Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Approximately 1.884 NW 15th STREET. CASE NO: 2004-0788 Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows: The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows: Lots 11 and 12, Block 6, "KENWOOD SUBDIVISION", Plat Book 6, Page 134 and certain strip of land, 9.90 feet in width, more or less, is lying between Lot 12 in Block 6 of "KENWOOD SUBDIVISION", Plat Book 6, Page 134 and NW 19th Avenue. Also, Lot 10, less the North 100 feet thereof of Block 6, "KENWOOD SUBDIVISION", Plat Book 6, Page 134 from R-2 "Two -Family Residential" to C-2 "Liberal Commercial". The following findings have been made: • It is found that the subject parcel is on a corner at NW 15th Street and NW 19th Avenue. • It is found that the character of NW 19th Avenue and NW 15`h Street in this area is residential. • It is found that a change to C-2 "Liberal Commercial" will constitute an intrusion of commercial activities into a well defined R-2 "Two -Family Residential" area. Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending denial of the application as presented. ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Yes No N/A CASE NO. 2004-0788 In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment. In harmony with established land use. Is related to adjacent and nearby districts. Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City. Maintains similar population density pattern. Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn. Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary. Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood. Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety. Has similar impact on drainage. Has similar impact on Tight and air to adjacent areas. Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas. Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property. Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification. Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.