HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-24-04 FIG City Commission MUSP HearingISLAND GARDENS
PROJECT
•--� MIAMI
=- -4r COMMISSION
MUSP HEARING't
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
• ONLY POSSIBLE LOCATION
• CONSISTENT WITH MASTER PLAN
• CONSISTENT WITH RFP
• 68% VOTER REFERENDUM
• NO ADDITIONAL ZONING CHANGES
• NO IMPACT TO DRI & TRAFFIC
• SFRPC & DCA APPROVALS
• SUBSTANTIAL PUBLIC BENEFITS
• UNAMIOUS APPROVAL FROM UDRB,
SHORELINE, & WATERFRONT & PABJ
• COMPLIED WITH REASONABLE REQUESTS
•TIGHT TIME:SCHEDULE
ONLY VIABLE SITE
• DEEP WATER CHANNEL
• COMMERCIAL MARINE BASIN
• LANDSIDE TRANSPORATION CONNECTORS
• MIAMI - MIAMI BEACH CONNECTOR
• -PORT & CRUISE FACILITIES SERVIC
• REPAIR & SERRVICE FACILITIES
• SECURITY, COAST GUARD, PILOTS, USDHS'
• TOURISM FACILITIES
- SEAPLANE BASE
- HEUeQRT
- RECREATION & AMUSEMEN
• PARKING GARAGES
4-01.7gMag
BALLOT QUESTION NO. 1
AUTHORIZING 45-YEAR LEASE OF CITY -OWNED
UPLAND/SUBMERGED LAND ON WATSON ISLAND
Shall the City lease City -owned land consisting of
24.2 total upland and submerged acres on Watson
Island to Flagstone Properties, LLC for
development of a mega yacht marina, fish market,
hotels with timeshare units, a maritime museum,
public gardens, cultural facilities, restaurants, retail
and support facilities, for 45 years with two 15-year
renewals, subject to capital investment, subject to
a minimum annual guaranteed rent of $2,000,000
and other conditions the City may require?
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
• LEADING MEGA YACHT FACILITY FOR NEXT 30 YEARS
• LANDMARK GATEWAY ICON - DOWNTOWN
ORIENTATION
• MAKE MIAMI A GLOBAL CITY AND SOUTH FLORIDA A
GLOBAL COMMUNITY
• ACCESSIBLE GARDEN ENVIRONMENT WITH
LANDSCAPED ROOFS THAT TERRACE TO
WATERFRONT at
• OPEN PUBLIC AREAS & ACCESS+
SEPARATION OF SERVICE AND SECURITY FRO
GUEST PEDESTRIAN & VEHICULAR
• COMPATIBLE WITH FUTURE PLANS FOR FDOT
PROJECTS
LEADING STATE-OF-THE-ART MEGAYACHT
HARBOR FOR THE NEXT 30 YEARS
LANDMARK GATEWAY ICON
GARDEN ENVIRONMENT
. rm.
.„,.. i::::::iiET;
LA
1i .w.i.;:.. '''.1iliLL1*•••
E. 19 1,11111Frili —, •
• m•
... .1.,....lirn:=•• 1.4.11•
:1.L.
.::021 ' '07:::Iii la il: 0 r1;71 lel
aff gi .. . •••11•411.,.•
luire,re • • ... !....•.
utag•ip•••••es• Irl..
,p•••16.16......-•..,
Tp••10•1911...."..M.
GARDEN ENVIRONMENT
f)
SECURITY COMPLIANT
a F4
) LANDSCAPE
PLANTER
SEATING WATER
PROMENADE BENCH FEATURE
SECURE
EDGE
Ivl AR I NA
PROMENADE
YACHT
AC CESS/SERVICE
LEVEL
murifii
COMPLIANT WITH FDOT
• — — 4—
is
_ —
_
rrrtcfcTTw r 11,17.
[11,1.14.01.1
..=. ..=
.: .1 3
r
-=••;.2. • •
teEjEF
•dram,m..
— • 4.1":"....
.160.3s
2
itnILLE7T111WINIINI-1:71014
1:-RET31 ROL .2.E01-1019
5 LUTIWETE FEVE*TGTIDT4
- .
