Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Impact Analysis• • AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for AVANT TOWERS, LLC P.O. Box 190924 Miami Beach, Florida 33119 by Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 (305) 754-8695 FEBRUARY 2004 ckson M. ,Ahtstedt, RE. Florida Registrat n #28258 f / / • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY 3 3.0 STUDY AREA 3 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 5 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING 6 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS 6 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS 14 4.3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 20 4.4 MASS TRANSIT 22 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE 22 5.0 TRIP GENERATION 25 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 27 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 29 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT 30 9.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC 35 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING 39 11.0 PEDESTRIANS 39 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN 39 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS 39 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK 40 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 41 13.0 RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPOSED MIDTOWN MIAMI PROJECT 41 14.0 CONCLUSIONS 42 • LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA 1 TABLE 2 YEAR 2002 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) 6 TABLE 3 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 8 TABLE 4 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 8 TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 9 TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 33RD STREET AND NE 34TH STREET 10 TABLE 7 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 2ND AVENUE BETWEEN NE 33RD STREET AND NE 34TH STREET 11 TABLE 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 34TH STREET BETWEEN NE 2ND AVENUE & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 12 TABLE 9 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 33RD STREET BETWEEN NE 2ND AVENUE & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 13 TABLE 10 EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 21 TABLE 11 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 22 TABLE 12 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE 23 TABLE 13 PROJECT TRAFFIC 25 TABLE 14 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 26 TABLE 15 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 27 TABLE 16 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 29 TABLE 17 ANNUAL AADT GROWTH RATES 30 TABLE 18 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 32 TABLE 19 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 33 TABLE 20 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT 33 TABLE 21 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 36 TABLE 22 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 37 TABLE 23 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT 37 TABLE 24 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES 40 TABLE 25 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 43 LIST OF FIGURES • FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION 2 FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA 4 FIGURE 3 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 25TH STREET & NE 26TH STREET .... _ ..... _ 16 FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 2ND AVENUE BETWEEN NE 33RD STREET & NE 34TH STREET 17 FIGURE 5 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 34TH STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE 18 FIGURE 6 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 33RD STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE 19 FIGURE 7 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE 24 FIGURE 8 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 28 FIGURE 9 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT 34 FIGURE 10 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH THE PROJECT 38 • • • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Avant project is a mixed -use project consisting of approximately 114 dwelling units and 14,765 SF of retail space The project includes approximately 187 on --site parking spaces. The site is located in the City of Miami on the south side of NE 34th Street and the west side of Biscayne Boulevard. Currently, the site is vacant. The project will result in a net increase of approximately 233 vehicles per hour in the AM peak hour and 118 vehicle per hour in the PM peak hour. Based upon existing traffic count data, the AM volume is approximately 8% of the total two-way AM peak hour volume on Biscayne Boulevard. The PM volume is approximately 4% of the total two-way PM peak hour volume on Biscayne Boulevard. Primary vehicular access to the site is restricted to one, two-way driveway connecting to NE 34th Street. In addition, there is a pick-up/drop-off driveway at the entrance to the building. Loading dock access is via NE 34th Street. Two types of level of service analysis were conducted. The first type of analysis included Intersection and roadway link level of service analysis. The second type of analysis consisted of transportation corridor analysis. For purposes of identifying the specific localized impacts of the project, level of service analysis was conducted for the existing year 2004 conditions, and future conditions in the year 2006 with and without the project. These analyses included link and intersection level of service analysis. The results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, indicate that, with or without the project, by the year 2006 there will be some deterioration in the level of service on Biscayne Boulevard. That deterioration, however, will not fall below acceptable standards. Finally, the transportation corridor analysis clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the proposed project. • • • 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Avant is a single phase development consisting of condominiums, retail space and parking. As shown in Figure 1, the site is located on the south side of NE 34th Street west of Biscayne Boulevard. The proposed development program is summarized in Table 1. TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 114 DU COMMERCIAL RETAIL 14,765 SF PARKING 187 SPACES Primary vehicular access to the site is consists of a two-way driveway connecting to NE 34th Street. In addition, there is a pick-up/drop-off driveway at the entrance to the building. Loading dock access via NE 34th Street. For purposes of this traffic impact analysis, build -out has been estimated to occur by the year 2006. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 1 • FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 2 • • • 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The primary purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and intersection level of service analysis. In addition, the report provides a general assessment of project impacts on parking and pedestrians. Specific items discussed are as follows: Determination of existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area; Estimation of the number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. Estimation of future background and project traffic conditions and levels of service; Determination of whether the transportation impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate any adverse impacts; Determination of project impacts on on -street parking; and, Determination of project impacts on pedestrians. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries were defined to include: NE 38th Street as the northern boundary, NE 29st Street as the southern boundary, Biscayne Bay as the eastern boundary, and Miami Avenue as the western boundary. This area includes a one-half mile section of Biscayne Boulevard. Figure 2 shows the intersections and roadway links which are most significant to the project. These include the following intersections: NE 34th Street and Biscayne Boulevard NE 34th Street and NE 2nd Avenue NE 33rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard NE 33rd Street and NE 2nd Avenue The roadway links include the following: Biscayne Boulevard between NE 29th Street and NE 38th Street NE 2nd Avenue between NE 29th Street and NE 38th Street JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 3 • • • rr l TUTTLE STREET..... ) i NE 38 ST I r f r � 1 Sli Ili NE3SST MIDTOWN MIAMI F l l r l r f l l f ir NE 29 ST F • l • I F r BISCAYNE1 r" • B. r r l S i i SP l [ l f r • • NE 34 ST VA t E 33 ST BIr BIS " (PLATINUM CONDO N MIAMI AVE i • ___: • s CNI t. l IL1 � J 2 l l F. * N.T.S. Y TOWERS (BLUE) RESIDENCES PROJECT SCAYNE BAY CAYNE BAY LOFTS (ONYX) Y 25 FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA ,JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 4 • • • 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic count locations, and to collect traffic count data. 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS This section describes the characteristics of selected roadways in the study area Key roadways in and/or near to the study area include Biscayne Boulevard (SR-5/US-1), NE 2nd Avenue, NE 29th Street, and NE 36th Street. Of these roadways, Biscayne Boulevard is by far the most significant roadway serving the proposed project. Local access to the site is provided by NE 34th Street. Loading dock access is provided by NE 34th Street. Biscayne Boulevard (SR-5/US-1) Biscayne Boulevard is a four lane divided roadway with striped median between NE 29th Street and NE 38th Street. Turn lanes are provided at intersections. Traffic signals are located at: ■ NE 26th Street ■ NE 29th Street ■ NE 33rd Street ■ NE 36th Street ■ NE 38th Street This equates to three signalized intersections within one-half mile. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. For purposes of analysis, Biscayne Boulevard was classified as a State Two- way Arterial, Class III. NE 2nd Avenue NE 2nd Avenue is a four lane un-divided roadway without a median between NE 29th Street and NE 38th Street. Turn lanes are not provided at intersections. Traffic signals are located at: ■ NE 29th Street ■ NE 36th Street This equates to one signalized intersection within one-half mile. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. For purposes of analysis, NE 2nd Avenue was classified as a Non -State Roadway. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 5 • • • NE 33rd Street NE 33rd Street is a two lane roadway with parking on either side. Traffic on NE 33rd Street is controlled by a traffic signal at Biscayne Boulevard and stop signs at NE 2nd Avenue. NE 33rd Street is interrupted at the FEC Rail Road, west of NE 2nd Avenue. NE 33rd Street is classified as a local roadway. NE 34th Street NE 34th Street is a two lane roadway with parking on either side. Traffic on NE 34th Street is controlled by stop signs at Biscayne Boulevard and at NE 2nd Avenue. NE 34th Street is interrupted at the FEC Rail Road, west of NE 2nd Avenue. NE 34th Street is classified as a local roadway. 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING Existing signal timing data for the signalized intersections to be analyzed was obtained from the Miami -Dade County Traffic Control Center. This data was used in the intersection capacity analysis to determine each intersection's level of service (LOS) and in the roadway link analysis. 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS There are two existing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) traffic count stations location within or near the study area. Data for these traffic count stations is summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2 YEAR 2002 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) fi 's�'s, Y4 . :4:— s2 lS. { �ifii dw C 5Ly^ 4 .0 ( .Zz- " a 4 ?� '.ks4,,' `Jk P l 143 SR 51US-1, 200` SOUTH OF NE 36TH STREET NB 22,500 SB 24,000 46,500 5058 SR 5/US-1, 200' NORTH OF NE 29TH STREET NB 19,000 SB 19,500 38,500 Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 6 • • • Original 24 Hour machine traffic counts were taken the week of January 26, 2004 at the following locations: • Biscayne Boulevard between NE 33rd Street and NE 34th Street • NE 2nd Avenue between NE 33rd Street and NE 34th Street • NE 34th Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue • NE 33rd Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue The count program provided machine traffic counts (without vehicle classifications) summarized every 15 minutes for a 24-hour period. - Machine traffic count data is summarized in Tables 6 thru 9, inclusive. Turning movement counts were obtained as follows: • At the intersection of NE 33rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard, on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. At the intersection of NE 34th Street and Biscayne Boulevard, on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and Thursday, January 29, 2004 between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. At the intersection of NE 33rd Street and NE 2nd Avenue, on Wednesday, January 28, 2004 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. At the intersection of NE 34th Street and NE 2nd Avenue, on Wednesday, January 28, 2004 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. This traffic count data, adjusted to reflect peak hour volumes for Average Annual Weekday Traffic conditions is summarized in Table 10. Weekly Volume Factors Weekly volume factors to adjust raw count data to Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2002. Rather than using county- wide factors, Miami -Dade County North factors were used. These factors are shown in Table 3. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 7 • • TABLE 3 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS WEE K ' BEOI E sq E FA�T('3�,; 5 1/27/02 2/2/02 0.99 6 2/3/02 2/9/02 0.99 Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. Axle Adjustment Factors Weekly axle adjustment factors to adjust raw count data to Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2002_ Rather than using county- wide factors, factors for SR--5/Biscayne Boulevard were used. These factors are shown in Table 4. TABLE 4 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS y'( yam, _ ir., , ���.:.. t. . ier f i�.. ,yr'' #: ��i,.`A•Y 5 1/27/02 2/2/02 1.00 6 2/3/02 2/9/02 1.00 Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. Peak Season Adjustment Factors Peak season adjustment factors were obtained from FDOT records for the years 2000 through 2002. Consistent with the FOOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, the median weekly factor for the thirteen highest consecutive weeks of the year (the peak season) for each of the three years was determined. The peak season adjustment factor was determined to be 1.026. These factors are shown in Table 5. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 8 • • • TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 2000 1.024 2001 1.025 2002 1.029 MEDIAN 1.026 Source of yearly data: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. The significance of the peak season adjustment factor is that it shows that there is less than a 3% difference between average annual daily traffic and peak season traffic. This is well within the ability to accurately measure and/or estimate traffic volumes. The roadways in question are not seasonal roadways and average annual weekday conditions are not significantly different than peak season conditions. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, F.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 9 • • TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 33RD STREET AND NE 34TH STREET RAW DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY ADT 21,275 23,222 . . 44,497 AM PEAK HOUR 858 2,102 2,960 MID -DAY PK HR 1,423 1,556 2,979 PM PEAK HOUR 1,871 1,412 3,283 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.99 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.00 ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY AADT 21,100 23,000 44,100 AM PEAK HOUR 850 2,080 2,930 MID -DAY PK HR 1,410 1,540 2,950 PM PEAK HOUR 1,850 1,400 . 3,250 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AADT N/A 48% 52% AM PEAK HOUR 6.64% 29% 71% MID -DAY PK HR 6.69% 48% 52% PM PEAK HOUR 7.37% 57% 43% K(100) 7,56% 57% 43% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 10 • • • TABLE 7 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 2ND AVENUE BETWEEN NE 33RD STREET AND NE 34TH STREET RAW DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY ADT 9,275 6,982 16,257 AM PEAK HOUR 366 946 1,312 MID -DAY PK HR 618 468 1,086 PM PEAK HOUR 1,396 403 1,799 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.99 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.00 ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY AADT 9,200 6,900 16,100 AM PEAK HOUR 360 940 1,300 MID -DAY PK HR 610 460 1,080 PM PEAK HOUR 1,380 400 1,780 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AADT N/A 57 % 43% AM PEAK HOUR 8.07% 28% 72% MID -DAY PK HR 6.71% 56% 43% PM PEAK HOUR 11.06% l8% 22% K(100) 11.34% 78% 22% JACKSON M. AI-ILSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 11 • • TABLE 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 34TH STREET BETWEEN NE 2ND AVENUE & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD RAW DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2-WAY ADT 372 489 861 AM PEAK HOUR 32 51 83 MID -DAY PK HR 33 42 75 PM PEAK HOUR 22 54 76 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.99 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.00 ADJUSTED DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2-WAY AADT 400 500 900 AM PEAK HOUR 30 50 80 MID -DAY PK HR 30 40 70 PM PEAK HOUR 20 50 80 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AADT N/A 44% 56% AM PEAK HOUR 8.89% 38% 63% MID -DAY PK HR 7.78% 43% 57% 1 PM PEAK HOUR 8.89% 25% 63% K(100) 9.12% 38% 63% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 12 • • • TABLE 9 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 33RD STREET BETWEEN NE 2ND AVENUE & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD RAW DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2-WAY ADT 711 1,008 1,719 AM PEAK HOUR 41 59 100 MID -DAY PK HR 72 85 157 PM PEAK HOUR 70 134 204 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.99 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.00 ADJUSTED DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2-WAY AADT 700 1,000 1,700 AM PEAK HOUR 40 60 100 MID -DAY PK HR 70 80 160 PM PEAK HOUR 70 130 200 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AADT N/A 41% 59% AM PEAK HOUR 5,88% 40% 60% MID -DAY PK HR 9.41% 44% 50% PM PEAK HOUR 11.76% 35% 65% K(100) 12.07% 35% 65% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 13 • • • 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS This section identifies characteristics of existing peak hour traffic in the study area. These characteristics include AM and PM peak hours, Planning Analysis Hour Factor (Kloo) factors and Directional Distribution (D) factors. Biscayne Boulevard The peaking characteristics of Biscayne Boulevard between NE 33rd Street and NE 34th Street are presented graphically in Figure 3. As can be seen from Figure 3, this section of Biscayne Boulevard experiences the following three peaks. An AM Peak of approximately 6.64% beginning at 8:30am A mid -day peak of approximately 6.69% beginning at 12:00pm A PM Peak of approximately 7.37% beginning at 4:45pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 7.56%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 56.92%. NE 2nd Avenue The peaking characteristics of NE 2nd Avenue between NE 33rd Street and NE 34th Street are presented graphically in Figure 4. As can be seen from Figure 4, this section of NE 2nd Avenue experiences the following three peaks. • An AM Peak of approximately 8.07% beginning at 8:15am • A mid -day peak of approximately 6.71% beginning at 12:30pm A PM Peak of approximately 11.06% beginning at 4:15pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 11.34%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 77.53%. NE 34th Street The peaking characteristics of NE 34th street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue are presented graphically in Figure 5. As can be seen from Figure 5, this section of NE 34th Street experiences the following three peaks. • An AM Peak of approximately 8.89% beginning at 7:30am • A mid -day peak of approximately 7.78% beginning at 1:45pm • A PM Peak of approximately 8.89% beginning at 3:30pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 9.12%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 62.50%. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 14 • • NE 33rd Street The peaking characteristics of NE 33rd Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue are presented graphically in Figure 6. As can be seen from Figure 6, this section of NE 33rd Street experiences the following three peaks. An AM Peak of approximately 5.88% beginning at 9:15am A mid -day peak of approximately 9.41 % beginning at 1:00pm A PM Peak of approximately 11.76% beginning at 5:00pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 12.07%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 65.00%. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 15 • • 8.00% 7.00% Q 0 4.00% 0 W < 3.00% Z W BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 25TH STREET & NE 26TH STREET 1.00% 0 0:00 5:00 10:00 15:00 HOUR BEGINfNG 20:00 FIGURE 3 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 25TH STREET & NE 26TH STREET JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 16 • 12.00©l0 1 Q 00% LL. LL. 8.00% J {L 6. 00% 0 Z 4,00% W 0 ce 2.00% 0 NE 2ND AVENUE BETWEEN NE 33RD STREET & NE 34TH STREET 1 I I r 1 L ! lit Pk 1 i 1I 1 j{f E i1� 3 l } II[f k. I r�I I E�E,i L I i 21 \ E I � € E 1 0:00 5:00 10:00 15 00 HOUR BEGINING 20:00 FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 2ND AVENUE BETWEEN NE 33RD STREET & NE 34TH STREET JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 17 e 0:00 NE 34TH STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE 5:00 10:00 15:00 HOUR BEGUNING 20:00 FIGURE 5 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 34TH STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 18 • • 12.00% 10.00% LL 8.00% J L 6.00% 0 0 F�- Z 4.00% 0 ^ce 2.00% 0 NE 33RD STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE _ r II 11 I I f I 1 i fil 1. j 1 Iilf ', E jj 1 '. • 'fA i r �`. ��tr I 1 1,4 0:00 5:00 10 00 15 00 HOUR BEGINtNG 20 00 FIGURE 6 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 33RD STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, RE. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 19 • • • 4,3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section describes the traffic conditions on selected roadways and at selected intersections in the study area. Biscayne Boulevard Although heavy during peak hours, traffic flow on the section of Biscayne Boulevard in the study area is reasonably acceptable. Signal progression appears to be good. It might be noted that NE 33rd Street intersection is the break point between two timing sections. It appears that during the AM peak the section of Biscayne Boulevard south of NE 33rd Street is timed for 33 mph in the southbound direction. During the PM peak, it is timed for 22 mph in the northbound direction. The section to the north is timed to accommodate the traffic in the intersections with NE 36th Street and NE 38th Street During the PM peak hour, northbound queues created at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 36th extend back beyond NE 33rd Street NE 2nd Avenue Although heavy during peak hours, traffic flow on the section of NE 2nd Avenue in the study area is reasonably good. During the PM peak hour, northbound queues created at the signalized intersection of NE 2nd Avenue and NE 36th periodically extend back beyond NE 33rd Street. Southbound traffic appears to travel at high rates of speed during all hours of the day. NE 33rd Street Due to the minimal amount of traffic, traffic flow on NE 33rd Street is good. During the PM peak hour, queues created at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 36th Street can create operational difficulties at this intersection. Northbound traffic on Biscayne Boulevard was observed to use the signalized intersection as a cut-thru to avoid congestion at NE 36th Street. NE 34th Street Due to the minimal amount of traffic, traffic flow on NE 34th Street is good. During peak hours, operational conditions deteriorate at the intersection with Biscayne Boulevard. At such times, drivers desiring to use NE 34th Street generally rely on the courtesy of drivers on Biscayne Boulevard to allow them to make northbound and southbound left turns and all eastbound and westbound movements. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 20 • • • '3'd R1O31S1HV -IN NOS4oVC TABLE 10 EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES •c "*! .. 4. ,'2. �.. µA. �..,wSg•. "1 ;t it u": d;. , ,:at .ref€'S.•" a , •. J� ltr _ _ 'I n- fiAS >.1t;,�n` Jt ■�� P`sys i s i q [p}��]�,» f ' _ f �� P,'X?'�v. +�*q�F>r x :: r ",� r sy"-n�•�.. W�a �.,'i�n r,,■a.N»,` ..& r ...,y(i� w.:�: // ... $ g4L •y. •.m� 44'41 f: :Mi5 A �; ,�° .S,k sl'i"�••et, _�� e�,a �T, v'�y�t!( .,.Y�b`+\ ✓�'.�NE (Y�3da �G ,,f, r.}``. r,bes•, �.t`i dr,,f t.r {.k p C -,%�:• 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 10 3 16 44 21 30 11 733 5 7 21 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 2 0 11 21 2 83 11 739 23 :1;709 271,649 27 NE 34TH STREET & 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 21 0 18 0 272 17 31913NE NE 33RD STREET & 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 54 0 13 0 276 11 23911NE ..Ne..a., e £9 �., v.4 � �i "k k ��' C�f4 `eJ'Y�b,t �!a �g -" w+1 4A ], a2 �P'"� `i N' S C-n 1 Yt l•s x�'f'r.Fq^'-s'i +,,J �a �` z1 c: v�£i? 1, le`;�'�'6', � Pr�.•�...��,, �� q^^f,C ���� 7� ��- w 1:. 7 +r x,.� SSr NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 17 19 25 37 24 17 79 1233 25 27 1,064 16 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 1 1 21 19 3 55 34 1,239 57 70 1,118 15 NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 17 0 43 0 1,139 11 9 385 0 NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 20 0 79 0 1,071 27 29 373 0 Source: Original traffic counts taken January 27-29, 2004. Note: Data has been adjusted to reflect AM and PM peak hour volumes for Average Annual Weekday Traffic conditions. • • 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The site is located within the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor. Transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are MetroBus Routes 3, 16, 32, 36, 62, 95, T, Biscayne Max, 9, 10, and 6. 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each of the selected intersections were analyzed to determine their level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS Version 4.1 d was used. The results are shown in Table 10 and on Figure 7. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix A. Link analysis, based upon AM and PM peak hour directional volumes, was also performed for the section of Biscayne Boulevard between NE 26th Street and NE 38th Street using the FDOT ARTPLAN 2003 version 5.1.0 (June 6, 2003) software and FDOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, Table 4-7. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 11. TABLE 11 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS . _ !� _ 'fi�,S6 � 'nt'"� Y V ERS CTIOl�i "v F � , ' i � € 2 t'ia - F=t"'j�L'p-`-'t'` _ J� - { E N Y4 0. 4'��""° "T ?a��]Se �yw�'r NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD B A NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EB=C, WB=B EB=C, WB=D . NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE WB=C WB=C NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE WB=C W$=D JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 22 • • TABLE 12 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE Biscayne Boulevard NE 26th Street NE 38th Street AM=E PM=F ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA PEAK HOUR LOS A E MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME (VPH) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) NIA N/A 740 126L] 1290 2,421 PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A NIA 500 1260 1410 2,421 Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTP LAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average GIC of 0.69. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average GIC of 0.79. 3.) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2002 FDOT data for count station 0143 (AADT = 46,500; K= 9.75%; and, D = 52.35%) and escalated by 2% per year for one year. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 23 • • NE 36 ST N.T.S. LJ AM PM WB=C WB=C -/ NE 34 ST AM PM WB=C WB=D NE 29 ST AM PM EB=C EB=C WB=B WB=D NE 33 ST >- W Z 0 O:l AM PM WB=F WB=F EB=F EB=F AM/PM MINOR STREET APPROACH LOS (UNSIGNALIZEIJ INTERSECTION) AMIPM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS AM LINK LOS PM LINK LOS FIGURE 7 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 24 • 5.0 TRIP GENERATION The total number of vehicular trips generated by the project was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1TE) publication, Trip Generation, 7th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the project was based on the total number of condominium units, using data for ITE Land Use Code 230 and the number of retail trips calculated using data for ITE Land Use Code 814. These trips are the total number of vehicular trips generated by the project before adjusting for pedestrian and mass transit trips. TABLE 13 PROJECT TRAFFIC E' LIME '" 1 3 5 �f HIC RIP s '' r "t' u - x�«e OTALS is ifC. `S ry -G d5 11 k / _ ■�' [[r% 6 COI DOLT NILJM F '- ^i d{\ y{2y[ _ ;■e} yF- Cc ', yt .F 4 ,.i ETA1L f4 4 s ��.'�`� sSZ 5.,- Vy� ,, - - -_ �FM(M(K� 5�.?..3 i �W"+ .%#S.VI y. {�/�yp` fy�. r ywc hs " -r; ""+. Y 4 'jSM WEEKDAY IN 359 335 693 VPD OUT 359 335 693 VPD TOTAL 717 669 1,387 VPD AM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 10 90 100 VPH OUT 48 98 145 VPH TOTAL 57 188 245 VPH PM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 45 25 70 VPH OUT 22 32 54 VPH TOTAL 67 57 124 VPH Because of its proximity to MetroBus routes and the nature of the area, it is anticipated that 5% of the person trips will use mass transit or walk. These person trips will not negatively effect the traffic conditions, and therefore, are not included in the vehicle trips distributed throughout the study area. The remaining 95% of the person trips generated by the project JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.F. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 25 • were distributed throughout the study area as vehicle trips. Table 14 summarizes external trips for the project after accounting for modal splits. TABLE 14 ANAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC ►OMI AM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 9 86 95 VPD OUT 45 93 138 VPD TOTAL 54 179 233 VPD PM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 43 24 66 VPH OUT 21 30 51 VPH TOTAL 64 54 118 VPH As can be seen from Table 14, the estimated number of new vehicle trips entering the site during the AM peak hour is 95 vph. The estimated number of new vehicle trips leaving the site during the AM peak hour is 138 vph. The estimated number of new vehicle trips entering the site during the PM peak hour is 66 vph. The estimated number of new vehicle trips leaving the site during the PM peak hour is 51 vph. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 26 • 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 503 (note that this is the new zone numbering system). The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 503 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 13.28% East -Northeast 4.64% East -Southeast 5.33% South -Southeast 10.39% South -Southwest 12.76% West -Southwest 21.80% West -Northwest 14.93% North -Northwest 16.87% The distribution of AM and PM project trips is summarized in Table 15. Based upon this trip distribution, the project trips were assigned to the roadway network. This is shown in Figure 8. TABLE 15 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ''"_ '1 - '' 4 _7 ' f T*w .a , "c' C� `'f�r�' Y`i '� Y 4" y Tin 2 5 � x 3 -, _ ,�- S 2 3 �._ j h ' i = �S jEr E ..h "h .4 1*. S a as 3tv"' "" ?' 't ` ,, .! ty , *� _,- ! j x ,i.. t:. ~h` { �✓ °.E SYk'�' �, �''� a N 'E: - ` '+ f "Y 3A� r _ `v '. �a. ~SSA' . '1-$ SL �'�h. ' 'r'-iy„ 23 .•, wd 'f `' } .^"(} �1 _ s ..s `'si�'GtN 1 '4'''' i"T z..� �r`e`, '6 C.t • v vh�' 4,.aa.— �!��r,^ ;' ...*I�" , ..,.�s.a NORTH NNW 16.87% 39 16 23 20 11 9 NNE 13.28% 31 13 18 16 9 7 EAST ENE 4.64% 11 4 6 5 3 2 ESE 5.33% 12 5 7 6 4 3 SOUTH SSE 10.39% 24 10 14 12 7 5 SSW 12.76% 30 12 18 15 8 7 WEST WSW 21.80% 51 21 30 26 14 11 WNW 14.93% 35 14 21 18 10 8 TOTAL 100.00% 233 95 138 118 66 51 JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 27 • 16/11 21/8 .�� NE 36 ST 23/9 17/12 22/10 4 N.T.S. 14/10 N M1AMI AVE 30/21 w NE 29 ST 49/18 , 17/12 44/17 8/6 NE 34 ST 21/8+ 41 7/5 NE 33 ST ca r33/22 uJ m 21/8 t33/22 8/6 7/5 6/2 33/27 = AM/PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC FIGURE 8 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 28 • 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Programmed and planned improvements in or near the study area were identified using the Miami -Dade County February 5, 2004 Draft of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 2005. These improvements are detailed in Table 16. None of these improvements appear to add significant capacity to the transportation system. TABLE 16 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS SR 112/1-195 1-95 Biscayne Bay PD&E/EMO Study PE 2004-2005 ROW 2006-08 SR 112/1-195 NW 2nd Avenue Miami Avenue Widen/Resurface Existing Lanes iNC 2004-05 NE 2nd Avenue NE 36th Street NE 87th Street Beautification/Re surfacing UNFUNDED SR 251NW/NE 36th Street NW 7th Avenue NE 7th Avenue Resurfacing CST 2004-05 It might be noted that the proposed Midtown Miami Project will likely make major changes to the transportation system in the area. In addition, as part of the recently completed FEC Corridor Study a number of potential transportation improvements have been identified. One of much significance to the Avant project is the addition of light rail on NE 2nd Avenue. Implementation of the proposed light rail service would obvious capacity to the corridor. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 29 • • • 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT Future traffic conditions without the project were analyzed. Future traffic consisting of background traffic and committted development traffic was estimated. Background traffic was estimated by applying an annual growth factor to existing traffic. The annual growth factor of 2% per year was developed based upon the historical traffic count data shown in Table 17. TABLE 17 - ANNUAL AADT GROWTH RATES VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) L C L IO t t } 143 SR 5/US-1, 200' SOUTH OF NE 36TH STREET 28,598 41,000 46,500 1.89% 5058 SR 5/US-1, 200' NORTH OF NE 29TH STREET 28,461 37,000 38,500 1.17% Future traffic conditions were analyzed for year 2006. The growth rate of 2% per year was applied to the 2002 FDOT traffic counts and the 2004 original traffic count volumes in order to achieve 2006 traffic volumes. In addition, City of Miami data on major committed developments was researched and the traffic associated with those developments was included in the analysis. These developments consisted of the following projects: • Biscayne Bay Tower ▪ Cultural Center ■ Miramar Center II ■ 1800 Club ■ Biscayne Village ▪ Tuttle Street ■ Sky Residences ■ Bay 25 (Star) ▪ Platinum Condominium ■ Metropolis Bayshore (Quantum) ■ Edgewater Tower (Rosabella) • Biscayne Bay Lofts (Onyx) Table 18 provides the future traffic volumes without the Avant project and shows these volumes with the associated movement. These volumes were used to determine intersection level of service by using the same software programs as used for the JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 30 • • previously described analysis. The intersection level of service for the future traffic volumes without the Avant project are shown in Table 19 and on Figure 9. The analysis shows a slight deterioration in the intersection level of service during the AM peak hour. In general, the values are generally the same as those for the year 2004. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix B. The link level of service analysis for future AM and PM peak hour directional traffic conditions was performed on the previously identified roadway link. These results are summarized in Table 20. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 31 • '3'd 1031S11v 'W NOS)IOVf TABLE 18 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT "' PI i i: - k 6 5i �i.4yy 4kk3SY'.. YYJ ( IE F,, � ry ''2. • , . ,S . (✓te�fii. Y i tX`t''ih4 �.i µMyz s. NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 10 3 16 22 31 11 1,191 5 7 2,058 22 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 2 0 11 2 95 11 1,195 26 29 1,993 28 NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 19 0 283 18 32 950 0 NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 13 0 287 11 24 948 0 '.YY"""" k _ t w r 1.'8)' .�,. �Yn� �,� .yy�AK�{ u14?5'�'F - Yi 5 5C �14'ifit}�"'�4 ! (% i g,} '. _ A'. i}, NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 18 20 26 40 25 18 82 1,637 27 28 1,554 16 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 1 1 22 20 3 61 35 1,639 66 78 1,609 15 NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 18 0 44 0 1,186 11 9 401 0 NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 21 0 82 0 1,114 28 30 388 0 • • • TABLE 19 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS IN ERSECTI JN s YEA 006 LOS J ��Ci �Rq �T �, 3 - - x f NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD B A NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EB=D, WB=D EB=F, WB=D NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE WB=C WB=D NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE WB=C WB=D TABLE 20 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT t may' - ( ii"} l £.R .. sf;= t E.t S W i.-`S L� T ' x s} '1F ��, '" 1 Biscayne Boulevard NE 26th Street NE 38th Street AM=F PM=F ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA PEAK HOUR LOS MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME (VPH) A B C D E AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) NIA N/A 740 12e0 1290 2806 PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) NIA NIA a)0 1260 1410 2875 Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average G/C of 0.69. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average G/C of 0.79. 3) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2002 FDOT data for count station 0143 (AADT = 46,500; K= 9.75%; and, D = 52.35%) escalated by 2% per year for three years and includes committed development traffic. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 33 • • NE 36 ST N.T.S. AM PM WB=C WB=D AM PM WB=C WB=D NE 29 ST NE 34 ST AM PM EB=D EB=F WB=D WB=D NE 33 ST m W Z }- Q U AM PM WB=F WB=F EB=F EB=F AM/PM MINOR STREET APPROACH LOS (LINSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) AM/PM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS AM LINK LOS PM LINK LOS FIGURE 9 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTElT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 34 • • 9M FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC Future traffic conditions with project traffic were analyzed for the year 2006. This was accomplished by using the 2006 estimated traffic volumes without the project and adding the traffic generated by the project (as shown in Table 15). Table 21 details the future traffic plus project traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection levels of service using the same procedures as previously stated. For the most part, there were only minor changes between the year 2006 future intersection level of service with and without the project. The most significant changes are a deterioration of the level of service of the westbound approach to the intersection of NE 34th Street and NE 2nd Avene; and, a deterioration during the AM peak hour of the level of service for the eastbound approach to the intersection of NE 34th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. This is shown in Table 22 and on Figure 10. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix C. The link level of service analysis for future AM and PM peak hour directional traffic conditions with the project was performed on the previously identified roadway links. These results are summarized in Table 23. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 35 • '9'd `1a3i61Hv 'W NOSMOV!' TABLE 21 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT egSr �, R is { TdF_:: :^R': -, �f h � �Y� wc� 'S - - Y , , `iC^ ' �"'#7 „ E 33RD STREET & ISCAYNE :OULEVARD 10 3 16 52 22 31 19 1,198 5 7 2,079 22 E 34TH STREET & ISCAYNE :OULEVARD 26 0 32 25 2 95 18 1,195 26 29 1,993 45 E 34TH STREET & E 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 71 0 63 0 283 59 62 950 0 NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 57 0 21 0 320 11 24 948 0 r £ } rV N 5 .. . .. - ; A.Y '.t,, I :; ,�1q�'py, , y 1 Z 4 �f�{ dw `,' 3V'4./ %l5si i •� ' y■w�y�. zlm> I t. �". ..„,,,,eee 4, ,Y�J ,T1' (�i�(,�� "`T ��y( '*tFn :� s� 4: I ala �i; RIGHT may' F�}yµ, T'. � .-.. ■Y^L� t. s` FT THRLf _�li+r.�h} • ',', u ' [[i S., it ..n"" # ._.�''�e•( _ NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD .,: 18 20 26 40 25 18 88 1,642 27 28 1,562 16 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 10 1 30 20 3 61 40 1,639 66 78 1,609 27 NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 36 0 61 0 1,186 39 30 401 0 NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 21 0 88 0 1,136 28 30 388 0 • • TABLE 22 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD A B A A NE 34TH STREET & EB=C, BISCAYNE BOULEVARD WB=B EB=C, WB=D EB=D, WB=D EB=F, WB=D EB=F, WB=D EB=F, WB=D NE 34TH STREET & NE WB=C 2ND AVENUE WB=C WB=C WB=D WB=F WB=E NE 33RD STREET & NE WB=C 2ND AVENUE WB=D WB=C WB=D WB=C WB=D TABLE 23 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT is STREET - S'Y !' Illy-. t •ah ?-T `v` v^ � vs-...�. ���. LO Biscayne Boulevard NE 26th Street NE 38th Street AM=F PM=F ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA PEAK HOUR LOS MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR D1RECTIONALVOLUME (VPH) A B C D E AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A N/A 740 1250 1290 2827 PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) NIA N/A 500 1260 1410 2899 Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average GIC of 0.67. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average GIC of 0.79. 3) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2002 FDOT data for count station 0143 (AADT = 46,500; K= 9.75%; and, D = 52.35%) escalated by 2% per year for three years and includes committed development traffic and project traffic. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 37 • NE 36 ST N.T.S. AM PM WB=F WB=E AM PM WB=C WB=0 NE 29 ST NE 34 ST AM PM EB=F EB=F WS=0 WB=D NE 33 ST ci w U CA AM PM WB=F WB=F EB=F EB=F AM/PM MINOR STREET APPROACH LOS (LINSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) AM/PM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS AM LINK LOS PM LINK LOS FIGURE 10 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH THE PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 38 • • • 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING There are parking spaces on either side of NE 34th Street. Adjacent to the site there are existing un-metered, on --street parking spaces. The project will result in the elimination of a minimal amount of existing un-metered on - street parking spaces on the south side of NE 34th Street. The project will construct some 187 on -site parking spaces. Parking will be provided for residents, employees and visitors to the site. 11.0 PEDESTRIANS Little pedestrian activity was noted in the immediate vicinity of the site. Because no driveways are proposed on Biscayne Boulevard; the proposed project will not significantly impact pedestrian movements along Biscayne Boulevard. Pedestrian activity on NE 34th Street is minimal. 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN Traffic and transportation aspects of the proposed site plan were reviewed and analyzed. 121 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS The proposed project includes one, two-way driveway providing main access to the site. A drop-off lane is also shown on the site plan. The proposed project driveway is located over 260 feet from the west curb line of Biscayne Boulevard. This should be adequate to preclude operational disturbances at the driveway impacting the intersection of NE 34th Street and Biscayne Boulevard, Table 24 summarizes the AM and PM peak hour driveway volumes anticipated at the service point. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 39 • • TABLE 24 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 95 138 66 51 9 45 43 21 The ground level plan, provided by the project architect, dated January 26, 2004 indicates that there will be no control point for the retail parking and that the control point for the residential parking will be well within the property, approximately 300 feet from the south curb line of NE 34th Street. Queuing analysis was conducted based upon the assumption that access to the residential portion of the garage will be controlled by a card reader system and consist of an inbound lane and an outbound lane. Analysis of potential inbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is better than a 99% probability that the queue should not exceed 2 vehicles including the vehicle being processed. Analysis of potential outbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is better than a 99% probability that the queue should not exceed 2 vehicles including the vehicle being processed. It should be anticipated that the location and geometry of the access control point to the residential portion of the parking garage will be refined during the design process. 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK The proposed site plan includes a loading dock area internal to the site, immediately adjacent to the entrance/exit to NE 34th Street. Access to the loading dock is from NE 34th Street. The loading dock area consists of two single unit truck berths. This should be adequate to serve the type and magnitude of development anticipated. It should be anticipated that the design of the loading dock area will be refined through -out the design JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 40 • • process. 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The proposed site plan provides pedestrian access to Biscayne Boulevard and to NE 34th Street. Residential access is via provided off of NE 34th Street. Retail spaces have access to Biscayne Boulevard. 13.0 RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPOSED MIDTOWN MIAMI PROJECT Over the last several years considerable planning effort has gone into the re -development of the Florida East Coast Railway Buena Vista Yard. This proposed development, reportedly to consist of some 3,000 residential units and 600,000 square feet of commercial space would have a profound impact on the area. The most recent planning for this project envisions NE 34th Street as a major east/west connector between Miami Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. Thus far, the planning has identified two options for this recommendation. The first option would widen NE 34th Street to provide a four -lane section between NE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. This option would create two new signalized intersections, one at NE 34th Street and Biscayne Boulevard and the other at NE 34th Street and NE 2nd Avenue. Because this option would require additional right-of-way on NE 34th Street between NE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard a second option. The second option would develop a one-way pair between NE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard using NE 34th Street as the westbound leg and NE 33rd Street as the eastbound leg. This option would create three new signalized intersections, one at NE 34th Street and Biscayne Boulevard, one at NE 34th Street and NE 2nd Avenue, and another at NE 33rd Street and NE 2nd Avenue. Given the fact that, during the PM peak hour, the existing signalized intersection at Biscayne Boulevard and NE 33rd Street is already adversely impacted by the northbound queue back from the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 36th Street; the wisdom of proposing this additional emphasis on the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 34th Street seems questionable. This, coupled with the fact that NE 34th Street west of Miami Avenue is one-way eastbound, should raise questions as to the viability of using the NE 34th Street alignment as the major east/west roadway between NE 36th Street and NE 29th Street. it is more than likely that NE 34th Street and NE 33rd Street would remain two-way east of Biscayne Boulevard. This would mean that, if the one-way pair option were adopted, a split -phase operation would likely be implemented. Typically split -phase operations are JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 41 • • not as efficient as more conventional signal operating plans. The existing traffic signal at the intersection of NE 33rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard is a span wire assembly which would likely be replaced or eliminated altogether regardless of the chosen option. This would be an opportunity to provide for protected -permitted signal phases for northbound and southbound left turns. Because it is not blocked by 1-95, NE 32nd Street connects through to NW 7th Avenue. This might argue for some curvilinear alignment connecting NE 32nd Street west of Miami Avenue to NE 33rd Street east of NE 2nd Avenue. However, between 1-95 and Miami Avenue, NE 32nd Street traverses a residential area. Additionally, between NE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, NE 32nd Street is a narrow, one-way eastbound roadway. In all likelihood there will be considerable additional planning of the transportation improvements needed to support the Midtown Miami Project. At the current time, the proposed Avant Project is best accommodated by keeping NE 34th Street two-way between NE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. If, in the future, NE 34th Street is selected as a main connection to the Midtown Miami Project; given the currently identified two options, the proposed Avant Project might best be served if NE 34th Street were one- way westbound. 14.0 CONCLUSIONS After reviewing the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, it can be concluded that with or without the project, by the year 2006 there will be some deterioration in the level of service on NE 34th Street at its intersections with Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue. The intersection analysis, conducted for the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 34th Street shows a degradation of level of service in the eastbound direction during the AM peak hour. Similar analysis of the intersection of NE 2nd Avenue and NE 34th Street indicates a deterioration of westbound level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. A comparison of the results of all of the intersection analyses are shown in Table 25. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 42 • TABLE 25 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS Y � �µi� A k� A I XI NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD B A g A B A NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EB=D, WB=D EB=F, WB=D EB=F, WB=D EB=F, WB=D EB=F, WB=D EB=F, WB=D NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE WB=C WB=D WB=F WB=E WB=F WB=E NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE WB=C WB=D WB=C WB=D WB=C WB=D The roadway link analyses, with and without the project, yield similar level of service results, indicating that roadway levels of service remain relatively consistent through the year 2006 with or without the project. Finally, the corridor analysis provided in Appendix D clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the proposed project. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. AVANT February 20, 2004 Page 43 APPENDIX A Existing intersection Levels of Service • • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID AVANT East/West Street: NE 33RD STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 276 11 23 911 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.69 0.64 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 303 15 35 990 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 3 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L Volume 54 13 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0..63 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 85 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I L R v (vph) 35 85 16 C(m) (vph) 1232 279 855 v/c 0.03 0.30 0.02 95% queue length 0.09 1.25 0.06 Control. Delay 8.0 23.5 9.3 LOS A C A Approach Delay 21.2 Approach LOS C AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-1 • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 33RD STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1071 27 29 373 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.68 0.73 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1190 39 39 449 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 3 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 f 10 11 12 L T R i L T R Volume 20 79 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 90 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade () 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 L R I v (vph) 39 40 90 C(m) (vph) 557 102 432 v/c 0.07 0.39 0.21 95% queue length 0.23 1.60 0.78 Control Delay 11.9 61.4 15.5 LOS B F C Approach Delay 29.6 Approach LOS D AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-2 • • • 1-1CS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 3598 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/20/04 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTING Project ID: AVANT E/W St: NE 34RD STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound 1 Northbound l Southbound L T R L T R I L T R I L T R 0 1 1 LT R 10 3 16 11.0 11.0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 LT R j L TR I L TR 44 21 30 111 733 5 17 1709 21 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds i Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left 2 Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 20.0 62.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 324 1456 0.07 0.22 27.8 C 27.7 C R 337 1516 0.06 0.22 27.7 C Westbound LT 332 1494 0.24 0.22 29.1 C 28.8 C R 337 1516 0.12 0.22 28.1 C Northbound L 86 125 0.23 0.69 11.4 B TR 2331 3383 0.35 0.69 6.1 A 6.3 A Southbound L 395 574 0.03 0.69 4.6 A TR 2328 3379 0.78 0.69 12.0 B 12.0 B Intersection Delay = 11.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-3 • HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 3598 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/20/04 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/9D0T Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTING Project ID: AVANT E/W St: NE 34RD STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound 1 IL T R I L T R 1 L. T R I L T R 1 1 1 1 1 _ No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 LGConfig 1 LT R i LT R 1 L TR 1 L TR Volume 117 19 25 137 24 17 179 1233 25 127 1064 16 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 ;11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left P Thru A Thru P Right A Right P Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left P Thru A Thru P Right A Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 13.0 94.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 123 1087 0.39 0.11 49.4 0 48.3 D R 171 1516 0.19 0.11 46.7 D Westbound LT 134 1183 0.69 0.11 62.7 E 59.0 E R 171 1516 0.16 0.11 46.5 0 Northbound L 338 414 0.28 0.82 4.6 A TR 2759 3375 0.52 0.82 4.0 A 4.1 A Southbound L 237 290 0.14 0.82 3.3 A TR 2762 3379 0.41 0.82 3.4 A 3.4 A Intersection Delay = 7.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-4 • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/"DOT Units: U. 5. Customary Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 [ 4 5 6 L T R j L T R Volume 272 17 31 913 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.71 0.43 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 302 23 72 981 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 3 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 T R I L T R Volume 21 18 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.48 0.50 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 43 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 72 43 36 C(m) (vph) 1224 242 851 v/c 0.06 0.18 0.04 95% queue length 0.19 0.63 0.13 Control Delay 8.1 23.1 9.4 LOB A C A Approach Delay 16.8 Approach LOS C AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-5 HCS2000: Unsignalized intersections Release 4.ld TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1139 11 9 385 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.55 0.75 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1251 19 12 458 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -_ 3 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 T R I L T R Volume 17 43 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.71 0.60 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 71 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT i L R I v (vph) 12 23 71 C(m) (vph) 537 108 419 v/c 0.02 0.21 0.17 95% queue length 0.07 0.76 0.60 Control Delay 11.9 47.1 15.3 LOS B E .. C Approach Delay 23.1 Approach LOS C AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-6 • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY J. AHLSTEDT 2/20/04 Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID.:. AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 11 739 23 27 1649 27 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.93 0.82 0.75 0.95 0.61 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 15 794 28 36 1735 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L `T' TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume - 21 2 83 2 0 11 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.66 0.50 0.91 0.50 1.00 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 31 4 91 4 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT TR I LT TR v (vph) 15 36 33 93 4 15 C(m) (vph) 504 874 284 705 150 538 v/c 0.03 0.04 0.12 0.13 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 0.09 0.13 0.39 0.45 0.08 0.09 Control Delay 12.4 9.3 19.3 10.9 29.7 11.9 LOS B A C B D B Approach Delay 13.1 15.6 Approach LOS B C AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-7 • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AILSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 { 4 5 6 L T R j L T R Volume 34 1239 57 70 1118 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.71 0.92 0.85 0.77 0.94 0.54 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 47 1346 67 90 1189 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 4 10 11 12 L T R { L T R Volume 19 3 55 1 1 21 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.48 0.38 0.67 0.25 0.25 0.75 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 39 7 82 4 4 28 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 j 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 LT TR j LT TR v (vph) 47 90 42 85 6 30 C(m) (vph) 747 505 109 458 96 452 v/c 0.06 0.18 0.39 0.19 0.06 0.07 95% queue length 0.20 0.64 1.58 0.67 0.20 0.21 Control Delay 10.1 13.7 57.4 14.6 45.0 13.5 LOS B B F B E B Approach Delay 28.8 18.8 Approach LOS D C AVANT Appendix A February 20, 2004 Page A-8 • APPENDIX B Future Intersection Levels of Service Without Project • • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Project ID: AVP2'TT East/West Street: NE 33RD STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement I 2 3 j 4 5 6 L T R 1 T., T R Volume 287 11 24 948 Beak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.69 0.64 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 315 15 37 1030 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 3 _..- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 57 13 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.63 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 90 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (-) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 3 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L v (vph) 37 90 16 C(m) (vph) 1219 264 847 v/c 0.03 0.34 0.02 95% queue length 0.09 1.45 0.06 Control Delay 8.0 25.5 9.3 LOS A D A Approach Delay 23.1 Approach LOS C AVANT Appendix B February 20, 2004 Page B-1 • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 33RD STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1114 28 30 388 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.68 0.73 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1237 41 41 467 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 3 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 j 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 21 82 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42 94 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R v (vph) 41 42 94 C(m) (vph) 534 92 416 v/c 0.08 0.46 0.23 95% queue length 0.25 1.93 0.86 Control Delay 12.3 73.5 16.2 LOS B F C Approach Delay 33.9 Approach LOS D AVANT Appendix B February 20, 2004 Page B-2 HCS2000: Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 2/20/04 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: AVANT E/W St: NE 34RD STREET Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: 3598 Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Westbound I Northbound I L T R 1 L T R I I 0 1 1 LT R 1 10 3 16 152 11.0 11.0 I 0 I 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 LT R I L TR 22 31 111 1191. 