. The current Miami Urban Are Study shows no assigned trips for the corresponding TAZ. According to the MP explanation for this and recommended that we use the assignments for the correspon p t of the proposed ely 200,000 SF, uation a 1.0 SF of as evident in tvveen the I E e traffic impact Transportation , they have no ing TAZ in the previous LRTP _model. Copies for the appropriate TAZL66) for years 2005, 2010 and 2015 are iiieluded. Pro'ect trips would result in the same assignment of ,I p gnment in any of the three year because the limited area roadway network and project access routes. 5. A Traffic Control Measures Plan has been included. Thank you, gmjax 0924C4.doc 7750 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TELEPHONE: 305 447.0900, FAX: 305 4d4-4986 5-MAIL: dpaag,dplummor.corn L r�V �. 1J 1 LLJI'il'€G i[HIYLH��I,J HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d r�auw eel TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DPA Illgency/Co.: Date Performed: 9/23/2004 Analysis Time Period: EXISTING PM PEAK Intersection: $ MIAMI AVE/SW 3 ST Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: RIVER VILLAGE- #04103 Eat/West Street: SW 3 ST North/South Street: SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.21 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Race, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? Undivi ded No 263 415 8 $�� 0.95 0.95 0.95 i'd^- 276 436 8 0 / 0 2 0 LT TR No Illknor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 J 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes Configuration R 1 78 0.95 82 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 i 7 8 9 ( 10 11 Lane Contig LT 1 12 v (vph) 276 C(m) (vph) 1636 v/c 0.17 95% queue length 0.61 Control Delay 7.6 LOS A Aliproach Delay 11,broach LOS 9.9 A 82 823 0.10 0.33 9.9 A LH V L L) r LAJ}' mtIr[h MAJI HCS2000: Unsigna1ized Intersections TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY WITH PROJECT PM PEAK MIAMI AVE/SW 3 ST #04103 3 ST MIAMI AVENUE NS Study Volumes and Adjustments Northbound 1 2 3 I L T R I Release 4.1d alys t : DPA envy/Co.: Date Performed: 9/23/2004 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE Intersection: S Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: RIVER VILLAGE-- East/West Street: SW North/South Street: SOUTH Intersection Orientation: Vehicle period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street: Approach Movement Southbound 4 5 6 L T R Volume Peak --Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Wstream Signal? -- -- Undivided No / 328 652 9 0.95 0.95 0.95" 345 686 9 0 -- -- 0 2 0 LT TR No nor Street: Approach Movement Westbound 7 8 9 1 L T R I Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration / 117 0.95 123 0 0 1 R / Delay, Queue Length, and Level SE Westbound 4 17 8 9 LT I of Service Approach NE Movement 1 Lane Config Eastbound I 10 11 I 2 v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay L O S Ilproach Delay roach LOS 345 1636 0.21 0.80 7.8 A 1L1.2 11.2 B 23 00 .18 .63 g I i-1'.IC LIY HCS2000: unsignalized Intersections TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL. SUMMARY WITH PROJECT PM P1 / S MIAMI AVENUE Miami #04103 MIAMI AVENUE NS Study Volumes and Adjustments Northbound 1 2 3 ( L T R I Release 4.1d Cana1y : DPA ency/Co.: #04103 te Performed: 9/2004 Analysis Time Period: FUTURE Intersection: DRIVEWAY Jurisdiction: Downtown Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2012 Project