ILAINTLE110.1)
4!•::=
•Hriza
!=rF14.71"R Fr.M Nr711'41N
1-L1- -
A PLR r! i I IK:.ir;
Mgr •r
E1EF SIOADIEr11.7.1
1 . F141" Fa.r. N!.NT Dta
11,5.1
5.1r_
00 • -;-4-s
7/MILEAL'SriSsICM:itiSKE'
our! mArprahr..
ILEf!..E-E9 F
2
FLAO!TD11!
Impriv•ro.6p
rirrlEsAltdb
trills OWN
•:a•avem
PUBLIC BENEFITS PROVIDED
• CREATE A GLOBAL PROJECT FOR A CITY GLOBAL IMAGE
• GARDEN AND OPEN AREAS ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC (MORE THAN 60%)
• 950 FTES & 3,040 CONSTRUCTION JOBS.
• MARITIME GALLERY
• FISH MARKET
• FISHING PIER
•
-
• $2,000,000 ANNUALGUARANTEED PLUS PERCENTAGE RENTAL REVENUE
• $1,000,000 ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION RENT
• RECURRING CITY TAX INCOME $4,313,865
• RECURRING COUNTY TAXES $6,813,78
• ONE-TIME FEE BENEFITS $3,460,566
• OVERALL ECONOMIC IMPACT $521.7 MILLION
• ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION
• FAIRCHILD TROPICAL GARDENS & HISTORICAL MUSEUM OF SOUTH FLORIDA
• NUMEROUS FOUNTAINS AND PUBLIC AREAS
• FESTIVAL CALENDAR
• VARIED PRICE POINT RETAIL SHOPS AND RESTAURANTS
• CIVIC ARTS TRUST
• $1,000,000 MASTER PLAN &ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENT TO SOUTH PARK
ISLAND GARDENS
PROJECT
WATSON ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD
WORKSHOPS
JUNE26,2004
1OOQ V_ ETIAWAY
WATSON ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD WORKSHOPS OF MAY 24 & 26, 2004
The following is the list of "Concerns & Requests" made of the Island Gardens Project by the "Groups" and verified
by the Groups at the Neighborhood Workshops of May 24 and 26. These items will be presented to the City of
Miami Planning Advisory Board at their Special Meeting on June 2, at which time responses will be provided by
Flagstone Island Gardens, LLC.
GROUP
TOPIC
3 VW TRAFFIC
4 UEL U_SE
5 UEL USE -- —__
6� UEL USE
7 _ UEL USE_ _—
8� PJ USE
_10 PJ __ SHADOWS
_CM SHADOWS
12 PJ__
13 VW VIEWS _____
14 VW VIEWS _ ___
15 FM FISH MK_T___
16 UEL FISH _MK_T___
17 MYC S_E_CU_RITY___
18 PJ P_A_RKING___
19 PJ _T_RAFFIC _
20 MYC TRAFFIC
21� VW TRAFFIC
22 VW T_RAF_FI_C __�_
23 VW__ B_E_NE_FI_TS___
24 UEL B_E_NE_FI_TS___
25 UEL BENEFITS
26 VW BOATS
.27 __ CM___R_OAD_______
28 —67 ETAT
29 CM 30 _CM R_OOAADD_
31�CM__U_ _T_ 32 CM__ SECURITY
34 CM__ P_A_RKING___
35 CM PARKING
38 PJ NOISE __
39 VW NOISE
40 VW NOISE
41 VW& PJ TRAFFIC
42 VW U_SE--_
44 VW PARKING
45 CM__ PARKING
46 CM__ P_A_RKIN_G____
47 CM_ ACCESS
48 CM ACCESS
49 CM ROAD
------------------------
WANTS & REQUESTS
RESOLVE LEFT TURNS ONTO HIBISCUS & STAR ISLANDS BACKUP TRAFFIC
TIME SHARES PROHIBITED
HOTEL USE IS MORE THAN 20 ACRES �� ��
PRIVATE___CLUBS _NOT PERMITTED__e__�__�_�_�_���_e__����
MEETINGSPACE ISCOMPETITIVE
PARKING BELO_W_M_AC_A_RT_H_UR B_RIDG_E_IS C_OMPETITIV__E
SHA_DOWS_R_EST_RICT PJ LANDSCAPE GROWTH
S_HA_DO_W_S IM_P_AC_T_C_M PLAYAREA __
VIEWS FROM_ PJBANQUET
V_W_VIEWS_OF _DO_W_NTO_WN _WI_LL_BE R_E_ST_RICT_E_
PICTURE FROM VWISNOT TRUEPERSPECTIVE____________________________________________
EXISTING_FISH_M_AR_KET_NOT I_NC_LUD_ED___________________________________________________
FISH MA_R_KETAC_CES_S IS_ RE_S_TRIC_TE_D_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _
SEC_U_RITY_O_F _WA_T_SON ISLAND W_ ITH_IN_C_RE_AS_ED NUM BER_ OF PEOPLE �� ���
PARKING _ON_W_ATS_ON ISLAND_IS N_OT ADEQUATE ___ _ _________�___
C_UR_REN_T ISLA_N_D R_O_AD_WA_Y D_EFI_CIEN_CY_R_ESU_LT_S IN TRAFFIC ISSUES ���
RESOLVETRAFFIC IMPACTSTO EMERGENCYVEHICLESAND ISLAND_ ____
IN_CLU_DE V_C IN_T_RA_FFIC_STU__DIE__S_FO__R__N_O_PC ���_
INCLUDE EVACUATION PLAN ___
REALISTIC_FINANCIAL B_EN_E_FITS
NOT P_ROVIDIN_G EN_O_UG_H PUBLIC ACCESS & AMENITY
AMENITY GUARANTEES--'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'---'—'—'—'—'—'---'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—
SOUTH ROAD EL 9 SHOULD BE BOTH INGRESS/EGRESS
D_RO_P_O_FF_S_HO_U_LD_MAINTAIN_C_M PEDESTRIAN_PL_AZ_A_ _
MINIMIZE ELEVATIO_N DIFFERENCEOF PERIMETERROAD_WIT_H
MITIG_ATE_DR_AIN_AG_E ONTO _MU_S_EUM_SITE FR_OM_PLANNED
PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION STAGIN_G OPERATIONSPLAN_
CONS_TRU_CTIO_N_ST_AFF T_O P_R_OVID_E IDENNTITY CREDENTIALS ��� _�
PROVIDE PE_DS_T_RIAN_ACC_E_SS FROM PROJECT TO_M_USE_U_M_SP_IFL_Y_F_O_R__CHILDREN__A_N__D
PROVIDE SUFFICIENTPARKING FORFACILITY ANDSTAFF___________________________________
AVOID ENCROACHMENT ON MUSEUM PARKING SPACES
NOISE MAY BE DISTURBING
CONTROL _SOUND FROM _PROMENADE
__________________ __ _—_—J
EVALUATE SPECIAL EVENTS (OFFSITE& ONSITE&WEEKENDS) TRAFFIC AND PARKING AND
PROJECTIONS
AVOIDRAISING_ GR_OU_ND LEVEL HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE MUSEUM ���
PROVID_E FREE_PARKING------------------------------- ���_��_�__��_
Filar__D_G_A_RA_GE ON_DOS_P_SI_TE_S_OU_TH _OF_M_USEU_M��_
SOLVE-ISLANDWID_E OV_E_RFLO_W_P_ARKINGNE_EDS_OF S_P_E_C_I_A_L__E_VENTS
LIMIT_US_E_OFS_OUTH_ROA_DBY_V_ALET&OTHERUS_ERS___ ______ __ _____
SERVICE VEHICLES, GARBAGE TRUCKS AND OTHERS SHOULD ONLY EXIT THE PROJECT FROM
T_HE_NORT_H/WEESTEND_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ISLAND GARDENS SHOULD ASSUME COSTS FOR PLANNED ROADWAYS, IMPROVEMENTS,
RESPONS
Unrelated____
_Unrelated ____
Unrelated
Inaccurate
naccurate
Inaccurate
Inaccurate
Inaccurate _
rate Inaccura—_
_Inaccurate ___
naccurate
Inaccurate___
_Inaccurate ___
naccurate
Inaccurate_
_Inaccurate ___
naccurate
Inaccu rate___
_Inaccurate ___
naccurate _
rate Inaccura—
_Inaccurate ___
naccurate
Inaccurate_
Inaccurate
A reed
A reed
Agreed_
1 reed��
A reed
Agee d
A reed
A reed
A reed
A reed
_Condition
Condition
Condition
Condition
Condition __--
Condition
_Not Areed _
N
ot Agreed
_Not Agreed _
N
ot Agreed __
Not Agreed -_
Not Agreed ._
Not Agreed
Not A
greed
COMMUNITY CONCERNS
To date, we have held 19 public hearings, 2 Workshops for Watson Island and Venetian Causeway neighbors, and numerous meetings with our immediate island tenants. The Workshops
identified 49 issues brought up by neighbors on the following topics:
Traffic 7 Access 3 Shadows 2 TOTAL 49
Use 7 Benefits 3 Boats 1
Parking 6 Noise 3 School 1
Road 5 Security 3 Screen 1
Views 4 Fish Market 2 Site 1
• NOT PROVIDING ENOUGH PUBLIC ACCESS & AMENITY
(see "BENEFITS PROVIDED BY FLAGSTONE')
• AMENITY GUARANTEES
The Lease, and all pending land use approvals require that the property be developed in compliance with the site plan approved under the MUSP process.
All of the site plans clearly include the Public Amenities. The Lease incorporates by referencing Flagstone's proposal submitted in response to the RFP.
That proposal clearly outlines all public amenities to be provided by Flagstone.
• FISH MARKET ACCESS IS RESTRICTED
In fact, Fish Market is accessible to the project, and to residents as well.
• INAPPROPRIATE USE OF LAND
Consistent with Master Plan passed Jan. 25, 1996 which was adopted unanimously by PAB on 01-17-96 subsequent to Public Hearing (PAB 2-96). The Flagstone project passed
Nov. 2001 General Election Referendum by 68%
• TIME SHARES PROHIBITED
City's `RFP" stated no residential uses permitted, but hotel and offering of certain timeshare licenses are. The referendum included time shares. The lease between Flagstone and
the City (the "Lease") provides that Flagstone is entitled to sell timeshare licenses which comply with Section 721.05(35), F.S.:35
"Timeshare license" means a right to occupy a timeshare unit, which right is neither coupled with a freehold interest, nor coupled with an estate for years with a future interest, in
a timeshare property".
The licenses, which will be sold by Flagstone, fully comply with that statute.
• HOTEL USE IS MORE THAN 20 ACRES
The entire land side lease parcel is only 10.7 acres, and the hotels are only a fraction of that area.
• PRIVATE CLUBS NOT PERMITTED
There are no "Private Clubs" Staff lounges are for crews and are required by industry standards.
CONCESSIONS MADE
• ENTRY BLVD (SOUTH @ EL 9) SHOULD BE BOTH INGRESS/EGRESS
Flagstone will make this concession requested by the Children's Museum.
• DROP OFF SHOULD MAINTAIN CM PEDESTRIAN PLAZA
Flagstone will make this concession requested by the Children's Museum.
• MINIMIZE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE OF PERIMETER ROAD WITH MUSEUM
Flagstone is required to comply with both FDOT and City roadway and engineering standards, but will attempt to minimize the differences.
• MITIGATE DRAINAGE ONTO MUSEUM SITE FROM PLANNED ROAD
Flagstone is required to comply with both FDOT and City roadway and engineering standards including drainage.
• PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION STAGING OPERATIONS PLAN
Flagstone agrees to City review and approval of a construction staging and operations plan.
• CONSTRUCTION STAFF TO PROVIDE IDENTITY CREDENTIALS
Flagstone agrees to City review and approval of an island wide security plan that includes all tenants as well as construction workers.
• PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM PROJECT TO MUSEUM SPECIFICALLY FOR CHILDREN AND DISABLED
Flagstone agrees to provide ADA compliant walkways and lifts as required by Code, and a security plan relative to children, supervised by the City.
• PROVIDE SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR FACILITY AND STAFF
To the contrary, Flagstone has exceeded parking requirements, ,but is on record that at peak, it will shuttle staff from mainland stations and parking.
• AVOID ENCROACHMENT ON MUSEUM PARKING SPACES
It would be contrary to good policy and relations for Flagstone to encroach on Museum parking.
• PROVIDE LANDSCAPE & SCREENING TO GARAGE
Flagstone agrees and desires the landscape approach to its garage elevations. However, the Children's Museum and 1000 Venetian Causeway resident should
request such condition, since the Urban Design Review Board stipulated an architectural solution in lieu of a landscape solution to this issue.
• BUILDING LIGHTING SHOULD NOT BE OFFENSIVE
Flagstone agrees that in addition to the conventional Building Department regulations governing exterior lighting, that the City Assistant Director of Planning and
Zoning be empowered to review and assure that each island tenant's exterior lighting is not offensive to it's neighbors.
• NOISE MAY DISTURB ANIMALS
Flagstone agrees that City Assistant Director of Planning and Zoning be empowered to review and assure that each island tenant's noise control, abatement, and
reduction activities are not offensive to their neighbors.
• EVALUATE SPECIAL EVENTS (OFFSITE& ONSITE WEEKENDS) TRAFFIC AND PARKING AND PROJECTIONS
The City's traffic consultants have looked beyond MacArthur Causeway. The data shows that weekend peak hourly volumes are lower than weekday peak hour
volumes. Flagstone agrees to participate with all other island tenants in development, documentation, and enforcement of City Class 1 Special Event Permits. Based
on the MUSP Traffic Studies, Flagstone will pay regional transportation mitigation fees.
TRAFFIC
• TRAFFIC METHODOLOGY AND STUDY APPROVALS INCLUDED
— (2) State Agencies
— (1) Regional Agency
— (2) Quasi -Public Authorities
— (2) City Agencies
— (5) Traffic Consultants
— DCA has concurred
• REGIONAL NOPC TRAFFIC STUDY
— Expanded Downtown DRI area to Watson Island
— Included Miami Beach and Venetian Causeway
— Analyzed the inclusion as well as exclusion of the Tunnel
— Keeps DRI trips constant
— Created No significant change in traffic impacts
— Does not even require additional bridge openings on Venetian Causeway
• LOCAL MUSP TRAFFIC STUDY
— Weekend hourly volumes are lower than weekday peak hour volume
— Included driveways and nearby intersections
— Met applicable LOS standards
— Project will pay regional transportation impacts mitigation fees
TRAFFIC
• MacArthur Causeway, is classed as an arterial, but functions
somewhere between an arterial and a freeway due to the
absence of driveways that impede arterial traffic.
• Based on the comments from Miami Beach, the applicant
revisited the analysis using the figures for an arterial and the
analysis was still sufficient.
* �1 • lb e r .
• While the roadway level of service (LOS) was not met, the 5%
threshold was not exceeded and the resultant impact is not
considered significant.
• Only if both the LOS fails and the 5% threshold are exceeded is
the impact of a project considered significant per the approved
methodologies.
el
•
i
•
TRA FIC
0[
.0=
U : U i 1:
� � : � ►I � aII
Of 32 critical public approvals, only 9 were not advertised
Mayor Diaz specifically met with Cit Manager and Staff of Miami
Y p Y Y� g
Bich on 08-28-02 requesting their suppqort
Staff was involved in all SFRPC meetings including the Approved
NOPC Methodology of 11/25/02
Miami Beach has made no specific traffic related proposals for
consideration
If Miami Beach wishes to claim substantial deviation from the DRI,
the DCA is the proper forum
11 Broader Issues beyond this project i etween municipalities should
be resolved before the MPO 1
•
. t 11,
'4111.1k-
e
im
•
•
MIAMI BEACH DEVELOPMENT
No. Project
Units FT Floors Type
Status Year
1 Canyon Ranch South Tower
2 Canyon Ranch Residence North Tower
20
39
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Approved 2005
Approved 2005
3 The Setai Hotel and Residence
4 Murano Grande at Portofino
5 Continuum on South Beach
6 Villa di Mare
7 Grand Venetian
8 Flamingo Resort Residence III
9 The Waverly at South Beach
10 Murano at Portofino
11 Royal Palm Crowne Plaza Tower 1
12 Royal Palm Crowne Plaza Tower 2
13 Blue Diamond
14 Green Diamond
15 Yacht Club
16 Loews Miami Beach
17 Marriott
18 Royal Palm
19 Ritz Carlton
20 Fontainebleu Hilton
21 The Carillon
22 The Clevelander
23 Hilton Grand Resorts
24 Radisson Deauville
386 38 Mixed Use
407 37 Mixed Use
471 40 Mixed Use
14 Mixed Use
25 Mixed Use
338 32 Mixed Use
362 35 Mixed Use
402 37 Mixed Use
16 Mixed Use
16 Mixed Use
559 44 Mixed Use
559 44 Mixed Use
361 33 Residential
800 16 Hotel
230 11 Hotel
424 Hotel
Hotel
460 36 Hotel
1,005 42 Hotel / Condo
Hotel
2 Hotels 3 Hotel
544 Hotel
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Expand
Expand
Expand
Renovate
Renovate
2004
2003
2002
2002
2002
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2000
2000
1999
1998
25 Bently Bay North Tower
26 Bently Bay South Tower
27 Akoya Condominiums
28 Ocean Blue Condominium
29 Bel Aire on the Ocean
30 6000 Indian Creek
31 Fontaunebleau II
32 The Bath Club Residence
33 ICON at South Beach
34 Publix Supermarket
35 Lincoln Place @ Washington Ave
36 Lincoln Plaza
37 72nd Street Site
38 Anchor Shops
39 Collins Ave
40 Cultural Campus
41 Lincoln Road
42 Ocean Steps
43 II Villagio
44 St. Tropez
47,955 SF
142,000 SF
160,000 SF
4 Acre
127
91
243 24
259 26
495 47
15
18
25
36
19
43
3
8
6
4
18
28
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Entertainment
Residential & Retail
Residential
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
In Prog
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
PROJECT PUBLIC & ADVERTISED MEETINGS
DATE
ACTION
DESCRIPTION
ADv 1 TJJED
Dec-09-98
City Commission Hearing
Public hearing to determine development of approximately 29.66 acres on Watson Island
to be a Unified Development Project (UDP)
Yes
Oct-26-00
City Commission Hearing
Public hearing reducing area to 24.2 acres of land to be included in the UDP
Yes
Nov-14-00
Waterfront Advisory Board
Review of draft request for proposals (RFP)
No
Nov-29-00
Waterfront Advisory Board
Workshop to review draft RFP
No
Dec-14-00
City Commission Hearing
Public hearing authorizing issuance of RFP
Yes
Feb-01-01
Request for Proposal ("RFP")
City of Miami issues RFP for mega yacht marina and adjacent upland
Yes
Apr-26-01
City Commission Hearing
Motion recommending public hearing to consider a fish market as a required use
No
May-10-01
City Commission Hearing
Directive to amend RFP that a fish market be included as a required use
Yes
May-24-01
City Commission Hearing
Appointed individuals to review col iniiittee and extended deadline for proposals
Yes
Aug-01-01
Selection Committee
Flagstone selected to develop Project
No
Sep-17-01
City Commission Hearing
Public Hearing to choose the Project pursuant to the RFP.
Yes
Oct-09-01
Waterfront Advisory Board
Presentation of proposal by Flagstone
No
Nov-06-01
General Election Ballot
Project placed on general election ballot. Approved by City of Miami voters.
Yes
Apr-19-02
Meeting ofDDA(Downtown DevelopmentAuthority)
DDA votes to expand its boundaries to include Watson Island.
No
Jul-23-02
Meeting with South Florida Regional Planning
Council ("SFRPC")
Pre -Application meeting for NOPC with DCA, SFRPC, City of Miami, City of Miami
Beach, DDA and Flagstone
No
Sep-19-02
Meeting with South Florida Regional Planning
Council ("SFRPC")
Pre -Application meeting for NOPC with DCA, SFRPC, City of Miami, City of Miami
Beach, DDA and Flagstone
No
Dec-12-02
City Commission Hearing
City Commission approves expanding DDA boundaries to include Watson Island.