5 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 I 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 7 2058 22 11.0 11.0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination FB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow A11 Red 1 A A A A A A 20.0 4.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 Intersection NB Left Thru Right Peds SE Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 P P P P 6 7 6 62.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS secs Eastbound LT 322 1446 0.07 R 337 1516 0.06 Westbound LT 326 1467 0.28 R 337 1516 0.12 Northbound L 80 115 0.25 TR 2332 3385 0.56 Southbound L 205 297 0.06 TR 2328 3380 0.94 Intersection Delay = 16.6 0.22 27.8 C 27.7 C 0.22 27.7 C 0.22 29.5 C 29.1 C 0.22 28.1 C 0.69 12.6 B 0.69 8.1 A 8.1 A 0.69 5.1 A 0.69 20.9 C 20.8 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B AVANT Appendix B February 20, 2004 Page B-3 HCS2000: Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 2/20/04 Period: 804 PEAK HOUR Project ID: AVANT E/W St: NE 34RD STREET Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: 3598 Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT 1 Eastbound 1 L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 LGConfig 1 Volume 118 Lane Width I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 LT 20 11.0 N%S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound 1 Northbound L T R I L T R 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 LT R I L TR 140 25 18 182 1637 27 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 1 0 0 1 R 26 11.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 128 1554 16 111.0 11.0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WE Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 13.0 94.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity Is) We 5 6 7 P P P P P P g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 8 Eastbound LT 115 R 171 Westbound LT 131 R 171 Northbound L 180 TR 2761 Southbound L 128 TR 2764 1015 0.43 0.11 50.2 D 48.8 D 1516 0.19 0.11 46.8 D 1155 0.75 0.11 70.3 E 64.8 E 1516 0.18 0.11 46.6 D 220 0.55 0.82 15.0 B 3378 0.69 0.82 5.8 A 6.3 A 157 0.26 0.82 7.2 A 3382 0.60 0.82 4.7 A 4.8 A Intersection Delay = 8.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A AVANT Appendix B February 20, 2004 Page B-4 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 j 4 5 6 L T R i L T R Volume 283 18 32 950 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.71 0.43 0.93 Dourly Flow Rate, HER 314 25 74 1021 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 3 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T{ L T R Volume 22 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.48 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration L R 1 19 0.50 38 3 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 74 45 38 C(m) (vph) 1210 229 841 v/c 0.06 0.20 0.05 95% queue length 0.20 0.71 0.14 Control Delay 8.2 24.5 9.5 LOS A C A Approach Delay 17.6 Approach LOS C AVANT Appendix 6 February 20, 2004 Page B-5 • HCS2000: unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE W/0 PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 i 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1186 11 9 401 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.55 0.75 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 1303 19 12 477 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- __ 3 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 18 44 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.71 0.60 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level. of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 l 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 L R 1 v (vph) 12 25 73 8 403 C(m) (vph) 513 90.18 v/c 0.02 0.26 95% queue length 0.07 0.93 0.65 Control Delay 12.2 53.9 15.9 LOS B F C Approach Delay 25.6 Approach LOS D AVANT Appendix B February 20, 2004 Page B-6 • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK ROUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: N5 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Sorthbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L R 1 L T R Volume 11 1195 26 29 1993 28 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.93 0.82 0.75 0.95 0.61 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 1284 31 38 2097 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- 3 Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 RT Channelized? 1 2 0 Lanes 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 25 2 95 2 0 11 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.66 0.50 0.91 0.50 11.00 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 4 104 4 3 3 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration. LT TR LT TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SE Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT TR I LT TR v (vph) 15 38 39 106 4 15 C(m) (vph) 266 545 114 445 54 538 v/c 0.06 0.07 .0.34 0.24 0.07 0.03 95% queue length 0.18 0.22 1.36 0.92 0.23 0.09 Control Delay 19.3 12.1 52.2 15.6 76.9 11.9 LOS C B F C F B Approach Delay 25.4 25.6 Approach LOS D D AVANT Appendix B February 20, 2004 Page B-7 • HC52000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Project ID AVANT ............................. . East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 35 1639 66 78 1609 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.71 0.92 0.85 0.77 0.94 0.54 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 49 1781 77 101 1711 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T .TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 € 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 20 3 61 1 1 22 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.48 0.38 0.67 0.25 0.25 0.75 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 7 91 4 4 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (5) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT TR I LT TR v (vph) 49 101 44 94 6 31 C(m) (vph) 396 . 322 258 0 0 v/c 0.12 0.31 0.36 95% queue length 0.42 1.31 1.60 Control Delay 15.4 21.2 26.7 LOS C C D F F Approach Delay Approach LOS AVANT Appendix B February 20, 2004 Page B-8 • APPENDIX C Future Intersection Levels of Service With Project HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE WITH PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 33RD STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 320 11 24 948 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.69 0.64 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 351 15 37 1030 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 3 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / AT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T .Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 57 21 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.63 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 90 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NE S8 Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 37 90 25 C(m) (vph) 1182 250 825 v/c 0.03 0.36 0.03 95% queue length 0.10 1,57 0.09 Control Delay 8.1 27.3 9.5 LOS A D A Approach Delay 23.4 Approach LOS C AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page C-1 • HCS2000: Unsignaiized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AELSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE WITH PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 33RD STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1136 28 30 388 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.68 0.73 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1262 41 41 467 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 3 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 21 88 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42 101 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R 1 v (vph) 41 42 101 C(m) (vph) 522 88 408 v/c 0.08 0.48 0.25 95% queue length 0.25 2.03 0.96 Control Delay 12.5 78.7 16.7 LOS B F C Approach Delay 34.9 Approach LOS D AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page G-2 HCS2000: Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: ➢ate: 2/20/04 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: AVANT E/W St: NE 34RD STREET Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: 3598 Area Type: Ail other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 L T R I Westbound L T 1 Northbound R 1 L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 LGConfig 1 LT R Volume 110 3 16 152 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 LT R I L TR 22 31 119 1198 5 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 I 0 1 2 0 L TR 7 2079 22 11.0 11.0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red 1 A A A A A A 20.0 4.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Area Type: All other areas Signal. Operations 2 3 4 Intersection Adj Sat Flow Rate NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WE Right 5 P P P P P P 6 7 8 62.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Performance Summary secs Ratios Lane Group Approach (s) vie g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 322 1448 0.07 R 337 1516 0.06 Westbound LT 326 1467 0.28 9 337 1516 0.12 Northbound L 80 115 0.44 TR 2332 3385 0.56 Southbound L 203 294 0.06 TR 2328 , 3380 0.94 Intersection Delay - 17.4 0.22 27.9 C 27.7 C 0.22 27.7 C 0.22 29.5 C 29.1 C 0.22 28.1 C 0.69 22.7 C 0.69 8.1 A 8.5 A 0.69 5.1 A 0.69 22.0 C 21.9 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page C-3 • i{CS2000: Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 2/20/04 Period: PM PEAE HOUR Project ID: AVANT E/W St: NE 34RD STREET Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: 3598 Area Type: All other. areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R N/5 St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound 1 Northbound L T R i L T R 0 1 1 LT R 18 20 26 11.0 11.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 1 1 LT R 40 25 18 11.0 11.0 i 1 2 0 ! L TR 188 1642 27 111.0 11.0 0 i 0 1 2 0 L TR 28 1562 16 11.0 11.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WE Left A Thru A Right A Peds B Right SB Right Green 13.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 0.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Eastbound LT R Westbound 2 3 4 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) 5 P P P P P P 6 7 8 94.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Summary v/c g/c Delay LOS Delay LOS 115 1015 0.43 0.11 50.2 D 48.8 D 171 1516 0.19 0.11 46.8 D LT 131 R 171. Northbound L 177 TR 2761 Southbound L 128 TR 2764 1155 0.75 0.11 70.3 E 64.8 E 1516 0.18 0.11 46.6 D 217 0.60 0.82 17.8 B 3378 0.69 0.82 5.8 A 6.5 A 156 0.26 0.82 7.2 A 3382 0.60 0.82 4.8 A 4.8 A Intersection Delay = 8.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page C-4 • HCS2000: Unsignalized intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE WITH PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 283 59 62 950 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0,90 0.71 0.43 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 314 83 144 1021 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- --- 3 __ Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 71 63 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.48 0.50 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 147 126 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB S8 Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 144 147 126 C(m) (vph) 1151 165 807 v/c 0.13 0.89 0.16 95% queue length 0.43 6.38 0.55 Control Delay 8.6 99.0 10.3 LOS A F B Approach Delay 58.0 Approach LOS F AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page C-5 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE WITH PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: NE 2 AVENUE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 T R 1 L T R Volume 1186 39 30 401 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.55 0.75 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1303 70 40 477 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 3 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 36 61 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.71 0.60 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 101 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 L R I v (vph) 40 50 101 C(m) (vph) 490 81 3S8 v/c 0.08 0.62 0.26 95% queue length 0.27 2.81 1.03 Control Delay 13.0 103.9 17.5 LOS B F C Approach Delay 46.1 Approach LOS E AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page C-6 • HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/20/04 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction.: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: FUTURE WITH PROJECT Project ID: AVANT East/West Street: NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 18 1195 26 29 1993 45 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.93 0_82 0.75 0.95 0.61 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 26 1284 31 38 2097 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- _- 3 Median Type/Storage TWLTL 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 25 2 95 26 0 32 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.66 0.50 0.91 0.50 1.00 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 4 104 52 0 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level. of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 LT TR 1 LT TR v (vph) 26 38 39 106 52 46 C(m) (vph) 253 545 103 431 51 538 v/c 0.10 0.07 0,38 0.25 1.02 0.09 95% queue length 0,34 0.22 1.53 0.96 4.48 0.28 Control Delay 20.9 12.1 59.8 16.1 260.0 12.3 LOS C B F C F B Approach Delay 27.8 143.8 Approach LOS D F AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page C-7 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY J. AHLSTEDT 2/20/04 PM PEAK HOUR CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT FUTURE WITH PROJECT Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Units: U. 5. Custo Analysis Year: Project 1D: AVANT East/West Street: ary NE 34TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 T R k L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 40 0.71 56 3 TWLTL 1639 66 78 0.92 0.85 0.77 1781 77 101 -- -- 3 / 1 1 2 0 L T TR Yes 1609 0.94 1711 1 2 0 L T TR Yes 27 0.54 49 Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound 7 8 9 L T R Eastbound I 10 11 12 I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Lanes Configuration 20 0.48 41 3 3 0.38 7 3 0 Exists?/Storage 0 2 LT 61 10 1 0.67 0.25 0.25 91 40 4 3 3 3 0 No / 0 0 2 TR LT 30 0.75 40 3 No 0 TR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 L L I LT TR I LT TR v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/ c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 56 101 44 385 322 0.15 0.31 0.50 1.31 15.9 21.2 C C 94 235 0.40 1.81 30.2 D 42 0 42 0 AVANT Appendix C February 20, 2004 Page C-8 • APPENDIX D Corridor Analysis • • • INTRODUCTION A level of service analysis was conducted using the techniques contained in the adopted Transportation Element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. These techniques are contained in the City of Miami publication Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. In performing the analysis, of the three possible scenarios available, .Scenario 2 - maximum auto was used. The level of service analysis for Avant is documented in Tables 1 through 4. The proposed project is located in the Biscayne Boulevard corridor. The roadways providing capacity to the corridor are: • • Biscayne Boulevard N.E. 2nd Avenue North Miami Avenue The transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are MetroBus Routes 3, 16, 32, 36, 62, 95, T, Biscayne Max, 9, 10, and 6. EXISTING 2004 LEVEL OF SERVICE Table 1 presents an analysis of the existing 2004 corridor level of service. Roadway vehicular capacities (column 2) were based upon data contained in Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. Roadway vehicular volumes (column 4) were taken from several sources. FDOT traffic count data was used for Biscayne Boulevard. This AADT volume was adjusted to reflect peak hour conditions by applying factors obtained from FDOT data. The original machine traffic count was used for NE 2nd Avenue. A count taken from the FEC Corridor Study prepared by Lehman Center for Transportation Research at FIU study was used for Miami Avenue. The FOOT and FIU count data was adjusted to 2004 using a growth rate of 2% per year. Mass Transit person trip capacities (columns 8, 9 and 10) were calculated from route schedules and equipment information supplied by the Miami -Dade Transit Agency (MDTA) and data contained in Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. Average weekday ridership data was obtained from MDTA. Total route ridership was available for MetroBus. Additionally, MDTA provided an estimated percentage of person AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D-1 • • trips during the peak 4 hours of the day. Because the MetroBus data reflected ridership on the entire route, some percentage of which is typically outside of the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor, it was necessary to estimate the portion of the total route ridership which was actually on the buses when they were in the corridor. To facilitate this estimate of segment volumes, 2002 through 2003 data on MetroBus boardings in the corridor was obtained from MetroBus surveys. Transit volumes (column 12) were calculated using the ridership data and the percentage of passengers during the peak hours supplied by MDTA and estimating ridership in the corridor from actual load factors calculated from the MetroBus survey data. Thus, the transit volumes shown in column 12 reflect actual load factors calculated from MDTA surveys. As can be seen from Table 1, the existing Biscayne Boulevard Corridor currently operates at Level of Service "B" AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D-2 MIMIROADWAY MODE L•,'v , _ y r MASS TRANSIT MODE 1 CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME _ 2004 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAYMMLOCAL SUS RAIL TRAN TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORR EZZEICENIMMIDERNI PER. TRIP ® PERSON NM PER. TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON Princi.al Raadwa s CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME M TRIP -I CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP ' ' TRIG' �i �' 111111111111111111=11== ��PPV= - 6 -M---1 IPPV= CAPACITY ®LOS! C LOAD = :t LOAD = .1 LOAD = :� LOAD = TRIP ® CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS ®LO6 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY �- CAPACITY - __ (N ®111MI® (4) (6) IIMIIUM ( 0) (11) REIMIIIMI1111111111 (15) (16) (17) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR _®----_-----__ 1111111111111111111111111.11111 88 Isrard 0143 -_EIMMEMMIIIIMMINIMMIEMOMENIMEMMal _-------_ ---- ®-- 11111111111® MIMI IMIVINIME/11111111MINIIMMEI IIIIIIMIIIIIINIMII®— ®-®�®- IIIIIMMIIIIIIIMIIIII110111111111EIMI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIMINIIIIIIIM IIMIIIIINIIIIIIIMMEMIIIIII■I■■II■III■■IIIM■N■■11a1111111�■1■11111111■Mn11•1■.11 IIIIIIIIMIIIMINIIIEMTRETIMIMI■■III■IM■■MIIIIIII■NIwIIII■IIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIMMIIINMII■I■ IIIIMEMIgINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMINIIIIIIIIIMIIIMIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMMINIIIIIIIM11111 __4-----_ �� r■■■MINIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■IIINIMMIIIIIII■I■ir■IIIMMI■1111111M1111111 MINIM■N■i■MMI1111111111111111_11=111_— IIIRMINNIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIMII� INIIMINIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIMIIIIEMIMITIIIIIII ®1=1■r1111■1110•1®moo •111111■■ IIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMEWM11111111EW ®--IIIITIMM a1111111•1111®A® ® IIIIMIMINIIIIMIIIIIIMMINIIIIIIIIII 11111211111•11111111111E11111EM111111011111 ■e■■®IIIIIMIN IIIIMEMINIMMI®- M.ao2ua R18 MAX - _-- __ 2.720 -_--- .012.11 ®INKEEMICI ErEallinlig ------ 0 Illeni L30 ® a, am IIIIIMIIMINIEMINIMEMINI® 7344 0.51 _ E A N.C. 2nd A.enw O5, final Count 127/04 _-11MWEIMEMINIMINI 1 880 '®1111. ®-- �� 'r ® Hellos.. Rte 10___--__--_ 2,720 35 1.70a111=1111 1.880 057 Ill 1.033 ------ a•01111111111111•1 0 0 ■1 1,033 ®�� a® 111111711111,11EMI® as® 0.52 A Miami Avenue 3U Coons 3714 2002 __I� ���� INIIIIMIIIIIIII■11.