ID: RiVER VILLAGE East/West Street: DRIVEWAY North/South Street: SOUTH Intersection Orientation: Vehicle period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street: Approach Movement Southbound 4 5 6 L T R Volume peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes configuration _,Jpstream Signal? -- Undivided No -- / 559 105 0.95 0.95 ' 588 110 -- -- 2 0 T TR No O Ivor Street: Approach Movement Westbound 7 8 L T 9 I R 1 Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration / 112 0.95 117 3 0 1 R / Delay, Queue Length, and Level SI3 Westbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 of Service Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config Eastbound ] 10 11 j 2 v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Ipproach Delay roach LOS 692 0.17 0.61 11.3 11.3 B 17 8 .Urtu 11l r'LLJ i•1CICHfNLH�nu !- A E ab s • • Sunrnary of Trip Generation Calculation For .001 Th.Gr.Sq.Ft. of General. Office Building September 27, 2004 Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Facer Volume Avg_ Weekday 2-Way Volume 188.44 7--9 AM Peak Hour Enter 16.51 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 2,25 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 18.76 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 13397.89 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 65413.23 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 78811.12 Saturday 2-Way Volume 18472.14 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 1.78 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 1.52 Saturday Peak Hour Total 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 13 65 18 ❑ 0 Note: A zero indicates no data available - The above rates were ' calculated fro3ti these 24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: 7-9 Ali Peak Hr. Total; 4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: Sat. 2-Way Volume: Sat_ Pk Hr. Total: Sun. 2-Way Volume: Sun. Pk Hr. Total: equations: LN(T),= .77LN(X) + 3.65, RA2 = 0.8 =(T) _ .8LN(X) + 1.55 R"2 0.83 , 0.88 Enter, 0.12 Exit T = 1.12(X) -1• 78.81 RA2 = 0.82 , 0.17 Enter, LN(T) = .8LN(X) + 1.55 R^2 = 0.83 s 0.88 Enter, 0.12 Exit + 78.81 R^2 = 0.82 , 0.17 Eater, 0.83 Exit T = 2.14(X) + 18.47, R^2 = 0.66 LN(T) = .81LN(X) + -.12 P.^2 = 0.59 , 0.54 Enter, 0.46 Exit LN(T) = . 86LN (X) + .31, R^2 = 0.5 LN(T) _ .61LN(X) + -.23 R^2 = 0.56 , 0.58 Enter, 0.42 Exit 0.83 Exit Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003. TRIP GENERATION. BY MICROTRA.NS • • 800 700 600 CCI c 500 H m 0 4.00 > 300 200 100 0 General Office Belding Land Use 710 PM Peak Hour 3 3 I I - J .1._...._ I i _i...„, T r f r i I °o �.ti° �.'�o tio �,� tio° et,C rye el, c• et, gb°n �tio X =1000 SF GFA Rate Equation IrAt,'I'; • RIVER FRONT WEST PARCEL YEAR 2005 Direct on NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW wsw WNW NNW TAZ 6fi2 'TOTAL 100.0O% TAZ ass NOTE PRE15016 VER.e O N OF LONG 1WVOE tmitsPORT,ATI]N PLAN LPC .1EWA4 USED; 2.7fteRN f.Z milVJRRENT VE}Te lartE10,.F FR.C/A 11 PO RIVER FRONT WEST PARCEL YEAR 2010 TXinsdipet TAZaz reiE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 12.12% 7437% OM% 8.o>75G 27.27% . 