Yes
Dec-12-02
City Commission Hearing
Approve Flagstone's lease and development agreements for Island Gardens
Yes
Nov-19-03
Pre -Application meeting with City's Design Review
Board
Major Use Special Permit
No
Dec-03-03
Planning Advisory Board Hearing
1st Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change
Yes
Jan-22-04
City Commission Hearing
1st Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (First Reading)
Yes
Jan-26-04
Zoning Board Hearing
Special Exception Application to permit marina
Yes
Feb-05-04
large Scale Dev. Review Committee Meeting
Review Site Plan
No
Mar-17-04
Urban Development Review Board
Review Project
Yes
Apr-01-04
Miami -Dade Shoreline Dev. Rev. Coliiittee
Review Project
Yes
Apr-06-04
Notice of Proposed Change ("NOPC")
DDA filed NOPC with the Department of Community Affairs ("DCA"), the South Florida
No
Regional Planning Council ("SFRPC"), the City of Miami Beach ("MB")
Apr-07-04
Planning Advisory Board Hearing
2nd Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change
Yes
Apr-13-04
Waterfront Advisory Board
Review Project
No
May-05-04
Planning Advisory Board
Present NOPC to PAB
Yes
May-06-04
City Commission Hearing
1st Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Second Reading)
Yes
May-10-04
City Zoning Board
Present Major Use Special Permit Application
Yes
May-11-04
Waterfront Advisory Board Meeting
Review Project
No
May-19-04
Planning Advisory Board
Present MUSP Application to PAB
Yes
May-27-04
City Commission Hearing
2nd Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (First Reading)
Yes
Jun-24-04
City Commission Hearing
NOPC and MUSP scheduled to be heard by the City Commission
Yes
Ju1-10-04
City Commission Hearing
2nd Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Second Reading)
Yes
(tentative)
ISLAND GARDENS PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE AREAS- GROUND LEVEL ONLY
PUBLIC AREAS
NET SITE AREA = 469,974 SF (10.79 ACRES}
BUILDING FOOTPRINTS = 207,433 SF
GROUND LEVEL ACCESSIBLE PUBLIC SPACES
GREEN SPACE = 68,560 SF
GROUND FLOOR = 147,940 SF
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION = 46,000 SF
INNOW.W.IN PerigreleVii
11011.1Eirrounirik„,.
t j W, : Fa- 1
• e
i
A 1
x
AID Itt .
p,,, ,
oil wit- w
rit,2_,...P ,orei.jimiir ion
ION
UM II
I i . '''
M 11 1 1 3
lox:. termitie
EMI
:itti
In:
El
WIZ— 11111M, It
=PRIM UPI
Do you watch City of Miami Television?
Tune in this week for special programming about the
November 6th and 13th ballot questions. Informational
programs will be presented in English, Spanish and Creole
on City of Miami Television (cable channel 9) for the next
few weeks to educate residents on three different issues for
public consideration. The issues include:
• Lease of land on Watson Island for a mixed -use
development
• Revisions to the City of Miami Charter
• Neighborhood Enhancement Bond
Two of these programs are presented here in the lobby as a
preview. The complete programs will air daily in 3
languages between 6:00 - 10:00 AM and 7:00 — 11:00 PM.
Ballot Question # 1
Watson Island Development
Island Gardens by Flagstone Properties, LLC
The City of Miami requested proposals for the redevelopment of the existing 13.4-acre Watson Island
Marina and the adjacent 10.8-acres of undeveloped land into a world class marina and mixed use water-
front development to emphasize diverse and public open spaces, pedestrian activity, and offer a wel-
coming mix of uses to residents and visitors.
After a competitive process, the City Commission chose Flagstone Properties, LLC to create a mixed -use
development on Watson island. The development features a fish market, marina facilities, public gardens,
a maritime gallery, two hotels, as many as 14 restaurants, and retail shops - Island Gardens. Flagstone
will invest $281 million in the project. No public funds are involved. Details of the Flagstone proposal
include:
Job Creation
• Approximately 5,000 construction jobs during two year construction period
• Approximately 2,500 permanent jobs will be created
• Will create a Skills Training Center and an Employment Career Center
• Will enter into a "First Source" Hiring Agreement to hire City of Miami residents
Parks
• 50% of the minimum base rent paid to the City will be set aside for development and programming of
parks throughout the City
• Approximately 7-acres on the south side of the island parallel to Government Cut has been designated
to remain as a public park
Public Amenities and Cultural Arts
Approximately 60% of the upland is accessible for public use
• Partnerships with Fairchild Tropical Gardens and Historical Association of South Florida
• Festival terrace programmed for annual events
1060
/02
RESOLUTION O_
A REsoLuTION OF THE XIAMI C=TY COMMISSION,
w= T 'TACHMENT ( ), AUTHORIZING THE =TY
J'4MA E R TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT TO ENTER
INTO A GROUND LEASE AND A GROUND LEASE
AG?_T2MENT, IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE ATTACHED
FORM, WITH FLAGSTONE I S L GARDENS, LLO FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF
MEGA -YACHT MARINA, FISH MARKET, TWO HOTELS,
RETAIL, D=NING, AND CULTURAL N PUBLIC
FACILITIES N APPROXIMATELY 10,6 ACRES OF
CITY -OWNED WATERFRONT PROPERTY LOCATED O
WATSON ISLAND AND 12,4 ACRES OF SUBMERGED
LAND ADJACENT TO TS O I S M FOR A PERIOD
OF FO THY - F Z YEARS W I Tu AN OPTION TO EXTEND
FOR TWO ADDITIONAL F 'TEEN -YEAR IO 5 r
REQUIRINC, SAID LESSEE TO MAKE A. TOTAL
CAPITAL INVESTMENT IN SA=D PROPERTY OF NOT
ES TM 61r 00r 000, I G THE CITY OF
"The Watson Island Site is one
of very few sites on the South
Florida Coast that can provide
the advantages necessary to
develop a facility such asihis.
In fact, it may_ berth
VaRieSiteI
"
Watson Island Meqa Yacht Marina Design and
Concept, September, 1994
1913
MI s ►1! 1I ►!LT NIW Alfa Nv *nl
i/n1wa" irrtt"
M I A M I DOCK PLAN PREPARED BY PLANNNG BOARS
v ET/AN CAUSE W Y
6 SAN MARCO
7.11
16
b
5
I!
5
BURLINGAME
ISLAND
5
r�EIL;F.F BASE
5
SEAPLANE
BASE
0
r
'/.1
8
t
3
3
9
Ns'dos
7
ex/sowsex/sows FE.C. GH,Eteveva
8
!IL UhtirroL L
;1952
0
STAR
8
Table l: PARTIAL SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACTS
OF MEGA YACHTS ON THE TRI-COUNTY REGION
— 1997 ($ MILLIONS & NUMBERS OF JOBS)
Impact Type
Total
Direct
Indirect
Induced
Output
$497.0
Yew
$287.0
589.0
$120.0
Employment (FTE Jobs)
5,364
2,931
850
1,583
Employee Compensation
166.7
97.8
26.9
42.0
Personal Income
179.2
103.4
29.5
46.3
Total Value Added
236.6
109.3
47.5
79.8
Business Taxes
(sales, excise, etc.)
$21.5
$7.7
$5.2
$8.6
Murray , Thomas J., & Associates, Inc.,
Recent Growth, Current Activity, and Economic Impacts Of Mega Yachts In
South Florida— 1997-1998 on behalf of Marine Industries Association of South
Florida, Inc. and the Broward Alliance, Inc., October, 1998, updated 2001.
WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES
• History
• Design
• External Factors
/- 4
• Questions & Clarifications
• Concerns. & Requests
LANDMARK GATEWAY ICON
J /
/ t
/
t
///
/ ///
//
// //
/ //
//
.‘/ //
//
//
///
/ //
s
�� �,iiiili
lik
/' '_►_
in ■� ■� �■■■ ■■ ■ !
rJ-
DOWNTOWN ORIENTATION
SECURITY COMPLIANT
ilk[Cary
FIC•TAURAHT
1:1-41.1.0im rai
DOMESTICATED CIRCULATION
= 111
: ---
I 'Roll
= -
-----------
--
um
mi _r •
r
in 1 i i i M.4 li i tgIt ,T. : .1.: 1 I R ' iffiirIir/A111111•141
11101111
Migialiai4 Otiiir 4-iiiffilz---ulTiqui ,,61 111F
M
WWII!
SECURED ZONES
SECURITY COMPLIANT
"SANITIZED" SECURITY CORRIDOR
0
..,
•r
1.s
wave . Iraq
—
tit
era-
•
• 0000a oaaapl� ii
I • Iii —wn [max s.
i it
.0
m IGM
_AT e.rrm_
i 11011.1 DAM ALMOFf4
+�l Ems r _
7r'
"MEN
p
ti
11 - a1
MIC. PROFILE
� I
IY
111
I 11
nun' neat m
_x5rb11r.*In.
n
O'
u
SECURITY COMPLIANT
I II-
ijiNgfirr •••=1 0
Sec. Cohicia EREll
irSA
5.4 1.21
RIT- ERNI 1-12,1
F1515:71V--:.
r.•
raY •