■111111111•■1■■01i■■•1111=1■■•1111111111.111.■11111 A.enee sealowl __ 2,720 ® 1.g0 ® 2,100 0.52 0 34 0 a�a®® 0.52 Miami __ 5,160 130a 5013 11,215 Mr= 0.88 E 4,289 e�J 0 1,759 ® /3410 0.70 IIIIIII 0 TOTAL 111111•111111111111•111111•11111111MMIIIIIMMINIIIIIIIMENIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ---M ----�- ---- - --MMO� --- ---- __ AUTO PERSON TRIPS --_ 0.00 r r 1.�- �_ TOTAL PERSON TRIPS �®' �' T00.00%--- --_ . • �_------_ -�---_ — - 0.71 11•1111111111111111111•111111111MINIIII=M1111111111111111111=11111=11111111111•0 0,d1011111_------- IIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMENIIIMIIIIIIIIII=11111111111111.1111=M11111111111111•11.1•1111.11111111111 IIIIIIIIMMINIIIIMMI11111111111111111111111111•1111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11EMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIII---_ ©� ©_------_ IIIIM11112111■■1111221111111■■■0111111a-11111.1.1111=E NEINIe■■==1111111MI■11111•11111111MIMIIIIIN■ ------- ------ ------ ---- _—_—_— ------ ---- ------ ------ ---IIIIIIIIIIMINIMINIIII 11■■■1•1■■1111•1■■1111■i1111•11•111111■1111111111■ r■■■■■IMINIMINIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIMII■II■■MIIMI _■IIrIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■IIIIIIIIIII■ ■■IM■■IIIIIIMIIIIIII■M■i■IIIIIIIIIIIIMM 1111.1.11111111111111111=���er�I■�■■III_■III_IIIIIIIIII■— IIIIIIIMIIIIIIIMEEMrllrMIIIII MMUMMIIIII■ 150.00% _ ��■����— --_ ■�■��■■M�■���II�� IIMIIII■u■Nr■IIIIIIIII■IIIIM■r■IMMI11111111■M ---_-- _-----—- _----- ■■__■��_■__� IIIMIIIIII■■IIMMINNINIIMINIMI ---- -- Mattoeua Rte 19 �' 150.00%--_ - .- Na ' ''a 150-00% ��--- 1soao% 0H��� ������ ��� - ::: mII11111111111 15a 00% ®IIIMEIMI--_ ---_-- — Rtn 95 EM®�'.' 1/1'�--_ -----_ --__ imiiiiiiiimMek00us t50.00% --_ -----= --_— Meso®w Rt. Ml1( 11111111•11111111...: r Mv5a5ua Rte 80®IIIIIIIIIMM I�1®®� 0MEIIIIMIIMIIIM _-1111-- 150.00% 150.009E �'--_ © 100.00% —__ _—_ ------ ------ _--- ---- _---_— _--- AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE C • • • • YEAR 2006 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT THE PROJECT Table 2 presents an analysis of the future year 2006 corridor level of service without the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes was taken from Table 1 (2004) and adjusted to the year 2006 by applying a growth factor of 2%n_per year and adding committed development traffic. As can be seen from Table 2, it is estimated that the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor will operate at Level of Service "C" in the year 200E without the project. AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D-4 TABLE 2 - 2006 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT ROADWAY MODE MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME 2006 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL SUS EXPRESS RAIL TRAN TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Principal Roadway(s) CORR VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSON PER. TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PER. TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP @PPV= QPPV= CAPACITY WC LOS a LOAD = @ LOAD =A. LOAD = g LOAD , TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS V/C LOS 1.8 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY (Notes) (1) .2 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) BiSCAYNE CORRIDOR LS Biscayne Boulevard (0143) 2 720 4,352 5,614 7,880 13,90131 1.81 1° 4.362 7,860 13,5081 1.81 F Nhe2085e Me 3 369 0 0 369 201 113 339 201 188 Meea6ue Rte 16 392 0 0 392 177 216 392 177 218 0.1etroBue Rte 32 387 0 0 387 58 379 337 56 329 Metra8us Rte 36 400 0 0 400 39 361 400 19 362 MalroBus Rte 82 734 0 0 734 107 627 734 107 127 MetroBue Rte 95 0 447 0 447 2 444 447 2 444 Me5,0ue Res T 400 0 0 400 184 215 400 184 215 Me9o501 RBI MAX 519 0 0 519 226 293 519 226 293 5/snare Boulevard Subtotal 2,720 4,352 5,414 7,860 (3,508) 1.41 1 3,221 447 0 1,868 994 2,674 8,020 8,554 (834) 1.10 N.B. 2nd Avenue {04914ra1 Count 1/27104} 1,720 4,352 1,552 2 593 1,759 0.60 B 4.352 2,593 1,759 0.60 A MetroBus Rte 9 828 0 0 426 335 493 828 336 493 Metro659 Rte 70 200 0 0 205 56 149 205 58 149 24.E. 2nd Avenue Subtotal 2,720 4.352 1352 2,593 1,759 0.90 B 1,033 0 0 1,033 392 641 5,365 2,985 2.401 0.55 A Mani Avenue {Fill Count 3114)2002} 2 720 4 352 1 673 2,343 2,009 054 A 4,352 2,343 2,209 0.54 A MSI/oBus Rte 5 34 0 0 34 9 28 34 9 20 Miami Avenue Subtotal 2,720 4.352 1,673 2,343 2,009 0.54 A 34 0 0 34 9 26 4,347 2,351 2,035 4.54 A TOTAL 6.160 13.056 9,140 12793 261 0.98 C 4.289 447 0 4,736 1,395 3,341 17,792 14,129 3.602 0.80 C LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 12 795 90.17% 0.00 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 1,395 9.63% 0.60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 14,120 160.00% 0.91 B 0.70 B 0.71 O 0.80 C 0.31 0 0.30 0 0.91 B 190E 1.0r F GROWTH FACTOR 1.02 Pet Year 2 - YEARS CONMRITTB00435LOPMENT TRAFFIC VPH • PAX TRANSIT 2495 3,493 154 5,0054 TRANSIT 81ucayne Boulevard 150541 603 1 124 PAX L0GAL EXPRESS RAIL TOTAL Met ,Bus R9e 3 24.38% 26.4 20 htetro9us Rte 10 12.64% 23.3 23 Metto8us Rte 32 4.12% Mstmaue Rte 96 2.82% 5.2 5 Metro9us Rte62 767% 14,1 14 Matro5as Rte 95 0.17% 0 0 Htetro9us Ms T 13.22% 24.3 24 MalsoBus ate MAX 13.2196 29.8 30 Ma649us Rte9 24.05% 44.2 44 MetroBus Rte 10 4.05% 7.4 7 MetroBu6 Rte 8 0.62% 1.1 100.001. 184 0 0 184 AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D- • • • PROJECT TRAFFIC Table 3 presents project traffic and mass transit ridership based upon PM peak hour project traffic. The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 503 (note that this is the new zone system). The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 503 was obtained from Miami - Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 13.28% East -Northeast 4.64% East -Southeast 5.33% South -Southeast 10.39% South -Southwest 12.76% West -Southwest 21.80% West -Northwest 14.93% North -Northwest 16.87% Using this trip distribution, the project trip assignment was determined. This is shown in Figure 1. Project transit ridership was estimated based upon the assumption that 5% of project person trips would be by mass transit. Assignment of person trips was proportioned to the MetroBus routes . AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D-6 • • 16/11 21/8 4-- NE36ST 23/9 122/10 N.T.S. 14/10 uJ z 30/21 L.).. NE 29 ST w N W t33122 17/12 444/17 49/18 24191 8/6 21/8 NE 34 ST 7/5 NE33ST 33/22 U UJ 21/8 8/6 7/5 T15111 6/2 33/22 = AM/PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC FIGURE a-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D-7 TABLE 3 - PROJECT TRAFFIC ROADWAY MODE MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME 2006 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRESS RAIL TRAN TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Princi.al Roadwa s CORR VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSON PER. TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PER. TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP -IIIIIIIII :1PPV= oPPV= CAPACITY VIC LOS « LOAD = .r LOAD = C LOAD = 0 LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS WC LO: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1.6 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY (Notes) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) {12) (13) {14) (15) (16) (17) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR .11111111111.1 1111111.1.111.111=M11111011111111110.11111111 4 323 0,01 A 4 352 28 4 323 0.01 A 389 0 0 389 1 383 389 1 368 392 0 0 392 1 I 391 332 1 341 307 0 0 387 0 387 387 0 387 Matroaus Rta 36 1111=111111111111111111111111.11111.1111734 M05o94s Rto 9511=1.0.111111111.1111111111111111111111.1.111111.11111 .1.01.111111.111■- 400 0 0 400 0 400 400 0 400 0 0 734 1 733 734 1 733 0 447 0 447 0 447 447 0 447 400 0 0 440 1 398 400 1 396 M9Va6as Frye WAX 11111111111111111111.111 519 0 0 519 1 615 519 1 518 Elan - Boulevard Subs° 2,720 MMINIIIIMIIIIIIINM 4,323 0.01 A 3,221 447 0 3,666 6 3,682 8,020 0.00 A N.F. 2#d Avenutl 0nrinal Gaunt 1127104 INIMINIMMINUMMINIMI 4288 001 A 4352 64 4286 0.91 A 9eb93us Rte 9 828 0 0 828 2 826 828 2 826 92009ua Rto 10 205 0 0 205 0 205 205 0 205 N.E. 2nd Avenue Su6Wdl 2,720INIZIMMIIIMEMINIMIE 4,263 0.01 A 1,033 0 0 1,033 2 1,031 5.355 67 5,318 0.01 A 2003 venue (5L.MITE *0' 4352 0.00 A 4352 0 4352 0.00 A _ - 1111111111.1.111111111 0 34 0 34 34 0 34 -®, 4,352 0 0 4,352 0 00 A 34 0 0 34 0 34 4,387 0 4,386 0.00 A 13,056 67 94 12,962 a 01 A 4,289 447 0 4.736 4 4,727 17,792 102 17,689 0.01 A 1111111111111111.10111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111. inlarlINIENIIIIIIIMMINIMI AUTO PERSON TRIPS 94 41,54% 9.00 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 9 5.46% TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 102 100 9% 1111111111111111111..111.1.1.111.01.111.11111.1111111.11.11111111.1111111.1111.11111111.111.1111111111111.111111111111.11.11111111.1.11 IIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIIIIUIIIIIIINNIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINMIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEMITMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0.81 0,90 0 IIIIIMIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIIIIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIOIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIMMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII E111111111111111111.111.1111111111111111111111111111111.11.1.1.111.111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1.111111111.111.101111111111.11111.11111111 1.11111111.111111I♦ TOTAL WEIMINIMINIMINIMI11111111111111111 TRANSIT Max Blsca - Boulevotd IIIMIli MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIM 21 IIIIMOMMITIIIIII EINMMMIMOHMINIIIIIIIIUMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINMMIMIMIMIIIIIMIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIIIIIIIIIINIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 8a3uo Ris 3 MeM35o6us 14,30% Rte 16 12,8815 ®1111111111111 MS60560 R10 32 4.12% 111111111111111111.1.1111111111.1.0.111.111111111111111111111111011.1.11111111111111.1.1.111111111111111111.1111111.11.111111111111111111111......111111.111111111.11111111111111111111111 Motto9us Rte 36 2,62% 0 0 Mavo90a Rto 62 7.67% 2,0e8069. R64 95 0.17% 11.111.11111/11111111 Matraaus Ate T 13,22% 1 1 Mat705ua Rt. MAX ,6.21%111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 M9V760o Rho 10 4.05% 100,00% AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D. • • • • YEAR 2006 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH THE PROJECT Table 4 presents an analysis of the future year 2006 corridor level of service with the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes were determined by adding the data from Table 2 (Year 2006 Without Project) and Table 3 (Project Traffic). As can be seen from Table 4, it is estimated that the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor will operate at Level of Service "C" in the year 2006 with the project. AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D-9 TABLE 4 - 2006 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS WITH PROJECT ROADWAY MODE MASS TRANSIT MODE • CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME 2006 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRESS RAIL TRAN TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Principal Roadway(s) CORR VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSON PER, TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PER, TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP OPPV= aPPV= CAPACITY WC LOS rd LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = B LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS VFC LOS 1.8 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY (Notes) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR LS Biscayne Boulevard (01431 - 2 720 4,352 5,835 7,889 12 537) 1.61 P 4 352 7 969 {1,5371 1.31 P 05t7e075 Rte 0 369 0 7 389 202 167 389 202 1E7 Me708ue Ric 16 - 392 0 0 392 173 214 382 178 214 Moira.Rte 32 3E7 o a 387 58 329 387 58 329 Me77eus Rite 36 400 0 0 402 40 361 400 40 361 Me344us Rte 82 - - 734 0 0 734 108 626 734 108 626 MeRs s 95 0 - 447 0 447 2 444 447 2 444 Mehra.Rte T 460 0 0 400 186 214 400 166 214 Matta. Matt Rio MIX 519 0 0 519 227 292 519 227 292 Biscayne Bou1mnrd Subtotal : 2,720 4,352 5,635 7,66$ (3,637) 1.81 P 3,221 447 0 3668 1,000 2,5E8 5,020 3,390 (670) 1.11 51.5 2nd Avenue (Original Court 127174 . 2,720 4 352 1 898 2 657 1,696 0 61 B 4,352 2,657 1,695 0 61 B 6bboBus Rile 9 323 3 0 828 338 490 626 333 490 MC70Bas Rte 10 205 0 0 205 57 143 205 Si 143 N.E. 2nd Avenue Subtotal = 2,720 4,352 1,398 2,657 1,695 0.61 8 1633 0 0 1,033 394 43$ 5,365 3,051 2,334 0.57 A Nan Avenue (FEU Count 3/14120021 2 720 4,352 1573 2 343 2 009 0,54 A 4,352 2,343 2,009 0,54 A Merolla'Rte 6 34 0 0 34 9 26 34 9 26 Miami:Avenue Submtat : 2,722 4,352 1,673 2,343 2,009 0,54 4 34 0 0 34 9 26 4,387 2,351 2,035 0.54 A TOTAL : 6,160 13,256 9.207 12,639 167 0.99 C 4,239 447 0 4,738 1.403 3,333 17,792 14,292 3,499 0.80 0 LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 12,889 99,18% 9.09 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS - 1,403 9,82% 0.60 A 1102-AL PERSON TRIPS 14.292 100.00% 0.61 B 0.70 8 9.71 C 0.600 0.61 23 0.90i3 0.91 5 1.00 5 1.01 P AVANT February 20, 2004 PAGE D • • • RAW DATA & '' CALCULA T IONS o • • BISCAYNE BLVD NE 2 AVE NE 34 ST NE 33 ST BISCAYNE BLVD NE 2 AVE NE 34 ST NE 33 ST BISCAYNE BLVD NE2AVE NE 34 ST NE 33 ST BTWN 33 & 34 ST BTWN 33 & 34 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD W/O BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN 33 & 34 ST BTWN 33 & 34 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD W/O BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN 33 & 34 ST BTWN 33 & 34 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD W/O BISCAYNE BLVD 1 2 ADT 21,275 23,222 44,497 9,275 6,982 16,257 372 489 861 711 1,008 1,719 AM MID PM 8:30 AM 12:00 PM 4:45 PM 8:15 AM 12:30 PM 4:15 PM 7:30 AM 1:45 PM 3:30 PM 9:15AM 1:00PM 5:00PM PEAK K PSF 4:45 PM 7.38% 1.026 4:15 PM 11,07% 1,026 7:30 AM 9,64% 1.026 5:00 PM 11.87% 1.026 1 NORTHBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND EASTBOUND EVE 18:15 18:15 20:30 18:15 K(100) 0.076 0.114 0.099 0.122 2 SOUTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND WESTBOUND PEAK 16:45 16:15 7:30 17:00 D 56.99% 77.60% 61.45% 65.69% AVANT February 20, 2004 BISCAYNE BLVD NE 2 AVE NE 34 ST NE 33 ST AM 1 2 TOTAL BTWN 33 & 34 ST 8:30 AM 858 2,102 2,960 6.65% BTWN 33 & 34 ST 8:15 AM 366 946 1,312 8.07% W/O BISCAYNE BLVD 7:30 AM 32 51 83 9.64% WIO BISCAYNE BLVD 9:15 AM 41 59 100 11.61% MID 1 2 TOTAL % BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN 33 & 34 ST 12:00 PM 1,423 1,556 2,979 6.69% NE 2 AVE BTWN 33 & 34 ST 12:30 PM 618 468 1,086 6.68% NE 34 ST WIO BISCAYNE BLVD 1:45 PM 33 42 75 8.71% NE 33 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD 1:00 PM 72 85 157 1823% PM 1 2 TOTAL BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN 33 & 34 ST 4:45 PM 1,871 1,412 3,283 7.38% NE 2 AVE BTWN 33 & 34 ST 4:15 PM 1,396 403 1,799 11.07% NE 34 ST WIO BISCAYNE BLVD 3:30 PM 22 54 76 8.83% NE 33 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD 5:00 PM 70 134 204 23.69% AVANT February 20, 2004 PROJECT NAME: Traffic Data Collection Notice to Proceed : • TIME 1st Y4 12:OOAM 106 01:00 AM 61 02:00 AM 58 03:00 AM 41 04:00 AM 28 05:00 AM 35 06:00 AM 75 07:00 AM 147 08:00 AM 200 09:00 AM 211 10:00 AM 265 11:00 AM 308 12:00 PM 372 01:OO PM 346 02:00 PM 322 03:00 PM 364 04:00 PM 461 05:00 PM 473 06:00 PM 456 07:00 PM 293 08:00 PM 268 09:00 PM 220 10:00 PM 205 11:00 PM 170 NORTBOUND MECHANICAL COUNTS LOCATION: COUNT DATE: BISCAYNE BLVD 8TWN33&34ST 01/27/04 2nd Y4 3rd %4 4th Y4 TOTAL TIME 1stY4 92 83 70 351 12:00 AM 92 58 46 47 212 01:00 AM 61 32 32 39 161 02:00 AM 29 27 32 36 136 03:00 AM 43 34.. 39 32 . ... 133 . 04:00. AM. ..... 25. 58 47 59 199 05:00 AM 63 99 133 124 431 06:00 AM 136 169 195 198 709 07:00 AM 334 211 215 219 845 08:00 AM 493 213 239 221 884 09:00 AM 536 238 263 281 1,047 10:00 AM 369 280 336 317 1,241 11:00 AM 359 372 335 344 1,423 12:00 PM 411 370 323 353 1,392 01:00 PM 359 348 325 340 1,335 02:00 PM 262 292 406 456 1,518 03:00 PM 302 454 423 461 1,799 04:OO PM 293 444 493 416 1,826 05:00 PM 346 343 325 264 1,388 06:00 PM 278 247 293 243 1,076 07:00 PM 321 286 236 227 1,017 08:00 PM 215 205 188 200 813 09:00 PM 185 229 215 153 802 10:00 PM 130 130 125 112 537 11:00 PM 104 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUM al NORTBOUND A.M. Peak Hour, Time: A.M. "K" Factor A.M. "D" Factor: P.M. Peak Hour, Time: P.M. "K" Factor: P.M. "D" Factor: BOTHWAY: NORTBOUND A.M. A.M. A.M. • 24 Hour Total 21,275 MARY 11:30 AM Volume: 6.6°% P.H.F.: 49.0% 04:45 PM Volume: 8.8% P.H.F.: 57.0% SOUTHBOUND 2nd Y 70 45 SOUTHBOUND 1,397 A.M. Peak Hour, Time: 0.94 A.M. "K" Factor: A.M. "D" Factor: 1,871 P.M. Peak Hour, Time: 0.95 P.M. "K" Factor: P.M. "D" Factor: and SOUTHBOUND Peak Hour, Time: 08:30 AM "lc Factor: 6.7% Hour "D" Factor: 71,0% P.M. Peak Hour, Time: P.M. "K" Factor: P.M. Hour ''D'. Factor: 04:45 PM 7.4% 57.0% Volume: 2,960 P.H.F.: 0.98 Volume: 3,283 P.H.F.: 0.93 3rdY4 63 48 29 30 26 23 27 28 49 80 182 313 403 481 503 541 523 502 500 395 356 299 309 351 357 322 364 382 399 356 362 369 319 325 328 266 346 339 271 344 315 365 386 312 329 331 325 291 264 174 186 160 155 157 176 155 150 111 122 125 110 85 24 Hour Total 08:15 AM Volume: 9.1% P.H.F.: 71.1% 12:00 PM Volume: 6.7% P.H.F.: 52.2% 4th'/4 TOTAL 67 292 45 199 21 109 13 105 26 106 BOTHWAY TOTAL 643 411 270 241 239 121 313 286 917 488 1,706 2,060 1,933 1,333 1,389 1,556 1,446 1,234 1,253 1,223 1,409 1,263 1,050 716 673 513 424 23,222 2,103 0.97 1,556 0.95 512 1,348 2,415 2,905 2,817 2,380 2,630 2,979 2,838 2,569 2,771 3,022 3,235 2,651 2,126 1,733 1,486 1,315 961 44,497 PROJECT NAME: Traffic Data Collection Notice to Proceed : • DAILY TRAFFIC NORTHBOUND 11) A.M. Peak Hour, Time: A.M. "K' Factor: A.M. "D" Factor: P.M. Peak Hour, Time: P.M. "K' Factor: P.M. "D" Factor: BOTHWAY: NORTHBOUND A. M A.M A.M • MECHANICAL COUNTS LOCATION: COUNT DATE: NE 2 AVE BTWN33&34ST 01/27/04 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BOTHWAY TIME 1st'14 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th %4 TOTAL TIME 1st'/4 2nd 174 3rd % 4th 1/4 TOTAL TOTAL 12:00AM 8 14 12 7 41 12:00AM 8 8 10 5 31 72 01:00 AM 7 6 16 6 35 01:00 AM 4 6 8 5 23 58 02: 00 AM 7 7 5 4 23 02:00 AM 4 3 5 0 12 35 03:00 AM 1 3 1 2 7 03:00 AM 3 5 3 3 14 21 04:00 AM 8 1 8 6 23 04:00 AM 9 1 13 6 29 52 05:00 AM 3 12 11 24 50 05:00 AM 11 17 14 25 67 117 06:00 AM 17 19 38 41 115 06:00 AM 26 52 81 96 255 370 07:00 AM 48 50 62 73 233 07:00 AM 86 161 183 240 670 903 08:00 AM 93 81 72 111 357 08:00 AM 227 .. 230 215 279 951 1,308 09:00 AM 102 94 104 115 415 09:00 AM 222 195 159 136 712 1,127 10:00 AM 106 123 111 121 461 10:00 AM 120 110 101 109 440 901 11:00 AM 119 123 130 144 516 11:00 AM 93 96 94 119 402 918 12:00 PM 167 153 156 159 635 12:00 PM 104 114 121 109 448 1,083 01:00 PM 146 157 144 136 583 01:00 PM 109 129 108 97 443 1,026 02:00 PM 145 137 145 132 559 02:00 PM 95 147 78 116 436 995 03:00 PM 171 198 216 268 853 03:00 PM 90 98 116 99 403 1,256 04:00 PM 298 338 312 323 1,271 04:00 PM 105 98 95 105 403 1,674 05:00 PM 423 327 291 328 1,369 05:00 PM 105 96 93 103 397 1,766 06:00 PM 246 196 174 115 731 06:00 PM 73 67 70 49 259 990 07:00 PM 107 85 73 59 324 07:00 PM 56 48 41 49 194 518 08:00 PM 66 66 55 45 232 08:00 PM 44 28 27 37 136 368 09:00 PM 42 40 42 35 159 09:00 PM 49 31 14 16 110 269 10:00 PM 59 71 39 28 197 10:00 PM 27 25 22 17 91 288 11:00 PM 20 24 18 24 86 11:00 PM 16 17 14 9 56 142 24 Hour Total 9,275 24 Hour Total 6,982 16,257 COUNT SUMMARY 11:45 AM Volume 6.7% P.H.F. : 57.5% 04:15 PM Volume: 15.1% P.H.F.: 77.6% SOUTHBOUND 620 A.M. Peak Hour, Time: 08:00 AM Volume: 951 0.93 A.M. "K" Factor: 13.6% P.H.F. : 0.85 A.M. "D" Factor: 72.7% 1,396 P.M. Peak Hour, Time: 12:30 PM Volume: 468 0.83 P.M. "K" Factor: 6.7% P.H.F.: 0.91 P.M. "D" Factor: 43.1 % and SOUTHBOUND Peak Hour, Time: 08:15 AM . "K' Factor: 8.1% . Hour "D" Factor: 72,1% P.M. Peak Hour, Time: P.M. "K" Factor: P.M. Hour "D" Factor: Volume: 1,312 P.H.F.: 0.84 04:15 PM Volume: 11.1% P.H.F.: 77.6% 1,799 0.85 MECHANICAL COUNTS PROJECT NAME: Traffic Data Collection LOCATION: NE 34 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD Notice to Proceed : COUNT DATE: 01/27/04 IIIEASTBOUND WESTBOUND BOTHWAY TIME lst 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd %, 4th % TOTAL TIME lst 1/4 2nd 1, 3rd % 4th 1/4 TOTAL TOTAL 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 AM 0 0 0 3 3 3 01:00AM 1 1 5 4 11 01:00AM 1 0 0 0 1 12 02:00 AM 1 0 0 1 2 02:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 3 03:00 AM 2 1 0 0 3 03:00 AM 1 0 1 0 2 5 04:00 AM 2 2 1 0 5 04:00 AM 2 0 2 0 4 9 05:00 AM 0 1 0 3 4 05:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 5 06:00 AM 0 7 4 2 13 06:00 AM 0 2 1 1 4 17 07:00 AM 4 5 6 12 27 07:00 AM 6 5 13 21 45 72 08:00 AM 6 8 6 5 25 08:00 AM 10 7 4 5 26 51 09:00 AM 4 9 5 6 24 09:00 AM 5 7 12 8 32 56 10:00 AM 4 5 5 6 20 10:00 AM 7 5 7 7 26 46 11:00 AM 4 7 11 2 24 11:00 AM 10 8 12 8 38 62 12:00PM 9 9 5 15 38 12:00PM 8 10 7 8 33 71 01:00 PM 7 3 9 6 25 01:00 PM 9 5 6 10 30 55 02:00 PM 8 8 11 7 34 02:00 PM 11 11 10 9 41 75 03:00 PM 3 5 4 6 18 03:00 PM 11 4 15 17 47 65 04:00 PM 5 7 2 8 22 04:00 PM 10 12 8 12 42 64 05:00 PM 8 6 7 1 22 05:00 PM 10 11 8 13 42 64 06:00 PM 11 1 4 4 20 06:00 PM 10 6 2 1 19 39 07:00 PM 2 5 1 1 9 07:00 PM 4 1 5 2 12 21 08:00 PM 2 5 3 1 11 08:00 PM 4 0 2 7 13 24 09:00 PM 3 2 0 3 8 09:00 PM 7 7 1 3 18 26 10:00 PM 3 2 0 0 5 10:00 PM 1 1 2 1 5 10 11:00PM 0 1 1 0 2 11:00PM 4 0 0 0 4 6 24 Hour Total 372 24 Hour Total 489 861 COUNT SUMMARY WESTBOUND 07:30 AM Volume: 32 A.M. Peak Hour, Time: 07:30 AM Volume: 51 8.6% P.H.F.: 0.67 A.M. "K' Factor: 10.4% P.H.F.: 0.61 38.6% A.M. "D" Factor: 61.4% 12:00 PM Volume: 38 P.M. Peak Hour, Time: 03:30 PM Volume: 54 102% P_H.F.: 0.63 P.M. "K" Factor: 11.0% P.H.F.: 0.79 53.5% P.M. "D" Factor: 71.1% DAILY TRAFFIC EASTBOUND . A.M. Peak Hour, Time: A.M. "K' Factor: R.M. "D" Factor: P.M. Peak Hour, Time: P.M. "K Factor: P.M. "D" Factor: BOTHWAY: EASTBOUND A.M. A.M. A.M. and WESTBOUND Peak Hour, Time: 07:30 AM "K' Factor: 9.6% Hour "D" Factor: 61.4% P.M. Peak Hour, Tirne: P.M. "K' Factor: P.M. Hour "D" Factor: 03:30 PM 8.8% 71.1% Volume: 83 P.H.F.: 0.63 Volume: 76 P.H.F.: 0.83 MECHANICAL COUNTS PROJECT NAME: Traffic Data Collection LOCATION: NE 33 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD Notice to Proceed : COUNT DATE: 01127/04 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BOTHWAY TIME 1st 14 2nd 14 3rd 14 4th 14 TOTAL TIME lst 14 2nd 14 3rd 1/4 4th 1 TOTAL TOTAL 12:00AM 3 3 1 3 10 12:00AM 4 0 6 1 11 21 01:00 AM 2 1 2 1 6 01:00 AM 3 1 5 5 14 20 02:00 AM 1 2 0 1 4 02:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 6 03:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 03:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 2 04:0❑ AM 0 1 0. .. 1. . 2 04:00 AM 0 1 4 2 7 9 05:00 AM 0 3 1 0 4 05:00 AM 0 0 2 3 5 9 06:00 AM 2 1 3 10 16 06:00 AM 4 3 6 5 18 34 07:00 AM 5 3 8 9 25 07:00 AM 5 8 18 17 48 73 08:00 AM 11 5 11 3 30 08:00 AM 17 13 9 17 56 86 09:00 AM 3 9 13 13 38 09:00 AM 10 16 20 9 55 93 10:00 AM 6 4 13 10 33 10:00 AM 14 17 16 13 60 93 11:00 AM 7 16 10 10 43 11:00 AM 7 12 8 11 38 81 12:00 PM 19 9 16 14 58 12:00 PM 17 13 21 15 66 124 01:00 PM 18 20 19 15 72 01:00 PM 19 19 29 18 85 157 02:00 PM 8 23 7 12 50 02:00 PM 16 14 15 11 56 106 03:00 PM 6 9 12 16 43 03:00 PM 10 19 23 29 81 124 04:00 PM 8 16 14 12 50 04:00 PM 29 22 17 30 98 148 05:00 PM 13 16 17 24 70 05:00 PM 36 32 27 39 134 204 06:00 PM 8 7 11 4 30 06:00 PM 19 13 7 16 55 85 07:00 PM 7 8 7 8 30 07:00 PM 7 9 7 7 30 60 08:00 PM 10 11 11 9 41 08:00 PM 8 6 9 2 25 66 09:00 PM 9 6 6 3 24 09:00 PM 10 9 5 3 27 51 10:00 PM 3 4 3 2 12 10:00 PM 0 4 8 1 13 25 11:00 PM 7 5 6 1 19 11:00 PM 6 6 6 5 23 42 24 Hour Total 711 24 Hour Total 1,008 1,719 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND A.M. Peak Hour, Time: 11:15 AM Volume: 55 A.M. Peak Hour, Time: 07:30 AM Volume 65 A.M. "K' Factor: 7.7% P.H.F.: 0.72 A.M. "K" Factor: 6.4% P.H.F.: 0.90 A.M. "D" Factor 53.4a/a A.M. "D" Factor: 66.3% P.M. Peak Hour, Time: 01:00 PM Volume: 72 P.M. Peak Hour, Time: 05:00 PM Volume: 134 P.M. "K" Factor: 10.1% P.H.F.: 0.90 P.M. "K" Factor: 13.3% P.H.F.: 0.86 P.M. "D" Factor: 45.9% P.M. "D" Factor: 65.7% BOTHWAY: EASTBOUND and WESTBOUND A.M. Peak Hour, Time: Volume: 116 A.M. "K" Factor: 6.7% P.H.F.: 0.78 A.M. Hour "D" Factor: 53.4% P.M. Peak Hour, Time: P.M. "K' Factor: P.M. Hour "D" Factor: • 11.9% 65.7% Volume: 204 P.H.F.: 0.81 • • RAW DATA NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 740 5 10 3 16 7 1,726 21 44 21 30 AM NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 80 1,245 25 17 19 25 27 1,075 16 37 24 17 PM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 746 23 2 0 11 27 1,666 27 21 2 84 AM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 34 1,252 58 1 1 21 71 1,129 15 19 3 56 PM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 275 17 0 0 0 31 922 0 21 0 18 AM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,151 11 0 0 0 9 389 0 17 0 43 PM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 279 11 0 0 0 23 920 0 55 0 13 AM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,082 27 0 0 0 29 377 0 20 0 80 PM FDOT SEASONAL FACTOR 0.99 AADT ADJUSTED DATA NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 733 5 10 3 16 7 1,709 21 44 21 30 AM NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 79 1,233 25 17 19 25 27 1,064 16 37 24 17 PM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 739 23 2 0 11 27 1,649 27 21 2 83 AM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 34 1,239 57 1 1 21 70 1,118 15 19 3 55 PM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 272 17 0 0 0 31 913 0 21 0 18 AM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,139 11 0 0 0 9 385 0 17 0 43 PM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 276 11 0 0 0 23 911 0 54 0 13 AM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,071 27 0 0 0 29 373 0 20 0 79 PM AVANT February 20, 2004 :--DOT PEAK SEASONAL FACTOR 1.026 PEAK SEASON ADJUSTED DATA NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE PHF NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT 11 752 5 10 3 16 7 1,753 21 45 21 30 AM 81 1,265 25 17 19 25 27 1,092 16 38 24 17 PM 11 758 23 2 0 11 27 1,692 27 21 2 85 AM 35 1,272 59 1 1 21 72 1,147 15 19 3 57 PM 0 279 17 0 0 0 31 937 0 21 0 18 AM 0 1,169 11 0 0 0 9 395 0 17 0 44 PM 0 283 11 0 0 0 23 934 0 56 0 13 AM 0 1,099 27 0 0 0 29 383 0 20 0 81 PM NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0.55 0.92 0.63 0.50 0.75 0,80 0.58 0.96 0.66 0.92 0.66 0.75 AM NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0.83 0.88 0,69 0.71 0.79 0.78 0.84 0.95 0.80 0.66 0.67 0.61 PM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0.69 0.93 0.82 0.50 ERR 0.69 0.75 0.95 0.61 0.66 : 0.50 0.91 AM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0.71 0.92 0,85 0.25 0.25 0.75 0.77 0.94 0.54 0.48 0.38 0.67 PM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR 0.90 0.71 ERR ERR ERR 0.43 0.93 ERR 0.48 ERR 0.50 AM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR 0.91 0.55 ERR ERR ERR 0.75 0.84 ERR 0.71 ERR 0.60 PM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR 0.91 0.69 ERR ERR ERR 0,64 0.92 ERR 0.63 ERR 0.81 AM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR 0.90 0.68 ERR ERR ERR 0.73 0.83 ERR 0.50 ERR 0.87 PM AVANT February 20, 2004 • • • EXISTING AADT NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 733 5 10 3 16 7 1,709 21 44 21 30 AM NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 79 1,233 25 17 19 25 27 1,064 16 37 24 17 PM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 739 23 2 0 11 27 1,649 27 21 2 83 AM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 34 1,239 57 1 1 21 70 1,118 15 19 3 55 PM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 272 17 0 0 0 31 913 0 21 0 18 AM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,139 11 0 0 0 9 385 0 17 0 43 PM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 276 11 0 0 0 23 911 0 54 0 13 AM NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,071 27 0 0 0 29 373 0 20 0 79 PM GROWTH FACTOR 1.0404 FUTURE BACKGROUND AADT NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 762 5 10 3 16 7 1,778 22 45 22 31 AM NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 82 1,282 26 18 20 26 28 1,107 16 38 25 18 PM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 11 768 24 2 0 11 28 1,716 28 22 2 87 AM NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 35 1,290 60 1 1 22 73 1,163 15 20 3 58 PM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 283 18 0 0 0 32 950 0 22 0 19 AM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,186 11 0 0 0 9 401 0 18 0 44 PM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 287 11 0 0 0 24 948 0 57 0 13 AM NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 1,114 28 0 0 0 30 388 0 21 0 82 PM COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0 429 0 0 0 0 0 280 0 7 NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0 355 1 0 0 0 0 447 0 2 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0 427 2 0 0 0 1 277 0 3 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0 349 6 0 0 0 5 447 0 0 NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T RT 0 0 AM 0 0 PM 0 8 AM 0 3 PM 0 0 AM 0 0 PM 0 0 AM 0 0 PM AVANT February 20, 2004 • 0 'UTURE WITHOUT PROJECT JE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD JE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 4E 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 4E 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD JE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE JE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE JE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE JE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 'ROJECT TRAFFIC \IE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 'IE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD '1E 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD JE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD dE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE \JE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE FUTURE WITH PROJECT NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT 11 1,191 5 10 3 16 7 2,058 22 52 22 31 AM 82 1,637 27 18 20 26 28 1,554 16 40 25 18 PM 11 1,195 26 2 0 11 29 1,993 28 25 2 95 AM 35 1,639 66 1 1 22 78 1,609 15 20 3 61 PM 0 283 18 0 0 0 32 950 0 22 0 19 AM 0 1,186 11 0 0 0 9 401 0 18 0 44 PM 0 287 11 0 0 0 24 948 0 57 0 13 AM 0 1,114 28 0 0 0 30 388 0 21 0 82 PM NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 AM 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 PM 7 0 0 24 0 21 0 0 17 0 0 0 AM 5 0 0 9 0 8 0 0 12 0 0 0 PM 0 0 41 0 0 0 30 0 0 49 0 44 AM 0 0 28 0 0. 0 21 0 0 18 0 17 PM 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 AM 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 PM NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT 19 1,198 5 10 3 16 7 2,079 22 52 22 31 AM 88 1,642 27 18 20 26 28 1,562 16 40 25 18 PM 18 1,195 26 26 0 32 29 1,993 45 25 2 95 AM 40 1,639 66 10 1 30 78 1,609 27 20 3 61 PM 0 283 59 0 0 0 62 950 0 71 0 63 AM 0 1,186 39 0 0 0 30 401 0 36 0 61 PM 0 320 11 0 0 0 24 948 0 57 0 21 AM 0 1,136 28 0 0 0 30 388 0 21 0 88 PM AVANT February 20, 2004 • • NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/27/04 S8 WB NB EB NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL PEPS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL 07:00 AM 0 1 278 3 282 0 6 1 2 9 0 0 105 0 105 0 2 0 0 2 387 11 : 398 07:15 AM 0 4 342 0 346 0 5 1 8 14 0 3 149 1 153 0 3 1 1 5 499 19 518 07:30 AM 0 6 395 3 404 0 6 4 4 14 0 2 195 3 200 0 2 1 1 4 604 18 622 07:45 AM 0 6 417 0 423 0 15 4 14 33 0 3 205 4 212 0 7 2 2 11 635 44 679 2125 92 2217 08:00 AM 0 5 431 1 437 0 10 8 12 30 0 1 175 5 181 0 2 0 3 5 618 35 653 2356 116 2472 08:15 AM 0 4 409 0 413 0 8 3 12 23 0 2 188 1 191 0 5 1 0 6 604 29 633 2461 126 2587 08:30 AM 0 4 451 3 458 0 8 5 8 21 0 1 175 2 178 0 4 1 2 7 636 28 664 2493 136 2629 08:45 AM 0 8 435 3 446 0 4 5 12 21 0 1 202 3 206 0 5 1 5 11 652 32 684 2510 124 2634 TOTALS 0 38 3158 13 3209 0 62 31 72 165 0 13 1394 19 1426 0 30 7 14 51 PK HR 0 21 1726 7 1754 0 30 21 44 95 0 5 740 11 756 0 16 3 10 29 2510 124 2634 PERCENT 1% 98% 0% 100% 32% 22% 46% 100% 1% 98% 1% 100% 55% 10% 34% 100% PHF 0.66 0.96 0.58 0.96 0.75 0.66 0.92 0.79 0.63 0.92 0.55 0.92 0.80 0.75 0 50 0.66 NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/27/04 SB WB NB EB NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL 04:00 P M 0 4 282 13 299 0 8 5 6 19 0 3 266 13 282 0 6 2 2 10 581 29 610 04:15 PM 0 5 271 7 283 0 7 4 4 15 0 7 352 20 379 0 8 6 6 18 662 33 695 04:30 PM 0 5 242 6 253 0 4 9 6 19 0 5 322 24 351 0 5 4 3 12 604 31 635 04:45 PM 0 3 284 8 295 0 1 6 14 21 0 9 288 23 320 0 6 5 3 14 615 35 650 2462 128 2590 05:00 PM 0 3 278 6 287 0 5 5 13 23 0 4 283 13 300 0 6 4 5 17 567 40 627 2468 139 2607 05;15 PM 0 5 273 9 287 0 2 6 15 23 0 3 276 9 288 0 4 4 9 17 575 40 615 2381 146 2527 05:30 PM 0 4 271 9 284 0 8 4 9 21 0 6 314 11 331 0 7 11 6 24 615 45 660 2392 160 2552 05:45 PM 0 6 258 4 268 0 4 9 9 22 0 8 317 33 358 0 4 6 3 13 626 35 661 2403 160 2563 TOTALS 0 35 2159 62 2256 0 39 48 76 163 0 45 2418 146 2609 0 46 42 37 125 4865 288 5153 PK HR 0 16 1075 27 1118 0 17 24 37 78 0 25 1245 80 1350 0 25 19 17 61 2468 139 2607 PERCENT 1% 96% 2% 100% 22% 31% 47% 100% 2% 92% 6% 100% 41% 31% 28% 100% PHF 0.80 0.95 0.84 0.95 0.61 0.67 0.66 0.85 0,69 0.88 0.83 0.89 0.78 0.79 0.71 0.85 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/27/04 SB WB NB EB NB+S8 EB+WB TOTAL NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL 07:00 AM 0 3 274 3 280 0 10 1 3 14 0 2 108 1 111 0 1 0 0 1 391 15 406 07:15 AM 0 2 331 4 337 0 15 0 3 18 0 3 149 3 155 0 3 0 0 3 492 21 513 07:30 AM 0 9 389 4 402 0 11 1 0 12 0 3 199 0 202 0 2 1 0 3 604 15 619 07:45 AM 0 15 396 4 415 0 18 0 8 26 0 6 215 1 222 0 3 0 3 6 637 32 669 2124 83 2207 08:00 AM 0 11 417 8 436 0 20 0 6 26 0 3 184 1 188 0 3 0 1 4 674 30 654 2357 98 2455 08:15 AM 0 2 392 4 398 0 20 1 3 24 0 6 188 2 196 0 3 0 0 3 594 27 621 2459 104 2563 08:30 AM 0 7 439 6 452 0 23 0 4 27 0 7 174 4 185 0 1 0 0 1 637 28 665 2492 117 2609 08:45 AM 0 7 418 9 434 1 21 1 8 30 0 7 200 4 211 0 4 0 1 5 645 35 680 2500 120 2620 TOTALS 0 56 3056 42 3154 1 138 4 35 177 0 37 1417 16 1470 0 20 1 5 26 4624 203 4827 PK HR 0 27 1666 27 1720 1 84 2 21 107 0 23 746 11 780 0 11 0 2 13 2500 120 2620 PERCENT 2% 97% 2% 100% 79% 2% 20% 100% 3% 96% 1% 100% 85% 0% 15% 100% PHF 0.61 0.95 0.75 0.95 0.91 0.50 0.66 0.89 0.82 0.93 0.69 0.92 0.69 ERR 0.50 0.65 NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/29/04 SB WB NB EB NB+SE EB+WB TOTAL NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL PEDS R7 T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL. 0.400 PM 0 3 273 10 286 0 1 2 4 7 0 13 287 8 306 0 1 0 0 1 594 8 602 0415 PM 0 2 244 14 260 0 19 2 2 23 0 16 269 2 287 0 2 0 0 2 547 25 572 04:30 PM 0 7 296 11 314 0 7 1 3 11 0 11 290 9 310 0 9 0 0 9 624 20 644 04:45 PM 0 4 236 12 252 0 10 1 3 14 0 11 305 10 326 0 3 0 0 3 578 17 595 2343 70 2413 05:00 PM 0 7 301 16 324 0 10 0 1 11 0 11 296 10 317 0 6 0 0 6 641 17 658 2390 79 2469 05:15 PM 0 4 291 17 312 0 5 0 4 9 0 17 340 5 362 0 7 0 0 7 674 16 690 2517 70 2587 05:30 PM 0 4 265 23 292 0 20 1 4 25 0 14 310 12 336 0 2 1 0 3 628 28 656 2521 78 2599 05:45 PM 0 0 272 15 287 0 21 2 10 33 0 16 306 7 329 0 6 0 1 7 616 40 656 2559 101 2660 TOTALS 0 31 2178 118 2327 0 93 9 31 133 0 109 2403 63 2575 0 36 1 1 38 4902 171 5073 PK HR 0 15 1129 71 1215 0 56 3 19 78 0 58 1252 34 1344 0 21 1 1 23 2559 101 2660 PERCENT 1% 93% 6% 100% 72% 4/ 241e 100% 4% 93% 3% 100% 91% 44 4% 100% PHF 0.54 0.94 0.77 0.94 0.67 0.38 0.48 0.59 0.85 0.92 0.71 0.93 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.82 NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/28/04 SB WB NB EB NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL 07:00 AM 0 0 126 8 134 0 2 0 1 3 0 2 39 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 175 3 178 07:15 AM 0 0 150 5 155 0 5 0 2 7 0 3 47 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 205 7 212 07:30AM 0 0 209 9 218 0 6 0 5 11 0 2 57 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 277 11 288 07:45 AM 0 0 247 18 265 0 9 0 11 20 0 6 57 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 328 20 348 985 41 1026 08:00 AM 0 0 226 5 231 0 2 0 3 5 0 5 74 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 310 5- 315 1120 43 1163 08:15 AM 0 0 203 5 208 0 3 0 3 6 0 1 68 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 277 6' 283 1192 42 1234 08:30 AM 0 0 246 3 249 0 4 0 4 8 0 5 76 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 330 8: 338 1245 39 1284 08:45 AM 0 0 236 2 238 0 2 0 6 8 0 0 79 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 317 8 325 1234 27 1261 TOTALS 0 0 1643 55 1698 0 33 0 35 66 0 24 497 0 521 0 0 0 0 0 2219 68 2287 PK HR 0 0 922 31 953 0 18 0 21 39 0 17 275 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 1245 39 1284 PERCENT 0% 97% 3% 100% 46% 0% 54% 100% 6% 94% 0% 100% ERR ERR ERR ERR PHF ERR 0.93 0.43 0.90 0.50 ERR 0.48 0.49 0.71 0.90 ERR 0.90 ERR ERR ERR ERR NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/28/04 SB WB NB EB NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL NB+SB E0+WB TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PECS RT T LT TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 0 100 7 107 0 7 0 5 12 0 2 230 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 339 12 351 04:15 PM 0 0 75 2 77 0 11 0 3 14 0 5 241 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 323 14 337 04:30 PM 0 0 97 4 101 0 18 0 2 20 0 20 211 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 332 20. 352 04:45 PM 0 0 97 2 99 0 18 0 4 22 0 5 263 0 268 0 0 0 0 0 367 22 389 1361 68 1429 05:00 PM 0 0 116 1 117 0 10 0 6 16 3 2 309 0 311 0 0 0 0 0 428 16 444 1450 72 1522 05:15 PM 0 0 89 3 92 0 6 0 2 8 0 1 317 0 318 0 0 0 0 0 410 8 418 1537 66 1603 05:30 PM 0 0 87 3 90 0 9 0 5 14 0 3 262 0 265 0 0 0 0 0 355 14. 369 1560 60 1620 05:45 PM 0 0 92 2 94 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 262 0 262 0 0 0 0 0 356 10 366 1549 48 1597 TOTALS 0 0 753 24 777 0 89 0 27 116 0 38 2095 0 2133 0 0 0 0 0 2910 116. 3026 PK HR 0 0 389 9 398 0 43 0 17 60 0 11 1151 0 1162 0 0 0 0 0 1560 50 1620 PERCENT 0% 98% 2% 100% 72% 0% 28% 100% 1% 99% 0°/ 100% ERR ERR ERR ERR . PHF ERR 0.84 0.75 0.85 0,60 ERR 0.71 0.68 0.55 0.91 ERR 0.91 ERR ERR ERR ERR NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/28/04 SE WB NB EB NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL NB+SB EB+WB TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL 07:00 AM 0 0 124 3 127 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 41 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 169 3• 172 07:15 AM 0 0 151 1 152 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 50 0 51 0 0 0 3 0 203 3. 206 07:30 AM 0 0 209 5 214 0 3 0 15 18 0 1 56 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 271 16 . 289 07:45 AM 0 0 249 9 258 0 4 0 14 18 0 3 59 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 320 18 338 963 42 1005 08:00 AM 0 0 224 5 229 0 2 0 22 24 0 4 77 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 310 24 _ 334 1104 63 1167 08:15 AM 0 0 204 2 206 0 3 0 11 14 0 1 66 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 273 14 287 1174 74 1248 0830 AM 0 0 243 7 250 0 4 0 8 12 0 3 77 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 330 12 1 342 1233 68 1301 08:45 AM 0 0 235 7 242 0 2 0 7 9 0 4 77 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 323 9 332 1236 59 1295 TOTALS 0 0 1639 39 1678 0' 18 0 83 101 0 18 503 0 521 0 0 0 0 0 2199 101 - 2300 PK HR 0 0 920 23 943 0 13 0 55 68 0 11 279 0 290 0 0 0 0 0 1233 68 1301 PERCENT ❑% 98% 2% 100% 19% fl% 81% 100% 4% 96% 0% 100% ERR ERR ERR ERR PHF ERR 0.92 0.64 0.91 0.81 ERR 0.63 071 0.69 0.91 ERR 0.90 ERR ERR ERR ERR NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 15 MINUTE HOURLY 01/28/04 SB WB NB EB NB+SB EB+VVB TOTA1. NB+SB EF3+WB TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL PEDS RT T LT TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 0 95 10 105 0 28 0 3 31 0 9 204 0 213 0 0 0 0 0 318 31 349 04:15 PM 0 0 67 11 78 0 29 0 11 40 0 5 217 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 300 40 340 04:30 PM 0 0 88 11 99 0 24 0 10 34 0 5 207 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 311 34 345 04:45 PM 0 0 91 10 101 0 23 0 10 33 0 5 245 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 351 33 384 1280 138 1418 05:00 PM 0 0 114 8 122 0 19 0 2 21 0 6 292 0 298 0 0 0 0 0 420 21 441 1382 128 1510 05:15 PM 0 0 84 7 91 0 18 0 3 21 0 6 300 0 306 0 0 0 0 0 397 21 418 1479 109 1588 05:30 PM 0 0 88 4 92 0 20 0 5 25 0 10 245 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 347 25 372 1515 100 1615 05:45 PM 0 0 85 7 92 0 29 0 5 34 0 9 233 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 334 34 368 1498 101 1599 TOTALS 0 0 712 68 780 0 190 0 49 239 0 55 1943 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 2778 239 3017 PK HR 0 0 377 29 406 0 80 0 20 100 0 27 1082 0 1109 0 0 0 0 0 1515 100 1615 PERCENT 0°% 93% 7°% 100% 80% 0% 20% 100% 2% 980/0 0% 100% ERR ERR ERR ERR PHF ERR 0.83 0.73 0.83 0.87 ERR 0.50 0.76 0.68 0.90 ERR 0.91 ERR ERR L2RR ERR • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EXISTING DATA larwary 29, 2004 TIME NB 80 NS Ed WII EW TOTAL BEGINS LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT 'DOTAL TOTAL 07:00 AM 0 105 0 105 3 278 1 282 387 0 0 2 2 2 1 6 9 11 398 09:15 AM 1 149 3 153 0 342 4 346 499 1 1 3 5 8 I 5 1=1 19 518 07:30 AM 3 195 2 200 3 395 6 404 604 1 1 2 4 4 4 6 14 18 622 07:45 AM 4 205 3 212 0 417 6 423 635 2 2 7 11 14 4 15 33 44 679 08:00 AM 5 175 1 181 1 431 5 439 618 3 0 2 5 12 8 IQ 30 35 653 08;15 A.M. 1 188 2 191 0 409 4 413 604 0 1 5 6 12 3 9 23 29 633 68:30 AM 2 175 1 178 3 451 4 458 636 2 1 4 7 8 5 8 21 28 664 08:45 AM 3 202 1 206 3 435 8 446 652 5 1 5 11 12 5 4 21 32 684 PK 11R 11 740 5 756 7 1726 2t 1754 2516 10 3 16 29 44 21 30 95 124 2634 PERCENT 1% 98% 1% 30% 0% 48% 13,, 70% 95% 34% 10% 55% 23% 46% 22% 32% 77% 5% PHF 0.55 0.92 0.63 0.92 0.58 0.96 0.66 0.96 0.95 0.50 0.75 0.80 0.66 0.92 0.66 0,75 0.79 9.76 0.94 AADT FACTOR 0.99 PK HR AADT NB SE NS Ed WO EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT - T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAI, TOTAL II 733 5 748 7 1709 21 1736 2485 10 3 16 29 44 21 30 94 123 2608 AVERAGE PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1.026 PK FIR AVERAGE PEAK SEASON NB Sd - NS EB WB EW TOTAI. LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT '1' RT TOTAL TOTAL 11 752 5 768 7 1753 21 1782 2550 10 3 16 29 45 21 30 96 126 2ti75 GROWTH FACTOR 1.04 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC NB Sd NS Ed WB LT T RT TOTAL LT T R'T TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT ADT 11 770 5 787 7 1796 22 1825 2611 10 5 17 30 46 AADT 11 752 5 779 7 1778 22 1807 2585 10 3 16 30 45 PSEASON 12 782 5 799 7 1824 22 1854 2653 11 3 17 31 46 EW TOTAL RT TOTAL TOTAL 22 31 99 129 2740 22 31 98 128 2713 22 32 100 131 2784 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 1 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NH 50 NS BB WB EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL. LT T R'1' TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL PERFORMINL] ARTS 9 9 8 8 17 0 0 0 17 MIRAMAR CENTER 201 201 132 132 333 0 0 0 333 BISCAYNE VILLAGE 11 11 6 6 17 0 0 0 17 1800 CLUB 72 72 33 33 105 0 0 11 t35 TLirTLE STREET 26 28 6 6 34 0 0 0 34 BISCAYNE BAY TOWERS 13 13 32 32 45 0 0 0 45 SKY RESIDENCES 2 0 2 3 3 5 0 7 7 7 12 BAY 25 2 2 13 13 15 0 0 0 15 PLATINUM CONDO I 1 8 8 9 0 0 0 9 METROPOLIS 62 62 17 17 79 0 0 0 79 EDGEWATERTOWER 25 25 6 6 31 • 0 0 0 31 ONYX 3 3 16 16 19 0 0 0 19 TOTAL 0 429 0 429 0 280 0 280 710 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 7 7t7 FUTURE TRAFFIC WrI'I3OUT PROJECT NB SB NS Ell WB EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 11 1,199 5 1,216 7 2,076 22 2,105 3,321 10 3 17 30 53 22 31 106 136 3,457 AADT 11 1,191 5 1,208 7 2,058 22 2,087 3,245 10 3 16 30 52 22 31 105 135 3,430 PSEASON 12 1,211 5 1,228 7 2,104 22 2,134 3,362 11 3 17 31 53 22 32 107 138 3,500 PROJECT TRAFFIC NB SB NS BB WO E.W TOTAL LT T FT TOTAL, LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT RT TOTAL TOTAL. 9.111' 8 7 15 21 21 36 0 0 0 36 AADT 8 7 0 15 0 21 0 21 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 PSEASON 8 7 0 15 0 21 0 21 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NH SB NS 1113 WB EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL IT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL 1.T 'T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 19 1,206 5 1,231 7 2,097 22 2,126 3,357 10 3 17 30 53 22 31 106 136 3,493 AADT 19 1,19S 5 1,223 7 2,079 22 2,198 3,331 10 3 16 30 52 22 31 105 135 3,466 PSEASON 20 1,218 5 1,243 7 2,125 22 2,155 3,398 11 3 17 31 53 22 32 107 138 3,536 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 2 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EXISTING DATA January 27, 2004 TIME NB SB NS EB WS BEO[I4S LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT 04:00 PM 13 266 3 282 13 282 4 299 581 2 2 6 10 6 04:15 P151 20 352 7 379 7 271 5 283 662 6 6 6 18 4 04:30 PM 24 322 5 351 6 242 5 253 604 3 4 5 12 6 04:45 PM 23 288 9 320 8 284 3 295 615 3 5 6 14 14 05:00 PM 13 283 4 300 6 278 3 287 567 5 4 8 17 13 05'.15 PM 9 276 3 288 9 273 5 287 575 9 4 4 17 15 05:30 PM 11 314 6 331 9 271 4 284 615 6 11 7 24 9 05:45 PM 33 317 8 358 4 258 6 268 626 3 6 4 13 9 PK 11R 80 1245 25 1350 PERCENT 6% 92% 2% 55% PHF 0.83 0.88 0,69 0.89 AADT FACTOR 0,99 PK HR AADT 5 8 4 7 9 4 6 5 6 4 9 27 1075 16 1118 2468 17 19 25 61 37 24 1:7 2% 96% I% 45% 95% 28% 31% 41% 44% 47% 31% 22% 0.84 0.95 0.80 0.95 0.92 0,71 0.79 0.78 0.85 0.66 0.67 0.61 NB SB NS EB WII LT T RT TOTAL LT T RI TOTAL TOTAL LT 1' RT TOTAL LT T RT 79 1233 25 1337 27 1064 16 1107 2443 17 19 25 60 37 24 17 AVERAGE PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1 026 PK HR AVERAGE PEAK SEASON NB SB NS EB WB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT 81 1265 25 1371 27 1092 16 1136 2507 17 19 25 62 38 GROWTH FACTOR 1.04 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC NB SB NS 63 WE LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT ADT 83 1295 26 1405 28 1118 17 1163 2568 18 20 26 63 38 AADT 82 1282 26 1390 215 1107 16 1152 2542 18 20 26 63 38 PSEASON 85 1316 26 1427 29 1136 17 1181 2608 18 20 26 34 39 1' RT 24 37 ' 25 18 25 18 25 i8 L3W TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 19 29 610 15 33 695 19 31 635 21 35 650 23 40 627 23 40 615 21 45 660 22 35 661 78 139 2607 56% 5% 0.85 0.85 0.91 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 77 136 2561 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 79 141 2646 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 81 145 2712 80 143 2685 82 147 2755 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 3 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33RD STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD COMM1TFED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Nil S13 NS I1B WE LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T JtT "FOTAL LT T PERFORMING ARTS 9 9 8 8 17 0 MIRAMAR CENTER 132 132 201 201 333 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE 6 6 11 I I 17 0 1800 CLUB 65 65 72 72 137 0 TUTTLE STREET 6 6 28 28 34 0 BISCAYNE BAY TOWERS 32 32 13 13 45 0 SKY R0'S1DENCES 6 1 7 0 0 7 0 2 BAY 25 13 13 6 6 19 0 PLATINUM CONDO 7 7 4 4 II 0 METROPOLIS 55 55 73 73 128 0 EDGEWATER TOWER 13 13 25 25 38 0 ONYX II 11 5 5 16 0 TOTAL 0 355 1 356 0 447 0 447 803 0 0 0 0 2 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT NB SE NO ER WB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT AUT 83 1,650 27 1,761 28 1,565 17 1,610 3,370 18 20 26 63 40 AADT 82 1,637 27 1,746 28 1,554 16 1,598 3,345 la 20 26 63 40 PSEASON 85 1,671 27 1,783 29 1,563 17 1,62a 3,411 18 20 26 64 41 PROJECT TRAFFIC KT a T RT 25 18 25 16 25 18 NB SB NS Eli WE LT T RT TOTAL, LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL Li T RT TOTAL LT T ADT 6 5 11 8 8 19 0 AADT 6 5 0 11 0 8 0 8 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 PSEASON 6 5 0 11 0 8 0 8 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NB SE NS EA WB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT '1' RT TOTAL 1.T T ADT 89 1,655 27 1,772 28 1,573 17 1,618 3,389 18 20 26 63 40 25 AADT 88 1,642 27 1,757 28 1,562 16 1,606 3,364 18 20 26 63 40 25 PSEASON 91 1,676 27 1,794 29 1,591 17 1,636 3,430 38 20 26 64 41 25 E W TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL O 0 17 O 0 333 0 0 17 1) 0 137 0 0 34 0 0 45 2 2 9 0 0 19 O 0 11 O 0 128 0 0 38 O 0 16 2 2 805 1_W TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 83 147 3,517 82 145 3,490 84 149 3,560 15W TOTAL RT TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 EW TOTAL kT TOTAL TOTAL 18 83 147 3,536 18 82 143 3,509 1a 84 149 3,579 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PACE 4 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EXISTING DATA January 27, 2004 TIME NB SB NS ER WB EW 'IOTA L BEGINS LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAI, LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 07:00 AM 1 108 2 111 3 274 3 280 391 0 0 1 1 3 I 10 14 15 406 07:15 AM 3 149 3 155 4 331 2 337 492 0 0 3 3 3 0 15 18 21 513 07:30 AM 0 199 3 202 4 389 9 402 604 0 1 2 3 0 1 11 12 15 619 07:45 AM 1 215 6 222 4 396 15 415 637 3 0 3 6 8 0 18 26 32 669 08:00 AM 1 164 3 188 8 417 11 436 624 1 0 3 4 6 0 20 26 30 654 08:15 AM 2 168 6 196 4 392 2 398 594 0 0 3 3 3 1 20 24 27 621 08:30 AM 4 174 7 185 6 439 7 452 637 0 0 1 1 4 0 23 27 26 665 08:45 AM 4 200 7 211 9 418 7 434 645 1 0 4 5 8 1 21 30 35 680 PK HR 11 746 23 780 27 1666 27 1720 2500 2 0 11 13 21 2 84 107 120 2620 PERCENT 1% 96% 3% 31% 2% 97% 2% 69% 95% 15% 0% 85% 11% 20% 2% 79% 89% 51/ 9149 0.69 0.93 0.82 0.92 0.75 0.95 0.61 0.95 0,94 0.50 ERR 0.69 0.65 0.66 0.50 0. 91 0,89 0.87 0.94 AADT FACTOR 0.99 PR FIR AADT NB SB NS EB W13 EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 11 739 23 772 27 1649 27 1703 2475 2 0 It 13 21 2 83 106 119 2.594 AVERAGE PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1,026 PK HR AVERAGE PEAK. SEASON N8 SE NS EB WH LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT 11 758 23 792 27 1692 27 1747 2539 2 0 11 13 21 GROWTH FACTOR 1.04 FUTURE BACKGROUNDTRAFFIC T RT TOTAL 2 8.5 109 N13 SB NS EB WB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T ADT 11 776 24 812 28 1733 28 1789 2601 2 fl 11 14 22 2 AADT 11 768 24 803 28 1716 28 1772 2575 2 0 11 13 22 2 PSEASON 12 786 24 824 29 1761 29 1818 2642 2 0 12 14 22 2 RT 87 87 09 EW TC3'I'AL TOTAL 122 2661 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 111 125 2726 110 124 2699 113 127 2769 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NB SB NS EB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT PERNORM114G ARTS 9 9 6 6 17 MIRAMAR CENTER 291 201 132 132 333 BISCAYNE VILLAGE I it 6 6 17 1800 CLUB 72 72 33 33 105 TUTTLE STREET 26 26 6 6 34 BISCAYNE BAY TOWERS 13 13 32 32 45 SKY RESIDENCES 2 2 1 0 1 3 BAY 25 2 2 13 13 15 PLATINUM CONDO 1 1 8 6 9 METROPOLIS 62 62 17 17 79 EDOEWATER TOWER 25 25 6 6 31 ONYX 3 3 16 16 19 TOTAL 0 427 2 429 1 277 0 278 708 FUTURE TRAFFIC WETHOUT PROJECT WB EW TOTAL RT TOTAL I,T T RT 'TOTAL TOTAL O 3 0 17 O 0 0 333 0 0 0 17 O 0 0 105 0 0 0 34 O 0 0 45 O 3 8 II 11 14 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 19 0 0 3 0 8 11 11 719 NB 613 NS EB W11 EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RI' TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL 1:T T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 11 1,203 26 1,241 29 2,011 28 2,068 3,309 2 0 11 1.4 25 2 95 122 136 3,444 AADT 11 1,195 26 1,232 29 1,993 28 2,050 3,283 2 0 11 13 25 2 95 121 135 3,417 PSEASON 12 1,215 26 1,253 30 2,036 29 2,046 3,350 2 0 12 14 25 2 97 124 138 3,467 PROJECT TRAFFIC NB SB NS EB WB EW TOTAL LT '1' RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 7 7 17 17 24 24 21 45 0 45 69 AA➢T 7 0 6 7 0 0 17 i 7 24 24 0 21 45 0 0 0 0 45 69 PSEASON 7 0 0 7 0 0 17 17 24 24 0 21 45 0 0 0 0 45 65 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NB SB NS ES - 16113 EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 1:1' T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 18 1,203 26 1,248 29 2,011 45 2,085 3,333 26 9 32 59 25 2 95 122 181 3,513 AA➢T 18 1,195 26 1,239 29 1,993 45 2,067 3,307 26 0 32 58 25 2 95 121 180 3,486 PSEASON 19 1,215 26 1,260 30 2,038 46 2,113 3,374 26 0 33 59 25 2 97 124 183 3,556 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EXISTING DATA January 29, 2004 TIME NB S13 NS EI3 W13 EW TOTAL BEGINS LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T ItT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM 8 287 13 308 10 273 3 286 594 0 0 1 1 4 2 1 7 8 602 04:15 PM 2 269 16 287 14 244 2 260 547 0 0 2 2 2 2 19 23 25 572 04:30 PM 9 290 11 310 11 296 7 314 624 0 0 9 9 3 1 7 II 20 644 04:45 PM 10 305 11 326 12 236 4 252 578 0 0 3 3 3 1 10 14 17 595 05:00 PM 10 296 11 317 16 301 7 324 641 0 0 6 6 1 0 10 11 17 658 05:15 PM 5 340 17 362 17 291 4 312 674 0 0 7 7 4 0 5 9 16 690 05:30 PM 12 310 14 336 23 265 4 292 628 0 1 2 3 4 1 20 25 28 656 05:45 PM 7 306 16 329 15 272 0 287 6I6 1 0 6 7 10 2 21 33 40 656 PK 1010 34 1252 58 1344 71 1129 15 1215 2559 1 1 21 23 19 3 56 78 101 2660 PERCENT 3% 93% 4% 53% 6% 93% 1% 47% 96% 4% 4% 91% 23% 24% 4% 72% 77% 4% PHF 0.71 0.92 0.85 0.93 0.77 0.94 0.54 0.94 0.93 0.25 0.25 0.75 0.82 0.48 0.38 0.67 0.59 0.64 0.92 AADT FACTOR 0.99 PK HR AADT NE SE NS 1313 WE 13W TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T ItT TOTAL TOTAL 34 1239 57 1331 70 1118 15 1203 2533 1 1 21 23 19 3 55 77 100 2633 AVERAGE PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1.026 PK HR AVERAGE PEAK SEASON NS SE NS EB W13 EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT "TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL l;T T RT 7YJ'I'AL TOTAL 35 1272 59 1365 72 1147 15 1234 2599 I 1 21 23 19 3 57 79 103 2702 GROWTH FACTOR 1.04 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 6.93 SH NS E13 WO EW TOTAL LT T RT 'TOTAL LT T la TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT ' T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 35 1303 60 1398 74 1175 16 1264 2662 1 1 22 24 20 3 58 81 105 2767 AADT 35 1290 60 1384 73 1163 15 1251 2636 1 1 22 24 20 3 58 80 104 2740 PSEASON 36 1323 61 1420 75 1193 16 1284 2704 1 1 22 24 20 3 59 82 107 2811 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 7 • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NB SB NS 30 LT 'I' RT TOTAL LT "i' RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL PERFORMING ARTS 9 9 8 S 17 0 MIRAMAR CENTER 132 132 201 201 333 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE 6 6 11 11 17 0 1800 CLUB 65 65 72 72 137 0 TUTTLE STREET 6 6 28 26 34 0 BISCAYNE BAY TOWERS 32 32 13 13 45 0 SKY RESIDENCES 6 6 5 5 11 0 BAY 25 13 13 6 6 19 0 PLATINUM CONDO 7 7 4 4 11 0 METROPOLIS 55 55 73 73 128 0 EDGEWATERTOWER 13 13 25 25 38 0 ONYX II 11 5 5 16 0 TOTAL 0 349 6 355 5 447 0 152 807 0 0 0 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT W13 LT T RT 0 0 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 17 0 0 333 ]I 0 17 0 0 137 0 0 34 0 0 45 3 3 14 0 0 19 0 0 11 0 0 128 D 0 38 a 0 16 3 3 810 NB SB NS EB WE EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL 'TOTAL LT T 13T TOTAL LT T RT '1'O'1AL TOTAL ADT 35 1,652 66 1,753 79 1,624 16 1,716 3,469 1 1 22 24 20 3 61 84 108 3,577 AADT 35 1,639 66 I,739 78 1,609 15 1,703 3,442 1 1 22 24 20 3 61 83 107 3,5-19 PSEASON 36 1,672 67 1,775 80 1,640 16 1,736 3,511 I 1 22 24 20 3 62 85 110 3,621 PROJECT TRAFFIC NB SB NS EB W13 LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T APT 5 5 12 12 17 9 S 17 AADT 5 0 0 5 0 0 12 12 17 9 0 8 17 0 0 0566,5014 5 0 0 5 0 0 12 12 17 9 0 8 17 0 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NO SB NS LT T RT TOTAL LT T ET TOTAL TOTAL ADT 40 i,652 66 1,758 79 1,621 28 1,728 3,466 AADT 40 1,639 66 1,744 78 1,609 27 1,715 3,459 PSEASON 41 1,672 67 1,780 80 1,640 28 1,748 3,528 EB WB LT T' RT' TOTAL LT T RT' 10 1 30 41 20 3 61 10 1 30 41 20 3 61 10 1 30 41 20 3 62 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL U 17 34 u 17 34 0 17 34 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 84 125 3,611 83 124 3,583 85 127 3,655 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 8 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34T11 STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE EXISTING DATA Lannary 28, 2004 TIME NB S0 NS Ell BEGINS LT T RT TOTAL LT T la TOTAL TOTAL LT 07:00 AM 0 39 2 41 8 126 0 134 175 0 07:15 AM 0 47 3 50 5 150 0 155 205 0 07:30 AM 0 57 2 59 9 209 0 218 277 0 07:45 AM 0 57 6 63 18 2,17 0 265 338 a 08:OO AM 0 74 5 79 5 226 0 231 310 0 08:15 AM 0 68 1 69 5 203 0 268 277 0 0830 AM 0 76 5 81 3 246 0 249 330 0 08:45 AM 0 79 0 79 2 736 0 238 317 0 PK HR 0 275 17 292 31 922 0 953 1245 0 PERCENT 0% 94% 6% 2306 3% 97% 0% 77% 97% ERR PHF ERR 0.90 0.71 0.90 0.43 0.93 ERR 0.90 0.90 ERR AAOT FACTOR 0.99 OK BR AADT NB SE NS EL1 LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT 0 272. 17 289 31 913 0 943 1233 0 AVERAGE PEAT: SEASON FACTOR 1.026 PK 14R AVERAGE PEAK. SEASON NB SE NS E0 LT T RT TOTAL LT 'I' RT TOTAL TOTAL LT 0 279 17 297 31 937 0 968 I265 0 CROWT'H FACTOR 1.04 1'"UTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC WB EW 'TOTAL T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 3 178 O 0 0 2 0 5 7 7 2I2 O 0 0 5 0 6 11 11 288 O 0 0 11 0 9 20 20 348 0 0 0 3 0 2 5 5 315 0 0 0 3 0 ' 3 6 6 283 0 0 0 4 0 - 4 8 8 338 O 0 0 6 0 2 8 8 325 0 0 0 21 0 .18 39 39 1284 ERR ERR 0% 54% 0% 46% 100% 3% ERR ERR ERR 0,48 ERR 0;50 0.49 ERR ERR WE EW TOTAL RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 21 0 .18 39 39 1271 W0 RT TOTAL LT 0 0 21 NE SS NS EB WE LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT ADT 0 286 18 304 32 959 0 992 1295 0 0 0 22 AADT 0 283 18 301 32 950 0 982 1282 0 0 0 22 PSBASON 0 291 18 309 33 974 0 1007 1316 0 0 0 0 22 I' RT TOTAL 0 .18 40 1' RT 6 '19 0 19 a 19 EW 'I'OTA.L. TOTAL 40 1304 OW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 41 41 1336 40 40 1323 41 41 1357 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 3 • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE COMMTI'TED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NB S13 NS EB WE EW 'TOTAI, LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL PERFORMING ARTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MIRAMAR CENTER 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE 0 6 0 0 - 0 0 0 1800 CLUB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUTTLE STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE BAY TOWERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SKY RESIDENCES 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 BAY 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLATINUM CONDO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 METROPOLIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDGEWATER TOWER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ONYX 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :0 0 0 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT NB SB NS EB WE EW TO'PAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T KL' 'TOTAL TOTAL ADT 0 286 18 304 32 959 0 992 1,295 0 6 0 0 22 0 19 41 41 1,336 AADT 0 283 18 301 32 950 0 962 1,262 0 0 0 0 22 0 19 40 40 1,323 PSEASON 0 291 18 309 33 974 0 1,907 1,316 0 0 0 0 22 0 19 41 41 1,357 PROJECT TRAFFIC NB SB NO EB WE EW TOTAL LT T RI' TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT' ItT TOT'AI, TOTAL ADT 41 41 30 30 71 0 49 44 93 93 164 AADT 0 0 41 41 30 0 0 30 71 6 0 0 0 49 44 93 93 164 PSEASON 0 0 41 41 30 0 0 30 71 0 0 0 0 49 0 44 93 43 164 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NO SB NS EB WB - EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT '1' RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 0 286 59 345 62 959 0 1,022 1,366 0 0 0 0 71 0 63 134 134 1,500 AADT 0 283 59 342 62 950 0 1,012 1,353 0 0 0 0 71 0 63 133 133 1,487 PSEASON 0 291 59 350 63 974 0 1,037 1,387 0 0 0 0 71 0 63 134 134 1,521 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 10 • s • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34T11 STREET 6. NE 21ND AVENGE EXISTING DATA January 28, 2004 TIME NB SB NS ES WB EW TOTAI. BEGINS LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T Fa TOTAL TOTAL 64:00 PM 0 230 2 232 7 100 0 107 339 0 0 0 0 5 0 7 12 12 351 04:15 PM 0 241 5 246 2 75 0 77 323 0 0 0 0 3 0 LI 14 14 337 04:30 PM 0 211 20 231 4 97 0 101 332 0 0 0 0 2 0 18 20 20 352 04:45 PM 0 263 5 268 2 97 0 99 367 0 0 0 0 4 0 10 22 22 389 05:00 PM 0 309 2 311 1 116 0 117 428 0 0 0 0 6 0 ID 16 i0 444 05:15 PM 0 317 1 318 3 89 0 92 410 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 8 8 418 05:30 PM 0 262 3 265 3 87 0 90 355 4 0 0 0 5 0 9 14 14 369 05:45 PM 0 262 0 262 2 92 0 94 356 0 0 0 0. 