19-t2% 2E1E% TOTAL tD7.CO TAZ E62 RIVER FRONT WEST PARCEL YEAR 2015 Oirection TAZ 662 NPtE ENE ESE SSE SSW WBW WNW NNW 7O1AL IOuCt% TAZ 662 74% t L C 4 4 4 c fl Ct9fit\it7>.ninlleiril.J iTT rMr1 D fr CS a $Ca1Ts- TAZ .see TAZfi82 A.i4 J LJ .JY.tYY _ )o JJH V IL) LUMMt ANDA55U PAGE 89 Msfi o-Dods Tn#spbrlotioI Pili: tang Roge Eionwswt to foe Your 2015 ORIGIN ZONE 661 TRIPS PERCENT 662 T" 'S PERL. NT 663 TRIPS PERCENT 664 TRIPS. PERCENT 665 TRIPS PERCENT 666 TRIPS PERCENT 667 TRIPS PERCENT 668 TRIPS PERCENT 669 TRIPS PERCENT 670 TRIPS PERCENT 671. TRIPS PERCENT 672 TRIPS PERCENT 673 TRIPS PERCENT 674 TRIPS PERCENT 675 TRIPS PERCENT 2005 STAGE OF 2015 LRTP - ALTERNATIVE 05U DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY NNE 170 13 . 92 L4 16.84 360 14.63 CARDINAL DIRECTIONS ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW 124 27 58 109 314 170 10.16 2.21 4.75 3.93 25.72 13.92 20_ 4 28 lf 4.21 2.11. 6.32 8.42 29.47 15.79 16. 163 63 171 203 567 437 4 6.62 2.56 6.95 8.25 23.04 1.7.76 20. 993 457 147 123 1142 2330 1837 17 11.25 5.1.8 1.67 1.39 12.94 26.40 20.81 20 229 121 12.47 6.59 380 6.51 1.348 12,25 201 5.59 4022 14.99 893 18.94 2887 38.60 653 203 32.58 10.13 823 21.63 .33 1.31. 12.63 25.31 21.01 20. 0 8 7 4 6 226 120 82 593 1653 1453 1333 3.87 2.05 1.40 10.15 28.30 24.88 22.3 502 87 115 1202 2738 2242 2771 4.56 .79 1.04 10.92 24.88 20.37 25.18 17 4.78 1091 4.07 3.86 344 4.60 260 6.83 .19 .89 8.50 7 1587 .01 8 1.14 5.91. 7 44 125 .15 .93 2.65 .129 .72 1.35 .30 1.80 2,94 27 43 199 .71 1.13 5.23 868 24.12 7006 26.11 1105 23.44 1267 16.94 375 18.71 908 23,86 935 25.99 5646 21.04 977 20.73 129E 17.35 289 14.42 692 18.19 1077 29. 3 71 5 26, 6 1381 29.30 1507 20.15 383 19.11 853 22.4,2 3312 903 565 263 1076 4650 3083 3726 18.82 5.13 3.21 1.61 6.11 26.42 17.52 21. 7 1822 706 219 504 1039 2842 2193 28 1.5.02 5.82 1.20 4.15 8.56 23.42 18.07 23. 9 5 TOTAL 49 1221 16 84 7 2461 8827 1837 5840 11005 3598 26836 4714 7480 2004 3805 17598 12134 .Lif U 1 u rLUMNItr<PNU4b5U HAC-iL 1 d Moro-0.4 ram/optative Pi m: Long Rings Mimi to he rep MI5 ORIGIN 2010 STAGE OF 2015 LRTP - ALTERNATIVE 10U DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY 1 CARDINAL DIRECTIONS NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNw 661 TRIPS 199 135 34 58 125 309 203 PERCENT 14.95 10.14 2.55 4.36 9.39 23_22 15.25 2 662 7 PERL.c.AT 12 .12 7.07 .00 663 TRIPS 365 162 59 PERCENT 14.24 6.32 2.30 664 TRIPS 1033 491 148 PERCENT 11.01 5.24 1.58 665 TRIPS 251 122 6 PERCENT 1.2.68 6.16 .30 666 TRIPS 381 219 116 PERCENT 6_17 3.55 1.88 27 13 6.06 8 . uri 27.27 13.13 26. 180 244 594 439 5 7.02 9,52 23.17 17.12 20. MP TOTAL 68 1331 14 26 21 2564 32 9379 1980 6174 6 3773 28290 4879 7714 5 2082 7 9 3975 1 3 18480 7 12796 26 128 1234 2485 1956 1904 1.36 13.16 26.50 20.86 20.30 30 239 515 410 407 1 52 12.07 26,01 20,71 20.56 30 660 1760 1573 1385 1.30 10.69 28.51 25 . 48 .22 .43 667 TRIPS 1406 508 89 117 1295 2903 2331 29 PERCENT 12.15 4,39 .77 1.01 11.19 25.08 20.14 25 668 TRIPS 215 172 6 PERCENT 5.70 4,56 .16 34 323 940 971 11 .90 8.55 24.911 25.74 29. 669 TRIPS 419E 1098 21 311 PERCENT 14.84 3,88 .07 1.10 670 TRIPS 938 PERCENT 19.23 671 TRIPS 2999 PERCENT 38.88 672TRIPS 667 PERCENT 32.04 673 PERCENT 21.74 1778 7415 5967 75 6.28 25.21 21.09 26. 2 7 2 2 182 7 45 145 1144 992 14 6 3,73 .14 .92 2,97 23.45 20,33 29. 3 344 23 55 111 1306 1327 15 9 4.46 .30 .71 1.44 16.93 17.20 20.08 207 6 41 63 399 304 3 9.94 .29 1.97 3.03 19.16 14.60 18. 264 24 35 224 956 728 8 6.64 .60 .91 5.64 24.05 18.31 22. 674 TRIPS 3454 912 593 293 1183 4932 3220 38 PERCENT 18.69 4.94 3.21 1.59 6.40 26.65 17.42 21. 675 TRIPS 1900 723 232 527 1140 3035 2322 29 PERCENT 14.85 5.65 1.81 4.12 8.91 23.72 18.15 22. • 80 UH V 1 U rL. imMLNPNL`ASSU PAGE 11 '6 ro-Pod, rrsolioirittiew Plate- long Row Row/ to 40 Vup 2015 P ORIGIN ZONE 661 TRIPS PERCENT 2015 COST FEASIBLE PLAN ALTERNATIVE 15U DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY -------- .