HomeMy WebLinkAboutRFP evaluationEVALUATION OF RFP NO. 03-04-099 EXTERNAL AUDITING SERVICES
Area
Evaluation Criteria
TOTAL: 40 Points
Max
Points:.
KPMG
Rachlin
Cohen
1
Meaningful governmental auditing experience of partners, managers, other key
staff members, and other supervisory staff assigned to the City's account.
20.00
196.00
1/6.00
2 Sub -Consultants' qualifications and experience in governmental auditing.
10.00
3 Overall relevant auditing experience of firm for at least three (3) years,
particularly governmental auditing experience, including grant audits.
10.00
Subtotal
40.00
I96.00
176.00
Ability and Capability to Perform
TOTAL: 35 Points
1 Overall ability and capability to provide required services stipulated in Section
2.0 Scope of Work, including detailed responses to City requirements.
I8.00
169.00
160.00
2 Current and projected workload of Proposer, and auditors assigned to the City's
account,
5.00
3 Provision of two (2) recent external quality control reviews, and results of any
federal or state desk review or field audits, during past three (3) years.
4.00
Ability to provide analysis of current developments of GASB and FASS
4 pronouncements; description of the audit procedures to be followed, and
tentative schedule for performing key aspects of audit.
5.00
-
-
Any litigation or proceedings against Proposer, its partners, managers, other key
staff members, within the past three (3) years; impediments to independence, if
5 any; & any circumstances and status of any disciplinary actions taken or pending
against the Proposer, its partners, managers, other key staff members. Note:
Inverse scale for points (i.e., no occurrence gets 3 points).
3.00
-
-
Subtotal
35.00
169.00
160.00
TOTAL: 20 Points
1 Flat Fees Proposal for Services.
15.00
93.00
95.00
2 Fees for additional services, including hourly rate.
5,00
Subtotal
20.00
93.00
95.00
TOTAL: 10 Points
1 Office located within the City of Miami corporate limits.
5.00
25.00
25.00
Subtotal
5.00
25.00
25.00
TOTAL AVAILABLE POINTS: I00.00
TOTAL POINTS BY PROPOSER:
483.00
456.00
Evaluated by:
Date:
EVALUATION OF RFP NO. 03-04-099 EXTERNAL AUDITING SERVICES
Area
Evaluation Criteria
Max
Points
KPMG
Rachlin
Cohen
TOTAL: 40 Points
1
Meaningful governmental auditing experience of partners, managers, other key
staff members, and other supervisory staff assigned to the City's account.
20.00
39.20
35,20
2 Sub -Consultants' qualifications and experience in governmental auditing.
10.00
3 Overall relevant auditing experience of firm for at least three (3) years,
particularly governmental auditing experience, including grant audits.
10.00
Subtotal
40.00
39.20
35.20
Ability and Capability to Perform
TOTAL: 35 Points
l Overall ability and capability to provide required services stipulated in Section
2.0 Scope of Work, including detailed responses to City requirements.
18,00
33.80
32.00
2 Current and projected workload of Proposer, and auditors assigned to the City's
account.
5.04
3 Provision of two (2) recent external quality control reviews, and results of any
federal or state desk review or field audits, during past three (3) years.
4,00
-
-
Ability to provide analysis of current developments of GASB and FASB
4 pronouncements; description of the audit procedures to be followed, and tentative
schedule for performing key aspects of audit.
5.00
-
-
Any litigation or proceedings against Proposer, its partners, managers, other ke)
staff members, within the past three (3) years; impediments to independence, if
5 any; & any circumstances and status of any disciplinary actions taken or pending
against the Proposer, its partners, managers, other key staff members. Note:
Inverse scale for points (I.e., no occurrence gets 3 points).
3.00
-
-
Subtotal
35.00
33.80
32.00
TOTAL: 20 Points
1 Flat Fees Proposal for Services.
15.00
18.60
19.00
2 Fees for additional services, including hourly rate.
5.00
_
-
Subtotal 20.00 18.60
19.00
3 q
�4
TOTAL: 10 Points
1 Office located within the City of Miami corporate limits.
5.00
5.00
5.00
Subtotal 5.00 5.00 5.00 I
TOTAL AVAILABLE POINTS: 100.00
TOTAL POINTS BY PROPOSER:
96.60
91.20
Evaluated by:
Date: