Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis• • • ANALYSIS FOR LAND USE CHANGE REQUEST Approximately 3253, 3265 and 3269 SW 22nd Terrace. Application No. LU- 2004-017 DISCUSSION The proposal has been reviewed for a change to the Future Land Use Map of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 from "Duplex Residential" to "Restricted Commercial". The subject property consists of three lots facing SW 22"` Terrace (Complete legal description on file at the Hearing Boards Office). Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) Land Use Policy 1.6.1., established future land use categories according to the Future Land Use Plan Map and the "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map". The subject properties are currently designated "Duplex Residential" and the same designation is to the west, south and east; to the north, there is a "Restricted Commercial" land use designation. "Duplex Residential": Areas designated as "Duplex Residential" allow residential struc- tures of up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Community based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers are peimnissible in suitable locations within duplex residential areas. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suit- able locations within duplex residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing struc- ture(s). "Restricted Commercial": Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residen- tial uses (excepting rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; any activity included in the "Office" designation as well as commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, res- • • taurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The Planning and Zoning Department is recommending DENIAL of the application as presented based on the following findings: • It is found that immediately adjacent to the north of the subject properties there is an area designated Restricted Commercial. • It is found that the character of SW 22° Terrace is residential. • It is found that the change to "Restricted Commercial" is not a logical extension of that category and will be an intrusion of commercial activities into a well defined duplex residential area. • It is found that recently, similar petitions has been recommended for approval and finally granted in the same area and, it is also found that those petitions were part of a Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) and went through the design review process, complying with several conditions in order to mitigate the impact of the proposed project in the low residential area. This petition is not part of a MUSP. • It is found that MCNP Goal LU-1 (5) require the City to promotes the efficient use of land and minimizes land use conflicts and, Policy LU-1.1.3 which require the City to provide protection of all areas of the city from the encroachment of incompatible land uses. These findings support the position that the existing land use pattern in this neighborhood should not be changed. It also should be stated, that whereas MCNP Land Use Policy 1.1.1. requires development or redevelopment, that results in an increase in density or intensity of land use, to be contingent upon availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards adopted in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) (CIE Policy 1.2.3.). It is found that the attached Concurrency Management Analysis pertaining to concurrency demonstrates that no levels of service would be reduced below minimum levels. • Proposal No 04-17 Date: 04/23/04 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LAND USE MAP WITHIN A TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AMENDMENT INFORMATION CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Applicant: Gilberto Pastonza, Esq. on behalf of property owner Address: 3269, 3265 & 3253 SW 22nd Ter Boundary Streets: North: nfa East n/a South: SW 22nd Ter West: n/a Proposed Change: From: Duplex Residential To: Restricted Commercial Existing Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 0.396 acres @ 18 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Other sq.ft. @ FAR Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Other Proposed Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 0.396 acres @ 150 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Other sq.ft. @ FAR Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Other Net Increment With Proposed Change: Population Dwelling Units Peak Hour Person -Trips Planning District County Wastewater Collection Zone Drainage Subcatchment Basin Solid Waste Collection Route Transportation Corridor Name 7 DU's 8 0 sq.ft. 0 59 DU's 30 0 sq.ft. 134 52 22 Coral Way 310 S1 35 Coral Way RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Population Increment, Residents Space Requirement, acres Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 134 0.17 182.80 182.63 OK POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents Transmission Requirement, gpd Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 134 30,092 >2% above demand >2% above demand OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents 134 Transmission Requirement, gpd 24,853 Excess Capacity Before Change See Note 1. Excess Capacity After Change See Note 1. Concurrency Checkoff WASA Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration System Before Change Exfiltration System After Change Concurrency Checkoff On -site On -site OK RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Land Use Policy 1.1.1 CIE Policy 1.2.3 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Population Increment, Residents Solid Waste Generation, tons/year Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 134 172 800 628 OK TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Population Increment, Residents Peak -Hour Person -Trip Generation LOS Before Change LOS After Change Concurrency Checkoff 134 22 A A OK NOTES 1. Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Metro -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department (WASA). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known CM 1 IN 03/13/90 ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMENTS Population increment is assumed to be all new residents. Peak -period trip generation is based on 1TE Trip Generation, 5th Edition at 1,4 ppv average occupancy for private passenger vehicles. Transportation Corridor capacities and LOS are from Table PT-2(R1), Transportation Corridors report. Potable water and wastewater transmission capacities are in accordance with Metro -Dade County stated capacities and are assumed correct, Service connections to water and sewer mains are assumed to be of adequate size; if not, new connections are to be installed at owner's expense. Recreation/Open Space acreage requirements are assumed with proposed change made.