___ CARDINAL DIRECTIONS �! TOTAL 1 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW, 220 171 42 69 .138 363 213 28 14.69 11.42 2.80 4.61 9.21 24.23 14.22 18.8 662 TRIPS 47 23 10 12 11 43 22 3 PERCENT .23.27 11.39 4.95 5.94 5.45 21.29 10.89 16.8 663 TRIPS 393 170 65 1.83 263 622 470 55 PERCENT 14.45 6.25 2.39 6.73 9.67 22.88 17.29 20.3 664 TRIPS PERCENT 665 TRIPS PERCENT 1051 487 152 129 1370 2646 2078 197 10.63 4.93 1.54 1.30 13,86 26.76 21.02 19.9, 263 130 8 34 275 541 434 44 12.37 6.11 .38 1.60 12.94 25.45 20.41 20.7 666 TRIPS 403 235 1.24 83 708 1833 1676 146 PERCENT 6.17 3,60 1.90 1.27 10.84 28.07 25.67 22.4 667 TRIPS 1452 521 91 120 1450 3118 2446 304 PERCENT 11.86 4.26 .74 .98 11.84 25.47 19.98 24.8 668 TRIPS 206 176 5 39 341 950 1029 111 PERCENT 5.34 4,56 .13 1.01 8.83 24.61 26.65 28.8 669 TRIPS 4356 1137 24 327 2051 7860 6279 794 PERCENT 14.53 3.79 ,08 1,09 6.84 26.21 20.94 26.5 670 TRIPS 1038 190 8 50 178 1245 1104 159 PERCENT 19.20 3.51 .15 .92 3.29 23.03 20.42 29.4 671 TRIPS 3091. 355 20 59 132 1357 1357 159 PERCENT 38.80 4.46 .25 ,74 1.66 17.03 17.03 20.0 672 TRIPS 684 208 6 37 61 407 302 40 PERCENT 32.42 9.86 .28 1.75 2.89 19.29 14.31 19.1 673 TRIPS 914 274 30 44 264 1028 772 92 PERCENT 21.53 6.45 .71 1.04 6,22 24.21 18.18 21.67 674 TRIPS 3584 943 612 315 1372 5265 3452 4111 PERCENT 18.24 4.80 3.11 1.60 6.98 26,79 17.56 20.92 675 TRIPS 1963 736 242 568 1251 3180 2472 3097 PERCENT 14.53 5.45 1.79 4.20 9.26 23.54 18.30 22.93 2 1498 3 4 202 3 3 2719 a 9888 7 2126 6530 12243 3861 29983 5406 7966 2110 4246 19654 13509 v tt+ i.. �ui•ii*IGr'SNIY7JN7�U t'(-1Cil 12 • • RIVER FRONT WEST PARCEL TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES PLAN The project's design and location will reduce the project vehicular traffic volum follows: s as • The project is a proposed residential development which includes some retail and office components. This type of development will result in a portion of the trips being captured within the development, or internal to the site. � • The project will also provide residential units with accessibility to mass transit. This feature will allow residents to use mass transit for their trip to work. The development will also do the following to further reduce peak hour vehicle trips: • Will encourage employers/landlords to participate in ridesharing programs thr ugh South Florida Commuter Services. Available information will be obtained and distributed to all employers/landlords in the development. • Miami Dade County Transportation Agency current local and regional mass tr sit route and schedule information will be provided to potential transit users n a prominent public area of the development. The information provided and main ed on the premises will be updated, when necessary, at no less than six month intern s. • Promote mass transit use by encouraging employers/landlords to purchase tr sit passes and make them available to employees and residents at discounted prices r no charge, or in lieu of subsidized parking. • Encourage employers to implement staggered work hours. Implementation of these items will result in a nainirnurn of ten percent (10%) rreducti n of peak hour vehicle trips. The performance of the plan will be monitored by meal 'ng actual afternoon peak hour volumes at the project driveways and comparing the c unts against total project trips based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates. TRAFFIC CONTROLDOC UF3V1U VUUMMEKANDAS9O PAGE 02 Description Land Use: 710 General Office Building A general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An o ce building or buildings may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services; lnsurance companies; investment brokers; and tenant setvlees, such as a bank or savings and loan institution, a recta► rant or cafeteria and service retail facilities. Nearly all of the buildings surveyed were in suburban locations. Corporate headquarters (Land Use 714), single tenant office building (Land Use 715), office park (Land Use 750), research and development center' (Land Use 780) and business park (Land Use 770) are related uses. if information Is known about individual buildings, It Is suggested that the general offl4e building category be used rather than office parks when estimating trip generation for,One or more office buildings in a single development. They office park category is more general and should be used when a breakdown of individual or different uses is not known. If the general office building category Is used and If additional buildings, such as banks, restaurants, or retail stores are included to the development, than the development shp uld be treated as a multiuse project. On thee other hand, if the office park category is used Internal trips are already reflected in the data and do not need to be considered. EE When the buildings are interrelated (defined -by shared parking facilities or the ability tb easily walk between buildings) or house one tenant, it is suggested that the total area or employment of ell the buildings be used for calculating the trip generation. When the individual buildings are Isolated and not related to one another, It is suggested that tri-� generation be calculated for each building separately and then summed. Additional Data Average weekday transit trip ends — Transit service was either nonexistent or negligible at the majority of the sites survey�d in this land use. Users may wish to modify trip generation rates presented in this land se to reflect the presence of public transit, carpools and other transportation demand management (TDM) strategies. information has not been analyzed to document the impacts of TDM measures on the total site generation. See the ITE Trip Generation Handbook for additional Information on this topic. The average building occupancy varied considerably within the studies where occupancy da was provided_ For buildings with occupancy rates reported, the average percent of occupie J gross leasable area was 88 percent Some of the regression curves plotted for this land use may produce Illogical trip end estlma -. for small office buildings. When the proposed site size is significantly smaller than the avers • se...A, sized facility published In this report, caution should be used when applying these statistics. 'For more information, please refer to Chapter 3, "Guidelines for Estimating Trip Generation," of the Trip Generation Handbook. In some regions peaking may occur earlier or [ester and last somewhat longer than the traditi na 4111 7:00 ern. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. peak period time frames. The sites were surveyed from the 1980s to the 2000s throughout the United States. Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1149 Institute of Transportation Engineers