HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Approximately 1990, 2000 & 2020 Tigertail Avenue and
2015 & 2035 S. Bayshore Drive
CASE NO: 2004-0777
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordi-
nance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for an amendment to the Zoning
Atlas has been reviewed as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
Several parcels fronting Tigertail Avenue and South Bayshore Drive (complete legal
description on file with the Hearing Boards Office), from R-1 "Single -Family
Residential", SD-3 Coconut Grove Major Streets Overlay District", SD-18
"Minimum Lot Size Overlay District" and SD18.1 "Minimum Lot Size Overlay
District" to Gil "Government and Institutional".
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that immediately adjacent to the west and under the same ownership, the
area is designated GII "Government and Institutional".
• It is found that the requested change will represent a logical extension of the activities
of the Ransom Everglades School.
• It is found that the requested change will unify the zoning designation of the Ransom
Everglades School campus.
• It is found that the requested change will increase the possibility of the Ransom
Everglades School properties being developed and enhanced in a manner that will
directly benefit the adjacent area.
Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending
approval of the application as presented.
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
CASE NO. 2004-0777
Yes No N/A
In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment.
In harmony with established land use.
Is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City.
• Maintains similar population density pattern.
:..� Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn.
Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary.
Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood.
• Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety.
Has similar impact on drainage.
Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas.
Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas.
Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification.
Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.