0 0 10 10 10 366 PK FIR 0 1151 11 1162 9 389 0 398 1560 0 0 0 0 17 0 43 60 60 1620 PERCENT 0% 99% 1% 74% 2% 98 0% 26% 96% ERR ERR ERR 0% 28% 0% 72 1001 4% PHF ERR 0.91 0.55 0.91 0.75 0.84 ERR 0.135 0.90 ERR ERR ERR ERR 0,71 ERR 0.60 0.68 ERR ERR AADT FACTOR 0.99 PK HR AADT NB SB NS EB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT 0 1139 11 1154 9 385 0 394 1544 0 AVERAGE PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1.026 W11 EW TOTAL T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 0 17 0 43 59 59 1604 PK HR AVERAGE PEAK SEASON NB SB NS EB WB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL IT T RT TOT 0 1169 II 11E0 9 395 0 404 1585 0 0 0 0 17 0 GROWTH FACTOR 1.04 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC NB SB NS ES WB LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T ADT 0 1198 11 1209 9 405 0 414 1623 0 0 0 0 18 0 AADT 0 1186 11 1197 9 401 0 410 1607 0 0 0 0 18 0 PSIEASON 0 1216 12 1228 10 411 0 421 1649 0 0 0 0 18 0 EW TOTAL T TOTAL TOTAL 4 61 61 1645 RT 45 44 d5 EW "TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 62 62 1685 62 62 1669 63 63 1712 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 11 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 34TH STREET E NE 2ND AVENUE COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NB SB NS £l3 WB LT T RT TOTAL LT i' RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TO'l'AL LT T PERFORMING ARTS 0 0 0 0 MORAMAR CENTER 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 IWO CLUB 0 0 0 0 TUITLE STREET 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE BAY TOWERS 0 0 0 0 SKY RESIDENCES 0 0 0 0 BAY 25 6 0 0 0 PLATINUM CONDO 0 0 0 0 METROPOLIS 0 0 0 0 EDGEWATERTOWER 0 9 0 0 ONYX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT NB LT T RT TOTAL ADT 0 1,198 i 1 1,209 AADT 0 1,186 II 1,197 PSEASON 0 1,216 12 1,228 PROJECT TRAFFIC RT EW 'TOTAL TOTAL T(YTAL 9 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 6 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 6 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 SB NS EB WB EW TOTAL LT T R"1' TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT 'P 03 TOTAL TOTAL 9 405 0 414 1,623 0 0 0 0 18 0 45 62 62 1,685 9 401 0 410 1,607 0 0 0 0 18 0 44 62 62 1,669 10 411 0 421 1,649 0 0 0 9 18 0 45 63 63 1,712 NB SB LT T RT TOTAL LT T R'1' TOTAL ADT 28 28 21 21 AADT 0 0 28 28 21 0 0 21 PSEASON 0 0 28 28 21 0 0 21 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NS EB WB EW TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 49 0 18 17 35 35 84 49 0 0 0 0 18 0 17 35 35 84 49 0 0 0 0 18 0 17 33 35 84 NB SB NS E13 WB LT T RT "TOTAL LT T RT 'TOTAL TOTAL LT T RI TOTAL LT ADT 0 1,198 39 1,237 30 405 0 435 1,672 0 0 0 0 36 AADT 0 1,186 39 1,225 30 401 0 431 1,656 0 0 0 0 36 PSEASON 0 1,216 40 1,256 31 411 0 442 1,698 0 0 0 0 36 T R.I. 0 62 0 bl 0 62 EW TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 97 97 1,769 97 97 1,753 98 98 1,796 AVANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33R17 STREET &. NE 2ND AVENUE EXISTING DATA lanuacy 28, 2004 TIME NB SI3 NS EB BEGI3JS LT '1' RT TOTAL. LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT 07:00 AM 0 43 1 42 3 124 0 127 169 0 07:15 AM 0 50 1 51 1 151 0 152 203 0 07:30 AM 0 56 1 57 5 209 0 . 214 271 0 07:45 AM 0 59 3 62 9 249 0 258 320 0 0B':OO AM 0 77 4 81 5 224 0 229 310 0 08:15 AM 0 66 1 67 2 204 0 206 273 0 0839 AM 0 77 3 80 7 243 0 250 330 0 98':45 AM 9 77 4 81 7 235 0 242 323 0 PK HR 0 279 11 290 23 920 0 943 1233 0 PERCENT 0% 96% 4% 24% 2% 98% 0% 76% 95% ERR PHF ERR 0.91 0.69 0.90 0.64 0.92 ERR 0,91 0.91 ERR AADT FACTOR 0.99 PK 11R AADT NB S13 NS ?13 LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT 0 276 11 287 23 911 0 934 1221 0 AVERAGE PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1,026 PK HR AVERAGE PEAK SEASON NB S13 NS BE LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT 0 263 11 295 23 934 0 958 1252 0 GROWTH FACTOR 1.04 FIJTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC WE EW TOTAL T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL. TOTAL 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 172 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 206 0 0 0 15 0 3 16 18 289 0 0 0 14 0 4 18 18 336 0 0 0 22 9 2 24 24 334 0 0 0 I1 0 3 14 i4 287 0 0 0 8 0 4 12 12 342 0 0 0 7 0 2 9 9 332 0 0 0 55 0 13 68 68 1301 ERR ERR 0% 81% 0% 19% 100% 5% ERR ERR ERR 0.63 ERR 0.81 0.71 ERR ERR WE EW T RI' TOTAL, LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 6 0 0 54 0 13 67 67 WE EW T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 0 56 0 13 69 69 NB S13 NS E13 W13 EW LT T Rl' TOTAL LT T RI' TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RI TOTAL TOTAL ADT 0 290 11 302 24 957 0 981 1283 0 0 0 0 57 0 14 71 71 AADT 0 287 11 299 24 948 0 971 1270 9 0 0 0 57 0 13 70 70 PSEASON 0 295 12 306 24 972 0 997 I303 0 0 0 0 58 0 14 72 72 TOTAL 1288 OTAL 1321 TOTAL 1354 1340 1375 AVANT TROPIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 13 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE COMMITTED DEVELOPMENTTRAFFIC N6 SB NS F.B Wi3 EW TOTAL LT 1' RT TO`L'AL Ur T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL PERFORMING ARTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MIRAMAR CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1800 CLUB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUTTLE STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 131SCAYNE BAY TOWERS 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 SKY RESIDENCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAY 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLATINUM CONDO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 METROPOLIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDGEWATERTOWER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ONYX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT NB S11 NM GB WB EW-TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LTT RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 0 290 11 302 24 957 0 981 1,283 0 0 6 0 57 0 14 71 71 1,354 AADT 0 287 11 299 24 948 0 971 1,270 0 0 0 0 57 0 13 70 70 1,340 PSEASON 0 295 12 300 24 972 0 997 1,303 0 0 0 0 58 0 14 72 72 1,375 PROJECT TRAFFIC NE ME NM EB WB EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAI, TOTAL LT 3' RT' TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL: A.37T 33 33 0 33 0 8 8 8. 41 AADT 0 33 0 33 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 41 PSEASON 0 33 0 33 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 8 41 FUTURE. TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NH SB NS Eli WB 0W TOTAL 1,T T ET TOTAL LT T RP TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 0 323 11 335 24 957 0 981 1,316 0 0 0 0 57 0 22 79 79. 1,395 AADT 0 320 11 332 24 948 0 971 1,303 0 0 0 0 57 0 21 78 78. 5,381 PSEASON 0 328 12 339 24 972 0 997 1,336 0 0 0 0 58 0 22 80 80 1,416 AVANT TNAPPIG IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 19 • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33RD STREET Sc NE 2N➢ AVENUE EXISTING DATA January 28, 2004 TIME NE SB NS EB W13 EW TOTAL BEGINS LT T RT TOTAL LT T ET TOTAL TOTAL LT T R7' TOTAL LT T ET TOTAL 'TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 204 9 213 10 95 0 105 318 0 0 0 0 3 0 28 31 31 349 04:15 PM 0 217 5 222 11 67 0 78 300 0 0 0 0 11 0 29 40 40 346 04:30 PM 0 207 5 212 11 88 0 99 311 6 0 0 0 10 0 24 34 34 345 04:45 PM 0 245 5 250 10 91 0 101 351 0 0 0 0 10 0 23 33 33 384 05:00 PM 0 292 6 298 8 114 0 122 420 0 0 0 0 2 0 19 21 21 441 05:15 PM 0 300 6 306 7 84 0 91 397 0 0 0 6 3 0 18 21 21 418 95:30 PM 0 245 10 255 4 88 0 92 347 0 0 0 0 5 0 20 25 2.5 372 05:45 PM 0 233 9 242 7 85 0 92 334 0 0 0 6 5 0 29 34 34 368 900HE 0 1082 27 1109 29 377 0 406 1515 0 0 0 0 20 0 80 100 160 1615 PERCENT 0% 98% 2% 73% 7% 93% 0% 27% 94% ERR ERR ERR 9% 20% 0% 80% LOOT fi/ PEIF ER.R 0.90 0.68 0.91 0,73 0.83 ERR 0.83 0.89 ERR ERR ERR ERR 0.50 ERR 0.87 6,76 ERR ERR AADT FACTOR 0,99 PK HE AADT NE 513 NS EB WB EW .TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT 7' RT TOTAL TOTAL 0 1071 27 1098 29 373 0 402 1500 0 0 0 0 20 0 79 99 99 1599 AVERAGE PEAK SEASON FACTOR 1.026 PK HE AVERAGE PEAK SEASON NB S8 NS E23 WB EW TOTAL l:f T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT "1' RT TOTAL TOTAL 0 1099 27 1126 29 383 4 412 1539 0 0 0 0 20 0 81 102 102 1640 GROWTH FACTOR 1.04 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC NB 513 NS EIS WO IiW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL APT 0 1126 28 1154 30 392 0 422 1576 0 0 0 0 21 0 83 104 104 1600 AADT 0 1114 28 1142 30 388 0 418 1560 0 0 0 0 21 0 82 103 103 1663 PSEASON 0 1143 29 1177 31 398 0 429 1601 0 0 0 0 21 9 85 196 106 1707 AVANT TRAPI9C IMPACT ANALYSES PAG E 16 • • INTERSECTION VOLUMES NE 33RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NB SB NS E13 'NB EW TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT '1' RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL PERFORMINGARTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MIRAMAR CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1E00 CLUB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUTTLE STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE BAY TOWERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SKY RESIDENCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAY 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLATINUM CONDO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 METROPOLIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDGEWATERTOWER 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 ONYX 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 FUTURE TRAFFIC WIT HOLT PROJECT NB SB NS EB WE EW TO'1'AL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 0 1,126 28 1,154 30 392 0 422 1,576 0 0 0 0 21 0 83 104 104 1,680 AADT 0 1,114 28 1,142 30 388 0 418 1,560 0 0 0 0 21 0 82 103 103 : 1,663 ?SEASON 0 1,143 29 1,172 31 398 0 429 1,601 0 0 0 0 21 0 85 106 106 1,707 PROJECT TRAFFIC NB SB NS EE WB EW LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL. LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL ADT 22 22 0 22 0 6 6 6 AADT 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 PSEASON 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 22 0 11 0 0 0 6 6 6 FUTURE TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT NB SE NS EB 'NB OW LT T RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL. 'TOTAL LT '1 RT TOTAL LT T RT TOTAL TOTAL. ADT 6 1,148 28 1,176 30 392 0 422 1,598 0 0 0 0 21-6 89 116 110 AAIYI' 6 1,136 28 1,164 30 388 6 418 1,582 0 0 0 0 21 0 68 109 109 ?SEASON 0 1,165 29 1,194 31 396 0 429 1,623 0 0 0 0 21 0 91 112 112 OTAL 28 20 28 FITAL 1,708 1,691 1,735 AVANT TRAM'1C IMPACT ANALYSIS PAGE 16 • • ARTPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis Description/.File Information Filename AP_BB AM PEAK.xml Date Prepared 2/18/2004 Program ARTPLAN Version 5.1.1 Analyst J. AFILSTEDT Agency District Arterial Name BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Begin Intersection NE 38TH ST End Intersection NE 26TH ST Study Period Kp/d Peak Direction Southbound User Notes AM PEAK HOUR AVANT Facility Data Roadway Variables Traffic Variables Control Variables Multimodal Variables Area Type Urbanized AADT 46500 Arrival Type 3 Paved Shoulder/Bike Lane No Class 3 K 0.097 Signals/Mile 5.00 Outside lane Width Typical Posted Speed 30 D 0.52 Cycle Length �© Pavement Condition Typical Lanes 4 PHF 0.925T�� ugh gMedian 0,69 Sidewalk Yes Type Restrictive % Turns Excl. Lanes 12 Control Type Semiactuated Sidewalk/Roadway Separation Typical Left Turn Lanes Yes Heavy Vehicles 2 Sidewalk/Roadway Protective Barrier No Base Flaw Sat Rate 1900 Obstacle to Bus Stop No Local Adj. Factor 0.95 Bus Freq 1 Adjusted Sat Flow Rate 1770 Bus Span Of Service 15 Automobile Segment Data Segment # (to NE 36TH ST) ler 2 (to NE 33RD ST) 3 (to NE 29TH ST) 4 (to NE 26TH ST) Cycle Length 160 90 90 90 g/C 0.32 Arr. Type Turns 12 0.69 0.67 0.69 3 3 12 12 12 # Dir. Lanes 2 2 2 Automobile LOS Length 0.125 AADT 0.1875 0.25 0.1875 46500 46500 46500 46500 Hourly Vol. 2345 2345 2345 2345 FIBS 35 35 35 35 Median Type Non - Restrictive Non - Restrictive Non - Restrictive Non - Restrictive Segment # Thru Mvmt Flow Rate v/c Control Delay Int. Approach LOS Speed (mph) Segment LOS 1 (to NE 36TH ST) 2231 1.97 490.95 F 0.9 F 2 (to NE 33RD ST) 2231 0.91 12.38 B 19 C 3 (to NE 29TH ST) 2231 0.94 16.34 B 19.2 C 4 (to NE 26TH ST) 2231 0.91 13.39 B 18.5 C Arterial Length 0.8 Auto Speed *** Auto LOS F Automobile Service Volume Tables A B C D E Lanes Hourly Volume In Peak Direction 1 ** ** 330 630 640 2 ** ** 740 1260 1290 3 ** ** 1140 1900 1930 4 ** ** 1550 2530 2570 * ** ** 740 1260 1290 Lanes Hourly Volume In Both Directions 2 ** ** 640 1200 1240 4 ** ** 1420 2430 2480 6 ** ** 2190 3650 3710 8 [ ** ** 2980 4870 4950 * ** ** 1420 2430 2480 Lanes Annual Average Daily Traffic 2 ** ** 6600 12400 12800 4 ** ** 14600 25000 25500 6 ** ** 22600 37600 38300 8 ** ** 30800 50200 51000 * ** ** 14600 25000 25500 • • • ARTPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis Description/File Information Filename AP_BB PM PEAK.xml Date Prepared 2/18/2004 Program ARTPLAN Version 5.1.1 Analyst J. AHLSTEDT Agency District Arterial Name BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Begin Intersection NE 26TH ST End Intersection NE 38TH ST Study Period Kp/d Peak Direction Northbound User Notes PM PEAK HOUR AVANT Facility Data Roadway Variables Traffic Variables Control Variables Multimodal Variables Area Type Urbanized AADT 46500 Arrival Type 3 Paved Shoulder/Bike Lane No Class 3 K 0.097 Signals/Mile 5.00 Outside Lane Width Typical Posted Speed 30 D 0.52 Cycle Length 115 Pavement Condition Typical Lanes 4 PHF 0.925 9�C ugh 0.79 Sidewalk Yes Median%Turns Type Restrictive Excl. Lanes 12 Control Type Serniactuated Sidewalk/Roadway Separation Typical Left Turn Lanes Yes % Heavy VehiclesBase 2 Sidewalk/Roadway Protective Barrier No Flow Sat Rate 1900 Obstacle to Bus Stop No Local Adj. Factor 0.95 Bus Freq Adjusted Sat Flow Rate 1770 Bus Span Of Service 15 Automobile Segment Data Segment # Cycle Length 9Ie Arr. Type % Turns # Dir. Lanes Length AADT Hourly Vol. FFS Median Type 1 (to NE 29TH ST) 115 0.79 3 12 2 0.1875 46500 2345 35 Non Restrictive 2345 35 Non Restrictive 2 (to NE 33RD ST) 115 0.82 3 12 2 0.25 46500 3 (to NE 36TH ST) 148 0.35 3 12 2 0.1875 46500 2345 35 Non Restrictive 0.125 46500 2345 35 Non Restrictive 4 (to NE 38TH ST) 124 0.42 3 12 2 Automobile LOS Segment # Thru Mvmt Flow Rate v/c Control Delay Int. Approach LOS Speed (mph) Segment LOS 1 (to NE 29TH ST) 2231 0.8 8.12 A 21.6 C 2 (to NE 33RD ST) 2231 0.77 6.06 AfF 24.5 B 3 (to NE 36TH ST) 2231 1.8 410.18 F 1.6 F 4 (to NE 38TH ST) 2231 1.5 261.53 F 1.6 € F Arterial Length 0.8 Auto Speed *** Auto LOS F Automobile Service Volume Tables Lanes 1 A B c D E Hourly Volume In Peak Direction ** 230 590 700 2 ** ** 500 1260 1410 3 ** ** 770 1930 2110 4 Lanes 2 ** ** ** ** 1040 500 2600 1260 2820 1410 Hourly Volume In Both Directions ** 440 1140 1350 4 ** ** 970 2430 2710 6 ** ** 1480 3720 4060 8 Lanes 2 ** ** ** ** 2000 970 5000 2430 Annual Average Daily Traffic ** 4500 5420 2710 11800 14000 4 ** ** 10000 25000 27900 6 ** ** 15300 38300 { 41900 8 ** ** 20600 51600 55800 * • ** ** 10000 25000 27900 AM INBOUND • • Project: Analyst: Date: Control System: AVANT J. Ahlstedt 2120/2004 Card Reader Input Data Arrival Rate 9 per hour Service Rate _. 360 per hour Number of Servers 1 Queue Capacity 2000 Threshold Time (Assumed) - 15 seconds System Capacity (Queue Capacity + Number of Servers) 2001 Calculated Data Average Number In System L 0.026 Average Number in Queue Lq 0.001 Minimum Number of Agents (threshold time & system capacity) MinAgents 2 Minimum Number of Servers (threshold time & queue capacity) MinServers 2 Probability That System is Empty Po 98% Probability That Arriving Customer Will Depart Without Entering System PrBalk 0% Probability That an Arriving Customer Will Have To Wait PrWait 3°/0 Probability That Waiting Time is Less Than Threshold Time Service Level 99% Average Server Utilization Util 39/0 Average Time Customer Spends In System W 10 Seconds Average Time Customer Spends In Queue Wq 0 Seconds Probability Distribution of Number of Customers in System 0 .- N Cr) r LO (0 ti c0 0) 0 N "1- ID CO Number of Customers in System CO o PrState 0 97.50% 2.44% 0.06% 0.00% 0.00°/0 5 6 7 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8 0.00% 9 0.00°/Q 10 0.00% 11 0.00% 12 0.00% 13 0.00% 14 0.00% 15 0.00% 16 0.00% 17 0.00% 18 0.00% 19 0.00% 20 0.00% Page 1 AM INBOUND • • Cummulative Probability of Number of Customers in System 100% 100% 99% 99% 0 w98% U 98% 97% 97% 96% 0 1 2 3 4 5 Nulmber of Customers in System 15 16 17 18 19 20 r Number' °/a 9 14 15 16 20 97.50% 99.94% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100,00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00G/0 Page 2 AM OUTBOUND • Project: AVANT Analyst: J. Ahlstedt Date: 2/20/2004 Control System: Card Reader Input Data Arrival Rate 45 per hour Service Rate... .. 360 per hour. Number of Servers 1 Queue Capacity 2000 Threshold Time (Assumed) 15 seconds System Capacity (Queue Capacity + Number of Servers) 2001 Calculated Data Average Number In System L 0.143 Average Number in Queue Lq 0.018 Minimum Number of Agents (threshold time & system capacity) MinAgents 2 Minimum Number of Servers (threshold time & queue capacity) MinServers 2 Probability That System is Empty Po 88% Probability That Arriving Customer Will Depart Without Entering System PrBalk 0°f0 Probability That an Arriving Customer Will Have To Wait PrWait 13% Probability That Waiting Time is Less Than Threshold Time Service Level 97% Average Server Utilization Util 13% Average Time Customer Spends In System W 11 Seconds Average Time Customer Spends In Queue Wq 1 Seconds 90% 80% 70% 60% 50 sa n a. 30% 20% 10% a% Probability Distribution of Number of Customers in System r PrState Number of Customers In System 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 87.50% 10.94% 1.37% 0.17% 0.02% 0.001% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Page 3 AM OUTBOUND • • Cummulative Probability of Number of Customers in System 0 i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Customers in System Number 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 % 87.50% 98.44% 99.80% 99.98% • 1•00.00% 14- 15 16 17 18 19 20 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1 00.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Page 4 PM INBOUND • Project: AVANT Analyst: J. Ahlstedt Date: 2/20/2004 Control System: Card Reader Input Data Arrival Rate 43 per hour Service Rate 360 per hour Number of Servers 1 Queue Capacity 2000 Threshold Time (Assumed) 15 seconds System Capacity (Queue Capacity + Number of Servers) 2001 Calculated Data Average Number in System L 0.136 Average Number in Queue Lq 0.016 Minimum Number of Agents (threshold time & system capacity) MinAgents 1 Minimum Number of Servers (threshold time & queue capacity) MinServers 1 Probability That System is Empty Po 88% Probability That Arriving Customer Will Depart Without Entering System PrBalk 0% Probability That an Arriving Customer Will Have To Wait PrWait 12% Probability That Waiting Time is Less Than Threshold Time Service Level 97% Average Server Utilization Util 12% Average Time Customer Spends In System W 11 Seconds Average Time Customer Spends In Queue Wq 1 Seconds Probability Distribution of Number of Customers in System PrState % Probability 0 88.06% 1 10.52% 2 1.26% 3 0,15% 4 0.02% 5 0,00% 6 0.00% % 0.00%0 �a 8 0.00% 9 0.00% 10 0.00% 11 0.00% 12 0.00% 13 0,00% 14 0.00% 15 0.00% 16 0.00% o - N cis v Ln CO N 43 al o N 01 v to cca N- m Cr)o 17 0.00% Number of Customers In system 18 0.00% 19 0.00% 20 0.00% Page 5 PM INBOUND Cummulative Probability of Number of Customers in System t] 1 2 3 4 5 Number of Customers In dyst9ff115 16 17 18 19 20 Number 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 88.06% 98.57% 99.83% 99.98% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 9 10' 100.00% 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20, 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00°/a 100.00% 100.00% 100.00°f° 100.00% Page 6 PM OUTBOUND • • Project: AVANT Analyst: J. Ahistedt Date: 2/20/2004 Control System: Card Reader Input Data Arrival Rate 21 per hour Service Rate 360 per hour Number of Servers 1 Queue Capacity 2000 Threshold Time (Assumed) 15 seconds System Capacity (Queue Capacity + Number of Servers) 2001 Calculated Data Average Number in System L 0.062 Average Number in Queue Lq 0.004 Minimum Number of Agents (threshold time & system capacity) MinAgents 2 Minimum Number of Servers (threshold time & queue capacity) MinServers 2 Probability That System is Empty Po 94% Probability That Arriving Customer Will Depart Without Entering System PrBalk 0°/0 Probability That an Arriving Customer Will Have To Wait PrWait 6°/D Probability That Waiting Time is Less Than Threshold Time Service Level 99% Average Server Utilization Util 6% Average Tirne Customer Spends In System W 11 Seconds Average Time Customer Spends In Queue Wq 1 Seconds Probability Distribution of Number of Customers in System PrState % 0 94.17% icy' 1 5.49% = `" 2 0.32% 3 0.02% 80% 4 0.00% 5 0.00°/D 70% 6 0.00% .4" 60%k k 7 0.00% 8 0.00% css 50% o - x= 9 0.00% 10 0.00% ri 40% 11 0.00% 12 0.00% 13 0.00% 20% 14 0.00% 15 0.00% 10% 16 0.00% 0% F o <- cv (*) ,:r 1.11 co CO rn Q cNI ce) v u) CO r� CC. rn a Number of Customers In System 17 0.00% 18 0.00% 19 0.00% 20 0.00% Page 7 PM OUTBOUND Cummutative Probability of Number of Customers in System 0 1 2 3 4 Number of Customers In Syst rn 15 16 17 18 19 2° Number 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 94.17% 99.66% 99.98% 100,00% 1.00.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1 00,00% Page 8